GPM/DPR Precipitation Compared with the 3.5-kmresolution NICAM Simulation Shunji Kotsuki, Koji Terasaki and Takemasa Miyoshi 1RIKEN Advanced Institute for Computational Science, Japan 1. Goals and Precipitation Datasets ○ Goals ー Comparing the GPM/DPR-derived precipitation data with other precipitation data and a NICAM 3.5-km simulation ○ Precipitation Datasets ー GPM/DPR (Hou et al. 2014) ・Normal Scan (NS): KuPR/NS (similar to TRMM/PR) and DPR/NS ・High Sensitivity Scan (HS) : DPR/HS ー NICAM 3.5km (Satoh et al. 2014) ・Initialized NCEP-FNL and 48-hour simulation (24-h spin-up) ・Joint Simulator for radar reflectivity (Hashino et al. 2013) ー Other satellite-derived precipitation data ・GSMaP/NRT (Ushio et al. 2009) & GPM/GMI (microwave imager) GPM: Global Precipitation Measurement, DPR: Dual-frequency Precipitation Radar TRMM: Tropical Rainfall Measurement Mission GMI: GPM Microwave Imager Fig. Average surface precipitation over 12 hours (mm h-1). NICAM: Nonhydrostatic Icosahedral Atmospheric Model : GPM/GMI : GPM/DPR : NICAM-Joint-Simulator : NICAM 2. Results and Discussion Frontal Precipitation over Japan CFADs over storm track regions KuPR/NS & DPR/NS ≠ DPR/HS CFADs: Contoured Frequency by Altitude Diagrams Grid counts for CFADs at each altitude Smaller convection NICAM-Joint-Simulator > GPM/DPR Bright band/0 NICAM ≒ GPM/DPR height over storm track regions NICAM-Joint-Simulator > GPM/DPR ---: GPM Bright band height (m) ---: NICAM 0°C height (m) KuPR/NS & DPR/NS ≒ NICAM DPR/HS ≠ NICAM 3. Citation Kotsuki S., K. Terasaki and T. Miyoshi (2014): GPM/DPR Precipitation Compared with the 3.5-km-resolution NICAM Simulation. SOLA. (in press)
© Copyright 2024 Paperzz