Your Turn Give the New Idea Scorecard a try. On a scale of 1 to 5, rate the two innovations below with respect to Everett Rogers’ five characteristics of spreadable ideas. Which one do you think is more likely to spread? 1 — “The change is very weak relative to this attribute.” 3 — “The change is okay relative to this attribute.” 5 — “The change is very strong relative to this attribute.” 1. A car-bicycle blend with a small electric motor and solar panels that can go for 1,800 miles (2,895 kilometers) on the energy equivalent of a gallon of gas; price starts around 5,000 USD2 Laura Andy Mike Steph AVG. Discussion Relative Advantage 5 2 5 1 3.25 Simplicity 2 3 1 1 1.75 Compatibility 2 2 4 1 2.25 Trialability 1 2 1 1 1.25 Observability 4 3 5 5 4.25 It is much less expensive and better for the environment than a car, but you can’t carry a lot of people or stuff. It is much faster than a bike, but it doesn’t provide exercise. The functionality is similar to a motorcycle, but it seems less versatile. Existing road and parking systems aren’t set up for it, and you probably couldn’t use it on highways. You could drive the vehicle in the rain, when you can’t easily use a bike or motorcycle. The solar aspect seems complicated. It seems somewhat difficult to learn. There would be a lot of legal questions, such as what roads you can take, where you can park, and what type of license and/or registration you need. It is environmentally friendly — which some people care about a lot. It doesn’t improve safety, and it might be dangerous. There are a lot of alternatives, so it isn’t clearly fulfilling a strong need. The cost savings on gas would be significant, especially for daily commuters. If you gave it to people for free, they could test it out, but it would be expensive for people to try otherwise. It would be dangerous without proper training. It’s brightly colored and you would definitely notice it driving around. It wouldn’t be immediately clear what other mode of transportation someone was replacing. 2. An activity-tracking wristband that can measure personal data such as steps walked, heart rate, quality of sleep, and other health and fitness metrics; price starts around 130 USD3 Laura Andy Mike Steph AVG. Relative Advantage 5 4 5 5 4.75 Simplicity 4 2 1 5 3 Discussion Compatibility Trialability 4 5 5 4 4 3 5 3 4.5 3.75 Observability 2 4 4 5 3.75 It can track a lot of data that would usually require more complicated equipment. You can live the same healthy lifestyle without it. Putting it on would be easy for most people. It requires downloading programs, which may be confusing or have bugs. It would be difficult to explain to someone who isn’t comfortable with technology. Interpreting the data would take some getting used to and could be frustrating to learn. People care about their health. Fitness is trendy. People might not want to wear a wristband all the time or on certain occasions. The cost could be a barrier. It wouldn’t require a lot of training beyond the initial setup. It would be easy to distribute to people. You wouldn’t necessarily see that a person was wearing it or be able to tie visible results to it. If you did see someone wearing it, you would probably ask them about it. As a user, you could react immediately to the data it provides. Users who were inspired to make lifestyle changes would have visible results. Copyright © 2014 Institute for Healthcare Improvement (IHI). All rights reserved. Individuals may copy and distribute this resource for educational, not-for-profit uses, provided that the contents are not altered in any way and that proper attribution is given to IHI as the source of the content. This resource may not be reproduced for commercial, for-profit use in any form or by any means, or republished under any circumstances, without the written permission of the Institute for Healthcare Improvement.
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz