ONBOARDING Faculty Wrap-around Guide DA VINCI PURPOSE, DREAM, PRINCIPLES AND BRAND PROMISE Purpose To cultivate managerial leaders Dream To contribute to the development of a sustainable society Principles Seeking the truth (Curiosita) Taking responsibility (Dimostrazione) Sharpening awareness (Sensazione) Engaging the shadow (Sfumato) Nurturing integration (Corporalita) Embracing holism (Connessione) Cultivating balance (Scienza) Brand promise To co-create reality TABLE OF CONTENT TABLE OF CONTENT WELCOME AT DA VINCI ...................................................................................................... 1 Who we are ....................................................................................................................... 1 Profile of our students ....................................................................................................... 3 The Da Vinci way................................................................................................................ 4 The seven Da Vinci principles ......................................................................................... 5 TIPS model .......................................................................................................................... 6 Meta learning framework................................................................................................ 8 Collaborative framework ................................................................................................ 9 The conceptual frame for qualifications at Da Vinci ................................................ 10 Design, facilitation and learning principles ................................................................... 11 Mode 2 learning ............................................................................................................. 11 Inductive versus deductive teaching and learning .................................................. 13 Meta-cognition ............................................................................................................... 15 The art of powerful questioning .................................................................................... 16 Learning styles ................................................................................................................. 17 Bloom’s taxonomy .......................................................................................................... 18 NQF level descriptors ..................................................................................................... 20 Critical cross field outcomes ......................................................................................... 23 Learning activities that support design principles...................................................... 24 Facilitating learning ......................................................................................................... 25 Introduction ..................................................................................................................... 25 The facilitator as reflective critical thinker................................................................... 25 The adult learner............................................................................................................. 27 Learning methods........................................................................................................... 33 Assessment ....................................................................................................................... 36 Introduction ..................................................................................................................... 36 Concepts defined .......................................................................................................... 36 Assessment in the mode 2 context .............................................................................. 38 Assessment rubrics .......................................................................................................... 40 Assessment and quality assurance in Higher Education .......................................... 41 The management of learning and assessment ............................................................. 42 Management of learning .............................................................................................. 46 Management of assessment ........................................................................................ 50 Student support .............................................................................................................. 52 Continuous professional development for facilitators .............................................. 55 Reviewed: 3 April 2017 © The Da Vinci Institute for Technology Management (Pty) Ltd FACULTY | i ICONS ICONS The following icons will guide you on your learning journey: Research/read/investigate: You will be guided through the learning material resources provided and challenged to do your own research, e.g. on the Sabinet and Springer-link online libraries. This icon symbolises studying best practice and available literature. Learn in the workplace: You may want to browse the intranet, read the policies and procedures, and other documentation. Observing current practice and talking to managers or practitioners also form an important part of workplace learning. Reflect: To read, watch and talk may only offer existing knowledge and practice, and the opinion of others. You also need to reflect on what you have read and observed. Involve your personal community of learning to assist with critical analysis and generating new insights and knowledge. Create: This icon indicates an opportunity to integrate what you have learnt through reading, observing, talking and reflecting. You will be challenged to create a new product or tool to apply your learning, e.g. a checklist, framework, presentation, or action plan. Apply: Your ultimate reward as student at Da Vinci will be the impact you have in your workplace. You will be invited to apply what you have learnt by developing new approaches to problems, improving current practice and influencing decisions on the way forward. Looking at the issue under investigation through the lens of Da Vinci’s unique TIPS model will challenge your thinking and analysis. It will open up new possibilities for analysis and solving of the workplace challenges you face every day. The development of Managerial leadership is one of the core deliverables of all Da Vinci programmes. You will be challenged to reflect on your development as managerial leader. Remember to build on the selfawareness you gained through your personal Shadowmatch profile. Your work-based challenge is the most important learning and assessment activity in the programme. This icon will remind you to apply what you have learnt to address your challenge, throughout the programme. The learning journey is designed to support and enhance your professional development. We encourage you to embrace every learning opportunity offered. ii | FACULTY ONBOARDING GUIDE WELCOME AT DA VINCI Who we are The Da Vinci Institute for Technology Management is a School of Management contributing towards socio-economic development and transformation. The Institute’s purpose is to cultivate managerial leaders through the core principles of businessdriven action learning by offering students a personalised journey of selfdiscovery and co-creation. The Institute was established in 2004 as a result of a decision by Warwick University to exit the education landscape in South Africa because of the then revised regulatory requirements for overseas universities in the country. With the support of Mr Nelson Mandela and Dr Ben Ngubane, the Marcus family decided to continue with the work started by Warwick and as a result established what is now well known as The Da Vinci Institute for Technology Management. The Institute was provisionally registered with the Department of Higher Education in 2004. The first Chief Executive Officer, Professor Benjamin Anderson, joined The Institute during 2005. Under his leadership The Institute received full registration and accreditation status from the Department of Higher Education and Training and the Council on Higher Education during 2006. The first Institutional Audit was conducted during 2006 by the Higher Education Quality Committee (HEQC). Being a Mode 2 educational institution, The Institute is focused on the creation of knowledge that is trans-disciplinary in nature, socially relevant and of which the intent is to solve work based problems and to contribute towards the professional development of the people involved. It is in this context that The Institute facilitates a journey of self-discovery for prospective business leaders and entrepreneurs. The Institute derives its passion from developing entrepreneurs and future managerial leaders who will contribute towards the facilitation of a sustainable and socioeconomic transformed society. Together with its South African and international partners, The Institute offers a spectrum of learning solutions including aspects related to, amongst other, entrepreneurship, innovation management, systems thinking and managerial leadership. By offering students an opportunity to participate in an international immersion they could obtain a truly global perspective on managerial FACULTY | 1 ONBOARDING GUIDE leadership development as it presents itself in different parts of the world. Students are able to participate in small classes, affording them the opportunity to reflect on their own learning and to integrate such with that of people who represent a wide range of cultural backgrounds and organisational realities. The Institute which is situated in the serene and peaceful suburb of Modderfontein, offers Certificate, Diploma, Bachelor, Masters, and Doctorate programmes in the Management of Technology, Innovation, People, Systems (TIPS™) and Business Management(B). By integrating the TIPS™ (B) framework, The Institute is able to engage, align and become agile in co-creating new workplace realities with students and sponsors. The framework enables The Institute to offer a truly customised service to meet its client’s ever changing organisational performance needs. The Institute is registered as a Private Higher Education Institution under the Higher Education Act 1997, registration no. 2004/ HE07/003. The Institute’s qualifications are accredited by the Council on Higher Education and recorded with the South African Qualifications Authority. 2 | FACULTY ONBOARDING GUIDE Profile of our students The following infographic depicts the rich diversity of our students. Figure 1: Profile of Da Vinci students FACULTY | 3 ONBOARDING GUIDE THE DA VINCI WAY Our purpose, dream and brand promise Purpose: To cultivate managerial leaders Dream: To contribute to the development of a sustainable society Brand promise: To co-create reality Read the following articles: Managerial leadership https://issuu.com/thedavinciinstitute/docs/managerial_leadership Understanding Managerial Leadership as more than an oxymoron https://issuu.com/thedavinciinstitute/docs/new_directions_for_community_colleg_3f 436da7b45dde Leadership effectiveness in Higher Education: Managerial self-perceptions versus perception of others https://issuu.com/thedavinciinstitute/docs/leadership_effectiveness_in_higher_ Do you role model managerial leadership in your interactions with students? What can you do differently to contribute to realising the purpose, dream and brand promise of The Da Vinci Institute? What can The Da Vinci Institute do to empower you to make a greater contribution? What can you do to make this happen? 4 | FACULTY ONBOARDING GUIDE The seven Da Vinci principles The seven Da Vinci Principles guide the way we do business, facilitate learning and manage relationships with students and corporate clients. It had long since come to my attention that people of accomplishment rarely sat back and let things happen to them. They went out and happened to things. Leonardo da Vinci Watch the clips: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pkAZ0R2YKk8 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pkAZ0R2YKk8 Identify new habits or practices that will enable you to live the principles. Curiosita - An insatiably curious approach to life and an unrelenting quest for continuous learning. Dimostrazione - A commitment to test knowledge through experience, persistence and willingness to learn from mistakes. Sensazione - The continual refinement of the senses, especially sight as the means to enliven experience. Sfumato - Turned to mist or going up in smoke. A willingness to embrace ambiguity, paradox and uncertainty (Mona Lisa). Arte/Scienze - The development of the balance between science and art, logic and imagination. Corporality - The cultivating of grace, ambidexterity, fitness and poise. Connessione - A recognition of and appreciation for the interconnected-ness of all things and phenomena – systems thinking. Practical exercises to assist in practicing the seven principles. http://www.andreabalt.com/7-ways-to-think-like-leonardo-da-vinci/ Register and download a free e-book: How to Think Like Leonardo Da Vinci: Liberating Creativity and Innovation in the Workplace http://mylovelibrabry.com/emylibraryus/free.php?asin=B019ND3KUQ I have been impressed with the urgency of doing. Knowing is not enough; we must apply. Being willing is not enough; we must do. Leonardo da Vinci FACULTY | 5 ONBOARDING GUIDE TIPS model The Da Vinci learning programmes are underpinned by the TIPS™ model. This model focuses on the following four (4) elements: The Management of Technology The Management of Innovation The Management of People The Management of Systems Figure 2: The TIPS model The Management of Systems (MoS) This is the process of synthesis, where systemic integration of all organisational activities and performance is used to solve unique problems, and where hyper-competitive redesign of the landscape occurs. This includes internal synovation and organisational ecology that allows the parts to become greater than the whole. The Management of Technology (MoT) The management of technology is all about the 'tools' and metrics organisations use to gain competitive advantage. Simplistically it is “a way of doing things better” and may involve the use of anything from computers and hi-tech, to simple handheld tools. In this context, we refer to the small “t” in technology where organisations manage their technology to best position their products or services to maximise their market share. The Management of Innovation (MoI) The management of innovation is all about how an organisation stimulates and capitalises on the ideation process to develop an innovative product or service which 6 | FACULTY ONBOARDING GUIDE has either commercial or social value. It’s about hard metrics such as income generated from new products, process or services as well as success rates in commercialising new offerings. The Management of People (MoP) The management of people is all about the human technology interface. It embraces both the employee and the end user. It is about the processes that organisations deploy in the development of their human capital, and how they retain and re-skill existing employees, how they incentivise their people and how they plan for succession to ensure organisational longevity. The Management of Systems (MoS) This is the process of synthesis, where systemic integration of all organisational activities and performance is used to solve unique problems, and where hyper-competitive redesign of the landscape occurs. This includes internal synovation and organisational ecology that allows the parts to become greater than the whole. Agility Integrates the dynamics of the management of technology and the management of innovation such that as the organisation develops, it improves and adapts its technology needs and appropriate innovation is applied to generate real market value and profitability. It is about speed to market, response to changes and ability to cope with new world flexibility. Alignment Alignment is the integration of the management of technology and the management of people by ensuring that the organisation up-skills (by acquisition or development) the appropriate human capabilities to match, and even exceed the technological needs at any one time. It is measured in terms of total up skilling cost ensuring that appropriate skills are in place, matching new technology and skill needs and developing from within. Engagement Engagement integrates the management of people and the management of innovation by way of evaluating the commitment and motivation of people at the workplace. It is measured in terms of the total incentive cost within the organisation and how much people take on personal initiative and accountability. Are you constantly on the lookout for opportunities in workshops where you can integrate and apply the TIPS model? How can we challenge students to apply this model in every module? Create innovative learning and assessment activities that will reinforce it. FACULTY | 7 ONBOARDING GUIDE Meta learning framework The Da Vinci Institute (Da Vinci) intends to facilitate an integrated research journey of self-discovery for all its students. All students, facilitators, moderators and supervisors should partake in each other’s concrete experiences with a view of identifying and developing a ‘work based challenge’, argument or issue, originating from a ‘burning desire’ or feeling within one self, the organisation or the community. At the same time such challenge should focus on the professional development of the individual, assume a trans-disciplinary engagement, embrace a heterogeneous understanding and accept accountability within the social system. Figure 3: The meta learning framework Questions I need to ask about this framework: 8 | FACULTY ONBOARDING GUIDE Collaborative framework This framework illustrates how Da Vinci collaborates with stakeholders to provide the best learning experience for students situated in real workplace contexts. Figure 4: The collaborative framework The central challenge for programmes involving workplace learning remains: How best to bring together subject-based and work-based knowledge, in ways that meet the requirements and expectations of the learner/employee, the employer, the provider, the awarding and professional bodies. Karen Evans What should Da Vinci and its faculty do differently to meet this challenge? Read more about: Putting Knowledge to Work: https://www.ial.edu.sg/files/documents/282/Putting%20Knowledge%20to% 20Work%20(Evans,%20K,%2021%20Oct%2011_IAL).pdf International literature on workplace-based learning http://www.academia.edu/22122910/International_Literature_on_Workpl ace_Based_Learning_June_2015 The work based challenge is central to the Collaborative framework and the qualification. What can you do to ensure it remains at the core of each workshop you facilitate? FACULTY | 9 ONBOARDING GUIDE The conceptual frame for qualifications at Da Vinci Da Vinci offers a Higher Certificate, BCom, MSc and PhD. The conceptual frame answers three questions 1. Why do we do it? 2. How do we do it? 3. What do we do to achieve it? Figure 5: The conceptual frame for qualifications at Da Vinci Imagine you need to use this model to describe qualifications at Da Vinci. Identify the gaps in the model – how can we improve it? 10 | FACULTY ONBOARDING GUIDE DESIGN, FACILITATION AND LEARNING PRINCIPLES Mode 2 learning The five key features of Mode 2 are listed below. What should we do during design, development, preparation, facilitation and assessment of learning to ensure each of these principles are applied? Knowledge produced in the context of application Transdisciplinary Heterogeneity Social accountability Diverse range of quality controls FACULTY | 11 ONBOARDING GUIDE Read the following articles: What kind of university? Research and teaching in the 21st century. http://www.uws.edu.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0017/405251/Gibbons_Wh at_Kind_of_University.pdf Mode 2 Management Research. https://issuu.com/thedavinciinstitute/docs/item_1__mode_2_management_research The dynamics of innovation: from National Systems and ‘‘Mode 2’’ to a Triple Helix of university–industry–government relations. http://www.uni-klu.ac.at/wiho/downloads/Etzk.pdf The production of Mode 2 knowledge in higher education in South Africa. http://uir.unisa.ac.za/bitstream/handle/10500/775/thesis.pdf;jsessionid=9FBB25335650 7DB1D15D59ADB19743D5?sequence=1 Knowledge creation, diffusion, and use in innovation networks and knowledge cluster. http://www.uni-klu.ac.at/wiho/downloads/campbell_university_business.pdf Re-Thinking Science: Mode 2 in Societal Context http://comparsociology.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/Mode2-ScienceGibbons-Nowotny.pdf The case for critical thought: an investigation into contemporary determinist knowledge, its social effects, and the alternative offered by a 'mode 2' approach to teaching, learning and research. http://researchspace.ukzn.ac.za/xmlui/bitstream/handle/10413/4896/Skinner_Jane_ 2002.pdf?sequence=1 Mode 2 society and the emergence of context-sensitive science http://supportservices.ufs.ac.za/dl/userfiles/Documents/00000/546_eng.pdf Download the free e-book Changing Modes; New knowledge production and its implications for higher education in South Africa; Andre Kraak (ed) http://www.hsrcpress.ac.za/product.php?cat=29&freedownload=1&productid=193 8 Any additional insights gained regarding the significance of the Work based challenge in a mode 2 learning context? 12 | FACULTY ONBOARDING GUIDE Inductive versus deductive teaching and learning Watch the clip: Deduction, induction, abduction: The Differences https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5ioyWeUEyvo The concept in the context of design thinking: http://effectivelearninginstructionaldesign.com/Topics/science/ Figure 6: Inductive, deductive and abductive reasoning Are you aware of your personal reasoning preference? In what way does this impact the way you facilitate? When you facilitate, become more aware of the flow of the students’ arguments during discussion. This will enable you to challenge them to develop their reasoning skills by practicing different approaches. FACULTY | 13 ONBOARDING GUIDE Watch the clip: Uncovering students’ tacit knowledge. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2uLKlWPpTCg Read the articles: The Many Faces of Inductive Teaching and Learning http://www4.ncsu.edu/unity/lockers/users/f/felder/public/Papers/Inductive(JCST).pdf Inquiry learning. Inquiry is the simplest of the inductive approaches and might be the best one for inexperienced or previously traditional instructors to begin with. It requires designing instruction so that as much learning as possible takes place in the context of answering questions and solving problems. As the students gain more experience with this approach, the instructor may increase the scope and difficulty of the focus questions, use more open-ended and ill-structured problems and simultaneously decrease the amount of explicit guidance provided. Michael J. Prince and Richard M. Felder Read more in this article: Inductive Teaching and Learning Methods: Definitions, Comparisons, and Research Bases https://www.mcgill.ca/tised/files/tised/michael_prince_on_inductive_teaching_and_ learning.pdf Identify a variety of learning methods that will develop students’ deductive, inductive and abductive reasoning skills in the workshops you facilitate? Deductive reasoning: Reasoning from the general to the specific Inductive: Deriving general principles from particular facts or instances Abductive: Reasoning based on the principles of inference to the best explanation 14 | FACULTY ONBOARDING GUIDE Meta-cognition Read the articles: Metacognition https://cft.vanderbilt.edu/guides-sub-pages/metacognition/ Fact Sheet: Metacognitive Processes https://teal.ed.gov/tealguide/metacognitive Metacognition and learning in adulthood http://leadu.info/leaderWARE/Metacognition.pdf Thinking About Thinking: Metacognition https://www.learner.org/courses/learningclassroom/support/09_metacog.pdf Metacognition, or thinking about one’s thinking, is key to facilitating lasting learning experiences and developing lifelong learners. Linda Darling-Hammond and her colleagues identify two types of metacognition: reflection, or “thinking about what we know,” and self-regulation, or “managing how we go about learning." Read more on the website of DePaul University: http://resources.depaul.edu/teaching-commons/teachingguides/learning-activities/Pages/activities-for-metacognition.aspx What is the relationship between mindfulness, meta-cognition and critical thinking? FACULTY | 15 ONBOARDING GUIDE The art of powerful questioning Read the articles: The art of powerful questions http://www.cihm.leeds.ac.uk/document_downloads/Art_of_Powerful_Que stions.pdf Four types of questions every facilitator should ask http://www.meeteor.com/blog/types-of-questions/ “Does your dog bite?” Creating Good Questions for Online Discussions http://www.isetl.org/ijtlhe/pdf/IJTLHE85.pdf When students know how to ask their own questions, they take greater ownership of their learning, deepen comprehension, and make new connections and discoveries on their own. Dan Rothstein and Luz Santana, co-directors of the Right Question Institute Read more in this article: Teaching Students to Ask Their Own Questions http://hepg.org/hel-home/issues/27_5/helarticle/teaching-students-to-asktheir-own-questions_507#home The above Harvard Education letter outlines the Questions Formulation Technique: The facilitator designs a question focus Students produce questions Students improve their questions Students prioritise their questions Students and facilitator decide next steps Students reflect on what they have learned At what point in the flow of a workshop can you introduce this technique? Think of a specific module or workshop and design the activity for a Mode 2 context. 16 | FACULTY ONBOARDING GUIDE Learning styles Figure 7: Kolb’s learning styles Concrete Experience Accommodating (feel & do) ACTIVISTS DOING Processing Continuum Diverging (feel & watch) REFLECTORS (How we do things) Reflective Observation WATCHING Perception Continuum Active Experimentation (How we think about things) FEELING Converging (think & do) PRAGMATISTS Assimilating (think & watch) THEORISTS Abstract Conceptualisation THINKING Watch the clip: The 3 minute Kolb https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ObQ2DheGOKA Read the articles: Concrete/Reflective/Abstract/Active – David Kolb http://web.cortland.edu/andersmd/learning/Kolb.htm Kolb's Learning Styles and Experiential Learning Model http://www.nwlink.com/~donclark/hrd/styles/kolb.html How can we introduce micro learning in a way that accommodates all learning preferences AND guides the students through the learning cycle? FACULTY | 17 ONBOARDING GUIDE Bloom’s taxonomy Read more about Bloom’s taxonomy on the following websites: https://cft.vanderbilt.edu/guides-sub-pages/blooms-taxonomy/ http://thesecondprinciple.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/Understandingrevisions-to-blooms-taxonomy1.pdf Using different types of learning and assessment activities as we progress through the taxonomy develops students’ higher order thinking skills. Is this evident in the activities you use for students as they progress on their learning journey, or are you using similar activities on all levels? Figure 8: Bloom’s taxonomy Create Produce new or original work Design, assemble, construct, conjecture, develop, formulate, author, and investigate Evaluate Justify a stand or decision Appraise, argue, defend, judge, select, support, value, critique, and weigh Analyze Apply Draw connections among ideas Differentiate, organize, relate, compare, contrast, distinguish, examine, experiment, question, and test Use information in new situations Execute, implement, solve, use, demonstrate, interpret, operate, schedule, and sketch Understand Explain ideas or concepts Classify, describe, discuss, explain, identify, locate, recognize, report, select, and translate Remember Recall facts and basic concepts Define, duplicate, list, memorize, repeat, and state In every curriculum the levels of cognitive demand indicated above should be present. When we are planning a curriculum for a lower level qualification, then most of the learning and assessment activities will be in the lower stages, but higher level thinking skills should still be present. When we design a curriculum for a high level qualification, the reverse pyramid is helpful. 18 | FACULTY ONBOARDING GUIDE Figure 9: Bloom’s taxonomy – the reverse pyramid Analyse Evaluate Create Apply Understand Remember This pyramid suggests that the higher the level of the qualification, more would be required in terms of the high level skills such as creating, evaluating and analysing – and less of remembering and understanding. http://blog.curriculet.com/38-question-starters-based-blooms-taxonomy/ http://www.virtuallibrary.info/blooms-taxonomy.html Bloom’s digital taxonomy verbs https://globaldigitalcitizen.org/blooms-digital-taxonomy-verbs A 3-Dimensional Model of Bloom’s Taxonomy http://www.teachthought.com/critical-thinking/blooms-taxonomy/3-dimensionalmodel-blooms-taxonomy/ How does Bloom’s taxonomy compare with the level descriptors of the National Qualification Framework? FACULTY | 19 ONBOARDING GUIDE NQF level descriptors Introduction Level descriptors have been established for all 10 levels of the National Qualifications Framework A set of statements that describe learning achievement at a particular level of the NQF Also intends to enhance comparability of qualifications at the same level Is used for international comparisons of standards and qualifications It guides development of learning outcomes, assessment criteria and assessment through applied competence (foundational, practical, reflexive) Generic in nature, contextualised for qualifications Using Level Descriptors in the development of integrated assessment instruments: 1) Study the level descriptors for a particular level The level, breadth and depth of learning 2) Study the purpose of the qualification The core or rationale for the qualification - main focus 3) Analyse the exit level outcomes and the main learning areas Greatest weighting to main learning areas 4) Decide which elements need to be assessed discretely Formative or summative assessment? 5) Identify areas where applied competence can be assessed Which fields of learning can meaningfully be assessed together? 6) Sequence the assessment (plan and scaffold) First, second, third year; formative or summative? 7) Design instruments 8) Review and improve 20 | FACULTY ONBOARDING GUIDE NQF Level descriptors a. Scope of knowledge, in respect of which a learner is able to demonstrate: Level 5 an informed understanding of the core areas of one or more fields, disciplines or practices, and an informed understanding of the key terms, concepts, facts, general principles, rules and theories of that field, discipline or practice. b. Knowledge literacy, in respect of which a learner is able to demonstrate: the awareness of how knowledge or a knowledge system develops and evolves within the area of study or operation. c. Method and procedure, in respect of which a learner is able to demonstrate: the ability to select and apply standard methods, procedures or techniques within the field, discipline or practice, and to plan and manage an implementation process within a welldefined, familiar and supported environment. identify, evaluate and solve defined, routine and new problems within a familiar context, and to apply solutions based on relevant evidence and procedures or other forms of explanation appropriate to the field, discipline or practice, demonstrating an understanding of the consequences. the ability to take account of, and act in accordance with, prescribed organisational and professional ethical codes of conduct, values and practices and to seek guidance on ethical and professional issues where necessary. d. Problem solving, in respect of which a learner is able to demonstrate the ability to: e. Ethics and professional practice, in respect of which a learner is able to demonstrate: Level 6 detailed knowledge of the main areas of one or more fields, disciplines or practices, including an understanding of and the ability to apply the key terms, concepts, facts, principles, rules and theories of that field, discipline or practice to unfamiliar but relevant contexts; and knowledge of an area or areas of specialisation and how that knowledge relates to other fields, disciplines or practices. an understanding of different forms of knowledge, schools of thought and forms of explanation within an area of study, operation or practice, and awareness of knowledge production processes. the ability to evaluate, select and apply appropriate methods, procedures or techniques in investigation or application processes within a defined context. identify, analyse and solve problems in unfamiliar contexts, gathering evidence and applying solutions based on evidence and procedures appropriate to the field, discipline or practice. an understanding of the ethical implications of decisions and actions within an organisational or professional context, based on an awareness of the complexity of ethical dilemmas. Level 7 integrated knowledge of the central areas of one or more fields, disciplines or practices, including an understanding of and the ability to apply and evaluate the key terms, concepts, facts, principles, rules and theories of that field, discipline or practice; and detailed knowledge of an area or areas of specialisation and how that knowledge relates to other fields, disciplines or practices. an understanding of knowledge as contested and the ability to evaluate types of knowledge and explanations typical within the area of study or practice. an understanding of a range of methods of enquiry in a field, discipline or practice, and their suitability to specific investigations; and the ability to select and apply a range of methods to resolve problems or introduce change within a practice. identify, analyse, evaluate, critically reflect on and address complex problems, applying evidence-based solutions and theory-driven arguments. the ability to take decisions and act ethically and professionally, and the ability to justify those decisions and actions drawing on appropriate ethical values and approaches within a supported environment. FACULTY | 21 ONBOARDING GUIDE NQF Level descriptors f. Accessing, processing and managing information, in respect of which a learner is able to demonstrate the ability to: g. Producing and communicating information, in respect of which a learner is able to demonstrate the ability to: h. Context and systems, in respect of which a learner is able to demonstrate the ability to: i. Management of learning, in respect of which a learner is able to demonstrate the ability to: j. Accountability, in respect of which a learner is able to demonstrate the ability to: 22 | FACULTY Level 5 gather information from a range of sources, including oral, written or symbolic texts, to select information appropriate to the task, and to apply basic processes of analysis, synthesis and evaluation on that information. communicate information reliably, accurately and coherently, using conventions appropriate to the context, in written and oral or signed form or in practical demonstration, including an understanding of and respect for conventions around intellectual property, copyright and plagiarism, including the associated legal implications. operate in a range of familiar and new contexts, demonstrating an understanding of different kinds of systems, their constituent parts and the relationships between these parts, and to understand how actions in one area impact on other areas within the same system. evaluate his or her performance or the performance of others, and to take appropriate action where necessary; to take responsibility for his or her learning within a structured learning process; and to promote the learning of others. account for his or her actions, to work effectively with and respect others, and, in a defined context, to take supervisory responsibility for others and for the responsible use of resources, where appropriate. Level 6 evaluate different sources of information, to select information appropriate to the task, and to apply well-developed processes of analysis, synthesis and evaluation to that information. present and communicate complex information reliably and coherently using appropriate academic and professional or occupational conventions, formats and technologies for a given context. Level 7 develop appropriate processes of information gathering for a given context or use; and the ability to independently validate the sources of information and evaluate and manage the information. develop and communicate his or her ideas and opinions in well-formed arguments, using appropriate academic, professional, or occupational discourse. make decisions and act appropriately in familiar and new contexts, demonstrating an understanding of the relationships between systems, and of how actions, ideas or developments in one system impact on other systems. manage processes in unfamiliar and variable contexts, recognising that problem solving is context and system bound, and does not occur in isolation. evaluate performance against given criteria, and accurately identify and address his or her task-specific learning needs in a given context, and to provide support to the learning needs of others where appropriate. work effectively in a team or group, and to take responsibility for his or her decisions and actions and the decisions and actions of others within well-defined contexts, including the responsibility for the use of resources where appropriate. identify, evaluate and address his or her learning needs in a self-directed manner, and to facilitate collaborative learning processes. take full responsibility for his or her work, decision-making and use of resources, and limited accountability for the decisions and actions of others in varied or ill-defined contexts. ONBOARDING GUIDE Critical cross field outcomes These are the Critical Outcomes adopted by SAQA: Identify and solve problems in which responses display that responsible decisions using critical and creative thinking have been made. Work effectively with others as a member of a team, group, organisation, community. Organise and manage oneself and one’s activities responsibly and effectively. Collect, analyse, organise and critically evaluate information. Communicate effectively using visual, mathematical and/or language skills in the modes of oral and/or written presentation. Use science and technology effectively and critically, showing responsibility towards the environment and health of others. Demonstrate an understanding of the world as a set of related systems by recognising that problem-solving contexts do not exist in isolation In order to contribute to the full personal development of each learner and the social and economic development of the society at large, it must be the intention underlying any programme of learning to make an individual aware of the importance of: o Reflecting on and exploring a variety of strategies to learn more effectively; o Participating as responsible citizens in the life of local, national and global communities; o Being culturally and aesthetically sensitive across a range of social contexts; o Exploring education and career opportunities, and o Developing entrepreneurial opportunities. Read more on SAQA’s website: http://www.saqa.org.za/docs/pol/2000/curriculum_dev.pdf FACULTY | 23 ONBOARDING GUIDE Learning activities that support design principles Identify learning activities we can use in our guides and workshops that support the principles discussed in this chapter of the manual. Wrap-around guide Research/ read/ investigate: Learn in the workplace: Reflect: Create: Apply: TIPS model: Managerial leadership: Work-based challenge: 24 | FACULTY Workshop ONBOARDING GUIDE FACILITATING LEARNING Introduction Ramsey Musallam: 3 rules to spark learning https://www.ted.com/talks/ramsey_musallam_3_rules_to_spark_learning? language=en Do you think these rules support the Da Vinci way of facilitating learning? Are you applying these rules? Can you think of other “rules” or principles we should add? As you work through the remainder of this guide, keep reflecting on how the proposed techniques and approaches support these three rules. The facilitator as reflective critical thinker Do you agree with Stephen Brookfield’s definition of “skillful teachers”? Does this quote challenge you to think differently about your role during a workshop and where your energy should be channelled? Skillful teaching is whatever helps students learn Skillful teachers adopt a critically reflective stance toward their practice The most important knowledge that skillful teachers need to do good is a constant awareness of how students are experiencing their learning and perceiving teachers’ actions. From: Brookfield, S.D. 1995. Becoming a Critically Reflective Teacher. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. A review of this book: http://vc.bridgew.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1005&context=fac_articles FACULTY | 25 ONBOARDING GUIDE One of the best ways to practice reflective thinking, is the critical incident technique. But one needs to look at a critical incident through different lenses to gain an accurate picture of who we are and what we do as facilitators of adult learning. Brookfield offers the following four lenses: Self-review Student review Peer review Benchmarking Choose a particular event you want to learn from – it might be when something went wrong, or a situation that can be regarded as a huge success. Reflect on the incident through the four lenses. What do you learn? More information on the four lenses: https://www.learning.ox.ac.uk/media/global/wwwadminoxacuk/localsite s/oxfordlearninginstitute/documents/supportresources/lecturersteachingst aff/resources/resources/CriticallyReflectiveTeaching.pdf http://sydney.edu.au/arts/teaching_learning/academic_support/Brookfield_summar y.pdf And another approach to critical incident analysis: reflection of a teacher educator. https://www.google.co.za/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=2&ved=0ah UKEwiXn7OXzeTOAhWrAMAKHdSzC9YQFggiMAE&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.uel.ac.u k%2F~%2Fmedia%2FMain%2FImages%2FCass%2FRiTE%2FMay-2016publications%2FRITE-MAY-16---Mohammed.ashx&usg=AFQjCNHaPaxm5H8yjJyD_yQ1IRJh0vt9Q&sig2=nbHPSUkAH4QO7LU2wmOz3w Through the Lens of Learning: How Experiencing Difficult Learning Challenges and Changes Assumptions About Teaching - Stephen Brookfield http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1351&context=podimpr oveacad A resource with details on specific techniques and practices for teachers to hone their reflection skills: The reflective teacher http://www.mheducation.co.uk/openup/chapters/9780335222407.pdf 26 | FACULTY ONBOARDING GUIDE “The characteristics of an effective teacher are often the same as an effective leader. In order to be effective, both teachers and leaders must be able to have an influence and make an impact. Authenticity is using basic morals and applying these to one’s position. Authenticity must be displayed because students and employees bring their own unique experiences and expectations to any situation. An effective teacher can use the guidelines presented to effectively communicate to students through authentic behavior. This paper will explore being an authentic teacher, being an authentic leader, and combining teaching and leading for the authentic classroom.” Carol Wright http://www.na-businesspress.com/JAF/WrightC_Web13_2_.pdf More information about students’ expectations: Brookfield, S. 1990. The Skillful Teacher: On Technique, Trust and Responsiveness in the Classroom. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Do your students perceive you as credible and authentic? What else do they expect from their facilitators? The adult learner Research indicates that adult learners are unique and the way they learn differ from children. In your experience, in what ways are they similar (children and adults as learners) and in what ways are they different? FACULTY | 27 ONBOARDING GUIDE Andragogy is defined as “… the art and science of helping adults learn”. For Knowles, adult learning is based on specific characteristics. https://ala.asn.au/adult-learning/the-principles-of-adult-learning/ http://elearninginfographics.com/adult-learning-theory-andragogy-infographic/ A more critical review of the work of Knowles: http://infed.org/mobi/andragogy-what-is-it-and-does-it-help-thinking-about-adultlearning/ A resource with great reflection activities that will assist the facilitator of adult learning in applying the research material. https://msu.edu/~dirkx/adult%20learning%20module.html Create an observation checklist that a colleague could use to evaluate your workshop. Focus on the specific aspects you need feedback on in order to facilitate learning in the Da Vinci Mode 2 environment. 28 | FACULTY ONBOARDING GUIDE Experiential learning Read the following handout on Experiential learning: http://www.ryerson.ca/content/dam/lt/resources/handouts/ExperientialL earningReport.pdf The above report outlines the following characteristics of experiential learning. Are you facilitating experiential learning? 1. Mixture of content and process: There must be a balance between the experiential activities and the underlying content or theory. 2. Absence of excessive judgment: The instructor must create a safe space for students to work through their own process of self-discovery. 3. Engagement in purposeful endeavours: In experiential learning, the learner is the selfteacher, therefore there must be “meaning for the student in the learning.” The learning activities must be personally relevant to the student. 4. Encouraging the big picture perspective: Experiential activities must allow the students to make connections between the learning they are doing and the world. Activities should build in students the ability see relationships in complex systems and find a way to work within them. 5. The role of reflection: Students should be able to reflect on their own learning, bringing “the theory to life” and gaining insight into themselves and their interactions with the world. 6. Creating emotional investment: Students must be fully immersed in the experience, not merely doing what they feel is required of them. The “process needs to engage the learner to a point where what is being learned and experience strikes a critical, central chord within the learner.” 7. The re-examination of values: By working within a space that has been made safe for self-exploration, students can begin to analyze and even alter their own values. 8. The presence of meaningful relationships: One part of getting students to see their learning in the context of the whole world is to start by showing the relationships between “learner to self, learner to teacher, and learner to learning environment.” 9. Learning outside one’s perceived comfort zones: “Learning is enhanced when students are given the opportunity to operate outside of their own perceived comfort zones.” This doesn’t refer just to physical environment, but also to the social environment. This could include, for instance, “being accountable for one’s actions and owning the consequences”. Design an experiential learning activity that will support the principle of “integrated assessment”. FACULTY | 29 ONBOARDING GUIDE Self-directed learning Read the article: Self-Directed Learning: Key Component of Adult Learning Theory https://www.bpastudies.org/bpastudies/article/view/38/78 Do you agree with Lindeman’s assumptions on adult learners? 1. Adults are motivated to learn as they experience needs and interests that learning will satisfy. 2. Adults' orientation to learning is life‑centered. 3. Experience is the richest source for adults' learning. 4. Adults have a deep need to be self‑directing. 5. Individual differences among people increase with age. Are you frustrated by students not preparing for the workshop, not doing the pre-reading and conducting insufficient research for their assignments? What is your view on the opinions expressed in the following article? An Examination of Learner Self-Direction in Relation to the Big Five and Narrow Personality Traits http://sgo.sagepub.com/content/spsgo/4/2/2158244014534857.full.pdf 30 | FACULTY ONBOARDING GUIDE The nature of the self – learning as a social activity “As we examine the issue of control in self-direction it is also important to recognise that the ‘self’ that is involved in conducting learning is culturally formed and bound. Who we are and how we decide what it is important for us to be able to know or do are questions that are questions of culture. The self in a selfdirected learning project is not an autonomous, innocent self, contentedly floating free from cultural influences. It has not sprung fully formed out of a political vacuum. It is, rather, an embedded self, a self whose instincts, values, needs and beliefs have been shaped by the surrounding culture. As such, it is a self that reflects the constraints and contradictions, as well as the liberatory possibilities, of that culture. The most critically sophisticated and reflective adults cannot escape their own autobiographies. Only with a great deal of effort and a lot of assistance from others can we become aware of how what we think are our own wholly altruistic impulses, free from any bias of race, gender or class, actually end up reinforcing repressive structures. Hence, an important aspect of a fully adult self-directed learning project should be a reflective awareness of how one’s desires and needs have been culturally formed and of how cultural factors can convince one to pursue learning projects that are against one’s own best interests.” http://infed.org/mobi/self-directed-learning/ The work-based challenge is the most important learning and assessment activity in the Da Vinci learning programme. Students find this assignment challenging. Reflect on the concepts of adult, experiential and self-directed learning. What can the facilitators at Da Vinci do to ensure students perform better in this assignment? FACULTY | 31 ONBOARDING GUIDE Brain based learning “I strongly believe that once educators understand how information is processed, they will be more inclined to venture out of their comfort zone and begin using strategies that facilitate the natural learning process.” Materna, L. 2007. Jump start the adult learner. How to engage and motivate adults using brain-compatible strategies. California: Corwin Press. Download and complete the following questionnaire to gain insight into your own cognitive style. http://www.google.co.za/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=2&ved=0ahU KEwit6siSieTOAhWECMAKHSpQBAMQFggoMAE&url=http%3A%2F%2Fstyves.pbworks.com%2Ff%2FHandout%25234%2BBrain%2BQuiz.doc&usg=AFQjCNH3TTu hqd3U_fngFpqkkDzbf1lrog&sig2=TUXjfa9X4bJeNxwHNnGC_w Given you cognitive style or brain dominance, which learning activities do you find easy to design and facilitate? Are you constantly aware of your personal preference and how they impact your facilitation and your students’ learning? How can you ensure the students in your class enter a state of “flow” more often? “Flow is that highest level of learning brought about by active engagement in a challenging and stimulating learning experience. Once a learner enters the flow state, intrinsic motivation and commitment to learning predominates. The learner finds the subject to be personally meaningful and therefore becomes personally committed to learning.” Learn more about eliminating “downshifting” and promoting “flow”. https://vimeo.com/117140991 http://www.jenningsclc.org/featured-posts/this-is-the-second-post/ 32 | FACULTY ONBOARDING GUIDE Learning methods Tacit knowledge Watch the following clips: Importance of Tacit Knowledge in Education; Richard Brock; TEDx Cambridge University https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hkd-1zc_Gn4 Uncovering Students' Tacit Knowledge https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2uLKlWPpTCg Are you using facilitation techniques that uncover students’ tacit knowledge or do you rely primarily on the knowledge of experts in your field of expertise? Identify opportunities where you can use facilitation techniques that allow students to explore and share what they know. Stimulating conversation, creativity and critical thinking Stephen Brookfield on Creative & Critical Thinking https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y8umk4w8kB8 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X11cXiVB9tY https://vimeo.com/42142710 Free resources available, e.g. Circle of voices, Chalk talk, Circular response, Newsprint dialog, Fish bowl, Snowballing, Critical incident questionnaire. http://www.stephenbrookfield.com/ https://www.cte.cornell.edu/teaching-ideas/engaging-students/collaborativelearning.html http://resources.depaul.edu/teaching-commons/teaching-guides/learningactivities/Pages/activities-for-metacognition.aspx http://dmeforpeace.org/sites/default/files/Guide%20to%20Facilitating%20Reflection _1.pdf FACULTY | 33 ONBOARDING GUIDE Management techniques as learning methods The techniques included in the list below serve as examples of management techniques that could be used as learning methods. Consider adapting them for your workshop to guide critical thinking. Affinity diagram https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ewWFFe-243s https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=he5WvisN6o0 Root cause analysis https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jDQLrP3zlDc https://www.mindtools.com/pages/article/newTMC_80.htm http://www.thinkreliability.com/Root-Cause-Analysis-CM-Basics.aspx The five whys https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JmrAkHafwHI Cause and effect/Fishbone diagram https://www.mindtools.com/pages/article/newTMC_03.htm https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fwfgx0dOYvE Tree diagrams https://www.mindtools.com/pages/article/tree-diagrams.htm https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WO9DhnMubUU https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5clFNf9XYvQ Force field analysis https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tEbZwl07oWo Overview of Total Quality Management Tools that you can adapt and use for learning http://www.bexcellence.org/Total-Quality-Management-Tools.html Consider ways in which you can use these techniques in a non-traditional sense, e.g. to guide the flow of analysis or critical thinking as part of a learning process. 34 | FACULTY ONBOARDING GUIDE Conclusion John Hattie's Visible Learning https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5WSTcVDwH3s Are you practicing the 8 mindframes? 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. FACULTY | 35 ONBOARDING GUIDE ASSESSMENT Introduction What is the aim of assessment? Why do we assess students? ________________________________________________________________________ When will an assessment be regarded as fair, valid and reliable? __________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________ What are the characteristics of a good assessor? __________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________ Why is the assessment of students so important in terms of quality assurance conducted at a registered Higher Education Institution? __________________________________________________________________________________ When do we start thinking about the assessment if we design and develop a new module? __________________________________________________________________________________ How does assessment at Da Vinci, a mode 2 university differ from assessment at a mode 1 university? __________________________________________________________________________________ Concepts defined Research the following concepts and describe them in your own words: 1. Formative assessment 2. Summative assessment 3. Integrative assessment 4. Authentic assessment 36 | FACULTY ONBOARDING GUIDE Reflect on the concept: authentic assessment. List some real life, on-the-job products that assignment may ask students to produce as proof of competence in your field of expertise. General examples include a report, audit, presentation, strategy, or proposal. Examples of authentic assessment tools: http://calpro-online.org/eric/docs/custer/custer5.pdf Design an authentic assessment activity to assist students in applying the TIPS model. Assessment opportunities as learning opportunities Assessment activities are not only opportunities to gain evidence of a student’s competence, but each assessment is also a learning opportunity. If you adopt this approach, what needs to change about the way we formulate assessment activities, facilitate them in a workshop and assess the products? Assessment to promote learning - Seven Practices for Effective Learning http://www.ascd.org/publications/educational-leadership/nov05/ vol63/num03/Seven-Practices-for-Effective-Learning.aspx FACULTY | 37 ONBOARDING GUIDE Assessment in the mode 2 context Read the following summary on mode 2. http://www.uws.edu.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0017/405251/ Gibbons_What_Kind_of_University.pdf How does this approach to learning impact the types of assessments we include in our programmes and the way in which it is assessed? The assessment of experiential learning poses some unique challenges. How can we overcome those challenges? http://www.ryerson.ca/content/dam/lt/resources/handouts/ ExperientialLearningReport.pdf The work-based challenge is the most important learning and assessment activity in every Da Vinci programme. Identify ways in which the formative and summative assessment conducted in your module can support the work-based challenge as integrated assessment. 38 | FACULTY ONBOARDING GUIDE Self-assessment In order to foster independent learning, it is necessary to provide students with many opportunities to regulate their own learning. This calls for structured tasks that encourage reflection and self-assessment. When students engage in academic tasks (for example, essay writing, solving problems), to varying degrees they are already monitoring and assessing their own progress. Hence, formalising opportunities for self-assessment in the curriculum would not only capitalise on abilities that students already possess, but would also ensure that these abilities are developed further. http://ee.ulster.ac.uk/assessment_and_feedback/index.php?/principles/develop_sel f_assessment_and_reflection Reflection is at the core of the learning methodology at Da Vinci. Selfassessment opportunities assist students in developing this skill. Identify opportunities for self-assessment in the workshops you are currently facilitating. Design a self-assessment activity that supports the achievement of the learning outcomes. Peer assessment The development of Managerial leadership is one of the core deliverables of every programme at Da Vinci. Peer assessment is commonly used to develop leadership skills. Design a peer assessment activity that will contribute to the development of the student as managerial leader. Examples of peer and self-assessment: https://www.deakin.edu.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0020/53462/peer-andself-assessment.pdf FACULTY | 39 ONBOARDING GUIDE Assessment rubrics Do you re-write the same comments on several students’ assignments? Does the marking of Post modular assignment take up a lot of your time? Are students always arguing about the validity of assessment and results? Do you suspect different assessors are using different criteria when assessing a particular assignment? The use of assessment rubrics might be a way to address all these frustrations! “A rubric is a coherent set of criteria for students' work that includes descriptions of levels of performance quality on the criteria.” Holistic rubrics group several different assessment criteria and classify them together under grade headings whereas analytic rubrics separate different assessment criteria and address them comprehensively. http://www.ascd.org/publications/books/112001/chapters/What-Are-Rubrics-andWhy-Are-They-Important%C2%A2.aspx https://uwaterloo.ca/centre-for-teaching-excellence/teaching-resources/teachingtips/assessing-student-work/grading-and-feedback/rubrics-useful-assessment-tools Create an assessment rubric for a PMA you have to assess. Include the elements depicted in figure 10. Figure 10: Assessment rubric You will find examples of rubrics at this link: http://resources.depaul.edu/teaching-commons/teaching-guides/feedbackgrading/rubrics/Pages/types-of-rubrics.aspx 40 | FACULTY ONBOARDING GUIDE Criteria to evaluate rubrics: Does the rubric relate to the outcome(s) being measured? Does it cover important criteria for student performance? Does the top end of the rubric reflect excellence? Are the criteria and scales well-defined? Can the rubric be applied consistently by different scorers? http://resources.depaul.edu/teaching-commons/teaching-guides/feedbackgrading/rubrics/Pages/evaluating-rubrics.aspx Assessment and quality assurance in Higher Education The moderation of assessment refers to the process used to evaluate assessment practice to ensure that the latter is fair, valid and reliable. If you were to moderate assessments at Da Vinci, what will you be looking for? List the issues you will address in your moderation report. The Higher Education Act (Act No 101 of 1997) assigns executive responsibility for quality assurance in higher education in South Africa to the Council on Higher Education (CHE). The Council discharges this responsibility through its permanent subcommittee, the Higher Education Quality Committee (HEQC). Their responsibilities as an ETQA is to report formally to SAQA on the quality management arrangements of its constituent providers in respect of moderation of assessment. Read more about them at this link: http://www.che.ac.za/sites/default/files/publications/HEQC_Framework_ Delegated_Functions_Oct2008.pdf Conclusion List the characteristics of a good assessor. ________________________________________________________________________ Do you meet the requirements? Any room for improvement? http://www.skills-universe.com/forum/topics/what-is-an-assessor ________________________________________________________________________ FACULTY | 41 ONBOARDING GUIDE THE MANAGEMENT OF LEARNING AND ASSESSMENT The Management Team at The Da Vinci Institute for Technology Management consists of the following people: Professor Ben Anderson | Chief Executive Officer As CEO, Bennie is responsible for leading the development and execution of the Company’s long term strategy with a view to creating shareholder value. The CEO’s leadership role also entails being ultimately responsible for all day-to-day management decisions and for implementing the Company’s long and short term plans. The CEO acts as a direct liaison between the Board and management of the Company and communicates to the Board on behalf of management. The CEO also communicates on behalf of the Company to shareholders, employees, Government authorities, other stakeholders and the public. The Senior Management team reports to Bennie. Dr Ronel Blom | Dean: Design and Research The Dean is responsible for providing strategic direction and leadership in the Academic Office. This includes the Learning Design as well as the Research offices. The Dean also looks after our facilitators, supervisors, external examiners, markers and moderators. The facilitation and monitoring of research publications also forms an integral part of this function. Marizanne Burger | Operations Manager The Operations Office looks after the following: Finance, Human Resources and Facilities. They ensure that the whole team works together and not in silos. Being an operations manager involves overseeing and having responsibility for all the activities in the organisation which contribute to the effective production of services. 42 | FACULTY ONBOARDING GUIDE Kenneth Mabilisa | Business Development Manager The Business Development Office finds new business for us and helps us to reach our financial targets for the year. Sushie Padayachee | Secretariat The secretariat office assists to keep minutes of all meetings, connect the dots between the meetings and also assists with event planning. The secretariat looks after corporate governance at Da Vinci. Louise Fuller | Registrar The Registrar is responsible for registering new students, keeping record of marks and oversees all admissions. The Registrar ensures that quality management aligns to regulatory requirements. Carin Stoltz-Urban | Manager: Teaching and Learning The Teaching and Learning team consist of the Key Account Managers (KAM’s), Administrators, Reception and Faculty. They assist our students and clients on their studying journey to graduation and becoming alumni. Storm Thomas | Communications Manager The Communications Office tells the story of The Da Vinci Institute. They also do branding and marketing for us. Professor Niel Viljoen | Strategic Advisor He provides us with strategic direction and assists with the overall strategy and where big decisions need to be made. FACULTY | 43 ONBOARDING GUIDE Our biggest asset at The Da Vinci Institute for Technology Management – our staff. Debra Stead Bookkeeper Sonya Landman Administrator Dewald Kruger Information Officer Elize Smit Office Manager (CEM) Future Ngwenya Key Account Manager Martin Pheiffer IT Manager Rinaka Moodliar Administrator Karen Verster Key Account Manager Mawoza Dhliwayo Catering Manager Onicca Maculube Receptionist Pierre Kabeya Print Master Hendrien van Zyl Learning Design Manager 44 | FACULTY ONBOARDING GUIDE Sharlene Vania Key Account Manager Simon Gathua Acting Research Manager Berouzka Rheeder Office Manager Cheryl London Accountant: Invoicing and Debtors Orpa Roberts Administrator Italino Chivulele Admissions Clerk Dr Linda Chipunza Student Support Luendri Chetty Administrator Ylla Sentzikas Office Manager Maditabeng ‘Betty’ Leshaba Administrator Raymond Toga Key Account Manager Kgalalelo Hlaoli Administrator FACULTY | 45 ONBOARDING GUIDE Celeste Williams Collections Officer/Administrator Cyril Tapile Admissions Officer Natashia Naidoo HR Assistant Ntokozo Dlamini Administrator Management of learning Four action learning steps at Da Vinci 1. Identify a work-based challenge 2. Indicate relevant strategic drivers which may inform your decision towards the identified challenge 3. Provide the names of people (including relevant stakeholders) with whom you will liaise whilst being a student at Da Vinci, who will serve as a soundboard, a source of inspiration or just as a learning partner 4. Identify one or more level descriptor/s which you may identify to be assessed against as part of your Post Module Assignment (optional) What should every facilitator and assessor do to ensure that the workshops the facilitate and the assessments they conduct reinforce and apply the action learning approach? 46 | FACULTY ONBOARDING GUIDE Facilitators The role of the facilitator includes the following: Facilitate workshops in his/her field of specialisation up to honours/masters level based on both the Action Learning and Mode 2 Learning methodologies. Interact with and guide students on the specific module via The Institute’s elearning platform. Assess students’ post-modular assignments (PMAs) and provide constructive feedback to individual students according to The Institute’s requirements. Re-assess PMAs of students, who were not competent in the first submission. Re-assess PMAs of students, who would like to improve their final mark for a specific module. Report observations and specific issues and challenges that some students might have experienced in completing the PMA. The report template will be provided with each batch of PMAs. Be assessed by students and colleagues to determine the quality of the contract facilitator’s teaching and facilitation range and effectiveness (both face-to-face and e-learning) as well as the quality of the assessment process of the contract assessor. For more detail refer to the Memorandum of agreement signed with each facilitator. Confidentiality agreement Facilitators are required to sign a confidentiality agreement, undertaking not to divulge any of the Confidential Information relating to Da Vinci which may be disclosed for the purposes of employment, facilitation, learning material development, assessment, supervision, examination, advising, etc., except with the prior written consent thereto of Da Vinci. For more detail refer to the Confidentiality agreement signed by each facilitator. Faculty head The responsibilities of the faculty head include the following: The annual revision of the learning material, wrap-around guides, facilitation plans and assessment in collaboration with the Design Office of The Institute; The moderation of the post modular assignment in keeping with the agreed assessment framework; Monitoring of the Institute’s facilitators including periodic class visits as agreed with the Dean; and Facilitation of classes according to the Da Vinci facilitation schedule; and Faculty heads gets preference (first right of refusal) for all workshops in their field of expertise. FACULTY | 47 ONBOARDING GUIDE The process Booking confirmation The Key Account Manager (KAM) will book the facilitator using the booking confirmation form. This form stipulates the following conditions for a particular engagement, e.g. facilitation of a workshop: 80% of the fees are payable to the Contractor upon satisfactory completion of the following activities: Reviewing and giving feedback on learning material and the post-modular assignment (PMA) as part of the preparation process. o Engaging with students via Moodle to guide them through the pre-work in preparation for the learning session. This is relevant where students are already registered and active on Moodle. o Facilitating of learning session. o Interacting with students prior to and during completion of PMAs as and when required. o Submitting a facilitator’s report 3 days after each learning session. A template of the report is available on Moodle. 20% of the fee will be payable on submission of assessed PMAs, providing they are received by Da Vinci within 10 working days of receipt of PMAs. o Individual mark sheets indicating the marks of the students are to be submitted and should include comments regarding the learning experience of the student and suggestions for improvement. Each PMA should include constructive feedback and comments, using track changes. The comments should guide the student to improve the relevant skills and knowledge. For more detail refer to the Facilitator booking form KAM briefing meeting with facilitator Prior to each workshop, the KAM will brief the facilitator regarding the following: Confirmation of the details as per the booking form Venue, specific requirements regarding the venue and facilities Programme, level and customisation Prework – Uploaded onto MOODLE Learning styles of the group, Shadowmatch, other relevant information on students Material PMA Time line for marking – 2 weeks Facilitator interaction with students prior to the workshop: MOODLE and/or email Marking of the PMAs as per the contract 48 | FACULTY ONBOARDING GUIDE Would you require any additional information from the KAM in preparation for a workshop? Should this information be part of the standard agenda of the briefing? Invoicing Invoices: Should be submitted after facilitation of a learning session - on/or before the 5th of every month Will be paid within 30 days after submission, provided the facilitator’s report has been submitted (80% paid) and assessed PMAs have been submitted (20%) Should include o Supplier name, address, tax number and VAT number if applicable o Service provided, i.e. Facilitation or assessment, date of the work performed, programme name, module name o Correct bank details, i.e. account name, branch code, account number Must be addressed to: The Da Vinci Institute for Technology Management (Pty) Ltd P O Box 1045 | Rivonia | 2128 Co Reg No: 2001/009271/07 Tel No: 011 608 1331 Fax No: 011 608 1332 VAT No: 4530208265 FACULTY | 49 ONBOARDING GUIDE Management of assessment Teaching, learning and assessment at The Da Vinci Institute adhere to national statutory criteria for effective outcomes-based education in the Higher Education Sector, as stipulated by Act 101 of 1997, the Criteria for Programme Accreditation (HEQC 2004), the National Qualifications Framework (SAQA 2004) and the Higher Education Qualifications Sub-Framework (HEQSF) (Department of Education, 2006). The assessment process Prework Submitted 2 days before the workshop via Moodle PMA submission Refer to the programme schedule PMA assessment Completed ± 2 weeks after submission PMA moderation Completed ± 1 week after assessment Mark Committee sign-off Completed ± 1 week after moderation For more detail refer to the official Policy of The Da Vinci Institute Assessment and certification management (AD02) 50 | FACULTY ONBOARDING GUIDE Student feedback letter Assessors are encouraged to compile a feedback letter to students after assessment of the group’s assignments. The KAM will assist with distributing the letter, via e-mail or Moodle. This letter could summarise the common problems and offer suggestions for improving assignments in future. Plagiarism The Institute’s policy on plagiarism differentiates between first/minor offences, which normally result in a developmental discussion and written warning, and more serious/repetitive offences, which can result in more serious penalties such as suspension or expulsion. Understanding the root causes of plagiarism is crucial in developing strategies to combat it effectively. If it is assumed that many students tend to plagiarise or reference incorrectly due to ignorance or a lack of academic writing skills, this is something that must be dealt with both upfront and repeatedly during the learning journey. The first step is to provide clear guidelines in the form of a reference guide that shows students ‘how to’. The intention is to regularly revisit the issue of referencing with students throughout the learning journey. Facilitators must also be much more vigilant in their assessment of referencing in Post Modular Assignments. The second assumption is that plagiarism may be due to pressure, whether time or financial related, or other pressures. This may be addressed through tight management of ‘at risk’ students so that students do not fall behind by more than one assignment at any given time, which gives rise to the additional pressure leading to an increase in plagiarism. Lastly, the issue of hubris must be addressed. Students may think that they are ‘above the law’ and that they can get away with plagiarism, that they will not get caught, or that there will not be severe consequences for their actions. This may stem from previous experiences where they did manage to get away with plagiarism. One of the strategies already employed is a ‘zero tolerance’ strategy. Even minor cases of plagiarism are treated as a formal offence, resulting in a hearing and written warning where appropriate, so that students are deterred from believing that this practice is acceptable. Please ensure you are familiar with the Harvard method of referencing as applied at the Da Vinci Institute. Every facilitator and assessor should offer feedback to students regarding the application of the Harvard method – with every assignment. Procedure: approval for certification Upon completion of a programme the relevant Key Account Manager (KAM) presents the required documentation to the Examination Committee, declaring that assessment and moderation took place in accordance with this policy and that the preliminary process was adhered to. The Examination Committee recommends qualifications to be awarded to the Academic Board for approval and submission to the Council for ratification. FACULTY | 51 ONBOARDING GUIDE Student support General approach We follow a proactive approach in supporting students. ‘At risk’ students (students who do not submit their Post Modular Assignments (PMAs) on time, who fall behind on research or modular work, or fail to show up for workshops) receive follow-up phone calls and e-mails as soon as it is noticed. Catch-up plans are made proactively and there is a greater awareness of the importance to stay in touch with students. Student support specialists All students including postgraduate students are required to complete the Shadowmatch profile and are invited to one compulsory session to introduce them to the service and to give them feedback on their Shadowmatch profile. The Shadowmatch profile was used to assess the study (and work) habits of individual students and to highlight ‘danger’ areas to them in terms of their studies – for example a low responsiveness habit may lead to late submission of assignments and this needs to be managed. This is followed up with another compulsory session at the beginning of each new academic year. In addition to the first compulsory session, the service is available ‘on demand’ to all students who feel the need to speak to one of the Student Support Specialists, with a maximum of four sessions per annum. These students must make appointments. The Client Engagement Team may also refer ‘at risk’ students (all levels) to the Student Support Specialists for assistance. The Student Support Specialists can be seen on appointment only. Appointments with the Student Support Specialists are booked using the dedicated e-mail address: [email protected]. Students may book via their Key Account Manager or with the receptionist directly. Moodle (e-learning platform) All Da Vinci students have access to and are actively encouraged to make use of Moodle (acronym for Modular Object-Oriented Dynamic Learning Environment). Students can access learning material including additional reading material from Moodle and also use this platform to upload their assignments. In addition, Moodle is used to communicate with students regarding assignments, workshops, and other issues related to their studies. 52 | FACULTY ONBOARDING GUIDE Library and Information Services Research is integral to the learning journey and every assignment submitted at Da Vinci. As part of their research skills, students need to support their arguments with information from credible sources. The learning resources and facilitators refers students to some of these credible sources. It is, however the student’s responsibility to source their own information. We provide students and facilitators access to two academic databases: Springer and Sabinet. Springer When facilitators are contracted by Da Vinci, their contact details are submitted to the Information Officer. He registers you on the Springer database. You will receive an email inviting you to the join the subscription; e-mail subject line: “Springer online access”. Remember to check your junk/spam folder if you do not see this mail in your inbox Log in by following the link in the e-mail Create a personal profile. You will use this profile to log in and use the database When viewing your search results, uncheck the checkbox to ensure you only view information you can access. Sabinet Go to www.journals.co.za and sign in using the following details: Username: davinci Password: dv561b FACULTY | 53 ONBOARDING GUIDE Select “Advanced Search” In the field: “Filters by access types”, choose to limit the search to “Open Access” and “Free”. You need to uncheck “All access types”. The following platforms are collections of open source journals that provides free use of their articles: https://doaj.org/ http://www.oajse.com/ https://aminer.org/ https://www.base-search.net/ http://www.jurn.org/#gsc.tab=0 Use http://www.scholar.google.co.za for more credible results - not the usual google.co.za For assistance using these and other resources please contact the information officer. [email protected] 54 | FACULTY ONBOARDING GUIDE Continuous professional development for facilitators Facilitators’ workshops To support all facilitators and assessors in continued professional development, Da Vinci will be hosting regular workshops for facilitators, assessors and research associates. We invite you to join our LinkedIn group and actively participate in the conversations. Learning resources contained in this onboarding guide can be accessed on the following web page: You are also invited to attend the monthly Curiosita forum. Curiosita The Curiosita forum is a monthly colloquium for contemporary thinking on the Management of Technology, Innovation and People in a systemic context, hosted by Faculty of The Da Vinci Institute. The forum strives for enhanced participation and discourse for greater experiential learning rather than just “death by PowerPoint” - to capture Aristotle’s notion of dialectic rather than that of rhetoric speech. Objectives To facilitate the execution of quality research To allow an opportunity for Da Vinci researchers to obtain experience in presenting their research verbally to experts in the world of work, and to obtain feedback and input on their research To provide mutual support by sharing knowledge, experiences, contacts, tips and techniques within the research and working community To provide formal input on research methodology to the Da Vinci research community. Please discuss any suggestions for topics to be discussed at the facilitators’ workshops with the Manager: Teaching and Learning. FACULTY | 55
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz