OUR UNALIENABLE RIGHTS
By Jason R Mann - 3/26/2012
This Treatise shall accompany and be filed alongside any cases being issued under the CLDC [Citizens for Legal Defense of the
Constitution] Civil Rights Case & Analyses in respect to the Organic and Foundational Law of the United States of America
Introduction
It is without question that through our dependencies “We the People of these United States of America” have wholly and
undeniably failed in our Natural and Lawful duty to secure for ourselves “a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure
domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves
and our Posterity”; and in so doing, we have allowed this Great Nation to be overrun by Liars, Princes and Tyrants whom
over the ages have Institutionalized a form of Government which by its own actions has secured for itself an Ideological
Rule over the Hearts and Minds of Men.
In every sense, the words of our formidable Declaration of Independence rings true “In every stage of these Oppressions
We have Petitioned for Redress in the most humble terms: Our repeated Petitions have been answered only by repeated injury. A
Prince, whose character is thus marked by every act which may define a Tyrant, is unfit to be the Ruler of a Free People.” and by all
accounts, as we have shown, this grievous declaration lends itself to all of the Officers and Members of this Institutionalized
and treasonous Government.
Freedom has a Price. And that Price is a Labor of Unwavering Determination [Honor].
There is nothing that is Honorable save the act of securing and respecting the Equal and Unalienable Rights of all People; and
there is nothing as Dishonorable as rendering the Rights of any Person, Alienable.
There is no Freedom without Honor!
Our Nation and its Constitutional Republic were Founded and Formed on the Principles of Freedom, and yet the
House which we were petitioned to construct upon that Foundation has never been built. Our own Government to
this very day espouses and enforces the Principles of Alienable Rights and seeks to control and oppresses anyone with
whom they disagree, and through the guise of false Charity and Security has rendered mute any effective strategy to
uphold the Constitution through our system of Democracy.
There is only one Peaceful option left available to us…The Supreme Court is the only Branch of Government left
with the Constitutional tools available to them to once and for all enforce the Legal and Foundational Principle Purpose of
our Constitution and hold to the Fire, the feet of all those who would and have opposed it. But, our capable Judges
have no authority to act on their own volition; they must have this case brought before them, and it must be brought
in such a forcible manner as to forever resolve the rectitude of our intentions.
Through ignorance and deceit, our Government, our scholars and teachers, and as a whole, we the People have lost
all understanding of the Principles of Freedom [Unalienable Rights]. The Security of our Tranquility can no longer be
left unattended by a Dependent and Lazy People or any Institutionalized Government which declares our Rights
Negative and Transferable; there is no such thing as an American Patriot who would deny these Natural Rights to any
of his fellow Countrymen. It is high time we once again don the duds of a Pioneer and in this Land, by dawn’s early light
rediscover the Honorable quest of Unalienable Rights and in so doing, Secure for ourselves The Blessings of Liberty.
1
Introduction
IX: If we are a Constitutional Republic what constitutes Democracy?
I: Know what to ask
X: How do we interpret the 9th Amendment?
II: What is the Declaration of Independence?
XI: Is a Free Market System and Fair Representation a Natural Right?
III: What is the Constitution?
XII: What form of Social Welfare programs or policies could be
considered a Natural Right?
IV: What is the Bill of Rights?
XIII: How should we interpret the Separation of Church and State?
V: What are Unalienable Rights?
XIV: What is Justice?
VI: What is Common Law and Organic Law?
XV: What are Wars verses Police Action?
VII: What are State’s Rights?
XVI: What is my Right to Privacy?
VIII: How do we know if a Law or policy is a protection or a violation of
our Rights?
In Closing
I: Know what to ask
A.
We should each ask ourselves this question every single day – What is my Right to Privacy?





Does my Government give it to me out of the kindness of its heart?
Do my Neighbors give it to me out of the kindness of their hearts?
Does my Religion give it to me?
Does someone else’s Religion give it to me out of the kindness of their hearts?
Do I get to have a different Right to Privacy then someone else?
[If we cannot answer this simple question correctly, we will inevitably loose our Freedom, Property and even lives to
those who would exploit our ignorance]
B.
This should not be a complicated question, yet if we do not understand where we get our Rights from, then it is
impossible to answer correctly. In fact, many of us answer this question Dead Wrong every day. I know this because
even if we were to get the correct spelling of the actual answer, all of our other demands and complaints say
otherwise.
C.
In order to get a strong [solid] answer to this question, we need to ask a series of questions that speak directly to its
purpose, and more importantly, we need to ask the very documents that enumerate the Principles of, and protect
those Rights themselves;
1.
2.
3.
4.
The Declaration of Independence (DOI) (1776)
The Constitution of the United States of America (1787)
The Bill of Rights (BOR) (1791)
The 14th Amendment (1886)
2
D.
Article IV Section 2. Of The Constitution says this “The citizens of each State shall be entitled to all privileges and
immunities of citizens in the several States” (1787). This one well thought out sentence in the Constitution will make a
notable difference in many of the subjects to come.
E.
One of the many and predictable points of confusion surrounding Article IV-Section 2 is the belief that the Bill of
Rights were not yet written [False]. Somewhere in the boondoggle of political renderings we Americans have lost
touch with the fact that “The Declaration of Independence” was in fact a unanimous Declaration of the first 13 States
(Colonies), by Congress.
F.
In fact two documents Ruled the Land before even the Constitution we know today was ratified and signed in 1787,
and went into effect in 1789;
a)
b)
The Articles of Confederation” (the first Constitution) which “Congress” labored over from 1776 until it was
fully adopted by all States in 1780
The Declaration of Independence which was signed into Law by Congress in 1776
[For the sake of expedience I will not note a distinction between the 2nd Continental Congress and Congress, as it
clearly represented the People of United States of America as a Sovereign Nation]
G.
Now we have the framework for our questions.




I know Congress (the Representatives of the United States of America) existed as a central means to
govern and unify the Colonies (States) prior to July, 1776
I know that the Declaration of Independence was signed by that Congress as the Supreme Law of the
Land, governing those “Free and Independent States”.
I know that I have a Right to Privacy
I know that without my Privacy I have, or own nothing
It is time to ask the first of many important questions…
II: What is the Declaration of Independence?
A.
The Declaration of Independence (1776) is the Foundation, Cornerstone and undeniable Declaration of the People of
The United States of America.
a)
b)
“We hold these truths to be Self-evident, that all men are created Equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with
certain Unalienable Rights that among these are Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness”
“We, therefore, the Representatives of the united States of America, in General Congress, Assembled, appealing to the
Supreme Judge of the world for the rectitude of our intentions”
3
B.
The Declaration of Independence (DOI) is the will of the People, declaring their Rights as human beings, declaring the
establishment of the United States of America as a Free and Independent Country.
The DOI is the Greatest Civil Liberties document ever signed into Law by man.
a)
b)
The United States was founded on two core Principles 1“all men are created Equal” and all men have
2
“Unalienable Rights” - “Lex est ab æterno” or “Law is from everlasting”.
This was in fact a legal consensus or positive Law. It did not recognize a Religion but rather it was the “legal
convention from eternity” or “Nature’s God”.
[The DOI claimed that the entire existence of the newly formed Sovereign Country (USA) was grounded in those two
core Principles; it was, in fact the [1; 2] Supreme Law which shall govern all other future laws]
C.
The entire DOI was a document designed to assault the allowance of any Ideological Rule over any man, including the
establishment of a State recognized God [b) 1; 2; 3] [Theocracy]. In fact this very thing was proclaimed “destructive to these ends”
in the DOI itself.
a)
b)
c)
d)
[b) 1; 2; 3]
The Right “Unalienable” of the People “to abolish” or “alter” any Government which usurped authority over their
personal “Unalienable Rights” [Natural Rights] was made very clear.
If a Government proclaims your Rights to be “Alienable” [Legislated Rights – Rights which can be given to you
or taken from you by the State] then the Government has established itself and its own Ideology [Religion] as
the Supreme Ruler over the consciousness of man 1[State recognized God]2[contemporary definition Marxism]3[by proxy the rightful owner of your body, your Property and your conscience]
“Natural Law” or “Unalienable Rights” are Rights which can neither be taken from or given away by the
possessor.
The possessor is you – the Person, not the State.
[The Government is your God]
D.
These Unalienable Rights came under attack on day one in the United States by those who desired to usurp authority
for power and prestige and those who desired to keep it. The Greatest Civil Liberties Law ever written was about to
be to be misrepresented, confused and entirely ignored by slave owners, Religious authoritarians, Judges, and
Congressmen, and yes even the very men who wrote and signed the DOI itself.
E.
The very thing our Forefathers so desperately wanted to end, the Rule of hate, fought its way back into Life in almost
no time at all, and by 1902, barely a century later, a book called “The Common Law” was introduced to a Country
primed for its 1unintentional contribution to a current sordid Ideology; its author Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr., elected
as an Associate Justice on the Supreme Court of the United States, argues that the Natural Rights of men can and
should be subject to the dependencies of the society.
[1]
Although many of his arguments were meant to uphold the Natural Rights of men, in practice they were entirely
destructive to them
a)
“For the most part, the purpose of the criminal Law is only to induce external conformity to Rule. All Law is directed to
conditions of things manifest to the senses.”
4
[a]
This has remained the prevailing and subscribed theory among courts, policy and legislation; although Holmes
believed in the Equality of man this destructive Ideology speaks more to the Equality or Equal dispersion of the Law:
whether or not the Law upholds the Unalienable Rights of men is not as important as what the Law accomplishes; if the
Law alone prevents an injustice sensible to the People than the Law itself is justified.
1.
[Hate Crimes - the Rights of one Race, Creed or Religion are outweighed by the sensibilities of another Race Creed or
Religion, violating the Natural Rights of the former: an unequal degree of punishment for Equal crimes, and among
others the [ill] legal punishment [oppression] of their Natural Right to Free speech respectively]
[a]
This unnatural Religion of Thought has gone so far as to in fact punish unjustly entire segments of society by removing
their Equal access to 1employment, 2grants, 3loans, 4Property, 5education, and even 6representation through a body of policy
and Law inappropriately named Equal Opportunity (EO) [ see U.S. EEOC].
2.
3.
4.
A large percentage of Americans are legal Immigrants of many Nations or are of mixed ancestry of every Race,
Creed, Sex and Religion and are not responsible for the individual crimes or actions of any group of People or
society which no longer exists, or that they are separated from those crimes in any individual manner.
All persons must be considered innocent unless proven guilty in a court of Law; however EO laws convict everyone of
a particular Race, Creed, Sex or Religion. [legislated bigotry or racism]
EO policy is a direct violation on a Free Market system as it values [rewards] via theft the sensibilities or
dependencies of a Race, Creed, Sex or Religion over experience, due diligence and qualification.
F.
The Declaration of Independence and the Supreme Law of the Land (Unalienable Rights) has been weakened by our
Government to the point of mere literature, and a Law which is never recognized in context by our judicial system. It
is in fact ignored, and as this document will show [replace He with] this Government as a whole is guilty of violating the
most basic of grievances against We the People, The Constitution of the United States of America and the Principles of
the DOI;
a)
“He has forbidden his Governors to pass Laws of immediate and pressing importance, unless suspended in their operation
till his Assent should be obtained; and when so suspended, he has utterly neglected to attend to them.” - The DOI is now
lamenting its own demise
III: What is the Constitution?
A.
Now that we have talked about the most ignored or undervalued legal document in the United States, it is only
fitting that we talk about the most misused.
B.
The Constitution was signed in 1787, by the same Congress which signed into Law the DOI, in order to form a “more
perfect Union” (Central Government) which could protect (secure) our Unalienable Rights. It laid out the basic Rules
and regulations dictating and restricting the format and actions of the Federal and the State Governments. It was
adopted by all of the States and became Law in 1789;
a)
“We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility,
provide for the common defense, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our
Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.”
5
b)
c)
C.
Article IV, Section 2. “The Citizens of each State shall be entitled to all Privileges and Immunities of Citizens in the
several States.”
The Constitution directly invoked the DOI in “Blessings of Liberty” and “Privileges and Immunities of Citizens” as
the authority of those enumerated “Principles” of “Unalienable Rights” of “We the People”.
The Constitution declared itself 1the protector of the Rights of the People.
a)
b)
The Constitution did not enumerate or give any person new [Alienable] Rights, special privileges or immunities
save the heads of Government themselves.
The Constitution was strictly a blueprint for a limited Government, it laid out the design thereof and the
restrictions and checks and balances upon it to ensure that our Unalienable Rights [discovered and retained by the
People] could not be trampled upon.
[1]
“That to secure these Rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, -That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and
to institute new Government, 2“laying its Foundation on such Principles” and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall
seem most likely to affect their Safety and Happiness.” – The DOI
[2]
This line dictates the only Just purpose of forming a new Government [“laying its Foundation on such Principles”] which
is [“to secure these Rights”] to secure the Unalienable Rights of men [“We hold these truths to be Self-evident, that all men are
created Equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain Unalienable Rights that among these are Life, Liberty and the…
Pursuit of Happiness”], and is the only form of Government to which our Forefathers set out to Form: The Constitution of
the United States of America.
D.
One of the greatest struggles that we have had to overcome in the discovery and enumeration of our Unalienable
Rights has been in rectifying the contradictory nature in which slave owners and Religious usurpers (Tyrants) grabbed
a foot hold in the wording of the Constitution itself.
a)
“..Which shall be determined by adding to the whole Number of Free Persons, including those bound to Service for a Term
of Years, and excluding Indians not taxed, 1three fifths of all other Persons”
[1]
However this Clause does not need to be rendered mute; there are two Classes of Citizens who fall under this category
with respect to their Unalienable Rights:
1. Children [whom remain wards [Property] of their Parents] see Penal Code Title 6 sec. 25.10.
2. Felons [whom remain wards [Property] of the State] see United States Penal Code, Incarceration
E.
The first Negative Right was thus argued, and began a long line of legislated offences against humanity [slavery,
segregation and women’s suffrage] within the United States Government as a 1bipArtisan agreement between those
who believed that all men were created Equal (persons, humans) and those who believed only certain People were
created Equal. The great scourge of Religious claim and segregation was now Legislated Tyranny in the hearts and
minds of all those who would abuse it.
6
[1]
bipartisanship is rarely in defense of the Constitution, since the Natural Rights of the People are most often the source of
partisanship to begin with; although it would sometimes seem prudent in order to prevent conflict at the moment, kicking the can
down the road, such as with segregation, often creates deep seeded and bitter culture wars far more destructive than we could have
imagined.
a)
b)
Although many of the founding fathers were anti slavery, the long held Religious belief that women were
just slightly elevated above a piece of Property, and the slaves could be no more valuable because of their
color and “ignorance”, the “mob” bitterly set out to change the meaning of, or omit Unalienable Rights from the
hearts and minds of the Nation.
In 1839 President John Quincy Adams lamented that "there are still philosophers who deny the Principles asserted
in the Declaration, as Self-evident truths--who deny the Natural Equality and inalienable Rights of man." A mere 50
years later.
F.
Our Forefathers should have simply, along with the freeing of all of their own slaves, supported and enforced the
protection of women and colored People[s] full and Equal access to express their Unalienable Rights, Right from the very
beginning. If they had ended those two primary offences against humanity with the revolutionary war in 1861-1865,
we could have avoided more than a century of Tyranny over the hearts and minds of men. But alas, they did not.
IV: What is the Bill of Rights?
A.
By 1791, 15 years after the DOI and only 2 years after the Ratified Constitution of the United States of America became
Law; the entire landscape of political renderings among the States had become so disingenuous that Congress had to
start listing the things that the State Governments could not do to the People (citizens of the several States).
B.
The State governments were treading all over men’s Unalienable Rights, and per Article IV, section 2 of the
Constitution, Congress needed to clarify its Duty to Protect those Rights. It is also important to note that many State
legislators and Judges of the day were siding with the local mob Rule rather than upholding the Law of the Land, and was
in fact making a mockery of the Constitution and the DOI.
a)
George Washington in reference to the Bill of Rights said this: 1 "They have given the Rights of man a full and
fair discussion, and explained them in so clear and forcible manner as cannot fail to make a lasting impression."
[1]
George Washington was correct in this statement; however it has become clear that he had put too much faith in
the virtuous nature of men.
1.
The Political Scriptures published in 2006 by The United Church of America, includes, along with its collection of
writings by our Forefathers, a vile mockery of their own supposed intentions in a segment called the
Communion Rite which espouses an entirely Marxist proclamation of Alienable Rights - “Prophet: May the
Constitution [our God] bless America.” [this sordid Ideology has perverted every political discussion in this
Country; with an entire segment of our society, and the majority of our Government officials claiming that
Government is indeed the Supreme God (Law), or Author of our Alienable (legislated) Rights; and the rest
claiming that their Rights are given to them by, and the Constitution was founded upon their own personal
(particular) God (Father figure) along with the Land (from sea to shining sea) itself]
7
2.
Ceremonial Deism was introduced in 1954 as ‘One Nation Under God’ in the Pledge of Allegiance, and ‘In God we
Trust’ as the official motto of the United States in 1956 [167 years after the BOR], defying the most basic
Principle of the DOI, Natural Rights, and the establishment clause in the 1st Amendment [BOR]; the excuse
for violating the establishment clause was that it could be seen as mere ritual [in other words, as the
argument of a modern ‘Conservative Christian’ would go: ‘all we are doing is merely taking the Lord’s name in vain’]
but as Professor Martha Nussbaum [University of Chicago Law school]graciously points out: “’Ceremonial
Deism’ is an odd name for a ritual affirmation that a Deist would be very reluctant to endorse, since Deists think of God
as a rational causal Principle but not as a personal Judge and father."
C.
The inclusion of the Bill of Rights in the Constitution was intended to clarify the purpose of the Constitution, yet
somehow it was used by Religious Leaders, Lawyers, Politicians, Judges and even Presidents to create a catastrophic
breakdown in our ability to Articulate, much less secure even the most basic of our Unalienable Rights.
D.
Few modern Buddhist, Christians, Atheists, Muslims, Catholics, Marxists, or even modern Deists have even a
rudimentary grasp of Unalienable Rights; I can say this with absolute certainty and conviction because almost all of
them will without fail describe their own Material faith as Supreme, and declare their Divine Material Right to Rule.
a)
James Madison – 1 “Who does not see that the same authority which can establish Christianity, in exclusion of all other
Religions, may establish with the same ease any particular sect of Christianity, in exclusion of all other Sects?”
[1]
James Madison and the entire Body of Work done by all of the Authors throughout the Age of Reason made it very clear;
No one can [are able to] Pursue Happiness, nor can they freely [openly] Practice, Preach, or Teach their particular
[personal] Religion, Faith, or Creed if the same Right is not afforded to those who follow any other Religion, Faith, or
Creed.
E.
The most influential document dictating the drafting and language in the Declaration of Independence, the
Constitution and the Bill of Rights (BOR) was, in fact The Virginia Declaration of Rights (VDR) which was adopted on
June 12, 1776:
a)
b)
c)
d)
Article I. “That all men are by nature equally Free and Independent, and have certain inherent Rights, of which, when
they enter into a state of society, they cannot, by any compact, deprive or divest their posterity; namely, the enjoyment of
Life and Liberty, with the means of acquiring and possessing Property, and pursuing and obtaining Happiness and safety.”
The context of “Equality” with “Life and Liberty” re: “with the means of acquiring and possessing Property, and
pursuing and obtaining Happiness and safety” was Paramount to our Construction.
On June 9, 1868, almost 100 years after the DOI and VDR, they were referenced in the adoption of the
Fourteenth Amendment.
In 1971, almost 200 years after the DOI was written the Religious mob finally lost its first major battle against
our Unalienable Rights in “REED v REED” (404 U.S. 71) and that Self-evident truth that “all men are created
Equal” was finally extended to women in these United States of America.
F.
Thomas Jefferson, arguably the most influential author of our Country’s Government, the man who drafted the
DOI, the Constitution, and greatly supported James Madison’s drafting of the BOR, wrote:
a)
“Bacon, Locke and Newton… I consider them as the three greatest men that have ever lived, without any exception and as
having laid the Foundation of those superstructures which have been raised in the Physical and Moral Sciences".
8
G.
The political doctrines espoused by 1the Age of Enlightenment or 2Age of Reason were the Foundation for the VDR, DOI,
Constitution and BOR;
[1; 2]
a cultural movement of intellectual arguments that sought to liberate the Human mind from the dogmatic state of
ignorance from 1687 – 1789 through the Freedom of Religion, Science, Art and Press worldwide
a)
b)
c)
d)
e)
f)
g)
h)
These intellectual arguments were entirely secular in nature;
They espoused the absolute separation of church and state, the absolute Right of the individual, the absolute
Equality of all men, and Nature’s God [the universal mechanism of Life].
John Adams - “The Government of the United States is not in any sense founded upon the Christian Religion”
James Madison – “If all men by nature are considered Free and Independent, all men are to be considered as entering into
Society on Equal conditions; as relinquishing no more, and therefore retaining no less, one than another, of their Natural
Rights.” [Unalienable]
Immanuel Kant – “Enlightenment is man’s emergence from his self-incurred immaturity.”
Isaac Newton – “We are to admit no more causes of Natural things than such as are both true and sufficient to explain
their appearances.”
John Locke - “Man... hath by nature a power
... to preserve his Property - that is, his Life, Liberty, and estate - against the injuries and attempts of other men.”
Francis Bacon – “Knowledge is Power.”
H.
The Bill of Rights was a parchment barrier against any Federal, State, or Moral Majority, and Ideological attack on our
Unalienable Rights. They did not take any Rights away from the State, because Unalienable Rights were simply never
theirs to give.
I.
George Mason [the Father of the VDR] speaking to the importance of the Federal protection of our Natural Rights
wrote:
a)
"There is no Declaration of Rights, and the laws of the general Government being paramount to the laws and constitution
of the several states, the Declaration of Rights in the separate states are no Security."
V: What are Unalienable Rights?
A.
We have shown so far that Unalienable Rights are Self-evident truths which cannot be given or taken away from the
possessor (you). So it stands to reason we must understand what a Self-evident truth is before going forward.
a)
b)
c)
d)
A Self-evident Truth was an argument of self awareness and reason which could not be denied.
It was laid out and formally presented by Galileo, Bacon, Descartes, and Hobbs as a Scientific Rule precluding
the Age of Reason.
Isaac Newton’s Principia Mathematica in 1687 was one of the Foundational arguments describing Natures God
or The Law of Nature as Scientific proof that mechanism of Life is in fact Self-evident or unchanging and that
ignorance of that Law was in fact inconsequential or meaningless to the Law itself. 1[Primordial – essential or
basic to something]
Natures God or Creator [a mechanism of Life] in the DOI was not referencing a Christian God, a Muslim God, a
Buddhist God or any other gods.
9
e)
B.
Jefferson [the author of Natures God and Creator in the DOI] believed that there was “no such thing as immaterial
beings” and that all things were created through a Scientific [mechanical] process of Nature. [see The Age of
Reason][IV: H]
A Self-evident truth governed your existence whether you believed in it or not!
a)
Can anyone as a matter of fact, claim that they are in fact, weightless because they do not understand the
Principles of Gravity or where it came from?
Immanuel Kant said it best:
b)
Sapere Aude! [Dare to Know!].
C.
Thomas Jefferson when writing the DOI, and James Madison when dictating the BOR in the Constitution, both
regarded these Unalienable Rights to be Self-evident [Mechanically Sound] and an indestructible Law which governed
every aspect of our Constitution’s design, purpose and intent.
a)
It is your job, the individual to discover and protect your own Rights; your neighbor, no matter how
intelligent cannot determine a Right for you, nor can he take it away.
D.
If you did not realize that it was Immoral [unnatural] for someone to thieve your horse [Property], does that make
stealing legal? Unalienable Rights say no! It simply says you were negligent in your duty to discover that Right to begin
with, the Right itself was already there, and once realized [dictated] it lent itself to every man, women and child and
could not be redacted.
a)
b)
c)
Once you have realized it was Immoral [unnatural] for a man to steal your horse, it is thereby shown to be
Immoral [unnatural] for any man to thieve any man’s horse, as it is has been discovered to be a most basic
violation of the very essence of Unalienable Rights [Equality, Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness].
“Through laziness and cowardice a large part of mankind, even after nature has freed them from alien guidance, gladly
remain immature. . . . It is so comfortable to be a minor! If I have a book which provides meaning for me, a pastor who
has conscience for me, a doctor who will Judge my diet for me and so on, and then I do not need to exert myself. . .
.Therefore there are only a few who have pursued a firm path and have succeeded in escaping from immaturity by their
own cultivation of the mind.” - Immanuel Kant
Would it be possible to convince a Black man or an Irish man that he would be better off returning to slavery
now that his Natural Rights have been realized [discovered]?
E.
We can no more tell a Black man to return to slavery than we can tell a White man to, and if we were to try [as this
Government does even now] even on the smallest of scales we will be [are] met with a flurry opposition that will not
disappear or ease over time.
F.
Even our symbol of the US Judicial system is the Roman goddess Justitia; her blindfold symbolizes impartiality [she
is no respecter of persons] “all men are created Equal”; her scales weigh the arguments from both sides against one
another [according to the Principle of the Law, or Right of the People]; her double edged sword represents the power of
“Reason and Justice”
10
a)
b)
Reason denotes a Self-evident Truth. [any violation of a man’s Natural Right[s] is a crime]
Justice denotes the Right of the People to Fair Compensation.
G.
The entire DOI and the Constitution which was established to defend it (these United States of America) demanded
that it was the Right of the People to alter, disband or separate themselves from any Government which denied them,
their Unalienable Rights.
H.
It should be noted that our Government under the authority of the Constitution was intentionally designed to be easily
altered and removed [replaced] to curb against Tyranny and Institutions from within our processes, but if the People are not
willing to stand up and fight for their Freedoms but rather rely on the vile nature of their dependencies, than it is much
more difficult to root out corruption once it has been comfortably seated.
a)
The lazy and obese require much more effort to move than a fit and trim society accustomed to the exercise
of a Free Market System.
VI: What is Common Law and Organic Law?
A.
The U.S. Code (2007) defines the organic laws of the United States of America to include (or is codified as) the
Declaration of Independence, the Articles of Confederation, the Northwest Ordinance, and the U.S. Constitution.
a)
b)
c)
d)
Organic Law is a Codification of U.S. Law and is in Fact a Statute or Legislated Law which governs the
United States, cities and Counties of the United States of America, or the “Supreme Law of the Land” or
“Precedence”, whereas precedence by definition is the Origin of, or Original Law.
Organic Law is the Original Legislated Law which all other successive Law is subjected to or weighed
against. An Organic Law is a Fundamental Law
Organic Law is a Law or system of laws which form the Foundation of a Government, corporation or other
organization’s body of Rules.
“The body of laws that is fundamental to defining and creating a Government and its legal system, whether written (such
as a constitution) or unwritten.”- Webster’s New World Law Dictionary 2010.
B.
Common Law (case Law or precedence) is Law developed by Judges through the decision of the courts, it is
founded in a legal Principle which says Judges are obligated to respect the precedents established by prior decisions.
a)
If those prior decisions or precedents adhered to in the relevant body of court systems or jurisdictions are
wrong, such as segregation laws that defied the very Principles of our Foundational Law (Organic Law) then
they can be overturned and a new precedence is set.
C.
Our form of Government has to, by constitutional design, first and for most must Legislate Law through the scope
of the Constitution which protects the Principles of the Unalienable Rights of the People which give them power to
govern through Democratic elections. Any Amendment to the Constitution, Law or Policy which argues against the
Principles of the Original Law and Unalienable Rights is in fact 1unconstitutional and has no power!
1.
The Declaration of Independence is the Foundation of the United States of America
11
2.
3.
4.
5.
D.
The Articles of Confederation were designed to protect the Principles of DOI
The Northwest Ordinance was designed to protect the Principles of the DOI
The Constitution was the Ratification of the Articles of Confederation designed to further secure the Principles of the DOI
through a more perfect Government structure
The Amendments which Protect our Unalienable Rights were added to the Constitution in order to protect the Principles of
the DOI [any Amendment which violates those Principles are powerless and should emphatically be removed]
Law Dictionary: Republican Government;
a)
b)
c)
A Government in the republican form; a Government of the People; it is usually put in opposition to a monarchical or
aristocratic Government.
The fourth section of the fourth Article of the constitution, directs that "the United States shall guaranty to every state in
the Union a republican form of Government."
The form of Government is to be guaranteed, which supposes a form “already established”, and this is the republican form
of Government the United States have undertaken to protect.
E.
In the United States of America the Civil Law or Statutes are derived from We the People and codified as Legislated or
Organic Law such as the DOI and Constitution through our Republican form of Government, with the Foundation or
earliest Law having Seniority over all other successive or common laws generated or enforced in the State and local
Courts. Article VI of the Constitution of the United State of America says;
a)
b)
“All Debts contracted and 1Engagements entered into, before the Adoption of this Constitution, [4] shall be as valid against
the United States under this Constitution, as under the Confederation.”
“This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which [4] shall be made in 2Pursuance thereof; and all 3Treaties
made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, 4shall be the Supreme Law of the Land; and the
Judges in every State [4] shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary not
with-standing.”
[The Declaration of Independence was the Original [Organic] [1] contract [3] [Treaty – a formal contract or agreement
negotiated between countries or other political parties] made between the Several States to [1] Engage in Forming a
Constitutional Government under the Principles agreed upon [2] [Pursuance – the process of doing something or carrying it
out in the way that is expected or required] and [4] Shall be the Supreme Law of the Land]
1.
“…we mutually pledge to each other our Lives, our Fortunes and our sacred Honor.” - The final words of the Declaration
of Independence signed by the Honorable Representatives of all of the formed States and Colonies.
F.
Our Civil Rights are Natural Rights [Unalienable Rights] derived from We the People as laid into the Foundation of our
Country in the DOI as Organic Law;
a)
b)
The Constitution was written as means to protect those Unalienable or Inherent Rights of the People and was
codified in every State Constitution in agreement to those Principles.
The nature of our 1Unalienable Rights was stated in the 2Bill of Rights and the 3Preamble of the Constitution as a
means ensure that those Rights were protected and adhered to throughout the United States and common Law
courts.
12
G.
The beauty of State Rights is that it (we) can protect itself (ourselves) where the Fed fails, but it cannot take away or
oppress an Unalienable Right without as long as “We the People” understand our Rights, Organic Law, and our how our
Republican form of Government is supposed to work.
[j3]
the Preamble such as in the Constitution and the DOI is a succinct statement meaning that it is expressed with brevity and
clarity, with no wasted words [Concise]
VII: What are State’s Rights?
A.
Individual States within the U.S. are classified as federated states as agreed to by the Articles of Confederation and the
United States Constitution, and governed the creation of all new or joining States through the Congressional passing
of the Northwest Ordinance of 1787 which is codified as an Organic Act.
B.
A federate State is not a Sovereign State by definition as it transfers a portion of its power, or is subjected to the
federal Government;
a)
b)
C.
The powers not delegated to the United States (federal Government) are reserved to the States respectively.
Article VI paragraph 2: This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof;
and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the Supreme Law of the
Land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the
Contrary not with-standing. - The United States Constitution
The 10th Amendment of the US Constitution says:
a)
“The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the
States respectively, or to the People.”
D.
The States, like the Federal Government derive their power from the People, certain amounts of that power are
reserved to the State branches of Government and a portion is given to the Federal branches of Government;
1.
2.
a)
b)
the People themselves have individual Natural Rights which by definition are not contingent upon the laws,
customs, or beliefs of our many cultures or layers of Government, because they are Universal and
Unalienable;
The protections of these Equal and Unalienable Rights are what We the People give our State and Federal
governments the power to oversee [secure].
Article IV Section 2: The Citizens of each State shall be entitled to all Privileges and Immunities of Citizens in the
several States. - The United States Constitution
14th Amendment Section 1: All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction
thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any Law
which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of
Life, Liberty, or Property, without due process of Law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the Equal protection
of the laws. – The United States Constitution
13
E.
The Federal Government was constructed in such a way to represent, secure and protect our Unalienable Rights on a
National and International economic platform; whereas the State Government was designed to help represent, secure
and protect our Unalienable Rights on a territorial (State), county and local economic platform.
a)
The State Government has the power to write and enforce laws [subject to the protection of Unalienable
Rights, and The Constitution] which best effect the Safety and Happiness of its own Citizens such as 1spending,
2
tax rates, 3local trade regulations, 3maintaining public Property, 4encouraging tourism, 5safety regulations,
6
public access, etc…
F.
Indelibly tied to our Unalienable Rights is the legal Right of a People to disband, modify or change any form of
Government, whether it be local, state or federal which does not protect those Rights; this is one of the most
important declarations made in the DOI:
a)
“That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to
abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its Foundation on such Principles and organizing its powers in such
form, as to them shall seem most likely to affect their Safety and Happiness.”
G.
If we have wholly designed a Government to protect those Unalienable Rights than any Government which denies
them has literally no [VI: C1] Power because that power is derived from the Consent of the People.
a)
b)
The Supreme Court via the Separation of Powers in the Constitution is our final line of defense against the
violation of our Natural Rights through Amendments, Legislation, Policy, Treaties, prior Rulings, and all those
who would lie cheat and steal in order to render those Natural Rights Alienable.
We the People cannot by Nature, Consent to the oppression of our Unalienable Rights [Natural Rights] as they are
a [V: A1] Primordial and Intrinsic to our [XVI: F; G] DNA or Construct. Any attempt to do or say otherwise is by
definition an act of [V: D, b)] Ignorance.
H.
If a member[s] of our State Government deems it prudent to serve the will of a Tyrant or a Mob Rule [non Republican
form of Government] rather than uphold the Law of the Land [Law which secures the Natural Rights of the People] then we as
Americans must deem it prudent to strip them of their title, not only for our own sake [State], but for the sake of the
Union [States] as well.
a)
Article IV Section 3. Paragraph 2: The Congress shall have Power to dispose of and make all needful Rules and
Regulations respecting the Territory or other Property belonging to the United States; and nothing in this Constitution
shall be so construed as to Prejudice any Claims of the United States, or of any particular State. – The United States
Constitution
14
VIII: How do we know if a Law or policy is a protection or a violation of our Rights?
A.
This is really quite simple, or well at least it should be. Due to the ambiguous nature of case Law developed by
immoral Judges, or the dependencies of the People, or the reprehensible practice of our State appointed
Representatives to usurp the Constitution and ignore its system of Checks and Balances, when “We the People” become lax
in our duties to protect our Rights on the smallest of scales we lose miles of ground to an unaccountable and rouge
form of Government.
a)
All Law can be judged by this Principle; does it protect or violate our Equality, Life, Liberty and Pursuit of
Happiness? If not, we have the Right or Duty to abolish it. Any decent and moral [mechanically sound] Law or
judgment will weigh this Principle against the argument.
B.
Can someone (anyone) legally trespass on my Land without my express permission? The answer is unequivocally
no! It is my Property;
a)
b)
Personal Property [materialism] is an inherent extension of my Life, Liberty and Pursuit of Happiness and
cannot be separated; therefore anyone trespassing on my Property is claiming my Life as their own to do
with what they will.
Any Government or Law which denies the [XI] Free Market Principles of Materialism is by definition an Ideological
Rule [see Religion] [see Marxism]
C.
In fact this argument convicts any Government which does not protect our National Borders as well; our Land is
Our [We the People] Property, and the first duty of the Federal Government is to protect that Property, by not doing so
they are violating our Natural Rights and failing to protect and uphold the Constitution of the United States of
America;
a)
b)
c)
Preamble -“We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic
Tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves
and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America”
The DOI – “He has refused for a long time, after such dissolutions, to cause others to be elected; whereby the Legislative
powers, incapable of Annihilation, have returned to the People at large for their exercise; the State remaining in the mean
time exposed to all the dangers of invasion from without, and convulsions within.”
The DOI – “He has obstructed the Administration of Justice, by refusing his Assent to Laws for establishing Judiciary
powers.” [see illegal immigration][D]
[Obstructing (ob-struct-ing) - to cause a serious delay in action or progress]
D.
The U.S. Policy on Naturalization and Border Security being currently employed is both ambiguous [causing uncertainty
or confusion] and pernicious [causing great harm, destruction, or death]
a)
b)
The majority of all immigration and border Security Law has been removed, deleted or even generated by or
from any single Bill or Legislated Act of Congress; it is rather, dictated through the policies subject to the
Ideologies of the Executive Branch [see Article I Section 8 paragraph 3 of the U.S. Constitution]
Enforcing the Policies and Bodies of Law which do in fact speak to how our National Borders should in fact be
secured are left to the discretion of the Departments which are given the authority to do so [see US: ICE, DHS and
CBP]
15
c)
d)
e)
In 2011 the United States was attacked from within its own borders by illegal immigrants who were allowed
into the U.S. because the Checks and Balances and Law of the Constitution were not enforced.
All subsequent policy and Law through guys of a [XV] War on Terror (WOT) has in fact weakened our boarder
Security, irreparably damaged our economy, stripped away the Natural Rights of our Citizens, and have
almost completely eliminated the checks and balances provides us thru the Separation of Powers.
“He has erected a multitude of New Offices, and sent hither swarms of Officers to harass our People, and eat out their
substance.” - DOI
E.
Is a Law that taxes a rich person at a different rate than a poorer person fair? The answer is unequivocally no. The
amount of Property a person owns does not make him any more or less Equal than a person who owns a different
amount;
a)
b)
all persons are created Equal and therefore must be treated as equals
this simple and Self-evident truth denies any man or Government the Right to engage in slavery, segregation,
and unfair advantages such as laws that protect certain groups, Races, Creeds, Religious establishments and
minorities more than another, or plays favorites to certain groups, Races, Creeds, Religious establishments and
minorities by intentionally distributing our common Property unequally and regardless of qualification, such as
grants, jobs, and access to any other Equal opportunity or service.
F.
Is a Law which prevents a person from building a home on his own piece of Property, because his neighbor does not
want his view blocked, or the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) arbitrarily decides it is a hazard to the
environment, a violation of that person’s Natural Rights? The answer is unequivocally yes. If that person had already
purchased the Land, and afterward the neighbor decided to get a resolution passed to prevent him from using it, then
that would be considered the destruction of Property [the neighbor has entirely ruined the value of another person’s
Land, and just like trespassing he has claimed that Land as his own, to do with what he wills].
a)
b)
This same Principle shows that the Government’s practice of blighting [spoils or damages something severely]
Property [preventing the maintenance of, or protection of, in order to gain control of] is in fact an egregious
violation of our Natural Rights [see Eminent Domain Laws]
Article I Section 10. Of the Constitution: “….pass any 1Bill of Attainder, 2ex post facto Law, or Law impairing the
3
Obligation of Contracts, or grant any 4Title of Nobility.”
[b) 1]
A legislative act, that singles out an individual or group for punishment without a trial. [By declaring it your responsibility
to find a way to, and pay for suing the Government for violating your Property Rights and or your Freedom of Speech]
[b) 2]
[Latin, "After-the-fact" laws.] Laws that provide for the infliction of punishment upon a person for some prior act that, at the
time it was committed, was not illegal. [By subjecting you to fines, fees, regulations and loss of Land [monetary and
material Property] for Ordinances previously undeclared]
[b) 3]
Any Law which enlarges abridges, or in any manner changes the intention of the parties, resulting from the stipulations in the
contract, necessarily impairs it. [By arbitrarily subjecting the invested Deed [contract] to your Property with stipulations
outside the scope and intentions of the Contract]
[b) 4]
An order of men, in several countries to whom privileges are granted at the expense of the rest of the People. [By granting
privileges to another person [s], neighbor, Government, committee or otherwise, the power to take control of,
adjust or modify your personal Property regardless of your [VII: G, b)] express consent]
16
c)
Alexander Hamilton -"It is easy for men … to be zealous advocates for the Rights of the citizens when they are invaded
by others, and as soon as they have it in their power, to become the invaders themselves."
[The State or Fed will have in fact punished [fined] a person for investing in Property by deliberately destroying its value,
and making his prior venture in the Pursuit of Happiness a crime]
G.
I argue that the Principles of Natural Rights must apply and can apply to every Law, from now until eternity.
a)
b)
There is absolutely no good or just [mechanically sound] Law ever written by man that violates the Principles of
our Equal and Unalienable Rights.
And there is absolutely no good reason for not upholding a good Law which was designed to secure our
Equal and Unalienable Rights.
H.
Any Law that protects the Natural Rights of all individuals equally is essential and cohesive to both the DOI (the
Foundational Laws of our great Nation) and the Constitution which protects them.
IX: If we are a Constitutional Republic what constitutes Democracy?
A.
Democracy is how we elect our State, Local and Congressional Representatives. We do this through a majority vote
which, along with the election process (or public vetting) is how “We the People” dictate which issues are the most
important to us. The Electoral College however, supersedes the majority vote in a Presidential election, but rarely
often does so, but nonetheless acts as a check or balance against Mob Rule. The Constitutional Republican Government
derives its power from the People through this Democratic process.
a)
b)
Once a Representative is elected, his duty, no matter the branch or political persuasion, is to protect our
Unalienable Rights by protecting the Constitution of the United States of America.
If We the People fail in our duty to elect the Representatives most capable of defending the Constitution, then
we have left it up to someone else, or as we have seen recently they are left simply unprotected.
B.
The United States of America should not be permanently divided by two [d]polarized political parties 1[Institutionalized]
[b; c]
[neither Party currently protects the Constitution, both argue that it should be continually altered, but at different
rates], instead that the Constitution was constructed in such a way to inevitably resolve any dispute, but this assumption
was based on the idea that the Federal Government and State Governments would in fact uphold the Constitution,
discover and protect our Unalienable Rights, and never permanently fall into a downward spiral of Socialist Ideology that
could wholly corrupt the very essence of our Foundation.
a)
b)
The only way they could see any of those monstrous failures becoming an issue is if “We the People” had
forsaken “Liberty”, yet they still believed whole heartedly that there would always be enough Patriots to the
Cause, which valued their Freedom above all else, to disrupt and remove the Tyranny of our time.
I [myself] am entirely disenfranchised (politically) as an American whose Natural Rights should be secured by the
Constitution and the Principles which it protects Natural Rights [Unalienable Rights], and am entirely without
17
c)
d)
[1]
representation, as neither the Republican Party [Conservatism] or Democratic Party [Liberalism] understand
[comprehend] nor uphold [protect] them.
Whether by their actions or words, both parties espouse and dictate Alienable Rights and have no love of
Freedom for anyone who would argue against their particular Ideologies [“Tyranny over the mind of man”]
John Adams - "There is nothing which I dread so much as a division of the republic into two great parties, each
arranged under its leader, and concerting measures in opposition to each other. This, in my humble apprehension, is to be
dreaded as the greatest political evil under our Constitution."
The Separation of Powers has been almost entirely dismantled through
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
Executive Treaties which bypass Congress,
Executive powers drawn from Treasonous Legislature designed to keep us in a constant and eternal
state of War and Economic Crisis,
Executive orders, left unchallenged, which establish control over our Private and Local Industry and
Trade,
Small groups of our Representatives formed by Executive order to write our Laws and Policies in
secret,
A Supreme Court which rarely challenges any Legislative Law or Policy or Executive order which
violates our Unalienable Rights, but rather finds it more expedient to alter the meaning or definition of
Constitutional Principles to fit their sordid Ideologies,
A Congressional Budget Office (CBO) which will often skew and mask the true nature of our national
debt and finance to meet the desired effect at our Executive’s request
[When a Government can routinely affect policy after policy which blatantly denies us our Natural Rights without any
fear of retribution, even in an election year, it has become Institutionalized. Whether or not the same offending
individuals remain in their current offices or not is inconsequential as they often merely move on to a better position,
out of the spot light, and rewarded handsomely for their treasonous acts]
C.
The entire purpose of using Democracy to elect (appoint) State and Federal Republican governments was to create a
system with enough checks and balances to prevent any political party or Ideology from usurping the authority or
Unalienable and Natural Rights of the People. More precisely the Government’s role in maintaining this balance is best
described by the Constitution itself:
a)
b)
c)
“…and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity”; whereas posterity is our future (the following
generations) or children
This in fact dictates that each generation is wholly responsible to pay off its own debt and not leave it to our
children.
We cannot in fact have a Socialist Society if we are prevented from allowing our children to become
indentured slaves to our excess.
D.
Not only today, but for many previous and lazy generations a large portion of our Society have allowed and even
begged for our Government to violate our Unalienable Rights in so many cases that we been left with few options to
declare our own consent;
a)
The Federal Government has rendered us powerless to redress even our grievances on many levels, even so
much as to claim Sovereign Immunity from its own People, giving us waivers now and again to address issues
which they do not see as a direct threat to their usurpations of Our [We the People’s] power[consent].
18
E.
Today the Government, and those running for office, has found ways to obstruct and even remove our Unalienable
Right to fair and Democratic elections; they shut down entire voting districts eliminating their voice; transfer the vote
counts and poll procedures to foreign lands and entities; and among many more, preventing any form of honesty and
clarity.
a)
“He has refused to pass other Laws for the accommodation of large districts of People, unless those People would relinquish
the Right of Representation in the Legislature, a Right inestimable to them and formidable to Tyrants only.” – The DOI
F.
It is the argument of this paper that if Unalienable Rights are not protected by the Constitution then the Government must [by
definition] believe we have no Rights what so ever and thereby declaring that the Constitution protects nothing, rendering their oath
to protect it meaningless.
a)
b)
c)
d)
If our Rights are merely Alienable [Transferable – capable of being transferred by a legal process to another
owner] then they are neither protected nor represented
The Government [Legal System] owns all Property...period.
And the governed [We the People] have zero authority to even consent to the actions of Government itself
We must therefore be a Theocratic, a Socialist or a Communist Country, because a democratically elected
Constitutional Republic cannot, by definition, support Alienable Rights.
G.
Any argument against our Unalienable Rights is anti Constitutional, and any action against our Unalienable Rights is
Tyranny.
e)
“The Supreme Court never ventured into the issues of redistribution of wealth and sort of more basic issues
of political and economic justice in this society. And to that extent as radical as I think People tried to
characterize the Warren Court, it wasn’t that radical. It didn’t break Free from the essential constraints
that were placed by the founding fathers in the Constitution, as least as it’s been interpreted, and Warren
Court interpreted in the same way that generally the [F] 1Constitution is a charter of Negative Liberties,
2
says what the states can’t do to you, 3says what the federal Government can’t do to you, [VIII: C] 4but it
doesn’t say what the federal Government or the state Government must do on your behalf. And that hasn’t
shifted.” – President Barack Obama
It is not hard for any layman to determine that [1, 2, 3, and 4] mean the same thing: “…establish Justice, insure domestic
Tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general 5Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our
Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.”
[5]
By upholding and enforcing the Constitution: [4] [This is what it says the Federal Government can and must do for
US]
1.
2.
3.
4.
By making Rules and Regulations [[Laws] the role of Congress] which make Regular [shows no preference to]
our Interstate Commerce and Trade;
By establishing and enforcing all the needful Rules and Laws to protect our Unalienable Rights;
By striking down and closing with a vengeance, all Rules, Laws, Policies, Trade agreements, Treaties, and
Departments of Enforcement which violate our Constitution and by proxy, our Unalienable Rights;
By wiping away all Fascism from our Free Market system by establishing a Fair and Equal Percentage Tax on
all forms of Monetary Trade [profit], and eliminating all Establishment Violations by removing all Blank
19
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
23.
Exemptions from Established Religious Ventures and Non Profits that do, by all accounts Retain a Profit. [all
Organizations and Corporations retain no more Rights, than the Natural Rights of their Owners, and should be shown no
Preference]
By securing our Boarders from attacks from without and within;
By fixing the standards of Weights and Measurements;
By securing the Natural Rights of our Inventors;
By establishing Post Offices and Roads;
By attempting to run as Efficiently as any known Profitable Business could Justify
By securing our Right to Privacy;
By respecting and enforcing the Separation of Powers;
By establishing and enforcing uniform Rule of Naturalization;
By establishing and enforcing uniform Rules of Bankruptcy;
By making International Trade agreements which best effect our Economy, by allowing us to be Energy,
Industry, and Commercially Independent from within the Borders of the United States of America;
By allowing us to access our own Natural Resources;
By not giving away our Natural Resources;
By Protecting with a vengeance our State Secrets [Technology and Property] which we have worked so hard to
obtain, and by not simply allowing our Presidents to flippantly give them away, especially to those who have
no common respect for the Unalienable Rights of men;
By not supporting and putting the needs of our Enemies above our own;
By fighting Wars in a swift and effective manner;
By ending Wars and all its unnatural Policies in a swift and effective manner;
By deliberately showing some self restraint and limiting its own bloated Dependencies;
By swiftly removing and punishing those who usurp the Power of the People;
By putting the Constitution and the Principles upon which we were Founded [We the People] their own
Institutions and above those of the U.N. or any other Foreign Power…
[4]
By all accounts and purposes I have listed 23 Primary points that the Federal Government was [is] Mandated to do,
by the Constitution, and have listed 23 points that by all accounts the Federal Government has either neglected to do,
refused to do, or as History has shown, not done well indeed.
[4]
This blatant disregard for the United States of America and for Honoring and Upholding his 6Oath of Office as the
Executive and Chief of the United States of America is astounding. If there was ever a case for having had immediately
removed a man from office for being wholly incapable of performing his most basic of Duties, this would have been
it.
[6]
"I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States, and will to the best of
my Ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States."
E.
If the fate of this Nation balances on the Ideologies one man, as unfolding history has shown, then Democracy is Lost.
X: How do we interpret the 9th Amendment?
A.
“The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain Rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the People.”
– The 9th Amendment
This is much easier than all the lofty arguments would have you believe;
20
a)
Certain Rights are enumerated in the Constitution, or declared recognized by Government as retained by the
People
b)
Those Rights shall not be construed to affect other Rights not yet recognized
c)
Government derives its power from the People and therefore cannot pretend to know or recognize
(enumerate) all of the “Natural Rights” of men as it is the “Natural Right” of the People to discover and retain
those Rights.
B.
As per the DOI and the Constitution, the Government does however have the responsibility or duty to uphold or
secure the Principles of those Natural Rights. Since a Natural Right cannot in fact be a man made or adjudicated Law but
rather an intrinsic Principle which Judges the validity of a Law or body of laws itself, a consensus must be formed which
dictates or enumerates how we shall apply that intrinsic Principle. Since history has shown that all Rights retained by
the People are not Natural Rights we should break down the Equation of Unalienable Rights, and end this ridiculous
discussion once and for all.
C.
The DOI, the Constitution, the BOR, and the Material and Moral Sciences, and this Paper submit that, the Equation
of Unalienable Rights is: Natural Rights = [Equality + Life + Liberty + Pursuit of Happiness] whereas any
variance or subtraction of or within the previous equation, is a Violation of Unalienable Rights, and is therefore:
Alienable or Unnatural Rights = [Inequality + Life + Obligation][V:D]
1. “For every action there is an Equal and opposite reaction” – Newton’s laws of Physics
D.
It is quite reasonable to assume that one man’s Happiness may in fact be another man’s oppression, and therefore
any Law which makes irregular or unequal the Rights of men is in fact bad Law.
a)
“Happiness” is impossible to legislate which is why just like any other part of the “Natural Rights” equation
omitting “Pursuit” would generate a Negative Law, and therefore “Liberty” would be rendered mute.
b)
An unnatural or Alienable Right concludes that your condition is satisfactory [common] according to the
Government, group or person who retained larger portion of [in] Equality.
E.
A clear example as to how all of this fits together with the 9th Amendment would be the 14th; without the 9nth
amendment the Constitutional dictation of Natural Rights would have been complete [finished] making it impossible
for the 14th to be written clarifying that all People (men, women, and various colors) are equally Free and have a
Right to the same representations and securities of any other man, if this were simply left to the States slavery could
not have been overthrown, as each State would have been subject to its own interpretation of men’s Equality; and [II: B,
b]
Article 4, section 2 of the Constitution would be rendered mute.
F.
It would also stand to reason that a Law or Statute which is left unprotected is a violation of the Constitutional duty to
protect our Unalienable Rights:
a)
“We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic
Tranquility…” – this is in fact the first and prioritized Constitutional mandate that demands the Government
insure our domestic Security through peace
b)
Article 1, Section 8 says Congress Shall have the power “…To establish an uniform Rule of Naturalization…”
and “…To provide for calling forth the Militia to execute the Laws of the Union, suppress Insurrections and repel
Invasions…”
c)
It is the job of Congress to oversee the protection of our National borders and maintain a clear path to
Citizenship, and if they have need authorize the Militia or National Guard to repel the [Alien] Invasion.
G.
It is the Natural Right of the People to have a Government which upholds and executes the Law of the Land. The 9th
Amendment made it clear that it is the responsibility of the People and those they choose to represent them to
21
discover and clarify the Natural Rights retained by the People, and once discovered, protect them and in doing so keep
the peace.
XI: is a Free Market System and Fair Representation a Natural Right?
A.
Pure and unadulterated Capitalism is the only form of marriage between Government and Trade which meets the
requirements of the Natural Rights equation;
a)
It is in fact inseparable and reliant on an almost perfect system of restraint
b)
In order for Capitalism to thrive there must be a Government which is entirely restricted to protecting or
securing Equality; thus Justice and Tranquility may thrive [Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness].
B.
Cronyism [Government Corporatism: Fascism or Corporate State] however is entirely unnatural to a Free society, and
instead depends on a Government to make unequal judgments concerning trade practices, and relies entirely on
favoritism and the use of usurping other persons’ accessibility and Property [theft] in order to achieve Market
dominance; some of the many tools used (some misused) in Cronyism to create unequal or irregular trade include:
a)
1
permits and 2restrictions, 3price fixing, 4subsidization, 5grants, 6tax breaks, 7taxes, 8fees, 9price gouging, 10earmarks,
bribes, 12money laundering, 13lobbying, 14environment 15protection acts, 16IP laws, 17International trade policy,
18
interstate commerce policy, 19welfare, 20union contracts, 21social environment policy, 22substance control, 23trading or
offering up State secrets, 24confiscation and detention, 25blighting communities, 26regulatory pandering, 27Sovereign
immunity, 28executive privilege, 29bailouts, 30corporate restructuring, 31debt hikes, 32inflationary spending, 33classifying
public records as secrets, 34police action, 35patent infringement, 36insider trading, 37intimidation, 38discretionary spending,
39
public investment, 40illegible or indecipherable Law, 41belligerence, and or 42mounds of unnecessary bureaucracy to
name a few.
11
C.
Capitalism as a fair trade system follows one simple Rule: let the customer decide; the customer will always
ultimately decide the price or value, the need for supply, the best fit between quality and style, and of course the
success of the company[s]or person which provides the product itself. Why? Because the company and product must
compete with all other companies and product which provide similar services or solutions on an 1equal platform of
opportunity;
a)
Any necessary and minimal Rules, laws and regulations would be regular [Equal] and designed to allow every
business and person Equal access to Pursue to obtain the tools necessary to create and distribute their best
work.
[1]
So a Free Market System is an Equal Market System which is bolstered and secured by Fair [Equal] Representation, and is in
fact a Natural Right;
b)
For if we are all Equal, and the Government is to secure our Unalienable Right to Equality, Life, Liberty and the
Pursuit of Happiness then it is the only system of Government (Democratically elected Constitutional
Republic) and Trade (Free Market System) which would best effect our Happiness.
D.
We know that Cronyism disenfranchises us, but what about those who believe the Government should elevate us
individually (socialist Ideology) to the same position of wealth as someone who has already been favored by the Free
Market System and claim disenfranchisement as merely a personal condition? Again we must look at the equation: Natural
Rights = [Equality + Life + Liberty + Pursuit of Happiness] does not say we have an Equal claim to [ownership of] all of
the Property on Earth, or in the Union, or in the State to be divided up amongst us equally, it says we have an “Equal”
and “Unalienable Right” to Pursue it fairly.
22
E.
Any system[s] which interlaces or affects Cronyism or Fascism, Socialism or Communism, Theocracy or Marxism which
claims to be able to obtain and distribute the Happiness of man is in fact a Lie, and is wholly unequal and unnatural to
every person, and any Government or branch of Government which does not uphold and affect the Principles of Nature
and Unalienable Rights by refusing Fair Representation and Protecting a Free Market System has, in the words of the
DOI, become “destructive to these ends”.
F.
Our Federal Tax Code uses Cronyism as a matter of Principle, by taking [Theft] from one group of People and offering
exemptions [Socialism] to others;
a)
b)
c)
d)
The entire system is convoluted by design in order to hide favoritism in every corner of our economy.
It is entirely ignorant to believe the Lie that somehow Cronyism is caused by a lack of Government Regulation;
The State, Local and Federal Tax System brings in exactly 32% of the entire GDP in Revenue every single year
regardless of their feigned Partisan cries of Nepotism;
Cronyism is the Brain Child of massive amounts of convoluted Regulation, and leveraged equally by both
Conservative and Liberal Parties.
G.
Through the deliberate act of obeying the Principles of our Unalienable and Natural Rights [Free Market], through which
this Great Nation was founded, we could eliminate massive amounts of Fraud, both in Government and Private
sectors, and finally secure for ourselves and our Posterity real sustainable Prosperity.
XII: What form of Social Welfare programs or policies could be considered a Natural Right?
A.
It is inevitable that any Society will have amongst them those who are 1sick, 2crippled or dependent whether by
injury or age, 3unmotivated, 4ignorant, those who fall on hard times, 5disenfranchised victims of violence and crime,
6
self destructive, and finally 7criminal.
a)
If we use the Principles of Natural Rights finding humane, economically sound, and Natural [Just] ways of
supporting our sick and needy.
B.
It has been shown over the course of history that two Negative Principles, which are being either practiced or
legislated as social engineering in the U.S. to deal with these problems today, do not work: 1Communism (From each
according to his ability, to each according to his needs.) and 2Socialism (From each according to his ability, to each according
to his deeds.), both of which are explicit violations of the DOI, Constitution, and the Natural Rights of men, and are
historically the forgone conclusion of 3Cronyism (Government corporatism);
a)
Communism and Socialism are both Religions of Legislated Theft and extract [steal] from those who can produce,
as much Property [money, Land, labor, intellectual renderings, and product] as can be [un] justified by the
dependencies of the People.
[1]
Communism takes Property [Theft] and distributes it according to the People’s needs (the needs and the ability
[productivity] of the People to produce are discovered or determined by the Government [profiteer] and not the People themselves).
23
b)
The People remain poor because their needs are considered to be only those which nourish production
[deeds].
[2]
Socialism takes Property [Theft] and distributes it according to their deeds (like Communism the People still work for the
Government but are somehow rewarded or profit equally for their [some of the peoples’] extra efforts);
c)
The People remain poor because the deeds of a few never produce enough to meet the consumption [needs] of
the many.
1.
Neither of these systems actually work nor have they ever worked without the threat of death, violence or
punishment (slavery) because no dependent person will in fact work [labor] for what he has already perceived
to have obtained [of his own volition].
Without the interjection of charity and subsidies of Partial Free Market Countries like the U.S. [some semblance
to a Free Market system] these systems simply resort to simply killing off or starving their unwanted or
excessive baggage (genocide).
“Without an alliance with non-Communists in the most diverse spheres of activity there can be no question of any
successful communist construction.” – Vladimir Lenin
2.
3.
[3] “
The passing of state power from one class to another is the first, the principal, the basic sign of a revolution, both in the strictly
Scientific and in the practical political meaning of that term. To this extent, the bourgeois, or the bourgeois-Democratic, revolution
in Russia is completed.” – Vladimir Lenin
C.
The first thing we can do in fight against poverty and depravity is to remove the unnatural and unconstitutional
practice of Cronyism out of our Government.
D.
The Constitution demands that both the State and the Fed are suppose to guaranty us the Constitutional Republican
form of Government we founded this Country on; without its checks and balances via the Separations of Powers, our
Constitution and the Unalienable Rights of our People have been subjected to the oppression of Tyranny and Treason.
E.
We must have a real Free Market System and Fair Representation in order to succeed. The only Welfare program the
Constitution allows our Government to engage in is the 1Protection of our Rights;
a) Article I Section 8 – “…To promote the Progress of Science and useful Arts, [1] by securing for limited Times 2to Authors
and Inventors the exclusive Right to their respective Writings and Discoveries;” [2] [securing (giving protection) to the
Authors and Inventors, not the Government]
b) Not one line or phrase in the Constitution gives Government the authority to manage, invest in, give
preference to, or own any of our Ideas, Businesses, Industries, or Charities.
F.
It is not the Natural Right of man to be taken care of by another, nor is it enumerated in the Constitution. All of the
categories in [A: 3; 4; 5; 6; 7] above can either be reestablished, rehabilitated or maintained in work programs (jobs we
already pay for in order to upkeep Public Property);
a)
There is nothing inhumane about paying for your keep, we are giving them the means and opportunity to move
back into the private sector, rather than simple writing them checks year after year
24
b)
c)
Those who can maintain their own self reliance keep their dignity and Unalienable Rights, and so do we [those
who give them the means and opportunity].
By removing any and all accessibility to those only looking to be lazy, we can eliminate an entire sector of
public fraud and many of the incentives to affect Fascism in our Government
G.
Those who are terminally ill or crippled [A: 1; 2] [Non Military], and have no other recourse to charity then we can
find a way as a Society to care for them through a simple 1State authorized Voucher System that can be made Uniform
by the Federal Government [Congress].
a)
b)
c)
d)
We pay almost 1/3 [32% which does not include fines and fees] of our entire GDP to Federal, State and
Local Governments in Taxes, and almost 2/3 [66% of Tax revenue or 21.33% of GDP] of that is wasted on
Illegal [unconstitutional] bureaucracy and Cronyism [fascism].The Government receives about $10,000.00 per
year, per every man women and child in the U.S. or more than the annual income of 25% of its Citizens.
[A: 1; 2]
= less than 2% of the entire population [about 4.7 million]
If we only spent $60Billion of monies we would be wasting on Taxes, on caring for those who were
permanently disabled and disenfranchised it would only amount to 2% of the current annual tax revenue.
We could argue how much the cost of living and health care would fall by simply following a Free Market
system, later, but if we could supply each of our permanently disabled [helpless and unable to perform] with
a $10,000.00+ Voucher each year it would be far more humane than what we are doing now.
H.
All of the Doctrines espoused and made popular by the likes of the Occupy Wall Street movement, Michael Moore, Cass
Sunstein, President Barack Obama, Mitt Romney, Valery Jarrett, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Van Jones, Al Gore, John McCain, John
Boehner, 1Nancy Pelosi, and along with many more hypocritical arguments by both the Democratic and Republican parties
and Members trying to repair a Fascist [Crony] system with even more Fascism and Cronyism in one form or another.
[1]
“I appreciate [my colleague's] leadership on helping us Honor what our founders put forth in our founding documents, [XI: D] which
is Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness…And that is exactly what the Affordable Care Act helps to guarantee.”
a)
This Minority Leader [Rep. Nancy Pelosi] has proven beyond a shadow of a doubt, that she has little love
for, wishes to understands, or has any known intention to uphold her Oath of Office by Protecting the
Constitution of the United States of America.
I.
The concept of reimbursing those who are Charitable [of their own Free will] through tax deductions and favoritism,
is Cronyism, and needs to be removed from our system.
J.
For every body of bad policy written, there are a thousand micro fixes and repairs, compounding the destruction of
our economy through Cronyism.
XIII: How should we interpret the Separation of Church and State?
A.
Concerning Ideology and Religion, Thomas Jefferson, the Father of the DOI and the United States of America said
this:
25
a)
"I have sworn upon the altar of God eternal hostility against every form of tyranny over the mind of man."
B.
Concerning the Separation of Church and State James Madison, the man who wrote the 1st Amendment and Father
of the Constitution of the United States of America said this:
a)
“The purpose of separation of church and state is to keep forever from these shores the ceaseless strife that has soaked the
soil of Europe with blood for centuries.”
C.
These two men (not to disparage the importance of any others) both claimed to be Christians and declared their belief
in the [some] Principles of Jesus Christ [Religious], yet utterly hated and abhorred the idea of any man, group of men or
Government be given the power to legislate or establish moral Principles and through the prism of any Religion or
Creed, usurp authority over another man.
D.
Another very convincing look into why Thomas Jefferson was so intent on crafting a Government Free from
Religious Rule and social engineering can be found in his letters in which he espoused more of his own uncommon
Religious beliefs that even the Puritans of the time would have found to be heresy;
a)
b)
In a letter to William Short he said this - "it is not to be understood that I am with him [Jesus] in all his doctrines. I
am a Materialist” – here he clearly states that he could not personally justify believing in or adhering to all of
the Principles of Christ.
And in speaking to the importance of Scientific Morality over Religious Morality in governance, he said this - “I
have recently been examining all the known superstitions of the world, and do not find in our particular superstition
[Christianity] one redeeming feature. They are all alike, founded upon fables and mythologies”.
E.
Jefferson also held to the belief that women could not be Equal with men in the political arena as they were dependent
by nature, and that Africans were inferior to Whites, yet he believed that through the Principles of Unalienable Rights the
sensibilities’ of the entire People [We the People] the Equality of all People would eventually be issued naturally.
F.
Through all of our Forefathers’ own hypocrisy, they somehow managed to form a Principled [mechanical] Foundation
designed to maintain the fairest form of Government ever established by man. They argued that anytime that “We the
People” become dependent we lose our virtue, power, and all Fairness, Equality and Liberty and thus Happiness. They
realized that if their own personal, Creeds, philosophies and Ideologies [social engineering] had been legislated, even
if they were widely held beliefs, they would be guilty of usurping the Unalienable Rights of other men, and guilty of
the very same Tyranny they accused King George of: “tyranny over the mind of man."
G.
The 1st Amendment was a strict check on Government and the People from usurping authority over any person’s
Unalienable Right to Free speech or Press, exercise of Religion, peaceable assembly, and to petition the Government
for a redress of grievances.
a)
b)
It does not only protect Religious Freedom and the Freedom of any other Philosophy or Creed from
oppression or suppression, but it protects the Unalienable Rights of all others from being subjected to, or
oppressed by it.
“In no instances have…the Churches been guardians of the Liberties of the People.” – James Madison
H.
In a letter to Thomas Jefferson, John Adams, himself a Christian, struggled with the idea of allowing a Religion, of
which he could not agree roam Free;
a)
“Can a Free Government possibly exist with the Roman Catholic Religion?”
26
Or in a letter to Van der Kemp, he argued again, but this time amongst his own Religion;
b)
"As I understand the Christian Religion, it was, and is, a revelation. But how has it happened that millions of fables,
tales, legends, have been blended with both Jewish and Christian revelation that have made them the most, bloody
Religion that ever exist."
I.
Imagine what we might have for a Government today, if John Adams had enforced [legislated] all of his personal
Religious [Ideologies] beliefs on us; or what he may have felt like if the Marxist Ideologies [Religion] of today had been
enforced [legislate] on him.
XIV: What is Justice?
A.
Justice is what “We the People” decide is fair recompense or compensation for work performed, or for Property trade, or
for the violation of, as a whole or as an individual, our Unalienable and Natural Rights.
a)
b)
The Constitution, Article III Section 2 - “The judicial Power shall extend to all Cases, in Law and Equity, arising
under this Constitution, the Laws of the United States, and Treaties made, or which shall be made, under their
Authority…”
Article IV Section 2 - “The Citizens of each State shall be entitled to all Privileges and Immunities of Citizens in the
several States.”
B.
In a criminal matter such as the theft of a horse (Property), we must decide two things: 1. How much is a horse
worth? 2. How can we detour a person from thievery or determining that another man’s horse may be his own?
a)
b)
c)
In order to detour someone from stealing a horse, it would stand to reason that the punishment for the
crime would be much greater than the value of the horse, but not so much so that it would be considered
cruel and unusual.
If the person who committed the crime realized that it would have cost much less to just buy the horse
rather than steal it, we have set an example (deterrent) for those who would contemplate it as well, and thus
Justice is served.
Before automobiles were common a horse could be the difference between Life and death; but even today if
a person is far of the beaten path and his horse is stolen it can still mean certain death
How can we suppose Justice may even exist when our own Government itself, is a den of Thieves?
C.
The Government is taking our Liberty and Property [Natural Rights] from us through blatant disregard of the
Separation of Powers;
a)
1
Blighting our Property to lower its value, 2taking monies, 3assets, 4borrowing more money than we can pay,
reckless spending, 6egregious taxation and fees
1
Affecting unlegislated policies on us from foreign lands, 2giving our technology and means of protection to
our enemies so that we are forced to pay for new ones, 3fighting wars in such a tenuous manner that our
economy and safety is damaged
5
b)
27
c)
d)
e)
f)
g)
h)
Failing to guard against fraudulent voting practices, and even using it as a common tool available to them to
effect change
Inventing trade policies which favor other countries and even our enemies over our own
Expanding its own cost, powers, size and reach while we are struggling to pay ends meet
1
taking from one group of People [Race, Creed or color] and giving to another, and 2taking water Rights
away from one State and giving to another
1
Taking over entire segments of private industry, 2investing our money in shady and ill-conceived companies
then allowing the spoils to be divvied up amongst their friends,
And a remainder of offences, including [at times] every one laid against Great Britain in the Declaration of
Independence, against our Unalienable Rights so long as to reach across every page of every piece of Legislation
and every Precedent which seeks to deny or disparage them.
D.
When our Court systems fail to recognize or choose to ignore our Unalienable Rights, they fail to uphold the
Constitution, and in so doing fail to secure our Blessings of Liberty; by choosing to embrace a policy of explaining away
bad legislation, infringements and oversight our Judicial system has failed to provide Justice;
a)
Instead of creating a deterrent against Legislated Theft and Tyranny they have embraced it, siding with the
Government rather than the People, even so much as to allow it to claim Sovereignty against us.
E.
When Hurricane Katrina devastated our southern coast, hundreds if not thousands looted homes and retail stores left
unprotected in the chaos. The world renowned celebrity singer and song writer, Celine Deon publicly issued this
ignorant and despicable statement that represents the diseased Ideology plaguing our halls of Government and our
streets ever since:
a)
b)
“Oh, they’re stealing 20 pair of jeans or they’re stealing television sets. Who cares? They’re not going to go too far with
it. Maybe those People are so poor, some of the People who do that they’re so poor they’ve never touched anything in their
lives. Let them touch those things for once.”
In every case regarding the Occupy Wall Street movement, the revolution of Van Jones, the Statements and
Legislature being written by our Representatives, and the Policies of this President follow this mantra of
Marxist Ideology of Theft, and are wholly anti Unalienable Rights.
F.
It is now the [Executive order] Policy of this entire [Tyranny] Government that [Socialism] Theft is now the [archaic]
modern and more [in] humane form of [in] Justice.
a) Article II Section 4 – “The President, Vice President and all Civil Officers of the United States, 1shall be removed from
Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors.”
b) "We can't be so fixated on our desire to preserve the Rights of ordinary Americans ..." – President Bill Clinton
[1]
Legal definition [Shall – mandatory; no exceptions; required by Law]. When our Senators refuses to act, or turns a blind
eye to, or subjects us to dog and pony shows, when our Country is subjected to Treason and Tyranny, it is in fact its own
Crime against our Constitution, the United States of America and our Unalienable Rights.
G.
How can we expect Justice when there is no Justice to be found? 1When the checks and balances afforded to us by
the Constitution have been so diluted in the minds of an Institutionalized Government that there is no recourse to
28
address their Crimes; 2year after year, case after case, and election after election we try to persuade our new
Representatives to finally uphold the Supreme Law of the Land; but alas, we have only succeeded in giving more bodies
to their cause as they are almost instantly corrupted with greed; we can only hope that in the process of making one
more legitimate plea that we will be heard.
a)
b)
c)
d)
When Bills and Legislature such as the International Economic Emergencies Act (IEEA) and the National
Emergencies Act (NEA) allow our Government to remain in a constant and never ending State of War and Crisis
delivering almost unfettered access and power to our Executive Branch, we have no hope of Security through our
normal process of Elections and Representation.
When Bills and Legislation such as the Enemy Expatriation Act (EEA) and Enemy Belligerent Interrogation, and
Prosecution Act (EBIPA) under the guise of a Department of Defense (DOD) Budget such as the National Defense
Authorization Act (NDAA) can even be proposed by our so called Representatives, in direct violation of our
Constitution and our Unalienable Rights, we have no hope of Security through our normal process of Elections and
Representation.
When our President can mandate Unconstitutional Executive Orders and Directives such as EO 13514, NDRP March
2012, PPD-14 2012, 2 Executive Continuations of the NEA in Feb and 1 in Jan 2012, and many more that gives
that all Expand the unfettered Power of the Executive Branch to restrict and Control the Productivity of our Private
Industry and Nationalizes all of our Recourses and Transportation, we have no hope of Security through our normal
process of Elections and Representation.
When all of our Representatives are complacent in the destruction of our Constitution and merely mumble as
the Separation of Powers are crossed so often that the extent of their Influence is that of a lone one eighth mile
marker on a one quarter mile oval on a Speed Way, we have no hope of Security through our normal process of
Elections and Representation.
[1]
“For taking away our Charters, abolishing our most valuable Laws, and altering fundamentally the Forms of our Governments;” The DOI
[2]
“For suspending our own Legislatures, and declaring themselves invested with power to legislate for us in all cases whatsoever.” The DOI
1.
Article VI of the Constitution of The United States of America – “…The Senators and Representatives before
mentioned, and the Members of the several State Legislatures, and all executive and judicial Officers, both of the United
States and of the several States, shall be bound by Oath or Affirmation, to support this Constitution…”
XV: What are Wars verses Police Action?
A.
Under the Principles of Unalienable Rights enumerated in our Declaration of Independence and the Rules of Governance laid
out in our Constitution, War is Resolution [Retaliation] and Police Action is Security [Deterrence].
B.
There are very strict Rules laid out in our Constitution regarding War; these Rules [Law] are not suggestions or mere
opinions; they serve a specific and necessary purpose in protecting our Economic Stability and Health. [They protect our
Unalienable Rights and the Unalienable Rights of a Foreign Country’s Citizens as well]
Article I Section 8 of the Constitution says - “The Congress [XIV: F: 1] shall have the Power to”;
29
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
“To define and punish Piracies and Felonies committed on the high Seas, and Offences against the Law of Nations;”
[Policing]
“To declare War, grant Letters of Marque and Reprisal, and make Rules concerning Captures on Land and Water;” [War
Time]
“To raise and support Armies, but no Appropriation of Money to that Use shall be for a longer Term than two Years;”
[War Time]
“To provide and maintain a Navy; To make Rules for the Government and Regulation of the Land and naval Forces;”
[Policing]
“To provide for calling forth the Militia to execute the Laws of the Union, suppress Insurrections and repel Invasions;”
[Policing]
“To provide for organizing, arming, and disciplining, the Militia, and for governing such Part of them as may be
employed in the Service of the United States, reserving to the States respectively, the Appointment of the Officers, and the
Authority of training the Militia according to the discipline prescribed by Congress;” [Policing]
C.
Only [B2.] and [B3.] fall under the provisions of declaring and affecting War against a Foreign Country, and if we are to
uphold the Principles of the Unalienable Rights of all men, there are only two solid arguments for going to War;
1.
2.
The Eminent Threat to our Soil [a Foreign Country which by all shown intentions will [is in Route], or has
attacked us] [this also includes a Foreign Country which by proxy allows [authorizes through complacency or consent]
a rouge element of its Citizens to pose an Eminent Threat] in capturing or causing great harm to our Land.
To Assist an 1Ally who expressly requests our help and is in-fact in being unjustly Assaulted [attacked] by a
Foreign Country
D.
America should never: [C: 2. 1] align itself with, trade with, subsidize, or assist in War or any other Venture with any
Foreign Country that does not uphold the Unalienable Rights of its People, or any People which consents to the usurpations
of Power by its Government to oppress a portion of its population, and is by definition under the Principles of Unalienable
Rights to which the Constitution of the United States of America is [was] Formed to Secure, the Enemy of We the People.
a)
b)
[b) 1; 2; 3]
The act of supporting in monies, supplies, labor, resources, trade or any other subsidy to our Enemy is by definition…
[5]
Aiding and Abetting, and is Treason.
Article III Section 3 – “Treason against the 1United States shall consist only in levying War against 2them or in
adhering to 3their Enemies, giving 4them 5Aid and Comfort…”
[We the People] [b) 4] [We the People’s Enemy]
E.
There is no good War, and no good way to wage War, there are only efficient means to Vanquish [over throw] our
Enemies; and the only efficient way to vanquish our Enemies is use all of the Dreadful Tools available to us with a
Vengeance; our Constitution defines War as [1] War, and the conclusion of War as [2] Reprisal [Punishment and Capture]
a)
b)
[B2] “To declare 1War, grant Letters of Marque and 2Reprisal, and make Rules concerning Captures on Land and Water;”
If a Foreign Power attacks us, its Citizens either don’t control it or are Complicit; the Land and Resources we
capture should by all Rights be ours until every penny that we incur affecting the war and securing peace in that
Land is reimbursed; and until such time as we see fit, it should be our Honorable Duty to uphold the Unalienable
Rights of the Inhabitants of the Land we Occupy, and set in place a Government which will best suit that
purpose, and utilize its Resources to pay for it; and there for Justice will be served.
30
F. B
[ 3] “To raise and support Armies, but no Appropriation of Money to that Use 1shall be for a longer Term than two Years;” is
designed to keep our War Powers limited and restricted to no more than a Two Year period [Congress may reconvene at
the end of two years, and if Convinced that we are still in Eminent and Danger, may under the same Rules, Declare War for another
Two Year period] This is a Constitutional [1] Mandate on us to affect War as quickly and efficiently as possible, and as much
as possible, not strain our Economy, limit the Loss of Life, not deplete our Natural Resources, and to not subject us to
long term War Time policy.
a)
b)
If for all intents and purposes, there is a Country which through the demonstrable natures of its People [s], refuses
to allow an end to War, and shows no intention of ending its charges and assaults on our Property [Assets and
Land] then we should, for the sake of our own Security and Tranquility, utterly wipe them off the face of the
Earth.
War is Hell, and if we must be drawn into it, we must for the good of all men End it.
G.
In no instance in the Constitution is the President given the Power to affect War with, or to utilize any Branch of
Military or Militia [Weapons of War], unless they are called into the 1actual Service of the United States by Congress;
a)
Article II Section 2 – “The President shall be Commander in Chief of the Army and Navy of the United States, and of
the Militia of the several States, when called into the [1] actual Service of the United States; he may require the Opinion,
in writing, of the principal Officer in each of the executive Departments, upon any Subject relating to the Duties of their
respective Offices, and he shall have Power to grant Reprieves and Pardons for Offences against the United States, except
in Cases of Impeachment.”
H. B
[ 1 and 4-6] are all Security [Police] measures [And are also called into service during a declared War] necessary to the
Welfare of our Country, and any Police action should follow all of the Rules and regulations of Civil protection that
uphold our Natural Rights.
a)
b)
c)
d)
It is the Job of the Federal Government to protect our Borders, Patrol the Seas, and protect our assets at home
and abroad;
If our Government is protecting an asset that is not making us money, than it is a liability and should be
abandon;
If we are occupying [controlling] or carrying out assaults [killing or capturing] in a Country that has neither
attacked nor invited us, than it is an unjust act of war against them;
If we are protecting or securing Trade and assets on behalf of a Foreign Power which does not uphold the
Unalienable Rights of men, then we are aiding and abetting the Enemy.
[We cannot by Contract support any foreign or domestic Venture which denies the Natural Rights of men]
I.
If our actions and ventures against and from within Foreign Countries don’t uphold the Principles of Unalienable Rights
then they are unconstitutional; the DOI itself describes what it is like to be violated by a Foreign Power;
1.
“He has erected a multitude of New Offices, and sent hither swarms of Officers to harass our People, and eat out their
substance.”
2.
“He has kept among us, in times of peace, Standing Armies without the Consent of our legislatures.”
3.
“He has affected to render the Military Independent of and superior to the Civil power.”
31
4.
“He has combined with others to subject us to a jurisdiction foreign to our constitution, and unacknowledged by our laws;
giving his Assent to their Acts of pretended Legislation:”
J.
The War this Government is Fighting today, is unjust, unhealthy, and entirely unconstitutional; the War on Terror
[WOT];
a)
b)
c)
d)
e)
We have given up in the name of [false] “Security” a multitude of protections of our Unalienable Rights;
The Government has almost completed Institutionalizing its self proclaimed Sovereignty against We the People,
by dissolving its Checks and Balances [Separation of Powers];
We are subjected to mountains of Debt incurred through a massive expansion of a Marxist Government
formidable to Tyrants only, directed by the will of an Executive Branch drunk with the Powers of an eternal
and Unconstitutional War;
We are subjected to unlawful searches and seizures, by our Federal Branch of Government as we pass between
our own States, Cities and Towns;
Our Government has left our Borders insecure by design, and enforcing on us, all actions reserved for criminals;
while handing over our resources, Property and business over to illegal aliens;
K.
Through all of the Executive orders, sequestered Powers and Property, and by Declaring our own Country a War
Zone; calling American Patriots Belligerent Enemies of the State for calling out our Rouge Government on their
Tyranny and Treason, and threatening us with Expatriation and Indefinite Detention for even discussing [repeatedly]
the Constitution amongst our fellow Countrymen and Representatives, claiming we are out of control and dangerous
members of society, and are guilty of hindering their War efforts by calling them out on their Domestic Treachery; and
through all of the destruction to our Economy, way of Life, and Liberty, even as our Government has antagonized and
prodded, and by all intents and purposes has turned and aimed its War Machine on us, we have through great angst
remained Civil.
XVI: What is my Right to Privacy?
A.
There is an old saying that goes “you have your opinions [beliefs] and I have mine”. This one descriptive phrase speaks
volumes to the human condition. It describes our intrinsic nature and individuality; it is the Foundation and Unalienable
Nature of our human psyche [reason of being].
a)
b)
c)
Without it we would merely be the unfortunate spectators of change, unable to transform our environment
to meet our needs, relying on the adaptation of our baser instincts to move from one food source [habitat] to
the next.
Innovation would be impossible without individualism; we could not argue [reason] the possibility of
invention against the belief [opinions] that would say otherwise.
We would never be able to question, rationalize, ponder, deduce, or have faith in anything, anyone or even
ourselves.
B.
Those who espouse Slavery, Cronyism, Fascism, Marxism, Socialism, Communism, Theocracy, and any other form of
Dictatorship believe that the majority of us are incapable of making rational decisions about our lives. They believe that
32
without their self proclaimed Higher Intellect to guide us, we are merely sheep that need to be herded and nudged into
whichever lifestyle they deem fit.
C.
It is entirely impossible for a man to be without an opinion of his own, although some are better at suppressing it
then others, there are no paths in Pursuit of Happiness outside of having the Freedom to express our own personal
opinions.
a)
b)
c)
d)
e)
f)
g)
If we are forced to worship a God we don’t believe in, we are unhappy [oppressed]
If we are forced to work at a job we don’t love, we are unhappy [oppressed]
If we are forced to live in a neighborhood we hate, we are unhappy [oppressed]
If we are forced to marry a person we have no attraction to, we are unhappy [oppressed]
If we are forced to eat food we cannot appreciate, we are unhappy [oppressed]
If we are forced to pay for another man’s dependencies, we are unhappy [oppressed]
If we are forced to do or say anything that is not our idea to do, we are unhappy [oppressed]
D.
We are Creators, all of us; we must invent our own Happiness; everything we aspire to become is affected by our
ability to navigate through Life’s obstacles, the fewer there are the easier it is for us to be productive. The more
Government or People restrict us, and the more oppressed we are the more agitated and disagreeable we become.
We need to be continuously creating; developing, releasing energy into something that personally gratifies us [makes
us happy].
E.
My Right to Privacy is my Unalienable Right to my opinion [who I am, what I believe, what I like, who I like, who I love, my
aspirations, and my dreams], and everything [the entire Life] that I am able to create, secure and achieve because of it, and I
alone own it. All of these things are Unalienable to me, and private;
1
My Speech: [my Unalienable Right to voice my opinion] If we cannot speak our minds, how are we to grow the
Market Place of Ideas?
2
My Actions: [my Unalienable Right to act on my opinion] If we cannot act on our own impulses, how then could
we invent, construct or create Industry?
3
My Endeavors: [my Unalienable Right to Pursue my opinion] If we cannot Pursue our own dreams and
intentions, how then could we obtain those things which would affect our Happiness?
4
My Religion: [my Unalienable Right to believe in my opinion] if we cannot believe in our own understandings,
how then could we obtain Purpose?
5
My Property: [my Unalienable Right to own my opinion] If we cannot acquire, trade and protect our own
possessions, what then is the point of Liberty?
6
My Body: [my Unalienable Right to my opinion] If our bodies are not our own temples, then who’s bodies are
they, and what then is the point of Life?
[1-6]
[Unless it specifically takes away from the Life and Liberty [Property] or the Pursuit thereof, from another Human
Being]
F.
If anyone of us could construct for ourselves from a group of randomized, subatomic particles [Not Atoms, Proteins or Genes,
which are already formed] into one seed which would then grow into one blade of grass which could then reproduce into a
33
new blade of grass through its own design, then we would have only the slightest of justifications to presume ourselves a
god of Nature; and therefore presume to know on the slightest of scales, what may or may not affect another man’s
Conscious.
G.
From the Moment I was Conceived [Created by Nature’s God the Mechanism of Life]: I was Constructed naturally
from two completely and separate Forms of individual Life, made from Millions of subatomic particles, controlled by
Trillions of quantum reactions, and was by design, imprinted with every Mechanism of my Natural Existence [Life]
with all of the Equal and Unalienable Rights of men to that Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness.
H.
My very existence dictates that my individual and separate quest to discover and secure my Unalienable Rights, is
mine, and mine alone. [IX: F]
In Closing
I do not intend, nor should this Treatise be confused as to discourage the fair discourse of the Religions or Doctrines
or Creeds of any Person [s] individual mind, and in fair and full disclosure, I myself, believe that Nature’s God [the
universal Mechanism of Life] was created by a Supernatural Being, my God, the Father of Jesus Christ, and by Him all
things were Created, and yet this is my belief and faith, and mine Conscious alone; I also in my personal Life have
suffered most recently, the dependencies of socialized aide in order to meet my family’s most basic needs due to the
oppressions of this current State of the Union, and by all accounts am fighting to remove myself from this system, as I
have no wish or desire to require any more or less than what I have faithfully paid in.
I have, to the best of my abilities resolved in my own mind, only those arguments necessary to decry the nature of the
hypocrisy which acts to oppress and prevent the Honorable and Legal Freedoms of myself and my fellow
Countrymen. I humbly admit, that for the sake of my own good conscience, I cannot tell any other man or woman
how to live their lives, or what they shall choose to believe, and so I will only say is this;
“Every word in this Treatise is drawn from the True and Accurate accounts of the Annals of History, and yet it is
you’re individual and Unalienable Right to discover these truths, and any others I have left unaccounted for, for your
selves.”
Jason R Mann,
On behalf of myself, as a Natural Born Citizen of the United States of America, and as a capable representative of the
CLDC [Citizens for Legal Defense of the Constitution]
34