CHAPTER 2 The Founding and The Constitution Learning Objectives 2.1 Discuss the origins and causes of the American Revolution. 2.2 Describe the first national government under the Articles of Confederation, including its strengths, weaknesses, and struggles. 2.3 Compare and contrast the various plans for the new constitution and the obstacles to agreement among the different colonies. 2.4 Explain the principles incorporated in the new constitution, including popular sovereignty, the separation of powers, federalism, and limited government. 2.5 Evaluate the advantages enjoyed by those seeking to ratify the new constitution. 2.6 Assess the role that the Federalist Papers played in ratification. 2.7 Explain the origins of the Bill of Rights and its role in securing ratification. 2.8 Describe the process of amending the Constitution. 2.9 Outline the informal types of constitutional change, including different forms of constitutional interpretation. 2 Copyright © 2016 Cengage Learning. All rights reserved. The Beginnings of a New Nation Colonial Political Structures Similar to England Royal Governor-Substitute for the king in each individualized colony. Governor’s Council-mini House of Lords (Senate). Influential men on a high court. General Assembly-Elected by qualified voters in each colony, House of Commons ( House of Representatives) passing ordinances and regulations that would govern the colony. 3 Copyright © 2016 Cengage Learning. All rights reserved. The Beginnings of a New Nation French and Indian War (1754) Turning point in British-colonial relations Treaty of Paris (1763)all territory from the Arctic to the Gulf of Mexico, between the Atlantic and the Gulf of Mexico ( except New Orleans. British debt- 130 pounds 4 Copyright © 2016 Cengage Learning. All rights reserved. The Beginnings of a New Nation British Actions Proclamation of 1763-restricted trade to eastern side of the Appalachian chain so as not to interfere with fur trade Sugar Act (1764)increase duties on foreign goods shipped from England to the colonies (sugar coffee wine) 5 Copyright © 2016 Cengage Learning. All rights reserved. The Beginnings of a New Nation Stamp Act (1765)-Newspapers, pamphlets, legal documents Colonial outrage-boycotts that hurt English merchants. Repealed in 1766 Colonial Responses Virginia Assembly sponsored the Virginia Resolves 6 (1765)– opened debate to “No Taxation without Representation” ( Intercontinental Stamp Act) On the same day British Parliament repealed the Stamp Act, issued the Declaratory Act – England full Copyright © 2016 Cengage Learning. All rights reserved. power and authority to enact laws binding the The Beginnings of a New Nation Colonial Responses Intercolonial Stamp Act Congress (1765) Declaration of Rights and Grievances 7 Copyright © 2016 Cengage Learning. All rights reserved. The Beginnings of a New Nation 8 Colonial Responses Townshend Acts (1767)-Tax on various items , including tea, and established the Board of Customs Commissioners. Also, additional 4000 soldiers sent over. The additional troops and colonists led to the Boston Massacre ( March 5, 1770) With the additional boycotts and the fallout from the massacre, the British once again repealed all duties except on tea (1770). Copyright © 2016 Cengage Learning. All rights reserved. The Beginnings of a New Nation Colonial Responses Committees of Correspondence -Samuel Adams (1772) (like the townhall meetings of today/internet) Tea Act (1773) passed by the British Parliament which allowed the British East Indian Company to sell directly to the colonies. So it helped the British merchants/loyalists and undercut the colonial merchants. 9 Copyright © 2016 Cengage Learning. All rights reserved. The Beginnings of a New Nation Colonial Responses Boston Tea Party (1773)-Response to the British Tea Act which had penalized many colonial merchants. Throwing tea overboard. King George was so angry that he passed the Intolerable Acts(1774), also known as the Coercive Acts to the colonists. Closed the port of 10 Boston, revised the Massachusetts colonial government, and required the colonists to provide housing for British troops stationed in the colonies. The response to the Intolerable Acts was the First Continental Congress. The Beginnings of a New Nation Colonial Responses 11 First Continental Congress (1774)-In response to the Intolerable acts passed by King George, the Colonists met in Philadelphia to plan a united response to Parliament's actions. Boycotts and militias to arm themselves Denounced British policy, but still did not advocate outright independence from England. Started collecting and storing weapons The British governor general of Massachusetts ordered British troops to seize and destroy the weapons. (April 1775)Concord and Lexington) The Beginnings of a New Nation By the time Second Continental Congress convened in Philadelphia on May 10, 1775, delegates were united by their increased hostility to Great Britain. In a final attempt to avert conflict, the Second Continental Congress adopted the Olive Brand Petition of July 5, 1775, asking the king to end hostilities. King George rejected the petition and sent 20,000 troops to quell the rebellion 12 Copyright © 2016 Cengage Learning. All rights reserved. The Beginnings of a New Nation