! ! ! ! THE ACTING PROCESS BEHIND PERFORMING THE ROLE OF HIPPOLYTUS ! By Curtis M. Jackson B. A., Columbia College Chicago, 2008 ! Submitted to the Graduate Faculty in the Conservatory of Performing Arts in partial fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Fine Arts ! ! ! ! Point Park University 2014 iii TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGMENTS……………………………………….. iv ABSTRACT……………………………………………………… v CHAPTERS I. INTRODUCTION……………………………………… 1 II. TEXTUAL ANALYSIS, HISTORICAL RESEARCH AND VISUAL ART INSPIRATION A. A CLOSE READING OF THE TEXT………… 3 B. HISTORICAL RESEARCH…………………… 9 C. OTHER DRAMATIC VERSIONS…………….. 12 D. VISUAL ART………………………………….. 14 III. ACTING TECHNIQUE A. PRACTICAL AESTHETICS………………….. 19 B. HEIGHTENED LANGUAGE………………… 23 IV. CONCLUSION……………………………………… 28 WORKS CITED…………………………………………………. 31 APPENDIX A. VISUAL ART…………………………………………. 32 B. Phèdre PRODUCTION PHOTOS…………………….. 38 iv ACKNOWLEDGMENTS It wasn’t possible to do this alone. Thank you Point Park University, and to all who have taught me inside and out of the classroom. Thank you Robin Walsh, Monica A. Payne, Sheila McKenna, John Amplas, Marianne DiQuattro, James FitzGerald, Terry McCabe, Sheldon Patinkin and O. F. Harten. Special thanks to my fellow graduate class, and my unconditionally supportive family. v ABSTRACT This thesis explores various approaches to my process, including conventional forms of acting, and their application to heightened language text. I drew from Aristotle’s six elements of drama, script analysis and practical research, bringing them to bear in my portrayal of Hippolytus in Ted Hughes’ translation of Racine’s Phèdre. CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION As with all theatrical productions I’ve worked on, there is an acting process. The acting process feels more like a blueprint, a guide to build structure supporting the creation of the play’s production. After working with countless artists on various theatrical productions, receiving a Bachelors of Arts from Columbia College Chicago in Theatre Performance and learning about processes honed by many acting practitioners during graduate studies at Point Park University, I’ve discovered not only how important it is for an actor to have their own acting procedure, but for the actor to systematically apply this process. Through textual analysis by way of Aristotle’s six elements of drama, exploring the play though historical research, using visual art as a medium for inspiration and applying the Practical Aesthetics conceived by David Mamet and William H. Macy, I was able undertake the role of Hippolytus in Point Park University’s production of Phèdre. Understanding the aspects of my acting process and how they were applied to the production of Phèdre is the intent of this paper. In the spring of 2013, I was assigned the role of Hippolytus in our graduate thesis production of Phèdre by Jean Racine translated by Ted Hughes. Unlike auditioning for the role in the show, the role was given to me, and I was charged with bringing the character to life. For me, the analytical research and preparation experience through textual analysis was a very important step in the acting process. Jackson 1 Jackson !2 I learned textual analysis, or a version of it, during my time in undergraduate studies at Columbia College Chicago. Professor Terry McCabe and his Text Analysis class instilled in me a level of dedication and respect toward the playwright, their purpose and their plays. Through textual analysis, I learned that taking a close read of Racine’s text led to a better understanding of Phèdre’s complex story. I also learned how to fully understand the play through the six elements of drama written about in Poetics by Aristotle. Plot, thought and spectacle were the main elements used to inform my acting process for the production of Phèdre. They will be spoken about in this paper. (Character, rhythm and language are three other elements written about by Aristotle, and will be referenced, though not specifically in relation to Phèdre.) The character Hippolytus, along with the other mythical characters in Phèdre, were researched and referenced as source material. I was also able to represent the story of Phèdre through the use of visual art. During the rehearsal period for Phèdre, there were two main points of focus directly relating to acting performance. I apply an acting technique called Practical Aesthetics, originally conceived by David Mamet and William H. Macy. I also concentrated on one of the most difficult aspects of performing Hughes’ translation of Racine’s text, the ability to deliver heightened language. Lastly, I will discuss the rehearsal process for Phèdre. I will also speak about how incorporation of my acting process proved to be effective as our production of Phèdre was well received by our audiences. CHAPTER II TEXTUAL ANALYSIS, HISTORICAL RESEARCH AND VISUAL ART INSPIRATION Research and textual analysis requires the actor to activate their analytical skills when learning about a play, the playwright and the meaning of the play. Analytical research helps me as an actor to develop how I’m going to approach the character as well as the play. I become better informed about the world in which the play takes place and how my character functions in that world. In the case of textually analyzing the play Phèdre and the character Hippolytus, I found the first and most important step is, of course, to read the play. Any questions I initially have about the play will be answered by reading the script. Before I can begin to play any character, I should know what the play is about, where the character I’m playing comes from, what the character does in the play and what is done to the character. I should also learn what the character relationships are and how my character supports the meaning of the play. The first read, or the first time I read a play, is to understand the story. Racine’s version of Phèdre goes into great detail as to where we are, who we are and what we’re doing. By first reading the play to get the story, we learn what the play is about. In Act I Scene I, Hippolytus speaks the exposition for the audience as well as for the actors Jackson 3 Jackson !4 playing the roles. We discover we’re in the city of Troezen and Theseus’ reputation is legendary as the king. We also discover King Theseus has been missing for six months. Hippolytus is King Theseus’ son and he is in love with Aricia who is the surviving daughter of the Pallantes, an enemy family to the king’s. We learn how Phèdre, King Theseus’ wife and stepmother to Hippolytus, came to Troezen. Phèdre is consumed with being in love with Hippolytus, her stepson, but she is concerned with what will become of her own son once King Theseus is confirmed dead. Phèdre wants to assert her son’s right to the throne and can do so if she is favored by Hippolytus. Meanwhile, Hippolytus is claiming his right to succession and is restoring the throne of Athens to Aricia. Hippolytus is in love with Aricia and plans to marry her. Through analyzing the play textually, we find that Hippolytus could succeed as ruler of Troezen and Crete. He could also restore the throne of Athens to Aricia, and if he marries her, he would be in control of all of Greece leaving Phèdre and her son with nothing. Political power is a strong theme within the text where the assertion of power is offset by passionate love. “Fate is inescapable. And here, in Troezen, I had to confront the one I banished. The first sight of him ripped my wounds wide open. No longer fever in my veins, Venus has fastened on my like a tiger” (Hughes 18). Eventually, the king returns which leaves the characters to deal with their prior ill-fated decisions. By first reading the play objectively, I was able to piece together the play’s complicated story. I take the first read to break down the play’s synopsis into a simple and specific explanation. Everything else I find about the play becomes in full support of Jackson !5 that synopsis. Everything else about the play can be considered the character’s journey, showing the content of the play’s story. Terry McCabe, author of the book Mis-directing the Play: An Argument Against Contemporary Theatre and my text analysis professor at Columbia College Chicago, relied heavily on Aristotle’s six elements of drama. Spoken about in Aristotle’s Poetics, the six elements of drama refer to what makes a well made dramatic play. Applying the six elements to Racine’s Phèdre helped me to understand what about the play was important, what about my character was needed to fulfill the play and what we wanted the audience to gain from the story. For the character Hippolytus and the production of Phèdre as a whole, I relied specifically on three of the elements; the play’s plot, thought and spectacle. The first and probably most important element of drama, so says Aristotle, is plot or mythos. The plot is literally what happens in the play. Plot has been referred to as the representation of action or the structure of incidents. “Hence, the Plot is the imitation of the action:- for by plot, I here mean the arrangement of incidences” (Aristotle 11). While working on Racine’s Phèdre, I knew the plot could be considered complicated. Therefore, during my textual analysis of the play, I had to focus on the plot in order to fully understand the play. Aristotle says the plot must be whole, “A whole is that which has a beginning, a middle and an end” (14). Phèdre’s plot begins with a missing king, a deranged queen and Hippolytus’ declaration of love to Aricia. The middle includes Phèdre’s declaration of Jackson !6 love to Hippolytus, the king’s return and Hippolytus being accused of rape. The end of Phèdre’s plot concludes with the banishment and death of Hippolytus, Phèdre’s confession before suicide and King Theseus’ acceptance of Aricia. Viewing Phèdre’s plot as a whole with a beginning, middle and end helped to inform me about Hippolytus’s journey throughout the entire play. I was able to conclude what is ultimately important to Hippolytus during each section of the play so as to determine how best to communicate the plot to the audience. The plot as a whole must also function as a unit. The beginning, middle and end of the plot must be united through consistency of the actions of events. An action happening earlier in the play causes another later on in the play. Aristotle writes about plot-unity stating, “…the internal structure of the plot, so that what follows should be the necessary or probable result of the proceeding action” (19). Learning how Phèdre is united as a whole helped me to determine what consistencies needed to be developed by Hippolytus. For example, constant references to King Theseus’ relationships with women lead to Hippolytus’ aversion to love.This directly related to more action in later scenes uniting the plot/play as a whole. I was able to develop Hippolytus’ behavior towards love through discovering how the plot as a whole is united. At first, it was difficult to follow the plot by just reading the play, especially when the plot changes. But Aristotle says, plot changes (plot reversals or peripeteia) are what make a well made play. It’s also what delineates a simple plot from a complex plot. Phèdre has a complex plot where all of the characters have what is called a reversal of the situation. For Hippolytus, I attributed his moments of desperation, uncertainty and Jackson !7 emotionally driven courses of action to his ever-changing plot reversals. For example, in Act IV of Phèdre, Hippolytus seeks to comfort his father Theseus by revealing good news about being in love with Aricia. Instead, by the end of the scene, Hippolytus is accused by Theseus of committing adultery and incest with Phèdre, and banished from Troezen. This scene is also an example of Hippolytus’ recognition of character; another element of plot coinciding with plot reversal. “Recognition, as the name indicates, is a change from ignorance to knowledge, producing love or hate between the persons destined by the poet for good or bad fortune” (20). Playing the role of Hippolytus including Aristotle’s definition of recognition meant I had to critically acknowledge moments of recognition such as when Hippolytus recognizes his love for Aricia or recognizes Phèdre’s trechery. The combination of Aristotle’s elements (plot, character and language) must support the fifth element of a drama, thought. “…Thought,— that is, the faculty of saying what is possible and pertinent in given circumstances” (Aristotle 13). Our director, Monica Payne, developed the thought as a force within the play. She chose to have all of the elements of drama support the play’s thought by focusing on Phèdre’s mood and execution. Our production centered around the plot, characters and language inspired by the overwhelming power of love. The play climaxed in the death of characters, and descended with acceptance towards truth. To play the role of Hippolytus in this production, I had to recognize how we put together all the elements of drama within this play, and submit to that thought. By establishing the overwhelming power of love was going to be the thought of our production, and by attributing the combined elements Jackson !8 supporting the thought as one of the six elements of drama, I was able to perform within the bounds of our production. I was able to make sense of our director’s concept and execute the concept during performance. Everything that is seen or heard onstage is the sixth element of drama, spectacle. Though a minimalist set, general theatre lighting, one cellist, three chairs and thousands of red rose petals seemed to simplify the sensory effect on our audience, in our production of Phèdre the spectacle aspect of the show emphasized the performance of the actors. The actors could also be considered spectacle as are costumes, sound, lights, set and props. As the actor playing Hippolytus, I used the spectacle to better support my character and the play. Aristotle writes that spectacle has “an emotional attraction of its own, but of all the parts, it is the least artistic, and connected least with the art of poetry” (13). To support the overall spectacle of the production, I honed my physical presence as the heir to the throne of Greece. Our clothes were not traditional greek tragedy costumes, but the use of my bare feet on the stage floor, a dagger strapped to my waist and a fitted black leather jacket gave me a strong physical presence. The sound of the cellist helped to create a visceral feeling for Hippolytus at the top of the show as did being immersed in blood-red colored rose petals. I’ve always made full use of spectacle to help me perform in the world of the play. In our production of Phèdre, spectacle helped Hippolytus feel in love, feel as if he were in a palace and feel like a king. ! ! Jackson !9 Historical Research Despite Racine’s detailed retelling of the story of Hippolytus, there were many aspects to Phèdre that weren’t easily apparent by just reading the script. I knew if there were questions that could not be answered just by reading the script, I must further my research by reading as much about the play and the character of Hippolytus as I could. The information about the mythical character Hippolytus is literally a full length play within itself. Researching the character Hippolytus and uncovering what could be used to support his actions is another important step in the analysis process. Throughout Racine’s Phèdre, there’s mention of where Hippolytus came from and who he is. Terry McCabe, along with other theatrical writers, label the process of learning about a character as character analysis. Character analysis describes a character’s personality based on their thoughts and behaviors. Through my research on the character Hippolytus, I found his mother, and her story in direct relation to his father were very influential towards the character analysis. Hippolytus’ thoughts and actions are described as chaste, prideful and bronze. He is “Our Prince of Scorn, who laughed at love and lovers?” (Hughes 6). Hippolytus also describes himself as not being a self-indulgent or wild person. He says, “There’s not a drop of dissolute blood in me” (Hughes 60). Hippolytus believes this, because he feels he inherited honorable traits from his mother. Hippolytus also explains he inherited pride from his mother by stating, “I drank this spirit in from the breast of an Amazon…” (6). Théramène also describes the influence of Antiope, Hippolytus’ mother, and her submission to love. He explains Antiope’s ability to love, along with the power of Venus, Jackson !10 influences Hippolytus taking precedence over being prideful and bronze. He questions Hippolytus: “Maybe Venus has suffered your taunts a day too long? Has she forced you, even you, to kneel at her alter bending your neck—…”(6). Théramène then says to Hippolytus, “You reject love, but where would Hippolytus be if Antiope, your indomitable mother, had not nursed that flame for your father?” (8). As a part of my research, I sought to know more information about his mother in hopes of understand what made Hippolytus such a noble and love fearing man. I discovered Antiope, Hippolytus’ mother, was the sister to Hippolyta, Queen of the Amazons known by her golden chastity garter. Though stories conflict, Antiope is mentioned by name in Racine’s script as Hippolytus’ mother, therefore my research towards Hippolytus’ character would come from Antiope and Theseus’ story. In relation to Hercules’ ninth labor and the obtaining of Hippolyta’s girdle, our story states that Antiope was captured by King Theseus and brought to Troezen. Antiope however betrayed the Amazons by eventually falling in love with Theseus and bearing his child, Hippolytus. Theseus later abandons Antiope for Phèdre. Antiope rallies the Amazons against Theseus’ marriage to Phèdre, and attacks Athens on their wedding day. Antiope is later then killed during the attack. Some versions of the story say Theseus killed Antiope. Some say she was killed by Hercules and some say she was mistakenly killed by another Amazon, Molpadia. I believe Antiope’s story directly influenced Hippolytus’ character to be chaste and resentful to his father. Knowing Hippolytus’ mother was abandoned by his his father, Theseus, and replaced by Phèdre provided insight towards developing these character relationships. Jackson !11 Researching the backstory on Hippolytus’ mother, Antiope, helped to define Hippolytus’ character in regards to his father, King Theseus. Hippolytus views Theseus as “…a hero in your own epic” and describs his father as “…filling the empty place of Hercules” (Hughes 51, 6). Hippolytus also mentions Theseus’ heroic triumph by slaying the Minotaur in Crete and keeping all of Greece safe. However, when Hippolytus describes Theseus’ less admirable character traits relating to women and love, his regard for his father changes to feelings of resentment. Hippolytus later condemns his father Theseus for believing in Phèdre’s accusations by saying he is obsessed with adultery and incest. Theseus’ past directly influences Hippolytus’ character where Hippolytus is inspired to be heroic like his father, but adverse to meaningless relationships with women. Furthermore, this research effects Hippolytus’ relationship with Phèdre informing me about his resentful feeling towards her for taking his mother’s place along side Theseus. Researching and textually analyzing information about the character Hippolytus led me to develop my character analysis. Hippolytus is: bronze, but an obedient son, chaste, but admires women, brave, but has never been in battle, admirable, but scornful, and rejecting of romantic love, but in love. After reading Phèdre to get the story and learning about the history between Antiope and Theseus, I was able to appropriately play the role of Hippolytus in relation to the other characters. Jackson !12 Other Dramatic Version In addition to reading Jean Racine’s version, the research process included different dramatic treatments of the myth by different playwrights. Hippolytus by Euripides is a Greek tragedy which was first performed in Athens in 428 BC. Euripides’ play Hippolytus is derived from the myth of Hippolytus and is the first theatrical production of the story. In this section I will examine 2 of those: Euripides’ Hippolytus and Kane’s Phaedra’s Love. In Euripides’ Hippolytus, there is more insight on all of the characters’ outrageous motivations being out of their control. Euripides relied heavily on the power of love being out of control of the common man and in the control of a higher power— Aphrodite the Goddess of love. In this version, Aphrodite is angered by Hippolytus due to his rejection of love. “It is his sinful neglect of me for which I shall punish Hippolytus this very day” (Euripides 67). Hippolytus is chaste and sworn to worship the Goddess of the hunt, Artemis. “He consorts with her [Artemis] continually in the green forests, clearing away the beasts of the earth with his swift dogs, pursuing a more than mortal companionship” (67). Aphrodite sets a plan in motion to punish Hippolytus by casting a spell over Phèdre, Hippolytus’ stepmother, causing her to fall in love with him. Euripides’ story put the control in the hands of the gods. Oppositely, Racine’s characters have control over their fate. Researching Euripides’ Hippolytus offered more analytical comprehension towards the story of Phèdre and the character Hippolytus. For Hippolytus, he too was in the control of a higher power, Artemis the Goddess of the hunt, leading him to be chaste. Jackson !13 Though the differences between Racine’s Phèdre and Euripides’ Hippolytus primarily revolve around what is exactly motivating the characters, their stories directly relate to each other when it comes to the overwhelming power of love. Racine’s version seemed to involve political positions of power where Euripides’ original version dealt with the power of the Gods, but both are valid and helped to put me in a strong position to perform the role of Hippolytus. Sarah Kane’s play is a very contemporary, Hippolytus-centered and a quasicomedic adaptation of Racine’s Phèdre. Hippolytus’ story follows the similar pattern of being falsely accused of rape, imprisoned and cast out by his father Theseus, however the character has been completely transformed. Not only does this version include gruesome violence and sexuality, the character Hippolytus is depicted as the opposite of every other Hippolytus described in other texts. “Kane’s revisioning of the Hippolytus and Phaedra myth took inspiration from Seneca, rather than Euripides or Racine– Nevertheless, there is a highly Racinian feel to Phaedra’s Love: the setting, the royal palace, functioning as spatial metaphor for Phaedra’s inescapable passion, presented as a human rather than god-driven emotion” (Aston 78). In Kane’s version, Hippolytus is described as fat, lazy, cynical, apathetic and overtly sexual though sexually unsatisfied. Phaedra still falls in love with him and says to Hippolytus, “You’re difficult. Moody, cynical, bitter, fat, decadent, spoilt. You stay in bed all day then watch TV all night, you crash around this house with sleep in your eyes and not a thought for anyone. You’re in pain. I adore you” (Kane 79). In Kane’s Phaedra’s Love, the play has nothing to do with love, but rather the grotesqueness of humanity. Jackson !14 Elizabeth Klett saw it as, “The play, for all its explicit sex and violence, is a darkly humorous exploration of the place of love in a godless, celebrity-obsessed materialistic society” (“PHAEDRA’S LOVE (Review)”). Despite the setting of the play, Hippolytus’ character in Phaedra’s Love is completely different than Racine’s depiction. The myth of Hippolytus, Euripides’ and Racine’s characterization of Hippolytus describe him as chaste, bronze, admirable, beautiful and prideful. Researching these differences in character traits between the many versions of the story can be used to identify analytically the true character of Hippolytus for our production. I found researching these plays and comparing their contrasting aspects informative to me as the actor playing the role of Hippolytus. ! Visual Art Inspiration Visual art became an inspiring source of practical research material. Throughout time, paintings and sculptures have depicted the stories we tell through the medium of theatre. A multitude of visual art sprung out of sourcing iconic classical art. Conducting practical research on classical art to find source materials as inspiration became another way of learning about Hippolytus. As a part of my preparation for the role Hippolytus, I put together two pieces of art. One was in the form of a collage and the other became a storybook coupling Racine’s text with found visual art. The collage represented insight into Hippolytus’ journey beginning with the story of his mother, Antiope, and ending with the gruesomeness of his death by Poseidon. Both the collage and storybook not only help to depict what’s actually Jackson !15 happening, but also further describe my character analysis. Through another artist’s interpretation and perspective, we get the essence of emotion, conflict, inner and outerrelationships to help support and convey the story’s meaning. My collage was made as a visual art piece depicting a timeline of events relating to the story of Hippolytus. I found images, some directly created for Racine’s Phèdre, to represent Hippolytus’ story. After compiling the images, I placed them together to make a linear timeline of events. ! Assembling different kinds of found art relating to Racine’s Phèdre to make a new piece of art allowed me to better learn Hippolytus’ story. The School of Education at John Hopkins University wrote about learning through visual arts stating, “The arts offer us models for the redescription of the world. They attach us to others, to our history, and to ourselves by providing a tapestry rich with threads of time, place, character, and even advice on what we might do with our lives” (Dickenson, Lee. “Learning Through Visual Arts”). By producing the art, I was also able to form a personal artistic attachment to the character Hippolytus and artistically develop a better understanding of Phèdre. For my second piece, I created a storybook which specifically related pieces of visual art to Jean Racine’s text from Phèdre. Each piece of art was coupled with the text Jackson !16 to tell a synopsis of Phèdre’s story. I wanted to promote our production using timed released pages of my storybook as advertisement. I wanted to market our show using somewhat ancient art and text without revealing our production’s contemporary look. Marketing this show using the ancient visual art synopsis helped to generate interest and acquaint the audience on what they were eventually going to see. Phaedra and Hippolytus, 1802, Pierre-Narcisse Guérin, Baron ! Phèdre (Above) Phèdre: Theseus is alive? Oenone, it's finished. I have confessed an appetite that is unspeakable. With a few greedy words I have stripped my husband of all honour. Aye! And Hippolytus! That arrogant gaze, plan as speech, tells me how hopeless my case is. ! Oenone: Say nothing. All my plan requires is your silence. Accuse him first-of the same crime. Who could contradict you? Everything is evidence against him. His own sword-which he left in your hand so luckily. Innocent blood might have to be spilt if it threatens your name. ! ! Theseus: Shall I never get out of the labyrinth? Where am I? Which way can I turn? The adulterer's gaze has to inveigle us with that seamless mask of probity. As an example, I used an image of Baron Pierre-Narcisse Guérin's oil paining entitled Phaedre and Hippolytus. The image depicts a series of notable plot changing events happing in the play. Hippolytus is shown representing rejection of his father and the kingdom’s hold on his maturing as a man. Theseus has returned to Troezen, and is seated in a position of power as the king with an accusatory look given to Hippolytus. Phèdre is seated beside Theseus, seemingly after she has accuses Hippolytus of adultery Jackson !17 and incest. Phèdre is baring Hippolytus’ sword as evidence, while being fed damaging advice from Oenone who is positioned behind her whispering in her ear. I wanted to best represent this image with Racine’s text captioning the events happening in the image. ! I also used another image interpreting the climax of the play. This engraving of an 1850’s production of Racine’s Phèdre came from the Granger Collection. The image shows the actors in motion as Phèdre has confessed her love, and is rejected by Hippolytus. The engraving also shows Oeone’s attempt to save Phèdre from committing suicide by Hippolytus’ sword. The dialogue I used to caption the image depicts the dramatic climax of Racine’s Phèdre. RACINE: Phèdre, 1850. Scene from an 1850 production of 'Phèdre,' by Jean Racine (1639-1699). Wood engraving, English, 1850. The Granger Collection. ! Phèdre Phèdre: I look at you and I see him. My husband's face is this face. And my love, my need, yes, in spite of myself, my deprivation, my starvation, my fever-I can't hide it. He has to know it. It has to come out. ...your baring, exactly, your eyes, your lips, the very pitch of your voice, this noble modesty gives his cheeks just that flesh of colour. Look-my heart. Here. Bury your sword here. I feel it lifting to meet your stroke. Strike! -Phèdre reveals her burning love for Hippolytus, her stepson ! Jackson !18 Inspiration through visual art and storytelling through images captioned by Racine’s text further my understanding of Phèdre. Making the collage and storybook enabled me to retell a synopsis of the story highlighting Hippolytus’ journey. I was able to recall picturizations of these scenes captioned with the text as a reference during the rehearsals. CHAPTER III ACTING TECHNIQUE The actor must understand that a technique cannot in itself enable him or her to act. Rather, it provides the actor with tools that, combined with strength of will, bravery, and common sense, can help the actor bring the life of the human soul to the circumstances created by the playwright. -A Practical Handbook for the Actor (Bruder et, al. 9) ! Practical Aesthetics While I researched the play, read different translations of the story, created visual inspiration, and applied Aristotle’s six elements of drama, I also applied an acting technique during rehearsal and performance. The technique I subscribed to is called Practical Aesthetics and was originally conceived by David Mamet and William H. Macy. Practical Aesthetics is derived from the methods of Sanford Meisner, Stanislavski and the Greek Stoic philosopher Epictetus. The technique teaches actors to use a four step process when working on a scene from a play. The techniques are explained in A Practical Handbook for the Actor and are also mentioned in the book True and False, written by David Mamet. As a graduate student at Point Park University, I was reintroduced to the Stanislavski based technique. Both Robin Walsh and Rich Keitel, my acting teachers, attributed good acting to having a Stanislavski based method where characters are internally developed and externally performed. My Meisner teacher, Monica Payne, taught me the importance of an actor doing something during a scene which involves Jackson 19 Jackson !20 their scene partners. I discovered Practical Aesthetics as an acting technique which includes Stanislavski’s internal development of what a character is experiencing in a scene, and Meisner’s work on what the actor is doing in the scene. Practical Aesthetic’s four step analysis focuses on both Stanislavski’s method and Meisner’s technique. While performing the role of Hippolytus, I payed constant attention to what the character Hippolytus was experiencing during the play and what I was actually doing as the actor performing the role. The analysis forces the actor to make decisions on what he is doing to communicate the scenes to the audience. Award winning actress Felicity Huffman uses the Practical Aesthetics technique stating, “It gave me structure from which to work. Analyzing the script, breaking it down to actions that are simple and become habitual. The structure then becomes the base from which the actor can jump into improvisatory work. The true currency of the actor is in the moment-tomoment work. That’s where the truth of the moment lies” (“Successful Actors Talk About Their Training.” backstage.com). The four steps written about in A Practical Handbook for the Actor are called: the “literal,” the “want,” the “essential action” and the “as-if.” Using Act V in Racine’s Phèdre, as an example of applying Practical Aesthetics, I started with step one of the analysis process, the “literal.” This step answers the question, “What is the character literally doing?” (Bruder, et al. 21). I wrote out a basic description of what is happening in the scene. Act V: “Hippolytus is asking Aricia to run away with him and get married.” In Act V, Hippolytus speaks long speeches about Phèdre’s declaration of love for him, and his father’s accusations toward him about adultery and incest. Hippolytus also Jackson !21 explains he has been dishonorably banished from Troezen, that he would like Aricia to escape with him and that they can be married at a sacred ancient shrine. Although there is a lot of dialogue and exposition written in heightened language, the literal description of what is happening in this scene is, Hippolytus is asking Aricia to run away with him and get married. The “want” in Act V for Hippolytus would be: What Hippolytus wants Aricia to do or say. I wrote: “Hippolytus wants Aricia to agree she will marry him and escape together.” Again, a basic description of what the character Hippolytus wants from the other character in the scene gives a strong starting position. I now have a clear intention and specific need from the other character in the scene. The “essential action” step for me was not as basic or simple as the first two steps. I attribute the “essential action” step to the teachings of Sanford Meinser’s acting approach. A Practical Handbook for the Actor describes “essential action” as “…or essence, of what the character is doing in the scene. This is the actual physical action you will be performing onstage…” Once I found the essence of what Hippolytus was doing in the scene, I had to develop what Hippolytus was physically going to be doing. “Essential action” is attributed to physical action. “To act means to do, so you must always have something specific to do onstage or you will immediately stop acting” (Bruder et al. 13). Meisner’s acting exercise, called the Activity, is synonymous with physical action. “Acting is doing. It is not talking about, it is doing something and when we are not doing onstage we have stopped acting” (Silverberg 55). Practical Aesthetics’ technique has nine Jackson !22 guidelines to follow when developing physical action derived from “essential action.” This action must: ! 1. be physically capable of being done. 2. be fun to do. 3. be specific. 4. have its test in the other person. 5. not be an errand. 6. not presuppose any physical or emotional state. 7. not be manipulative. 8. have a ‘cap.’ 9. be in line with the intentions of the playwright. (Bruder et al. 13-14) The “essential action” I chose for Hippolytus was: “Make Aricia sacrifice her life for love.” My physical action for Hippolytus became kneeling before Aricia, wrapping my arms around her waist and proposing for her hand in marriage. This “essential action” gave me a strong physical action in order to get what I wanted. It also fit perfectly within the context of the scene that involved the other characters. The fourth step in Practical Aesthetics’ scene analysis process is called the “as if.” Its intent is to help the actor get away from thinking about the play as fiction by developing ways to find the truth in the scene. By applying the “as if,” I was able to immerse myself into the scene by using my own sense memory, acting as if I were in the scene’s imaginary circumstance. Playing the character Hippolytus “as if” I were in Hippolytus’ situations allowed me to commit to the circumstances, react honestly to what was happening and pursue my intentions. “It helps the actor gain a fuller understanding of the action he has chosen for a given scene.” (Burder et al. 27-28). Jackson !23 Using Act V as an example, I acted as if I were asking my true love to escape with me and get married. Relating the “as if” to the “essential action,” I proposed marriage to her truthfully incorporating physical honesty as if I would in reality proposing to my true love. Using the Practical Aesthetics as an acting technique during the production of Phèdre helped me to be a physically and mentally present actor during rehearsals. Because of the techniques I was able to try different choices in the scenes, and later select the strongest choice that worked best for the scenes. I was never at a loss or unable to actively engage during rehearsal. The technique’s emphasis on involving the other actors also enforced a strong connection between my scene partners and me. ! The Language Racine’s Phèdre is written in heightened language. To avoid getting lost and overwhelmed with the text, I paid close attention to how Racine’s text is needed to best serve the play, what is considered heightened language and how to deliver a strong performance by having intention through the use of heightened language. Racine was a master at writing in alexandrian verse, and he chose this way of writing because of the effect it would have on the audience. The effect of his writing was explained to be Racine’s intention. He wanted to inspire social dominance, to be acknowledged as the greatest literary figure of his age and to be the Euripides of classical France. Racine’s writing was known for being beautiful while full of heart-wrenching and tragic sentiment. He wrote primarily neoclassical works drawing on the tragedies first Jackson !24 presented by the Greeks. Because of Racine’s intricate poetry, his works are not easily translated into other languages without the full effect of the poetry being lost. Knowing this about Racine and his writing allowed me to read and perform in Phèdre with a better understanding of how this story is both beautifully written and ugly in human nature. I believe Racine’s poetry is considered to represent raw human instinct delivered through elegant linguistics. This is why his works are difficult to translate into the English language. We used the Ted Hughes translation of Racine’s Phèdre which is, as our director Monica Payne says, the best translation of Racine’s work. Hughes’ translation of Phèdre was written in free verse to allow a more natural rhythm of speech. I believe the challenge for Hughes was to translate Racine’s alexandrine meter into beautiful English poetry while keeping the ugly nature of human behavior. Performing heightened language was a challenge for me as a young actor. While working on Phèdre, the same challenges blocked my ability to fully speak the lines and understand what I was saying. Through the advice of my Shakespeare teacher at Point Park University, James FitzGerald, I was reminded of John Barton and his teachings on delivering heightened language. John Barton is a theatre director, actor and writer who specializes in Shakespearian Theatre. In his book and television series, both entitled Playing Shakespeare, Barton speaks about heightened language where he describes it as text full of images, metaphor and simile. For the characters, the text is not necessarily considered naturalistic, but of an urgent need to be used to heighten the character’s intention. Phèdre Jackson !25 is written in heightened language and I wanted to develop Hippolytus’ speeches to make full use of the text and full understanding of the language. I wanted to develop the character Hippolytus as someone who uses his language not only to explain himself, but in return, is also being described by what he speaks. Barton says, “…the nature of the language tells us the nature of the character, or maybe we should say is the character” (71). Hippolytus’ speeches in Phèdre are beautifully written poetry. During Phèdre’s rehearsals, I wanted to not only deliver the speeches clearly, but to exploit the richness of the heightened language. I found myself becoming overwhelmed with the amount of physical and mental agility it took to deliver these very long speeches, and realized how much attention it took away from working with my scene partners. I went back to John Barton’s Playing Shakespeare, and realized the same fundamentals on Shakespeare’s heightened language applied to Racine’s text. In regard to heightened language, Barton says, “I believe that in rehearsal, at any rate, we should tend to go too far, because we can always pull back later” (57). In addition to going too far with the delivery of the language during our Phèdre rehearsals, I also discovered what motivated the language needed to be clear to the audience. The motivation for the language is the intention. The most important step with heightened language wasn’t to deliver the speech as beautiful poetry, but to first establish the intention of the speech. Barton uses one of Henry V’s speeches as an example and states, “…I want to concentrate here on Henry’s use of language. His intention is to rally his Jackson !26 troops and so his language is heightened because of his intention, not because it is a set speech” (69). When Hippolytus’ intention with his speeches became clear, the speeches themselves became clear, and the heightened language became words that Hippolytus needed to say. Hippolytus’ speech to Aricia is a wonderful example of heightened language where I needed to find a very clear intention in order to deliver the speech. I chose Hippolytus’ intention to be: A truthful confession to Aricia about how I’m in love with her. Hippolytus’ need to speak words that may be unfamiliar to him is considered heightened language, but the language came from a clear intention that even Hippolytus is able to execute. Desperate, humiliated, With the arrow in me, Six months of mortification, Fighting you, fighting myself. I search your absence for you like a madman, And yet I run from your presence. Everywhere in the woods your image hunts me. I try to escape you But every shaft of sunlight, Every night shadow Sets you in front of me, surrounds me with you. Everything competes to fling The obstinate fool Hippolytus ! Helpless at your feet. (Hughes 30) Jackson !27 The heightened language is a highly regarded aspect of Phèdre. There is both narrative exposition and dramatic dialogue in Phèdre which I was able to use to help portray the character Hippolytus. His language is dynamic, expressive and vivid, therefore so is the character of Hippolytus. I was able to use the heightened language as my primary way to communicate human emotions, communicate exposition, break through character obstacles, and relate the story of Phèdre to the audience. Techniques from Barton’s Playing Shakespeare and an understanding of Racine’s intentions through his literary works bettered my ability to perform Hippolytus’ speeches. CHAPTER IV THE CONCLUSION ! Phèdre is the tragic story of a queen and her unrequited love for her stepson. Unbalanced by the Goddess Venus and spurned by the young man, Phèdre’s pursuit of Hippolytus forces her mind and the family itself into a downward spiral from which there is no return. -Monica A. Payne, Director Incorporating this entire process while working on the production of Phèdre was a huge undertaking. Our rehearsal process was very unusual and included chunks of time working together as a cast of actors, and chunks of time working individually as researchers. While we were together, a lot of time was devoted to table work sessions, some acting exercises and staging on a minimalist set. During the table work sessions, our cast would speak about the research found in Greek mythology, the different versions of Phèdre, and correct pronunciations of Greek names and places. We would talk about heightened language, and the overwhelming power of love being in control of the goddess Venus rather than in the control of the characters. In addition to putting together collages for inspiration through visual art, we also made character tableaus called triptychs. We self directed and performed these triptychs using a minimalist set, some lighting and some costumes to convey parts of our character’s story. To help with the heightened language and memorization, our director, Monica Payne, taught us an acting exercise called punctuations walks. The punctuation walks Jackson 28 Jackson !29 exercise could be done with a scene partner or alone. The idea is to have the actor step forward on each syllable of a line, and only changing direction, body position, physical and vocal speed when punctuation in the line appears. The lines are to be spoken in a monotone voice so as not to develop artificially memorized vocal inflection. We spent full rehearsal periods working on the punctuation walks exercise. The exercise helped us to physically learn our lines, be able to tackle long speeches of heightened language and develop a connection with our scene partners when we were punctuation walking together. We met as a cast once a week for fifteen weeks. During that time, we eventually started to work on staging scenes in the rehearsal space on our minimalist set. The set consisted of three antique chairs and thousands of red-rose petals. Knowing there would be very little to anchor us as actors, other than the three chairs, our director instructed us to own the space, and depend on the language of the piece to ground us along with each other as scene partners. The staging of Phèdre also became minimalistic where most of the movement came from the actors entering or exiting the stage. This allowed for our director to create a lot of picturization, and freed us as actors to communicate through text, physical gesture and physical contact. After a four week hiatus from working on Phèdre, we were finally able to meet as a complete cast. We immediately began to review, re-block and work on new staging with newly added cast members. During this time, I was able to review all of my research about Phèdre by teaching it to the new cast members. During technical rehearsals, the use of spectacle (i.e. costumes, light, sound and props) helped to solidify for all of us the Jackson !30 world in which this play and our characters lived. The production of Phèdre had literally come to life. Our production of Phèdre opened on February 1st and closed on February 2nd, 2014. With only three scheduled performances within a two day period, I was very impressed by the overwhelmingly hard work and dedication put forth by our entire cast and crew. During the performance period, I felt my acting process while working on this show prepared me to sustain a fully professional, six week run. I felt confident and informed about what our play was saying, what my character was doing and who my character was in relation to the rest of the cast. I felt the play was very well suited for its production and served the Aristotelian definition of a well made play. Performing the role of Hippolytus in Racine’s Phèdre proved the importance of an actor having an acting process. By applying a text analysis to the script, I was able to develop how to approach the play as well as the character Hippolytus. Fully understanding the play through Aristotle’s six elements of drama clarified for me the aspects of our production and how they all fit together. Researching historical myths supported the discoveries I made about Hippolytus’ character traits and creating visual art unlocked my artistry towards visually interpreting Racine’s classical text. Using the Practical Aesthetics scene analysis always gave me as an actor something to bring into rehearsal and kept me from actor’s blocks. Finally, applying intention to heightened language provided me with the ability to not be overwhelmed by Phèdre’s very long and beautiful poetry. WORKS CITED Aristotle. Poetics. Mineola: Dover Publications, Inc., 1997. Print. ! Aston, Elaine. Feministic Views on the English Stage: Women Playwrights 1990-2000. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003. eBook. ! Barton, John. Playing Shakespeare. New York: Anchor Books, a division of Random House, Inc., 1984. Print. ! Bruder, Melissa, Lee Michael Cohen, Madeleine Olnek, Nathaniel Pollack, Robert Previto, and Scott Zigler. A Practical Handbook for the Actor. New York: Random House, Inc., 1986. Print. ! Dickinson, Dee. “Learning Through the Arts.” New Horizons for Learning. (1997). http:// education.jhu.edu/PD/newhorizons/strategies/topics/Arts%20in%20Education/ dickinson_lrnarts.htm. Date Accessed April 13, 2014. ! Kane, Sarah. Sarah Kane: Complete Plays; Blasted; Phaedra’s Love; Cleansed; Crave; 4.48 Psychosis; Skin. London: Methuen Publishing, 2001. Print. ! Jackson 31 Jackson !32 Klett, Elizabeth. “PHAEDRA’S LOVE (Review).” jstor.org (Oct. 11, 2002). http:// www.jstor.org/stable/25069242. Date Accessed April 19, 2014. ! Hughes, Ted. Phèdre: A Play. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 1998. Print. ! McCabe, Terry. Mis-directing the Play: An Argument Against Contemporary Theatre. Chicago: Ivan R. Dee, 2001. Print. ! Silverberg, Larry. The Sanford Meisner Approach. Hanover: Smith and Kraus, Inc., 1994. Print. ! “Successful Actors Talk About Their Training.” Backstage.com (Nov. 09 2011). http:// www.backstage.com/news/successful-actors-talk-about-their-training/. Date Accessed April 17, 2014. APPENDIX A Hippolytus by Eugene Danagers. Phèdre (Above) Everything has changed since the gods Decided to grace this palace With the daughter of Minos and Pasiphae. -Hippolytus ! Phèdre (Left) Oenone: What is all this remorse? What crime could be so awful? ! Phèdre: He had simply appeared-Staring at me, The man created to destroy me. Before I could grasp what I'd seen I felt my face flame crimson-then go numb. My whole body scorched-then icy sweat. My eyes went dark. I could not speak. Phèdre by Alexandre Cabanel, 1880. I could hardly stand. The first sight of him ripped my wounds wide open. No longer a fever in my veins, Venus has fastened on me like a tiger. I know my guilt and it terrifies me. My own craving fills me with horror. I detest my life… -Phèdre reveals her dark secret to Oenone Jackson 33 Jackson !34 Phèdre (Left) Hippolytus: I try to escape you. But every shaft of sunlight, every night shadow sets you in from of me, surrounds me with you. All I had meant to do was declare my love. Your delicate snare has caught a strange creature... -Hippolytus declares his love to Aricia The Awakening of Adonis by John William Waterhouse, 1900. Phèdre, The Ganger Collection, 1850. Phaedra, Oenone And Hippolytus by Raphael Urbain Massard,1824. !! !! !! !! Phèdre (Left & Below) Hippolytus: You gods, what am I hearing? Have you forgotten that King Theseus is my father, and that you are his wife? Phèdre: I look at you and I see him. My husband's face is this face. And my love, my need, yes, in spite of myself, my deprivation, my starvation, my fever-I can't hide it. He has to know it. It has to come out. ...your baring, exactly, your eyes, your lips, the very pitch of your voice, this noble modesty gives his cheeks just that flesh of colour. Look-my heart. Here. Bury your sword here. I feel it lifting to meet your stroke. Strike! -Phèdre reveals her burning love for Hippolytus, her stepson Hippolytus and Phaedra 11 by John Woodrow Kelly, 1997. Jackson !35 Etude for Hippolytus by Piotr Naliwajko, 2000. Venus and Adonis by Georges Barbier. Phèdre (Above) Hippolytus: You gods, what am I hearing? Have you forgotten that King Theseus is my father, and that you are his wife? ! Phèdre: I look at you and I see him. My husband's face is this face. And my love, my need, yes, in spite of myself, my deprivation, my starvation, my fever-I can't hide it. He has to know it. It has to come out. ...your baring, exactly, your eyes, your lips, the very pitch of your voice, this noble modesty gives his cheeks just that flesh of colour. Look-my heart. Here. Bury your sword here. I feel it lifting to meet your stroke. Strike! -Phèdre reveals her burning love for Hippolytus, her stepson !! ! Phèdre (Left) Phèdre: Theseus is alive? Oenone, it's finished. I have confessed an appetite that is unspeakable. With a few greedy words I have stripped my husband of all honour. Aye! And Hippolytus! That arrogant gaze, plan as speech, tells me how hopeless my case is. ! Oenone: Say nothing. All my plan requires is your silence. Accuse him first-of the same crime. Who could contradict you? Everything is evidence against him. His own sword-which he left in your hand so luckily. Innocent blood might have to be spilt if it threatens your name. Phaedra and Hippolytus, by Baron PierreNarcisse Guérin, 1802. ! Theseus: Shall I never get out of the labyrinth? Where am I? Which way can I turn? The adulterer's gaze has to inveigle us with that seamless mask of probity. Jackson !36 Phèdre (Left) Theseus: You made a mistake. Have you forgotten? You dropped your sword. In her hand it convicts you. You made another mistake. You omitted to kill her-and cut off her voice. ! Hippolytus: Am I to understand-the Queen has accused me? My lord, consider a son's solicitude for the father he loves. That keeps my mouth sealed. Unless you wish to open an abyss under a gulf that is already gaping. My mother's chastity was her fame. There is not a drop of dissolute blood in me. She formed me. Remember Phèdre's mother. Phèdre bears the blood of a lineage far more heavily charged with such crimes than mine ever was and you know it. ! ! Theseus: Your lascivious eyes are locked on Phèdre. Get out. For the last time-get out. Do you have to be flung out bodily? Neptune, O great God of the Oceans, remember how I scoured your shores clean of every ruffian. Grant me my wish. Avenge a heart-broken father. Break your wrath on the head of this traitor. Smash the bones of his effrontery, show how a great god can demolish a man. ! Authentic Greek Sword, 400BC. ! A god of vengeance out of the sea pursues you. And yet in spite of your nature, so strangely diseased, I love you. You gods, see what I suffer. How did I sire this deformity? -On the word of Phèdre and Oenone, Hippolytus is accused of adultery and incest. Theseus banishes his son Hippolytus from Troezen. !! !! Phèdre (Left) Phèdre: What am I hearing? How dare you go on mixing these drugs? Will you try to poison me to the last? Witch. This is how you have destroyed me. Leave me to mourn what you have made of me. And may the heavens pay you exactly what you have earned. Sycophants, the most pernicious of the gifts an angered god can give to the wearer of the crown. ! Oenone: Ah God, I have spent my life to saver her. Have I now been paid as I deserved? -Phèdre condemns Oenone for executing their plot against Hippolytus Phaedra and Oenone by Raphael Urbain Massard,1824. Jackson !37 Phèdre Theseus: Where is Hippolytus? I gave him to your care Théramène. Where is my son? ! Théramène: Ah- so much concern coming so late and superfluously. Such paternal love. And all so useless. Hippolytus is dead. ! It came out of the sea, as if the whole sea had bellowed. A sudden skull-splitting roar, an indescribable, terrible, tearing voice, like lightning flash and thunderclap together. And out of it, the foam cascading from a colossal body, came a beast- Up the sand, with a fury of a supernatural existence. It's head was one huge monster all to itself, like a bull's head, with bull's horns. I saw Hippolytus swerve tight passed it's jaw and The Death of Hippolytus (La mort d’Hippolyte) by Sir bury a javelin all but for a span length of the shaft behind that thing's shoulder, right where the heart is in creatures that have hearts. With a fury at his daring- the whole mass of it rose and collapsed onto Hippolytus, like another mountain of ocean, or like a giant octopus of water. A last scything swipe of the monster's tail came round under their hooves, toppling the horses and smashing the wheels of the chariot. The horses galloped away with their weightless bundle that had fed them, and that was your son. We followed- The trail was easy- he had signed every stone, left us rags of flesh on every thorn. My lord, with those words Hippolytus' voice and his life failed all together. And I was left The Death of Hippolytus by Carle Vernet, 1800. Death of Hippolytus by Peter Paul Rubens, 1611. The Death of Hippolytus by Joseph Desire Court, 1825. embracing the latest prize of the triumphant gods- an object hardly recognizable as a man. -Théramène described Hippolytus' death by Neptune called upon by Theseus Jackson !38 Phèdre and Thésée by Léon Bakst, 1927. Phèdre (Above) Théramène: And here comes the cause of everything- ! Phèdre: No, Theseus. Now hear me speak. Let me restore your son's lost innocents. Hippolytus was not guilty. Hippolytus was chaste. And loyal to you. I was the monster in this riddle. I was insane with an incestuous passion, to amuse some malevolent deity. ! ! Panope: My lord, she is dying. Phèdre: I feel my pulses pushing it icily into my feet, hands and the roots of my hair. I see the sun's ball through a mist, and you, whom my very presence sickens, I see you in a mist, darkening. My eyes go dark. Now the light of the sun can resume its purity unspoiled. -Phèdre clears Hippolytus' good name and dies by drinking the poison her sister Medea brought to Athens APPENDIX B ! Production Photos: Phèdre, By Jean Racine Directed by Monica Payne Produced by the Point Park Graduate Program in Acting GRW Space, Lawrence Hall, Point Park University 2014 Jackson 39 APPENDIX B ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! !! !! !! !! !! !! PHEDRE BY JEAN RACINE DIRECTED BY MONICA PAYNE Saturday, Feb. 1 at 8 pm Sunday, Feb. 2 at 2 pm and 8 pm GRW Performance Studio, Lawrence Hall Point Park University Produced by the Point Park Graduate Program in Acting Admission is free. Please RSVP to [email protected]. Phèdre Production Poster, 2014 Jackson 40
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz