Assessing the Influence of Copper-NickelBearing Bedrocks on Baseline Water Quality in Three Northeastern Minnesota Watersheds Perry M. Jones Laurel G. Woodruff Robert R. Seal Nadine Piatak Steven A. Hauck U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Carrie Jennings USGS MN Activities Related to Potential Mining 2011 - St. Louis River - streambed sediment sampling/ streamflow gaging – GLIFWC/Fond du Lac/EPA In 3 watersheds (Filson, Keeley, St. Louis) 2012 - water quality/streambed sediment sampling – USGS 2013-16 - bedrock and soil sampling with additional waterquality sampling/streamflow gaging - LCCMR 2015-16 - additional water-quality analyses (i.e stable isotopes) - GLRI/EPA Why these 3 watersheds? Filson Creek Ni-Cu-PGE mineralization Keeley Creek little/no mineralization St. Louis River Fe-Ti-oxide mineralization USGS – 2013-2016 LCCMR Study Assessment of Duluth Complex Bedrocks on Water Quality 1) Characterize metal concentrations in • surface waters • bedrock • stream-bed sediments • soil across the basal part of the Duluth Complex 2) Determine if metal concentrations are currently influencing regional water quality Outcomes Establish the current regional pre-mining baseline geochemistry of soils, sediments, rocks and waters. Create datasets/tools to assess potential impacts of proposed mining on water quality. Used by Federal, State, local, tribal entities, and mining companies as a context for sound public policy decisions. Study Design Activity 1: Determine major and trace element contents in bedrock samples, soil samples, and stream-bed sediment samples. Activity 2: Determine temporal flow rates and background metal and major constituent loads. Activity 3: Construction of conceptual hydrologic and water-quality models to assess hydrologic and water-quality conditions prior to potential mining 2014 – 2015 Sampling Plan WATER QUALITY – all 3 watersheds 21 total sites sampled 4 times/year 18 trace elements 12 major constituents (ions) DOC (total and quality)/TOC stable isotopes (O, H) SOLID MEDIA SAMPLING – in each watershed 10 bedrock samples >30 soil samples (up to 3/site) 20 stream bed sediments ( 2 size fractions: < 2 mm; <63 microns) 44 major and trace elements (near-total digestion) 10 metals by weak leach (stream bed sediments) Filson and Keeley Creeks • • • • abundant wetlands several lakes thin glacial cover (< 50 feet) topography bedrock-controlled FILSON KEELEY FILSON Filson/Keeley sample sites VIRGINIA FORMATION OUTCROP St. Louis River • • • • abundant wetlands minimal bedrock exposure thick glacial cover (100 – 150 feet) topography controlled by glacial features GABBRO BOULDERS St. Louis sample sites Preliminary Water Quality Assessment, 2012-2014 Comparison of median and range dissolved concentrations 1) temporal changes in all samples relative to flow 2) watersheds Different Laboratories USGS Research Laboratory - September 2012, June 2013 USGS National Water-Quality Laboratory - September 2013, April, June, August, and Sept/Oct 2014 Water Quality Assessment – pH and Specific Conductance Dilute waters in each watershed Lower pH values may be associated with mineralization and contributing waters from wetlands/bogs Watersheds Specific Conductance (µS/cm) pH Filson Creek 23 – 51 5.0 – 7.2 Keeley Creek 25 – 105 5.6 – 6.8 St. Louis River 37 – 98 6.4 – 8.3 Conceptual Hydrologic/Water-quality Modeling Hydrology Water balances for 3 watersheds Synthetic hydrographs Water-quality modeling Visual MINETEQ – equilibrium model USGS OTIS – transport model Tracer test – Filson Creek What are the important parameters controlling metal transport at various concentrations? Do you know what this white stuff is?
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz