Colorado Assessment Update Colorado Department of Education February 2015 Overview Colorado Measures of Academic Success PARCC-Developed English Language Arts and Mathematics Colorado-Developed Science and Social Studies Colorado READ Act Kindergarten School Readiness Assessments Colorado Measures of Academic Success (CMAS) Christina Wirth-Hawkins, PhD Director of Assessment Development Spring 2015 Summative Assessment Calendar Assessment Grade PARCC Performance3-8, High School Based Assessment (PBA) 4 and 7 (Social CMAS and CoAlt: Science Studies) and Social Studies 5 and 8 (Science) CoAlt: DLM English 3-11 language arts and math PARCC End-of-Year 3-8, High School Assessment (EOY) ACCESS for ELLs® Reading, Writing, K-12 Speaking and Listening CO ACT Grade 11 11 Window 3/09/15 to 4/03/15 Early Window 3/02/15 to 4/03/15 4/13/15 to 5/01/15 4/13/15 to 5/15/15 (recommended) 4/27/15 to 5/22/15 1/12/15 to 2/13/15 Initial Test Date 4/28/15 Make-up Test Date 5/12/15 4/20/15 to 5/15/15 Administration Overview PARCC English Language Arts and Mathematics Performance Based Assessment (PBA) End-of-Year Assessment (EOY) Content Area Grades English Language Arts 3-11 Mathematics 3-8, three high school assessments • Pathway 1: Algebra I, Geometry, Algebra II; • Pathway 2: Integrated/Math I, Integrated/Math II, Integrated/Math III Science and Social Studies Elementary and Middle School (one window) Content Area Grades Science 5 and 8 Social Studies 4 and 7 6 Secondary Math Options 2014-2015 New high school mathematics assessment system increases flexibility: High school mathematics standards are not grade specific Grade Assessment Options Additional Flexibility Pilot Options* 7 7th grade assessment Algebra I/Integrated I 8 8th grade assessment or Algebra I/Integrated I Geometry Integrated II (Math II) 9 Algebra I/Integrated I or Geometry/Integrated II Algebra II Integrated III (Math III) 10 Algebra I/Integrated I or Geometry/Integrated II or Algebra II/Integrated III - 11 Geometry/Integrated II or Algebra II/Integrated III - 12 Algebra II/Integrated III - *Available to districts participating in pilot Test Claims, Structure and Timing Colorado Measures of Academic Success: English Language Arts – Mathematics - Science - Social Studies ELA/Literacy Claims Master Claim: Students are on-track or ready for college and careers in ELA Major Claim: Reading Complex Text Major Claim: Writing Students read and comprehend a range of sufficiently complex texts independently. Vocabulary Interpretati on and Use Reading Informational Text Students write effectively when using and/or analyzing sources. Reading Literature Written Expression . Research Conventions and Knowledge of Language Mathematics Claims Master Claim: Students are on-track or ready for college and careers in mathematics Solve problems involving the major content for their grade level with connections to practices Solve problems involving the additional and supporting content for their grade level with connections to practices Solve real world problems engaging particularly in the modeling practice Express mathematical reasoning by constructing mathematical arguments and critiques Demonstrate fluency in areas set forth in the Standards for Content in grades 3-6 CMAS Science and Social Studies Performance Levels and Policy Claims Distinguished Students performing at this level demonstrate a distinguished command of the concepts, skills, and practices embodied by the Colorado Academic Standards Command Strong Command for Science or Social Studies assessed at their grade level. They are academically well prepared to engage successfully in further studies in this content area. Students performing at this level demonstrate a strong command of the concepts, skills, and practices embodied by the Colorado Academic Standards for Science or Social Studies assessed at their grade level. They are academically prepared to engage successfully in further studies in this content area. Moderate Command Students performing at this level demonstrate a moderate command of the concepts, skills, and practices embodied by the Colorado Academic Standards for Science or Social Studies assessed at their grade level. They will likely need academic support to engage successfully in further studies in this content area. Limited Command Students performing at this level demonstrate a limited command of the concepts, skills, and practices embodied by the Colorado Academic Standards for Science or Social Studies assessed at their grade level. They will likely need extensive academic support to engage successfully in further studies in this content area. 11 State Level 2014 CMAS Performance Level Results Social Studies: Approximately 15% of students scored at the Distinguished or Strong Command level Science: Approximately 30% of students scored at the Distinguished or Strong Command level 12 PARCC Design Component Content Area PBA - ELA # of Sessions 2-3 Task Type Task Description Research simulation For each task, students will read one or Literary analysis more texts, answer several short Narrative vocabulary questions, and write an essay that requires them to draw evidence from the text(s) PBA – Math 2 Short and extended-response questions Questions focus on conceptual knowledge and skills, and the mathematical practices of reasoning and modeling EOY – ELA 2 4-5 literary and informational texts Short-answer and vocabulary questions will be associated with each text EOY - Math 2 Primarily short answer and selected response questions Focused on conceptual knowledge, skills, and understandings Guidelines for Administration Time Task Time to be Allotted for an Administration Preparing for testing (includes reading instructions to students and answering questions) 10 minutes (recommended) Distributing test materials 5 minutes (recommended) PARCC English language Arts and Mathematics Unit testing time Science and Social Studies Section testing time Completing end-of-unit activities, including closing units, collecting test materials, and administering a student survey (after EOY) 14 60-90 minutes* 80 minutes 5–15 minutes (recommended) *For PARCC, depending on unit and subject—refer to Unit Guidelines and Schedule table in the Test Coordinator Manual for each Unit Time. Testing Time Windows versus used days Student versus school 2014-2015 State Testing Time Grade(s) 3 SY 2014-2015 Approximate Maximum Total Time (min) Content Area Reading/Writing (English language arts) 285 Mathematics 300 Total 4 and 5 Reading/Writing (English language arts) 300 Mathematics 300 Social Studies or Science 240 Total 6 840 (14 hours) Reading/Writing (English language arts) 345 Mathematics 305 Total 7 and 8 585 (<10 hours) 650 (<11 hours) Reading/Writing (English language arts) 345 Mathematics 305 Social Studies or Science 240 Total 890 (<15 hours) 2014-2015 State Testing Time (Continued) Grade(s) 7 and 8 Content Area Approximate Maximum Total Time (min) Reading/Writing (English language arts) 345 Mathematics Social Studies or Science Total 9 and 10 Reading/Writing (English language arts) 345 Mathematics Total 11 ACT Reading/Writing (English language arts) 320 665 (11 hours) 175 345 Mathematics Total 12 305 240 890 (<15 hours) Science Social Studies Total 320 840 minutes (14 hours) 210 210 420 minutes (7 hours) State Readiness for Spring Administration Colorado Measures of Academic Success: English Language Arts – Mathematics - Science - Social Studies Challenges from Spring 2014 Administration Device, operating system, browser and test engine interactions New item types and tools Software updates Bandwidth Feedback from Districts and School Surveys How did your experience with CMAS change from the Spring 2014 administration to this fall’s administration? District level: “ The ‘unknown’ wasn’t there. I can better train teachers on giving the test in the fall because of the experience in spring. I called Pearson less because I knew the tricks on making the assessment work.” “ There was an improvement in the directions to students when they log out of a section and the entire test.” “We had fewer technology issues this fall.” School Level: “ Technology was refined second time” “ The testing took too much school time” “Logistics much better” “ The experience with technology and the overall administration was great!” “Very well overall. We experienced a few technical difficulties (mostly related to the Internet), but the test was successfully administered.” Improvements from Spring 2014 Previous Administration Improve TestNav Exit Process Streamline Process for Accommodation and Special Form Assignment Provide infrastructure trial resources that will allow districts to sufficiently test environments Refine PearsonAccess reporting features and status indicators Closely align PearsonAccess training and operational sites Spring 2015 Capacity We know that schools can assess online; however, depending on number of devices: Multiple groups for each grade level Technology directed to assessment To reduce technology burden, CDE offered two paper assessment options for Spring 2015: Mathematics option – districts selected paper or online administration mode for all grade levels Grade 3 English language arts option – based on their instructional approach, districts selected paper or online administration mode Concerns from some in the field about 3rd grade students’ readiness for extensive online writing. Next year’s paper-based forms availability will be determined after this administration Online Test Engine and Assessment Management System Online Test Engine: TestNav8 Same engine for English Language Arts, Math, Science and Social Studies Streamlined student experience and technology preparation Assessment Management System Science and Social Studies: PearsonAccess (Classic) PARCC English Language Arts and Math: PearsonAccessnext Colorado will move all content areas to PearsonAccessnext as soon as possible District and School Readiness Colorado Measures of Academic Success: English Language Arts – Mathematics - Science - Social Studies Preparation Activities District Assessment Coordinators Statewide Regional trainings (8) Webinars Weekly Virtual Office Hours District Technology Coordinators District visits Webinars Technical support website/checklists Online Support Group Weekly Virtual Office Hours Technology Updates Technology and Communication Pay attention to technology updates distributed to District Technology and Assessment Coordinators Verify testing environments prior to testing window through SystemCheck tool and Infrastructure Trial After verification, freeze test environment so that automatic updates are no longer accepted Develop district and school communication plans PearsonAccess User Accounts • User Roles - PearsonAccessnext users must be assigned roles. • Permissions - Each User Role contains a set of permissions that determine which tasks a specific User Role can perform in PearsonAccessnext. Permissions are bundled into User Roles. • Access to personally identifiable information is restricted to limited user roles. 27 Student Readiness Colorado Measures of Academic Success: English Language Arts – Mathematics - Science - Social Studies Feedback from Student Surveys PARCC Field Test Feedback: PBA: 5,089 responses EOY: 5,372 responses How many questions asked you about things you have not learned in school this year? (Most to all of them) Component ELA Math PBA 12% 38% EOY 17% 28.5% How difficult was this test? (Harder than school work) Component ELA Math PBA 23.3% 65.1% EOY 25.9% 56.3% How to Prepare Students for the CMAS Assessments Teach the Colorado Academic Standards! The Assessments are designed to measure the standards Students who master the standards should perform well on the assessments Assessment Frameworks Reporting Category 1 Colorado Academic Standards Summative Assessment Framework Social Studies Grade 4 History 1. Organize and sequence events to understand the concepts of chronology and cause and effect in the history of Colorado a) Construct a timeline of events showing the relationship of events in Colorado history with events in United States and world history (DOK 1‐2) b) Analyze primary source historical accounts related to Colorado history to understand cause‐and‐effect relationships (DOC 2‐3) c) Explain the cause‐and‐effect relationships in the interactions among people and cultures that have lived in or migrated to Colorado (DOK 1‐ 2) d) Identify and describe how major political and cultural groups have affected the development of the region (DOK 1‐2) % of Score Points 25% Points 19 PARCC Informational Guides http://www.parcconline.org/mathematics-test-documents Student Readiness • Many resources are available to expose students to the test engine and item types: • TestNav 8 Tutorial (~30 minutes) • Student Tutorials (~30 minutes) • • Equation Editor • Text to Speech – available for both ELA* and Math • Graphing Calculator • Printable Paper-Based Student Tutorials • Online Student Tutorials Practice Tools https://sites.google.com/a/aurorak12.org/parcc/math/3rd--5th • Sample Items • Practice Tests (~60 minutes)/ePATs *ELA/L requires unique accommodation 33 Sample Items Colorado Measures of Academic Success: English Language Arts – Mathematics - Science - Social Studies CSAP/TCAP: Grade 4 Math PARCC: Grade 4 Math Ava and Mia are comparing the fractions 3/2 and 5/6. Part A: Ava created this number line to graph 3/2. Select the correct point on the number line to represent 3/2. Mia created this number line to graph 5/6. Select the correct point on the number line to represent 5/6. PARCC: Grade 4 Math Part B: Is 3/2 greater or less than 5/6? Explain how you know. Part C: Write a fraction that is between 3/2 and 5/6. Explain how you know your fraction is between 3/2 and 5/6. CSAP/TCAP Writing – Grade 10 Think about how you learned a skill or technique. This skill may be playing an instrument, drawing a picture, fixing a car, playing a sport, or any other skill. Write a well-developed paragraph to explain to a beginner the steps needed to learn this skill. CSAP/TCAP Reading – Grade 10 Read this sentence from the story. My grandma doesn’t know about the stack, but she tells me anyone can do one thing every day. Tell how this statement relates to the main idea of the story. Use two details from the story to support your response. PARCC English language Arts PBA – Grade 10 You have read two passages … Write an essay in which you analyze the different approaches the authors take to develop these characters. In your essay, be sure to discuss how each author makes use of such elements as: the main characters’ interactions with other characters, the presentation of the main characters’ thoughts, and the strong feelings each character experiences at the end of each passage Use specific evidence from both passages to support your analysis. http://www.parcconline.org/take-the-test Next Steps Colorado Measures of Academic Success: English Language Arts – Mathematics - Science - Social Studies Next Steps: Setting Cut Scores New Content Standards New Assessments (Development Cycle) New Performance Standards (cut scores) PARCC English Language Arts and Mathematics Next Steps Score Report Design Performance Level Standard Setting Release Test Results 2015 SPRING First Full Scale PARCC Assessment SUMMER College & Career Readiness Determination FALL Diagnostic Assessments & Formative Tools Optional Resources Science and Social Studies Resources Assessment Frameworks http://www.cde.state.co.us/assessment/newassess-sum Sample Items and Practice Testing Environments www.pearsonaccess.com/co (available under the ePAT tab) Communication Resources http://www.cde.state.co.us/assessment/resources PARCC Resources Model Content Frameworks http://www.parcconline.org/parcc-model-content-frameworks College and Career Readiness Determination (CCRD) http://www.parcconline.org/CCRD Performance Level Descriptors http://www.parcconline.org/plds Sample Items http://www.parcconline.org/samples/item-task-prototypes Communication Resources http://www.cde.state.co.us/assessment/resources Colorado READ Act Dian Prestwich, PhD Assistant Director, Office of Literacy Supporting K-3 Literacy Development The Colorado READ Act focuses on early literacy development for all students (K-3) and especially for students at risk of not achieving third grade reading proficiency. Three key components to supporting literacy development are: Early identification of students at risk Intervention support and ongoing monitoring of progress Professional development for teachers and administrators 48 READ Act Requirements Assessments Development of READ Plans READ Plan Implementation Advancement of Students with Significant Reading Deficiencies District Reporting Requirements Accountability and Improvement Planning 49 Assessments The READ Act requires teachers to assess the literacy development of students in K-3. In March 2013, the State Board of Education approved interim assessments for use in measuring reading competency skill levels for children in K-3. Features of Interim Assessments Serve as screening tools for early identification Measure foundational skills of early literacy Offer progress monitoring throughout year Note: The READ interim assessment may be used in place of the literacy portion of the School Readiness assessment. 50 Approved Interim Assessments English Literacy Assessments Spanish Literacy Assessments aimsweb Dynamic Indicators of Basic Early Literacy Skills Next (DIBELS Next) Indicadores Dinámicos del Éxito en la Lectura (IDEL) Formative Assessment System for Teachers (FAST) i Ready ISIP ER, Istation ISIP ER Spanish, Istation Phonological Awareness Literacy Screening (PALS) Phonological Awareness Literacy Screening Español STAR Early Learning NOTE: DRA2 and DIBELS 6th Edition may be used until July 1, 2016. 51 Determining a Significant Reading Deficiency (SRD) Within 30 days, SCREEN all K-3 students with approved interim assessment. Is the score within the SRD cut off? If YES, within another 30 days, follow up with a progress monitoring probe from the same interim assessment. Ask: Does the second test substantiate the first test score? If YES, confirmation of SRD occurs and then: follow up with an approved diagnostic assessment Use interim and diagnostic results to create a READ Plan in collaboration with all stakeholders including family members 52 Determining a Significant Reading Deficiency (SRD) Within 30 days, SCREEN all K-3 students with approved interim assessment. Is the score within the SRD cut off? If YES, within another 30 days, follow up with a progress monitoring probe from the same interim assessment. Ask: Does the second test substantiate the first test score? If NO, there is no confirmation of SRD. That means either: Student is at grade level, OR Student is not identified as SRD, but is also not at grade level For this student, monitor progress through RtI process 53 Determining a Significant Reading Deficiency (SRD) Within 30 days, SCREEN all K-3 students with approved interim assessment. Is the score within the SRD cut off? If NO, there is no confirmation of SRD. That means either: Student is at grade level and requires only effective universal/core instruction and monitoring of progress OR Student is not identified as SRD, but is also not at grade level For this student, monitor progress through RtI process 54 Flexibility Options for Implementation of Kindergarten School Readiness Assessments Sharon Triolo-Moloney Director of Early Learning and School Readiness Overview of School Readiness within CAP4K - 2008 Requirements of State Board of Education Define “School Readiness” Adopt one or more assessments aligned with definition of school readiness Overview of School Readiness within CAP4K Requirements of local education providers in School Readiness Legislation: By fall of 2013*, ensure all children in publicly funded preschool or kindergarten receive an Individual School Readiness Plan. Individual School Readiness Plans are informed by approved assessment systems. *CDE Board voted to allow phase in, required for all children in 2015. 57 Assessment Approval Process Per statute, tools must be able to inform instruction and intervention needs as researchbased, reliable, and nationally recognized instruments for measuring school readiness (Section 22-7-1004 (2)(a) C.R.S.) Statute addresses the ready child and ready school component Assessment Review committee used this guidance when reviewing possible assessment tools 58 Intent of School Readiness Assessment School readiness assessments… Guide the development of Individual School Readiness Plans for students. Provide real-time information to teachers that inform instruction and intervention. School readiness assessment information WILL NOT be used to: Deny a student admission or progression to kindergarten or first grade Nature of School Readiness Assessment It is: Observation Based, Over-Time, Contextual Routine school and classroom activities Teachers target opportunities to observe children Teachers Record Observations It is NOT: Formal “Pull-Out”, Standardized, Paper-Pencil Worksheet-based Child is required to “perform” 60 School Readiness Assessment Options Kindergarten Only Four Assessment Options*: Teaching Strategies GOLD (TS GOLD) full tool TS GOLD Survey Desired Results Developmental Profile: Kindergarten (DRDP-K) Riverside Early Assessment of Learning (REAL) *Decisions were made in response to feedback from the field and approved by State Board of Education Fall 2014 Required Domains for School Readiness Assessment All approved assessment systems measure the minimum required domains in statute: Physical well-being /Motor development domain Social /Emotional development domain Language /Comprehension development domain Cognition/General Knowledge development domain Academic Literacy domain Academic Math domain Optional domains include the Arts, Social Studies, Science and Technology, and English Language Acquisition 62 CDE Implementation Support Subscription Reimbursement Assistance Race to the Top Early Learning Challenge Fund RFP Technical Assistance and Training for Kindergarten School Readiness Implementation Teachers Administrators School Readiness Plan Templates School readiness plan template samples Reports in tools to support many district needs School Readiness Guidance Website: Guidance documents, technical assistance Teaching Strategies GOLD 64 65 66 Contacts Daryl Gagliano; [email protected] 303-866-6971 Amy Cameron; [email protected] 303-866-6185 Emily Kielmeyer; [email protected] 720-822-0640 Lauren Augusta; [email protected] Sharon Triolo-Moloney; [email protected] 303-866-6781 67 Presenter Contact Information Program Presenter Email Address CDE Unit CMAS [email protected] Christina Wirth-Hawkins Assessment Colorado Read Act Dian Prestwich [email protected] Office of Literacy School Readiness Sharon TrioloMoloney Early Learning and School Readiness [email protected]
© Copyright 2025 Paperzz