The Decision for Independence Common Sense-Publication in which Thomas 13 Paine attacked King George and converted many to the cause (January 1776) On May 1776 (carry over of Second Continental Congress), Virginia became the first colony to call for independence and on June 7, 1776, Richard Henry Lee of Virginia rose to move “that these United colonies are, and of right ought to be free and independent states.” Copyright © 2016 Cengage Learning. All rights reserved. Declaration of Independence- Needed formal document so they formed a committee to draft a document to meet the objectives By July 2, 1776, twelve of the thirteen states voted for independence. Two days later (July 4, 1776) voted to adopt the Declaration of Independence Influenced by John Locke and natural rights/social contract Jefferson, Adams, Franklin, Livingston, and Sherman Addressed proper role of government and that if government failed it its duty to secure these rights the people have right to “alter” or abolish it 14 (Continuation of the Declaration of Independence) Enumerated wrongs Justified breaking away from Britain Pledge our lives, our fortunes, our Sacred honor 15 War was fought and ended in 1781 (Yorktown) and officially in 1783 (Treaty of Paris). The colonists won but now had to address whether the Articles of Confederation was really the best form of Copyright © 2016 Cengage Learning. All rights reserved. government for the colonists. The Beginnings of a New Nation The First National Government: The Articles of Confederation • Weak central government-League 16 of friendship government among the 13 states during and immediately after the war. Problems with interstate commerce (no one to mediate boundary disputes) The Beginnings of a New Nation The First National Government: The Articles of Confederation • Depended upon voluntary contributions from state (Problems with collecting revenues) • No mentions of an executive (president; did not exist) 17 The Beginnings of a New Nation The First National Government: The Articles of Confederation • Unanimous vote for amendments(so one state could stop the show) • 9 out of 13 to pass legislation. (that is 2/3rds instead of just a majority) 18 The Beginnings of a New Nation The First National Government: The Articles of Confederation • Each state delegation one vote( so the more populous states same voting power as the less populous states) 19 The Beginnings of a New Nation The First National Government: The Articles of Confederation 20 • Annapolis • Convention (1786) • Shays's RebellionArmed uprising by debt-ridden Massachusetts farmers frustrated with the state government. Copyright © 2016 Cengage Learning. All rights reserved. The Beginnings of a New Nation The First National Government: The Articles of Confederation • • • • 21 Annapolis Convention (1786) Shays's RebellionWeak and unresponsive federal government carried with it the danger of violence and disorder 22 Copyright © 2016 Cengage Learning. All rights reserved. The Constitutional Convention Government from 1781-1787 was not working too well. On May 25, 1787 the Constitutional Convention convened in Philadelphia Originally called to make amendments to the Articles of Confederation not to change/alter the entire Articles of Confederation. Did not expect to have an entire new Constitution. 23 The Constitutional Convention Primary Concerns (To the Articles of Confederation) 24 Protection against Native American violence(National Government had been illequipped to provide citizens with protections. Worsening postwar economic depressioncentral government powerless to take any action to address it. Foreign trade(contempt from other countries) Economic radicalism(Shay's Rebellion)due to The Constitutional Convention George Washington, Ben Franklin, and Hamilton were at this convention. (Jefferson and Adams who were so involved in the Declaration were on diplomatic assignment in Europe) Madison (father of the Constitution) was beginning to make a name for himself 25 The Constitutional Convention 26 Copyright © 2016 Cengage Learning. All rights reserved. The Constitutional Convention Plans and Compromises 1st issue- Representation 27 Virginia Plan-Empowered three separate branches of government, including a legislature with membership proportional to population.“Large states plan” New Jersey Plan-retained the Articles of Confederation 's principle of a legislature where states enjoyed equal representation “Small states plan” The Constitutional Convention Plans and Compromises(con't) Great Compromise-Connecticut Compromise Bicameral Legislature-upper house(Senate) elected by the state legislatures (now we elect by the people of the respective states) Each state would have 2 senators in the Senate regardless of the population (Philadelphia the same as Virginia) 28 Copyright © 2016 Cengage Learning. All rights reserved. The Constitutional Convention Plans and Compromises (Connecticut Compromise) In the lower house (House of Representatives) based on state population. (So some states would have more representation than others) Also, all bills for raising and spending money would originate in House of Representatives 29 30 Copyright © 2016 Cengage Learning. All rights reserved. The Constitutional Convention 2nd issue was the Slavery issue Series of compromises-to forestall the convention's collapse. Three-Fifths Compromise New Constitution said nothing about preserving or outlawing slavery Did say time limit on legislation banning slave importation (20 years) 31 Copyright © 2016 Cengage Learning. All rights reserved. The Constitutional Convention 3rd issue how to elect president. Didn't trust the people nor wanted the Congress to elect president. Electoral College. The states would elect individuals to reflect the sentiments of the population but also safeguard against mob rule 32 Concentration of Slavery (by County), Circa 1790 33 Copyright © 2016 Cengage Learning. All rights reserved. The New Constitution Governing principles Popular Sovereignty-”We the People” not states, for the purpose of creating a new government. House of Representatives based on population and tax bills originate in this chamber. (kick the representatives out in the next two years if not satisfied) 34 Copyright © 2016 Cengage Learning. All rights reserved. The New Constitution Governing principles Separation 35 of Powers-each branch of government enjoys separate and independent powers and areas of responsibility. (Montesquieu) Checks and Balances- A system of limits imposed by the constitution that gives each branch of government the limited right to change or cancel the acts of the other branches. To prevent one faction from easily dominating all government. Copyright © 2016 Cengage Learning. All rights reserved. The New Constitution Examples: Checks and Balances- President nominates a Supreme Court Justice and Senate needs to confirm (advice and consent) President vetoes a law passed by the Congress and the Congress can override his veto Congress/President pass a law. Supreme Court can overrule a congressional or executive act as unconstitutional (Marbury v 36 Madison) Checks and Balances in the U.S. Constitution 37 Copyright © 2016 Cengage Learning. All rights reserved. The New Constitution Governing principles(con't) Federalism-Dividing sovereign powers between the states and the federal government. Enumerated Powers-express powers explicitly granted by the Constitution, such as the taxing power specifically granted to Congress. (Article 1, section 8) 38 Copyright © 2016 Cengage Learning. All rights reserved. The New Constitution Governing principles – Flexibility – a “living” Constitution- to meet 39 the changing demands placed on it over time. – Articles required unanimous consent of the states to amend the document so even the most popular reforms stood little chance of passing (Remember one state could hold up everything).So decided to need only 9 out of 13 states (2/3rds) to ratify and not the 13 out of 13). The Ratification Battle Once Congress submitted the new constitution to the state for approval, battle lines were formed between the Federalists and Anti-Federalists. So now the representatives had to convince the individuals in their respective states Advantages Advantages that Federalists had: Non unanimous consent, ratification would only require 9 out of the 13 , making it difficult for hold out from other states 40 Copyright © 2016 Cengage Learning. All rights reserved. The Ratification Battle Special “ratifying conventions”-not state legislature. The rule of secrecy- (5 state ratifying conventions approved before the antifederalists forces were collecting their strength.) Conventions held in the winter limited rural participation 41 Copyright © 2016 Cengage Learning. All rights reserved. The Ratification Battle First Part of Constitution (7 Articles) Article I (1)1 Legislature (Congress) (enumerated rights) Article II (2)Presidency Article III (3) Courts Article IV (4) Federalism (national/state) Article V (5) Amending the Constitution Article VI (6) Supremacy Clause/no religious criteria to hold office 42 Article VII (7) Ratification of the Constitution Copyright © 2016 Cengage Learning. All rights reserved. The Ratification Battle The Federalist Papers Essays by James Madison, Alexander Hamilton, and John Jay Defended the new constitution Emphasized inadequacies of Articles of Confederation 43 Copyright © 2016 Cengage Learning. All rights reserved. The Ratification Battle The Federalist Papers Federalist No. 51 Separation of Powers-To prohibit any one branch from dominating the national government or violating the rights of citizens Federalist No. 51”multiplicity of interests” 44 that influences so many different parts of government would guarantee the security Copyright © 2016 Cengage Learning. All rights reserved. The Ratification Battle Federalist No. 51(con't) Federal vs. State Federal level (Legislative,executive, and judicial) “the rights of the individual or of the minority, will be in little danger from interested combinations of the majority. 45 Copyright © 2016 Cengage Learning. All rights reserved. The Ratification Battle The Federalist Papers- No. 10. nature, causes and effects of factions. Greatest threat to liberty from factions yet factions are both the product and price of liberty. The federal system would minimize the effects of political factions. Most of the time voters would not succeed in electing enlightened statesmen. 46 The Ratification Battle The Federalist Papers- No. 10. nature, causes and effects of factions (con't). Creation of a national government too large for any one single group(faction) to control and a smaller government that would be more responsive to local needs. Justification for a pluralist theory-competition among groups for power produces the best approximation of overall public good. 47 Copyright © 2016 Cengage Learning. All rights reserved. The Ratification Battle The Federalist Papers- No. 78 The Supreme Court opinions- Hamilton argues that the judiciary would be the weakest of the three branches because it has “neither FORCE nor WILL, but merely judgment.” Because the court depends on the other branches to uphold that judgment, Hamilton called it “the least dangerous branch. Additional papers on page 40 of textbook. 48 Copyright © 2016 Cengage Learning. All rights reserved. The Ratification Battle The Anti-Federalists insisted on the Bill of Rights , the first 10 amendments to the Constitution,as a specific limitation on the national government's ability to interfere with a wide variety of personal liberties Madison (Federalists) feared omitting some 49 essential rights, so we shouldn't include in Constitution. Hamilton said didn't need them because already Federal government has enumerated rights. Yet, supported by Thomas Copyright © 2016 Cengage Learning. All rights reserved. Jefferson ( was in France at the time) 50 Copyright © 2016 Cengage Learning. All rights reserved. The Ratification Battle Twelve amendments proposed but only ten ratified Two which were rejected: Prohibition against salary increases for legislators taking effect prior to the next congressional election ( Now 27th amendment) A provision defining the rules for determining the number of members of the House of Representative ( set at 435) 51 Copyright © 2016 Cengage Learning. All rights reserved. Changing the Constitution The Formal Amendment Process Two methods of proposal Two-thirds vote in both houses (This is the only 52 one that has been used thus far) Two-thirds of state legislatures calls a national constitutional convention to propose national convention to propose amendments. Never has been done because usually the Congress ( house and senate respond. Nevertheless, some are talking about this method to circumvent the Congress because they believe Congress is not responsive to some major concerns ( debt, and Copyright © 2016 Cengage Learning. All rights reserved. immigration) Changing the Constitution The Formal Amendment Process – Two methods of ratification • Three-fourths vote in state legislatures • Special ratifying convention (Only used once to repeal prohibition) 53 In summary, generally when there is an amendment to the Constitution, you need 2/3 of the House and 2/3 of the Senate to amend and ¾ of the states. President is not formally involved with the amendment process. How an Amendment Gets Proposed and Ratified 54 Copyright © 2016 Cengage Learning. All rights reserved. Changing the Constitution The Formal Amendment Process Critics: process is undemocratic-13 out of the 50 states can block amendments desired by a large majority History: 27 amendments ratified since 1789 55 Copyright © 2016 Cengage Learning. All rights reserved. Demonstrators (including Rep. Carolyn Maloney [D-NY], at the podium urging reintroduction of the ERA as an amendment to the Constitution. 56 Copyright ©2016 Cengage Learning. All rights reserved. Changing the Constitution Informal Process of Change 1.Judicial Interpretation 57 – Loose construction-Constitutional interpretation that gives constitutional provision broad and open-ended meanings. Ex. Marshall, through the necessary and proper clause, gave the federal government considerable implied powers(those not explicitly stated ) to regulate the economy. (McCullough v. National Copyright Maryland) © 2016 Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.Bank. Changing the Constitution 58 Informal Process of Change – Strict construction- Constitutional interpretation that limits the government to only those powers explicitly stated in the Constitution. Article 1, Section 8, Clause 3 gave the Congress the power to regulate Interstate Commerce; they couldn't do it by creating a national bank; it would have to be done by the formal amendment process nor by congressional action or judicial ruling. Copyright © 2016 Cengage Learning. All rights reserved. Changing the Constitution 59 Informal Process of Change (con't) 2.Powers expanded because of tradition/custom-presidential power during the 20th Century reacts to circumstances facing the executive office by assuming greater authority over foreign and domestic policymaking, and the other branches of government defer to the president in many such matters 3. Technological advances ( Internet and Copyright © 2016 Cengage Learning. All rights reserved. Changing the Constitution Marbury v. Madison-(1803) Supreme Court asserted its right of judicial review, the power to nullify acts of the nation's government when the courts found such acts to conflict with the Constitution. Authority to review acts of Congress for their Constitutionality and void those that the Court determines are contrary to the Constitution. When state and federal power collide, federal powers takes precedence. 60 Copyright © 2016 Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz