MVA and (mainly) Malaria Adrian Hill The Jenner Institute, Oxford University MVA: A Growing Safety Database • 120,000 MVA vaccines during 1970s • Poxvirus boosting for T cell response amplification discovered in malaria – Vaccinia then MVA (1996) • First clinical trial of MVA boosting in 1999 • Since then over 100 clinical trials – 46 in malaria (six inserts), 35 in TB, HIV, influenza, HCV – >1000 vaccinees in malaria, > 2000 in TB, > 1000 others – Therapy: melanoma, renal cancer, prostate cancer, HIV, HCV, HPV (over 500 cancer patients for Trovax alone) – No myocarditis issue MVA: some updates • BAC recombineering technology has accelerated vector construction (Cottingham et al PLoS One, 2008) – – – – as have flow sorting methods Attempts to enhance immunogenicity further: limited success Immunogenicity dependent on cross-presentation Vector genetic and thermo-stability generally excellent • Some differences from NYVAC reported – But appear minor • Orthopox vectors being developed for diverse species – e.g. cattle (TB) and chickens (influenza) – Multiple avipox vectors widely used as veterinary vaccines Malaria A Complex Parasite Life-Cycle The MeTRAP Vaccine Insert Targets the Liver-Stage of Plasmodium falciparum A Polyepitope-Protein Vaccine Construct ME: Multiple malaria epitopes TRAP: ThrombospondinRelated Adhesion Protein TRAP strain is T9/96 in this vaccine Why Use Viral Vectors in Prime-Boost Regimes? • Best means of safely inducing T cells in humans • 7 vaccines have induced >1500 SFU/ml – – • in malaria (x 3), HCV, HIV, tuberculosis and influenza all used MVA viral vector boosting Adenovirus – MVA is the most potent approach – – better than DNA – Adenovirus better than Adenovirus - Heterologous Ad 8 weeks Adenovirus Prime MVA Boost ME-TRAP T Cell Immunogenicity in the Clinic VACCINE T CELL RESPONSE ANTIGEN mean cells/ million PBMCs DNA x 3 48 ME-TRAP Fowlpox x 2 50 ME-TRAP MVA x 3 41 ME-TRAP ChAd63 x 1 850 ME-TRAP DNA x 2 - MVA 430 ME-TRAP Fowlpox x 2 - MVA 475 ME-TRAP ChAd63-MVA 2800 ME-TRAP Viral Vector Vaccines to Maximise Cellular Immunogenicity 8 weeks Adenovirus Prime MVA Boost Malaria, HCV, HIV, influenza, TB... MVA Can Re-Boost at One Year Gambian Data: FFM and DDM 800 DNA/MVA 700 FP9/MVA SFCs / MILLION PBMCs 600 500 400 300 200 100 0 1 2 Pre- d7 MVA 3 d28 4 d56 5 6 7 d360 d367 MVA Moorthy et al. 2004 J Inf Dis ChAd-MVA Responses are Durable and Can Be Re-Boosted at 6-30 Months Post-MVA O’Hara et al. 2012 J Inf Dis ChAd63-MVA MeTRAP Efficacy correlates with CD8+ T cells 57% (8/14) of volunteers show vaccine efficacy 21% (3/14) show sterile protection 3/3 showed efficacy at 8 months CD8+ T cells correlate with efficacy specifically g -interferon +ve cells Ewer et al. submitted 40 Anti-MS Anti-MS Anti-MS 20 10 10 MVA Boosts MSP1 & AMA1 Antibodies 1 0 80 60 20 120 40 140 60 160 80 100 1 100 120 140 160 40 0 20 1 0 80 60 20 120 40 140 60 160 80 100 120 140 160 100 Time (d) Time (d)trials ChAd63-MVA Phase Ia clinical Time (d) C AdCh63-MVA MSP1 AdCh63 100000MSP1 IFN-g SFU / Million PBMCs 0 10 100 10 10 1 1 1000 100 10 10000 1000 100 100 100 1000 1000 Anti-AMA1 (3D7) ELISA units 100 MSP119 ELISA units (QKNG) 1000 MSP119 ELISA units (QKNG) MSP119 ELISA units (QKNG) Anti-MSP119 ELISA units 1000 100000 2000 10000 AdCh63-MVA AMA1 AdCh63 AMA1 1000 1000 10000 100 100 100000 1000 0 10000 1000 100 10 100000 80MSP1100 120 140 MSP119 ELISA units (ETSR) unitsMSP1 (ETSR) SP11940 ELISA60 units (ETSR) 19 ELISA 19 ELISA units (ETSR) 0 1 Time (d) rs = 0.87 60 60 40 40 20 20 00 3D7 80 60 40 20 1B 1B FVO Group 1 120 120 (g/ml) IgG (g/ml) Anti-AMA1 IgG Anti-AMA1 100 100 100 0 2B 2B 3D7 20 40 r = 0.90 120 Ps140 < 0.0001 60 1 1B 1B FVO Group Group Group Group 2 1 80 100 120 140 Time 0 (d)20 40 60 80 100 120 140 Time (d) Time (d) MSP1 D 80 80 r = 0.90 s 20 P < 40 100 0.000160 P <80 0.0001 120 120 Anti-MSP142 IgG (g/mL) Anti-AMA1 (g/ml) IgG (g/ml) Anti-AMA1 IgG rs = 0.87 P < 0.0001 0 Time (d) 3000 d28 vs QKNG / dC-1 d28 / dC-1 d84 MSP1d84 ETSR vs QKNG MSP1d84 ETSR vs QKNG 10000 d28 MSP1 ETSRd84 8 MSP1 ETSR vs QKNG 10000 10 Group 2B+C Group 2B+C AMA1 ChAd63 prime = 5 x 1010 vp (i.m.) 100 100 MVA boost = 1.25 - 5 x 108 pfu (i.m.) 80 80 60 60 40 40 20 20 00 2B 2B 3D7 1B 1B FVO2B 2B Group 2 1B 1B Group Group Sheehy SH et al. (2011) Mol Ther 19:2269-76 Sheehy SH et al. (2012) PLoS ONE 7:e31208 2B 2B Sukuta Vaccine Clinic The Gambia MVA: Immunogenicity Summary • MVA is a poor priming vector – but it remains the best boosting vector • Generally MVA boosts what is primed – responses appear to broaden • Mixtures of different vectors (Ad mixed with MVA) – are more potent than the individual vectors – both pre-clinically and clinically (Reyes-Sandoval et al. Mol Therapy 2012) • Many adjuvants reduce MVA immunogenicity – IMX313 increases it as a carrier protein (Spencer et al. PLoS One 2012) • Late re-boosting should be explored further Why Might You Not Use MVA? Three potential concerns 1. Cost of scale-up Use cell lines (EB66, AGE1.CR) 2. Instability Use the right promoter 3. IP No longer an issue 3 Take Home Messages • In nearly all cases MVA boosts pre-existing T cell responses by about 5 to 10 fold – to 1,000 - 10,000 SFU / million – significant efficacy in 6 phase II malaria trials required MVA boosting – also good antibody boosting, by about a 10 fold • Safety has been very good in thousands of vaccinees – Malaria, TB, HIV, cancer, flu, HCV:- > 4000 subjects – Europe, Africa, US • Re-boosting with MVA vector after 6 months works – in mice and in humans Malaria Acknowledgements Malaria Pre-Clinical Simon Draper Arturo Reyes-Sandoval Alex Spencer Migena Bregu Matt Cottingham Sarah Gilbert The Gambia Kalifa Bojang Katie Flanagan Muhammed Afolabi Jenny Mueller Britta Urban European Vaccine Initiative Egeruan Imoukhuede BioManufacturing Sarah Moyle Eleanor Berrie Alfredo Nicosia Stefano Colloca Riccardo Cortese Kilifi, Kenya Roma Chilengi Caroline Ogwang Clinical Trials Geraldine O’Hara Susanne Sheehy Chris Duncan Nick Anagnostou Katharine Collins Katherine Gantlett Ian Poulton Sean Elias Nick Edwards Alison Lawrie Katie Ewer Bob Sinden WRAIR Jitta Murphy
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz