Welcome Publications ICSTI '06, November 26-30 Osaka, Japan SLAG BEHAVIOUR IN LKAB PELLET AT ELEVATED TEMPERATURE It is a important tool in terms of product development and process research, in addition the risks involved in full-scale production trials can be avoided. Nicklas Eklund, Bo Lindblom [email protected] LKAB Technology & Business Development Svartövägen 16, 974 37 Luleå SWEDEN ABSTRACT Integrated steel plants in Europe operate with mixed burdens with sinter as major burden constituent and some plants use only pellet as burden material. It is important that pellet behaviour is well suited for different blast furnace burdens. Therefore it is necessary to understand pellet behaviour during reduction. As the raw material costs has increased rapidly during the last couple of years blast furnace burden materials is an important area for optimising the economy of the blast furnace process. Pellet development at LKAB comprises formulation of pellet formula and testing in laboratory scale. The LKAB Experimental Blast Furnace (EBF) is an excellent tool to verify experimental pellet behaviour, here laboratory equipment and EBF-data was used to outline pellet behaviour at elevated temperature. Fig. 1 Development route at LKAB To examine blast furnace burden material in laboratory enviroment softening and melting equipment is used. Around the world numerous of different test set up exists1) with specific characteristics. At Studiengesellschaft für Eisenerzaufbereitung (SGA) in Germany a test method, the REAS test, has been developed to outline blast furnace burden material 1. INTRODUCTION during reduction, softening and melting1). In this investigation the REAS-test equipment is used to LKAB is a mining company situated in northern Scandinavia. Manufacturing of blast furnace- and direct reduction pellets and sinter fines is made at three separate production sites. Total amount of finished products is in excess of 20 Mton/year. Development evaluate LKAB pellets in laboratory enviroment. The EBF is used when a comparison is made during blast furnace operation. 2. EXPERIMENT route at LKAB comprises laboratory scale testing, pilot scale testing and full scale testing, Fig. 1. The LKAB EBF is a unique test facility for blast furnace materials. 2.1 Laboratory equipment Welcome Publications The REAS- test set up has already been described in receiving hopper. Either a bell or a rotary Top Charger is detail and will only be discussed breifely here. In Fig. used to charge the burden material. While using the 1) 2 a schematic view of the REAS-test is shown. bell system there is a movable armour for distribution control. Pebbles heaters provides up to 1250 °C in blast temperature. The blast enter the blast furnace through one of three tuyeres. The tuyeres are separated by 120 degrees and has a diameter of 54 mm resulting in a blast velocity of 150 m/s at normal blast volume. One tap hole is used and normal tap to tap time is one hour. Top gas is transported through the uptakes and down comers to a dust catcher. Top gas is further cleaned in a venturi scrubber and a wet Fig. 2 Schematic view of softening and melting unit electrostatic precipitator. Finally the top gas is flared in a torch. During operation it is possible to collect Burden material to be tested is mounted in between material or gas and temperature profiles by inburden graphite layers and a thermocouple in the burden probes, Fig. 4. Horisontal probes can be positioned at material is monitoring increase in temperature. Inlet five different heights and one inclined probe collect gas is preheated and outlet gas is analysed to make material from bosh area. reduction and reducibility calculations. When sample measurement give the temperature profile over the reaches a differential pressure of 200 mmWG gas is blast furnace height. A vertical temperature by-passed to let molten material drip into the cruicible. Weight change of dripped out material is monitored at incresing temperature. Furnace is heated electrically up to 1550 oC and temperature- and gas flow control during this evaluation is shown in Fig. 3. Hydrogen and alkali reactions is not simulated in the REAS-test. Temperature control Temperature range 20-450 oC 450-900 oC o 900 C 900-Tmax Heating rate 5 oC/min 10 oC/min konstant 5 oC/min Gas flow control Gas composition 100 %N2 25%CO/15%CO2/60%N2 35%CO/5%CO2/60%N2 100 %N2 Time 55 min 95 min until end of test Fig. 3 Gas- and temperature control of test unit 2.2 The LKAB Experimental Blast Furnace Fig. 4 The LKAB Experimental Blast Furnace As to now the experience is that the EBF is a very sensitive tool for detecting differences in properties for The LKAB Experimental Blast Furnace has been different pellet types5-6). The response time is much described in several publications2-4) and will be briefly shorter for the EBF compared to a commercial furnace. outlined here. Burden material are screened at +6 mm Evaluation of data and comparison to full-scale for pellet, 6-50 mm for sinter, coke 15-30 mm and fluxes operation has been described3). 10-20 mm. Iron ore is stored in one of four bins, coke is stored in a larger bin. A skip transport material to a 3. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION Welcome Publications Composition of blast furnace burden material that In addition, the total amount of dripped mass is higher was tested in the REAS-test and in the EBF is shown in for the acid pellet grade. From Fig. 8 it is seen that the Table 1. amount of primary slag for acid pellet is higher and attaine in a more narrow temperature interval. Table 1 Pellet composition of pellet grades Acid Fe 66,45 66,51 B2 0,24 0,23 MgO/SiO2 0,78 450 Olivine 400 Dripping mass(g) Olivine 0,23 Acid 350 300 ACID 250 200 OLIVINE 150 100 50 0 When temperature is increased pellet experience softening before melting and in the REAS-test softening 240 250 260 270 280 290 300 Time (min) 310 320 330 Fig. 7 Melting behaviour of acid and olivine pellet Acid pellet show a sharp peak at lower temperature compared to olivine pellet, Fig. 5. 300 ACID 1500 Temperature (°C) 250 Pressure drop (mmWG) 1600 200 1400 150 1300 100 1200 OLIVINE 50 0 1100 200 220 240 260 Time (min) 280 Dripping mass primary slag (%) is defined at attained pressure drop of 200 mmWG. 25 Olivine Acid 20 15 10 5 0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 Temperature interval primary slag (°C) 80 90 Fig. 8 Formation of primary slag of pellets 1000 300 320 During campaign 12 trial with acid and olivine pellets Fig. 5 Softening behaviour of pellets were conducted. Blast parameters, injection rate, slag volume and burden distribuition was kept constant to The effect of pellet basicity on dripping temperature, make the evaluation easier. In this study an attempt is Fig. 6, show higher dripping temperature at increased made to link the REAS-data with the EBF-data in terms basicity B3. At lower temperature acid pellet start to of the high temperature region. Heat loss at tuyere is drip and the amount of primary slag is higher compared higher for acid pellet grade, Fig. 9. to the olivine pellet, Fig. 7. 120 Acid 1360 1340 1320 1280 0,00 0,20 0,40 0,60 0,80 Basicity B3 (CaO+MgO/SiO2) 1,00 1,20 Fig. 6 Effect of pellet basicity on dripping temperature 1550 80 1500 60 1450 40 1400 20 0 1300 Hot metal temperature (°C) Dripping temperature (°C) 1380 Olivine Tuyere Heat Loss (kW) 100 1400 1600 OLIVNE 1350 ACID 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 Time (hour) 350 400 450 1300 500 Fig. 9 Development of tuyere heat loss and hot metal temperature over time Welcome Publications From operational data burden resistance index is simulate the softening and melting phenomena of blast calculated and within each period the permeability is furnace burden. An attempt is made to link burden decreasing for increasing heat loss at tuyere, Fig. 10. behaviour in laboratory softening and melting test to EBF-data. Burden Resistance Index 4,5 Based on laboratory tests and results from the EBF it 4,25 R = 0,3775 2 OLIVINE 4 is possible to describe softening and melting behaviour 3,75 of different pellet types during blast furnace operation. 3,5 3 ACID R 2 = 0,4582 3,25 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100 105 Tuyere Heat Loss (kW) 110 115 120 For evaluation of blast furnace burden material and 125 blast furnace operation research LKAB has an Fig. 10 Permeability at varying heat level important tool in the Experimental Blast Furnace. From the REAS-test it is shown that the acid pellet soften at lower temperature compared to the olivine pellet and that the olivine pellet experience better permeability at higher temperature. The fayalitic nature of the primary slag of acid pellet contribute to the formation of larger amount of primary slag at shorter temperature interval. With lower softening and melting temperature of the acid pellet it is expected that the cohesive zone would be located at a higher position in the blast furnace compared to the olivine pellet burden. Results based on excavated material2) from the EBF confirm the higher cohesive zone position of acid pellet. REFERENCES For each pellet grade the burden resistance index is 1) increasing with increasing heat loss but there is a difference in level when comparing the two pellet ICSTI/Ironmaking conf. proc., Toronto, (1998). 2) grades. Furthermore higher heat losses for the acid pellet indicate a higher position of the cohesive zone H. A. Kortmann, V. J. Ritz and K. Koch: M. Hallin: International BF Lower Zone Symp., Wollongong, (2002), 22-1. 3) L. Hooey, J. Sterneland, M. Hallin: Iron & Steel and larger burden resistance index for the olivine pellet Society’s 60th Ironmaking Conference, (2001), indicate that the cohesive zone is thicker than in the 197. case of acid pellet. Also, higher burden resistance 4) index can be an effect of the surrounding temperature in the case of olivine pellet with its lower cohesive zone J. Sterneland, M. Hallin: Proc. 6th Japan-Nordic Countries Joint Symp., (2000), 9. 5) L. Sundqvist-Öqvist, A. Dahlstedt, M. Hallin: Iron & Steel Society’s 60th Ironmaking Conference, position. (2001), 167. 4. CONCLUSIONS 6) L. Hooey, J. Sterneland, M. Hallin: 1st Internat. Meeting on Ironmaking, Belo Horizonte, Brazil, The REAS softening and melting test can be used to (2001).
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz