Varieties of Cereal and Oilseed Crops for Alberta 2017 (Agdex 100

January 2017
Agdex 100-32
Varieties of Cereal and Oilseed Crops
for Alberta
T
his annual publication provides information on
cereal and oilseed variety performance in Alberta
and northeastern British Columbia. Important agronomic
characteristics and disease resistance information are
provided for varieties of wheat, barley, oat, rye, triticale,
flax and canola.
The Alberta Regional Variety Testing program for cereals
and flax is coordinated by the Alberta
Regional Variety Advisory Committee
(ARVAC) and Alberta Agriculture and
Forestry (AAF). Funding for the program
is provided by the following:
• Alberta Agriculture and Forestry
• Alberta Wheat Commission
• Alberta Barley Commission
• Alberta Oat Growers Association
• Smoky Applied Research & Development Association
(SARDA)
• Battle River Research Group (BRRG)
• Chinook Applied Research Association (CARA)
• Gateway Research Organization (GRO)
• Lakeland Applied Research Association (LARA)
• McKenzie Applied Research Association (MARA)
Exercise caution
when making
yield comparisons
among varieties
• Alberta Seed Growers
• Alberta Seed Processors
• Entry fees for the varieties being tested
Data for this publication come from various sources:
• Northern Peace Applied Research
Association (NPARA)
• Prairie Grain Development
Committee
• Canola Council of Canada
The following individuals are the
Regional Variety Trial and crop specific
co-ordinators:
• Alex Fedko, Regional Variety Trial
Co-ordinator
• Spring wheat, Dr. H. Randhawa and Dr. D. Spaner
• Winter Wheat, Dr. R. Graf
• Barley, J. Anderson
• Alberta Agriculture and Forestry
• Oat, Dr. J. Mitchell-Fetch
• Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada
• Triticale, Dr. H. Randhawa
• British Columbia Grain Producers
• Fall Rye, Dr. J. Larsen
• CPS Canada
• Winter Triticale, Dr. J. Larsen
• University of Alberta
• Flax, Dr. M. Beaith
• Alberta Innovates Technology Futures
• Farming Smarter
Sincere thanks are extended to all individuals and
organizations who contribute to this publication.
Yield results and reporting
The yield comparison tables have several features:
• Overall actual yield of the check (bushels/acre) based
on all data available to the testing program is provided
along with the number of station years of testing.
Variety choice should never be based solely on yield
performance, as it is only one factor that affects net
return. The genetic yield potential of a variety is often
masked by numerous factors, some of which can be
controlled through variety choice and others through
astute agronomic management.
• The range in yield for each Yield Test Category is
defined.
• Actual yield of the check in each Yield Test Category
is reported.
Producers are encouraged to consider other characteristics
such as maturity, plant height, lodging and disease/pest
resistance when deciding which varieties to grow. Long
term satisfaction with a variety is often related to non-yield
characteristics.
• For varieties with sufficient data, the Overall Yield and
performance in each Yield Test Category is expressed
relative to the check.
• Significant statistical differences relative to the check
are indicated.
Exercise caution when making yield comparisons
among varieties. Variety yield should only be directly
compared to the standard reference check. Actual
head-to-head yield comparisons between other varieties
may not have occurred.
Yields that are statistically higher (+) or lower (-) than
the check are indicated to aid in the selection process.
No symbol after the yield figure indicates that there is no
statistical difference from the check.
Pay particular attention to data on new varieties that
have not been fully tested. If a large difference from the
check is reported but is not significant, it could mean that
yields have varied widely and/or there are not enough
data to prove a statistical difference. With additional
years of testing, the reported yield differences will
become more accurate.
Small plot agronomic trials are expensive to grow, and
new varieties are registered every year. It is simply
impractical to grow all varieties at the same time.
Following several years of data collection, the yield
performance for a particular variety stabilizes relative to
the check, and further testing is no longer required. It is
for these reasons that the check varieties are grown every
year (e.g. AC Barrie for CWRS wheat, AC Metcalfe for
barley) and that changes to these checks are infrequent.
The “Overall Station Years of Testing” column provides
an indication of the unbalanced nature of the dataset.
To make effective use of the yield comparison tables,
producers should set a realistic yield target for the season
and determine where it fits within the Low, Medium,
High and Very High Yield Test Categories. This approach
facilitates the matching of variety choice to expected
productivity levels and is similar to that used when
making decisions on other levels of inputs.
At least six station-years of yield data collected over two
years are required before reporting the figures in this
publication. For new varieties, Overall Yield is often the
first indication of yield potential relative to the check. As
additional data become available, yield performance is also
expressed on the basis of environmental productivity (Yield
Test Categories of Low, Medium, High and Very High).
Please note that the actual yield levels indicated are from
small plot trials, which may be 15 to 20 per cent higher
than yields expected under commercial production.
Maturity ratings
Yield rankings among varieties can change substantially
due to growing conditions. To reflect these differences,
results from a test site that produced high yield in a
particular year are placed into the database for “high”
yielding environments. The same site may contribute to the
“low” yield category in a drought year, when yields are low.
As is the case for yield, growing conditions have a
tremendous influence on the date of maturity. For
example, a variety of CWRS wheat may mature in
98 days in Lethbridge, but take 103 days to mature
in Edmonton. In the same way, a two-day difference
in maturity between varieties in southern Alberta may
amount to a five-day difference in a more northerly
location.
Consistent performance over all Yield Test Categories
indicates that a variety has environmental responses
similar to the check and may have good yield stability over
a wide range of environments.
To take this factor into account, maturity is expressed
using a five-category scale: Very Early, Early, Medium,
Late and Very Late. To aid producers with this relative
scale, the average number of days to maturity for the
check is reported. Note that this scale is different for
Scientific studies conducted on variety performance in
western Canada have shown that Yield Test Category
analysis provides a more reliable indication of yield
performance than results organized by geographic region.
2
each crop type. For example, an early barley variety will
mature much earlier than an early flax variety.
treated with a systemic fungicide as low levels of
infection will restrict marketability.
• Refer to labels for maximum storage periods of treated
seed.
Seed size and plant populations
• Treated seed must not be fed to livestock, poultry or
wildlife and cannot be sold for feed.
Seed size within a crop kind will vary from variety to
variety, requiring adjustment of seeding volumes to
achieve desired plant populations. Some of the tables
provide an average 1,000 kernel weight (TKW) that can
be used as a guide for variety differences.
• Leaf spot ratings in the wheat tables are a combination of
resistance to tan spot and septoria leaf disease complex.
• Fusarium head blight (FHB), caused by Fusarium
graminearum and other species, is an increasing
problem in Alberta. The relative ranking of crops
from most susceptible to least susceptible is durum
wheat, common wheat, triticale, barley and oat. Corn
is a host of F. graminearum and can serve as a source
of infection when residue is left on the ground. FHB
infection is highly influenced by the environment and
heading date. A resistant (R) tolerance rating for FHB
does not equate to immunity. Under severe epidemics,
all varieties will sustain damage. All seed should be
tested for the presence of FHB and treated with an
appropriate seed treatment if required. Producers are
advised to choose varieties with the best FHB tolerance
whenever possible and always use best management
practices to slow the spread of this disease.
The best approach is to determine the 1,000 kernel
weight of the seed to be planted, the germination rate, the
emergence mortality and in the case of fall-seeded crops,
an estimate of winterkill.
For more information and user-friendly seeding rate
calculators that take into account these and other
considerations, please see the web page www.agric.gov.
ab.ca/app21/ldcalc
Plant Breeders’ Rights
Plant Breeders’ Rights (PBR) are a form of intellectual
property rights by which plant breeders can protect new
varieties in the same way an inventor protects a new
invention with a patent. In 2015, Canada amended the
PBR Act to bring it into conformity with UPOV 91.
Varieties protected under the previous legislation
(UPOV 78) are indicated with the logo, whereas those
protected under the new legislation that are shown with a
new logo. The use of the ▲ logo indicates that PBR is
pending.
• Seed used in the Alberta Regional Variety Testing
program comes with a “fusarium-free” certificate, and
trials are inspected for FHB during the growing season.
Laboratories participating in the FHB testing program:
• 20/20 Seed Labs Ltd., Nisku, AB: 1-877-420-2099
• BioVision Seed Research Ltd., Edmonton, AB:
1-800-952-5407
• BioVision Seed Research Ltd., Grande Prairie, AB:
1-877-532-8889
For more information on Plant Breeders’ Rights, please
see www.pbrfacts.ca or the Canadian Food Inspection
Agency website at www.inspection.gc.ca.
• Parkland Laboratories, Red Deer, AB: 403-342-0404
• Precision Seed Testing, Beaverlodge, AB: 780-354-2259
• Seed Check Technologies Inc., Leduc, AB: 780-980-8324
Canola
Abbreviations and rating scales
The Alberta Regional Variety Advisory Committee
(ARVAC) does not take any responsibility for accuracy
or validity of the canola performance data.
• TKW = Thousand kernel weight
• XX = Insufficient data to describe
• Maturity: VE = Very Early, E = Early, M = Medium,
L = Late, VL = Very Late
Diseases, seed treatment and seed testing
• Disease ratings are compiled from various data
sources in Alberta and other prairie provinces.
• Resistance Ratings: VP = Very Poor, P = Poor,
F = Fair, G = Good, VG = Very Good, EX = Excellent
• Treat rye and flax seed to control seedling blight;
cereal seed for smuts and fusarium; canola seed to
control flea beetle, seedling blight and the seed-borne
phase of virulent blackleg.
• Disease Tolerance Ratings: R = Resistant,
MR = Moderately Resistant, I = Intermediate,
MS = Moderately Susceptible, S = Susceptible
• Kernel Type (winter wheat): HR = Hard Red, SR =
Soft Red, HW = Hard White, SW = Soft White
• Wheat with Moderately Susceptible (MS) or
Susceptible (S) ratings for common bunt should be
• Awns (wheat): Y = Yes (bearded), N = No (awnless)
3
• Awn Type (barley): R = Rough, S = Smooth,
SS = Semi-smooth
Variety tables
• Seed Size (flax): S = Small, M = Medium, L = Large
CropPage
Spring wheat................................................................ 5 – 10
Other variety information
Barley......................................................................... 11 – 13
Oat...................................................................................... 14
For additional information, including varieties not listed in
this publication, please call the Alberta Ag-Info Centre tollfree at 310-FARM (3276), or check the Alberta Agriculture
and Forestry website at: www.agriculture.alberta.ca/rvt
Winter wheat.....................................................................15
Fall rye............................................................................... 16
Flax..................................................................................... 17
Factsheet information and tables prepared, reviewed and
approved by:
Alberta Regional Variety Advisory Committee (ARVAC)
(formerly the Alberta British Columbia Grain Advisory
Committee – ABCGAC)
Canola................................................................................ 18
Data preparation and factsheet coordination by:
Alex Fedko
Co-ordinator RVT/Crop Research Technologist
Alberta Agriculture and Forestry
U02/17
4
CCANADA
A N A D AWESTERN
W E S T E RED
R N SPRING
R E D S P R I N G
Variety
Yield Category (% AC Barrie):
Overall
Station
Low
Medium
High
Years of Overall
< 45
45 – 75
> 70
Testing Yield
(bu/ac) (bu/ac) (bu/ac)
Agronomic Characteristics:
Maturity Protein
Rating
%
Test
Weight
(lb/bu)
TKW
(g)
Disease Tolerance:
Resistance to:
Height
(cm)
Awns
(Y/N)
87
94
81
96
83
75
78
83
93
84
94
91
N
Y
N
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
G
G
VG
G
G
VG
VG
VG
G
F
VG
G
87
87
91
92
81
81
87
92
90
89
90
84
93
82
83
84
85
87
87
87
88
85
85
Y
Y
Y
N
Y
Y
Y
N
N
N
N
Y
Y
Y
Y
N
N
N
N
Y
N
N
Y
G
G
G
G
VG
G
G
P
G
F
G
G
F
G
G
G
G
VG
G
G
G
G
VG
Bunt
Stripe
Rust
Leaf
Spot
Fusarium
Head
Blight
MR
S
MR
S
R
S
MR
MR
I
MS
MS
MS
I
R
I
S
I
MR
R
R
MR
S
R
MR
S
S
R
R
R
R
MR
MS
I
MR
S
MR
MS
I
I
MS
MS
I
MS
MS
S
MS
MS
I
I
I
MR
I
I
I
MR
I
I
I
I
MR
MS
MS
R
MS
MR
I
MS
I
I
I
MR
I
S
I
MS
I
MR
R
MR
MS
MR
MS
I
I
I
MR
I
S
I
I
MR
MR
I
MR
S
S
I
I
I
MR
I
S
I
I
S
I
MS
XX
I
I
MR
MR
MR
I
MR
I
I
MS
MR
MS
MR
XX
I
MR
I
R
I
I
MR
MR
MS
MS
I
I
I
MS
MS
MS
I
XX
MS
I
MS
S
I
I
I
I
MS
I
I
I
I
I
MR
I
MR
I
I
XX
MS
MS
MS
MR
MR
S
MS
MR
S
MR
MS
MR
MS
MS
I
Loose
Smut
G
F
G
G
G
G
F
F
P
P
VG
XX
VG
G
XX
G
P
F
VG
G
P
F
P
G
P
F
VP
P
F
P
G
P
P
G
F
Lodging Sprouting
Varieties tested in the 2016 trials (Yield, significant differences and agronomic data only directly comparable to AC Barrie)
AC Barrie (bu/ac)
AC Barrie
AAC Cameron VB ▲
AAC Connery
AAC Prevail ▲
AAC Redberry ▲
AAC Viewfield ▲
Carberry
CDC Bradwell ▲
Go Early ▲
SY Slate ▲
SY479 VB
SY637
28
42
42
28
28
81
28
42
28
42
42
60
100
116+
106+
106+
108+
117+
106+
108+
104
106+
97103
36
100
XX
XX
XX
XX
XX
116+
XX
XX
XX
XX
XX
57
100
115+
108
107+
108+
117+
104
109+
105
107
100
101
81
100
117+
108+
107+
107+
116+
103
109+
104
103
95103
M
M
E
L
M
L
L
L
VE
M
M
L
14
-0.7
0
-0.6
-0.1
-0.4
-0.1
-0.4
0.3
0.2
0.8
0.8
62
62
62
62
63
63
62
63
61
62
62
62
38
43
40
39
40
40
39
38
40
40
40
39
Previously tested varieties (Yield, significant differences and agronomic data only directly comparable to AC Barrie)
5603HR †
5604HR CL
5605HR CL
AAC Bailey
AAC Brandon
AAC Elie
AAC Redwater
AC Eatonia †
AC Intrepid †
AC Splendor †
Alvena †
Cardale
Coleman
CDC Abound
CDC Go
CDC VR Morris
CDC Osler †
CDC Plentiful
CDC Stanley
CDC Titanium VB
CDC Thrive †
CDC Utmost VB
Glenn
63
76
43
58
41
41
41
78
107
153
68
41
43
88
92
41
74
41
76
41
66
53
61
105+
99
109+
103
114+
115+
103
94102
95101
105+
101
110+
110+
109+
106+
106+
113+
108+
108+
112+
104
104
102
XX
102
106
107
96
8798
9399
100
XX
108+
103
105
103
100
114+
XX
107
115+
110+
107+
98
114+
104
117+
120+
106
97
103
96101
106+
105
110+
112+
111+
106
108+
114+
112+
107+
112+
100
104+
99
106+
103
113+
112+
104
92105+
98
103
105
98
112+
116+
107
108+
106+
113+
103
110+
111+
104
L
E
M
M
M
M
E
M
E
VE
E
M
M
M
M
M
E
M
M
E
M
M
L
-0.5
-0.7
-0.2
-0.6
-0.2
-0.1
0
0.4
0
0.9
0.1
-0.3
0
-0.1
-0.1
-1
0
-0.2
-0.8
0.5
-0.4
-0.2
-0.2
63
63
64
63
64
64
64
62
62
61
63
63
64
63
61
65
61
64
63
65
63
64
65
33
33
38
37
38
38
35
35
39
37
37
37
37
40
42
37
35
35
34
41
36
36
36
–5–
(continued)
CANADA WESTERN RED SPRING
CCANADA
A N A D AWESTERN
W E S T E RED
R N
RCategory
E D S
I N G
YieldSPRING
(% P
ACRBarrie):
Variety
Overall
Yield
(% AC Barrie):
Station
LowCategory
Medium
High
Overall
Years
of
Overall
<
45
45
–
75
> 70
Station
Low
Medium
High
Testing
Yield
(bu/ac)
(bu/ac)
(bu/ac)
Years of Overall
< 45
45 – 75
> 70
96
105+
107+
103
104
Testing
Yield
(bu/ac)
(bu/ac)
(bu/ac)
Agronomic Characteristics:
Test Agronomic Characteristics:
Maturity Protein Weight
Test
Rating Protein
%
(lb/bu)
Maturity
Weight
M
-0.1
62
Rating
%
(lb/bu)
TKW
(g)
TKW
36
(g)
Height
(cm)
Height
88
(cm)
Resistance to:
Resistance to:
Awns
(Y/N)
Awns Lodging Sprouting
Lodging
Sprouting
N
VG
G
(Y/N)
Disease Tolerance:
Disease Tolerance:
Loose
Smut
Loose
MR
Smut
Bunt
Stripe
Rust
Stripe
I
Rust
Leaf
Spot
Leaf
MS
Spot
Fusarium
Head
Fusarium
Blight
Head
S
Blight
Goodeve
MS
Variety VB
Bunt
Harvest
118
102
98
103
104+
M
-0.1
62
36
84
N
VG
VG
MR
S
MRI
MS
SS
Goodeve VB
96
105+
107+
104
M
-0.1
62
36
88
N
VG
G
MR
MS
MS
Katepwa
†
278
98989798E
-0.2
62
35
93
N
F
F
MR
MR
MS
MS
IS
Harvest
118
102
98
103
104+
M
-0.1
62
36
84
N
VG
VG
MR
S
MR
MS
Lillian
87
104+
111+
100
104
M
0.2
61
37
86
N
F
G
I
MR
R
MR
S
Katepwa †
278
98989798E
-0.2
62
35
93
N
F
F
MR
MR
MS
MS
I
Muchmore
53
111+
114+
107
111
L
-0.9
63
37
75
YN
VG
GG
MRI
R
MR
MS
MSS
Lillian
87
104+
111+
100
104
M
0.2
61
37
86
F
MR
R
MR
Peace
53
100
100
97
103
ML
0.1
63
37
92
NY
G
PG
R
RR
MR
XX
SMS
Muchmore
111+
114+
107
111
-0.9
63
37
75
VG
MR
MR
MS
Shaw
VB
53
112+
116+
109+
113+
M
-0.9
63
37
92
N
G
G
S
MR
I
MS
MS
Peace
100
100
97
103
M
0.1
63
37
92
N
G
P
R
R
MR
XX
S
StettlerVB
69
112+
119+
109+
111+
M
-0.3
63
37
84
YN
GG
GG
RS
I
II
S
MS
Shaw
53
116+
113+
M
-0.9
63
37
92
MR
MS
MS
Superb
184
110+
112+
115+
L
-0.4
62
42
85
YY
GG
FG
IR
MRI
SI
SS
MS
Stettler
69
112+
119+
109+
111+
M
-0.3
63
37
84
MS
SY433
44
104
101
104
104
ML
-1
64
39
95
YY
GG
GF
II
S
XXS
IS
MR
Superb
184
112+
110+
112+
115+
-0.4
62
42
85
MR
MS
Thorsby ▲
43
106+
XX
110
105
E
-0.5
64
38
89
NY
GG
FG
II
SS
RXX
MSI
I
SY433
44
104
101
104
104
M
-1
64
39
95
MR
Unity VB▲
71
110+
111+
110+
111+
ME
-0.7
64
36
89
YN
FG
GF
MSI
RS
MS
MS
II
Thorsby
43
106+
XX
110
105
-0.5
64
38
89
R
MS
Vesper
45
106+
106
108+
104
M
-1.5
63
37
90
YY
FF
FG
I
SR
S
I
II
Unity
VBVB
71
110+
111+
110+
111+
M
-0.7
64
36
89
MS
MS
MS
Waskada
†
67
100
101
98
102
M
0.1
64
37
92
YY
FF
VG
MRI
RS
MS
MSI
MRI
Vesper
VB
45
106+
106
108+
104
M
-1.5
63
37
90
F
S
WR859 CL †
79
106+
110+
103
107+
M
-0.4
64
34
81
YY
GF
G
R
RR
I
MS
MR
Waskada
67
100
101
98
102
M
0.1
64
37
92
VG
MR
MS
MS
MR
WR859
CL
79
106+
110+
103
107+
M
-0.4
64
34
81
Y
G
G
R
R
I
MS
MR
Remarks: For explanations on data summarization methods, abbreviations and other pertinent information, please see the comments at the beginning of this publication. Several CWRS varieties will be reclassified to the new CNHR wheat
class, effective
August 1, 2018.
The
varieties
affected
aremethods,
AC Abbey,
AC Cora,
Eatonia,
ACpertinent
Majestic, AC
Michael,
Minto,
Alvena,
CDC Makwa,
CDC
Osler,ofColumbus,
Conway,
Harvest,
Kane,
Katepwa,
Remarks:
For explanations
explanations
data
summarization
abbreviations
and
other
information,
please
see
the
comments
atofthe
this publication.
Several
CWRS
varieties
willnew
beLillian,
reclassified
Remarks:
For
onon
data
summarization
methods,
abbreviations
andAC
other
pertinent
information,
please
seeAC
the
comments
at Alikat,
the beginning
thisbeginning
publication.
Several
CWRS
varieties
will be
reclassified
toLeader,
the
CNHR wheat
to
the newNeepawa,
CNHR wheat
class,
effective
August
1, 2018.
The
varieties
affected
are AC
Abbey,see
ACthe
Cora,
AC Eatonia,
AC Majestic,
AC Michael,
AC Minto, Alvena,
CDCaverage
Makwa,
CDC Osler,
Conway,
McKenzie,
Park,
Pasqua,
Pembina,
Thatcher,
Unity
VB and
5603HR.
ForEatonia,
more
information
Canadian
Grain
Commission
website
www.grainscanada.gc.ca.
TheAlikat,
long
term
maturity
for
AC Columbus,
Barrie
is 106Lillian,
days and
class,
effective
August
1,
2018.
The
varieties
affected
are
AC
Abbey,
AC
Cora,
AC
AC
Majestic,
AC
Michael,
AC
Minto,
Alvena,
Alikat,
CDC
Makwa,
CDC
Osler,
Columbus,
Conway,
Harvest,
Kane,
Katepwa,
Leader,
Harvest, Kane, Katepwa, Leader, Lillian, McKenzie, Neepawa, Park, Pasqua, Pembina, Thatcher, Unity VB and 5603HR. For more information see the Canadian Grain Commission website www.grainscanada.gc.ca.
rated
as
Medium
(M).
Fusarium
Head
Blight
(FHB)
infection
is
highly
influenced
by
the
environment
and
heading
date.
Under
high
levels
of
FHB
all
varieties
will
sustain
damage.
Moderately
Resistant
(MR)
and
Resistant
(R)
ratings
for FHB
The
long term
average
maturity
AC Barrie
is 106 Unity
days VB
andand
rated
as Medium
(M).
Fusariumsee
Head
(FHB)
infection
is highly
influenced
by the environment
and term
heading
date.
Underfor
high
FHBdays
all
McKenzie,
Neepawa,
Park,
Pasqua,for
Pembina,
Thatcher,
5603HR.
For more
information
the Blight
Canadian
Grain
Commission
website
www.grainscanada.gc.ca.
The long
average
maturity
AC levels
Barrie of
is 106
and
varieties
will sustain
damage.
Moderately
Resistant(I)(MR)
and Resistant
(R)
ratings
for
FHBshould
do notbeequate
to
immunity.
Varieties
rated Intermediate
(I) to Susceptible
(S)
for
loose smut
or
bunt
should VB
be treated
with
do
not
equate
to
immunity.
Varieties
rated
Intermediate
to
Susceptible
(S)
for
loose
smut
or
bunt
treated
with
a
systemic
seed
treatment
to
reduce
the
potential
for
infection.
AC
Eatonia,
Lillian,
CDC
Landmark
and
CDC
rated
as
Medium
(M).
Fusarium
Head
Blight
(FHB)
infection
is
highly
influenced
by
the
environment
and
heading
date.
Under
high
levels
of
FHB
all
varieties
will
sustain
damage.
Moderately
Resistant
(MR)
and
Resistant
(R)
ratings
for
a systemic seed treatment to reduce the potential for infection. AC Eatonia, Lillian, CDC Landmark VB and CDC Hughes VB have a solid stem that confers resistance to the wheat stem sawfly. 5604HR CL, 5605HRFHB
Hughes
VB
have
a solid
that confers
resistance
thetowheat
stemtolerant
sawfly.
CL,or5605HR
CL,herbicides
CDC
Abound,
Imagine,
CDC
ThriveFX.
and
WR589
CL potential
are tolerant
the
CLEARFIELD®
SCVB
and
Altitude
do
not
equate
to immunity.
Varieties
ratedThrive
Intermediate
(I)
Susceptible
(S) for5604HR
loose
bunt should
be treated
withCDC
a systemic
seed
treatment
toVB
reduce
the
for to
infection.
AC
Eatonia, herbicides
Lillian,
CDCAdrenalin
Landmark
and
CDC
CL,
CDC
Abound,
CDC stem
Imagine,
CDC
and to
WR589
CL are
to
the smut
CLEARFIELD®
Adrenalin
SC and
Altitude
- designates
a varietal
blend
to preserve
the Sm1
orange
wheat
blossom
FX.
VB
designates
a
varietal
blend
to
preserve
the
Sm1
orange
wheat
blossom
midge
tolerance
gene.
New
CWRS
registrations:
AAC
Redberry
(BW966),
AAC
Viewfield
(BW965),
CDC
Landmark
VB
(BW971),
CDC
Hughes
VB
(PT588),
midge
tolerance
gene.
New
CWRS
registrations:
AAC
Redberry
(BW966),
AAC
Viewfield
(BW965),
CDC
Landmark
VB
(BW971),
CDC
Hughes
VB
(PT588),
Parata
(PT772),
SYSlate
(BW496).
Insufficient
data
to
Hughes
VB
have
a
solid
stem
that
confers
resistance
to
the
wheat
stem
sawfly.
5604HR
CL,
5605HR
CL,
CDC
Abound,
CDC
Imagine,
CDC
Thrive
and
WR589
CL
are
tolerant
to
the
CLEARFIELD®
herbicides
Adrenalin
SC
and
Altitude
describe:
AAC Whitefox,
CDC Landmark
VB (BW971),
CDC Hughes
VB (PT588).
† – Flagged(BW971),
for possible
in (PT588).
2018. † - Flagged for possible removal in 2018.
SYSlate
(BW496).
to describe:
Whitefox,
Landmark
CDC removal
Hughes
VB
Parata
FX.
VB (PT772),
- designates
a varietal
blend Insufficient
to preservedata
the Sm1
orangeAAC
wheat
blossomCDC
midge
toleranceVBgene.
New CWRS
registrations:
AAC Redberry (BW966), AAC Viewfield (BW965), CDC Landmark VB (BW971), CDC Hughes VB (PT588),
toAdescribe:
CDC S
Landmark
CDC Hughes VB (PT588). † - Flagged for possible removal in 2018.
CANADA
SPRING
CParata
A N(PT772),
A D SYSlate
AWESTERN
W(BW496).
E S TInsufficient
E HARD
R N data
HWHITE
R D AAC
W Whitefox,
HI T E
P R IVB
N(BW971),
G
CANADA WESTERN
HARD
WHITE
Yield Category
(% SPRING
AC Barrie):
Overall
Agronomic Characteristics:
Yield
(% AC Barrie):
LowCategory
Medium
High
Test Agronomic Characteristics:
Station
Overall
Resistance to:
Overall
<
45
45
–
75
>
70
Maturity
Protein
Weight
TKW
Height Awns
Years
of
Low
Medium
High
Test
Station
Variety
Yield
(bu/ac)
(bu/ac)
Rating Protein
%
(lb/bu)
(g)
(cm)
(Y/N)
Testing
< 45
45 – 75 (bu/ac)
> 70
Maturity
Weight TKW
Height
Awns Lodging Sprouting
Years
of Overall
Previously
tested
varieties
(Yield
and
agronomic
data
only
directly
comparable
to
AC
Barrie)
Variety
(bu/ac) (bu/ac) (bu/ac)
Rating
%
(lb/bu)
(g)
(cm)
(Y/N) Lodging Sprouting
Testing Yield
AAC Icebergtested varieties
39 (Yield and
104agronomic
96 data only
106directly comparable
107
M Barrie)-0.7
Previously
to AC
CDC
Whitewood
▲
43
107+
XX
110
105
M
-0.9
AAC Iceberg
39
104
96
106
107
M
-0.7
Snowbird
94
101
99
101
101
M
-0.2
CDC Whitewood ▲
43
107+
XX
110
105
M
-0.9
Snowstar
58
102
99
103
102
M
-0.8
Snowbird
94
101
99
101
101
M
-0.2
Whitehawk
42
107
112+
108+
106
E
-0.9
Snowstar
58
102
99
103
102
M
-0.8
64
64
64
62
64
64
62
63
64
39
38
39
36
38
30
36
33
30
86
87
86
89
87
82
89
90
82
Y
YY
NY
NN
NN
Disease Tolerance:
Resistance to:
G
GG
GG
GG
GG
P
GP
GG
GG
GG
Loose
Smut
Loose
Smut
MS
S
MS
MR
S
MS
MR
I
MS
Disease Tolerance:
Fusarium
Stripe
Leaf
Head
Fusarium
Bunt
Rust
Spot
Blight
Stripe
Leaf
Head
Bunt
Rust
Spot
Blight
I
SI
MS
S
S
MS
MS
S
MR
I
MR
MSI
MS
MS
MS
MS
MS
MS
MS
S
MS
IS
MSI
I
II
II
MSI
I
MS
Remarks:
explanations
data
summarization
methods,
abbreviations
and
other
pertinent
please
comments
of
this
publication.
long
Whitehawk
42onon
107
112+
108+
106
E
-0.9 information,
63 see the
33 see the
N atofthe
G
G
I The
MSterm
MS ismaturity
IBarrie
Remarks: For explanations
data
summarization
methods,
abbreviations
and other
pertinent
information,
please
comments
at90the
beginning
thisbeginning
publication.
The
long
term average
maturity
for ACaverage
Barrie
106MS
daysfor
andAC
rated
is 106 days and rated as Medium (M). Fusarium Head Blight (FHB) infection is highly influenced by the environment and heading date. Under high levels of FHB all varieties will sustain damage. Moderately Resistant
as Medium
(M). Fusarium
Head Blight
(FHB)
infection
is highly
influencedVarieties
by the environment
and heading(I)date.
Under high levels
ofloose
FHB all
varieties
will sustain
damage.
Moderately
Resistant seed
(MR) and
Resistant
(R)
ratings
forpotential
FHB do for
(MR)
and
Resistant
(R)
ratings
for
FHB
do
not
equate
to
immunity.
rated
Intermediate
to
Susceptible
(S)
for
smut
or
bunt
should
be
treated
with
a
systemic
treatment
to
reduce
the
Remarks: For explanations on data summarization methods, abbreviations and other pertinent information, please see the comments at the beginning of this publication. The long term average maturity for AC Barrie is 106 days and rated
not equateInsufficient
to immunity.data
Varieties
rated Intermediate
(I) to Susceptible
(S) for
for loose
smutremoval
or bunt should
be treated with a systemic seed treatment to reduce the potential for infection.Insufficient data to describe: AAC Whitefox. † - Flagged
infection.
to describe:
AAC Whitefox.
† – Flagged
possible
in 2018.
as Medium (M). Fusarium Head Blight (FHB) infection is highly influenced by the environment and heading date. Under high levels of FHB all varieties will sustain damage. Moderately Resistant (MR) and Resistant (R) ratings for FHB do
for possible removal in 2018.
not equate to immunity. Varieties rated Intermediate (I) to Susceptible (S) for loose smut or bunt should be treated with a systemic seed treatment to reduce the potential for infection.Insufficient data to describe: AAC Whitefox. † - Flagged
for possible removal in 2018.
–6–
CCANADA
A N A D APRAIRIE
P R A I RSPRING
I E S P RED
R I N G
R E D
Yield Category (% AC Barrie): Overall
Station
Medium
High
Years of Overall Low
Maturity Protein
45 - 90
> 90
Rating
%
< 45
(bu/ac)
(bu/ac)
Testing Yield
Agronomic Characteristics:
Test
TKW
Weight
Height
(g)
(lb/bu)
(cm)
Variety
Varieties tested in the 2016 trials (Yield, significant differences and agronomic data only directly comparable to AC Barrie)
AC Barrie (bu/ac)
61
42
63
90
AC Barrie
100
100
100
100
M
13.8
62
38
88
Awns
(Y/N)
N
Disease Tolerance:
Resistance to:
Lodging Sprouting
G
G
Loose
Smut
MR
Bunt
Stripe
Rust
Leaf
Spot
Fusarium
Head
Blight
I
S
MS
I
AAC Crossfield ▲
26
119+
XX
119+
XX
M
-1.4
62
43
80
Y
G
XX
MS
I
R
I
I
AAC Crusader
40
116+
XX
116+
117+
M
-1.2
60
41
80
Y
G
P
MR
I
XX
MS
I
AAC Tenacious VB ▲
40
107+
XX
109+
101
M
-1.3
62
39
97
Y
P
VG
R
R
MR
MS
R
Previously tested varieties (Yield, significant differences and agronomic data only directly comparable to AC Barrie)
5700PR *
117
117+
XX
121+
113+
L
-1.9
62
42
75
Y
VG
F
MS
R
MS
MS
MS
5702PR * †
52
117+
XX
119+
114+
L
-1.8
61
40
79
Y
G
P
MS
I
MS
I
MS
AAC Foray VB ▲
41
128+
XX
130+
120+
M
-1.7
63
51
85
Y
G
G
MS
I
MR
MS
I
AAC Penhold
41
117+
XX
121+
114+
M
-1.5
63
46
71
Y
VG
G
I
R
MR
I
MR
AAC Ryley
37
118+
XX
120+
114+
M
-0.6
60
48
82
Y
G
G
I
R
S
MS
MS
AC Crystal
278
115+
XX
119+
113+
L
XX
62
42
79
Y
G
P
I
R
S
I
S
AC Foremost *
124
116+
XX
119+
112+
L
XX
62
43
73
Y
VG
F
I
R
S
MS
S
Conquer VB *
51
121+
XX
123+
120+
M
-0.8
62
45
84
Y
F
P
MS
R
MR
I
MS
Enchant VB * †
37
115+
XX
119+
112
M
-0.7
62
48
85
Y
F
G
MS
R
XX
MS
S
SY985 *
51
112+
XX
115+
109+
M
0.1
61
44
78
Y
G
P
R
MR
XX
I
I
SY995 ▲
41
118+
XX
119+
113+
M
-1.9
63
45
79
Y
G
P
S
MR
MR
MS
MS
Remarks:For
Forexplanations
explanationsonondata
datasummarization
summarizationmethods,
methods,abbreviations
abbreviationsand
andother
otherpertinent
pertinentinformation,
information,please
pleasesee
seethe
thecomments
commentsatatthe
thebeginning
beginningofofthis
thispublication.
publication.Several
SeveralCPSR
CPSRvarieties
varietieswill
willbebereclassified
reclassifiedto
Remarks:
the CNHR wheat class. AC Foremost, AC Taber, Conquer and Oslo will be reclassified on August 1, 2018 and AC Crystal will be reclassified on August 1, 2019. For more information see the Canadian Grain Commission
to
the
CNHR
wheat
class.
AC
Foremost,
AC
Taber,
Conquer
and
Oslo
will
be
reclassified
on
August
1,
2018
and
AC
Crystal
will
be
reclassified
on
August
1,
2019.
For
more
information
see
the
Canadian
Graindate.
website www.grainscanada.gc.ca. The long term average maturity for AC Barrie is 106 days and rated as Medium (M). Fusarium Head Blight (FHB) infection is highly influenced by the environment and heading
Under
high levels
of FHB
all varieties will sustain The
damage.
Moderately
and
Resistant
ratings
FHBasdo
not equate
immunity.
Varieties
(I) to Susceptible
(S)the
forenvironment
loose smut or
Commission
website
www.grainscanada.gc.ca.
long term
averageResistant
maturity(MR)
for AC
Barrie
is 106(R)days
andfor
rated
Medium
(M). to
Fusarium
Head
Blight rated
(FHB)Intermediate
infection is highly
influenced by
bunt should be treated with a systemic seed treatment to reduce the potential for infection. VB - designates a varietal blend to preserve the Sm1 orange wheat blossom midge tolerance gene. New CPSR registrations:
and Crossfield
heading date.
Under AAC
high levels
FHB all varieties
will (HY537),
sustain damage.
Moderately
(MR) anddata
Resistant
(R) ratings
forfigures
FHB dobased
not equate
to immunity.
Varieties
rated Intermediate
(I) to
AAC
(HY1632),
Entice of
(HY1627),
CDC Terrain
SY Rowyn
(HY2013).Resistant
XX – Insufficient
to describe.
* Yield
on direct
and indirect
comparisons
with AC Barrie.
† -Susceptible
Flagged for
possible
removal
(S) for loose
smutinor2018.
bunt should be treated with a systemic seed treatment to reduce the potential for infection. VB - designates a varietal blend to preserve the Sm1 orange wheat blossom midge tolerance gene.
New CPSR registrations: AAC Crossfield (HY1632), AAC Entice (HY1627), CDC Terrain (HY537), SY Rowyn (HY2013). XX - Insufficient data to describe. * Yield figures based on direct and indirect comparisons
with AC Barrie † Flagged for possible removal in 2018
–7–
CANADA WESTERN
SPECIAL PURPOSE
W E S T E R N S P E C I A L P U
CA N A D A
Overall
Station
Years of Overall
Testing Yield
R P O S E
Yield Category (% AC Barrie): Agronomic Characteristics:
Medium
High
Test
TKW
Low
45 - 90
> 90
Maturity Protein Weight
Height
(g)
< 45
(bu/ac)
(bu/ac)
Rating
%
(lb/bu)
(cm)
Variety
Varieties tested in the 2016 trials (Yield, significant differences and agronomic data only directly comparable to AC Barrie)
Awns
(Y/N)
Disease Tolerance:
Resistance to:
Lodging Sprouting
Loose
Smut
Bunt
Stripe
Rust
Leaf
Spot
Fusarium
Head
Blight
AC Barrie (bu/ac)
63
26
57
88
AC Barrie
100
100
100
100
M
14.1
62
38
89
N
G
G
MR
I
S
MS
I
134+
XX
135+
135+
L
-3.2
60
41
82
Y
G
P
S
S
R
I
S
AAC Innova
38
Previously tested varieties (Yield, significant differences and agronomic data only directly comparable to AC Barrie)
AAC NRG097
41
124+
XX
121+
126+
L
-3
63
47
80
Y
G
F
I
R
S
I
I
CDC NRG003 * †
51
121+
XX
126+
112+
M
-1.9
61
43
80
Y
G
F
MS
R
XX
MS
S
NRG010 * †
51
126+
XX
XX
XX
L
-2.6
62
41
83
Y
G
P
MS
R
R
I
MS
Pasteur *
37
137+
XX
142+
132+
VL
-2.3
62
42
82
N
VG
G
MS
S
MR
I
I
SY087
41
120+
XX
122+
114+
M
-1.4
63
40
82
Y
G
F
MS
MR
MR
I
MR
Remarks:For
Forexplanations
explanationsonondata
datasummarization
summarizationmethods,
methods,abbreviations
abbreviationsand
andother
otherpertinent
pertinentinformation,
information, please
pleasesee
seethe
thecomments
commentsatatthe
thebeginning
beginning of
of this
this publication.
publication. The
The long
long term
term average
maturity for
Remarks:
average maturity
for AC
AC Barrie
isBarrie
106 days
and
rated
Medium
(M). Fusarium
Head Blight
is highly is
influenced
by the environment
and heading
date. Under
levels
FHB all
will sustain
Moderately
Resistant
is 106
days
andasrated
as Medium
(M). Fusarium
Head(FHB)
Blightinfection
(FHB) infection
highly influenced
by the environment
and heading
date.high
Under
highoflevels
of varieties
FHB all varieties
will damage.
sustain damage.
Moderately
(MR) and Resistant (R) ratings for FHB do not equate to immunity. Varieties rated Intermediate (I) to Susceptible (S) for loose smut or bunt should be treated with a systemic seed treatment to reduce the potential for
ResistantNew
(MR)CWSP
and Resistant
(R) ratings
for FHB do(GP151),
not equate
immunity.
Varieties
ratedThrottle
Intermediate
(I) XX
to Susceptible
(S)data
for to
loose
smut or* Yield
bunt should
treated
with a and
systemic
seed
treatment to
reduce
the
infection.
registrations:
AAC Awesome
CDCtoKinley
(HW616)
and CDC
(GP131).
– Insufficient
describe.
figuresbe
based
on direct
indirect
comparisons
with
AC Barrie.
†potential
– Flagged
possibleNew
removal
in registrations:
2018.
forfor
infection.
CWSP
AAC Awesome (GP151), CDC Kinley (HW616) and CDC Throttle (GP131). XX-Insufficient data to describe. * Yield figures based on direct and indirect comparisons
with AC Barrie. † - Flagged for possible removal in 2018.
CANADA
NORTHERN
C
A N A D A
N O R T H EHARD
R N HRED
A R D
Variety
R E D
Yield Category (% AC Barrie): Overall
Station
Medium
High
Years of Overall Low
45 - 70
> 70
(bu/ac)
(bu/ac)
< 45
Testing Yield
Agronomic Characteristics:
Maturity Protein
Rating
%
Test
Weight
(lb/bu)
TKW
(g)
Height
(cm)
Awns
(Y/N)
Disease Tolerance:
Resistance to:
Lodging Sprouting
Loose
Smut
MR
I
XX
Bunt
Stripe
Rust
Leaf
Spot
Fusarium
Head
Blight
I
MR
S
S
R
MR
MS
I
I
I
MS
I
Varieties tested in the 2016 trials (Yield, significant differences and agronomic data only directly comparable to AC Barrie)
AC Barrie (bu/ac)
AC Barrie
AAC Concord ▲
Elgin ND
28
26
60
100
107+
114+
36
100
XX
XX
56
100
108
116+
80
100
107
112+
M
M
M
14
-0.9
-1
62
60
63
38
41
38
88
88
87
N
N
Y
G
F
G
G
F
XX
Remarks:For
For explanations
explanations on
methods,
abbreviations
and other
pertinent
information,
please see
the comments
at the beginning
this publication.
CWRSSeveral
and CPSR
varieties
will bevarieties
reclassified
this
Remarks:
ondata
datasummarization
summarization
methods,
abbreviations
and other
pertinent
information,
please
see the comments
at the of
beginning
of thisSeveral
publication.
CWRS
and CPSR
willtobe
reclassified
thiseffective
new CNHR
class,
effective
1, 2018.are
TheAC
CWRS
varieties
areAC
AC
Abbey,AC
ACMajestic,
Cora, AC
AC Michael,
AC Minto,
Alikat,
CDC Makwa,
CDC
Osler, Columbus,
Conway,
new CNHR to
class,
August
1, 2018.
The August
CWRS varieties
Abbey,
AC Cora,
Eatonia,
ACEatonia,
Michael,AC
ACMajestic,
Minto, Alvena,
Alikat, CDC
Makwa,Alvena,
CDC Osler,
Columbus,
Conway,
Harvest,
Kane, Katepwa,
Harvest, Kane, Katepwa, Leader, Lillian, McKenzie, Neepawa, Park, Pasqua, Pembina, Thatcher, Unity VB and 5603HR. The CPSR varieties are AC Foremost, AC Taber, Conquer and Oslo. AC Crystal will be reclassified
Leader,
Lillian,
McKenzie,
Neepawa,
Park, Pasqua,
Unity VB and
5603HR.
The CPSR varieties are AC
Foremost,
ACaverage
Taber, Conquer
AC Crystal
be reclassified
onMedium
August 1,(M).
2019.Fusarium
For moreHead
on
August
1, 2019.
For more
information
see the Pembina,
CanadianThatcher,
Grain Commission
website
www.grainscanada.gc.ca.
The
long term
maturityand
forOslo.
AC Barrie
is 106will
days
and rated as
Blight
(FHB)see
infection
is highly
influenced
by the
environment
and heading date.
Under
highaverage
levels ofmaturity
FHB allfor
varieties
willissustain
damage,
Moderately
(MR) Head
and Resistant
(R) infection
ratings for
FHB do
not equate
information
the Canadian
Grain
Commission
website
www.grainscanada.gc.ca.
The
long term
AC Barrie
106 days
and rated
as MediumResistant
(M). Fusarium
Blight (FHB)
is highly
influenced
by to
immunity. AAC Concord has a solid stem that confers resistance to the wheat stem sawfly. Varieties rated Intermediate (I) to Susceptible (S) for loose smut or bunt should be treated with a systemic seed treatment to
the
environment
and
heading
date.
Under
high
levels
of
FHB
all
varieties
will
sustain
damage,
Moderately
Resistant
(MR)
and
Resistant
(R)
ratings
for
FHB
do
not
equate
to
immunity.
AAC
Concord
has
a
solid
stem
that
confers
reduce the potential for infection. Insufficient data to describe: Faller, Prosper. New CNHR registrations: AAC Concord (BW963). XX – Insufficient data to describe.
resistance to the wheat stem sawfly. Varieties rated Intermediate (I) to Susceptible (S) for loose smut or bunt should be treated with a systemic seed treatment to reduce the potential for infection. Insufficient data to describe: Faller,
–8–
CANADA
AMBER
DURUM
C A N A D AWESTERN
W E S T E R
N A M B
E R DU R U M
Variety
Overall
Station
Years of
Testing
Yield Category (% Strongfield): Low
Medium
High
< 45
Overall
45 - 75
> 75
(bu/ac)
Yield
(bu/ac)
(bu/ac)
Maturity Protein
Rating
%
Agronomic Characteristics:
Resistance to:
Test
SproutWeight
Height
Lodging
ing
(lb/bu) TKW (g) (cm)
Disease Tolerance:
Loose
Smut
Bunt
Stripe
Rust
Leaf
Spot
Fusarium
Head
Blight
Varieties tested in the 2016 trials (Yield, significant differences and agronomic data only directly comparable to Strongfield)
Strongfield (bu/ac)
Strongfield
AAC Cabri
AAC Congress ▲
AAC Spitfire ▲
CDC Carbide VB ▲
CDC Precision ▲
25
15
25
25
15
64
100
94100
97
100
93-
36
100
98
XX
100
104
XX
61
100
93100
96
100
94
96
100
XX
XX
XX
XX
XX
M
M
M
M
M
M
14.1
0.1
-0.6
-0.4
0
-0.4
62
62
62
61
62
62
46
45
46
46
45
46
84
86
81
82
85
82
F
G
F
G
G
G
F
P
P
P
P
F
S
MR
MR
MS
MS
MS
I
R
R
R
R
R
MR
R
R
R
R
R
MS
I
MS
MS
MS
MS
S
MS
MS
S
MS
MS
85
76
83
82
77
88
83
81
82
83
83
88
89
F
F
F
F
G
G
F
G
G
G
G
G
F
F
F
F
F
G
F
G
F
F
F
F
F
F
MS
S
MR
MS
S
MS
MS
MS
MS
I
MS
MS
S
MR
R
R
MR
R
R
R
R
R
R
MR
R
R
MR
MR
R
MR
R
MR
MR
R
R
MR
R
R
R
I
I
MS
I
S
I
I
MS
MS
I
I
I
I
MS
S
MS
S
S
MS
S
MS
MS
S
MS
MS
MS
Previously tested varieties (Yield, significant differences and agronomic data only directly comparable to Strongfield)
AAC Current
AAC Durafield
AAC Marchwell VB
AAC Raymore
AC Navigator
Brigade
CDC Desire
CDC Fortitude
CDC Verona
CDC Vivid
Enterprise
Eurostar
Transcend
30
22
32
34
65
69
34
32
46
34
48
47
35
99
99
99
97
95103
102
102
102
100
101
102
102
104
XX
107
99
102
105
106
102
103
104
104
100
103
98
99
96
98
93103
101
102
103
99
100
105+
101
XX
XX
98
94
93102
101
103
99
98
102
99
100
M
M
M
M
M
L
E
M
M
M
M
L
M
0
-1
-0.1
0.8
XX
XX
0
-0.6
XX
0.1
XX
XX
XX
62
64
63
62
63
63
62
63
62
62
63
64
62
44
46
46
47
45
48
44
45
46
45
44
47
47
Remarks: For explanations on data summarization methods, abbreviations and other pertinent information, please see the comments at the beginning of this publication. Generally, durum wheat is best adapted to southern
Remarks:
For explanations
data summarization
abbreviations
andtoother
please see
the comments
at the
beginning
of this
publication.
Generally,
durum wheat
best 10%
adapted
to
Alberta. Outside
of this area,ondurum
tends to be late methods,
maturing and
often subject
qualitypertinent
loss. Theinformation,
long term average
maturity
for Strongfield
is 105
days and
is rated
as Medium
(M). Strongfield
yields isabout
higher
southern Alberta. Outside of this area, durum tends to be late maturing and often subject to quality loss. The long term average maturity for Strongfield is 105 days and is rated as Medium (M). Strongfield yields
about
10%
higher
than AC
Barrie
in areas of
best adaptation.
varieties
are generally
susceptible
to Fusarium
Head
Blight
than CWRS
AAC Cabri,
AAC
Raymore
andaCDC
than AC
Barrie
in areas
of best
adaptation.
Durum
varieties areDurum
generally
more susceptible
to more
Fusarium
Head Blight
than CWRS
wheat
varieties.
AACwheat
Cabri, varieties.
AAC Raymore
and CDC
Fortitude
have
solidFortitude
stem thathave
confers
a solid stem that confers resistance to the wheat stem sawfly. VB - designates a varietal blend to preserve the Sm1 orange wheat blossom midge tolerance gene. New CWAD registrations: AAC Congress (DT856),
resistance
to
the
wheat
stem
sawfly.
VB
designates
a
varietal
blend
to
preserve
the
Sm1
orange
wheat
blossom
midge
tolerance
gene.
New
CWAD
registrations:
AAC
Congress
(DT856),
AAC
Stronghold
(DT862),
CDC
AAC Stronghold (DT862), CDC Alloy (DT579), CDC Credence (DT583), CDC Dynamic (DT578), CDC Precision (DT577). XX – Insufficient data to describe. † – Flagged for possible removal in 2018.
Alloy (DT579), CDC Credence (DT583), CDC Dynamic (DT578), CDC Precision (DT577). XX - Insufficient data to describe. † - Flagged for possible removal in 2018.
–9–
SPRING
CCANADA
A N A D AWESTERN
W E S T E SOFT
R N S WHITE
O F T W
H I T E S P R I N G
Overall
Yield Category (% AC Andrew): Station
Low
Medium
High
Years of Overall
< 45
45 - 90
> 90
Maturity Protein
Variety
Testing Yield
(bu/ac)
(bu/ac)
(bu/ac)
Rating
%
Agronomic Characteristics:
Disease Tolerance:
Test
Fusarium
Resistance to:
TKW Height Awns
Shatter- Sprout- Loose
Weight
Stripe Leaf
Head
(g)
Lodging ing
ing
(lb/bu)
(cm) (Y/N)
Smut Bunt Rust Spot Blight
Varieties tested in the 2016 trials (Yield, statistical differences and agronomic data only directly comparable to AC Andrew)
AC Andrew (bu/ac)
AC Andrew *
AAC Indus
24
83
100
102
35
100
XX
75
100
102
116
100
105
L
VL
10.8
-0.6
61
62
39
44
79
87
Y
Y
VG
VG
VG
VG
P
P
S
S
S
S
I
MR
MS
I
I
MS
88
80
82
Y
Y
Y
G
G
VG
VG
G
VG
P
F
P
S
MS
I
S
S
S
MR
MR
R
I
I
I
S
S
S
Previously tested varieties (Yield, statistical differences and agronomic data only directly comparable to AC Andrew)
AAC Chiffon
AC Meena
Sadash
39
51
51
104+
97110+
106
101
113+
105+
97107+
101
95109+
L
L
L
-0.4
0
0.2
62
62
63
46
37
39
Remarks:
For explanations
explanationsonon
data
summarization
methods,
abbreviations
and pertinent
other pertinent
information,
please
see the comments
at theofbeginning
of thisAC
publication.
AC about
Andrew
35%
more
Andrew yields
35%yields
moreabout
than AC
Barrie.
In than
addition
Remarks: For
data
summarization
methods,
abbreviations
and other
information,
please see
the comments
at the beginning
this publication.
AC Barrie. In addition to traditional markets, SWS wheat varieties may have demand as a feedstock for ethanol production. *Maturity, resistance to lodging and sprouting are compared with AC Barrie. Varieties
to traditional
markets,
wheat varieties
may
havesmut
demand
as a should
feedstock
ethanol
production.
*Maturity,
resistancetotoreduce
lodging the
and potential
sprouting for
are infection.
compared New
with AC
Barrie.registrations:
Varieties ratedAAC
Intermediate
(I) to(SWS433).
Susceptible (S) for
rated
Intermediate
(I) SWS
to Susceptible
(S) for
loose
or bunt
be for
treated
with
a systemic
seed treatment
CWSWS
Paramount
XX
– Insufficient
to describe.
Yield
figures based
on directtoand
indirect
comparisons
with AC
Andrew.
loose
smut or buntdata
should
be treated*with
a systemic
seed treatment
reduce
the potential
for infection.
New
CWSWS registrations: AAC Paramount (SWS433). XX - Insufficient data to describe. * Yield figures based on direct and
indirect comparisons with AC Andrew.
– 10 –
MALTING
BARLEY
M A L T I N G
B AR L
Variety
2 or 6
row
E Y
Overall
Station
Awn Years of Overall
Type Testing Yield
Agronomic Characteristics:
Yield Category (% AC Metcalfe):
Low
< 60
(bu/ac)
Medium
60 - 90
(bu/ac)
High
90 - 120
(bu/ac)
V. High
> 120
(bu/ac)
Test
Maturity Weight
Rating (lb/bu)
TKW
(g)
Resistance
to
Height
Lodging
(cm)
Disease Tolerance:
Net Blotch: Fusarium
Spot Net
Head
Loose Other Root
Blight
Smut Smuts Rot Scald form form
Varieties tested in the 2016 trials (Yield, significant differences and agronomic data only directly comparable to AC Metcalfe)
AC Metcalfe (bu/ac)
AC Metcalfe
CDC Bow ▲
CDC Platinum Star ▲
CDC Fraser ▲
2
2
2
2
R
R
R
R
42
42
27
100
100
104+
106+
107+
47
100
XX
XX
XX
78
100
106
108
106
103
100
105
107+
109
134
100
104
102
107+
M
M
M
M
51
51
53
51
46
48
49
49
79
77
82
75
F
VG
F
G
R
S
R
R
I
I
R
MR
I
MS
S
MS
S
MS
S
MS
I
MR
MR
MR
S
S
I
MR
I
MS
MR
I
48
47
47
47
43
46
44
46
44
45
44
46
39
40
39
40
75
81
85
81
78
76
79
74
78
73
79
73
80
76
82
81
F
G
G
F
G
F
G
F
F
G
F
F
G
G
G
G
S
MS
R
MS
S
R
S
R
MS
R
MS
S
MR
S
I
S
I
MR
R
I
R
MR
R
R
MS
MR
S
MR
R
MR
MR
MR
I
MR
I
I
I
MR
MS
I
I
I
I
MR
I
I
MR
MR
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
MS
MS
MS
MS
S
S
S
R
R
R
I
MR
R
MR
MR
MS
MR
MR
MR
MR
MR
MR
I
MR
MS
MS
I
MS
S
S
MS
S
I
MS
I
MS
MS
S
S
MS
MS
MR
I
I
I
MR
I
MR
I
MS
I
I
MS
MS
S
Previously tested varieties (Yield, significant differences and agronomic data only directly comparable to AC Metcalfe)
AAC Synergy
Bentley
CDC Clear
CDC Copeland
CDC Kindersley
CDC Meredith
CDC PolarStar
Cerveza
Harrington †
Major
Merit 57
Newdale
CDC Anderson
†
CDC Mayfair
†
LEGACY
Tradition
†
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
6
6
6
6
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
SS
SS
42
77
43
137
47
65
43
49
284
72
87
94
44
56
122
121
114+
105+
95103+
104+
107+
101
109+
93107+
109+
105+
96
97
99
98
XX
109
XX
96
XX
102
XX
XX
96104
110+
106
XX
XX
93
90-
115+
102
92101
102
108+
103
109+
94108+
108+
104+
96
939595-
115+
105+
100
106+
104
108+
105+
108+
93107+
109+
105+
92
96
102
101
113+
106+
XX
104+
104+
107+
97
109+
91106+
111+
106+
100
104
103
103
M
M
L
M
E
L
M
M
M
M
VL
M
M
E
M
E
51
52
62
51
53
51
52
51
51
51
51
52
50
49
49
50
Remarks:
ForFor
explanations
on data
methods,methods,
abbreviations
and other pertinent
information,
please
see the comments
thethe
beginning
of thisatpublication.
The long
termpublication.
average maturity
Remarks:
explanations
onsummarization
data summarization
abbreviations
and other
pertinent
information,
please at
see
comments
the beginning
of this
Thefor
long
AC Metcalfe is 95 days and is rated as Medium (M). Varieties rated Intermediate (I) to Susceptible (S) for smuts should be treated with a systemic seed treatment to reduce the potential for infection. The Canadian
term
average
maturity
for
AC
Metcalfe
is
95
days
and
is
rated
as
Medium
(M).
Varieties
rated
Intermediate
(I)
to
Susceptible
(S)
for
smuts
should
be
treated
with
a
systemic
seed
Malting Barley Technical Centre (CMBTC) evaluates and recommends malting barley varieties for industry acceptance. Please refer to the 2016-2017 CMBTC Recommended Malt Barley Variety List for more
information.
CDC
Clear is
a hulless
malting
variety. New
registrations:
FraserBarley
(TR12135).
† - Flagged
for possible
removal
in 2018.
treatment to
reduce
the
potential
for infection.
The
CanadianCDC
Malting
Technical
Centre
(CMBTC)
evaluates
and recommends malting barley varieties for industry acceptance.
Please refer to the 2016-2017 CMBTC Recommended Malt Barley Variety List for more information. CDC Clear is a hulless malting variety. New registrations: CDC Fraser (TR12135).
† - Flagged for possible removal in 2018.
– 11 –
FEED
BARLEY
F E E D AND
A N FOOD
D F O O
D B A R
Variety
L E Y
Overall
Station
2 or 6 Awn Years of Overall
row Type Testing Yield
Yield Category (% AC Metcalfe):
Low
< 60
(bu/ac)
Medium
60 - 90
(bu/ac)
High
90 - 120
(bu/ac)
V. High
> 120
(bu/ac)
Agronomic Characteristics:
Test
Maturity Weight
Rating (lb/bu)
Disease Tolerance:
Net Blotch:
Height
(cm)
Resistance
to
Lodging
Loose
Smut
Other
Smuts
46
49
47
50
44
79
76
76
66
73
F
G
G
VG
VG
R S
S
S
I
I
R
R
R
R
I
MR
I
I
MR
S
S
S
S
I
47
49
46
48
47
55
49
55
50
49
52
51
46
50
49
40
43
41
46
45
41
42
43
41
74
78
78
72
74
103
74
98
80
73
80
83
80
86
77
80
74
82
69
80
76
73
86
78
G
G
G
VG
G
F
F
F
G
G
G
F
G
G
G
G
F
G
VG
F
G
G
G
G
MS
S
S
MS
R
MS
S
S
MS
R
I
R
R
S
MS
MS
MS
MS
S
MS
MS
MS
MS
MS
R
MR
R
MR
R
MR
I
R
R
R
I
R
R
R
MS
I
I
R
MS
MR
MR
R
R
MR
MR
S
I
MR
I
I
I
I
MR
I
MR
I
I
I
MR
I
MR
MR
MS
I
MS
MS
MS
MR
S
I
S
S
S
MS
I
MS
MS
MR
S
R
MR
MR
S
I
MS
S
I
I
MR
MR
R
I
TKW
(g)
Net
form
Fusarium
Head
Blight
I
I
I
MR
MR
S
S
S
S
R
I
I
I
S
S
I
MR
R
I
MR
MR
MS
MR
R
MR
MR
MR
MR
MS
I
I
MR
MR
MR
MR
MR
MR
I
MR
I
MS
MS
S
S
I
S
I
I
MS
I
MS
MS
S
S
I
I
I
I
I
I
MS
MS
S
I
I
I
S
I
MR
MR
MR
I
I
MR
I
I
MR
MR
MS
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
I
Spot
Root
Rot Scald form
GENERAL PURPOSE
Varieties tested in the 2016 trials (Yield, significant differences and agronomic data only directly comparable to AC Metcalfe)
AC Metcalfe (bu/ac)
AC Metcalfe
Champion
Claymore
Oreana
Vivar
2
2
2
2
6
R
R
R
R
R
166
42
42
175
100
100
113+
111+
112+
109+
47
100
124+
XX
XX
97
78
100
113+
110+
109+
105+
103
100
112+
109+
114+
109+
134
100
111+
115+
115+
115+
M
M
L
L
M
51
53
51
53
49
Previously tested varieties (Yield, significant differences and agronomic data only directly comparable to AC Metcalfe)
Brahma
Busby
CDC Austenson
CDC Bold †
CDC Coalition
CDC Cowboy
CDC Dolly †
CDC Maverick
CDC Trey
Canmore
CONLON
Gadsby
Ponoka
Seebe
XENA
AC Harper
AC Ranger
AC Rosser †
Amisk
Breton †
Chigwell
Muskwa
Sundre
Trochu
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
S
R
R
S
R
R
R
R
SS
S
S
SS
S
S
S
S
S
87
45
65
77
57
75
184
43
106
40
63
45
120
229
271
166
48
166
40
42
43
44
72
136
111+
104+
112+
106+
110+
95101
95103+
107+
94112+
108+
101
112+
103+
107+
108+
105+
107+
104
105+
110+
107+
112+
107
108
111+
107
107
97
XX
101
XX
97
XX
101
97
111+
95
101
101
XX
97
XX
XX
100
101
109+
103
113+
107+
112+
94100
90105+
104
93114+
107+
100
109+
9699
102
105
108
98
103
105
102
113+
106
111+
106+
108+
93103+
97
101
111+
93114+
110+
102
114+
102
118+
109+
104
106+
106
105
112+
109+
111+
103
112+
102
109+
96100
96
105+
108+
96108+
109+
100
112+
111+
107+
113+
108+
110+
111+
110+
117+
112+
M
M
L
M
L
L
M
M
M
M
VE
M
L
VL
M
M
L
M
M
M
M
M
L
M
– 12 –
53
53
54
53
53
52
53
54
52
52
52
53
51
52
52
48
49
48
49
49
49
50
51
49
(continued)
FEED
F E E DAND
A N FOOD
D F O BARLEY
O D B A R
L E Y
Overall
Station
2 or 6 Awn Years of Overall
row Type Testing Yield
Variety
Agronomic Characteristics:
Yield Category (% AC Metcalfe):
Low
< 60
(bu/ac)
Medium
60 - 90
(bu/ac)
High
90 - 120
(bu/ac)
V. High
> 120
(bu/ac)
Test
Maturity Weight
Rating (lb/bu)
Disease Tolerance:
Net Blotch:
TKW
(g)
Height
(cm)
Resistance
to
Lodging
Loose
Smut
Other
Smuts
39
39
35
40
77
80
68
73
VG
VG
VG
VG
R
MS
MS
S
R
MR
MR
R
Spot
Root
Rot Scald form
Net
form
Fusarium
Head
Blight
I
I
I
S
I
MR
S
MS
HULLESS
Previously tested varieties (Yield, significant differences and agronomic data only directly comparable to AC Metcalfe)
CDC Carter
CDC McGwire
Falcon
Tyto †
†
2
2
6
6
R
R
S
S
45
107
181
72
97938381-
97
887279-
99
938384-
9499
9196
XX
XX
89
96
M
M
E
M
62
61
58
55
S
MR
I
I
MS
I
I
MS
MR
MR
I
I
Remarks:For
Forexplanations
explanations on
abbreviations
andand
other
pertinent
information,
pleaseplease
see the
comments
at the beginning
of this publication.
The long term
average
maturity
formaturity
AC Metcalfe
is 95
Remarks:
on data
datasummarization
summarizationmethods,
methods,
abbreviations
other
pertinent
information,
see
the comments
at the beginning
of this publication.
The long
term
average
for AC
Metcalfe
isdays
95 days
is rated
as Medium
(M). Varieties
rated Intermediate
(I) to Susceptible
(S) for
smuts
with seed
a systemic
seed
reducefor
theinfection.
potentialHulless
for infection.
varieties
theand
hull in
and isand
rated
as Medium
(M). Varieties
rated Intermediate
(I) to Susceptible
(S) for smuts
should
beshould
treated be
withtreated
a systemic
treatment
to treatment
reduce thetopotential
varietiesHulless
leave the
hull in leave
the field
the field and thus grain yields comparable to hulled varieties are 9-12% lower. Handling of hulless varieties should be minimized to avoid seed damage. CDC Carter, CDC McGwire, Falcon and Tyto are normal starch
thus grain
yields for
comparable
hulled
varieties areClaymore
9-12% lower.
Handlingand
of hulless
should
minimized
to avoid removal
seed damage.
CDC Carter, CDC McGwire, Falcon and Tyto are normal starch barleys suitable for food
barleys
suitable
food use.toNew
registrations:
(TR12733)
Oreanavarieties
(TR12735).
† – be
Flagged
for possible
in 2018.
use. New registrations: Claymore (TR12733) and Oreana (TR12735). † - Flagged for possible removal in 2018.
– 13 –
OAT
O A T
Overall
Station
Years of
Testing
Overall
Yield
Yield Category (% CDC Dancer): V. High
High
Medium
Low
70 - 100 100 - 130 > 130
< 70
(bu/ac) (bu/ac) (bu/ac) (bu/ac)
Maturity
Rating
Agronomic Characteristics:
Test
Resistance Tolerance
Weight
Height
to
to
(lb/bu) TKW (g) (cm)
Lodging
Smuts
Variety
MILLING
Varieties tested in the 2016 trials (Yield, significant differences and agronomic data only directly comparable to CDC Dancer)
CDC Dancer (bu/ac)
95
49
84
112
148
CDC Dancer
129
100
100
100
100
100
E
42
37
94
Akina ▲
19
110+
XX
102
112
XX
M
41
38
88
CDC Norseman ▲
27
101
XX
100
101
XX
E
41
38
94
CS Camden ▲
27
109+
XX
109+
106
XX
L
41
39
90
Previously tested varieties (Yield, significant differences and agronomic data only directly comparable to CDC Dancer)
AAC Justice
28
104
XX
99
109+
XX
M
42
36
91
AC Juniper
80
104+
102
104
106+
105+
E
41
38
94
AC Morgan
95
111+
110+
110+
111+
115+
M
40
40
92
Bradley
31
104+
XX
103
108
106
M
39
39
92
CDC Boyer
89
102
103
102
100
105
M
39
42
101
CDC Minstrel
61
104+
103
103
105
105+
M
39
38
88
CDC Orrin
52
109+
113+
107+
107+
XX
M
41
40
84
CDC Ruffian
28
110+
110
105
116+
XX
M
40
39
94
CDC Seabiscuit
30
111+
124
106
108
108
M
39
41
101
CDC Weaver
44
104
108+
103
100
100
M
40
43
91
Derby
79
101
103
102
96105
L
41
39
103
Jordan
36
112+
112+
109+
117+
XX
VL
38
44
87
Souris
28
110+
120+
103
111
XX
M
41
34
91
Stride
30
104+
101
102
107
106
M
42
35
104
Triactor
47
110+
109
108+
114+
110+
M
38
38
89
FEED
Previously tested varieties (Yield, significant differences and agronomic data only directly comparable to CDC Dancer)
AC Mustang *
108
114+
118+
112+
110+
116+
L
42
37
103
CDC Nasser
31
116+
132
107
115+
110
L
39
36
98
Lu *
58
100
99
98
99
108
VE
41
39
85
FORAGE
G
VG
G
G
R
XX
MS
I
G
VG
VG
VG
G
VG
G
G
G
F
G
G
VG
G
G
R
I
I
R
MS
R
R
R
MR
R
MS
R
R
R
R
G
G
G
I
MR
R
XX
F
XX
S
MR
S
Previously tested varieties (Yield and agronomic data only directly comparable to CDC Dancer)
CDC Baler *
CDC Haymaker
Murphy
*
42
28
51
99
104
95-
96
XX
93
106
103
96
96
105
97
XX
XX
94
L
L
M
40
39
39
43
40
36
99
100
108
Remarks:For
Forexplanations
explanationsonondata
datasummarization
summarizationmethods,
methods,abbreviations
abbreviationsand
andother
otherpertinent
pertinentinformation,
information,please
pleasesee
seethe
thecomments
commentsatatthe
thebeginning
beginningofofthis
this
Remarks:
publication.
The
long
term
average
maturity
for
CDC
Dancer
isis98
days
and
rated
as
Early
(E).
Varieties
rated
Intermediate
(I)(I)
to to
Susceptible
(S)(S)
forfor
thethe
smuts
should
publication.
The
long
term
average
maturity
for
CDC
Dancer
98
days
and
rated
as
Early
(E).
Varieties
rated
Intermediate
Susceptible
smuts
be treated with a systemic seed treatment to reduce the potential for infection. New registrations: OT6011. Insufficient data to describe: OT6011. * Yield figures
based
andwith
indirect
comparisons
with CDCtoDancer.
shouldonbedirect
treated
a systemic
seed treatment
reduce the potential for infection. New registrations: OT6011. Insufficient data to describe: OT6011. * Yield
figures based on direct and indirect comparisons with CDC Dancer.
14
CCANADA
A N A D WESTERN
A W E S TRED
E R WINTER
N R E D
Overall
Station
Years of
Testing
W I N T E R
Agronomic Characteristics:
Yield Category (% Radiant):
Overall
Yield
Low
< 45
(bu/ac)
Medium
45 - 75
(bu/ac)
High
75 - 105
(bu/ac)
V. High
> 105
(bu/ac)
Variety
Yield, significant differences and agronomic data only directly comparable to Radiant
Radiant (bu/ac)
Radiant
240
76
37
63
87
114
100
100
100
100
100
Winter Maturity
Survival Rating
VG
L
Disease Tolerance:
Resistance
Test
to
Protein Weight TKW Height Kernel
(cm)
Type
Lodging
%
(lb/bu) (g)
12.0
63
36
90
HR
VG
Stripe
Rust Bunt
S
S
Fusarium
Head
Leaf Stem
Blight
Rust Rust
S
S
S
AAC Elevate ▲
63
106+
106
106
106
XX
G
M
+0.3
63
39
84
HR
VG
MS
MR
I
I
MR
AAC Gateway
66
100
XX
99
102
XX
F
M
+0.9
63
33
77
HR
VG
MR
S
I
I
MR
AAC Goldrush ▲
20
101
XX
XX
105
XX
VG
M
+0.5
63
34
86
HR
G
I
S
I
R
MR
34
115+
XX
119+
115+
XX
VG
VL
+0.3
64
38
86
HR
G
R
MR
MR
I
S
AC Tempest †
AAC Wildfire ▲
117
97-
96
97
96-
99
P
VL
+1.5
63
37
91
HR
VG
MR
MS
I
S
S
CDC Buteo
189
96-
94-
97
95-
101
VG
M
+0.3
65
34
91
HR
F
S
S
MR
I
I
CDC Chase
34
102
XX
97
109
XX
F
M
+0.6
64
33
94
HR
F
MR
S
MS
R
R
Emerson
79
98
96
95
100
XX
G
M
+0.7
64
30
86
HR
G
MR
S
R
I
R
Flourish
119
100
99
98
102
104
F
E
+0.6
63
35
80
HR
VG
I
MR
S
I
I
104+
91
102
107+
108+
G
M
+0.7
64
33
91
HR
F
MR
MS
S
R
R
F
M
- 0.6
63
32
82
HW
VG
R
S
MS
R
MR
Moats
90
CCANADA
A N A D WESTERN
A W E S TSPECIAL
E R N SPURPOSE
P E C I A L
P U R P O S E
Yield, significant differences and agronomic data only directly comparable to Radiant
AAC Icefield ▲
30
CDC Ptarmigan
104
XX
XX
111
XX
104
105
106+
102
108+
105
Peregrine †
63
108+
XX
107+
109+
G
M
- 1.7
61
34
93
SW
F
S
S
I
S
S
XX
VG
M
- 0.7
64
33
97
HR
F
MR
S
I
R
I
Pintail
79
108+
XX
109+
Sunrise
88
108+
102
106
109+
XX
VG
L
- 1.4
61
29
88
HR
G
MR
S
S
MS
MS
110+
108
G
M
- 0.9
61
32
89
SR
G
MR
S
XX
MR
MR
Swainson
54
111+
XX
107
115+
XX
F
M
- 0.2
64
38
95
HR
F
MR
S
XX
R
R
REMARKS:
Winterwheat
wheatcan
canbe
begrown
grown successfully
successfully in
in all
stubble
within
thethe
optimal
seeding
datedate
period
(generally
before
September
15) and
thereif is
adequate
snowfall.
Remarks: Winter
all areas
areas of
of Alberta
Albertaififseeded
seededinto
intostanding
standing
stubble
within
optimal
seeding
period
(generally
before
September
15)if and
there
is adequate
snowfall.
Varieties with
withpoor
poor(P)
(P)winter
wintersurvival
survival
generally
suitable
outside
of southern
Alberta.
average
maturity
for Radiant
is August
rated
(L). Fusarium
headinfection
blight infection
Varieties
arearegenerally
notnot
suitable
outside
of southern
Alberta.
The The
long long
term term
average
maturity
for Radiant
is August
10 and10is and
ratedisas
lateas
(L).late
Fusarium
head blight
may be may be
reduced if varieties with Intermediate (I) resistance or better are used and when recommended seeding dates are followed. Radiant and AAC Elevate have tolerance to the wheat curl mite, the vector for Wheat
reduced
if varieties
with
resistance or of
better
are used
and
when
recommended
seeding dates
are followed.
Radiant
AACbridge”
Elevateofhave
tolerance
theserves
wheat curl
the vector
for Wheat
Streak Mosaic
Virus.
ToIntermediate
preserve the(I)effectiveness
the wheat
curl
mite
tolerance
gene, agronomic
practices
that eliminate
theand
“green
plant
materialtothat
as amite,
reservoir
for mites
shouldStreak
be
followed
whenever
possible.
Fields in southern
should
inspected
in the
fall for infestation
by eliminate
Russian wheat
aphid,
as it may
reduce
winter
AAC
Wildfire for
expresses
somebetolerance
Russian
Mosaic
Virus.
To preserve
the effectiveness
of theAlberta
wheat curl
mitebe
tolerance
gene,
agronomic
practices that
the "green
bridge"
of plant
material
thatsurvival.
serves as
a reservoir
mites should
followed to
whenever
wheat aphid. AC Tempest, Radiant and AAC Wildfire have bronze chaff at maturity. AAC Icefield is a new special purpose variety with a hard white kernel that has been granted interim registration to facilitate
possible.
Fields in southern
Alberta
should be
inspected
in theof
fallvery
for infestation
Russian
as itatmay
reduce
winter
survival. AAC
Wildfire
some
tolerance
RussianCDC
wheatPtarmigan
aphid. ACand
Tempest,
market research.
AAC Icefield
expresses
high
milling yield
white flourbyand
good wheat
glutenaphid,
strength
lower
protein
concentrations
that
may beexpresses
of interest
in some
nichetomarkets.
Pintail
have an and
awnless
head
which
may
improve
palatability
when
harvested
for
forage
or silage.
AAC
Elevate
is
expected
to
be available
in
fall granted
2017. AAC
Wildfire,
AAC Goldrush
and
AACresearch.
Icefield will
notIcefield
be available
Radiant
AAC
Wildfire
have
bronze
chaff
at
maturity.
AAC
Icefield
is
a
new
special
purpose
variety
with
a
hard
white
kernel
that
has
been
interim
registration
to
facilitate
market
AAC
in 2017. New registrations: AAC Goldrush (W526), AAC Icefield (W530). † Flagged for possible removal in 2018.
expresses high milling yield of very white flour and good gluten strength at lower protein concentrations that may be of interest in some niche markets. CDC Ptarmigan and Pintail have an awnless head which may
improve palatability when harvested for forage or silage. AAC Elevate is expected to be available in fall 2017. AAC Wildfire, AAC Goldrush and AAC Icefield will not be available in 2017. New registrations: AAC
Goldrush (W526), AAC Icefield (W530). † Flagged for possible removal in 2018.
– 15 –
FFALL
A L L RYE
R Y E
Variety
Overall
Station
Hybrid or Years of
OP Variety Testing
Yield Category (% Hazlet):
Overall
Yield
Low
< 48
(bu/ac)
Medium
48 - 80
(bu/ac)
High
80 - 112
(bu/ac)
Agronomic Characteristics:
V. High
> 112
(bu/ac)
Winter
Survival
Test
Weight
(lb/bu)
TKW
(g)
Falling
Number
(sec)
Height
(cm)
Resistance to
Lodging
Yield, significant differences and agronomic data only directly comparable to Hazlet
Hazlet (bu/ac)
102
48
65
94
137
Hazlet
OP
48
100
100
100
100
100
EX
59
39
137
109
G
Bono
Hybrid
18
131+
XX
113
132+
133+
EX
59
34
250
105
VG
Brasetto
Hybrid
22
124+
XX
115
140+
120+
EX
59
36
246
104
VG
Guttino
Hybrid
22
123+
XX
116
135
120+
EX
60
36
279
101
VG
F
Prima
OP
48
85808086
89
EX
58
33
179
121
REMARKS: Hazlet has lower viscosity which improves feed performance in monogastric livestock. Fall rye is much more cold tolerant than winter wheat or winter triticale. The long term average
Remarks: Hazlet has lower viscosity which improves feed performance in monogastric livestock. Fall rye is much more cold tolerant than winter wheat or winter triticale. The long term average heading date and
maturity
Hazlet
June 5 and
fall rye7,varieties
are similar
forrye
heading
and maturity
andfor
areheading
considered
A major
in marketingearly.
rye grain
into the
milling
market is sprouting.
headingfordate
andis maturity
forAugust
Hazlet7,isrespectively.
June 5 and All
August
respectively.
All fall
varieties
are similar
andearly.
maturity
andfactor
are considered
A major
factor
in marketing
rye grain
This is generally measured using the Hagberg falling number test and is measured in seconds. Typically, a falling number of 180 seconds or greater is preferred by the rye milling market. Falling number is heavily
into
the
milling
market
is
sprouting.
This
is
generally
measured
using
the
Hagberg
falling
number
test
and
is
measured
in
seconds.
Typically,
a
falling
number
of
180
seconds
or
greater
is preferred
influenced by moisture around harvest time and producers must make sure rye is harvested in a timely manner, similar to wheat crops. There is considerable variation in fall rye varieties for falling number
and this
must be considered if the milling market is the targeted end-user for rye grain. All fall rye is susceptible to ergot. AFSC crop insurance deadlines for seeding fall rye is September 15, north of the Bow river and
by the rye30,
milling
Falling
September
southmarket.
of the Bow
river.number is heavily influenced by moisture around harvest time and producers must make sure rye is harvested in a timely manner, similar to wheat crops. There is
considerable variation in fall rye varieties for falling number and this must be considered if the milling market is the targeted end-user for rye grain. All fall rye is susceptible to ergot. AFSC crop
insurance deadlines for seeding fall rye is September 15, north of the Bow river and September 30, south of the Bow river.
– 16 –
FLAX
F
L A X
Variety
Overall
Station
Years of Overall
Testing Yield
Yield Category (% CDC Bethune): Low
< 20
(bu/ac)
Medium
20 - 35
(bu/ac)
High
35 - 50
(bu/ac)
V. High
> 50
(bu/ac)
Agronomic Characteristics:
Quality:
Disease Tolerance:
Resistance
Maturity Seed Seed Height
to
Rating Colour Size
(cm)
Lodging
Oil
ALA
Content Content Iodine
(%)
(%)
Value
Fusarium
Wilt
Powdery
Mildew
G
G
G
G
VG
G
G
VG
MR
MR
MR
MR
MR
MR
MR
MR
MR
MR
XX
MR
XX
MR
XX
MR
46
46
47
46
47
46
46
47
55
59
57
56
68
58
60
57
189
194
196
193
209
193
198
193
G
G
G
F
VG
G
G
VG
G
MR
MR
MR
MR
R
MR
R
MR
MR
MR
MR
MR
MR
MR
MR
MR
R
MS
45
46
46
45
45
48
45
46
48
60
57
57
58
59
57
58
54
61
194
192
191
193
198
193
195
187
198
Varieties tested in the 2016 trials (Yield, significant differences and agronomic data only directly comparable to CDC Bethune)
CDC Bethune (bu/ac)
CDC Bethune
CDC Neela
CDC Plava ▲
CDC Buryu ▲
VT50
Prairie Grande
WestLin 60
WestLin 72 ▲
109
24
24
16
24
76
24
16
35
100
109+
104
100
103
98100
102
14
100
XX
XX
XX
XX
101
XX
XX
29
100
115
110
104
105
102
103
100
44
100
102
98
96
101
9398
105
58
100
XX
XX
XX
XX
99
XX
XX
L
L
M
L
VL
M
M
VL
brown
brown
brown
brown
yellow
brown
brown
brown
M
M
M
L
S
M
M
S
57
55
52
56
51
53
50
51
Previously tested varieties (Yield, significant differences and agronomic data only directly comparable to CDC Bethune)
AAC Bravo
CDC Glas
CDC Sanctuary
CDC Sorrel
Hanley
Prairie Sapphire
Prairie Thunder
Taurus
WestLin 71
23
23
28
32
37
23
40
27
25
104
106+
105+
104
9796
99
9895-
XX
XX
XX
112
99
XX
101
103
101
XX
XX
100
104
97
XX
98
97
94
103
106
100
100
95
97
99
XX
91-
104+
XX
108+
99
97
101
99
XX
XX
L
L
VL
L
M
L
L
L
L
brown
brown
brown
brown
brown
brown
brown
brown
brown
L
S
M
L
M
M
M
M
M
64
61
64
61
53
64
55
53
56
Remarks:
explanations
on on
data
summarization
methods,
abbreviations
and other
pertinent
information,
pleaseplease
see thesee
comments
at the beginning
of this publication.
The longThe
termlong
average
CDC
Remarks:ForFor
explanations
data
summarization
methods,
abbreviations
and other
pertinent
information,
the comments
at the beginning
of this publication.
term maturity
averagefor
maturity
Bethune in Alberta is 110 days and rated as Late (L). All varieties are immune to flax rust. New registrations: CDC Buryu (FP2316), AAC Prairie Sunshine (FP2357) and WestLin 60 (FP2388). Insufficient data to describe:
for CDC
Bethune
in Alberta is 110 days and rated as Late (L). All varieties are immune to flax rust New registrations: CDC Buryu (FP2316), AAC Prairie Sunshine (FP2357) and WestLin 60 (FP2388).
AAC
Prairie
Sunshine.
Insufficient data to describe: AAC Prairie Sunshine.
– 17 –
Canola Variety Information
Disease ratings for canola
The variety description tables summarize the performance
of limited canola varieties tested in 2016 through the postregistration Canola Performance Trial (CPT).
The column indicating “Disease Tolerance” is for
Blackleg, Clubroot or Sclerotinia.
All tested varieties have the resistant (R) rating that
strongly suppresses blackleg but can still develop lesions
or cankers at certain locations and years. Better blackleg
control is achieved through the use of resistant varieties
and by using a 1 in 4 year canola rotation.
The data was audited by field inspection and a data
review process by a joint committee of government and
industry. The data presented was collected from small
plot trials (13 successful in 2016) following scientific
protocols to ensure comparisons are unbiased.
Varieties with clubroot resistance
Detailed notes on other variety attributes, trial
management and variety comparisons at individual
locations or across multiple years and locations can be
found at the website: www.canolaperformancetrials.ca
• Bayer CropScience: L135 C, L241C
• Brett Young: 6056CR, 6076CR, 6086CR
• CANTERRA Seeds: CS2000
The most reliable performance indicator is a comparison
over multiple sites and years. The trial design included
grouping varieties by herbicide tolerance (HT), so the LSD
(Least Significant Differences) has been included for each
group to help determine if yield difference are significant.
• Cargill: V12-3
Large scale (51 successful) trials with limited variety
comparisons were conducted with protocols and selected
audits for proper comparisons, data collection and
scrutiny. Paired “t-test” statistics were used to identify
significant yield differences from the check (5% level).
• Pioneer Hi-Bred/DuPont: 45H29, 45H33, D3155C,
45CS40
• Crop Production Services: PV 580 GC, PV 581 GC,
PV 590 GCS, VR 9562 GC
• Dow AgroSciences: 1020 RR, 2020 CL
• Monsanto/DeKalb:74-54 RR
• Syngenta: SY4105, SY 4187
18
CANOLA
CA
C ACANOLA
N O L NOTES
A P EforRgeneral
F O R information
MANCE TRIALS 2016 – SMALL PLOT RESULTS
SEE
No averages
plotinformation.
trials in LONG and SHORT season zones due to limited data (only 2 sites each) in the 2016 canola trials,
SEE
CANOLA shown
NOTESfor
forsmall
general
please
visit www.canolaperformancetrials.ca
view
data season
or to within
to make
across
years
and other
No
averages
shown for small plot trials in LONGto
and
SHORT
zonesthese
due togrowing
limited zones
data (only
2 sitescomparisions
each) in the 2016
canola
trials.
Please
visit www.canolaperformancetrials.ca to view data or to make comparisions across years and other locations within these growing zones.
locations
MID Season Zone (9 trials)
Maturity Lodging Height
Yield
5440%
(days)
(1-5)
(inches)
Small Plot Variety Description
Seed supplier/sponsor
Name
Clearfield
5545 CL
CS2200 CL
DL 1504 +
PV 200 CL
LSD (%)
Disease+
Tolerance @
99
93
97
96
12
101
102
102
101
2.6
2.0
2.0
2.5
49
51
52
50
BL
BL
BL
BL
Bayer CropScience
Bayer CropScience
Bayer CropScience
Liberty Link
5440
L130
L252
LSD (%)
100
98
108
17
100
99
99
1.2
1.4
1.9
52
50
49
BL
BL
BL
Brett Young
Brett Young
Brett Young
Brett Young
CANTERRA SEEDS
Cargill - VICTORY Hybrid Canola
Syngenta
Proven Seed / CPS
Proven Seed / CPS
Dekalb
Dekalb
Dekalb
Canola Growers
Roundup Ready
6074 RR
6080 RR
6076 CR
6086 CR
CS2000
V12-1 *
SY 4187
PV 533 G
VR 9562 GC
74-44 BL
74-54 RR
73-75 RR
45H33
LSD (%)
99
100
95
99
99
96
102
101
106
100
96
100
101
11
102
100
101
102
100
100
101
98
99
98
98
99
99
2.0
1.8
2.2
2.3
2.5
2.3
1.8
1.7
2.0
2.1
2.7
2.6
2.1
50
48
51
51
50
49
53
48
51
46
47
46
50
BL/S
BL
BL/CR/S
BL/CR
BL/CR
BL
BL/CR
BL
BL/CR
BL
BL/CR
BL
BL/CR
Brett Young
CANTERRA SEEDS
DL Seeds
Crop Production Services/Proven
CHECK MEAN 5440 (bu/ac)
60
Indicatesvarieties
varieties
Specialty
oil profiles
and premiums
associated
with
pricing.
Visit www.canolaperformancetrials.ca
** Indicates
withwith
Specialty
oil profiles
and premiums
associated
with pricing.
Visit
www.canolaperformancetrials.ca
for more details.
“@”
Indicates
genetic
disease
resistance
based
on variety
descriptions
submitted
to CFIA:
an “R” or resistant
ratingtotoCFIA:
blackleg
for more
details.
"@"
Indicates
genetic
disease
resistance
based
on variety
descriptions
submitted
an=BL;
"R" or
Clubroot resistance= CR; and an MR to sclerotinia =S. “+” indicates variety supported for registration by Western Canada Canola / Rapeseed
resistant
rating
to
blackleg
=BL;
Clubroot
resistance=
CR;
and
an
MR
to
sclerotinia
=S.
"+"
indicates
variety
supported for
Recommending Committee.
registration by Western Canada Canola / Rapeseed Recommending Committee
Large
Scale Variety
2016 LARGE
SCALETrials
VARIETY TRIAL S (% yield of 5440)
Long Season Zone
Mid Season Zone
Short Season Zone
Overall
45H33
74-44 BL
L130
L252
PV 533 G
5440 (bu/ac)
97
97
–
96*
101
99
99
99
99
99
103
100
100
102
104*
102*
–
89*
–
95*
54
52
61
54
* indicates statistical difference from 5440 using paired t test
* indicates statistical difference from 5440 using paired t test
––zone
zoneaverage
averagenot
notshown
showndue
duetotoless
lessthan
than5 5locations
locationsdata
data
19