Interview - Association of Certified Fraud Examiners

Interviewing Techniques for
Auditors:
Eliciting Information
Ryan Hubbs, CFE, CIA, CCSA, PHR
Senior Manager, Fraud Investigation & Dispute Services, EY
Introduction
®2013 Association of Certified Fraud Examiners, Inc.
®2015 Association of Certified Fraud Examiners, Inc.
1 of
Definitions
 Interview: A structured question-and-answer
session designed to elicit specific information.
 Fraud examination: A methodology of
resolving fraud allegations from inception to
disposition.
®2015 Association of Certified Fraud Examiners, Inc.
2 of 8
Methodology
 Fraud examination
methodology
 Interviewing
methodology
Document
examination
Neutral third-party
witnesses
Observation
Corroborative
witnesses
Co-conspirators
Interview
®2015 Association of Certified Fraud Examiners, Inc.
Accused
3 of 8
Characteristics of a Good
Interview/Interviewer
 Interview
Thoroughness
 Interviewer
Good listener
Demonstrates fairness
Pertinence
Objectivity
Works informally
Lacks bias
Projects professionalism
Timeliness
®2015 Association of Certified Fraud Examiners, Inc.
Presents no threat
4 of 8
Preparation
 Review the case file
thoroughly.
 Review the
hypothesis.
 Learn what
information the
witness has.
 Consider the timing of
the interviews.
®2015 Association of Certified Fraud Examiners, Inc.
5 of 8
Overview of Question Typology
 Introductory: questions used
to provide an introduction and
get the interviewee to verbally
agree to cooperate in the
interview
 Informational: fact-gathering
that uses open, closed, and
leading questions
®2015 Association of Certified Fraud Examiners, Inc.
6 of 8
Overview of Question Typology
 Closing: Certain questions are asked at closing
for the purposes of reconfirming the facts,
obtaining previously undiscovered information,
seeking new evidence, and maintaining
goodwill.
®2015 Association of Certified Fraud Examiners, Inc.
7 of 8
Overview of Question Typology
 Assessment: If the interviewer has reason to
believe the respondent is being deceptive,
certain types of hypothetical, non-accusatory
questions can be posed.
 Admission-seeking: These questions are
reserved specifically for those individuals whose
culpability in misdeeds is reasonably certain.
®2015 Association of Certified Fraud Examiners, Inc.
8 of 8