Australian Forestry Australian Forestry is published by the Institute of Foresters of Australia (IFA) for technical, scientific and profes sional communication relating to forestry in Australia and adjacent geographic regions. The views expressed in this journal are not necessarily those of the IFA. The journal is included in the Register of Refereed Journals maintained by the Australian Government Department of Education, Science and Training, and as from the first issue in 2008, in Science Citation Index Expanded (SCIE). Managing Editor: Dr Colin Matheson Production Editor: Mr Alan Brown Editorial Panel: Dr Stuart Davey Mr Neil (Curly) Humphreys Dr Grant Wardell-Johnson Dr Brian Turner Dr Ian Bevege Dr Humphrey Elliott Mr Jack Bradshaw Dr John Herbohn Contributions Contributions to this journal are sought covering any aspect of forest ecology, forest management, forest policy and land use related to Australia and the South Pacific region. Contributions related to the performance of Australian tree genera elsewhere in the world are also welcome. Instructions to authors are given inside the back cover of each issue. Contributions should be sent to the Executive Director at the address below. Past issues Full-text copies of the journal for the years 2001–2004 are available to the public on our website, http://www.forestry.org.au/ifa/f/f15-ifa.asp Journal subscriptions 2009 A$260 including GST within Australia A$290 per year in all other countries The above prices are for hardcopy. For information about options for electronic access and pricing, please contact the Executive Director at the address below. All correspondence relating to subscriptions should be addressed to: Executive Director, The Institute of Foresters of Australia, PO Box 7002, Yarralumla, ACT 2600, Australia. Phone: 61 2 6281 3992. Fax: 61 2 6281 4693. Email: [email protected] Web: http://www.forestry.org.au Cover The front cover features Corymbia hybrids and their parents Corymbia torelliana (cadaga) and C. citriodora subsp. variegata (spotted gum). The hybrids are promising plantation varieties for subtropical and tropical environments in the 700 to 1300 mm MAR zone. The development of these hybrids was described by David Lee in Australian Forestry Vol. 70, pages 11–16. David also selected the photos on the cover. Main photo (No. 6): In the foreground is one replicate (a five-tree row plot) of a six-year-old Corymbia hybrid family, with a mean height of 14.8 m and a diameter at breast height over bark (dbhob) of 13.8 cm, on a black earth soil near Gympie, Queensland. Behind David (standing) is a C. torelliana family with a mean height of 7.7 m and a dbhob 8.5 cm. The C. citriodora subsp. variegata controls, which were badly damaged by frost, had a mean height of 7.2 m and a dbhob of 5.8 cm at the same age. (Photo courtesy of Elizabeth Lee.) Photo 1: Corymbia citriodora subsp. variegata buds developing on a grafted tree in a clone bank at Gympie in January 2008. (Photo courtesy of David Lee.) Photo 2: Grafted, potted clone bank established to aid production of Corymbia hybrids. These C. citriodora subsp. variegata clones are 18 months old and already yielding good quantities of pollen. (Photo courtesy of David Lee.) Photo 3: Healthy three-year-old Corymbia hybrids (on left of photo) with frost-killed C. citriodora subsp. variegata on the right. (Photo courtesy of David Lee.) Photo 4: One of many selected Corymbia hybrid trees harvested at age 3.6 years for evaluation of a range of wood properties. Coppice that developed on the stumps has been propagated and clonal testing of the hybrids is underway, with two-year-old clonal trials continuing to demonstrate the early good potential of the hybrids. (Photo courtesy of David Lee.) Photo 5: Ends of butt logs from selected 3.6-year-old Corymbia hybrids (diameter range 12–23 cm). These logs were used to study the wood properties of early-age Corymbia hybrid selections. Properties evaluated included sawing, splitting and pulping. (Photo courtesy of David Lee.) ISSN 0004-9158 ACN 083 197 586 Australian Forestry The Journal of the Institute of Foresters of Australia Volume 72 Number 1, 2009 ISSN 0004-9158 blank page blank Graham Wilkinson 1 Guest editorial Transparent forestry – seeing is believing A locked gate on a forest road is a sad symbol of a breakdown in trust and transparency. Forest managers may need to close their doors to potential thieves and vandals, but they should not close their doors to public scrutiny. My role as an independent forest regulator gives me the privilege to see what is happening ‘beyond the locked gate’. What I have seen, by and large, is evidence of good forest practices by dedicated and professional people; evidence that needs to be transparently available to the public. Transparency applies equally to forest managers in both the public and private sectors. Values such as biodiversity, water quality and yield, amenity and clean air do not respect property boundaries, and increasingly, neither does the public. Nearly two-thirds of the complaints investigated by the Forest Practices Authority in Tasmania each year relate to private property. Neighbours, local communities and the general public are demanding more information and evidence of sustainable forest management across all tenures. Forest managers in Australia continue to walk precariously along the tightrope of public opinion in their quest to achieve a reasonable mixture of environmental, economic and social outcomes from their forests. Never before has the task seemed so complex and the operating environment so changeable. It’s fair to say that decisions about forest management are never fully ‘right’ or ‘wrong’; they are, after all, value judgements made for specific situations at specific times. Therefore whilst the decisions about forest management are important, the context within which the decisions are made is of more enduring importance. The public will always hold differing views on forest management and these views will change over time. A good example is the change in attitudes towards the clearing of native forest for agriculture and other land use, including plantations. Up until about the 1970s clearing was actively promoted and subsidised by governments for economic and social development. This was followed by a period of governmental ambivalence. Since the 1990s governments have responded to environmental and social concerns by imposing increasingly stricter restrictions on clearing, with severe penalties for unauthorised clearing. These dramatic changes have occurred within the lifespan of the current generation of landowners and forest managers. Similar changes in social attitudes are forcing a rethink on many other aspects of contemporary forest management, including intensive silviculture in native forests, smoke emissions from the burning of logging residues, the use of chemicals and the role and impact of forest plantations on a range of social and environmental values. What was right in the past is not necessarily right for the future. Foresters have an obligation to promote informed discussion about forest management. However, ultimately it is the community, well informed or otherwise, that makes the value judgments upon which forest management must be based. It is often said that truth is the first casualty of war, and this is certainly the case in the ongoing war of words over forest management in parts of Australia. Both sides of the forestry debate are guilty of using selective information, simplifications and distortions in their attempt to sway public opinion. However, what really matters is whether the public has transparent access to the information and basis upon which decisions are made, so that they can better understand and judge the validity and appropriateness of the decisions. Of course it is naïve to think that most people will go to the trouble of accessing relevant information before they form an opinion. However, for many it is important to know that they have a right to information, if only a few ever fully exercise that right. A social licence, whether for forestry or any other business, is only earned by going beyond the minimum requirements of the law. Socially responsible organisations are those that promote transparency and accountability in a proactive manner. Relying upon Freedom of Information legislation is generally a sign of a failure in transparency and accountability. So what does this mean for forest managers within both the public and private sectors? Forest management plans have traditionally provided the strategic framework for forest management decisions. They should record what the forest manager knows about the assets and values of the forest and the supply and demand for products and services. They should also be upfront about the limits to the knowledge. Forest management plans should be developed with public input, with periodic review and reporting of actual versus planned outcomes. The public has a right to know not only the outcomes of forest management but also the reasons for any variations in planned outcomes. Operational plans are important because they directly affect a piece of land and its surrounds. Neighbours and other directly affected parties have a right to information about both the planned and actual outcomes of forest operations so that they can take account of any impacts on their land or values. The broader public also has a right to this information given that many of the values potentially affected by forest operations, including water values, biodiversity and air quality, are not vested as private rights or ‘owned’ by the forest manager, but belong to the common good. This means that operational plans should be publicly available, together with the planning tools and assessments that provide the technical basis for the plan. This also places an obligation on forest managers to monitor and report on the outcomes of forest operations, including both compliance with the required standards and the effectiveness of the actions in achieving the stated objectives of management. Transparency means making available as much information as possible, not just glossy summaries. Many forest managers have Australian Forestry 2009 Vol. 72 No. 1 pp. 1–2 2 Transparent forestry – seeing is believing shied away from this in the past because of the logistics and cost of publishing or providing large databases and reports. However, this is no longer the case with modern electronic media. The challenge is to manage information so that it can be made readily available to the public in an efficient and affordable manner. The issue is one of ethics. Ask not ‘what information should be available?’ but ‘what information should be withheld and for what reason?’. There are risks involved in being transparent, including the risk of increased public criticism and penalty if management practices are revealed to be deficient. However, socially responsible managers should consider public transparency to be an important adjunct to the processes of internal review and continuing improvement. There are far greater risks in not being transparent; raising suspicions about why information is being hidden and inviting more adversarial ways of extracting information or opposing forest management practices for which there may be perfectly good justification. For example, if the public is denied information about the success or otherwise of regeneration practices it can simply assume the worst and accept the myth that logging destroys forests. In my experience foresters have much to be proud of, and much to gain from transparent reporting. I recently attended a forestry workshop within the Asia-Pacific region where in the context of international concerns about illegal and unsustainable logging an enlightened Director of Forests called upon the delegates to find out what was happening in their forests and to transparently report ‘the good, the bad and the ugly. It is only through reliable monitoring and reporting systems that we can properly report on the standards being achieved and the progress or otherwise that is being made to improve those standards. Australia, with its long history of formal forest management has a leadership role to play within the region and we could set a good example by demonstrating our own commitment to socially responsible forest management in a fully transparent and accountable manner. Graham Wilkinson RPF, FIFA Chief Forest Practices Officer Forest Practices Authority 30 Patrick Street Hobart, Tasmania 7000 Email: [email protected] What lies beyond the locked gate? Australian Forestry 2009 Vol. 72 No. 1 pp. 1–2 Dane Thomas, Michael Henson, Bill Joe, Steve Boyton and Ross Dickson 3 Review of growth and wood quality of plantation-grown Eucalyptus dunnii Maiden Dane Thomas1,3, Michael Henson1, Bill Joe2, Steve Boyton1 and Ross Dickson2 1Forests NSW, Land Management and Forestry Services, PO Box J19, Coffs Harbour, NSW 2450, Australia NSW, Land Management and Forestry Services, PO Box 100, Beecroft, NSW 2119, Australia 3Email: [email protected] 2Forests Revised manuscript received 5 September 2008 Summary Forests NSW manages Eucalyptus plantations on the north coast of NSW, Australia, for high-value timber production. One species increasingly being planted both in Australia and overseas is Eucalyptus dunnii Maiden. For a species to be considered suitable for forestry, criteria to be met include successful establishment, growth and suitability for end use, be that pulp, solid wood or veneer production. Historic data from E. dunnii plantations aged from 3 to 34 y were reviewed. Growth and wood quality using a range of non-destructive and destructive measurements are reported. Eucalyptus dunnii typically grew equally well as some alternative species, although species ranking was affected by the growing site. Eucalyptus dunnii produced high-quality wood chips with average pulp yield from three NSW plantations aged 8–10 y of 53% and 265 kg m–3. This yield is comparable with that of 10-y-old E. globulus plantation material from Tasmania. Wood density increased with tree age from about 500 kg m–3 at age 10 y to 600 kg m–3 at age 25 y, and more slowly beyond that age. Many solid-wood quality traits such as hardness and strength could be positively correlated with both tree age and basic density. This has implications for the timber industry as it is intended that plantation trees will be harvested at younger ages than native forest trees, but wood quality in such younger material may not satisfy minimum product performance requirements. However, trees selected for higher density achieved strength group ratings at age 9 y that would normally be achieved at age 25–30 y. It is not known if similar improvements can be made in other wood quality traits. Quality traits requiring further examination are growth stresses and endsplitting of logs, and shrinkage of sawn timber. Collapse (reversible shrinkage) and non-reversible shrinkage are positively related to wood density, but a greater concern is the high ratio of tangential shrinkage compared to radial shrinkage. This ratio, which can be 2.5 or greater in E. dunnii, leads to excessive distortion in sawn material. It may be possible to reduce overall wood shrinkage and the ratio of tangential to radial shrinkage, as well as other unfavourable wood quality traits, through genetic selection as these traits in related eucalypts (e.g. blackbutt, E. pilularis) are heritable. Keywords: plantations; growth rate; wood properties; pulpwood; yields; wood density; growth stress; modulus of elasticity; hardness; shrinkage; genetic improvement; Dunn’s white gum; Eucalyptus dunnii Introduction Eucalyptus dunnii Maiden (Dunn’s white gum) naturally occurs in two small disjunct populations on north-eastern New South Wales (NSW) and south-eastern Queensland, Australia, primarily on the margins of rainforests (Boland et al. 2006). These sites, at between 400 m and 650 m altitude, have a mean annual rainfall of 1100–1500 mm with a summer maximum, and typically fertile basaltic or alluvial soils (Benson and Hager 1993). Eucalyptus dunnii has recently gained favour as an alternative plantation species to E. grandis because it is better suited to drier and or more frost-prone sites (Darrow 1994; Johnson and Arnold 2000). This has lead to its establishment mostly on higher-altitude sites (> 500 m asl), or on lower-lying creek flats prone to frost. In NSW, Forests NSW (FNSW) has established over 8500 ha, mostly since 1994. This review uses available data from Australian and international research to report on growth of plantation-grown E. dunnii, and the suitability of the plantation-grown wood for a variety of end uses. Wood properties of plantation-grown E. dunnii of different ages and of mature E. dunnii from the native forest resource are reported to illustrate the development of wood characteristics with tree maturity, and to identify differences between material from plantations and native forests. We have included all available data in the figures presented to display relationships and to compare the characteristics of wood from Australian plantations of E. dunnii with those of wood grown elsewhere, but have used only data from NSW (or Queensland if that was available) plantations for regressions. Growth Several trials from NSW were available to examine growth of E. dunnii including species trials established between 1972 and 1976 on a range of soil types, climate and local within-site environments that are useful to compare the performance of E. dunnii with alternative forestry species such as E. pilularis Australian Forestry 2009 Vol. 72 No. 1 pp. 3–11 Quality of plantation-grown Eucalyptus dunnii 4 and E. grandis (Johnson and Stanton 1993). These trials were planted at 1111 stems ha–1 (sph) (3 m espacements between and within rows) and were not thinned during the rotation. The trial sites include: • Bulahdelah State Forest (SF) (latitude 32°24′S, longitude 152°15′E), sandstone or mudstone, mean annual rainfall (MAR) 1360 mm, altitude 60 m • Cascade SF (30°13′S, 152°46′E), siliceous argillates and slates, MAR 1280 mm, altitude 640 m • Chichester SF (32°14′S, 151°46′E) carboniferous sediments, MAR 1550 mm, altitude 800 m • Yabbra SF (28°32′S, 152°34′E), siltstone or sandstone, MAR 1080 mm, altitude 520 m. Figure 1 shows diameter over bark at 1.3 m (dbhob) and tree height of E. dunnii, E. grandis and E. pilularis grown in these species trials at ages between 14 and 18 y (typically when the last age measurements were taken) (Johnson and Stanton 1993). The data show growth was comparable between the three species within a site, signifying that E. dunnii performs as well as an alternative species, although site effects existed for all species. Figure 1 shows growth of E. dunnii at two of these species trials, at Cascade SF and Chichester SF, in greater detail as these sites have been used for wood quality assessments. Figure 1 also shows growth over time for two FNSW E. dunnii progeny trials planted in 1995 at: • Boambee SF (30°18′S, 153°03′E), yellow podzolic soils, MAR 1700 mm, altitude 60 m • Megan SF (30°17′S, 152°47′E), yellow podzolic soils, MAR 1600 mm, altitude of 730 m. The Boambee SF and Megan SF progeny trials were planted at 1388 sph on rows 3 m apart and 2.4 m apart within the rows. Both trials were thinned from 1388 sph to 694 at age 4.5 y. The Boambee SF progeny trial was thinned to 347 sph in late 2007. These data show growth at the two progeny trials was similar to that at the earlier-planted species trials, although site effects are noticeable. Boambee SF is a higher-quality site with predicted MAI at 20 y of 20 m3 ha–1 compared to 15 m3 ha–1 at Megan SF (Henson and Vanclay 2004). Growth of 9- and 14-y-old E. dunnii in Argentina was comparable to these reported values (Marco and Lopez 1995), but diameter growth of E. dunnii in Brazil aged 8–19 y was almost double that observed in NSW, although height growth was similar (Trugilho et al. 2005). Although the growth of E. dunnii in NSW plantations — measured as diameter, height or volume — is similar to that of other betterknown species such as E. pilularis and E. grandis, ‘growth’ is only one attribute of a species grown for timber. The end use of the timber also has to be considered. A study is in progress to examine potential end uses of E. dunnii from plantations of various ages — the Boambee SF trial was harvested in 2007 at age 12 y, and the properties of solid wood, veneer and pulp wood from this high-performing young stand are being assessed; two other sites aged 17 y (Newry SF) and 34 y (Cascade SF) were also harvested in 2007 and similar end uses evaluated. Records of destructive and non-destructive assessments of growth and wood quality traits relevant to pulping and solid-wood products are available for these three sites. Density Wood is often characterised by density because this property is correlated, although perhaps not always causally related, with many other quality traits. Denser wood tends to be stronger, but may have greater shrinkage and more checks when dried. Denser wood contains more wood per unit volume and tends to give a higher yield of pulp in paper manufacturing. Thus information about wood density is useful to plantation management. Overall wood density typically increases with tree age as the proportion of lower-density material formed early in a tree’s life is reduced by the formation of higher-density material in older trees (e.g. de Silva et al. 2004). Basic density of native forest (a) (b) 40 35 30 35 Chichester Cascade 25 20 Buladehlah 15 10 Yabbra 5 0 Chichester 30 Tree height (m) Diameter breast height (cm) 40 Yabbra 25 Buladelah 20 15 Cascade 10 5 0 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 0 10 Age (y) 20 30 40 Age (y) Figure 1. Mean diameter over bark at 1.3 m (a), and mean tree height (b) at last formal measurement of E. dunnii (open square), E. grandis (open triangle) and E. pilularis (open circle) from four trials. The measurements of the four trials are encircled. Mean tree growth of E. dunnii over time for two of these trials at Cascade (solid square) and Chichester (solid diamond) is shown. Mean growth at two E. dunnii progeny trials at Boambee SF (solid triangle) and Megan SF (solid circle) is shown. Australian Forestry 2009 Vol. 72 No. 1 pp. 3–11 Dane Thomas, Michael Henson, Bill Joe, Steve Boyton and Ross Dickson E. dunnii is reported to be 610 kg m–3 (Bootle 2005). These data would have been based on tests of wood from mature stands. Data on basic density from 12-mm diametric (bark-to-bark) cores and whole disks at breast height (1.3 m), and estimates of whole-tree density, were used to develop a relationship with tree age for material grown in NSW plantations. Data on plantation-grown material from NSW and elsewhere shows a trend of increasing basic density in older trees to about 600 kg m–3 at 25 y, although there is some variability with method of sampling and or site with non-NSW sites (predominantly South American) (Ribeiro and Filho 1993; Marco and Lopez 1995; Calori and Kikuti 1997; Ferreira et al. 1997; Backman and deLeon 1998; Dickson et al. 2003; Arnold et al. 2004; Henson et al. 2004; Trugilho et al. 2005; Muneri et al. 2007) (Fig. 2). The (log transformed) density of Australian plantation-grown E. dunnii was highly correlated with tree age, with a coefficient of determination (R 2) of 0.85, n = 17. Basic density (kg m–3) 700 500 400 300 200 0 R 2 = 0.85, n = 17 0 10 20 Pulp characteristics Site and age can affect pulp yield and quality. Pulp characteristics of E. dunnii from a number of sites have been evaluated (Table 1). Eucalyptus dunnii from 8-y-old trees grown at Boambee SF were easier to pulp, produced 53% screened pulp and had a higher pulp yield of 277 kg m–3 compared to trees of the same age grown at Megan SF which produced 50% screened pulp and a pulp yield of 237 kg m–3 (Muneri et al. 2007). Trees at Boambee SF were also about twice the height and diameter and four times the volume of trees at Megan SF (Fig. 1). The pulping results at Boambee SF are similar to both 9-y-old E. dunnii grown at Newry SF in northern NSW and 12-y-old material from Gympie, Queensland (Hicks and Clark 2001); and to E. dunnii aged 9 y in South Africa (Swain et al. 2000) and 4 y in Uraguay (Backman and deLeon 1998). The screened pulp yield of 55% for the 9-y-old Newry site was higher than 10-y-old E. globulus from Tasmania (Hicks and Clark 2001). Furthermore Hicks and Clark (2001) rated E. dunnii from Newry amongst the top three of 23 combinations of species and sites for value as woodchips based on bulk densities, alkali requirements and pulp yields, and over 10% better than Tasmanian export woodchips from native forests. Site also affected pulp quality, the average fibre length being longer, 0.86 mm, at Boambee SF than the 0.74 mm at Megan SF, the latter being similar to results reported from South Africa (Muneri et al. 2007). This is important as fibre length can affect paper quality (Wimmer et al. 2002). Silvicultural practices such as stocking can also affect pulp productivity of E. dunnii (Ferreira et al. 1997) through, amongst other factors, changes in pulping characteristics, tree diameter and height growth, and wood density. 600 100 5 30 Age (y) Figure 2. Basic density of E. dunnii as a function of tree age. NSW plantation data were estimated from whole trees (solid diamond), calculated from disks (small solid circle), or wood cores (solid square). Data from one Queensland plantation using whole-tree data are shown (open diamond). The logarithmic regression with a coefficient of determination of 0.85 was calculated with data from 16 NSW plantations and one Queensland plantation where density was derived from wood samples and not Pilodyn needle penetration. Data from overseas plantations are shown (solid triangle). Density of mature trees from native forest is shown as a large solid circle plotted as an age of 36 y for the purpose of graphic display, but was not used in the regression. Pulp yield of 8-y-old E. dunnii growing at Boambee SF and Megan SF plantations was recently estimated using near-infrared spectroscopy (Muneri et al. 2005). This technique offers fast, cost-effective evaluation of the economic potential of trees. The predicted values were within 2% of observed values, with high correlation coefficients. It is recommended that this technique be tested on other sites and older trees to determine its wider application. Table 1. Pulping characteristics of plantation-grown Eucalyptus dunnii, with 10-y-old plantation-grown E. globulus from Tasmania as a comparison Plantation location Age (y) Active alkali (% Na2O) Pulp yield (%) Yield (kg m–3) Boambee SF, NSW Megan SF, NSW Newry SF, NSW Gympie, Qld 08 08 09 12 12.8 13.8 12.3 13.9 53.3 50.1 54.8 51.6 277 237 282 276 Muneri et al. 2007 Muneri et al. 2007 Hicks and Clark 2001 Hicks and Clark 2001 South Africa Uruguay 09 04 NA 14.6 50.3 50.1 256 245 Swain et al. 2000 Backman and deLeon 1998 Tasmania, E. globulus 10 11.5 53.8 268 Hicks and Clark 2001 NA denotes data not available Australian Forestry 2009 Vol. 72 No. 1 pp. 3–11 Reference 6 Quality of plantation-grown Eucalyptus dunnii Solid wood Growth stresses Solid-wood properties of E. dunnii are in many ways more difficult to ascertain than density or pulping characteristics. A common problem of plantation-grown wood as opposed to native forest material is related to growth stresses. It is generally accepted among researchers that growth stresses are generated in the secondary xylem during cell maturation (Jacobs 1938; Kubler 1987). However, theories put forward to explain the generation mechanism remain controversial and unresolved. Two theories that have survived to the present day are the ‘lignin swelling’ theory advanced by Boyd (1972, 1985) and the ‘cellulose tension’ theory advanced by Bamber (1979, 1987). Neither theory appears to apply in all circumstances. More recently, Yamamoto (1998) introduced a unified hypothesis that incorporated both lignin swelling and cellulose tensioning, and implicated microfibril angle (MFA), in generating growth stresses. The lignin swelling hypothesis became relevant in the region of the cell wall with a large MFA (i.e. compression wood fibre), whilst the cellulose tension hypothesis became relevant in the region of the cell wall with a small MFA (i.e. normal and tension wood fibre). Regardless of the mechanism of generation, the occurrence of growth stresses is not in doubt and is thought to be related to the growth rate of trees; the stresses or stress gradients often decline with tree age. Excessive growth stresses can result in endsplitting of logs after they are felled and considerable downgrading of log quality. Growth stress manifested in the form of endsplitting is under genetic control in E. dunnii (Anonymous 1999; Swain et al. 2000), which suggests the possibility of using genetic selection to reduce losses from endsplitting. Silvicultural management may also affect growth strains and hence endsplitting. Peripheral growth strains in 9-y-old E. dunnii grown at Boambee SF were evaluated by Murphy et al. (2005). Growth strain was found to be heritable, but it was also observed that taller thinner trees had higher growth strain than short thick trees (Murphy et al. 2005), suggesting strain may be altered by site and the influences of silvicultural practices on stem taper. Growth stresses are also a major concern when processing timber. It has been estimated that one-third of material sawn from plantation-grown E. dunnii may suffer degrade attributable to growth stress (Matos et al. 2003). Similar degrade was reported in 10-y-old plantation-grown E. globulus, where 30% of boards were rejected due to excessive distortion and 40% of this distortion could be attributed to growth stress (Yang et al. 2001, 2002). It is therefore not surprising that methods have been examined to reduce losses due to growth stress. Alternative sawing techniques are available which rely on removing stresses over the entire log, which increases timber recovery. These techniques have allowed the successful production of structural timber from young plantation-grown material of several eucalypts. Additionally various methods have been used to reduce and release growth stresses prior to harvest (Malan 1995). Techniques such as girdling of standing trees, or partial defoliation prior to harvest, were shown to reduce growth stresses of E. grandis although variation between trees and decay of girdled trees was excessive (Malan 1995). Herbicide and radial cuts were most effective in reducing growth stresses of E. dunnii (Matos et al. 2003). Postharvest steaming treatments prior to milling were also effective in reducing splitting and other growth-stress-related defects in E. dunnii (Severo and Tomaselli 2000). Mechanical properties Modulus of elasticity (MOE) and modulus of rupture (MOR) are the principal mechanical properties dictating uses of solid wood. Modulus of elasticity Modulus of elasticity is a measure of stiffness of wood and has traditionally been determined by static bending of standard clearwood specimens. It is less of a problem with hardwoods than softwoods, although juvenile wood from plantation-grown trees of both may have unacceptable MOE. Static bending MOE in E. dunnii increased with wood density in five NSW plantations, but the relationship with tree age was weaker (Fig. 3). Data from Brazil also show that MOE (measured in tension) increased with tree age and or wood density (Fig. 3) (Trugilho et al. 2005). However, wood from these Brazilian plantations had much higher MOE than that from NSW plantations. MOE increases over time, although neither tree age nor basic density was a wholly satisfactory explanatory variable. MOE is influenced by density and microfibril angle, with that angle accounting for more variation than density (Evans and Ilic 2001; Yang and Evans 2003). In combination, density and microfibril angle can account for over 90% of MOE in plantation eucalypts (Evans and Ilic 2001; Yang and Evans 2003). The relationship between MOE and density (Fig. 3a) shows MOE of wood from mature E. dunnii was higher than predicted using data from plantation-grown E. dunnii despite having similar basic density. As microfibril angle typically declines with tree age (e.g. Lindstrőm et al. 1998; Evans et al. 1999), and as large gains in MOE are realised with relatively small changes in microfibril angle (e.g. Yang and Evans 2003), it seems likely that the MOE of mature native forest material is more influenced by lower microfibril angle than younger plantation material, despite having similar basic density. MOE can also be predicted from acoustic measurements such as the FAKOPP microsecond timer. Of three acoustic instruments tested, Henson et al. (2004) found the FAKOPP microsecond timer gave the most accurate predictions of MOE. MOE of older E. dunnii plantations predicted using a linear relationship between MOE and the FAKOPP readings showed MOE to be greater than 14 GPa in stands aged 12 y or older. This MOE is similar to that predicted from the relationship between age and MOE (Fig. 3b). Management of stem taper may also affect strength of processed timber as stem taper has also been related, albeit weakly, to strength of loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.) solid wood and veneer (Floyd et al. 2006). It has yet to be determined if similar relationships exist in eucalypts. Australian Forestry 2009 Vol. 72 No. 1 pp. 3–11 Dane Thomas, Michael Henson, Bill Joe, Steve Boyton and Ross Dickson (b) 30 30 25 25 20 20 MOE (GPa) MOE (GPa) (a) 15 10 15 10 5 5 0 7 R 2 = 0.63, n = 5 300 400 500 600 R 2 = 0.36, n = 5 0 700 0 5 10 Basic density (kg m–3) 15 20 25 30 35 Age (y) Figure 3. Modulus of elasticity (MOE) of static bending as a function of basic density (a), and of age (b) of E. dunnii. Material from NSW plantations (solid square) was used for the linear regressions which had coefficients of determination of 0.63 and 0.36 for the relationship with basic density and with age respectively. Data from mature trees in native forest are shown as a large solid circle and plotted as an age of 36 y for the purpose of graphic display, but were not used in the regressions. MOE in tension values of Brazilian material are also included (solid triangle). Modulus of rupture Modulus of rupture (MOR) was found to be related to density and to age in plantation-grown E. dunnii (Fig. 4). Both correlations were highly positive, with a coefficient of determination of 0.91 for the relationship with basic density and 0.67 for the relationship with tree age. The MOR data for E. dunnii from mature native forest (Bootle 2005) were comparable to the experimental data for plantation wood of similar density (Fig. 4a). Strength group (SD) MOR and MOE are the key determinants of quality of solid-wood products used in structural applications (e.g. floor joists, lintels, trusses, girders). Under the Australian strength classification system using AS/NZS2878:2000 (Standards Australia 2000), species are classified into ‘strength groups’ based on minimum mean MOR and MOE values. Individual sawn boards are then assigned stress grades (F-grades) depending on the size and type of defects present. For seasoned timber, there are eight strength groups from SD1 to SD8 in descending order of strength. Figure 5 shows the strength grouping of plantation-grown E. dunnii improving with age. This is an important relationship as it indicates that the utilisation potential improves with plantation age. The predictive equation indicates that a tree age of 22 y is necessary before SD4 is attained, and 30 y for SD3; the latter corresponds to stress grades from F14 to F27 depending the extent of strength-reducing characteristics present in the boards. Material selected from a progeny trial at age 9 y for high density had a (b) 160 140 140 120 120 MOR (MPa) MOR (MPa) (a) 160 100 80 60 80 60 40 40 20 20 0 300 100 2 R = 0.91, n = 5 400 500 600 700 R 2 = 0.67, n = 5 0 0 Basic density (kg m–3) 10 20 30 Age (y) Figure 4. Modulus of rupture (MOR) of E. dunnii as a function of basic density (a) and of age (b) of NSW plantation material (solid square), and the regressions calculated using these data. Material from NSW plantations (solid square) was used for the linear regressions which had coefficients of determination of 0.91 and 0.67 for the relationship of MOR with basic density and with age respectively. Data from mature trees in native forest are shown as a large solid circle plotted as an age of 36 y for the purpose of graphic display, but were not used in the regressions. Australian Forestry 2009 Vol. 72 No. 1 pp. 3–11 Quality of plantation-grown Eucalyptus dunnii 8 superior strength group (i.e. SD3) than the general relationship with plantation age would suggest (i.e. SD5, which corresponds to stress grades F8 to F17). The general relationship predicts trees would be 20 y older before a similar SD rating was achieved in unselected material. It would be assumed that this selected material would maintain its overall stronger SD rating as it continues to grow, and that newly established plantations using genetically improved material could produce better timber at a younger plantation age. Hardness Wood hardness is a measure of resistance to indentation, and provides an indication to how well the wood in service performs 8 7 SD group 6 5 4 3 2 1 R 2 = 0.84, n = 4 0 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 Age (y) Figure 5. Seasoned strength (SD) group as a function of age for E. dunnii grown in NSW plantations (solid square) and of 9-y-old material selected for high density (solid diamond). Only the four data points of nonselected material were used to develop the linear regression which had a coefficient of determination of 0.84. Data from mature trees in native forest are shown as a large solid circle plotted as an age of 36 y for the purpose of graphic display, but were not used in the regression. (Strength is inversely related to the group category number.) in relation to wear and marking. It is an important quality trait for flooring and furniture, but less important for other solid-wood products. The Janka method (Mack 1979) was used to determine the hardness values reported here. Phenotypic correlations between hardness and density of eucalypts including E. dunnii have been shown to be positive (e.g. Dickson et al. 2003). The regressions of hardness and density, and hardness and tree age, using NSW plantation-grown E. dunnii were positive and highly correlated (Fig. 6). Data from mature E. dunnii and E. dunnii grown in Brazil agree with these relationships, suggesting hardness will increase with plantation age because density will increase with plantation age. Shrinkage and collapse It is generally accepted that denser woods will shrink (and swell) more than lower-density woods as they have proportionately more cell wall and less lumen (e.g. Kollman and Côté 1977; West 2006). The cell wall of denser wood contains larger amounts of water such that as water is removed from the cell wall during drying, the volume of cell wall decreases (i.e. shrinks) by an equivalent amount. The relationship between basic density and shrinkage after reconditioning to overcome collapse or reversible shrinkage during drying for NSW plantation-grown E. dunnii was positive (Fig. 7). The corresponding values for wood from mature trees provided by Bootle (2005) generally agree with those for plantation-grown E. dunnii. Recoverable shrinkage (collapse) accounted for about 4% tangentially and 1% radially in this NSW plantation material irrespective of density (or age), which meant that the relationship between density and shrinkage was not affected. Bootle (2005) lists tangential shrinkage of mature native forest E. dunnii of an unknown age to be 10% and radial shrinkage at 5%, giving a ratio between tangential and radial shrinkage of 2.0. Lower shrinkage ratios are desirable as cupping of boards during drying would be reduced with more uniform shrinkage. Older plantation-grown E. dunnii has shrinkage comparable to that of the mature trees whose properties are given in Bootle (2005) (Fig. 8). (b) 8 7 7 Hardness (Janka) (kN) Hardness (Janka) (kN) (a) 8 6 5 4 3 2 5 4 3 2 1 1 0 6 R 2 = 0.94, n = 5 300 400 500 600 R 2 = 0.90, n = 5 0 700 0 5 –3 Basic density (kg m ) 10 15 20 25 30 35 Age (y) Figure 6. Hardness of E. dunnii as a function of basic density (a) and of age (b) for NSW plantation material (solid square) and non-NSW data (solid triangle). The linear regressions were calculated using plantation-grown material from NSW. These regressions had coefficients of determination of 0.94 and 0.90 for the relationship of hardness with basic density and with age respectively. Data from mature trees in native forest are shown as a solid circle plotted as an age of 36 y for the purpose of graphic display, but were not used in the regressions. Australian Forestry 2009 Vol. 72 No. 1 pp. 3–11 Dane Thomas, Michael Henson, Bill Joe, Steve Boyton and Ross Dickson Tangential shrinkage of 10.2% and radial shrinkage of 6.2% were found in 20-y-old Brazilian plantation E. dunnii, giving a lower ratio between tangential shrinkage and radial shrinkage of almost 1.5 (Calori and Kikuti 1997). Shrinkage after reconditioning to recover collapse of 29-y-old E. dunnii at Chichester, NSW, was 8.4% tangentially and 3.2% radially (Joe, FNSW, unpublished data), while shrinkage after reconditioning to recover collapse of 6-y-old E. dunnii was 6.2% tangentially and 2.2% radially (Joe, FNSW, unpublished data). These shrinkage values are less than those for the Brazilian trees, but in each case the ratio between tangential and radial shrinkage was higher at 2.6 for the 29-y-old material and 2.8 for the 6-y-old material. Recoverable collapse in the NSW plantation material accounted for about 4% of tangential shrinkage but less than 1% of the radial shrinkage (Joe, FNSW, unpublished data). Recovery of this collapse could lead to checking and be detrimental to appearance-grade products (Harwood et al. 2005). Shrinkage in 6- and 9-y-old plantation-grown E. dunnii from NSW has also been examined on 12-mm diametric (bark-tobark) pseudo-cores (Arnold et al. 2004; Bandara 2006; Johnson FNSW, unpublished report). Total tangential shrinkage before reconditioning of the 9-y-old material was 17.4% — tangential shrinkage measured after reconditioning was 7.1% while collapse was found to be 10% (Bandara 2006). No data were available of radial variation in these shrinkage or collapse values. However, Henson et al. (2004) reported tangential and radial shrinkage of boards — obtained from this material and dried quickly to (a) (b) 40 7 35 6 Radial shrinkage (%) Tangential shrinkage (%) 9 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 5 4 3 2 1 0 300 400 500 600 700 300 400 Basic density (kg m ) 500 600 700 Basic density (kg m ) –3 –3 Figure 7. Tangential (a) and radial (b) shrinkage before and after reconditioning of plantation-grown E. dunnii as a function of basic density. Shrinkage was measured on blocks or boards before reconditioning (solid square) and after reconditioning (open square); or on 12-mm diametric cores before reconditioning (solid diamond) and after reconditioning (open diamond). Non-NSW data are shown as solid triangle and it is unknown if this is before or after reconditioning. Data from mature trees in native forest are shown as a large solid circle. (b) 7 12 6 Radial shrinkage (%) Tangential shrinkage (%) (a) 14 10 8 6 4 4 3 2 1 2 0 5 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 0 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 Age (y) Age (y) Figure 8. Tangential (a) and radial (b) shrinkage before and after reconditioning of plantation-grown E. dunnii as a function of age. Shrinkage was measured on blocks or boards before reconditioning (solid square) or after reconditioning (open square). Non-NSW data are shown as solid triangles and it is unknown if this is before or after reconditioning. Data from mature trees in native forest are shown as a large solid circle, and plotted as an age of 36 y for the purpose of graphic display. Australian Forestry 2009 Vol. 72 No. 1 pp. 3–11 10 Quality of plantation-grown Eucalyptus dunnii exacerbate distortion — to be 11.7% and 3.1% respectively. This corresponds to a ratio of tangential to radial shrinkage of 3.8, a value higher than in other reports. The high ratio of tangential to radial shrinkage in wood from NSW plantations is of concern as sawn material will be under differential stresses while drying, which may lead to dryingrelated defects such as cupping (Harwood et al. 2005). Harwood et al. (2005) and Bandara (2006) noted that a high percentage of boards sawn from 9-y-old material displayed cupping after drying. Following reconditioning, 27% of these boards had unrecoverable collapse-related defects on an average of 60% of their length, while surface checking was visible on less than 0.1% of the board length (Harwood et al. 2005; Bandara 2006). It is interesting to note that the higher ratio of tangential to radial shrinkage in material from NSW plantations is different to that in material from both the older native forest resource and the 20-y-old plantations in Brazil. This suggests this difference is not solely related to age of the material. The higher ratio in the NSW plantation material was due more to proportionally much lower radial shrinkage in the NSW plantation material than to differences in tangential shrinkage between the trees from the three sources. Why NSW plantation material would have less radial shrinkage is unclear. Differential transverse shrinkage can be due to many factors including gross anatomical structures such as cell lumen size or cell wall thickness, or the presence of wood rays, or more detailed structure such as cell wall microfibril angle, or composition of the middle lamella (Kollman and Côté 1977). Clearly the higher ratio of tangential shrinkage to radial shrinkage of NSW plantation-grown E. dunnii needs to be addressed. Gains could be made through greater use of improved genetic material as it has been shown that wood traits are highly heritable, and that in E. pilularis tangential and radial shrinkage and their ratio is under genetic control (Pelletier 2006; Raymond et al. 2007). Shrinkage of wood is a further quality attribute that is correlated with both growth stress and density. Ten-year-old E. nitens with low growth stress had less shrinkage (Chauhan and Walker 2004), while Yang et al. (2002) found a weak negative relationship between tangential shrinkage and growth stress of 10-y-old E. globulus. A strong positive relationship existed between growth stress and the difference in shrinkage between heartwood and sapwood of E. nitens (Chauhan and Walker 2004). Shrinkage of E. globulus sapwood was typically low, being about half that of outer heartwood (Yang and Pongracic 2004). These shrinkage results may in part be due to differences in density or extractives content (which act as a bulking agent) between the outer heartwood and sapwood. It is clear the relationship between growth stress and shrinkage requires further research. Conclusion Wood from E. dunnii plantations shows increasing basic density as stands age. Basic density was correlated, although perhaps not causally related, with many other wood quality traits. These traits, including shrinkage and structural characteristics such as hardness, MOE and MOR, showed linear increases with both basic density and stand age. The increasing MOR and MOE corresponded to increased strength and improved strength group (SD grade), highlighting the higher quality of denser material from older stands. As these traits, along with growth characteristics such as tree volume and diameter, heavily influence end product recovery and value, it should be realised that plantation-grown material which is usually harvested at younger ages than trees in native forest material may be of different quality. References Anonymous (1999) Preliminary study of end splitting in young E. dunnii billets in Boambee family trial. Forests NSW, 5 pp. Arnold, R.J., Johnson, I.G. and Owen, J.V. (2004) Genetic variation in growth, stem straightness and wood properties in Eucalyptus dunnii trials in northern New South Wales. Forest Genetics 11, 1–12. Backman, M. and de Leon, J.P.G. (1998) Pulp and paper properties of four-year-old eucalyptus trees for early species selection. In: Brown, P. (ed.) Proceedings 52nd APPITA Annual General Conference. Brisbane, 11–14 May 1998. APPITA, Melbourne, Volume 1, pp. 7–14. Bamber, R.K. (1979) The origin of growth stresses. Forpride Digest 8(1), 75–96. Bamber, R.K. (1987) The origin of growth stresses: a rebuttal. IAWA Bulletin 8, 80–84. Bandara, K.M.A. (2006) Genetic improvement of solid wood product value of subtropical eucalypts: a case study of Eucalyptus grandis and E. dunnii. PhD thesis, Australian National University, Canberra. Benson, J.S. and Hager, T.C. (1993) The distribution, abundance and habitat of Eucalyptus dunnii (Myrtaceae) (Dunn’s white gum) in New South Wales. Cunninghamia 3, 123–145. Boland, D.J., Brooker, M.I.H., Chippendale, G.M., Hall, N., Hyland, B.P.M., Johnston, R.D., Kleinig, D.A., McDonald, M.W. and Turner, J.D. (2006) Forest Trees of Australia. 5th edition. CSIRO Publishing, Collingwood, Victoria, Australia, 736 pp. Bootle, K.R. (2005) Wood in Australia: Types, Properties and Uses. Second edition. McGraw-Hill, 452 pp. Boyd, J.D. (1972) Tree growth stresses — part 5: evidence of an origin in differentiation and lignification. Wood Science and Technology 6, 251–262. Boyd, J.D. (1985) The key factor in growth stress generation in trees: lignification or crystallisation? IAWA Bulletin 6, 139–150. Calori, J.V. and Kikuti, P. (1997) Physical and mechanical properties of wood from E. dunnii of 20 years of age. In: Conference IUFRO Sobre Silvicultura e Melhoramento de Eucalyptus. Salvador, Brazil. Embrapa, Brazil, pp. 321–326. Chauhan, S.S. and Walker, J. (2004) Relationships between longitudinal growth strain and some wood properties in Eucalyptus nitens. Australian Forestry 67, 254–260. de Silva, J.C., da Oliveira, J.T.S., Tomazello Filho, M., Keinert Junior, S. and de Matos, J.L.M. (2004) Influence of age and radial position on the density of the wood of Eucalyptus grandis Hill ex. Maiden. Floresta 1, 13–22. Dickson, R.L., Raymond, C.A., Joe, W. and Wilkinson, C.A. (2003) Segregation of Eucalyptus dunnii logs using acoustics. Forest Ecology and Management 179, 243–251. Dickson, R.L., Joe, W., Johnson, D., Austin, S. and Ribton-Turner, F. (2005) Pre-processing prediction of wood quality in peeler logs grown in northern New South Wales. Australian Forestry 68, 186–191. Evans, R. and Ilic, J. (2001) Rapid prediction of wood stiffness from microfibril angle and density. Forests Products Journal 51, 53–57. Evans, R., Hughes, N. and Menz, D. (1999) Microfibril angle variation by scanning X-ray diffractometry. Appita Journal 52, 363–367. Australian Forestry 2009 Vol. 72 No. 1 pp. 3–11 Dane Thomas, Michael Henson, Bill Joe, Steve Boyton and Ross Dickson Ferreira, G.W., Gonzaga, J.V., Foelkel, C.E.B., Assis, T.F. de, Ratnieks, E. and de Silva, M.C.M. (1997) Kraft-anthraquinone pulp properties of Eucalyptus dunnii obtained from five tree plantation spacings and compared with commercially planted Eucalyptus grandis and Eucalyptus saligna. Ciencia Florestal 7, 41–63. Floyd, S.L., Miltimore, Y.C. and Huang, C-L. (2006) Method of evaluating logs to predict properties of lumber or veneer produced from the logs. US Patent US 6,996,497B2. Harwood, C., Bandara, K., Washusen, R., Northway, R., Henson, M. and Boyton, S. (2005) Variation in Wood Properties of Plantation Grown Eucalyptus dunnii Relevant to Solid Wood Products. Project PN04.3003, Forest and Wood Products Research and Development Corporation, Melbourne, 37 pp. Henson, M. and Vanclay, J.R. (2004) The value of good sites and good genotypes: an analysis of Eucalyptus dunnii plantations in NSW. In: The Economics and Management of High Productivity Plantations. IUFRO. 4.04.06 International Meeting. Escuela Politécnica Superior Universidad de Santiago de Compostela, Lugo, 27–30 September 2004. ISBN 84 609 3061 0. 6 pp. Henson, M., Boyton, S., Davies, M., Joe, B., Bandara, K., Murphy, T.N., Palmer, G. and Vanclay, J.K. (2004) Genetic parameters of wood properties in a 9-year-old E. dunnii progeny trial in NSW, Australia. In: Borralho, N.M.G., Pereira, J.S., Marques, C., Coutinho, J., Madeira, M. and Tome, M. (eds) Eucalyptus in a Changing World. 11–15 October, Aveiro, Portugal, 83 pp. Hicks, C.C. and Clark, N.B. (2001) Pulpwood Quality of Thirteen Eucalypt Species with Potential for Farm Forestry. Publication 01/164, RIRDC, Canberra. 38 pp. Jacobs, M.R. (1938) The Fibre Tension of Woody Stems, with Special Reference to the Genus Eucalyptus. Bulletin No. 22, Common wealth Forestry Bureau, Australia, 37 pp. Johnson, I.G. and Arnold, R.J. (2000) Age 3 Year Assessment of Cooperative SFNSW/CSIRO Eucalyptus dunnii Provenance– Family Trials in Northern New South Wales. Research Paper 37, Forest Research and Development Division, State Forests of New South Wales, Sydney, 28 pp. Johnson, I.G. and Stanton, R.R. (1993) Thirty Years of Eucalypt Species and Provenance Trials in New South Wales — Survival and Growth in Trials Established from 1961 to 1990. Research Paper No. 20. Forestry Commission of New South Wales, Sydney, 92 pp. Kollman, F.F.P. and Côté, W.A. (1977) Principles of Wood Science and Technology. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany, 592 pp. Kubler, H. (1987) Growth stresses in trees and related wood properties. Forestry Abstracts 48, 131–189. Lindstrőm, H., Evans, J.W. and Verrill, S.P. (1998) Influence of cambial age and growth conditions on microfibril angle in young Norway spruce (Picea abies (L.) Karst.). Holzforschung 52, 573–581. Mack, J.J. (1979) Australian Methods for Mechanically Testing Small Clear Specimens of Timber. CSIRO Division of Building Research Paper (2nd Series) No. 31. Malan, F.S. (1995) Eucalyptus improvement for lumber production. Semonario Internacional de Utiliizacao de Madeira de Eucalypto para Serraria. In: IPEF, IPT, IUFRO and ESALQ (eds) Anais do Seminário Internacional de Utilização da Madeira de Eucalipto para Serraria. São Paulo, Brazil, pp. 1–19. Marco, M.A. and Lopez, J.A. (1995) Performance of Eucalyptus grandis and Eucalyptus dunnii in the Mesopotamia region, Argentina. In: Potts, B.M., Borralho, N.M.G., Reid, J.B., Cromer, R.N., Tibbits, W.N. and Raymond, C.A. (eds) Eucalypt Plantations – Improving Fibre Yield and Quality. Proceedings CRCTHF–IUFRO Confer ence, Hobart, 19–24 February. CRC for Temperate Hardwood Forestry, Hobart, pp. 40–45. 11 Matos, J.L.M., Iwakiri, S., da Rocha, M.P., Paim, R.M. and de Andrade, L.O. (2003) Reduction of growth stress effects in the logs of Eucalyptus dunnii. Scientia Forestalis 64, 128–135. Muneri, A., Diado, T. and Henson, M. (2005) Near infrared spectroscopy calibrations for pulp yield and basic density of 8-year-old Eucalyptus dunnii using samples from contrasting sites. In: Coghill, R. (ed.) Proceedings 59th APPITA Annual General Conference. 16–19 May, Auckland, New Zealand. APPITA, Melbourne, pp. 431–434. Muneri, A., Daido, T., Henson, M. and Johnson, I. (2007) Variation in pulpwood quality of superior Eucalyptus dunnii families grown in NSW. APPITA Journal 60, 74–77. Murphy, T.N., Henson, M. and Vanclay, J.K. (2005) Growth stress in Eucalyptus dunnii. Australian Forestry 68, 144–149. Pelletier, M-C. (2006) Genetic variation in shrinkage properties of Eucalyptus pilularis (Smith) using increment cores. Honours thesis. Southern Cross University, Lismore, Australia. 75 pp. Raymond, C.A., Henson, M., Peletier, M-C., Boyton, S., Joe, W., Thomas, D.S., Smith, H. and Vanclay, J. (2007). Improving Dimensional Stability in Plantation-Grown E. pilularis and E. dunnii. Project PN06.3017, Forest and Wood Products Australia, Melbourne, 68 pp. Ribeiro, F. de A. and Filho, J.Z. (1993) Variacao da densidade basica da madeira em especies/procedencias de Eucalyptus spp. IPEF, Piracicaba 46, 76–85. Severo, E.T.D. and Tomaselli, I. (2000) Vaporization on the release of growth stresses in logs of Eucalyptus dunnii from two origin. Scientia Agraria 1, 29–32. Standards Australia (2000) Timber – Classification into Strength Groups. AS/NZS 2878:2000. Standards Australia, Sydney. Swain, T.L., Gardner, R.A.W. and Chiappero, C.C. (2000) Final Results of Three ICFR Eucalyptus dunnii Trials in Kwazulu-Natal, South Africa. ICFR Bulletin series number 02/2000, 15 pp. Trugilho, P.F., Lima, J.T. and Rosado, S.C.S. (2005) Longitudinal growth stress in Eucalyptus dunnii Maiden. In: Li Xuiwei, Liu Jing, Gai Yu and Li Feng (eds) Proceedings of the International Conference on Plantation Eucalyptus. Zhanjiang, Guangdong, China, November 28–December 1, 2005. Science Press, China, pp. 68–73. West, P.W. (2006) Growing Plantation Forests. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany. 304 pp. Wimmer R., Downes, G.M., Evans, R., Rasmussen, G. and French, J. (2002) Direct effects of wood chaacteristics on pulp and handsheet properties of Eucalyptus globulus. Holzforschung 56, 244–252. Yamamoto, H. (1998) Generation mechanism of growth stresses in wood cell walls: role of lignin deposition and cellulose microfibril during cell wall maturation. Wood Science and Technology 32, 171–182. Yang, J.L. and Evans, R. (2003) Prediction of MOE of eucalypt wood from microfibrial angle and density. Hotz als Roh-und Werkstoff 61, 449–452. Yang, J.L. and Pongracic, S. (2004) The Impact of Growth Stress on Sawn Distortion and Log End Splitting of 32-Year-Old Plantation Grown Blue Gum. Project PN3.1312, Forest and Wood Products Research and Development Corporation, Melbourne, 31 pp. Yang, J.L., Fife, D. and Matheson, A.C. (2001) Growth strain in three provenances of plantation grown Eucalyptus globulus Labill. Australian Forestry 64, 248–256. Yang, J.L., Fife, D., Waugh, G., Downes, G. and Blackwell, P. (2002) The effect of growth strain and other defects on the sawn timber quality of 10-year-old Eucalyptus globulus Labill. Australian Forestry 65, 31–37. Australian Forestry 2009 Vol. 72 No. 1 pp. 3–11 Failure of Eucalyptus globulus plantations on previously irrigated pasture sites 12 Failure of Eucalyptus globulus (Labill.) plantations on previously irrigated pasture sites in south-eastern South Australia D.N. Fife1,2 and M. Michael1 1CSIRO Forest Biosciences, PO Box 946. Mt Gambier, South Australia 5290, Australia 2Email: [email protected] Revised manuscript received 19 September 2008 Summary From the mid-1990s onwards large areas of Eucalyptus globulus (Labill.) were planted in south-eastern South Australia and south-western Victoria (the Green Triangle region) on land which had been under pasture for decades. Within these plantations some well-defined areas had poor tree growth, and in extreme cases trees died in circular patches. The geometry of the affected areas strongly suggested an association with previous irrigation practices: very clear boundaries separated healthy and affected trees. Foliar analyses of both healthy and affected trees indicated adequate levels of most major nutrients (N, P, K and Ca). There were, however, marked differences in foliar manganese concentrations. Analysis of soil from previously irrigated areas showed increased soil bicarbonate concentration and pH compared to soil from areas with no history of irrigation. There was a strong negative correlation between soil pH and DTPA-extractable manganese. Concomitantly, foliar manganese concentrations decreased significantly to deficient levels as the soil-extractable manganese decreased. We conclude that the severe growth problems in E. globulus commonly found in circular patches of previously irrigated areas are due to acute manganese deficiency as a result of increased soil pH caused by irrigation with water containing high levels of bicarbonate. At one site where pasture grass was analysed, manganese concentration in pasture was considerably lower than in pasture from unirrigated areas, suggesting there could be problems in future for other crops in the region receiving repeated irrigation. The evidence that the pre-planting history dramatically influenced the growth of E. globulus plantations is important because plantations were not irrigated after planting, and areas of current eucalypt plantations in the region include land which had been under irrigation. Keywords: plantations; growth; mortality; nutrition; nutrient deficiencies; irrigation; soil pH; bicarbonates; manganese; Eucalyptus globulus Introduction In the Green Triangle region of south-eastern South Australia (SA) and south-western Victoria, establishment of commercial plantations of E. globulus started in the mid-1990s. By March 2007, 150 000 ha had been established (Green Triangle Regional Plantation Committee 2007) on land previously under pasture. In some plantations, young trees (within 12 mo of planting) had stunted growth and with small chlorotic leaves. In extreme cases, patches of trees died. Such adversely affected areas overlaid circles of land previously irrigated with bore water for pasture production; trees outside the circles grew normally. The boundary between healthy and unhealthy areas was sharp and well delineated. Two irrigation systems, flood irrigation and centre pivot systems, are commonly used. Under flood irrigation, water pumped from underground is allowed to flow over the entire pasture. Under centre pivot irrigation, water pumped from a central bore is spayed in a circle by sprinklers mounted on a rotating water supply line. The circular area covered by one centre pivot unit varies from about 1 ha to 80 ha. The largest in this study was 80 ha. The frequency of centre pivot installations and area covered by irrigation varies from farm to farm, but the area can be up to 60% of the land surface in some locations. Based on the distribution of stunted and unhealthy trees and their location in the paddock, we hypothesised that the irrigation history of the land had induced changes in the soil, sometimes critically, which in young eucalypts induced nutrient deficiency or toxicity, poor tree health and death. This hypothesis was investigated on a number of farms in the Wattle Range area west of Penola in SA. After planting E. globulus none of the areas received irrigation. This investigation is thus a study of the effects of pre-planting irrigation history on E. globulus. For simplicity of description, hereafter we refer to areas formerly irrigated (typically circles) as irrigated and those outside the irrigated areas as unirrigated. The main objectives were: • to seek the cause of poor health and growth, chlorosis and often death of trees by comparing the nutritional status of trees in adjacent areas with contrasting irrigation histories • to measure the differences in selected soil properties between unirrigated and irrigated areas, and link those to the adverse effects on trees. Materials and methods Sites In the Wattle Range area of south-eastern SA, 50 km west of Penola, we selected five plantations where significant problems of tree growth and mortality had been observed. Four sites had been irrigated by centre pivot and one by flood irrigation (Table 1). Australian Forestry 2009 Vol. 72 No. 1 pp. 12–19 D.N. Fife and M. Michael 13 Table 1. Nature of previous irrigation, age, survival and height of trees in selected stands Site Nature of prior irrigation A B C D E Centre pivot Centre pivot Centre pivot Centre pivot Flood Survival (%) Height (cm) Stand age (y) Unirrigated Irrigated Unirrigated Irrigated 1 1 2 2 1 99 95 95 99 95 01 01 50 75 01 200 180 180 200 180 010 010 030 100 010 The soil in the area is described as a humus nomopodsol and classified as a Short Sand (Stephens et al. 1941). It had an A1 horizon (0–25 cm) of dark-grey sand with organic matter decreasing with depth, and light-grey sand to 60 cm. A band of dark-brown sand overlaid pale-yellow clay extending from 70 cm. The type of past irrigation, and age and health of the stands Records were not available of the duration of the irrigation at all these sites and the nature of the crop, although most would have been pasture. However, one of the centre pivot sites (site D) had been irrigated for 6 mo for a single crop of potatoes and another (site A) had been irrigated for 12 y under pasture. Irrigation stopped at least 1 y before planting eucalypts. An example of the pattern of occurrence of the healthy and unhealthy areas of plantation can be seen in an aerial photograph of site A (Fig. 1): the entire area was planted 4 y before this photograph was taken. In the irrigated circle, all trees have died and many have disappeared. Isolated stunted trees with chlorotic foliage were scattered around the margins of the circular area. In sites B, C and D, unhealthy trees occurred in a similar geometric fashion, but their survival and growth were not as severely affected as in site A. At the flood-irrigated site (site E, Table 1) mortality was very high but some healthy trees were present on mounds that had been raised between the irrigated bays. The appearance of recently expanded foliage on affected trees differed between sites, depending on the severity of the impact. At the least-affected site (site D) the foliage was as described by Dell et al. (2001) p. 95 and Fig. 120: margins pale green or yellow with chlorosis spreading between the lateral veins towards the midrib. At this site the leaf size was similar to that of leaves at a similar stage of development in adjacent healthy trees. At the more severely affected sites the leaves were much reduced in size and rounded compared to leaves from healthy trees. The margins of affected leaves at these sites were inevitably necrotic. Figure 1. Aerial photograph of site A 4 y after planting Eucalyptus globulus. One-year-old seedlings were planted outside and within the irrigated circular area (arrows) at the same time. All the trees in the irrigated areas were seriously unhealthy or have died, leading to the distinct and sharp difference in vegetation cover. Trees outside the circle grew well. surface before sampling. The undisturbed cores were placed in a plastic bag, sealed and stored in a cool room at 4°C until they were air-dried and sieved (< 2 mm). At each site, pairs of plots (each plot 4 m × 4 m) were established to form five replicate pairs. Each pair of plots had one plot in the irrigated area and the other in the adjacent unirrigated area. These plots were used for soil, foliage and grass sampling. Sampling of eucalypts Soil sampling Sampling of grass Soil was sampled in June from all paired plots. Five soil cores (0–30 cm soil) were taken at random points using PVC pipe of 50 mm internal diameter. Grass was removed from the soil Grasses were sampled from a 50 cm × 50 cm area within each of the paired plots in site A. Concurrent with the soil sampling, four recently fully expanded (juvenile leaves) from three E. globulus trees per plot were sampled and bulked as a plot sample. Australian Forestry 2009 Vol. 72 No. 1 pp. 12–19 14 Failure of Eucalyptus globulus plantations on previously irrigated pasture sites Water sampling Nutrient status of eucalypt leaves At sites A, B, D and E the bore which had supplied irrigation water was located. A water sample was collected once after flushing the water line for 15 minutes to ensure the water sample was freshly extracted from the water table. The nutrient concentrations in leaves of E. globulus on unirrigated and irrigated plots are presented in Figure 2. Concentrations of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium in trees from irrigated areas were consistently higher than in trees from unirrigated land (Fig. 2a to 2c). Differences in concentrations of calcium, sodium, chloride, magnesium, zinc, copper, iron and boron were small and showed no consistent effects of irrigation history (Fig. 2d to g, i to l). Sample processing and analyses Soil The soil cores were separated into 0–7.5, 7.5–15 and 15–30 cm layers. The samples from each layer from the five cores per plot were mixed and air-dried. A sub-sample was used for the following measurements for each layer: • pH and electrical conductivity (EC) in a 1 : 5 soil : water extract (Rayment and Higginson 1992) • concentration of K, Ca, Na, Mg and bicarbonate (Rayment and Higginson 1992) • Cu, Zn, Mn and Fe in diethylene triamine pentaacetic acid (DTPA) extracts (Rayment and Higginson 1992). Leaves and grass Samples were dried at 70°C, ground, digested and analysed for N, P, K, Ca, Na and Mg (Lowther 1980) and B, Cu, Fe, Mn and Zn by inductively coupled plasma spectrometry (ICP). Chloride was measured by titration with silver nitrate after water extraction with clarifying agents (Lowther CSIRO unpublished). Water Samples were analysed for pH, EC, bicarbonate concentration, Na, K and Ca and Mg (Rayment and Higginson 1992). Statistical analysis and data presentation One-way analysis of variance was used for testing differences in results between unirrigated and irrigated areas within sites. Figures in the text and tables are the means of five replications. Values in brackets following the mean and error bars in figures are the standard errors of the means for five replications. There was a marked difference in the concentration of manganese in leaves (Fig. 2h). Leaves from unirrigated areas had a concentration of 206.8 mg kg–1 (se = 6.9), whilst those from irrigated areas had a concentration of 69.7 (44.6) mg kg–1. In four of the five sites (sites A, B, C and E, Table 2) manganese concentrations were significantly higher in foliage from un irrigated than in that from irrigated areas. For example, at site A in healthy trees the foliar manganese concentration was 225.2 (18.0) mg kg–1 compared to 4.9 (1.2) mg kg–1 in leaves of unhealthy trees growing on irrigated areas. At the site D, which had been irrigated for the shortest period, there was no significant difference in manganese concentration between the two areas (Table 2), somewhat paralleling the results in survival. Soil properties The pH of the surface 7.5 cm of soil was significantly lower in unirrigated soils than in irrigated soils in all sites (Fig. 3a). Values of pH ranged from 5.5 to 6.4 in unirrigated areas to 6.0 to 7.2 in irrigated areas, an increase of 0.7–1.7 units due to irrigation. Soil pH did not alter significantly with depth to 30 cm in either unirrigated and irrigated areas (Fig. 4a) but tended to decrease with depth. Electrical conductivity (EC) of surface soil in unirrigated areas ranged from 0.009 to 0.036 mS cm–1 (Fig. 3b). At all sites EC was higher in irrigated areas and ranged from 0.015 to 0.056 mS cm–1 (Fig. 3b). EC decreased with depth at all sites and was always lower from unirrigated areas (Fig. 4b). Tree survival and growth The concentration of bicarbonate in the surface soil was significantly higher in irrigated areas at all sites except for site D (Fig. 3c). For example, at site A (Fig. 3c) bicarbonate concentration in the surface soil from the unirrigated plot was 7.1 (0.6) mg L–1 compared with 26.1 (3.6) mg L–1 in the irrigated plot. Bicarbonate concentrations decreased with depth at all sites (Fig. 4c), with concentrations at all depths in previously irrigated areas being higher than in unirrigated areas. The areas where tree growth was adversely affected overlaid precisely the areas formerly irrigated (Fig. 1). An identical circular pattern was evident at sites A, B, C and D. At site E, the rectangular blocks of affected trees were within the levee banks of the flood irrigation system. At A and B the trees were only 12 mo old and tree survival within the irrigated area at the two sites was just 1% (Table 1). We were unable to find remnants of dead trees, suggesting that they may have died soon after planting and may have partly decomposed or blown away. Those which had survived in the irrigated area were smaller (Table 1). In stark contrast, trees in the unirrigated areas had grown to 2 m in height within 12 mo. At site D, which had been irrigated for less than 12 mo, survival was up to 75%. Extractable manganese concentrations in the soil from irrigated areas at all sites were lower than in soil from unirrigated areas (Fig. 3d). At site A, manganese concentration in the unirrigated plot was 3.24 (0.33) mg kg–1 but only 0.98 (0.07) mg kg–1 in the irrigated plot (Fig. 3d), a significant difference. At site D, manganese concentration in the soil from the unirrigated plot was 3.02 (0.31) mg kg–1, and from the irrigated plot 2.14 (0.28) mg kg–1, a non-significant difference. On average, the concentration of manganese in surface soil of irrigated areas was half of that in unirrigated areas. Manganese concentrations decreased sharply with depth (Fig. 4d) and below the surface soil there was no difference in manganese concentration of unirrigated and irrigated soils. Results Australian Forestry 2009 Vol. 72 No. 1 pp. 12–19 D.N. Fife and M. Michael (a) Nitrogen (b) Phosphorus 0.3 3.0 1.0 2.5 0.2 2.0 1.0 0.5 0.0 0.0 (f) Chloride 0.3 0.6 0.2 0.5 0.0 0.0 (e) Sodium 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.0 (g) Magnesium 0.5 Unirrigated 0.2 0.4 0.6 1.0 0.4 0.1 (d) Calcium 1.5 0.6 1.5 Concentration (%) (c) Potassium 0.8 2.0 15 Irrigated 0.3 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.0 Concentration (mg kg–1) (h) Manganese 250 (i) Zinc 20 2.5 200 16 2.0 150 12 1.5 100 8 1.0 50 4 0.5 10 0 0 0.0 0 (j) Copper 60 (l) Boron (k) Iron 40 50 30 40 30 20 20 10 0 Figure 2. Concentration of nutrients in foliage of Eucalyptus globulus growing on unirrigated and on irrigated areas. Vertical bars are the standard errors of the means of the five sites. Table 2. Manganese concentration in recently expanded leaves of young Eucalyptus globulus grown on unirrigated and irrigated areas Concentration (mg kg–1) Site A B C D E Unirrigated Irrigated Average se Average se 225.2 183.3 210.9 201.9 212.6 18.0 14.7 10.0 16.6 28.6 004.9 005.7 005.7 237.8 014.7 01.2 00.7 00.7 22.5 05.8 Australian Forestry 2009 Vol. 72 No. 1 pp. 12–19 Significance level P < 0.001 < 0.001 < 0.001 ns < 0.001 Failure of Eucalyptus globulus plantations on previously irrigated pasture sites 8 (a) pH (b) Electrical conductivity 0.07 Unirrigated 0.06 4 2 0 0.04 0.03 0.02 2 15 10 0.00 0 0.8 3 20 5 (d) Manganese (e) Copper 6 0 A B C D 0.4 0.0 E (f) Zinc 5 0.6 4 3 2 0.2 1 (c) Bicarbonate 25 0.01 Cu (mg kg–1) Mn (mg kg–1) 4 Irrigated 0.05 Zn (mg kg–1) E. C. (mS cm–1) pH 6 30 HCO3– (mg L–1) 16 1 A B C Site D 0 E A B Site C D E Site Figure 3. Properties of the surface soil (0–7.5 cm). Vertical bars are the standard errors of the means of five samples from each site. Depth (cm) 0 4 (c) HCO3– (mg L–1) (b) EC (mS cm–1) (a) pH 5 6 7 8 0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 0 5 5 10 10 15 15 20 20 25 25 (d) Mn (mg kg–1) 0 0 1 2 (e) Cu (mg kg–1) 3 4 0.1 0.2 0.3 0 4 8 12 16 20 (f) Zn (mg kg–1) 0.4 0.5 0 1 2 3 4 Depth (cm) 5 10 15 20 25 Unirrigated Irrigated Figure 4. Distribution of soil properties in relation to soil depth. Horizontal bars are the standard errors of the means of the five sites. Australian Forestry 2009 Vol. 72 No. 1 pp. 12–19 D.N. Fife and M. Michael Copper concentrations were lower in soil from irrigated areas than in soil from irrigated areas (Fig. 3e) but the differences were not statistically significant. The irrigation history had no significant effect on the zinc concentration in the surface 0–7.5 cm soil at any site (Fig. 3f) and was not consistent across sites. Zinc concentrations decreased with soil depth and were little different between unirrigated and previously irrigated soils at any depth. Water Because irrigation was suspended several years prior to sample collection the water samples we gathered may not be strictly representative of the quality of the water used for irrigation, but given the strong association between some foliage and soil analyses we chose to examine the properties of water from the bores, expecting the results to be indicative of water quality and relativity between sites. The ranges of pH and EC between the sites were very small; pH ranged from 7.6 to 7.9 and EC from 1.4 to 1.6 mS cm–1. Bicarbonate concentrations ranged from 650 to 780 mg–1 whilst potassium, calcium, sodium and chloride concentrations ranged from 1.5 to 5.8, 92 to 113, 159 to 168 and 290 to 616 mg L–1 respectively. Nutrients in grass At site A, nitrogen concentration in grass from the unirrigated plot was significantly lower than in grass from the irrigated plot, 1.7 (0.2)% compared to 2.4 (0.2)%. The difference between phosphorus concentrations was small, 0.42 (0.01)% compared to 0.57 (0.04)%. There was a large and highly significant (P < 0.001) difference in manganese concentrations, values being 90.2 (6.2) mg kg–1 from the unirrigated plot and 11.5 (1.0) mg kg–1 from the irrigated plot. There were statistically insignificant differences in copper and zinc concentrations. Copper concentrations in grass from unirrigated and irrigated plots were 3.22 (02) and 2.22 (0.44) mg kg–1 respectively. Zinc concentrations were 24.2 (1.05) and 22.2 (2.42) mg kg–1. 17 within the range considered adequate for young E. globulus in plantations (Dell et al. 2001). Concentrations of these nutrients in adjacent trees on unirrigated areas, where trees grew well, were lower — suggesting that these nutrients were not limiting growth. The clearest effects were found in the foliar concentrations of manganese (Fig. 2). Foliar manganese averaged 207 mg kg–1 in trees from the unirrigated areas but only 70 mg kg–1 in samples from irrigated areas. Site A had been irrigated for about 12 y, and site D for less than 12 mo, both by centre pivot. At site A, there was a highly significant difference in manganese concentration in foliage from unirrigated and irrigated areas (225 (18.0) c.f. 4.9 (1.2) mg kg–1, Table 2). At site D, where the irrigation history was much shorter, the difference in foliar manganese was not significant, 201.9 (16.6) in unirrigated areas compared with 237.8 (22.5) mg kg–1 in irrigated areas (Table 2). Survival was also considerably higher at site D than at site A, suggesting a link between manganese deficiency and poor tree health (Table 1). Foliar manganese concentrations in samples from irrigated areas with the exception of site D ranged from 5 to 85 mg kg–1, well below adequate levels of 90–134 mg kg–1 cited by Dell et al. (2001) and indicating mild to severe manganese deficiency. Manganese can exist in the soil in a divalent, trivalent or tetra valent form (Mengel and Kirby 1982), the divalent form being the most important for plant nutrition. This form of manganese decreases with increasing soil pH above pH 6 (Attiwill and Leeper 1987; Uren 1999). In this study soil pH was significantly and negatively correlated with available manganese in the soil (Fig. 6a), irrigated areas having higher soil pH (Fig. 3a) and less available manganese (Fig. 3d). The concentration of available manganese in the soil was in turn significantly correlated with manganese concentrations in foliage (Fig. 6b). Increased soil pH has been associated with manganese deficiency in silver fir, with higher concentrations of oxidised (unavailable) manganese in soils with pH > 5.2 than in soils with pH < 5.2 (Hiltbrunner and Flückiger 1996). A strong negative correlation between soil pH and extractable manganese concentration has also been demonstrated Relationships between soil properties The relationships between soil pH and the amount of DTPAextractable copper, zinc, iron and manganese were examined. Coefficients of determination (r2) between soil pH and these elements in the soil were 0.002, 0.21, 0.26 and 0.76 respectively. In contrast, soil pH and DTPA-extractable manganese in the surface soil were significantly negatively correlated (Fig. 6a). 8 y = 5.505 + 0.098x – 1.158x 2 n = 50 r 2 = 0.79 7 pH The concentration of bicarbonate in the surface 7.5 cm of soil was significantly correlated with the pH of soil in that layer (Fig. 5). Low or undetectable concentrations of bicarbonate were associated with a soil pH of 6 or less. These were from areas that had been unirrigated or from site D with a short history of irrigation. In contrast, soil samples with the highest concentration of bicarbonate and highest pH came from irrigated areas at the sites which had previously had most irrigation. Site A 6 B C D E Unirrigated Previously irrigated 5 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 Bicarbonate concentration (mg L–1) Discussion Foliar concentrations of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium within foliage of unhealthy trees at all sites (Fig. 2) were Figure 5. Relationship between bicarbonate concentration and pH in the surface soil (0–7.5 cm) of unirrigated and irrigated areas Australian Forestry 2009 Vol. 72 No. 1 pp. 12–19 Failure of Eucalyptus globulus plantations on previously irrigated pasture sites 18 Irrigated r 2 = 0.76 (b) r 2 = 0.70 300 3 Mn concentration (mg kg–1) in foliage Mn concentration (mg kg–1) in soil 4 Unirrigated (a) 2 1 0 200 100 0 5 6 7 8 Soil pH 0 1 2 3 4 –1 Mn concentration (mg kg ) in soil Figure 6. Regressions relating (a) soil pH to the concentration of extractable manganese in the soil, and (b) extractable manganese in the soil and foliar manganese in Eucalyptus globulus, on areas previously unirrigated and irrigated areas in an experiment comparing a range of management options in cropping in mid-northern SA (Xu et al. 2002). Applications of bauxite sand residue (Gerhardi and Rengel 2001) and limestone (Bolland et al. 2002), both with a high pH, resulted in increased soil pH and reduced manganese availability. Fertiliser manganese sulphate rapidly became unavailable when applied to soils of high pH (Gerhardi and Rengel 2001). High soil pH associated with the use of crushed limestone as roadbuilding material has been suggested as the reason for chlorosis of foliage of mature eucalypts adjacent to roads in south-eastern SA; the chlorosis can spread through the canopy and ultimately lead to tree death (Czerniakowski et al. 2006). This disorder, known as Mundulla Yellows, is a form of lime chlorosis associated with low levels of micronutrients (Cu, Fe and Mn) and has been reviewed by Parsons and Uren (2007). As noted earlier, at each site the area where E. globulus was adversely affected closely matched the area previously under the irrigation. Water from the bores at the sites had a pH of 7.8, compared to 7.6 of water from the confined aquifer (the water supply for the city of Mount Gambier, Brown et al. 2001) and an electrical conductivity of 1.6 mS cm–1 compared to 1.3 mS cm–1. There were, however, very large differences in bicarbonate concentration — 713 mg L–1 compared to 435 mg L–1 in the confined aquifer. It is very likely that bore water is the source of the high levels of bicarbonate in the soil that was irrigated. The concentration of bicarbonate in the soil and soil pH was highly and positively correlated (Fig. 5). Irrigation with water containing high levels of bicarbonate increased soil pH in western Victoria (Gardner 2004). In the areas of high soil pH tree survival was very poor, and the growth of the few remaining trees adversely affected. The surviving trees on irrigated areas had foliar manganese concentrations well below deficient levels (Dell et al. 2001). It is very clear that irrigation history induced a serious problem for E. globulus growth, although the trees were never irrigated. The total area affected in this way, however, is a small proportion of the current estate of E. globulus plantations. Current and planned areas of E. globulus plantation, however, include many parcels of land which have been subjected to irrigation, so the extent of the problem will be much greater than the five sites studied here. We examined the effect of irrigation on the nutrient concentration of pasture at only one site. There, the manganese concentration was 11.5 mg kg–1, a level less than is considered to be deficient for a range of pasture species (15–20 mg kg–1, Pinkerton et al 1997). To put this potential impact on pasture in perspective, we note that the area of pastures that are irrigated for crop production is substantial — 75 000 ha in 1999 (Binks 2000). We did not study the extent to which the manganese deficiency encountered here in E. globulus can be corrected by manganese addition. The latter is unlikely to be a useful option because soil-applied manganese is likely to be rendered unavailable to trees in these soils, and repeated foliar sprays are not practicable in forestry. In the long term the current irrigation practice may also adversely affect crop production, as manganese deficiency is a widespread and well known historical problem in SA soils. It was the first widespread trace element deficiency recorded in Australia (Reuter et al. 1988). Although the concentration of copper in E. globulus foliage was not statistically significantly affected by previous land use, concentrations in foliage from irrigated areas were lower than in that from unirrigated areas (Fig. 2j). In both cases copper concentrations were within deficiency levels (Dell et al. 2001). Even where tree growth was adequate, copper concentrations were low. Copper deficiency is a common problem in soils in the area. A measure of the sustainability of management practices on soil used for production is the suitability of the soil for diverse land uses in response to changing needs of land owners. In this case the irrigation history clearly induced a serious adverse effect on the utility of the soil for farm-scale forest plantations. Australian Forestry 2009 Vol. 72 No. 1 pp. 12–19 D.N. Fife and M. Michael Acknowledgements We acknowledge the assistance of Steven Dawes, previously of Woakwine Forests, who managed the areas when this matter was drawn to our attention; and of D. Gritton with aspects of field work and R. Lowther for advice on chemical analyses. Drs Mendham, Nambiar and Smethurst provided valuable comments, as has Don McGuire, Forestry SA, who has also offered much encouragement to complete this work since the senior author’s departure from CSIRO. We are also very appreciative of the comments of referees appointed by Australian Forestry. References Attiwill, P.M. and Leeper, G.W. (1987) Forest Soils and Nutrient Cycles. Melbourne University Press. Binks, B. (2000) Profile of the South East Irrigation Industry. Report to the South East Catchment Water Management Board. Primary Industry and Resources South Australia Technical Report No. 275. Bolland, M.D.A., Allen, D.G. and Rengel, Z. (2002) Response of annual pastures to applications of limestone in the high rainfall areas of south‑western Australia. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 42, 925–937. Brown, K.G., Love A.J. and Harrington, G.A. (2001) Vertical Groundwater Recharge to the Tertiary Confined Sand Aquifer, South East, South Australia. Department for Water Resources, South Australia. Report DWR 2001/002, 42 pp. Czerniakowski, B., Crnov, R., Smith, I.W. and Luck, J.E. (2006) Soil properties associated with the tree decline ‘Mundulla Yellows’. Plant and Soil 285, 197–206. Dell, B., Malajczuk, N., Xu, D. and Grove T.S. (2001) Nutrient Disorders in Plantation Eucalypts. 2nd edn. ACIAR, Canberra, Monograph No.74. Gardner, W.K. (2004) Changes in soils irrigated with saline groundwater containing excess bicarbonate. Australian Journal of Soil Research 42, 825–831. 19 Gherardi, M.J. and Rengel, Z. (2001) Bauxite residue sand has the capacity to rapidly decrease availability of added manganese. Plant and Soil 234, 143–151. Green Triangle Regional Plantation Committee (2007) Facts and figures. http://www.gtpantations.org Hiltbrunner, E. and Flückiger, W. (1996) Manganese deficiency in silver fir trees (Abies alba) as a reforested site in the Jura mountains Switzerland: aspects of cause and effect. Tree Physiology 16, 963–975. Lowther, J.R. (1980) Use of a single sulphuric acid-hydrogen peroxide digest for the analysis of Pinus radiata needles. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis 11, 175–188. Mengel, K. and Kirby E.A. (1982) Principles of Plant Nutrition. 3rd edn. International Potash Institute, Switzerland, pp. 491–500. Parsons, R.F. and Uren, N.C. (2007) The relationship between lime chlorosis, trace elements and Mundulla Yellows. Australian Plant Pathology 36, 415–418. Pinkerton, A., Smith, F.W. and Lewis, D.C. (1997) Pasture species. In: Reuter, D.J. and Robinson, J.B. (eds). Plant Analysis: An Interpretation Manual. 2nd edn. CSIRO Australia, pp. 545–546. Rayment, G.E. and Higginson, F.R. (1992) Australian Laboratory Handbook of Soil and Water Chemical Methods. Inkata Press. Reuter, D.J. et al. (1988) Trace Elements in South Australian Agriculture. Department of Agriculture, South Australia. Technical Report No. 139, pp. 20–22. Stephens, C.G., Crocker, R.L., Butler, B. and Smith, R. (1941) A Soil and Land Use Survey of the Hundreds of Riddoch, Hindmarsh, Grey, Young and Nangwarry, County Grey, South Australia. CSIRO (Aust.) Bulletin No. 142. Uren, N.C. (1999) Manganese. In: Peverill, K.I., Sparrow, L.A. and Reuter, D.J. (eds) Soil Analysis : An Interpretation Manual. CSIRO Australia, pp. 287–294. Xu, R.K., Coventry, D.R., Farhoodi, A. and Schultz, J.E. (2002) Soil acidification as influenced by crop rotations, stubble management, and application of nitrogenous fertiliser, Tarlee, South Australia. Australian Journal of Soil Research 40, 483–496. Australian Forestry 2009 Vol. 72 No. 1 pp. 12–19 20 Lyctine hardwood susceptibility Lyctine susceptibility of selected hardwoods Laurie J. Cookson1,2, Jenny Carr1, Narelle Chew1 and Jim W. Creffield1 1CSIRO Materials Science & Engineering, Private Bag 10, Clayton, Victoria 3169, Australia 2Email: [email protected] Revised manuscript received 7 October 2008 Summary The lyctine susceptibility of 16 timber species, hybrids and geo graphical types was examined in this study. Several of the timbers had been placed previously in a ‘rarely susceptible’ category, but such uncertain ratings are not acceptable for standards and compliance purposes. Timber specimens were exposed to three species of lyctine beetles in an insectary. New criteria were developed to divide the problematic ‘rarely susceptible’ species, including designating a species as non-susceptible if significant damage was limited to 6 mm depth, as this outer region is routinely lost upon sawing or peeling. Lyctine-susceptible species were Erythrophleum chlorostachys, Eucalyptus delegatensis grown in Tasmania but not Victoria or NSW, Eu. regnans × Eu. obliqua hybrid, Corymbia nesophila, Eu. fibrosa, Eu. grandis, Eu. crebra, Eu. argophloia, Eu. dunnii, Eu. regnans from Tasmania and Eu. saligna. Eu. grandis × Eu. saligna hybrid is probably lyctine-susceptible as both parent species were susceptible. The non-lyctine-susceptible species were Eu. cloeziana, Eu. pilularis, Eu. sieberi and Eu. tetradonta. Keywords: hardwoods; sapwood; wood borers; lyctine; Lyctus; Lyctus brunneus; Minthea rugicollis; Lyctus discedens; Eucalyptus; Erythrophleum; Corymbia Introduction The sapwood of certain hardwoods is susceptible to lyctine beetle damage. The significance of the damage varies according to the proportion of sapwood present in the timber piece. If the sapwood band is thin, then a small amount of damage in a structural member may be tolerated. In New South Wales (NSW) and Queensland, however, where there is a history of using hardwood species with thick bands of sapwood, state legislation constrains the sale and use of lyctine-susceptible timber. Similarly, even minor damage to appearance-grade products such as flooring and furniture can be unacceptable and lyctine-susceptible sapwood is not permitted by AS 2796.2-2006 (Standards Australia 2006). Susceptible timbers therefore require some form of preservative treatment to enable greater sawn recovery and utilisation of the hardwood resource. Most studies on lyctine susceptibility were conducted from the 1940s to 1970s on mature trees that were more than 80 y old (CSIRO 1950; Fairey 1975). Lyctine susceptibility can vary with forest location and tree age. For example, Eucalyptus delegatensis (alpine ash) from Victoria is said to be non-susceptible, while the same species from Tasmania and NSW has been reported with varying degrees of susceptibility (Fairey 1975). Creffield et al. (1995) showed differences in susceptibility between samples of some regrowth and old-growth Western Australian hardwood species. More recently, Peters et al. (2002) reviewed the biology and behaviour of Lyctus brunneus and provided guidelines on methods for determining lyctine susceptibility. Significant savings can accrue from using species or timber sources shown to have non-susceptible sapwood. Treatment costs can be avoided and the timber will be preservative-free. The main nutrient for lyctines is starch, which the tree produces to store energy. Starch content can vary with season. In cool temperate regions, starch usually accumulates over winter, but at other times concentrations may be below that needed to support the successful development of lyctines. A key aim of the current research was to give more detailed information on a number of ‘borderline’ timber species that historically have been termed ‘rarely susceptible’. As the state acts of Queensland (Timber Utilisation and Marketing Act 1987, TUMA) and NSW (Timber Marketing Act 1977, TMA), and AS 5604-2005 (Standards Australia 2005b) recognise only susceptible or non-susceptible categories (and provide clear guidance on whether to treat the timber with preservatives), better information was needed on how to classify these borderline species. The test timbers were exposed to three lyctine beetle species: Lyctus brunneus which is found Australia wide, and the smaller species L. discedens and Minthea rugicollis. Results from these bioassays are presented and the implications for industry are discussed in this paper. Materials and methods While Peters et al. (2002) described the preferred steps in lyctine testing, resource restrictions for this project necessitated some short-cuts and variations, as indicated in this section. Timber sources The timber species examined were: Corymbia nesophila (Melville Island bloodwood) from Cape York, Queensland Australian Forestry 2009 Vol. 72 No. 1 pp. 20–24 Laurie J. Cookson, Jenny Carr, Narelle Chew and Jim W. Creffield Erythrophleum chlorostachys (Cooktown ironwood) from Cape York, Queensland Eucalyptus argophloia (western white gum) from Queensland Eucalyptus cloeziana (Gympie messmate) from Queensland Eucalyptus crebra (narrow-leaved red ironbark) from NSW Eucalyptus delegatensis (alpine ash) from Tasmania, Victoria and one collection from NSW Eucalyptus dunnii (Dunn’s white gum) from NSW and Queens land Eucalyptus fibrosa (broad-leaved red ironbark) from NSW Eucalyptus grandis (rose gum) from NSW Eucalyptus pilularis (blackbutt) from NSW Eucalyptus regnans (mountain ash) from Tasmania Eucalyptus regnans × Eu. obliqua hybrid from Tasmania Eucalyptus saligna (Sydney blue gum) from NSW Eucalyptus sieberi (silvertop ash) from Victoria Eucalyptus tetradonta (Darwin stringybark) from Cape York, Queensland Efforts to obtain authentic Eu. grandis × Eu. saligna hybrid were unsuccessful. The initial plan was for forestry collaborators to supply samples containing sapwood at three-monthly intervals for two years or until there was earlier demonstration of lyctine susceptibility (Peters et al. 2002). At each sampling, five trees were to be sampled from three to four regions throughout the natural distribution of regrowth or plantation for each timber species. Regrowth timber from trees in the 25–50-y age group was targeted as being more representative of the future timber supply than samples from old-growth trees. Younger trees were examined when the 25–50-y age group was not available. One problem encountered with tree sampling was that the number of samples and the geographical distribution sought were difficult to achieve for some species. For example, mature trees of Western white gum (Eu. argophloia) are relatively rare, and most occur in reserves, so that the level of sampling desired was not possible. The Victorian alpine fires in early 2003 also rendered some sites for collection of Eu. delegatensis unsuitable for the trial. At other times it was difficult for cooperating agencies to roster staff to the project in the face of competing demands and organisational changes. Nevertheless in total 777 test specimens, representing 772 different trees, were examined. Sapwood samples, with heartwood attached, were cut at breast height as a disc from felled trees (within 48 h of felling). Bark was removed immediately in the field and the sample forwarded to CSIRO for air drying. Timber was stored indoors and uncovered, to avoid mould growth. Prior to bioassay, the sapwood was spot tested for starch using an iodine indicator as described in Australian Standard 1604.1-2005 (Standards Australia 2005a). The timber was then cut to obtain heartwood–sapwood test specimens with dimensions greater than 100 mm long × 25 mm wide × full sapwood depth. Test specimens were cut using a tungsten-tipped saw, to prevent burring and the blocking of vessels (which may inhibit lyctine oviposition). All test specimens, regardless of the result of the starch test, were subjected to lyctine bioassay. With each round of bioassay, jars containing untreated sapwood samples of black bean (Castanospermum australe) were also prepared as a check on the viability of the lyctine test cultures. 21 Peters et al. (2002) suggested that a starch test should be used in the field to determine which timbers to test against lyctines. For this project, however, all timber samples collected were placed into bioassay, for two reasons: • As timber was being collected by many different collaborators it was not certain that the starch test would be used and interpreted consistently, which could have lead to some bias in the selection of samples to be tested. • Most timber species to be examined in this work were in the previously-assigned ‘rarely susceptible’ category and as a consequence we believed that assessment of starch alone may not have been a reliable indicator of susceptibility of these species. Another departure from Peters et al. (2002) is that the diameter of pores in test samples was not determined. Most Eucalyptus species have mean pore diameters greater than the 70 µm threshold for lyctine susceptibility — 46 out of 50 Eucalyptus species examined by Bamber and Erskine (1965) had mean pore diameters > 70 µm. Therefore effort was directed towards the bioassay of every test specimen as the final arbiter on lyctine susceptibility. Lyctine bioassays The test specimens including black bean were heated at 60°C overnight to kill any mites that might be present on the received timber samples. They were then equilibrated in a conditioned insectary at 26°C and 70% relative humidity for seven days prior to inoculation with test insects. Each test specimen was exposed to not less than 20 unsexed adult beetles of each species of lyctine (Lyctus brunneus, L. discedens and Minthea rugicollis). Three lyctine species rather than L. brunneus alone (Peters et al. 2002) were used in the bioassay. This was to avoid any problem arising from variations between beetle species that might have affected results for the ‘rarely susceptible’ timbers. Inoculation with the lyctine species occurred consecutively, each lyctine species inoculation being separated by two weeks or more. For each lyctine species, a second inoculation of 20 unsexed adult beetles was made three weeks after the first inoculation. Therefore, test specimens were inoculated on six different occasions. The duration of the tests was at least three months from the time of the last inoculation. Ratings The test specimens were assessed by splitting them longitudinally and evaluating any larval channelling thereby revealed, using the following subjective rating system (Creffield et al. 1995; Peters et al. 2002): • NS: non-susceptible — no channelling • S1: slightly susceptible — small amount of larval channelling, sometimes only 10 mm in length along the vessel. Emergence holes absent, and frass not expelled from wood • S2: moderately susceptible — moderate amount of larval channelling • S3: highly susceptible — large amount of larval channelling. Broad frass-packed larval galleries. Australian Forestry 2009 Vol. 72 No. 1 pp. 20–24 22 Lyctine hardwood susceptibility Results and discussion Criteria for susceptibility In this work a species was considered to be non-susceptible when all test specimens lacked larval channelling. Further, species of which a minor percentage of test specimens rated no more than S1 were considered non-susceptible. The S1 rating is light damage, with no frass discharge from the test specimen and no emergence holes, indicating that the lyctines had insufficient starch to continue development and had died. They could not re-infest the original host specimen nor extend their activity to new wood. The S1 ratings were often evident only under magnification and would be largely unnoticeable in service. We also found that if a timber species had only S1 damage the percentage of test specimens damaged was also small. For example, the worst rating we gave to any sample of Eu. tetradonta was S1, and this rating applied to only 3% of test specimens. Timber species where any replicate had S2 (moderate) or S3 (heavy) damage through most of the sapwood were considered susceptible (with the following caveat), even if only one or a few replicates were involved. The caveat is that if the S2 or S3 damage was confined to the outer 6 mm of sapwood (and the remainder of the sapwood was not damaged or had S1 damage only), the timber was considered non-susceptible. During normal sawmilling, at least the outer 6 mm of sapwood is lost due to kerf and the need to have some wood on either side of the blade to provide stability during sawing. Similarly, when logs are peeled to produce veneer, the outer 10–15 mm (three log revolutions) is usually removed to waste (S. Dorries, PAA Newstead, 2007 pers. comm.). For these examples, iodine tests usually confirmed that significant starch was present only in the outer sapwood bands. It would be useful to verify the consistency in industry of the depth of these sapwood losses during machining. Our finding that susceptibility in some timber species can vary according to sapwood depth may account for some of the discrepancies in the rating of certain species by previous studies. Likewise, sawmills experiencing problems of differing lyctine susceptibility of the same timber species may be routinely removing varying depths of outer sapwood during conversion. Details on the depth of damage to each test specimen can be found in Cookson et al. (2007). Susceptibility results The highly lyctine-susceptible species, C. australe, was included in the bioassays to check that the lyctine beetles were active. Of the 78 C. australe test specimens exposed, one had no damage, nine had slight (S1) damage, five had moderate (S2) damage and 63 were heavily damaged (S3), confirming the viability of the lyctine beetles used in the project. The source billet of the C. australe samples that had little or no damage was checked and found to contain little starch. The number of samples received of each timber species is shown in Table 1. Also shown is whether most trees came from plantations or natural regrowth. The results of the lyctine bioassays are shown in Table 1, along with the recommended susceptibility ratings resulting from this work. Further discussion of the suggested ratings of some of the species follows: • Eucalyptus delegatensis grows in the colder regions of Tasmania, Victoria and south-eastern NSW (Bootle 2005). In Table 1. Lyctine susceptibility results and suggested ratings Timber species and source details Number of test specimens Fraction with any damage (%) Fraction with S2 or S3b damage deeper than 6 mm (%) Suggested ratingc Er. chlorostachys (PY) Eu. saligna (R) Eu. delegatensis, Tas (R) Eu. regnans × Eu. obliqua, Tas (R) C. nesophila (PY) Eu. fibrosa (R) Eu. grandis (PR) Eu. crebra (RP) Eu. argophloia (PRY) Eu. dunnii (PY) Eu. regnans, Tas (R) Eu. delegatensis, mainland (RO) Eu. pilularis (PR) Eu. sieberi (R) Eu. tetradonta (PY) Eu. cloeziana (PY) 046 002 040 028 067 018 052 040 039 021 024 055 089 091 135 025 100 100 058 057 054 061 037 055 015 043 017 016 011 008 003 000 091 100 052 046 025 017 010 008 008 005 004 000 000 000 000 000 S S S Sd S Sd Sd Sd Sd S Sd NSd NS NS NSd NS a a Tas = trees from Tasmania; P = plantations, R = natural regrowth, with main type listed first; Y = some trees < 20 y old, O = some trees 50–70 y old See text for explanation of S2 and S3 c S = susceptible, NS = non-susceptible d Differs from AS 5604-2005, or was not listed b Australian Forestry 2009 Vol. 72 No. 1 pp. 20–24 Laurie J. Cookson, Jenny Carr, Narelle Chew and Jim W. Creffield NSW, the species is confined to the southern tablelands and grows best around Batlow and Tumbarumba (Bootle 1971) (Fig. 1). The appearance of bark, leaves and fruit of Tasmanian Eu. delegatensis differs from that of the mainland population of the species (Boland et al. 1984). CSIRO (1950) listed alpine ash (Eu. gigantea = Eu. delegatensis) as rarely susceptible, but the source of the trees that were the basis of this assessment was not specified. In further research, Fairey (1975) noted that Eu. delegatensis grown in Victoria was not susceptible, that trees from NSW were rarely susceptible and that Tasmaniangrown material was susceptible. The current lyctine bioassay results support the view that mainland and Tasmanian populations are different, as Tasmanian Eu. delegatensis was readily damaged, whereas using the new criteria suggested here, Victorian-grown material should remain listed as nonsusceptible. Only five trees from NSW were sampled, and all were non-susceptible. Due to close proximity (Fig. 1), NSWand Victorian-grown Eu. delegatensis probably mix genetically and could be considered the one population. Therefore, based on existing information, mainland-grown Eu. delegatensis should be considered non-susceptible, while Tasmanian-grown Eu. delegatensis is susceptible. • Eucalyptus regnans grows naturally in the mountainous regions of Tasmania and eastern Victoria (Bootle 2005), while Eu. obliqua (messmate) also grows in Tasmania, Victoria and the tableland districts of NSW and southern Queensland (Bootle 2005). Eu. obliqua is known to be lyctine susceptible (AS 5604-2005). The Eu. regnans × Eu. obliqua hybrid came from Tasmania where the appearance of the tree closely resembles that of Eu. regnans (P. Bennett, FIAT Hobart, 2006 pers. comm.), while anatomically the timber looks more like Eu. obliqua (J. Ilic, CSIRO Clayton, 2006 pers. comm.). Boland et al. (1984) noted that ‘in southern Victoria and parts of Tasmania gum-topped forms intermediate between Eu. regnans and Eu. obliqua are not uncommon’. The method used to collect samples of Eu. regnans rather than hybrids for the current study was to obtain the material from higher altitudes (where Eu. obliqua does not occur) in areas regenerated after wildfire without 23 supplementary aerial sowing (P. Bennett, FIAT Hobart, 2006 pers. comm.). The bioassay found that 46.4% of hybrid test specimens from Tasmania had lyctine damage, while only one test specimen (4.2% of those collected) of Eu. regnans from Tasmania had significant (S3) damage. Results were sufficient to consider both timbers lyctine susceptible, although further study on the differences between these timbers seems warranted. Note that Eu. regnans from the mainland is non-susceptible (as for Eu. delegatensis). Potentially, non-susceptible Eu. regnans could be distinguished and also separated from hybrid material at the sawmill by testing logs for the presence of starch. • Eucalyptus argophloia grows naturally in a small area northeast of Chinchilla in south-eastern Queensland, from Burncluith to Burra Burri (Boland et al. 1984). It is a potential plantation species for Queensland and parts of NSW, and its lyctine susceptibility is not listed in AS 5604-2005. No specimens from 25–50-y old trees of Eu. argophloia from Queensland collected on three separate occasions were lyctine susceptible, which supports the finding from the iodine test that these specimens had starch contents that were low or not detectable. However, many test specimens from young plantations (trees 8 and 12 y old) had medium or high starch contents and several were lyctine susceptible. It is not known if this difference is due to tree age, different growing locations or month of collection. • Eucalyptus grandis grows naturally along the east coast of NSW from the Hunter River to northern Queensland (Bootle 2005). It has been listed in AS 5604-2005 as not susceptible to lyctines. CSIRO (1950) considered that Eu. grandis was rarely susceptible, as did Fairey (1975). Only 5 out of 52 specimens (9.6%) of Eu. grandis had significant S2 or S3 damage, yet this is sufficient to consider the species lyctine susceptible. There appears to be some potential for avoiding lyctine-susceptible sapwood in this species by selecting the month of harvest. The highest proportion of susceptible Eu. grandis specimens was harvested in September, although some level of susceptibility continued for the remaining months and into February (Fig. 2). Humphreys and Humphreys (1966) found that the starch content of Eu. grandis also peaked in spring and early summer. We attempted to investigate the susceptibility of hybrid Eu. grandis × Eu. saligna but unfortunately authentic hybrid samples could not be obtained. Nevertheless, as Eu. grandis has been shown here to be susceptible and Eu. saligna has even greater susceptibility, it is likely that the hybrid would follow suit and, without further information, should be considered susceptible. • Eucalyptus tetradonta grows naturally in the northern and northern coastal regions of the Northern Territory, the Kimberley region of Western Australia, and Cape York Peninsula (Bootle 2005). Most of this distribution is north of 17°S latitude (Boland et al. 1984). It is being grown as a plantation species in Cape York and, in an Aboriginal community enterprise, is being salvaged from rehabilitated mine sites. While AS 5604-2005 lists Eu. tetradonta as lyctine susceptible, it should be noted that this rating arose from an earlier interpretation of the current results when it was assumed that even limited S1 damage could be used to classify a timber as susceptible. Figure 1. Collection sites (●) for Eu. delegatensis on the mainland Australian Forestry 2009 Vol. 72 No. 1 pp. 20–24 Incidence of damaged samples (%) 24 Lyctine hardwood susceptibility References 40 NS 35 S1 30 S2 25 S3 20 15 10 5 0 Ja Fe Ma Ap Ma Ju Ju Au Se Oc No De Month collected Figure 2. Eu. grandis lyctine susceptibility results in relation to month of sample collection. See text for key to the categories of damage (NS–S3). This project was undertaken during drought conditions in much of the country, and drought may have reduced starch levels in trees of some species at some collection sites. Consequently, lyctine damage to sapwood may have been abnormally low in some specimens. Our assessment of 11 of the 16 timbers examined as lyctine susceptible would not have been affected in this way. The conditions under which the timbers were sampled may reflect future supply conditions, but whether in the longer term global warming will change relevant climatic conditions is not known. Those timbers that are lyctine susceptible could be preservative treated using methods described and reviewed by Cookson et al. (1998) and Cookson (2004). Acknowledgements We thank the following people and organisations for providing timber samples: Tim Cleary and Boris Iskra formerly of the Timber Promotion Council of Victoria; Peter Bennett and Larry Henderson of the Forest Industries Association of Tasmania; staff of the Huon and Derwent Districts of Forestry Tasmania; Greg Deambrogio, Arthur Johnson, Harry Callope, Andy Page, Russell Vance and Matt Armstrong through the Queensland Department of State Development and Timber Queensland; Brinos Notaras of J. Notaras & Sons Pty Ltd; and Peter Paunovic, Peter Tarjanyi, Alan Davidson and David Wilson through State Forests of NSW. We also thank the FWPA for providing funding towards this project. Bamber, R.K. and Erskine, R.B. (1965) Relationship of Vessel Diameter to Lyctus Susceptibility in some New South Wales Hardwoods. Research Note No. 15, Division of Wood Technology, Forestry Commission of NSW, 18 pp. Boland, D.J., Brooker, M.I.H., Chippendale, G.M., Hall, N., Hyland, B.P.M., Johnson R.D., Kleinig, D.A. and Turner, J.D. (1984) Forest Trees of Australia. Thomas Nelson and CSIRO, Melbourne, 677 pp. Bootle, K.R. (1971) The Commercial Timbers of New South Wales and their Uses. Angus and Robertson, Sydney, 276 pp. Bootle, K.R. (2005) Wood in Australia. Types, Properties and Uses. McGraw-Hill, Sydney, 452 pp. Cookson, L.J. (2004) Treatment Methods for the Protection of Hardwood Sapwood from Lyctine Borers. CSIRO Technical Report No. 145. FWPRDC Project No. PN03.1313, 23 pp. http://www.fwpa.com. au/content/pdfs/PN03.1313.pdf. Cookson, L.J., Scown, D.K. and McCarthy, K. (1998) Boron treatment methods for lyctid susceptible hardwoods growing in Tasmania. The International Research Group on Wood Protection. Document No. IRG/WP 98-30168, 12 pp. Cookson, L.J., Carr, J., Chew, N. and Creffield, J. (2007) Reassessment of Lyctine Susceptible Sapwood. FWPRDC Project No. PN03.1313, 67 pp. http://www.fwpa.com.au/content/pdfs/new%20pdfs/ PN03.1313_lyctine-report.pdf. Creffield, J.W., Brennan, G.K., Chew, N. and N.-K. Nguyen (1995) Reassessing the susceptibility of karri (Eucalyptus diversicolor) and jarrah (E. marginata) sapwood to attack by the powder post borer (Lyctus brunneus). Australian Forestry 58, 72–79. CSIRO Division of Forest Products (1950) Lyctus susceptibility list. Proceedings 5th Forest Products Research Conference, Melbourne, Topic 8B, 24 pp. Fairey, K.D. (1975) Lyctus Susceptibility of the Commercial Timbers Used in New South Wales. Forestry Commission of NSW Technical Publication No. 19, 8 pp. Humphreys, F.R. and Humphreys, N. (1966) Starch levels in flooded gum sapwood. Australian Forest Research 2, 35–40. Peters, B.C., Creffield, J.W. and Eldridge, R.H. (2002) Lyctine (Coleoptera: Bostrichidae) pests of timber in Australia: a literature review and susceptibility testing protocol. Australian Forestry 65, 107–119. Standards Australia (2005a) Australian Standard 1604.1 Specification for Preservative Treatment. Part 1. Sawn and Round timber. Standards Australia, Sydney, 41 pp. Standards Australia (2005b) Australian Standard 5604. Timber — Natural Durability Ratings. Standards Australia, Sydney, 22 pp. Standards Australia (2006) Australian Standard 2796.2 Timber — Hardwood — Sawn and Milled Products — Grade Description. Standards Australia, Sydney, 33 pp. Australian Forestry 2009 Vol. 72 No. 1 pp. 20–24 Jo Sasse, Stephen Elms and Peter Kube 25 Genetic resistance in Pinus radiata to defoliation by the pine aphid Essigella californica Jo Sasse1,2, Stephen Elms3 and Peter Kube4 1Sassafras Group, 2 O’Farrell St, Yarraville, Victoria 3013, Australia 2Email: [email protected] 3HVP Plantations, PO Box 385, Churchill, Victoria 3842, Australia 4CSIRO Marine and Atmospheric Research, GPO Box 1538, Hobart, Tasmania 7001, Australia Revised manuscript received 13 November 2008 Summary The Monterey pine aphid, Essigella californica, has been associated with extensive defoliation and growth losses in radiata pine plantations in south-eastern Australia since it was first detected in 1998. HVP Plantations (HVPP) observed variation in the level of defoliation between clones in clonal seed orchards and archives, and initiated a program of assessment of progeny trials. Between 2001 and 2005, defoliation was assessed in a provenance trial, a subset of clones within a seed orchard, and 18 progeny trials (some repeatedly). Needle retention in upper crowns was scored on a scale of 1–10, rather than needle loss, because this ensured higher scores equated to the desirable state of the assessed trait. There were significant differences in the extent of retained foliage between populations, and between subpopulations within populations. The inland northern (Coastways Ranch) sub-population of Año Nuevo population had the highest level of retained foliage in the upper crown (mean score of 8.3), and the northern (Pico Creek, Haarst Ranch) sub-population of the Cambrian population had the least retained foliage (5.0). Estimates of heritability from progeny trials ranged from 0 to 0.9, and averaged about 0.5 in trials where there was a significant family (maternal) effect. Cross-site analysis using a family model resulted in an overall heritability of 0.4. Genetic correlations between assessments across two trials in 2004 and those in 2001 and 2003 were high, suggesting that defoliation due to aphids is consistent across years and can be considered to be the same trait. In addition to the observed differences between provenances and families, there were significant differences between clones, and average levels of retained foliage among clones ranged from 1.9 to 9.4. HVPP has used this information to develop an aphid-resistant breed of radiata pine which has been deployed on an increasing scale since 2005 into the most susceptible areas of its Victorian estate. Keywords: defoliation; genetic variation; clones; families; provenance; resistance; heritability; radiata pine; Monterey pine aphid; Essigella californica; Victoria Introduction The Monterey pine aphid, Essigella californica, was first detected in plantations of radiata pine in south-eastern Australia in 1998 (Carver and Kent 2000). It causes yellowing and premature drop of needles, typically in the upper third to quarter of the crown of older trees (20–25 y), but has also been observed in young trees (4–6 y, Carver and Kent 2000; 1–5 y, Smith et al. 2008). In Victoria and South Australia, damage is greatest during late summer and early autumn and needles are shed a few months later (May and Carlyle 2003). Defoliation has been associated with significant growth losses. High correlations between defoliation and growth loss have been reported, with a 10% loss of foliage estimated to reduce growth by about 5% (Hopmans et al. 2008) to 8% (May and Carlyle 2003). The extent of defoliation has been observed to vary with location, nutritional status (Smith et al. 1999; Hopmans et al. 2008), stand age and condition (i.e. defoliation increases with age, Smith et al. 2008; and thinning, May 2004), and from tree to tree (Smith et al. 1999). In Victoria, defoliation has been regularly monitored from 2002 as part of HVP Plantations’ (HVPP) routine health surveillance program. Defoliation due to aphids has been consistently highest in the north-east. Some plots lost 50–70% of the upper crown over successive years, and average upper crown defoliation for all stands above 11 y old has generally been low to moderate (11–30%). Plantations south of the Great Dividing Range had much less damage in 2002–2003, but have experienced damage comparable to that in the north-east during the period 2004–2007 (Smith et al. 2008). Defoliation of individual trees has been observed to vary between 0 and 100% within a locality and this, together with observations of a range of consistent degrees of defoliation among ramets within clones in clonal seed orchards and archives on the HVPP estate, suggests the presence of a genetic component to resistance to defoliation. Genetic variation in the extent of defoliation of conifers by aphids has been observed at varied levels in a number of species. Simpson and Ades (1990) reported variation in susceptibility of provenances of P. radiata and P. muricata to the woolly aphid Pineus pini and the needle aphid Eulachnus thunbergia. The green spruce aphid (Elatobium abietinum) causes defoliation and consequently growth losses and mortality in Sitka spruce in the British Isles (Leibhold and Csóka 2001); resistance to defoliation is variable, heritable and stable (Harding et al. 2003), enabling effective breeding for increased resistance. Observations in 1999 of more than 240 clones in three of HVPP’s clonal seed orchards confirmed that there was variation between Australian Forestry 2009 Vol. 72 No. 1 pp. 25–31 26 Genetic resistance to defoliation by aphids in radiata pine clones in the extent of defoliation due to aphids, and that these differences were reasonably consistent between sites. More progeny trials where defoliation was evident were then opportunistically assessed between 2001 and 2005 to confirm the presence of a genetic component to resistance to defoliation, and to identify selections that could be captured and quickly incorporated into a deployment program. Heritability and genotype × environment interactions were estimated, and pheno typic and genetic correlations between assessments in different years calculated. Selections were made and brought into the HVPP nursery program as an Aphid-Resistant (AR) Breed, and deployed as family cuttings in the most seriously affected plantation areas from 2005. In 2005, aphid defoliation was observed in a mature provenance trial. The extent of foliage retained in the upper crown was assessed and the data analysed to establish whether defoliation differed between populations. A number of concurrent projects were also initiated to evaluate population levels and dynamics, resistance screening options, impacts of defoliation on growth and silvicultural management options. This paper summarises the results of the assessment of defoliation by aphids in a provenance trial, in progeny trials and in clonal seed orchards across the HVPP estate over a number of years. Materials and methods Defoliation by aphids is assessed by HVPP using a standard technique. The extent of foliage retained in the upper crown (RUC) of individual trees is scored on a scale of 1–10, where 10 represents 91–100% foliage retained (i.e. little or no defoliation due to aphids). Needle retention rather than loss is assessed because a high score reflects the desirable state of the assessed trait. Each block was assessed by only one person, and the assessor’s identity was recorded. RUC is typically assessed in late autumn to early winter, when needles are in an advanced stage of chlorosis or have been shed already. Foliage retention was assessed in clonal seed orchards, progeny trials and a provenance trial (Table 1). Consistent differences were first observed in clonal seed orchards in 1999 (data not shown). The foliage retained in the upper crowns of a subset of 12 clones in Lal Lal clonal seed orchard was assessed in 2002. Clonal identities were arbitrarily recoded using the letters A to L. These data were analysed separately from those of progeny trials. The clones included in the assessment were part of a trial testing the effectiveness of two formulations of gibberellin (GA4/7) in promoting cone retention, and the data on retained upper foliage were analysed in Genstat (v.9.2, 2007) using a two-way ANOVA (treatment × clone) to confirm that there was no effect of GA treatment on the extent of retained foliage. Data were then analysed using a two-way ANOVA to test the interaction of clone × assessor. Table 1. Trials assessed from 2001 to 2005 for defoliation by aphids Trial Year Location established Design summary Number of trees assessed Number of families Average trees per family Year assessed VRC025 RAD114 RAD117 1979 1967 1967 Flynn Warrenbayne Warrenbayne Provenance trial CP families CP families 1348 0354 0237 16 52 36 84.3 06.9 08.9 RAD148 1972 Narbethong 0425 48 09.0 RAD150 RAD151 RAD152 1972 1972 1972 Narbethong Narbethong Narbethong 0154 0176 0118 20 20 23 08.1 09.3 05.4 2004 2004 2004 RAD153 RAD154 RAD155 1972 1972 1972 Narbethong Narbethong Narbethong 0172 0082 0154 42 32 26 04.2 02.6 06.2 2004 2004 2004 RAD156 RAD157 1972 1972 Narbethong Narbethong 0360 0079 61 19 06.0 04.4 2004 2004 RAD162 RAD168 1973 1976 Narbethong Warrenbayne Heritability trial, NCI design CP families NSW OP SO families Vic and Tas OP SO families CP families, density × spiral grain SA IGP OP families ACT IGP OP families Qld IGP OP families and Vic OP SO families NSW IGP OP families Guadalupe, Cedros, Cambria OP families ex ACT CP families Heritability trial, NCI design CP families 12 × 3 CP factorial CP families 4 × 4 2G CP factorial 4 × 4 CP factorial 3 × 4 CP factorial Clonal seed orchard 2005 2001 2001, 2003, 2004 2004 0376 0600 62 54 06.2 12.2 0216 1344 0129 0442 0233 0254 34 36 14 26 16 12 clones 06.5 28.6 09.9 17.7 15.5 21.0 2002 2001, 2003, 2004 2001 2003 2001 2001 2001 2002 RAD170 RAD195 RAD205 RAD225 RAD226 Lal Lal SO 1978 1985 1986 1989 1989 Various Toorour Myrtleford Rennick Rennick Rennick Lal Lal Australian Forestry 2009 Vol. 72 No. 1 pp. 25–31 Jo Sasse, Stephen Elms and Peter Kube A total of 18 progeny trials established between 1967 and 1989 were opportunistically assessed between 2001 and 2005. Details are given in Table 1. Of these trials, 11 were from controlpollinated (CP) seed and seven from open-pollinated (OP) seed. Most trials had been thinned. Trials RAD148 to RAD157 at Narbethong formed part of the International Gene Pool trials planted in 1972. These trials, in particular, often had limited numbers of families represented, and had been heavily thinned, further compromising their design. A Californian provenance trial established in 1979 was assessed in 2005. The data were analysed separately from those of the progeny trials (Elms and Sasse 2005). The data on retained foliage were square-transformed to overcome skewness. Analysis of variance was used to examine differences between sub-populations within populations. Regression analysis was used to examine relationships between diameter growth and retained foliage. The progeny trial data were analysed using Excel (MS Office 2003) and Genstat (v9.2, 2007). Pedigree information for each trial was combined with the assessment data of each trial. A master dataset of all data from all trials in all years was collated, treating each year’s assessment as a different trait. Care was taken to ensure that linkage between the families represented in the trials, particularly the International Gene Pool trials, was identified. For analysis, pedigree information was converted to numeric codes where parents had a lower number than progeny, and control seedlots (bulked seedlots) and selfed families were excluded. Basic statistics were collated using Excel. Individual trials were separately analysed in Genstat using a family model, and the heritability calculated. A combined site analysis was done to estimate the genotype × site interactions and to estimate acrosssite heritability. In this analysis, it was assumed assessments in different years were measures of the same trait. The following steps were followed in the analysis: (a) Each trial was analysed using the model y = mean + rep + assessor + mother + father + mother.father + error where rep and assessor were fixed effects and the others random. The variance components were recorded and used to estimate heritability: h2 = (2σ2mother + 2σ2father) / (σ2mother + σ2father + σ2mother. 2 father + σresid) and its standard error. Open-pollinated trials were assessed using the same model, but omitting terms involving fathers; i.e. y = mean + rep + assessor + mother + error, and h2f = 4σ2mother / (σ2mother + σ2resid). Trials with non-significant genetic effects were excluded from further analysis. (b) Genetic correlations between years were calculated for those trees (excluding controls) measured on all occasions in the two trials RAD117 and RAD168, and between defoliation in 2004 and diameter in RAD151 (dbh at age 10 y and 20 y), RAD117 (dbh age 15 y) and RAD168 (dbh age 11 y). Corre lations were calculated as rg = σfam(x,y) / (σ2fam(x) + σ2fam(y)), where σfam(x,y) = (σ2fam(x + y) – σ2fam(x) – σ2fam(y) )/ 2. (c) A combined site analysis using data from all years (first year of assessment if multiple years were assessed) for all trials was done to examine the interaction between mother and site, as maternal linkage was strongest between trials. This was done for all trials except those where genetic effects were non-significant and RAD225, a second-generation trial. Of the 187 mothers in the reduced dataset, 70 were represented 27 on two or more sites. The model used was y = mean + site + rep + assessor + mother + mother.site + error, and cross-site heritability was estimated using the OP calculation. Results Provenance trial Trait means by sub-population are summarised in Table 2. There were significant differences in growth between populations in dbh (P < 0.001), with the seed orchard stock (30.4 cm) being significantly larger than the population seedlots (average of all three populations 27.4 cm). There were no differences between the Californian populations in growth. There were, however, significant differences between populations and between subpopulations within populations in the proportion of upper crown retained (Table 3). The Año Nuevo population had the greatest proportion of retained foliage in the upper crown (transformed data, RUC2; 62.4), and Cambria had the least (36.3). The foliage retention for the seed orchard material was most similar to, but significantly greater than, that of the Monterey population from which it is probably derived (55.3 and 51.5, respectively). The sub-population with the greatest RUC2 was the inland northern (Coastways Ranch) sub-population of the Año Nuevo population, and the population with the least RUC2 was the northern (Pico Creek, Haarst Ranch) sub-population of Cambria population. There were significant differences between sub-populations within all populations except the seed orchard populations. There is a broad relationship between diameter and the amount of retained foliage in the upper crown, that is between diameter class and mean RUC score for all populations (R2 = 0.81, Elms and Sasse 2005). At an individual-tree level, however, the relationship is much weaker, explaining about 6% of the variation in RUC on average (varying from 1% to 10% between populations, data not shown). Progeny trials Between 2001 and 2004, a total of 5427 trees in 18 trials from a pedigree of 315 genotypes were assessed (Table 4). On average there were about 34 families (31 excluding controls and selfs) per trial, and about nine trees per family. The average score for retained foliage was 7.0 in 2001–2002, 8.5 in 2003 and 6.8 in 2004. There was generally significant variation within sites in average retained foliage scores, indicated by significant differences between replicates within trials. Mean scores between replicates within trials typically varied by 1.5–3.0 points in 2001, less than 1 in 2003, and 1.0–2.5 in 2004. Heritabilities for the trials assessed ranged between 0.32 and 0.95 (Table 5). RAD117 at Warrenbayne consistently had a high heritability: about 0.9 in 2001 and 2003, and 0.5 in 2004. One trial (RAD195) had very little variability in defoliation (minimum defoliation score was 7, 94% of trees scored 9 or 10), and was not further analysed. Several trials had heritabilities that were either very low, could not be calculated, or had very high standard errors (RAD150, 151, 154, 155, 156, 157 and 170); these trials were trials with little structure (RAD154, 157; small trials of ACT and Californian population material, respectively), poor design (low Australian Forestry 2009 Vol. 72 No. 1 pp. 25–31 28 Genetic resistance to defoliation by aphids in radiata pine Table 2. Mean DBH and retained upper crown score (RUC) by population and sub-population in the Flynn provenance trial. Population and sub-population nomenclature follows that of Eldridge (1998) No. of trees Dbh (cm) RUC RUC t’formeda Coastal Strip, Highway 1 Inland Coastal, Last Chance Road Inland Northern, Coastways Ranch Inland Southern, Swanton 030 028 028 026 26.9 26.0 27.0 26.5 .7.8 .7.5 .8.3 .7.3 63.4 58.0 70.6 57.7 Cambria Furthest Inland, Scott Rock Main Stand, Cambria Town Northern, Pico Creek, Haarst Ranch 028 035 027 27.8 26.2 25.0 .6.1 .6.1 .5.0 39.8 39.9 29.2 Monterey Coastal Northern, Sand Dunes Coastal Southern, Point Lobos Furthest Inland, Jacks Peak Park Inland Southern, Highest Altitude Inland, Huckleberry Hill Inland, Town Area 041 034 035 027 030 026 26.9 28.5 28.4 26.6 28.2 25.6 .7.4 .6.8 .6.3 .7.3 .7.0 .6.6 56.7 49.1 43.0 57.7 53.2 49.0 Saxtons SO 1976 Harvest 601/101L 1977 Harvest 601/106M 046 079 30.7 30.2 .6.9 .7.4 51.8 57.0 520 27.6 07.0 52.1 Population Sub-population Año Nuevo Total or overall average a RUC transformed to remove skewness in data by squaring the scores Table 3. Comparisons between populations and sub-population for transformed retained upper crown scores (RUC2) Año Nuevo Coastal Strip, Highway 1 Inland Coastal, Last Chance Rd Inland Northern, Coastways Ranch Inland Southern, Swanton 63.8 59.6 70.8 57.8 ab ab a ab Furthest Inland, Scott Rock Main Stand, Cambria Town Northern, Pico Creek, Haarst Ranch 40.8 39.8 29.0 a a ab Monterey Coastal Northern, Sand Dunes Coastal Southern, Point Lobos Furthest Inland, Jacks Peak Park Inland Southern, Highest Altitude Inland, Huckleberry Hill Inland, Town Area 56.3 49.5 42.2 57.0 52.5 47.8 ab abc ab cd a abc ab cd Saxtons SO 1976 Harvest 601/101L 1977 Harvest 601/106M 51.8 57.0 a a Overall average b Group in populationa Sub-population Cambria a RUC 2 Population 52.1 Population average Group between populationsb 62.4 A 36.3 D 51.5 C 55.3 B 52.1 Sub-populations within populations with different lower case letters are in significantly different groups within the population (Fisher’s PLSD at 5%) Populations with different upper case letters are significantly different (Fisher’s PLSD at 5%) or variable replication or family numbers; RAD151, 155, 156), or unbalanced family representation following thinning (RAD150). RAD154 and 170 had little variation in defoliation — in both trials about 85% of trees scored 7 or above. In each of these trials (except RAD154), there was no significant family effect when analysed in a fixed-effects model. Excluding these trials, heritability averaged about 0.5, suggesting that retention of the upper crown is heritable. The combined site analysis, excluding the above trials, showed that the maternal × site variance component was less than 10% of the total observed (σ2mother = 0.41; σ2mother.site = 0.30; σ2resid = 2.94) Australian Forestry 2009 Vol. 72 No. 1 pp. 25–31 Jo Sasse, Stephen Elms and Peter Kube 29 Table 4. Summary statistics for trials assessed for aphid defoliation between 2001 and 2004 Trial RAD114 RAD117 RAD117 RAD117 RAD148 RAD150 RAD151 RAD152 RAD153 RAD154 RAD155 RAD156 RAD157 RAD162 RAD168 RAD168 RAD168 RAD170 RAD195 RAD205 RAD225 RAD226 Year of assessment Number of trees assessed Number of families (exc. controls) Av. trees per family (exc. controls) Average Min. Max. 2001 2001 2003 2004 2004 2004 2004 2004 2004 2004 2004 2004 2004 2002 2001 2003 2004 2001 2003 2001 2001 2001 0354 0312 0236 0237 0425 0154 0176 0118 0172 0082 0154 0359 0079 0376 0644 0602 0600 0216 1344 0129 0442 0233 50 31 20 20 46 16 16 20 39 29 22 60 08 53 50 50 50 31 32 13 22 12 06.9 08.5 09.8 09.8 09.1 08.3 09.6 05.3 03.9 02.8 06.2 06.0 04.6 05.5 11.8 11.6 11.5 06.5 29.2 09.9 15.8 14.6 6.7 6.9 7.1 6.6 6.1 6.5 6.3 5.3 7.4 7.8 7.4 7.5 7.8 7.7 6.9 7.5 6.9 8.1 9.4 4.6 6.7 7.3 1.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 4.0 1.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 7.0 2.0 2.0 0.5 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 09.0 09.5 09.5 and that the across-site heritability was 0.45 (se = 0.13). Part of the maternal × site interaction was due to differences in paternal contribution between sites that arose because a different suite of fathers was used at each site. A pseudo-F test (F = s21 / s22) of the stratum variances (s2mother = 10.08, effective d.f. =116; s2mother.site = 5.48, effective d.f. = 87; F = 1.84) was significant, showing that variation due to maternal contribution was significantly greater than the variation due to the interaction between mother × site, which suggests differences in paternal contributions between sites did not have a strong effect. The phenotypic correlations between the three traits (foliage retained in the upper crown 2001, 2003 and 2004) measured in RAD117 and RAD168 were moderate (0.4–0.5), but the genetic correlations were about 0.9 between 2004 and the other two years (Table 6), suggesting that the traits can probably be considered to be the same. The correlations between 2003 and the other two years were lower, perhaps because defoliation was more uniform in 2003. The high rg implies that the analysis can be done independently between years, and the results for each trial measured in each year should be comparable. Correlations between aphid defoliation in 2004 and diameter at a range of ages were examined at RAD117 (age 15 y, dbh), RAD151 (age 10 and 20 y, dbh) and RAD168 (age 11 y, dbh). The correlations (Table 7) varied between both the trials and ages. At RAD151, the genetic correlations were moderate to strong and positive, but at RAD168 and RAD117 they were moderately negative. Greaves (2001) reported a genetic correlation of 0.77 between foliage retention in 2001 and diameter at age 8 y in RAD114. Retained foliage score σtrees σfam 1.9 2.1 2.0 2.0 2.3 2.4 2.2 2.3 1.7 1.3 1.8 1.8 1.7 1.5 1.9 1.6 1.8 2.1 0.6 1.7 1.4 1.6 1.1 1.5 1.0 1.3 1.2 1.0 1.0 1.4 1.2 1.1 1.0 0.8 0.7 1.1 1.2 0.9 0.9 1.2 0.2 0.9 0.6 0.7 Clonal orchards Mean scores for retained foliage in the upper crowns of the 12 clones assessed at Lal Lal Seed Orchard ranged from 1.9 to 9.4. Levels of defoliation were unaffected by gibberellin treatment (P = 0.103), but there was a significant interaction between clone and assessor (P < 0.001, Table 8). However, the effect of clone is dominant (P < 0.001 for clone, after eliminating assessor effect), and 10 of the 12 clones could be classified into three distinct groups (Fig. 1) with mean defoliation scores of 8.5, 6.2 and 2.4 (Clones G and C were intermediate between the top two groups and could not be classified to either). Other data (not shown) suggest that levels of defoliation within clones are consistent across sites (39 clones from three seed orchards, assessed in 1999). Discussion These results show that resistance to defoliation by aphids is both variable and moderately to highly heritable. This encourages selection and breeding as a strategy to reduce productivity losses, and results from these analyses have been used to identify existing and new selections to develop an ‘aphid-resistant’ breed within HVPP’s deployment program. About 20 parents contribute to this breed, the first plants of which were distributed for establishment in 2005. Although the genetic correlations between foliage retention and growth estimated from the progeny trial data were variable, it appears that the ‘aphid resistant’ breed currently being deployed by HVPP has overall Treeplan® breeding values for productivity similar to those of the standard breed. This suggests that gains in Australian Forestry 2009 Vol. 72 No. 1 pp. 25–31 30 Genetic resistance to defoliation by aphids in radiata pine Table 5. Variance components and heritabilities for trials assessed for aphid defoliation between 2001 and 2004 Trial RAD114 RAD117 RAD117b RAD117 RAD148b RAD152 a RAD153 a RAD162a RAD168 RAD168b RAD168 RAD225 a b Year assessed σ2mother (se) σ2father (se) σ2mother.father (se) σ2resid (se) h2 (se) 2001 2001 2003 2004 2004 2004 2004 2002 2001 2003 2004 2001 0.24 (0.26) 0.94 (0.60) 0.77 (0.46) 0.23 (0.55) 0.39 (0.22) 0.86 (0.58) 0.54 (0.31) 0.26 (0.13) 0.74 (0.32) 0.34 (0.15) 0.34 (0.21) 0.18 (0.14) 0.30 (0.27) 1.23 (1.09) 1.92 (1.57) 0.75 (0.90) 0.45 (0.31) — — — 0.34 (0.25) 0.12 (0.09) 0.18 (0.18) 0.15 (0.13) 0.13 (0.27) 0.35 (0.40) ∼0 0.74 (0.61) ∼0 — — — 0.04 (0.21) — 0.10 (0.19) 0.04 (0.04) 2.73 (0.23) 2.44 (0.23) 2.98 (0.32) 2.03 (0.22) 4.08 (0.30) 3.46 (0.53) 2.58 (0.34) 1.75 (0.16) 2.59 (0.16) 2.03 (0.13) 2.49 (0.15) 1.12 (0.09) 0.32 (0.21) 0.88 (0.32) 0.95 (0.31) 0.52 (0.47) 0.34 (0.12) 0.80 (0.45) 0.70 (0.36) 0.52 (0.23) 0.58 (0.17) 0.37 (0.10) 0.33 (0.16) 0.45 (0.20) OP trial mother.father variance estimated to be negative or close to 0, or completely aliased with other terms, and therefore excluded from model Table 6. Phenotypic (above diagonal) and genotypic (below diagonal) correlations between retained foliage in 2001, 2003 and 2004, calculated from trees in RAD117 and RAD168 which were assessed on all occasions 2001 2003 2004 2001 0.73 0.92 2003 2004 0.42 0.53 0.52 0.90 Table 7. Genetic and phenotypic correlations between growth at various ages and defoliation in 2004, calculated from trees in RAD117, RAD151 and RAD168 Trial RAD151 RAD151 RAD168 RAD117 No. observations rg rp 10 20 11 15 153 123 571 196 –0.22 –0.52 –0.28 –0.25 0.04 0.03 0.00 0.02 Clone code Assessor 1 Assessor 2 A B C D E F G H I J K L 09.5 09.0 07.4 08.3 07.9 05.6 06.7 01.6 06.0 10.0 07.0 09.7 8.2 8.0 6.7 8.0 5.3 6.3 8.2 3.0 6.3 7.8 5.4 8.1 (6.2) (2.4) 10 10 9 9 8 8 7 7 6 6 5 5 4 4 3 3 2 2 1 1 0 Age of dbh assessment (y) Table 8. Mean retained upper crown score (RUC) by clone and assessor at Lal Lal Seed Orchard Mean RUC score rg \ rp (8.5) L A J B D G C E I K F H 0 Clone Assessor 1 Assessor 2 Mean Figure 1. Retained upper crown score (RUC) by assessor, and mean score adjusted for assessor, for the 12 clones assessed at Lal Lal Seed Orchard. Lines show the three groups (and their mean score) that could be identified amongst the 12 clones. (The groups were identified by post-hoc analysis of LSDs — using Fisher’s PLSD at 5%.) Clones G and C were intermediate between the upper and medium groups, and could not be classified to either. Australian Forestry 2009 Vol. 72 No. 1 pp. 25–31 Jo Sasse, Stephen Elms and Peter Kube aphid resistance can be made without compromising productivity, and the genetic correlations are likely to be positive. The pedigree of the current aphid-resistant deployment breed used by HVPP is limited and needs expansion. Therefore further assessment of progeny trials is required, and the data should be included with the current data in the national analysis of radiata pine as coordinated by the Southern Tree Breeding Association. Assessing second- and third-generation progeny trials would allow comparison of genetic parameters with first-generation trials, provide greater depth to the pedigree, and enable BLUPs (Best Linear Unbiased Predictors) to be estimated for material relevant to current deployment populations. Analysis of the data using Treeplan® would allow multivariate analysis of defoliation between years, integration of the aphid BLUPs with those of other traits and expansion of aphid BLUPs to a broader suite of genotypes through the pedigree. Identification of secondgeneration progeny trials that are in aphid-affected districts and that have already been thinned, or thinning some candidate trials and possibly fertilising them with high levels of nitrogen to induce aphid attack, may be worth consideration. Screening methods are also needed to evaluate the resistance of genotypes to defoliation at a young age, to enable efficient selection for breeding and deployment. Investigating the feeding preferences of the aphids and or defence mechanisms of the trees may provide clues to possible methods. Conclusions Resistance to defoliation by aphids has been shown to have a significant genetic component. At a provenance level, foliage retained in the upper crown was greatest in the Año Nuevo population, and greatest in the inland northern (Coastways Ranch) sub-population from Año Nuevo. At a clonal level, clones had significantly different amounts of retained foliage. At a family level, the extent of retained foliage was found in progeny trials to be highly heritable, consistent between years, and with little genotype × environment interaction evident. Heritability estimates varied between sites and between years. The reasons for this are not entirely clear, but there were indications that defoliation was more variable in some years and on some sites than others, suggesting that genetic effects are better estimated in years and on sites expressing greater variability. These results have been used to initiate development of an ‘aphid resistant’ breed for operational deployment in plantations. 31 References Carver, M. and Kent, D.S. (2000) Essigella californica (Essig) and Eulachnus thunbergii Wilson (Hemiptera: Aphididae: Lachninae) on Pinus in south-eastern Australia. Australian Journal of Entomology 39, 62–69. Eldridge, K.G. (1998) Australian Radiata Provenance Trials. Client Report 416. CSIRO Division of Forestry and Forest Products, Canberra. Elms, S. and Sasse, J. (2005) Defoliation by aphids in Californian provenances of radiata pine at RES0024 (Flynn, 1979). Internal Research Report, Hancock Victorian Plantations. Greaves, B.L. (2001) Quantitative analysis of aphid defoliation score. Consultancy report to Hancock Victorian Plantations. Harding, S., Roulund, H. and Wellendorf, H. (2003) Consistency of resistance to attack by the green spruce aphid (Elatobium abietinum Walker) in different ontogenetic stages of Sitka spruce. Agricultural and Forest Entomology 5, 107–112. Hopmans, P., Collett, N., Smith , I.W. and Elms, S. (2008) Growth and nutrition of Pinus radiata in response to fertilizer applied after thinning and interaction with defoliation associated with Essigella californica. Forest Ecology and Management 255, 2118–2128. Leibhold, A. and Csóka, G. (2001) Risks posed by exotic forest pests – foliage feeding insects. In: Exotic Forest Pests Online Symposium – http://www.apsnet.org/online/proceedings/ExoticPest/Papers/ Leibhold.htm (verified 22 April 2008) May, B.M. (2004) Assessment of the Causality of Essigella-Ascribed Defoliation of Mid-Rotation Pine and its National Impact in Terms of Cost of Lost Wood Production. Final Report for Project PN04.4002 to Forest and Wood Products Research and Develop ment Corporation, Melbourne. May, B.M. and Carlyle, J.C. (2003) Effect of defoliation associated with Essigella californica on growth of mid-rotation Pinus radiata. Forest Ecology and Management 183, 297–312. Simpson, J.A. and Ades, P.K. (1990) Variation in susceptibility of Pinus muricata and Pinus radiata to two species of Aphidoidae. Silvae Genetica 39, 202–206. Smith, I.W., Collett, N.G. and Hopmans, P. (1999) Impact on growth of defoliation associated with Essigella californica infestation of 23-year-old thinned P. radiata at Warrenbayne, Victoria. In Collett, N., Simpson, J. and Schoenborn, C. (eds) A Review of the Current Status of the Monterey Pine Aphid in Australia. Workshop Proceedings, Centre for Forest Tree Technology, Heidelberg, Victoria. Smith, I., Smith, D., Collett, N. and Elms, S.R. (2008) Forest health surveillance in Victoria. Australian Forestry 71, 188–195. Acknowledgements Defoliation in provenance and progeny trials and clonal seed orchards was assessed by staff from HVP Plantations, including Peter Buxton, Robyn Pearson and Warwick Williams; and teams from the Centre for Forest Tree Technology (Department of Sustainability and Environment, now University of Melbourne) including Nick Collett, Carolien Schoenborn, David Smith, Paul Clements and Matthew Hamilton. Dr Bruce Greaves (Strategic Forest Research Pty Ltd) completed the first analysis of aphid defoliation for HVP Plantations. Dr Peter Hopmans (Timberlands Research) and Nick Collett (University of Melbourne) have provided valuable feedback and guidance to the HVP Plantations research program into defoliation by aphids. Australian Forestry 2009 Vol. 72 No. 1 pp. 25–31 32 Scaling export pulpwood A sampling system for scaling partly segregated export pulpwood J.C. Ellis1,2 and M.O. Kimberley3 1Scaling Research International, Private Bag 12501, Tauranga 3143, New Zealand 2Email: [email protected] 3Scion, Private Bag 3020, Rotorua 3046, New Zealand Revised manuscript received 14 November 2008 Summary Estimates of pulpwood volumes exported from Australia and New Zealand are generally based on stratified samples of logs. This study investigates the possibility of modifying the existing sampling technique to cover consignments of logs only partly segregated on log size. A data set of 10 export consignments consisting of 193 truckloads containing 12 150 logs was used to compare 100% scale, 10% stratified sampling, and a revised system involving 10% sampling of logs below a small-end diameter limit of 26 cm and complete scaling of logs above that limit. Compared with 10% stratified sampling, the revised system reduced the average bias for a typical consignment of pulpwood and improved the precision, with the 95% confidence interval of mean log volume being reduced from 7.9% to 3.9% of the mean. Keywords: pulpwood; scaling; sampling; volume determination Introduction Complete scaling of pulpwood is expensive and difficult because of the small piece size and consequent large number of logs in a typical load or shipment (Ellis and Kimberley 1995). This is especially so given the generally lower value per unit volume of pulpwood compared with sawlogs (Blythe 1945). Before 1991, pulpwood exported from New Zealand to Asia was either fully scaled or the volume was estimated from a sample of truckloads, with all logs in each sampled truckload being scaled (Ellis and Kimberley 1995). Typically one truckload in ten was fully scaled. This often caused severe traffic congestion. Moreover, volume estimates using this sampling method often had poor precision because of the variation between truckloads, and costs could be high because of the large number of truckloads required to obtain reasonable levels of precision. Measuring all the logs within each sample truckload was also expensive and prone to error because of the large number of logs in a load, which typically number 60 to 180 for pulpwood. Because of the difficulty in identifying the small end of logs in the centre of a load, large-end diameters were sometimes measured, leading to a volume overestimate. An improved stratified sampling technique was therefore developed and this has been used in New Zealand since 1991 (Ellis and Kimberley 1995). This method involves measuring a 10% sample of logs from each truckload as it arrives at the scaling area or wharf marshalling area. To apply the method, the total number of logs in each load is firstly counted, and the number of sample logs required calculated to obtain a 10% sample. Logs against the bolster at the edge of the load are then measured until a sufficient number of sample logs is obtained. Loads with fewer than 26 logs are fully scaled. This procedure has been found to give a representative sample of logs with little bias. Because of their position at the edge of the load, the small ends of the logs can be identified and measured easily and quickly along with the log length. Volumes of the sampled logs are estimated using the appropriate log volume formulae, and standard stratified sampling formulae applied to estimate the mean log volume of a total consignment. Each truck or trailer load is treated as a sample stratum in this procedure. This stratified sampling method gave greatly improved precision compared to the previous system, with standard errors typically being reduced by two-thirds (Ellis and Kimberley 1995). Where the system has been applied on log populations with a restricted range of diameters it has worked well, and importers and exporters have not had cause for concern. Where the method has been used on unsegregated pulplogs (Fig. 1), however, there have been claims of volume bias. With the number of log grades generated in bush landings, it is often difficult to segregate pulp logs into large and small sizes, and unsegregated pulplogs are consequently placed onto trucks. While there may be a large number of pieces, the wide range of sizes compromises the precision of the stratified sampling system. To overcome this problem, some exporters ignore measurements of a small number of oversized logs in the sample, but count them as a small pulp piece. However, this is certain to give a negative bias to the estimated average piece size. A similar system of sampling export pulplogs has been used in Tasmania, although scaling is performed on log stacks (Fig. 2) rather than bunks on truck or rail wagon. An important difference from the New Zealand system is that larger-diameter logs in the stack are fully scaled, and the sampling procedure is applied only to the smaller-diameter logs in the stack. Typically, all pieces are butt marked so that the (unpainted) small end can be identified. All pieces with a small-end diameter of 26 cm and over are ticketed and scaled. The remaining pieces have numerically sequenced paper tickets placed on the small end and every 10th number is used as a sample. In other parts of Australia where logs are Australian Forestry 2009 Vol. 72 No. 1 pp. 32–38 J.C. Ellis and M.O. Kimberley 33 Figure 1. A truckload of unsegregated pulplogs Figure 2. Pulp pieces sampled along the top of a pulp load in Geelong, Victoria stacked without any butt or small-end marks, samples are taken from the top of the stack where the small end can be positively identified. To achieve a sample of about 10% in pulp stacks less than two metres in height, half the logs along the top of the stack or truckload (those with the small end on one chosen side of the stack) are measured. In stacks over two metres in height, all the logs along the top of the stack are measured. Trial data The current trial was set up to determine whether the New Zealand pulplog stratified sampling system could be improved by measuring all large logs in a consignment, and applying a sampling system to the smaller logs. Specifically the objective was to determine whether volume estimates with better precision and less bias could be obtained by scaling all larger logs and a sample of smaller logs in each load. Consignments of pulp logs delivered to the New Zealand North Island log export ports of Northport and Mount Maunganui were used for test data. All of the logs in each truckload were ticketed and measured. The sequence of ticketing started with the sample logs against the bolster and continued with the remainder of the load. The first ticketed logs provided the 10% sample, and the remaining logs gave the true volume of the load. Note that a consignment consists of a group of truckloads (dockets) in one location at the storage facility. Characteristics of each consignment are shown in Table 1. The data sets from Northport and Mount Maunganui differed in piece size, the number of pieces per truck, and the number of Table 1. Study data for each consignment Port and consignment Northport G045 G096 G098 G137 G147 H112 Overall Mount Maunganui W1219 W1829 W2129 W4191 Overall Overall combined Small-end diameter (cm) Loads Logs Min. Max. Mean Min. Max. Mean log volume (m3) 3.8 3.8 3.8 3.9 3.8 3.0 012 019 015 019 031 015 111 01 549 01 268 00736 01 679 01 649 01 507 08 388 41 12 01 10 01 02 01 187 132 106 161 171 134 187 129 067 049 088 053 100 076 11 10 11 10 10 09 09 72 96 50 92 62 48 96 0.137 0.218 0.157 0.165 0.151 0.115 0.155 3.9 3.9 3.9 3.9 030 017 018 017 082 00782 01 119 00902 00959 03 762 01 03 01 01 01 138 107 103 143 143 026 066 050 056 046 08 14 13 10 08 58 42 70 62 70 0.190 0.271 0.299 0.196 0.242 193 12 150 01 187 063 08 96 0.182 Log length (m) Number of Number of logs per load docket Australian Forestry 2009 Vol. 72 No. 1 pp. 32–38 34 Scaling export pulpwood ‘pseudo-loads’ added to locations as rejects from sawing-grade logs. A load signifies a log or logs belonging to a single docket. The average log size for the Northport population was somewhat smaller than for the Mount population. Both populations show a small but significant number of larger logs in the upper range of the distribution, which are most likely reject sawlogs (Figs 3 and 4). (b) For logs equal to or greater than 6 m long: Sampling methods Note that (L′ – 4)/2 is the factor for taper. The volume of each log in the study data set was calculated from the small-end diameter and log length using the Japanese Agricultural Standard (JAS) (Ellis and Elliott 2001), that is: For each consignment in the study, the actual total JAS volume was calculated along with volume estimates using the standard ‘10% stratified sampling method’ and a revised method in which larger-diameter logs were fully scaled and the remaining logs sampled using the 10% sampling method. For the standard method, a 10% sample of logs was used for loads with more than 25 logs, but loads with 25 or fewer logs were fully scaled. For the revised method, all logs with a small-end diameter greater than the specified limit of 26 cm were scaled. For loads with more than 25 logs below the diameter limit, a 10% sample of these remaining (a) For logs less than 6 m long: D2 L , 10 000 V = (1) where D is the shortest diameter in centimetres, L is the length in metres and V is the volume in cubic metres. V = (D + (L� − 4)/2)2 L , 10 000 where D is the shortest diameter in centimetres, L is the length in metres, L′ is the length in metres rounded down to a whole metre and V is the volume in cubic metres. 700 Population Number of logs 600 Sample*10 500 400 300 200 100 0 8 10 12 14 18 22 26 30 34 38 42 46 50 54 58 62 66 70 74 78 82 86 90 94 JAS small-end diameter class (cm) Figure 3. Diameter distribution, Northport logs 2000 1800 Population Sample*10 Number of logs 1600 1400 1200 1000 800 600 400 200 0 (2) 8 10 12 14 18 22 26 30 34 38 42 46 50 54 58 62 66 70 74 78 82 86 90 94 JAS small end-diameter class (cm) Figure 4. Diameter distribution, Mount Maunganui logs Australian Forestry 2009 Vol. 72 No. 1 pp. 32–38 J.C. Ellis and M.O. Kimberley logs was scaled. Loads with 25 or fewer logs below the limit were fully scaled. The effect of using a size limit other than 26 cm was then explored by varying it from zero (effectively complete sampling of all logs in the consignment) to 100 cm (effectively the standard method as no individual log in the study exceeded this limit) in 2-cm steps. For convenience, logs with diameter less than or greater than the specified size limit are referred to in the remainder of this paper as ‘undersized’ or ‘oversized’ logs respectively. Finally, the effect of using a sampling percentage of undersized logs other than 10% was explored by varying it from 5% to 20%. The revised sampling method consists of a stratified sample of the undersized logs combined with complete measurement of the oversized logs. The estimated mean log volume of the consignment is obtained using the following formula. This and the following variance equation are essentially those used in stratified random sampling (e.g. Cochran 1977): �a (v̄i Ni ) + v̄o no �a V̄ m = i=1 , (3) i=1 Ni + no where a is the number of truckloads, v̄i is the average piece size (m3 JAS) of the sampled logs below the diameter limit in the ith load, Ni is the total number of undersized logs in the ith load, and no and v̄o are the number and mean piece size of all the oversized logs in the consignment. The variance of V̄m is estimated using: var(V̄ m ) = 2 2 i=1 ((si /ni )Ni (1 − (ni /Ni )) � �a �2 i=1 Ni + no �a (4) , where s2i is the variance between sample logs in the ith load, ni is the number of undersized logs in the ith load, and other symbols are as before. 35 Probable limits of error (PLE, equal to half the 95% confidence interval expressed as a percentage of the mean) are calculated using: � 100 tn−a var(V̄ m ) , (5) PLE = V̄ m where n = ni, and tn–a is the t-value with n – a degrees of freedom (2-tailed, P = 0.05). The total volume for a consignment is obtained by multiplying the mean log volume (Equation 3) by the total number of logs in � �a � the consignment i=1 Ni + no . Results In eight of the ten consignments, the volume bias was reduced by the revised method compared with the standard method (Table 2). Average bias across the ten consignments in the study was 0.96% for the revised method compared with 1.39% for the standard method. The PLE for the revised method was generally about half that of the original system: the average PLE was 3.87% compared with 7.93% for the original system. For populations of 1000 logs or more, a PLE of less than 5% is achievable using the revised method. In the study data set, however, this superior precision and reduced bias was achieved at the expense of scaling on average 24% of all logs compared with less than 13% for the standard sampling system. The relationship between the small-end diameter size limit and PLE for the revised method along with the percentage of logs scaled is shown for each port in Figure 5. Note that the percentage of logs scaled is always higher than the nominal undersized log sampling percentage of 10% even for large size limits. This is because all the consignments included some loads of fewer than 26 logs, which were therefore fully scaled. As the small-end Table 2. Comparative precision and bias between original and new systems Population Consignment Standard sampling method Logs sampled Revised sampling method Logs sampled Bias (%) PLE (%) No. Fraction (%) Bias (%) PLE (%) Loads Logs No. Fraction (%) G137 G045 G096 G098 G147 H112 W1219 W1829 W2129 W4191 19.0 12.0 19.0 15.0 31.0 15.0 30.0 17.0 18.0 17.0 1679 1549 1268 0736 1649 1507 0782 1119 902 959 178 155 199 081 203 152 171 152 154 121 10.6 10.0 15.7 11.0 12.3 10.1 21.9 13.6 17.1 12.6 –4.65 –2.52 –4.88 –4.04 –4.8 –8.75 –3.32 –0.03 –0.29 –6.23 08.42 06.53 06.25 10.19 06.86 09.64 10.94 05.36 05.32 09.75 247 216 291 146 278 251 244 513 461 271 14.7 13.9 22.9 19.8 16.9 16.7 31.2 45.8 51.1 28.3 –2.97 –0.23 –5.02 –2.35 –0.74 –0.04 –0.47 –1.01 –0.71 –1.50 3.61 4.88 3.12 6.77 3.79 4.47 5.19 1.61 1.37 3.84 Northport mean Mount mean 18.5 20.5 1398 0941 161 150 11.6 16.3 –2.75 –0.65 07.98 07.84 238 372 17.5 39.1 –1.82 –0.33 4.44 3.00 Overall mean 19.3 1215 157 13.5 –1.39 07.93 292 26.1 –0.96 3.87 Australian Forestry 2009 Vol. 72 No. 1 pp. 32–38 Scaling export pulpwood 100 10 90 9 80 8 70 7 60 Mount sample % 50 North sample % 40 30 6 5 Mount PLE 4 North PLE 3 20 2 10 1 0 10 20 30 40 PLE (%) Log sampled (%) 36 0 60 50 SED (cm) Figure 5. Percentage of logs scaled and precision at each port versus small-end diameter size limit diameter limit is reduced, the PLE also reduces, but at the expense of having to scale a greater percentage of logs. There was a noticeable difference between the two ports, with the PLE being larger and the scaling percentage smaller for a given small-end diameter size limit at Northport compared with Mount Maunganui. At both ports, however, similar precision was achieved for the same scaling percentage. For example for the Mount Maunganui log population, a size limit of 32 cm produced a PLE of 5% and a scaling percentage of 20%. For the Northport population, a similar PLE was achieved using a size limit of 28 cm, which required a scaling percentage of 17%. Potentially, both the sampling percentage of undersized logs and the small-end diameter size limit could be varied to achieve higher or lower precision. Table 3 shows various combinations of these parameters which all achieve an average PLE of about 5% for the ten consignments in the trial data set. Using a 10% nominal sampling percentage, a small-end diameter limit of 30 cm is required to achieve a mean PLE of 5%. The same precision can be obtained either by reducing the sampling percentage to 7.5% and the diameter limit to 28 cm, or by raising sampling percentage to 15% and the diameter limit to 40 cm. Under both these alternative systems, however, the overall percentage of logs scaled is greater than required by the 10% sampling system. Note also that to achieve a 5% PLE using the standard sampling system, a nominal sampling percentage of 22% is required. Of the various sampling systems shown in Table 3, the one using a 10% sample of undersized logs and a 30 cm diameter limit results in the smallest overall percentage of scaled logs. This indicates that a sampling percentage of about 10% combined with a suitable diameter limit is likely to provide an acceptable level of precision in the most cost-effective manner. Discussion and conclusions The study data set provided an excellent test of the original stratified system and the revised sampling systems using varying diameter size limits. One anomaly in the data was the inclusion of 66 loads with 25 or fewer logs, which under both the standard and revised sampling systems were fully scaled. The numbers of logs in these ‘loads’ ranged from 1 to 24, and as many of the loads contained large logs, this limited the opportunity for sampling bias. Thus it is believed that the bias and precision figures for the standard 10% sampling method obtained in this study may be less than would be typical in practice. The use of a diameter restriction in conjunction with stratified sampling has been successful in Tasmania for a number of years. This was made possible by bush gangs marking the large end of each piece. Measurement and therefore sampling challenges occur where pulp logs are not marked at the large end. In export operations in New South Wales and Victoria, logs are sampled along the top of the stack or truckload so that small ends can be positively identified. In New Zealand, logs are sampled on truck against the bolster so that the small end can be easily identified. Potentially, selecting sample logs along the top of a stack or along the bolster in a truckload could produce biased samples. For example, there is evidence that when unsegregated pulp logs are being placed on truck it may be practice to put large-diameter logs on the outside of the load, and this could lead to bias in the sample. Under the revised method, such logs would most likely be included in the fully-scaled oversized portion of the log population, reducing this potential bias. However, when the complete study data set was analysed as if it was a single very large consignment, the average bias using the standard 10% sampling method with no diameter restriction was only 1.9 ± 2.4% (mean and 95% confidence interval), indicating that any bias under this method is minimal. Using the revised method, the average bias was even smaller — only 1.1 ± 1.1%. Therefore, the evidence of this study is that both the standard method and especially the revised method of selecting sample logs will produce estimates within a typical customer’s expectations that bias should be no more than 2%. It has to be accepted that any non-random method of sampling is potentially biased, but as long as the bias is small it may be acceptable if the method Table 3. Combinations of undersized log sampling percentages and small-end diameter limits that achieve a mean PLE of 5% Sampling system SED limit (cm) Revised sampling system Standard sampling system 24 28 30 40 — Sampling fraction of undersized logs (%) 05.0 07.5 10.0 15.0 22.0 Australian Forestry 2009 Vol. 72 No. 1 pp. 32–38 Total fraction of logs scaled (%) 27.3 17.4 17.3 19.1 25.3 J.C. Ellis and M.O. Kimberley gives good precision and is cost-effective. It is doubtful whether 100% scaling could achieve an estimate closer than 1%, when one considers the likelihood of scaling errors in pulpwood because of small piece size and inability to validate the identification of the small ends of logs. To apply the revised method in practice, it is necessary that the small ends of all logs be readily identifiable so that oversized logs can be correctly identified and measured. Without the marking of all logs, identifying the oversized logs at time of scaling is probably not practical as it is impossible to recognise the small ends of logs in the centre of loads or stacks. Therefore the large ends of all logs should be marked in some way prior to loading, so that the absence of a mark on a log end can be used to indicate that it is the small end. As long as the logs are clearly marked, application of the revised method should not cause any significant complication during the scaling operation, although data capture and management systems will have to be changed to cope with the two ‘pseudo loads’ on each docket. However, the end result will be a robust pulp sampling system. Stratification is an important feature of both the revised sampling system described in this paper and the original 10% sampling system described by Ellis and Kimberley (1995). Substantial improvements in accuracy and precision over simple random sampling can potentially be achieved using stratification with virtually no increase in sampling costs. Stratification is worthwhile when logs within each stratum are more uniform than in the overall population. The original system was developed in New Zealand for scaling logs on truck or rail wagon bunks, a situation in which each load forms a natural stratum. The variation in log size within loads was generally found to be considerably lower than in the overall population, making stratification worthwhile (Ellis and Kimberley 1995). Similar systems have been used in Australia where sampling and scaling occurs on log piles or stacks, but it is less obvious how strata should be defined in these situations. As a minimum, each stack or pile should be treated as a single stratum. However, when stacks are large, and especially when logs from mixed sources are stacked together, improved estimates may be obtained by dividing stacks into multiple strata. Selection of strata is especially important when logs are stacked without any butt or small-end marks. As mentioned above, the revised sampling procedure cannot be readily used in this situation because the lack of log end markings makes it impossible to accurately identify oversized logs in the stack. However, a stratified sampling system similar to the original method can still be applied using samples taken from the top of the stack where the small end can be positively identified. Under this system, the sampling percentage will vary if the stack height is not constant or if log size varies along the stack, and potentially this could cause bias in the estimated mean log size. To overcome this, long stacks should be divided into strata (e.g. on the basis of distance along the stack, stack height or sources of logs within the stack) by marking vertical lines on face of the stack. On one end of each stratum, any log touching the line should be included in the stratum, while any log touching the line on the other end of the stratum should be excluded. Once the strata have been delineated along the stack, the log count and the average log size of the sampled logs should be obtained for each stratum, and an overall mean across the combined strata calculated using Equation 3. As long as the sampling percentage remains constant within each stratum, there 37 should be little bias using this procedure. The sampling percentage can vary between strata without causing bias. In this situation, stratification will not only improve the precision of the estimate but more importantly will reduce its bias. Stack sampling issues caused by variation in stack height or log size are only problematic when logs are sampled on the basis of their position in the stack (e.g. along the top row). They are not a problem in the Tasmanian sampling system in which numerically sequenced paper tickets are placed on the small ends of all pieces in the stack and a fixed proportion (e.g. every 10th number) is used as a sample. In natural populations, systematic sampling systems such as this usually provide more precise estimates than simple random sampling (Cochran 1977). In this case the advantage of using stratification is less clear. Because logs are sampled representatively both within and across potential strata, the estimate of mean log size under stratification is essentially identical to a simple mean across all strata. However, stratification may still be worthwhile as it should provide better estimates of precision (e.g. the PLE). The revised sampling system described in this paper can also readily be applied in this case because oversized logs can be easily identified and measured. This study identified differences between the log populations at Northport and Mount Maunganui, the average piece size generally being larger at the Mount. The consequence was that a common size limit of 26 cm for both ports resulted in far larger percentage of logs being scaled at the Mount than at Northport, producing an unnecessarily high level of precision at the Mount. It may be practical to vary the size limit depending on the characteristics of the populations being sampled. For example, to achieve a PLE of 5%, a size limit of 32 cm could be appropriate for the Mount but a limit of 28 cm is necessary at Northport. When choosing an appropriate log scaling system, there must be a balance between scaling cost and the risk of over- or under-payment. A 100% scale costs about 5% of the total value of a consignment to gain a volume estimate within 1% of total value. Using the revised method, the likely range of over- or under-payment is increased to 4% for a scaling cost of 1% of total revenue. The original 10% method costs only 0.5% of total revenue but estimates of value could vary by as much as 10%. In the earlier study that led to the development of the standard 10% sample method for pulp logs (Ellis and Kimberley 1995), it was shown that increasing the sampling percentage above 10% gave minimal gain in precision. This study shows that real gains in reduced bias and increased precision can be achieved by sampling logs below a given diameter limit and complete scaling of logs above that limit. However, segregating logs before measurement is still the simplest system. Acknowledgements This work was made possible through Ian Leslie of Pacific Forest Products allowing the free use of data. Thanks are due to Quality Marshalling (Mount Maunganui) and C3 Limited (Northport) for the collection of trial data. The authors are grateful to Jerry Leech and Shayne Jenkins for helpful comments on the draft. This project was funded through the generosity of Scion Research and C3 Limited. Australian Forestry 2009 Vol. 72 No. 1 pp. 32–38 38 Scaling export pulpwood References Blythe, R.H. (1945) The economics of sample size applied to the scaling of sawlogs. Biometrics Bulletin 1, 67–70. Cochran, W.G. (1977) Sampling Techniques. 3rd edition. John Wiley and Sons, New York, 428 pp. Ellis, J.C. and Kimberley, M.O. (1995) Volume estimation of export pulplogs. New Zealand Journal of Forestry Science 25, 123–132. Ellis, J.C. and Elliott, D.A. (2001) Log Scaling Guide for Exporters. Forest Research Bulletin No. 221. Forest Research, Rotorua, NZ, 53 pp. Appendix. Suggested operational procedures (truck or stack) On truck 1. Every log should be butt marked so that small ends can be identified in the load. 2. Every truck must be sampled. 3. Pulpwood pieces are to be selected and measured for JAS at the marshalling point as follows: •Count the number of pieces on each truck unit. •Ticket and scale for JAS all logs that are greater than the specified diameter limit (oversized logs). •If there are fewer than 26 remaining undersized logs, all remaining logs must be scaled. •If there are 26 or more undersized logs, 10% (one tenth) of the remaining undersized logs are sampled and scaled for JAS. These sample pieces (all below the specified diameter limit) must be resting against the bolster of the Oversized logs Load 1 2 3 4 Totals Number Mean log volume (m3) Total number of undersized logs 12 03 06 00 21 1.10550 0.29800 0.30533 — 0.76152 000 064 066 132 262 truck or trailer unit so that the small end can be positively identified (as an additional check of correct butt marking) and measured. Selection of sample pieces should begin on the bottom of the left side of every load, with logs taken in order up the side of the load until the required number of samples is chosen. If insufficient logs are available on the left side of the load, sampling should continue from the bottom of the right side of the load. In stack where small ends of all logs can be identified (e.g. by butt marking of large ends of all logs) 1. Every stack must be sampled. 2. Pulpwood pieces are to be selected and measured for JAS on each stack as follows: •Ticket and measure all logs with small-end diameter greater than 26 cm. •Ticket (and count) the unmeasured pieces in each stack. •Sample 10% of the logs by measuring those logs that have tickets ending in zero, or some other digit in the range between zero and nine. Note that where logs in stacks are unmarked and the sample logs are taken from the top row of the stack, the revised method described in this paper cannot be applied because accurate identification of oversized logs is not feasible. An example of the volume calculations for a small consignment is shown below. Note that Load 1 has no undersized logs and Load 4 has no oversized logs. Sampled undersized logs Volume estimates (m3) Number Mean log volume (m3) Mean log volume Total volume 00 07 07 13 27 — 0.19200 0.21529 0.18700 0.19563 1.10550 0.19675 0.22279 0.18700 0.23736 13.266 13.182 16.041 24.684 67.173 Australian Forestry 2009 Vol. 72 No. 1 pp. 32–38 Julian C. Fox, Fiona Hamilton and Sharon Occhipinti 39 Tree hollow incidence in Victorian state forests Julian C. Fox1,2, Fiona Hamilton3 and Sharon Occhipinti4 1Department of Forest and Ecosystem Science, Melbourne School of Land and Environment, The University of Melbourne, Burnley Campus, 500 Yarra Blvd, Richmond, Victoria 3121, Australia 2Email: [email protected] 3Department of Sustainability and Environment, 3/8 Nicholson Street, East Melbourne, Victoria 3002, Australia 4URS Australia Pty Ltd, Level 6, 1 Southbank Boulevard, Southbank, Victoria 3006, Australia Revised manuscript received 4 December 2008 Summary The availability of tree hollows in timber production forests is a contentious issue facing forest and wildlife managers in Australia. To integrate conservation priorities for hollow-dependent fauna in forest stewardship, public land managers need information on the quantity and spatial distribution of hollow-bearing trees. This information has previously been lacking, but an extensive hollows database exists in the Victorian Statewide Forest Resource Inventory (SFRI). We use the SFRI to estimate simple stand-level models for the density of hollow-bearing trees, and the density of hollow size classes. Models were of borderline predictive ability but were statistically significant. This is consistent with previous models of hollow incidence that have found hollow formation to be intrinsically stochastic. We then applied these models in a geographic information system (GIS) to generate spatial predictions of hollow availability in Victorian state forests. The resulting GIS layers are available from the Department of Sustainability and Environment (DSE) and are a valuable resource for forest and wildlife managers, researchers and the interested public. We also created tables describing hollow abundance for different forest types, and important stand-level trends in hollow availability emerged. We found that hollow density in ash forests (Eucalyptus regnans, Eucalyptus delegatensis) was consistently low and strongly influenced by the presence of non-ash species that are more susceptible to hollow formation. Hollows occurred in E. regnans forest at particularly low density, with less than 37% of trees having hollows until diameter exceeded 125 cm. The density of hollows in non-ash forests was comparatively greater, with more than 49% of trees containing hollows when their diameter exceeded 75 cm. Keywords: forest management; wildlife; cavities in trees; habitats; models; state forests; Victoria Introduction Managing state forests for net social benefit requires an appro priate balance of timber production and conservation priorities (Ferguson 1996). Forest managers trying to strike this balance face many challenges, and amongst the most contentious is the availability of tree hollows, with previous studies indicating that a limited availability constrains populations of forest-dwelling species (Ambrose 1982; Smith and Lindenmayer 1988; Loyn 1993). These include species listed as threatened under the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (EPBC Act), and for this reason loss of hollow-bearing trees has recently been listed as a ‘Key Threatening Process’ under the EPBC Act. In Victoria, much of the hollow-based habitat for these species may occur within state forests (Attiwill 1995), but little is known of the availability and distribution of tree hollows in these forests. Tree hollows form as a result of stochastic, episodic events such as fire, decay by fungal or insect attack, and mechanical damage from other trees, wind or lightning. Given the stochastic nature of hollow development and a paucity of information from which to develop and parameterise predictive models (Gibbons and Lindenmayer 1996), previous modelling attempts have had modest success. Models previously developed in Victoria are those of Lindenmayer et al. (1993), who examined 2315 trees in the central highlands of Victoria, and Bennett et al. (1994), who studied 1120 trees on the northern plains of Victoria. Although both studies identified useful relationships between the incidence of hollows and individual-tree attributes, the developed models had limited predictive ability. In a small number of studies trees have been felled for a more detailed examination of hollow size and abundance. The extent of such work has been limited because of the expense of tree felling and dissection and restrictions on this practice in national parks and state forests (Lindenmayer et al. 2000), but the studies of Mackowski (1987), Gibbons (1999), Whitford and Williams (2002) and Koch et al. (2008) are notable. Unfortunately the limited size of the samples in these studies hindered the usefulness of the models developed (Gibbons 1999). Several studies have attempted to build predictive models for the incidence of tree hollows, using biotic and abiotic factors to explain the variation. Studies have used generalised linear models and have assumed either that counts of hollow incidence follow a Poisson distribution (e.g., Lindenmayer et al. 1993; Bennett et al. 1994; Gibbons 1999) or that the presence or absence of hollows follows a binomial distribution (Lindenmayer et al. 1991; Gibbons 1999; Fox et al. 2008). These studies indicated that biotic factors including tree diameter, crown form, age, species and understorey composition (Lindenmayer et al. 1993; Bennett et Australian Forestry 2009 Vol. 72 No. 1 pp. 39–48 40 Tree hollows in Victorian forests al. 1994; Gibbons 1999), as well as abiotic factors including site characteristics such as slope, latitude and rainfall (Lindenmayer et al. 1993; Bennett et al. 1994) influence the incidence of hollows. The models developed had limited predictive ability, however, and researchers resigned themselves to identifying simple rules of thumb that can be coarsely applied (Lindenmayer et al. 2000). Researchers have speculated that the poor precision of previous predictive models indicates a need to collect further data at several spatial scales and to ensure that variables are measured at the appropriate level of resolution (Lindenmayer et al. 1993). Victoria’s Statewide Forest Resource Inventory (SFRI) provides an opportunity to overcome the limitations facing previous modelling (Fox et al. 2008). As part of SFRI, information on the incidence of tree hollows was collected in state forests across Victoria. This information on the distribution and abundance of tree hollows is critical given the aims of forest management to balance timber extraction with wildlife conservation (Department of Natural Resource and Environment 1999). SFRI sampling was restricted to state forest that is available for timber production. National park, reserves and areas within state forest that are unavailable for timber production due to low productivity, steep slope or proximity to water courses were not sampled in the SFRI. Despite the sample being restricted to productive and available state forest, information on tree hollows collected in the SFRI represents the most extensive database of hollow incidence in Australian forests. A methodology for modelling tree-level hollow incidence has been developed and applied to SFRI data (Fox et al. 2008). The developed tree-level models can be used to estimate the probability that any individual tree will have a hollow and can be used for creating guidelines for tree retention strategies or for assessing the habitat potential of particular retained trees. However, the models of Fox et al. (2008) cannot be applied for stand-level predictions of hollow incidence, and cannot generate landscape-level information on hollow availability. The models of Fox et al. (2008) are generalised linear mixed models (GLMMs) that incorporate a hierarchy of nested and spatial dependence. Although statistically elegant and theoretically sound, such complexity may hinder the application of models by forest management agencies. In this paper, simpler stand-level models are developed that can be directly applied using existing GIS layers to generate a spatial layer of hollow density for hollows of different sizes across Victorian state forest. The objective of this study was to develop a modelling method with improved predictive utility that could be readily applied by practitioners. Models are needed that are capable of generating spatial predictions of hollow incidence in the form of GIS layers. Such spatial information is a valuable tool for forest stewardship, and can facilitate the improved integration of conservation priorities for hollow-dependent fauna in forest management. Methods SFRI hollows database SFRI hollows data were collected in two stages; in the first stage the presence or absence of visible hollows was estimated from the ground for every live or dead tree included in SFRI variable-radius plots (basal area factor of 3). The first-stage database consists of 25 361 ground-based assessments of hollow presence or absence across 2683 variable-radius plots. In the second stage the size and quantity of hollows was measured in three randomly-sampled trees that were felled for a subset of randomly-selected plots (Department of Natural Resource and Environment 1999; Fox et al. 2008). In total 1326 trees were felled for 423 randomly-selected plots. The dimensions of entries to hollows in felled trees were categorised into four size classes: 2–5 cm, 5–10 cm, 10–20 cm and > 20 cm. Dead trees were included in the modelling, as they often contain hollows: this is particularly the case for ash forests where pre-1939 stags are an important source of hollows (Lindenmayer et al. 1990). Therefore we have a large dataset of first-stage hollow presence or absence, and a smaller subset of second-stage hollow size and quantity. We used SFRI ground plots from state forests in Central, Dandenong, Tambo, Central Gippsland and East Gippsland Forest Management Areas. State forest in western Victoria and in North-East and Benalla/Mansfield FMAs was not included due to problems with data consistency and quality. Associated with each SFRI ground plot are the attributes of the aerial photograph interpretation (API) polygon within which the plot falls. The entire state forest area sampled in the SFRI has been divided into uniform API polygons that were classified for species composition, tree height and crown cover (Department of Natural Resource and Environment 1997), and for which a number of derived BIOCLIM environmental (McMahon et al. 1995) and radiometric variables (DPI 2005) were generated. Therefore models relating the number of hollows on SFRI plots to API polygon and other derived predictors can be applied to the entire forest estate for spatial predictions of hollow incidence in state forests. Modelling hollow-bearing trees per hectare Several alternative statistical methodologies were tested for standlevel modelling. Using hollow counts in a Poisson regression resulted in very poor models because hollows were absent in many plots. Logistic models were also applied to predict the presence or absence of hollows on SFRI plots but also performed poorly. For clarity and simplicity we transformed hollow counts to a continuous metric facilitating the use of classical statistical methods. Hollow presence on each SFRI tree was converted to hollow-bearing trees per hectare (HBTHA) based on the diameter at breast height over bark (dbhob) using equation 1. HBTHA = 3 dbhob2 (π/40 000) . (1) The sum of HBTHA for all hollow-bearing trees in each plot resulted in a continuous metric of hollow trees per hectare for each SFRI plot. This conversion weights the contribution of each tree according to dbhob to create a statistically valid per-hectare representation for the variable-radius SFRI plots. The application of equation 1 resulted in a very large hollow-tree-per-hectare estimate when a small tree had a visible hollow. These large values distorted plot-level estimates. To alleviate this it was assumed that trees of less than 35 cm dbhob do not contain hollows, and recorded visible hollows in these trees were omitted from the modelling dataset. This affected only 0.01% of trees. Australian Forestry 2009 Vol. 72 No. 1 pp. 39–48 Julian C. Fox, Fiona Hamilton and Sharon Occhipinti Previous modelling has found that tree diameter is the best predictor of hollow presence or absence (Bennett et al. 1994; Fox et al. 2008). To include some indication of tree size in plot-level estimates, hollow-tree-per-hectare estimates were calculated for the following diameter classes: 35–75 cm, 75–100 cm, 100–125 cm, 125–150 cm and >150 cm. The sum across all diameter classes was equivalent to the original plot-level estimate of hollow trees per hectare. Modelling by diameter class incorporates information on the size of trees that contain hollows and can be used as the basis for predicting quantities of hollow sizes. For each diameter class, linear regression was applied with hollow-bearing trees per hectare as the dependent variable, and 75 API and 38 environmental and radiometric variables as independent variables. The all-possible-subset algorithm of SAS PROC REG (SAS Institute Inc. 1996) was used to identify optimal subsets of predictors. These subsets were then examined for ‘biological reality’ to ensure that relationships were consistent with what is known of hollow formation and hollow incidence. If a biological explanation could not be identified then predictors were rejected. Finally, models were subject to diagnostic testing for multicollinearity, influential observations, and the assumptions of normal and independent errors (Rawlings 1988). Spatial dependence among model residuals was examined using correlograms and was found to negligible. After modelling the number of hollow-bearing trees per hectare in each diameter class, we estimated the average quantity of the four hollow size classes (2–5 cm, 5–10 cm, 10–20 cm and >20 cm) for felled trees. This allowed an estimate of the quantity of each hollow size class for the stand by multiplying the hollow-bearing trees per hectare by the mean number of each hollow size class. To accomplish this, the average number of hollows for each hollow size class was calculated for each diameter class for felled trees. Only felled trees with a hollow present were included in this analysis (164 of the 1326 felled trees). Where diameter classes were under-sampled, they were combined across diameter classes to create an adequate sample size of more than ten samples. Stratification The SFRI hollows database covers an extensive area of diverse forest, so stratification was required to improve model precision. We stratified the database initially into East Gippsland and nonEast Gippsland forest. East Gippsland forests have quite different characteristics compared to other FMAs, and constitute a large dataset in their own right (1305 plots). To identify trends in hollow incidence based on forest type, remaining areas were stratified by the dominant species classification of the API polygon. The final stratification and the number of plots were as follows: East Gippsland • All forest types — 1305 plots 41 • Messmate (E. obliqua forest) — 167 plots • Mixed species forest (all remaining stands) — 491 plots The modelling was undertaken separately in each of the five forest types to generate diameter class models of hollow-bearing trees per hectare, and to estimate the availability of each hollow size class. Validation Given the extensive nature of the SFRI hollows database, there was an opportunity to keep a portion of the database separate from model building for model validation, which is an important step in the development of robust predictive models (Vanclay and Skovsgaard 1997). Validation becomes crucial when the data are divided into forest-type categories and diameter classes within forest types, and can test whether models are performing within these classes and more globally when hollows are summed across classes. Validation datasets for each model were created by randomly selecting 25% of SFRI first- and second-stage samples. The validation datasets for the first-stage plot sample consisted of 325 and 345 plots from East Gippsland and non-East Gippsland respectively. For the second stage sample, 40 of the 164 felled trees with hollows were set aside. Models were built and parameterised using the remaining 75% of plot data, and then applied to the validation dataset for an independent assessment of predictive capabilities. Following validation, models were re-examined and re-parameterised using all the data combined. Results Validation Figures 1 and 2 illustrate the degree of concurrence between actual and predicted values for the validation datasets within the 75–100 cm diameter class, and summed across diameter classes respectively. Figure 1 is unconvincing because most trees do not have hollows, and the actual values tend to be banded. The R 2 is therefore low (0.23), and the linear regression does not pass through zero. Despite this unconvincing result, the significant relationship between predicted and observed suggests we should proceed. Figure 2 demonstrates that models of total hollow trees per hectare are performing more satisfactorily when applied to the validation dataset: the simple linear regression has a higher R 2 (0.3) and graphical correspondence between predicted and observed values is improved. These results concur with previous studies that hollow-incidence models explain only small to moderate amounts of the variability in what appears to be a highly stochastic event. Figures 1 and 2 are for non-East Gippsland; graphs for East Gippsland and for other diameter classes demonstrated similar low to moderate predictive strength (R 2 between 0.2 and 0.35). Following model validation, all data were combined and final models were parameterised as described below. Eucalyptus delegatensis forest Non-East Gippsland: Dandenong, Central, Tambo, Central Gippsland • Alpine ash (E. delegatensis forest) — 381 plots • Mountain ash / shining gum (E. regnans and E. nitens forest) — 339 plots Models of hollow-bearing trees per hectare for E. delegatensis are shown in Table 1, and varied in strength from 12% to 21% explained variability. Despite explaining only a small amount of variability, the models were significant and provided an acceptable Australian Forestry 2009 Vol. 72 No. 1 pp. 39–48 Tree hollows in Victorian forests 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 R 2 = 0.2335 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 Actual number of hollow-bearing trees per hectare 45 Figure 1. Validation for the number of hollow-bearing trees per hectare, 75–100 cm diameter class, for Non-East Gippsland Predicted number of hollowbearing trees per hectare Predicted number of hollowbearing trees per hectare 42 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 R 2 = 0.3032 0 0 50 100 150 200 Actual number of hollow-bearing trees per hectare Figure 2. Validation for the number of hollow-bearing trees per hectare, summed across all diameter classes for Non-East Gippsland Table 1. Models for Eucalyptus delegatensis forest Diameter class (cm) Model 0–74.9 75–99.9 100–124.9 125–149.9 150 + Hollow trees per hectare PredictorsA Intercept Mature SFRI Vi Percent Potassium Cm Regir Mix Ash Percent Cy Percent Rsquare Mean Tree/ha Mean HolTree/ha Mean DeHolTree/ha % hollow trees De % trees with hollows Parameter Pr > F Parameter Pr > F Parameter Pr > F Parameter Pr > F Parameter Pr > F –3.545 –2.954 < 0.1880 < 0.0280 < 0.0240 < 0.0001 0.412 2.335 < 0.0000 < 0.0001 –1.450 < 0.0000 < 0.0070 < 0.0001 < 0.0001 < 0.0010 0.553 1.880 –6.649 –1.659 –2.581 –0.248 –0.050 < 0.0001 0.018 < 0.0360 –0.126 –1.364 –0.017 < 0.0001 < 0.0001 < 0.0001 1.379 < 0.0001 000.17 291.00 004.79 000.83 017.33 001.65 Hollow size classes per hollow treeB Hollow size class (cm) Samples Average 02.1–5 05.1–10 10.1–20 20.1 + 9 9 9 9 1.000 0.444 0.111 0.000 00.12 15.44 02.69 00.93 34.57 17.42 00.16 03.22 01.56 00.82 52.56 48.45 0.21 1.34 0.96 0.54 56.25 71.64 00.20 00.66 00.58 00.30 51.72 87.88 Samples Average Samples Average Samples Average Samples Average 13 13 13 13 0.833 0.615 0.667 0.167 11 11 11 11 1.000 0.909 0.818 0.545 15 15 15 15 0.866 0.800 0.933 0.733 15 15 15 15 0.866 0.800 0.933 0.733 Top row of the table are diameter classes, Mean DeHolTree/ha is the mean number of E. delegatensis that contain hollows per hectare, and % hollow trees De is the percentage of hollow trees that are E. delegatensis. For hollow size classes; Samples is the number of felled trees used to compute the Average of hollow size class per tree. Mature SFRI; identifies stands where crown cover is dominated by mature or older crowns. Vi Percent; percent of eucalypt crown cover that is E. viminalis. Potassium; radiometeric energy spectrum which relates to the decay of K40 (Potassium) isotopes. Crn Reglr; percent of regular crowns. MixAsh Percent; percent of crown cover that is ash. Cy Percent; percent of crown cover that is E. cypellocarpa. predictive framework for a highly stochastic event such as hollow formation. The ‘Mature SFRI’ predictor identified mature E. delegatensis forests, and the parameter estimate indicated that these forests have more hollow-bearing trees. ‘Potassium’ is a radiometric variable that measures the potassium response, and has been associated with drier sites. It could be hypothesised that hollow formation is more likely on these drier sites as trees are more susceptible to fire (an important agent of hollow formation) and are under stress, making them susceptible to disease and insect attack. Other predictors such as ‘Vi Percent’, ‘MixAsh Percent’ and ‘Cy Percent’ identify the presence of non-ash (E. viminalis, E. cypellocarpa and minor mixed species) that are contributing to the number of hollow-bearing trees. To investigate this further we calculated the percentage of E. delegatensis that contained hollows. It is important to understand this incidence in ash forests, where hollow-bearing trees may be predominately non-ash species. This is confirmed for E. delegatensis as the species rarely contained hollows; only 17% of hollow trees were E. delegatensis for the < 75-cm diameter class, whilst this rose to 52% for the > 150-cm diameter class. Very few trees in the smaller diameter classes contain hollows: only 2% of trees < 75 cm dbhob. This increases for the larger diameter classes until 88% of trees > 150 cm contain hollows. The Australian Forestry 2009 Vol. 72 No. 1 pp. 39–48 Julian C. Fox, Fiona Hamilton and Sharon Occhipinti overall number of hollow-bearing trees per hectare is small, rang ing from 5 ha–1 for the smallest diameter class (mainly because there are so many small trees) to 0.6 ha–1 for the largest diameter class. Therefore on average there is a single hollow-bearing tree >150 cm dbhob for every 2 ha of E. delegatensis forest. The average number of each hollow size class for hollow-bearing trees indicates that a hollow-bearing tree can be expected to contain about one hollow of the smallest size class. However, larger hollows occur only in larger trees — that is hollows above 20 cm in diameter occur at the rate of 0.7 per hollow-bearing tree when dbhob exceeds 125 cm. Eucalyptus regnans and Eucalyptus nitens forest Predictors for E. regnans and E. nitens detailed in Table 2 were similar to those for E. delegatensis: the potassium radiometric response, that identifies drier sites, indicated more hollow-bearing trees per hectare; ‘Mature SFRI’, an indicator for mature stands, and the presence of non-ash species (‘High Cover Mx Perc’ and ‘Ra Percent’) were also indicative of more hollow-bearing trees per hectare. ‘Crn Irreg’, which identifies the proportion of the irregular component of eucalypt crown cover, was also associated with more hollow-bearing trees; trees with irregular crowns are more likely to contain hollows as they are generally senescent stags, or are under stress. 43 Models for E. regnans were quite weak, with R-square values between 0.09 and 0.18. Although the models are statistically significant, the small amount of variability explained signifies the unpredictable nature of hollow occurrence in these forests. The predicted incidence of hollow-bearing trees per hectare is very small, with less than two hollow trees per hectare for all diameter classes except the smallest. For E. regnans-dominated forest, even fewer hollow-bearing trees were actually E. regnans: only 15% were E. regnans for the < 75 cm class, whilst this rose to 31% for the > 150 cm class. This indicates the importance of minor non-ash species in these forests for providing hollow-based habitat. Eucalytpus obliqua forest Table 3 indicates that E. obliqua-dominated forest contained more hollow-bearing trees than ash forests; 11 ha–1 for dbhob < 75 cm falling to 1 ha–1 for dbhob > 150 cm. The proportion of hollow-bearing trees that were actually E. obliqua was greater than in ash; 29% for the < 75 cm class that rose to 54% for the > 150 cm class. These statistics indicate that E. obliqua is more prone to hollow formation, perhaps because the trees have more branches and less regular crowns, and are more susceptible to fire, rot and insect attack. Table 2. Models for Eucalyptus regnans and E. nitens forest Diameter class (cm) Model 0–74.9 75–99.9 100–124.9 125–149.9 150 + Hollow trees per hectare PredictorsA Parameter Intercept Potassium Ra Percent High Cover Mx Perc Mature SFRI Crn Irreg Rsquare Mean Tree/Ha Mean HolTree/Ha Mean ReHolTree/Ha % Re with hollows % trees with hollows –8.58281 < 0.0005 14.73904 < 0.0001 03.79434 < 0.0030 Pr > F Pr > F –2.46297 04.45376 3.1440 00.07143 < 0.0099 < 0.0001 < 0.0001 < 0.0005 13 13 13 13 0.917 1.000 1.308 0.615 Parameter Pr > F Parameter Pr > F Parameter –1.61902 < 0.0122 03.06176 < 0.0001 –0.47579 01.07301 0.2047 0.0132 02.08125 < 0.0001 –1.59049 < 0.0059 00.04245 < 0.0022 0.8157 < 0.0139 00.02782 0.0005 00.17 16.46 01.79 00.36 02.19 20.11 00.10 03.89 01.42 00.22 05.66 15.49 00.08564 0.0020 00.08 01.22 00.79 00.15 12.30 18.99 Samples Average Samples Average Samples Average 000.09 222.91 004.07 000.59 000.26 014.50 Hollow size classes per hollow treeB Hollow size class (cm) Samples Average 02.1–5 05.1–10 10.1–20 20.1 + Parameter 13 13 13 13 0.917 1.000 1.308 0.615 9 9 9 9 1.333 0.556 0.889 0.667 9 9 9 9 1.333 0.556 0.889 0.667 Pr > F 00.74115 < 0.0043 00.14395 < 0.0001 00.08 01.45 01.25 00.39 26.90 31.20 Samples Average 9 9 9 9 1.333 0.556 0.889 0.667 A Potassium = radiometeric energy spectrum which relates to the decay of K40 (potassium) isotopes. Ra Percent = percent of eucalypt crown cover that is E. radiata. High Cover Mx Perc = percent crown cover of mixed species with high productivity. Mature SFRI identifies stands where crown cover is dominated by mature or older crowns. Crn Irreg = percent of irregular crowns. Mean Tree/Ha = the mean number of trees per hectare. Mean HolTree/Ha = the mean number of trees that contain hollows per hectare. Mean ReHolTree/Ha = the mean number of E. regnans that contain hollows per hectare. % Re with hollows = the percentage of E. regnans trees that have hollows. B For ‘Hollow size classes per hollow tree’, Samples = the number of felled trees used to compute the average of hollow size class per tree. Australian Forestry 2009 Vol. 72 No. 1 pp. 39–48 44 Tree hollows in Victorian forests Table 3. Models for Eucalyptus obliqua forest Diameter class (cm) Model 0–74.9 75–99.9 100–124.9 125–149.9 150 + Hollow trees per hectare PredictorsA Intercept Site Index Di Percent Logn Elevation Mean temp cold quart FaCyObSiViMixAshP Rsquare Mean Tree/Ha Mean HolTree/Ha Mean ObHolTree/Ha % Ob with hollows % trees with hollows Parameter Pr > F Parameter Pr > F Parameter Pr > F Parameter Pr > F Parameter Pr > F 46.309 –1.735 01.098 0.002 0.013 0.001 01.686 –0.703 0.863 0.003 70.225 0.011 44.636 0.004 03.182 < 0.0001 02.833 0.025 –7.630 –3.309 0.026 0.002 –4.811 –2.192 0.012 0.000 –0.053 < 0.0520 00.11 05.48 03.46 02.06 37.59 59.54 00.17 02.43 01.96 1.2 49.38 61.22 Samples Average Samples Average Samples Average Samples Average 000.16 180.82 011.09 003.26 001.80 029.40 Hollow size classes per hollow treeB Hollow size class (cm) Samples Average 02.1–5 05.1–10 10.1–20 20.1 + 00.09 14.22 04.88 02.31 16.24 47.34 –0.395 < 0.0000 00.019 < 0.0000 00.19 01.23 01.14 00.62 50.41 54.39 13 13 13 13 0.750 0.583 0.083 0.308 13 13 13 13 0.750 0.583 0.083 0.308 8 8 8 8 2.625 1.625 0.375 1.000 8 8 8 8 2.625 1.625 0.375 1.000 8 8 8 8 2.625 1.625 0.375 1.000 A Site Index = site productivity estimate based on stand height. Di Percent = percent of eucalypt crown cover that is E. dives. Logn Elevation = natural log of elevation. Mean temp cold quart = BIOCLIM variable describing mean temperature of the coldest quarter. FaCyObSiViMixAshP = percentage eucalypt crown cover that is E. fastigata, E. cypellocarpa, E. obliqua, E. sieberi, E. viminalis ssp. viminalis and mixed ash. Mean Tree/Ha = the mean number of trees per hectare. Mean HolTree/Ha = the mean number of trees that contain hollows per hectare. Mean ObHolTree/Ha = the mean number of E. obliqua that contain hollows per hectare. % Ob with hollows = the percentage of E. obliqua trees that have hollows. B For ‘Hollow size classes per hollow tree’, Samples = the number of felled trees used to compute the average of hollow size class per tree. Significant predictors were ‘Site Index’, ‘Di Percent’, ‘Logn Elevation’, ‘Mean temp cold quarter’, and ‘FaCyObSiViMixAshP’. Forest of higher site index had fewer hollow-bearing trees per hectare because on better sites trees will be under less stress, resulting in better form, more regular crowns and reduced susceptibility to agents of hollow formation such as fire, insects and rot. Similarly, lower elevations had more hollows (indicated by the negative parameter on ‘Logn Elevation’), perhaps due to sites being poorer at lower elevations. ‘Mean temperature of the coldest quarter’ is a BIOCLIM variable that may result in fewer hollow-bearing trees due to a warmer winter creating better growing conditions for E. obliqua forests. Models were of similar strength to those for ash, if not marginally stronger, with R 2 values from 0.09 to 0.19. The average number of hollows per hollow-bearing tree was also greater, with 2.6 hollows of < 5 cm, and 1 hollow of > 20 cm on each hollow-bearing tree > 100 cm in dbhob. Mixed-species forests This forest type consisted of stands not dominated by ash or E. obliqua in non-East Gippsland FMAs. The models are shown in Table 4, and were of similar strength to previous models. The number of hollow-bearing trees per hectare was similar to that found in E. obliqua but with more smaller hollow-bearing trees, and fewer larger hollow-bearing trees. However, the average number of hollows per hollow-bearing tree was relatively small. Larger stand heights resulted in more large hollow-bearing trees, perhaps because taller forests are more likely to have larger trees. Higher percentages of pure ash (‘Pure Ash Percent’) and E. nitens (‘Ni Percent’) resulted in fewer hollow trees because, as observed before, these species have fewer hollows. Higher proportions of irregular and regular crowns (‘Crown Irreg Reglr’) resulted in more hollow trees because irregular crowns are more likely to contain hollows. ‘Wetness index’ and ‘Precipitation’ are BIOCLIM variables that indicated fewer hollow-bearing trees, perhaps because they provided better growing conditions. East Gippsland — all forest types Table 5 indicates that models for East Gippsland were stronger for the larger diameter classes (R 2 of 0.31 for dbhob > 150 cm). Important predictors identified hollow-prone species such as E. croajingolensis and E. fastigata (‘Cr Percent’ and ‘Fa Percent’ respectively). Higher site index resulted in more hollow-bearing trees, an opposing relationship to that observed in non-East Gippsland forests. This may be due to the varied forest types present in East Gippsland, and the large range in site index from nutrient-poor coastal sites to more productive inland sites. ‘Max temp’ was a BIOCLIM variable estimating the maximum Australian Forestry 2009 Vol. 72 No. 1 pp. 39–48 Julian C. Fox, Fiona Hamilton and Sharon Occhipinti 45 Table 4. Models for mixed species forest Diameter class (cm) Model 0–74.9 75–99.9 100–124.9 125–149.9 150 + Hollow trees per hectare PredictorsA Intercept Stand Ht Potassium Crown Irreg Reglr Wetness index Precipitation Pure Ash Percent Rsquare Mean Tree/Ha Mean HolTree/Ha % trees with hollows Parameter Pr > F Parameter Pr > F Parameter Pr > F Parameter Pr > F Parameter Pr > F 48.560 –0.666 08.244 00.217 –4.784 < 0.0002 < 0.0001 < 0.0284 < 0.0002 < 0.0040 09.211 0.017 –3.670 00.070 0.003< 0.018< –2.898 00.093 < 0.0001 < 0.0001 00.056 0.006 –1.274 0.027 00.021 0.004 –0.086 0.009 00.06 14.56 07.14 49.04 00.034 0.001< –2.057 00.092 –0.602 < 0.0001 < 0.0001 < 0.002 00.020 0.0001 –0.064 0.000< 00.12 04.68 03.32 70.94 00.007 < 0.001 –0.031 < 0.001 00.10 01.56 01.31 83.97 –0.016 < 0.002 00.21 00.75 00.67 89.33 Samples Average Samples Average Samples Average Samples Average 000.12 192.05 016.56 008.62 Hollow size classes per hollow treeB Hollow size class (cm) Samples Average 02.1–5 05.1–10 10.1–20 20.1 + 25 25 25 26 0.520 0.320 0.160 0.269 30 30 30 30 0.867 0.667 0.267 0.033 18 18 18 18 0.444 0.500 0.944 0.556 18 18 18 18 0.444 0.500 0.944 0.556 18 18 18 18 0.444 0.500 0.944 0.556 A Stand Ht = height of dominant crown cover component. Potassium = radiometeric energy spectrum which relates to the decay of K40 (potassium) isotopes. Crown Irreg Reglr = percent of irregular and regular crowns. Wetness index = BIOCLIM variable for the steady state wetness index. Precipitation = BIOCLIM variable for annual precipitation. Pure Ash Percent = crown cover of stands consisting entirely of E. delegatensis, E. regnans, E. nitens or E. denticulata. Mean Tree/Ha = the mean number of trees per hectare. Mean HolTree/Ha = the mean number of trees that contain hollows per hectare. B For ‘Hollow size classes per hollow tree’, Samples = the number of felled trees used to compute the average of hollow size class per tree. Table 5. Models for East Gippsland — all species Diameter class (cm) Model 0–74.9 75–99.9 100–124.9 125–149.9 150 + Hollow trees per hectare PredictorsA Intercept Is Tfire 1983 Max temp Site Index Cr Percent Fa Percent Rsquare Mean Tree/Ha Mean HolTree/Ha % trees with hollows Parameter Pr > F Parameter Pr > F 65.560 04.549 –1.264 –1.379 00.284 < 0.0001 < 0.0001 < 0.0080 < 0.0001 < 0.0001 26.725 02.055 –0.966 < 0.0001 < 0.0001 < 0.0001 00.089 < 0.0001 02.1–5 05.1–10 10.1–20 20.1 + 27 27 27 27 0.926 0.519 0.185 0.037 Pr > F Parameter Pr > F Parameter Pr > F 05.122 < 0.0002 03.494 –0.270 –0.292 00.210 < 0.0014 < 0.0069 < 0.0001 < 0.0001 00.08 13.64 04.64 34.02 11.680 < 0.0001 01.192 < 0.0001 –0.618 < 0.0001 00.256 < 0.0001 00.023 < 0.0220 00.042 < 0.0001 00.17 04.53 02.34 51.66 –0.318 < 0.0001 00.167 < 0.0001 00.010 < 0.0441 00.049 < 0.0001 00.25 01.53 00.95 62.09 Samples Average Samples Average Samples Average 000.09 176.41 011.83 006.71 Hollow size classes per hollow treeB Hollow size class (cm) Samples Average Parameter 27 27 27 27 0.926 0.519 0.185 0.037 14 14 14 14 1.071 0.929 0.786 0.357 A 14 14 14 14 1.071 0.929 0.786 0.357 00.039 < 0.0001 00.31 00.85 00.59 69.41 Samples Average 14 14 14 14 1.071 0.929 0.786 0.357 Is Tfire 1983 = stands affected by the 1983 fire. Max temp = BIOCLIM variable for maximum temperature. Site Index = site productivity estimate based on stand height. Cr Percent = percent of eucalypt crown cover that is Eucalyptus croajingolenisis. Fa Percent = percent of eucalypt crown cover that is E. fastigata. B For ‘Hollow size classes per hollow tree’, Samples = the number of felled trees used to compute the average of hollow size class per tree. Australian Forestry 2009 Vol. 72 No. 1 pp. 39–48 46 Tree hollows in Victorian forests temperature of the warmest period, and indicated fewer hollowbearing trees for higher values. The predictor ‘Is Tfire 1983’ identified stands affected by fires in 1983; these stands had more hollow-bearing trees. This can be explained by the influence of fire in initiating or advancing hollow formation due to scarring, damage and stress. Each hollow-bearing tree was predicted to have a single hollow 2–5 cm in diameter, whist larger hollows were less frequent. Comparing trends across forest types Figure 3 shows trends in the incidence of trees with hollows across diameter classes for different forest types. All species show an increase in the percentage of trees with hollows as the size of the trees increases. E. delegatensis and E. regnans show lower initial values for smaller diameters, after which there is a steady increase in the percentage of trees with hollows. For other species initial values are higher, and the trend is more asymptotic, starting to level off beyond 100 cm. Different trends between ash and non-ash forests reflect differing susceptibility to hollow formation across diameter classes; non-ash species appear more susceptible for smaller diameters, while ash forests resist hollow formation until trees move into the largest diameter classes. Model application Percentage of trees with hollows The models related the number of hollows on SFRI plots to API polygon predictors and spatially continuous climatic and radiometric variables. Therefore they can be applied to GIS layers to create a spatially continuous prediction of the incidence of hollow-bearing trees per hectare and the number of hollows in each size class per hectare across state forest in eastern Victoria. The resulting spatial predictions were examined to ensure that models were behaving realistically. An example application to a section of Central Gippsland is provided in Figure 4, and shows how hollow occurrence tends to be spatially clumped — that is, stands with more hollow-bearing trees tend to occur in spatial proximity. GIS layers describing hollow density in each tree size class and the density of hollows of different sizes are available from the Department of Sustainability and Environment (DSE) Corporate Spatial Data Library (CSDL). External access to this 100 90 80 70 60 E. delegatensis E. regnans E. obliqua Mixed spp. East Gippsland 50 40 30 20 10 0 0–74.9 75–99.9 100–124.9 125–149.9 150 + Diameter classes (cm) Figure 3. Trends in percent trees with hollows across diameter classes for forest types data can be arranged through the Data Distribution Manager: data. [email protected]. Discussion Previous studies have indicated that tree size (dbhob) is the most important predictor of hollow incidence (Fox et al. 2008; Koch et al. 2008), and this was incorporated in stand-level models by modelling hollow occurrence within diameter classes. Tree diameter is a useful proxy for tree age, and given the various stochastic events capable of initiating hollow development (fire damage, limb breakage and external damage from falling timber due to strong winds, snow and lightning strike), the older the tree, the more likely it is that such stochastic events will have occurred (Mackowski 1984; Lindenmayer et al. 1993; Bennett et al. 1994). Several important stand-level trends for ash forests emerged: drier sites and more mature forests tended to have higher densities of hollows, but hollow density in E. delegatensis and E. regnans forest was consistently low and strongly influenced by the presence of minor non-ash species. Ash species may only rarely develop hollows as they tend to be healthy and vigorous, and relatively free of decay by fungal or insect attacks that may initiate hollow formation. Hollow formation may occur only when stands become senescent and more prone to decay and damage. For this reason some researchers have estimated that it may take 120–200 y before ash develops hollows (Smith 1982; Smith and Lindenmayer 1992). The trend in hollow density across diameter classes for E. regnans (Fig. 3) supports this, with low hollow densities (<36% of trees) until trees are > 100 cm when it rises to 65%. The ash forests sampled in the SFRI are dominated by 1939 regrowth consisting of largely mono-specific stands with a few remnant stags that predate 1939, many of which are dead. Previous studies have indicated that these dead stags are an important source of hollows and that their collapse is depleting the resource further (Lindenmayer et al. 1990). It is intuitive that the brittle timber of dead trees is highly susceptible to hollow formation due to limb breakage and the lack of mechanisms to respond to hollow-causing agents such as fungal infection and insect attack including excavation by termites. Non-ash (E. obliqua and mixed) forests contained comparatively more hollows than ash forests, particularly in the smaller diameter classes (29% of trees < 75 cm dbhob contained a hollow for E. obliqua compared with 15% for E. regnans). This result suggests that tree species in these forests are more prone to hollow formation. The physiology and morphology of different tree species will be important as they determine the extent of branch shedding, the ability to survive fire events, and they influence timber properties that dictate susceptibility to a variety of hollow-causing agents (Lindenmayer et al. 1993; Bennett et al. 1994; Lindenmayer et al. 2000). Particular species may also have a higher incidence of defect in the stem, which will result in more hollows. Sensitivity to fire is also important as species able to survive fire events are very likely to develop hollows (Taylor and Haseler 1993). A suite of models for predicting hollow-bearing trees per hectare, and the abundance of hollows of various size on these Australian Forestry 2009 Vol. 72 No. 1 pp. 39–48 Julian C. Fox, Fiona Hamilton and Sharon Occhipinti 47 Legend 0.0–4.0 4.1–10.0 10.1–20.0 20.1–25.0 25.1–30.0 30.1–40.0 40.1–50.0 50.1–100.0 100.1–200.0 Metres 10000 N Figure 4. Example application of a model to an area of Central Gippsland for the 2–5-cm hollow size class. The predicted attribute is the number of hollows 2–5 cm in diameter per hectare. Blank areas are non-state forest. hollow-bearing trees, were parameterised using SFRI data. The central modelling objective was to ensure models were relatively simple and could be readily applied, whilst still being mindful of statistical assumptions. This objective was met by transforming hollow occurrence to a continuous dependent variable that could be modelled against stand-level predictors. With a prediction of hollow-bearing trees per hectare, the number of each hollow size class on these trees could be estimated using averages from the second-stage SFRI sample of felled trees. A validation exercise using independent data demonstrated that models of hollowbearing trees per hectare provided predictions of borderline but acceptable accuracy. Hollow formation is intrinsically stochastic and therefore explained variation was generally less than 25%, but the models were statistically significant and the parameters were biologically plausible. The models were used to generate GIS layers of hollow abundance for state forests in eastern Victoria that will be useful for improving forest stewardship and conservation efforts for hollow-dependent fauna. Australian Forestry 2009 Vol. 72 No. 1 pp. 39–48 48 Tree hollows in Victorian forests The models detailed in this paper can be used to improve the integration of conservation priorities for hollow-dependent fauna in the management of timber production forests. Their application at the stand level yielded a prediction of hollow incidence in some of Victoria’s most contentious timber production forests. This information will be useful for testing hypothesis as to the limited availability of hollows in state forests (e.g. Lindenmayer 1995), and may help resolve contentions surrounding this (e.g. Macfarlane and Loyn 1994; Attiwill 1995). References Ambrose, G.J. (1982) An ecological and behavioural study of vertebrates using hollows in eucalypt branches. Unpublished PhD thesis, La Trobe University, Melbourne. Attiwill, P.M. (1995) Managing Leadbeater’s possum in the mountain ash forests of Victoria, Australia — Reply. Forest Ecology and Management 74, 233–237. Bennett, A.F., Lumsden, L.F. and Nicholls, A.O. (1994) Tree hollows as a resource for wildlife in remnant woodlands: spatial and temporal patterns across the northern plains of Victoria, Australia. Pacific Conservation Biology 1, 222–235. Department of Natural Resources and Environment (1997) SFRI, Victoria’s Statewide Forest Resource Inventory Program Overview. Forests Service Technical Reports 97-1. Department of Natural Resources and Environment, Victoria. Department of Natural Resources and Environment (1999) Victoria’s Statewide Forest Resource Inventory: Bennalla/Mansfield, Wangaratta and Wodonga Forest Management Areas. Forests Service Technical Reports 99-2. Department of Natural Resources and Environment, Victoria. Department of Primary Industries (2005) Digital geophysical data for Victoria: statewide gridded airborne magnetic and radiometric data and located and gridded gravity data. GDA94 data released October 2005. Geoscientific Data Package. Melbourne, Victoria, Australia. Ferguson, I.S. (1996) Sustainable Forest Management. Oxford University Press, Melbourne, 162 pp. Fox, J.C., Hamilton, F. and Ades, P.K. (2008) Models of tree-level hollow incidence in Victorian state forests. Forest Ecology and Management 255, 2846–2857. Gibbons, P. (1999) Habitat-tree retention in wood production forests. Unpublished PhD thesis, Australian National University, 242 pp. Gibbons, P. and Lindenmayer, D.B. (1996) Issues associated with the retention of hollow-bearing trees within eucalypt forests managed for wood production. Forest Ecology and Management 83, 245–279. Koch, A.J., Munks, S.A., Driscoll, D. and Kirkpatrick, J.B. (2008). Does hollow occurrence vary with forest type? A case study in wet and dry Eucalyptus obliqua forest. Forest Ecology and Management 255, 3938–3951. Lindenmayer, D.B. (1995) Forest disturbance, forest wildlife conservation and the conservative basis for forest management in the mountain ash forests of Victoria — comment. Forest Ecology and Management 74, 223–231. Lindenmayer, D.B., Cunningham, R.B., Tanton, M.T. and Smith, A.P. (1990) The conservation of arboreal marsupials in the montane ash forests of the central highlands of Victoria, South-Eastern Australia: II. The loss of trees with hollows and its implications for the conservation of Leadbeater’s possum Gymnobelideus leadbeateri McCoy (Marsupialia: Petauridae). Biological Conservation 54, 131–145. Lindenmayer, D.B., Cunningham, R.B., Nix, H.A., Tanton, M.T. and Smith, A.P. (1991) Predicting the abundance of hollow-bearing trees in montane forest of southeastern Australia. Australian Journal of Ecology 16, 91–98. Lindenmayer, D.B., Cunningham, R.B., Donnelly, C.F., Tanton, M.T. and Nix, H.A. (1993) The abundance and development of cavities in Eucalyptus trees: a case study in the montane forests of Victoria, southeastern Australia. Forest Ecology and Management 60, 77–104. Lindenmayer, D.B., Cunningham, R.B., Pope, M.L., Gibbons, P. and Donnelly, C.F. (2000) Cavity sizes and types in Australian eucalypts from wet and dry forest types — a simple rule of thumb for estimating size and number of cavities. Forest Ecology and Management 137, 139–150. Loyn, R.H. (1993) Effects of Previous Logging on Bird Populations in East Gippsland: VSP Retrospective Study. VSP Technical Report No. 18. Department of Conservation and Natural Resources, Melbourne. Macfarlane, M.A. and Loyn, R.H. (1994) Management for the conservation of Leadbeater’s possum (Gymnobelideus leadbeateri) — a reply. Pacific Conservation Biology 1, 84–86. Mackowski, C.M. (1984) The ontogeny of hollows in blackbutt, Eucalyptus pilularis, and its relevance to the management of forests for possums, gliders and timber. In: Smith, A.P. and Hume, I.D. (eds) Possums and Gliders. Surrey Beatty, Sydney, pp. 517–525. Mackowski, C.M. (1987) Wildlife hollows and timber management in blackbutt forest. Unpublished MSc thesis. University of New England, Armidale, Australia. McMahon, J.P. Hutchinson, M.F., Nix, H.A. and Ord, K.D. (1995) ANUCLIM: Users Guide. Centre for Resource and Environmental Studies, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT, Australia. Rawlings, J.O. (1988) Applied Regression Analysis. Wadsworth & Brooks/Cole, Belmont, California. SAS Institute, Inc. (1996) SAS/STAT Software: Changes and Enhance ments through Release 6.11. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC. Smith, A.P. (1982) Leadbeater’s possum and its management. In: Groves, R.H. and Ride, W.D. (eds) Species at Risk: Research in Australia. Australian Academy of Science, Canberra, pp. 129–145. Smith, A.P. and Lindenmayer, D.B. (1988) Tree hollow requirements of Leadbeater’s possum and other possums and gliders in timber production ash forests of the Victorian Central Highlands. Australian Wildlife Research 15, 347–362. Smith, A.P. and Lindenmayer, D.B. (1992) Forest succession, timber production and conservation of Leadbeater’s possum, Gymnobelideus leadbeateri McCoy (Marsupialia: Petauridae). Forest Ecology and Management 49, 311–332. Taylor, R.J. and Haseler, M. (1993) Occurrence of potential nest trees and their use by birds in sclerophyll forest in north-east Tasmania. Australian Forestry 56, 165–171. Vanclay, J.K. and Skovsgaard, J.P. (1997) Evaluating forest growth models. Ecological Modeling 98, 1–12. Whitford, K.R. and Williams, M.R. (2002) Hollows in jarrah (Eucalyptus marginata) and marri (Corymbia calophylla) trees. II: Selecting trees to retain for hollow dependent fauna. Forest Ecology and Management 160, 215–232. Australian Forestry 2009 Vol. 72 No. 1 pp. 39–48 Book reviews 49 Book reviews The Forest Wars Judith Ajani Melbourne University Press, 2007, 362 pages, paperback, ISBN 9780522854190, RRP $34.95 Tilting at sawmills The Forest Wars offers a personal insight into two decades of dispute in forest policy and politics by the author, Judith Ajani, formerly Judy Clark. It is worth reading because of the insights it offers. It is a scholarly book, carefully but selectively researched and documented. But it is also a disturbing book because of the views it puts forward, because of the assumptions it makes, and because of the bias in its coverage. Ajani is up-front about this, and admits (p. 5) that ‘My biases show through the book. I personally favour processing over exporting raw materials. I also privilege the environment …’. It is also disturbing because the book — based on a PhD thesis (completed in 2002) and a Postdoctoral Fellowship at ANU’s Fenner School of Environment and Society — builds a grand argument based on several untested assumptions that are not canvassed in the book. It is disturbing to me personally because in my teaching of forest policy, I draw upon several sources that are also used by Ajani to reach quite different conclusions. I was interested to review this book, in part because Ajani’s involvement in forest policy has some parallels with mine — she came to forestry in Victoria as an economist in the early 1980s, while I was drawn into policy debates through forest resource estimates for the Wet Tropics in the mid-1980s. But when I removed the book from its packaging, by coincidence it opened to page 255, where my eyes fell on a quote in which Ajani ridicules a politician for expressing the view that ‘There is no basic reason why native forests cannot be managed on an ecologically sustainable basis.’ Ajani contends that this view ‘is fundamentally flawed … the public knows this intuitively …’. This contention is not explored in the book, and is not a view that I share, so I began with a sceptical viewpoint. Ajani opens with a 50-page overview of softwood policies originating in the 1920s, before progressing to her major thrust, the woodchipping and MIS plantation policies of the 1980s and 1990s. Much emphasis is devoted to the ‘who and when’ of these issues, but the ‘how and why’ is covered more unevenly. At times I was irritated by irrelevant name-dropping, and Chapter 12 (Parliament’s forestry myths) is boringly dominated by a long series of half-page verbatim quotes used to ridicule politicians. Brevity could sharpen the argument. Ajani reflects that writing the book helped her to reach three key findings (p. 5): that forest conflict persists only because governments have not allowed market forces to work; that there are alternatives to the market approach (such as those pursued by Queensland and WA); and that entrenched conflict often takes on a life of its own, on which some people thrive (I agree with this third finding). Because of my work there some decades ago, I took a particular interest in the long narrative about Queensland (Chapter 8, Beattie’s solution), but was disappointed to find it rather one-sided and uncritical. Ajani is obviously a great admirer of the Queensland ‘solution’, and does not question whether twenty-five years of logging ‘slightly more intensively than previously’ (p. 149) proposed as part of the ‘solution’ is a Faustian bargain, with higher ecological impacts than a continuing series of more appropriate harvests. The book does not examine the assumption that gazetting native forests as national parks solves all the problems (what about fire, weeds, feral predators?), and does not consider the utility of a biosphere approach with managed forest providing a buffer around conservation areas. This leads to my main criticism of the book, that it explores political and policy issues without considering ecological underpinnings or market realities. In some places, readers may find unexpected relief. On page 28, Ajani reflects on Swain’s 1928 prediction that, by 1990, Australia would require 24 million cubic metres of logs. I’m amused that an economist lampoons this 60-year prediction, saying that ‘As it turned out, Australia in 1990 required only 12.5 million cubic metres of logs.’ Her own predictions, made as Judy Clark in 1992, that the demise of native forest timber industry in Victoria would be complete by the end of the 1990s turned out to be somewhat less accurate. Like Don Quixote, Ajani expends much effort tilting at imagined demons. With flimsy supporting evidence she imagines an unsettling scenario, and then sets out to demolish it. For instance, she repeatedly reiterates her criticism that ‘foresters wanted to bring order to the forests … by converting indigenous forests … to softwood tree crops’ (p. 77) and that ‘foresters wanted to improve … indigenous forests by converting them into productive softwood tree crops’ (p. 81), and so on, apparently confusing the quantity and quality of an argument. She seems, or chooses, to remain unaware of any enthusiasm for — and a large body of work on — uneven-aged silviculture, including but not confined to continuous-cover forestry and close-to-nature management. There is an implication in the book that all harvesting is clearfelling, and alternatives are not canvassed. There are four photos in the book, two of sawmills, and two of land clearing showing the worst excesses of the 1970s, reproduced from the Routley’s Fight for the Forests. Despite all the name-dropping and her years spent at the ANU just a stone’s thrown from ANU Forestry, there is no mention of silviculturalists such as Ross Florence and their enthusiasm for ecologically-appropriate forest management. Australian Forestry 2009 Vol. 72 No. 1 pp. 49–50 50 Book reviews Ajani also asserts that ‘The minutiae engulfing the debate over ecologically suitable native forest logging should not be allowed to detract Australia’s foresters from their main role … of managing plantations to support a competitive manufacturing industry’ (p. 310). Most foresters I know don’t see that as their role, and see themselves as environmental stewards, rightly concerned with the ecological ‘minutiae’ not just of forests, but of the broader environment and of our society. Another Quixotic example is found on page 311, where Ajani asserts that ‘The Australian public has been led to believe that the nation’s inherent competitive advantage lies more in raw materials exporting than in manufacturing …’ and then builds a perfectly reasonable argument in favour of local processing. But I’m unaware of any forester, tree grower or forestry academic who favours roundwood exports over local processing. Even ardent supporters of woodchipping see it as a way to rejuvenate forests, not as a way to solve our balance of trade deficit, and all would welcome more local value-adding. Ajani seems to have blind faith in sources supporting her viewpoint. On page 280, she reports that Carr ‘nearly double[d] the area of protected public forests in New South Wales to 3.6 million hectares … the area of public native forests available … to log had fallen by only 4 per cent … identifying more native forests than previously reported explains this seeming miracle.’ A discerning reader might question this ‘miracle’, and ask whether this protection was token gazettal of lands too steep to log, whether it was some other slight of hand, or whether there was some more serious deceit involved. The sudden exit at this time of Chairman John Kerin and his entire Board of Directors, along with CEO Bob Smith and General Manager David Ridley, from State Forests suggests that this question is not insignificant, but this issue is not explored by Ajani. and to process the plantation resource in Australia. Personally, I think that these two strategies are neither necessary nor sufficient, even though they may be desirable. The book’s final paragraph (p. 313) sums up Ajani’s view that: ‘The governments of Western Australia and Queensland have … positioned their states to … reap the wealth, employment and environmental benefits [of plantation forestry]. In contrast, the governments of New South Wales, Victoria, Tasmania and the federal government retain out-of-date forest policies that generate unnecessary losses all round. I challenge these four governments to say where and why they disagree … to explain … what it is that prevents them from acting.’ Personally, I remain to be convinced that the two states have positioned themselves in this way, and that the challenges for the other four governments are that simple. Ajani’s book is worth reading to gain an insight into her view of history, but I doubt that it is going to help solve ‘the forest wars’, or show the way forward. Jerry Vanclay Lismore, NSW Email: [email protected] The book does raise important issues about political interference; about distortions in stumpage schemes, especially for native hardwoods (pp. 49, 112); about excess profits in the woodchip and MIS sector (p. 255); about the reluctance of governments to revise timber resource estimates objectively, regularly and openly (p. 160); and about the lack of effective dialogue between stakeholders (p. 113); but for many readers these points are likely to get lost amongst the many more equivocal issues canvassed. By the last chapter (15, What should we do?), Ajani seems to be running out of steam. Half of this chapter is backward looking (Recapping the story), and the five-page finale (A new forest policy for Australia) does little more than suggest that problems would be solved if all states simply followed the example of Queensland. In calling for a new forest policy, Ajani proposes three core desires (p. 309): ecological integrity of native forests, an economically and environmentally viable forest industry, and an expansion of employment and wealth-creation opportunities in rural Australia. Few will disagree, but the devil is in the detail. She proposes that these three objectives require only two strategies: to shift commodity wood production from native forests to plantations, Australian Forestry 2009 Vol. 72 No. 1 pp. 49–50 Book reviews 51 The Wild Trees What if the Last Wilderness is Above our Heads? Richard Preston Allen Lane — an imprint of Penguin Books, 2007, hardback, 294 pages, ISBN 978 1 8641 4023 5, $32.95, www.penguin.com The Wild Trees is an engaging and readable account of exploration in the redwood (Sequoia sempervirens) forests of northern California. What sets this story apart from other tales of forest exploration is the fact that the action takes place at dizzying heights in the canopy of the world’s tallest trees. This book is very much about individual trees and the select group of people who chose to climb them. I was surprised to read that parts of the California coastal range remain inaccessible and are seldom visited, raising the possibility that the tallest redwoods have yet to be discovered. Many of the largest trees have been named, often with exotic names originating from literature and ancient mythology. Richard Preston’s book clearly conveys the individual character of these ancient veteran trees that may live for several thousand years before succumbing to winter storms sweeping in from the Pacific Ocean. Kinglake in Victoria. The description of voracious leeches, dense understorey and falling branches should be familiar to anyone who has worked in tall eucalypt forests. This worthwhile book provides new insights into old forests, and is well worth reading. Lachie McCaw Manjimup, WA [email protected] The Wild Trees is also a story about people; some of them are professional scientists while others are enthusiastic amateurs with a passion for tall trees. Tree climbing is not a new past-time but has traditionally been the domain of specialist axemen employed to remove the tops of tall trees to enable cable logging or to construct fire lookout towers. Having climbed fire lookout trees in the karri (Eucalyptus diversicolor) forest of south-western Western Australia I have the greatest respect for those prepared to scale a large tree equipped only with a rope and basic climbing tools. Lightweight, high technology climbing gear has allowed a new generation of tree climbers to ascend the tallest trees and discover the unique community of plants and animals that inhabit the forest canopy. Salamanders, worms, mosses, lichens, huckleberries and a host of other living organisms all depend on the environment created by the canopies of large old trees. The elegant line drawings that illustrate this book capture the unique character of the redwood forest canopy. The Wild Trees also provides a glimpse into the distinctive subculture of the new generation of tree climbers who have their own language with colourful expressions such as ‘ninja ascent’ to describe a stealthy climb done suddenly and quietly under cover of darkness! Australian readers will be interested in the chapter describing the ascent of tall Eucalyptus regnans on the Hume Plateau near Australian Forestry 2009 Vol. 72 No. 1 p. 51 52 Book reviews The Zealous Conservator: A Life of Charles Lane Poole John Dargavel University of Western Australia Press, 2008. 252 pages, paperback, ISBN 978 1 921401 14 5, $29.95 John Dargavel has done a remarkably good job of compiling the story of the professional life of one of Australia’s pioneer foresters, Charles Lane Poole, largely from historic records. The result makes a very good read, giving great insights into the work and personal characteristics of this remarkable forester, who at the age of 19 had his left hand amputated and replaced with a steel hook. Reading through the story, one is somewhat humbled by the challenges that early foresters like Lane Poole endured and surprised that some of the challenges have a nature remarkably similar to those facing foresters today. Born in Sussex in 1885, Charles was one of two English cadets, sponsored by the Colonial Office, to graduate from the French Forestry School at Nancy in 1906. He then spent more than four years in the Transvaal Forest Department and then another five years in Sierra Leone. For much of this time he worked on demarcation of the best of the remaining forests as well as establishing plantation trials. By modern standards, times were tough. He often spent three months away from his post surveying forests and when he married in 1911 his wife Ruth remained in Dublin for the next five years and they corresponded regularly by letter. Most of Lane Poole’s working life was spent in Australia. When he arrived in Australia in 1916 and became Western Australia’s Conservator of Forests, he was only the second university-trained forester working in Australia. There was so much to be done: it was not clear how much forest there was, no one knew how fast the trees grew or when they reached maturity, his staff could not identify the forest flora botanically, indeed much of it had never been classified, and wood science investigations had barely begun. He attacked all of these problems in his first year as the Conservator of Forests. The book provides intriguing insights into the political dimensions of forestry in the early part of the twentieth century in Australia. Between 1916 and 1921, Charles put enormous personal energy into the development of Western Australia’s first forestry legislation. The process was long and complex and was a battle between the forest scientist and powerful stakeholders, particularly the owners of Millars, then the largest sawmilling company in Western Australia, that stood to have their concessions converted to permits and their log prices increased to levels consistent with those of other timber permit holders. He had to do battle with the Premier of the state, and in the end when he could not achieve the outcome that he believed was right for the forests he tendered his resignation. This is fascinating as one often thinks the political challenges faced by today’s foresters are of recent making. Lane Poole spent the next two years working in the Australian Territories of Papua and New Guinea conducting forest assess ments. The description of the challenges he faced when surveying the forests of Papua and New Guinea, including crossing flooded rivers, dealing with malaria-infected mosquitoes and savage attacks from indigenous tribesmen, puts today’s remote sensing inventories into perspective. Lane Poole always had a great interest in the education of foresters. When he attended the third Interstate Forestry Conference in Adelaide in 1916, he drafted a resolution that set out the need to train foresters at the university level and apprentices in a training school. In 1927, he became the acting principal of the Australian Forestry School when it opened in Canberra and remained in the post for 28 years. But this period was not without its controversies, as he had major conflicts with his staff and more significantly with Alfred Galbraith and Harold Swain, the respective heads of the Victorian and NSW forest departments, both of whom Lane Poole considered not to be properly trained foresters. These conflicts seriously impacted on student numbers and led to the partnership between the Creswick School of Forestry and the University of Melbourne. This conflict explains the tensions that persisted until the late 1970s between Victorian- and Canberra-trained foresters. Despite the conflicts he had with some politicians, Lane Poole was well connected with many politicians including Prime Minister Stanley Bruce. These connections enabled him to achieve some of his goals, such as the establishment of the Australian Forestry School, but weren’t sufficient to allow him to achieve his ultimate desire of having the control of forests vested under the Commonwealth. He also failed to get agreement for the headwaters of the Hume Weir catchment to be managed by the Commonwealth. He also spent about 20 years as Inspector General of Forests trying unsuccessfully to forge the development of a national forest policy. He was, however, more successful in getting the Forestry and Timber Bureau established to conduct the forest research he knew was needed to guide the management of Australian forestry. Lane Poole made very significant contributions to botanical knowledge in many of the places he worked, including Africa, Australia and Papua New Guinea. He collected 44 type specimens during his survey work in Papua New Guinea. He also collected specimens when on tour in Western Australia and one of them, Eucalyptus lane poolei, was subsequently named after him. Dargavel goes to great length to give the reader an accurate portrayal of the personality of Charles Lane Poole, including his advocacy regardless of the personal consequences or political realities. Lane Poole was very strong minded and intolerant of other’s views, including those of other ‘less well-trained’ foresters working with him and in the various forestry agencies he interacted with. This characteristic made it very difficult for him to achieve some of his goals as the principal of the Australian Australian Forestry 2009 Vol. 72 No. 1 pp. 52–53 Book reviews Forestry School and the Inspector General of Forests with the Commonwealth government in Australia. It also explains some of the tensions that existed in Australian forestry when I entered the profession in the early 1970s and which persisted until a national forest policy was agreed to in 1992. Two other things of significant interest are described in the book. Lane Poole’s wife Ruth had great skills in interior design and was given the job of designing the furniture and interior colours in both the Prime Minister’s and Governor General’s residences which were under construction in the new national capital of Australia. Lane Poole developed a life-long friendship with one of Australia’s great philanthropists, Sir Russell Grimwade, who was an early member of the Australian Forest League — the forerunner of conservation organisations in Australia. Both Grimwade and Lane Poole believed strongly in the importance of Australian foresters gaining first-hand experience of the long-standing forest management systems practised in Europe. Grimwade donated funds to establish a prize that enabled Australian foresters to study at the Imperial Forestry Institute at Oxford, from which nearly 30 Australian foresters have benefited. Dargavel’s story of Lane Poole’s life is well worth the read, both from the historical perspective and from the insights it gives into successes and failures of a forestry leader. Tony Bartlett Canberra, Australia Australian Forestry 2009 Vol. 72 No. 1 pp. 52–53 53 54 Book reviews Plantation Eucalypts for High-Value Timber A.G. Brown and C.L. Beadle (editors) Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation Publication No. 08/113, 2008, x + 182 pages, paperback, ISBN 1 74151 701 X, $25, or free online from http://www.rirdc.gov.au/reports/AFT/08-113.pdf Plantation Eucalypts for High Value Timber is published as a report of the Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation and consists of the edited proceedings of a conference of the same name held in Melbourne in October 2007. The report has been edited by Alan Brown and Chris Beadle and contains 12 chapters written by a range of authors. The hard copy is available to the general public from http://www.rirdc.gov.au/eshop for $25. It was assumed from the outset that plantation eucalypts for high value timber are desirable because they reduce the demand on native forests for such products. The aim of the conference was to explore the challenges in creating a plantation estate of sufficient size and security to encourage investment to develop a viable industry sector. Consequently the target audience is broad and includes growers, managers, processors and policy makers, although it is probably directed mostly towards the R&D requirements necessary to attract investment. The subject matter covers the whole value chain from plantation establishment through to market. Consequently the research priorities include breeding and silviculture for preferred wood properties; thinning and pruning strategies; harvesting and transport; and challenges in drying, processing and process recovery. Lott and Gooding detail research priorities in their chapter. Tepper discusses species selection and site assessment considerations for high-value eucalypt plantations and argues for the use of process-based models to assist in making decisions. Volker highlights already existing relevant silvicultural research, particularly in thinning pruning and nutritional management. Quill summarises existing international experience in harvesting eucalypts and concludes there will be no particular problems extending this knowledge to high-value regimes in Australia. Washusen and Innes discuss processing and highlight the challenges in limiting degrade if drying times are to be reduced. Cannon and Innes show how Forest Enterprises Australia Limited has made a product, EcoAshTM, from Eucalyptus nitens grown under pulpwood regimes but suitable for some highervalue structural applications. Grealy reviews the potential and challenges of placing naturally durable timber from eucalypt plantations in the market. Bush discusses genetic improvement of high-value timber species. The report is ably introduced by Vince Erasmus and concluded by Rod Keenan. The nature of the report, a consolidation of individual conference presentations, inevitably must lack continuity in substance and style and it is to the credit of the editors that they have been able to keep this to an absolute minimum, and the report is as close to a unified whole as could be expected. It is unusual for conference proceedings to be promoted as a book for the general public, but this report contains so much valuable information there is a very good case for doing so. Research funders need to have this information to channel investment and research providers need to be able to adapt to the challenges identified in this report. Policy-makers and industry need to respond in a unified manner. The report highlights the necessity to develop a skills base capable of serving this initiative. The report is not overly negative. It rightly highlights the very real challenges, but also is optimistic and points to a realisable future. I commend the report. Roger Sands Professor Emeritus University of Canterbury, New Zealand A theme throughout the report is that, if government wishes reduced reliance on native forests for high-value timbers, it needs a policy, developed in consultation with industry, to support the development of a plantation resource of appropriate scale. Taylor discusses investment strategies and the likely importance of management investment schemes, especially now they have some taxation advantages extolled in the report by the then Minister for Fisheries, Forestry and Conservation, Eric Abetz. Australian Forestry 2009 Vol. 72 No. 1 p. 54 Obituary 55 Obituary Alfred John (Alf) Leslie 5 February 1921 – 24 January 2009 Alf Leslie was born in Melbourne, Australia, on 5 February 1921. He was educated at University High School, where he achieved an excellent academic record and was a long distance runner of note. He commenced training to be a primary school teacher but changed his mind when offered a Forests Commission Cadetship at the Victorian School of Forestry, at Creswick, Victoria. He studied at the school from 1938 to 1940, graduating first in his class in 1941. He is remembered as a serious student and an ardent tennis player. He supervised salvage logging on the Torongo Plateau for a time before joining the Royal Australian Navy. Alf was generally reluctant to talk about his war service. He was seconded to a Royal Navy submarine operating out of Western Australia during World War II and saw active service on it. He once vividly described an encounter between himself, as gunnery lieutenant, and an attacking Japanese plane, in which both achieved their goals, but leaving him with stomach and other wounds that dogged him in later life. After recuperation and the end of the war, he took up a field posting with the Forests Commission at Taggerty, where he met his wife-to-be, Jean. In 1947, he was nominated by the Commission to undertake the Bachelor of Science (Forestry) course at the University of Melbourne and graduated early in 1949. He and Jean were married on 21 December 1948, so planned as to minimize his time away from work. They later had two daughters, of whom he was very proud. After their marriage he was posted to Mansfield and then to Beech Forest in the Otways in Victoria. He resigned to take up an appointment as Wood Superintendent and then Chief Forester with APM in Gippsland in 1951. APM was a relatively new paper mill, then largely reliant in hardwood pulpwood from nearby state forests. He worked closely with the late Geoff Chandler, the General Manager of APM Forests Pty Ltd, in starting plantation forestry in Gippsland. On a visit there two years ago, he was greatly taken by the extent and success of the plantations, both pine and eucalypt, which at the time must have been a risky venture for a private enterprise. His inclinations towards teaching resurfaced, and he took up appointment as Lecturer in Forest Management at the University of Melbourne in 1958 and was promoted to Senior Lecturer in 1962. He completed a Master of Science in Forestry thesis and was editor of Australian Forestry from 1962 to 1964. Forestry students of that era still extol his teaching in bringing economics and business management into a course that had been dominated by sylvan fundamentalism. He did so not as an ideologue, but as a skeptic, always able to point to the unresolved assumptions and logical gaps and to urge independent and critical thought and debate. He laboured long and hard in grappling with the problems associated with state-owned forestry, which predominated then. His experience in private enterprise highlighted some of the changes needed and he was not reticent in expounding on them in dialogue with students and colleagues. He attended a forestry conference in 1963 in Malaysia, where he came to the attention of Jack Westoby, Head of the Forestry Division of the Food and Agriculture Organisation (FAO) of the United Nations. Jack recruited him to teach at the University of Ibadan from 1964 to 1966. There, he gained a taste for the challenges of international forestry, notwithstanding a revolution in Nigeria late in that period. During this and the earlier period of teaching, he read widely, especially in economics, and developed a standing internationally as a forest economist. He was by now a powerful speaker and although he did not publish widely, what he did publish carried considerable weight. In 1966, he was appointed Officer-in-Charge of Regional Stations in the then national Forest Research Institute in Canberra, Australia. During this time, he travelled widely and frequently between the far-flung research stations and was highly successful in lifting the profile of forest research and of the researchers involved. In 1968, he accepted an appointment as Forest Economist with FAO in Rome. During this period, and in later service with FAO, he encouraged and guided a number of Australian foresters into short-term consultancies in international forestry, establishing a core of people who later joined international organisations or undertook bilateral and multilateral research and consultancy projects. Teaching again called in 1974, when he took up the aptly-titled appointment as Reader in the School of Forestry at the University for Canterbury, New Zealand. A cohort of New Zealand forestry students of that era attest to his continuing influence through his teaching of forest economics and management. In 1977, he was again recruited by Jack Westoby to take up the position of Director of Forest Industries of FAO. He served with Westoby and a distinguished team of international colleagues working on many forestry projects throughout the developing countries until he reached compulsory retirement age. He was later to assist a dying Westoby in writing his final book, a testimony to the bond between them. He was one of the very few Australians to reach a very senior and influential level in international forestry, and many people in international forestry still refer to the motivation or insights that he gave in addresses and discussions during his frequent travels. Australian Forestry 2009 Vol. 72 No. 1 pp. 55–56 56 Obituary After his so-called ‘retirement’ in 1981, he extended his influence as an international consultant in tropical forestry. He was invited by Dr Freezailah, first Executive Director of the International Tropical Timber Organization (ITTO), to assist him lay the groundwork for the work of the organisation when it commenced operation in 1986. He remained deeply engaged with ITTO and its work over the next 22 years, contributing to many of the organisation’s key initiatives. In an interview shortly before his death, he rated his role in helping to establish ITTO as his greatest professional achievement. His long experience in international forestry and dealing with international bureaucracies gave him the ability to ‘cut through the crap’, as one of his long-time colleagues put it, in a way that was always illuminating and refreshing. He was a bibliophile and, despite a very active professional career, read across a prodigiously wide range of topics. His recent book The Skeptical Forest Economist (http://repository. unimelb.edu.au/10187/2473) encapsulates the curmudgeonly delight he took in disputing conventional wisdom, and deflating bureaucratic edicts and political correctness. To quote Alf: ‘After playing around in the field of forest economics for the best part of sixty years, I wanted to sort out my ideas on the subject’. The book exemplifies his scholarship, prodigious memory and love of reading. Booksellers, as well as us, will be much the worse for his passing. He was a skeptic who delighted in starting an argument. His speeches often progressively developed the conventional wisdom on a topic, before torpedoing the assumptions on which it was founded. He took delight in exposing flaws and gaps with the broad brush of a skeptical pragmatist, often supported by some rough but telling calculations on the back of an envelope. If the proponent could not immediately rebut his argument factually, they were well advised to think again. he spent many years teaching and was a very popular supervisor of postgraduate students. The University of Melbourne conferred an honorary Doctor of Forest Science on him in 1994, in recognition of his services to international forestry. He was the recipient of the Commonwealth Forestry Association’s ‘Regional Medal’ in 2001 and of the Council of Forest Engineering’s ‘International Forest Engineering Achievement Award’ in 2007. He passed away on 24 January 2009 in New Zealand following complications from a stroke in 2008. His funeral was held on 5 February, which would have been his 88th birthday. He is survived by his wife Jean, children Leigh Leslie, and Eleanor and Pat Quaid; and grandchildren Tristan and Alison Leslie, Morghan Quaid, Kiersten Leslie, Jesse-Leigh Quaid and Shannon Quaid. Alf’s family is accepting donations for a memorial grove of trees to be established at the Creswick campus of the University of Melbourne’s Department of Forest and Ecosystem Science. See http://itto.or.jp for details for those who may wish to contribute. Vale Alf Leslie — a much respected and admired international forester, teacher, scholar, mentor and skeptic. Ian Ferguson Melbourne Ian wishes to acknowledge the assistance of many others in preparing this obituary. At a personal level, Alf had a gift of engaging the newly encountered, whether young or old and no matter their ethnic background or education, by joking about the ills of the organisation or economy on an impersonal level. He often took an interest in the work of younger foresters, offered support and counsel as a mentor in a way that you did not realize you were being mentored, and encouraged many younger foresters to lift their aspirations, as many now in senior positions can attest. He could also point out the need to rethink ideas in a way that neither threatened nor embarrassed the proponent. He was a gentleman in every respect; discourse always being lubricated with numerous cups of tea. Whatever the topic or concern, one left a discussion with him with a feeling that here was a person who listened, probed and cared, as well as counselled. He was elected a Fellow of the Institute of Foresters of Australia in 1964 and is a past President of the International Union of Societies of Foresters. After 1981, he was a visiting fellow and guest lecturer at many universities, notably at the University of Melbourne where Australian Forestry 2009 Vol. 72 No. 1 pp. 55–56 57 Referees 2008 The editors of Australian Forestry are pleased to acknowledge the important contribution of referees to the journal in 2008. Frank Batini Chris Beadle Chris Borough Leon Bren David Bush David Butt Angus Carnegie Kerrie Catchpoole Mike Connell Dick Curtin Bernie Dell Ian Dumbrell Heidi Dungey Bob Eldridge Ken Eldridge Humphrey Elliott Ian Ferguson Janet Farr Ross Florence Michael Greenwood Rod Griffin Paul Heubner Gary Hopewell Dominic Kain Roger Leakey David Lee Jerry Leech Richard Loyn Colin Matheson Sarah Munks Sadanandan Nambier Doland Nichols Greg Nolan Richard Northway Brenton Peters Digby Race John Raison Rowan Reid Wayne Schmidt Jim Shield John Simpson Geoff Stoneman Brian Turner John Turner Jerry Vanclay Tim Wardlaw Phil West Kim Whitford Graham Wilkinson Dean Williams Allan Wills Ross Wylie Australian Forestry 2009 Vol. 72 No. 1 p. 57 Australian Forestry Notice to contributors Scope Australian Forestry provides a vehicle for formal publications in all areas of interest to the Institute of Foresters of Australia. The editors welcome original scientific and technical contributions, reviews, suitably argued opinions, short communications and reviews of books on topics related to forest research, forest management and forest policy in Australia and the South Pacific region. Papers relating to any aspect of knowledge or management of forest species and land use matters of interest to the region will be particularly valued. It is a condition of submission of original papers that they have not been accepted for publication elsewhere. The Editorial Panel evaluates the suitability of material for publication. All papers submitted to the journal will be reviewed by referees nominated by the panel. Criteria for the assessment of papers centre on the suitability of the topic for publication in Australian Forestry, technical and scientific quality of the work, clarity and conciseness of presentation, appropriateness of the conclusions on the basis of the evidence presented, and suitability of the material for printing. Manuscripts Contributions should be printed with double spacing on one side of the paper only. Three copies of each paper should be submitted. Following review, please submit the revised manuscript as one hard copy and an electronic file or files. The latter should be in Word or RTF, and should include tables and illustrations. The latter should also be supplied in their original files (e.g. in Excel) or as photographs. Low-resolution files are not acceptable. Title The title should be brief and where possible begin with a word suitable for indexing. Summary The summary should follow immediately after the author’s address and should concisely describe the aim and nature of the work, the principal results and conclusions. It should normally not exceed 5% of the length of the paper and should be suitable for reproduction by abstracting journals. If possible provide several keywords drawn from the CAB thesaurus; if this is not available it will be helpful to look at the keywords assigned to similar articles in Forestry Abstracts or in previous issues of this journal. Presentation Authors should follow the pattern of presentation used in this issue. Figures and tables should be numbered with arabic numerals. Photographs should be identified as figures, and numbered in a single sequence with line drawings. Photographic prints should be of high quality on gloss paper, with a full range of tones and good contrast. Tables should be constructed in Excel or in the ‘Table’ facility of Word — not tabbed, nor as pictures. The preferred placement of tables and figures in the text should be marked with for example ‘Figure 1 near here’. Actual tables and figures should be gathered at the end of the paper. Illustrations Graphical material may be submitted as computer-generated graphics or line drawings. Diagrams should be provided in postscript (ps) or encapsulated postscript (eps) format if possible. If diagrams are supplied only as hard copy, they should be camera ready, with labels applied at an appropriate size, printed by high quality (e.g. laser) printer. Where possible, figures will be printed within a single column width. References References should be cited in the text by author and year of publication. Three or more authors should be referred to by the senior author et al. The reference list should cite the full title of the publication. Please follow the style used in recent issues of this journal. Submissions Please forward your submission to: Executive Director, The Institute of Foresters of Australia, PO Box 7002, Yarralumla ACT 2600, Australia. Copyright protection For the protection of authors and the IFA, a simple form of copyright agreement has been developed and is available on request from the Executive Director. A copy of the agreement will be sent to the senior author or his or her agent with the typeset proofs; it should be signed by the senior author or agent on behalf of all co-authors and returned to the office of the IFA. Under the terms of this agreement the IFA will obtain an interest in copyright only if the article is published by the institute. Offprints A copy of the final paper in portable document format (pdf), and guidelines for the distribution of copies, will be provided to authors after publication of their paper. Correspondence on editorial matters should be addressed to the Managing Editor, Dr Colin Matheson, C/- The Institute of Foresters of Australia.
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz