© UNEP PCDMB IDP camp near a NP buffer zone, DRC The environment is fundamental to humanitarian action for two reasons. First, environmental issues are often underlying and contributing factors to humanitarian crises. For example, scarce natural resources can lead to conflict. Second, humanitarian crises can have negative effects on the environment and exacerbate risk and vulnerability if managed inadequately or addressed too late. Therefore, humanitarians should minimize and mitigate the negative environmental impacts of their projects, and build back safer and sustainably to improve affected people’s resilience and reduce the risk of disasters. In an emergency, humanitarian actors’ priorities include saving lives, reducing suffering and jump-starting recovery. Integrating environmental issues into humanitarian programmes and operations contributes to these priorities by: • Protecting lives and livelihoods by safeguarding natural resources, such as water or wood (see case study overleaf). • Improving affected people’s health and safety by reducing air and water pollution. • Addressing underlying environmental issues that may have contributed to the humanitarian crisis, and thereby enhancing resilience. • Anticipating hazards and planning mitigation measures so as to reduce or reverse environmental degradation. This improves community resilience, biodiversity, food security and economic development, and thereby enhances the protection of people and their environment. Overall, integrating environmental issues into humanitarian preparedness and response increases the effectiveness, sustainability and accountability of humanitarian action. Promoting the environment through partnerships The United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA) and the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) work with partners to promote the integration of environmental issues across all elements of humanitarian response. They do this through the Joint UNEP/OCHA Environment Unit (JEU), which offers the following services: For practical guidance and tools on integrating environmental issues into humanitarian action, visit: www.humanitarianresponse.info/ themes/environment Technical field-support services The JEU provides practical advice on how to integrate environmental considerations into humanitarian action in a country-specific context, either through remote support or by deploying experts. An Environmental Field Adviser can be deployed for up to six months to major emergencies through OCHA’s Stand-by Partnership Programme. These experts work under the guidance of the head of the OCHA country or regional office, with technical support from the JEU. Environmental field advisers have been deployed to the Philippines and Sudan. The JEU can also deploy experts and trainers to strengthen the capacity of local and national disaster management authorities and the Humanitarian Country Team or UN Country Team. This includes supporting authorities to outline action plans to better integrate environmental issues into humanitarian action. © UNEP PCDMB Joint UNEP/OCHA Environment Unit Environment and Humanitarian Action Environment and Humanitarian Action Nigeria The Environmental Emergencies Centre offers the Environment in Humanitarian Action eLearning module. This free 90-minute online course teaches humanitarian actors how to effectively integrate environmental issues into humanitarian response and early recovery strategies. The course highlights key opportunities, misconceptions and challenges. For more details, visit http://eecentre.org/Online-Learning.aspx/lan/en-US © UNEP PCDMB Training resources Sudan The JEU ensures environmental guidance is mainstreamed into the tools and guidance of the Inter-Agency Standing Committee and the cluster guidance available on HumanitarianResponse.info. By incorporating environmental issues in all stages of the humanitarian programme cycle, measures to mitigate and reduce environmental risks are integrated into humanitarian preparedness and response. The JEU also offers support to use the Environment Marker, which was designed by UNEP. It helps to track a humanitarian project’s environmental effects—positive and negative—and indicates whether recommended actions have been carried out. © IRIN/Manoocher Deghati The environment and the Inter-Agency Standing Committee Uganda The JEU chairs the Environment and Humanitarian Action (EHA) Reference Group. This informal advocacy group identifies key issues involved in integrating environmental concerns in humanitarian action, and prioritizes joint actions for EHA advocacy and training. Members include humanitarian and environmental actors, such as UN agencies, the Red Cross/Red Crescent Movement, NGOs and implementing partners. © UNEP PCDMB Networking and advocacy Haiti CASE STUDY Darfur: Preserving livelihoods © Halima Khier Adam The ongoing humanitarian crisis in Darfur, Sudan, which began in 2004, is closely linked with deforestation and desertification. These environmental factors directly affect lives and livelihoods, and they are intensified by the humanitarian operations. The humanitarian consequences of deforestation and desertification are numerous. Protection and education are affected because women have to travel farther for firewood and water, and they often remove their daughters from school to help with this additional burden. The loss of fertile topsoil hampers agricultural activities and destroys livelihoods. Less groundwater is retained and groundwater aquifers are depleted at a quicker rate, exacerbating the already serious water-scarcity problem. Deforestation is mainly caused in places where firewood is used as fuel for cooking stoves and kilns (ovens used for brick production). The humanitarian crisis has exacerbated this problem due to an exponential increase in construction needs. Brick manufacturing also uses a significant amount of soil and water, adding to the destruction of agricultural land and limiting water supplies further. When these negative effects were identified, humanitarian actors looked for alternative ways Darfur to produce bricks. Many projects now use stabilized soil blocks made by mixing compacted earth with a stabilizer such as cement or lime, which makes them about 30 per cent cheaper to produce. And because they are dried in the sun, there is no need to use firewood as fuel. Other environmentally conscious initiatives include using fuel-efficient stoves, using alternative construction materials for latrines, such as concrete slabs instead of wood, and including tree planting in early recovery projects. Contact Contact Joint UNEP/OCHA Environment WendyUnit Cue OCHA Emergency Services Chief ofBranch Section, Geneva, Switzerland Joint UNEP/OCHA Environment Unit E-mail: Office for the Coordination of [email protected] Humanitarian Affairs For more information, please visit: Office S-225, Palais des Nations www.unocha.org/unep CH 1211 Geneva, Switzerland www.eecentre.org Tel: +41 (0) 22 917 1934 www.humanitarianresponse.info/themes/ Email: [email protected] environment
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz