Literature Review - Plan Estratégico de Seguridad Vial de Puerto Rico

PR Strategic Highway
Safety Plan
SHSP Literature Review - An
Assessment of PR Highway Safety
Plans & Procedures
Working Together Toward Highway Safety...
To Save More Lives
April 2014
CSA Architects and Engineers, LLP
1064 Ponce de Leon Ave. | CSA Plaza | Suite 500
San Juan, PR 00907-374
T: 787.641.6800 x 238 | F: 787.641.6850
Submitted to:
Samuel Forestier Castillo, PE
Traffic Engineering and Operations
Area Director
PRHTA
PO Box 42007
San Juan PR 00940 – 2007
PUERTO RICO
STRATEGIC HIGHWAY SAFETY PLAN
Highway Safety Literature Review
Executive Summary
The Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act (MAP-21) establishes priorities to the Departments of
Transportation in the nation to reduce crashes along the entire highway system. Per MAP-21, States and Territories
shall prepare a Strategic Highway Safety Plan (SHSP) with the objective of reducing fatalities and serious injuries on
their respective highway systems.
The SHSP shall be a data driven planning document that integrates multiple safety stakeholders from governmental
agencies, private entities and non-profit organizations. In addition, it is specified that the SHSP shall be coordinated
and/or synchronized with other safety related plans independently prepared by the various governmental agencies in
Puerto Rico. As such, it is important to assess the current Safety Plans developed for Puerto Rico, as well as crash
databases and other tools used by the public sector agencies in developing their respective Safety Plans. Furthermore,
the Puerto Rico Highway and Transportation Authority (PRHTA) will use several crash databases for analyzing the
trends and statistics related to crashes in Puerto Rico. Hence, it is of upmost importance to understand the limitations
in the data gathering process and the tools employed to retrieve said information.
This report, prepared as part of the SHSP development process, provides the Puerto Rico current practice in highway
safety planning, crash data gathering and management. The Highway Safety Literature Review included the following
documents/references:












Interim SHSP for Puerto Rico
2040 Long Range Transportation Plan
Statewide Transportation Improvement Program
Highway Safety Plan
Commercial Motor Vehicle Safety Plan
Fatal Analysis Reporting System
PRHTA Crash Database and Crash Analysis Reporting Environment (CARE) System
Automobile Accident Compensation Administration
Citation Data
GIS Data
Behavioral Survey (DUI and Seatbelt)
Police Accident Reports
The preparation of a SHSP creates an opportunity for integrating the transportation plans, more specifically in relation
to safety initiatives/strategies. Each planning document evaluated follows a unique format in terms of goal definition,
strategies, emphasis areas, metrics, and years of execution. The SHSP initiative provides an unprecedented
opportunity to set guidelines at the State level to unify and align these parameters.
Another important element to consider is the integration of technology in the data gathering/management processes.
The data gathering process may benefit from GPS and other electronic tools that facilitate the location of crashes and
the flow of information without the need for additional manual data entry. The use of technology and personnel
training will help to achieve an integrated and complete database between the primarily responsible governmental
agencies. Hence, having a more efficient, reliable and accurate crash information system is essential for crash analysis.
i
i
PUERTO RICO
STRATEGIC HIGHWAY SAFETY PLAN
Highway Safety Literature Review
Although Emergency Medical Services (part of the 4 Es) is considered a cornerstone in achieving a significant reduction
in fatal and serious injury crashes, in Puerto Rico the active participation and integration of EMS in the area of
transportation planning is limited. One main objective for the SHSP shall be to incorporate specific strategies and
coordination with EMS representatives.
Finally, the PRHTA is executing an aggressive highway safety improvement program (HSIP). Currently, the agency has
allocated 25% of FHWA funds for highway safety improvements projects. The PRHTA shall consider the use of a
comprehensive Islandwide approach in selecting safety improvement projects based on the KABCO severity index
classification system and incremental benefit cost analysis. The selection of hot spots/corridors will be facilitated with
the use of GIS technology for accurately identifying the location of crashes. Puerto Rico shall also consider creating its
own Crash Modification Factor (CMF) database.
i
i
ii
PUERTO RICO
STRATEGIC HIGHWAY SAFETY PLAN
Highway Safety Literature Review
List of Acronyms/Abbreviations
AADT
ACAA
AAO
BAC
CAPS
CARE
CU
DTPW
DUI
F+I
FARS
FMCSA
GIS
GPS
HPMS
KM
MCSAP
MIRE
MMUCC
NHTSA
PAR
PDO
PR
PRPD
PRTSC
PRHTA
RSA
LRTP
STIP
CVSP
HSP
TMCQ
i
i
Average Annual Daily Traffic
Automobile Accident Compensation Administration (in Spanish)
Accident Analysis Office
Blood Alcohol Content
Center for Advanced Public Safety
Critical Analysis Reporting Environment
Causing Unit
Department of Transportation and Public Works
Driving Under the Influence
Fatal and Injury
Fatality Analysis Reporting System
Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration
Geographic Information System
Global Positioning System
Highway Performance Monitoring System
Kilometer
Motor Carrier Safety Assistance Program
Model Inventory of Roadway Elements
Model Minimum Uniform Crash Criteria
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
Police Accident Record
Property Damage Only
Puerto Rico
Puerto Rico Police Department
Puerto Rico Traffic Safety Commission
Puerto Rico Highway and Transportation Authority
Road Safety Audit
Long Range Transportation Plan
Statewide Transportation Improvement Program
Commercial Vehicle Safety Plan
Highway Safety Plan
TMC Qualitative
iii
PUERTO RICO
STRATEGIC HIGHWAY SAFETY PLAN
Highway Safety Literature Review
Table of Contents
Executive Summary........................................................................................................................................ i
List of Acronyms/Abbreviation .................................................................................................................... iii
1.
Introduction .......................................................................................................................................... 1
2.
PR Transportation Plans ........................................................................................................................ 3
2.1.Interim Strategic Highway Safety Plan for Puerto Rico .................................................................... 3
2.2.Highway Safety Plan from the PRTSC ............................................................................................... 6
2.3.Statewide Transportation Improvement Program (STIP)............................................................... 11
2.4.Commercial Vehicle Safety Plan from the Public Service Commission .......................................... 13
2.5.Long Range Transportation Plan (2040) ......................................................................................... 15
2.6.Findings and Recommendations .................................................................................................... 17
3.
Crash Databases .................................................................................................................................. 20
3.1.Fatal Accident Reporting System (FARS) ........................................................................................ 21
3.2.PRHTA Crash Database and CARE System ...................................................................................... 21
3.3.Automobile Accident Compensation Administration (ACAA) ........................................................ 29
3.4.Traffic Citation Data ....................................................................................................................... 29
3.5.GIS Data .......................................................................................................................................... 31
3.6.Findings and Recommendations .................................................................................................... 31
3.6.1.Data Limitation ..................................................................................................................... 31
3.6.2.Opportunities for Improvement ........................................................................................... 32
4.
Behavioral Surveys .............................................................................................................................. 33
4.1.DUI Survey ...................................................................................................................................... 33
4.2.Use of Seatbelt Survey ................................................................................................................... 33
4.3.Findings and Recommendations .................................................................................................... 34
5.
Data Gathering Tools .......................................................................................................................... 34
5.1.Police Report .................................................................................................................................. 34
5.1.1.Format................................................................................................................................... 34
5.2.Data Entry Process.......................................................................................................................... 35
5.2.1.Selection of Applicable Crashes ............................................................................................ 35
5.2.2.Zoning (Location by Maps or Kilometers) ............................................................................. 35
5.2.3.Codification ........................................................................................................................... 36
5.2.4.Data Entry ............................................................................................................................. 36
5.3.Opportunities to Automate or Improve Process ............................................................................ 37
i
i
ii
PUERTO RICO
STRATEGIC HIGHWAY SAFETY PLAN
Highway Safety Literature Review
5.3.1.Use of GIS .............................................................................................................................. 37
5.3.2.Use of Tablets ....................................................................................................................... 37
5.3.3.Others ................................................................................................................................... 38
5.4.Findings and Recommendations to Update Processes and Tools .................................................. 38
i
i
6.
Conclusions ......................................................................................................................................... 40
7.
References .......................................................................................................................................... 41
iii
PUERTO RICO
STRATEGIC HIGHWAY SAFETY PLAN
Highway Safety Literature Review
1. Introduction
This report was prepared as part of the requirements for the development of the Strategic Highway Safety Plan (SHSP)
for Puerto Rico. The PRHTA’s approach to develop the SHSP for Puerto Rico consists of a data gathering and analysis
phase followed by an interactive/participative Safety Summit with the objective of receiving ideas/strategies to reduce
fatal and serious accidents on our highway system. The figure below depicts the events that will take place for the
preparation of the SHSP.
Data Gathering
Case Studies
Highway Safety
Literature Review
Stakeholder’s Survey
Analysis of Crash Data
to Identify Trends and
Preliminary Emphasis
Areas
Data Analysis /
Preselection of
Emphasis Areas
Pre-Safety Summit Work
Pre-Selection of
Emphasis Areas
Strategies
Development /
Analysis
Implementation
Planning &
Documentation
Prepare Package for PR
Safety Summit
Safety Summit Report
PR Safety Summit
Work Session
(Strategies)
Safety Summit
Strategies, Goals &
Metric Discussion
SHSP Preparation
PR SHSP Report
Due on August 2014
PR SHSP Preparation
The Highway Safety Literature Review report (highlighted in the figure above) is part of the data gathering phase,
taking place prior to the Safety Summit. The purpose of the report is to present the local practice in terms of
transportation safety planning, crash databases, and the tools for gathering and analyzing crash information.
Per the requirements of Moving Ahead for Progress for the 21st Century (MAP-21), the SHSP shall be a data driven
planning document that integrates multiple safety stakeholders. In addition, the SHSP shall be coordinated and/or
synchronized with other safety related plans prepared by Government Agencies of Puerto Rico. As such, it is important
to assess the current Safety Plans developed for Puerto Rico, as well as crash databases and other tools used by the
governmental agencies in developing their Safety Plans. For the SHSP development, the PRHTA will use several crash
databases. Hence, it is of the upmost importance to understand the scope of the available information reviewed and
the tools employed to retrieve said information.
1
1
PUERTO RICO
STRATEGIC HIGHWAY SAFETY PLAN
Highway Safety Literature Review
As part of the review effort, several documents, databases, and tools were reviewed. The documents fall within the
following three (3) categories:



Transportation Plans
Traffic Records (Including Crash Databases and Processing Platforms)
Data Collection/Processing/tools
The transportation plans include those safety/programming plans already prepared by Puerto Rico in compliance with
Federal requirements. Among the transportation plans we have the Interim Strategic Highway Safety Plan (Interim
SHSP), developed by the Puerto Rico Highway and Transportation Authority (PRHTA) in 2013; the PR Highway Safety
Plan, prepared by the Puerto Rico Traffic Safety Commission for 2014; the 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP);
the Statewide Transportation Plan (STIP) and the Commercial Vehicle Safety Plan (CVSP), prepared by the Public
Service Commission.
In terms of the databases, this report evaluates the Fatal Analysis Reporting System (FARS), the crash database from
the Department of Transportation and Public Works (DTPW), the use of the Critical Analysis Reporting Environment
(CARE) system, the Automobile Accident Compensation Administration (ACAA by its acronyms in Spanish), traffic
citation data and the GIS information available. This report focused on the most immediate needs for the upcoming
Safety Summit. However, future analyses will include other traffic records important for the SHSP development and
implementation.
Finally, the data collection/processing included the evaluation of the form used by the PR Police Department to report
on crashes, and the process/tools used for data entry into the databases.
For each of the categories, a summary of the findings, limitations and potential areas for improvement are presented.
2
2
PUERTO RICO
STRATEGIC HIGHWAY SAFETY PLAN
Highway Safety Literature Review
2. PR Transportation Plans
A SHSP is a major component and requirement of the Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) (23 U.S.C. § 148). It
is a coordinated safety plan that provides a comprehensive framework for reducing highway fatalities and serious
injuries on all public roads. The SHSP will identify Puerto Rico's key safety needs and guide investment decisions
toward strategies and countermeasures with the greatest potential to save lives and prevent injuries.
Per FHWA recommendations, it is a priority to include safety initiatives/projects as part of all transportation plans. The
figure below shows how the SHSP integrates the Long term plans (i.e., Metropolitan Transportation Plans and the
LRTP) with the midterm safety plans (i.e., CMVSP, HSP and other local plans) and short term project execution of safety
projects included in the Statewide Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) as part of the HSIP.
Metropolitan
Transportation Plans
(Urbanized Areas)
Islandwide Long Range Transportation
Plan (UAs & Rural)
Other Local Plans
Strategic Highway Safety Plan (SHSP)
Transportation Improvement
Program (TIP) – Urbanized
Areas
Highway Safety Improvement
Program (HSIP)
Commercial Motor
Vehicle Safety Plan
(CMVSP)
Highway Safety
Plan (HSP)
Statewide Transportation Improvement
Program (STIP)
This section includes a review of the Interim SHSP, the HSP, the STIP, the CMVSP and the current LRTP. It presents a
description of the emphasis areas, strategies, goals, and actions from each plan.
2.1. Interim Strategic Highway Safety Plan for Puerto Rico
The PRHTA, in a joint effort with the PRTSC and the DTPW, published an Interim SHSP in 2013 (Submitted to FHWA on
April 18, 2013). The Interim SHSP defines four (4) Emphasis Areas:




Traffic Crash Records and Information Systems
Roadway Departure
Pedestrian and Cyclists
Driver Behavior
The Interim SHSP was developed by the Interim SHSP Steering
Committee, composed of the PRHTA, PRTSC, FHWA and the
Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA) key
safety personnel. The Interim SHSP presents the Puerto Rico
3
3
PUERTO RICO
STRATEGIC HIGHWAY SAFETY PLAN
Highway Safety Literature Review
crash trends in terms of fatalities and injuries. However, the detailed information shown is for fatalities from FARS.
The table below depicts the traffic crash trends (from PRTSC and NHTSA).
Category
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
Number of Fatalities
452
406
365
340
361
Number of Serious Injuries
Fatalities per 100 Million
VMT
No. of Roadway Departures
Fatalities
No. of Pedestrian Fatalities
No. of Speeding-Related
Fatalities
No. of Alcohol Related
Fatalities
41,341
38,448
36,965
35,530
35,533
2.35
2.08
1.92
1.83
1.96
160
126
129
132
129
144
127
109
101
111
228
162
156
135
138
193
172
138
110
103
For each Emphasis Area, the Interim SHSP presents background information (including statistical data), objectives and
the strategies. Among the strategies for each of the Emphasis Areas, the interim SHSP includes:
Emphasis Area
Traffic Crash Records
and Information
Systems
Roadway Departure
4
Strategies
1. Reduce the backlog of motor vehicle crash data from five years to less than
one year.
2. Support the implementation of the new PAR that updates all the crash data
fields including the commercial motor vehicle data fields.
3. Train traffic law enforcement agencies on how to collect complete and
accurate crash data that supports the new PAR.
4. Provide direct access to crash data reports and information to stakeholders.
5. Acquire a user-friendly data analysis software tool.
6. Continue the program of kilometer and hectometer marker installations on all
State Roads so that crashes can be located for analysis purposes.
1. Upgrade guardrail systems, crash cushions and concrete barrier installations to
NCHRP 350 standards.
2. Install, replace or enhance pavement markings, signing and delineation in
compliance with the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices for Highways
and Streets (MUTCD).
3. Remove, relocate, or protect trees and utility poles located within the clear
zone of high crash locations or roadways with common characteristics where
4
PUERTO RICO
STRATEGIC HIGHWAY SAFETY PLAN
Highway Safety Literature Review
Emphasis Area
Pedestrian and
Cyclists
Driver Behavior
5
Strategies
these crashes occur.
4. Install rumble strips on high speed, rural, or high crash locations.
5. Educate transportation professionals on new and innovative roadway
departure countermeasures.
6. Enhance targeted enforcement activities on high speed, rural, or high crash
corridors.
7. Pilot innovative engineering countermeasures targeting roadway departure
crashes.
8. Revise islandwide roadside safety standard drawings and specifications to
include new and innovative roadway departure countermeasures.
9. Provide the necessary tools to improve performance of EMS and first
responders to crash incidents.
1. Provide assistance to communities for developing and implementing local
pedestrian safety improvement projects.
2. Educate all road users about Puerto Rico Vehicle and Traffic Law (Law # 22) and
recent amendments.
3. Enhance police department’s enforcement of existing traffic regulations,
particularly at high risk locations.
4. Provide training to police officers on the rights and duties of cyclists and
pedestrians.
5. Evaluate provisions for incorporating ped/bike facilities on all new road
construction or reconstruction, and rehabilitation projects.
6. Implement traffic calming measures in high-volume pedestrian areas.
7. Implement targeted “Share the Road” and Pedestrian Awareness campaign to
provide information and enhance awareness to all road users.
8. Support the implementation of the Complete Streets concept in highway
design.
1. Develop and implement driver behavior educational media campaigns focused
on speeding, impaired and distracted driving.
2. Support the development of a program of surveys to help measure the
effectiveness of the driver behavior strategies.
3. Support the acquisition of speed radar, equipment, and vehicle maintenance
activities to law enforcement agencies to increase police enforcement.
4. Support sustained and high-visibility traffic law enforcement strategies and
activities, tailored to high risk drivers and locations.
5. Support the development of educational and training programs for traffic law
enforcement and first responder agencies on crash site and incident
investigations including commercial motor vehicles to work with the scenes
caused by driver behavior related crashes.
6. Pilot innovative and/or proven engineering countermeasures targeting driver
5
PUERTO RICO
STRATEGIC HIGHWAY SAFETY PLAN
Highway Safety Literature Review
Emphasis Area
Strategies
behavior.
7. Support the enhancement of the judicial and prosecution training program on
enforcement of traffic laws, crash and traffic incident investigations.
The Interim SHSP is a first successful step towards the development of a more participative and collaborative planning
document. One of the limitations of the Interim SHSP is that only FARS data was used and there was no opportunity
for a broader range of safety stakeholders to collaborate in developing strategies and recommendations resulting in
common islandwide safety goals and priorities. However, the implementation of the SHSP will result in a more
efficient and integrated way to reduce fatalities and serious injuries.
2.2. Highway Safety Plan from the PRTSC
Highway Safety Plans (HSPs) address behavioral safety areas (e.g., occupant protection, impaired driving, police traffic
services, emergency medical services, motorcycle safety, etc). It is a requirement of the National Highway Traffic
Safety Administration (NHTSA). NHTSA, under the U.S. Department of Transportation, was established by the Highway
Safety Act of 1970 as the successor to the National Highway Safety Bureau, to carry out safety programs under the
National Traffic and Motor Vehicle Safety Act of 1966 and the Highway Safety Act of 1966. The Vehicle Safety Act has
subsequently been re-codified under Title 49 of the U. S. Code in Chapter 301, Motor Vehicle Safety. NHTSA also
carries out consumer programs established by the Motor Vehicle Information and Cost Savings Act of 1972, which has
been re-codified in various Chapters under Title 49.
NHTSA requires that Puerto Rico prepare the HSP and that the before-mentioned plan shall be synchronized with the
SHSP (i.e., in agreement, in terms of Emphasis Areas, strategies, performance measures and goals). In Puerto Rico, the
HSP is prepared by the PRTSC. These activities are coordinated with the Puerto Rico Police Department as the primary
law enforcement agency. The PRTSC provides training and many other activities designed to reduce motor vehicle
crash-related injuries and fatalities. The HSP included a problem identification analysis, several emphasis areas and
goals, as depicted in the following section.
Puerto Rico’s Problem Identification
There are 16,694 roadway miles in Puerto Rico and in 2011 there were 3,619,499 licensed drivers and 3,084,543
registered vehicles. Over 200,000 traffic crashes occur every year in Puerto Rico, resulting in more than 35,000 injuries
and 366 fatalities in 2012. The age distribution, population size, topography, climate and the vast number of vehicles
(per square mile) are important factors in the evaluation of the traffic crash information.
The Puerto Rico Highway Safety Plan (FY 2014) Problem ID, from the Puerto Rico Traffic Safety Commission (PRTSC)
includes the following summary table:
6
6
PUERTO RICO
STRATEGIC HIGHWAY SAFETY PLAN
Highway Safety Literature Review
Indicator
Registered Vehicles
Licensed Drivers
Roadway Miles
Traffic Crash Trends
2008
2009
2010
3,129,561
3,026,815
3,020,455
2,017,055
2,628,207
3,102,941
16,576
16,680
16,693
2011
3,084,543
3,619,499
16,694
VMT
194.3
190.1
185.7
183.9
Total Crashes
Total Injuries
Fatal Crashes
Total Fatalities
287,798
39,100
386
406
210,721
38,748
343
365
202,335
37,396
330
340
190,170
35,592
343
361
2012
3,500,941
2,991,904
Not
Available
Not
Available
232,012*
35,219
354
366
*Preliminarily provided by the PRPD
The priority areas identified by the PRTSC, based on their own analysis, are:
 Alcohol – Impaired driving fatalities represent 45% of the total fatalities in Puerto Rico. These fatalities
typically occurred at nights and during weekends. Males comprise 85% of these fatalities and the age group
24-49 is the most at risk with 49%. The majority of alcohol related fatal crashes occurred on State Roads PR-1,
2, 3, 22 and 52.
 Motorcycle – Motorcyclists represent 15% of the total fatalities. The available crash data indicates that 99% of
these are males and the predominant age group is 18-36. An interesting fact is that Sunday is the day of the
week when most fatalities related to motorcycles occur. Another fact to note is that 70% of motorcyclists
killed were not helmeted.
 Occupant Protection – In relation to occupant protection, males represent 81% of unrestrained occupant
fatalities and ages 18-36 reflect the greatest number with 51%. These fatalities typically occur between
6:00pm and midnight and also during weekends.
 Non-Occupant – This priority area represents 34% of all fatalities reported. Of theses, 30% are pedestrian
fatalities. Males represent 71% of all pedestrian fatalities and the 63+ age group is at a higher risk. The
greatest number of non-occupant fatalities occurred after 6:00 pm in the metropolitan areas of San Juan,
Aguadilla, Ponce and Mayaguez.
In reviewing the data described above, it can be observed that Puerto Rico has been achieving significant results in the
reduction of fatalities, especially when considering that back in 1987 there were 648 traffic fatalities in Puerto Rico.
Many efforts from the PRTSC, the PRHTA, and the Police Department, among others, have yielded significant results.
The most significant achievements are as follows:
 Puerto Rico was the first jurisdiction to pass a mandatory Safety Belt Law in 1974. As a result, a 2012 survey
showed a 90.2% usage rate and 94.7% use of child restraints.
 Major legislation was passed for reducing BAC from 0.15% to 0.10% and then to 0.08%.
7
7
PUERTO RICO
STRATEGIC HIGHWAY SAFETY PLAN
Highway Safety Literature Review
 A new traffic law and executive order that increased penalties for traffic violations and promoted sobriety
checkpoints was passed during the mid-90s.
 An aggressive Public Information and Education (PI&E) campaign and high visibility enforcement
 Funding for vehicles, equipment, training and other resources for Education and Enforcement activities
 Law 201, enacted in 2013 that prohibits cell phone use while driving.
 Continuous efforts from the Safety Engineering office at the PRHTA in promoting the latest safety engineering
standards, including Standard Drawings, Design Directives, and seminars
 Continuous Police Department crackdown/selective enforcement efforts
The PRTSC HSP for 2014 includes several Behavioral Programs, and goals as depicted below. The program
identification and the respective goals were developed considering the problem identification effort previously
discussed.
8
Program
Performance Goals
AlcoholImpaired
Driving
 To reduce 5% of alcohol-related fatalities
from 2011 to 2014 (i.e., 161 fatalities in 2011
to 153 in 2014).
 To increase the number of police agencies
participating in HVE’s from 23 to 35 in 2014
 To conduct five alcohol mobilizations during
2014.
 To coordinate at least four alcohol training
sessions for the PR Police Department and
Municipal Police in 2014.
 To conduct at least one training for judges
and one for prosecutors during 2014.
Youth Alcohol
 To reduce 20% of youth alcohol-related
fatalities from 35 in 2011 to 28 in 2014.
Police Traffic
Services
 To reduce in 5% of speed related fatalities
from 134 in 2013 to 127 in 2014.
Performance Measures
Number and percentage of alcohol-related
fatalities
Number of DWI interventions and arrests
Number of young drivers involved in alcohol
related fatality crashes
Number of peer presentations
Number of youths reached
Number of traffic violations for speeding and
other moving citations
Number of police officers trained
Number of police agencies participating in
national campaigns
Number of police agencies visited and oriented
and site visits reports.
8
PUERTO RICO
STRATEGIC HIGHWAY SAFETY PLAN
Highway Safety Literature Review
Program
9
Performance Goals
Planning and
Administration
 Implement and maintain police procedures
that provide for effective, efficient and
economical operation and evaluation of the
Highway Safety Program.
 Provide full support for all legislative.
amendments that will improve traffic safety
(i.e., increase penalties to unauthorized
and/or suspended licensed drivers, for
second offenders distracted drivers and
unrestrained vehicle occupants).
Occupant
Protection
 Reduce 5% of unrestrained related fatalities
from 99 in 2012 to 94 in 2014.
 Increase safety belt use from 90.2% in 2012
to 92% in 2014.
 Increase child restraint use from 94.7% in
2012 to 95% in 2014.
 Increase five additional fitting stations from
63 in 2012 to 68 in 2014.
 To certify 25 more technicians from 84 in
2012 to 109 in 2014.
 To participate in the 2014 National Click it or
Ticket (CIOT) Mobilization.
Community
Program
 Maintain the PRTSC’s traffic safety
educational efforts in all 78 municipalities to
reduce traffic fatalities from 366 in 2012 to
350 in 2014.
 Reduce the number of fatalities at the
municipal level in high incident
municipalities.
Performance Measures
Prioritize problems and manage the received
funds adequately
To develop, coordinate, monitor and
administratively evaluate traffic safety grants
identified in the Plan
To promote the PR Highway Traffic Safety
Programs
To contract professional services to develop a
coordinated HSP to NHTSA by July 1st according
to PRTSC traffic safety priorities and in
accordance to MAP-21
To contract professional services for HSP annual
reports
Monitor performance of Sub-Grantees
Continue to expand technology applications
Single Audit for FY 2012-13
Number of seatbelts and child restraint nonusage citations
Number of police agencies participating in the
CIOT mobilization
Number of child seats inspections and clinics
checkpoints
Amount of additional fitting stations
Amount of new CPS Technicians
Number of paid media and earned media units.
Number of educational traffic safety activities
conducted
Number of fatalities by municipal area
Number of citizens that received direct
orientations and educational and promotional
material in the activities
Number of coordination efforts with local law
enforcement.
9
PUERTO RICO
STRATEGIC HIGHWAY SAFETY PLAN
Highway Safety Literature Review
1
0
Program
Performance Goals
Performance Measures
Number of Digital PAR
The time between crash and data availability in
the database
Number of members that have access to
Project CARE
Number of update driver records with DWI
cases
Traffic Record
 To collect data of the PAR by the end of the
calendar year from 0% in 2012 to 25% in
2014.
 To reduce the time between crash and data
availability in the analysis Accidents Office
(DOT) from 916 days in 2011 to 365 in 2014
by reducing the crash records backlog.
 To increase project CARE access from 6 TRCC
members in 2012 to 12 members in 2014.
 To integrate FARS into Puerto Rico CARE
Database from 9% to 15% in 2014.
 To integrate the drunk drivers criminal.
record of the Criminal Justice Information
System (DOJ) with the DAVID+ Database
System (DOT) from 0% in 2012 to 25%
integration in 2014.
Non-Occupant
Protection
 To reduce pedestrians fatalities using 5 year
rolling average from 110 in 2012 to 95 in
2014.
 To reduce cyclist fatalities using 5 year
rolling average from 12.4 in 2012 to 12 in
2014.
Number of non-occupants fatalities
number of pedestrians fatalities
Number of cyclists fatalities
number of people reached with the educational
programs
Traffic
Engineering
 To inspect and evaluate multiple road sites
with reported traffic safety issues, from 16 in
2013 to 24 in 2014.
 To coordinate and promote Professional
Highway Safety Education, from 4 in 2013 to
6 in 2014.
 To increase number of site visits and refer
traffic safety issues to DOT, from 8 in 2013
to 16 in 2014.
 To monitor and manage on-going projects.
 To promote replacement and up-grades of
traffic control devices in road systems, from
4 in 2013 to 6 in 2014.
Number of sites visited to address and identify
safety issues
Number of sites visited and referrals to the DOT
Number of inspections to monitor construction
projects
Number of crash reductions
Number of traffic safety devices installed
10
PUERTO RICO
STRATEGIC HIGHWAY SAFETY PLAN
Highway Safety Literature Review
Program
Paid Media
Performance Goals
 Ensure that the Target Market adopts the
road safety message.
 Increase recognition of the PRTSC
educational message.
 Obtain an effective positive change in
attitudes toward traffic safety.
 Increased Earned Media coverage.
Motorcycle
Safety
 To reduce motorcycle fatalities by a 7% from
45 in 2012 to 42 in 2014.
Distracted
Driving
 To decrease the percentage of people that
reported making cell phone calls while
driving from 64% in 2013 to 54% in 2014.
 To establish a Corporate Outreach Program
in 40 State agencies and municipalities to
address distracted driving and to promote
and enforce policies regarding distracted
driving during 2014.
 To educate the public through mass media
efforts about the dangers of texting or using
a cell phone while driving.
 To coordinate one national law enforcement
mobilization targeting distracted drivers.
Performance Measures
Amount of Paid Media time
Amount of Earned Media time
Surveys
Number of motorcycle fatalities
Number of instructor examiners trained
Number of military trained under MSF
curriculum
Number of campaigns materials developed and
distributed
Number of motorcyclist trained in “First There,
First Care”
Number of agencies and municipalities visited
and oriented as part of the Corporate Outreach
Program
Number of distracted driving tickets
Number of educational and orientation
activities conducted
Media exposure
Distracted driving survey
For each of the programs above, the HSP for 2014 includes a program overview presenting the statistics and a series of
strategies/projects to execute in order to reach the program goals.
2.3. Statewide Transportation Improvement Program (STIP)
Statewide and Metropolitan Transportation Improvement Programs (STIP and TIPs), developed by the States and
MPOs, are capital programming documents. These programs are resource constrained and identify projects and
funding that reflect society’s mobility, operational and safety needs. Currently, the PR STIP includes safety projects.
Below, there is a list of the most relevant safety projects for Puerto Rico after a review of the STIP for Fiscal Year 2014.
It should be noted that the STIP is a living document and the PRHTA is continuously updating this planning tool based
on project execution and availability of funds.
1
1
11
PUERTO RICO
STRATEGIC HIGHWAY SAFETY PLAN
Highway Safety Literature Review
AC Code
Federal Code
990110
MP30
990113
MP30
018193
MP-181(21)
000214
MP40
000214
MP50
Description
Islandwide Roadside, Pavement
Marking, Signing, and Geometric
Safety Improvements Projects
(23CFR924) – 2012/13
Upgrade of Roadside Barriers on
NHS/ (NCHRP-350 Stand) 2013
RFP for Pedestrian Bridge PR-181,
Los Prados
Consultant Services for Developing
PR SHSP
Consultant Services for Developing
PR SHSP
Municipality
Funding
Islandwide
$12,961,811.33
Islandwide
$18,631,087.00
San Juan
$105,598.46
Islandwide
$75,196.00
Islandwide
$3,149,804.00
The table below shows a breakdown of the Islandwide Roadside, Pavement Marking, Signing and Geometric Safety
Improvements projects.
AC Code
100082
1
2
Federal Code
MP-10(71)
Description
Geometric and Safety
Improvements of PR-10 from
km 33.7 to km 70.1
Geometric and Safety
Improvements of PR-2 from
km 52 to km 66
200279
MP-2(63)
000204
9999(203)
Safe Routes to School Project #1
000205
9999(204)
Safe Routes to School Project #2
000206
9999(206)
Safe Routes to School Project #3
000207
9999(205)
Safe Routes to School Project #4
000208
9999(202)
Safe Routes to School Project #5
Municipality
Utuado and
Arecibo
Manatí,
Barceloneta
and Arecibo
San Sebastian,
Las Marías,
and Maricao
Lares and
Adjuntas
Villalba, Juana
Díaz, Coamo
and Santa
Isabel
Vieques and
Culebra
Ciales,
Manatí, Vega
Baja, Vega
Alta and
Dorado
Funding
$2,445,805.00
$1,218,406.32
$200,000.00
$200,000.00
$200,000.00
$200,000.00
$200,000.00
12
PUERTO RICO
STRATEGIC HIGHWAY SAFETY PLAN
Highway Safety Literature Review
AC Code
Federal Code
301127
MP-3(41)
005380
MP-53(9)
301131
MP-3(45)
030809
MP-308(1)
085318
MP-853(3)
Description
Geometric Improvements for
Hospital Access of PR-3
Geometric & Safety Improvements
to Humacao Toll Plaza
Highway Safety Improvements
including shore bank stabilization,
protection and pavement rehab at
PR-3, km 68.4 to 70.0
Safety Improvements to PR-308
Safety Improvements to PR-853
from km 0.0 to km 13.7
Municipality
Funding
Carolina
$2,000,000.00
Humacao
$287,742.00
Naguabo,
Humacao
$148,285.91
Cabo Rojo
$3,300,000.00
Carolina
$2,561,572.10
The table below depicts the breakdown of projects related to NCHRP 350 upgrade
AC Code
Federal Code
520119
MP-52(34)
026123
MP-26(25)
990101
MP-9999(116)
Description
Safety Improvements of PR-52 at
km 15 to km 32
Geometrical and Safety
Improvements of PR-26 from
PR-1 to PR-66 (15 kms)
Installation of Crash Cushions and
Traffic Impact Attenuators
Municipality
Funding
Various
$2,131,087.00
San Juan,
Carolina
$12,500,000.00
Various
$4,000,000.00
Considering only the funding available for safety initiatives, the PRTHA has programmed an investment of $34.9 Million
for the current Fiscal Year, meeting the requirement of MAP-21, in which 25% of the Federal funds available to PR shall
be allocated for activities eligible under the Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP).
2.4. Commercial Vehicle Safety Plan from the Public Service Commission
The Puerto Rico Public Service Commission (PRPSC) is the local agency in charge of regulating commercial vehicle
transportation services and to improve Commercial Motor Vehicle (CMV) safety. The PRPSC prepared a Safety Action
Plan, as part of the Motor Carrier Safety Assistance Program (MCSAP) and in accordance with the FMCSA regulations.
The mission of the PRPSC is to reduce accidents involving CMV in Puerto Rico and the goal is to reduce the Fatality Rate
involving CMV to 0.114 per 100 million total miles traveled.
The PRPSC recognizes the importance of all collaborative efforts from other agencies within the government of Puerto
Rico, specifically:





1
3
9-1-1 Services
PR Police Department
PR Department of Transportation and Public Works
PR Highway and Transportation Authority
PR Ports Authority
13
PUERTO RICO
STRATEGIC HIGHWAY SAFETY PLAN
Highway Safety Literature Review
 PR Traffic Safety Commission
 Traffic Records Coordinating Committee
 PR Environmental Quality Board
By using the Safetynet 2013 crash data, the PRPSC identified three (3) corridors of secondary roads and one primary
roadway corridor with high crash incidents, as depicted below.
Corridor Classification
High Crash Incident Roads
Primary Roads
PR-22
PR-137
PR-149
PR-142
Secondary Roads
According to the Safety Action Plan, 54% of the crashes along those corridors resulted in injuries and 27% were fatal.
The goal is to decrease the fatality rate, from 0.03 per 100 million total vehicle miles traveled to 0.00 per 100 million
total vehicle miles traveled in accordance to FMCSA guidelines. The crash reduction goal is one of six (6)
areas/components of the PR CMV Safety Plan. The following table presents the six (6) areas/components and the
related strategies/actions.
1
4
PR CMV Safety Program
Component
Strategies/Actions
Crash Reduction Goal
 Inspection activities at PR-22, PR-137, PR-149 and PR-142 at least four (4)
times a month at two different shifts, from 6:00 am to 2:30 pm and from
11:00 am to 7:30 pm.
 Coordinate traffic enforcement strike forces in coordination with the PR
Police Department at least four (4) times a month with one MCSAP
inspector per shift.
Passenger
Transportation Safety
 To provide MCSAP inspector with necessary training and certifications
 To provide MCSAP inspector with the special equipment needed
 To coordinate with the PR Department of Tourism and other agencies for
commercial transportation of passengers to achieve uniformity and
compliance
 To conduct educational outreach with the motorcoach vehicle operators
in order to get compliance with Federal Motor Carrier Safety Regulation
 To identify motorcoach origin and destination and the highway corridor
most commonly used.
 To coordinate with Federal, State and local agencies to facilitate the
access of MCSAP inspectors to origin and destination sites
 Conduct North American Standard Level I, II, II, and IV inspections to the
passenger vehicle on the destination sites
 Conduct North American Standard Level I, II, III, and IV inspections to
passenger vehicles on motor carrier facilities
 To increase the presence of the MCSAP inspectors on the highways
14
PUERTO RICO
STRATEGIC HIGHWAY SAFETY PLAN
Highway Safety Literature Review
 Use of strike forces on special occasions where an uncommonly large
number of motorcoaches is expected.
Hazardous Materials
Transportation Safety
 Coordination at Federal level with the Pipeline Hazardous Material Safety
Administration (PHMSA) and FMCSA as well as with the LPG Office of the
PSC to reduce violations in the Hazardous Materials Transportation
Safety, especially for LPG cylinder requirements of 49 CFR Part 178
 To reduce the number of Shipping Paper and Placard violations by 10%
over the next two years.
Driver/Vehicle
Inspections
 Level III inspections to constitute 33% of all inspections. This strategy will
be combined with traffic enforcement.
 Increase the total level of inspections by 5% from previous fiscal year
 Increase staff hours to be dedicated to conduct roadside inspections of
passenger carrier at recreational areas
 To continuously address vehicle overweight and over dimension safety
violations together with the PRDTPW
 To develop awareness of driver by distribution of brochures
Traffic Enforcement
 To establish a base line of inspector hours allocated to traffic
enforcement activities
 To have inspectors equipped with radar guns and videotaping equipment
to facilitate the traffic enforcement activity without abandoning
interagency traffic enforcement activities
Carrier Interventions
 To coordinate Compliance Review training for the PRPSC inspectors.
2.5. Long Range Transportation Plan (2040)
The 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP) for Puerto Rico is a compendium of four (4) major LRTPs; two for the
Transportation Metropolitan Areas (TMAs) of San Juan and Aguadilla, one for the 5 Urbanized Areas (UZAs) and one
Islandwide considering rural areas. The LRTPs were approved in December 2013 by the Metropolitan Planning
Organization (MPO). For the purpose of this evaluation, we will be focusing on an assessment of the elements used in
the LRTPs to prioritize the project inclusion, the sources of funding and the coordination done with other
transportation plans; all within the vision of safety as one of the top priorities.
In general, all LRTPs include the same vision, as depicted below:
“The Islandwide transportation system will offer safe (emphasis provided), efficient and effective
accessibility and mobility for all its citizens and businesses and for the movement of people and goods,
promoting livable communities and urban spaces with energy efficiency and sustainable economic
development.”
In terms of the goals and objectives of the LRTPs, the documents make reference to safety (under the category for
efficiency) in terms of:
1
5
15
PUERTO RICO
STRATEGIC HIGHWAY SAFETY PLAN
Highway Safety Literature Review
Goal: “Improve Transportation System Performance - Maintain and operate Puerto Rico's
transportation facilities and services proactively for better economy and efficiency, leveraging
available capacity, with adequate safety and security.”
Objective: “Improve transportation system safety and security, and ability to support emergencies”
The documents provide additional description of the objectives in terms of support for emergencies, making reference
to hurricane evacuation, flooding and major system blockage incidents.
For the financial background, the LRTP made reference to the FHWA funds, but does not provide a breakdown of the
restricted uses per MAP-21.
The forecast of PRHTA revenue used from 2013 to 2040 includes $995,521,000 for safety projects. The LRTP for PR
Islandwide also indicates that 20% of the PRHTA construction and highway program funds are used for safety projects.
In terms of the safety coordination efforts, the LRTP highlighted the important role of the PRHTA in defining
engineering safety improvement projects as well as the collaboration efforts with the PRTSC and the PR Police
Department. However, it does not include the Emergency Medical Services as a key factor, probably due to the lack of
active participation by EMS organizations within the last several years.
The following key strategies are proposed in the LRTP to improve safety:
 Continue through the partnership with the Puerto Rico Traffic Safety Commission to advance the work of
traffic safety across the island, which has shown commendable results through a well-conceived and multipronged approach. Work to bring crash record reporting current to provide timely data for priority analysis
and performance.
 Coordinate with the public transit corporations and services to conform to new MAP-21 requirements relating
to safety plan and reporting requirements.
 Through a commitment of heightened funding for safety improvements, develop a targeted approach to
identifying and defining safety improvements for maximum positive impact.
 Improve coordination with the Puerto Rico Emergency Management Office on the use and management of the
highway system for special incident and natural disaster event emergency preparedness and response (for
floods, hurricanes, tsunamis, hazardous material incidents, terrorism, etc). Coordinate with the Federal
Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers on hurricane-scenario analysis,
and revisit storm-surge mapping as it relates to transportation infrastructure risk and response and also as
related to the climate change sea level rise analysis.
 Update hazardous cargo roadway incident response procedures with involved agencies and police authorities.
Review prior incident records to identify any patterns of repeat incidents to address contributing factors.
 Review the status of the system response plan with U.S. Department of Homeland Security guidance.
 Explore implementation of a Road Ranger program on major expressways in urban areas to assist with disabled
motorists, road debris, and other minor incidents. These agents can also report other roadway condition risks,
accidents, and erratic or risk-causing vehicle activity. In some instances these services may be partially or fully
sponsored by private business such as insurance companies.
 Expand security coordination with the Puerto Rico Emergency Management Office to better integrate
evacuation protocols and also coordinate with ITS development and deployment activities.
Again, it can be observed that the LRTP makes reference to coordination with Emergency Management Office, but not
with the Emergency Medical Services component in terms of saving more lives.
1
6
16
PUERTO RICO
STRATEGIC HIGHWAY SAFETY PLAN
Highway Safety Literature Review
Finally, Chapter 8 of the LRTP for PR Islandwide presents performance measures for each of the goals and the
performance elements (previously presented for safety). For Safety and Security, the LRTP recommends monitoring
the Traffic Fatality Rate and not the serious injuries, probably due to the lack of this information at the time the LRTP
was written.
2.6. Findings and Recommendations
The reviewed plans change in format, and content as expected due to the differences in requirements. However; it is
worth mentioning, before entering into a content discussion, the largest and most significant differences in terms of
formatting/requirements are shown in the next table.
Plan / Element
Interim SHSP
Supporting
Statistics
HSP
LRTP
PSC Safety Plan
FARS
FARS/Surveys
Yes
Yes
Transportation
Models/
Public Hearings/
MPO Input
No
No
Yes
N/A
No
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
5
2
N/A
Various
Goals Defined
Goals supported
by trends
evaluation
Performance
Measures
Strategies
Period (years) for
Reaching Goals
Safetynet 2013
Partially
Based on our review of the plans, the following table presents a summary of the most significant goals (or main
objectives).
Emphasis Area /
Goals
Interim SHSP
HSP
Traffic Record &
Info Systems
Improve crash
database by 2016
Improve crash database
by 2014
5% decrease in
fatalities by 2016
Increase in: road
inspections, highway
safety education, and
replacement and upgrade
of traffic control devices
Roadway
Departure
1
7
LRTP (Only Strategies /
Goals not Required)
Bring crash data current to
provide timely data for
analysis and performance.
Develop a targeted
approach for identifying
and defining safety
improvements for
maximum positive impact.
PSC Safety Plan
17
PUERTO RICO
STRATEGIC HIGHWAY SAFETY PLAN
Highway Safety Literature Review
Emphasis Area /
Goals
Pedestrian and
Cyclists
5% decrease in
fatalities by 2016
Driver Behavior
10% decrease in
fatalities by 2016
Distracted Driving
Motorcycle
Planning &
Administration
Occupant
Protection
Community
Programs
Paid Media
CMV Crash
Reduction
1
8
Interim SHSP
HSP
LRTP (Only Strategies /
Goals not Required)
Pedestrian – 13.6%
reduction in 5Y rolling
average from 2012 to
2014
Cyclists – Reduction in 5Y
rolling average from 12.4
in 2012 to 12.0 in 2014
Alcohol related fatalities 5% reduction from 2011
to 2014
Youth alcohol related
fatalities – 20% reduction
from 2011 to 2014
Speeding related fatalities
– 5% reduction from 2013
to 2014
A reduction from 64% to
54% in use of Cell phone
calls (per survey results)
7% reduction in fatalities
from 2012 to 2014
Ongoing efforts for
Implementing/maintaining
policies and procedures
Unrestrained related
fatalities – 5% reduction
from 2012 to 2014
Traffic fatality reduction
from 366 in 2012 to 350 in
2014
Increase recognition of
the PRTSC educational
message, positive change
in attitudes toward traffic
safety
PSC Safety Plan
To establish a base line of
inspector hours allocated
to traffic enforcement
activities
Update hazardous cargo
roadway incident
response procedures.
Review prior incident
Reduction fatality rate
from 0.03 per 100 million
TVM to 0.00 per 100
million TVM
18
PUERTO RICO
STRATEGIC HIGHWAY SAFETY PLAN
Highway Safety Literature Review
Emphasis Area /
Goals
Hazardous
Materials
Transportation
Safety
Interim SHSP
HSP
Passenger
Transportation
Safety
LRTP (Only Strategies /
Goals not Required)
records to identify
contributing factors
Coordinate with the public
transit corporations and
services to conform to
new MAP-21
requirements relating to
safety plan and reporting
requirements
Lowering the number of
shipping paper and
placard violations by 10%
over the next 2 years
Several strategies
included. Not goal was
specified
Increase all inspections
by 5% from previous FY
Level III inspection to
reach 33% of all
inspections
Establish state policies
and procedures to
conduct Compliance
Reviews
Driver/Vehicle
Inspections
Carrier
Interventions
Road Ranger
Program
PSC Safety Plan
Remove disable vehicles,
debris and clear incidents
In general, the following findings/recommendations are presented:
 The STIP for FY 2013-14 presents a series of Safety Improvement projects meeting the requirements of MAP21 to allocate 25% of the PR funds from FHWA for safety related projects.
 Based on interviews with PRHTA personnel, the safety engineers from the PRHTA assign priorities based on
safety assessments of hot corridors, site visits and using the crash database. Determining severity indices, and
by performing RSAs, together with an incremental Benefit Cost Analysis (BCA) would enhance the PRHTA’s
ability to make more efficient and effective decisions in the process of selecting safety projects.
 The use of the Critical Analysis Reporting Environment (CARE) system will facilitate/ease the process of
identifying hot corridors/spots. The recent launch of the CARE system and crash data analysis improvements is
still an ongoing process.
 There are opportunities to refine the severity classification process by using the KABCO injury scale and by
improving the location of the crashes in the database.
 The HSP from the PRTSC presents an assessment of the base conditions, establishes the goals and strategies to
reach those goals and the metrics to measure the success of the program. It includes data from the ACAA to
evaluate the characteristics of serious injury crashes, based on the definition that a serious injury crash
involves the mobilization of the person(s) injured by ambulance. The plan presents limitations in the crash
1
9
19
PUERTO RICO
STRATEGIC HIGHWAY SAFETY PLAN
Highway Safety Literature Review










data, as most of the analyses consider FARS data, and the serious injuries data do not include the PAR number.
However, it is well complemented through the use of stakeholders' surveys.
Most of the goals established in the PRTSC consider 2014 as the achievable year.
The Interim SHSP considers a 5 year prediction in performance.
Close coordination with the PRTSC shall be maintained within the first tasks of the SHSP project, currently the
PRTSC and the PRHTA are developing Emphasis Areas and strategies for the HSP and the SHSP and both shall
be in agreement.
The LRTP seems well coordinated and in agreement with the MAP-21 requirements. However, there is an
opportunity to improve it by maximizing the crash data analysis and integrating EMS as another critical
element to consider in lowering the fatality and serious injury rates in Puerto Rico.
There is consensus in all plans for addressing driver behavior for achieving a reduction in fatalities and serious
injuries.
With the exception of the PR CMV Safety Plan, the plans include improvements to the crash database as part
of the Emphasis Areas/strategies.
The PR CMV Safety Plan presents several objectives/strategies. However, no specific metrics or goals are
included for Carrier Interventions and Passenger Transportation Safety.
The PR CMV Safety Plan recognizes that driver behavior is the main element accountable for crashes.
However, it recognizes the limitation on MCSAP Inspectors, as they are not able to write citations and fines for
drug and alcohol use while driving a vehicle. The Plan indicates that there is a bill in the PR Senate to amend
PR Law 22 to include PR PSC Inspectors in the Law Enforcement Officer definition. If this bill becomes a law, PR
PSC Inspectors will be able to conduct drug and alcohol field test and issue the appropriate citations.
The PR CMV Safety Plan emphasizes the importance of establishing State policies and procedures to conduct
Compliance Reviews for Hazardous Materials (HM) CMV, non-HM CMV and buses.
Both the HSP and the Interim SHSP recognize the importance of the EMS as one of the “Four Es” in reducing
fatalities and serious injuries. The LRTP and the PR CMV Safety Program do not incorporate EMS as part of the
plans.
3. Crash Databases
This section presents a detailed review of the databases that are available with the Puerto Rico Highway
Transportation Authority (PRHTA). The available crash databases, traffic citation database, and the Geographic
Information Systems (GIS) databases are discussed in detail. The limitations of the available data are then provided.
The chapter concludes with a discussion on potential improvements to the data gathering and management process.
The review includes the following crash databases:





2
0
Fatal Accident Reporting System (FARS)
Critical Analysis Reporting Environment (CARE) Database and the PRHTA
Automobile Accident Compensation Administration (ACAA)
Traffic Citation Data
GIS Data
20
PUERTO RICO
STRATEGIC HIGHWAY SAFETY PLAN
Highway Safety Literature Review
3.1. Fatal Accident Reporting System (FARS)
FARS is a nationwide census that provides yearly traffic crash data involving fatalities. The FARS database contains data
on fatal crashes for the years 1975 to 2012 for the 50 States in the U.S., District of Columbia, and Puerto Rico. “To be
included in FARS, a crash must involve a motor vehicle traveling on a traffic way customarily open to the public, and
must result in the death of an occupant of a vehicle or a non-occupant within 30 days (720 hours) of the crash”
(National Highway Traffic Safety Administration NHTSA, 2014). The FARS Analytical User’s Manual (2014) provides a
detailed discussion on the types of data variables available and the codes used in FARS.
For year 2012, FARS database, extract made available by the PRTSC, includes the following data variables for all fatal
crashes that occurred on public roads in PR:









Municipality
Hour, month, and day of crash
Roadway name and kilometer marker
Age
Blood Alcohol Content (BAC)
Classification: (bicyclist, pedestrian, driver, passenger, motorcyclist, trooper, other)
Gender
Seatbelt use
Alcohol-involvement
For years 2008 to 2011 PR FARS database, extract made available by the PRTSC, includes all the above identified data
variables for all fatal crashes except data on seatbelt use and alcohol-involvement.
3.2. PRHTA Crash Database and CARE System
The PR DTPW crash database is operated and managed by the Accident Analysis Office (AAO). The database consists of
all the data entered in crash reports, representing more than 230,000 data entered per year from 1997 to 2011, except
year 2001, with incomplete data for years 2010 and 2011. The limitations in the data gathering process of the AAO
resulted in a serious evaluation of data fields needed to perform on a yearly based crash analysis in Puerto Rico. After
this evaluation, performed with the help of the Traffic Engineering and Operational Area (PRHTA) and the PRTSC, the
AAO reduced the fields entered in the database and began to use only Fatal and Injury crashes (F+I) for their crash
analysis. In order to gather a tool for faster and deeper crash evaluations, the PRTSC has an agreement with the
University of Puerto Rico (Río Piedras campus). Through the execution of this agreement, the University contracted
the staff of the Center for Advanced Public Safety (CAPS) at the University of Alabama.
The Center for Advanced Public Safety, at The University of Alabama, is a research and development center dedicated
to the use of information technology to help improve society by performing crime, accidents, and other analyses that
impact people positively. CAPS has more than thirty years of experience in the traffic safety industry in the United
States. The following products from CAPS have received the support from local and national government agencies in
the USA:
 eCite: Comprehensive electronic citation issuance and processing system
o Mobile Officer’s Virtual Environment (MOVE): enables officers to operate their computer systems from
anywhere on the highway
2
1
21
PUERTO RICO
STRATEGIC HIGHWAY SAFETY PLAN
Highway Safety Literature Review
 eCrash: Electronic crash reporting and transmission procedure used with MOVE (gather and stores
information)
 CARE: Data analysis software package used for problem identification and countermeasure development in
traffic safety and others applications (criminal justice, emergency management, questionnaires, etc.)
The Critical Analysis Reporting Environment (CARE) is being used to provide to the decision-makers a practical report
on crash analysis. This is because it is a crash data analysis software system that has an easy-to-use interface which
turns data into information. This software has the following capabilities (CARE, 2014):









Statistical Generation
Data Analysis
Information Mining Capability
Analysis of Non-categorical Variables
Narrative Data Searching (subject to data availability)
Hotspot Determination
Report Generation
Collision Diagram Generation (subject to data availability)
GIS Integration (subject to data availability)
Traditionally, agencies often maintain crash databases in the following three different tables: crash, vehicle, and
person. The crash table includes all the attributes of the crash such as crash type, severity, roadway condition, weather
condition, etc. The vehicle table includes specific details about the vehicles involved in the crash such as the vehicle
type, make and model of the vehicle, etc. Finally, the person table includes details on all the road users involved in the
crash and includes person-level information such as age, gender, seating position, etc. For example, a crash involving
two vehicles with three occupants in the two vehicles will have one record in the crash table, two records in the
vehicle table, and three records in the person table. Note that all these tables could be linked through a unique ID, the
crash number or the PAR number.
For PR data, the DTPW and the CAPS personnel worked together to develop a crash database that integrates data from
a group of the 108 tables of the database. In other words, the CARE database does not include separate tables for the
crashes, vehicles, and occupants; all the important information is compiled into one table. Note that each record in this
table corresponds to one crash. The future crash data entry improvements could include providing the complete
relational database with the crash, vehicle, and person tables.
CARE version 10.0.0.22 has Puerto Rico crash data for years 2002 through 2009, and for year 2012. The database
includes all crashes (i.e., fatal, injury, and property damage only (PDO) crashes) for the years 2002 to 2006 and only
fatal and injury (F+I) crashes for the years 2007 to 2009 and 2012. More specifically, the following data variables and
their attributes are included in CARE database:
 Year (2002-2009, 2012)
 Month
 Day of month
 Day of the week
 Week of the year
2
2
22
PUERTO RICO
STRATEGIC HIGHWAY SAFETY PLAN
Highway Safety Literature Review
 Time of day
 Date
 Related event (most harmful)








Overturn
Fire/explosion
Submerged
Gas inhalation
Spilled load
Leakage/spilling
Irregular road surface
Fell off cliff

Collapsed road/bridge













Two vehicles
Three or more vehicles
Pedestrian hit and run
Hit and run
Stationary vehicle
Cyclist
Cyclist hit and run
Motorcyclist
Motorcyclist with fixed
object
Animal barrier
Safety drums
Utility poles








Mailbox
Traffic sign
Back-slope
Bridge
Building
Fence
Other fixed object
Pothole

Agricultural equipment
Jackknifed

 Construction equipment
Motorcycle overturned

 Storm drain
Fallen person

 Other with collision
Other event without
 Trees
collision
 Pedestrian
 Fire hydrant
 Collision type
 Entering intersection at an angle
 A parked vehicle
 In the same direction – posterior
 A vehicle stopped on pavement
 In the same direction – turning
 A vehicle parking or reversing
 In the same direction – side
 A vehicle exiting a parking space
 In the opposite direction – front
 A vehicle entering a private entrance
 In the opposite direction – turning
 A vehicle exiting a private entrance
 In the opposite direction – side
 Not available
 Contributing circumstances
 Left crash scene
 Vision obstructed
 Vehicle to the left
 Under the influence of
 Driver lost control
 Failure to obey signal
alcohol
 Failure to yield
 Mechanical defect
 Over-extended load
 Disregarded traffic control
 Roadway defect
 Street racing
 Exceeded speed limit
 Driver too slow
 Pedestrian violation
 Weight/height/width of
 Avoid object/person
 Overloaded
vehicle
 Improper turn
 Climate/weather
 Failure to dim
 Following too closely
 Inappropriate trailer hitch
 Load fell off
 Improper lane change
 Driver condition
 Didn’t see person/object
 Improper reverse
 Wrong way
 Defective traffic light
2
3
23
PUERTO RICO
STRATEGIC HIGHWAY SAFETY PLAN
Highway Safety Literature Review
 Improper passing




 Vehicle pushing another
vehicle
 Person pushing vehicle
 Failure to signal
 Number of vehicles involved
 Number of pedestrians involved
 Number of injured
 Number of fatalities
 Crash type
 Fatal
 Injury
 PDO
 Road surface condition
 Dry
 Wet
 Muddy
 Other
Roadway characteristics
 Straight-level
 Straight-downhill
 Straight-uphill
 Straight-hill top
 Curve-level
Traffic control
 Police/work zone flagger
 Pedestrian control
 Traffic light
 Flashing traffic light
 Stop sign
Lighting condition
 Daytime
 Sunrise
 Sunset
Weather condition
 Foggy
 Windy
 Clear
 Location type
 Intersection of two state roads
 Other
 None
 Curve-downhill
 Curve-uphill
 Curve-hill top
 Other
 Unknown
 Yield sign
 No passing zone
 Other
 Unknown
 Dark with lighting
 Dark without lighting
 Unknown
 Cloudy
 Rainy
 Other
 Intersection of one state road and one municipal road
 Intersection of two municipal roads
2
4
24
PUERTO RICO
STRATEGIC HIGHWAY SAFETY PLAN
Highway Safety Literature Review
 State road with kilometer marker (non-intersection)
 Road or street with section number (urban area)
 Road or street without intersection, kilometer marker or section number
 Unknown
 Police precinct/district
Arecibo Highway
Bayamon Highway
Caguas Highway
Fajardo Highway
Guayama Highway
Ponce Highway
San Juan Highway
Adjuntas District
Aguada District
Aguadilla District
Aguas Buenas District
Aibonito District
Añasco District
Arecibo District
Arroyo District
Barceloneta District
Barranquitas District
Cabo Rojo District
Caguas District
Camuy District
Canóvanas District
Cataño District
Cayey District
Ceiba District
Ciales District
Dorado District
Fajardo District
Florida District
Guánica District
Guayama District
Guayanilla District
Guaynabo District
Gurabo District
Hatillo District
Hormigueros District
Humacao District
Isabela District
Jayuya District
Juana Díaz District
Juncos District
Lajas District
Lares District
Las Marías District
Las Piedras District
Levittown District
Loíza District
Luquillo District
Manatí District
Maricao District
Maunabo District
Cidra District
Coamo District
Comerío District
Corozal District
Culebra District
Dajaos District
Mayagüez District
Moca District
Morovis District
Naguabo District
Naranjito District
Orocovis District
Patillas District
Peñuelas District
Ponce District
Quebradillas District
Rincón District
Rio Grande District
Rio Piedras District
Sabana Grande District
Salinas District
San Germán District
San Juan District
San Lorenzo District
San Sebastián District
Santa Isabel District
Toa Alta District
Toa Baja District
Utuado District
Vega Alta District
Vega Baja District
Vieques District
Villalba District
Yabucoa District
Yauco District
Traffic Division
Carolina Traffic Division
Station A
Caimito Precint
Airport Precint
Angeles Precint
Highway Precint
Ramey Base Precint
North Bayamón Precint
West Bayamón Precinct
South Bayamón Precinct
Bo. Obrero Precinct
Loiza St. Precinct
North Carolina Precinct
West Carolina Precinct
South Carolina Precinct
Castañer Precinct
Cedro Arriba Precinct
Cupey Precinct
El Tuque Precinct
East Hato Rey Precinct
West Hato Rey Precinct
Juan Domingo Precinct
La Playa Precinct
La Rambla Precinct
Mameyes Precinct
North Mayaguez Precinct
South Mayaguez Precint
Monte Hatillo Precint
Morell Campos Precint
Parada 19 Precint
Puerto Nuevo Precint
Sabana Hoyos Precint
North Trujillo Alto Precint
South Trujillo Alto Precint
Touristic Zone Precint
Traffic Sub-Div. Bayamon
Aibonito Traffic Div.
 Municipality
2
5
25
PUERTO RICO
STRATEGIC HIGHWAY SAFETY PLAN
Highway Safety Literature Review

















Adjuntas
Aguada
Aguadilla
Aguas Buenas
Aibonito
Añasco
Arecibo
Arroyo
Barceloneta
Barranquitas
Bayamón
Bo. Obrero
Cabo Rojo
Caguas
Camuy
Canóvanas
Carolina

















Cataño
Cayey
Ceiba
Ciales
Cidra
Coamo
Comerío
Corozal
Culebra
Dorado
Fajardo
Florida
Guánica
Guayama
Guayanilla
Guaynabo
Gurabo

















Hatillo
Hato Rey
Hormigueros
Humacao
Isabela
Isla Verde
Jayuya
Juana Díaz
Juncos
Lajas
Lares
Las Marías
Las Piedras
Loiza
Luquillo
Manatí
Maricao

















Maunabo
Mayagüez
Moca
Morovis
Naguabo
Naranjito
Orocovis
Patillas
Peñuelas
Ponce
Puerto Nuevo
Quebradillas
Rincón
Rio Grande
Rio Piedras
Sabana Grande
Salinas

















San Germán
San Juan
San Lorenzo
San Sebastián
Santa Isabel
Santurce
Toa Alta
Toa Baja
Trujillo Alto
Utuado
Vega Alta
Vega Baja
Vieques
Villalba
Yabucoa
Yauco
Unknown
 Road class and jurisdiction
 Primary state road (regional)
 Secondary state road (inter municipal)
 Tertiary state road (intra municipal)
 Street (municipal road)
 Unknown
 Causing Unit (CU) driver gender

Male

Female

Unknown
 CU driver age
 CU driver authorized
2
6

Yes

No

Unknown
26
PUERTO RICO
STRATEGIC HIGHWAY SAFETY PLAN
Highway Safety Literature Review
 CU driver condition

Normal

Inebriated

Fatigued

Under the influence of drugs

Drunk

Other

Learner driver

Unknown
 CU vehicle type

Car

Motorcycle

Small truck

Bicycle

Pick-up

Agricultural machine

Van

Road equipment

Semi-tractor (cab)

Trailer

Truck

Mobile home

Bus

Jeep

School bus

Other

Crane
 CU contributing circumstance

Left scene of the crash

Vision obstructed

Vehicle to the left

Under the influence of
alcohol

Driver lost control

Failure to obey signal

Failure to yield

Mechanical defect

Over-extended load

Disregard traffic
control

Roadway defect

Street racing

Exceeded speed limit

Driver too slow

Pedestrian violation

Avoid object/person

Overloaded

Weight/height/width of
vehicle

Improper turn

Climate/weather

Failure to dim

Following too closely

Inappropriate trailer
hitch

Load fell off

Improper lane change

Driver condition

Didn’t see person/object

Improper reverse

Wrong way

Defective traffic light

Improper passing

Vehicle pushing another
vehicle

Other

Failure to signal

Person pushing vehicle

None
 CU seatbelt use
2
7
27
PUERTO RICO
STRATEGIC HIGHWAY SAFETY PLAN
Highway Safety Literature Review
 CU vehicle direction
o
North
o
Southwest
o
Northeast
o
West
o
East
o
Northwest
o
Southeast
o
Unknown
o
South
 Motorcycle involved
 Bicycle involved
 Passenger vehicle involved
 Truck or van involved
 Heavy vehicle involved
 Young victims involved
 Youth victims involved
 Adult victims involved
 Older victims involved
 Elderly victims involved
 Male victims involved
 Female victims involved
 Young drivers involved
 Youth drivers involved
 Adult drivers involved
 Older drivers involved
 Elderly drivers involved
 Male drivers involved
 Female drivers involved
 Has Global Positioning System (GPS)
2
8
o
Provided by officer
o
Derived from route and kilometer (KM)
o
Removed as invalid
o
N/A
28
PUERTO RICO
STRATEGIC HIGHWAY SAFETY PLAN
Highway Safety Literature Review
3.3. Automobile Accident Compensation Administration (ACAA)
The Automobile Accident Compensation Administration (ACAA, in Spanish) is a social based governmental agency that
works as an insurance company. It compensates families affected by serious and fatal crashes to mitigate the
economic and social impact on their health or life loss. ACAA gathers data from police crash reports, from the
emergency management services provided to crash victims and from the Department of Transportation and Public
works (DTPW). The ACAA database includes personal data of all the victims of serious injury and fatal crashes and the
agency focuses on the demographic information of the victims. The following data variables are included within the
ACAA database:
 Category: driver, passenger, pedestrian, without license
 Date and hour of crash
 Day of crash
 Municipality
 Gender
 Age
This data contained in the ACAA database is too limited to use in conducting a detailed crash analysis. One
recommendation is to link the ACAA database to the crash database by means of the PAR number. If both databases
could be linked, data on crashes involving severe injuries could be analyzed. Another potential limitation with the
ACAA database is that the database also includes crashes involving fatalities. This is because a person seriously injured
at a crash site might have died later at the hospital. Since the database might not include all fatalities, the analysis of
fatal and serious injury crashes might require merging the fatal crash database and the ACAA database and removing
the duplicate records.
3.4. Traffic Citation Data
Current traffic citation data, provided by the Puerto Rico Police Department, includes years 2008 to 2012. The
database, which includes both the police areas and the division of highway patrol, provides statistics on total
accidents, traffic tickets, and other interventions. Total accidents, fatal accidents, and injury accidents are separately
identified in “Accidents” category. The following are identified in “Traffic Ticket” category:
2
9
 Speed limit 55 MPH
 Unnecessary noise
 Heavy vehicles/trucks
 Speeding in school zones
 Vehicle inspection
 Waste management law
 Other speed-related
 Window tinting
 People with disability law
 Safety belt
 Traffic lights
 Parking tickets
 Car seats (children)
 Stop sign
 Other tickets
29
PUERTO RICO
STRATEGIC HIGHWAY SAFETY PLAN
Highway Safety Literature Review
Similarly, the “Other Interventions” category includes the following:
 Driving under the influence (DUI)
with BAC ≥ 0.08%
 Street peddlers
 Interventions with minors (no adults)
 DUI with BAC < 0.08%
 Non-authorized driver
 Blood test
 Other interventions
 Negatives
 Orientations
 Total DUI records
 Aid or help given
 Intervention with Pedestrians
Law 201-2011, enacted on January 1, 2013 prohibits the use of handheld cell phones while driving. The data related to
fees imposed for driving while using a cell phone for year 2013 and part of year 2014 (January to March 2014) was
provided by the Police Department. The data indicates that 42,203 and 10,006 tickets were issued on 2013 and 2014
respectively. The data available for cell phone usage while driving included only the total tickets written by the police
per year. For a more specific analysis of the cell phone use while driving, the following data shall be included as part of
the citation data report:






Distribution of the tickets: regions, municipalities, road numbers
Time of the day
Day of the week
Driver's Age
Driver's condition
Driver's gender
The limitations on the use of the citation data for in-depth behavior analysis are:
 The data is not collected and stored electronically: There is no database available on citations data
 The data is limited to the number of issued tickets: There is no other data field related to the citation, as
mentioned above.
 The data is not associated to any crash data: The data is limited to non-crash events and there is a lack of
information on crash reports associated to distracted drivers and/or the use of cell-phones.
Future data associated with crashes and cell-phone usage is expected because Law 201-2011 requires that police
officers collect that information on crash scenes.
Other citation data related to driver's license revocation due to drunk driving is going to be evaluated. The Directory of
Drivers Services (DISCO in Spanish) has the responsibilities of drivers' license examination, point system management,
and revocation, among others. Once the data of drivers' license revocation due to drunk drivers is gathered, a
comparison with crash trends related to alcohol is going to be performed.
3
0
30
PUERTO RICO
STRATEGIC HIGHWAY SAFETY PLAN
Highway Safety Literature Review
3.5. GIS Data
In Puerto Rico, the use of GIS files is being limited to map generation and other purposes not related to identify crash
locations for analysis. The following GIS shape files are available from the PRHTA:
 HPMS_2014_LOGS_2012 - The HPMS Log information (by sections and state road KM)
 GIS Base Map with dynamic segmentation of state road kilometers
 ACT_CARRETERAS_ESTATALES_OCT_2013
 ACT_CARRETERAS_NHS_2014 - ACT NHS
 ACT_INTERSTATE_SYSTEM_ 2013 - ACT Interstate System
 ACT_STRAHNET_SYSTEM_2013
 ACT_CARRETERAS_SEGMENTADAS_KM_2013
It is to be noted that the Highway Performance Monitoring System (HPMS) log data (i.e., the GIS base map) is available
and complete only for the state roads in PR.
3.6. Findings and Recommendations
3.6.1. Data Limitation
The PR DTPW, together with the PRHTA and the PRTSC, have access to police crash reports used to fill their database in
the AAO. In addition, PR DTPW has access to FARS database, police citations reports, a limited database from ACAA for
serious injuries and fatalities, and GIS highway maps. Regardless, there are several limitations associated with the
databases that are currently available.
One of the major issues with the current crash databases is missing or incomplete location information. For the 2002
to 2006 data, only approximately 40% of crashes (depending on crash type and police reporting unit) are being located
because only state roads have kilometer markers. For the most recent data (i.e., for 2007-2009 and 2012), this
percentage is 60% for non-state roads and 80% for state roads. Non-state roads, except at urban locations, have not
yet been installed with kilometer markers. Furthermore, the kilometer markers on the state roads are not 100%
accurate, as two or more state roads might have the same roadway name (or ID) and kilometer markers, thus
questioning the validity of the crash locations.
The crash location data shall improve after the projects initiated by the PRHTA (see Statewide Transportation
Improvement Program -STIP in Chapter 2) to install new kilometer posts for state roads are completed. Furthermore,
the intersection data for state roads is expected to improve, based on the GIS data being collected as part of these
projects. The GIS data also includes some roadway characteristics data identified in the Model Inventory of Roadway
Elements (MIRE) database. However, since these projects are for state roads alone, the crash locations of non-state
roads cannot be improved unless the non-state roads are provided with kilometer markers.
3
1
31
PUERTO RICO
STRATEGIC HIGHWAY SAFETY PLAN
Highway Safety Literature Review
3.6.2. Opportunities for Improvement
Injury Severity Classification
Although the police reports record injury severity as fatal, major injury, or minor injury, the data are not being coded in
the crash summary records. It would definitely be beneficial to include the following detailed classification for injury
severity.





K – Fatal Injury
A – Incapacitating Injury
B – Non-Incapacitating Injury
C – Possible Injury
O – Property Damage Only
Improve Existing Police Reports
One of the main opportunities that the Police Department has for enhancement would be to digitize and store the
police crash reports. The scanned copies of the police reports will vastly improve data collection management, data
entry process, and lead times from the Puerto Rico Police Department (PRPO) to PRDTPW. This improved method of
data collection and storage would be beneficial in performing RSAs, conducting site-specific safety analyses and for law
enforcement officers in targeting specific crash patterns and high crash locations. The Puerto Rican Traffic Records
Coordinating Committee (TRCC) is working together with the Puerto Rico Police Department (PRPD) to achieve these
goals.
Improve Crash Locations
As previously discussed, the crash location information is currently either inaccurate or incomplete. Installing both
state roads and non-state roads with kilometer markers would be the first step toward obtaining accurate crash
locations. Another approach to accurately obtain crash locations would be to use GPS to record the coordinates (i.e.,
latitude and longitude) of the crash site. The PR DTPW and the PRHTA can work in coordination with municipalities to
install kilometer posts along the entire highway system (state roads and non-state roads) and to integrate kilometer
information on the existing GIS maps. In addition, the PRPD could obtain GPS tools (i.e. official cell phones, camera
systems, tablets) to gather GPS information at crash and crime scenes for the analysis of these locations.
Collect and Maintain Roadway Characteristics Information
Besides accurate and complete crash data, the safety analysis requires detailed information on roadway
characteristics. For example, in addition to the facility type, information on the number of lanes; lane width; presence,
width, and type of shoulders; presence and width of median, etc. are required for roadway segments. Similarly, for
intersections, number of intersection legs; traffic control type; number of left-turn lanes, through lanes, and right-turn
lanes at each approach leg, etc. are required to analyze intersections. Lack of this information significantly hinders a
majority of the safety analysis procedures, including network screening and project prioritization.
The GIS Office of the PRHTA visits state road projects gathering some of the information on roadway characteristics for
use by the Highway System Office. However, the PRHTA must develop an Asset Management Plan according to MAP21 using the recommended roadway and traffic elements listed on MIRE (Model Inventory of Roadway Elements).
Consequently, the FHWA's Guidance Memorandum on Fundamental Data Elements (FDEs) to Improve the Highway
Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) has to be implemented in the Traffic Bureau in order to collect the minimum data
required for each road.
3
2
32
PUERTO RICO
STRATEGIC HIGHWAY SAFETY PLAN
Highway Safety Literature Review
Collect and Maintain Traffic Data
Average Annual Daily Traffic (AADT) is the most important variable to conduct safety analyses. For example, crash rate,
the most common measure to evaluate safety at a location requires normalizing crash frequency (i.e., number of
crashes that occurred at the location) by the amount of traffic that passes through that location (i.e., number of
vehicles). This information is not available for the entire roadway network. Therefore, efforts to collect and maintain
yearly AADT data would be beneficial to the PRDTPW. As part of the Asset Management Plan (MAP-21, MIRE)
mentioned previously for the PRHTA, it shall include a continuous traffic monitoring system for the entire highway
system. To accomplish that goal, the use of ITS technologies for traffic data collection and management is needed.
4. Behavioral Surveys
Other sources of information available are the results of behavioral surveys. This chapter discusses the following two
behavioral studies that were conducted in Puerto Rico:
 Campaign effectiveness study of the driving under the influence of alcohol pre-campaign vs. post-campaign
report (TMCQ, 2013a)
 2013 Puerto Rico observational seatbelt use survey (TMCQ, 2013b)
4.1. DUI Survey
The PRTSC contracted with the firm TMC Qualitative (TMCQ) to measure the effectiveness of media campaigns
designed to create an awareness of the consequences of driving under the influence of alcohol. The media campaigns
were launched in July 2013; the pre-campaign study was conducted in early July 2013, and the post-campaign study
was conducted in August and September, 2013. Based on 500 person-to-person interviews that were conducted both
pre- and post-campaigns, the study concluded that the campaigns were successful in spreading the message on DUI.
Approximately 30% of the sample was found to have admitted to having driven while intoxicated. The authors,
therefore, concluded that the government should continue to educate the general public, particularly males and
younger drivers.
4.2. Use of Seatbelt Survey
The TMC Qualitative (TMCQ) conducted the observational seatbelt use study in 2013 for PR (TMCQ, 2013b). The
objective of this study was to estimate the seat belt use in PR at a specific point in time. The study was conducted from
December 5th through 13th, 2013. The analysis subsequently performed was based on a total of 6,800 vehicle
observations (constituting a total of 8,995 occupants, of which 6,800 were drivers and the remaining 2,195 occupants
were passengers in the front seat) across 17 counties in PR. The study determined that the overall belt use by the
occupants was 89.7%, with a standard error of 2.2%. The following are the key conclusions of this study:
 The seat belt use on expressways or limited-access highways was highest at 90.9%, followed by arterials at
90.5%, while the seat belt use on local roads was relatively lower, at 82.6%.
 A high 90.3% of drivers wore seat belts, while 86.7% of front seat passengers wore seat belts.
 A high 92.3% of females wore seat belts, compared to 88.3% of males.
 The younger age group (16-40 yrs) had the lowest rate of seat belt use (86.5%), followed by middle-aged
occupants (40-60 yrs) at 91.3%, and finally the older age group (over 60 yrs) at 95.9%.
3
3
33
PUERTO RICO
STRATEGIC HIGHWAY SAFETY PLAN
Highway Safety Literature Review
4.3. Findings and Recommendations
Behavioral studies help to understand the way people change for a specific behavior. The two studies performed
recently in Puerto Rico, seatbelt use and drunk drivers had shown the influence that targeted law enforcement and
educational campaigns had in positively changing road users' behavior. The impact of previous educational campaigns
on seatbelt use had resulted in an 89.7%, seatbelt usage, the highest in the nation. In addition, people who
participated in the DUI alcohol survey recommended educational campaigns to impact males and younger drivers,
among the general public.
5. Data Gathering Tools
The need to acquire a sufficient quantity of accurate data is a fundamental requirement for performing any type of
research. In terms of traffic crash analysis, the information gathered at the crash scene has to be very specific and
comprehensive in order to fully understand the circumstances associated with the event and subsequently, to
determine what engineering countermeasures may be needed to reduce the potential for related crash patterns in the
future. This chapter summarizes the data gathering process for crash analysis purposes in the government of Puerto
Rico. It includes a description of the police reports used on the Island, the process of entering crash data in the
PRDTPW, a summary of findings and recommendations to update the process and tools, and opportunities to
automate and/or improve the process.
5.1. Police Report
The PRPD uses Forms PPR-93 and PPR-94 for obtaining on-scene crash data. These forms include information for all
the people and vehicles involved in the crash, crash description, crash location, and other related data. In 2012, a new
version of the crash report form was developed; however, it has not yet been instituted. The revised form includes
332 fields for fatal and injury crashes and 106 fields for property damage crashes. The TRCC efforts include the
digitalization of the new PPR-93 which integrates old PPR-94 and PPR-94 and shall be filled out using tablets or laptop
computers.
5.1.1. Format
The prevailing PD crash report (PPR-93 and PPR-94, ver. 01/88) format is organized into four main sections:




Crash Location
Vehicle’s Information
Injured or Deaths Information
Crash Description (Narrative/Drawing)
The Information of Crash Location Section includes the following fields (1 thru 14):
3
4
 Date (day-month-year)
 Federal Highway Classification
 Time
 Collision Type
 Day of the Week
 Qty. Vehicles
 Municipality
 Qty. Pedestrians
 Related Event to Collision
 Qty. Injured
 Location
 Qty. Fatalities
 Location Code
 Accident Type
34
PUERTO RICO
STRATEGIC HIGHWAY SAFETY PLAN
Highway Safety Literature Review
The Section of Vehicles’ Information is divided in two identical sub-sections. Fields 15 to 62 refer to Vehicle 1 and
fields 63 to 112 refer to Vehicle 2. The fields include the following data:
 Drivers’ information: name, age, gender, phone num., occupation, address, years driving, authorized, insured,
license status, license num., license type, Soc. Sec. num., condition, blood analysis, alcohol level, resident 25
miles
 Vehicle’s information: year, brand, model, plaque, state, inspection, owner’s name, owner’s address, vehicle
type, use, hazardous cargo, puller, mechanical defects, affected area
 Other information: speed limit, estimated speed, safety belts, vehicle in motion, contributing circumstances,
driver’s maneuver, pedestrian, bicyclist, location code
The “Injured and/or Deaths” information includes spaces for up to five persons’ data. The data includes: name,
vehicle, age, gender, injured, lesion type, expulsion, first aid by, address, emergency transportation data, and safety
equipment.
The last sheet contains the Crash Description. In this section, the police officer writes down all of the details that
he/she considers to be important for describing the crash scene. The report also includes a crash diagram for the
officer to draw the position of vehicles as observed at the scene. Finally, the officers have to sign the form and include
the investigating officer’s plaque ID and date.
5.2. Data Entry Process
5.2.1. Selection of Applicable Crashes
The Accidents Analysis Office (AAO) receives all crash reports from the Police Department by year. The reports are
organized by AAO personnel into four categories: Fatal, Injury, Property Damage and Not Applicable. The Not
Applicable reports are those crashes related to criminal activities and other injuries or fatalities which occurred that
are not related to traffic crashes.
5.2.2. Zoning (Location by Maps or Kilometers)
Identification of the approximate location of crashes, or zoning, is important to accurately analyze crashes and/or
crash patterns. After organizing the reports, the fatal and injury crashes are selected for the zoning process.
The zoning process is strictly manual, using the maps labeled in the office and other tourist maps of the Island because
they are more up to date. These maps (AAO's maps) have labels for road number, kilometer, intersections, section
numbers, and roadway classification (primary, secondary, and tertiary). The data entry personnel have to interpret the
police narrative in order to locate the crash on the AAO's maps. These maps include legends for important
infrastructure references such as:
3
5
 Churches
 Jails
 Schools
 Central Business Districts
 Police Stations
 Post Offices
 Hospitals
 Fire Engine Houses
 Cemeteries
 Pedestrian Bridges
 Industrial Plants
 Others
35
PUERTO RICO
STRATEGIC HIGHWAY SAFETY PLAN
Highway Safety Literature Review
The section numbers are used when there is a reference location and there isn't a specified kilometer. For grade
separated intersections, the personnel have to find the kilometers where the roads intersect and assign that kilometer
to the road where the accident occurred. If there isn't enough information to establish on which road the crash
occurred, the person in charge assumes that it occurred on the ramp and uses the corresponding section number
because most ramp locations can be identified using the ramp section number. After completing the zoning process
the reports have to be codified.
5.2.3. Codification
Codification of police crash reports is a process utilized to convert the police data to a more accurate and manageable
data format. It starts by adding all the necessary digits required for the data entry process. For example, adding 9999
where the police didn't provide kilometer information means that there is no data. In addition, a code for the traffic
direction of each vehicle is added. The codification personnel check the consistency of the report and make changes
when they find a possible mistake or inconsistency in the data. The inconsistencies can occur in many fields such as:
town code versus the town written by the police, code for collision type versus narrative, code for related event versus
narrative and contributing circumstances versus narrative and related event. The data entry process can start after the
codification processes have ended and the badge and control numbers are assigned.
5.2.4. Data Entry
The process for entering crash data into the PRDTPW computerized database is performed by the AAO. In the past,
this office populated all the fields contained in the police reports, resulting in more than 100 entries per crash. In
addition, all crash types were being entered, affecting the amount of data available for performing annual reports on
crash analysis.
The Accidents Analysis Office has taken actions to improve the data entry process and to reduce the time needed for
crash analyses. One of the actions taken was the reduction of fields used for data entry. After receiving
recommendations from the Roadside Safety Audit Team (actually the Traffic Safety Projects Division) of the PRHTA and
others, the office changed their protocol and their data entry page to enter only 35 fields from the police crash report.
The fields that are being entered are:
3
6
 Citation Number
 Qty. Fatalities
 Type of Injury
 Accident Date
 Accident Type
 Type of Lesion
 Day of the Week
 Road Condition
 Driver’s Sex
 Street or Road
 Road Charact.
 Driver’s Age
 Km
 Traffic Control
 Authorized Driver
 Intersection
 Visibility
 Driver Lic. Num.
 Intersection Type
 Weather
 Driver Condition
 Related Event
 Police Precinct
 Type of Vehicle
 Collision Type
 Municipality Num.
 Use of Seat Belt
 Qty. Vehicles
 Classification
 Contributing Circ.
 Qty. Pedestrians
 Sex
 Impact Direction
 Qty. Injured
 Age
36
PUERTO RICO
STRATEGIC HIGHWAY SAFETY PLAN
Highway Safety Literature Review
In addition, because the analysis requested by the Federal and local governments is based on fatal and injury crashes,
the office utilizes only these two crash types for performing the analysis.
5.3. Opportunities to Automate or Improve Process
After analyzing the process of crash data analysis short, intermediate, and long term opportunities for improvement
can be evaluated. For the short term, the Accident Analysis Office and the IT Office can evaluate and reprogram the
page used for data entry in order to reduce the possibility of human errors in the data entry process. In addition, for
the intermediate term, the DAVID traffic fines’ database from CESCO could be integrated to the AAO database to
reduce the amount of information entered by the AAO personnel. DAVID’s database includes the driver’s personal
information, vehicles’ plaque database and fines associated with the previous two. If both databases are integrated,
all the personal information can be obtained by entering the driver’s license number. For the long term consideration,
the AAO and the Police Department could integrate GIS maps into tablets or laptops to locate the crash at the scene
together with digital or paper police reports.
5.3.1. Use of GIS
The GIS Office from the Programming and Special Studies Area of the PRHTA is using aerial photos and field studies to
produce accurate primary and secondary highway maps of Puerto Rico. Since 1994 the entire highway system (state
and municipal roads) has been geo-referenced. Actually, the efforts are concentrated on identifying municipal roads,
especially the roads near municipal boundaries because of the current lack of information for these areas. These maps
are available to locate crashes but the information from the police report and map coordinates are not equivalent; one
has road and kilometer numbers and the other real coordinates. Actually, PRHTA is performing an extensive project to
install km posts along state roads, geo-reference them and revise origin and end points for each road. The project
includes the use of non-metal sign posts due to the increase of metal robbery in PR. After the completion of this
project (estimated by 2016), PRHTA will have enough data to integrate real coordinates and road kilometers for the
main roads of the Island.
The use of GPS technology is one of the latest developments currently being used by law enforcement agencies around
the World. Some examples of the applications of GPS technology used by police departments within the United States
are as follows:




Police radios
Cellular phones
Handheld digital devices
Digital in-car video camera systems
The PR Police Department has been making efforts to include GPS technology in crime and crash scene investigations
without results. To achieve this goal, it is fundamental for the PD to invest in the necessary technology, personnel, and
training.
5.3.2. Use of Tablets
The PR Police Department has been making efforts to try to introduce computers or other electronic devices in the
field to enter crash data directly into a digital database. Currently, the Police Department vehicles are not equipped
with any such technology for crash data collection purposes.
3
7
37
PUERTO RICO
STRATEGIC HIGHWAY SAFETY PLAN
Highway Safety Literature Review
5.3.3. Others
Other areas of opportunity to improve the process of data gathering include the following:






Implement the use of Crash Data Improvement Program Guide (April 2010) in the AAO
Install kilometer markers along secondary and tertiary roads
Install official municipality limits signs
Use GPS technology to locate crashes at the scene
Use GIS maps to identify the crash location at the AAO or for any other crash analysis tool
Develop an integrated database with data gathered by ACAA, Police Department, Emergency Management, 91-1, FARS, Compulsory Insurance Company and PRHTA (GIS).
5.4. Findings and Recommendations to Update Processes and Tools
There have been efforts to improve the process to manage crash data driven by the PRPD. Efforts include police report
revisions, the use of data entry technology at crash scenes, reduction of fields used for data entry at the AAO, selection
of fatal and injury crashes reports for the Crash Analysis and others. However, as a part of the SHSP process for Puerto
Rico, we recommend a complete re-look at the crash data that is being collected. The current crash reporting form has
332 fields for fatal and serious injury crashes. That is a considerable amount of information to collect. Since only a
small part of that is being entered into the electronic crash databases, there is a need to simplify the PAR to reduce the
data collected following the Model Minimum Uniform Crash Criteria (MMUCC).
One of the assignments for the “Traffic Crash Records and Information Systems” Emphasis Area team will be to take a
strategic look at the data being collected and determine whether each piece should be classified as “required to have,”
“nice to have,” or “no apparent reason to have.” It is important that this Emphasis Area team have representation
from all of the “E’s” so that data that is not needed by one particular stakeholder is not inadvertently removed from
the form.
Another assignment for the “Traffic Crash Records and Information Systems” emphasis area team will be to determine
what data collection methods are appropriate and applicable. As the prices of technology have continued to drop,
very low-cost GPS devices can now be deployed in all vehicles. This would allow law enforcement personnel to easy
locate all future crash scenes. The use of FHWA 402 Safety funds for the purchase of equipment to help law
enforcement agencies to collect better crash data is something that also should be explored.
It should be noted that when Florida’s Strategic Highway Safety Planning efforts were being initiated, it became
apparent that “Aggressive Driving” and “Distracted Driving” were areas that the partner agencies believed needed
emphasis. However, there was little data about the prevalence of aggressive or distracted driving crashes. Therefore,
modifications were made to Florida’s crash form and statutory language was added regarding aggressive driving and
distracted driving crashes. Florida’s crash report form now has check boxes for aggressive driving and distracted
driving. With this data, Florida is now able to track the trends in this emphasis area so that data-driven decisions can
be made. It is recommended that Puerto Rico similarly revise the crash form as necessary to track and monitor all of
the SHSP emphasis areas.
Florida’s law-enforcement agencies also have been successful in embracing the technology available to more easily
document traffic crashes. Virtually all law-enforcement vehicles have on-board laptop computers that can
communicate in real time to their dispatch/command centers. Thus, when officers arrive on-scene, they are able to
enter the data for the crash form into their onboard computer. Many of these agencies also have GPS integrated into
3
8
38
PUERTO RICO
STRATEGIC HIGHWAY SAFETY PLAN
Highway Safety Literature Review
the vehicle for fleet management and can pull the crash location information from the on-board GPS into the crash
data form. At a minimum, many modern digital cameras and/or smart phones have the capability to store a photo’s
location information within the .jpg file format. Thus by simply taking a picture of a crash scene, the police officer
could be collecting location data that can be used to help locate the crash into a GIS-based crash analysis system. At a
minimum, PRPD should begin collecting crash photos of all fatal and severe injury crashes that can be analyzed to
determine their coordinates.
Another significant help for Florida has been the use of close-range photogrammetry in the analysis of serious crashes.
The Florida Highway Patrol now uses close-range photogrammetry to gather location data quickly and efficiently at
crash scenes. This technology reduces the on-scene time for a crash investigator dramatically. Rather than several
hours to measure all of the crash data using total station methodology, the use of photogrammetry can allow for all
the measurements to be taken in a matter of minutes.
3
9
39
PUERTO RICO
STRATEGIC HIGHWAY SAFETY PLAN
Highway Safety Literature Review
6. Conclusions
This report provides an information baseline for the current highway safety practice in Puerto Rico. In addition, it
provides a high level understanding of the different planning and execution tools used by the Commonwealth of
Puerto Rico to improve safety on the highway system. As such, a review of the long, mid and short term
transportation plans as well as the traffic data gathering tools and protocols was performed. The following bullets
present the conclusions and/or recommendations based on the review of the before mentioned documents,
interviews, and assessment of electronic tools and crash databases. For additional conclusions and recommendations
related to transportation plans, crash databases, and others, please refer to the finding and recommendations section
within this report.
 Based on the information obtained, there are limitations on the data gathering process, the integration
between sources of information and data, the application of GIS maps, among others.
 With the exception of the PR CMV Safety Plan, the plans include improvement to the crash database as part of
the Emphasis Areas/strategies.
 Most of the plans use FARS data, as other databases that include injury crash information became available
recently.
 Continuous update of the crash databases and the quality of the crash data is of upmost importance. The data
gathering process may benefit from GPS and other electronic tools that facilitate the location of crashes and
the flow of information without the need of additional manual data entry.
 The current STIP for FY 2013-14 presents a series of Safety Improvements projects meeting the requirements
of MAP-21. However, there is an opportunity for prioritizing projects by implementing severity indices, and
performing RSAs, together with incremental Benefit Cost Analyses (BCA).
 There are opportunities to refine the prioritization process in the short term by using the KABCO system, the
severity index and by improving the location of the accidents in the database.
 Each planning document follows a unique format in terms of goals definition, strategies, areas of emphasis,
metrics, years of execution, etc. There is an opportunity to set guidelines at the state level to unify these
parameters.
 There is very limited information regarding EMS in the Transportation Plans.
 The LRTP seems well coordinated and in agreement with the MAP-21 requirements.
 There is a consensus in all plans for addressing behavior driving for achieving a reduction in fatalities and
serious injuries.
 All transportation plans, to a larger or smaller degree, make reference to driver behavior as critical.
 The PR CMV Safety Plan and the HSP from the PRTSC emphasizes the need for establishing regulations to
continuously improve in safety.
 Both, the HSP and the Interim SHSP recognize the importance of the EMS as part of the Four Es to reduce
fatalities and serious injuries. The LRTP and the PR CMV Safety Program do not incorporate EMS as part of
their plans.
4
0
40
PUERTO RICO
STRATEGIC HIGHWAY SAFETY PLAN
Highway Safety Literature Review
7. References
Puerto Rico Highway and Transportation Authority (PRHTA). “Interim Strategic Highway Safety Plan” (2013), San Juan,
PR.
Puerto Rico Traffic Safety Commission (PRTSC). “Puerto Rico Highway Safety Plan FY 2014”,(2014) San Juan, PR
Puerto Rico Traffic Safety Commission. “Problem ID”, (2014), San Juan, PR
Puerto Rico Public Service Commission. “ Safety Action Plan for the Puerto Rico Public Service Commission Motor
Carrier Safety Assistance Program”, (March, 2014), San Juan, PR
Puerto Rico Highway and Transportation Authority (PRHTA). “2040 PR Islandwide Long Range Transportation Plan”
(September 2013), San Juan, PR
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA). (2014). “FARS Analytical User’s Manual 1975-2012.” Publ.
DOT HS 811 855, U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, DC.
University of Alabama. Center for Advanced Public Safety (2009). “CARE – Critical Analysis Reporting Environment.”
http://caps.ua.edu/care.aspx, Accessed March 2014.
The TMC Qualitative (TMCQ). (2013a). “Campaign Effectiveness Study of the Driving Under the Influence of Alcohol:
Pre-campaign vs. Post-campaign Report.” Final Report, Puerto Rico Traffic Safety Commission, San Juan, PR.
The TMC Qualitative (TMCQ). (2013b). “Puerto Rico Observational Seat Belt Use Survey 2013.” Final Report, Puerto
Rico Traffic Safety Commission, San Juan, PR.
4
1
41