ATTACHMENT E
SPECIAL STATUS AMPHIBIAN REPORT
October 4, 2013
(Revised February 4, 2014)
Mr. David Rydman, P.E.
Carollo Engineers, Inc.
199 South Los Robles Avenue, Suite 530
Pasadena, California 91101
Subject:
VIA EMAIL AND MAIL
[email protected]
Results of the 2013 Amphibian Surveys for the Arroyo Seco Canyon Project in
Pasadena, Los Angeles County, California
Dear Mr. Rydman:
This Letter Report presents the results of focused surveys to determine the presence or absence of
special status amphibian species, including the arroyo toad (Anaxyrus californicus) and California
red-legged frog (Rana draytonii), on the Arroyo Seco Canyon Project Site (hereinafter referred to
as the “Project Site”). A Biologist with the necessary experience conducted the surveys according
to U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) protocol for these species.
The Arroyo Seco Canyon Project will increase the utilization of surface water rights held by the
City of Pasadena Water and Power Department (PWP) and the Lincoln Avenue Water Company
(LAWC) by restoring and improving the intake facilities; modifying the existing sediment
removal mechanism; naturalizing the Arroyo Seco streambed; and expanding recharge
operations by creating additional spreading basins. In addition, the project is planned to include a
new public restroom facility with recreational and educational amenities near the Headworks
structure, as well as a new reduced size parking lot at the existing Jet Propulsion Laboratory
(JPL) parking site for those using the Arroyo Seco Canyon and Hahamongna Watershed Park
area. The Project Site is in the City of Pasadena and is located on the U.S. Geological Survey’s
(USGS’) Pasadena 7.5-minute quadrangle map (Exhibit 1).
SPECIES BACKGROUND
Arroyo Toad
The USFWS listed the arroyo toad as a federally Endangered species on December 16, 1994, and
is considered a California Species of Special Concern (USFWS 1994; CDFW 2013). At the time
of listing, the arroyo toad (Anaxyrus californicus) was considered a subspecies of Bufo
microscaphus occurring in Southern California and Arizona, until genetic studies (Gergus 1998)
separated the arroyo toad (B. californicus) from the Arizona toad (B. microscaphus). Recent
research (Frost et al. 2006) places both species in the genus Anaxyrus.
Mr. David Rydman, P.E.
Page 2 of 13
October 4, 2013
(Revised February 4, 2014)
Arroyo Seco Canyon Project
This rather uniformly warty, stocky toad has a light-colored stripe across the head between and
including the eyelids. The parotid glands are oval-shaped, widely separated, and pale toward the
front. The underside of the arroyo toad is usually buff-colored and unspotted, and the cranial
crests are absent or weak. Reproductive adult toads typically range from 2 to 2.6 inches snout to
vent length (svl) for males and 2.6 to 3.1 inches svl for females (Sweet 1992, 1993).Tadpoles
reach an average maximum length of 1.3 inches (maximum record of 1.6 inches) and are black in
coloration at hatching, developing tan dorsum and crossbars on the tail and an opaque, white
venter before metamorphosing (Sweet 1992).
Early descriptions of the habitat requirements for the arroyo toad are based on detailed life
history studies conducted over a period of years by Dr. Samuel Sweet (1992, 1993). Much of that
work was conducted in the Los Padres National Forest in Santa Barbara County. Subsequent to
this work, additional studies of populations in other portions of the range have resulted in a
somewhat broader habitat description (e.g., Griffin et al. 1999; Ramirez 1999, 2000, 2001,
2002a, 2002b, 2002c). It can generally be said that the arroyo toad frequents third order washes,
streams, and arroyos in semiarid parts of the southwest; however, they are also found in first or
second order headwaters to third order water courses. Stream substrates range from sands to
small cobble, with sandy banks supporting mule fat (Baccharis salicifolia), willows (Salix spp.),
cottonwoods (Populus spp.), and/or sycamores (Platanus racemosa. The arroyo toad breeds both
within streams and in small backwater pools that form along the stream margins, usually in
relatively shallow water (ten centimeters or four inches) with sand or gravel substrate.
Arroyo toads are nocturnal and will move extensively in upland habitats and seasonally. Adult
males will sometimes travel 1.2 to 1.9 miles along a stream course, often becoming more
sedentary once reaching a large size (Sweet 1992). Females are more sedentary, typically
maintaining an area of movement less than 330 feet in diameter (Sweet 1992). Adults feed
primarily on ants, particularly nocturnal, trail-forming tree ants (Liometopum occidentale), but
will also consume other invertebrates (Sweet 1992). Tadpoles are substrate gleaners, feeding on
detritus and microbial mats from just beneath the surface layer of fine sediments or within the
interstices of gravel deposits (Sweet 1992).
During the breeding season, typically from February to July, males will make advertisement
vocalizations above water from shallow areas along the creek margins. The advertisement call is
a whistling trill that lasts from 4 to 9 seconds in duration and is audible up to 300 meters under
ideal conditions (Gergus et al. 1997). Egg strings of 2,000 to 10,000 eggs are deposited in
shallow water (less than 4 inches in depth) on fine sediment with very low current and hatch
4 to 6 days later (Sweet 1992). Larval stage length ranges from 65 to 80 days post-hatching
(Sweet 1992).
On February 7, 2001, the USFWS published a final rule designating 182,360 acres of land in
Monterey, Santa Barbara, Ventura, Los Angeles, San Bernardino, Riverside, Orange, and
San Diego counties, California as critical habitat for the arroyo toad (USFWS 2001). Following
the designation of critical habitat, several lawsuits were filed challenging various aspects of the
designation. In response to these lawsuits, the critical habitat designation was vacated and the
USFWS was instructed by the court to re-evaluate its previous position.
Mr. David Rydman, P.E.
Page 3 of 13
October 4, 2013
(Revised February 4, 2014)
Arroyo Seco Canyon Project
On April 13, 2005, the USFWS published a final rule designating 11,695 acres of critical habitat
for the arroyo toad in portions of Santa Barbara, Ventura, Los Angeles, Riverside, and
San Bernardino Counties, California (USFWS 2005a). The final critical habitat designation
reflects the exclusion of 13 units totaling 67,584 acres based solely on economic considerations.
These units are located in Santa Barbara, Ventura, Los Angeles, Orange, Riverside,
San Bernardino, and San Diego Counties. Portions of two other units in Orange and San Diego
Counties were excluded from critical habitat based on economic considerations and a
combination of other factors. All proposed critical habitat in Monterey, Orange, and San Diego
Counties was excluded in the final rule.
Following a challenge of the 2005 critical habitat designation by the Centers for Biological
Diversity (CBD) on December 19, 2007, a settlement agreement was reached in which the
USFWS reconsidered the designation. The revised critical habitat designation was published in
the Federal Register on February 9, 2011, and included 98,366 acres in Santa Barbara, Ventura,
Los Angeles, San Bernardino, Riverside, Orange, and San Diego Counties, California.
The project site is not within critical habitat but is located approximately 7 miles south of Unit 7,
which is within Big Tujunga Creek above Big Tujunga Reservoir. Unit 7 encompasses:
(1) approximately 8 miles of upper Big Tujunga Creek from immediately above Big Tujunga
Reservoir upstream to 1.2 miles above the confluence with Alder Creek; (2) approximately
3.7 miles of Mill Creek from the Monte Cristo Creek confluence downstream to Big Tujunga
Creek; and (3) 1.9 miles of Alder Creek from the Mule Fork confluence downstream to Big
Tujunga Creek. The closest known population for this species is within Unit 7 immediately
upstream of Big Tujunga Reservoir approximately 7 miles north of the project site.
California Red-Legged Frog
The USFWS listed the California red-legged frog as an Endangered species on May 23, 1996,
and is considered a California Species of Special Concern. This species has been extirpated from
approximately 70 percent of its historic range (USFWS 2006). At the time of listing, the
red-legged frog (Rana aurora) was comprised of two subspecies, the California red-legged frog
(R. aurora draytonii) and the northern red-legged frog (R. aurora aurora) until genetic studies
(Shaffer et al. 2004) determined that R. aurora is actually two separate species, northern
red-legged frog (R. aurora) and California red-legged frog (R. draytonii). The ranges of these
two species overlap in Mendocino County. Only the California red-legged frog (R. draytonii)
occurs in the project region.
The California red-legged frog ranges in size from 1.5 to 5.5 inches svl, making it the largest
native frog in the Western United States (Wright and Wright 1949). Adult females are
significantly longer than males, with an average svl of 5.4 inches versus 4.5 inches for adult
males (Hayes and Miyamoto 1984). The hind legs and lower abdomen of adult frogs are often
characterized by a reddish or salmon pink color, and the back is brown, gray, olive, or reddish
brown, marked with small black flecks and larger irregular dark blotches (USFWS 2002a;
Stebbins 2003). Dorsal spots often have light centers, and in some individuals form a network of
black lines (Stebbins 2003). Dorsolateral folds are prominent. Tadpoles range in length from
14 to 80 millimeters, and are a dark brown or olive, marked with darker spots (Storer 1925).
Mr. David Rydman, P.E.
Page 4 of 13
October 4, 2013
(Revised February 4, 2014)
Arroyo Seco Canyon Project
This species is found in humid forests, woodlands, grasslands, streams, wetlands, ponds, and
lakes from sea level to 8,000 feet above mean sea level (msl)(Stebbins 2003). Preferred breeding
habitat includes deep ponds and slow-moving streams where emergent vegetation is found on the
bank edges (Jennings and Hayes 1994). Although primarily aquatic, it has been recorded in damp
terrestrial places up to 302 feet from water for up to 50 consecutive days (Tatarian 2008) and
using small mammal burrows and moist leaf litter as refugia during dry periods (Jennings and
Hayes 1994b).
California red-legged frog adults tend to be primarily nocturnal, while juveniles can be active at
any time of day (Hayes and Tennant 1985). Adults feed on a wide range of prey, having been
recorded feeding on at least 42 different taxa in a single study (Hayes and Tennant 1985), the
majority of which were terrestrial invertebrates, but also included fish, other amphibians, and
small rodents. The diet of red-legged tadpoles has not been studied, but is expected to be similar
to other ranid frogs that feed on algae, diatoms, and detritus by grazing the surface of rocks and
vegetation (Kupferberg 1997).
During the breeding season, typically from November through April, males call to females from
the margins of ponds and slow streams (Jennings and Hayes 1994a). Unlike northern red-legged
frogs, which lack vocal sacs and call underwater, California red-legged frogs have paired vocal
sacs and call above the water surface (Hayes and Krempels 1986), though vocalizations are
relatively weak and difficult to detect. Actual mating most commonly occurs in March, but can
vary depending on seasonal climatic patterns. The female lays a jellylike mass of 2,000 to
5,000 reddish brown eggs attached to emergent vegetation, twigs, or other structures in still or
slow moving water. The resulting tadpoles typically require about 3 weeks to hatch, and another
11 to 20 weeks to metamorphose into juvenile frogs. Metamorphosis typically occurs from July
to September, although some tadpoles have been observed to delay metamorphosis until the
following March or April (Bobzien et al. 2000; Fellers et al. 2001). Male red-legged frogs
typically reach sexual maturity two years from metamorphosis whereas females reach sexual
maturity three years from metamorphosis (Jennings and Hayes 1985).
On April 13, 2006, the USFWS reissued the final Critical Habitat designation for the California
red-legged frog, greatly reducing the approximate 4.1 million acres which had previously been
proposed in 2000 (USFWS 2000) and designated in 2001. The 2006 Critical Habitat designation
included approximately 450,288 acres located in Alameda, Butte, Contra Costa, El Dorado,
Kern, Los Angeles, Marin, Merced, Monterey, Napa, Nevada, San Benito, San Luis Obispo,
San Mateo, Santa Barbara, Santa Clara, Santa Cruz, Solano, Ventura, and Yuba Counties,
California. However, the USFWS reviewed the 2006 Critical Habitat designation in response to
questions raised about the integrity of the scientific information used for this designation and its
consistency with appropriate legal standards. On September 16, 2008, the USFWS proposed to
revise the Critical Habitat boundaries to better reflect lands containing essential features for this
species, designating approximately 1,804,856 acres of critical habitat in 28 California counties
with the addition of units in Calaveras, Kings, southern Mendocino, Placer, Riverside,
San Joaquin, Sonoma, and Stanislaus Counties, resulting in an increase of approximately
1,354,577 acres (USFWS 2008). Based on public response received during the comment period,
the USFWS published a final rule on March 17, 2011, designating approximately 1,636,609
acres of habitat in 27 California counties, excluding Riverside County from the final Critical
Mr. David Rydman, P.E.
Page 5 of 13
October 4, 2013
(Revised February 4, 2014)
Arroyo Seco Canyon Project
Habitat designation. The survey area is not located within designated Critical Habitat for this
species.
The California red-legged frog occurred historically in the Big Tujunga Creek above Big
Tujunga Dam and in several other drainages in the San Gabriel Mountains, but it had not been
observed in the San Gabriel Mountains since the mid-1980s. In fact, this species was considered
extirpated from the entire Angeles National Forest (ANF) until small populations were
rediscovered in San Francisquito Creek (Stephenson and Calcarone 1999) and in Aliso Creek
near its confluence with Gleason Canyon (USFS 2009). The Aliso Creek population is the
closest known for this species and is located approximately 15 miles northwest of the project
site.
STUDY AREA
The approximate 2.5-mile Survey Area for special-status amphibian species includes Arroyo
Seco from the Devil’s Gate Dam upstream to Agua Canyon down-slope of the Arroyo Gould
Substation. The upper ¾ mile of the survey area is within the ANF and the remaining southern
portion, approximately 1.75 miles in length, is within the City of Pasadena in Los Angeles
County. The Study Area is represented on Sections 5, 31, and 32 of U.S. Geological Survey’s
(USGS’) Pasadena 7.5-minute quadrangle map (Exhibit 1) at Township 1 North and Range 12
West with elevations ranging from 1,000 to 1,445 feet above msl. The upstream portion of the
survey area in the ANF is primarily open space with few privately owned cabins. Land uses to
the east and west of the ANF boundary include residential; research facilities (the NASA Jet
Propulsion Laboratory); and recreational land uses, including the La Cañada Flintridge Country
Club. This Survey Area is intended to capture potential habitat for special status amphibians
throughout the Project boundaries which consist four discrete areas that include (from north to
south): Area 1, the Arroyo Seco Headworks; Area 2, the Arroyo Seco Intake; Area 3, the JPL
East Parking Lot; and the Temporary Staging Site between Areas 2 and 3; (Exhibit 2).
Arroyo Seco is characterized by very steep slopes, shallow soils, and watercourses contained
within bedrock channels. Erosion has deposited alluvium, including large boulders, eroded rocks,
cobbles, gravels, and coarse to fine sandy soils within the stream course, forming a braided
alluvial wash that is the predominant geologic feature of the upper study area within the ANF
and lower study area in the Hahamonga Watershed Park. Stream morphology is predominantly
riffle with scattered pools. Water flow is perennial, but during drought and/or dry summer
months drops below the surface in areas with deeper alluvial deposits, particularly Hahamonga
Watershed Park.
Vegetation in the survey area consists mainly of willow riparian forest dominated by arroyo
willow (Salix lasiolepis) and red willow (Salix laevigata); however, in some areas it is
co-dominated by white alder (Alnus rhombifolia) and Fremont cottonwood (Populus fremontii
ssp. fremontii). Other common species present include mule fat (Baccharis salicifolia) and
mugwort (Artemisia douglasiana). Coast live oaks (Quercus agrifolia) and western sycamores
(Platanus racemosa) are also present.
Mr. David Rydman, P.E.
Page 6 of 13
October 4, 2013
(Revised February 4, 2014)
Arroyo Seco Canyon Project
SURVEY METHODOLOGY
Prior to conducting the focused surveys, a search of the most recent California Natural Diversity
Data Base (CDFW 2013) and other relevant available documents (Jennings and Hayes 1994a,
1994b; Campbell et al. 1996; USFWS 2002a, 2002b, 2006, 2008, 2009, 2011) was conducted to
determine if and to what extent the California red-legged frog and arroyo toad occur in the
project vicinity.
Surveys were conducted by Sam Stewart, with assistance from Sarah Thomas, Jason Mintzer,
Jonas Winbolt, and Nathan Moffatt. Surveys were completed in accordance with the red-legged
frog protocol and the arroyo toad protocol established by the USFWS (USFWS 1999, 2005b).
Surveyor qualifications are presented in Attachment A of this Letter Report. California
red-legged frog survey data sheets are provided in Attachment B.
Mr. Stewart was the principal investigator and was present during all surveys. A total of eight
surveys were conducted between January 1 and September 30, 2013, including two diurnal and
two nocturnal surveys during the breeding season and best egg survey period (i.e., between
February 25 and April 30), as specified by the California red-legged frog protocol for the
Southern California region and two surveys (1 diurnal/1 nocturnal) during the non-breeding
season (i.e., between July 1 and September 30). In accordance with the arroyo toad protocol, six
surveys were completed between March 15 and July 30, each with a diurnal and nocturnal
component, with at least one survey occurring in each month of April, May, and June.
Because surveys for these species were conducted concurrently, the timing of the surveys was
scheduled to accommodate the activity patterns of both species. Diurnal surveys were conducted
from 3 PM to dusk and nocturnal surveys were conducted from one hour after dusk to 1 AM.
Surveys focused on the detection of frogs/toads by visually identifying species; listening for the
advertising call of adult males; and checking potentially suitable breeding habitat for tadpoles
and/or eggs. Survey biologists scanned pools for eggs, larvae, juveniles, amplexing pairs, or
vocalizing adults in potentially suitable breeding locations along the stream, and for foraging
individuals in the adjacent riparian and upland areas. Egg masses and strings, and/or larvae
observed during surveys were identified to species in the field. Headlamps (Black Diamond Icon
– 100 lumens), flashlights (Surefire E2L Outdoorsman – 60 lumens), and binoculars (Pentax
DCF SP 8x42) were used to visually identify toads, frogs, and their larvae detected at night.
Nocturnal surveys were conducted during appropriate environmental conditions conducive to the
activity patterns for the red-legged frog and arroyo toad. Generally, these conditions are
nighttime temperatures greater than 50 degrees Fahrenheit (°F), with low winds (less than 10
miles per hour), and avoiding nights with a full or nearly full moon. If the preferred
environmental conditions were not met, surveys were conducted under conditions that were
determined to be the most favorable for the species. Survey dates, times, and weather data are
shown in Table 1.
Mr. David Rydman, P.E.
Page 7 of 13
October 4, 2013
(Revised February 4, 2014)
Arroyo Seco Canyon Project
TABLE 1
SUMMARY OF AMPHIBIAN SURVEY CONDITIONS*
Wind
(miles/hour)
Survey
Surveying Biologists
Survey Date
Start
Relative
Humidity
(%)
Temperature
(°F)
End
Start
End
Start
End
Cloud
Cover
(%)
1
S. Stewart, S. Thomas
4/3/2013
4–7
0–2
76
54
49
80
Clear
2
S. Stewart, J. Mintzer
4/17/2013
5–10
6–10
70
58
16
28
Clear
3
S. Stewart, J. Winbolt
5/3/2013
2–5
0–1
88
63
6
19
30
4
S. Stewart, J. Mintzer
5/16/2013
1–5
Calm
70
55
60
83
50
5
S. Stewart, J. Mintzer
6/13/2013
3–5
Calm
78
58
44
78
Clear
6
S. Stewart, J. Mintzer
6/20/2013
2–5
Calm
78
61
45
56
Clear
7
S. Stewart, N. Moffatt
7/9/2013
0–2
0–1
88
69
37
70
Clear
°F: degrees Fahrenheit
*
All measurements taken with a Kestrel 3500 weather meter
SURVEY RESULTS
No red-legged frogs or arroyo toads were observed during the focused amphibian surveys.
Native amphibian species observed during surveys include Coast Range newt (Taricha torosa
torosa), western toad (Anaxyrus boreas), California chorus frog (Pseudacris cadaverina), and
Pacific chorus frog (Pseudacris regilla). A list of all wildlife species observed within the survey
area is included in Attachment C to this Letter Report. Special status species encountered during
focused surveys are presented in Table 2.
TABLE 2
SPECIAL STATUS SPECIES
ENCOUNTERED DURING SURVEYS
Status
Scientific Name
Common Name
USFWS
USFS
CDFW
Coast Range newt
–
S
SSC
two-striped garter snake
–
S
SSC
Amphibians
Taricha torosa torosa
Reptiles
Thamnophis hammondii
USFWS: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service; USFS: U.S. Forest Service; CDFW: California
Department of Fish and Wildlife
Federal (USFWS, USFS) Designations
S
Listed by the U.S. Forest Service as “Sensitive”
State (CDFW) Designations
SSC Species of Special Concern
Other non-native aquatic fauna observed during surveys include American bullfrog (Lithobates
catesbeiana) and red-eared slider (Trachemys scripta).These observations were few in number,
indicating that these species are not well established in the study area. However, the
Mr. David Rydman, P.E.
Page 8 of 13
October 4, 2013
(Revised February 4, 2014)
Arroyo Seco Canyon Project
documented presence of multiple non-native aquatic species represents a decline in habitat
quality for native species.
BonTerra Consulting has appreciated the opportunity to assist with this project. Please contact
Marc Blain or Sam Stewart at (626) 351-2000 if you have questions or comments.
Sincerely,
BonTerra Psomas
Marc T. Blain
Associate, Biological Resources Manager
Enclosures:
Samuel C. Stewart, IV
Project Manager
Exhibits 1 and 2
Attachment A – Surveyor Qualifications
Attachment B – California Red-legged Frog Survey Data Sheets
Attachment C – Wildlife Compendium
R:\PAS\Projects\Carollo\J041\ARTO CRF Report-020314.doc
REFERENCES
Bobzien, S., J.E. DiDonato, P.J. Alexander. 2000. Status of the California Red-Legged Frog in
the East Bay Regional Park District, California. Oakland, CA:
California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW). 2013. California Natural Diversity Database.
Records of occurrence for the USGS Pasadena 7.5-minute quadrangle map.
Sacramento, CA: CDFW, Natural Heritage Division.
California Department of Fish and Game (CDFG). 2008. Life History Account for the Sierra
Madre Yellow-legged Frog (Publication No. A044). Sacramento, CA: California
Interagency Wildlife Task Group.
Campbell, L., T. Graham, L. Thibault, and P. Stine. 1996. The Arroyo Toad (Bufo microscaphus
californicus), Ecology, Threats, Recovery Actions, and Research Needs (Technical
Report NBS/CSC-96-01 for the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Ventura Field Office).
Davis, CA: U.S. Department of the Interior, National Biological Service, California
Science Center.
Center for Biological Diversity (CBD). 2013 (Last accessed September). Critical Habitat
Lawsuit
Settlement
Agreement
(Case
No.
07-cv-02380).
http://www.biologicaldiversity.org/species/amphibians/arroyo_toad/pdfs/SettlementAgreement_6-4-08.pdf
Mr. David Rydman, P.E.
Page 9 of 13
October 4, 2013
(Revised February 4, 2014)
Arroyo Seco Canyon Project
Dickman, M. 1968. The Effect of Grazing by Tadpoles on the Structure of a Periphyton
Community. Ecology 49:1188–1190. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell Scientific Publications,
Inc.
Fellers, G.M., A. Launer, G.B. Rathbun, S. Bobzien, J. Alvarez, D. Sterner, R.B. Seymour, and
M. Westphal. 2001. Overwintering Tadpoles in the California Red-Legged Rrog (Rana
aurora draytonii). Herpetological Review 32(3):156–157. Salt Lake City, UT: Society for
the Study of Amphibians and Reptiles.
Frost, D.R., T. Grant, J. Faivovich, R.H. Bain, A. Haas, C.F.B. Haddad, R.O. de Sá, A.
Channing, M. Wilkinson, S.C. Donnellan, C.J. Raxworthy, J.A. Campbell, B.L. Blotto, P.
Moler, R.C. Drewes, R.A. Nussbaum, J.D. Lynch, D.M. Green, and W.C. Wheeler. 2006.
The Amphibian Tree of Life. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History 297:1–
370. New York, NY: American Museum of Natural History.
Gergus, E.W.A., B.K. Sullivan, and K.B. Malmos. 1997. Call Variation in the Bufo microscaphus
Complex: Implications for Species Boundaries and the Evolution of Mate Recognition.
Ethology 103:979–989. Maldon, MA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Gergus, E.W.A. 1998. Systematics of the Bufo microscaphus complex: allozyme evidence.
Herpetologica 54:317–325. Salt Lake City, UT: Society for the Study of Amphibians and
Reptiles.
Griffin, P.C., T. Case, and R. Fisher. 1999. Radio Telemetry Study of Bufo californicus, Arroyo
Toad Movement Patterns and Habitat Preferences (Contract Report to the California
Department of Transportation Southern Biology Pool).
Hayes, M.P. and D.M. Kremples. 1986. Vocal Sac Variation among Frogs of the Genus Rana
(Anura: Ranidae) from Western North America. Copeia 1986:927–936. Miami, FL:
American Society of Ichthyologists and Herpetologists.
Hayes, M.P. and Miyamoto, M.M. 1984. Biochemical, Behavioral and Body Size Difference
between Rana aurora aurora and R. a. draytonii. Copeia 1984(4): 1018–1022. Miami,
FL: American Society of Ichthyologists and Herpetologists.
Hayes, M.P. and Tennant, M.R. 1985. Diet and Feeding Behavior of the California Red-Legged
Frog, Rana aurora draytonii (Ranidae). Southwestern Naturalist 30(4): 601–605.
Washington, D.C.: BioOne for Southwestern Association of Naturalists.
Heller, C.L. 1960. The Sierra Yellow-legged Frog. Yosemite Nature Notes 39:126–128.
Yosemite, CA: National Park Service.
Jennings, M.R. and M.P. Hayes. 1994a. Amphibian and Reptile Species of Special Concern in
California (Contract No. 8023). Sacramento, CA: CDFG, Inland Fisheries Division.
———. 1994b. Decline of Native Ranid Frogs in the Desert Southwest. In Herpetology of the
North American deserts: Proceedings of a Symposium (P.R. Brown and J.W. Wright,
Eds.). Southwestern Herpetologists Society Special Publication No. 5. Van Nuys, CA:
Southwestern Herpetologists Society.
Mr. David Rydman, P.E.
Page 10 of 13
October 4, 2013
(Revised February 4, 2014)
Arroyo Seco Canyon Project
———. 1985. Pre-1900 overharvest of the California red-legged frog (Rana aurora draytonii):
the inducement for bullfrog (Rana catesbeiana) introduction. Herpetologica 41:94–103.
Knapp, R.A., D.M. Boiano, V.T. Vredenburg. 2007 (February). Removal of nonnative fish results
in population expansion of a declining amphibian (mountain yellow-legged frog, Rana
muscosa). Biological Conservation 135(1):11–20. Cambridge, MA: Elsevier.
Kupferberg, S.J. 1997. The Role of Larval Diet in Anuran Metamorphosis. American Zoologist
37:146–159. Washington, D.C.: BioOne for the Society for Integrative and Comparative
Biolgy.
Lannoo, M. 2005. Amphibian Declines: The Conservation Status of United States Species.
Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Livezey, R.L. and A.H. Wright. 1945. Descriptions of Four Salientian Eggs. The American
Midland Naturalist. 34:701–706. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame.
Mullally, D.P. 1953. Observations on the Ecology of the Toad Bufo canorus. Copeia 1953:182–
183. Miami, FL: American Society of Ichthyologists and Herpetologists.
Ramirez, Jr., R.S. 2002a. Arroyo Toad (Bufo californicus) Radio Telemetry Study, Little Rock
Creek, Los Angeles County, California (Final Unpublished report). Arcadia, CA: USDA
Forest Service, Angeles National Forest.
———. 2002b. Arroyo Toad (Bufo californicus) Radio Telemetry, San Juan Creek,
Orange/Riverside Counties, California (Interim Unpublished report). Rancho Bernardo,
CA: USDA Forest Service, Cleveland National Forest.
———. 2002c. Arroyo Toad (Bufo californicus) Radio Telemetry & Pitfall Trapping Studies, Little
Horsethief Canyon, Summit Valley Ranch, San Bernardino County, California (Final
Unpublished Report). San Bernardino, CA: California Department of Transportation,
District 8.
———. 2001. Arroyo Toad (Bufo californicus) Radio Telemetry Study, Little Rock Creek, Los
Angeles County, California (Iterim Unpublished Report 2). Arcadia, CA: USDA Forest
Service, Angeles National Forest.
———. 2000. Arroyo Toad (Bufo californicus) Radio Telemetry Study, Little Rock Creek, Los
Angeles County, California (Iterim Unpublished Report). Arcadia, CA: USDA Forest
Service, Angeles National Forest.Ramirez, Jr., R.S. 1999. Results of Focused California
Red-legged Frog Surveys at Ahmanson Ranch, Ventura County, California.
San Diego Zoo. 2009. Mountain Yellow-Legged Frog Hopping for Survival. Zoo Newsletter.
http://www.sandiegozoo.org/conservation.
Mr. David Rydman, P.E.
Page 11 of 13
October 4, 2013
(Revised February 4, 2014)
Arroyo Seco Canyon Project
Shaffer, H.B., G.M. Fellers, S. R. Voss, J.C. Oliver, and G.B. Pauly. 2004. Species Boundaries,
Phylogeography and Conservation Genetics of the Red-legged Frog (Rana
aurora/draytonii) Complex. Molecular Ecology 13:2667–2677. Boston, MA: Blackwell
Publishing Ltd.
Stebbins, R.C. 2003. A Field Guide to Western Reptiles and Amphibians (3rd ed.). Boston, MA:
Houghton-Mifflin Company.
Stephenson, J.R. and G.M. Calcarone. 1999. Southern California Mountains and Foothills
Assessment: Habitat and Species Conservation Issues (General Technical Report GTRPSW-175). Albany, CA: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific
Southwest Research Station.
Storer, T.I. 1925. A Synopsis of the Amphibia of California. University of California Publications
in Zoology 27: 1–342. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Sweet, S.S. 1993. Second Report on the Biology and Status of the Arroyo Toad (Bufo
microscaphus californicus), on the Los Padres National Forest of Southern California
(Report to United States Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Los Padres National
Forest, Goleta, California). Goleta, CA: USDA.
———. 1992. Ecology and Status of the Arroyo Toad (Bufo microscaphus californicus) on the
Los Padres National Forest of Southern California, with Management Recommendations
(Contract report to United States Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Los Padres
National Forest). Goleta, CA: USDA.
Tatarian, P.J. 2008. Movement Patterns of California Red-Legged Frogs (Rana draytonii) in an
Inland California Environment. Herpetological Conservation and Biology 3:155–169.
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 2011 (February 9). Endangered and Threatened
Wildlife and Plants; Revised Critical Habitat for the Arroyo Toad; Final Rule. Federal
Register 76(27): 7245–7467. Washington, D.C.: USFWS.
———. 2009 (October 13). Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Revised Critical
Habitat for the Arroyo Toad (Anaxyrus californicus); Proposed Rule. Federal Register
74(196): 52611–52664. Washington, D.C.: USFWS.
———. 2008. Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Revised Critical Habitat for the
California Red-Legged Frog (Rana aurora draytonii). Federal Register 73(180): 53491–
53680. Washington, D.C.: USFWS.
———. 2006a (September 14). Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Designation of
Critical Habitat for the Southern California Distinct Vertebrate Population Segment of the
Mountain Yellow-Legged Frog (Rana muscosa); Proposed Rules. Federal Register
71(178): 54344–54386. Washington, D.C.: USFWS.
———. 2006b. Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Designation of Critical Habitat
for the California Red-legged Frog, and Special Rule Exemption Associated with Final
Listing for Existing Routine Ranching Activities; Final Rule. Federal Register 71(71):
19243–19346. Washington, D.C.: USFWS.
Mr. David Rydman, P.E.
Page 12 of 13
October 4, 2013
(Revised February 4, 2014)
Arroyo Seco Canyon Project
———. 2005a (September 13). Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Proposed
Designation of Critical Habitat for the Southern California Distinct Vertebrate Population
Segment of the Mountain Yellow-Legged Frog (Rana muscosa); Proposed Rules.
Federal Register 70(176): 54106–54143. Washington, D.C.: USFWS.
———. 2005b (August). Revised Guidance on Site Assessment and Field Surveys for the
California Red-legged frog. Portland, OR: USFWS.
———. 2004 (April 28). Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Proposed Designation
of Critical Habitat for the Arroyo Toad (Bufo californicus); Proposed Rule. Federal
Register 69(82): 23253–23328. Washington, D.C.: USFWS.
———. 2002a. Recovery Plan for the California Red-legged Frog (Rana aurora draytonii).
Portland, OR: USFWS.
———. 2002b (July 2). Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Determination of
Endangered Status for the Southern California Distinct Vertebrate Population Segment
of the Mountain Yellow-Legged Frog (Rana muscosa); Rules and Regulations. Federal
Register Vol. 67(127): 44382–44392. Washington, D.C.: USFWS.
———. 2001 (February 7). Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Final Designation
of Critical Habitat for the Arroyo Toad; Final Rule. Federal Register 66 (26): 9414–9474.
Washington, D.C.: USFWS.
———. 2000. Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Proposed Designation of Critical
Habitat for the California Red-Legged Frog (Rana aurora draytonii); Proposed Rule.
Federal Register 65(176): 54891–54932. Washington, D.C.: USFWS.
———. 1999. Survey Protocol for the Arroyo Toad. Ventura, CA: USFWS.
———. 1996. Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants: Determination of Threatened
Status for the California Red-legged Frog: Final Rule. Federal Register 61(25): 813–833.
Washington, D.C.: USFWS.
———. 1994. Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Determination of Endangered
Status for the Arroyo Southwestern Toad; Final Rule. Federal Register 59(241): 64859–
64866. Washington, D.C.: USFWS.
United States Forest Service (USFS). 2009 (September). Wildlife and Fish Technical Specialist
Report: Burned Area Emergency Rehabilitation for the Station Fire. Arcadia, CA: USFW,
Angeles National Forest Supervisor’s Office,.
http://www.fs.fed.us/r5/angeles/station/BAER/SpecialistReports/WildlifeAssessmentRep
ort_PublicRelease_StationBAER.pdf.
Vredenburg, V.T., R. Bingham, R. Knapp, J.A.T. Morgan, C. Moritz, and D. Wake. 2007.
Concordant Molecular and Phenotypic Data Delineate New Taxonomy and Conservation
Priorities for the Endangered Mountain Yellow-Legged Frog. Journal of Zoology
271:361–374. London, England: Zoological Society of London.
Mr. David Rydman, P.E.
Page 13 of 13
October 4, 2013
(Revised February 4, 2014)
Arroyo Seco Canyon Project
Wright, A. H. and A.A. Wright, A. A. 1949. Handbook of Frogs and Toads of the United States
and Canada. Ithaca, NY: Comstock Publishing Company, Inc..
Zweifel, R.G. 1955. Ecology, Distribution, and Systematics of Frogs of the Rana boylei Group.
University of California Publications in Zoology 54(4):207–292. Berkeley, CA: University
of California Press.
Santa
Clarita
C la r a
er
Riv
A N G E L E S
N A T I O N A L
F O R E S T
118
T
S
§
5̈
Chatsworth
Reservoir
£
¤
101
Project Location
§
¨
210
Van Nuys 170
T
S
Burbank
134
T
S
Pasadena
27
S
T
1
T
S
110
T
S
Santa Monica
West Hollywood
§
¨
§
¨
§
¨
405
110
D:\Projects\Carollo\J041\MXD\Amphibian\ex_RL_USGS.mxd
105
Project Boundary
Focused Survey for Special Status Amphibian Species for the Arroyo Seco Canyon Project
²
0
§
¨
605
§
¨
710
Whittier
Downey
72
S
T
Source: USGS 7.5 Minute Quadrangle
Pasadena, CA
Regional and Local Vicinity
1,000
710
T
S
Los Angeles
10
§
¨
2,000
Altadena
Glendale
Exhibit 1
2,000
Feet
(Rev: 2-04-2014 JAZ) H:\PAS\Projects\Carollo\J041\Graphics\Amphibian\ex1_LV_USGS.pdf
2
R
o
Pr
i
St
Arali
a Rd
a rl i g h t Cr e s t D r
C anyon
Cr es
et
El
1
Area 1
t R
d
d
2
2
1
Ar
2
1
r oy
2
o B
l
vd
1
Area 2
2 4
2
1
1
1
1
2
er Rd
3
Fl
Area 3
or
ec
P i o ne
Temporary Staging Site
ita
Dr
F l o r ec i ta Wa y
Rd
3
Oak G ro
ve Dr
er
Rd
1 - Coast range newt
2 - two-striped garter
ing
Ma
Rd
Survey Areas
Focused Survey for Special Status Amphibian Species for the Arroyo Seco Canyon Project
²
600
300
0
e
as
Vik
Dr
Av
S u r v ey o r R d
4 - red-eared slider
ena
600
Feet
rip
sit
3 - bullfrog
ad
ge
vie
R o ad C
Alt
os
a S
t
Ca
Project Boundary
ng
w D
r
Ra
Rid
D:\Projects\Carollo\J041\MXD\Amphibian\ex_SS_aerial.mxd
E x p l o r er
Exhibit 2
(Rev: 2-04-2014 JAZ) H:\PAS\Projects\Carollo\J041\Graphics\Amphibian\ex2_SS_aerial.pdf
ATTACHMENT A
SURVEYOR QUALIFICATIONS
Arroyo Seco Canyon Project
SAM C. STEWART IV – LEAD SURVEYOR
Mr. Sam Stewart has been working in the field of environmental consulting for 15 years
conducting focused surveys for amphibian and reptile species throughout southern California.
Mr. Stewart has observed all life stages of California red-legged frog (Rana draytonii) in the
field in Pescadero Marsh, San Mateo County. Within the Angeles National Forest (ANF) he has
observed all life stages of California red-legged frog in San Francisquito Creek, Aliso Creek, and
Beartrap Creek. Mr. Stewart has observed adult arroyo toad (Anaxyrus californicus) in the Santa
Clara River and all life stages in San Juan Creek. Within the ANF he has observed all life stages
in Big Tujunga Creek, Alder Creek, and Lynx Gulch. Given Mr. Stewart’s field experience with
native and introduced ranids and his familiarity with anuran morphology and anatomy, he is
capable of visually identifying southern California toad and frog species with 100% certainty. He
has surveyed for California red-legged frog in Ventura and Los Angeles counties with positive
results in the Aliso Creek and Beartrap Creek. He has also surveyed for arroyo toad in
Los Angeles, Orange, Riverside, and San Bernardino counties with positive findings in the
Castaic/Santa Clara River area in 2003, San Juan Creek in 2007, 2008, 2009, 2011, and 2012,
and Tujunga Creek, Alder Creek, and Lynx Gulch in 2011, 2012, and 2013.
Mr. Stewart has been lead herpetologist for the Southern California Edison Tehachapi
Renewable Transmission Project since 2010, managing focused surveys in the ANF for arroyo
toad and California red-legged frog. During focused surveys, he has recorded more than
200 observations of red-legged frog in all life stages in Aliso Creek and Beartrap Creek, as well
as more than 200 observations of arroyo toad in all life stages in Tujunga Creek, Alder Creek and
Lynx Gulch. Furthermore, Mr. Stewart is a USFWS-approved arroyo toad and California redlegged frog handler for the TRTP project and has translocated arroyo toad beyond the project
disturbance limits during construction activity.
Mr. Stewart was on-call biological services contractor to Caltrans from 2007 to 2012.
Mr. Stewart and Dr. Mike Robson developed a methodology for additional data collection on the
arroyo toad population found along the 3-mile stretch of San Juan Creek adjacent to the segment
of Ortega Highway undergoing safety improvements. Data collected included a GPS point,
determination of sex, measurement of mass and snout-vent length, and a dorsal/ventral
photographic record of each toad observed. Furthermore, during initial arroyo toad surveys, the
presence of invasive species (bullfrog, African clawed frog, & red swamp crayfish) became
apparent and an invasives control program was proposed and approved by USFWS staff to be
carried out concurrent with focused surveys. Data was collected on over 2,000 reproductive adult
bullfrogs taken from the creek, including sex, mass, snout-vent length (svl), and stomach
contents. Mr. Stewart has been the lead biologist for biological monitoring, focused arroyo toad
surveys, and the invasives control program in the San Juan Creek adjacent to the Ortega
Highway project site from the second half of 2007 to present. The invasives control program
resulted in the successful removal of all life stages of bullfrog from the San Juan Creek within
the Cleveland National Forest (CNF) into downstream areas within Casper’s Regional Park.
Mr. Stewart has handled over 300 adult and subadult arroyo toads, taken 5 years of data on this
population and utilized the photographic data to determine growth rates and movement patterns
within the canyon. Data will be summarized in a comprehensive report that will be submitted to
USFWS and will potentially support proposed articles for publication in scientific journals.
R:\PAS\Projects\Carollo\J041\ARTO CRF Report-020314.doc
A-1
Surveyor Qualifications
Arroyo Seco Canyon Project
Other relevant work experience
Since 2005, Mr. Stewart has served as an on-call biological surveyor for the Los Angeles County
Department of Public Works, conducting constraints analyses and focused surveys for special
status amphibian species, including coast range newt, spadefoot toad, arroyo toad, and Sierra
Madre yellow-legged frog, in storm water basins and soft-bottom channel reaches throughout
Los Angeles County.
From 2005 to 2008, Mr. Stewart conducted amphibian focused surveys, and prepared and
implemented a CDFG approved relocation plan for the western spadefoot, which included the
construction of mitigation pools, relocation of western spadefoot toads and larvae, and long-term
monitoring of spadefoot toad populations at the mitigation pools.
From 2003 to 2006, Mr. Stewart conducted focused surveys for amphibian species, including the
arroyo toad and western spadefoot toad, on an approximately 1,200-acre survey area, including
breeding habitat within 1 kilometer of the project impact boundary and portions of Castaic
Creek. Surveys determined presence of western spadefoot and a mitigation program was
developed to avoid and/or reduce project impacts to the species.
From 2002 to 2004, Mr. Stewart installed and operated reptile and amphibian pitfall trap arrays,
and hand-captured reptile and amphibian species on a project site in Santa Clarita. Sensitive
species on the project site included coastal western whiptail, silvery legless lizard, and western
spadefoot toad. Mr. Stewart developed a protocol, consulted with the local California
Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) office to obtain a Memorandum of Understanding, and
collected and relocated sensitive species from pitfall trap arrays, transporting them to
predetermined appropriate on- and/or off-site habitat.
From 1999 to 2000, Mr. Stewart assisted Robert Goodman with focused surveys, implementation
of a relocation plan, and monitoring of a relocated population of southwestern pond turtle in the
San Gabriel River. Turtles were caught in funnel traps and by hand and moved to a tributary
location above the Cogswell Dam. Some turtles were fitted with telemetry in order to monitor the
population and determine program success. As part of the same project,
Mr. Stewart assisted Dr. Noel Davis with fish and macroinvertebrate sampling (kick-netting,
seining, and electrofishing) at several sampling locations in the San Gabriel River.
