209
Mack, Mrs G M
1044.2
0
Opposes extension of maximuni height bands to the area surtounding the High
Rise Plan Area fronting the Mall and Marine Parade. Considers this will only
provide an incentive to breach the curtent height and result in high rise
buildings which would further destroy the look and image ofthe Mount.
Amend relevant objectives, policies and rules on high density and building
height to clearly state than no high rise will be provided for outside ofthe
existing high rise plan area and the maintenance of a height differential
between this and surtounding properties, clarify the market ie visitor or
permanent accommodation that is expected in the area. Also requests that
Council look at other areas for Intensification and undertake a
1comprehensive review ofthe future role ofthe Mount isthmus and ways to
1
address building design and visual amenity, car parking and respect of
existing privacy and oufiook. Update the 2002 Mount Maunganui North
Neighbourhood Plan.
Accept in part
Hatchwell, Sue
1045.2
0
Opposes extension of maximum height bands to the area surtounding the High
Rise Plan Area fronting the Mall and Marine Parade. Considers this will only
provide an incentive to breach the current height and result in high rise
buildings which would further destroy the look and image ofthe Mount.
Amend relevant objectives, policies and rales on high density and building
height to eleariy state than no high rise will be provided for outside ofthe
existing high rise plan area and the maintenance of a height differential
between this and surtounding properties, clarify the market ie visitor or
permanent accommodation that is expected in the area. Also requests that
Council look at other areas for intensification and undertake a
comprehensive review ofthe future role ofthe Mount isthmus and ways to
address building design and visual amenity, ear parking and respect of
existing privacy and outlook. Update the 2002 Mount Maunganui North
Neighbourhood Plan.
Accept in part
Purcell, Sharon
1046.1
0
Opposes the proposed discretionary activity provisions (Rule 14.8.1), including Requests that buildings above 9m (3 storeys) be a Prohibited Activity in the Accept in part
Appendix 14C and related Objecfives and Policies, relating to heights in the
area from Adams Avenue to Banks Avenue.
High Density Residential Zone, outside the High Rise Plan Area, between
Adams and Commons Avenue, Mount Maunganui.
Archibald. Jeffrey & Miller Deborah
FS 1128.341
(1046.1)
S
Submission point is supported to the extent that it is consistent with submission Allow this submission point.
449 and seeks a 9 metre height limit outside the High Rise Plan Area, for the
reasons listed in submission 449.
Accept in part
Clotworthy Family Tmst
1047.2
0
Opposes extension of maximum height bands to the area surtounding the High
Rise Plan Area fronting the Mall and Marine Parade. Considers this will only
provide an incentive to breach the current height and result in high rise
buildings which would further destroy the look and image ofthe Mount.
Amend relevant objectives, policies and rules on high density and building
height to clearly state than no high rise will be provided for out.slde ofthe
existing high rise plan area and the maintenance of a height differential
between this and surtounding properties, clarify the market ie v isitor or
pennanent accommodation that is expected in the area. Also requests that
Council look at other areas for intensification and undertake a
comprehensive review ofthe future role ofthe Mount isthmus and ways to
address building design and visual amenity, car parking and respect of
exisfing privacy and outlook. Update the 2002 Mount Maunganui
Neighbourhood Plan.
Accept in part
Bry-jo Investment Trast
1048.2
0
Opposes extension of maximum height bands to the area surtounding the High
Rise Plan Area fronting the Mall and Marine Parade. Considers this will only
provide an incentive to breach the curtent height and result in high rise
buildings which would ftirther destroy the look and image ofthe Mount.
Amend relevant objectives, policies and rules on high density and building
height to eleariy state than no high rise will be provided for outside ofthe
existing high rise plan area and the maintenance of a height differential
between this and surtounding properties, clarify the market ie visitor or
pemianent accommodation that is expected in the area. Also requests that
Council look at other areas for intensification and undertake a
comprehensive review ofthe future role ofthe Mount isthmus and ways to
address building design and visual amenity, car parking and respect of
existing privacy and outlook.
Accept in part
Page 88 of 96
TCC3280764
210
Amend relevant objecfives, policies and mles on high density and building Accept in part
height to eleariy state than no high rise will be provided for outside ofthe
existing highri.seplan area and the maintenance of a height differential
between this and surtounding properties, clarify the market ie visitor or
permanent accommodation that is expected in the area. Also requests that Council look at other areas for Intensification and undertake a
comprehensive review ofthe future role ofthe Mount Isthmus and ways to
address building design and visual amenity, car parking and respect of
existing privacy and outlook. Update the 2002 Mount Maunganui North
Neighbourhood Plan.
Gray. Peter & Diane
1052.2
0
Opposes extension of maximum height bands to the area surtounding the High
Rise Plan Area fronting the Mall and Marine Parade. Considers this will only
provide an Incentive to breach the curtcnt height and result in high rise
buildings which would further destroy the look and image ofthe Mount.
Skene, Heather
1054.1
0
Opposes the proposed discrefionary activity provisions (Rule 14.8.1). including Requests that buildings above 9ni (3 storeys) be a Prohibited Activity in the Accept in part
Appendix 14C and related Objectives and Policies, relating to heights in the
area from Adams Avenue to Banks Avenue.
High Density Residential Zone, outside the High Rise Plan Area, between
Adams and Commons Avenue, Mount Maunganui.
Archibald, Jeffrey & Miller Deborah
FS 1128.367
(1054.1)
S
Submission point is supported to the extent that it is consistent with submission Allow this submission point.
449 and seeks a 9 metre height limit outside the High Rise Plan Area, for the
reasons listed in submission 449.
Shephard. Jill Marie
1056.1
0
Opposes the proposed discretionary activity provisions (Rule 14.8.1), including Requests that buildings above 9m (3 storey.s) be a Prohibited Activity in the Accept in part
Appendix 14C and related Objectives and Policies, relating to heights in the
area from Adams Avenue to Banks Avenue.
High Density Residential Zone, outside the High Rise Plan Area, between
Adams and Commons Avenue, Mount Maunganui.
Archibald, Jeffrey & Miller, Deborah
FS 1128.363
(1056.1)
S
Submission point is .supported to the extent that it is consistent with submission Allow this submission point.
449 and seeks a 9 metre height limit outside the High Rise Plan Area, for the
reasons listed in submission 449.
Accept in part
Goodwin, Bartie & Jan
1058.2
0
Opposes extension of maximuni height bands to the area surrounding the High
Rise Plan Area fronting the Mall and Marine Parade. Considers this will only
provide an incentive to breach the curtcnt height and result in high rise
buildings which would further destroy the look and image ofthe Mount.
Amend relevant objecfives, policies and rules on high density and building
height to clearly state than no high rise will be provided for outside ofthe
exisfing high rise plan area and the maintenance of a height differential
between this and surtounding properties, clarify the market le visitor or
pemianent accommodafion that is expected in the area. Also requests that
Council look at other areas for intensification and undertake a
comprehensive review ofthe future role ofthe Mount isthmus and ways to
address building design and visual amenity, car parking and respect of
existing privacy and outlook. Update the 2002 Mount Maunganui North
Neighbourhood Plan.
Accept in part
Accept in part
Issue: Rezoning Requests [REZONEREQ]
Medlicott, Jann
181.8
0
Concemed about the planning Intentions for Mount North partieulalry in
relation to intensifieation ofthe area. Submit that the Mount isthmus shoild be
idenfified as a special area in the Plan due to its special features inelduing that it
accommodates the tallest buildings/highest densities in the City and has a
unique role as a top holiday desfination and it's sensitivity as an isthmus to
overcrowding, congestion and the effects of climate change.
Designate the area bounded by Commons Avene, Marine Parade, Adams
Avenue and the Mall as a 'special control area'. Undertake market research
on the housing needs in Mount Maunganui North and existing residents'
views on intensification and factors likely to increase acceptance ofthe
Plan's designation as a 'primary intensification area'.
Reject
Black, Phill
377.3
0
Submits that to extend maximum height bands in the High Rise Plan Area to the
adjoining High Density Area provides for high rise development outside ofthe
High Rise Plan Area. Submits that this can only be redressed by explicitly
declaring the High Rise Plan Area as the only area in which high rise
development at the Mount will be tolerated and that this should be accompanied
by this area becoming a zone in its own right. Submits that the area has special
features including that it accommodates the tallest buildings and highest
densities in the City and has a unique role as a top holiday destination and that
it already has specific objecfives and policies in the Operative and Proposed
Plan and is of sufficient size to wartant a separate zone.
The High Rise Plan Area to become a seperate zone from the rest ofthe
High Density Residential Zone and this rezoning be accompanied by a
seperate set of objectives, policies and mles including clarificafion ofthe
definition of, and policies for visitor accommodation including the
cumulative effects of such accommodation and meassures to address these
effects.
Rejee
Page 89 of 96
TCC3280764
11
591.2
0
Submit diat the area bounded by Commons Avenue. Marine Parade. Adams
Avenue and the Mall bc identified as a special area in the Plan as the area has
many special features including that it accommodates the tallest buildings and
liighest densities in the (itv and has a unique role as a top holidav destination.
Concerns arc raised in relation to the past intensification ofthe area and how
this intensification will bc managed into the future as it is submitted that further
intensification as a growth area under SmartGrowth would require subslaiitial
iustificatioii.
591.3
0
Submits that the High Rise Plan Area .should become a zone in its own right on That the High Rise Plan Area become a separate zone with a separate set of Reject
the grounds it is occupied by high rise buildings not found or intended
objectives, policies and rules.
elsewhere in the Mount, contains significantly high densities than the rest ofthe
High Density Residential Zone, already has distinctive objective and policies
and rules, is large enough to wartant a dedicated zone and is a tourist
destination w ith a unique role and contribution to the City. Al.so submit that
such a new zoning would allow greater control ofthe height density differential
with the rest ofthe High Densitv' Zone and send the inessage that this is the only
area in w liicli high rise buildings will be tolerated at the Mount.
0
Submits that the High Ri.se Plan Area should become a zone in its own right on That the High Rise Plan Area become a separate zone with a separate set of Reject
the grounds it is occupied by high rise buildings not found or intended
objectives, policies and rules.
elsewhere in the Mount, contains significantly high densities than the rest of tlie
Higli Density Residential Zone, already has distinctiv e objcctiv c and policies
and rules, is large enough to w anant a dedicated zone and is a tourist
destination with a unique role and contribution to the City. Also submit that
such a new zoning would allow greater control ofthe height density differential
with the rest ofthe High Density Zone and send the message that this is the only
area in which high nse buildings will be tolerated at the Mount.
592.1
0
Submit that the area bounded by Commons Avenue, Marine Parade. Adams
Avenue and the Mall be identified as a special area in the Plan as the area has
many special features including that it accommodates the tallest buildings and
highest densities in the City and has a unique role as a top holiday destination.
Concems are raised in relation to the past intensification ofthe area and how
ihis intensification will be managed into the future as it is submitted that further
intensification as a growth area under SmartGrowth would require substantial
justification.
Designate the area bounded by Cominons Avenue. Marine Parade, Adams
Av enue and the Mall as a special control area. Seeks further claritv as to
how increases in density would met the projected growth of 1 -2 person
households and households of people over 80 years in age. Also seek
further market and community research into housing needs and
intensification ofthe Mount North area.
Reject
Oceanside Lodge Body Coqioratc S 79330 593.1
0
Submit that the area bounded by Cominons Avenue. Marine Parade, Adams
Avenue and the Mall be identified as a special area in the Plan as the area has
many special features including that it accommodates the tallest buildings and
highest densities in the Citv and has a unique role as a top holidav destination.
Concems are raised in relation to the past intensification ofthe area and how
this intensification will be managed into the future as it is submitted that further
Intensification as a growth area under SniartGrowth weiuld require substantial
justification.
Designate the area bounded by Commons Avenue. Marine Parade. Adams
Avenue and the Mall as a special control area. Seeks further clarity as to
how increases in density would met the projected gnrnth o\' 1-2 person
households and households of people over 80 years in age. Aho seek
further market and community research into housing needs and
intensification ofthe Mount North area.
Reject
Oceanside Lodge Body Coqiorate S 79330 593.3
0
Submits that the High Rise Plan Area should become a zone in its own right on That the High Rise Plan Area become a separate zone with a separate set of Reject
obiectives. policies and rules.
the grounds it is occupied by high rise buildings not found or intended
elsewhere in the Mount, contains significantly high densities than the rest ofthe
High Densitv Residential Zone, alrcadv has distinctive objcctiv c and policies
and rules, is large enough to w arrant a dedicated /one and is a tourist
destination widi a unique role and contribution to the City. Also submit that
such a new zoning would allow greater control ofthe height densitv differeiilial
w ith the rest ofthe High Density Zone and send the message that this is the onlv
area in w hich high rise buildings w ill be tolerated at the Mount.
Tower 1 Body Corporate S 70841
Tower 1 Body Corporate S 70841
592.3
Tower 2 Body Corporate S 73368
Tower 2 Body Corporate S 73368
Designate the area bounded by Commons Avenue, Marine Parade. Adams
Avenue and the Mall as a special control area. Seeks further clarity as to
how increases in density would met the projected grow th of 1 -2 person
households and households of people ewer SO years in age. .Also seek
further market and community research into housing needs and
iiitensificatioii ofthe Mount North area.
Page 90 of 96
Reject
TCC3280764
2 12
Lee, Sue
762.3
0
Submits that the Mount is unique in the City as being a prime holiday
destination, a recreational area for Bay people and a place for pertnanent
residents. Submits it is an environmently senisitlve Isthmus requiring a
ienvironmentally sustainable planning approach to growth than is in the
Proposed Plan.
1 Prov ide an environmental impact assessment on the impacts of increasing Reject
density and heights in the Mount Maunganui North area. Review and
update the 2002 Mount Maunganui North Neighbourhood Plan for public
consultation.
•••^^•^^^•^•^^^••Jj^^^H
Issue: Purpose ofthe High Density Residential Zone [14.3]
Campbell, Wendy Kathleen
101.24
0
Submits that 14.3 Purpose Statement for the High Density Residential Zone
makes no mention of SmartGrowth's predicted population and how to
accommodate it.
Amend 14.3 Purpose Statement for the High Density Residenfial Zone to Reject
state that the purpose ofthe zone is to avoid urban expansion over areas of
food production, to reduce long commuter corridors and to reduce fossil fiiel
emissions pollufion.
' Medlicott, Jann
181.9
0
Submits that there is only passing reference to visitor accommodation and yet
this form of accommodation is and may confinue to be the driving force behind
most new developments in the High Density Residential Zone and the High
Rise Plan Area and the sustainable limits of this alongside permanent residential
use need to be determined.
Include a clear definition of visitor accommodation in temis of planning
intent, policies and rules and determine the cumulative effects of
intensifying visitor accommodation at the Mount and measures to address
these effects.
SmartGrowth Implementation Management 357.17
Group
S
Retain the purposcobjectives and policies of Section 14.3 High Density
' Supports the purposcobjectives and policies of Section 14,3 High Density
Residenfial Zone on the grounds that achieving higher densities at the westem Residential Zone.
end ofMount Maunganui is a key part ofthe SmartGrowth Strategy in temis of
accommodating future growth, providing for a range of housing types,
supporting transport outcomes and providing for live, work and play
opportunities and that Mount Maunganui is identified as an intensificafion area
in the Strategy.
Black, Phill
377.19
o
Submits that market research on hosuing needs in Mount Maunganui North and Undertake market research on housing needs in Mount Maunganui North Reject
and existing residents views on intensification and factors likely to Increase |
exisfing residents views on intensifieation and factors likely to increase
acceptance ofthe Plan's designation as a primary Intensification area.
acceptance ofthe Plan's designation as a primary intensification area is
required.
Tauranga Architect's Practice Support
Group
497.13
0
Submits that 14,3 Purpose Statement for the High Density Residential Zone
makes no mention of SmartGrowth's predicted population and how to
accommodate it.
Amend 14.3 Purpose Statement for the High Density Residential Zone to Reject
state that the purpose of the zone is to avoid urban expansion over areas of
food production, to reduce long commuter cortidors and to reduce fossil fuel
emissions pollufion.
Benton, Jason
498.17
0
Submits that 14.3 Purpose Statement for the High Density Residential Zone
makes no mention of SmartGrowth's predicted population and how to
accommodate it.
Amend 14.3 Purpose Statement for the High Density Residential Zone to Reject
state that the purpose ofthe zone is to avoid urban expansion over areas of
food production, to reduce long commuter corridors and to reduce fossil ftie
emissions pollution.
Mathiesen, Anne-Marie
515.26
0
Opposes Rule 14.3 Purpose ofthe High Density Residenfial Zone on the
grounds that it does not mention SmartGrowth's predicted population growth
and how to accommodate it.
Add to the Rule 14.3 Purpose ofthe High Density Residenfial Zone that the Reject
purpose is to av oid urban expansion over areas of food production, to
reduce long commuter corridors and to reduce fossil fuel emissions
pollution.
Dimensions Limited Architects
517.17
0
Submits that 14.3 Purpose Statement for the High Density Residential Zone
makes no mention of SmartGrowth's predicted population and how to
accommodate it.
Amend 14.3 Purpose Statement for the High Density Residenfial Zone to
Reject
state that the purpose ofthe zone is to avoid urban expansion over areas of
food production, to reduce long commuter cortidors and to reduce fossil fiiel
emissions pollution.
Brendon Gordon Architechture Limited
597.17
0
Submits that 14,3 Purpose Statement for the High Density Residenfial Zone
1 makes no mention of SmartGrowth's predicted population and how to
' accommodate it.
Colin J Davis & Associates Limited
619.22
0
Submits that not enough areas are zoned for urban consolidation.
Amend 14.3 Purpose Statement for the High Density Residential Zone to
Reject
state that the purpose ofthe zone is to avoid urban expansion over areas of |
food production, to reduce long commuter cortidors and to reduce fossil fuel:
emissions pollution.
Include urban intensifieation zones around present shopping areas
Reject
throughout the city.
Colin J Davis & Associates Limited
619.6
0
Submits that there is no mention of Smartgrowth's predicted population growth Add that the purpose ofthe High Density Residential Zone is to avoid urban Reject
expansion over areas of food production, secondly to reduce long commuter
and how to accommodate it.
corridors and thirdly to reduce fossil fuel emissions pollution.
Page 91 of 96
Reject
Accept
TCC3280764
213
McAlpine. Jon
664.3
0
Submits that there is no mention of SmartGrowth's predicted population growth Addition to the policy that the purpose of High Density Residential Zone is Reject
and how to accommmodate it.
to avoid urban expansion over areas of food production, secondly to reduce
long commuter cortidors and thirdly to reduce fossil fuel emissions.
Chapman, Yvonne Allison
743.6
0
Submits that Chapter 14 is primarily concerned with residential growth with
only passing reference to visitor accommodation yet this fomi of
accommodation is and will confinue to be the driving force behind most new
developments in the High Rise Plan Area.
Benge, Rob
869.6
0
' Submits there is no mention of SmartGrowth's predicted population growth and Amend 14.3 Purpose ofthe High Density Residential Zone to add that the
purpose ofthe zone is to avoid urban expansion over areas of food
how to accommodate it.
production, reduce long commuter corridors and reduce fossil fuel
pollution.
Requests that the sustainable limits of visitor accommodafion alongside that Reject
established for residential use be detemiined.
Reject
Issue: Policy - Bulk and Scale of Buildings in the High Density Residential Zone - Height [14.3.1.1.1]
Medlicott, Jann
181.4
SA
Black, Phill
377.6
0
Submits that 14.3.1.1.1 Policy - Bulk and Scale of Buildings in the High
Density Residential Zone - Height should eleariy state that high rise buildings at
the Mount are restricted to the "High Rise Plan Area" (shown on the Planning
Maps). Also submits that the proposed criteria forjudging over height
applications Introduce uncertainty, are open to misinterpretation, could
encourage applications for taller buildings and that other factors such as visual
impact from public areas, cumulative impacts and natural hazards need to be
considered if such criteria are retained. Also requires further clarification of
what is meant by "decreasing height from the centre ofthe isthmus to the coast."
Jones. Bryan & Diana
411.8
0
Submit that if the height pennitted in the High Rise Plan Area is not intended to Include a statement that "high rise development is a prohibited activity
be a consideration in regulating building heights on the adjoining high density outside the high rise residenfial zone,
residential sites then such an intent should be stated.
Accept in part
Brown, June & Dave
426.7
0
Submit that if the height permitted in the High Rise Plan Area is not intended to Include a statement that high rise development is a prohibited activity
be a consideration in regulafing building heights on the adjoining high density outside the high rise residential zone,
residential sites then such an intent should be stated.
Accept in part
Hodgson, Bryce Norman & Dorothy
Elizabeth
453.8
0
Submit that if the height pemiitted in the High Rise Plan Area is not intended to Include a statement that high rise development is a prohibited activity
be a considerafion in regulafing building heights on the adjoining high density outside the high rise residential zone
residential sites then such an intent should be stated.
Accept in part
Edwards, David & Patricia
454.8
0
Submit that if the height pemiitted in the High Rise Plan Area is not intended to Include a statement that "high rise development is a prohibited activity
be a consideration in regulafing building heights on the adjoining high density outside the high rise residential zone,
residenfial sites then such an Intent should be stated.
Accept in part
Phillips. David
461.7
SA
Submit that if the height permitted in the High Rise Plan Area is not intended to Include a statement that "high rise development is a prohibited activity
be a eosideratlon in regulating building heights on the adjoining high density
outside the high rise residential zone,
residential sites then such an intent should be stated.
Accept in part
Black, Phill
FS 1140.23(461.7)
0
Challenges Councils assessment of whether submission supports or opposes the Neutral
section ofthe City Plan. Amend the position registered in the table from "SA" j
,to"0".
Accept in part
Chapman. Donald Leslie
524.8
0
Submit that if the height pennitted in the High Rise Plan Area is not intended to Include a statement that "high rise development is a prohibited activity
be a consideration in regulating building heights on the adjoining high density outside the high rise residential zone,
residenfial sites then such an intent should be stated.
'Accept in part
Submits that if the height of buildings permitted in the High Rise Plan Area is Amend the policy to the effect that high rise building development is a
not intended to be a consideration in regulating building heights in the high
prohibited activity outside ofthe High Rise Plan Area and that the curtent
density residenfial zone then such an intent should be stated and the relevant
High Rise Plan Area become a zone in it's own right and that references to
objectives, policies and rules amended in line with this intent. It is submitted
the High Rise Plan Area be amended to refer to this new zone,
that combined with a new zoning for the High Rise Policy Area this should
i
prevent taller buildings in the surtounding area. Submits that the policy be
amended to state that high rise buildings at the Mount are limited to the existing
Accept in part
Accept in part
Remove reference to the "High Rise Plan area" and provide for this as a
.seperate zoning and include a statement confimiing that high rise building
development is a prohibited activity outside the new "high rise residential
zone". Delete proposed criteria from the policy or expand such criteria to
encompass all relevant matters and add a more substantial refcTence to what
is meant by "decreasing height from the centre ofthe isthmus to the coast."
Page 92 of 96
TCC3280764
21.4
0
Submits that if the height of buildings permitted in the High Rise Plan Area is
not intended to be a consideration in regulating building heights in the high
density residential zone then such an intent should be stated and the relevant
objectives, policies and rales amended in line with this intent. It is submitted
that combined with a new zoning for the High Rise Policy Area this should
prevent taller buildings in the surtounding area.
The High Rise Plan Area to be given a separate zone and include a
statement confirtning that high ri.se building development is a prohibited
activity outside the requested new High Rise Zone.
Accept in part
592.5
0
Submits that if the height of buildings pcrtnitted in the High Rise Plan Area is
not intended to be a consideration in regulating building heights in the high
density residential zone then such an intent should be stated and the relevant
objectives, policies and rales amended in line with this Intent. It is submitted
that combined with a new zoning for the High Rise Policy Area this should
prevent taller buildings in the surtounding area.
The High Rise Plan Area to be given a separate zone and include a
statement confirming that high rise building development is a prohibited
activity outside the requested new High Rise Zone.
Accept in part
Oceanside Lodge Body Corporate S 79330 593.5
0
Submits that if the height of buildings permitted in the High Rise Plan Area is
not intended to be a considerafion in regulating building heights in the high
density residential zone then such an intent should be stated and the relevant
objecfives. policies and rules amended in line with this intent. It is submitted
that combined with a new zoning for the High Rise Policy Area this should
prevent taller buildings in the surtounding area.
The High Rise Plan Area to be given a separate zone and Include a
statement confimiing that high rise building development is a prohibited
activity outside the requested new High Rise Zone.
Accept in part
Eleven Maunganui Road Limited
599.1
s
Supports the policy to limit height of buildings in the High Density Residential Retain proposed Policy 14.3.1.1.1. (b) as written.
Zone (outside ofthe High Rise Plan Area) to be compatible with the Suburban
Residential Zone.
Reject
Sandy Walker Group
wrmm—-^
0
While we agree to limit High Density Residential Zone heights we note that this Disallow this submission point.
High Rise Area is different. We also want height in High Rise Policy Area
(which should be a zone) lowered to protect O.N.F. & L. (Policy 14.3.1.1.1 .(b))
Accept in part
Tower 1 Body Corporate S 70841
591.5
Tower 2 Body Corporate S 73368
\
(599.1)
Tunnicliffe, R & N
634,1
0
Submits that changes in building heights will lead to shading ofthe recreational
areas of both beaches and waterfronts, especially Pilot Bay, create major wind
draughts and traffic and pedestrian congestion, place pressure on infrastmcture
and denigrate the chami of Mauao.
Chapman, Yvonne Allison
743.8
0
Submit that if the height permitted in the High Rise Plan Area is not intended to Include a statement that "high rise development is a prohibited activity
be a consideration in regulating building heights on the adjoining high density outside the high rise residential zone."
residential sites then such an intent .should be stated.
Accept in part
Phillips, Jill
759.4
0
Submit that if the height pemiitted in the High Rise Plan Area is not intended to Include a statement that "high rise development is a prohibited activity
be a considerafion in regulating building heights on the adjoining high density outside the high rise residential zone."
residenfial sites then such an intent should be stated.
Accept in part
Amend proposed Rule 14.8.1 Discretionary Activity - Standards and Temis Accept in part
Height of Buildings and Appendix 14C Maximuni Height Plane Relative to
Mount Maunganui High Rise Plan Area so that buildings above 9m in the
High Density Residenfial Zone outside ofthe High Rise Plan Area are
prohibited acfivities.
flH
Issue: Policy - Site Layout efe Building Design in the High Density Residential Zone [14,3.1.2.1]
Black, Phill
377.16
0
Submits that 14.3.1.2.1 Policy - Site Layout and Building Design in the High
Density Residential Zone should also include the need to assess the likely
impact on beach/harbour views of existing high rise development along
Maunganui Road as such views were part of previous approval decisions and
are similar to 'residential outlook' requirenients for new single storey housing
development. Submits that the policy should also be made to the intent to step
down building heights from the centre ofthe isthmus at the Mount by retaining
pemiitted building heights and only permitting relaxations demonstrated to be
'minor' in nature and which have no visual impact on local amenity and the
adjacent exisfing high rise development.
Include a statement on the need to respect ocean and harbour views from
Reject
existing apartments within the 'high rise plan area' and that only height
increases above that permitted which are considered 'minor' in character and
have no impact on existing development, will be considered in the 'high
density residential zone'
tissue: Objective - Density of Development in the High Density Residenfial Zone [14.3.1.3]
Page 93 of 96
TCC3280764
21.5
Medlicott. Jann
181.5
0
Amend the objective to refer to existing and committed high rise
Submits the objective is too open ended in relation to the phrase "Including
some high rise development opportunities" and leaves potential for
dcveloiinient.
inteniretation that further high rise opportunities could be entertained on the
Mount isthmus. Seek an amendment to make it clear that such opportunities are
limited to the High Rise Plan Area.
Black. Phill
377.7
0
Reject
Submits that 14.3.1.3 Objective- Density of Dcv elopnient in the High Density Amend 14.3.1.3 Objective - Density of Development in the High Densitv
Residential Zone is too open ended and leaves potential open for inten-retation Residential Zone by amending the reference to "some high rise
opportunties" to "including existing and committed high rise dcv elopnient."
that further high rise developincnt opportunities could bc entertained on the
Mount North isthmus.
Jones. Bryan & Diana
411.9
0
Submits the objective is too open ended in relation to the phrase "including
some high nse development opportunities" and leaves potential for
intcqiretatioii that further high rise opportunities could be entertained on the
Mount isthmus.
Specify the maxiinum number of high rise buildings that the Mount isthmus Reject
and associated infrastructure can tolerate. Submit that this couUI be a
maximum of 20 "towers" including the 10 existing.
Brown. Juncefe Dave
426.8
0
Submits the objective is too open ended in relation to the phrase "Including
some high rise dcv elopnient opportunilies" and leaves potential for
inter|-)retalion thai further high rise opportunities could he ciitcrtaincil on the
Mount isthmus.
Specify the maximum number of high rise buildings that the Mount isthmus Reject
and associated infrastructure can tolerate. Submit that this could be a
niaxinnim of 20 "tciwers" including the 10 existing.
Hodgson. Bryce Nomian & Domtliy
F-|izabeth
453.9
0
Submits the objective is too open ended in relation to the plira.se "including
some high rise development opportunities" and leaves potential for
interpretation that further high rise opportunities ceuild be emcriained on the
Mount isthmus.
Specify the maximum number of high rise buildings that the Mount isthmus Reject
and associated infrastructure can tolerate. Submit that this could be a
maximum ol'20 "ttnvers" including the 10 existing.
Edwards. David & Patricia
454.9
0
Submits the objcctiv e is loo tipen ended in relation to the phrase "including
some high rise developmenl opportunities" and leaves potential for
inteniretatioii that further high rise opportunities could be entertained on the
Mount isthmus.
Specify the maximum number of high rise buildings that the Mount isthmus Reject
and associated infrastructure can tolerate.
Phillips. David
461.8
0
Specify the maximum number of high rise buildings that the Mount isthmus Reject
Submits the objective is too open ended in relation to the phrase "including
some high rise development opportunities" and leaves potential for iiiterpreation and associated infrastructure can tolerate. Submit that this could be a
that further high rise opportunities could be entertained on the Mount isthmus. iiuixiniuni of 20 "towers" including the 10 existing.
Chapman. Donald Leslie
524.9
0
Submits the objeetiv e is too open ended in relation to the phrase "including
some high rise development oiiportunitics" and leaves potential for
interpretation that further high rise opportunities could be entertained on the
Mount isthmus.
Tower 1 Body Coqiorate S 70841
591.6
0
Submits the objective is too open ended in relation to the phrase "including
Amend the objective to refer to existing and committed high rise
some high rise dcv elopnient opportunities" and leaves potential for
development.
iiiter]iretation that further high rise opportunities could be entertained on the
Mount isthmus. Seek an amendment to make it clear that such opportunities are
limited to the High Rise Plan Area.
Reject
Tow cr 2 Body Corporate S 73368
592.6
0
Submits the objective is too open ended in relation to the phrase "including
Amend the objcctiv e to refer to existing and committed high rise
some high rise development opportunities" and leaves potential for
development.
interpretation that further high rise opportunities could be entertained on the
Mtmiit isthmus. Seek an amendment to make it clear that such opportunities are
limited to the High Rise Plan Area.
Reject
Oceanside Lodge Body Coqborate S 79330 593.6
0
Amend the objective to refer to existing and coniinittcd high rise
Submits the objective is too open ended in relation to the phrase "Including
some high rise development oiiportunities" and leaves potential for
dcv elopnient.
inten-iretation that further high rise opportunities could be entertained on the
Mount isthmus. Seek an amendment to make it clear that such opportunities are
limited to the High Rise Plan Area.
Reject
Chapman. Yvonne Allison
0
Submits the objective is too open ended in relation to the phrase "including
some high rise dcv elopnient opportunilies" and leaves potential for
inteniretalicin that further high rise opportunities could bc cntcnained on the
Mount isthmus.
743.9
Reject
Specify the maximum number of high rise buildings that the Mount isthmus Reject
and associated infrastructure can tolerate. Submit that this could be a
maxinuim of 20 "towers" including the 10 existing.
Specify the maximum number of high rise buildings that the Mount isthmus Reject
and associated infrastructure can tolerale. Submit that tins could be a
maximum of 20 "towers" including the 10 existing.
Page 94 of 96
TCC3280764
o
Phillips, Jill
759.5
0
Issue: Policy - Residenfial Diversity and Densities [14.3.1.3.1]
Medlicott, Jann
181.6
SA
Submits the objecfive is too open ended in relation to the phrase "including
some high rise development opportunities" and leaves potential for
interpretation that further high rise opportunities could be entertained on the
Mount isthmus.
16
Specify the maximum number of high rise buildings that the Mount isthmus Reject
and associated infrastracture can tolerate. Submit that this could be a
maximum of 20 "towers" including the 10 existing.
Supports clause a), but requests that there be another policy point describing
Include reference to a description ofthe special environmental qualities of
what constitutes the special environmental qualities ofthe area at the Mount and the High Rise Plan Area and quantify visitor accommodation demand.
has reference to visitor accommodation as this type of housing is the cause of
many problems in the area.
Accept in part
Black, Phill
377.8
0
Submits that while 14.3.1.3.1 Policy - Residential Diversity and Density refers Include a reference to a description ofthe special environmental qualities of Accept in part
to the "special environmental qualities ofthe area" and "visitor accommodafion" the high rise plan area and quantify visitor accommodafion demand.
there is no documentation or clear description of what these are or what they
constitute
Tower 1 Body Corporate S 70841
591.7
SA
Include reference to a description ofthe special env ironmental qualifies of
Supports clause a), but requests that there be another policy point describing
what constitutes the special environmental qualifies ofthe area at the Mount and the High Rise Plan Area and quantify visitor accommodafion demand.
has reference to visitor accommodation as this type of housing is the cause of
many problems in the area.
Accept In part
Tower 2 Body Corporate S 73368
592.7
SA
Include reference to a description of the special environmental qualities of
Supports clause a), but requests that there be another policy point describing
what constitutes the special environmental qualifies ofthe area at the Mount and the High Rise Plan Area and quantify visitor accommodafion demand.
has reference to visitor accommodation as this type of housing is the cause of
many problems in the area.
Accept in part
Oceanside Lodge Body Corporate S 79330 593.7
SA
Include reference to a description ofthe special environmental qualities of
Supports clause a), but requests that there bc another policy point describing
what constitutes the special environmental qualifies ofthe area at the Mount and the High Rise Plan Area and quantify visitor accommodation demand.
has reference to visitor accommodation as this type of housing is the cause of
many problems in the area.
Accept in part
Issue: Policy - Activities in the High Density Residential Zone [14.3.1.4.1 ]
Eleven Maunganui Road Limited
599.4
SA
Supports in part 14.3.1.4.1 Policy Activities in the High Density Residenfial
Zone but requests the polcly be amended to allow for some non residential
acfivities. Submits that if the downtown area at the Mount intensifies either
with pcTmanent residents or visitor numbers and no new commercial areas are
proposed there will be increasing demand on curtent cafes/restaurants and
dairys etc which will mean poor levels of supply and people increasing vehicle
trips outsidethc area to meet their requirenients and this does not met the live,
work, play approach or the promofion of non private vehicle based
transportafion. Submits also that some recognition of tourist based activities and
businesses is appropriate in this location.
Amend the policy to allow for some non-residential activities such as small Accept in part
scale cafe/retail outlets, potentially as restricted discretionary activities
with appropriate criteria controlling size, scale, location and operational
management issues (i.e. hours of operation, goods or service provided etc).
Will Tatton Architecture
711.3
0
Submits that business activities such as cafes should be a permitted activity at
ground level in the High Density Residential Zone.
Provide for business activities, including cafes, as a permitted activity at
ground level in the High Density Residential Zone.
Page 95 of 96
Accept in part
TCC3280764
217
Sandy Walker Group
FS 1214.119
(599.4)
0
Do not increase any commercial acitivity in this residential area for reasons of Disallow this submission point.
traffic, parking, noise, ambience and trading of area of'Outstanding Natural
Features & Landscapes'. Developers on this site are today, 1 April 2010,
wanting to get a cafe etc - not enough carparks. Simultaneously, they are
advertising carparks for sale! This is a DISGRACE. Public are being pushed
towards parking meters at the beach - which we totally OPPOSE, by these
greedy developers pushing the envelope. PS: their building was not OK for
FIRE PERMITS - basic! Council has, via draft plan 'comments' already
decided not to have "mixed" use - as in Commercial / Residential mix in this
area. It has been debated and clarified that reference to "mix" referred to mix of
residential pertnenant / holiday, not mix of residential / commercial.
Cumulative effect is appalling. A walk to nearby facilities is health giving ie 2
mins walk.
Accept in part
491.29
SA
Support the high density provisions in part, supports the use ofthe high rise
zoning mechanism for the downtown Mount area. Submits that further
consideration is needed to determine how this area should be further developed
or not.
Accept in part
Issue: [14.6.1.1]
Property Council of New Zealand (Bay of
Plenty Branch)
Retain the provisions, further long term strategic direction required in
considering how the intensification ofthe Mount area may finally look
before significant changes to the rules are promoted.
1
Page 96 of 96
TCC3280764
218
Appendix 3
Recommended Amendments to Pian Content
>flL^
219
Taurangacityplan
Jitumn^aOty
I 14.3.1.1.1 Policy - Bulk and Scale of Buildings in the High Density Residential Zone Height
I By defining areas of permitted height through:
a)
A High Rise Plan Area where an absolute maximum height Is Identified that provides an
appropriate relationship of high density residential development to the outstanding
natural landscape and historic heritage values of Mauao and Hopukiore, and the natural
landscape features of the coastal and harbour edges, v\^hlle limiting the potential
adverse effects of accelerated wind speed and overshadowing on adjacent residential
development,
b)
Limiting the height of buildings within the zone and adjacent to the High Rise Plan Area
to a scale compatible with the Suburbaf^ Residential Zone that reflects the ability of the
environment to absorb higher buildings near the central spine of the isthmus and closer
to Mauao but lower buildings around its coastal fringes and adjacent to Important open
spaces, taking into account outlook from existing buildings, and ensuring development
Is subservient to the landscape values afforded by:
i)
The Norfolk Island Pines along Marine Parade and The Mall;
ii)
The outstanding natural landscape and historic heritage values of Mauao and
Hopukiore;
lii)
The coastal environment;
iv)
The relationship of tangata whenua with Mauao and Hopukiore.
14.3.1.1.2 Policy - Bulk and Scale of Buildings in the High Density Residential Zone Overshadowing
By defining a permitted building envelope to ensure that:
a)
There is an adequate supply of daylight for sites adjacent to, but outside, the High Rise
Plan Area;
b)
All other sites in the zone (I.e., outside the High Rise Plan Area) and adjacent
recreational and open space areas receive an adequate supply of daylight.
14.3.1.2 Objective - Site Layout and Building Design in the High Density Residential
Zone
Buildings within the zone provide a residential amenity characterised by open space
between sites and a streetscape comprised of consistent building setbacks and opportunities
for frontage landscape planting.
14.3.1.2.1 Policy - Site Layout and Building Design in the High Density Residential
Zone
By ensuring that the layout and design of development within the zone:
a)
Provides building setbacks between sites that ensure a physical separation of buildings
between sites, access for building maintenance, and contributes to the visual and aural
privacy of adjoining sites;
220
/ ^ ^ -^
Taurangacityplan
Tituran^aOty
b)
Ensures that buildings are setback from the road boundary to provide a streetscape
with opportunities for landscape planting, that encourages passive surveillance of the
street, and contributes to a high level of amenity at the public-private interface;
14.8.1 Discrotionary Activity—Standards and Terms—Hoight of Buildings
No part of any building in the High Density Residential Zone shall exceed the maximum
height plane shown In Appendix ^AC: Maximum Height Plane Relative to Mount Maunganui
High Rise Plan Area.
A^ofe.- Notwithstanding any othor rule in the Plan any building in a High Density Residential
Zone that excoods tho maximum height permitted by Rule 14.8.1 shall bo considered a
Prohibited Activity:
14.8.2 Assessment of Discretionary Activities
In considering a Discretionary Activity the Council's discretion Is unrestricted. The Council
will consider any relevant matter with particular regard to the relevant Objectives and
Policies of the Plan.
14.9 Non-Complying Activities
The following are Non-Complying Activities;
a)
Any Permitted Activity that does not comply with:
V)
Rule 14.5.4 b) Setbacks;
vl)
Rule 14.5.7 Homestays;
vii)
Rule 14.5.8 Home-based businesses;
vlii)
Rule 14.5.9 Heavy Machinery;
ix)
b)
Rule 14.5.10 Natural Character Coastal Environment, Wetlands, Rivers and
Streams;
All those activities listed as a Non-Complying Activity in Table 14.4A.
'^
Anv building that exceeds 9,0m on the land identified as Area B on the plan at
Appendix 3 of this report.
d)
Anv building that exceeds 19m on the land identified as Area C on the plan at
Appendix 3 of this report.
e)
Anv building that exceeds 15m on the land, defined as Area D on the plan at
Appendix 3 of this report.
d)f)
Anv building that exceeds 12m on the land identified as Area E on the plan at
Appendix 3 of this report."
14.10 Prohibited Activities
The following are Prohibited Activities:
221
Taurangai [ i y plan
Tnuran<ia Oty
a)
Any building on a specified high rise site In the High Rise Plan Area of the High Density
Residential Zone that exceeds the maximum height permitted by Rule 14.6.1.1 b);
fe)—Afvy-4^uilding in the High Density Residential Zone that exceeds the maximum height
permitted by Rule 14.8.1.
APPENDIX 14C: MAXIMUM HEIGHT PLANE RELATIVE TO IVIOUNT MAUNGANUI HIGH
RISE PLAN AREA DELETE THIS APPENDIX
MAUAO
38,5m Ceiling
MOUNT DRURY
INDICATIVE ELEVATION-REDUCED LEVELS
OF lulAXIMUM HEIGHT PLANE
MOUNT DRURY
- : ' / . ' ;.
V
•
NOTES:
(1) All BuUdirto Heights in metres anej taken from the Moturiki Datum.
(2) 6ui!dir>g above the Building Heights ahown Is a Prohibited ActivKy
under Rule 14.10
(3) Bu'tding ebove 9 metres and beto-.v the Building Heights shown is a
DiscretionaryAcbvity under Rule 14 8 1.
4
S
o
O)
C
poo
'^
<C C <«
1-
»
H
8
(D
ffi
2
J
O
III
11
m
^
5-
S
E
C
5
D>
S
<i.23
l£
2
o
•awnoQ AtO eOucunoi piOrUdeo - K I M P A J itonouuofut 3KfdoiOo*o Aq pwanpcuj
X
J
III
hi
(B
BL
^
O
5
D)
c
'c
c
O
224
2
- 1^
=,tef
—
i
^P
1
1 ^
--
1
1
g
|3Une3j(|3O0uei«nDi|g0itAdo3-iiu*pAiuciinu»ju|3!Wdo'Io*O'^ pasnpojj
rir
aS
K
D)
D
~1<.,^
^
225
o K-J
I ^ ^
0R f ^
„ -IL
®
II
•3UA03 Ajo o0M>MOX MCMMOO • MMit^ ucwDWN>|U| 3|udD«e«0 Aq P M ) ^ ^
•"*^Ci:tCT»*0(g/<0/a-l
ni
I 2 ll
•a o
o