Intentional Thinking Map for PLC Planning (Questions 1 & 2) Benchmark: SS.7.C.3.12 Analyze the significance and outcomes of landmark Supreme Court cases including, but not limited to, Marbury v. Madison, Plessy v. Ferguson, Brown v. Board of Education, Gideon v. Wainwright, Miranda v. Arizona, in re Gault, Tinker v. Des Moines, Hazelwood v. Kuhlmeier, United States v. Nixon, and Bush v. Gore. PLC Question #1: what do we expect all students to learn? -­‐> PLC Question #2: How will we know if and when they have learned it? Know (Declarative knowledge) [Facts, vocabulary, information] Do (Procedural knowledge) [Transferrable skills, strategies and processes] Vocabulary: Juvenile rights, Judicial Review, Summary judgment, Precedent,
Landmark (case). Rights of the accuses, Segregation, Separate but equal, Miranda Rights, Process of Law, Hanging Chads, Public Defender
Students will know: 1. Using primary sources, what is the significance of these Supreme Court cases? 2. What impact on society did these Supreme Court cases have? 3. What constitutional principles and/or rights are relevant to these U.S. Supreme Court cases? Level 1 (Retrieval) • Define key terms • Recall each case’s main idea • Name significant Supreme Court cases Level 2 (Comprehension) • Summarize the impact specific Supreme court case on society • Explain the constitutional principles that apply to Supreme Court cases • Illustrate the similarities and differences between cases to cases and amendments to cases (Plessy v. Fergusson and Brown v. Board) Level 3 (Analysis) • Evaluate the importance of each Supreme court case in regards to the Constitution • Examine example cases and distinguish which constitutional principles or rights apply • Trace the path of a landmark case to the Supreme Court (Re) Level 4 (Knowledge Utilization) • Rate the success of a significant cases at Supreme Court level • Using Primary sources, Research the findings and dissenting opinions of a landmark Supreme Court case • Simulate mock trial on landmark Supreme Court case Understand: Landmark Supreme Court cases including, but not limited to, Marbury v. Madison, Plessy v. Ferguson, Brown v. Board of Education, Gideon v. Wainwright, Miranda v. Arizona, in re Gault, Tinker v. Des Moines, Hazelwood v. Kuhlmeier, United States v. Nixon, and Bush v. Gore, had significance impacts and outcomes. Intentional Thinking Map for PLC Planning (Questions 1 & 2) Benchmark: Analyze the significance and outcomes of landmark Supreme Court cases including, but not limited to, Marbury v. Madison, Plessy v. Ferguson, Brown v. Board of Education, Gideon v. Wainwright, Miranda v. Arizona, in re Gault, Tinker v. Des Moines, Hazelwood v. Kuhlmeier, United States v. Nixon, and Bush v. Gore. Score Sample Task(s) Aligned to the Cognitive Complexity of the Learning Progression (Ways to check for Understanding) Learning Progression •
4.0 3.5 3.0 Target (Standard) 2.5 I can demonstrate in-­‐depth inferences and applications that go beyond what was taught I can do everything at a 3.0, and I can demonstrate partial success at score 4.0 •
I can Analyze the significance and outcomes of landmark Supreme Court cases including, but not limited to, Marbury v. Madison, Plessy v. Ferguson, Brown v. Board of Education, Gideon v. Wainwright, Miranda v. Arizona, in re Gault, Tinker v. Des Moines, Hazelwood v. Kuhlmeier, United States v. Nixon, and Bush v. Gore. I can do everything at a 2.0, and I can demonstrate partial success at score 3.0 •
•
•
•
2.0 •
I can list 3 Supreme Court case I can explain how Supreme Court cases only deals in Constitutional law I can identify the key outcomes of landmark Supreme Court cases 1.5 I can do some things at a 2.0 with some success 1.0 I need prompting and/or support to complete 2.0 tasks Evaluate the importance of each Supreme court case in regards to the Constitution Examine example cases and distinguish which constitutional principles or rights apply Trace the path of a landmark case to the Supreme Court (Re) •
•
•
Rate the success of a significant cases at Supreme Court level Using Primary sources, Research the findings and dissenting opinions of a landmark Supreme Court case Simulate mock trial on landmark Supreme Court case •
•
Summarize the impact specific Supreme court case on society Explain the constitutional principles that apply to Supreme Court cases Illustrate the similarities and differences between cases to cases and amendments to cases (Plessy v. Fergusson and Brown v. Board) •
•
•
Define key terms Recall each case’s main idea Name significant Supreme Court cases Intentional Thinking Map for PLC Planning (Questions 1 & 2) Teacher Reflections: What Do I Have Questions About? What Do I Need to Learn More About in What Might Students Struggle with When Order to Teach the Content Addressed by This Is Taught? What does it mean in the content limit of the This Benchmark? benchmark that students will not be Distinguishing between so many landmark required to recall “specific details of any Current cases that cite landmark cases and cases. Supreme Court case?” apply to current events. Applying which rights and principles How do we know these will be only Supreme Court specific policies, procedures, specific to landmark cases and effects on important cases to cover? and processes current cases.