Education
B.A., Bachelor of Arts, Social Ecology, University of California, Irvine, CA, 1998
R:\PAS\Projects\Carollo\J041\ARTO CRF Report-020314.doc
A-2
Surveyor Qualifications
ATTACHMENT B
CALIFORNIA RED-LEGGED FROG DATA SHEETS
ATTACHMENT C
WILDLIFE COMPENDIUM
Arroyo Seco Canyon Project
ATTACHMENT C
WILDLIFE COMPENDIUM
SPECIES
Fish
SALMONIDAE – TROUT & SALMON
Oncorhynchus mykiss
rainbow trout
Amphibians
SALAMANDRIDAE – SALAMANDERS
Taricha torosa torosa
coast range newt
BUFONIDAE – TRUE TOADS
Anaxyrus boreas
western toad
HYLIDAE – TREEFROGS
Pseudacris [Hyla] cadaverina
California chorus frog
Pseudacris [Hyla] regilla
Pacific chorus frog
RANIDAE – TRUE FROGS
Rana catesbeiana*
bullfrog
Reptiles
EMYDIDAE – WATER & BOX TURTLES
Trachemys scripta
red-eared slider
PHRYNOSOMATIDAE – ZEBRA-TAILED, FRINGE-TOED,
SPINY, TREE, SIDE-BLOTCHED, AND HORNED LIZARDS
Sceloporus occidentalis
western fence lizard
Uta stansburiana
side-blotched lizard
TEIIDAE – WHIPTAIL LIZARDS
Aspidoscelis [Cnemidophorus] tigris stejnegeri
coastal western whiptail
COLUBRIDAE – COLUBRID SNAKES
Pituophis catenifer
gopher snake
Trimorphodon ocrorhyncha
coast night snake
Thamnophis hammondii
two-striped garter snake
VIPERIDAE – VIPERS
Crotalus oreganus
western rattlesnake
Birds
ANATIDAE – WATERFOWL
Anas platyrhynchos
mallard
ODONTOPHORIDAE – QUAILS
Callipepla californica
California quail
R:\PAS\Projects\Carollo\J041\ARTO CRF Report-020314.doc
C-1
Wildlife Compendium
Arroyo Seco Canyon Project
ATTACHMENT C
WILDLIFE COMPENDIUM
SPECIES
ARDEIDAE – HERONS
Ardea herodias
great blue heron
Ardea alba
great egret
Egretta thula
snowy egret
Butorides virescens
green heron
Nycticorax nycticorax
black-crowned night-heron
ACCIPITRIDAE – HAWKS
Accipiter cooperii
Cooper’s hawk
Buteo lineatus
red-shouldered hawk
Buteo jamaicensis
red-tailed hawk
FALCONIDAE – FALCONS
Falco sparverius
American kestrel
RALLIDAE – RAILS
Fulica americana
American coot
CHARADRIIDAE – PLOVERS
Charadrius vociferus
killdeer
COLUMBIDAE – PIGEONS & DOVES
Zenaida macroura
mourning dove
TYTONIDAE – BARN OWLS
Tyto alba
barn owl
STRIGIDAE – TRUE OWLS
Megascops kennicottii
western screech owl
Bubo virginianus
great horned owl
CAPRIMULGIDAE – GOATSUCKERS
Phalaenoptilus nuttallii
common poorwill
APODIDAE – SWIFTS
Aeronautes saxatalis
white-throated swift
TROCHILIDAE – HUMMINGBIRDS
Archilochus alexandri
black-chinned hummingbird
Calypte anna
Anna's hummingbird
R:\PAS\Projects\Carollo\J041\ARTO CRF Report-020314.doc
C-2
Wildlife Compendium
Arroyo Seco Canyon Project
ATTACHMENT C
WILDLIFE COMPENDIUM
SPECIES
Selasphorus sasin
Allen's hummingbird
PICIDAE – WOODPECKERS
Melanerpes formicivorus
acorn woodpecker
Picoides nuttallii
Nuttall’s woodpecker
Picoides pubescens
downy woodpecker
Colaptes auratus
northern flicker
TYRANNIDAE – TYRANT FLYCATCHERS
Contopus sordidulus
western wood-pewee
Empidonax difficilis
Pacific-slope flycatcher
Sayornis nigricans
black phoebe
Myiarchus cinerascens
ash-throated flycatcher
Tyrannus vociferans
Cassin’s kingbird
Tyrannus verticalis
western kingbird
VIREONIDAE – VIREOS
Vireo gilvus
warbling vireo
CORVIDAE – JAYS & CROWS
Aphelocoma californica
western scrub-jay
Corvus brachyrhynchos
American crow
Corvus corax
common raven
HIRUNDINIDAE – SWALLOWS
Tachycineta thalassina
violet-green swallow
Stelgidopteryx serripennis
northern rough-winged swallow
Petrochelidon pyrrhonota
cliff swallow
Hirundo rustica
barn swallow
PARIDAE – TITMICE
Baeolophus inornatus
oak titmouse
AEGITHALIDAE – BUSHTITS
Psaltriparus minimus
bushtit
TROGLODYTIDAE – WRENS
Campylorhynchus brunneicapillus
R:\PAS\Projects\Carollo\J041\ARTO CRF Report-020314.doc
C-3
Wildlife Compendium
Arroyo Seco Canyon Project
ATTACHMENT C
WILDLIFE COMPENDIUM
SPECIES
cactus wren
Catherpes mexicanus
canyon wren
Salpinctes obsoletus
rock wren
Thryomanes bewickii
Bewick's wren
TURDIDAE – THRUSHES & ROBINS
Sialia mexicana
western bluebird
TIMALIIDAE – WRENTITS
Chamaea fasciata
wrentit
PTILOGONATIDAE – SILKY-FLYCATCHERS
Phainopepla nitens
phainopepla
PARULIDAE – WARBLERS
Dendroica petechia
yellow warbler
Dendroica nigrescens
black-throated gray warbler
Geothlypis trichas
common yellowthroat
Wilsonia pusilla
Wilson’s warbler
THRAUPIDAE – TANAGERS
Piranga ludoviciana
western tanager
EMBERIZIDAE – SPARROWS & JUNCOS
Pipilo maculatus
spotted towhee
Pipilo crissalis
California towhee
Melospiza melodia
song sparrow
Junco hyemalis
dark-eyed junco
CARDINALIDAE – GROSBEAKS & BUNTINGS
Pheucticus melanocephalus
black-headed grosbeak
Passerina caerulea
blue grosbeak
ICTERIDAE – BLACKBIRDS
Agelaius phoeniceus
red-winged blackbird
Molothrus ater
brown-headed cowbird
Icterus cucullatus
hooded oriole
Icterus bullockii
Bullock’s oriole
R:\PAS\Projects\Carollo\J041\ARTO CRF Report-020314.doc
C-4
Wildlife Compendium
Arroyo Seco Canyon Project
ATTACHMENT C
WILDLIFE COMPENDIUM
SPECIES
FRINGILLIDAE – FINCHES
Carpodacus mexicanus
house finch
Carduelis psaltria
lesser goldfinch
Carduelis tristis
American goldfinch
Mammals
LEPORIDAE – HARES AND RABBITS
Sylvilagus audubonii
desert cottontail
SCIURIDAE – SQUIRRELS
Spermophilus beecheyi
California ground squirrel
GEOMYDAE – POCKET GOPHERS
Thomomys bottae
Botta's pocket gopher
MURIDAE – MICE, RATS, AND VOLES
Neotoma lepida
desert woodrat
CANIDAE – WOLVES & FOXES
Canis latrans
coyote
Urocyon cinereoargenteus
gray fox
URSIDAE – BEARS
Ursus americanus
black bear
PROCYONIDAE – RACCOONS
Procyon lotor
raccoon
CERVIDAE – DEER
Odocoileus hemionus
mule deer
FELIDAE – CATS
Lynx rufus
bobcat
* introduced species
R:\PAS\Projects\Carollo\J041\ARTO CRF Report-020314.doc
C-5
Wildlife Compendium