Performance assessment of the TEMPO® system : an automated method for Escherichia coli enumeration in foods Danièle SOHIER1*, Maryse RANNOU1, Florence GORSE2 1 ADRIA Développement, Quimper, France 2 bioMérieux, Marcy l’Etoile, FRANCE * Corresponding author: [email protected] INTRODUCTION Culture methods used to determine Escherichia coli levels in food products are time consuming and labor intensive. The TEMPO system and reagents have been developed to replace plate and tube counting methods. In this study the TEMPO system has been used to compare the performance of the TEMPO EC test for the enumeration of E. coli in food products to the ISO 16649-2 plate count method (TBX) according to ISO 16140 technical rules for performance assessment, as part of the AFNOR validation. The difference between TBX and PCA shows in all cases (except for E. coli 1) a negative value due to an underestimation of E. coli pure cultures in TBX. The enumeration obtained with TEMPO EC is more in agreement with that obtained on non selective plates (PCA) than with selective medium TBX, which signifies that TEMPO EC ensures a better recovery of E. coli cells than the ISO 16649-2 method. Table 2 : Enumeration of non E. coli pure cultures performed by ISO 16649-2 and TEMPO EC Non E. coli strains TEMPO EC PRINCIPLE The TEMPO EC test consists of a vial of culture medium and an innovative card (Figure 1), which are specific to this test. The culture medium is inoculated with the sample to be tested by the TEMPO Filler (Figure 2) into the card containing 48 wells of three different volumes. The TEMPO Filler seals the card to avoid any contamination during subsequent handling. During incubation, the E. coli strains present in the card reduce the medium substrate, MU-β-glucuronide, and cause a fluorescent signal to appear, detected by the TEMPO Reader (Figure 3). Depending on the number and size of the positive wells, the TEMPO system deduces the number of Escherichia coli present in the original sample according to a calculation based on the MPN method. Card reading, interpretation and reporting are managed by the system after a 24h incubation at 37°C. From a 1:10 diluted sample, the TEMPO EC method allows E. coli enumeration from 10 to 49,000 CFU/g of food. Bacillus subtilis 630 Escherichia vulneris 132 Citrobacter diversus 140 Hafnia alvei 111 Citrobacter freundii 23 Klebsiella oxytoca CIP 7932 Enterobacter aerogenes CIP6086 Klebsiella pneumoniae 47 Enterobacter cloacae 10 Kluyvera ascorbata CIP 8295T Enterobacter sakazakii D7 Proteus vulgaris 56 Enterococcus faecalis 25 Providencia stuartii 46 Erwinia carotovora CIP 103762 Rhanella aquatilis 69 Escherichia hermanii 395 Serratia liquefaciens 26 Escherichia vulneris 127 Shigella flexneri CIP 8248 None of the 20 non E. coli strains belonging to 19 species were detected by either method. MATERIAL AND METHODS Two methods, TEMPO EC and ISO 16649-2 on TBX medium, used for enumeration of β-glucuronidase positive E. coli were compared with pure cultures, and on artificially and naturally contaminated food products. This comparison was performed according to the ISO 16140 rules and to robust statistics, the choice of the regression depending on the SDwy/SDwx ratio : GMFR (orthogonal regression) and OLS (linear regression). TEMPO EC is sensitive and specific. RELATIVE LINEARITY Figure 4 Figure 5 Figure 6 Figure 1 : TEMPO reagents SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY The sensitivity and specificity of TEMPO EC were assessed using pure cultures of 30 E. coli strains and 20 non-E. coli strains encountered in food products (Tables 1 and 2). R = 0.99 N = 10 RELATIVE LINEARITY The relative linearity was investigated by mixing pure culture serial dilutions with 5 food categories : dairy , meat, vegetable, seafood and pet food (Figures 4 to 8). RELATIVE EXACTITUDE 50 artificially and naturally contaminated food products were tested in parallel with the ISO 16649-2 method and TEMPO EC (Figure 9) including: - Figure 7 R = 0.96 N = 10 Figure 8 All linear correlation coefficients are contained between 0.96 to 1.00 (Figures 4 to 8). Figure 2 : Preparation station with TEMPO Filler R = 0.96 N = 10 Meat and poultry: raw and processed, fresh or frozen. Dairy products: frozen, dry, fermented. Fish and seafood: smoked, raw, fresh and frozen. Fruits and vegetables: fresh, dehydrated or frozen Pet food: raw, processed or dehydrated R = 0.97 N = 10 R = 1.00 N = 10 Figure 9 Figure 3 : Reading station with TEMPO® Reader RELATIVE EXACTITUDE Figure 9 : Relative exactitude according the analysis of 50 food products RESULTS SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY Table 1 : Enumeration of E. coli pure cultures performed by ISO 16649-2 and TEMPO EC Control PCA log CFU/ml ISO 16649-2 TBX log CFU/ml E.coli 1 E.coli 17 E.coli 19 E.coli 101 8.87 9.28 8.76 9.15 8.89 8.53 8.34 7.81 E.coli 108 E.coli 2B E.coli 118 E.coli 12 9.32 8.81 8.89 9.08 Strains TEMPO log CFU/ml log difference TEMPO-PCA log CFU/ml log difference TBX-PCA log CFU/ml log difference TEMPO-TBX log CFU/ml 8.99 9.40 8.97 8.93 0.12 0.12 0.21 -0.22 0.02 -0.75 -0.42 -1.34 0.10 0.87 0.63 1.12 9.00 8.96 9.00 <6 -0.32 0.15 0.11 NA -0.66 -0.05 -0.18 NA 0.34 0.20 0.29 NA 8.75 9.32 9.21 9.08 8.83 -0.17 0.02 0.06 -0.20 -0.37 -0.21 -0.62 -0.45 -0.58 -1.24 0.04 0.64 0.505 0.38 0.87 8.96 -0.19 -0.39 0.20 8.70 <6 -0.26 NA -0.35 NA 0.09 NA 9.10 9.11 6.42 9.21 8.93 9.25 9.14 9.11 9.11 8.93 9.06 8.96 9.14 9.36 -0.19 -0.12 -2.94 -0.03 0.16 0.21 -0.06 -0.09 -0.07 -0.19 -0.85 -0.20 -0.15 0.10 -0.64 -0.55 -2.71 -0.47 -0.47 -0.40 -0.57 -0.44 -0.47 -0.85 -0.95 -0.97 -0.72 -0.54 0.46 0.43 -0.23 0.45 0.63 0.61 0.51 0.35 0.40 0.67 0.10 0.78 0.58 0.64 Light blue colonies 8.66 8.76 8.71 8.88 Non characteristic white colonies E.coli 121 E.coli 123 E.coli 13 E.coli 14 E.coli 143 8.92 9.30 9.15 9.28 9.20 8.71 8.68 8.70 8.70 7.96 white colonies with a blue outline E.coli 144 9.15 E.coli 21 E.coli ATCC 43888 8.96 8.93 E.coli 70 E.coli 9 E.coli 91 E.coli 94 E.coli 96 E.coli 97 E.coli Ad 217 E.coli Ad 222 E.coli Ad 223 E.coli Ad 228 E.coli 18 E.coli CIP 54127 E.coli CIP 54117 E.coli CIP 7624 9.28 9.23 9.36 9.23 8.77 9.04 9.20 9.20 9.18 9.11 9.91 9.15 9.28 9.26 8.76 with a blue outline 8.61 8.04 R = 0.90 N = 50 All TEMPO EC results match with those obtained with the reference method. No false positive or false negative results are observed, confirming the specificity and sensitivity of TEMPO EC. According to the regression equation of the relative exactitude, TEMPO EC favours the recovery of E. coli cells compared to ISO 16649-2 method. TEMPO PRACTICABILITY The practicability of the two methods was compared according to AFNOR validation rules. TEMPO system offers important economic savings by standardizing the analysis and by minimizing the training time, the volume of waste and the number of operations. Only 4 minutes are required for the analysis of 1 sample, of a large series, by the TEMPO system, instead of 11 minutes by the plate count method (Table 3). Table 3 : Timing required for samples analysis Steps Sampling Weighting Petri dishes preparation (*) Serial dilutions and Inoculation Reading Total time Time required for analysis of 1 sample NF ISO 16649-2 method 20 samples 45 15 13 64 90 227 11.4 1 sample 4 2 0,3 4 2.5 12.8 12.8 TEMPO EC 1 sample 4 2 / 2 0.45 8.45 8.45 20 samples 45 15 / 20 2 82 4.1 Non characteristic white colonies 8.64 8.68 6.65 8.76 8.30 8.64 8.63 8.76 8.71 8.26 8.96 8.18 8.56 8.72 All E. coli strains, characteristic on the reference method, have been detected on TEMPO EC. (*) The timing indicated does not include media preparation and this should be added for the reference method. TEMPO EC is a ready to use medium. TEMPO significantly improves the productivity by at least a three fold reduction in the time to perform an analysis. Moreover, the unique bar-code on each TEMPO card ensures complete traceability and fully automated reading, thereby limiting the risk of errors. CONCLUSION TEMPO EC : - is sensitive and specific - gives comparable results to the ISO 16649-2 method - shows very high practicability TEMPO EC represents a valuable and innovative alternative automated method for E. coli enumeration in 24 hours in food products.
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz