Report on the Results of the
Alumni Survey, Fall 2014
Undergraduate and graduate alumni responses to the question: “What were the strongest aspects of your MU education?”
Prepared by the Office of Planning and Institutional Effectiveness (PIE)
Marymount University
April 17, 2015
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Every Fall semester, Marymount’s Office of Planning and Institutional Effectiveness conducts a survey of
Marymount’s alumni from the first year following graduation and the fifth year following graduation. The survey
asks alumni to evaluate their experiences at Marymount and to report professional and educational
achievements since graduation. Survey results are used to examine Marymount’s effectiveness in providing its
students with a quality educational experience and to identify where to make improvements.
Survey Administration and Response Rate
In Fall 2014, a paper survey was mailed and an invitation with a link to an online survey was emailed to
Marymount alumni who graduated in 2008-2009 and in 2012-20131. Those who did not respond received
periodic email reminders. Of the 1,848 alumni who were contacted, 544 responded, for an overall response rate
of 29%. Twenty-six percent (26%) of the undergraduate cohort contacted responded, as did 33% of the graduate
cohort.
Key Findings
Overall Ratings of Marymount Experience
 Seventy-nine percent (79%) of undergraduate and 87% of graduate alumni respondents rate their
overall experience at Marymount as “good” or “excellent”.
 Eighty-one percent (81%) of undergraduate and 87% of graduate alumni respondents rate Marymount’s
academic quality as “good” or “excellent”.
 Sixty-five percent (65%) of undergraduate and 70% of graduate alumni respondents rate Marymount’s
academic advising as “good” or “excellent”.
 Sixty-eight percent (68%) of undergraduate and 73% of graduate alumni respondents rate Marymount’s
reputation as “good” or “excellent.”
 Fifty-five percent (55%) percent of undergraduate and 77% of graduate alumni respondents would
choose Marymount again if they were starting over.
 In response to the open-ended questions concluding the survey, both undergraduate and graduate
alumni felt that Marymount’s greatest strength was its faculty. Both groups also felt that improvements
need to be made in the curriculum and in the quality of faculty, including adjuncts, and advisors.
Contribution to Personal Development
 More than 90% of undergraduates reported that their education at Marymount contributed to their
development of an interest in lifelong learning and to an openness to new experiences. Less than 40%
reported that their education contributed to their development of spirituality.
 More than 90% of graduates reported that their education contributed to the development of selfconfidence and an interest in lifelong learning, with nearly the same percentage reporting that it
contributed to their openness to new experiences. Less than 33% reported that it contributed to their
development of spirituality.
Education Preparation
 Undergraduate alumni reported most favorably that their education prepared them well to find
appropriate sources of information, to apply knowledge and skills to new situations, to evaluate the
1
Undergraduate students enrolled in the Nursing as a Second-Degree option were sent a modified survey, and their responses are not included in this
overall report.
Planning and Institutional Effectiveness: Alumni Survey 2014
April 17, 2015
P a g e |2

quality of information, to understand the major ethical dilemmas in their field, and to determine the
most ethically appropriate responses to situations. Least favorable areas were finding a job in their field
and conducting research to support a position.
Graduate alumni reported most favorably that their education prepared them well to apply knowledge
and skills to new situations, to solve problems, to determine the most ethically appropriate response to
a problem, to understand the major ethical dilemmas in their field, and to find appropriate sources of
information and to evaluate the quality of information.
Career and Employment Information
 Seventy-three percent (73%) of undergraduate and 86% of graduate alumni respondents reported that
they were currently employed full-time. If adjustment is made to remove those who are not employed
but not looking for work, the percentage of alumni employed full-time rises to 76% for undergraduates
and 89% for graduates.
 Sixty-two percent of undergraduate and 80% of graduate alumni respondents were employed within six
months of graduation.
 The first job after graduation was directly related to their studies for 49% of undergraduate and 58% of
graduate alumni respondents.
 Forty-three percent of undergraduate respondents and 23% of graduate respondents have pursued
further education since completing their degree at Marymount.
Relationship to the University
 Nearly 80% of both undergraduate and graduate respondents felt proud of being a Marymount
alumnus/a.
 Forty-six percent (46%) of undergraduate alumni and 42% of graduate respondents reported that they
feel connected to the university. Sixty percent (60%) of undergraduate alumni and 50% of graduate
alumni are interested in remaining involved with the university.
 Twenty-six percent (26%) of undergraduate and 24% of graduate alumni respondents would consider
financially supporting Marymount.
Planning and Institutional Effectiveness: Alumni Survey 2014
April 17, 2015
P a g e |3
UNDERGRADUATE ALUMNI
Student Demographic Data
Fifth-Year Alumni
(2008-2009)
Count
%
First-Year Alumni
(2012-2013)
Count
%
What degree did you receive?
Bachelors
Certificates
90
1
98.9%
1.1%
140
1
99.3%
0.7%
What school did you belong to?
Arts and Sciences
Business Administration
Education and Human Services
Health Professions
44
20
16
11
48.4%
22.0%
17.6%
12.1%
65
33
22
21
46.1%
23.4%
15.6%
14.9%
At which location did you take the majority of your classes?
Main Campus
Ballston
Online
71
19
0
78.9%
21.1%
0.0%
99
40
2
70.2%
28.4%
1.4%
What was your primary enrollment status?
Full-time
Part-time
83
7
92.2%
7.8%
134
7
95.0%
5.0%
51
56.7%
69
48.9%
35
38.9%
65
46.1%
4
4.4%
7
5.0%
Were you employed while attending classes?
Employed full-time
Employed part-time
Not employed
21
52
17
23.8%
54.1%
22.1%
34
73
34
24.1%
51.8%
24.1%
If you were employed, did you work on campus?
Yes
No
33
40
45.2%
54.8%
44
62
41.5%
58.5%
How many years did you live on campus or in university housing?
None
Less than 1 year
1 to 2 years
3 or more years
41
3
17
29
45.6%
3.3%
18.9%
32.2%
80
5
13
43
56.7%
3.5%
9.2%
30.5%
Which of the following statements describes your start at MU?
Marymount was the first college or university I attended.
I transferred into Marymount from a community college or four-year
college or university.
I earned a degree from another college or university prior to enrolling at
Marymount.
Planning and Institutional Effectiveness: Alumni Survey 2014
April 17, 2015
P a g e |4
Program/Major
Fifth-Year Alumni
(2008-2009)
First-Year Alumni
(2012-2013)
Total
Count
Count
Count
44
4
6
3
1
5
4
3
1
3
9
0
0
1
3
1
20
13
1
2
1
2
1
0
16
8
1
7
0
11
6
5
91
65
0
10
5
4
4
10
4
2
7
7
1
2
0
5
4
33
23
0
1
0
7
1
1
22
10
2
9
1
21
8
13
141
109
4
16
8
5
9
14
7
3
10
16
1
2
1
8
5
53
36
1
3
1
9
2
1
38
18
3
16
1
32
14
18
232
Arts and Sciences
Art
Biology
Communication
English
Fashion Design
Fashion Merchandising
Graphic Design
History
Interior Design
Liberal Studies
Mathematics
Multidisciplinary Studies
Philosophy
Politics
Theology and Religious Studies
Business Administration
Business Administration
Computer Information Systems
Economics In Society
Forensic Computing Certificate
Information Technology
Paralegal Studies
Paralegal Studies Certificate
Education and Human Services
Criminal Justice
Criminal Justice: Forensic Science
Psychology
Sociology
Malek School of Health Professions
Health Sciences
Nursing
Total
The Marymount Experience
From your experience at MU, how would you rate each of the following? (Scale: 1=”Poor”, 5=”Excellent”)
Fifth-Year Alumni (Class of 2008-2009)
Overall Experience
Academic Quality
Major or Program
Academic Advising
Academic Reputation
Library and Learning
Services
Valid N
Poor
Needs to be
Improved
Adequate
Good
Excellent
Mean
Std. Dev.
90
90
90
90
90
0.0%
1.1%
1.1%
6.7%
1.1%
4.4%
3.3%
6.7%
16.7%
13.3%
16.7%
15.6%
16.7%
18.9%
20.0%
58.9%
57.8%
46.7%
30.0%
46.7%
20.0%
22.2%
28.9%
27.8%
18.9%
3.94
3.97
3.96
3.56
3.69
0.70
0.79
0.91
1.25
0.97
89
0.0%
4.5%
25.8%
41.6%
28.1%
3.93
0.85
Planning and Institutional Effectiveness: Alumni Survey 2014
April 17, 2015
P a g e |5
First-Year Alumni (Class of 2012-2013)
Overall Experience
Academic Quality
Major or Program
Academic Advising
Academic Reputation
Library and Learning
Services
Valid N
Poor
Needs to be
Improved
Adequate
Good
Excellent
Mean
Std. Dev.
136
136
136
136
136
1.5%
0.0%
2.2%
5.9%
2.9%
5.9%
5.9%
7.4%
7.4%
6.6%
14.0%
13.2%
10.3%
16.2%
21.3%
47.1%
41.9%
40.4%
39.7%
47.1%
31.6%
39.0%
39.7%
30.9%
22.1%
4.01
4.14
4.08
3.82
3.79
0.91
0.86
1.00
1.13
0.96
135
1.5%
2.2%
19.3%
48.9%
28.1%
4.00
0.84
For each of the following skills, please indicate how well you believe your education prepared you to: (Scale: 1=”Poor”,
5=”Excellent”)
Fifth-Year Alumni (Class of 2008-2009)
Valid N
Poor
Needs to
be
Improved
Adequate
Good
Excellent
Mean
Std. Dev.
Find a job in your field
87
16.1%
21.8%
18.4%
24.1%
19.5%
3.09
1.38
Pursue more education in your field
88
6.8%
15.9%
29.5%
28.4%
19.3%
3.38
1.17
Conduct research to support a position
87
8.0%
16.1%
32.2%
28.7%
14.9%
3.26
1.15
Develop a coherent written argument
88
5.7%
5.7%
28.4%
36.4%
23.9%
3.67
1.08
Deliver a coherent oral presentation
88
5.7%
5.7%
27.3%
35.2%
26.1%
3.70
1.10
88
6.8%
6.8%
31.8%
36.4%
18.2%
3.52
1.08
88
8.0%
11.4%
22.7%
36.4%
21.6%
3.52
1.18
Apply knowledge and skills to new situations
88
5.7%
2.3%
28.4%
39.8%
23.9%
3.74
1.03
Solve problems in your field using your
knowledge and skills
88
4.5%
5.7%
28.4%
37.5%
23.9%
3.70
1.04
Find appropriate sources of information
88
3.4%
2.3%
28.4%
35.2%
30.7%
3.88
0.99
88
2.3%
8.0%
23.9%
31.8%
34.1%
3.88
1.05
88
3.4%
10.2%
33.0%
31.8%
21.6%
3.58
1.05
88
4.5%
4.5%
31.8%
37.5%
21.6%
3.67
1.01
Valid N
Poor
Needs to
be
Improved
Adequate
Good
Excellent
Mean
Std. Dev.
Find a job in your field
134
11.2%
16.4%
21.6%
29.9%
20.9%
3.33
1.28
Pursue more education in your field
133
6.0%
7.5%
23.3%
39.1%
24.1%
3.68
1.10
Conduct research to support a position
133
3.8%
12.0%
27.8%
36.8%
19.5%
3.56
1.05
Develop a coherent written argument
133
3.0%
9.0%
21.1%
44.4%
22.6%
3.74
1.00
Use quantitative/qualitative techniques within
your professional field
Use technology effectively in a workplace
environment
Evaluate the quality of information (e.g. scholarly
articles, newspapers)
Understand the major ethical dilemmas in your
field
Determine the most ethically appropriate
response to a situation
First-Year Alumni (Class of 2012-2013)
Planning and Institutional Effectiveness: Alumni Survey 2014
April 17, 2015
P a g e |6
Valid N
Poor
Needs to
be
Improved
Adequate
Good
Excellent
Mean
Std. Dev.
134
3.0%
4.5%
23.1%
46.3%
23.1%
3.82
0.94
133
3.8%
10.5%
26.3%
37.6%
21.8%
3.63
1.06
134
6.0%
9.7%
19.4%
41.0%
23.9%
3.67
1.12
Apply knowledge and skills to new situations
134
2.2%
4.5%
19.4%
44.8%
29.1%
3.94
0.93
Solve problems in your field using your
knowledge and skills
134
4.5%
5.2%
19.4%
44.8%
26.1%
3.83
1.02
Find appropriate sources of information
134
1.5%
6.0%
16.4%
43.3%
32.8%
4.00
0.93
134
3.0%
4.5%
19.4%
39.6%
33.6%
3.96
0.99
134
2.2%
7.5%
15.7%
45.5%
29.1%
3.92
0.97
134
1.5%
6.0%
19.4%
46.3%
26.9%
3.91
0.91
Deliver a coherent oral presentation
Use quantitative/qualitative techniques within
your professional field
Use technology effectively in a workplace
environment
Evaluate the quality of information (e.g. scholarly
articles, newspapers)
Understand the major ethical dilemmas in your
field
Determine the most ethically appropriate
response to a situation
Percentage of Alumni Respondents Indicating* that MU's Education Prepared Them Well To:
43.7%
50.7%
Find a job in your field
47.7%
Pursue more education in your field
63.2%
43.7%
Conduct research to support a position
56.4%
60.2%
66.9%
Develop a coherent written argument
61.4%
69.4%
Deliver a coherent oral presentation
54.5%
59.4%
Use quantitative/qualitative techniques within your professional field
58.0%
64.9%
Use technology effectively in a workplace environment
63.6%
Apply knowledge and skills to new situations
73.9%
61.4%
Solve problems in your field using your knowledge and skills
70.9%
65.9%
Find appropriate sources of information
76.1%
65.9%
73.1%
Evaluate the quality of information (e.g. scholarly articles, newspapers)
53.4%
Understand the major ethical dilemmas in your field
74.6%
59.1%
Determine the most ethically appropriate response to a situation
Fifth-Year
73.1%
First-Year
*The percentage of alumni who responded to each item with “good” or “excellent”
Planning and Institutional Effectiveness: Alumni Survey 2014
April 17, 2015
P a g e |7
Please indicate how much your education at MU contributed to the development of: (Scale: 1=”Not at All”, 4=”To a Great Extent”)
Fifth-Year Alumni (Class of 2008-2009)
Interest in lifelong learning
Awareness of global issues
Self-confidence
Openness to new experiences
Interest in cultures different from your own
Leadership skills
Spirituality
Valid N
Not at All
Very Little
Somewhat
To a Great
Extent
Mean
Std. Dev.
87
87
87
87
87
87
87
6.9%
9.2%
5.7%
4.6%
4.6%
6.9%
20.7%
9.2%
16.1%
17.2%
14.9%
16.1%
17.2%
36.8%
49.4%
54.0%
43.7%
47.1%
47.1%
44.8%
28.7%
34.5%
20.7%
33.3%
33.3%
32.2%
31.0%
13.8%
3.11
2.86
3.05
3.09
3.07
3.00
2.36
.84
.85
.86
.82
.82
.88
.96
Not at All
Very Little
Somewhat
To a Great
Extent
Mean
Std. Dev.
3.7%
4.5%
6.0%
2.2%
2.2%
5.2%
17.9%
5.2%
14.2%
3.0%
5.2%
5.2%
10.4%
20.1%
41.8%
38.1%
37.3%
35.8%
35.8%
28.4%
34.3%
49.3%
43.3%
53.7%
56.7%
56.7%
56.0%
27.6%
3.37
3.20
3.39
3.47
3.42
3.35
2.72
.75
.85
.81
.70
.72
.87
1.06
First-Year Alumni (Class of 2012-2013)
Valid N
Interest in lifelong learning
Awareness of global issues
Self-confidence
Openness to new experiences
Interest in cultures different from your own
Leadership skills
Spirituality
134
134
134
134
134
134
134
Percentage of Alumni Respondents Who Indicate* that MU's Education Contributed to Their
Development of:
83.9%
Interest in lifelong learning
74.7%
Awareness of global issues
81.3%
77.0%
Self-confidence
91.0%
80.5%
Openness to new experiences
92.5%
79.3%
Interest in cultures different from your own
75.9%
Leadership skills
42.5%
Spirituality
Fifth-Year
91.0%
92.5%
84.3%
61.9%
First-Year
*The percentage of alumni who responded to each item with “somewhat” or “to a great extent”
Did your education at Marymount include an internship?
Fifth-Year
(2008-2009)
Count
Percent
First-Year
(2012-2013)
Count
Percent
Yes
74
82.2%
126
92.6%
No
16
17.8%
10
7.4%
Planning and Institutional Effectiveness: Alumni Survey 2014
April 17, 2015
P a g e |8
If yes, please check if the experience allowed you to do any of the following (check all that apply): (Count of alumni
responses)
52
Explore career interests
95
48
Improve understanding of responsibilities required in the profession
94
40
Network with professionals
71
39
Apply critical thinking skills
92
38
Get professional feedback on career skills and options
79
37
Work with a team in an organizational setting
90
33
Improve oral and written communication
89
27
Develop a network of contacts
19
Obtain employment at your internship site
65
34
12
Develop a portfolio of work samples
Fifth Year
53
First Year
Please indicate how strongly you agree with each of the following statements: (Scale: 1=”Strongly Disagree”, 5=”Strongly Agree”)
Fifth-Year Alumni (Class of 2008-2009)
Valid N
Strongly
Disagree
Disagree
No Opinion
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Mean
Std. Dev.
I am in contact with friends and fellow
students from Marymount.
90
6.7%
21.1%
6.7%
34.4%
31.1%
3.62
1.30
I am still in touch with faculty and advisors.
89
19.1%
36.0%
12.4%
24.7%
7.9%
2.66
1.26
I feel connected to Marymount.
90
10.0%
28.9%
22.2%
32.2%
6.7%
2.97
1.14
90
8.9%
22.2%
17.8%
42.2%
8.9%
3.20
1.15
90
1.1%
16.7%
30.0%
41.1%
11.1%
3.44
0.94
89
10.1%
29.2%
36.0%
21.3%
3.4%
2.79
1.01
90
0.0%
7.8%
25.6%
52.2%
14.4%
3.73
0.80
90
5.6%
18.9%
24.4%
36.7%
14.4%
3.36
1.12
90
3.3%
2.2%
28.9%
46.7%
18.9%
3.76
0.90
90
16.7%
21.1%
10.0%
38.9%
13.3%
3.11
1.35
I am proud of being a Marymount alumnus.
90
3.3%
1.1%
20.0%
57.8%
17.8%
3.86
0.84
My professional colleagues have heard of
Marymount.
90
5.6%
24.4%
13.3%
37.8%
18.9%
3.40
1.21
I am well informed about activities for
alumni.
I am interested in remaining involved with
Marymount.
I would consider financially supporting
Marymount.
Marymount has a good reputation.
If I could start over, I would choose
Marymount again.
I would recommend Marymount to a friend
or family member.
My Marymount education was worth the
expense.
Planning and Institutional Effectiveness: Alumni Survey 2014
April 17, 2015
P a g e |9
First-Year Alumni (Class of 2012-2013)
Valid N
Strongly
Disagree
Disagree
No
Opinion
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Mean
Std. Dev.
I am in contact with friends and fellow
students from Marymount.
136
8.1%
14.7%
3.7%
45.6%
27.9%
3.71
1.25
I am still in touch with faculty and advisors.
136
9.6%
27.2%
12.5%
39.0%
11.8%
3.16
1.22
I feel connected to Marymount.
136
12.5%
19.1%
18.4%
36.8%
13.2%
3.19
1.25
135
10.4%
20.0%
20.0%
37.8%
11.9%
3.21
1.20
136
5.9%
5.9%
23.5%
44.9%
19.9%
3.67
1.05
136
16.9%
15.4%
40.4%
22.1%
5.1%
2.83
1.11
136
3.7%
5.9%
14.0%
57.4%
19.1%
3.82
0.93
136
10.3%
12.5%
19.9%
27.9%
29.4%
3.54
1.31
136
6.6%
6.6%
12.5%
43.4%
30.9%
3.85
1.13
136
10.3%
11.0%
18.4%
43.4%
16.9%
3.46
1.20
I am proud of being a Marymount alumnus.
136
4.4%
2.9%
13.2%
48.5%
30.9%
3.99
0.98
My professional colleagues have heard of
Marymount.
136
7.4%
11.8%
16.9%
42.6%
21.3%
3.59
1.16
I am well informed about activities for
alumni.
I am interested in remaining involved with
Marymount.
I would consider financially supporting
Marymount.
Marymount has a good reputation.
If I could start over, I would choose
Marymount again.
I would recommend Marymount to a friend
or family member.
My Marymount education was worth the
expense.
Please indicate if you participated in or used the following while attending Marymount:
Fifth-Year Alumni
(Class of 2008-2009)
Career Center
Cultural activities
Intercollegiate athletics
Intramural athletics
MU service opportunities
MU spiritual development activities
Research projects
Student clubs
Study Abroad program
Planning and Institutional Effectiveness: Alumni Survey 2014
First-Year Alumni
(Class of 2012-2013)
Count (Yes)
Percent
Count (Yes)
Percent
48
34
21
21
31
23
26
51
14
54.5%
39.5%
24.1%
24.4%
35.6%
26.4%
29.9%
58.0%
16.1%
77
56
23
19
54
44
61
86
30
57.9%
41.5%
17.4%
14.3%
40.0%
32.8%
45.5%
64.2%
22.6%
April 17, 2015
P a g e | 10
Occupational Experiences since Leaving Marymount
Relative to completing your degree, when did you find your first professional experience?
Fifth-Year Alumni
(Class of 2008-2009)
Continued a position held while attending school
Found a new position prior to graduation
0-3 months
4-6 months
7-12 months
More than 12 months
Have not yet entered professional position since graduation
First-Year Alumni
(Class of 2012-2013)
Count
Percent
Count
Percent
21
11
12
9
11
17
6
24.1%
12.6%
13.8%
10.3%
12.6%
19.5%
6.9%
18
21
24
20
11
8
31
13.5%
15.8%
18.0%
15.0%
8.3%
6.0%
23.3%
Was the position full-time?
Fifth-Year Alumni
(Class of 2008-2009)
First-Year Alumni
(Class of 2012-2013)
Count
Percent
Count
Percent
Yes
66
82.5%
83
80.6%
No
14
17.5%
20
19.4%
How closely related was your college major/specialization to your first position?
Fifth-Year Alumni
(Class of 2008-2009)
Directly related
Somewhat related
Not related
First-Year Alumni
(Class of 2012-2013)
Count
Percent
Count
Percent
32
28
22
39.0%
34.1%
26.8%
59
28
16
57.3%
27.2%
15.5%
Which of the following best describes your current employment status?
Fifth-Year Alumni
(Class of 2008-2009)
Count
Percent
Employed full-time
Employed part-time
Not employed, but seeking employment
Not employed, and not looking
72
4
8
4
81.8%
4.5%
9.1%
4.5%
First-Year Alumni
(Class of 2012-2013)
Count
Percent
89
21
17
6
66.9%
15.8%
12.8%
4.5%
What is your current salary range?
Fifth-Year Alumni
(Class of 2008-2009)
Count
Percent
under $10,000
$10,000 to $19,999
$20,000 to $29,999
$30,000 to $39,999
$40,000 to $49,999
$50,000 to $59,999
$60,000 to $69,999
$70,000 to $79,999
Planning and Institutional Effectiveness: Alumni Survey 2014
3
2
2
6
19
19
12
3
April 17, 2015
4.1%
2.7%
2.7%
8.2%
26.0%
26.0%
16.4%
4.1%
First-Year Alumni
Class of 2012-2013)
Count
Percent
8
11
11
24
22
17
9
2
7.3%
10.1%
10.1%
22.0%
20.2%
15.6%
8.3%
1.8%
P a g e | 11
Fifth-Year Alumni
(Class of 2008-2009)
Count
Percent
$80,000 to $89,999
$90,000 to $99,999
$100,000 and above
3
2
2
4.1%
2.7%
2.7%
First-Year Alumni
Class of 2012-2013)
Count
Percent
2
1
2
1.8%
.9%
1.8%
Current Position Salary Range
100%
90%
80%
2.7%
2.7%
4.1%
1.8%
.9%
1.8%
1.8%
4.1%
8.3%
16.4%
15.6%
70%
$100,000 and above
$90,000 to $99,999
60%
20.2%
26.0%
$80,000 to $89,999
$70,000 to $79,999
$60,000 to $69,999
50%
$50,000 to $59,999
$40,000 to $49,999
40%
22.0%
$30,000 to $39,999
$20,000 to $29,999
30%
26.0%
$10,000 to $19,999
under $10,000
10.1%
20%
8.2%
10%
0%
10.1%
2.7%
2.7%
4.1%
7.3%
Percent
Percent
Current Employer:
Fifth-Year Alumni (Class of 2008-2009)
Anthropologie
Arlington Public Schools
Ashcraft & Gerel
BCT Partners
Booz Allen Hamilton
CBRE, Inc.
Planning and Institutional Effectiveness: Alumni Survey 2014
April 17, 2015
CEB
CGS Inc.
Chic Communications
P a g e | 12
CMS
Conners Sales Group
Coulter Companies
DBI Architects
Department of Justice
Discovery Communications
Drug Enforcement Administration
Fairfax County Government Center
Fairfax County Public Schools
FDAnews
Federal Bureau of Investigation
FedInsider
Georgia Southern University
(Government)
Grant Thornton
Iliff Nursing and Rehab Center
Inova
Integrity Management Consulting
Jacobs Engineering
John Benjamin Designs LLC
KidsPeace
Kings Super Markets
Ledroit Brands
Lilly Pulitzer
Loudoun County Public Schools
MD Department of Juvenile Services
Meridian Senior
Ministry of Finance and Economic
Affairs
Montgomery County Public Schools
NORC at the University of Chicago
NVCC
NYP
ODS Graphics (Pentagon)
PKDL
Porcelanosa USA
RCM Solutions
RTI International
Smart & Harris
Solutions by Design II
St. Francis International School
St. Johns
St. Thomas More Cathedral School
University Hospital
University of Iowa
University of Maryland University
College
USG
Verizon
Virginia Government
Virginia Hospital Center
Washington D.C. Superior Court
Washington Hospital Center
WVU Healthcare Services
Xavier High School
YWCA USA
Florida State University
George Mason University
Georgetown University
Healthy Directions
Howard Hughes Medical InstituteJanelia Research Campus
HSBC
InfoReliance Corporation
Inova Health System
Internal Revenue Service
J. Crew
J. McLaughlin
Jerusalem Farm
JMA Interior Decoration
JP Morgan Chase & Co.
Kaiser Permanente
Kimpton Hotels and Restaurants
KPMG
La petite academy
Luck Companies
Magee Rehabilitation Hospital
Marjorie McKnight, M.D.
Marshalls
Marymount University
Media Prowler
Medstar Washington Hospital Center
Mercado Consultants, Inc.
Metropolitan Police Department
Microbac Laboratories
Morton Hospital-Steward
Navy Federal Credit Union
Neiman Marcus
NIH
Nine West Group
North Carolina State University
NOVA Pain and Rehab
Pinnacle Health
Porcelanosa USA
Quinn Emanuel
Radio Shack
Rehabcare
Rohini Chopra
Shah & Shah Distinctive Jewelers
Somerset County Health Department
St. Joseph Hospital
STC
The Teal Center
Ultimate Staffing
University of Maryland University
College
US Conference of Catholic Bishops
US Fitness, LLC
Vykin Corporation
W Homes
Washington Hospital Center
Your Health Magazine
Youth Apostles Institute- Old Dominion
University Catholic Campus Ministry
Zara
First-Year Alumni (Class of 2012-2013)
ACS
Aliron
Allied Barton Security Services
ASEAN-Korea Centre
Aspen Ski Company
Bank Al Rajhi
Bogman, Inc.
Builders Design
CACI, Inc.
Carlyn and Company Interiors and
Design
Chaplain Alliance for Religious Liberty
Clifton Larson Allen LLP
Computing Technologies
Costco Pharmacy
Costco Wholesale
Cowles Nissan of Woodbridge
CRI Solutions, Inc.
David's Bridal
Davis Computer Technologies
Department of Family Services
Ellucian
Emeritus Senior Living
Encore Ballroom Couture
Enterprise Resource Planning Inc.
ExxonMobil
Fairfax Co. Gov't OFC
Fairfax County
Fairfax County Public Schools
Fiorella Pizzeria
Planning and Institutional Effectiveness: Alumni Survey 2014
April 17, 2015
P a g e | 13
Educational Experiences since Graduation
Have you pursued further education since completing your degree at MU?
Fifth-Year Alumni
(Class of 2008-2009)
First-Year Alumni
Class of 2012-2013)
Count
Percent
Count
Percent
46
40
53.5%
46.5%
48
85
36.1%
63.9%
Yes
No
If you are working toward or have completed another degree, please indicate your level of degree.
Fifth-Year Alumni
(Class of 2008-2009)
First-Year Alumni
Class of 2012-2013)
Count
Percent
Count
Percent
2
1
1
29
1
2
5.6%
2.8%
2.8%
80.6%
2.8%
5.6%
1
1
1
32
4
4
2.3%
2.3%
2.3%
74.4%
9.3%
9.3%
Associates
Bachelors
Doctorate
Masters
Other
Professional
College/University Attended/Currently Attending:
Fifth-Year Alumni (Class of 2008-2009)
College of Southern Maryland
Columbia University
Florida Atlantic University
George Mason University
The George Washington University
Georgetown University
HTW- Berlin, Germany
Johns Hopkins University
Marshall University School of Medicine
Marymount University
Northern Virginia community college
Roger Williams University School of
Law
Sacred Heart University
Stevens Institute of Technology
The University of Edinburgh
University of Cincinnati
University of Maryland
University of Maryland, College Park
University of Pennsylvania
University of Phoenix
University of Pittsburgh
Virginia Commonwealth University
Walden University
William Patterson University
Maryland University of Integrative
Health
Marymount University
North Carolina State University
Norwich
Nova Southeastern University
Prince Georges Community College
The George Washington University
Tidewater Community College
University of Baltimore School of Law
University of Maryland
University of Maryland University
College
University of Surrey
Utica College
Virginia Tech
Walden
Wilmington University
First-Year Alumni (Class of 2012-2013)
JTCC
American University
Capitol Technical University
Duquesne University
Florida State University
Frontier Nursing University
George Mason University
Johns Hopkins University
Liberty University
Please indicate your participation in:
Fifth-Year Alumni
(Class of 2008-2009)
Americorps
Peace Corps
First-Year Alumni
Class of 2012-2013)
Count
Percent
Count
Percent
0
0
0.0%
0.0%
0
0
0.0%
0.0%
Planning and Institutional Effectiveness: Alumni Survey 2014
April 17, 2015
P a g e | 14
Alumni Relations
How do you typically find out about Marymount’s alumni events? (Count of alumni responses)
49
Emails
39
Postcards/invitations in the mail
18
Friends
5
The MU website
4
Other
Twitter
28
3
11
9
8
2
2
Fifth-Year
Other:

43
14
14
None
LinkedIn
99
First-Year
Coach, Facebook, family, Instagram, mother graduated from Marymount, have not been
What types of events would you like to attend? (Count of alumni responses)
44
Social
Notable speakers
20
None
23
48
17
Cultural
40
15
Sporting events
32
13
Student interaction
Catholic/religious events
6
5
5
38
22
Fifth-Year
Other:

58
18
Service/volunteer opportunities
Other
77
36
First-Year
Academic events, career-related, firing employees, veterans, PIM, networking, potential jobs, related to field
Have you attended an alumni event over the last two years?
Fifth-Year Alumni
(Class of 2008-2009)
Yes
No
Count
19
68
Planning and Institutional Effectiveness: Alumni Survey 2014
First-Year Alumni
Class of 2012-2013)
Percent
21.8%
78.2%
April 17, 2015
Count
31
101
Percent
23.5%
76.5%
P a g e | 15
If you have not attended an event over the last two years, why not?
Theme 1: Busy/Inconvenient Timing (N = 48)
Many alumni indicated they did not attend an event because they were busy for a variety of reasons or the events
were scheduled at inconvenient times. Of those who were busy, many indicated they did not attend due
scheduling conflicts, school, or work-related obligations. Some alumni indicated that the timing of the event was
poor or inconvenient, while others stated the timing often conflicted with work schedules.
Example Responses:
“Scheduling conflict”
“I have not attended the events because they conflicted with my work schedule.”
“Real Busy. But I do want to attend one in the future”
Theme 2: Distance/Location (N =38)
Alumni stated distance as a barrier to attending events, indicating they did not live in the area or lived too far
away.
Example Responses:
“Distance, live too far away”
“Moved out of State for a few years. “
“I do not live in VA where most of them take place”
Theme 3: No Interest (N =28)
A number of alumni stated they did not attend an event due to a lack of interest. Some respondents indicated the
events themselves were not interesting, while others stated they were not interested in general.
Example Responses:
“Just not interested in it.”
“Nothing interests me”
“They don't seem interesting”
Theme 4: Uninformed (N =27)
Alumni stated they did not attend events because they were not aware of them. Many indicated they simply were
not aware of the events, while others specifically said they did not received notices or emails regarding the events.
Example Responses:
“I have not received any emails about any alumni events”
“I have not known about the events.”
“I do not receive direct emails or any alumni communication unless I visit the website or reach out to
fellow classmates which is not often. “
Theme 5: Miscellaneous Reasons (N =20)
There were a variety of other reasons given by alumni for not attending an event in the past two years. Some of
these reasons included not being able to financially afford to attend, no friends were attending, and no connection
to Marymount University.
Example Responses:
“I never really had a connection with the people at Marymount. I wouldn't feel comfortable going because
I don't really know anyone.”
“Too far away and unaffordable to me. “
“Sometimes it was the timing, but in all honesty I don't really feel comfortable going to an alumni event
because I didn't know too many people while I was in school so I don't want to be the awkward loner at
the events.”
Planning and Institutional Effectiveness: Alumni Survey 2014
April 17, 2015
P a g e | 16
Are you interested in volunteering to assist with alumni events and would like us to contact you?
Fifth-Year Alumni
(Class of 2008-2009)
Yes
No
First-Year Alumni
Class of 2012-2013)
Count
Percent
Count
Percent
14
73
16.1%
83.9%
38
94
28.8%
71.2%
What were the strongest aspects of your MU education?
Theme 1: Quality of Professors/Faculty/Staff/Advisors (N =75)
The vast majority of comments related to the high quality of professors, faculty, staff, and advisors. A number of
specific individuals were pointed out in this section, but more generally alumni indicated this group was helpful
and knowledgeable in their respective areas of expertise. Many alumni also stated one of the strongest aspects of
their Marymount education was the willingness of both faculty and advisors to assist them one-on-one. They felt
this group of Marymount wanted them (i.e. the students) to succeed.
Example Responses:
“One on one attention, support from faculty, (the faculty went above and beyond to help me flourish and
succeed and I can't not thank them enough)”
“Knowledgeable instructors with real experience”
“My academic advisor; ______. As a shy international student, she recognized my strengths and
weaknesses and effectively encouraged me in the right direction, i.e pursuing an economics degree. She
took time to sit and discuss issues with me and really made a difference in my Marymount stay when I felt
like I was drowning in the unknown. I will forever be grateful to her.”
Theme 2: Skills Learned (N =27)
Many alumni stated the skills they gained from their time at Marymount was one of the strongest aspects of their
education. These skills benefited them when they entered the real-world after college. Some skills referenced in
this section included communication skills, leadership skills, ability to conduct research and analysis, critical
thinking skills, and writing skills.
Example Responses:
“The strongest aspects of my Marymount education would have to be my ability to communicate
effectively in the workplace as well as my strong social interaction skills.”
“The written and critical thinking skills I obtained”
“My strongest aspects are the leadership and teamwork skills I learned from intercollegiate athletics as
well as business classes and projects that I had worked on.“
Theme 3: Class/School Size (N =25)
A number of alumni stated one of the strongest aspects of their Marymount education was the small school and
class sizes. Many indicated the small size made it easier to learn, allowed them to better know their teachers and
classmates, promoted individual attention, and facilitated better communication with faculty.
Example Responses:
“Small classes which made it easier to learn “
“Small class sizes fostered relationships with professors”
“I liked the small school - smaller class sizes and the ability to actually get to know teachers and other
students.”
Theme 4: Courses/Curriculum (N =19)
A number of alumni indicated the courses and curriculum as a strength in their education. Many stated they
enjoyed the courses they took for their specific majors/programs as well as the core classes. Others indicated they
liked that the structure of the curriculum. For example, some alumni liked that teamwork and discussion
components of the curriculum.
Planning and Institutional Effectiveness: Alumni Survey 2014
April 17, 2015
P a g e | 17
Example Responses:
“Team work and discussions”
“Taking a variety of classes”
“… Curriculum for my degree was well designed..”
Theme 5: Program/Course Specific (N =11)
A number of alumni identified unique specific courses or programs as the strongest aspects of their Marymount
education. More broadly, though, alumni often referenced that the content of the particular program or course
helped prepare them for the real-world.
Example Responses:
“The business/finance program provided a great foundation. The skills I learned prepared to accomplish
any task required at my first job. Since then, I have moved to my second job and started a Master’s of
Science in Finance at Johns Hopkins University. The course work in my master’s program does not present
a challenge. I believe this is due to the quality of my undergraduate education. “
“This answer is specific towards fashion design. I appreciated the fashion show we had every year. It gave
us realistic timelines and job related tasks/experiences.”
“My nursing education. The staff, clinicals, and curriculum lead me to my dream job.”
Theme 6: Classmates (N =11)
Interactions with fellow classmates was also viewed as a strength of Marymount education. Alumni indicated they
enjoyed being exposed to classmates of different perspectives and cultures. They also stated they enjoyed the
bonds created with classmates outside of the classroom.
Example Responses:
“The support of my fellow students. We were not in competition but wanted to see everyone succeed!”
“The bond among students.”
“Interacting with students of different cultures”
Theme 7: Overall Education (N =10)
A handful of alumni indicated that there education as a whole was one of the strongest aspects of their experience
at Marymount. These often included broad comments about the atmosphere of the university and the quality of
the education.
Example Responses:
“The education provided was excellent.”
“Great learning … Great atmosphere…environment conducive for an education … Learned a lot from
Marymount”
“Diverse education.”
Theme 8: Campus Resources (N =10)
Alumni indicated the types of campus resources offered as a strength of their education. Some of these resources
included the tutoring services, library and learning services, study abroad program, and the campus ministry.
Example Responses:
“Student Clubs, Campus Ministry, Study Abroad opportunities, I wish that I did take advantage of the
study abroad program…”
“Socialization with Campus Ministry events. Attending extracurricular events such as the student play...”
“…Study abroad staff was really helpful both times I went abroad…Librarians were always really helpful in
getting books from other schools and encouraging you to utilize regional resources also the fact that
printing was free was super helpful … for the most part the administration is pretty accessible”
Theme 9: Miscellaneous Strengths (N =23)
There were a variety of other strengths proposed by Marymount alumni. These included Marymount’s sense of
community, the networking opportunities, and ability to make connections in their respective field. Additionally,
other strengths included the location of the school, the internship requirement, and preparation for the future.
Planning and Institutional Effectiveness: Alumni Survey 2014
April 17, 2015
P a g e | 18
Example Responses:
“To be fully prepared for the work place.”
“Campus environment, professorial interest and skill level, excellent internship placements”
“The close knit community. I really enjoyed that the faculty and staff knew you by first name and some
took the time to get to know you on a more personal level.”
“I liked the smaller classes and location of the school.”
What aspects of your MU education need the most improvement?
Theme 1: Quality of Professors/Faculty/Staff/Advisors (N = 28)
Many alumni indicated that academic advising needs great improvements, as many stated the advisors seemed to
have little knowledge and did not adequately guide them in choosing the appropriate academic path. Some
professors were said to be of poor quality and did not communicate well.
Example Responses:
“ADVISING needs to be improved! “
“The academic advising was very poor and advisors seemed to have little knowledge or investment in the
student's individual learning path…”
“…However, there are a few professors who did absolutely nothing for my learning and had no clue what
they were doing as well. They, themselves, told us they were unprepared.”
Theme 2: Preparation for Future (N = 28)
Alumni indicated that preparation for life after Marymount needed improvement. They commented that they had
little job searching support, and had hoped for more assistance in determining what jobs to apply for in their
respective fields. In addition, alumni stated they did not feel well-prepared for graduate school.
Example Responses:
“Job search after graduation.”
“The Career Center was terrible in offering help finding a job in my field.”
“The coursework could have been more challenging. I do not feel that I was as well-prepared for graduate
school as I would have liked to be.”
Theme 3: Courses/Curriculum (N = 26)
Alumni commented that courses and curriculum needed improvement more generally. A number commented
that courses could have been more rigorous and the academics more challenging. Additionally, many wished to
see a greater availability of courses.
Example Responses:
“The coursework could have been more challenging. I do not feel that I was as well-prepared for graduate
school as I would have liked to be.”
“Variety of courses. There is also a lack of Physics and other science /engineering courses that I would have
liked to have taken.”
“Evening classes for working adults”
Theme 4: Course/Program Specific (N = 24)
Many alumni indicated improvements needed to be made to certain courses and programs. Often, they indicated
programs needed to expand upon certain topics or certain courses should have been taught through a different
style.
Example Responses:
“Providing classes that keep up with the newest design trends (mobile design, responsive design, etc.)!”
“Calculus! I do not like the way it is designed. Math is a hard subject that should be taught by a teacher,
not by group work.”
“In my field of Education, I was not provided with enough training on special education in terms of
identification process, providing services, etc. I also needed more training on technology in the classroom,
communication with parents, and addressing classroom concerns with administrations.”
Planning and Institutional Effectiveness: Alumni Survey 2014
April 17, 2015
P a g e | 19
Theme 5: Internships, Research Opportunities, and Skills Development (N = 19)
Respondents indicated they would have liked to have seen more research opportunities available, as well as better
development of certain skills, including writing skills, oral presentation skills, and leadership skills. Other alumni
expressed difficulty finding internship sites.
Example Responses:
“Better access to resources for internships. I know when I was at Marymount, finding an internship was a
very tough experience. There weren't many resources that I knew of to help find one in my major.”
“Leadership skills”
“The delivery of writing, APA format, and literature reviews need to be improved.”
Theme 6: Campus Resources and Connection to MU (N = 10)
Alumni indicated certain resources offered by the university, such as the Career Development Center, the library,
and advising, needed improvement. They also indicated access to certain resources was difficult. Another area of
improvement touched upon by alumni was that of campus interconnectivity. A number of alumni stated they felt
disconnected with the university, particularly main campus when the majority of classes taken by the alumni were
at the Ballston campus.
Example Responses:
“Career Services and counselors. The counselors should get more in touch with students and the career
center should give more options for work.”
“Connection to the main campus. I hated being disconnected from the main campus. I sometimes felt like I
wasn't even attending MU as a transfer. I was just taking classes offsite at the Ballston location…”
“Integration of international students who do not stay on campus into the Marymount 'culture' /life or
student activities…”
“I had to take some courses over the summer and felt it was harder to access some of the university
resources and staff during this time.”
Theme 7: Cost (N = 6)
Alumni indicated that receiving an education at Marymount was too expensive. They also stated the financial aid
and scholarships available to students should be improved.
Example Responses:
“Available scholarships to all students needing financial assistance. Education was extremely expensive;
still paying off student loans!”
“It’s way too expensive. “
“The cost of education was not worth it for my projected salary. Mu is too expensive.”
Theme 8: Miscellaneous (N = 25)
Alumni listed a variety of other areas of Marymount that needed improvement. Some were specific to the
individual’s situation, while others were more general such as the culture of diversity, technology advancements,
campus housing, and MU’s reputation.
Example Responses:
“Technology upgrades within the classroom”
“Its reputation, both in terms of public perception and people's knowledge of its existence.”
“Housing services for the students living on campus, and MU needs a wider variety of classes”
If you have any other comments regarding your MU education, please provide them here:
Theme 1: Overall Education/Experience (N = 18)
Many alumni made broad comments about their overall experience and education at Marymount University. The
vast majority of these comments were positive, as many stated they had a great experience and enjoyed their time
at MU.
Planning and Institutional Effectiveness: Alumni Survey 2014
April 17, 2015
P a g e | 20
Example Responses:
“I felt I got a great education at MU and I am really glad I chose it as my school”
“Great experience, would do it again and would recommend it!”
“It was a great educational experience. I thoroughly enjoyed all aspects of Marymount. The way the
community is connected add the university’s' charm. It makes Marymount unique. I hope the school
doesn't lose that since of community in the future.”
Theme 2: Preparation for Future (N = 16)
Alumni indicated they did not feel prepared for finding a job after college. Many wished there had been better
career resources and in-class preparation for securing post-college employment. However, some alumni did state
they felt prepared for a career in their respective fields after college.
Example Responses:
“I felt that I was prepared to go out and work in my related field after graduation!”
“It would be nice to have a class or a semester-long class that talks about the transition from college
student to young professional. More so, talk about the practical skills you will need to develop in regards
to your degree (In my case, Business Major, talk about skills and traits that companies look for when hiring
individuals)”
“Needs a better career center to help students find an internship/job that is suitable for them.”
Theme 3: Cost, Campus Living, and Facilities/Parking (N = 10)
Alumni stated Marymount was too expensive and had debt due to student loans. Additionally, respondents
indicated parking posed an issue and campus living had its challenges.
Example Responses:
“The problem with MU isn't the education, it’s the living conditions and the residence life dorm system. At
20 years old, I was being stalked and abused by a former boyfriend and current dorm resident. not only
did my cries for help go unheeded by residence life, but I was blamed, shamed, and told I would be
arrested and/or not allowed to graduate by members of the university.”
“Parking is a big problem…”
“I need a scholarship. I feel as though I wasted my money because I’m not in my field and not successful at
all. I'm in a ton of debt for no reason. MU could help former alumni pay for student loans.”
Theme 4: Course and Program Specific Statements/Curriculum (N = 9)
A number of alumni listed aspects they liked and disliked about certain courses and programs at Marymount.
Many alumni stated a number of courses and/or programs needed improvement.
Example Responses:
“Loved the nursing department and faculty. Honestly, the group of people I learned with became the best
support system and I hope other graduating classes find it the same.”
“Please, improve the business school programs and Accounting classes, and focus more on recruiting and
getting students into right positions. “
“MU needs more fashion up to date professors… No favoritism… More sewing techniques”
Theme 5: Quality of Professors/Faculty/Staff/Advisors (N = 9)
Overall, comments were positive in this section with many alumni emphasized particular professors who were of
high quality as well as the general excellence of faculty and staff. However, some also indicated problems with
teachers, such as information not being taught well, and advisors.
Example Responses:
“Found my teachers held favorites and this would affect work. Found some teachers would not teach
information well.”
“My advisor constantly changed and had to look for them every semester”
“Great professors!”
“At MU, my greatest appreciation was the faculty and staff that all participated in my academic career.
With smaller classrooms and encouragement to attend office hours, I formed a relationship with many of
my professors and was able to gain an education that was moderately personalized”
Planning and Institutional Effectiveness: Alumni Survey 2014
April 17, 2015
P a g e | 21
Theme 6: Miscellaneous (N = 9)
Alumni made a number of other additional comments on a variety of topics. For example, alumni stated that
alumni activities were lacking, there needed to be better textbook information available, and the internship system
was problematic.
Example Responses:
“Seriously, the internship things was a mess. I received zero help finding one that "qualified" and was
denied approval on my previous three internships.”
“I'm a PROUD MU alum. I would like there to be more alum activities…”
“Alumni events do not currently encourage life-long learning. They are just aimed at getting alumni
engaged socially which is a waste of time. The university would be much better served keeping its
graduates connected through continuous learning and education.”\
“It would be helpful to know before spending a lot of money on a textbook at the book store whether or
not they will be accepting it back after the class”
Planning and Institutional Effectiveness: Alumni Survey 2014
April 17, 2015
P a g e | 22
GRADUATE ALUMNI
Student Demographic Data
Fifth-Year Alumni
(Class of 2008-2009)
First-Year Alumni
Class of 2012-2013)
Count
%
Count
%
What degree did you receive?
Certificate
Masters
Doctorate
4
110
5
3.4%
92.4%
4.2%
9
170
14
4.7%
88.1%
7.2%
What school did you belong to?
Arts and Sciences
Business Administration
Education and Human Services
Malek School of Health Professions
7
43
56
13
5.9%
36.1%
47.1%
10.9%
12
68
87
26
6.2%
35.2%
45.1%
13.5%
At which location did you take the majority of your classes?
Main Campus
Ballston
Reston
Online
23
82
9
1
20.0%
71.3%
7.8%
0.9%
43
129
17
4
22.3%
66.8%
8.8%
2.1%
What was your primary enrollment status?
Full-time
Part-time
65
54
54.6%
45.4%
117
76
60.6%
39.4%
4
3.4%
12
6.3%
3
2.5%
8
4.2%
112
94.1%
170
89.5%
Were you employed, while attending classes?
Employed full-time
Employed part-time
Not employed
65
41
13
54.6%
34.5%
10.9%
104
65
24
53.9%
33.7%
12.4%
If you were employed did you work on campus?
Yes
No
19
87
17.9%
82.1%
31
136
18.6%
81.4%
How many years did you live on campus or in university housing?
None
Less than 1 year
1 to 2 years
3 or more years
115
2
2
0
96.6%
1.7%
1.7%
0.0%
172
6
8
5
90.1%
3.1%
4.2%
2.6%
Which of the following statements describes your start at MU?
Marymount was the first college or university I attended.
I transferred into Marymount from a community college or fouryear college or university.
I earned a degree from another college or university prior to
enrolling at Marymount.
Planning and Institutional Effectiveness: Alumni Survey 2014
April 17, 2015
P a g e | 23
Program
Arts and Sciences
Interior Design
Literature, Language, and the Humanities
Business Administration
Business Administration
Computer Security and Information Assurance
Certificate
Health Care Informatics Certificate
Health Care Management
Health Education and Promotion
Human Resource Management
Information Technology
Information Technology Certificate
Knowledge and Learning in Organizations Certificate
Leadership and Management
Leadership Certificate
Leading & Managing Change Certificate
Legal Administration
Non Profit Management Certificate
Paralegal Studies Certificate
Education and Human Services
Clinical Mental Health Counseling
Community Counseling
Education: Administration and Supervision of PK-12
Education: Catholic School Leadership
Education: English As a Second Language
Education: PK-6
Education: Professional Studies
Education: Secondary
Forensic Psychology
Pastoral Counseling
Psychology: Forensic and Counseling
School Counseling
Malek School of Health Professions
Nursing (DNP)
Nursing
Physical Therapy (DPT)
Total
Planning and Institutional Effectiveness: Alumni Survey 2014
Fifth-Year Alumni
(Class of 2008-2009)
Count
First-Year Alumni
Class of 2012-2013)
Count
7
1
6
47
12
12
4
8
74
21
19
5
14
121
33
1
1
2
0
13
4
8
4
1
0
2
1
1
0
0
0
56
0
9
0
3
3
9
2
2
22
0
1
5
9
0
4
5
119
1
5
6
13
9
0
2
5
0
2
6
1
2
87
6
2
6
0
5
10
3
6
43
2
0
4
20
1
6
13
193
1
18
10
21
13
1
2
7
1
3
6
1
2
143
6
11
6
3
8
19
5
8
65
2
1
9
29
1
10
18
312
April 17, 2015
Total
P a g e | 24
The Marymount Experience
From your experience at MU, how would you rate each of the following? (Scale: 1=”Poor”, 5=”Excellent”)
Fifth-Year Alumni (Class of 2008-2009)
Overall Experience
Academic Quality
Major or Program
Academic Advising
Academic Reputation
Library and Learning Services
Valid N
Poor
Needs to be
Improved
Adequate
Good
Excellent
Mean
Std. Dev.
119
119
118
117
118
118
0.0%
0.8%
0.8%
4.3%
0.8%
0.8%
0.8%
2.5%
1.7%
6.8%
4.2%
2.5%
8.4%
7.6%
6.8%
16.2%
18.6%
20.3%
47.9%
41.2%
32.2%
35.0%
49.2%
48.3%
42.9%
47.9%
58.5%
37.6%
27.1%
28.0%
4.33
4.33
4.46
3.95
3.97
4.00
0.67
0.79
0.77
1.10
0.84
0.82
Valid N
Poor
Needs to be
Improved
Adequate
Good
Excellent
Mean
Std. Dev.
190
190
188
189
190
190
0.0%
0.0%
1.1%
2.1%
1.1%
1.6%
13.7%
2.1%
1.6%
6.9%
6.3%
4.7%
43.7%
11.6%
6.9%
23.3%
21.1%
20.5%
41.1%
43.7%
39.9%
32.3%
46.3%
47.9%
31.6%
42.6%
50.5%
35.4%
25.3%
25.3%
4.24
4.27
4.37
3.92
3.88
3.91
0.75
0.75
0.77
1.03
0.90
0.89
First-Year Alumni (Class of 2012-2013)
Overall Experience
Academic Quality
Major or Program
Academic Advising
Academic Reputation
Library and Learning Services
For each of the following skills, please indicate how well you believe your education prepared you to: (Scale: 1=”Poor”,
5=”Excellent”)
Fifth-Year Alumni (Class of 2008-2009)
Find a job in your field
Pursue more education in your
field
Conduct research to support a
position
Develop a coherent written
argument
Deliver a coherent oral
presentation
Use quantitative/qualitative
techniques within your
professional field
Use technology effectively in a
workplace environment
Apply knowledge and skills to new
situations
Solve problems in your field using
your knowledge and skills
Find appropriate sources of
information
Evaluate the quality of information
(e.g. scholarly articles,
newspapers)
Valid N
Poor
Needs to be
Improved
Adequate
Good
Excellent
Mean
Std. Dev.
119
0.8%
4.2%
16.8%
43.7%
34.5%
4.07
0.87
119
0.8%
2.5%
22.7%
47.9%
26.1%
3.96
0.82
118
0.8%
4.2%
34.7%
43.2%
16.9%
3.71
0.83
119
0.8%
6.7%
16.0%
50.4%
26.1%
3.94
0.88
119
0.8%
3.4%
17.6%
47.1%
31.1%
4.04
0.84
119
1.7%
5.1%
17.8%
50.8%
24.6%
3.92
0.88
119
0.8%
7.6%
20.2%
52.9%
18.5%
3.81
0.86
119
0.8%
2.5%
6.7%
56.3%
33.6%
4.19
0.74
118
0.8%
0.8%
12.7%
50.8%
34.7%
4.18
0.75
118
0.8%
0.8%
13.6%
51.7%
33.1%
4.15
0.75
116
0.9%
0.9%
15.5%
50.0%
32.8%
4.13
0.76
Planning and Institutional Effectiveness: Alumni Survey 2014
April 17, 2015
P a g e | 25
Understand the major ethical
dilemmas in your field
Determine the most ethically
appropriate response to a
situation
Valid N
Poor
Needs to be
Improved
Adequate
Good
Excellent
Mean
Std. Dev.
116
0.9%
1.7%
13.8%
43.1%
40.5%
4.21
0.81
114
0.9%
1.8%
12.3%
44.7%
40.4%
4.22
0.80
First-Year Alumni (Class of 2012-2013)
Find a job in your field
Pursue more education in your
field
Conduct research to support a
position
Develop a coherent written
argument
Deliver a coherent oral
presentation
Use quantitative/qualitative
techniques within your
professional field
Use technology effectively in a
workplace environment
Apply knowledge and skills to
new situations
Solve problems in your field using
your knowledge and skills
Find appropriate sources of
information
Evaluate the quality of
information (e.g. scholarly
articles, newspapers)
Understand the major ethical
dilemmas in your field
Determine the most ethically
appropriate response to a
situation
Valid N
Poor
Needs to be
Improved
Adequate
Good
Excellent
Mean
Std. Dev.
183
2.2%
9.8%
23.5%
35.0%
29.5%
3.80
1.04
182
1.1%
5.5%
19.2%
47.8%
26.4%
3.93
0.88
182
1.6%
6.6%
24.2%
42.3%
25.3%
3.83
0.94
183
0.0%
3.3%
18.6%
42.1%
36.1%
4.11
0.82
183
0.0%
1.1%
16.9%
45.9%
36.1%
4.17
0.74
184
1.1%
7.6%
21.2%
41.3%
28.8%
3.89
0.95
184
0.5%
6.5%
19.0%
45.1%
28.8%
3.95
0.89
183
0.0%
1.1%
14.8%
44.3%
39.9%
4.23
0.74
184
0.5%
0.0%
12.0%
46.2%
41.3%
4.28
0.71
184
0.5%
.5%
12.0%
47.3%
39.7%
4.25
0.73
182
0.5%
1.6%
17.0%
41.2%
39.6%
4.18
0.81
184
0.0%
2.7%
11.4%
45.7%
40.2%
4.23
0.76
183
0.0%
2.7%
14.2%
45.9%
37.2%
4.17
0.77
Planning and Institutional Effectiveness: Alumni Survey 2014
April 17, 2015
P a g e | 26
Percentage of Alumni Respondents Indicating* that MU's Education Prepared Them Well To:
Find a job in your field
78.2%
64.5%
73.9%
74.2%
Pursue more education in your field
60.2%
67.6%
Conduct research to support a position
76.5%
78.1%
Develop a coherent written argument
78.2%
82.0%
Deliver a coherent oral presentation
75.4%
70.1%
Use quantitative/qualitative techniques within your professional field
71.4%
73.9%
Use technology effectively in a workplace environment
89.9%
84.2%
Apply knowledge and skills to new situations
Solve problems in your field using your knowledge and skills
85.6%
87.5%
Find appropriate sources of information
84.7%
87.0%
82.8%
80.8%
Evaluate the quality of information (e.g. scholarly articles, newspapers)
Understand the major ethical dilemmas in your field
83.6%
85.9%
Determine the most ethically appropriate response to a situation
85.1%
83.1%
Fifth-Year
First-Year
*The percentage of alumni who responded to each item with “good” or “excellent”
Please indicate how much your education at MU contributed to the development of: (Scale: 1=”Not at All”, 4=”To a Great Extent”)
Fifth-Year Alumni (Class of 2008-2009)
Very Little
Somewhat
To a Great
Extent
Mean
Std. Dev.
2.5%
4.2%
48.7%
44.5%
3.35
.68
119
4.2%
22.7%
53.8%
19.3%
2.88
.76
Self-confidence
118
2.5%
6.8%
50.0%
40.7%
3.29
.71
Openness to new experiences
Interest in cultures different from your
own
Leadership skills
118
2.5%
8.5%
44.9%
44.1%
3.31
.73
118
3.4%
23.7%
45.8%
27.1%
2.97
.81
119
2.5%
10.9%
45.4%
41.2%
3.25
.75
Spirituality
119
37.0%
30.3%
21.0%
11.8%
2.08
1.03
Valid N
Not at All
Very Little
Somewhat
To a Great
Extent
Mean
Std. Dev.
Interest in lifelong learning
184
.5%
5.4%
46.2%
47.8%
3.05
.62
Awareness of global issues
184
1.1%
22.8%
46.2%
29.9%
3.05
.76
Self-confidence
184
1.1%
10.9%
48.4%
39.7%
3.27
.69
Valid N
Not at All
Interest in lifelong learning
119
Awareness of global issues
First-Year Alumni (Class of 2012-2013)
Planning and Institutional Effectiveness: Alumni Survey 2014
April 17, 2015
P a g e | 27
Valid N
Not at All
Very Little
Somewhat
To a Great
Extent
Mean
Std. Dev.
Openness to new experiences
Interest in cultures different from your
own
Leadership skills
184
.5%
6.5%
44.6%
48.4%
3.41
.64
183
3.8%
19.7%
41.0%
47.8%
3.08
.84
184
.5%
12.5%
43.5%
43.5%
3.30
.70
Spirituality
184
32.6%
28.3%
23.4%
15.8%
2.22
1.07
Percentage of Alumni Respondents Who Indicate* that MU's Education Contributed to Their
Development of:
93.3%
94.0%
Interest in lifelong learning
73.1%
76.1%
Awareness of global issues
90.7%
88.0%
Self-confidence
89.0%
92.9%
Openness to new experiences
72.9%
Interest in cultures different from your own
88.8%
86.6%
87.0%
Leadership skills
32.8%
39.1%
Spirituality
Fifth-Year
First-Year
*The percentage of alumni who responded to each item with “somewhat” or “to a great extent”
Did your education at Marymount include an internship?
Fifth-Year Alumni
(Class of 2008-2009)
Yes
No
Planning and Institutional Effectiveness: Alumni Survey 2014
April 17, 2015
First-Year Alumni
Class of 2012-2013)
Count
Percent
Count
Percent
63
56
52.9%
47.1%
111
78
58.7%
41.3%
P a g e | 28
If yes, please check if the experience allowed you to do any of the following (check all that apply): (Count of alumni
responses)
Improve understanding of responsibilities required in the
profession
54
88
52
Apply critical thinking skills
Network with professionals
50
Explore career interests
49
Develop a network of contacts
48
89
75
87
75
46
Work with a team in an organizational setting
80
43
Get professional feedback on career skills and options
76
41
Improve oral and written communication
31
Develop a portfolio of work samples
24
Obtain employment at your internship site
Fifth Year
75
46
29
First Year
Please indicate how strongly you agree with each of the following statements: (Scale: 1=”Strongly Disagree”, 5=”Strongly Agree”)
Fifth-Year Alumni (Class of 2008-2009)
I am in contact with friends and fellow
students from Marymount.
I am still in touch with faculty and
advisors.
I feel connected to Marymount.
I am well informed about activities for
alumni.
I am interested in remaining involved
with Marymount.
I would consider financially supporting
Marymount.
Marymount has a good reputation.
If I could start over, I would choose
Marymount again.
I would recommend Marymount to a
friend or family member.
My Marymount education was worth
the expense.
I am proud of being a Marymount
alumnus.
Valid N
Strongly
Disagree
Disagree
No Opinion
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Mean
Std. Dev.
119
10.9%
19.3%
7.6%
45.4%
16.8%
3.38
1.28
119
21.0%
36.1%
10.1%
24.4%
8.4%
2.63
1.29
119
13.4%
25.2%
24.4%
27.7%
9.2%
2.94
1.20
119
5.9%
19.3%
27.7%
37.8%
9.2%
3.25
1.06
119
3.4%
14.3%
31.9%
39.5%
10.9%
3.40
0.98
119
12.6%
21.8%
40.3%
20.2%
5.0%
2.83
1.05
119
0.8%
5.0%
16.8%
53.8%
23.5%
3.94
0.83
119
0.8%
3.4%
17.6%
51.3%
26.9%
4.00
0.81
119
0.8%
1.7%
9.3%
50.0%
38.1%
4.23
0.76
119
2.5%
9.3%
14.4%
48.3%
25.4%
3.85
0.99
119
0.8%
1.7%
17.6%
47.1%
32.8%
4.09
0.80
Planning and Institutional Effectiveness: Alumni Survey 2014
April 17, 2015
P a g e | 29
Valid N
Strongly
Disagree
Disagree
No Opinion
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Mean
Std. Dev.
119
3.4%
10.1%
10.1%
47.1%
29.4%
3.89
1.05
Valid N
Strongly
Disagree
Disagree
No Opinion
Agree
Strongly
Agree
Mean
Std. Dev.
190
5.3%
10.0%
9.5%
47.4%
27.9%
3.83
1.11
190
7.9%
29.5%
12.1%
39.5%
11.1%
3.16
1.20
190
6.3%
24.2%
24.7%
34.2%
10.5%
3.18
1.11
190
3.2%
24.7%
22.6%
41.6%
7.9%
3.26
1.02
188
1.6%
14.4%
35.1%
33.5%
15.4%
3.47
0.97
189
8.5%
25.9%
42.3%
20.1%
3.2%
2.84
0.95
189
0.5%
4.8%
20.1%
56.6%
18.0%
3.87
0.78
188
1.6%
8.0%
14.4%
51.6%
24.5%
3.89
0.91
189
1.1%
6.3%
11.1%
52.4%
29.1%
4.02
0.87
189
3.2%
12.7%
19.6%
40.7%
23.8%
3.69
1.07
189
0.5%
3.7%
18.0%
50.3%
27.5%
4.01
0.81
189
3.7%
11.1%
11.1%
49.2%
24.9%
3.80
1.05
My professional colleagues have
heard of Marymount.
First-Year Alumni (Class of 2012-2013)
I am in contact with friends and fellow
students from Marymount.
I am still in touch with faculty and
advisors.
I feel connected to Marymount.
I am well informed about activities for
alumni.
I am interested in remaining involved
with Marymount.
I would consider financially supporting
Marymount.
Marymount has a good reputation.
If I could start over, I would choose
Marymount again.
I would recommend Marymount to a
friend or family member.
My Marymount education was worth
the expense.
I am proud of being a Marymount
alumnus.
My professional colleagues have
heard of Marymount.
Please indicate if you participated in or used the following while attending Marymount:
Fifth-Year Alumni
(Class of 2008-2009)
Count (Yes)
Percent
Career Center
Cultural activities
Intercollegiate athletics
Intramural athletics
MU service opportunities
MU spiritual development activities
Research projects
Student clubs
Study Abroad program
31
15
0
0
14
13
41
14
6
Planning and Institutional Effectiveness: Alumni Survey 2014
26.1%
12.6%
0.0%
0.0%
11.8%
10.9%
34.5%
11.8%
5.0%
April 17, 2015
First-Year Alumni
(Class of 2012-2013)
Count (Yes)
Percent
63
26
3
4
30
22
67
36
21
33.2%
13.8%
1.6%
2.1%
15.9%
11.6%
35.4%
18.9%
11.2%
P a g e | 30
Occupational Experiences since Leaving Marymount
Relative to completing your degree, when did you find your first professional experience?
Fifth-Year Alumni
(Class of 2008-2009)
Count
Percent
Continued a position held while attending school
Found a new position prior to graduation
0-3 months
4-6 months
7-12 months
More than 12 months
Have not yet entered professional position since
graduation
First-Year Alumni
(Class of 2012-2013)
Count
Percent
45
16
22
16
10
8
37.8%
13.4%
18.5%
13.4%
8.4%
6.7%
59
34
35
14
15
6
32.1%
18.5%
19.0%
7.6%
8.2%
3.3%
2
1.7%
21
11.4%
Was the position full-time?
Fifth-Year Alumni
(Class of 2008-2009)
Count
Percent
Yes
No
102
13
88.7%
11.3%
First-Year Alumni
(Class of 2012-2013)
Count
Percent
144
19
88.3%
11.7%
How closely related was your college major/specialization to your first position?
Fifth-Year Alumni
(Class of 2008-2009)
Count
Percent
Directly related
Somewhat related
Not related
73
32
12
62.4%
27.4%
10.3%
First-Year Alumni
(Class of 2012-2013)
Count
Percent
91
55
18
55.5%
33.5%
11.0%
Which of the following best describes your current employment status?
Fifth-Year Alumni
(Class of 2008-2009)
Count
Percent
Employed full-time
Employed part-time
Not employed, but seeking employment
Not employed, and not looking
105
7
3
4
88.2%
5.9%
2.5%
3.4%
First-Year Alumni
(Class of 2012-2013)
Count
Percent
156
15
8
5
84.8%
8.2%
4.3%
2.7%
What is your current salary range?
Fifth-Year Alumni
(Class of 2008-2009)
Count
Percent
under $10,000
$10,000 to $19,999
$20,000 to $29,999
$30,000 to $39,999
$40,000 to $49,999
$50,000 to $59,999
$60,000 to $69,999
$70,000 to $79,999
$80,000 to $89,999
Planning and Institutional Effectiveness: Alumni Survey 2014
2
2
1
5
13
26
13
10
12
April 17, 2015
1.9%
1.9%
0.9%
4.6%
12.0%
24.1%
12.0%
9.3%
11.1%
First-Year Alumni
Class of 2012-2013)
Count
Percent
5
4
10
13
26
39
24
14
7
3.0%
2.4%
6.0%
7.8%
15.6%
23.4%
14.4%
8.4%
4.2%
P a g e | 31
Fifth-Year Alumni
(Class of 2008-2009)
Count
Percent
$90,000 to $99,999
$100,000 and above
4
20
3.7%
18.5%
First-Year Alumni
Class of 2012-2013)
Count
Percent
6
19
3.6%
11.4%
Current Position Salary Range
100%
11.4%
90%
18.5%
3.6%
4.2%
80%
3.7%
8.4%
70%
11.1%
$100,000 and above
14.4%
60%
50%
$90,000 to $99,999
$80,000 to $89,999
9.3%
$70,000 to $79,999
$60,000 to $69,999
12.0%
23.4%
40%
$50,000 to $59,999
$40,000 to $49,999
$30,000 to $39,999
$20,000 to $29,999
24.1%
30%
$10,000 to $19,999
15.6%
under $10,000
20%
12.0%
7.8%
10%
0%
6.0%
4.6%
.9%
1.9%
1.9%
2.4%
3.0%
Percent
Percent
Current Employer:
Fifth-Year Alumni (Class of 2008-2009)
American Cancer Society
Archdiocese of San Francisco
Argentine Air Attaché Office
Arlington Public Schools
BAE Systems
Booz Allen Hamilton
BRMi
CACI
CCFS
Central Intelligence Agency (CIA)
Chamex Hughes
Cisco
Contractor
Planning and Institutional Effectiveness: Alumni Survey 2014
April 17, 2015
Defense Logistics Agency, Department
of Defense
Deloitte Consulting
Department of Defense
Department of Justice
Department of State Hospitals
Department of Health and Human
P a g e | 32
Services
District of Columbia Human Resources
Dotin
Elizabeth Seton High School
Excel Rehabilitation
Exelis, Inc.
Fairfax
Fairfax County
Fairfax County Public Schools
Fairfax-Falls Church Community
Services Board
Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI)
Federal Government
Gates Hudson
Genesis Rehab Services
George Mason Regional Library
George Mason University
Georgetown University
Harbor Point Behavioral Health Center
Head Start
Henrico Public Schools
Holy Cross Health
Holy Cross Home Care and Hospice
Holy Cross Hospital
Holy Cross Senior Source
Illinois Department of Corrections
Kratos Defense
Life Link III
Lindamood-Bell
LMI
Loudoun County Public Schools
Management Training Corporation
Marymount University
Mayo Clinic
Mendota Mental Health Institute/Sand
Ridge Secure Treatment Center
Mental Health Partners
Montgomery County MD
Motion Picture Association of America
Nassau County Property Appraiser
National Defense Industrial Association
NCMEC
NHS
Northern Virginia Community College
Oshkosh Police Department
Police Executive Research Forum
PwC
Self Employed
Self Employed; home health PT for
Capital Home Health Care
Sports Therapy and Rehab
St. Ambrose Catholic School
St. Michael School
Strategic Intelligence Group
Teva Bio Pharmaceutical
The Boeing Company
The Jemicy School
The Kellar School at Inova Kellar Center
U.S. Navy
VIdant Medical Center
Walter Reed National Military Medical
Center
Diocese of Arlington
Distilled Spirits Council of the US
FACETS
Fairfax County Public Schools
Fairfax County (SBMHS)
Fasterseals
Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI)
Fairfax County Public Schools
FCPS Longfellow MS
Federal Housing Finance Agency
First Command Financial Services
Forfeiture Support Associates
ForrestPerkins
Future Technologies, Inc.
GDIT
GEICO
Genesis Rehab
George Mason University
Greenwich Physical Therapy Center
GW Medical Faculty Associates
Hampton Public Defenders Office
HCA Dominion Hospital
HITT Contracting Inc.
Holy Cross Hospital
ICP Medical
Inova
Kaseya
Kelly Educational Staffing Highlands
High School
Keystone Human Services
Kilda Group
King Saud Medical City
KPMG
Lahaina Physical Therapy
Logistics Applications Incorporated
Loudoun County Public Schools
Marymount University
MedStar National Rehabilitation
Hospital
Merrill Lynch
Microsoft
Minute Clinic-CVS
Morven Park
MZ Physical Therapy
National Center for Missing and
Exploited Children
National Credit Union Administration
(via Curzon Staffing)
National Institutes of Health
National Penn Bank
Nativity Catholic School
NFI North-Transitional Housing
Services
Northern VA Mental Health Institute
Northrop Grumman
Omniplex
Our Lady of Lourdes School
Palo Alto University
Panera Bread
Perkins and Will
Phoenix House
Postal Regulatory Commission
Powell Piper Radomsky
Providence St. Mary Foundation
Public Broadcasting Service
Puppet Labs
Regional Public Defender for Capital
Cases
First-Year Alumni (Class of 2012-2013)
Accenture
Advocates
Alexandria Sheriff's Department
Ameriprise Financial
Arlington Public Schools
ASCE
Association of American Medical
Colleges
AT-RISK International
Audi of America
Augusta Health Center
AutoLoop
BAE Systems
Booz Allen Hamilton
CADCA
Capital Defender Office - Virginia
Indigent Defense Commission
Catapult
Central Intelligence Agency (CIA)
City of Alexandria
Columbia State Community College
Community Education Centers, Inc.
Cornell University
Craven County Public Schools
CSC
Danville Orthopedic
DBI Architects
DC Superior Court
Department of Commerce
Department of Health and Human
Services
Department of Homeland Security
Department of Justice
Department of Energy
Planning and Institutional Effectiveness: Alumni Survey 2014
April 17, 2015
P a g e | 33
Rocketship Education
Roth Doner Jackson, PLC
SA Medical of Virginia
San Bernardino County Sheriff's
Department
Saylor Academy
Securities and Exchange Commission
Self Employed
Shenzhen Middle School
SRA International
St. Joseph’s Hospital and Medical
Center
St. Louis University School of Nursing
St. Mary's School
St. Philip the Apostle Catholic School
Sunmount DDSO
Target Clinics
Team Trivia DC
The Women's Center
The Woodland, Inc
Toms River Regional Schools
U.S. Justice Department
United States Geological Survey,
Department of Interior
United States Postal Service
US Citizenship and Immigration
Services
Department of Justice
US Office of Personnel Management
USI Insurance Services
Victoria at Home - Self Employed
Virginia Hospital Center
Virginia International University
Winchester Community Mental Health
Center
Yoga Alliance
Educational Experiences since Graduation
Have you pursued further education since completing your degree at MU?
Fifth-Year Alumni
(Class of 2008-2009)
First-Year Alumni
Class of 2012-2013)
Count
Percent
Count
Percent
31
87
26.3%
73.7%
37
147
20.1%
79.9%
Yes
No
If you are working toward or have completed another degree, please indicate your level of degree.
Fifth-Year Alumni
(Class of 2008-2009)
Associates
Bachelors
Doctorate
Masters
Other
Professional
First-Year Alumni
Class of 2012-2013)
Count
Percent
Count
Percent
0
1
3
10
4
0
0.0%
5.6%
16.7%
55.6%
22.2%
0.0%
0
0
9
2
6
0
0.0%
0.0%
52.9%
11.8%
35.3%
0.0%
College/University Attended/Currently Attending:
Fifth-Year Alumni (Class of 2008-2009)
Johnson C. Smith University
Strayer University
Alliant University
Averett
Catholic University of America
Defense Acquisition
Grand Canyon
Institute of Psychiatry Kings College
London
James Madison University
Marymount University
Massachusetts School of Professional
Psychology
Naval Postgraduate School
The University of Washington
University of Hartford
University of Maryland
University of Virginia
Virginia International University
Palo Alto University
St. John’s University
St. Louis University
Towson University
University of Cincinnati
University of New Hampshire
University of Virginia
USUH
First-Year Alumni (Class of 2012-2013)
Capella University
DeVry Keller University
Fox Valley Technical College
George Mason University
Marymount University
Planning and Institutional Effectiveness: Alumni Survey 2014
April 17, 2015
P a g e | 34
Please indicate your participation in:
Fifth-Year Alumni
(Class of 2008-2009)
Count
First-Year Alumni
Class of 2012-2013)
Count
0
1
1
2
AmeriCorps
Peace Corps
Alumni Relations
How do you typically find out about Marymount’s alumni events? (Count of alumni responses)
78
Emails
Postcards/Invitations in the mail
43
20
None
8
Friends
6
6
5
LinkedIn
The MU website
Other
Twitter
1
0
0
145
48
24
15
13
3
Fifth Year
First Year
Other:

Facebook, MU English blog
What types of events would you like to attend? (Count of alumni responses)
45
None
78
35
Social
26
Cultural
56
35
23
Service/Volunteer opportunities
46
9
9
Sporting events
Catholic/Religious events
8
Student interaction
8
Other
48
38
Notable speakers
5
11
18
12
Fifth Year
First Year
Other:

Business networking, cohort events and reunions, engineering/technical talks, faculty interaction/leadership seminars,
recruitment and job fairs, PT department, networking, program-related/professional events, trips
Planning and Institutional Effectiveness: Alumni Survey 2014
April 17, 2015
P a g e | 35
Have you attended an alumni event over the last two years?
Fifth-Year Alumni
(Class of 2008-2009)
Yes
No
First-Year Alumni
Class of 2012-2013)
Count
Percent
Count
Percent
16
102
13.6%
86.4%
18
166
9.8%
90.2%
If you have not attended an event over the last 2 years, why not?
Theme 1: Busy/Inconvenient Timing (N =98)
Many alumni indicated they did not attend an event because they were busy for a variety of reasons or the events were
scheduled at inconvenient times. Of those who were busy, many indicated they did not attend due scheduling conflicts, family,
school, or work-related obligations. Some alumni indicated that the timing of the event was poor or inconvenient, while others
stated the timing often conflicted with work schedules.
Example Responses:
“I am too busy. I have other priorities that include work and family.”
“Conflict with either work or personal schedule”
“The times of speakers were not ideal…”
Theme 2: Distance/Location (N =62)
Alumni stated distance as a barrier to attending events, indicating they did not live in the area or lived too far away.
Example Responses:
“No longer live in Virginia”
“Most are held in Arlington, which is not a preferred or convenient location from home or work”
“Too far to travel.”
Theme 3: No Interest (N =53)
A number of alumni stated they did not attend an event due to a lack of interest. Some respondents indicated the events
themselves were not interesting, while others stated they were not interested in general.
Example Responses:
“Not really interested. No events appeal to me to take time out of my normal routine.”
“Haven't been interested in the events I was aware of.”
“No interest”
Theme 4: Uninformed (N =18)
Alumni stated they did not attend events because they were not aware of the events. Many indicated they simply were not
aware of the events, while others specifically said they did not received notices regarding the events.
Example Responses:
“Have not received notification of events specific to my graduate program.”
“Was not aware of them”
“I am not aware of the alumni events.”
Theme 5: No Connection to MU (N =12)
A number of alumni indicated they did not feel connected to MU. Some indicated this was due to only taking one or two
classes per semester, being part of a cohort, or taking classes at Reston.
Example Responses:
“Attended a satellite campus (Reston) so did not feel connected to the university at all.”
“I only took one or two classes a semester, so I don't feel particularly connected to the school.”
“Never really connected to student life at Marymount”
Theme 6: Miscellaneous Reasons (N =14)
There were a variety of other reasons given by alumni for not attending an event in the past two years. Some of these reasons
included not being able to financially afford to attend, no friends were attending, and events were not catered to graduate
students.
Example Responses:
“I am not financially able to participate.”
Planning and Institutional Effectiveness: Alumni Survey 2014
April 17, 2015
P a g e | 36
“Not catered to graduate students”
“Not interested because I do not know many alumni who went to Marymount.”
Are you interested in volunteering to assist with alumni events and would like us to contact you?
Fifth-Year Alumni
(Class of 2008-2009)
Yes
No
First-Year Alumni
Class of 2012-2013)
Count
Percent
Count
Percent
16
101
13.7%
86.3%
36
148
19.6%
80.4%
What were the strongest aspects of your Marymount Education?
Theme 1: Quality of Professors/Faculty/Staff/Advisors (N =139)
The vast majority of comments related to the high quality of professors, faculty, staff, and advisors. A number of specific
individuals were pointed out in this section, but more generally alumni indicated this group was helpful and knowledgeable in
their respective areas of expertise. Many alumni also stated one of the strongest aspects of their Marymount education was
the instructors’ real world experience. They felt the faculty were caring and wanted their students to succeed.
Example Responses:
“I thought that the Professors in my department were diverse and very knowledgeable in their teaching areas. I loved
that they had real life experience and integrated things from the field into their teaching. They applied ideas so that
we would know what to expect in the real world. “
“The faculty all care a great deal about their students and go above and beyond to help them succeed”
“The valuable and great connection with the professors who taught me. “
Theme 2: Courses/Curriculum (N =31)
A number of alumni indicated the courses and curriculum as a strength in their education. Many stated they enjoyed the
courses they took for their specific programs as well as the core classes for their respective programs. Others indicated they
liked that the structure of the curriculum. For example, some alumni like the broad array of courses offered, group study, class
discussion, and use of guest speakers.
Example Responses:
“Class discussions of assigned readings and class activities/presentations. Discussions always
lead to good debates and an enhanced understanding of material (I miss that!)”
“Wide variety of guest speakers who were experts in their field. “
“The different range of courses offered.”
Theme 3: Class/School Size (N =25)
A number of alumni stated one of the strongest aspects of their Marymount education was the small school and class sizes.
Many indicated the small size made it easier to learn and facilitated better access to faculty.
Example Responses:
“Small class sizes & most of the professors being open to meeting on an individual basis contributed to my academic
success.”
“Small class sizes; Access to faculty”
“Number of people in a classroom. “
Theme 4: Program/Course Specific (N =24)
A number of alumni identified unique specific courses or programs as the strongest aspects of their Marymount education.
Alumni also indicated that the content of the particular program or course helped prepare them for the real-world or
supplemented their current career.
Example Responses:
“I majored in Human Resource Management while working as an HR Manager. The strongest aspects were the
courses that added to my on the job experience where they provided theoretical knowledge to day to day activities.”
“I feel as though the Forensic Psychology program was very challenging and fulfilling. It met all of my academic
expectations and the professors were outstanding.”
“The physical therapy program was incredibly rigorous, preparing us for the challenges of the field.”
Theme 5: Skills Learned (N =20)
Many alumni stated the skills they gained from their time at Marymount was one of the strongest aspects of their education.
Planning and Institutional Effectiveness: Alumni Survey 2014
April 17, 2015
P a g e | 37
Some skills referenced in this section included quantitative and technology skills, public speaking skills, self-inquiry skills,
analytical skills, and writing skills.
Example Responses:
“My time at MU refined my ability to assess things both qualitatively and quantitatively. While my undergraduate
education provided me with the tools of my trade, MU taught me how to best employ them. “
“The opportunity to build analytic skills (reviewing and applying theory) and improve writing skills. “
“The education afforded me the needed skills and influence to move forward to explore changing interests and
avenues.”
Theme 6: Classmates (N =18)
Interactions with fellow classmates was also viewed as a strength of Marymount education. Alumni indicated they enjoyed the
cohort experience, working in teams, and the friendships that developed.
Example Responses:
“I liked the caliber of the other students. Discussions were always enriching because most students at the Reston
Center had professional experience.”
“I truly enjoyed talking to my fellow students and spending time with them outside the classroom…”
“Really liked the cohort structure - felt very close to other members of the cohort.”
“Friends I made.”
Theme 7: Internships (N =16)
Alumni indicated their internships were valuable components of their education at MU. The internships provided an applied
aspect to the programs.
Example Responses:
“The internship experience. “
“The internships I had. They gave me valuable experiences I could not get in the classroom.”
“Internship- I was able to get a sense of daily duties of a teacher and learned a great deal
through this experience. “
Theme 8: Overall Education (N =12)
A handful of alumni indicated that there education as a whole was one of the strongest aspects of their experience at
Marymount. These often included broad comments about the high quality of the education.
Example Responses:
“The education was of high quality”
“Education, getting a master’s degree, coursework, related to interests, etc.”
“I loved coming to class (most courses) because the topics were so interesting and the class stayed engaged and
interacted.”
Theme 9: Miscellaneous Strengths (N =41)
There were a variety of other strengths proposed by Marymount alumni. These included Marymount’s location and reputation.
Additionally, the campus resources, flexibility of course time offerings, and networking opportunities were also viewed as
strengths.
Example Responses:
“Time and location. Allowed me to get graduate degree while still working.”
“Excellent reputation of the teaching program and amazing support from professor mentors.”
“Most graduate courses offered in the evening, allowing me to work during the day.”
“The tutors were always available, extremely knowledgeable in their field, encouraging, supportive. The classes were
pitched at the right level for me and had a good balance of lecture with feedback.”
What aspects of your Marymount education need the most improvement?
Theme 1: Course/Program Specific (N =45)
Many alumni indicated improvements needed to be made to certain courses and programs. Often, they indicated programs
need to expand upon certain topics or add content.
Example Responses:
“The MBA program needs to be "tied together" better - thru a review board of managers/leaders, mid-level Directors
in local companies that can help frame the course content around real-world expectations.”
“For my specific degree, more methods.”
Planning and Institutional Effectiveness: Alumni Survey 2014
April 17, 2015
P a g e | 38
“Specialized MBA fields instead of General MBA like I have. For example, MBA in Financial Management, MBA in
Human Resources and things like that”
Theme 2: Quality of Professors/Faculty/Staff/Advisors (N = 40)
Many alumni indicated that the quality of both full-time and adjunct professors were poor. Some were unhelpful and under
qualified. Advising was also seen as a weakness of MU.
Example Responses:
“There was a wide variation in professor quality. Some classes were taught be extremely competent, knowledgeable
people while others were taught by people who weren't even in the right field.”
“Adjunct professors were not always qualified”
“Some of the instructors were not challenging or even engaging. There was a huge variation when it came to
expectations and how much you would actually learn in each class.”
“Advising - The professor I was assigned did little to help me plan my courses, and I witnessed favoritism toward other
students regarding course requirements (another student was allowed to waive a program requirement of a course in
his subject area, but I was in a similar situation and was not allowed the same waiver”
Theme 3: Facilities/Parking/Technology/Upgrades (N = 29)
Alumni stated that parking was a problem and some of the buildings needed great improvements. Further, they indicated
facilities were out of date and needed upgraded technology.
Example Responses:
“Facilities and lack of basic technology, like power outlets”
“The main campus needs an upgrade. The buildings are old and equipment was not always reliable.”
“Most of my programs classes were at the Ballston campus and that building overall needed improvement. Parking
was always a nightmare.”
Theme 4: Courses/Curriculum (N =28)
Alumni commented that courses and curriculum needed improvement more generally. A number commented that courses
could have been more rigorous and the academics more challenging. Additionally, others wished to see a greater availability of
courses, the elimination of certain courses, and the addition of certain content.
Example Responses:
“I found some of the classes to be quite simple and not very rigorous.”
“Less busy work, more structure “
“Variety of courses"
“A class on classroom management strategies would be beneficial”
Theme 5: Internships, Research Opportunities, and Skills Development (N = 25)
Respondents indicated they would have liked to see more research opportunities available, as well as better development of
certain skills, including writing skills and oral presentation skills. Other alumni expressed frustration with internship
requirements, especially in locating them.
Example Responses:
“In terms of finding internship sites, the list was very outdated. It would have been helpful to have a more up to date
contact list of intern sites available in the area.”
“The internship process was confusing and the individual who processed the information was difficult to deal with due
to long distances over school breaks. “
“Oral presentation skills are lacking”
“Research opportunities with faculty”
Theme 6: Preparation for Future (N = 19)
Alumni indicated that preparation for life after Marymount needed improvement. They commented that they had wanted
better assistance finding a job post-graduation and better preparation for further education. Additionally, alumni wished they
could have had better education on what types of careers are available to them.
Example Responses:
“Preparation for the process of the job search in the field, particularly assistance with networking. Also, discussion of
realistic expectations when it comes to the duration of the job search process.”
“Having a better understanding of what jobs are typically available for student s in the field.”
“Career placement and help in finding careers that I would be qualified for after graduating, preparing for finding a
career (how to build skills that employers are looking for), preparing to further education and applying to PhD or other
graduate programs, etc.”
Planning and Institutional Effectiveness: Alumni Survey 2014
April 17, 2015
P a g e | 39
Theme 7: Reputation and Cost (N = 14)
Alumni indicated that receiving an education at Marymount was too expensive and that not many people knew about the
university.
Example Responses:
“Reputation- nobody has ever heard of MU and thinks I went to school in California when I say Marymount. They
aren't even aware of a Marymount in Arlington.”
“Cost overall was a lot. Some classes were worth every penny while others I felt were a letdown”
“The cost of the education.”
Theme 8: Miscellaneous (N = 25)
Alumni listed a variety of other areas of Marymount that needed improvement. Some indicated certain campus resources
needed improvement, problems with classmates, and poor connection to MU.
Example Responses:
“I did not feel a connection to the campus. “
“Timely service of the shuttle buses and availability of parking spots on the campuses.”
“Caliber of students. There is an overall lack of professionalism.”
If you have any other comments regarding your Marymount education, please provide them here.
Theme 1: Overall Education/Experience (N = 29)
Many alumni made broad comments about their overall experience and education at Marymount University. In general, alumni
stated they had a great education and were happy they attended MU.
Example Responses:
“I am so proud that I received a graduate degree at Marymount University. The professors really were extremely
invaluable and I enjoyed every aspect of my education.”
“It was a good experience for me. I felt it was well worth the money and I did very well academically.”
“Excellent program! I would highly recommend it!”
Theme 2: Cost, Campus Resources, and Facilities/Parking (N =15)
Alumni stated Marymount was too expensive and certain spaces, including classrooms and the library, needed to be updated.
A number of campus offices were described as unsuccessful, and parking was difficult.
Example Responses:
“The financial aid office, student account office, and all offices related to that are unbelievably unprofessional and
really tainted my entire experience at Marymount after I had to deal with them”
“Parking at Ballston sucks!”
“It was difficult to have to pay tuition while working full time clinicals without pay- stressful”
Theme 3: Course and Program Specific Statements/Curriculum (N =12)
A number of alumni listed aspects they liked and disliked about certain courses and programs at Marymount. While alumni
indicated they generally liked courses/programs, they did courses needed improvement.
Example Responses:
“I really liked the Forensic Psych program - excellent instructors, enjoyable lectures and readings, and overall a
fantastic learning atmosphere. I use many of the concepts I studied in my career as a Senior Intel Analyst for several
law enforcement agencies, even if the material doesn't translate 100%. However, I feel that many of my classmates
felt the workload was too easy, and therefore not challenging enough.”
“There are some quality courses in the MBA program, I hope that some of the other courses are brought up to par,
which can help elevate the Marymount MBA.”
“The more opportunity for "hands-on" in the elementary classroom the better.”
Theme 4: Quality of Professors/Faculty/Staff/Advisors (N =12)
Overall, comments were positive in this section. Many alumni emphasized particular professors who were of high quality as
well as the general excellence of faculty and staff.
Example Responses:
“____, ____ and ____ were the best professors!”
“The core professors were very knowledgeable about topics…”
Planning and Institutional Effectiveness: Alumni Survey 2014
April 17, 2015
P a g e | 40
“____ was amazing! He made me feel like I could learn anything in his class. And to be honest, I did! His class was one
of my all-time favorite classes, and I have a feeling it had to do a lot with who was teaching it.”
Theme 5: Miscellaneous (N =21)
Alumni made a number of other additional comments on a variety of topics. For example, alumni stated that alumni activities
and MU’s reputation were lacking, they felt little connection to other alumni, and there was little career help for graduate
students.
Example Responses:
“I wish there was more of an emphasis on research”
“Need to work on getting the MBA ranking up.”
“Maybe it’s just the nature of Graduate programs but despite the quality of the education I don't feel connected with
my alumni peers or with Marymount at all.”
“As Marymount is more interested in financial gain by allowing anyone in, the academic quality reflects this. Until
higher recruiting standards are created, this problem will remain.”
Response Rates
Number Sent
Number Received
Response Rate
By Level
Undergraduate
Graduate
Total
904
944
1848
232
312
544
25.7%
33.1%
29.4%
By Cohort
First-Year Alumni
Fifth-Year Alumni
Total
951
897
1848
334
210
544
35.1%
23.4%
29.4%
By School
Arts and Sciences
Business Administration
Education and Human Services
Malek School of Health Professions
Total
455
555
583
255
1848
128
164
181
71
544
28.1%
29.5%
31.0%
27.8%
29.4%
By Level and Cohort
Undergraduate
First-Year Alumni
Fifth-Year Alumni
Graduate
First-Year Alumni
Fifth-Year Alumni
Total
904
473
431
944
478
466
1848
232
141
91
312
193
119
544
25.7%
29.8%
21.1%
33.1%
40.4%
25.5%
29.4%
By School and Level
Arts and Sciences
Undergraduate
Graduate
Business Administration
Undergraduate
Graduate
455
410
45
555
230
325
128
109
19
164
53
111
28.1%
26.6%
42.2%
29.5%
23.0%
34.2%
Planning and Institutional Effectiveness: Alumni Survey 2014
April 17, 2015
P a g e | 41
Education and Human Services
Undergraduate
Graduate
Malek School of Health Professions
Undergraduate
Graduate
Total
Number Sent
583
139
444
255
125
130
1848
Number Received
181
38
143
71
32
39
544
Response Rate
31.0%
27.3%
32.2%
27.8%
25.6%
30.0%
29.4%
By School and Cohort
Arts and Sciences
First-Year Alumni
Fifth-Year Alumni
Business Administration
First-Year Alumni
Fifth-Year Alumni
Education and Human Services
First-Year Alumni
Fifth-Year Alumni
Malek School of Health Professions
First-Year Alumni
Fifth-Year Alumni
Total
455
218
237
555
303
252
583
280
303
255
150
105
1848
128
77
51
164
101
63
181
109
72
71
47
24
544
28.1%
35.3%
21.5%
29.5%
33.3%
25.0%
31.0%
38.9%
23.8%
27.8%
31.3%
22.9%
29.4%
Planning and Institutional Effectiveness: Alumni Survey 2014
April 17, 2015
P a g e | 42