Hess, PEEP 1 normal lungs 20 min of 45 cm H2O 5 min of 45 cm H2O How Do I ... PEEP? Dean R. Hess PhD RRT FAARC Assistant Director of Respiratory Care Massachusetts General Hospital Associate Professor of Anesthesia Harvard Medical School Editor in Chief Respiratory Care Dreyfuss, Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1998;157:294-323 ALI/ARDS ALI/ARDS is Inhomogeneous Avoid over-distention (limit tidal volume and plateau pressure) Normal Edema Consolidation Atelectasis (Baby Lung) Over-Distention Avoid de-recruitment (adequate PEEP) Opening/Closing ARDS Network Study 861 patients with ALI/ARDS VT 6 mL/kg Patients randomized to tidal volumes of 12 mL/kg PBW or 6 mL/kg PBW (VCV, A/C, Pplat ≤ 30 cm H2O) 25% reduction in mortality in patients receiving smaller tidal volume Number-needed-to-treat: 12 patients Pplat 25 – 26 cm H2O Pplat 28 – 30 cm H2O Red: hyper-inflated Blue: normally aerated Yellow: poorly aerated Green: non-aerated Pplat 25 – 26 cm H2O N Engl J Med 2000; 342:1301 Pplat 28 – 30 cm H2O Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2007; 175:160 Hess, PEEP 2 Initial Ventilator Settings Protocol to Limit Tidal Volume A team of intensivists and RTs designed a * Interstitial lung disease, lung resection, severe pneumonia, edema ** Sepsis, aspiration, transfusions § With significant spontaneous respiratory effort, plateau pressure underestimates over-distention § With a stiff chest wall, plateau pressure overestimates overdistention £ To prevent atelectasis and maintain oxygenation protocol to limit VT Maximum 10 mL/kg in all patients 6 - 8 mL/kg for patients at risk of ALI Implemented with protocol to limit unnecessary transfusions ALI/ARDS decreased from 28% to 10% ICU mortality decreased from 20% to 7% Yilmaz, Crit Care Med 2007;35:1660 Shultz, Anesthesiology 2007;106:1226 ALI/ARDS is Inhomogeneous Normal Edema Consolidation Atelectasis (Baby Lung) Over-Distention Opening/Closing Higher PEEP Lower Tidal Volume Webb and Tierney, Am Rev Respir Dis 1974;110:556 ALVEOLI (Assessment of Low tidal Volume and elevated End-expiratory volume to Obviate Lung Injury) 2 PEEP levels with VT 6 mL/kg PBW Oxygenation and compliance better with higher PEEP Stopped at 549 patients for futility: no mortality difference N Engl J Med 2004;351:327 Target tidal volume 6 mL/kg PBW Control (n=508): Pplat ≤ 30 cm H2O (VCV), lower PEEP Experimental (n=475): Pplat ≤ 40 cm H2O (PCV), recruitment maneuvers (40 s at 40 cm H2O), initial PEEP 20 cm H2O; higher PEEP No mortality difference, but improved secondary end points related to hypoxemia and use of rescue therapies Meade, JAMA 2008;299:637 Hess, PEEP 3 Target tidal volume 6 mL/kg PBW Control (n=382): low PEEP (5 - 9 cm H2O) minimal distension strategy Experimental (n=385): higher PEEP set to reach Pplat of 28 - 30 cm H2O (increased recruitment strategy); PEEP 16 ± 3 cm H2O on day 1 No mortality difference, but improved lung function, reduced duration of mechanical ventilation and duration of organ failure PPlat or PEEP (cm H2O) Benefit of Higher PEEP Offset by Higher Pplat? 6 mL/kg Nonrecruitable 6 mL/kg Injury > Benefit 6 mL/kg Recruitable (↑Crs, ↓Vd) Benefit > Injury Lower PEEP Higher PEEP Mercat, JAMA 2008;299:646 N = 2299 Briel, JAMA 2010;303:865 ARR: 4% NNT: 25 N Engl J Med 2006;354:1775 How to Set PEEP Optimal PEEP by Tidal Compliance PEEP/FIO2 tables per oxygenation 15 normovolemic patients requiring Best compliance (lowest Pplat – PEEP) PEEP resulting in maximum oxygen transport Pressure-volume curve Lowest dead space Transpulmonary pressure (esophageal balloon) Stress index Incremental vs. decremental? mechanical ventilation for ARF and the lowest dead-space fraction resulted in highest compliance Optimal PEEP varied from 0 to 15 cm H2O Mixed venous PO2 increased from 0 PEEP to the PEEP resulting in maximum oxygen transport, but then decreased at higher PEEP Conclusion: compliance may be used to indicate the PEEP likely to result in optimum cardiopulmonary function Titrate PEEP to lowest Pplat – PEEP ↑ PEEP Suter, N Engl J Med 1975;292:284 Hess, PEEP 4 Pressure-Volume Curve Issues With PV Curves Requires sedation/paralysis Difficult to identify “inflection points” (Harris et al, AJRCCM 2000; 161:432) May require esophageal pressure to separate lung from chest wall effects (Mergoni et al, AJRCCM 1997; 156:846 Ranieri et al, AJRCCM 1997; 156:1082) Deflation limb may be more useful than inflation limb (Holzapfel et al, Crit Care Med 1983;11:561; Hickling, AJRCCM 2001;163:69) Pressure-volume curves of individual lung units not known (Hickling, AJRCCM 1998;158:194) Role of PV curve for setting PEEP currently unknown Stress Index tidal recruitment over-distention PEEP = 8 cm H2O SI = 0.75 Pplat = 20 cm H2O Crs = 28 mL/cm H2O PEEP= 18 cm H2O SI = 0.97 Pplat = 28 cm H2O Crs = 34 mL/ cm H2O Grasso, AJRCCM 2007;176:761 Pulmonary vs. Extrapulmonary ARDS (consolidation) (atelectasis) PaO2 ??? mortality positive transpulmonary pressure ⎢ Ccw Gattinoni, Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1998;158:3 N Engl J Med 2008;359:2095 Hess, PEEP 5 ALI/ARDS is Inhomogeneous Setting PEEP for ALI/ARDS 0 cm H2O: likely harmful 8 – 16 cm H2O: appropriate in most patients Higher PEEP for ARDS; lower PEEP for ALI >20 cm H2O: seldom necessary Normal Edema Consolidation Atelectasis High PEEP should be reserved for cases where recruitment can be demonstrated (Baby Lung) PEEP should be selected in the context of prevention Over-Distention Opening/Closing of ventilator-induced lung injury The benefit of “precise” PEEP is unproven 5 cm H2O PEEP 10 min after 0 PEEP Cuff pressure 30 cm H2O Crit Care Med 2008; 36:409 Crit Care Med 2008;36:2225 Hess, PEEP 6 Positive End-Expiratory Pressure PEEP 7 cm H2O auto-PEEP 10 cm H2O sensitivity -1 cm H2O auto-PEEP 3 cm H2O sensitivity -1 cm H2O PEEP 10 cm H2O PEEP 10 cm H2O trigger effort = 11 cm H2O trigger effort = 4 cm H2O Maintain alveolar recruitment Prevent ventilator-associated pneumonia Counterbalance auto-PEEP Reduce preload and afterload Splint airway with tracheomalacia Improve speech with tracheostomy cuff deflated Although we can debate how it is precisely set …. PEEP is good.
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz