2015 Major Field Test Comparative Data Guide Major Field Test for Chemistry The annual Comparative Data Guide (CDG) contains tables of scaled scores and percentiles for individual student scores and institutional means drawn directly from senior test takers across the nation. The report provides descriptive statistics based on the number of students that have completed the Major Field Test (MFT) for Chemistry since it was released in September 2011 through June 2015. Information about an institution gathered through MFT administrations cannot be released in any form attributable to or identifiable with an individual institution. The anonymity of each institution’s performance is maintained by reporting only the aggregate performance of the selected reference group. Below are descriptions of the various tables provided in this guide: Individual Students Total Score/Subscore Distributions – The distributions in these tables may be used to interpret individual student results by determining what percent of those taking the test at the selected institutions attained scores below that of a particular student. Each table shows scaled score intervals for Total Score and Subscores separately. By looking up the Total Score or Subscore and reading across the row to the corresponding number in the column headed “Percent Below,” the percent of individuals scoring below any interval can be determined. Institutional Means Total Score/Subscore Distributions – The distributions in these tables present the number of institutions at each mean score level. These tables provide a way to compare the Total Score and Subscore means for your institution with those of other participating institutions you selected. These tables show the mean of means (or the average of the mean scores for those institutions/programs selected) as well as the standard deviations of those means. Institutional Assessment Indicator Mean Score Distributions – The assessment indicator summary information in these tables includes the frequency distribution of departmental/program means for each assessment indicator. These tables show the distribution of institutional rounded means as well as the average and standard deviations of those means. Note that not all MFT titles in all subject areas generate subscores or assessment indicators. Please refer to the test content description for your subject area of interest at www.ets.org/mft/about/content to determine which score types you should expect to generate for your MFT test subject. The following considerations should be kept in mind when interpreting comparative data: This data should be considered comparative rather than normative because the institutions included in the data do not represent proportionally the various types of higher education institutions and programs. The data are drawn entirely from institutions that choose to use MFT. Such a self-selected sample may not be representative of all institutions or programs. The number of students tested and sampling procedures vary from one institution to another. Therefore, it is impossible to verify that the students tested at each institution are representative of all the institution’s students in that program. It is important that these comparisons involve students at approximately the same point in their educational careers. The tables report data for seniors only. Students who are not seniors are excluded from these calculations. The tables report data for institutions/programs that have tested five (5) or more seniors. Institutions/programs with fewer than five (5) test takers are excluded from these calculations. No single institution accounts for more than 6% percent of all the students included. For more information about this report or other ways the Major Field Tests can help your program, contact an ETS Advisor at [email protected] or call 1-800-745-0269. The following tables include tests taken as of June 30, 2015. Copyright © 2015 by Educational Testing Service. All rights reserved. ETS, the ETS logo and LISTENING. LEARNING. LEADING. are registered trademarks of Educational Testing Service (ETS). 2015 Comparative Data Guide - MFT for Chemistry Institution List Data includes seniors from domestic institutions who tested between September 2011 and June 2015. Alabama A&M University, AL Alabama State University, AL Albany State University, GA Albright College, PA Alma College, MI Angelo State University, TX Aquinas College (MI), MI Armstrong State University, GA Asbury University, KY Augustana College (IL), IL Austin Peay State University, TN Ball State University, IN Barry University, FL Bellarmine University, KY Benedict College, SC Berry College, GA Bethel University (MN), MN Bethel University (TN), TN Birmingham-Southern College, AL Black Hills State University, SD Brigham Young University (ID), ID California Baptist University, CA California State Polytechnic University - Pomona, CA Calvin College, MI Campbell University - Buies Creek, NC Capital University, OH Cedar Crest College, PA Centre College, KY Christopher Newport University, VA Claflin University, SC Clayton State University, GA College of Charleston, SC College of Saint Benedict & Saint John's Univ., MN Colorado Mesa University, CO Colorado State University - Fort Collins, CO Colorado State University - Pueblo, CO Columbia College (MO), MO Columbus State University, GA Concordia College, MN Converse College, SC Covenant College, GA Delaware Valley College, PA Dickinson State University, ND Dordt College, IA East Carolina University, NC East Tennessee State University, TN East Texas Baptist University, TX Eastern Illinois University, IL Elizabeth City State University, NC Elizabethtown College, PA Erskine College, SC Fairmont State University, WV Fisk University, TN Florida International University, FL Fort Valley State University, GA Freed-Hardeman University, TN Geneva College, PA George Fox University (OR), OR Georgetown College, KY Georgian Court University, NJ MFT 2015 Comparative Data Guide Goshen College, IN Grove City College, PA Hamline University, MN Hampton University, VA High Point University, NC Hillsdale College, MI Houston Baptist University, TX Howard Payne University, TX Humboldt State University, CA Huntingdon College, AL Illinois College, IL Indiana State University, IN Indiana Wesleyan University, IN Jamestown College, ND Juniata College, PA Kansas Wesleyan University, KS Kent State University, OH Lander University, SC Lane College, TN Langston University, OK Lawrence Technological University, MI Lebanon Valley College, PA Lenoir-Rhyne University, NC LeTourneau University, TX Lewis-Clark State College, ID Lipscomb University, TN Louisiana State University - Baton Rouge, LA Loyola University New Orleans , LA Lynchburg College, VA Macalester College, MN Malone University, OH Manhattan College, NY Marian University (IN), IN Mary Baldwin College, VA Mercer University, GA Messiah College, PA Methodist University, NC Millersville University of Pennsylvania, PA Millikin University, IL Mississippi College, MS Mississippi University for Women, MS Missouri Baptist University, MO Missouri Southern State University, MO Missouri State University, MO Missouri University of Science and Technology, MO Missouri Western State University, MO Morehead State University, KY Morehouse College, GA Mount St. Joseph University, OH Mount St. Mary's University, MD Mount Vernon Nazarene University, OH Muskingum University, OH Newman University, KS Nicholls State University, LA North Central College, IL Northeastern State University, OK Northern State University, SD Northwest Nazarene University, ID Norwich University, VT Notre Dame of Maryland University, MD ||DAK-4HMF|| Page 2 Old Dominion University, VA Pace University - New York, NY Pacific Union College, CA Pfeiffer University, NC Point Loma Nazarene University, CA Prairie View A&M University, TX Presbyterian College, SC Providence College, RI Quincy University, IL Roger Williams University, RI Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology, IN Rowan University, NJ Saint Anselm College, NH Saint Mary's University of Minnesota , MN Salem College, NC Salem State College, MA Schreiner University, TX Southeast Missouri State University, MO Southern Arkansas University, AR Southern Utah University, UT Southern Wesleyan University, SC Southwest Baptist University, MO Spelman College, GA Spring Hill College, AL St. Bonaventure University, NY St. Edward's University, TX Stonehill College, MA SUNY at Oswego, NY SUNY at Plattsburgh, NY Tarleton State University, TX Tennessee Tech University, TN Tennessee Wesleyan College, TN Texas A&M University - Corpus Christi, TX Texas Lutheran University, TX Texas Southern University, TX Thomas More College, KY Tougaloo College, MS Transylvania University, KY Trinity Christian College, IL United States Air Force Academy, CO University of Arkansas - Little Rock, AR University of Central Arkansas, AR University of Central Florida, FL University of Central Missouri, MO University of Colorado at Colorado Springs, CO University of Mary Hardin-Baylor, TX University of Mary Washington, VA University of Memphis, TN University of Missouri - Kansas City, MO University of Missouri - St. Louis, MO University of Mount Olive, NC University of Nebraska - Lincoln, NE University of Nebraska - Omaha, NE University of New Orleans, LA University of North Alabama, AL University of Pikeville, KY University of Redlands, CA University of Saint Francis (IN), IN University of San Diego, CA University of Sciences in Philadelphia, PA University of South Carolina - Upstate, SC University of Southern Indiana, IN University of St. Thomas (MN), MN University of Tennessee - Chattanooga, TN University of Tennessee - Knoxville, TN University of Tennessee at Martin, TN University of Texas at Tyler, TX University of the Cumberlands, KY University of Virginia's College at Wise, The, VA University of Wisconsin - La Crosse, WI University of Wisconsin - Stevens Point, WI University of Wisconsin - Whitewater, WI Vanderbilt University, TN Virginia Military Institute, VA Virginia State University, VA Wagner College, NY Washington & Jefferson College, PA Washington and Lee University, VA Washington University in St. Louis, MO Wesleyan College, GA West Chester University, PA Wheaton College, IL Willamette University, OR Wilmington College, OH Winona State University, MN Winston-Salem State University, NC Xavier University of Louisiana, LA Yeshiva University, NY Copyright © 2015 by Educational Testing Service. All rights reserved. ETS, the ETS logo and LISTENING. LEARNING. LEADING. are registered trademarks of Educational Testing Service (ETS). MFT 2015 Comparative Data Guide ||DAK-4HMF|| Page 3 2015 Comparative Data Guide - MFT for Chemistry Individual Students Total Score Distribution Data includes seniors from domestic institutions who tested between September 2011 and June 2015. Number of Examinees Mean Median Standard Deviation 6,964 148.2 146.0 14.7 Individual Students Total Score Distribution Total Score Range (120 - 200) 185 - 200 184 183 182 181 180 179 178 177 176 175 174 173 172 171 170 169 168 167 166 165 164 163 162 161 160 159 158 157 156 155 154 153 152 151 150 149 148 147 146 145 144 143 142 141 140 MFT 2015 Comparative Data Guide Percent Below 99 98 98 98 97 97 96 96 95 95 94 93 93 92 91 89 88 87 86 85 83 82 81 79 78 76 74 73 71 69 67 66 64 62 60 58 56 53 51 49 46 44 42 37 34 31 ||DAK-4HMF|| Page 4 Total Score Range (120 - 200) 139 138 137 136 135 134 133 132 131 130 129 128 127 126 125 120 - 124 Percent Below 29 27 24 22 20 15 13 11 10 8 6 4 3 2 2 1 Total Scores are reported as scaled scores. Percent Below based on percent below the lower limit of the score interval. Copyright © 2015 by Educational Testing Service. All rights reserved. ETS, the ETS logo and LISTENING. LEARNING. LEADING. are registered trademarks of Educational Testing Service (ETS). MFT 2015 Comparative Data Guide ||DAK-4HMF|| Page 5 2015 Comparative Data Guide - MFT for Chemistry 1 Individual Students Subscore Distribution Data includes seniors from domestic institutions who tested between September 2011 and June 2015. Subscore Number of Examinees Mean Median Standard Deviation 6,964 48.1 48.0 15.1 6,964 48.5 47.0 14.4 6,964 48.4 46.0 14.8 6,964 48.2 47.0 14.5 1: Physical Chemistry 2: Organic Chemistry 3: Inorganic Chemistry 4: Analytical Chemistry Individual Students Subscore Distribution Subscores Range (20 – 100) S12 Percent S22 Percent S32 Percent S42 Percent Below Below Below Below 86 - 100 99 99 99 99 85 98 99 99 99 84 98 99 98 99 83 98 98 98 98 82 97 98 97 98 81 97 97 97 97 80 96 97 97 97 79 96 97 95 97 78 96 96 95 95 77 94 96 95 95 76 94 94 93 95 75 94 94 93 93 74 92 94 93 93 73 92 92 93 93 72 92 92 91 91 71 92 89 91 91 70 89 89 91 91 69 89 89 87 88 68 89 86 87 88 67 85 86 87 88 66 85 84 83 84 65 85 84 83 84 64 81 84 83 84 63 81 80 83 80 62 81 80 78 80 61 75 80 78 80 60 75 75 78 75 59 75 75 72 75 58 70 75 72 75 57 70 71 72 69 56 70 71 66 69 55 70 65 66 69 MFT 2015 Comparative Data Guide ||DAK-4HMF|| Page 6 Subscores Range (20 – 100) S12 Percent S22 Percent S32 Percent S42 Percent Below Below Below Below 54 64 65 66 63 53 64 65 66 63 52 64 60 60 63 51 57 60 60 63 50 57 60 60 56 49 57 54 52 56 48 49 54 52 56 47 49 47 52 49 46 49 47 44 49 45 42 47 44 41 44 42 40 44 41 43 42 40 37 41 42 34 33 37 33 41 34 33 37 33 40 34 33 29 33 39 27 26 29 26 38 27 26 29 26 37 27 19 20 26 36 20 19 20 19 35 20 19 20 19 34 20 13 13 19 33 13 13 13 12 32 13 9 13 12 31 13 9 7 8 30 8 5 7 8 29 8 5 7 8 28 8 5 4 4 27 4 3 4 4 26 4 3 4 4 25 2 1 1 2 24 2 1 1 2 23 2 1 1 1 20 - 22 1 1 1 1 1 Subscores for this test cannot be compared to testing years prior to 2011 due to changes in the Chesmistry Test that were introduced in 2011. 2 Subscore Subscore Subscore Subscore 1: 2: 3: 4: Physical Chemistry Organic Chemistry Inorganic Chemistry Analytical Chemistry Copyright © 2015 by Educational Testing Service. All rights reserved. ETS, the ETS logo and LISTENING. LEARNING. LEADING. are registered trademarks of Educational Testing Service (ETS). MFT 2015 Comparative Data Guide ||DAK-4HMF|| Page 7 2015 Comparative Data Guide - MFT for Chemistry Institutional Means Total Score Distribution Data includes seniors from domestic institutions who tested between September 2011 and June 2015. Number of Institutions Mean Median Standard Deviation 208 147.9 148.0 9.6 Institutional Means Total Score Distribution Mean Total Score Range (120 - 200) 170 - 200 169 168 167 166 165 164 163 162 161 160 159 158 157 156 155 154 153 152 151 150 149 148 147 146 145 144 143 142 141 140 139 138 137 136 135 134 133 132 131 130 120 - 129 Percent Below 99 98 97 97 97 96 95 93 91 90 87 85 82 80 75 72 70 68 67 63 58 53 49 43 38 36 32 29 25 24 19 18 15 13 9 8 6 6 4 3 2 1 Total Scores are reported as scaled scores. Percent Below based on percent below the lower limit of the score interval. Copyright © 2015 by Educational Testing Service. All rights reserved. ETS, the ETS logo and LISTENING. LEARNING. LEADING. are registered trademarks of Educational Testing Service (ETS). MFT 2015 Comparative Data Guide ||DAK-4HMF|| Page 8 2015 Comparative Data Guide - MFT for Chemistry 1 Institutional Means Subscore Distribution Data includes seniors from domestic institutions who tested between September 2011 and June 2015. Subscore Number of Examinees Mean Median Standard Deviation 208 48.1 47.0 9.2 208 47.8 48.0 8.7 208 48.5 48.0 9.0 208 48.2 48.0 8.7 1: Physical Chemistry 2: Organic Chemistry 3: Inorganic Chemistry 4: Analytical Chemistry Institutional Means Subscore Distribution Subscores Range (20 – 100) S12 Percent Below S22 Percent Below S32 Percent Below S42 Percent Below 78 - 100 99 99 99 99 77 99 99 99 99 76 99 99 99 99 75 99 99 99 99 74 99 99 99 99 73 99 99 99 99 72 99 99 99 99 71 99 99 99 99 70 98 99 98 99 69 98 99 98 99 68 98 99 97 99 67 98 99 97 99 66 97 98 97 97 65 96 98 96 97 64 96 97 94 96 63 93 95 93 95 62 92 93 91 94 61 91 91 89 91 60 88 88 86 89 59 86 86 85 87 58 83 83 83 85 57 78 81 79 81 56 76 79 76 78 55 73 76 75 76 54 69 74 72 73 53 65 71 67 69 52 63 68 64 63 51 61 65 60 58 50 57 60 55 56 49 54 54 52 52 48 50 49 47 46 MFT 2015 Comparative Data Guide ||DAK-4HMF|| Page 9 Subscores Range (20 – 100) S12 Percent Below S22 Percent Below S32 Percent Below S42 Percent Below 47 45 45 44 42 46 42 40 39 37 45 36 34 35 33 44 30 31 29 28 43 27 28 26 25 42 24 25 24 21 41 23 21 19 18 40 18 18 16 14 39 15 14 14 14 38 12 10 11 13 37 11 9 8 12 36 8 8 6 9 35 6 6 4 6 34 5 4 3 4 33 5 4 1 2 32 2 3 1 2 31 1 2 1 1 20 - 30 1 1 1 1 1 Subscores for this test cannot be compared to testing years prior to 2011 due to changes in the Chemistry Test that were introduced in 2011. 2 Subscore Subscore Subscore Subscore 1: 2: 3: 4: Physical Chemistry Organic Chemistry Inorganic Chemistry Analytical Chemistry MFT 2015 Comparative Data Guide ||DAK-4HMF|| Page 10 2015 Comparative Data Guide - MFT for Chemistry 1 Institutional Assessment Indicator Mean Score Distributions Data includes seniors from domestic institutions who tested between September 2011 and June 2015. Assessment Indicator Number of Institutions Mean Median Standard Deviation 1: Biochemistry 208 47.9 48.0 9.3 2: Critical Thinking and Reasoning 208 45.1 45.0 10.7 Institutional Assessment Indicator Mean Score Distributions MFT 2015 Comparative Data Guide Mean Percent Correct (0-100%) A12 Percent Below A22 Percent Below 76 - 100 99 99 75 99 99 74 99 99 73 99 99 72 99 99 71 99 99 70 99 99 69 99 98 68 99 97 67 99 97 66 98 97 65 96 96 64 94 95 63 93 94 62 93 93 61 92 91 60 91 91 59 87 87 58 84 86 57 80 84 56 77 82 55 74 80 54 73 76 53 73 73 52 65 71 51 62 69 50 54 66 49 51 64 48 48 60 47 41 57 46 39 54 45 32 48 44 29 42 43 25 39 ||DAK-4HMF|| Page 11 Mean Percent Correct (0-100%) A12 Percent Below A22 Percent Below 42 22 36 41 20 34 40 18 29 39 16 26 38 13 25 37 11 22 36 10 19 35 9 18 34 8 14 33 7 12 32 4 10 31 4 8 30 3 7 29 2 5 28 1 4 27 1 3 26 1 2 25 1 2 0 - 24 1 1 ¹ Assessment Indicators for this test cannot be compared to testing years prior to 2011 due to changes in the Chemistry test that were introduced in 2011. 2 Assessment Indicator 1: Biochemistry Assessment Indicator 2: Critical Thinking and Reasoning Assessment Indicators are reported as percent correct. Percent Below based on percent below the lower limit of the score interval. Copyright © 2015 by Educational Testing Service. All rights reserved. ETS, the ETS logo and LISTENING. LEARNING. LEADING. are registered trademarks of Educational Testing Service (ETS). MFT 2015 Comparative Data Guide ||DAK-4HMF|| Page 12
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz