Safe patient
handling solutions
Simple Interventions. Extraordinary Outcomes.
How do we stop nurses
from becoming patients?
Nursing professionals incur more musculoskeletal (MSK) injuries/
nonfatal injuries on the job than any other occupation.1
Nurses and nursing assistants are more likely to get injured on
the job than any other occupation…more than construction,
manufacturing, transportation and warehouse employees.1
The most common
tasks that lead to
injury are patient:2
lifting
transferring
repositioning
It’s a costly problem…
n
$15,800
Average compensation claim due to patient handling3
n
$37,000
Average direct costs associated with an occupational back injury of healthcare provider4
n
$27,000 to $103,000
…that may get worse
Patient obesity levels
are increasing
n
Average age of nurses continues to rise6
n
n
Estimates project 260,000 unfilled nursing jobs by 20256
Cost of nurse turnover5
Who takes care of patients when
healthcare workers are injured on the job?
Many healthcare workers leave the profession early due to debilitating arm,
back and shoulder injuries. More nurses are worried about getting a back
injury than contracting an infectious disease.7 And for good reason:
n 56% of nurses reported shoulder, back, neck, or arm
pain at work7
n 80% continued to work despite having MSK pain7
n 13.3 days of work are missed (on average) by healthcare
workers due to overexertion in lifting/lowering patient1
REFERENCES: 1. U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, www.bls.gov/news.release/osh3.nro.htm accessed March, 12, 2015. 2. Safe Patient Handling and Mobility: Interprofessional National Standards Across the Care Continuum. American Nursing Association, 2013. 3. AON Risk Solutions. Health
Care Workers Compensation Barometer. December 2014. 4. AORN Position Statement on Workplace Safety. Dec 2009, reviewed March 2014. Available at: https://www.aorn.org/uploadedFiles/Main_Navigation/Clinical_Practice/ToolKits/PosStat%20Workplace%20Safety.pdf Accessed October
15, 2015. 5. Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) Safe Patient Handling Programs: Effectiveness and Cost Savings. Available at: https://www.osha.gov/Publications/OSHA3279.pdf Accessed October 15, 2015. 6. Buerhaus, PI, Auerbach, DI, Staiger, The Recent Surge In Nurse
Employment: Causes and Implications, Health Affairs July/August 2009 vol. 28 no. 4 w657-w668. 7. ANA Health and Safety Survey. American Nurses Association, 2011. 8. Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) Safe Patient Handling: Busting the Myths, Caring for our Caregivers
Brochure. Available at https://www.osha.gov/dsg/hospitals/documents/3.1_Mythbusters_508.pdf. Accessed October 15, 2015. 9. DuBose J, Donahue T, Taking the pain out of patient handling, American Nurse Today, December 2006;37-43. 10. Occupational Safety and Health Administration
(OSHA) Safe Patient Handling: Safety and Health Topics. Available at https://www.osha.gov/SLTC/healthcarefacilities/safepatienthandling.html. Accessed October 15, 2015. 11. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Occupational Traumatic Injuries Among Workers in Health Care Facilities
– United States, 2012-2014. MMWR 2015:64(15);405-410. 12. Association of periOperative Registered Nurses (AORN) Pocket Reference Guide: Safe Patient Handling and Movement in the Perioperative Setting. AORN Toolkit. 2014. 13. Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA),
Guidelines for nursing homes: ergonomics for the prevention of musculoskeletal disorders, 2009:13. 14. Pedersen J, Bill B, Call E, In vitro Measurement of the Impact of Transfer and Positioning Devices on Microclimate when Left in Place Following Use. Poster presented at SAWC 2013.
1
www.sageproducts.com
How is your hospital addressing
safe patient handling?
years of research and experience
show this is not an effective way to reduce
back and other MSK injuries.8
n During
an 8 hour shift, nurses can lift a
cumulative weight of up to 1.8 tons!9
American Nurses Association (ANA)2
Safe Patient Handling and Mobility (SPHM) Interprofessional National
Standards Across the Care Continuum
There is no such thing as safe manual lifting of
patients, regardless of body mechanics.8
n 30+
GUIDELINES &
RECOMMENDATIONS
Nurses can lift a
cumulative weight
of up to
1.8 TONS
during an 8hr shift
n MSK
injuries are often the result of repeated manual
patient handling activities, such as transferring and
repositioning patients.10
Hospitals are investing in equipment…
but healthcare workers are still getting injured
82% of healthcare workers who sustained an MSK did not use
facility lifting equipment.11
Why aren’t nursing staff using lifting equipment?
In most cases, the equipment is not easily accessible… it may
be located away from patient care areas, moved to another
floor, unavailable while being reprocessed, or worse yet, locked
away in a closet.
11 states have already enacted
Safe Patient Handling Laws
2.1.7 Reduce the physical requirements of high-risk tasks.
The organization will focus on reducing the physical
requirements of high-risk healthcare recipient transfer,
repositioning, and mobilization, and other applicable tasks
through engineering, safe work practice, and/or
administrative controls.
4.1.5 Provide and strategically place SPHM technology for
accessibility. The organization will develop a process for
providing SPHM technology that ensures ease in accessibility.
The quantity and type of SPHM technology will be sufficient to
minimize risk for the healthcare recipient population served and the environment of care.
Principles of the ANA Standards
for SPHM, include:
Establish a culture of safety.
Implement and sustain a SPHM program.
Select, install and maintain SPHM technology.
Integrate patient-­centered SPHM assessment, plan of care,
and use of SPHM technology.
n Create a systemized proactive approach that includes
prevention considerations in all designs that affect individuals
in the occupational environment.
n Provide assistive tools at the point of care to facilitate SPHM.
n
n
n
n
..........................................................
AORN12
Task Recommendations:
n General lateral transfer
• Use lateral transfer device and 4 caregivers
• Destination surface should be slightly lower
n Supine
• Anesthesiologist supports head and neck
• Weight < 157 lb
• Use lateral transfer device and 4 caregivers
• Weight > 157 lb
• Use mechanical lift with supine sling, mechanical lateral
transfer device, or air-assisted lateral transfer device and
3 to 4 caregivers
..........................................................
OHSA13
Lateral Transfer to and from: Bed to Stretcher, Trolley
For patients who are partially able or unable to assist:
• If patient is <100 pounds: Use a lateral sliding aid and 2 caregivers.
• If patient is 100-200 pounds: Use a lateral sliding aid -­or-­a friction
reducing device and 2 caregivers.
• If patient is >200 pounds: Use a lateral sliding aid and 3 caregivers
-­or-­a friction-­reducing device or lateral transfer device and 2
caregivers -or-­a mechanical lateral transfer device.
Now is the time to implement a safe
patient handling program utilizing
equipment with proven results
Sage Products provides a complete line of safe patient handling solutions for the entire
continuum of care, from admittance through recovery, with clinically proven results.
Sage’s Prevalon solutions—Liftaem, TAP, and SPS—are designed to stay with the patient
at the bedside for convenience and accessibility when needed, further promoting the use
of SPHM equipment. Our solutions promote safety for staff and patients, and help reduce
associated costs from healthcare workplace injuries.
Prevalon™ Liftaem® Mobile Patient Transfer System
Safely and easily transfer patients
n Helps reduce the risk of staff injury during patient transfers
n Provides a safe and comfortable transfer experience for patients
n Easy to use in a variety of care settings
Prevalon™ Turn and Position System (TAP)
Promotes safe patient handling
n The only device proven compatible with all low air loss mattresses14
n Helps staff more easily follow best practice prevention guidelines
n Reduces exertion needed to turn and boost patients
n Decreases strain on staff’s hands, wrists, shoulders, and backs
Prevalon™ Seated Positioning System (SPS)
Glide patients without lifting
n Secures patient to minimize the need for repetitive boosting and repositioning
n Promotes proper ergonomics to improve posture and body mechanics
n Designed to improve compliance to the seated position
800-323-2220
3
PROVEN RESULTS:
Prevalon™ Liftaem®
Mobile Patient Transfer System
Presented at the 2015 Safe Patient Handling and Mobility Conference, April 20-24, Glendale, AZ
Reducing Healthcare Worker Injury: The Establishment, Implementation,
and Results of an Evidenced-Based Protocol for Lateral Patient Transfer
Ruth E. Chance, BSN, RN a, Karen K. Giuliano, PhD, RNb
BACKGROUND
METHODS
According to the 2013 Bureau of Labor statistics, US hospitals
recorded 58,860 work-related injuries and illnesses that caused
employees to miss work in 2011, with nearly half of these injuries
were caused by over-exertion.
• The study was conducted at SwedishAmerican Hospital, a 333-bed, full-service,
hospital located in Rockford, IL.
• Evidence-based procedures were written to address safe patient handling, with these
procedures implemented in all clinical units.
77%
• Approximately 1,500 staff received training on the proper use of a lateral transfer device.
• The number of work-related injuries among HCWs surpasses injury
rates in construction and manufacturing.2
• Each employee was required to successfully complete a competency assessment to
evaluate their knowledge and skills for appropriate use of the patient transfer device.
• The average worker’s compensation claim ranged from $15,860 to
$22,300 per injury.2
• HCWI rates were monitored following implementation of the evidence-based procedures
and the lateral transfer device.
• The average hospital incurs $0.78 in losses due to workers’
compensation claims for every $100 of payroll, equivalent to a total
national annual cost of $2 billion.1
9%
48%
Table 1. Comparison of monthly HCWI
rate by frequency of use for the lateral
patient transfer device
1
Usage based on ordering history provided by manufacturer. No-
vember and December 2012 are based on usage rates for January
Figure 1. Monthly
HCWI rate prior to
implementation of
intervention to
reduce injuries
associated with
patient lateral
transfers
4% 1%
13%
Figure 2. Comparison of
monthly HCWI rates pre- and
post-implementation of
evidence-based protocol and
lateral patient transfer device
• The new lateral transfer procedures were incorporated into the policy and equipment
guidelines of the hospital and disseminated to staff though education programs
supplemented by written and verbal communications.
• The incidence of non-fatal occupational injuries in HCWs was 6.8
per 100 full-time employees compared with 3.5 per 200 in all US
industries combined.2
■ Overexertion and bodily
reaction
■ Slips, trips, and falls
■ Contact with objects
■ Violence
■ Exposure to substances
■ All other causes
Swedish American Hospital, Rockford, IL; bSage Products LLC, Cary IL
• The procedures addressed appropriate methods and equipment to meet
needs to improve the safety of patients and HCWs during lateral patient transfers.
• Hospitals are among the most hazardous places to work with
253,700 reported healthcare worker injuries (HCWIs) in 2011.1
• Recommendations to reduce HCWIs
include appropriate use of equipment,
minimal-lift policies and patient
assessment tools, and training
on proper use of equipment.3
a
and February 2013. November and December 2014 are based on
usage from January 2014 through October 2014. 2Collected and
provided by hospital.
Device Usage1
Quantity Used 2011
Quantity Used 2012
Quantity Used 2013
Quantity Used 2014
Number HCWIs
2011
2012
2013
2014
Jan
NA
NA
190
200
Feb
NA
NA
110
120
Mar
NA
NA
200
130
Apr
NA
NA
120
170
May
NA
NA
170
130
June
NA
NA
140
150
July
NA
NA
170
300
Aug
NA
NA
140
80
Sept
NA
NA
150
160
Oct
NA
NA
150
180
Nov
NA
153
140
164
Dec
NA
153
160
164
4
3
1
0
2
1
1
0
10
7
1
1
3
3
0
0
5
3
0
0
2
2
1
3
1
5
1
0
3
4
0
2
1
3
4
0
4
4
0
0
1
1
1
0
5
1
0
2
DISCUSSION
• This study demonstrates the effect of an evidence-based educational
intervention and use of a device to assist with lateral patient transfers
on rates of HCWIs at a single institution.
25%
• Utilization of the device was maintained at a fairly consistent rate in 2013
and 2014, following implementation of the device in January 2013.
RESULTS
• There were two notable spikes in HCWI rates in September 2013 (n=4)
and June 2014 (n=3).
• Healthcare worker injuries were summarized for 2011 and 2012 to establish a
pre-intervention injury rate.
OBJECTIVE
• Hospital analysis of these injuries revealed that the September 2013
injuries were due to:
• One employee did not request assistance or use the lateral transfer
device when moving a patient.
• One employee did not take time to use the lateral transfer device,
although it was readily available in the patient’s room.
• One employee was injured when a patient lost their balance while
being weighed.
• One employee was providing care in a home setting and did not have
access to the device or assistance from colleagues to move the patient.
• The total number of HCWIs in 2011 was 41, with 37 HCWIs occurring in 2012 prior to
implementation of the intervention of .the lateral transfer device in January 2013.
To evaluate the impact of implementation of patient safe-handling
protocols and a lateral patient transfer device on HCWI rates
• The rate of HCWIs declined to 10 in 2013 and 8 in 2014, for an overall reduction in
injuries of 76.9% (Figure 2).
Disclosures: Program upon which results are based was created and implemented independently by SwedishAmerican
Hospital. Poster to summarize program and results was written in collaboration with Sage Products, LLC and funded
by Sage Products, LLC.
• The average number of HCWIs declined to 0.83 in 2013 and 0.67 in 2014 (Table 1).
References: 1. Occupational Safety and Health Administration. Caring for our Caregivers. Facts About Hospital Worker
Safety. Available at: https://www.osha.gov/dsg/hospitals/documents/1.2_Factbook_508.pdf. 2. Bureau of Labor Statistics.
Case and Demographic Incidence Rates. Accessed March 30, 2015. 3. Aon Risk Solutions. 2012. 2012 Health Care Workers
Compensation Barometer.
• The three injuries in June 2014 were due to:
reduction in healthcare
worker injuries1
• Two employees were injured when a patient lost their balance while
being weighed.
• One employee was shifting the patient’s position on the table.
• Comments from hospital staff provide anecdotal support for the
intervention, with employees
commenting that it was “easier
to move patients laterally from one surface to another.”
• These results support that an institutional intervention based on staff
education, adherence to evidence-based protocols, and use of a
lateral
patient transfer device resulted in a clinically
reduction in HCWIs.
• Additional research is suggested to determine the unique contributions
of each component of the intervention to the overall reduction in HCWIs.
23100
Prevalon™ Turn and
Position System (TAP)
58% reduction in
employee injury2
=
$247,500
savings
Prevalon™ Seated
Positioning System (SPS)
professional practice
Repositioning Patients in Chairs—An Improved Method
by Guy Fragala, PhD, PE, CSP, CSPHP, and Maren Fragala, PhD, CSCSD
Proper seated posture is important in health care settings because immobilized
patients may be sitting for extended periods. In many situations, a caregiver
is required to assist a slouching patient to a proper, more comfortable upright
posture. The caregiver is at risk from exposure to the physical demands of
this task. This study evaluated exertion and risk to the caregiver using three
methods of repositioning patients in chairs in the health care setting. Through
application of a new method employing an ergonomically designed device,
exertion and risk were reduced. Results from this study indicate that the highrisk occupational activity of repositioning a slouching patient in a chair can be
made safer for caregivers. [Workplace Health Saf 2013;61(4):141-144.]
M
aintaining proper sitting
posture is important in
health care settings because
immobilized patients may be sitting
for extended periods. The seated position is often more desirable than
lying in bed because it can enhance
healing and rehabilitation processes
(Kleinpell, Fletcher, & Jennings,
2008; Powers, 2011). However, poor
seated posture can not only lead to
discomfort and pain but also result
in digestive and respiratory problems
ABOUT THE AUTHORS
Dr. G. Fragala is Senior Advisor for Ergonomics,
Patient Safety Center of Inquiry, The Villages,
FL. Dr. M. Fragala is Assistant Professor, University of Central Florida, Sport and Exercise
Science, Orlando, FL.
The authors have disclosed no potential conflicts of interest, financial or otherwise.
The authors thank Julie Chirchirillo, RN, Clinical
Educator, Intermediate Care Units, and Andrea
Klosinski, RN, BSN, Cardiac Telemetry Unit,
Rockford Memorial Hospital, Rockford, Illinois,
for their help and support related to conducting
this study in a clinical setting.
E-mail: [email protected].
doi:10.3928/21650799-20130327-16
(Bauman et al., 2011; Markus, 2009;
Sherwood, 2011; Watanabe, Eguchi,
Kobara, & Ishida, 2008). Often, when
seated, a patient may slide down in
the seat of a chair to a slouching position because of chair design and the
patient’s compromised physical condition.
The seated position places pressure on the ischial tuberosities from
the patient’s body weight. Because
this area of the body is relatively
small and the amount of pressure can
increase with poor posture, a pressure ulcer can develop. Poor seated
posture also makes the sacral region more prone to pressure ulcers
(Katz & Kirr, 2012; Melter, 2011).
For patients with existing pressure
ulcers on the ischial or sacral areas,
proper posture while sitting in a chair
is essential to prevent further skin
breakdown. Patients must be closely
monitored so they maintain appropriate posture that will not aggravate
existing pressure wounds (Wound,
WORKPLACE HEALTH & SAFETY • VOL. 61, NO. 4, 2013
Ostomy, and Continence Nurses Society, 2010).
Self-repositioning from a slouching posture to a proper upright seated
position may not be possible for a
physically limited patient. Hence,
chair-bound patients must be repositioned with the assistance of a
caregiver if they fall into a slouching posture to maintain comfort and
avoid health risks such as pressure
ulcers. However, when a caregiver is
required to assist a slouching patient
to a proper, more comfortable upright
posture, the caregiver is at risk due
to the physical demands of this task.
Because of the weight of the patient
and the posture the caregiver must
assume to pull the patient up in the
chair, forces on the musculoskeletal
structure of the caregiver are beyond
body tolerance; strain and sprain
type injuries can result. Direct care
providers continue to be one of the
occupational groups most at risk for
musculoskeletal injuries (Engkvist,
Hagberg, Lindén, & Malker, 1992;
Harber et al., 1985; Hedge, 2009;
Hignett, 1996; Jensen, Nestor, Myers,
& Rattiner, 1988; Khuder, Schaub,
Bisesi, & Krabill, 1999; Ljungberg,
Kilbom, & Hägg, 1989; Nelson, Fragala, & Menzel, 2003; Pheasant &
Stubbs, 1992). The task of pulling a
patient from a slouching position to
a more desirable posture is one of the
activities contributing to this high risk
for occupational injuries.
To date, repositioning solutions
have been sparse. However, the field
141
Overall exertion
was reduced
127%
166%
less exertion in the
lower back while
repositioning a
slouching patient3
REFERENCES: 1.Chance RE, Giuliano KK, Reducing Healthcare Worker Injury: The Establishment, Implementation,
and Results of an Evidenced-Based Protocol for Lateral Patient Transfer. Poster presented at the 2015 Safe Patient Handling and Mobility
Conference, April 20-24, Glendale, AZ. 2.Way, H, Safe Patient Handling Initiative Results in Reduction in Injuries and Improved Patient
Outcomes for Pressure Ulcer Prevention. Poster presented at 2014 Safe Patient Handling East Conference, March 27, 2014. 3. Fragala G,
Fragala M, Repositioning Patients in Chairs—An Improved Method, Workplace Health & Safety, 2013;61(4):141-4.
Simple Interventions. Extraordinary Outcomes.
At Sage Products, we believe that evidence-based interventions lead to improved outcomes. Our
market-leading products solve real problems in the healthcare industry and are backed by proven
clinical evidence. We develop and manufacture these products to make it easier for you to deliver
essential patient care, while helping to prevent infections, skin breakdown and staff injury.
Help reduce the risk of heel pressure
ulcers by continuously offloading the
heel with Prevalon® Heel Protector
Provide comprehensive oral care
with Q•Care® Oral Cleansing
and Suctioning Systems
Help reduce SSIs by addressing multidrug resistant organisms on your
patient’s skin prior to surgery with
2% Chlorhexidine Gluconate Cloth
Comfort Bath® Cleansing
Washcloths eliminate the
contamination risk from bath basins
Comfort Shield® Barrier Cream
Cloths help clean, treat and
protect your patient’s skin after
an incontinent episode
Standardize patient hygiene protocol
with a clean technique using
M-Care™ Meatal Cleansing Cloths
for the Foley Catheterized Patient
Help your patients comfortably
transition from hospital to home.
The same quality Sage products you trust in your
facility are available for family caregivers and
patients after they leave your care.
Receive more information at:
www.shopsageproducts.com/htoh
or call 800.323.2220
Sage Products LLC | 3909 Three Oaks Road | Cary, Illinois 60013 | www.sageproducts.com | 800.323.2220
23415 © Sage Products LLC 2015