The Plant Cell, Vol. 20: 1984–2000, July 2008, www.plantcell.org ã 2008 American Society of Plant Biologists
Induced Plant Defenses in the Natural Environment: Nicotiana
attenuata WRKY3 and WRKY6 Coordinate Responses
to Herbivory
W
Melanie Skibbe,1 Nan Qu,1,2 Ivan Galis, and Ian T. Baldwin3
Department of Molecular Ecology, Max-Planck-Institute for Chemical Ecology, 07745 Jena, Germany
A plant-specific family of WRKY transcription factors regulates plant responses to pathogens and abiotic stresses. Here, we
identify two insect-responsive WRKY genes in the native tobacco Nicotiana attenuata: WRKY3, whose transcripts
accumulate in response to wounding, and WRKY6, whose wound responses are significantly amplified when fatty acid–
amino acid conjugates (FACs) in larval oral secretions are introduced into wounds during feeding. WRKY3 is required for
WRKY6 elicitation, yet neither is elicited by treatment with the phytohormone wound signal jasmonic acid. Silencing either
WRKY3 or WRKY6, or both, by stable transformation makes plants highly vulnerable to herbivores under glasshouse
conditions and in their native habitat in the Great Basin Desert, Utah, as shown in three field seasons. This susceptibility is
associated with impaired jasmonate (JA) accumulation and impairment of the direct (trypsin proteinase inhibitors) and
indirect (volatiles) defenses that JA signaling mediates. The response to wounding and herbivore-specific signals (FACs)
demonstrates that these WRKYs help plants to differentiate mechanical wounding from herbivore attack, mediating a
plant’s herbivore-specific defenses. Differences in responses to single and multiple elicitations indicate an important role of
WRKY3 and WRKY6 in potentiating and/or sustaining active JA levels during continuous insect attack.
INTRODUCTION
In nature, plants battle continuously against pathogens and
herbivores; these attack plants in various ways, possess diverse
feeding methods, and evolve resistance to plant defenses
(Agrawal, 2001). In return, plants have evolved structural and
chemical barriers that, along with induced defenses, counter
herbivore attacks. Induced defenses, which are deployed only
when protection is needed, allow plants to forgo the costs of
defense production (Heil and Baldwin, 2002) and optimize their
ability to compete with other plants (Zavala et al., 2004) or to
tolerate the damage caused by resistant herbivores (Stowe et al.,
2000; Schwachtje et al., 2006). These defenses include the rapid
accumulation of toxins, antidigestive proteins, and antifeedants
expressed both locally at the feeding site and systemically in
unattacked tissues. Direct defenses that diminish the suitability
of plant tissues as food for herbivores can be simultaneously
deployed with indirect defenses, such as the production of extra
floral nectars (Heil et al., 2001) or volatile alarm calls that attract
predators or parasitoids to eliminate feeding herbivores (Dicke
and Sabelis, 1988; De Moraes et al., 1998; Kessler and Baldwin,
2002). Many of these defenses are coordinated by a jasmonate
1 These
authors contributed equally to this work.
address: Department of Plant Physiology, University of
Rostock, Albert-Einstein-Straße 3, 18051 Rostock, Germany.
3 Address correspondence to [email protected].
The author responsible for distribution of materials integral to the
findings presented in this article in accordance with the policy described
in the Instructions for Authors (www.plantcell.org) is: Ian T. Baldwin
([email protected]).
W
Online version contains Web-only data.
www.plantcell.org/cgi/doi/10.1105/tpc.108.058594
2 Current
(JA)-dependent signaling cascade that is required to activate
and rapidly disseminate the elicited responses throughout the
plant (Halitschke and Baldwin, 2003; Kalde et al., 2003).
A complex suite of defenses is elicited when herbivorespecific elicitors are introduced into wounds during feeding;
these rapidly activate large-scale transcriptional changes, phytohormone signaling, and posttranslational modifications of proteins (Halitschke et al., 2000; Halitschke and Baldwin, 2003;
Kalde et al., 2003). Such responses are often found to be specific
to the attacker (Walling, 2000; Kessler and Baldwin, 2002;
Voelckel and Baldwin, 2004; Schmidt et al., 2005; Ralph et al.,
2006; Wu et al., 2007). Large-scale and specific transcriptional
responses, which are mediated by transcription factors that bind
DNA in a sequence-specific manner, illustrate how adaptive phenotypic plasticity evolves. A number of the transcription factors
that specifically mediate responses to pathogens, wounding, and
abiotic stresses have been identified (Jakoby et al., 2002; Ulker
and Somssich, 2004; Eulgem and Somssich, 2007).
The WRKY transcription factors, which make up one of the
largest groups of transcription regulators, are unique to plants.
These proteins typically contain one or two WRKY domains
composed of ;60 amino acids with the conserved amino
acid sequence WRKYGQK, together with a novel zinc finger–
like motif (Pfam database: http://pfam.sanger.ac.uk/family?
acc=PF03106). WRKY proteins bind to specific W-boxes in the
promoters of their transcriptional targets, either up- or downregulating the gene expression. WRKY genes often contain
W-boxes in their own promoters, suggesting that they are selfregulated or that they are regulated by other WRKY transcription
factors (Ulker and Somssich, 2004; Eulgem, 2006).
WRKY transcription factors regulate responses of plants to
pathogen attack and to various abiotic stresses (see summary in
WRKY Transcription Factors in Plant Defense
Supplemental Figure 1 online). In rice (Oryza sativa), several
recently described WRKY genes mediate defense responses to
pathogens such as the rice blast fungus (Magnaporthe grisea) or
bacterial blight (Xanthomonas oryzae) (Chuio et al., 2007; Liu
et al., 2007; Qiu et al., 2007; Shimono et al., 2007; Wang et al.,
2007a). Most of the WRKY genes characterized in Arabidopsis
thaliana and other plant species also help defend plants against
phytopathogens and abiotic stresses (Robatzek and Somssich,
2002; Mare et al., 2004; Park et al., 2006; Knoth et al., 2007;
Marchive et al., 2007; Murray et al., 2007; Ulker et al., 2007; Xie
et al., 2007; Zheng et al., 2007; Zou et al., 2007) and mediate the
crosstalk between JA and salicylic acid (SA) signaling pathways
(Li et al., 2004). While most WRKY genes identified so far seem to
mediate antimicrobial defensive responses, in Arabidopsis,
some WRKYs were found to regulate developmental processes,
such as senescence and trichome development (Johnson et al.,
2002; Miao et al., 2007).
1985
To date, only a single WRKY gene has been directly associated
with defense against herbivores: the ectopic overexpression of
WRKY89 in rice enhanced resistance to the white-backed
planthopper Sogatella furcifera, a rice herbivore. However, the
resistance mechanisms regulated by WRKY89 remain unknown
(Wang et al., 2007a). Here, we describe two novel WRKY
transcription factors from the native tobacco Nicotiana attenuata, WRKY3 and WRKY6 (Figure 1A), which are strongly upregulated in plants attacked by Manduca sexta (Hui et al., 2003).
Moreover, plants accumulate transcripts of these genes in
response to attack by insects from other feeding guilds (Voelckel
and Baldwin, 2004).
Realizing the potential importance of these genes in plant–
herbivore interactions, we performed functional analysis with
both genes in N. attenuata. While WRKY3 transcripts were
already maximally induced in wounded leaves, we found that
the herbivore-specific elicitors, fatty acid–amino acid conjugates
Figure 1. WRKY3 Strongly Responds to Wounding, and WRKY6 Requires M. sexta’s OS for Transcript Elicitation.
(A) Alignment of WRKY3 and WRKY6 proteins. Identities of both proteins are shaded with black, and conserved WRKY domains are enclosed in the
black box.
(B) Mean (6SE) WRKY3 transcript levels in elicited (filled symbols) and unelicited (systemic; open symbols) leaves in five replicate N. attenuata wild-type
plants at each harvest time and treatment. Leaves were elicited by wounding and immediately treating the puncture wounds with 20 mL of water (W;
dotted lines) or 1:1 diluted OS from M. sexta larvae (solid lines). Inset: induction of WRKY3 transcripts in an independent experiment using wounding and
water (W; dotted line), 1:1 diluted OS (solid line), or a synthetic mixture of the two most abundant FACs in M. sexta OS, N-linolenoyl-L-glutamine and
N-linolenoyl-L-glutamate (FAC; dashed line). Transcripts were analyzed by real-time PCR in arbitrary units after calibration with a 43 dilution series of
cDNAs prepared from RNA samples containing WRKY3 or WRKY6 transcripts.
(C) WRKY6 transcript levels determined as above. The x axes in (B) and (C) are on a nonlinear scale to reveal the culmination of transcript levels between
0 and 60 min.
1986
The Plant Cell
(FACs) found in M. sexta oral secretions (OS), are required to
amplify the moderately wound-induced accumulation of WRKY6
transcripts. Using gene silencing and an Agrobacterium tumefaciens–mediated transformation system (Kruegel et al., 2002),
we show that WRKY3 and WRKY6 mediate both the direct and
indirect defenses of N. attenuata by regulating JA-dependent
signaling in herbivore-attacked plants. Moreover, when silenced
plants are transplanted into their native habitat in the Great Basin
Desert for three consecutive field seasons, they suffer extensive
damage from the local herbivore community. This susceptibility
is associated with impaired transcriptional responses, JA and
JA-Ile/-Leu phytohormone accumulation, and the deployment of
both direct (trypsin proteinase inhibitors) and indirect (volatile
alarm calls) defenses in WRKY-silenced plants. Because exogenously applied JA restores all impaired direct and indirect
defense responses in WRKY3- and WRKY6-silenced plants, we
propose that WRKY3 and WRKY6 function upstream of JA
biosynthesis to potentiate and/or sustain plants’ defenses
against herbivorous insects.
RESULTS
Specific Responses of WRKY3 and WRKY6 to
Herbivory-Associated Signals
Previously, we conducted differential display RT-PCR (DDRTPCR) analysis on M. sexta–attacked N. attenuata leaves and
identified many early herbivory-induced genes that may help
defend plants against insect herbivores (Hermsmeier et al., 2001;
Hui et al., 2003). One of them, a gene fragment with sequence
similarity to the WRKY gene family in plants, was particularly
strongly upregulated in M. sexta–elicited leaves. Using a 270-bp
DDRT-PCR fragment and N. attenuata cDNA library derived from
M. sexta–attacked shoots, two full-length cDNA sequences
belonging to group I of the WRKY protein family were isolated
and named Na WRKY3 and Na WRKY6 (Figure 1A). At the protein
level, Na WRKY3 was most similar to previously isolated Nicotiana tabacum WRKY2 (89% identity at protein level), while Na
WRKY6 resembled Nt WRKY1 (96% identity at protein level)
(Nishiuchi et al., 2004).
DDRT-PCR Results Suggested That at Least One of the
Genes Should Be Regulated by Herbivory
Quantitative RT-PCR analysis revealed that both genes are
differentially upregulated by herbivory-associated signals in
gene-specific ways: WRKY3 transcript levels maximally increased in response to wounding (Figure 1B), those of WRKY6,
in response to OS elicitation (Figure 1C). When synthetic
FACs were applied to wounds at concentrations found in OS
(Halitschke et al., 2001), the OS-elicited increase in WRKY6
transcripts was fully mimicked (inset in Figure 1C). Moreover, the
expression of WRKY3 and WRKY6 transcription factors was
shown to be independent of JA signaling, as comparable transcript accumulation was found in the wild type and in plants
silenced in their expression of JA-biosynthetic enzyme lipoxygenase3 (LOX3) (see Supplemental Figure 2 online). OS- and
FAC-elicited JA bursts are known to be impaired in these plants
(Halitschke and Baldwin, 2003). Moreover, neither WRKY was
elicited by direct treatment of the leaves with methyl jasmonate,
an elicitor that reliably activates wound- and herbivore-specific
defense responses in plants (Wu et al., 2008; see Supplemental
Figure 2 online).
Overexpressing WRKY3 and WRKY6 Does Not Alter
Resistance to M. sexta Larvae
To understand if WRKY3 or WRKY6 mediates defense responses to M. sexta attack, full-length cDNA fragments of both
genes were overexpressed in N. attenuata. The ectopic overexpression of WRKY3 (ov-WRKY3) and WRKY6 (ov-WRKY6) with
a constitutive 35S cauliflower mosaic virus promoter (see Supplemental Figures 3A and 3B online) substantially increased the
basal and induced transcript levels of WRKY3 and of WRKY6
genes (see Supplemental Figure 4A online), without significantly
affecting the plants’ morphology. Subsequently, performance
was assessed for M. sexta larvae that fed on two homozygous
lines per construct, each harboring a single T-DNA insert (see
Supplemental Figures 3C and 3D online), and compared with
larval performance on wild-type plants. Ten days after larvae fed
on either ov-WRKY3 or ov-WRKY6 lines, their masses did not
differ from those of larvae that fed on wild-type plants (see
Supplemental Figure 4B online). No metabolic changes or enhanced defense responses were observed in these transgenic
plants: JA and JA-Ile/-Leu concentrations were similar in both
overexpression lines and in wild-type plants after a single OS
elicitation (data not shown) as well as after continuous caterpillar
feeding (see Supplemental Figure 4C online). The absence of an
overexpressing phenotype in plants transformed to ectopically
express a transcription factor is not uncommon and likely reflects
the functional requirements of being expressed in the correct
molecular context: time, location, and/or the presence of specific
interacting partners. It is also possible that WRKY genes may
have to be posttranslationally modified during elicitation so they
can act as regulators.
Individually Silencing WRKY3 and WRKY6 Shows
Interaction between the Genes
Because ectopic overexpression of the WRKY genes in N.
attenuata did not seem to enhance protection against herbivores, we next constructed plants with suppressed levels of
WRKY transcripts and subjected them to extensive functional
analysis. Fragments (1 kb) of WRKY3 or WRKY6 coding regions
were introduced into an inverted-repeat silencing (ir) construct,
and N. attenuata plants were transformed (Kruegel et al., 2002;
see Supplemental Figure 5 online). Silencing of either WRKY3 or
WRKY6 resulted in plants with normal morphology and development (see Supplemental Figure 6 online). WRKY3 basal transcript concentrations in WRKY3-silenced plants (ir-wrky3) were
significantly reduced compared with those in wild-type plants,
whereas transcript concentrations in WRKY6-silenced plants
(ir-wrky6) did not differ from those in wild-type plants (Figure 2A).
Surprisingly, the accumulation of WRKY6 transcripts was as
reduced in WRKY3-silenced plants as in WRKY6-silenced plants
WRKY Transcription Factors in Plant Defense
1987
Figure 2. WRKY3 Is Required for WRKY6 Transcript Accumulation, and Both Are Required for Resistance to M. sexta Larvae.
(A) Mean (6SE) WRKY3 basal transcript levels in five replicates of each wild-type, WRKY3-, and WRKY6-silenced plants. Transcripts were analyzed by
real-time PCR. Different letters reflect significant differences at P < 0.05 from wild-type plants of the same treatment.
(B) Mean (6SE) WRKY6 basal transcript levels in five replicates of each wild-type, WRKY3-, and WRKY6-silenced plants as above.
(C) Mean (6SE) mass of M. sexta larvae that fed on wild-type (solid line), two lines of WRKY3-silenced (ir-wrky3; dotted lines), and two lines of WRKY6silenced (ir-wrky6; dashed lines) N. attenuata plants in the glasshouse for 8 d (n = 12/genotype).
(D) Mean (6SE) of JA and JA-Ile/-Leu concentrations and transcript levels of LOX3 after M. sexta larvae fed on the plants. FM, fresh mass.
(E) Mean (6SE) of TPI activity measured 4 d after M. sexta larvae fed on the plants. Different letters reflect significant differences at P < 0.05 from wildtype plants of the same treatment.
1988
The Plant Cell
(Figure 2B), suggesting that WRKY3 is required for efficient
WRKY6 transcript accumulation.
When working with two WRKY genes that share a certain level
of similarity, one must consider the possibility that the WRKY3
silencing construct might have silenced WRKY6 transcript accumulation. While the overall DNA sequence identity between
WRKY3 and WRKY6 gene fragments used for silencing is only
55.9%, WRKY3 and WRKY6 do show local areas of higher
identity, particularly in the conserved WRKY domains. However,
in both silencing constructs, these DNA sequences were present, implying that if ir-wrky3 cosilenced WRKY6, reciprocal
effects of ir-wrky6 on endogenous WRKY3 transcripts should
also occur. Because this was not the case, we assume that the
similarity between both genes was below the threshold required
for cosilencing. In addition, we tested five other WRKY genes,
each with conserved WRKY domains. In all cases, the transcripts
of these genes were not significantly influenced by the silencing
constructs (see Supplemental Figure 8 online).
Similar trends in WRKY3 and WRKY6 transcript levels were
observed in plants elicited with M. sexta OS (data not shown),
providing a strong demonstration of the functional silencing and
the mutual relationship between WRKY3 and WRKY6 genes.
These results indicate that WRKY6 is located downstream of
WRKY3 in the signaling cascade, where it may tailor the WRKY3mediated wound responses to the attack of a specific herbivore.
This hypothesis is consistent with the observation that WRKY6 is
mainly under the transcriptional control of FACs from insect OS
and suggests that the herbivore signaling network consists of a
wound-responsive component (WRKY3) and a nested component responsive to herbivore-specific elicitors such as FACs
(WRKY6).
Silencing WRKY3 and WRKY6 Makes Plants Vulnerable
to Herbivores
The performance of M. sexta larvae on WRKY3- and WRKY6silenced plants was compared with the performance of these
larvae on wild-type plants in the glasshouse: after 8 d of feeding
on both WRKY3- and WRKY6-silenced lines, larvae weighed at
least twice as much as those that fed on wild-type plants (Figure
2C; analysis of variance [ANOVA] Fisher’s protected least significant difference [PLSD], all P values < 0.05). This enhanced
caterpillar mass gain correlated with large reductions in the
activity of trypsin proteinase inhibitors (TPIs), an important family
of plant defense proteins that interfere with efficient digestion in
the gut of herbivores (Figure 2E; ANOVA Fisher’s PLSD, all P
values < 0.05). By contrast, levels of another direct defenserelated compound, nicotine, did not differ significantly between
wild-type and WRKY-silenced lines (data not shown).
Silencing WRKY3 or WRKY6 Reduces M. sexta–Elicited JA
and JA-Ile/-Leu Levels
JA signaling is known to mediate TPI activation (Halitschke and
Baldwin, 2003); therefore, we analyzed JA and JA-Ile/-Leu levels
in attacked leaves. We found significantly smaller concentrations
of JA and JA-Ile/-Leu compared with wild-type plants measured
22 and 30 h after infestation with M. sexta larvae (Figure 2D),
which provided an explanation for the low levels of TPI activity
(Figure 2E). Moreover, decreased phytohormone levels in
WRKY-silenced plants compared with wild-type plants correlated with lower levels of the gene transcripts that encode for
the JA biosynthetic enzyme LOX3 (Figure 2D; Halitschke and
Baldwin, 2003), suggesting that these WRKY transcription factors directly or indirectly mediate LOX transcriptional activation
and, thus, JA accumulation.
Tobacco plants respond to simulated herbivory (puncture
wounds created by rolling a pattern wheel the length of the leaf
lamina followed by the immediate application of M. sexta OS)
with a JA burst that usually attains maximum levels 60 min after
elicitation. We examined the ability of WRKY-silenced plants to
produce a JA burst in response to such standardized elicitation
treatment. In contrast with previous results with herbivore-fed
plants (Figure 2D), JA and JA-Ile/-Leu levels in WRKY3- and
WRKY6-silenced plants were similar to those observed in the
OS-elicited tissues of wild-type plants 60 min after elicitation
(Figures 3A and 3C). To determine if the number of OS elicitations
could account for the difference in phytohormone response
between plants that were OS elicited just once and larvaeattacked plants (continuous elicitation), we elicited plants with
OS every 30 min six times, with one row of puncture wounds
each time being immediately treated with 10 mL OS. JA and JAIle/-Leu were measured 30 min after the final, or sixth, elicitation.
Phytohormone levels were found to be significantly lower in
multiply elicited WRKY-silenced plants than in multiply elicited
wild-type plants: JA concentrations were significantly reduced in
both ir-wrky3 and ir-wrky6 lines (Figure 3B; ANOVA Fisher’s
PLSD, all P values < 0.05); JA-Ile/-Leu concentrations, however,
were significantly reduced only in ir-wrky6 lines (Figure 3D;
ANOVA Fisher’s PLSD, P < 0.05). Although JA-Ile/-Leu levels in
ir-wrky3-silenced plants tended to be reduced, only one line
provided a statistically significant reduction of JA-Ile/-Leu (Figure
3D; ANOVA Fisher’s PLSD, P = 0.0421, P = 0.0563, respectively).
Performance of WRKY-Silenced Plants in the
Natural Environment
Because only multiple OS elicitations, not single OS elicitations,
induced differential responses in WRKY-silenced plants, we
hypothesized that the endogenous function of WRKY genes
may be to integrate multiple herbivory-associated signals. Such
an ability could allow plants to respond differently to a continuously feeding herbivore and an herbivore that was only sampling. As a corollary to this hypothesis, we assumed that other
environmental factors that change the phytohormone balance in
plants may influence the behavior of WRKY-silenced plants and
that the effects of WRKY silencing may be either enhanced or
suppressed in nature. In a series of experiments over three
successive field seasons in 2006, 2007, and 2008 in the natural
habitat of N. attenuata in the Great Basin Desert of Utah, we
assessed herbivore resistance in wild-type plants paired with
either ir-wrky3 or ir-wrky6 lines. In addition, heterozygous plants
that were silenced in both WRKY3 and WRKY6 were created by
crossing ir-wrky3 with ir-wrky6 plants; these so-called ir-wrky3/6
plants were planted with size-matched wild-type pairs during the
2007 and 2008 field seasons. Although only the results of the
WRKY Transcription Factors in Plant Defense
1989
Figure 3. Consecutively OS-Elicited WRKY-Silenced Plants Show Decreased JA and JA-Ile/-Leu Levels.
Mean (6SE) of JA ([A] and [B]) and JA-Ile/-Leu ([C] and [D]) concentrations in OS-elicited leaves of separate plants of the wild type (black), two ir-wrky3
lines (gray), and two ir-wrky6 lines (white).
(A) and (C) Leaves harvested 60 min after a single OS elicitation, during which one leaf with six rows of holes was treated with 20 mL of OS (n = 5/
genotype; * P < 0.05, as determined by Fisher’s PLSD test from ANOVA).
(B) and (D) Leaves harvested after multiple OS elicitations, whereby one leaf was wounded with one row of holes and 10 mL of OS was applied to the
wounds. Treatment was repeated six times every 30 min, and leaves were harvested 30 min after the last elicitation (n = 5/genotype; * P < 0.05, as
determined by Fisher’s PLSD test from ANOVA).
2007 season are presented, the results obtained in the 2006 and
2008 were very similar to these results (see Supplemental Figure
7 online).
Phytohormone Concentrations in Field-Grown Plants
In the field, we first performed a simulated herbivory test on
plants that were pre-elicited by exposure to the natural environment. When the plant pairs had grown in the field for 30 d, we
elicited them with a single application of OS and harvested
leaves both before and 1, 3, and 24 h after OS elicitation. Analysis
of JA concentrations revealed that 1 h after OS elicitation irwrky3, ir-wrky6, and ir-wrky3/6 plants were significantly impaired
in their ability to produce a JA burst (;40% of the wild-type
levels; ANOVA Fisher’s PLSD, P = 0.0098, 0.0038, and 0.0074,
respectively; Figure 4A). In addition, the constitutive JA levels
measured just before OS elicitation revealed that plants silenced
in either WRKY3 or WRKY6, or both, contained only 10 to 20% of
the levels of JA in wild-type plants (ANOVA Fisher’s PLSD, P =
0.0002, 0.0008, and 0.0024, respectively). Like the phytohormone analysis, real-time quantitative RT-PCR analysis revealed
that the relative abundance of transcripts of LOX3, which encode
the key enzyme in JA biosynthesis, was significantly reduced in
ir-wrky3, ir-wrky6, and ir-wrky3/6 plants (Figure 4A; ANOVA
Fisher’s PLSD, P = 0.0039, 0.0023, and 0.0005, respectively).
Similar results were obtained for AOS, AOC, and OPR3 transcript levels, which were also reduced in WRKY-silenced lines
(Figure 4A).
Until now, no specific differences between WRKY3- and
WRKY6-silenced plants had been found. However, when the
JA-Ile/-Leu pools from OS-elicited field-grown plants were analyzed, plants silenced in WRKY3 or in both transcription factors
were impaired in the accumulation of JA-Ile/-Leu (ANOVA
Fisher’s PLSD, P = 0.0071 and 0.0018; respectively; Figure
4B), whereas plants lacking WRKY6 produced close to normal
levels of JA-Ile/-Leu (ANOVA Fisher’s PLSD, P = 0.3562; Figure
4B) 1 h after OS elicitation. The constitutive levels of JA-Ile/-Leu
in the field were also significantly lower in ir-wrky3 and ir-wrky3/6
plants; these contained ;80% of the JA-Ile/-Leu (ANOVA
Fisher’s PLSD, P = 0.0190 and 0.0425, respectively) found in
ir-wrky6 and wild-type plants (ANOVA Fisher’s PLSD, P =
0.9186). The reduced JA-Ile/-Leu accumulation in ir-wrky3 and
ir-wrky3/6 plants was not due to the regulation of transcript levels
of JA–amino acid synthetase JAR4 (Figure 4B) or Ile biosynthesisinvolved gene transcripts, Thr deaminase (TD; Figure 4B);
these transcripts were both similarly reduced in all WRKY-silenced
lines, including ir-wrky6, which had wild-type levels of JA-Ile/
-Leu.
1990
The Plant Cell
Figure 4. In Field-Grown Plants, Silencing WRKY3, WRKY6, or Both Reduces Constitutive and OS-Elicited Levels of JA.
(A) Mean (6SE) concentrations of JA in leaves of wild-type (solid line), ir-wrky3 (dashed line), ir-wrky6 (dotted line), and ir-wrky3/6 (dashed/dotted line)
plants grown in the Great Basin Desert in Utah after a single elicitation with OS. Mean (6SE) LOX3 transcript levels of wild-type (solid line), ir-wrky3
(dashed line), ir-wrky6 (dotted line), ir-wrky3/6 (dashed/dotted line) plants (n = 6/harvest and genotype). Mean (6 SE) of AOS, AOC, and OPR3 transcript
levels before (white) and 30 min after (black) OS elicitation (n = 6/harvest and genotype). Different letters reflect significant differences at P < 0.05 among
plants that underwent the same treatment. The transcripts were analyzed by real-time PCR.
(B) Mean (6SE) concentrations of JA-Ile/-Leu measured as above. Mean (6SE) of Na TD and Na JAR4 transcript levels before (white) and 60 min after
(black) OS elicitation (n = 6/harvest and genotype).
WRKY Transcription Factors in Plant Defense
Silencing WRKY3 and WRKY6 Impairs Both Direct and
Indirect Defenses and Increases Plants’ Susceptibility to
Herbivores in Nature
In glasshouse experiments, ir-wrky3 and ir-wrky6 plants were found
to be more susceptible to M. sexta larvae than were wild-type
plants. To determine whether WRKY3 and WRKY6 transcription
factors mediate resistance to other herbivores as well, we monitored herbivore damage on plants from WRKY-silenced lines and
on wild-type plants in the natural environment. Although the growth
of ir-wrky6, ir-wrky3, and ir-wrky3/6 plants was indistinguishable
from that of pairwise planted wild-type plants, all transformed
plants were heavily attacked by Trimerotropis spp grasshoppers
(Figure 5A; ANOVA Fisher’s PLSD, P = 0.0194, 0.0040, and 0.0465;
respectively) and Tupiocoris notatus mirids (Figure 5A; ANOVA
Fisher’s PLSD, P = 0.0157, 0.0039, and 0.051, respectively), the two
most abundant herbivores on N. attenuata at the time.
In the glasshouse, the plants exposed to M. sexta herbivory
showed lower levels of direct defense-related TPI transcripts and
less TPI protein activity compared with wild-type plants (Figure
2E). In the field, the TPI protein activity of ir-wrky3, ir-wrky6, and irwrky3/6 OS-elicited plants was 45 to 55% lower than that of wildtype plants (Figure 5B; ANOVA Fisher’s PLSD, P < 0.05). In
addition, levels of diterpene glycosides (DTGs), which have been
shown to reduce larval growth in tobacco budworm and to reduce
consumption of M. sexta larvae (Jassbi et al., 2006, 2008), were
also significantly lower in WRKY-silenced plants compared with
wild-type plants (Figure 5B; ANOVA Fisher’s PLSD, P < 0.05).
The release of volatile organic compounds (VOCs), which function as effective indirect defenses in nature by attracting Geocoris
pallens predators to herbivore-attacked plants (Kessler and
Baldwin, 2001), is activated by a JA burst (Halitschke and Baldwin,
2003). Because the JA burst was not as strong in the field-grown
WRKY-silenced lines, we examined whether the OS-elicited VOC
bouquet of wild-type plants differs from that of WRKY-silenced
plants. The most active OS-elicited N. attenuata sesquiterpene
known to attract predators is cis-a-bergamotene (Kessler and
Baldwin, 2001). We used a whole-plant trapping system to determine the total amount of cis-a-bergamotene and C6-volatiles
(green leaf volatiles) released from the induced plants. VOCs
released from wild-type and WRKY-silenced plants 24 h after OS
elicitation were collected over an 8-h period and measured by gas
chromatography–mass spectrometry. After plants that had been
exposed to natural herbivores were elicited once with OS, the
emission of cis-a-bergamotene was lower in all three transformed
lines, ir-wrky3, ir-wrky6, and ir-wrky3/6, than in wild-type plants
(Figure 5B; ANOVA Fisher’s PLSD, P < 0.0001, < 0.0001, and
< 0.0001, respectively). In contrast with levels of the sesquiterpene,
bergamotene, levels of green leaf volatile cis-3-hexenol emitted by
WRKY plants upon OS elicitation were not significantly different
from those emitted by wild-type plants (Figure 5B).
We assumed that the abnormal herbivore loads and damage
suffered by WRKY-silenced plants resulted from both impaired
direct defenses (as demonstrated above) and the inability of
these plants to recruit predatory insects by releasing cis-abergamotene after being attacked. To estimate the role of
indirect defenses in herbivore susceptibility, we glued M. sexta
eggs to wild-type and WRKY-silenced plants and measured the
1991
rate at which Manduca eggs were predated (Figure 5A). Predation rates of eggs placed on ir-wrky3, ir-wrky6, and ir-wrky3/6
plants were determined in the habitats used previously to monitor herbivore-induced damage. Predation of M. sexta eggs
began immediately after OS elicitation (and cis-a-bergamotene
emission); 36 h later, the predation rates on ir-wrky3, ir-wrky6,
and ir-wrky3/6 plants were significantly lower than those on wildtype plants (Figure 5A; ANOVA Fisher’s PLSD, P < 0.0001,
< 0.0001, and < 0.0001, respectively). All predated eggs carried
the characteristic signature of attack from G. pallens, namely, a
small puncture hole through which the contents had been emptied.
Exogenous Application of JA Complements
WRKY Phenotypes
Overall, WRKY3 and WRKY6 seem to contribute to mounting
increased levels of herbivore resistance by regulating JA levels
and/or JA-dependent direct and indirect defenses. To determine
whether impaired resistance to herbivores and compromised
defenses in WRKY-silenced plants could be primarily due to
lower JA levels (Figures 2D, 3B, and 4A), we treated plants with
JA in the field and in the glasshouse. First, we treated leaves of
field-grown plants with OS that had been supplemented with
synthetic JA. This direct JA complementation restored TPI
activity levels in ir-wrky3, ir-wrky6, and ir-wrky3/6 plants to the
levels observed in wild-type plants (Figure 6A). In addition, the
levels of cis-a-bergamotene released from OS-elicited ir-wrky3,
ir-wrky6, and ir-wrky3/6 plants were restored by JA treatment to
the levels released from wild-type plants (Figure 6B), implying
that lower JA levels in WRKY-silenced plants were responsible
for lower OS-elicited direct and indirect defenses.
In the field experiments, ir-wrky3 and ir-wrky3/6 plants were
impaired in JA-Ile/-Leu accumulation. In similar glasshouse JA
complementation experiments, both ir-wrky3 and ir-wrky3/6
lines were found to have delayed JA-Ile bursts, suggesting that
these plants indeed possess lower conjugation capacity compared with wild-type or ir-wrky6 plants (Figure 6D). These results
suggest that WRKY3 may play role in activating the JAR4
enzyme or regulating the transcription of an unknown JA conjugating enzyme in N. attenuata (Figure 7).
Next, we sprayed wild-type, ir-wrky3, ir-wrky6, and ir-wrky3/6
rosette-stage plants in the glasshouse with a 1 mM JA solution
(dissolved in 30% ethanol) and examined how M. sexta performed on them. In a control experiment, M. sexta larvae that fed
on plants sprayed with an equivalent amount of 30% ethanol
(used to suspend JA) retained their accelerated growth rates on
ir-wrky3, ir-wrky6, and ir-wrky3/6 compared with wild-type plants
(inset in Figure 6C), essentially as observed before in unsprayed
plants (Figure 2C). However, the caterpillars that fed on WRKYdeficient plants sprayed with JA had the same low growth rates
as caterpillars that fed on wild-type plants (Figure 6C), demonstrating that the levels of direct defenses in WRKY-deficient
plants were restored to normal levels.
DISCUSSION
We describe two WRKY transcription factors from N. attenuata
that are differentially regulated during herbivore attack; both
1992
The Plant Cell
Figure 5. WRKY-Silenced Plants Have Impaired Direct and Indirect Defenses and Are Highly Susceptible to N. attenuata’s Native Herbivore
Community When Transplanted into Their Native Habitat.
WRKY Transcription Factors in Plant Defense
factors play essential roles in the resistance of tobacco plants to
herbivores. Plants silenced in the expression of their WRKY3 and
WRKY6 genes are significantly more vulnerable to herbivores in
the glasshouse and in nature. We show that direct and indirect
defense strategies are strongly compromised in plants in which
WRKY3- and WRKY6-dependent transcriptional control of gene
expression has been suppressed.
Transcription of N. attenuata WRKY Genes
WRKY transcription factors that are involved in regulating various
plant-specific responses, including pathogen defense, senescence, trichome development, and the biosynthesis of secondary metabolites, are often functionally redundant, complicating
analysis of these genes (Ulker and Somssich, 2004; Zhang and
Wang, 2005). Two WRKY genes isolated from N. attenuata
contain highly conserved WRKY domains in their protein sequence; however, other parts of the proteins show significantly
less similarity, suggesting that the functions of these proteins do
not overlap. Indeed, the phenotypic similarity we found between
ir-wrky3 and ir-wrky6 plants is due to the function of WRKY3,
which is required to activate WRKY6 transcription. In other
words, plants deficient in WRKY3 are also deficient in WRKY6
accumulation, resulting in a common phenotype that is determined by the downstream gene product of WRKY6 (Figure 7).
Two previously reported defense-related genes from N. tabacum that have strong similarity to N. attenuata WRKY3 and
WRKY6 genes, Nt WRKY2 and Nt WRKY1, rapidly respond to
wounding and treatment with fungal elicitors (Nishiuchi et al.,
2004; Yamamoto et al., 2004). Molecular analysis of the recombinant proteins showed that these proteins bind specifically to
the W-box sequence found in the promoter of tobacco class I
basic chitinase gene CHN48; this promoter was also transactivated in transient expression assays with N. tabacum WRKY1,
WRKY2, and WRKY4 proteins. In addition, the efficiency of the
transactivation process was further enhanced in elicitor-treated
cells, suggesting that the proteins were posttranslationally modified in response to elicitor-derived signals.
Positioning WRKY Genes in the Defense Cascade
We found that neither of the N. attenuata WRKY genes is
transcriptionally induced by JAs. Thus, these genes may function
in herbivore defense downstream of the hypothetical FAC receptor in plants and upstream of the JA signal (Figure 7).
Recently, two wound- and FAC-elicited mitogen-activated pro-
1993
tein kinases (MAPKs), salicylic acid–induced protein kinase
(SIPK) and wound-induced protein kinase (WIPK), were characterized in N. attenuata (Wu et al., 2007). Plants whose SIPK or
WIPK was silenced by virus-induced gene silencing had diminished JA and JA-Ile/-Leu bursts and lower levels of JA biosynthetic gene transcripts as well as lower WRKY6 transcript levels
(Wu et al., 2007). Given the similarity in phenotypes and the
dependence of WRKY6 gene transcription on SIPK and WIPK,
we propose that WRKY3 and WRKY6 transcriptionally activate JA biosynthesis and downstream defenses in a MAPKdependent manner. The obvious targets of N. attenuata WRKY3
and WRKY6 are the JA-biosynthetic genes, including LOX3,
AOS, AOC, and OPR3, which are essential for JA accumulation
after wounding and herbivore attack (Halitschke and Baldwin,
2003; Figure 4A). Accumulation of these transcripts was lower in
field-grown plants silenced in WRKY expression; however, it is
still unknown whether WRKY proteins directly regulate the transcription of these genes or if they use another transcription factor
(s) to interact with their promoters.
Are WRKY Genes Targets of MAPKs?
The activation of several WRKY transcription factors is known to
be regulated posttranslationally by phosphorylation (Ulker and
Somssich, 2004). For example, N. tabacum WRKY1 (accession
number AAD16138), which is structurally different from the
tobacco WRKY1 gene described by Nishiuchi et al. (2004)
(accession number BAA82107), is phosphorylated by SIPK;
this process in turn enhances WRKY1 DNA binding activity to
its cognate binding site, a W-box sequence from the tobacco
chitinase gene CHN50 (Menke et al., 2005). In addition, the
closest Arabidopsis relative to N. attenuata WRKY3 and WRKY6
genes, pathogen-, SA- and ethylene-responsive WRKY33
(Rushton et al., 2002), is phosphorylated by MAP kinase 4
(MPK4). Because WRKY33 also interacts with the MKS1 protein,
MKS1 is thought to help couple the kinase to the WRKY33
transcription factor during defense activation (Andreasson et al.,
2005). Interestingly, MPK4 functions to regulate hormone crosstalk and systemic acquired resistance in Arabidopsis plants: it is
required both to repress SA-dependent resistance and to activate JA-dependent defense gene expression (Petersen et al.,
2000). The involvement of MAPKs in regulating JA and herbivore
defense (Wu et al., 2007) and the dependence of pathogen
resistance on the same MAPK cascade (Seo et al., 2007) may
facilitate crosstalk between plant defenses against pathogens
and herbivores and two main phytohormone signals, SA and JA
Figure 5. (continued).
(A) Mean (6SE) percentage canopy area damaged by grasshoppers (Trimerotropis ssp) observed on pairs of wild-type plants (white) paired with irwrky3, ir-wrky6, or ir-wrky3/6 (black) plants. Mean (6SE) canopy damage caused by mirids (T. notatus). Mean (6SE) percentage of M. sexta eggs
predated per wild-type plant (solid line), ir-wrky3 (dashed line), ir-wrky6 (dotted line), or ir-wrky3/6 (dashed/dotted line) plants grown in Utah. Predation
rates were monitored before and after elicitation with OS. Five eggs were glued on the second stem leaf of each plant (inset), and predation rates from G.
pallens were monitored for 24 h before and for 36 h after OS elicitation.
(B) Mean (6SE) of TPI activity levels in leaves from wild-type plants (black) or from lines silenced in WRKY3 (dark gray), WRKY6 (light gray), or both (open)
3 d after plants growing in the field were elicited with OS (n = 6). Different letters reflect significant differences at P < 0.05 from wild-type plants that were
treated similarly. Mean (6SE) DTG levels. Mean (6SE) emissions of cis-a-bergamotene 24 h after OS elicitation trapped over an 8-h period. Mean (6SE)
emission of cis-3-hexenol. C6-compounds were trapped over an 8-h period from plants treated with wounding and OS.
1994
The Plant Cell
Figure 6. Impaired Direct and Indirect Defenses Are Restored by Applying JA, and Plants Silenced in WRKY3 Are Delayed in JA-Ile Conjugation.
(A) Mean (6SE) of TPI activity measured after plants were elicited with JA-supplemented OS (10 mg/mL, n = 6) and harvested 3 d later.
(B) Mean (6SE) emissions of cis-a-bergamotene from wild-type plants (black), lines silenced in WRKY3 (dark gray), WRKY6 (light gray), or both (open)
24 h after plants were treated with JA-supplemented OS (10 mg/mL).
(C) Larval mass of M. sexta that fed on wild-type plants (solid line), WRKY3 (dashed line), WRKY6 (dotted line), and WRKY3/6-silenced (dashed/dotted
line) glasshouse-grown plants sprayed with 1 mM JA solution (diluted in 30% ethanol) (+JA; n = 12) or sprayed with 30% ethanol as control (inset; mock,
n = 12)
(D) Mean (6SE) of JA-Ile conjugation after adding both exogenous JA (0.625 mmol) and Ile (0.625 mmol) to the OS in the greenhouse (n = 4, * P < 0.05, as
determined by Fisher’s PLSD test from ANOVA).
(Li et al., 2004, 2006; Qiu et al., 2007). Divergence of signaling
pathways after the MAPK level probably involves specific transcription factors, including members of the WRKY family.
Overexpressing WRKY Genes Does Not Produce a
Defense Phenotype
The ectopic overexpression of WRKY3 and WRKY6 transcription
factors in our experiments did not result in the expected constitutive defense phenotype. Specific posttranslational modification
(s) of WRKY proteins, including phosphorylation by MAPKs (Ulker
and Somssich, 2004), during defense elicitation may be required
to mediate downstream responses. The presence of transcriptional complexes consisting of several WRKY proteins and other
scaffold proteins (such as MKS1) may also be required for WRKY3
and WRKY6 to function in planta. Several examples of such
interactions have been reported in the literature: WRKY71 and
WRKY51 proteins interact when the a-amylase gene is repressed
in rice aleurone cells (Xie et al., 2006), and pathogen-induced
Arabidopsis WRKY18, WRKY40, and WRKY60 transcription factors interact in pathogen defense (Xu et al., 2006). Understanding
the posttranslational modifications and interactions of N. attenuata WRKY proteins will make it easier to determine the molecular
function of these proteins in herbivore defense.
Alternatively, WRKY transcripts in wild-type plants accumulate
within 30 min after their first encounter with herbivores (Figures
1B and 1C). This could mean that the plants ectopically overexpressing WRKY genes gain only very limited time advantage
from having the transcripts, while efficient herbivore defense
responses take at least several hours to launch. The short time
WRKY Transcription Factors in Plant Defense
Figure 7. Proposed Function and Inferred Relative Position of the Two
N. attenuata WRKY Transcription Factors in the Defense Signaling
Cascade against Herbivores.
Two N. attenuata WRKY transcription factors regulate transcript accumulation of JA biosynthesis genes. The JA derivate JA-Ile regulates
direct and indirect defenses in tobacco plants. WRKY3 transcription
factor is required for transcript accumulation of the WRKY6 gene, and
both genes are under the control of MAPK signaling cascade, herbivoryspecific signals, wounding, and herbivore elicitors (FACs).
advantage of WRKY-overexpressing lines may be too short to be
translated into a stronger defense response.
Using Gene Silencing to Understand the Role of WRKY3 and
WRKY6 in Defense
To understand the ecological role of WRKY regulatory proteins,
we used gene silencing in combination with bioassays and field
releases; these techniques allowed us to monitor a large range of
responses and interactions between various stress factors,
including pathogens, herbivores, and abiotic stress, in a single
experimental design (Baldwin, 2001). We performed parallel
experiments with WRKY-silenced plants in the glasshouse and
at our experimental station in the Great Basin Desert in Utah
using M. sexta and natural populations of herbivores (including
Manduca quinquemaculata), respectively. In the field, ir-wrky3
and ir-wrky6 plants were morphologically indistinguishable from
wild-type plants; however, silencing WRKY3 and WRKY6 genes
impaired the deployment of both direct and indirect defenses,
thus making these plants more susceptible to herbivores in
nature. As the field data showed, several novel phenotypic
differences appeared when plants were grown in their natural
habitat and highlight the value of studying highly pleiotropic
responses, such as resistance traits, in natural environments.
JA Metabolism in Field-Grown WRKY-Silenced Plants
JA and JA-Ile/-Leu bursts in field-grown plants were different
among ir-wrky3, ir-wrky6, and wild-type plants. In the controlled
1995
glasshouse environment, the phytohormone burst in inexperienced ir-wrky plants was identical to the burst in wild-type plants
after a single OS elicitation (Figures 3A and 3C). However, in the
field-grown plants that were silenced in WRKY3 or WRKY6
expression, we observed smaller JA bursts after OS elicitation
than in wild-type plants (Figure 4A), which was similar to multiply
elicited glasshouse-grown plants (Figures 3B and 3D). The additional differences in JA-Ile/-Leu levels observed in ir-wrky3 plants
suggest that WRKY3 and WRKY6 genes, despite their common
phenotype, affect JA metabolism differently. We confirmed the
differences found in JA-Ile/-Leu concentrations in the field after
OS elicitation in a separate laboratory experiment using glasshouse plants that were simultaneously elicited with OS and
exogenous JA (the latter to mimic the plant’s prior history of
attack in the field). Such treatment again resulted in lower levels of
JA-Ile/-Leu in ir-wrky3 plants compared with wild-type or ir-wrky6
plants. At present, we are analyzing the role of both WRKY genes
in JA-Ile/-Leu formation and in the WRKY-mediated responses; in
particular, we ask why ir-wrky6 plants that accumulate wild-type
levels of JA-Ile/-Leu still show impaired defense responses. JAIle/-Leu is believed to be the form of JA that mediates the
degradation of JAZ repressors and activates most defense genes
at the transcriptional level (Chini et al., 2007; Thines et al., 2007).
We are exploring two working hypotheses: that WRKY3 controls
the expression of JA-conjugating enzymes and that WRKY6
interacts with the signaling pathway downstream of JA-Ile. Interestingly, N. attenuata plants silenced in their expression of the
COI1 gene show normal or even increased levels of JA-Ile/-Leu,
despite their low levels of elicited JA (Paschold et al., 2008). It
suggests that WRKY6 may interact with JA signaling at the level of
the COI1 protein; however, in contrast with true COI1 mutants, this
deficiency can be restored by exogenously applied JA and supraoptimal levels of JA-Ile (Figures 6A to 6D).
The Priming Effect of N. attenuata WRKY3 and
WRKY6 Genes
The fact that treatment with JA restored the expression of
defenses that were impaired in both WRKY-silenced lines suggests that impaired accumulation of JA and its metabolites in
these plants was primarily responsible. However, the JA burst in
glasshouse-grown plants after a single OS elicitation did not
differ significantly between ir-wrky and wild-type plants. The
differences in JA content and subsequently compromised defenses appeared only when plants were exposed to (1) natural
stresses, (2) continuous feeding by M. sexta larvae, or (3) repeated OS elicitations that closely mimicked herbivore feeding.
These findings suggest that the main function of WRKY3 and
WRKY6 genes might not be to elicit the primary JA burst but,
rather, to integrate and maintain JA levels and defense responses during prolonged herbivore attack. According to our
observations, the JA burst in N. attenuata elicited by a single OS
elicitation lasts on average 3 h, after which levels of JA and JAIle/-Leu return to their pre-elicitation levels (Kang et al., 2006).
How repeated elicitations, whose timing and duration vary due to
variable insect feeding behavior (Van Dam et al., 2001b), are
integrated to elicit cost-optimized defense responses in plants
remains largely unknown. We propose that N. attenuata WRKY
1996
The Plant Cell
genes, being elicited by wounding and FACs, help to coordinate
these defense signals generated from individual encounters with
herbivores, potentiating and/or sustaining optimal defense output. Consistent with this hypothesis, both constitutive JA levels
and the OS-elicited JA burst of field-grown WRKY-silenced plants
were found to be significantly smaller than these levels or this burst
in wild-type plants. Such a discrepancy could be viewed as the
failure of WRKY-deficient plants to integrate environmental signals
into an optimized defense response. Further experiments are now
being conducted that are aimed at finding the direct transcriptional
targets of WRKY3 and WRKY6 genes in native tobacco, which will
help to further establish the role of these genes in mediating
defense responses to herbivores.
METHODS
Isolation of WRKY3/6 cDNAs
WRKY3 and WRKY6 were isolated from cDNA libraries (lZAPll vector;
Stratagene) prepared from the leaves of Nicotiana attenuata plants fed on
by Manduca sexta for 24 h (Ziegler et al., 2001). We screened the library
using a WRKY fragment isolated from a DDRT-PCR (Hui et al., 2003) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Sequencing was conducted
using an ABI PRISM 377 automated sequencer (Applied Biosystems).
Clones were sequenced in both sense and antisense directions. Using
ClustalW (Multiple Sequence Alignment, http://align.genome.jp/), we
aligned protein sequences from WRKYs with at least some published
biological functions and constructed a neighbor-joining tree using MEGA
3.1 software (see Supplemental Figure 1A online).
Plant Culture in the Glasshouse and in the Field
Seeds of wild-type N. attenuata Torr. Ex Watts lines (synonymous with
Nicotiana torreyana Nelson and Macbr.; Solanaceae), originally collected
from a native population in southwestern Utah in 1988, were transformed
(see below) and used for all experiments. The same inbred generation of
seeds was used for the wild type and transformations.
For glasshouse experiments, seeds were germinated on sterile Gamborg B5 media (Sigma-Aldrich) and grown as described by Kruegel et al.
(2002) and Qu et al. (2004). For field experiments in 2006, plants were
transferred to 50 mm of peat pellets (Jiffy Products) after germinating in
Petri dishes on agar medium. Seedlings were gradually exposed to the
environmental conditions of the Great Basin Desert (high sun exposure
and low relative humidity) over 2 weeks and afterwards situated in two
different habitats: adapted seedlings of the same size were transplanted
to a field plot at the Lytle Ranch Preserve research station (Santa Clara,
UT) and into a natural population of N. attenuata growing in an area near
Santa Clara, UT, that had been burned by a wildfire in 2005. Seedlings
were watered every other day for 2 weeks until roots were established in
the native soil. Releases of the transformed plants were conducted under
APHIS notification number 06-003-08n.
In 2007, seeds were germinated directly in Jiffy 703 pots. These were
watered every other day over 2 weeks and fertilized with iron solution
(stock solution 2.78 g FeSO4·7 H2O and 3.93 g Triplex in 1 liter H2O, 100fold diluted). After 1 month, plants were transplanted into natural habitats
of N. attenuata in the Great Basin Desert. Wild-type and transformed
plants were placed in a watered field plot at the Lytle Ranch Preserve
research station in pairs. Releases of the transformed plants were
conducted under APHIS notification number 062424-03r. Experiments
in 2008 were conducted under APHIS notification numbers 06-242-02r
and 06-242-03r.
Nucleic Acid Analysis
The isolation of DNA and RNA and DNA gel blot analysis were performed
as described by Winz and Baldwin (2001). Blots were hybridized with
radioactively labeled WRKY3 or WRKY6 full-length cDNA or a PCR
fragment of the hygromycin phosphotransferase II gene specific for the
selective marker located on the T-DNA.
A quantitative real-time PCR assay was used to analyze the transcript
accumulation of WRKY3/6. Using TaqMan gene expression assay, specific amplicons for WRKY3 (WRKY3_F1, 59-CAGGATATGCAAATTCAGAGGATTC-39; WRKY3_R1, 59-ATTCAATTCAGCAGAGCAATGTG-39; and
WRKY3_P1, 59-AGCAAAGGACGAGCCTCGAGGTGACA-39) and WRKY6
(WRKY6_F1, 59-ACAAAACAAAGATGAAGTTCCAAAG-39; WRKY6_R1,
59-GGAGAAGCTGGTGATGAAGATG-39; and WRKY6_P1, 59-AAGTCATTTCCACCTTGTTCTTTGCCA-39) detecting only the endogenous transcript
were designed. Two additional set of primers were later used with the SYBR
Green detection system for WRKY3 (WRKY3_5prime_FWD, 59-CCAATTTGGACAATCTTTTGCATC-39; WRKY3_5prime_RVS, 59-TGCATAGTGTTGAATTCAGTTCTTCC-39) and WRKY6 (WRKY6_3prime_FWD, 59-TCGATGTAATTTATGATAGTTTTTGC-39; WRKY6_3prime_RVS, 59-CAAATATCTTAATGGGGAATTACAGC-39) detection of endogenous transcripts. As both
detection methods provided consistently similar results, only TaqMan data
are presented in the figures. LOX3, AOS, AOC, OPR3, JAR4, and JAR6
transcript levels were detected with primers as described by Paschold et al.
(2008).
Total RNA was isolated from four to five replicated wild-type plants, and
each of the transgenic lines from each treatment and time point and 66.6
ng of total RNA of each samples was used for cDNA synthesis with the
SuperScript first-strand synthesis system (Invitrogen). Real-time PCR
was performed on a SDS7700 system (Applied Biosystems) using the
qPCR core reagent kit for TaqMan and qPCR core kit for SYBR green
analysis, respectively (Eurogentec). N. attenuata sulfite reductase (ECI)
gene was used as an internal standard for normalizing cDNA concentration variations (Wang et al., 2007b).
Generation and Characterization of Transgenic Plants
Plants overexpressing WRKY3 and WRKY6 were generated by cloning
full-length PCR-amplified cDNA fragments of WRKY3 (ov-WRKY3) and
WRKY6 (ov-WRKY6) in a pRESC2 transformation vector after a constitutive 35S cauliflower mosaic virus promoter (see Supplemental Figures
3A and 3B online). Plants were transformed and screened for single
T-DNA inserts by DNA gel blotting (see Supplemental Figures 3C and 3D
online).
To generate stably transformed plants silenced in their expression of
WRKY3, a 1-kb cDNA fragment of WRKY3 was PCR amplified using the
primer sets of WRKY5-33 (59-GCGGCGCCATGGCTCGAGGCTCGTCCTTTGCTC-39), WRKY6-33 (59-GCGGCGCTGCAGCTCAGAGCAATGGTGGGAACC-39), and WRKY7-30 (59-GCGGCGGAGCTCAGAGCAATGGTGGGAACC-39) and was cloned in an inverted-repeat orientation
(ir-wrky3) in a pSOL3 transformation vector (see Supplemental Figure
5A online) as described by Bubner et al. (2006) to silence the gene. In the
case of WRKY6, a 1-kb cDNA fragment of WRKY6 was amplified with the
primers WRKY8-34 (59-GCGGCGCCATGGCGAATACAATGAATTGAGATGG-39), WRKY10-34 (59-GCGGCGCTCGAGCGAATACAATGAATTGAGATGG-39), and WRKY9-21 (59-GGAAATATGGGCAGAAGCAAG-39),
and PCR products were also cloned in an inverted-repeat orientation (irwrky6) in a pSOL3 transformation vector (see Supplemental Figure 5B
online) using respective restriction sites or blunt-ended DNA fragments
(Bubner et al., 2006).
Plant transformation using Agrobacterium tumefaciens was performed
as described by Kruegel et al. (2002). Progeny of homozygous lines
harboring a single T-DNA insertion were selected by hygromycin resistance screening, confirmed by DNA gel blotting (see Supplemental
WRKY Transcription Factors in Plant Defense
Figures 5C and 5D online) and determined to be diploid by flow cytometry
(Bubner et al., 2006). T2 and T3 homozygous plants from two homozygous lines, which accumulated low basal and OS-elicited levels of
WRKY3 and WRKY6 transcripts (Figures 2A and 2B), were used for
subsequent analysis and creation of the double-silenced heterozygous
plant. The impact of silencing WRKY3 and WRKY6 on other independent
WRKY genes was assessed by measuring the transcript levels of five
other independent WRKY genes in ir-wrky3, ir-wrky6, and ir-wrky3/6
plants. The transcripts of these genes were not influenced, suggesting
that silencing constructs were specific for WRKY3 and WRKY6 genes
(see Supplemental Figure 8 online).
1997
silencing WRKYs on herbivore-induced indirect defense, we conducted
an egg predation assay specifically designed to measure the ability of N.
attenuata’s herbivore-induced VOCs to attract the dominant predator of
N. attenuata herbivores, Geocoris pallens, as previously described
(Kessler and Baldwin, 2001). Five M. sexta eggs were glued on the
second stem leaf using a natural glue that is known to have no effect on
predation rates or on plants’ VOC emissions (Kessler and Baldwin, 2001).
Seven replicate wild-type and ir-wrky3 plant pairs and seven wild-type
and ir-wrky6 plant pairs were used in this experiment in 2006 and six pairs,
a wild-type and a transformed plant, in 2007. The number of M. sexta eggs
predated was measured before elicitation and after the first stem leaf was
OS elicited.
Plant Treatments in the Glasshouse
For the kinetic analysis of WRKY expression in wild-type plants, five
individual plants (biological replicates) were used at each harvest time for
each treatment. Rosette-stage plants were randomly assigned to treatments. Leaves at nodes +1 and +2 (first and second fully expanded) were
elicited. A fabric pattern wheel was used to create six rows of puncture
wounds parallel to the midrib. Twenty microliters of deionized water or M.
sexta OS (diluted in 1:1 deionized water) from fourth- or fifth-instar larvae
(for the treatment referred to as OS-elicited) or an OS equivalent concentration of a synthetic mixture of the two most abundant FACs in M.
sexta OS, N-linolenoyl-L-glutamine and N-linolenoyl-L-glutamate (0.012
mM N-linolenoyl-L-glutamine and 0.034 mM N-linolenoyl-L-glutamate,
synthesized in-house), were immediately added to the puncture wounds.
Nonwounded plants were treated with 150 mg methyl jasmonate in 20 mL
of lanolin paste, which was applied to lamina of the leaves. The treated
leaves or those at the next youngest positions (leaves at nodes 0 and 21)
were harvested 0, 15, 30, 60, 120, 240, and 480 min after treatment and
frozen in liquid nitrogen. Samples from the plants treated with FACs were
harvested only until 60 min after elicitation.
To examine the effects of silencing WRKY3 or WRKY6 on the accumulation of JA and JA-Ile/-Leu at the site of attack from M. sexta larvae,
neonates were placed on each of six replicate plants from each genotype
and harvest, two each at leaf nodes +2, +1, 0, and 21, and enclosed in
clip cages. Leaf tissue from within 2 cm of the feeding edge was collected
22 and 30 h after plants were infested with larvae. For the standardized
elicitation of phytohormone accumulation, leaves at node +2 from plants
at the rosette stage were OS elicited. The accumulation of JA and JAIle/-Leu was monitored 60 min after a single elicitation (one leaf elicited
with six rows of holes and immediately treated with 20 mL of OS) and a
multiple elicitation (six consecutive OS elicitations involving one leaf
wounded with one row of holes to which 10 mL of OS was applied every 30
min for six times and harvested 30 min after the last elicitation). Identical
nonelicited leaves were also harvested as controls.
Analysis of Herbivore Susceptibility in the Glasshouse and in
the Field
In the glasshouse, M. sexta larvae were monitored on the stably transformed lines. M. sexta eggs were purchased from North Carolina State
University. To examine how M. sexta performed on WRKY-overexpressed
lines and WRKY-silenced lines and compare how they performed on wildtype plants in the glasshouse, we enclosed neonates on node +2 leaves
and allowed the caterpillars to feed. Each caterpillar was weighed on days
4, 6, and 8 (and 10).
In the field, we observed the abundance of naturally occurring herbivores and the particular damage they caused to 23 pairs of wild-type and
ir-wrky6 lines and to eight pairs of wild-type and ir-wrky3 lines in 2006 as
well as to six to eight pairs of ir-wrky3, ir-wrky6, and ir-wrky3/6 lines in
2007, respectively. Plants were monitored starting 21 d after they were
transplanted into the field in 2006 and 50 d after being transplanted in
2007, depending on environmental conditions. To examine the effect of
Analysis of Direct and Indirect Defense Traits
To analyze secondary metabolites and TPI activity, all of which are known
to be regulated by M. sexta attack, elicited leaf tissue was harvested 72 h
after continuous feeding by M. sexta or after OS elicitation; the accumulation of secondary metabolites (nicotine and DTGs) was analyzed by
high-performance liquid chromatography as described by Keinanen et al.
(2001). TPI activity was analyzed by the radial diffusion assay described
by Van Dam et al. (2001a).
In 2006, terpenoid VOCs were trapped from individual leaves of fieldgrown plants 24 h after OS elicitation. In the next season, whole plants
were used to collect sesquiterpenes and C6-volatiles (green leaf volatiles). The VOCs released from treated leaves or whole plants were
trapped for 8 h using charcoal traps (OrboM32; Supelco). The traps were
spiked with 80 ng of tetraline as an internal standard and eluted with 500
mL dichloromethane. Samples were analyzed by gas chromatography–
mass spectrometry as described by Halitschke et al. (2000).
Analysis of Phytohormone Accumulation
Approximately 300 mg of tissues from each sample was homogenized on
a FastPrep homogenizer (Thermo Electron) with 1 mL of ethyl acetate
spiked with 200 ng of 1,2-13C-JA, paracoumaric acid and D4-SA as
internal standards in the FastPrep tubes. After centrifugation at maximum
speed for 10 min at 48C, the supernatants were transferred to fresh 2-mL
Eppendorf tubes, and the pellet was re-extracted with 1 mL of ethyl
acetate and centrifuged. The supernatants were combined and evaporated completely on a vacuum concentrator. The residue was resuspended in 0.5 mL of 70% methanol (v/v) and centrifuged at maximum
speed for 1 min. The supernatants were then used to analyze JA and
JA-Ile/-Leu with a 1200L Varian liquid chromatography–triple-quadrupole-mass spectrometry system (Varian). Fifteen microliters of each
sample was injected into a Pursuit C8 column (3 mm, 150 3 2 mm; Varian)
at a flow rate of 0.1 mL/min. A gradient of mobile phase composed of
solvent A (0.05% formic acid) and solvent B (0. 05% formic acid in
methanol) was used for separation, and a negative electrospray ionization
mode was used for detection. Ions with mass-to-charge ratios at 209, 211,
322, and 163 generated from endogenous JA, internal JA standard,
JA-Ile/-Leu conjugates, and paracoumaric acid in the ion source were
collected and fragmented with a collision energy of 12 V. Since JA-Ile and
JA-Leu have the same molecular mass and retention time, our liquid
chromatography–triple-quadrupole-tandem mass spectrometry method
was not able to distinguish the two, as described by Wang et al. (2007b).
Accession Numbers
Sequence data from this article can be found in the Arabidopsis Genome
Initiative or GenBank/EMBL databases under accession numbers
AY456271 (Na WRKY3) and AY456272 (Na WRKY6) (see Supplemental
Figure 1 online).
1998
The Plant Cell
Supplemental Data
The following materials are available in the online version of this article.
Supplemental Figure 1. Plant WRKY Gene Family: Phylogenetic
Relationships, Biological Function, and Elicitors of Selected WRKY
Genes.
Supplemental Figure 2. JA Signaling Does Not Influence WRKY
Transcript Accumulation.
Supplemental Figure 3. Plant Transformation Vector pRESC2 and
DNA Gel Blot Analysis of Overexpressing ov-WRKY3 and ov-WRKY6
Lines.
Supplemental Figure 4. Ectopic Overexpression of WRKY3 or
WRKY6 Does Not Change M. sexta Performance or Levels of
Jasmonic Acid and JA-Ile/-Leu.
Supplemental Figure 5. Plant Transformation Vector pSOL3 and
DNA Gel Blot Analysis of Inverted-Repeat WRKY3 (ir-wrky3) and
Inverted-Repeat WRKY6 (ir-wrky6) Lines.
Supplemental Figure 6. Silencing WRKY3, WRKY6, or Both Does
Not Alter Plants’ Physiology.
Supplemental Figure 7. WRKY-Silenced Plants Are Highly Susceptible to N. attenuata’s Native Herbivore Community When Transplanted into a Native Habitat in 2006 and 2008.
Supplemental Figure 8. Expression Pattern of Five Other WRKY
Genes Is Not Altered in ir-wrky3– and ir-wrky6–Silenced Plants.
Supplemental Data Set 1. Alignment Used to Generate Supplemental Figure 1.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This work was funded by the Max-Planck-Gesellschaft. We thank K.
Gase, T. Hahn, S. Kutschbach, T. Krügel, and the glasshouse team for
invaluable assistance with the experiments as well as E. Rothe, M.
Schöttner, and N. Heinzel for technical assistance. For the help with the
field work and volatile experiments, we thank D. Kessler, C. Diezel,
E. Körner, M. Schuman, and G. Rayapuram as well as Brigham Young
University for use of the Lytle Ranch Preserve field station and USDAAPHIS for constructive regulatory oversight of the release of genetically
modified organisms.
Received February 6, 2008; revised June 17, 2008; accepted July 6, 2008;
published July 18, 2008.
REFERENCES
Agrawal, A.A. (2001). Ecology - Phenotypic plasticity in the interactions
and evolution of species. Science 294: 321–326.
Andreasson, E., (2005). The MAP kinase substrate MKS1 is a regulator
of plant defense responses. EMBO J. 24: 2579–2589.
Baldwin, I.T. (2001). An ecologically motivated analysis of plant-herbivore
interactions in native tobacco. Plant Physiol. 127: 1449–1458.
Bubner, B., Gase, K., Berger, B., Link, D., and Baldwin, I.T. (2006).
Occurrence of tetraploidy in Nicotiana attenuata plants after Agrobacterium-mediated transformation is genotype specific but independent of polysomaty of explant tissue. Plant Cell Rep. 25: 668–675.
Chini, A., Fonseca, S., Fernandez, G., Adie, B., Chico, J.M., Lorenzo,
O., Garcia-Casado, G., Lopez-Vidriero, I., Lozano, F.M., Ponce, M.
R., Micol, J.L., and Solano, R. (2007). The JAZ family of repressors is
the missing link in jasmonate signalling. Nature 448: 666–671.
Chuio, T., et al. (2007). Involvement of the elicitor-induced gene
OsWRKY53 in the expression of defense-related genes in rice.
Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1769: 497–505.
De Moraes, C.M., Lewis, W.J., Pare, P.W., Alborn, H.T., and
Tumlinson, J.H. (1998). Herbivore-infested plants selectively attract
parasitoids. Nature 393: 570–573.
Dicke, M., and Sabelis, M.W. (1988). How plants obtain predatory
mites as bodyguards. Neth. J. Zool. 38: 148–165.
Eulgem, T. (2006). Dissecting the WRKY web of plant defense regulators. PLoS Pathog. 2: 1028–1030.
Eulgem, T., and Somssich, I.E. (2007). Networks of WRKY transcription factors in defense signaling. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 10: 366–371.
Halitschke, R., and Baldwin, I.T. (2003). Antisense LOX expression
increases herbivore performance by decreasing defense responses
and inhibiting growth-related transcriptional reorganization in Nicotiana attenuata. Plant J. 36: 794–807.
Halitschke, R., Kessler, A., Kahl, J., Lorenz, A., and Baldwin, I.T.
(2000). Ecophysiological comparison of direct and indirect defenses in
Nicotiana attenuata. Oecologia 124: 408–417.
Halitschke, R., Schittko, U., Pohnert, G., Boland, W., and Baldwin, I.
T. (2001). Molecular interactions between the specialist herbivore
Manduca sexta (Lepidoptera, Sphingidae) and its natural host Nicotiana attenuata. III. Fatty acid-amino acid conjugates in herbivore oral
secretions are necessary and sufficient for herbivore-specific plant
responses. Plant Physiol. 125: 711–717.
Heil, M., and Baldwin, I.T. (2002). Fitness costs of induced resistance:
Emerging experimental support for a slippery concept. Trends Plant
Sci. 7: 61–67.
Heil, M., Koch, T., Hilpert, A., Fiala, B., Boland, W., and Linsenmair,
K.E. (2001). Extrafloral nectar production of the ant-associated plant,
Macaranga tanarius, is an induced, indirect, defensive response
elicited by jasmonic acid. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98: 1083–1088.
Hermsmeier, D., Schittko, U., and Baldwin, I.T. (2001). Molecular
interactions between the specialist herbivore Manduca sexta (Lepidoptera, Sphingidae) and its natural host Nicotiana attenuata. I. Largescale changes in the accumulation of growth- and defense-related
plant mRNAs. Plant Physiol. 125: 683–700.
Hui, D.Q., Iqbal, J., Lehmann, K., Gase, K., Saluz, H.P., and Baldwin,
I.T. (2003). Molecular interactions between the specialist herbivore
Manduca sexta (Lepidoptera, Sphingidae) and its natural host Nicotiana attenuata. V. Microarray analysis and further characterization of
large-scale changes in herbivore-induced mRNAs. Plant Physiol. 131:
1877–1893.
Jakoby, M., Weisshaar, B., Droge-Laser, W., Vicente-Carbajosa, J.,
Tiedemann, J., Kroj, T., and Parcy, F. (2002). bZIP transcription
factors in Arabidopsis. Trends Plant Sci. 7: 106–111.
Jassbi, A.R., Gase, K., Hettenhausen, C., Schmidt, A., and Baldwin,
I.T. (2008). Silencing geranylgeranyl diphosphate synthase in Nicotiana attenuata dramatically impairs resistance to Manduca sexta. Plant
Physiol. 146: 974–986.
Jassbi, A.R., Zamanizadehnajari, S., Kessler, D., and Baldwin, I.T.
(2006). A new acyclic diterpene glycoside from Nicotiana attenuata
with a mild deterrent effect on feeding Manduca sexta larvae.
Zeitschrift Fur Naturforschung Section B A J. Chem. Sci. 61: 1138–
1142.
Johnson, C.S., Kolevski, B., and Smyth, D.R. (2002). TRANSPARENT
TESTA GLABRA2, a trichome and seed coat development gene of
Arabidopsis, encodes a WRKY transcription factor. Plant Cell 14:
1359–1375.
Kalde, M., Barth, M., Somssich, I.E., and Lippok, B. (2003). Members
of the Arabidopsis WRKY group III transcription factors are part of
different plant defense signaling pathways. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 16: 295–305.
WRKY Transcription Factors in Plant Defense
Kang, J.H., Wang, L., Giri, A., and Baldwin, I.T. (2006). Silencing
threonine deaminase and JAR4 in Nicotiana attenuata impairs jasmonic acid-isoleucine-mediated defenses against Manduca sexta.
Plant Cell 18: 3303–3320.
Keinanen, M., Oldham, N.J., and Baldwin, I.T. (2001). Rapid HPLC
screening of jasmonate-induced increases in tobacco alkaloids, phenolics, and diterpene glycosides in Nicotiana attenuata. J. Agric. Food
Chem. 49: 3553–3558.
Kessler, A., and Baldwin, I.T. (2001). Defensive function of herbivoreinduced plant volatile emissions in nature. Science 291: 2141–2144.
Kessler, A., and Baldwin, I.T. (2002). Plant responses to insect herbivory: The emerging molecular analysis. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 53:
299–328.
Knoth, C., Ringler, J., Dangl, J.L., and Eulgem, T. (2007). Arabidopsis
WRKY70 is required for full RPP4-mediated disease resistance and
basal defense against Hyaloperonospora parasitica. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 20: 120–128.
Kruegel, T., Lim, M., Gase, K., Halitschke, R., and Baldwin, I.
T. (2002). Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of Nicotiana
attenuata, a model ecological expression system. Chemoecology
12: 177–183.
Li, J., Brader, G., Kariola, T., and Palva, E.T. (2006). WRKY70
modulates the selection of signaling pathways in plant defense. Plant
J. 46: 477–491.
Li, J., Brader, G., and Palva, E.T. (2004). The WRKY70 transcription
factor: A node of convergence for jasmonate-mediated and salicylatemediated signals in plant defense. Plant Cell 16: 319–331.
Liu, X.Q., Bai, X.Q., Wang, X.J., and Chu, C.C. (2007). OsWRKY71, a
rice transcription factor, is involved in rice defense response. J. Plant
Physiol. 164: 969–979.
Marchive, C., Mzid, R., Deluc, L., Barrieu, F., Pirrello, J., Gauthier, A.,
Corio-Costet, M.F., Regad, F., Cailleteau, B., Hamdi, S., and
Lauvergeat, V. (2007). Isolation and characterization of a Vitis vinifera
transcription factor, VvWRKY1, and its effect on responses to fungal
pathogens in transgenic tobacco plants. J. Exp. Bot. 58: 1999–2010.
Mare, C., Mazzucotelli, E., Crosatti, C., Francia, E., Stanca, A.M.,
and Cattivelli, L. (2004). Hv-WRKY38: A new transcription factor
involved in cold- and drought-response in barley. Plant Mol. Biol. 55:
399–416.
Menke, F.L.H., Kang, H.G., Chen, Z.X., Park, J.M., Kumar, D., and
Klessig, D.F. (2005). Tobacco transcription factor WRKY1 is phosphorylated by the MAP kinase SIPK and mediates HR-like cell death
in tobacco. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 18: 1027–1034.
Miao, Y., Laun, T.M., Smykowski, A., and Zentgraf, U. (2007).
Arabidopsis MEKK1 can take a short cut: It can directly interact
with senescence-related WRKY53 transcription factor on the protein
level and can bind to its promoter. Plant Mol. Biol. 65: 63–76.
Murray, S.L., Ingle, R.A., Petersen, L.N., and Denby, K.J. (2007).
Basal resistance against Pseudomonas syringae in Arabidopsis involves WRKY53 and a protein with homology to a nematode resistance protein. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 20: 1431–1438.
Nishiuchi, T., Shinshi, H., and Suzuki, K. (2004). Rapid and transient
activation of transcription of the ERF3 gene by wounding in tobacco
leaves - Possible involvement of NtWRKYs and autorepression. J. Biol.
Chem. 279: 55355–55361.
Park, C.J., Shin, Y.C., Lee, B.J., Kim, K.J., Kim, J.K., and Paek, K.H.
(2006). A hot pepper gene encoding WRKY transcription factor is
induced during hypersensitive response to Tobacco mosaic virus and
Xanthomonas campestris. Planta 223: 168–179.
Paschold, A., Bonaventure, G., Kant, M.R., and Baldwin, I.T. (June
17, 2008). Jasmonate perception regulates jasmonate biosynthesis
and JA-Ile metabolism: The case of COI1 in Nicotiana attenuata. Plant
Cell Physiol. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/pcp/pcn091.
1999
Petersen, M., et al. (2000). Arabidopsis MAP kinase 4 negatively
regulates systemic acquired resistance. Cell 103: 1111–1120.
Qiu, D.Y., Xiao, J., Ding, X.H., Xiong, M., Cai, M., Cao, C.L., Li, X.H.,
Xu, C.G., and Wang, S.P. (2007). OsWRKY13 mediates rice disease
resistance by regulating defense-related genes in salicylate- and
jasmonate-dependent signaling. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 20:
492–499.
Qu, N., Schittko, U., and Baldwin, I.T. (2004). Consistency of Nicotiana
attenuata’s herbivore- and jasmonate-induced transcriptional responses in the allotetraploid species Nicotiana quadrivalvis and Nicotiana clevelandii. Plant Physiol. 135: 539–548.
Ralph, S.G., et al. (2006). Conifer defence against insects: Microarray
gene expression profiling of Sitka spruce (Picea sitchensis) induced by
mechanical wounding or feeding by spruce budworms (Choristoneura
occidentalis) or white pine weevils (Pissodes strobi) reveals largescale changes of the host transcriptome. Plant Cell Environ. 29: 1545–
1570.
Robatzek, S., and Somssich, I.E. (2002). Targets of AtWRKY6 regulation during plant senescence and pathogen defense. Genes Dev.
16: 1139–1149.
Rushton, P.J., Reinstadler, A., Lipka, V., Lippok, B., and Somssich, I.
E. (2002). Synthetic plant promoters containing defined regulatory
elements provide novel insights into pathogen- and wound-induced
signaling. Plant Cell 14: 749–762.
Schmidt, D.D., Voelckel, C., Hartl, M., Schmidt, S., and Baldwin, I.T.
(2005). Specificity in ecological interactions. Attack from the same
lepidopteran herbivore results in species-specific transcriptional responses in two Solanaceous host plants. Plant Physiol. 138: 1763–
1773.
Schwachtje, J., Minchin, P.E.H., Jahnke, S., van Dongen, J.T.,
Schittko, U., and Baldwin, I.T. (2006). SNF1-related kinases allow
plants to tolerate herbivory by allocating carbon to roots. Proc. Natl.
Acad. Sci. USA 103: 12935–12940.
Seo, S., Katou, S., Seto, H., Gomi, K., and Ohashi, Y. (2007). The
mitogen-activated protein kinases WIPK and SIPK regulate the levels
of jasmonic and salicylic acids in wounded tobacco plants. Plant J.
49: 899–909.
Shimono, M., Sugano, S., Nakayama, A., Jiang, C.J., Ono, K., Toki,
S., and Takatsuji, H. (2007). Rice WRKY45 plays a crucial role in
benzothiadiazole-inducible blast resistance. Plant Cell 19: 2064–2076.
Stowe, K.A., Marquis, R.J., Hochwender, C.G., and Simms, E.L.
(2000). The evolutionary ecology of tolerance to consumer damage.
Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 31: 565–595.
Thines, B., Katsir, L., Melotto, M., Niu, Y., Mandaokar, A., Liu, G.H.,
Nomura, K., He, S.Y., Howe, G.A., and Browse, J. (2007). JAZ
repressor proteins are targets of the SCFCO11 complex during
jasmonate signalling. Nature 448: 661–662.
Ulker, B., Mukhtar, M.S., and Somssich, I.E. (2007). The WRKY70
transcription factor of Arabidopsis influences both the plant senescence and defense signaling pathways. Planta 226: 125–137.
Ulker, B., and Somssich, I.E. (2004). WRKY transcription factors: From
DNA binding towards biological function. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 7:
491–498.
Van Dam, N.M., Hermenau, U., and Baldwin, I.T. (2001a). Instar-specific
sensitivity of specialist Manduca sexta larvae to induced defences in their
host plant Nicotiana attenuata. Ecol. Entomol. 26: 578–586.
Van Dam, N.M., Horn, M., Mares, M., and Baldwin, I.T. (2001b).
Ontogeny constrains systemic protease inhibitor response in Nicotiana attenuata. J. Chem. Ecol. 27: 547–568.
Voelckel, C., and Baldwin, I.T. (2004). Herbivore-induced plant vaccination. Part II. Array-studies reveal the transience of herbivorespecific transcriptional imprints and a distinct imprint from stress
combinations. Plant J. 38: 650–663.
2000
The Plant Cell
Walling, L.L. (2000). The myriad plant responses to herbivores. J. Plant
Growth Regul. 19: 195–216.
Wang, H.H., Hao, J.J., Chen, X.J., Hao, Z.N., Wang, X., Lou, Y.G.,
Peng, Y.L., and Guo, Z.J. (2007a). Overexpression of rice WRKY89
enhances ultraviolet B tolerance and disease resistance in rice plants.
Plant Mol. Biol. 65: 799–815.
Wang, L., Halitschke, R., Kang, J.H., Berg, A., Harnisch, F., and
Baldwin, I.T. (2007b). Independently silencing two JAR family members impairs levels of trypsin proteinase inhibitors but not nicotine.
Planta 226: 159–167.
Winz, R.A., and Baldwin, I.T. (2001). Molecular interactions between
the specialist herbivore Manduca sexta (Lepidoptera, Sphingidae) and
its natural host Nicotiana attenuata. IV. Insect-induced ethylene reduces jasmonate-induced nicotine accumulation by regulating putrescine N-methyltransferase transcripts. Plant Physiol. 125: 2189–2202.
Wu, J., Wang, L., and Baldwin, I.T. (2008). Methyl jasmonate-elicited
herbivore resistance: Does MeJA function as a signal without being
hydrolyzed to JA? Planta 227: 1161–1168.
Wu, J.Q., Hettenhausen, C., Meldau, S., and Baldwin, I.T. (2007).
Herbivory rapidly activates MAPK signaling in attacked and unattacked leaf regions but not between leaves of Nicotiana attenuata.
Plant Cell 19: 1096–1122.
Xie, Z., Zhang, Z.L., Hanzlik, S., Cook, E., and Shen, Q.X.J. (2007).
Salicylic acid inhibits gibberellin-induced alpha-amylase expression
and seed germination via a pathway involving an abscisic-acidinducible WRKY gene. Plant Mol. Biol. 64: 293–303.
Xie, Z., Zhang, Z.L., Zou, X.L., Yang, G.X., Komatsu, S., and Shen, Q.
X.J. (2006). Interactions of two abscisic-acid induced WRKY genes in
repressing gibberellin signaling in aleurone cells. Plant J. 46: 231–242.
Xu, X.P., Chen, C.H., Fan, B.F., and Chen, Z.X. (2006). Physical and
functional interactions between pathogen-induced Arabidopsis
WRKY18, WRKY40, and WRKY60 transcription factors. Plant Cell
18: 1310–1326.
Yamamoto, S., Nakano, T., Suzuki, K., and Shinshi, H. (2004). Elicitorinduced activation of transcription via W box-related cis-acting elements from a basic chitinase gene by WRKY transcription factors in
tobacco. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1679: 279–287.
Zavala, J.A., Patankar, A.G., Gase, K., and Baldwin, I.T. (2004).
Constitutive and inducible trypsin proteinase inhibitor production
incurs large fitness costs in Nicotiana attenuata. Proc. Natl. Acad.
Sci. USA 101: 16071612.
Zhang, Y.J., and Wang, L.J. (2005). The WRKY transcription factor
superfamily: Its origin in eukaryotes and expansion in plants. BMC
Evol. Biol. 5: 1.
Zheng, Z.Y., Mosher, S.L., Fan, B.F., Klessig, D.F., and Chen, Z.X.
(2007). Functional analysis of Arabidopsis WRKY25 transcription
factor in plant defense against Pseudomonas syringae. BMC Plant
Biol. 7: 2.
Ziegler, J., Keinanen, M., and Baldwin, I.T. (2001). Herbivore-induced
allene oxide synthase transcripts and jasmonic acid in Nicotiana
attenuata. Phytochemistry 58: 729–738.
Zou, X.L., Shen, Q.J.X., and Neuman, D. (2007). An ABA inducible
WRKY gene integrates responses of creosote bush (Larrea tridentata)
to elevated CO2 and abiotic stresses. Plant Sci. 172: 997–1004.
Induced Plant Defenses in the Natural Environment: Nicotiana attenuata WRKY3 and WRKY6
Coordinate Responses to Herbivory
Melanie Skibbe, Nan Qu, Ivan Galis and Ian T. Baldwin
Plant Cell 2008;20;1984-2000; originally published online July 18, 2008;
DOI 10.1105/tpc.108.058594
This information is current as of June 14, 2017
Supplemental Data
/content/suppl/2008/08/15/tpc.108.058594.DC1.html
References
This article cites 70 articles, 23 of which can be accessed free at:
/content/20/7/1984.full.html#ref-list-1
Permissions
https://www.copyright.com/ccc/openurl.do?sid=pd_hw1532298X&issn=1532298X&WT.mc_id=pd_hw1532298X
eTOCs
Sign up for eTOCs at:
http://www.plantcell.org/cgi/alerts/ctmain
CiteTrack Alerts
Sign up for CiteTrack Alerts at:
http://www.plantcell.org/cgi/alerts/ctmain
Subscription Information
Subscription Information for The Plant Cell and Plant Physiology is available at:
http://www.aspb.org/publications/subscriptions.cfm
© American Society of Plant Biologists
ADVANCING THE SCIENCE OF PLANT BIOLOGY