Clinical Chemistry 46:9 1318 –1325 (2000) Enzymes and Protein Markers Determination of Acid ␣-Glucosidase Protein: Evaluation as a Screening Marker for Pompe Disease and Other Lysosomal Storage Disorders Kandiah Umapathysivam,1 Alison M. Whittle,1 Enzo Ranieri,2 Colleen Bindloss,1 Elaine M. Ravenscroft,1 Otto P. van Diggelen,3 John J. Hopwood,1 and Peter J. Meikle1* Background: In recent years, there have been significant advances in the development of enzyme replacement and other therapies for lysosomal storage disorders (LSDs). Early diagnosis, before the onset of irreversible pathology, has been demonstrated to be critical for maximum efficacy of current and proposed therapies. In the absence of a family history, the presymptomatic detection of these disorders ideally can be achieved through a newborn screening program. One approach to the development of such a program is the identification of suitable screening markers. In this study, the acid ␣-glucosidase protein was evaluated as a marker protein for Pompe disease and potentially for other LSDs. Methods: Two sensitive immunoquantification assays for the measurement of total (precursor and mature) and mature forms of acid ␣-glucosidase protein were used to determine the concentrations in plasma and dried blood spots from control and LSD-affected individuals. Results: In the majority of LSDs, no significant increases above control values were observed. However, individuals with Pompe disease showed a marked decrease in acid ␣-glucosidase protein in both plasma and whole blood compared with unaffected controls. For plasma samples, this assay gave a sensitivity of 95% with a specificity of 100%. For blood spot samples, the sensitivity was 82% with a specificity of 100%. 1 Lysosomal Diseases Research Unit and 2 State Screening Services, Department of Chemical Pathology, Women’s and Children’s Hospital, 72 King William Rd., North Adelaide, South Australia 5006, Australia. 3 Department of Clinical Genetics, Erasmus University, PO Box 1738, 3000 DR Rotterdam, The Netherlands. *Author for correspondence. Fax 61-8-8204-7100; e-mail pmeikle@ medicine.adelaide.edu.au. Received March 20, 2000; accepted May 31, 2000. Conclusions: This study demonstrates that it is possible to screen for Pompe disease by screening the concentration of total acid ␣-glucosidase in plasma or dried blood spots. © 2000 American Association for Clinical Chemistry Pompe disease, or glycogen storage disease type II, is an autosomal recessive disorder of glycogen metabolism caused by a deficiency of lysosomal acid ␣-glucosidase. Patients with Pompe disease are unable to degrade glycogen stored in the lysosome, leading to the accumulation of this substrate in lysosomal storage vacuoles. Morphologically, this produces an increase in the size and number of lysosomes in the cell. Pompe disease can present as infantile, juvenile, or adult onset forms. The infantile onset form is characterized by massive cardiomegaly, macroglossia, progressive muscle weakness (including respiratory muscles), and marked hypotonia, with death occurring within the first 2 years of life. The juvenile and adult onset forms manifest as slower progressive muscular disorders that are limited to skeletal muscle, with death usually occurring from respiratory failure (1 ). The heterogeneous presentation of Pompe disease results, at least in part, from the occurrence of different mutations in the lysosomal acid ␣-glucosidase gene, which can lead to variable effects on the functional capacity of the mutant enzyme. According to Wisselaar et al. (2 ), lysosomal acid ␣-glucosidase (EC 3.2.1.3) is synthesized as a precursor protein with molecular mass of 110 kDa, which is then transported from the endoplasmic reticulum to the trans Golgi network. A large proportion of precursor molecule is transported to the lysosomes where it is proteolytically converted to 76- and 70-kDa forms via a long-lived intermediate molecule of 95 kDa. A small amount of precursor protein is transported to the plasma membrane and secreted. 1318 Clinical Chemistry 46, No. 9, 2000 Pompe disease is one of ⬎40 distinct genetic diseases known collectively as lysosomal storage disorders (LSDs). LSDs have a combined incidence of ⬃1 in 5000 births (3 ). On the basis of clinical diagnosis, Pompe disease has a reported incidence of 1 in 201 000 births in the Australian population (4 ); however, recent studies based on carrier detection in the general population have indicated that the incidence is much greater, at ⬃1 in 40 000 births, in both the US (5 ) and The Netherlands (6 ). Definitive treatment for Pompe disease is not currently available. However, two main treatment strategies are being developed. Correction of the enzyme deficiency by enzyme replacement therapy is well advanced (7, 8 ), and gene therapy using viral vectors is also under development (9 –12 ). In the quail and mouse animal models, enzyme replacement therapy using the precursor form of acid ␣-glucosidase (7, 13 ) has led to the clinical and metabolic correction of Pompe disease. It is anticipated that this type of therapy will be available for human use in the near future. Similar treatment strategies are being developed for many LSDs (3 ), and it is well recognized that early diagnosis and treatment will provide a substantial improvement in the efficacy of these therapies for this group of disorders. However, in the absence of a family history, the only practical way to achieve early diagnosis is through a newborn screening program. The clinical diagnosis of Pompe disease is confirmed by the virtual absence (in infantile onset) or markedly reduced (in juvenile and adult onset) activity of acid ␣-glucosidase in muscle biopsies and cultured fibroblasts. Prenatal diagnosis can be made by determining the acid ␣-glucosidase activity in cultured amniotic cells and/or in chorionic villus biopsies (14, 15 ) and also by mutation analysis (15 ). However, current diagnostic tools are not suitable for large-scale screening. Immunoquantification of the acid ␣-glucosidase protein can be adapted for large-scale screening; however, the protein concentration may not be diminished in all individuals with Pompe disease. Normal amounts of enzyme, which appear to be catalytically inactive, have been reported to be common in infantile patients in China (16 ). We previously evaluated lysosomal membrane glycoprotein-1 (LAMP-1) (17 ) and LAMP-2 (18 ) as effective screening markers for LSDs. Although these proteins were determined to be useful markers for many LSDs, they showed only marginal specificity and sensitivity for Pompe disease. In this study, we proposed to evaluate acid ␣-glucosidase as a marker for Pompe disease and other LSDs. Accordingly, we developed two sensitive immunoquantification assays for the determination of either the total (precursor and mature forms) or mature form only of acid ␣-glucosidase protein in dried blood spots and plasma. We used these assays to determine the concentrations of these proteins in plasma and dried blood spot samples taken from unaffected and LSDaffected individuals. 1319 Materials and Methods patient samples Dried blood spots used in this study were deidentified and were part of the routine samples collected between 48 and 72 h after birth, by the Neonatal Screening Laboratory at the Women’s and Children’s Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia. Blood spots were also obtained from previously diagnosed Pompe patients. Plasma samples used in this study were from samples submitted to the National Referral Laboratory for the Diagnosis of Lysosomal, Peroxisomal and Other Genetic Disorders and samples processed for routine biochemistry in the Department of Chemical Pathology, Women’s and Children’s Hospital. Additional plasma samples from Gaucher patients were obtained from Dr. Allan Cooper (Willink Biochemical Institute, Manchester, UK). reagents Acid ␣-glucosidase proteins. Pharming BV (The Netherlands) provided recombinant precursor and mature forms of acid ␣-glucosidase proteins purified from rabbit (8 ) and mouse milk, respectively (19 ). Purity of the proteins was established by sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoretic analysis carried out on 12.5% acrylamide gels using the method of Laemmli (20 ) and staining with silver (21 ). Protein calibrators were quantified by the bicinchoninic acid method of Smith et al. (22 ) using bovine serum albumin as a calibrator. Polyclonal antibodies. Sheep anti-acid ␣-glucosidase polyclonal antibody was produced against the recombinant precursor form of the protein. A sheep received subcutaneous injections containing 2 mg of protein in 1 mL of an emulsion of phosphate-buffered saline (pH 7.4) and complete Freund’s adjuvant, followed by four booster injections (2 mg each) with incomplete Freund’s adjuvant, each 3 weeks apart. One week after the last injection, the sheep was bled out and serum collected. Monoclonal antibodies. The hybridoma cell lines producing monoclonal antibodies that recognize both the precursor and mature forms (43D1) (23 ) and the mature form only (43G8) (24 ) of the acid ␣-glucosidase protein were provided by Pharming BV (The Netherlands). Purification of antibodies. Sheep polyclonal antibody was purified on a 5-mL HitrapTM protein G affinity column (Pharmacia Biotech) followed by an acid ␣-glucosidase affinity column. The acid ␣-glucosidase affinity column was prepared by coupling 5 mg of the precursor form of acid ␣-glucosidase protein to 2.5 mL of Affi-Prep Hz support (Bio-Rad) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Briefly, 5 mL of sheep serum was diluted with 5 mL of phosphate-buffered saline (pH 7.4) and centrifuged at 2200g for 10 min at 4 °C. The centrifuged serum was passed through a 0.2 m filter, and then loaded onto the 1320 Umapathysivam et al.: Acid ␣-Glucosidase as a Marker for LSDs protein G column at a flow rate of 0.5 mL/min. The column was washed with phosphate-buffered saline (pH 7.4), and the antibody was eluted with 0.1 mol/L H3PO4/ NaH2PO4 (pH 2.5) and immediately neutralized by adding 1.0 mol/L Na2HPO4 (1:10, by volume). The protein content was estimated by the absorbance at 280 nm (absorbance ⫽ 1.4 for 1.0 g/L protein). The eluate was diluted fourfold and then loaded onto the acid ␣-glucosidase affinity column at the same flow rate. The column was washed and eluted as described for the protein G column. Monoclonal antibodies 43D1 and 43G8 were purified from cell culture supernatants by ammonium sulfate precipitation (25 ) followed by affinity purification on the acid ␣-glucosidase and protein G affinity columns, respectively. Europium labeling of monoclonal antibodies. Purified monoclonal antibodies 43D1 and 43G8 were labeled with Eu3⫹ chelate, using the DELFIA® labeling kit (EG&G Wallac), and purified on a Pharmacia Superose 12 fast-phase liquid chromatography column (1.5 ⫻ 30 cm) as described by Meikle et al. (17 ). The coupling efficiencies were determined from protein mass and fluorescence output of the conjugate. immunoquantification of acid ␣-glucosidase Total (precursor and mature) acid ␣-glucosidase protein was determined with a polyclonal/monoclonal (43D1) sandwich immunoassay, whereas the mature acid ␣-glucosidase protein was specifically determined using a monoclonal (43D1)/monoclonal (43G8) sandwich immunoassay. Each assay was performed as either a one-step assay for the determination of protein in dried blood spots or a two-step assay for the determination of protein in plasma samples. One-step assay. Microtiter plates (Immulon 4; Dynatech Technologies) were coated overnight at 4 °C with 100 L/well of affinity purified anti-acid ␣-glucosidase polyclonal antibody (2 mg/L) or monoclonal antibody 43D1 (4 mg/L). Coated plates were prewashed once in DELFIA wash buffer (EG&G Wallac). Dried blood spots were placed in microtiter wells with 200 L of assay buffer containing 200 g/L of either Eu3⫹-labeled 43D1 (determination of total ␣-glucosidase) or 43G8 (determination of mature ␣-glucosidase) monoclonal antibody. The microtiter plates were shaken (at 20 °C for 60 min) and incubated overnight at 4 °C. The microtiter plates were again shaken at 20 °C for 60 min, blood-spot filters were removed by suction, and the plates were washed six times with DELFIA wash buffer. This was followed by the addition of 200 L of DELFIA enhancement solution (EG&G Wallac). The microtiter plates were shaken at 20 °C for 15 min, and the fluorescence was read on a DELFIA 1234 Research Fluorometer (EG&G Wallac). Two-step assay. Immunoquantification of both the total and the mature forms of acid ␣-glucosidase in plasma samples collected with EDTA or citrate as the anticoagulant was performed using the two-step assay. Plates were coated with antibodies as described for the one-step assay. Samples were diluted with DELFIA assay buffer (100 L/well). The plates were shaken at 20 °C for 60 min and incubated for 5 h at 20 °C. The plates were washed six times, and 100 L of assay buffer containing 200 g/L of either Eu3⫹-labeled 43D1 or 43G8 monoclonal antibody was added to each well. The plates were shaken at 20 °C for 15 min and incubated overnight at 4 °C. The plates were washed six times, and DELFIA enhancement solution (200 L) was added to each well. The plates were shaken at 20 °C for 15 min, and the fluorescence was read on a DELFIA 1234 Research Fluorometer. The concentrations of the total and the mature form of acid ␣-glucosidase in both the blood spots and the plasma were calculated using Multicalc Data Analysis software (EG&G Wallac). preparation of calibrators and quality-control samples The precursor form of acid ␣-glucosidase was used as a calibrator for immunoquantification of the total acid ␣-glucosidase, whereas the mature form was used for the immunoquantification of the mature protein. Blood spot calibrators were used to determine the total and mature forms of acid ␣-glucosidase protein in dried blood spots. The purified precursor and mature acid ␣-glucosidase proteins were diluted in buffer (40 g/L human serum albumin, 25 g/L human ␥-globulin, 20 mmol/L Tris-HCl, 150 mmol/L NaCl, pH 7.8). These proteins were further diluted threefold with washed sheep red blood cells to give final concentrations of 200, 100, 50, 25, and 12.5 g/L. Similarly, two blood spot controls containing low (60 g/L) and high (180 g/L) concentrations of acid ␣-glucosidase protein were also prepared as described above. Aliquots (50 L) of the calibrators and controls were spotted on Whatman 180 BFC filter paper and were air dried overnight at room temperature. Liquid calibrators were used to determine the total and mature forms of acid ␣-glucosidase protein in plasma. Liquid calibrators were prepared by diluting the precursor and mature forms of acid ␣-glucosidase protein in DELFIA assay buffer to give final concentrations of 5, 2.5, 1.25, 0.625, and 0.313 g/L for the precursor form and 10, 5, 2.5, 1.25, and 0.625 g/L for the mature forms of the protein. Three quality-control samples containing 0.1, 1.0, and 2.0 g/L precursor protein or 1.0, 2.0, and 8.0 g/L mature protein were prepared. Dried blood spot calibrators and controls were stored in sealed bags containing silica gel at ⫺70 °C. Liquid calibrators and controls were stored at ⫺70 °C. Both dried blood spot and liquid calibrators were assayed in duplicate at the beginning of each plate. Single estimations of Clinical Chemistry 46, No. 9, 2000 1321 the quality-control samples were made for each analytical assay. Dried blood spots were assayed singly, and any repeat samples were assayed in duplicate. All plasma calibrators and samples were assayed in duplicate. Results immunoquantification of acid ␣-glucosidase The acid ␣-glucosidase calibrators were ⬎99% pure based on sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoretic analysis. After silver staining, the precursor form showed a single band at 112 kDa, and the mature formed a single band at 81 kDa. These corresponded to the published precursor (110 kDa) and mature (76 kDa) forms of acid ␣-glucosidase, respectively (2 ). The immunoquantification assay for acid ␣-glucosidase was optimized by standard procedures to achieve the appropriate assay precision required for concentrations seen in blood spots and plasma. In addition, the specificities of the acid ␣-glucosidase antibodies for the precursor and the mature forms of the protein were determined (Fig. 1). The degree of cross-reactivity for the precursor form of the protein by the monoclonal antibody 43G8 was ⬍3% (Fig. 1B). To monitor assay performance, three quality-control samples (low, medium, and high) for plasma and two (low and high) for dried blood spots were included within each analytical run. Precision profiles for the analysis of total and mature forms of acid ␣-glucosidase using liquid calibrators and blood spot calibrators showed CVs ⬍7.5%. Precision studies for plasma study were conducted over 60 days with 28 observations performed. Blood spot precision studies were conducted with 36 observations over 30 days. Assays of dried blood spots stored for different periods of time (1, 4, 12, and 52 weeks) demonstrated that the dried blood spots were stable for at least 3 months when stored at room temperature. However, a significant decrease in the medium concentration (⬃29%) was found after storage for 12 months. acid ␣-glucosidase concentrations in plasma The total (precursor and mature) and mature forms of acid ␣-glucosidase protein were determined in plasma samples from 195 control individuals and 404 LSD-affected individuals, representing 26 different disorders (Table 1 and Fig. 2). In the control population, the total concentration of acid ␣-glucosidase protein had a skewed distribution with a median of 17.1 g/L and the 5th and 95th percentiles at 5.6 and 34.7 g/L, respectively. The concentration of the mature form of the acid ␣-glucosidase protein in the control population was very low, with a median value of 0.2 g/L and 5th and 95th percentiles at 0 and 3.66 g/L, respectively. Among the LSD-affected individuals, all individuals with acid lipase deficiency and 86%, 60%, and 58% of individuals with mucolipidosis II/III, Niemann-Pick (A/B) disease, and Gaucher disease, respectively, had total acid ␣-glucosidase concentrations higher than the 95th percentile of the control group (Table Fig. 1. Calibration curves for precursor and mature forms of acid ␣-glucosidase in plasma using the two-step assay. Acid ␣-glucosidase liquid calibrators for the precursor (䡺) and mature (E) forms of the protein were assayed for total protein (A) using monoclonal antibody 43D1 and for mature protein (B) using monoclonal antibody 43G8 as described in Materials and Methods. Under standard assay conditions, a linear response was observed over the range 0 –20 g/L for both the precursor and mature forms of acid ␣-glucosidase. Comparison of precursor and mature forms of the protein with each of the antibody combinations demonstrated that monoclonal antibody 43D1 recognizes both the precursor and the mature forms of acid ␣-glucosidase, whereas the monoclonal antibody 43G8 recognizes only the mature form of the protein. 1). In the Pompe disease group, the concentrations of both the total and mature forms of acid ␣-glucosidase were significantly reduced (P ⬍0.001) based on nonparametric statistical analysis (Mann–Whitney test). Only 1 of 22 plasma samples from Pompe patients had a total acid ␣-glucosidase concentration within the control range. distribution of acid ␣-glucosidase protein in blood spots The distribution of total acid ␣-glucosidase in blood spots from the newborn population showed a characteristic skewed distribution (Fig. 3). The median concentration of the 1951 blood spots was 59.0 g/L with 5th and 95th percentiles of 28.6 and 112.0 g/L, respectively. The Umapathysivam et al.: Acid ␣-Glucosidase as a Marker for LSDs 1322 Table 1. Acid ␣-glucosidase concentrations in plasma from control and LSD-affected individuals. Disorder n Total acid ␣-glucosidasea g/L Control Acid lipasec Fabryc Galactosialidosis Gaucherc GM Id Mucolipidosis II/IIIc Krabbe Mannosidosis MLD MSDc MPS I MPS IIc MPS IIIAc MPS IIIB MPS IIIC MPS IIID MPS IVAc MPS VI N-P (A/B)c N-P (C)c Pompee Sandhoff SASc TSDc TSD (A/B)c 195 2 27 1 87 14 14 14 9 34 4 24 23 24 19 3 3 16 10 10 13 22 6 18 23 2 17 (2–61) 76 (65–87) 10 (5–46) 14 40 (0–737) 16 (7–29) 149 (7–273) 17 (5–31) 10 (6–25) 17 (1–55) 27 (22–102) 19 (3–27) 26 (13–46) 23 (2–40) 20 (10–38) 18 (13–22) 25 (6–29) 14 (6–21) 12 (5–65) 39 (39–84) 24 (15–84) 0.7 (0–3.3) 22 (17–32) 27 (18–40) 19 (5–48) 32 (29–35) Mature acid ␣-glucosidasea g/L 0.2 (0–14) 5 (3–7) 0.1 (0–3.6) 2 19 (0–768) 4 (2–11) 7 (0–19) 0.4 (0–1.6) 1.5 (1–3) 0.6 (0–4.5) 2.9 (1–78) 1 (0–5.8) 2 (0–6.5) 1.2 (0–2.5) 1 (0–3) 0.6 (0.3–0.8) 0.3 (0.2–0.5) 1 (0.1–1.3) 0.2 (0–11) 0.6 (3–31) 3 (0–11) 0 (0–0.22) 0.8 (0–3.5) 1 (0–11) 0.2 (0–9) 1.4 (1–2) % >95th percentileb 100 14.8 0 57.5 0 86 7.1 0 2.9 25 0 17.4 25 5.3 0 0 0 10 60 15.4 0 27.8 21.7 0 a Median value (range). Percentage of each disorder group with total acid ␣-glucosidase concentrations above the 95th percentile of the control population (34.7 g/L). c Represents those LSDs in which the total acid ␣-glucosidase concentrations were significantly different from the control population (nonparametric statistical analysis). d GM I, GM I gangliosidosis; MLD, metachromatic leukodystrophy; MSD, multiple sulfatase deficiency; MPS, mucopolysaccharidosis; N-P, Niemann-Pick disease; SAS, sialic acid storage disease; TSD, Tay-Sachs disease. e Of Pompe-affected individuals, 95.5% had total acid ␣-glucosidase concentrations below the control population range. b median concentration of the mature form in blood spots was 53 g/L with 5th and 95th percentiles of 24 and 110 g/L, respectively. The correlation between the total (precursor and mature forms) and mature forms of the protein in blood spots was 0.83 (Pearson correlation) and was significant at P ⫽ 0.01 (two-tailed). In a separate study, the concentration of total acid ␣-glucosidase was determined in blood spots from 12 juvenile and 12 adult controls and compared with 20 newborn samples. Nonparametric statistical analysis (Kruskal–Wallis test) indicated no significant differences among these groups. The total and mature forms of acid ␣-glucosidase were measured in dried blood spots from 20 individuals with Pompe disease and 2 carriers (Table 2). The concentration of the total acid ␣-glucosidase protein was lower than the 0.2 percentile of newborn population in 16 of the 17 Pompe patients, whereas the concentration in all carriers tested was below the 0.6 percentile. In addition, the concentration of both the total and mature forms of acid ␣-glucosidase protein were measured in the correspond- ing plasma from three Pompe patients and one carrier (Table 2). The concentrations of the protein were also reduced in the plasma from these patients, supporting the low values observed in the dried blood spots. Discussion The LSDs are a large family of rare genetic disorders involving the lysosome that can lead to the manifestation of severe clinical symptoms. The incidence of LSD disorders (⬃1 in 5000 births in Australia) is comparable to other intensively studied genetic disorders such as cystic fibrosis and phenylketonuria (1 in 2500 and 1 in 14 000 births in Australia, respectively). In most LSDs, the pathology of the disease is not apparent at birth and manifests in the first few years of life. If current and proposed therapies are to achieve maximum efficacy, it will be required that these disorders are detected early, before the onset of irreversible pathology, particularly central nervous system and/or bone pathology. Except in cases where a family history is available, presymptomatic 1323 Clinical Chemistry 46, No. 9, 2000 Fig. 2. Box plots of total acid ␣-glucosidase concentrations in plasma from 195 control and 404 LSD-affected individuals. The concentrations of the total (precursor and mature forms) and mature form only of acid ␣-glucosidase in plasma were determined using 5-L samples in the two-step immunoquantification assay as described in Materials and Methods. N, number of samples in each group. Center bars show the median ␣-glucosidase concentration for each disorder, shaded areas shown the 25th and 75th percentiles, and top and bottom bars show the limits of the range. 䡺 and ⴱ represent outliers and extreme outliers, respectively. GM1, GM1 gangliosidosis; MLD, metachromatic leukodystrophy; MSD, multiple sulfatase deficiency; MPS, mucopolysaccharidosis; N-P, Niemann-Pick disease; SAS, sialic acid storage disease; TSD, Tay-Sachs disease. diagnosis of LSDs can be achieved only by a mass screening program. In this study, we investigated acid ␣-glucosidase as a potential screening marker for Pompe disease in particular and for LSDs in general. Earlier studies showed that LAMP-1 (17 ) and a related protein, LAMP-2 (18 ), were increased in the majority of LSDs (17 ) but were not increased in ⬃35% of patients representing several specific LSDs. To determine the usefulness of the acid ␣-glucosidase protein as a screening marker for LSD, we measured the Fig. 3. Histogram of the distribution of total acid ␣-glucosidase in dried blood spots from newborns. Concentrations of the total acid ␣-glucosidase protein in dried blood spots from 1951 newborns were determined with the one-step quantification method as described in Materials and Methods. The median value of the 1951 dried blood spots was 59.0 g/L with 5th and 95th percentiles of 28.6 and 112.0 g/L, respectively. The inset is the expanded histogram of the distribution of the total acid ␣-glucosidase in newborns that was less than the 3rd percentile (25 g/L). concentrations of both the total and mature forms of the protein in plasma from LSD-affected individuals and compared these with concentrations in plasma from control individuals. The majority of acid ␣-glucosidase in plasma from the control population was the precursor Table 2. Acid ␣-glucosidase concentrations in blood spots and plasma from Pompe-affected individuals and carriers. Sample ID Disorder Onset GC3 GC4 GC19 GC20 GC25 GC13 GC14 GC15 GC16 GC17 GC21 GC22 GC23 GC24 GC27 GC28 GC94 GC5 GC7 GC26 Pompe Pompe Pompe Pompe Pompe Pompe Pompe Pompe Pompe Pompe Pompe Pompe Pompe Pompe Pompe Pompe Pompe Carrier Carrier Carrier Infantile Infantile Juvenile Juvenile Juvenile Adult Adult Adult Adult Adult Adult Adult Adult Adult Adult Adult Adult Adult Total acid ␣-glucosidasea Mature acid ␣-glucosidasea 1.5 36.6 10.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.8 0.0 1.0 1.9 0.0 0.0 0.6 (0.6) 0.0 (0.0) 10.8 (0.5) 13.6 10.5 16.6 (6.7) 0.2 56.4 12.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 (0.1) 0.0 (0.0) 4.5 (0.2) 13.4 8.4 13.1 (0.2) a Expressed as g/L of whole blood for Guthrie cards and g/L (in parentheses) for plasma. 1324 Umapathysivam et al.: Acid ␣-Glucosidase as a Marker for LSDs form. The acid ␣-glucosidase protein was increased in individuals with acid lipase deficiency, mucolipidosis II/III, Gaucher disease, and Niemann-Pick disease (type A/B). The observed increase in plasma from mucolipidosis II/III patients was identified as the precursor form of the protein. This results from the mistargeting of newly synthesized protein in these patients because of the absence of the mannose-6-phosphate moiety on the enzyme. The increases observed in patients deficient for acid lipase also represented an increase in the concentration of precursor protein. However, the increases observed in patients with Gaucher disease and Niemann-Pick disease (type A/B) resulted primarily from an increase in the mature form of the protein. This implies a release of protein from the lysosome in these disorders. This may result from cell death and subsequent breakdown or alternatively, from specific exocytosis of lysosomal contents from affected cells. As a general marker for LSDs, acid ␣-glucosidase has limited application because it is significantly increased in relatively few disorders. Plasma samples from 22 patients with Pompe disease showed a significant decrease in the concentration of the acid ␣-glucosidase protein. Only one Pompe disease patient had protein concentrations within the control range. Individuals with significant concentrations of acid ␣-glucosidase protein may represent different mutations in the gene that lead to the absence or marked reduction in catalytic capacity of the mutant enzyme but normal processing (1 ). In dried blood spots, 14 of 17 patients had concentrations below the range of the control population (based on 1951 samples) and 16 of 17 patients were below the 0.4 percentile. One infantile patient had significant concentrations of acid ␣-glucosidase as determined from the dried blood spot. The majority of this protein was the mature form as determined by the assay specific for the mature form, which indicates lysosomal processing. No mutational data were available on this patient. A percentage of Pompe patients are reported to have mutations that lead to significant concentrations of ␣-glucosidase protein with reduced activity. One such mutation is Asp 6453 Glu, which is reported to be the most common mutation in the Chinese population in Taiwan, accounting for 36% of mutations (26 ). This mutation has been reported to lead to the mistargeting and misprocessing of the acid ␣-glucosidase protein (27 ), so that only the precursor form of the protein is present in the cells. Clearly this is not the mutation present in our high-protein patients. However, a potential approach to the identification of patients expressing only the precursor form is to screen for the mature form of the acid ␣-glucosidase protein. This approach would be limited to whole blood or blood spot samples because the concentration of mature protein in plasma is low in the unaffected population. We have demonstrated that it is feasible to reliably measure the total acid ␣-glucosidase protein (precursor and mature forms) and the mature form only in either dried blood spots or plasma. In addition, we have shown a good correlation between the absence or reduced concentrations of total acid ␣-glucosidase protein and the incidence of Pompe disease. For plasma samples, when we used a cutoff concentration of 2.0 g/L, the total acid ␣-glucosidase assay gave a sensitivity of 95% with a specificity of 100% (21 of 22 patient samples were below the control range based on 195 unaffected, age-matched control subjects). Analysis of the blood spot samples using a cutoff concentration of 6 g/L gave a sensitivity of 82% with a specificity of 100% (14 of 17 patients were below the range of the control population). Increasing the cutoff to 11 g/L increased the sensitivity (94%) but decreased the specificity (99.8%). A specificity of 99.8% would produce a large number of false positives that may also include many carriers, although the numbers of carriers in this study are insufficient to determine this value accurately. Although these studies were based on a comparison of infantile, juvenile, and adult patients with a control population of 1951 newborns, comparison of smaller control groups of newborns, juveniles, and adults showed no statistically significant difference in the concentration of acid ␣-glucosidase, indicating no age correlation. On the basis of this study, it is feasible to screen for Pompe disease by determining the concentration of total acid ␣-glucosidase protein in plasma or dried blood spots. However, additional work needs to be done to increase the sensitivity without a corresponding decrease in the specificity. One possible approach is the development of a two-tiered screening strategy involving an initial protein determination followed by an enzyme activity determination made on a second blood spot from the same Guthrie card. The second-tier assay would be performed on the top 0.5% of the population as determined from the first-tier assay. Alternative approaches may involve mutation analysis or determination of lysosomal substrate storage as a second tier of the screen. Additional work in these areas is ongoing. This work was supported by Pharming BV (The Netherlands) and the National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia. We thank Dr. Allan Cooper (Willink Biochemical Institute, Manchester, UK) for providing additional plasma samples from Gaucher patients, Dr. Martina Baethmann (University of Essen, Essen, Germany) for blood spot samples from some Pompe patients, and Dr. Arnold Reuser (Department of Clinical Genetics, Erasmus University, Rotterdam, The Netherlands) for helpful comments in the preparation of the manuscript. We also gratefully acknowledge Rosemarie Gerace, Bronwen Bartlett, and Kerry Barnard from the State Screening Service of South Australia for assisting with the screening of blood spots. Clinical Chemistry 46, No. 9, 2000 References 1. Hirschhorn R. Glycogen storage disease type II: acid ␣-glucosidase (acid maltase) deficiency. In: Scriver CR, Beaudet AC, Sly WS, Valle D, eds. The metabolic and molecular bases of inherited disease, 7th ed., Vol. II. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1995:2443– 64. 2. Wisselaar HA, Kroos MA, Hermans MM, van Beeumen J, Reuser AJJ. Structural and functional changes of lysosomal acid ␣-glucosidase during intracellular transport and maturation. J Biol Chem 1993;268:2223–31. 3. Hopwood JJ, Brooks DA. An introduction to the basic science and biology of the lysosome and storage diseases. In: Applegarth DA, Dimmick JE, Hall JG, eds. Organelle diseases. New York: Chapman & Hall Medical, 1997:7–35. 4. Meikle PJ, Hopwood JJ, Clague AE, Carey WF. Prevalence of lysosomal storage disorders. JAMA 1999;281:249 –54. 5. Martiniuk F, Chen A, Mack A, Arvanitopoulos E, Chen Y, Rom WN, et al. Carrier frequency for glycogen storage disease type II in New York and estimates of affected individuals born with the disease. Am J Med Genet 1998;79:69 –72. 6. Ausems MG, Verbiest J, Hermans MMP, Kroos MA, Beemer FA, Wokke JHJ, et al. Frequency of glycogen storage disease type II in The Netherlands: implications for diagnosis and genetic counselling. Eur J Hum Genet 1999;7:713– 6. 7. Bijvoet AGA, Van de Kamp EHM, Kroos MA, Ding JH, Yang BZ, Visser P, et al. Generalized glycogen storage and cardiomegaly in a knockout mouse model of Pompe disease. Hum Mol Genet 1998;7:53– 62. 8. Bijvoet AGA, Van Hirtum H, Kroos MA, Van de Kamp EHM, Schoneveld O, Visser P, et al. Human acid ␣-glucosidase from rabbit milk has therapeutic effect in mice with glycogen storage disease type II. Hum Mol Genet 1999;8:2145–53. 9. Nicolino MP, Puech JP, Kremer EJ, Reuser AJJ, Mbebi C, Verdieresahuque M, et al. Adenovirus-mediated transfer of the acid ␣-glucosidase gene into fibroblasts, myoblasts and myotubes from patients with glycogen storage disease type II leads to high level expression of enzyme and corrects glycogen accumulation. Hum Mol Genet 1998;7:1695–702. 10. Pauly DF, Johns DC, Matelis LA, Lawrence JH, Byrne BJ, Kessler PD. Complete correction of acid ␣-glucosidase deficiency in Pompe disease fibroblasts in vitro, and lysosomally targeted expression in neonatal rat cardiac and skeletal muscle. Gene Ther 1998;5:473– 80. 11. Zaretsky JZ, Candotti F, Boerkoel C, Adams EM, Yewdell JW, Blaese RM, et al. Retroviral transfer of acid ␣-glucosidase cDNA to enzyme-deficient myoblasts results in phenotypic spread of the genotypic correction by both secretion and fusion. Hum Gene Ther 1997;8:1555– 63. 12. Amalfitano A, McVie-Wylie AJ, Hu H, Dawson TL, Raben N, Plotz P, et al. Systemic correction of the muscle disorder glycogen storage disease type ii after hepatic targeting of a modified adenovirus vector encoding human acid-␣-glucosidase. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1999;96:8861– 6. 13. Kikuchi T, Yang HW, Pennybacker M, Ichihara N, Mizutani M, Vanhove JLK, et al. Clinical and metabolic correction of Pompe 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. 23. 24. 25. 26. 27. 1325 disease by enzyme therapy in acid maltase-deficient quail. J Clin Investig 1998;101:827–33. Park HK, Kay HH, McConkie-Rosell A, Lanman J, Chen YT. Prenatal diagnosis of Pompe’s disease (type II glycogenesis) in chorionic villus biopsy using maltose as a substrate. Prenat Diagn 1992; 12:169 –73. Kleijer WJ, van der Kraan M, Kroos MA, Groener JE, van Diggelen OP, Reuser AJJ, et al. Prenatal diagnosis of glycogen storage disease type II: enzyme assay or mutation analysis? Pediatr Res 1995;38:103– 6. Lin CY, Chang ZN, Su SN, Hwang B, Han SH. Preparation of monoclonal antibodies against acid ␣-D-glucosidase for study of Chinese glycogenesis type II patients. Hybridoma 1992;11:493– 505. Meikle PJ, Brooks DA, Ravenscroft EM, Yan M, Williams RE, Jaunzems AE, et al. Diagnosis of lysosomal storage disorders: evaluation of lysosome-associated membrane protein LAMP-1 as a diagnostic marker. Clin Chem 1997;43:1325–35. Hua CT, Hopwood JJ, Carlsson SR, Harris RJ, Meikle PJ. Evaluation of the lysosome-associated membrane protein LAMP-2 as a marker for lysosomal storage disorders. Clin Chem 1998;44: 2094 –102. Bijvoet AGA, Kroos MA, Pieper FR, Van der Vliet M, Deboer HA, Vanderploeg AT, et al. Recombinant human acid alpha-glucosidase— high level production in mouse milk, biochemical characteristics, correction of enzyme deficiency in GSDII KO mice. Hum Mol Genet 1998;7:1815–24. Laemmli UK. Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature 1970;227:680 –5. Tsai CM, Frasch CE. A sensitive silver stain for detecting lipopolysaccharides in polyacrylamide gels. Anal Biochem 1982;119: 115–9. Smith PK, Krohn RI, Hermanson GT, Mallia AK, Gartner FH, Provenzano MD, et al. Measurement of protein using bicinchoninic acid [published erratum appears in Anal Biochem 1987 May 15;163:279]. Anal Biochem 1985;150:76 – 85. Fransen JA, Ginsel LA, Cambier PH, Klumperman J, Oude Elferink RP, Tager JM. Immunocytochemical demonstration of the lysosomal enzyme alpha-glucosidase in the brush border of human intestinal epithelial cells. Eur J Cell Biol 1988;47:72– 80. Oude Elferink RP, Strijland A, Surya I, Brouwer Kelder EM, Kroos M, Hilkens J, et al. Use of a monoclonal antibody to distinguish between precursor and mature forms of human lysosomal ␣-glucosidase. Eur J Biochem 1984;139:497–502. Harlow E, Lane D. Antibodies: a laboratory manual. Cold Spring Harbor: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, 1988. Ko TM, Hwu WL, Lin YW, Tseng LH, Hwa HL, Wang TR, et al. Molecular genetic study of Pompe disease in Chinese patients in Taiwan. Hum Mutat 1999;13:380 – 4. Hermans MMP, de Graaff E, Kroos MA, Wisselaar HA, Willemsen R, Oostra BA, et al. The conservative substitution Asp-645 to Glu in lysosomal ␣-glucosidase affects transport and phosphorylation of the enzyme in an adult patient with glycogen-storage disease type II. Biochem J 1993;289:687–93.
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz