Elimination of viruses, viroids and phytoplasmas from grapevine germplasm Ivana Gribaudo, Danila Cuozzo, Giorgio Gambino, Franco Mannini Plant Virology Institute, CNR (IVV-CNR), Grugliasco Unit Via L. da Vinci 44, 10095 Grugliasco (TO), Italy Grapevine viral diseases Fanleaf Leafroll Rugose wood GRAPEVINE VIRUSES Someones very dangerous, others do not kill the plant but affect yield and/or quality Diffusion on long/medium distances through infected propagation materials (cuttings, graftings), on the short distances through vectors VIROIDS Small, circular, non-protein-coding RNAs Infected higher plants may develop symptoms, resulting in economic losses in several crops Grapevine is one of the most permissive, natural viroid host •Grapevine yellow speckle viroid 1 (GYSVd-1) •Grapevine yellow speckle viroid 2 (GYSVd-2) •Hop stunt viroid (HSVd or HpSVd) •Citrus exochortis viroid (CEVd •Australian grapevine viroid (AGVd) Strong symptoms with speckles tending to gather along the main veins Grapevine viroids Scattered yellow spots in a European grape leaf, typical of yellow speckle infection Vein banding symptoms in a vine doubly infected with yellow speckle viroid and GRAPEVINE FANLEAF VIRUS GRAPEVINE PHYTOPLASMAS Flavescence dorée (FD) Bois noir (BN) NO THERAPY TO APPLY IN THE FIELD PRODUCTION AND USE OF HEALTHY PROPAGATION MATERIAL (=FREE FROM THE MOST DAMAGING VIRAL DISEASES) Viruses, phytoplasma and some other bacteria represent a real risk for exploitation of grapevine germplasm collections and - to a certain extent - to their survival Grapevine germplasm collection, Grinzane Cavour, Italy How can this affect grapevine germplasm collections? We need clean materials to plant collection vineyards in order to: GLRaV-3 +GVA 1)do not lose accessions because of diseases 2)get correct data when a) describing ampelographic and ampelometric features b) evaluating germplasm potentialities HEALTHY (Mannini e Argamante, 1996; Mannini et al., 2000) In areas of old, specialized grapevine culture, finding “healthy plants” can be difficult – expecially for minor cultivars "Virus esenti" Infetti 21,5 78,5 Marche 85,2 14,8 Abruzzo 96,8 3,2 Puglia 92,6 7,4 Basilicata 97,8 2,2 Ischia 100 0 Campania 98,6 1,4 Calabria 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 SOUTH ITALY (Savino et al., 2002) 70 80 90 100 From: Avgelis e Grammatikaki, 2006 Sanitary status of grapevine mother plants of local varieties in Crete, Greece Virus % infection GFLV 95.8 GLRaV-1 66.3 GLRaV-3 94.7 GFkV 65.3 ArMV 0 From: Bertolini et al., 2010 High prevalence of viruses in table grape from Spain detected by real-time RT-PCR Common methods for virus eradication • meristem culture • thermotherapy (in vitro or in vivo) NB: Efficacy is related to number and type of viral diseases Serological/molecular assays (more than one!) Possibility of reinfection VIRUS ERADICATION THROUGH MERISTEM CULTURE ‘30-’40: it was observed that there is no virus in meristems (true???) ‘50: in France the 1st plant (dahlia) sanitated through meristem culture Dimensions: 0.2-0.3 to 0.5-0.7 mm Apical buds usually better than axillary buds Not for isodiametric viruses MERISTEMS MERISTEMS: Virus eradication efficacy is inversely proportional to the explant size The ability to resume growth is related to the initial explant size and to the genotype (problems in meristem isolation, growth and rooting) GRAPEVINE MERISTEM ISOLATION MERISTEM GROWTH FURTHER MERISTEM GROWTH … ROOTING AND ACCLIMATIZATION TRANSFER TO GREENHOUSE AND VINEYARD Results of virus eradication through meristem culture (IVV-Bari): 40.8 % from GFLV 98-100 % from GLRaVs 8-9 to 12-15 months to obtain greenhouse plantlets Results of eradication of phloem-limited virus through meristem culture (IVV-Grugliasco): Meristem development: from 5 to 76% (genotype effect, and others) Average success in eradicating viruses: 83.6% (189 lines from 19 cultivars, 34 clones) GVA is the most difficult virus to eradicate THERMOTHERAPY on potted plants (=in vivo) 37-39°C for 60-200 days Then: Tip excision (herbaceous cuttings) to root under mist Tip excision (1-20 mm) for in vitro culture Meristem culture (0.3-0.7 mm) THERMOTHERAPY on in vitro plants Lower temperatures (34°C) Then: tip excision (1-3 mm) from apical buds (plus eventually the youngest axillary buds) for in vitro culture meristem culture (0.3-0.7 mm) IN VITRO THERMOTHERAPY (2-3 months) CULTURE OF EXCISED APICAL BUDS Thermotherapy is more effective on some viruses GFLV GVA GLRaV-1 GLRaV-3 GFkV 100 % 70.2 % 25.1 % 24.7 % 0% From: Panattoni et al., 2010 For some grapevine viruses the traditional techniques do not get good results (e.g. GRSPaV) No. of lines obtained RSPaV elimination (%) Meristem culture 38 28.9 In vivo thermotherapy 72 23.6 In vitro thermotherapy 44 9.1 (Gribaudo et al., 2006) OTHER TECHNIQUES FOR VIRUS ELIMINATION: Micrografting Chemiotherapy Electrotherapy Cryotherapy Fragmented apexes Somatic embryogenesis MICROGRAFTING Scion is a meristem, rootstock is a virusfree seedling or cutting The rootstock acts as an intermediary between the meristem and the medium This allows to overcome problems of slow growth or rooting Used for citrus, apple, stone fruits CHEMIOTHERAPY • Ribavirine • DHT (2,4-dioxoesaidro-1,3,5-triazina) • DHPA [(S)9 (2,3—diidrossipropil-adenina)] • Vidarabine • 2-tiouracile • Oseltamir (neuramidase inhibitor) Somatic embryogenesis Usually or potentially adopted: to regenerate plantlets in biotechnological breeding programs regeneration of transformants after gene transfer induction of somaclonal variation to increase genetic variability for separation of periclinal chimeras in cryopreservation protocols for virus eradication Virus eradication through somatic embryogenesis: grapevine, citrus, sugarcane Somatic embryos of Vitis vinifera 10 cultivars (Vitis vinifera L.) viruses: GLRaV-1, GLRaV-3, GVA, GRSPaV, GFkV single or mixed viral infections 266 lines regenerated from single somatic embryos and micropropagated serological (DAS-ELISA) and molecular (RTPCR) assays: at least 3 assays in vitro and additional assays after transfer to greenhouse Virus eradication through somatic embryogenesis Cultivar Viruses in mother plants N° of regenerated lines Virus eradication (%) Grignolino GVA + GLRaV1 46 100 Müller Thurgau, Brachetto d’Acqui GLRaV-3 60 100 Brachetto GFkV 68 100 Dolcetto GVA 6 100 Proviné, Cari, Roussan GFLV 72 94 Albarola, Bosco, Brachetto, Grignolino, Müller-Thurgau, Rossese, Vermentino GRSPaV 97 100 Incidence of VIROID infections in plants generated by somatic embryogenesis (SE) or thermotherapy (T) (n° of infected plants/n° of tested plants) Cultivar Provinè Cari Nebbiolo Roussan Sanitation method SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE SE T T In vitro plantlets 1 year-old plants 3 year-old plants In vitro plantlets 1 year-old plants 3 year-old plants In vitro plantlets In vitro plantlets 1 year-old plants 3year-old plants In vitro plantlets 3 year-old plants GYSVd-1 HSVd 0/33 0/1 0/8 0/16 0/7 0/10 0/21 0/13 0/2 0/2 34/34 4/4 0/33 0/1 0/8 0/16 0/7 0/10 0/21 0/13 0/2 0/2 34/34 4/4 greenhouse plants from somatic embryos greenhouse plants from thermotherapy GYSVd-1 (cv Proviné) In vitro plants from somatic embryos In vitro plants from thermotherapy greenhouse plants from somatic embryos in vitro plants from somatic embryos somatic embryos non-embryogenic calli from anthers embryogenic calli from anthers Presence of viroids in different culture phases HSVd (cv Roussan) At the moment, somatic embryogenesis seems to be the most effective sanitation method to obtain healthy grapevines, i.e. free from viruses viroids (phytoplasmas?) An experimental vineyard was planted to check the performance of embryo-derived grapevine plants and to ascertain if any variation occurred • • • • • • Grignolino Dolcetto Grüner Vertliner Malvasia Bosco Albarola 1. Phenotypical analysis 2. SSR Grignolino Dolcetto VVS2 VVS5 VVMD5 VVMD6 VVMD7 VVMD21 VVMD24 VVMD25 VVMD27 VVMD28 VVMD31 VVMD32 VVMD36 VrZAG21 VrZAG25 VrZAG62 VrZAG64 VrZAG67 VrZAG79 VMC7h3 VVS2 VVS5 VVMD5 VVMD7 VVMD27 VVMD36 VrZAG62 VrZAG67 VrZAG79 3. AFLP/other analyses EcoRI(AC)/MseI(ACC) 303 Use of micropropagation to eradicate phytoplasmas Shoots from mother plants infected by da FD +/- LN Micropropagation of axillary buds Nested PCR assays + RFLP after 6/9 months-culture No effect due to: - time of culture beginning along the season - position of the bud explant on the shoot, and of the shoot on the mother plant - presence or absence of plant growth regulators in the culture media Effect of oxitetracyclin in the culture media Preliminary assays on sensibility of grapevine explants Proliferation medium Rooting medium Plantlets (with very short roots) showed no significant damage when transferred to a medium + 50 mg.l-1 oxitetracyclin Virus eradication from grapevine germplasm through in vitro techniques at IVV-CNR Grugliasco 1 cv 1 clone 4 cvs 4 clones 10 cvs 10 clones 13 cvs 26 clones 1 cv 1 clone 6 cvs 19 clones CULTIVAR Albarola Albarola (biotipo Bianchetta genovese) Albarossa Arvino Asprinio Barbera bianca Bian ver Bizzarria Bosco Bruciapagliaio Cari Carica l’asino Castiglione Frate Pelato Gamba di pernice Gaglioppo Granaccia secolare Guarnaccia bianca Iuvarello Lumassina Malvasia di Schierano Massaretta Mantonico Moscatello di Taggia Picabon Prié blanc Proviné Rossese Rossese di Arcola Rossese Campochiesa Roussan L6 T1 P14 N1 N° TREATED CLONES 3 1 1 3 1 1 1 1 5 1 1 1 3 1 1 9 1 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 5 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 VIRUSES IN THE MOTHER PLANTS GVA, GLRaV-1, GLRaV-3 GVA, GLRaV-1, GLRaV-3 GVB GVA, GLRaV-3 GVA, GLRaV-3 GVA, GLRaV-1, GLRaV-3, GFkV GVA, GLRaV-3 GLRaV-1, GLRaV-3 GVA, GLRaV-1, GLRaV-3 GVA, GLRaV-1 GFLV GFkV GVA, GLRaV-3 GVA, GLRaV-1 GVA, GLRaV-1 GVA, GFkV GVA, GLRaV-3 GVA, GLRaV-1, GLRaV-3 GVA, GLRaV-1, GLRaV-3 GFLV, GVA, GFkV GVA, GLRaV-1, GFkV GLRaV-1, GLRaV-3 GVA, GLRaV-1, GLRaV-3 GVA, GLRaV-1 GVA, GLRaV-3 GVA, GLRaV-1 GFLV GVA, GLRaV-1, GLRaV-3GFkV GLRaV-1 GVA, GLRaV-1, GLRaV-3 GFLV GVA, GLRaV-1, GLRaV-3 GVA, GLRaV-1, GLRaV-3 GVA, GLRaV-1, GLRaV-3 GVA, GLRaV-1, GLRaV-3 TECHNIQUES USED Meristem culture Meristem culture In vitro thermotherapy, meristem culture Meristem culture Meristem culture Meristem culture Meristem culture Meristem culture Meristem culture In vitro thermotherapy, meristem culture Somatic embryogenesis In vitro thermotherapy Meristem culture In vitro thermotherapy, meristem culture Meristem culture Meristem culture Meristem culture Meristem culture Meristem culture In vitro thermotherapy + meristem culture Meristem culture, somatic embryogenesis Meristem culture Meristem culture Meristem culture Meristem culture Meristem culture Somatic embryogenesis Meristem culture Meristem culture Meristem culture Somatic embryogenesis, in vitro thermotherapy Meristem culture Meristem culture Meristem culture, in vitro thermotherapy Meristem culture N° HEALTHY LINES 24 3 2 8 4 1 1 2 23 11 6 6 3 9 1 10 1 6 3 4 21 2 6 1 2 3 33 53 2 1 49 1 2 3 3 Besides cultivation in COLLECTION VINEYARDS, most sanitated lines are also collected in SCREEHOUSE and IN VITRO Thanks for your attention!
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz