ENERGISE –
3rd Workshop on Communications Infrastructure
Strategies for Smart Grid Applications
Anglet, 30.06.2016
3rd ENERGISE Workshop - Agenda
08h 30
Welcome Coffee
10h 15
Wrap up and joint discussion
09h 00
Welcome and introduction to the 3rd ENERGISE workshop
10h 30
Coffee break
09h 05
ENERGISE: How can cooperation between energy and
communications sector be achieved?
11h 00
Best practice solution / lessons learnt example:
“PowerMatchingCity Groningen”
Daniel Schöllhorn, TÜV Rheinland Consulting GmbH
Matthias Wissner, WIK Wissenschaftliches Institut für Infrastruktur und
Kommunikationsdienste GmbH
- Overview of the results of ENERGISE
- Strategic and practical dimensions of cooperation between the sectors
09h 15
Strategic aspects of cooperation between telecoms and the energy
sector – perspectives from a DSO I
Philip Westbroek, Telecommunications advisor, Enexis Asset Management
(Netherlands)
- Smart metering: current status and future plans
- Enexis data communications strategy
- Why we selected LTE
- Preventing a mobile operator lock-in
09h 45
Strategic aspects of cooperation between telecoms and the energy
sector – perspectives from a DSO II
Emmanuel Villalta, Chair of EUTC Spectrum Committee, Enedis (France)
- Update from the Radio Spectrum of the European Utility Telecom Council EUTC)
- Enedis´ (former ERDF) strategic approach for co-operation towards telecoms
2
30.06.2016
ICT-based ENERgy Grid Implementation – Smart and Efficient
(ENERGISE)
Eelko Steenhuis, EU Project Advisor, Cities Northern Netherlands
11h 30
Joint Workshop: Co-operation in critical operation status?
Daniel Iglhaut, TÜV Rheinland Consulting GmbH
12h 15
Wrap up and further steps of ENERGISE
12h 30
End of the workshop
TÜV Rheinland. At Home on All Continents.
Figures
2014
Sales in Mio. €
1.731
- abroad in %
49
EBIT in %
6,4
Employees
- abroad in %
Locations: more than 500 in 69 countries
3
30.06.2016
ICT-based ENERgy Grid Implementation – Smart and Efficient
(ENERGISE)
19,300
60
Expert for infrastructure industries
 Independent research and consultancy organisation
WIK and WIK-Consult
 Focus on policy and regulation of network industries
Telecommunications, Energy, Postal Services
 Department Smart Energy since 2004
 Approx. 35 Economists and Consultants
 Based in Bad Honnef (near Bonn)
4
30.06.2016
ICT-based ENERgy Grid Implementation – Smart and Efficient
(ENERGISE)
Overview - project ENERGISE / Introduction
Framework:
 CSA – Coordination and Support Action for the Horizon 2020 Call on Low Carbon Energy LCE 7 - 2014 - Distribution
grid and retail markets
General Questions:
 How will the future ICT infrastructure for smart grid applications look like?
Timeline:
 Start: 01/2015 – end: 03/2017
 Duration: 27 months
Partners:
 TÜV Rheinland Consulting
 WIK
5
30.06.2016
ICT-based ENERgy Grid Implementation – Smart and Efficient
(ENERGISE)
ENERGISE Context
1. Starting Point
2. Arising Problem
3. Core Question
New applications are increasing
the demand for communication and
data exchange in grids.
Differences between sectors make
synergies hard to exploit.
How can cooperation between
energy and communications sector
be achieved?
6
30.06.2016
ICT-based ENERgy Grid Implementation – Smart and Efficient
(ENERGISE)
ENERGISE Goal
4. Solution Concept
Identification of the relevant
stakeholders
Provide information and support
the decision making processes
Analysis of the current state of play
and assessment of
case studies and best-practices
Support the exchange of hands-onexperience
7
30.06.2016
ICT-based ENERgy Grid Implementation – Smart and Efficient
(ENERGISE)
European Coverage - ENERGISE
Use-Case Survey
DSO and Telco Company
Case Study already conducted
DSO or Telco Company
No Case Study so far
No DSO or Telco Company
8
Case Studies
30.06.2016
ICT-based ENERgy Grid Implementation – Smart and Efficient
(ENERGISE)
Core Question of ENERGISE
non-co-operative co-operative
type of interaction
Co-operation modes and infrastructure
usage between energy and telco sector
Fiber deployment
on electric poles
Use Case:
integrate new
users
Joint Venture
to deploy ICT
Use Case:
Network
security
Existing market
based solutions
dedicated
shared
usage of infrastructure
9
30.06.2016
ICT-based ENERgy Grid Implementation – Smart and Efficient
(ENERGISE)
Parameters influencing
decisions:
•
•
•
•
internal – external
technical – organisational
financial – regulatory
energy – telecommunication
ENERGISE – What has been done so far
2014/15:
 Survey plan:
Providing results of survey preparation work including survey methodology, structured questionnaire, roadmap (who,
when, in which order).
 Comprehensive list of stakeholders:
The list of stakeholders contains all relevant information in a structured way, incl. information such as name of
organisation, contacts, role etc.
 Survey summary report:
Summarising, categorising and aggregating the findings from the survey
 First Workshop in Brussels (1 October, 2015)
10
30.06.2016
ICT-based ENERgy Grid Implementation – Smart and Efficient
(ENERGISE)
ENERGISE – What has been done so far
Category
2016:
General data
 Interviews with stakeholders
Indicator
Sectors
Country
Both
Sector
Both
Description
Both
Values
Telco
Description of
business purpose
<250
 Second Workshop in Berlin (3 – 4 March, 2016)
Degree of
vertical
integration
>1000
Economies of
scale
<100,000
Vertical
integration
>100,000
Unbundling
Energy
Telco
Hardware vendors
Telco
Network operators
Content and
advertising services
Retail and
distribution
Generation
(bulk / decentral)
Telco
Telco
Energy
 Analysis summary report including use cases:
Providing an aggregated and categorised summary
based on analysed use cases and other input data
collected during survey.
Degree of
vertical
integration
Value creation
stages adopted
Portfolio-size
Organisational
structure
Market activity
30.06.2016
ICT-based ENERgy Grid Implementation – Smart and Efficient
(ENERGISE)
Energy
Transport and
distribution
Energy
Sales and customer
Both
Interdepende
nce w. other
indicators
High
Legal
obligation for
unbundling
from 100,000
metering
points on;
though
separated
Easier
integration of
new services
Agility
Agility
Capability to
enforce viewpoints on the
political
agenda
Economies of
scale
Degree of
vertical
integration
Make or buy
decisions
Number of
metering
points
Possibility for
product
bundling
Level of
vertical
integration
Different
rationales of
investments,
incentives
and operation
modes
Company size
Low
Share of
metering
points
equipped with
smart meters
 Results of theoretical rationale
11
Local focus
Regional
focus
Both
Company size
Number of
metering
points
Impact 2
Energy
250–1000
Employment
indicators
Impact 1
Energy
Existing own
infrastructure
Both
Type of
ownership
Both
Parent (if
applic.)
Both
Organisationa
l culture
Both
Scope of
operation
Both
Activities in
the respective
other sector
Engagement
in smart grid
activities
Share in absolute
numbers / percentag
e
Type of existing ICT
infrastructure
(leased) landline
connections or
mobile coverage in
the target area / use
case
Predominantly
private
Predominantly public
Risk
Innovation
Average age
Silo-thinking
National
No
Yes
Both
Available
communicatio
n solutions
Likelihood of
‘similar’ cooperations
No
Company size
Company size
European
Yes
Both
Available
communicatio
n solutions
Transferability
of business /
co-operation
models
ENERGISE – What is to come
2016/17:
 Developing a decision supporting
toolkit as a fundamental outcome
of the project ENERGISE.
 Third Workshop in Anglet
- Introducing ENERGISE
- Learning more about strategic aspects of cooperation
- Input from participants on the issue of co-operation in critical operation status
- Community building and networking
12
30.06.2016
ICT-based ENERgy Grid Implementation – Smart and Efficient
(ENERGISE)
3rd ENERGISE Workshop - Agenda
08h 30
Welcome Coffee
10h 15
Wrap up and joint discussion
09h 00
Welcome and introduction to the 3rd ENERGISE workshop
10h 30
Coffee break
09h 05
ENERGISE: How can cooperation between energy and
communications sector be achieved?
11h 00
Best practice solution / lessons learnt example:
“PowerMatchingCity Groningen”
Daniel Schöllhorn, TÜV Rheinland Consulting GmbH
Matthias Wissner, WIK Wissenschaftliches Institut für Infrastruktur und
Kommunikationsdienste GmbH
- Overview of the results of ENERGISE
- Strategic and practical dimensions of cooperation between the sectors
09h 15
Strategic aspects of cooperation between telecoms and the energy
sector – perspectives from a DSO I
Philip Westbroek, Telecommunications advisor, Enexis Asset Management
(Netherlands)
- Smart metering: current status and future plans
- Enexis data communications strategy
- Why we selected LTE
- Preventing a mobile operator lock-in
09h 45
Strategic aspects of cooperation between telecoms and the energy
sector – perspectives from a DSO II
Emmanuel Villalta, Chair of EUTC Spectrum Committee, Enedis (France)
- Update from the Radio Spectrum of the European Utility Telecom Council EUTC)
- Enedis´ (former ERDF) strategic approach for co-operation towards telecoms
13
30.06.2016
ICT-based ENERgy Grid Implementation – Smart and Efficient
(ENERGISE)
Eelko Steenhuis, EU Project Advisor, Cities Northern Netherlands
11h 30
Joint Workshop: Co-operation in critical operation status?
Daniel Iglhaut, TÜV Rheinland Consulting GmbH
12h 15
Wrap up and further steps of ENERGISE
12h 30
End of the workshop
Joint Workshop: Co-operation in critical operation status?
Joint Workshop: Co-operation in critical operation status? (45 Min)
Interdependencies between electricity and communication
networks
Mobile network is utilized in multiple ways in distribution networks

Distribution automation

Remote controlled disconnectors

AMR

Repair group communication
On the other hand, mobile network base stations require

electricity to operate

Backup is available, but is rarely enough
Two basic questions

Does co-operation in general, or jointly used infrastructures lead to an increased
robustness or an increased vulnerability in the power and communications sector?

How to secure (joint) operation in co-operative systems in critical states?
Source: Wikipedia, dailymail.co.uk
15
30.06.2016
ICT-based ENERgy Grid Implementation – Smart and Efficient
(ENERGISE)
Increasing number of loss events worldwide
Loss events worldwide 1980-2015
Source: Munich RE, 2016
16
04.07.2016
ICT-based ENERgy Grid Implementation – Smart and Efficient
(ENERGISE)
Does co-operation in general or jointly used infrastructures lead to an increased robustness or
an increased vulnerability in the power and communications sector?
Statements from the ENERGISE survey
Reasons for dedicated infrastructures
Use Case: Ensuring network security, system control
and quality of supply
Criticality is the outstanding reason to deploy /use dedicated
infrastructures for both industries.
jointly used infrastructures are not perceived to lead to an increased robustness
Source: ENERGISE
17
30.06.2016
ICT-based ENERgy Grid Implementation – Smart and Efficient
(ENERGISE)
Case Study Finland
Starting point

Huge amount of outages due to weather impact etc.

Lines are mostly in wood trenches -> huge amount of outages
New Electricity Market Act (2013)

Motivated by the need to ensure electricity supply, which is critical for a modern society as well as by investment deficit

the distribution network must be planned, built and maintained so that the failure of the network as a result of a storm or snow
does not cause a power outage of more than 6 hours to customers in urban areas and more than 36 hours to those in other
areas.

The act also stipulates the supply security requirements set for the transmission grid and high-voltage distribution networks. A
general obligation of preparedness will also be set for grid owners in case of disturbances and emergencies.

The standard compensation payable to customers for power outages will be increased.
Crown snow-load has bent a tree onto
overhead lines.
Implementation example from a Finish DSO

Legal obligation to “weather prove” the grid. Result is a huge activity to replace overhead lines with cables (approx. 200 km of
trenches per month and an increased invest)

As of today: 15 contracts with ICT providers to operate the grid and AMR –> Goal: have one provider with a turnkey solution!
Percentage of the power lines located in
forests.
18
04.07.2016
ICT-based ENERgy Grid Implementation – Smart and Efficient
(ENERGISE)
Sources: ENERGISE; Kim Forssén, Aalto Univesity 2016 after Tapio; Kaleva.fi, 2013
Co-operation in critical operation status? Questions to be discussed I
Does co-operation in general or jointly used
infrastructures lead to an increased robustness?
How to secure (joint) operation in co-operative
systems in critical states?
 Does close co-operation lead to an increased
resilience in case of emergency? Or do pure market
based solutions turn out to be more efficient?
 Which critical operation states are expected to
increase in future?
 Is there a need of state owned infrastructure for
critical applications (as infrastructure „of last
resort“)?
 Can commercial SLAS can be achieved? Are they
expected to be sufficient?
 How can operative details in for system restart in
crisis be forseen / trained?
 What is “critical” infrastructure?
 How much security / resilience is needed?
19
30.06.2016
ICT-based ENERgy Grid Implementation – Smart and Efficient
(ENERGISE)
 Which measuers do you wish to be implemented by
regulatory authorities to promote co-operation in
critical operation status?
Co-operation in critical operation status? Questions to be discussed II
Safety
Security
 What safety standard is needed?
 Data security as a critical issue?
 Who shall define this standard (Government /
Industry)?
 How can it be achieved? / Who is responsible?
 How can it be achieved? / Who is responsible?
General Issues
 Do we need more (or less) regulation on this issue?
 What are your (country-specific) experiences?
20
30.06.2016
ICT-based ENERgy Grid Implementation – Smart and Efficient
(ENERGISE)
Contact
Daniel Schöllhorn
Tel.: +49 30 756874 412
E-Mail: [email protected]
Matthias Wissner
Tel. + 49 2224 9225 37
E-Mail: [email protected]
21
30.04.2016
ICT-based ENERgy Grid Implementation – Smart and Efficient
(ENERGISE)
Back
Back Up
Up
Reasons for dedicated and shared infrastructure
Top 5 – Reasons for dedicated infrastructure
Communications providers
DSOs
Criticality of infrastructure
Criticality of infrastructure
Data security
Data security
Existing (own) communications
infrastructure
Clear liability and responsibility
Clear liability and responsibility
Existing (own) communications infrastructure
Concentration on core business
n=79
23
03.03.2016
Faster implementation of new services/solutions
n=51
ICT-based ENERgy Grid Implementation – Smart and Efficient
(ENERGISE)
Reasons for dedicated and shared infrastructure
Top 5 – Reasons for shared infrastructure
Communications providers
DSOs
Better utilization of existing infrastructure
Synergy effects during operation
Financial pressure for cost savings
Faster implementation of new services/solutions
Synergy effects during infrastructure
deployment
n=79
24
03.03.2016
Better utilization of existing
infrastructure
Synergy effects during operation
Synergy effects during infrastructure
deployment
Financial pressure for cost savings
New revenue options
n=51
ICT-based ENERgy Grid Implementation – Smart and Efficient
(ENERGISE)
Reasons and Hurdles for co-operation for DSOs and telecoms
Top 5 - Reasons for co-operation
DSOs
Communications providers
Faster implementation of new
services/solutions
Synergy effects during infrastructure
deployment
Financial pressure for cost savings
Synergy effects during operation
Increased customer access
n=79
25
03.03.2016
Faster Implementation of
new services / solutions
Strategic strengthening of the
market position (be prepared for new
markets and competitors)
Synergy effects during infrastructure
deployment
Financial pressure for cost savings
Synergy effects during operation
n=51
ICT-based ENERgy Grid Implementation – Smart and Efficient
(ENERGISE)
Reasons and Hurdles for co-operation for DSOs and telecoms
Top 5 - Hurdles for co-operation
DSOs
Communications providers
Unclear regulatory responsibilities
Difficult liability and responsibility
(data security / data protection)
Dependency on cooperation partner
Different standards for energy and
telecommunication demands
n=79
03.03.2016
Unclear market design
Different standards for energy and
telecommunication demands
Difficult liability and responsibility
(data security / data protection)
Higher complexity in
ownership structure
Unclear market design
26
Unclear regulatory
responsibilities
n=51
ICT-based ENERgy Grid Implementation – Smart and Efficient
(ENERGISE)
Overall Reasons and Hurdles for co-operation
Hurdles for cooperation
Reasons for cooperation
Unclear regulatory responsibilities
Faster Implementation of new
services / solutions
Unclear market design
Different standards for energy and telecommunication
demands
Difficult liability and responsibility
(data security / data protection)
Dependency on cooperation partner
Higher complexity in ownership structure
Higher complexity in approval procedures for new
infrastructure
Different lengths of technology lifecycles
Higher technical complexity
Existing competitive environment
Technology availability
Other
27
03.03.2016
Synergy effects during infrastructure deployment
Financial pressure for cost savings
Synergy effects during operation
Strategic strengthening of the market position
(be prepared for new markets and competitors)
Better access to existing know-how
Possible synergies in approval procedures for new
infrastructure
Increased customer access
Generate new revenues
Political demand for more cooperation
Other
n=294
ICT-based ENERgy Grid Implementation – Smart and Efficient
(ENERGISE)