Friday, February 3, 2012
Homonyms and Homophones as Esoteric Constructions
One of the more curious aspects of English is the use of "homonyms" and "homophones" within the vocabulary.
"Homonyms" and "homophones" share a common condition: and two (or three) words sound the same yet mean
something wholly different from each other. The difference is this: "homoyms" are spelled the same while
"homophones" are spelled differently.
Thus, "technically", "there" and "their" are considered "homophones", while "content" is a "homonym", such as "One
should never be content to coast along the coast looking for content." We note here that the "homonyms" of "content"
and "coast" take on the properties of "verbs" and "nouns". In all cases, placement, and variably, enunciation, enable the
proper meaning to form clearly within the receiver.
Delving further, it makes sense that within the construction of homonyms and homophones arises the probability of
some philosophical embedding, or encoding in such a way as to reveal rational demonstrations of the Construct.
Herein is a musing on just such a probability with an added element of poetic license.
Comparative Equivalence Constructions
One such comparative equivalence is the homophone of "flee" and "flea". One does not, generally, "flee", unless one is
under some state of duress or under some form of assault. Consider then the dog that scratches at a coat filled with
"fleas".
In this case, "fleas" that are under assault can be seen to "flee", or jump from the dog. In this way we see a form of
comparative equivalence in the naming and construction.
Equally, as "fleas" are to "flees", "ticks" are to "tickets". A "tick", once attached to a host, continues to such blood,
weakens the host, and perhaps spreads a form of seriously dibilitating or fatal disease. A "tick" in the form of a "ticket"
has allegorically parallel properties. Tickets as "fines" for alleged or manufactured transgressions equally latch
themselves on to the person targeted and, if not dealt with removed accordingly, often escalates into forms of
dibilitating circumstances.
"Tick"ets are, in practical analysis, a convenient way for the "State" to latch onto a victim and "leech" "blood", which
takes on the form of "money", and the State will do so so with ever escalating dibilitating circumstances until the "tick"
is removed.
Another form of comparative equivalence is in the idea of "leaves" and "leaves". In this case, it can be shown that the
verb "leaves" is comparatively equivalent to the noun "leaves". When all is healthy, or things are in some static state,
"leaves" remain on the tree. However, as conditions change, say, as at the time of "Autumn", "leaves" "leave" the tree,
wherein the "tree" is the condition within which the "leaf" co-exists as part of a larger unified body.
Hence, when, say, a baseball pitcher "leaves" the game, the verb "leaves" mimics the "leaves" on a tree, which, too,
"leave the tree".
Abstract Occult Constructions
Of course, since "the Construct" is a "qaballistic construction", there is a rational presumption that some words and
constructions are "lessons" or "observations" regarding "the gods", or, more clearly, specific letters.
Hence in the Letter B, it can be shown that B is comprised of a letter/number/sound in that its form and shape can be
seen to be derived from a mathematical formula of 1+2=3, wherein we use the 1 and the 3 to form the B. Hence "2B" or
not "2B" is a philosophical question which may be equally applied to the Letter B. B may be a "2", but too may be a
"3".
Hence the "homophone" of "2" will be "3": to, too, and two.
A more cryptic set of homophones revolves around the Letter C, the primary letter from which "Occult" is derived. A
general analysis of the word "occult" is that it is derived from the word/phenomena known as an "occultation".
A mass market definition generally treats the word "occultation" as being "the covering of one celestial body over
another". Such occurs when, say, there is a lunar or solar eclipse, but also occurs when, say, the moon covers some
distant star.
However, within the "Occult", or qaballistic study, occultations are transient. Hence, not being permanent, that which
covers will at some point in time become "uncovered". Thus there are two primary realities to the Letter "C": that which
is "seen" and "that which is unseen".
Thus in the word set "sea" and "see", we can show in the word "sea" that it "covers" the life that exists below and yet, if
one "takes the cover off the sea", euphemistically speaking, and peers down into the depths below, one is able to see
what the sea covers.
As "Typhon" is the realm of "the sea", it is the world of corruption and illusions and shadows
Thus we have another homophone, that of "seas" and "seize". Here we find a very universal, perhaps hardwired at the
DNA level, archetype. This is the idea of "savior gods". As mankind is said to be "drowned", or immersed into the sea
(atmosphere), although we may "rise above the waves", the ability to actually "exit the seize" requires a bit of outside
assistance. Try as you might to rise up and out of the "seas/seize", you cannot without some aid or external assistance.
Poetic License Homonym-Homophone Constructions
If "quiet contemplation frees the mind", what then is the philosophical relationship of "frees" to "freeze"? The object
and aim is to "rise above the waves". Thus in an "iceberg", we have what his hidden (occulted) and what is seen (risen
above the waves). The Construct is designed such that "water freezes" (frees) at "32 degrees". One may see the
Freemasonic parallel of "32 degrees", which is representative of the first 32 decimal digits of Pi. The "33" rises above
the waves (the decimal point) and "joins the Trinity", or the 3 of "3.1415926..."
Thus in FREEZE and FREES, we see a constructed design highlighting this aspect of the "Construct".
Another, with a bit of poetic license, is that of "halve" and "have". To "have" something is to "get" something. If I "got"
something, I then "have" something. But "halve" and "have" are interlinked.
If I "G"-"T" something, I must "halve it".
Here is a very elegant code within the Construct.
The key is PI. If we divide the G-T sequence in half, we end up at MN, or 1314, which is Pi. If we divide the two halves
again, the G and the T lie precisely at the half way points of each side of the Alphabet, leaving us with 6 on the left and
6 on the right of each letter.
The "Spirit of 76"
Another homophone that speaks of the "Construct" is that of "Steak" and "Stake". For a "qaballa purist", there can be no
denying that STEAK and STAKE are connected: the word and its anagram are always esoterically linked.
Here is the idea of the battle between "good" and "evil", of Isis against Jehovah/Typhon/Seth, who is the "vampyre" that
cannot survive exposure to the light.
One of the primary representations of Isis is that of "the cow". Hathor from Egypt and "Queen Moo" from the Maya are
two key ones. From a "cow" we derive a "steak" and from a "stake" we can drive it through the heart of
Jehovah/Typhon/Seth.
This provides but a small glimpse into the nature of homonyms and homophones as esoteric constructions.
Read more: http://illuminatusobservor.blogspot.com/2012/02/homonyms-and-homophones-asesoteric.html#ixzz2maLFUM3f