Matrix GeoTechnologies Ltd.
231 Donald Avenue
Toronto ON M6M1K7
MATRIX GEOTECHNOLOGIES LTD.
merit Report
A
Regarding the
GRAVITY SURVEY at the
IRON MASK PROPERTY,
Cartier, Ontario
6EOSCIENCEAS8ESSMENT
on behalf of
CHAMPION BEAR RESOURCES LTD
Calgary Alberta
41I12NE2030 2.28205
HART
010
Matrix GeoTechnologies Ltd
Gravity Survey
Champion Bear Resources Ltd
Iron Mask Property
T/ttg OF CQNTiNTS
1.
INTRODUCTION...............................................................................................................................................^
2.
GENERAL SURVEY DETAILS ........................................................................................................................4
LOCATION................................................................................................................................................^
ACCESS....................................................................................................................................................5
SURVEY GRID...........................................................................................................................................5
3.
SURVEY WORK UNDERTAKEN ....................................................................................................................7
GENERALITIES........................................................................................................................................../
PERSONNEL............................................................................................................................................../
SURVEY EQUIPMENT................................................................................................................................. 7
SURVEY SPECIFICATIONS.......................................................................................................................... 7
MEASUREMENT ACCURACY AND REPEATABILITY......................................................................................... 9
GRAVITY DATA PROCESSING................................................................................................................... 10
DATA PRESENTATION..............................................................................................................................11
4.
RESULTS AND SUMMARY INTERPRETATION .....................................................................,....,......,...13
PROPERTY GEOLOGY..............................................................................................................................13
GRAVITY DATA INTERPRETATION............................................................................................................. 13
FOLLOW-UP TARGETS ANALYSIS.............................................................................................................. 13
5.
CONLUSIONANDRECOMMENDATIONS..................................................................................................14
ysf or APPENDICES
APPENDIX A : STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS:
APPENDIX B : THEORETICAL BASIS AND SURVEY PROCEDURES
APPENDIX C: MAPS AND SECTIONS
AND FIGURES
, ; "' - : -^ ,.,W ^'\* ?v ^"""'p^t
•f:' 7'^'-.
-
Figure 1: General Property Location of the Iron Mask Property.............................................................4
Figure 2: Sketch of Gravity Base 9211-1976 Chelmsford, Ontario, Canada ......................................... 9
Figure 3: Photo of Gravity Base 9211-1976 Chelmsford, Ontario, Canada........................................... 9
Table
Table
Table
Table
l: GPS Control Stations ................................................................................................................6
II: Gravity Base Stations...............................................................................................................9
III: Gravity Ties ...........................................................................................................................10
IV: Gravity Repeat Stations........................................................................................................ 10
QS-183-May, 2004
Matrix GeoTechnologies Ltd
Gravity Survey
1,
Champion Bear Resources Ltd
Iron Mask Property
WREDUCTION
.
MGT Project*:
QS-185
*
Project Name:
Iron Mask Property
.
Survey Period:
June 22ND to July 20 , 2004
*
Survey Type:
Gravity
*
Client:
Champion Bear Resources Ltd.
*
Representative:
Watts, Griffis and McOuat
*
Client Address:
Suite 400, 8 King Street East
Toronto ON M5C 1B5
*
Objectives:
1.
The primary objective of gravity survey is to verify the possible presence of
massive mineralization in the property, large high grade Olympic Dam type
deposit and to assist in mapping of general geology, including lithology, locating
structural and alteration features that may favor the presence of ore deposit.
2.
Increase the exploration- program efficiency by detecting features on potentially
anomalous structures and document the physical properties of the major
lithologic units, alteration patterns for compilation with the exploration database.
The Gravity survey was designed to respond to the exploration objectives and to
detect the possible presence of a large massive mineralization deposit.
*
Report Type:
QS-183-May, 2004
Assessment Report
Champion Bear Resources Ltd
Iron Mask Property
Matrix GeoTechnologies Ltd
Gravity Survey
2. iiNERAL SURVEY DETAILS
LOCATION
*
Province:
Ontario
*
Country:
Canada
*
Nearest Settlement:
Cartier Twp.
*
UTM Coordinates:
UTM Coordinates (83, Zone 17N):
452.000E-5,171,DOON
Latitude /Longitude: 46 042'N l 81 0 38'W
SUDBURY
Figure 1: General Property Location of the Iron Mask Property
QS-183-May, 2004
DISTRICT
Champion Bear Resources Ltd
Iron Mask Property
Matrix GeoTechnologies Ltd
Gravity Survey
ACCESS
*
Base of Operations:
Cartier Township, Ontario
*
Grid Location:
The Iron Mask Grid is located 75 km NW of
the Sudbury town
*
Mode of Access:
The surveyed grid area is accessible by truck
SURVEY GRID
*
Coordinate Reference System:
UTM (Map Datum NAD83)
*
Established:
Prior the survey execution
*
Line Separation:
200 metres
*
Station Interval:
50 metres
*
Method of Chaining:
Metric-chained
*
Datum:
NAD 1983 1
*
Datum Transformation:
3 Parameter:
*
Spheroid:
GRS 1980
*
Geoid:
EGM 96 (Global)
*
Projection:
UTM Zone 17N
Origin Latitude:
00 N
Origin Longitude:
81 0 W
False Easting:
500,000 m
False Northing:
Om
Scale:
0.999
Flattening:
298.2572215381
Semi-Major Axis:
6,378,137
X: O, Y: O, Z: O
Survey control points established for the grid were based on a proximal first order control point named
CBN963014. The following is a list of survey control points used during the course of the project:
1 GPS measured coordinates are based on the WGS84 Ellipsoid. Coordinates have been converted to the NAD 1983 datum.
QS-183-May, 2004
Matrix GeoTechnologies Ltd
Gravity Survey
Champion Bear Resources Ltd
Iron Mask Property
NAME
NAD83
NORTHING
NAD83
EASTING
ELEVATION
WGSL.ATITUDE
CBN963014
5144010.80
485045.22
315.06
46.4495034720 N
l
81.1947163610W
IMB5
5172289.68
451092.64
434.70
46.7023747160N
;
81.6397582560W
1MB 4
5171994.30
452159.17
426.02
46.6997938100N
l
81.6257771370W
IMB9
5170703.15
451082.48
420.91
46.6880972980N
j
81.6397225610W
Table l: GPS Control Stations
QS-183-May, 2004
WGSL.ONGITUDE
Champion Bear Resources Ltd
Iron Mask Property
Matrix GeoTechnologies Ltd
Gravity Survey
3. liRVEY WOftK liNDERTAkEN
GENERALITIES
*
Surveyed By:
Quadra Surveys
*
Survey Dates:
June 22 to July 20 , 2004
*
Mob/Demob Days:
2 days
*
Survey Coverage:
approx. 20.0 km
PERSONNEL
FIELD CREW
*
Project Manager:
Thomas Mitchell, (Vancouver, BC)
*
Field Assistants:
Mark Schemdhurst, (Markham, ON)
Scott Dan, (Vancouver, BC)
DATA INTERPRETATION
Ludvig Kapllani, M.Se., Ph.D, (Toronto, ON)
Gene Kallfa, B.Se., P.Geo. (Toronto, ON)
SURVEY EQUIPMENT
LaCoste-Romberg G-239 gravity meter was utilized for the survey. This instrument is equipped with a
galvanometer read-out as well as standard optics for nulling to the reading line. The gravity meters have
a reading accuracy of approximately 0.01 mGal. Additionally G-239 has the variable dampening option
for ice readings.
SURVEY SPECIFICATIONS
*
G Meter Scale Factor:
see calibration tables (Appendix D)
*
Gravity Formula:
1967
*
Greenwich Mean Time D iff.:
(DST) = 4.00 hours
*
Earth Density:
2.67 gm/cm3
* Terrain Correction:
Modified Hammer Graticule 2 .
2 Terrain corrections calculated using modified Hammer (B-4 sectors, C-4 sectors) using operator notes, according to Telford, et
al., (2nd edition), pp. 12-14.
QS-183-May, 2004
Champion Bear Resources Ltd
Iron Mask Property
Matrix GeoTechnologies Ltd
Gravity Survey
Referencing to National Gravity Net: The gravity base station established on the Iron Mask Grid was
rigorously tied to the following National Gravity Net Station:
STATION IDENTIFICATION
Unique Number :
Name :
Last inspection :
9211-1976
Chelmsford, Ontario
09/1976
GRAVITY DATA (IGSN71)
Gravity Value : 980676.130 mgal
STATION COORDINATES (SCALED)
Latitude :
Longitude :
Elevation :
N460 34' 22"
W81 0 12'O"
282m
STATION INFORMATION AND LOCATION
Station is located on concrete entrance platform of school, on N side of building and 16.15m from NW
corner. Station is monumented with aluminum disc.
Rue Errington St.
Rue Brookside
St.
Pelousa S Lawn
*
!6.I5 M
a is
o t
tt JE
*
Eeoi*
QS-183-May, 2004
Champlain School
Champion Bear Resources Ltd
Iron Mask Property
Matrix GeoTechnologies Ltd
Gravity Survey
Figure 2: Sketch of Gravity Base 9211-1976 Chelmsford. Ontario. Canada
Figure 3: Photo of Gravity Base 9211-1976 Chelmsford. Ontario, Canada
Final Data Reduction:
In milligals - Complete Bouguer Anomaly
Gravity stations used during the course of the survey are listed as follows:
NAME
9211
-1 ;
AssG
NORTHING
EASTING
REPETITIONS
980676.13
5157709
484674
980631.16
5171994
452159 .
STDDEV
SOURCE
i Published
0.016 l Calculated
6
Table II: Gravity Base Stations
MEASUREMENT ACCURACY AND REPEATABILITY
Gravity meter Loop Ties:
GRID
Iron Mask
Iron Mask
Iron Mask
Iron Mask
Iron Mask
Iron Mask
Iron Mask
Iron Mask
Iron Mask
Iron Mask
LOOP DURATION
LOOP TIE
METER
DATE
8:39
9:16
7:43
7:18
7:55
0.01
239
22/06/2004
-0.03
-0.02
-0.02
239
239
239
0
-0.03
-0.03
-0.03
-0.02
239
239
239
239
239
239
23/06/2004
25/06/2004
26/06/2004
27/06/2004
29/06/2004
01/07/2004
02/07/2004
03/07/2004
04/07/2004
Iron Mask
10:03
239
06/07/2004
QS-183-May, 2004
7:55
8:46
5:49
6:23
6:14
0
-0.08
Champion Bear Resources Ltd
Iron Mask Property
Matrix GeoTechnologies Ltd
Gravity Survey
Iron
Iron
Iron
Iron
Iron
Mask
Mask
Mask
Mask
Mask
9:13
-0.01
239
11:24
-0.05
239
08/07/2004
10/07/2004
8:37
8:39
9:33
-0.07
-0.04
-0.04
239
239
239
12/07/2004
13/07/2004
18/07/2004
Table III: Gravity Ties
Gravity Station Repeatability Checks:
GRID
Iron
Iron
Iron
Iron
Iron
Iron
Iron
Iron
Iron
Iron
Iron
Iron
Iron
Iron
Iron
Iron
Iron
Iron
Iron
Iron
Iron
Iron
Iron
Mask
Mask
Mask
Mask
Mask
Mask
Mask
Mask
Mask
Mask
Mask
Mask
Mask
Mask
Mask
Mask
Mask
Mask
Mask
Mask
Mask
Mask
Mask
STN-GRIDN
GRIDE
REPABSG
-1800
-1600
O
O
O
300
O
-300
-50
-0.01
-1400
-800
-600
-200
-200
O
200
400
O
50
O
600
700
100
O
50
-800
800
1200
1200
1400
1400
1400
1600
1800
1800
1800
-250
100
50
-50
O
150
-200
-50
2000
2000
-0.05
0.05
0.03
-0.05
0.04
0.04
-0.01
-0.01
-0.06
-0.01
-0.05
-0.03
-0.01
0.02
O
0.03
-0.01
-0.02
-0.01
0.03
0.02
-0.05
Table IV: Gravity Repeat Stations
GRAVITY DATA PROCESSING
The data was reduced to partial Bouguer gravity anomaly values. Terrain corrections have been applied
to 53.3 meters. A density of 2.67 gm/cc is used in the data listing. This value was assumed to be the
appropriate density in calculations for the partial Bouguer value. The gravity data was processed by
computer in the following manner:
g0
Observed Gravity- field observations corrected for earth tides and long term instrument drift
were transcribed from field notebooks and corrections made for instrument height and residual
instrument drift. These values were not tied to the National Gravity Net.
gfa
Free Air Effect- Correction for relative distances of observation points from the centre of mass
(earth). This calculation moves all stations to a common elevation datum and corrects for relative
QS-183-May, 2004
10
Matrix GeoTechnologies Ltd
Gravity Survey
Champion Bear Resources Ltd
Iron Mask Property
distances from the source mass. The elevation datum used was mean sea level. The formula
used was:
gta^ -0.3086 mgal/m
g bs
Bouguer Slab Effect - Correction for the relative differences in amounts of surface rock below
gravity stations. This calculation requires that a mean density or rock type between the lowest
and highest grid elevations be established. All stations are shifted to a common datum as in the
free air effect except that the vertical change is through an assumed slab of the derived density.
The elevation datum used was mean sea level.
gbs^ 2*PI*. 00667*a mgal/m
Where a = slab density (gm/cc)
g.
Theoretical Gravity - Yields correction for change of observed gravity with change in (WGS84)
latitude which is due primarily to the rotation of the earth and the difference in earth's radius
between the poles and the equator.
g, = ge(1 * asin2 Q+ (3sin229)
Where ge = equatorial gravity = 978,031.85 mgal.
a = 0.005278895
P = -0.000023462
6 = Latitude
gt
Terrain Correction- corrections for variations caused by local terrain. The vertical component of
the gravitational effect exerted by nearby hills, or not exerted by nearby valleys or gullies, will
affect the net reading obtained on any one station. Areas were segmented using circular sectors
in zones developed by Hammer (1939). Corrections were made for zones B and C (covering an
area from 2 to 53.3 meters from the station), g, was calculated from the following expression:
g, = *PTa[r0 - r, * (n2 * z2)'7' - (r02 * z2)*]
Where O = Sector angle (B = 90", C = 90 0)
T = gravitational constant = 0.00667
o = average density (gm/cc)
r0 = outer sector radius (6=16.6, C=53.3)
n = inner sector radius (6=2, 0=16.6)
z = elevation difference between sector and station.
gfaa
Free Air Anomaly: is derived from the following formulae:
9faa = 9o - (gi -0.3086*E) = Free Air Anomaly
Where g0 = observed gravity
gi = theoretical gravity
E = elevation
gba
Bouguer Anomaly: was derived from the following formulae:
gba s gb -1- gfaa -i-gt* 6ouguer Gravity
Where gb = Bouguer gravity
graa = free air anomaly
gt = terrain corrections
DATA PRESENTATION
*
Maps:
Plan Maps:
QS-183-May,2004
Contoured Complete Bouguer Gravity and Complete
Bouguer Residual Gravity Maps (density 2.45 g/cm ), at
11
Champion Bear Resources Ltd
Iron Mask Property
Matrix GeoTechnologies Ltd
Gravity Survey
1:10,000 scale.
Digital:
*.GRD
*.XYZ
*.GDB
QS-183-May, 2004
Geosoft files for colour grids
GeosoftXYZ files
Geosoft database files
12
Matrix GeoTechnologies Ltd
Gravity Survey
Champion Bear Resources Ltd
Iron Mask Property
4.
PROPERTY GEOLOGY
The IRON MASK PROPERTY is underlain by rocks of the Superior Province, including Early Precambrian
metavolcanics, metasediments, felsic plutonic migmatic and mafic intrusive rocks, as well as Middle
Precambrian Huronian Supergroup metasedimets and mafic intrusions, the Nippising Diabase and late
mafic dykes and intrusives related to the Sudbury Igneous Complex (SIC).
The property lies in a zone of Sudbury Breccia, consisting of mineral and rock fragments derived
predominantly from wallrocks supported by a fine-grained matrix, and the intrusion of "offset dykes".
Two major varieties of these dykes have been recognized: radial and concentric.
The IRON MASK PROPERTY show apparent similarity to the general geological environment of Olympic
Dam Cu-U-Au-LREE deposit. There is also potential on the property for radial and concentric dyke
hosted Ni-Cu-PGE related to the SIC. Offset dyke deposit in the Sudbury area consists of disseminated
to massive sulphides, predominantly pyrrhotite, chalcopyrite and pentlandite within the dykes. The
massive sulphide bodies are often rimmed by a halo of disseminated material and are found along the
contacts of the dyke.
GRAVITY DATA INTERPRETATION
The Bouguer Anomaly assumes the earth below the elevation of a gravity observation is flat. In areas of
locally rough terrain the reduced Bouguer Anomaly can be significantly in error. To correct this error we
model the effect of the terrain surrounding an observation location (using the Hammer graticules) and
add a correction to the Bouguer Anomaly to yield the Complete Bouguer Anomaly.
Overall, the gravity signature on the IRON MASK GRID indicates that the area is dominated by relatively
large of higher density rocks, located in the central part of the survey area. The Complete Bouguer
Gravity data span nearly 4 mgals in magnitude (-57.53 to -53.58 mgals).
The gravity survey shows the presence of a high density causative body, centered at the BL O, and
crosscutting almost the whole grid. The gravimetric anomaly broadens to the north-east and most likely
continues further to the NE. The causative body most likely dips to North-West. In addition, it is quite
possible that anomalous zone is composed by several smaller anomalies, with the weakest one
composing the western shoulder of the anomalous zone. It is evident that the large anomaly in these
lines is a reflection of wide structure, interpreted to be gabbros, and it is directly related to near surface \
depth extended density changes. The gravity survey undertaken over IRON MASK GRID does not
corroborate the presence of any massive Olympic Dam type of mineralization.
Additionally, the gravity survey defines some isolated, pipe type of anomalies that form some NE-SW
trends and might represent some exploration potential. These anomalies are scattered all over the grid,
sometimes correlated from line-to-line.
Further to the south-southwest there is a distinct high densityMow density contact, most likely
representing the geological contact between the gabbro\diabase and Gowganda formation.
FOLLOW-UP TARGETS ANALYSIS
The gravity survey clearly identifies the gabbro\diabase spatial location. Based on the fact that the
known mineralization east and west flanks the gabbro\diabase intrusion, the authors believe that the
future exploration works must be focused in this area.
QS-185-July, 2004
Matrix GeoTechnologies Ltd
Gravity Survey
Champion Bear Resources Ltd
lron Mask Property
S. i0WkUS!6Ni AND RteOM^iNDAtlCpS
The gravity work over the IRON MASK GRID has clearly identified the presence of the gabbro intrusion,
potentially related to the mineralization and successfully assisted the mapping of general geology.
However the gravity work did not explicitly find signatures associated to large high grade mineralization,
Olympic Dam deposit,
In response to the survey objectives, a high density zone has been identified in the surveyed grid, which
is of significant importance to further exploration. The authors strongly recommend additional
geophysical survey, more specifically IP\Resistivity methods, to be used in order to define the extension
of known mineralization and explain the relation between the gabbro and known mineralization.
The authors have the opinion that the combination of gradient array with pole-dipole array aggregate a
very efficient exploration tool, emphasizing the merit of pole-dipole configuration on the determination of
a conceptual geological model derived from QUANTITATIVE SECTION. In addition, the geological model
derived from IP\Resistivity work might be used to model the gravity\magnetic data, with the purpose of
refining the final structural model.
Considering that the anomalous zone is still open to the north-northwest, additional reconnaissance
IP/Resistivity lines are strongly recommended in this direction.
We recommend that these results to be combined with the existing geoscientific database and the
results carefully evaluated prior to DDH-testing. Close comparisons against geochemistry or other
geological information can provide a better understanding of the geology and the potential targets.
RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED
GENC KALLFA, B.Sc., P.GEO.
Senior Geophysicist
THOMAS MITCHELL, A.Sc.T.
Senior Geophysicist
Toronto, July 29, 2004
QS-185-July, 2004
LUDVIG KAPLLANI, M.Sc., PH.D.
Senior Geophysicist
Matrix GeoTechnologies Ltd
Gravity Survey
Champion Bear Resources Ltd
Iron Mask Property
STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS:
l, Ludvig Kapllani, declare that:
1.
l am a consulting geophysicist with residence in Toronto, Ontario and am presently working in this capacity
with Matrix GeoTechnologies Ltd. of Toronto, Ontario.
2.
l obtained a Bachelor's of Science Degree, (B.Se.), Geophysics, in spring 1976, a Masters of Science
Degree, (M.Se.), Geophysics, in June 1986, Ph.D in January 1995, Geophysics, from Polytechnic
University of Tirana, Albania and Associate Professor, February 1995 (titles recognized by University of
Toronto, August 1999).
3.
l have practiced my profession continuously since May 1976, in North and South America, Africa and
Europe.
4.
l have no interest, nor do l expect to receive any interest in the properties or securities of Champion Bear
Resources Ltd.
5.
l am the author of this report and the statements contained represent my professional opinion based on my
consideration of the information available to me at the time of writing this report.
i
L kL
Jof
Toronto, Ontario
July, 2004
Ludvig Kapllani, M.Se., Ph.D.
Senior Geophysicist
Matrix GeoTechnologies Ltd.
QS-185-July, 2004
Matrix GeoTechnologies Ltd
Gravity Survey
Champion Bear Resources Ltd
Iron Mask Property
APPE
STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS:
l, Gene Kallfa, declare that:
1.
l am a consulting geophysicist with residence in Toronto, Ontario and am presently working in this capacity
with Matrix GeoTechnologies Ltd. of Toronto, Ontario.
2.
l obtained a Bachelor's of Science Degree, (B.Se.), Geophysics, from the Polytechnic University, in Tirana,
Albania, in spring 1987.
3.
l have practiced my profession continuously since May 1987, in North and South America, Africa and
Europe.
4.
l am member of ASSOCIATION OF PROFESSIONAL GEOSCIENTISTS OF ONTARIO (APGO), membership number
0404.
5.
l have no interest, nor do l expect to receive any interest in the properties or securities of Champion Bear
Resources Ltd.
6.
l am the author of this report and the statements contained represent my professional opinion based on my
consideration of the information available to me at the time of writing this report.
Toronto, Ontario
July, 2004
Gene Kallfa, ff^, 3 .Geo. (ON)
Senior (ieophysicist
Matrix GeoTechnologies Ltd.
QS-185-July, 2004
Matrix GeoTechnologies Ltd
Gravity Survey
Champion Bear Resources Ltd
Iron Mask Property
STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS
l, Thomas L. Mitchell, declare that:
1.
l am the owner of Quadra Surveys with office at 2AA -8211 River Road, Richmond, BC, V8X 3X9.
2.
l am a graduate of BCIP, with a diploma in Surveying Technology (1977).
3.
l am a geophysical surveyor, registered with the Association of Applied Science Technologists and
Technicians of British Columbia.
4.
l have practiced my profession in Africa, Chile, Canada, Japan and USA for 26 years.
5.
This report is based on a gravity survey which l conducted.
6.
l have no interest, nor do l expect to receive any interest in the properties or securities of Champion Bear
Resources Ltd.
Yellowknife, British Columbia
July, 2004
Tarn Mitchell, A.Sc.T.
Senior Geophysicist
Quadra Surveys
* - """"**
v' Vxpoloflr/s^s
t
*?
C'"*** *4\
.^SfT*1*^
QS-185-July, 2004
Matrix GeoTechnologies Ltd
Gravity Survey
Champion Bear Resources Ltd
Iron Mask Property
THEORETICAL BASIS AND SURVEY PROCEDURES
Gravity is the force of attraction between masses. In geophysical terms it is the force due to the
integrated mass of the whole Earth, which acts on the mechanism of a measuring instrument.
Measurements are usually made at the surface of the Earth, in aircraft or on ships. They may also be
made in mines or on man-made structures. The gravity field in space may be inferred from the orbit of a
satellite. The measuring instrument may be a very precise spring balance, a pendulum or a small body
falling in a vacuum.
If the Earth were a perfect homogeneous sphere the gravity field would only depend on the distance
from the centre of the Earth. In fact the Earth is a slightly irregular oblate ellipsoid which means that the
gravity field at its surface is stronger at the poles than at the equator. The mass (density) distribution is
also uneven, particularly in the rigid crust, which causes gravity to vary from the expected value as the
measurement position changes. These variations are expressed as gravity anomalies, the mapping of
which gives us an insight into the structure of the Earth.
Gravity varies as the inverse square of the distance of the observer from a mass so that nearby mass
variations will have a more pronounced (higher frequency) effect than more distant masses whose effect
will be integrated over a larger area (lower frequency). The force is proportional to the mass so that, per
unit volume, higher density bodies will cause a more positive gravity anomaly than lower density bodies.
QS-180-April 2004
Matrix GeoTechnologies Ltd
Gravity Survey
~.,
- r.
Champion Bear Resources Ltd
Iran Mask Property
MAPS AND SECTIONS
* Contoured Plan Maps at scale of (1:10,000)
QS-180 -April 2004
1. PLAN MAP:
COMPLETE BOUGUER GRAVITY MAP
2. PLAN MAP:
COMPLETE BOUGUER RESIDUAL GRAVITY MAP
3. PLAN MAP:
CLAIM MAP
CB*-EXP \ IronMw* \ MM.OB.CIoini^M^.C
Lait rrmion dole TuBjOnc. J Ajguit. 300*
Watts, Griffis and McOuat
(Iron Molt ChJimi Uap
*~*fj7 i j*.
l-W^WV^
^~*f~jf "^
t^i
fS
MUNSTER TWP
s-—'-?
-s^
W1
^C
y yr v
jf
S \
\ ^
j.
\
-**
-,
,~v~' v
-'
^*\/
** li v " LEINST iR T\W
/'
(. -'1N
t ^
^^^^
f r~~^~^ j
^3^
fL I
.
rf*"^^^-V
i
' 'v
—ffi
1215624
^
'^
1179649
1218244 h Vi————7
" -,. j 4
1 218245
1179647.'
121824^
i
CARTIER TWP
t-^ ^^c5 -^
^2m55
^
H
HARTTWPl
1231034
j
3009786
:
-j"^—^—
f8 CASCADEN TWP
^'-^ l——————————
-I'n.UDilnt.l-:.
7,500 m.
0
l : 150,000
Map Datum: NAD83. UTM Zone 17
CHAMPION BEAR RESOURCES LTD.
Iron Mask Property
l m*^-v WB
fufl *-* *il r
D**^v *x ^Vm^4-* T
Claim Map
ONTARIO
MINISTRY OF NORTHERN DEVELOPMENT AND MINES
Work Report Summary
Transaction No:
W0470.01217
Status: APPROVED
Recording Date:
2004-AUG-03
Work Done from: 2004-JUL-04
Approval Date:
2004-AUG-20
to: 2004-JUL-28
Client(s):
1 16945
CHAMPION BEAR RESOURCES LTD.
Survey Type(s):
GRAV
Work Report Details:
Claim*
Perform
Perform
Approve
Applied
Applied
Approve
Assign
Assign
Approve
Reserve
Reserve
Approve
Due Date
so
2005-AUG-03
S
1043524
S5.053
S5.053
56,400
86,400
SO
0
80
S
1098665
51,895
51,895
SO
SO
51,354
1,354
S541
S541 2005-APR-25
S
1174457
5884
5884
SO
SO
5884
884
80
SO 2005-APR-19
S
1179646
SO
so
52,400
S2.400
50
0
80
SO 2005-APR-02
S
1203893
SO
50
54,800
84,800
80
0
80
SO 2005-MAY-25
S
1203894
SO
SO
8800
S800
80
0
80
SO 2005-MAY-25
S
1210840
53,790
S3.790
SO
50
53,790
3,790
80
S
1210841
55,053
55,053
SO
SO
55,053
5,053
SO
S
1210842
55,684
55,684
SO
SO
S5.684
5,684
SO
S
1211181
52,526
52,526
8800
5800
81,726
1,726
SO
8800
S800
80
0
SO
S
1211360
55,053
85,053
51,600
S
1211361
51,263
51,263
so
SO
51,263
1,263
SO
so
so
so
so
so
so
so
so
1,895
SO
50 2004-DEC-27 E
S
1211272
S632
S632
S
1211355
51,263
81,263
8400
5400
5863
863
SO
51,600
53,453
3,453
SO
2005-JAN-18
2005-JAN-18
2005-JAN-18
2005-AUG-24
2005-AUG-24
2005-AUG-24
2005-AUG-24
2005-AUG-24
S
1214820
51,895
81,895
SO
SO
81,895
S
1214821
SO
50
8400
S400
80
0
80
S
1221541
SO
50
54,800
54,800
80
0
80
so
so
S
1221542
52,400
82,400
SO
0
80
SO 2005-SEP-06
1221543
so
so
SO
S
50
5800
5800
SO
0
SO
S
1221544
SO
50
5400
5400
SO
0
SO
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
1223181
80
SO
54,000
54,000
SO
0
50
1224157
80
SO
56,000
S6.000
SO
0
SO
1229424
SO
50
S2.000
52,000
SO
0
so
so
so
so
so
so
so
so
so
so
so
so
so
so
so
so
so
1229436
50
SO
5400
8400
SO
0
1229443
55,053
55,053
SO
SO
85,053
5,053
1231174
SO
SO
56,400
S6.400
SO
0
1235410
85,053
55,053
SO
SO
55,053
5,053
1235411
52,526
52,526
SO
SO
52,526
2,526
1241362
81,263
51,263
SO
SO
51,263
1,263
1241363
81,263
51,263
SO
80
51,263
1,263
1241364
S632
5632
SO
80
8632
632
1249906
SO
50
S800
5800
SO
0
3002857
SO
SO
51,200
81,200
SO
0
3002858
SO
SO
52,400
52,400
SO
0
2005-JUN-25
2005-SEP-07
2005-SEP-06
2005-SEP-06
2005-APR-02
2005-APR-20
2005-OCT-16
SO 2005-SEP-06
H
H
to
55
M
to
o
LJ
O
to
to
CO
to
o
Ul
SO 2005-MAR-02
80 2005-APR-02
80 2005-FEB-23
BH
80 2005-FEB-23
50 2005-JAN-15E
so
2005-JAN-15E
50 2005-JAN-15E
so
so
so
2005-JUN-22
2005-AUG-02
2005-AUG-02
y?
o
O
2004-Sep-08 09:29
armstrongjj
Page 1 of 2
ONTMIO
MINISTRY OF NORTHERN DEVELOPMENT AND MINES
Work Report Summary
Transaction No:
W0470.01217
Recording Date:
2004-AUG-03
Approval Date:
2004-AUG-20
Status: APPROVED
Work Done from:
2004-JUL-04
to: 2004-JUL-28
Work Report Details:
Claim*
S
Perform
Perform
Approve
Applied
Applied
Approve
Assign
Assign
Approve
Reserve
SO
SO
S240
5240
50
O
SO
550,781
550,781
350,240
550,240
541,755
541,755
5541
3004319
External Credits:
Reserve
Approve
Due Date
50 2005-SEP-11
5541
SO
Reserve:
5541
Reserve of Work Report*: W0470.01217
5541
Total Remaining
Status of claim is based on information currently on record.
2004-Sep-08 09:29
armstrongjj
Page 2 of 2
Ministry of
Northern Development
and Mines
Ontario
Ministere du
Developpement du Nord
et des Mines
GEOSCIENCE ASSESSMENT OFFICE
933 RAMSEY LAKE ROAD, 6th FLOOR
SUDBURY, ONTARIO
P3E 6B5
Date: 2004-AUG-26
Tel: (888)415-9845
Fax:(877)670-1555
CHAMPION BEAR RESOURCES LTD.
2005-9TH STREET, S.,W.,
CALGARY, ALBERTA
T2T 3C4
CANADA
Submission Number: 2.28205
Transaction Number(s): W0470.01217
Dear Sir or Madam
Subject: Approval of Assessment Work
We have approved your Assessment Work Submission with the above noted Transaction Number(s). The attached
Work Report Summary indicates the results of the approval.
At the discretion of the Ministry, the assessment work performed on the mining lands noted in this work
report may be subject to inspection and/or investigation at any time.
If you have any question regarding this correspondence, please contact STEVEN BENETEAU by email at
[email protected] or by phone at (705) 670-5855.
Yours Sincerely,
/f,
Ron.C. Gashinski
Senior Manager, Mining Lands Section
Cc: Resident Geologist
Champion Bear Resources Ltd.
(Claim Holder)
Assessment File Library
Champion Bear Resources Ltd.
(Assessment Office)
Joe Hinzer
(Agent)
Visit our website at http://www.gov.on.ca/MNDM/LANDS/mlsmnpge.htm
Page: 1
Correspondence 10:19763
ONTARIO :™:
OF MORTHtRN
AMD MIMES
41I12NE2030
2.28205
HART
CANADA
200
RECONDCHI OFF1C*
Mining Land Tenure
Map
Dale ; Timr of laaue Wed Od 06 12 03 30 EOT 200J
TOWNSHIP ' AREA
HART
PLAN
G-4058
ADMINISTRATIVE DISTRICTS t DIVISIONS
Mining Division
Sudbury
Land Titles/Registry Division
SUDBURY
Ministry of Natural Resources District
SUDBURY
TOPOGRAPHIC
Land Ttnura
Surfac* And Mnna Wghto
COnOMtwi lot
ProvraWPM
MMr Raiaiv*
O*, F*.| t PA*
rjl
Surfac* And Mwvng RiaM*
nn
SortBC* R^IKB 0"*y
rZl
Mn T) Mghli ON?
UatneaaTOacupiMn
Burton And Mm? R*Mi
W4.L-P192/9M
PwPark
W-LL-P1W01
Surtec* RlonM Only
.......
P**n* Qaa Ppatti*
B
Oflat m Courd ft** open Kr wMigi
UVH* Pom LCM*
^——n
LAND TENURE WITHDRAWALS
Awn
tn
Am
W'v*
W*
Unng Act* tfrandroiMt TyoM
Sui*t**rdl
Hurln "*V-B
Mni^fttBlMt
Ontar In Covrcl WiMnori TypM
IMPORTANT NOTICES
•••t* rum
S37B893
W-U-f 192/01
Cd. 11
C*t 11
S3M400
l
S378212
W-U.-f206
W-U.-C20W9B
ot* wMhmg lo *ak* muting dwms tfioufd conut with th* Pro* no W Mining R*eofdar*' Oftee or tn* MttiiMry of Northern Dwalopmant and Mine* tor nddinonai
on in* riatut ofth* land* *rown h*r*on. TNi map li nol kUwxivd (w fnvtfladcnial Kinvy, J land Utl* dalwmlnalWn purpni** *ttli* mfomnUon
ofltfiit m*p it nwnpiMtf from vnnouc loumi CompMtvr*** md •oouracy ira not guaranteed. Addtttonil mftxm*rion may *l*o b* OMWnvd tprmigh MM
-.cal Land Till*s or RagiMry Offo*, W Vt* Mnlilry of N*jr*l RMMITOM.
l ne i
Kiown la itonvM Irtvn dlgtt*! d* t* *v**abla In OM Prcnlnd*! MtnJng R*oo*a*re' Oole* M ih* tlma of downkMdMg Iram Ilw MlniKry of NttVia
General Information and Limliailons
ConlM Inrormillon
Provincial MmmgR.ooid.rs' Offic*
To* Fra*
Map Datum MAD A3
Tri. 1 (8*6j41S-WMS *U 57*t)|acllOO UTM (6 d*^(**
WWMGrMnMHI*rCartir*933RamNyLaM Road
Fix: 1 (877)670-1444
Sudbt^v ON P3E 685
Horn* Pag*: www.mndfli.oov.ofl ca*INDMJMINESilANDSrtni*mnpg*.rHm
Topographic Data Soure* Land (ntonntilion Ontsno
Mlnmi LitKl fanur* Souro Provina*! Mining R.cofdar. OHlo
This map may net inow un r#gt d wad tend Mnum and i
land including cwWn palant*, IMW*. MtMnant*. right of way*
flooding ngM*. Uoane**, or othw toon t of dlapoaWon of nghta and
•nMfMl tom the Crown Alto oanwn wid Unur* and land UIM
"w* "**i or prcMbR *** •rfty lo aUh* mining drinw iwy not b*
490000
4*800
4*1800
483000
482800
-MMl
-Mill
-M4S.
MM]
-M 64 l
•MN
•Hail
•5*4*1
ae t* l
•Will
Oravty
Slnlion In t Bn al 50m
Uo* Spacin
DATA PRESENTATION
ilcr firivTlV
-^.! O05 mftol
Champion Bear Resources
•4
H
O
Complete Bouguer Residual Gravity Map
Iron Mash Project
CartMr. Ontario. Canada
.•.j. ^'' -J
SuljconUacux 'ji.if.ra 'ji.-.ovi
Mifrte G*or*chrrotogies LW
10*1
owl
onl
owl
r se l
OJ'I
owl
O Al
01'
014 I
011!
O Of l
owl
tun!
OMl
•owl
•OH)
4 Of L
•O (M l
•awl
Gravity
S*/
Sl'Rvn SPBTIFICATIOTIS
Ptnlion l ri t FIT a l Vim
Une -'pat ing 2(Klm
RAT* PRK8F.NTATKW
C on* p 11-1 r Hoiiciif-r Rcsictii.il Crxvily
Thirtl Orrfpr Trenri (rfijionnl) R*mnvcff
Contour Interval 0.05 niGol
2. 45 (pn/cc
451900
M
M
O
4S2000
452300
Champion Bear Resources
Complete Bouguei Kestdiial Gravity Map
Iron Math Project
453000
Cartier. Onlano Canada
July 2004
Mttrix G#oT*crtnotogyes Lfd