APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORT
AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORT FortheProposed
1020S.FigueroaStreetProject
1020S.FigueroaStreet
LosAngeles,CA
Preparedfor:
HAZENS GROUP – JIA YUAN USA CO., INC.
801SouthFigueroaStreet,Suite1800
LosAngeles,CA90017
Preparedby:
ESAPCR
80SLakeAvenue,Suite570
Pasadena,CA91101
TEL626.204.6170
FAX626.204.6171
June2016
Table of Contents Page
ACRONYMSANDABBREVIATIONS....................................................................................................................................1 EXECUTIVESUMMARY.....................................................................................................................................................ES‐1 1.0INTRODUCTION...............................................................................................................................................................1 1.1 ExistingConditions..............................................................................................................................................................1 1.2 ProjectDescription...............................................................................................................................................................1 1.2.1HotelTower.......................................................................................................................................................................1 1.2.2ResidentialUses...............................................................................................................................................................2 1.2.3Podium(CommercialUsesandParking)..............................................................................................................2 1.2.4Construction......................................................................................................................................................................2 1.2.5Operation............................................................................................................................................................................2 1.3 ExistingSiteEmissions.......................................................................................................................................................5 1.4 ExistingAirQualityConditions.......................................................................................................................................6 1.4.1RegionalAirQuality.......................................................................................................................................................6 1.4.2LocalAirQuality..............................................................................................................................................................8 2.0REGULATORYSETTINGANDSIGNIFICANCETHRESHOLDS..........................................................................15 2.1 RegulatorySetting.............................................................................................................................................................15 2.1.1Federal..............................................................................................................................................................................15 2.1.2State...................................................................................................................................................................................19 2.1.3Regional............................................................................................................................................................................20 2.1.4Local...................................................................................................................................................................................24 2.2 SignificanceThresholds..................................................................................................................................................25 2.2.1ConstructionEmissions.............................................................................................................................................26 2.2.2OperationalEmissions...............................................................................................................................................27 2.2.3ToxicAirContaminants.............................................................................................................................................28 2.2.4ConsistencywithAirQualityPlansandPolicies.............................................................................................29 3.0METHODOLOGY............................................................................................................................................................31 3.1 ConsistencywithAirQualityPlan...............................................................................................................................31 3.2 ConstructionEmissions...................................................................................................................................................31 3.2.1EmissionsfromConstructionEquipment..........................................................................................................32 3.2.2EmissionsfromOn‐RoadTrips..............................................................................................................................33 3.2.3EmissionsfromArchitecturalCoating................................................................................................................34 3.2.4EmissionsfromPaving..............................................................................................................................................34 3.3 OperationalEmissions.....................................................................................................................................................35 3.3.1AreaSources(ConsumerProductsandCoatings)..........................................................................................36 3.3.2BuildingEnergyUsage...............................................................................................................................................37 3.3.3MobileSourceEmissions..........................................................................................................................................37 3.3.4StationarySourceEmissions...................................................................................................................................39 3.4 ToxicAirContaminantImpacts(ConstructionandOperations)...................................................................40 1020S.FigueroaStreetProject
ESAPCR
AirQualityTechnicalReport
i
Table of Contents (Continued) Page
3.5 LandUseCharacteristicsandProjectDesignFeatures......................................................................................40 3.5.1LandUseCharacteristics...........................................................................................................................................40 3.5.2ProjectDesignFeatures.............................................................................................................................................44 4.0COMPLIANCEWITHAMBIENTAIRSTANDARDS...............................................................................................47 4.1 RegionalSignificanceThresholds...............................................................................................................................47 4.1.1ConstructionEmissions.............................................................................................................................................47 4.1.2OperationalEmissions...............................................................................................................................................48 4.2 LocalizedSignificanceThresholds..............................................................................................................................50 4.2.1ConstructionEmissions.............................................................................................................................................50 4.2.2OperationalEmissions...............................................................................................................................................51 4.3 LocalizedCarbonMonoxideImpacts.........................................................................................................................51 4.4 ToxicAirContaminants‐Construction....................................................................................................................53 4.5 ToxicAirContaminants‐Operation..........................................................................................................................60 5.0CUMULATIVEANALYSIS.............................................................................................................................................62 5.1 ConstructionImpacts.......................................................................................................................................................62 5.2 OperationalImpacts.........................................................................................................................................................62 6.0SUMMARYOFRESULTS..............................................................................................................................................65 6.1 Construction.........................................................................................................................................................................65 6.2 Operation...............................................................................................................................................................................65 APPENDICES
APPENDIXA:AIRQUALITYWORKSHEETSANDOUTPUTFILES
List of Figures Figure
1 2 3 4 Page
VicinityLocationMap.........................................................................................................................................................3 AerialPhotographofProjectSiteandVicinity.........................................................................................................4 SensitiveReceptorLocationsNearesttotheProjectSite.................................................................................12 ConstructionHealthRiskAssessmentSource‐ReceptorDiagram................................................................57 1020S.FigueroaStreetProject
ESAPCR
AirQualityTechnicalReport
ii
– PRELIMINARY WORKING DRAFT – List of Tables Table
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
Page
EstimatedExistingSiteEmissions(poundsperday)a.........................................................................................5 PollutantStandardsandAmbientAirQualityDatafromRepresentativeMonitoringStations..........9 AmbientAirQualityStandards....................................................................................................................................16 SouthCoastAirBasinAttainmentStatus(LosAngelesCounty)...................................................................18 Phase1–MaximumUnmitigatedRegionalConstructionEmissions(poundsperday)a...................47 Phase2–MaximumUnmitigatedRegionalConstructionEmissions(poundsperday)a...................48 InterimYear–MaximumUnmitigatedRegionalOperationalEmissions(poundsperday)a...........49 FullBuildoutYear–MaximumUnmitigatedRegionalOperationalEmissions(poundsper
day)a.......................................................................................................................................................................................49 Phase1–MaximumUnmitigatedLocalizedConstructionEmissions(poundsperday)a.................50 Phase2–MaximumUnmitigatedLocalizedConstructionEmissions(poundsperday)a.................51 InterimYear–MaximumUnmitigatedLocalizedOperationalEmissions(poundsperday)a.........52 FullBuildoutYear–MaximumUnmitigatedLocalizedOperationalEmissions(poundsper
day)a.......................................................................................................................................................................................52 OEHHARecommendedResidentialDailyBreathingRatesforPointEstimateDose
Calculations(L/kgbodyweight)..............................................................................................................................55 OEHHARecommendationsforFractionofTimeatHome(FAH)forEvaluatingResidential
CancerRisk..........................................................................................................................................................................56 MaximumCarcinogenicRiskforOff‐SiteSensitiveReceptorsfromConstruction................................59 MaximumNon‐CancerChronicImpactsforOff‐SiteSensitiveReceptors.................................................59 1020S.FigueroaStreetProject
ESAPCR
AirQualityTechnicalReport
iii
ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS Acronym ASF
Description agesensitivityfactor
ASHRAE
AmericanSocietyofHeating,Refrigerating,andAir‐ConditioningEngineers
AQMP
AirQualityManagementPlan
ATCM
AirToxicsControlMeasure
BACT
BestAvailableControlTechnology
Basin
SouthCoastAirBasin
CAA
CleanAirAct
CalEEMod
CaliforniaEmissionsEstimatorModel
CARB
CaliforniaAirResourcesBoard
CEC
CaliforniaEnergyCommission
CEUS
CommercialEnd‐UseSurvey
CEQA
CaliforniaEnvironmentalQualityAct
City
CityofLosAngeles
CO
carbonmonoxide
CPF
CancerPotencyFactor
DPF
dieselparticulatefilter
DPM
dieselexhaustparticulatematter
EF
emissionfactor
EMFAC
on‐roadvehicleemissionsfactormodel
FAH
fractionoftimeathome
GVWR
grossvehicleweightrating
HARP
HotspotsAnalysisandReportingProgram
hp
horsepower
HRA
healthriskassessment
HVAC
heating,ventilation,andairconditioning
LAMC
LosAngelesMunicipalCode
LOS
LevelofService
LST
localizedsignificancethreshold
LUT
LandUseTransportation
MATESIV
MultipleAirToxicsExposureStudy,May2015
MERV
MinimumEfficiencyReportingValue
MPO
MetropolitanPlanningOrganization
NAAQS
NationalAmbientAirQualityStandards
NO
nitricoxide
NO2
nitrogendioxide
NOX
nitrogenoxides
OEHHA
OfficeofEnvironmentalHealthandHazardAssessment
Pb
lead
PM2.5
fineparticulates
1020S.FigueroaStreetProject
ESAPCR
AirQualityTechnicalReport
1
Acronyms and abbreviations June 2016 Acronym PM10
Description particulatematter
ppm
partspermillion
RTIP
RegionalTransportationImprovementProgram
RTP/SCS
RegionalTransportationPlan/SustainableCommunitiesStrategy
SCAG
SouthernCaliforniaAssociationofGovernments
SCAQMD
SouthCoastAirQualityManagementDistrict
SIP
StateImplementationPlan
SO2
sulfurdioxide
TAC
toxicaircontaminant
µg/m3
microgramspercubicmeter
µm
micrometers
URF
UnitRiskFactor
USEPA
UnitedStatesEnvironmentalProtectionAgency
VDECS
VerifiedDieselEmissionControlStrategies
VMT
vehiclemilestraveled
VOC
volatileorganiccompounds
1020S.FigueroaStreetProject
ESAPCR
AirQualityTechnicalReport
2
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY HazensGroup–JiaYuanUSACo.,Inc.,theApplicant,proposestodevelopthe1020S.FigueroaStreetProject
(theProject)onanapproximately2.7acre(116,660squarefeet)‘L’‐shapedsite(ProjectSite)boundedbyS.
FigueroaStreettothewest,S.FlowerStreettotheeast,OlympicBoulevardtothenorth,and11thStreetto
thesouth.InaccordancewiththerequirementsundertheCaliforniaEnvironmentalQualityAct(CEQA),this
Technical Report provides an estimate of air quality emissions for the Project and predicts the potential
impacts from construction and operational activities. The report includes the categories and types of
emission sources resulting from the Project, the calculation procedures used in the analysis, and any
assumptionsorlimitations.
TheProjectSiteislocatedinthesouthwestportionoftheDowntowncommunityoftheCityofLosAngeles
(City)whichfallswithintheSouthParkdistrictoftheCentralCityCommunityPlanArea.TheProjectwould
consistofmixed‐useresidential,hotelandcommercialuses.Overall,theProjectwouldatotalofupto300
hotelrooms,650residentialcondominiumunits,anduptoapproximately80,000sfofretail,restaurant,and
othercommercialuses,foratotalofapproximately1,130,000squarefeetoffloorarea.TheProjectincludes
demolition of all existing on‐site buildings and features, excavation for subterranean parking, and
constructionofbuildings.
ThisreportsummarizesthepotentialfortheProjecttoconflictwithanapplicableairqualityplan,toviolate
anairqualitystandardorthreshold,toresultinacumulativelynetincreaseofcriteriapollutantemissions,to
exposesensitivereceptorstosubstantialpollutantconcentrations,ortocreateobjectionableodorsaffecting
asubstantialnumberofpeople.Thefindingsoftheanalysesareasfollows:

The incremental increase in emissions from construction and operation of the Project would not
exceedtheregionaldailyemissionthresholdssetforthbytheSouthCoastAirQualityManagement
District(SCAQMD).Thus,theProjectwouldnotresultinaregionalviolationofapplicableairquality
standardsorjeopardizethetimelyattainmentofsuchstandardsintheSouthCoastAirBasin.

Theincrementalincreaseinon‐siteemissionsfromconstructionandoperationoftheProjectwould
not exceed thelocalized significance thresholdsset forthbytheSCAQMD. Thus,theProjectwould
not result in a localized violation of applicable air quality standards or expose off‐site receptors to
substantiallevelsofregulatedaircontaminants.

Emissions from the increase in traffic due to operation of the Project would not have a significant
impact upon 1‐hour or 8‐hour local carbon monoxide (CO) concentrations due to mobile source
emissions.

Project operations would not expose off‐ or on‐site receptors to significant levels of toxic air
contaminants.Construction‐phasedieselparticulateemissionswouldbereducedbyimplementation
of Project Design Feature (PDF)‐AQ‐1 and would result in less than significant construction health
riskimpacts.

Projectconstructionandoperationswouldnotresultinsignificantlevelsofodors.

The Project would be consistent with air quality policies set forth by the City of Los Angeles, the
SCAQMD,andtheSouthernCaliforniaAssociationofGovernments(SCAG).

TheProjectwouldnotresultinasignificantcumulativeairqualityimpact.
1020S.FigueroaStreetProject
ESAPCR
AirQualityTechnicalReport
ES‐1
1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 EXISTING CONDITIONS Theproposed1020S.FigueroaStreetProjectislocatedonanapproximately2.7acre(116,660squarefeet)
‘L’‐shapedsite(ProjectSite)boundedbyS.FigueroaStreettothewest,S.FlowerStreettotheeast,Olympic
Boulevardtothenorth,and11thStreettothesouth.TheProjectSiteislocatedinthesouthwestportionof
theDowntowncommunityoftheCityofLosAngeles(City)whichfallswithintheSouthParkdistrictofthe
CentralCityCommunityPlanArea.TheProjectSiteshowninFigure1,VicinityLocationMap.TheProject
SiteisinahighlyurbanizedandactiveareaadjacenttoLALIVE,StaplesCenterArena,MicrosoftTheater,and
incloseproximitytotheLosAngelesConventionCenter.
TheProjectSiteiswellservedbyanetworkofregionaltransportationfacilities.TheProjectSiteislocated
approximately 0.2 miles north of the Pico Station operated by the Los Angeles County Metropolitan
TransportationAuthority(Metro).ThePicoStationservestheBlueLineandtheExpoLine.TheBlueLine
providesrailservicebetweentheCityofLongBeachandDowntownLosAngeleswithconnectingserviceto
theMetroGreenLine(servingNorwalk,RedondoBeach,andLAXviashuttle).RegionalaccesstotheProject
Site is provided by the Pasadena/Harbor Freeway (I‐110/SR 110), located approximately 0.3 miles to the
west; the Santa Monica Freeway (I‐10) located approximately 0.5 miles to the south; and, the Hollywood
Freeway(US‐101),locatedapproximately1.5milestothenorth.Thesethreefreewaysalsoprovideaccessto
the Golden State/Santa Ana Freeway (I‐5) to the north, and the San Bernardino Freeway (I‐10) and the
PomonaFreeway(SR‐60)totheeastandsoutheast,respectively.
The Project Site is currently developed with the Luxe City Center Hotel (Luxe Hotel) on the northwest
portionoftheProjectSitewiththeremainderoftheProjectSitedevelopedwithsurfaceparking.TheLuxe
Hotelisa112,748squarefoot,ninestory,100foottallbuildingthatincludes178guestrooms,amainlobby,
meeting rooms, an interior restaurant, an indoor/outdoor bar and lounge area (Nixon Bar and Lounge), a
fitnesscenter,andaone‐levelparkingdeckwithparkingbelowandabovethedeck,allofwhichwouldbe
demolishedandremovedtosupportdevelopmentoftheProject.Figure2,AerialPhotographofProjectSite
andVicinity,showstheProjectSiteandsurroundinglanduses.
1.2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION TheProjectwouldconsistofmixed‐useresidential,hotelandcommercialuseswithtworesidentialtowers
andonehoteltower.PhaseIoftheProjectwouldincludeconstructionofthe34storyHotelTower,located
onthecornerof11thStreetandS.FigueroaStreetwouldincludeupto300hotelrooms,banquet,conference
spaceandvariousamenities.PhaseIwouldalsoincludeconstructionoftheResidentialTower1thatwould
include up to 290 residential units and would be located at the corner of 11th Street and S. Flower Street.
DuringPhase2,theResidentialTower2wouldbeconstructedthatwouldincludeupto360residentialunits
andwouldbelocatedatthecornerofS.FigueroaStreetandOlympicBoulevard.
1.2.1 Hotel Tower ConstructedduringPhaseIoftheProject,onthesouthwestportionoftheProjectSitedirectlyacrossfrom
StaplesCenter,a34storyHotelTowerisproposedthatwouldhaveamaximumheightof430feet.Itwould
1020S.FigueroaStreetProject
ESAPCR
AirQualityTechnicalReport
1
1.0 Introduction June 2016 be designed as a high‐quality hotel with up to 300 hotel rooms, along with banquet facilities, conference
spaceandamenities,foratotalof280,000sfofhoteluse.Additionalamenitieswouldalsobelocatedatthe
top/penthouseleveloftheHotelTower(HotelRooftopAmenityDeck),includingaswimmingpool,bar,spa
tub,loungingarea,andfunctionspace.
1.2.2 Residential Uses Developed as part of Phase 1 of the Project, Residential Tower 1 would be constructed at the southeast
corneroftheProjectSiteattheintersectionof11thStreetandFlowerStreet.TheResidentialTower1would
be 32 stories above grade with a maximum height of 490 feet and would include up to 290 residential
condominium units consisting of lofts, studios, one‐bedroom, two‐bedroom, three‐bedroom units, and
penthouseunits.Phase2wouldincludeconstructionofResidentialTower2,locatedonthenorthwestern
portion of the Project Site at the intersection of S. Figueroa Street and Olympic Boulevard. Residential
Tower2 would be 38 stories above grade, with a maximum height of 540 feet. Phase 2 would include the
constructionof360unitsconsistingoflofts,studios,one‐bedroom,two‐bedroom,three‐bedroomunits,and
penthouseunits.Amenitiesassociatedwiththeresidentialtowerswouldincludelobbies,fitnesscenters,and
recreationalspace.
1.2.3 Podium (Commercial Uses and Parking) ThePodiumareawouldincludeupto80,000sfofcommercialuses,including40,000sfofcommercialuse
and40,000sfofrestaurantuseslocatedwithintwo‐storiesfronting11thStreet,S.FigueroaStreet,Olympic
Boulevard, and S. Flower Street. The Podium would be 75 feet in height and levels three and four of the
Podiumwouldincluderesidentialunitsandhotelamenities.
1.2.4 Construction The Project will be constructed in two phases. Construction of Phase 1 of the Project is expected to
commenceinthethirdquarterof2017andwouldbecompletedinthesecondquarterof2020.Construction
ofPhase2oftheProjectwouldbeginimmediatelyafterPhase1andwouldbecompletedinthefirstquarter
of2023.Totalcutwouldbeapproximately202,000cubicyardsofsoil1andnofillwouldberequiredonthe
Site. A detailed discussion of the methodology used to estimate the construction emissions is provided in
Section3.0,Methodology,below.
1.2.5 Operation TheProject wouldincreasethe building floor area ontheSiteandassociated vehicle tripsascomparedto
existingconditions.Therefore,theincrementalincreaseinairemissions isestimated forthe Project.The
Projectwouldbebuilttomeetorexceedcurrentbuildingenergyefficiencystandards,whichwouldminimize
operationalemissions.Adetaileddiscussionofthemethodologyusedtoestimatetheoperationalemissions
isprovidedinSection3.0,Methodology,below.
1
Includedinthiscalculationisasoilexpansionfactorof1.25
1020S.FigueroaStreetProject
ESAPCR
AirQualityTechnicalReport
2
PROJECT
SITE
LA LIVE
Los Angeles
Convention Center
West Exhibit Hall
Staples Center
Los Angeles
Convention
Center
0
800
PROJECT SITE
1,600 Feet
Vicinity Location Map
1020 S. Figueroa Street Project
Source: ESRI, 2015; PCR Services Corporation, 2015.
FIGURE
1
110
¬
«
Office
Medical
Office
Office
MultiFamily
Salvation Army
Department
of Water
and Power
Hotel
Parking
Hotel
t
LA LIVE
gu
Fi
Restaurant
MultiFamily
MultiFamily
Staples Center
Fl
S
W
Construction
11
Commercial
ow
er
St
re
et
Construction
W
MultiFamily
th
St
Retail/
Parking
re
e
th
St
re
e
et
Ol
y
m
pi
MultiFamily
c
Office
Bo
ul
ev
ar
Park
d
MultiFamily
MultiFamily
t
MultiFamily
12
St
re
Mixed Use/
Multi-Family
S
LA LIVE
er
oa
Petroleum
Building
/Office
9t
h
MultiFamily
Mixed Use/
Multi-family
St
Microsoft
Theater
Commercial
re
e
The Ritz-Carlton
Residences and
JW Marriott
(Hotel/Residences)
W
MultiFamily
MultiFamily
t
Project Site
o
0
300 Feet
Aerial Photograph of Project Site and Vicinity
1020 S. Figueroa Street P roject
Source: Google Maps, 2015 (Aerial); PCR Services Corporation, 2016.
FIGURE
2
June 2016 1.0 Introduction 1.3 EXISTING SITE EMISSIONS TheProjectSiteislocatedwithintheDowntownareaoftheCityofLosAngeles,andiscurrentlydeveloped
with the nine‐story Luxe Hotel and surrounding surface parking lots, which would be demolished and
removed from the Project Site. Air pollutant emissions are currently associated with vehicle trips to and
fromtheexistingProjectSite,on‐sitecombustionofnaturalgasforheatingandcooking,on‐sitecombustion
emissions from landscaping equipment, and on‐site fugitive emissions from the use of consumer products
and architectural coatings. Emissions are estimated using the California Emissions Estimator Model
(CalEEMod), which is a statewide land use emissions computer model designed to provide a uniform
platformforgovernmentagencies,landuseplanners,andenvironmentalprofessionalstoquantifypotential
criteria pollutant and greenhouse gas emissions from a variety of land use projects. CalEEMod was
developed in collaboration with the air districts of California. Regional data (e.g., emission factors, trip
lengths, meteorology, source inventory, etc.) have been provided by the various California air districts to
account for local requirements and conditions. The model is considered to be an accurate and
comprehensive tool for quantifying air quality and GHG impacts from land use projects throughout
California.2BuildingelectricityandnaturalgasusageratesareadjustedtoaccountforpriorTitle24Building
Energy Efficiency Standards.3 Mobile source emissions are estimated based on CARB’s updated version of
the on‐road vehicle emissions factor (EMFAC) model. The most recent version is EMFAC2014, which
“represents ARB's current understanding of motor vehicle travel activities and their associated emission
levels.”4AdetaileddiscussionofthemethodologyusedtoestimatetheemissionsisprovidedinSection3.0,
Methodology,below.
TheexistingProjectSiteemissionsaresummarizedinTable1,EstimatedExistingSiteEmissions.Asshown,
the primary source of emissions is from transportation. Detailed emissions calculations are provided in
AppendixA.
Source Table 1
Estimated Existing Site Emissions (pounds per day) a VOC NOX CO ExistingSiteEmissions
Area(ConsumerProducts,Landscaping)
Energy(NaturalGas)
MotorVehicles
TotalExistingSiteEmissions
5
<1
2
7
<1
1
1
2
<1
1
15
16
SO2 PM10 PM2.5 <1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
7
7
<1
<1
2
2
a Totals may not add up exactly due to rounding in the modeling calculations Detailed emissions calculations are provided in Appendix A. Source: ESA PCR, 2016
2
3
CaliforniaAirResourcesBoard,CalEEModUser'sGuide,AppendixF,Section5,July2013,http://caleemod.com/.AccessedNovember
2015.FactorsforthepriorTitle24standardareextrapolatedbasedonthetechnicalsourcedocumentation.
4
California Air Resources Board, Mobile Source Emissions Inventory, http://www.arb.ca.gov/msei/categories.htm#emfac2014.
AccessedApril2016.
See:http://www.caleemod.com.
1020S.FigueroaStreetProject
ESAPCR
AirQualityTechnicalReport
5
1.0 Introduction June 2016 1.4 EXISTING AIR QUALITY CONDITIONS 1.4.1 Regional Air Quality The distinctive climate of the Basin is determined primarily by its terrain and geographical location.
Regional meteorology is dominated by a persistent high pressure area which commonly resides over the
easternPacificOcean.Seasonalvariationsinthestrengthandpositionofthispressurecellcausechangesin
theweatherpatternsofthearea.Warmsummers,mildwinters,infrequentrainfall,moderatedaytimeon‐
shore breezes, and moderate humidity characterize local climatic conditions. This normally mild climatic
conditionisoccasionallyinterruptedbyperiodsofhotweather,winterstorms,andhoteasterlySantaAna
winds.
TheBasinisanareaofhighairpollutionpotential,particularlyfromJunethroughSeptember.Thiscondition
is generally attributed to the large amount of pollutant emissions, light winds and shallow vertical
atmosphericmixing.Thisfrequentlyreducespollutantdispersion,thuscausingelevatedairpollutionlevels.
PollutantconcentrationsintheBasinvarywithlocation,seasonandtimeofday.Ozoneconcentrations,for
example,tendtobeloweralongthecoast,higherinthenearinlandvalleysandlowerinthefarinlandareas
oftheBasinandadjacentdesert.
Certainairpollutantshavebeenrecognizedtocausenotablehealthproblemsandconsequentialdamageto
the environment either directly or in reaction with other pollutants, due to their presence in elevated
concentrationsintheatmosphere.Suchpollutantshavebeenidentifiedandregulatedaspartoftheoverall
endeavortopreventfurtherdeteriorationandfacilitateimprovementinairquality.Thefollowingpollutants
areregulatedbytheUnitedStatesEnvironmentalProtectionAgency(USEPA)andaresubjecttoemissions
controlrequirementsadoptedbyfederal,stateandlocalregulatoryagencies.Thesepollutantsarereferred
toas“criteria airpollutants”as aresultofthespecificstandards,orcriteria,whichhave been adoptedfor
them.Abriefdescriptionofthehealtheffectsofthesecriteriaairpollutantsareprovidedbelow.
Ozone(O3):Ozoneisasecondarypollutantformedbythechemicalreactionofvolatileorganiccompounds
and nitrogen oxides (NOX) under favorable meteorological conditions such as high temperature and
stagnation episodes. Ozone concentrations are generally highest during the summer months when direct
sunlight,lightwind,andwarmtemperatureconditionsarefavorable.Anelevatedlevelofozoneirritatesthe
lungs and breathing passages, causing coughing and pain in the chest and throat, thereby increasing
susceptibilitytorespiratoryinfectionsandreducingtheabilitytoexercise.Effectsaremoresevereinpeople
with asthma and other respiratory ailments. Long‐term exposure may lead to scarring of lung tissue and
maylowerthelungefficiency.
VolatileOrganicCompounds(VOCs).VOCsaretypicallyformedfromcombustionoffuelsand/orreleased
throughevaporationoforganicliquids.SomeVOCsarealsoclassifiedbytheStateastoxicaircontaminants.
These are compounds comprised primarily of atoms of hydrogen and carbon. Internal combustion
associated with motor vehicle usage is the major source of hydrocarbons, as are architectural coatings.
EmissionsofVOCsthemselvesarenot“criteria”pollutants;however,theycontributewithNOXtoformation
ofO3andareregulatedasO3precursoremissions.
NitrogenDioxide(NO2)andNitrogenOxides(NOX): NOX is a term that refers to a group of compounds
containingnitrogenandoxygen.TheprimarycompoundsofairqualityconcernincludeNO2andnitricoxide
1020S.FigueroaStreetProject
ESAPCR
AirQualityTechnicalReport
6
June 2016 1.0 Introduction (NO), which can quickly oxidize in the atmosphere to form NO2. Ambient air quality standards have been
promulgated for NO2, which is a reddish‐brown, reactive gas. The principle form of NOX produced by
combustionisNO,butNOreactsquicklyintheatmospheretoformNO2,creatingthemixtureofNOandNO2
referred to as NOX. Major sources of NOX emissions include power plants, large industrial facilities, and
motor vehicles. Emissions of NOX are a precursor to the formation of ground‐level ozone. NO2 can
potentiallyirritatethenoseandthroat,aggravatelungandheartproblems,andmayincreasesusceptibility
torespiratoryinfections,especiallyinpeoplewithasthma.AccordingtotheCaliforniaAirResourcesBoard
(CARB), “NO2 is an oxidizing gas capable of damaging cells lining the respiratory tract. Exposure to NO2
alongwithothertraffic‐relatedpollutants,isassociatedwithrespiratorysymptoms,episodesofrespiratory
illnessandimpairedlungfunctioning.Studiesinanimalshavereportedbiochemical,structural,andcellular
changesinthelungwhenexposedtoNO2abovethelevelofthecurrentstateairqualitystandard.Clinical
studies of human subjects suggest that NO2 exposure to levels near the current standard may worsen the
effect of allergens in allergic asthmatics, especially in children.”5 NO2 also contributes to the formation of
particulatematter(PM10).Theterms“NOX”and“NO2”aresometimesusedinterchangeably.However,the
term “NOX” is primarily used when discussing emissions, usually from combustion‐related activities. The
term “NO2” is primarily used when discussing ambient air quality standards. More specifically, NO2 is
regulatedasacriteriaairpollutantundertheCleanAirActandsubjecttotheambientairqualitystandards,
whereasNOXandNOarenot.Incaseswherethethresholdsofsignificanceorimpactanalysesarediscussed
in the context of NOX emissions, it is based on the conservative assumption that all NOX emissions would
oxidizeintheatmospheretoformNO2.
Carbon Monoxide (CO): Carbon monoxide is primarily emitted from combustion processes and motor
vehicles due to incomplete combustion of fuel. Elevated concentrations of CO weaken the heart's
contractionsandlowertheamountofoxygencarriedbytheblood.Itisespeciallydangerousforpeoplewith
chronic heart disease. Inhalation of CO can cause nausea, dizziness, and headaches at moderate
concentrationsandcanbefatalathighconcentrations.
SulfurDioxide(SO2):MajorsourcesofSO2includepowerplants,largeindustrialfacilities,dieselvehicles,
and oil‐burning residential heaters. Emissions of sulfur dioxide aggravate lung diseases, especially
bronchitis. It also constricts the breathing passages, especially in asthmatics and people involved in
moderatetoheavyexercise.Sulfurdioxidepotentiallycauseswheezing,shortnessofbreath,andcoughing.
High levels of particulates appear to worsen the effect of sulfur dioxide, and long‐term exposures to both
pollutantsleadstohigherratesofrespiratoryillness.
ParticulateMatter(PM10andPM2.5):Thehumanbodynaturallypreventstheentryoflargerparticlesinto
the body. However, small particles including fugitive dust, with an aerodynamic diameter equal to or less
thantenmicrons(PM10)andevensmallerparticleswithanaerodynamicdiameterequaltoorlessthan2.5
microns(PM2.5),canenterthebodyandaretrappedinthenose,throat,andupperrespiratorytract.These
smallparticulatescouldpotentiallyaggravateexistingheartandlungdiseases,changethebody'sdefenses
against inhaled materials, and damage lung tissue. The elderly, children, and those with chronic lung or
heartdiseasearemostsensitivetoPM10andPM2.5.Lungimpairmentcanpersistfortwotothreeweeksafter
exposuretohighlevelsofparticulatematter.Sometypesofparticulatescouldbecometoxicafterinhalation
duetothepresenceofcertainchemicalsandtheirreactionwithinternalbodyfluids.Theelderly,children,
5
California Air Resources Board, “Nitrogen Dioxide – Overview,” http://www.arb.ca.gov/research/aaqs/caaqs/no2‐1/no2‐1.htm.
AccessedMay2016.
1020S.FigueroaStreetProject
ESAPCR
AirQualityTechnicalReport
7
1.0 Introduction June 2016 andthosewithchroniclungorheartdiseasearemostsensitivetoPM10andPM2.5.Inchildren,studieshave
shown associations betweenPMexposure andreducedlungfunction and increasedrespiratorysymptoms
and illnesses.6 Lung impairment can persist for two to three weeks after exposure to high levels of
particulate matter. Some types of particulates could become toxic after inhalation due to the presence of
certainchemicalsandtheirreactionwithinternalbodyfluids.
Lead (Pb): Lead is emitted from industrial facilities and from the sanding or removal of old lead‐based
paint.Smeltingorprocessingthemetalistheprimarysourceofleademissions,whichisprimarilyaregional
pollutant. Lead affects the brain and other parts of the body's nervous system. Exposure to lead in very
youngchildrenimpairsthedevelopmentofthenervoussystem,kidneys,andbloodformingprocessesinthe
body.
1.4.2 Local Air Quality 1.4.2.1 Existing Ambient Air Quality in the Surrounding Area The SCAQMD maintains a network of air quality monitoring stations located throughout the Air Basin to
measureambientpollutantconcentrations.ThemonitoringstationmostrepresentativeoftheProjectSiteis
the Central Los Angeles County Monitoring Station, located at 1630 North Main Street, Los Angeles, CA
90012.Criteriapollutantsmonitoredatthisstationincludeozone,NO2,CO,SO2,PM10,andPM2.5.Themost
recent data available from the SCAQMD for this monitoring station are from years 2010 to 2014.7 The
pollutantconcentrationdatafortheseyearsaresummarizedinTable2,PollutantStandardsandAmbientAir
QualityDatafromRepresentativeMonitoringStations.
1.4.2.2 Existing Health Risk in the Surrounding Area BetweenJuly2012andJune2013,theSCAQMDconductedtheMultipleAirToxicsExposureStudy(MATES
IV), which is a follow‐up to previous air toxics studies conducted in the Air Basin. The MATES IV Final
Report was issued in May 2015. The study, based on actual monitored data throughout the Air Basin,
consisted of several elements. These included a monitoring program, an updated emissions inventory of
TACs, and a modeling effort to characterize carcinogenic risk across the Air Basin from exposure to TACs.
Thestudyappliedatwo‐kilometer(1.24‐mile)gridovertheAirBasinandreportedcarcinogenicriskwithin
eachgridspace(coveringanareaoffoursquarekilometersor1.54squaremiles).Thestudyconcludedthat
theaverageofthemodeledairtoxicsconcentrationsmeasuredateachofthemonitoringstationsintheAir
Basin equates to a background cancer risk of approximately 418 in 1,000,000 primarily due to diesel
exhaust, which is about 65 percent lower than the previous MATES III cancer risk.8 Subsequent to the
SCAQMD’s risk calculations estimates performed for MATES IV, the California Environmental Protection
Agency Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA) updated the methods for estimating
6
California Air Resources Board, “Particulate Matter – Overview,” http://www.arb.ca.gov/research/aaqs/caaqs/pm/pm.htm.
AccessedMay2016.
7
South Coast Air Quality Management District, Historical Data by Year, http://www.aqmd.gov/smog/historicaldata.htm. Accessed
April2016.
8
SouthCoastAirQualityManagementDistrict,FinalReport–MultipleAirToxicsExposureStudyintheSouthCoastAirBasin,(2015)
ES‐2.
1020S.FigueroaStreetProject
ESAPCR
AirQualityTechnicalReport
8
June 2016 1.0 Introduction Table 2 Pollutant Standards and Ambient Air Quality Data from Representative Monitoring Stations 2010 2011 2012 2013 Pollutant/Standard O3(1‐hour)
MaximumConcentration(ppm)
Days>CAAQS(0.09ppm)
O3(8‐hour)
MaximumConcentration(ppm)
4thHigh8‐hourConcentration(ppm)
Days>CAAQS(0.070ppm)
Days>NAAQS(0.075ppm)
NO2(1‐hour)
MaximumConcentration(ppm)
98thPercentileConcentration(ppm)
NO2(Annual)
AnnualArithmeticMean(0.030ppm)
CO(1‐hour)
MaximumConcentration(ppm)
CO(8‐hour)
MaximumConcentration(ppm)
SO2(1‐hour)
MaximumConcentration(ppm)
99thPercentileConcentration(ppm)
SO2(24‐hour)
MaximumConcentration(ppm)
PM10(24‐hour)
MaximumConcentration(µg/m3)
Samples>CAAQS(50µg/m3)
Samples>NAAQS(150µg/m3)
PM10(AnnualAverage)
AnnualArithmeticMean(20µg/m3)
PM2.5(24‐hour)
MaximumConcentration(µg/m3)
98thPercentileConcentration(µg/m3)
Samples>NAAQS(35µg/m3)
PM2.5(Annual)
AnnualArithmeticMean(12µg/m3)
Lead
Maximum30‐dayaverage(µg/m3)
2014 0.098
1
0.087
0
0.093
0
0.081
0
0.113
3
0.080
0.064
1
1
0.065
0.060
0
0
0.077
0.068
2
1
0.069
0.060
0
0
0.094
0.072
7
2
0.089
0.071
0.025
0.110
0.067
0.023
0.077
0.069
0.025
0.090
0.063
0.022
0.082
0.067
0.022
3
2.3
‐‐
2.4
‐‐
1.9
‐‐
2.0
3
2.0
0.010
‐‐
0.015
0.020
0.011
‐‐
0.005
0.005
‐‐
0.006
0.005
‐‐
0.005
0.004
‐‐
42
0
0
27.1
53
1
0
29
80
4
0
30.2
57
1
0
29.5
66
3
0
30.6
39.2
27.1
2
11.9
49.3
31.5
4
13.00
58.7
31.8
4
12.55
43.1
29.0
1
11.95
59.9
34.5
6
12.36
0.020
0.012
0.014
0.013
0.013
Notes: ppm = parts per million; µg/m3 = micrograms per cubic meter Sources: South Coast Air Quality Management District, Historical Data by Year, http://www.aqmd.gov/home/library/air‐quality‐data‐
studies/historical‐data‐by‐year. Accessed April 2016; California Air Resources Board, Air Quality Data Statistics, http://www.arb.ca.gov/adam/. Accessed April 2016; U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, AirData, http://www.epa.gov/airdata/ad_rep_mon.html. Accessed April 2016. 1020S.FigueroaStreetProject
ESAPCR
AirQualityTechnicalReport
9
1.0 Introduction June 2016 cancer risks.9 The updated method utilizes higher estimates of cancer potency during early life exposures
and uses different assumptions for breathing rates and length of residential exposures. When combined
together,SCAQMDstaffestimatesthatrisksforthesameinhalationexposurelevelwillbeabout2.5to2.7
times higher using the updated methods. This would be reflected in the average lifetime air toxics risk
estimated from the monitoring sites data going from 418 per million to 1,023 per million.10 Under the
updatedOEHHAmethodology,adoptedinMarchof2015,therelativereductioninriskfromtheMATESIV
resultscomparedtoMATESIIIwouldbethesame(about65percent).
Approximately68percentoftheriskisattributedtodieselparticulateemissions,approximately22percent
to other toxics associated with mobile sources (including benzene, butadiene, and formaldehyde), and
approximately10percentofallairbornecarcinogenicriskisattributedtostationarysources(whichinclude
industries and other certain businesses, such as dry cleaners and chrome plating operations).11 The study
also found lower ambient concentrations of most of the measured air toxics compared to the levels
measuredinthepreviousstudyconductedduring2004and2006.Specifically,benzeneand1,3‐butadiene,
pollutants generated mainly from vehicles, were down 35 percent and 11 percent, respectively.12 The
reductionswereattributedtoairqualitycontrolregulationsandimprovedemissioncontroltechnologies.In
additiontoairtoxics,MATESIVincludedcontinuousmeasurementsofblackcarbonandultrafineparticles
(particlessmallerthan0.1micronsinsize),whichareemittedbycombustionofdieselfuels.Samplingsites
locatednearheavily‐traffickedfreewaysornearindustrialareaswerecharacterized byincreasedlevels of
blackcarbonandultrafineparticlescomparedtomoreruralsites.
As part of the MATES IV, the SCAQMD prepared maps that show regional trends in estimated outdoor
inhalationcancerriskfromtoxicemissions,aspartofanongoingefforttoprovideinsightintorelativerisks.
Themapsrepresenttheestimatednumberofpotentialcancerspermillionpeopleassociatedwithalifetime
ofbreathingairtoxics(24hoursperdayoutdoorsfor70years).Thebackgroundpotentialcancerriskper
million people in the Project area using the update OEHHA methodology is estimated at 1,516 per million
(comparedtoanoverallSouthCoastAirBasin‐wideriskof1,023permillion).13Generally,theriskfromair
toxics is lower near the coastline: it increases inland, with higher risks concentrated near diesel sources
(e.g.,freeways,airports,andports).
1.4.2.3 Sensitive Receptors Certainpopulationgroups,suchaschildren,elderly,andacutelyandchronicallyillpersons(especiallythose
withcardio‐respiratorydiseases),areconsideredmoresensitivetothepotentialeffectsofairpollutionthan
others. Sensitive land uses within 500 feet of the Project Site are shown in Figure 3, SensitiveReceptor
LocationsNearesttotheProjectSite,andincludethefollowing:
9
California Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Health Hazard Assessment, Air Toxics Hot Spots Program, Risk Assessment
Guidelines,GuidanceManualforPreparationofHealthRiskAssessments,(2015).
10
SouthCoastAirQualityManagementDistrict,FinalReport–MultipleAirToxicsExposureStudyintheSouthCoastAirBasin,(2015)
2‐11.
11
SouthCoastAirQualityManagementDistrict,FinalReport–MultipleAirToxicsExposureStudyintheSouthCoastAirBasin,(2015)
ES‐2.
12
SouthCoastAirQualityManagementDistrict,FinalReport–MultipleAirToxicsExposureStudyintheSouthCoastAirBasin,(2015)
6‐1.
13
South Coast Air Quality Management District, Multiple Air Toxics Exposure Study, MATES IV Carcinogenic Risk Interactive Map,
http://www.aqmd.gov/home/library/air‐quality‐data‐studies/health‐studies/mates‐iv.AccessedMay2016.
1020S.FigueroaStreetProject
ESAPCR
AirQualityTechnicalReport
10
June 2016 1.0 Introduction 
Multi‐Family Residential Dwellings at LA LIVE: The Ritz‐Carlton Residences are located across S.
FigueroaStreetwestoftheProjectSite.

Multi‐FamilyResidentialDwellings:Severalhighrisemixed‐useresidentialbuildingsarelocatedto
the north of the Project Site across from Olympic Boulevard. Mid‐ and high‐rise multi‐family
residentialarealsolocatedeastoftheProjectSitefrontingonS.FlowerStreet.High‐riseresidential
buildingsarelocatedapproximately300feettothesouthoftheProjectSiteacrossfrom11thStreet.

FutureResidentialUses:Mixed‐useprojectsthatincorporateresidentialusesincludetheFigCentral
project and the Circa project. These projects are currently under construction and are located
approximately80feetand700feetthesouthoftheProjectSiterespectively.

Future Residential Uses: Mixed‐use project that incorporates residential uses at the proposed
OlympicTowerproject.Theprojectisnotcurrentlyunderconstructionandislocatedapproximately
140feetnorthoftheProjectSite.
AllotherairqualitysensitivereceptorsarelocatedatgreaterdistancesfromtheProjectSite,andwouldbe
lessimpactedbyProjectemissions.Impactsarequantifiedfortheabovesensitivereceptors.
1020S.FigueroaStreetProject
ESAPCR
AirQualityTechnicalReport
11
Department
of Water
and Power
Hotel
Parking
W
MultiFamily
Hotel
The Ritz-Carlton
Residences and
JW Marriott
(Hotel/Residences)
Commercial
MultiFamily
Mixed Use/
Multi-family
LA LIVE
re
e
t
Mixed Use/
Multi-Family
oa
St
Petroleum
Building
/Office
Ol
y
m
pi
c
S
Fi
gu
er
LA LIVE
Restaurant
MultiFamily
Construction
11
St
re
e
Office
ar
d
MultiFamily
t
S
Fl
ow
er
St
re
et
Commercial
th
ul
ev
MultiFamily
MultiFamily
W
Bo
Project Site
MultiFamily
Sensitive Receptor
500-ft Buffer from
Project Site
Construction
o
0
W
Retail/
Parking
MultiFamily
12
th
MultiFamily
St
re
e
200
t
400 Feet
Sensitive Receptor Locations
Nearest to the Project Site
1020 S. Figueroa Street P roject
Source: Google Maps, 2015 (Aerial); PCR Services Corporation, 2016.
FIGURE
3
9t
h
St
June 2016 1.0 Introduction Thispageintentionallyblank.
1020S.FigueroaStreetProject
ESAPCR
AirQualityTechnicalReport
13
2.0 REGULATORY SETTING AND SIGNIFICANCE THRESHOLDS 2.1 REGULATORY SETTING Anumberofstatutes,regulations,plansandpolicieshavebeenadoptedwhichaddressairqualityconcerns.
TheProjectSiteandvicinityissubjecttoairqualityregulationsdevelopedandimplementedatthefederal,
State,andlocallevels.Atthe federallevel,theUnitedStates EnvironmentalProtectionAgency(USEPA)is
responsibleforimplementationofthefederalCleanAirAct(CAA).SomeportionsoftheCAA(e.g.,certain
mobile source requirements and other requirements) are implemented directly by the USEPA. Other
portionsoftheCAA(e.g.,stationarysourcerequirements)areimplementedthroughdelegationofauthority
toStateandlocalagencies.
A number of plans and policies have been adopted by various agencies that address air quality concerns.
ThoseplansandpoliciesthatarerelevanttotheProjectarediscussedbelow.
2.1.1 Federal The federal Clean Air Act of 1963 was the first federal legislation regarding air pollution control and has
beenamendednumeroustimesinsubsequentyears,withthemostrecentamendmentsoccurringin1990.
At the federal level, the USEPA is responsible for implementation of certain portions of the Clean Air Act
including mobile source requirements. Other portions of the Clean Air Act, such as stationary source
requirements,areimplementedbystateandlocalagencies.
TheCleanAirActestablishesfederalairqualitystandards,knownasNationalAmbientAirQualityStandards
(NAAQS)andspecifies futuredates for achievingcompliance. The 1990AmendmentstotheCleanAirAct
identifyspecificemissionreductiongoalsforareasnotmeetingtheNAAQS.Theseamendmentsrequireboth
ademonstrationofreasonablefurtherprogresstowardattainmentandincorporationofadditionalsanctions
for failure to attain or to meet interim milestones. Title I (Nonattainment Provisions) and Title II (Mobile
SourceProvisions)oftheCleanAirActaremostapplicabletothedevelopmentandoperationsoftheProject.
TitleIprovisionswereestablishedwiththegoalofattainingtheNAAQSforthefollowingcriteriapollutants:
(1)O3;(2)NO2;(3)CO;(4)SO2;(5)PM10;and(6)lead.Table3,AmbientAirQualityStandards,showsthe
NAAQScurrentlyineffectforeachcriteriapollutant.
The Project is located within the South Coast Air Basin, which is an area designated as non‐attainment
because it does not currently meet NAAQS for certain pollutants regulated under the Clean Air Act. The
CleanAirActsetscertaindeadlinesformeetingtheNAAQSwithintheBasinincluding:(1)1‐hourO3bythe
year2010;(2)8‐hourO3bytheyear2024;14(3)PM10bytheyear2006;and(4)PM2.5bytheyear2015.On
theNAAQSatallmonitoringstationsandtheUSEPAapprovedtherequestforre‐designationtoattainment
June11,2007,theUSEPAreclassifiedtheAirBasinasafederal“attainment”areaforCOandapprovedthe
14
The8‐hourozoneattainmentdeadlineforthe1997standardof80partsperbillionis2024.The8‐hourozoneattainmentdeadline
forthe2008standardof75partsperbillionis2032.
1020S.FigueroaStreetProject
ESAPCR
AirQualityTechnicalReport
15
2.0 Regulatory Setting and Significance Thresholds June 2016 Pollutant Average Time 1Hour
O3h
8Hour
1Hour
NO2i
Annual
Arithmetic
Mean
1Hour
CO
8Hour
8Hour
(Lake
Tahoe)
SO2j
PM10k
1Hour
0.25ppm
(655µg/m3)
3Hour
—
24Hour
0.04ppm
(105µg/m3)
Annual
Arithmetic
Mean
24Hour
Annual
Arithmetic
Mean
Leadl,m
Visibility
Reducing
Particlesn
—
Ultraviolet
Fluorescence
Gravimetricor
BetaAttenuation
—
0.5ppm
(1300
µg/m3)
—
—
Sameas
Primary
Standard
12.0µg/m3k
15µg/m3
1.5µg/m3
—
—
Calendar
Quarter
—
1.5µg/m3 (for
certain
areas)m
Rolling3‐
Month
Averagem
‐‐
Annual
Arithmetic
Mean
30Day
Average
8Hour
12µg/m3
Gravimetricor
BetaAttenuation
Atomic
Absorption
0.15µg/m3
Extinctioncoefficientof0.23per
kilometer—visibilityoftenmiles
ormore(0.07—30milesormore
forLakeTahoe)duetoparticles
whenrelativehumidityislessthan
Ultraviolet
Fluorescence;
Spectrophotometry
(Pararosaniline
Method)9
—
Sameas
Primary
Standard
NoSeparateStateStandard
1020S.FigueroaStreetProject
ESAPCR
—
0.14ppm(for
certainareas)j
0.030ppm
(forcertain
areas)j
150µg/m3
50µg/m3
20µg/m3
75ppb(196
µg/m3)
35µg/m3
24Hour
PM2.5k
Table 3 Ambient Air Quality Standards National Standards b California Standards a
c
d
c,e
Concentration Method Primary Secondary c,f Method g
Ultraviolet
0.09ppm
—
Sameas
Photometry
(180µg/m3)
Ultraviolet
Primary
Photometry
0.070ppm
0.070 ppm
Standard
(137µg/m3)
(137µg/m3)
100ppb(188
0.18ppm
None
µg/m3)
(339µg/m3)
GasPhase
GasPhaseChemi‐
Chemi‐
Sameas
luminescence
53ppb
0.030ppm
luminescence
Primary
(100µg/m3)
(57µg/m3)
Standard
20ppm
35ppm
(23mg/m3)
(40mg/m3)
None
Non‐Dispersive
Non‐Dispersive
9ppm
9.0ppm
Infrared
Infrared
(10mg/m3)
(10mg/m3)
Photometry
Photometry
(NDIR)
(NDIR)
6ppm
—
—
(7mg/m3)
Sameas
Primary
Standard
InertialSeparation
andGravimetric
Analysis
InertialSeparation
andGravimetric
Analysis
HighVolume
Samplerand
AtomicAbsorption
No
Federal
Standards
AirQualityTechnicalReport
16
September 2016 Pollutant Sulfates
(SO4)
Hydrogen
Sulfide
Vinyl
Chloridel
Average Time 24Hour
1Hour
24Hour
2.0 Regulatory Setting and Significance Thresholds Table 3 (Continued) Ambient Air Quality Standards California Standards a
Concentration c Method d
Primary c,e
70percent.Method:Beta
AttenuationandTransmittance
throughFilterTape.
Ion
25µg/m3
Chromatography
Ultraviolet
0.03ppm
Fluorescence
(42µg/m3)
Gas
0.01ppm
Chromatography
(26µg/m3)
National Standards b Secondary c,f Method g
a California standards for ozone, carbon monoxide (except 8‐hour Lake Tahoe), sulfur dioxide (1 and 24 hour), nitrogen dioxide, and particulate matter (PM10, PM2.5, and visibility reducing particles), are values that are not to be exceeded. All others are not to be equaled or exceeded. California ambient air quality standards are listed in the Table of Standards in Section 70200 of Title 17 of the California Code of Regulations. b
National standards (other than ozone, particulate matter, and those based on annual arithmetic mean) are not to be exceeded more than once a year. The ozone standard is attained when the fourth highest 8‐hour concentration measured at each site in a year, averaged over three years, is equal to or less than the standard. For PM10, the 24 hour standard is attained when the expected number of days per calendar year with a 24‐hour average concentration above 150 micrograms/per cubic meter (μg/m3) is equal to or less than one. For PM2.5, the 24 hour standard is attained when 98 percent of the daily concentrations, averaged over three years, are equal to or less than the standard. c
Concentration expressed first in units in which it was promulgated. Equivalent units given in parentheses are based upon a reference temperature of 25°C and a reference pressure of 760 torr. Most measurements of air quality are to be corrected to a reference temperature of 25°C and a reference pressure of 760 torr; ppm in this table refers to ppm by volume, or micromoles of pollutant per mole of gas. d
Any equivalent procedure which can be shown to the satisfaction of the California Air Resources Board to give equivalent results at or near the level of the air quality standard may be used. e
National Primary Standards: The levels of air quality necessary, with an adequate margin of safety to protect the public health. f
National Secondary Standards: The levels of air quality necessary to protect the public welfare from any known or anticipated adverse effects of a pollutant. g
Reference method as described by the USEPA. An “equivalent method” of measurement may be used but must have a “consistent relationship to the reference method” and must be approved by the USEPA. h
On October 1, 2015, the national 8‐hour ozone primary and secondary standards were lowered from 0.075 to 0.070 ppm. i
To attain the 1‐hour national standard, the 3‐year average of the annual 98th percentile of the 1‐hour daily maximum concentrations at each site must not exceed 100 ppb. j
On June 2, 2010, a new 1‐hour SO2 standard was established and the existing 24‐hour and annual primary standards were revoked. To attain the 1‐hour national standard, the 3‐year average of the annual 99th percentile of the 1‐hour daily maximum concentrations at each site must not exceed 75 ppb. The 1971 SO2 national standards (24‐hour and annual) remain in effect until one year after an area is designated for the 2010 standard, except that in areas designated non‐attainment for the 1971 standards, the 1971 standards remain in effect until implementation plans to attain or maintain the 2010 standards are approved. k On December 14, 2012, the national annual PM2.5 primary standard was lowered from 15 μg/m3 to 12.0 μg/m3. l The California Air Resources Board has identified lead and vinyl chloride as 'toxic air contaminants' with no threshold level of exposure for adverse health effects determined. These actions allow for the implementation of control measures at levels below the ambient concentrations specified for these pollutants. m
The national standard for lead was revised on October 15, 2008 to a rolling 3‐month average. The 1978 lead standard (1.5 μg/m3 as a quarterly average) remains in effect until one year after an area is designated for the 2008 standard, except that in areas designated non‐attainment for the 1978 standard, the 1978 standard remains in effect until implementation plans to attain or maintain the 2008 standard are approved. n
In 1989, the California Air Resources Board converted both the general statewide 10‐mile visibility standard and the Lake Tahoe 30‐mile visibility standard to instrumental equivalents, which are "extinction of 0.23 per kilometer" and "extinction of 0.07 per kilometer" for the statewide and Lake Tahoe Air Basin standards, respectively. Source: California Air Resources Board, Ambient Air Quality Standards (10/1/15), http://www.arb.ca.gov/research/aaqs/aaqs2.pdf. Accessed January 2016.
1020S.FigueroaStreetProject
ESAPCR
AirQualityTechnicalReport
17
2.0 Regulatory Setting and Significance Thresholds September 2016 COmaintenanceplanfortheAirBasin.15TheAirBasinpreviouslyexceededtheNAAQSforPM10,buthasmet
effectiveJuly26,2013.16TheAirBasindoesnotmeettheNAAQSforO3andPM2.5andisclassifiedasbeingin
non‐attainment forthesepollutants. Table4,SouthCoastAirBasinAttainmentStatus(LosAngelesCounty),
liststhecriteriapollutantsandtheirrelativeattainmentstatus.
Table 4
South Coast Air Basin Attainment Status (Los Angeles County) National Standards California Standards Pollutant Ozone(1‐hourstandard)
Ozone(8‐hourstandard)
CarbonMonoxide
NitrogenDioxide
SulfurDioxide
PM10
PM2.5
Lead
VisibilityReducingParticles
Sulfates
HydrogenSulfide
VinylChloride
N/Aa
Non‐attainment– Extreme
Attainment
Attainment
Attainment
Attainment
Non‐attainment
Non‐attainment
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Non‐attainment–Extreme
Non‐Attainment
Attainment
Attainment
Attainment
Non‐attainment
Non‐attainment
Attainment
Unclassified
Attainment
Unclassified
N/Ab
N/A = not applicable a
The NAAQS for 1‐hour ozone was revoked on June 15, 2005 for all areas except Early Action Compact areas. b
In 1990 the California Air Resources Board identified vinyl chloride as a toxic air contaminant and determined that it does not have an identifiable threshold. Therefore, the California Air Resources Board does not monitor or make status designations for this pollutant. Source: United States Environmental Protection Agency, The Green Book Non‐attainment Areas for Criteria Pollutants, http://www.epa.gov/oaqps001/greenbk/index.html. Accessed April 2016; California Air Resources Board, Area Designations Maps/State and National, http://www.arb.ca.gov/desig/adm/adm.htm. Accessed April 2016. The Clean Air Act also specifies future dates for achieving compliance with the NAAQS and mandates that
statessubmitandimplementaStateImplementationPlan(SIP)forlocalareasnotmeetingthesestandards.
These plans must include pollution control measures that demonstrate how the standards would be met.
The1990amendmentstotheCleanAirActidentifyspecificemissionreductiongoalsforbasinsnotmeeting
the NAAQS. These amendments require both a demonstration of reasonable further progress toward
attainmentandincorporationofadditionalsanctionsforfailuretoattainortomeetinterimmilestones.
TitleIIoftheCleanAirActpertainstomobilesources,suchascars,trucks,buses,andplanes.Reformulated
gasoline, automobile pollution control devices, and vapor recovery nozzles on gas pumps are a few of the
mechanismstheUSEPAusestoregulatemobileairemissionsources.TheprovisionsofTitleIIhaveresulted
intailpipeemissionstandardsforvehicles,whichhavestrengthenedinrecentyearstoimproveairquality.
6
“ApprovalandPromulgationofImplementationPlansandDesignationofAreasforAirQualityPlanningPurposes:California,Final
Rule.”FederalRegister72(11May2007):26718‐26721
7
FederalRegister,Vol.78,No.123,June26,2013,38223‐38226.
1020S.FigueroaStreetProject
ESAPCR
AirQualityTechnicalReport
18
September 2016 2.0 Regulatory Setting and Significance Thresholds Forexample,thestandardsforNOXemissionshaveloweredsubstantiallyandthespecificationrequirements
forcleanerburninggasolinearemorestringent.
2.1.2 State 2.1.2.1 California Clean Air Act TheCaliforniaCleanAirAct,signedintolawin1988,requiresallareasoftheStatetoachieveandmaintain
the CAAQS by the earliest practical date. The CAAQS apply to the same criteria pollutants as the federal
CleanAirActbutalsoincludeState‐identifiedcriteriapollutants,whichincludesulfates,visibility‐reducing
particles, hydrogen sulfide, and vinyl chloride. CARB has primary responsibility for ensuring the
implementation of the California Clean Air Act, responding to the federal Clean Air Act planning
requirementsapplicabletothestate,andregulatingemissionsfrommotorvehiclesandconsumerproducts
withinthestate.Table2showstheCAAQScurrentlyineffectforeachofthecriteriapollutantsaswellasthe
otherpollutantsrecognizedbythestate.AsshowninTable2,theCAAQSincludemorestringentstandards
thantheNAAQSformostofthecriteriaairpollutants.
Health and Safety Code Section 39607(e) requires CARB to establish and periodically review area
designationcriteria.Table3providesasummaryoftheattainmentstatusoftheLosAngelesCountyportion
of the Air Basin with respect to the state standards. The Air Basin is designated as attainment for the
California standards for sulfates and unclassified for hydrogen sulfide and visibility‐reducing particles.
Becausevinylchlorideisacarcinogenictoxicaircontaminant,CARBdoesnotclassifyattainmentstatusfor
thispollutant.
2.1.2.2 California Air Resources Board Air Quality and Land Use Handbook The CARB published the AirQualityandLandUseHandbook in April 2005 to serve as a general guide for
considering impacts to sensitive receptors from facilities that emit TAC emissions. The recommendations
providedthereinarevoluntaryanddonotconstitutearequirementormandateforeitherlanduseagencies
orlocalairdistricts.Thegoaloftheguidancedocumentistoprotectsensitivereceptors,suchaschildren,
the elderly, acutely ill, and chronically ill persons, from exposure to TAC emissions. Some examples of
CARB’ssitingrecommendationsincludethefollowing:(1)avoidsitingsensitivereceptorswithin500feetof
afreeway,urbanroadwith100,000vehiclesperday,orruralroadswith50,000vehiclesperday;(2)avoid
siting sensitive receptors within 1,000 feet of a distribution center (that accommodates more than 100
trucksperday,morethan40truckswithoperatingtransportrefrigerationunitsperday,orwheretransport
refrigeration unit operations exceed 300 hours per week); and (3) avoid siting sensitive receptors within
300feetofanydrycleaningoperationusingperchloroethyleneandwithin500feetofoperationswithtwoor
moremachines.
2.1.2.3 California Air Resources Board On‐Road and Off‐Road Vehicle Rules In2004,CARBadoptedanAirborneToxicControlMeasure(ATCM)tolimitheavy‐dutydieselmotorvehicle
idling in order to reduce public exposure to diesel PM and other Toxic Air Contaminants (TACs). The
measureappliestodiesel‐fueledcommercialvehicleswithgrossvehicleweightratingsgreaterthan10,000
pounds that are licensed to operate on highways, regardless of where they are registered. This measure
doesnotallowdiesel‐fueledcommercialvehiclestoidleformorethan5minutesatanygiventime.
1020S.FigueroaStreetProject
ESAPCR
AirQualityTechnicalReport
19
2.0 Regulatory Setting and Significance Thresholds September 2016 In2008CARBapprovedtheTruckandBusregulationtoreduceNOX,PM10,andPM2.5emissionsfromexisting
diesel vehicles operating in California. The requirements were amended in December 2010 and apply to
nearlyalldieselfueledtrucksandbusseswithagrossvehicleweightratinggreaterthan14,000pounds.For
thelargesttrucksinthefleet,thosewithagrossvehicleweightratinggreaterthan26,000pounds,thereare
two methods to comply with the requirements. The first way is for the fleet owner to retrofit or replace
engines,startingwiththeoldestenginemodelyear,tomeet2010enginestandards,orbetter.Thisisphased
over8years,startingin2015andwouldbefullyimplementedby2023,meaningthatalltrucksoperatingin
theStatesubjecttothisoptionwouldmeetorexceedthe2010engineemissionstandardsforNOXandPMby
2023.Thesecondoption,ifchosen,requiresfleetowners,startingin2012,toretrofitaportionoftheirfleet
with diesel particulate filters achieving at least 85 percent removal efficiency, so that by January 1, 2016
their entire fleet is equipped with diesel particulate filters. However, diesel particulate filters do not
typically lower NOX emissions. Thus, fleet owners choosing the second option must still comply with the
2010engineemissionstandardsfortheirtrucksandbussesby2020.
In addition to limiting exhaust from idling trucks, CARB recently promulgated emission standards for off‐
road diesel construction equipment of greater than 25 horsepower (hp) such as bulldozers, loaders,
backhoesandforklifts,aswellasmanyotherself‐propelledoff‐roaddieselvehicles.Theregulationadopted
bytheCARBonJuly26,2007,aimstoreduceemissionsbyinstallationofdieselsootfiltersandencouraging
the retirement, replacement, or repower of older, dirtier engines with newer emission controlled models.
Implementationisstaggeredbasedonfleetsize(whichisthetotalofalloff‐roadhorsepowerundercommon
ownership or control), with the largest fleets to begin compliance January 1, 2014. Each fleet must
demonstrate compliance through one of two methods. The first option is to calculate and maintain fleet
averageemissionstargets,whichencouragestheretirementorrepoweringofolderequipmentandrewards
the introduction of newer cleaner units into the fleet. The second option is to meet the Best Available
Control Technology (BACT) requirements by turning over or installing Verified Diesel Emission Control
Strategies(VDECS)onacertainpercentageofitstotalfleethorsepower.Thecomplianceschedulerequires
thatBACTturnoversorretrofits(VDECSinstallation)befullyimplementedby2023inallequipmentinlarge
andmediumfleetsandacross100percentofsmallfleetsby2028.
2.1.3 Regional 2.1.3.1 South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) Asindicatedpreviously,theCityofLosAngelesislocatedwithintheSouthCoastAirBasin.TheSCAQMDhas
jurisdictionoveranareaofapproximately10,743squaremiles.ThisareaincludesallofOrangeCounty,Los
Angeles County except for the Antelope Valley, the non‐desert portion of western San Bernardino County,
andthewesternandCoachellaValleyportionsofRiversideCounty.TheBasinisasub‐regionoftheSCAQMD
jurisdiction.Whileairqualityinthisareahasimproved,theBasinrequirescontinueddiligencetomeetair
qualitystandards.
TheSCAQMDhasadoptedaseriesofAirQualityManagementPlans(AQMP)tomeettheCAAQSandNAAQS.
SCAQMDandCARBhaveadoptedthe2012AQMPwhichincorporatesthelatestscientificandtechnological
information and planning assumptions, including the Southern California Association of Governments
(SCAG) 2012 Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy (RTP/SCS), and updated
1020S.FigueroaStreetProject
ESAPCR
AirQualityTechnicalReport
20
September 2016 2.0 Regulatory Setting and Significance Thresholds emissioninventorymethodologiesforvarioussourcecategories.17TheFinal2012AQMPwasadoptedbythe
AQMD Governing Board on December 7, 2012. Control measure IND‐01 was approved for adoption and
inclusionintheFinal2012AQMPattheFebruary1,2013GoverningBoardmeeting.
Therefore,the2012AQMPisthe mostappropriateplantouseforconsistency analysis.TheAQMPbuilds
upon other agencies’ plans to achieve federal standards for air quality in the Basin. It incorporates a
comprehensivestrategyaimedatcontrollingpollutionfromallsources,includingstationarysources,andon‐
road and off‐road mobile sources. The 2012 AQMP builds upon improvements in previous plans, and
includes new and changing federal requirements, implementation of new technology measures, and the
continueddevelopmentofeconomicallysound,flexiblecomplianceapproaches.Inaddition,ithighlightsthe
significant amount of emission reductions needed and the urgent need to identify additional strategies,
especially in the area of mobile sources, to meet all federal criteria pollutant standards within the time
framesallowedunderthefederalCleanAirAct.
The 2012 AQMP’s key undertaking is to bring the Basin into attainment with NAAQS for 24‐hour PM2.5 by
2014.Italsointensifiesthescopeandpaceofcontinuedairqualityimprovementeffortstowardmeetingthe
2023 8‐hour ozone standard deadline with new measures designedto reduce reliance on the CAA Section
182(e)(5) long‐term measures for NOX and VOC reductions. SCAQMD expects exposure reductions to be
achieved through implementation of new and advanced control technologies as well as improvement of
existingtechnologies.
The control measures in the 2012 AQMP consist of four components: (1) Basin‐wide and Episodic Short‐
term PM2.5 Measures; (2) Contingency Measures; (3) 8‐hour Ozone Implementation Measures; and (4)
TransportationandControlMeasuresprovidedbySCAG.ThePlanincludeseightshort‐termPM2.5control
measures, 16 stationary source 8‐hour ozone measures, 10 early action measures for mobile sources and
sevenearlyactionmeasuresareproposedtoacceleratenear‐zeroandzeroemissiontechnologiesforgoods
movementrelatedsources,andfiveon‐roadandfiveoff‐roadmobilesourcecontrolmeasures.Ingeneral,
theDistrict’scontrolstrategyforstationaryandmobilesourcesisbasedonthefollowingapproaches:(1)
availablecleanertechnologies;(2)bestmanagementpractices;(3)incentiveprograms;(4)developmentand
implementation of zero‐ near‐zero technologies and vehicles and control methods; and (5) emission
reductions from mobile sources.ControlstrategiesintheAQMPwithpotential applicabilitytoshort‐term
emissionsfromconstructionactivitiesassociatedwiththeProjectincludestrategiesdenotedintheAQMPas
ONRD‐04 and OFFRD‐01, which are intended to reduce emissions from on‐road and off‐road heavy‐duty
vehiclesandequipment.DescriptionsofmeasuresONRD‐04andOFFRD‐01areprovidedbelow:
ONRD‐04 – Accelerated Retirement of Older On‐Road Heavy‐Duty Vehicles: This proposed measure
seeks to replace up to 1,000 heavy‐duty vehicles per year with newer or new vehicles that at a minimum,
meetthe2010on‐roadheavy‐dutyNOXexhaustemissionsstandardof0.2gramsperbrakehorsepower‐hour
(g/bhp‐hr).Giventhatexceedancesofthe24‐hourPM2.5airqualitystandardoccurintheMiraLomaregion,
priority will be placed on replacing older diesel trucks that operate primarily at the warehouse and
distribution centers located in the Mira Loma area. Funding assistance of up to $35,000 per vehicle is
proposedandtheleveloffundingwilldependupontheNOXemissionscertificationlevelofthereplacement
vehicle. In addition, a provision similar to the Surplus Off‐Road Option for NOX (SOON) provision of the
17
SouthCoastAirQualityManagementDistrict,2012AirQualityManagementPlan,http://www.aqmd.gov/home/library/clean‐air‐
plans/air‐quality‐mgt‐plan/final‐2012‐air‐quality‐management‐plan.AccessedApril2016.
1020S.FigueroaStreetProject
ESAPCR
AirQualityTechnicalReport
21
2.0 Regulatory Setting and Significance Thresholds September 2016 statewide In‐Use Off‐Road Fleet Vehicle Regulation will be sought to ensure that additional NOX emission
reductionbenefitsareachieved.
OFFRD‐01–ExtensionoftheSoonProvisionforConstruction/IndustrialEquipment:Thismeasureseeksto
continue the Surplus Off‐Road Option for NOX (SOON) provision of the statewide In‐Use Off‐Road Fleet
VehicleRegulationbeyond2014throughthe2023timeframe.InordertoimplementtheSOONprogramin
this timeframe, funding of up to $30 million per year would be sought to help fund the repower or
replacement of older Tier 0 and Tier 1 equipment, with reductions that are considered surplus to the
statewideregulationwithTier4orcleanerengines.
SeveralSCAQMDrulesadoptedtoimplementportionsoftheAQMPmayapplytoconstructionoroperation
oftheProject.Forexample,SCAQMDRule403requirestheimplementationofbestavailablefugitivedust
controlmeasuresduringactiveconstructionperiodscapableofgeneratingfugitivedustemissionsfromon‐
siteearth‐movingactivities,construction/demolitionactivities,andconstructionequipmenttravelonpaved
and unpaved roads. Also, SCAQMD Rule 1113 limits the amount of volatile organic compounds from
architecturalcoatingsandsolvents,whichlowerstheemissionsofodorouscompounds.TheProjectmaybe
subjecttothefollowingSCAQMDrulesandregulations:
Regulation IV – Prohibitions: This regulation sets forth the restrictions for visible emissions, odor
nuisance, fugitive dust, various air emissions, fuel contaminants, start‐up/shutdown exemptions and
breakdownevents.ThefollowingisalistofruleswhichmayapplytotheProject:

Rule402–Nuisance:Thisrulestatesthatapersonshallnotdischargefromanysourcewhatsoever
such quantities of air contaminants or other material which cause injury, detriment, nuisance, or
annoyancetoanyconsiderablenumberofpersonsortothepublic,orwhichendangerthecomfort,
repose,healthorsafetyofanysuchpersonsorthepublic,orwhichcause,orhaveanaturaltendency
tocause,injuryordamagetobusinessorproperty.

Rule403–FugitiveDust: This rule requires projects to prevent, reduce or mitigate fugitive dust
emissions from asite. Rule 403restrictsvisible fugitivedusttotheprojectpropertyline,restricts
thenetPM10emissionstolessthan50microgramspercubicmeter(µg/m3)andrestrictsthetracking
outofbulkmaterialsontopublicroads.Additionally,projectsmustutilizeoneormoreofthebest
available control measures (identified in the tables within the rule). Mitigation measures may
includeaddingfreeboardtohaulvehicles,coveringloosematerialonhaulvehicles,watering,using
chemical stabilizers and/or ceasing all activities. Finally, a contingency plan may be required if so
determinedbytheUSEPA.
Regulation XI – Source Specific Standards: Regulation XI sets emissions standards for specific sources.
ThefollowingisalistofruleswhichmayapplytotheProject:

Rule1113–ArchitecturalCoatings:Thisrulerequiresmanufacturers,distributors,andendusers
ofarchitecturalandindustrialmaintenancecoatingstoreduceVOCemissionsfromtheuseofthese
coatings,primarilybyplacinglimitsontheVOCcontentofvariouscoatingcategories.

Rule1134–EmissionsofOxidesofNitrogenfromStationaryGasTurbines:Thisrulespecifies
NOXemissionslimits,monitoring,sourcetesting,andrecordkeepingrequirementsforstationarygas
turbines0.3megawatt(MW)andlarger.
1020S.FigueroaStreetProject
ESAPCR
AirQualityTechnicalReport
22
September 2016 2.0 Regulatory Setting and Significance Thresholds 
Rule1138–ControlofEmissionsfromRestaurantOperations:Thisrulespecifiesemissionsand
odorcontrolrequirementsforcommercialcookingoperationsthatusechain‐drivencharbroilersto
cookmeat.

Rule 1146.2 – Emissions of Oxides of Nitrogen from Large Water Heaters and Small Boilers
and Process Heaters: This rule requires manufacturers, distributors, retailers, refurbishers,
installers, and operators of new and existing units to reduce NOX emissions from natural gas‐fired
waterheaters,boilers,andprocessheatersasdefinedinthisrule.

Rule1186–PM10EmissionsfromPavedandUnpavedRoads,andLivestockOperations:This
ruleappliestoownersandoperatorsofpavedandunpavedroadsandlivestockoperations.Therule
is intended to reduce PM10 emissions by requiring the cleanup of material deposited onto paved
roads,useofcertifiedstreetsweepingequipment,andtreatmentofhigh‐useunpavedroads(seealso
Rule403).

Rule1403–AsbestosEmissionsfromDemolition/RenovationActivities:Thisrulerequiresowners
and operators of any demolition or renovation activity and the associated disturbance of asbestos‐
containing materials, any asbestos storage facility, or any active waste disposal site to implement
work practice requirements to limit asbestos emissions from building demolition and renovation
activities,includingtheremovalandassociateddisturbanceofasbestos‐containingmaterials.
RegulationXIII–NewSourceReview(NSR):RegulationXIIIsetsrequirementsforpreconstructionreview
required under both federal and state statutes for new and modified sources located in areas that do not
meet the Clean Air Act standards ("non‐attainment" areas). NSR applies to both individual permits and
entirefacilities.AnypermitthathasanetincreaseinemissionsisrequiredtoapplyBACT.Facilitieswitha
netincreaseinemissionsarerequiredtooffsettheemissionincreasebyuseofEmissionReductionCredits
(ERCs).Theregulationprovidesfortheapplication,eligibility,registration,useandtransferofERCs.Forlow
emittingfacilities,theSCAQMDmaintainsaninternalbankthatcanbeusedtoprovidetherequiredoffsets.
In addition, certain facilities are subject to provisions that require public notice and modeling analysis to
determinethedownwindimpactpriortopermitissuance.
The SCAQMD published a CEQAAirQualityHandbook (the Handbook) in November1993 to provide local
governmentswithguidanceforanalyzingandmitigatingproject‐specificairqualityimpacts.TheHandbook
providesstandards,methodologies,andproceduresforconductingairqualityanalysesinCEQAdocuments
and was used extensively in the preparation of this analysis. However, the SCAQMD is currently in the
process of replacing the Handbook with the AirQualityAnalysisGuidanceHandbook. While this process is
underway, the SCAQMD recommends that the lead agency avoid using the screening tables in the
Handbook’sChapter6,becausethetableswerederivedusinganobsoleteversionofCARB’smobilesource
emissionfactorinventory,andthetripgenerationcharacteristicofthelandusesidentifiedinthesescreening
tableswerebasedonthefiftheditionoftheITETripGenerationManual,insteadofthemostcurrentsixth
edition. Additionally, the lead agency should avoid using the on‐road mobile source emission factors in
Table A9‐5‐J1 through A9‐5‐L in the Handbook. The SCAQMD instead recommends using other approved
models to calculate emissions from land use projects, such as CalEEMod.18 To assist the lead agency, this
assessmentfollowsSCAQMD’srecommendations.
18
South
Coast
Air
Quality
Management
District,
CEQA
Air
Quality
Handbook
(1993),
http://www.aqmd.gov/home/regulations/ceqa/air‐quality‐analysis‐handbook/ceqa‐air‐quality‐handbook‐(1993). Accessed April
2016.
1020S.FigueroaStreetProject
ESAPCR
AirQualityTechnicalReport
23
2.0 Regulatory Setting and Significance Thresholds September 2016 In June 2003, the SCAQMD published a document called the LocalizedSignificanceThresholdMethodology
that is intended to provide voluntary guidance for lead agencies in analyzing localized air quality impacts
fromprojects.19ThedocumentwasrevisedinJuly2008toincorporateadditionalguidanceregardingPM2.5
emissions.20 The Localized Significance Threshold Methodology was also used in the preparation of this
assessment.
The SCAQMD has also adopted land use planning guidelines in the May 2005 Guidance Document for
Addressing Air Quality Issues in General Plans and Local Planning21which, like the CARB Handbook, also
considers impacts to sensitive receptors from facilities that emit TACs. SCAQMD’s distance
recommendations are the same as those provided by CARB (e.g., the same siting criteria for distribution
centersanddrycleaningfacilities).TheSCAQMD’sdocumentintroduceslanduse‐relatedpoliciesthatrely
on design and distance parameters to manage potential health risk. These guidelines are voluntary
initiativesrecommendedforconsiderationbylocalplanningagencies.
TheSCAQMDreleasedtheDraft2016AQMPonJune30,2016forpublicreviewandcomments.Thepublic
reviewperiodendedAugust4,2016andthepublichearingisscheduledforDecember2,2016atwhichtime
the SCAQMD Governing Board will consider approving the AQMP. Key elements of the Draft 2016 AQMP
include implementing fair‐share emissions reductions strategies at the federal, state, and local levels;
establishingpartnerships,funding,andincentivestoacceleratedeploymentofzeroandnear‐zero‐emissions
technologies; and taking credit from co‐benefits from greenhouse gas, energy, transportation and other
planningefforts.ThestrategiesincludedintheDraft2016AQMPareintendedtodemonstrateattainmentof
theNationalAmbientAirQualityStandards(NAAQS)forthefederalnon‐attainmentpollutants(ozoneand
PM2.5).
2.1.3.2 Regional Comprehensive Plan and Guide and Congestion Management Plan SCAG is the regional planning agency for Los Angeles, Orange, Ventura, Riverside, San Bernardino and
Imperial Counties and addresses regional issues relating to transportation, the economy, community
development and the environment. SCAG is the federally designated metropolitan planning organization
(MPO)forthemajorityofthesouthernCaliforniaregionandisthelargestMPOinthenation.Withregardto
airqualityplanning,SCAGhaspreparedtheRTPandRegionalTransportationImprovementProgram(RTIP),
which address regional development and growth forecasts and form the basis for the land use and
transportationcontrolportionsoftheAQMPandareutilizedinthepreparationoftheairqualityforecasts
and consistency analysis included in the AQMP. The RTP, RTIP, and AQMP are based on projections
originatingwithinlocaljurisdictions.
2.1.4 Local Local jurisdictions, such as the City of Los Angeles, have the authority and responsibility to reduce air
pollution through its land use decision‐making authority. Specifically, the City is responsible for the
assessmentandmitigationofairemissionsresultingfromitslandusedecisions.TheCity’sGeneralPlanAir
19
SouthCoastAirQualityManagementDistrict,FinalLocalizedSignificanceThresholdMethodology,(2008).
20
South Coast Air Quality Management District, Final Methodology to Calculate Particulate Matter (PM)2.5 and PM2.5 Significance
Thresholds,(2006).
21
South Coast Air Quality Management District, Guidance Document for Addressing Air Quality Issues in General Plans and Local
Planning,(May2005),http://www.aqmd.gov/prdas/aqguide/aqguide.html.AccessedApril2016.
1020S.FigueroaStreetProject
ESAPCR
AirQualityTechnicalReport
24
September 2016 2.0 Regulatory Setting and Significance Thresholds QualityElementincludesCitywidegoals,objectives,andpoliciesrelatedtoairqualityresources.Anumber
of these goals, objectives, and policies are relevant to the Project and are related to traffic mobility,
minimizing particulate emissions from construction activities, discouraging single‐occupancy vehicle trips,
managingtrafficcongestionduringpeakhours,andincreasingenergyefficiencyinCityfacilitiesandprivate
developments.
The City of Los Angeles is also responsible for the implementation of transportation control measures as
outlinedintheAQMP.Throughcapitalimprovementprograms,localgovernmentscanfundinfrastructure
that contributes to improved air quality by requiring such improvements as bus turnouts as appropriate,
installationofenergy‐efficientstreetlights,andsynchronizationoftrafficsignals.InaccordancewithCEQA
requirements and the CEQA review process, the City assesses the air quality impacts of new development
projects, requires mitigation of potentially significant air quality impacts by conditioning discretionary
permitsandmonitorsandenforcesimplementationofsuchmitigationmeasures.
The City has adopted regulations regarding the filtration of outdoor air for indoor environments.
Subsections99.05.504.5.3and99.04.504.6oftheLosAngelesMunicipalCode(LAMC)requirethatbuildings
located within 1,000 feet of a freeway provide regularly occupied areas of the building with air filtration
mediaforoutsideandreturnairthatmeetsorexceedstheAmericanSocietyofHeating,Refrigerating,and
Air‐ConditioningEngineers(ASHRAE)Standard52.2MinimumEfficiencyReportingValue(MERV)of13,to
the satisfaction of the City of Los Angeles Department of Building and Safety. Per ASHRAE Standard 52.2
(2012),MERV13wouldresultinaremovalefficiencyof50percentforparticlesfrom0.3to1.0micrometers
(µm),85percentfor1.0to3.0µm,and90percentfor3.0to10.0µm.22
2.2 SIGNIFICANCE THRESHOLDS PursuanttoAppendixGoftheStateCEQAGuidelines,theProjectwouldresultinasignificantimpactrelated
toairqualityifitwould:
a. Conflictwithorobstructtheimplementationoftheapplicableairqualityplan;
b. Violateanyairqualitystandardorcontributesubstantiallytoanexistingorprojectedairquality
violation;
c. Resultinacumulativelyconsiderablenetincreaseofanycriteriapollutantforwhichtheproject
region is nonattainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard
(includingreleasingemissionswhichexceedquantitativethresholdsforozoneprecursors);
d. Exposesensitivereceptorstosubstantialpollutantconcentrations;or
e. Createobjectionableodorsaffectingasubstantialnumberofpeople.
As discussed in the Initial Study, which is contained in Appendix A of the Draft EIR, and in Chapter 6.0,
Subsection F, Effects Found Not to be Significant, of the Draft EIR, the Project would have a less than
significant impact with regard to odors (item “e”) above. As such, no further analysis of this topic is
necessary.
22
ASHRAE, Method of Testing General Ventilation Air‐Cleaning Devices for Removal Efficiency by Particle Size.
https://www.ashrae.org/File%20Library/docLib/StdsAddenda/52_2_2012_2015Supplement.pdf.AccessedDecember17,2015.
1020S.FigueroaStreetProject
ESAPCR
AirQualityTechnicalReport
25
2.0 Regulatory Setting and Significance Thresholds September 2016 The L.A. CEQA Thresholds Guide incorporates the screening questions, and pursuant to the Appendix G
guideline, defers to threshold guidance established by the SCAQMD, in particular to the CEQA Air Quality
Handbook. Further, the L.A.CEQAThresholdsGuide provides guidance in the application of the SCAQMD
guidance.
TheSCAQMDisintheprocessofdevelopinganAirQualityAnalysisGuidanceHandbooktoreplacetheCEQA
Air Quality Handbook. In the interim, supplemental guidance has been adopted by the SCAQMD. The
potential air quality impacts of the Project are, therefore, evaluated according to numeric indicators
developedbytheSCAQMDintheCEQAAirQualityHandbookandsupplementalguidancefromtheSCAQMD.23
2.2.1 Construction Emissions TheSCAQMDhasestablishednumericalemissionindicatorsofsignificanceforconstruction.Thenumerical
emission indicators are based on the recognition that the Air Basin is a distinct geographic area with a
critical air pollution problem for which ambient air quality standards have been promulgated to protect
public health.24 Given that construction impacts are temporary and limited to the construction phase, the
SCAQMD has established numeric indicators of significance specific to construction activity. Based on the
indicatorsintheSCAQMDCEQAAirQualityHandbook,theProjectwouldpotentiallycauseorcontributetoan
exceedanceofanambientairqualitystandardifthefollowingwouldoccur:
AQ‐1:
Regionalconstructionemissionsfrombothdirectandindirectsourceswouldexceedanyof
thefollowingSCAQMDprescribeddailyemissionsthresholds:25 
75poundsadayforVOC;

100poundsperdayforNOX;

550poundsperdayforCO;

150poundsperdayforSO2;

150poundsperdayforPM10;or

55poundsperdayforPM2.5.
In addition, the SCAQMD has developed a methodology to assess the potential for localized emissions to
cause anexceedanceof applicable ambientair qualitystandardsorambientconcentrationlimits. Impacts
wouldbeconsideredsignificantifthefollowingwouldoccur:
AQ‐2:
Maximum daily localized emissions of NOX and/or CO during construction are greater than
the applicable localized significance thresholds, resulting in predicted ambient
23
WhiletheSCAQMDCEQAAirQualityHandbookcontainssignificancethresholdsforlead,Projectconstructionandoperationwould
notincludesourcesofleademissionsandwouldnotexceedtheestablishedthresholdsforlead.Unleadedfuelandunleadedpaints
havevirtuallyeliminatedleademissionsfromcommerciallanduseprojectssuchastheProject.Asaresult,leademissionsarenot
furtherevaluatedinthisDraftEIR.
24
SouthCoastAirQualityManagementDistrict,CEQAAirQualityHandbook(1993)6‐2.
25
South Coast Air Quality Management District, SCAQMD Air Quality Significance Thresholds, (March 2011),
http://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default‐source/ceqa/handbook/scaqmd‐air‐quality‐significance‐thresholds.pdf?sfvrsn=2. Accessed
April2016.
1020S.FigueroaStreetProject
ESAPCR
AirQualityTechnicalReport
26
September 2016 2.0 Regulatory Setting and Significance Thresholds concentrationsinthevicinityoftheProjectSitegreaterthanthemoststringentambientair
qualitystandardsforNO2and/orCO.26
AQ‐3:
Maximum daily localized emissions of PM10 and/or PM2.5 during construction are greater
than the applicable localized significance thresholds, resulting in predicted ambient
concentrations in the vicinity of the Project Site to exceed 10.4 μg/m3 over 24 hours
(SCAQMDRule403controlrequirement).
As discussed previously under subsection 3.a., the SCAQMD has established screening criteria that can be
used to determine the maximum allowable daily emissions that would satisfy the localized significance
thresholds and therefore not cause or contribute to an exceedance of the applicable ambient air quality
standardsorambientconcentrationlimitswithoutproject‐specificdispersionmodeling.Thisanalysisuses
thescreeningcriteriatoevaluateimpactsfromlocalizedemissions.
2.2.2 Operational Emissions The SCAQMD has established numerical emission indicators of significance for operations. The numerical
emission indicators are based on the recognition that the Air Basin is a distinct geographic area with a
critical air pollution problem for which ambient air quality standards have been promulgated to protect
public health.27 The SCAQMD has established numeric indicators of significance in part based on Section
182(e) of the Clean Air Act which identifies 10 tons per year of VOC as a significance level for stationary
sourceemissionsinextremenon‐attainmentareasforozone.28AsshowninTable4,theBasinisdesignated
asextremenon‐attainmentforozone.TheSCAQMDconvertedthissignificanceleveltopoundsperdayfor
ozoneprecursoremissions(10tonsperyear×2,000poundsperton÷365daysperyear=55poundsper
day). The numeric indicators for other pollutants are also based on federal stationary source significance
levels. Based on the indicators in the SCAQMD CEQAAirQualityHandbook,the Project would potentially
causeorcontributetoanexceedanceofanambientairqualitystandardifthefollowingwouldoccur:
AQ‐4:
Operational emissions exceed any of the following SCAQMD prescribed daily regional
numericindicators:29

55poundsadayforVOC;

55poundsperdayforNOX;

550poundsperdayforCO;

150poundsperdayforSOX;

150poundsperdayforPM10;or
 55poundsperdayforPM2.5.
26
South Coast Air Quality Management District, Localized Significance Thresholds, (2003, revised 2008),
http://www.aqmd.gov/home/regulations/ceqa/air‐quality‐analysis‐handbook/localized‐significance‐thresholds. Accessed April
2016.
27
SouthCoastAirQualityManagementDistrict,CEQAAirQualityHandbook(1993)6‐2.
28
SouthCoastAirQualityManagementDistrict,CEQAAirQualityHandbook(1993)6‐1.
29
South Coast Air Quality Management District, SCAQMD Air Quality Significance Thresholds, (March 2011),
http://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default‐source/ceqa/handbook/scaqmd‐air‐quality‐significance‐thresholds.pdf?sfvrsn=2. Accessed
April2016.TheL.A.CEQAThresholdsGuidealsoincludesathresholdof10tonsperyearofVOCs;however,thisisequivalenttothe
SCAQMDdailythresholdof55poundsperday.
1020S.FigueroaStreetProject
ESAPCR
AirQualityTechnicalReport
27
2.0 Regulatory Setting and Significance Thresholds September 2016 In addition, the SCAQMD has developed a methodology to assess the potential for localized emissions to
causeanexceedanceofapplicableambientairqualitystandards.Impactswouldbeconsideredsignificantif
thefollowingwouldoccur:
AQ‐5:
MaximumdailylocalizedemissionsofNOXand/orCOduringoperationaregreaterthanthe
applicablelocalizedsignificancethresholds,resultinginpredictedambientconcentrationsin
thevicinityoftheProjectSitegreaterthanthemoststringentambientairqualitystandards
forNO2and/orCO.30
AQ‐6:
Maximum daily localized emissions of PM10 and/or PM2.5 during operation are greater than
the applicable localized significance thresholds, resulting in predicted ambient
concentrationsinthevicinityoftheProjectSitetoexceed2.5μg/m3over24hours(SCAQMD
Rule1303allowablechangeinconcentration).
As discussed previously under subsection 3.a., the SCAQMD has established screening criteria that can be
used to determine the maximum allowable daily emissions that would satisfy the localized significance
thresholds and therefore not cause or contribute to an exceedance of the applicable ambient air quality
standardsorambientconcentrationlimitswithoutproject‐specificdispersionmodeling.Thisanalysisuses
thescreeningcriteriatoevaluateimpactsfromlocalizedemissions.
Impactswouldbeconsideredsignificantifthefollowingwouldoccur:
AQ‐7:
Thefollowingconditionswouldoccuratanintersectionorroadwaywithinone‐quartermile
ofasensitivereceptor:

The Project would cause or contribute to an exceedance of the CAAQS
one‐houroreight‐hourCOstandardsof20or9.0partspermillion(ppm),respectively;
2.2.3 Toxic Air Contaminants Based on the City of Los Angeles CEQAThresholdsGuide and criteria set forth by the SCAQMD, the Project
would expose sensitive receptors to substantial concentrations of toxic air contaminants if any of the
followingwouldoccur:31
AQ‐8:
The Project emits carcinogenic materials or TACs that exceed the maximum incremental
cancerriskofteninonemillionoracancerburdengreaterthan0.5excesscancercases(in
areasgreaterthanorequalto1in1million)oranacuteorchronichazardindexof1.0.
As discussed previously under subsection 3.a., construction impacts from TACs are evaluated qualitatively
because of the sporadic and temporary nature of construction emissions. The Project would have limited
30
South Coast Air Quality Management District, Localized Significance Thresholds, (2003, revised 2008),
http://www.aqmd.gov/home/regulations/ceqa/air‐quality‐analysis‐handbook/localized‐significance‐thresholds. Accessed April
2016.
31
SouthCoastAirQualityManagementDistrict,CEQAAirQualityHandbook,Chapter6(DeterminingtheAirQualitySignificanceofa
Project) and Chapter 10 (Assessing Toxic Air Pollutants), (1993); SCAQMD Air Quality Significance Thresholds, (March 2011),
http://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default‐source/ceqa/handbook/scaqmd‐air‐quality‐significance‐thresholds.pdf?sfvrsn=2. Accessed
September2015.
1020S.FigueroaStreetProject
ESAPCR
AirQualityTechnicalReport
28
September 2016 2.0 Regulatory Setting and Significance Thresholds sourcesofTACsassociatedwithoperations.Therefore,aqualitativeassessmentwillbeusedtodetermine
whethertheProjectwouldresultinasignificantimpactbyexceedingtheabove‐referencedstandard.
2.2.4 Consistency with Air Quality Plans and Policies TheProjectwouldhaveasignificantimpactifitwould:
AQ‐9:
Substantially conflict with or obstruct implementation of relevant air quality policies in the
General Plan or other adopted regional and local plans adopted for reducing air quality
impacts.
1020S.FigueroaStreetProject
ESAPCR
AirQualityTechnicalReport
29
3.0 METHODOLOGY The evaluation of potential impacts to regional and local air quality that may result from the construction
andlong‐termoperationsoftheProjectisconductedasfollows.AdditionaldetailsareprovidedintheAir
QualityTechnicalReportinAppendixA.
3.1 CONSISTENCY WITH AIR QUALITY PLAN TheSCAQMDisrequired,pursuanttotheCleanAirAct,toreduceemissionsofcriteriapollutantsforwhich
the AirBasinisin non‐attainmentoftheNAAQS (e.g.,ozone andPM2.5). TheSCAQMD’s 2012AirQuality
Management Plan contains a comprehensive list of pollution control strategies directed at reducing
emissions and achieving the NAAQS. These strategies are developed, in part, based on regional growth
projections prepared by the SCAG. As part of its air quality planning, SCAG has prepared the Regional
ComprehensivePlanandGuideandthe2016‐2040RegionalTransportationPlan/SustainableCommunities
Strategy, which provide the basis for the land use and transportation components of the Air Quality
ManagementPlanandareusedinthepreparationoftheairqualityforecastsandtheconsistencyanalysis
included in the Air Quality Management Plan. Both the Regional Comprehensive Plan and Air Quality
ManagementPlanarebased,inpart,onprojectionsoriginatingwithcountyandcitygeneralplans.
The 2012 Air Quality Management Plan was prepared to accommodate growth, reduce the high levels of
pollutantswithintheareasunderthejurisdictionofSCAQMD,returncleanairtotheregion,andminimize
the impact on the economy. Projects that are consistent with the assumptions used in the Air Quality
ManagementPlandonotinterferewithattainmentbecausethegrowthisincludedintheprojectionsutilized
intheformulationoftheAirQualityManagementPlan.Thus,projects,uses,andactivitiesthatareconsistent
with the applicable growth projections and control strategies used in the development of the Air Quality
Management Plan would not jeopardize attainment of the air quality levels identified in the Air Quality
ManagementPlan,eveniftheyexceedtheSCAQMD’snumericindicators
3.2 CONSTRUCTION EMISSIONS ConstructionoftheProjecthasthepotentialtogeneratetemporarycriteriapollutantemissionsthroughthe
use of heavy‐duty construction equipment, such as excavators and forklifts, and through vehicle trips
generated from workers and haul trucks traveling to and from the Project Site. In addition, fugitive dust
emissions would result from demolition and various soil‐handling activities. Mobile source emissions,
primarily NOX, would result from the use of construction equipment such as dozers and loaders.
Constructionemissionscanvarysubstantiallyfromdaytoday,dependingonthelevelofactivity,thespecific
typeofconstructionactivity,andprevailingweatherconditions.Theassessmentofconstructionairquality
impactsconsiderseachofthesepotentialsources.
Daily regional emissions during construction are forecasted by assuming a conservative estimate of
construction activities (i.e., assuming all construction occurs at the earliest feasible date) and applying the
mobile source and fugitive dust emissions factors. The emissions are estimated using the CalEEMod
(Version 2013.2.2) software, an emissions inventory software program recommended by the SCAQMD.
CalEEMod is based on outputs from OFFROAD and EMFAC, which are emissions estimation models
developedbyCARBandusedtocalculateemissionsfromconstructionactivities,includingon‐andoff‐road
vehicles. The input values used in this analysis were adjusted to be Project‐specific based on equipment
1020S.FigueroaStreetProject
ESAPCR
AirQualityTechnicalReport
31
3.0 Methodology September 2016 types and the construction schedule. These values were then applied to the construction phasing
assumptionsusedinthe criteriapollutant analysistogeneratecriteriapollutantemissionsvaluesfor each
construction activity. Detailed construction equipment lists, construction scheduling, and emissions
calculationsareprovidedinAppendixA.
Constructionhaulandvendortruckemissionsduringgrading,concretepourandbuildingconstructionwere
evaluatedusingregionalheavy‐dutytruckemissionfactorsfromEMFAC2014.Dailytrucktripsanddefault
triplengthdatawereusedtoassessroadwayemissionsfromtruckexhaust,aswellastypicalCARBidling
times of local emissions on‐site. Detailed calculations are provided in Appendix A. Construction of the
Project would be separated into two consecutive phases. Phase 1 is estimated to take approximately 33
months, starting as early as 2017 with completion by 2020. Subphases of construction would include
demolition of the associated parking, site clearing, grading, excavation, subterranean parking and building
construction. Phase 2 is estimated to take approximately 31 months, starting as early as 2020 with
completion by 2023. Subphases of construction would include demolition of the existing buildings and
associatedparking,siteclearing,grading,excavation,subterraneanparkingandbuildingconstruction.The
Project would export approximately 99,800 cubic yards of soil during Phase 1 and 102,300 cubic yards of
soil during Phase 2. Construction would generate approximately 16,000 square feet of paving demolition
debrisduringPhase1and353,000squarefeetofdemolitiondebris(asphalt,interiorandexteriorbuilding
demolition,andgeneralconstructiondebris)duringPhase2.Emissionsfromtheseactivitiesareestimated
by construction phase. It should be noted that the maximum daily emissions are predicted values for the
worst‐casedayanddonotrepresenttheemissionsthatwouldoccurforeverydayofProjectconstruction.
ThemaximumdailyemissionsarecomparedtotheSCAQMDdailyregionalnumericindicators.
The localized effects from the on‐site portion of the emissions are evaluated at nearby sensitive receptor
locations potentially impacted by the Project according to the SCAQMD’s Localized Significance Threshold
Methodology (June 2003, revised July 2008), which relies on on‐site mass emission rate screening tables
andproject‐specificdispersionmodeling,whereappropriate.Thelocalizedsignificancethresholdsareonly
applicabletoNOX,CO,PM10,andPM2.5.ForNOXandCO,thethresholdsarebasedontheambientairquality
standards.ForPM10andPM2.5,thethresholdsarebasedonrequirementsinSCAQMDRule403,FugitiveDust.
TheSCAQMDhasestablishedscreeningcriteriathatcanbeusedtodeterminethemaximumallowabledaily
emissionsthatwouldsatisfythelocalizedsignificancethresholdsandthereforenotcauseorcontributetoan
exceedance of the applicable ambient air quality standards without project‐specific dispersion modeling.
ThelocalizedanalysisisbasedonthisSCAQMDscreeningcriteria.Thescreeningcriteriadependon:(1)the
areainwhichtheprojectislocated,(2)thesizeoftheprojectsite,and(3)thedistancebetweentheproject
site and the nearest sensitive receptor (e.g., residences, schools, hospitals). The Project Site is located in
CentralLosAngelesareaandisapproximately2.7acresinsize.Theoff‐sitereceptorsarelocatedadjacentto
theProjectSitetothenorth,south,andeast.Therefore,thescreeningcriteriaapplicabletoa2‐acresitein
theCentralLosAngelesareawithsensitivereceptorslocated25metersawaywereused.
3.2.1 Emissions from Construction Equipment Mobilesourceemissions,primarilyNOXandPM,wouldresultfromtheuseofconstructionequipmentsuch
as bulldozers, wheeled loaders, and cranes. During the finishing phase, the application of architectural
coatings(i.e.,paints)andotherbuildingmaterialswouldreleasereactiveorganiccompounds.Construction
emissions can vary substantially from day to day, depending on the level of activity, the specific type of
1020S.FigueroaStreetProject
ESAPCR
AirQualityTechnicalReport
32
September 2016 3.0 Methodology operation and, for dust, the prevailing weather conditions. The assessment of construction air quality
impactsconsiderseachofthesepotentialsources.
Truckandconstructionequipmentemissionswillvarywithenginemodelyearsinwhichnewerequipment
will emit fewer pollutants. As a conservative assumption, the CalEEMod model uses an emission rate for
equipment and trucks which represents an average model year for available equipment within the basin.
TheequipmentmixandconstructiondurationforeachstageisdetailedinAppendixA.CalEEModcalculates
theexhaustemissionsbasedonCARBOFFROADmethodologyusingtheequationpresentedbelow.
ConstructionOff‐RoadEquipment:
EmissionsDiesel[g]=∑i(EFi×Popi×AvgHPi×Loadi×Activityi
Where:
EFi
Popi AvgHPi
Loadi Activityi
i
=
=
=
=
=
=
EmissionfactorfromOFFROAD[g/bhp‐hr]
Population[quantityofsameequipmenttype]
Maximumratedaveragehorsepower[hp]
LoadFactor[dimensionless]
Hoursofoperation[hours]
EquipmentType
CalEEMod default methodologies, mentioned in USEPA AP‐42 were also used to describe fugitive dust
emissions from construction phases. The CalEEMod tool provides options for specifying equipment,
horsepower ratings, load factors, and operational hours per day. Construction equipment lists for each
phase of activity were provided by the applicant and/or applicant’s construction contractor(s) and
architect(s).
The amount of construction equipment used and the duration of construction activity could have a
substantial effect upon the amount of construction emissions, concentrations and the resulting impacts
occurring at any one time. As such, the emission forecasts provided reflect a specific set of conservative
assumptionsbasedontheexpectedconstructionscenariowhereinarelativelylargeamountofconstruction
isoccurringinarelativelyintensivemanner.
3.2.2 Emissions from On‐Road Trips Constructiongenerateson‐roadvehicleexhaust,evaporative,anddustemissionsfrompersonalvehiclesfor
workerandvendorcommuting,andtrucksforsoilandmaterialhauling.Theseemissionsarebasedonthe
numberoftripsandVMTalongwithemissionfactorsfromEMFAC.
RunningemissionsforallpollutantsandPMemissionsfromtireandbrakewearweredividedbytheVMTof
eachrespectivevehicleclassfromeachscenarioyearandadjustedforunitconversionstoderiveemission
factorsinunitsofgramsperVMT.Allotheremissions(includingevaporative)weredividedbythenumberof
trips to derive emission factors in units of grams per trip. The emissions from mobile sources were
calculatedwiththetriprates,triplengthsandemissionfactorsforrunningfromEMFACasfollows:
1020S.FigueroaStreetProject
ESAPCR
AirQualityTechnicalReport
33
3.0 Methodology September 2016 ConstructionOn‐RoadTrips:
Emissionspollutant=VMT*EFrunning,pollutant
Where:Emissionspollutant
VMT EFrunning,pollutant =
=
=
emissionsfromvehiclerunningforeachpollutant[g]
vehiclemilestraveled[miles]
emissionfactorforrunningemissions[g/mile]
3.2.3 Emissions from Architectural Coating VOCoff‐gassingemissionsresultfromevaporationofsolventscontainedinsurfacecoatings.TheCalEEMod
tool calculates the VOC evaporative emissions from application of residential and non‐residential surface
coatingsusingthefollowingequation:
ConstructionArchitecturalCoatingEmissions:
EAC=EFACxF*Apaint
Where:
E
EF
A
emissions[lbVOC]
emissionfactor[lb/sqft]
buildingsurfacearea[sqft].
=
=
=
TheCalEEModtoolassumesthetotalsurfaceforpaintingequals2.7timesthefloorsquarefootage
forresidentialand2timesthatfornonresidentialsquarefootagedefinedbytheuser.Alloftheland
useinformationprovidedbyametricotherthansquarefootagewillbeconvertedtosquarefootage
usingthedefaultconversionsoruserdefinedequivalence.
F
=
fractionofsurfacearea[%].
ThedefaultvaluesbasedonSCAQMDmethodsusedintheircoatingrulesare75percentforthe
interiorsurfacesand25percentfortheexteriorshell.Parkingareasarebasedon6percent
coverage.
The emission factor (EF) is based on the VOC content of the surface coatings and is calculated estimated
usingtheequationbelow:
ConstructionSurfaceCoatingEmissionFactor:
EFAC=Cvoc/454[g/lb]x3.785[L/Gal]/180[sqft]
Where:
EF
=
emissionfactor[lb/sqft]
C
=
VOCcontent[g/L].Thisvariesbylocationandyear
The emission factors for coating categories are calculated using the equation above based on default VOC
contentprovidedbytheairdistrictsorCARB’sstatewidelimits.
3.2.4 Emissions from Paving While there is no specific screen associated with asphalt paving emissions, CalEEMod estimates VOC off‐
gassingemissionsassociatedwithasphaltpavingofparkinglotsusingthefollowingequation:
1020S.FigueroaStreetProject
ESAPCR
AirQualityTechnicalReport
34
September 2016 3.0 Methodology ConstructionPavingEmissions:
EAPEFAPAParking
Where:
E
=
EF
=
A
=
3.3 emissions[lb]
emissionfactor[lb/acre].TheSMAQMDdefaultemissionfactoris2.62lb/acre.
areaoftheparkinglot[acre]
OPERATIONAL EMISSIONS Operation of the Project has the potential to generate criteria pollutant emissions through vehicle trips
travelingtoandfromtheProjectSite.Inaddition,emissionswouldresultfromareasourceson‐sitesuchas
natural gas combustion, landscaping equipment, and use of consumer products. Stationary sources of
emissions may be generated by on‐site charbroiling associated with food preparation activities at the
proposedrestaurantlandusesiftherestaurantweretoinstallcharbroilingequipment.Operationalimpacts
were assessed for the Interim Year (2020) when Phase 1 becomes operational concurrent with Phase 2
constructionandforfullProjectbuildout(2023).
TheoperationalemissionsareestimatedusingtheCalEEModsoftware.CalEEModwasusedtoforecastthe
daily regional emissions from area and stationary sources that would occur during long‐term Project
operations. In calculating mobile‐source emissions, the trip length values were based on the distances
providedinCalEEMod.Thetripdistanceswereappliedtothemaximumdailytripestimates,basedonthe
trip rates in the traffic study.32 The trips take into account trip reductions from Project characteristics
includinginternalcapturefromco‐locatingcommercialandresidentialusesontheProjectSiteandtransit
andpedestriantrips.MobileemissionswereestimatedseparatelyusingtheresultingCalEEMod‐calculated
annual vehicle miles traveled (VMT) and regional emission factors from EMFAC2014 because CalEEMod
reliesontheolderEMFAC2011.DetailsregardingtripreductionareprovidedinAppendixA.
Areasourceemissionsarebasedonnaturalgas(buildingheatingandwaterheaters),landscapingequipment,
and consumer product usage (including paints) rates provided in CalEEMod. Natural gas usage factors in
CalEEMod are based on the California Energy Commission (CEC) California Commercial End Use Survey
(CEUS) data set, which provides energy demand by building type and climate zone.33 However, since the
data from the CEUS is from 2002, correction factors are incorporated into CalEEMod to account for the
appropriateversionoftheTitle24BuildingEnergyEfficiencyStandardsineffect.
Stationary‐sourceemissionsareestimatedseparatelyoutsideoftheCalEEModsoftware.Stationarysources
mayincludecharbroilingofmeatthatmayoccuron‐siteduringfoodpreparationactivitiesintherestaurant
kitchen.StationarysourceemissionsarecalculatedbasedonemissionsfactorsavailablefromtheSCAQMD.
Inordertoprovideaconservativeanalysis,itwasassumedthattherestaurantwouldcharbroilmeatwith
relativelyhighemissionfactors(i.e.,hamburgermeatandchicken).Thequantityofmeatcharbroiledinthe
restaurantisbasedonsurveydatafromtheSCAQMD.Theestimatedemissionsaccountforreductionsfrom
compliancewithemissionscontrolrequirementsconsistentwithSCAQMDRule1138.
32
GibsonTransportationConsulting,Inc.,TrafficStudyforthe1020S.FigueroaStreetProject,LosAngeles,California,(2016).
33
CaliforniaEnergyCommission,CaliforniaCommercialEnd‐UseSurvey,http://capabilities.itron.com/CeusWeb/Chart.aspx.Accessed
April2016.
1020S.FigueroaStreetProject
ESAPCR
AirQualityTechnicalReport
35
3.0 Methodology September 2016 Operational air quality impacts are assessed based on the incremental increase in emissions compared to
baselineconditions.UnderCEQA,thebaselineenvironmentalsettingforanEIRisestablishedatoraround
thetimethattheNoticeofPreparationfortheEIRispublished.Asdiscussedpreviously,theProjectSiteis
currentlydevelopedwiththenine‐storyLuxeHotelandsurroundingsurfaceparkinglots.Therefore,thenet
operational emissions generated by the proposed Project are equal to the Project’s emissions minus the
existing Project Site emissions. The maximum daily net emissions from operation of the Project are
comparedtotheSCAQMDdailyregionalnumericindicators.Detailedemissionscalculationsareprovidedin
AppendixA.
The localized effects from the on‐site portion of daily emissions from Project operation are evaluated at
nearbysensitivereceptorlocationspotentiallyimpactedbytheProjectaccordingtotheSCAQMD’sLocalized
SignificanceThresholdMethodology(June2003,revisedJuly2008).Thelocalizedimpactsfromoperation
oftheProjectareassessedsimilartoconstruction,asdiscussedpreviously.
Emissions of CO are produced in greatest quantities from motor vehicle combustion and are usually
concentratedatorneargroundlevelbecausetheydonotreadilydisperseintotheatmosphere,particularly
under cool, stable (i.e., low or no wind) atmospheric conditions. Localized areas where ambient
concentrationsexceedstateand/orfederalstandardsaretermedCOhotspots.ThepotentialfortheProject
to cause or contribute to the formation of off‐site CO hotspots are evaluated based on prior dispersion
modelingofthefourbusiestintersectionsintheAirBasinthathasbeenconductedbytheSCAQMDforitsCO
Attainment Demonstration Plan in the AQMP. The analysis compares the intersections with the greatest
peak‐hour traffic volumes that would be impacted by the Project to the intersections modeled by the
SCAQMD. Project‐impacted intersections with peak‐hour traffic volumes that are lower than the
intersections modeled by the SCAQMD, in conjunction with lower background CO levels, would result in
loweroverallCOconcentrationscomparedtotheSCAQMDmodeledvaluesinitsAQMP.
3.3.1 Area Sources (Consumer Products and Coatings) Area source emissions were calculated using CalEEMod default assumptions for of the multi‐family
residential, retail, and restaurant land uses. Area sources include hearths, consumer product use,
architecturalcoatings,andlandscapemaintenanceequipment.Emissionsassociatedwithnaturalgasusage
in space heating, water heating, and stoves as these are calculated in the building energy use module
discussedbelow.
3.3.1.1 Consumer Products Consumer products are chemically formulated products used by household and institutional consumers,
including, but not limited to, detergents; cleaning compounds; polishes; floor finishes; cosmetics; personal
care products; home, lawn, and garden products; disinfectants; sanitizers; aerosol paints; and automotive
specialtyproducts;but doesnotincludeotherpaintproducts, furniture coatings,or architecturalcoatings.
SCAQMDdidanevaluationofconsumerproductusecomparedtothetotalsquarefootageofbuildingsusing
data from CARB consumer product Emission Inventory. To calculate the VOC emissions from consumer
productuse,thefollowingequationwasusedinCalEEMod:
1020S.FigueroaStreetProject
ESAPCR
AirQualityTechnicalReport
36
September 2016 3.0 Methodology ConsumerProducts:
EmissionsEFBuildingArea
Where:EF=poundsofVOCperbuildingsquarefootperday
Thefactoris2.04x10‐5lbs/sqft/dayforSCAQMDareas.
BuildingArea=Thetotalsquarefootageofallbuildingsincludingresidentialsquarefootage.
3.3.1.2 Architectural Coatings VOCoff‐gassingemissionsresultfromevaporationofsolventscontainedinsurfacecoatingssuchasinpaints
and primers. The methodology for operations is the same as the construction methodology mentioned
above.
3.3.2 Building Energy Usage Withregard toenergy usage,theconsumptionof fossilfuelstogenerateelectricityandtoprovideheating
andhotwatergeneratescriteriapollutants.Futurefuelconsumptionratesareestimatedbasedonspecific
square footage of the multi‐family residential, retail, and restaurant land uses, as well as predicted water
supply needs of the Project. Energy usage (off‐site electricity generation and on‐site natural gas
consumption) for the Project is calculated within CalEEMod using the CEC CEUS data set.34 This data set
providesenergyintensitiesofdifferentlandusesthroughoutthestateanddifferentclimatezones.However,
since the data from the CEUS is from 2002, the CalEEMod software incorporates correction factors to
accountforcompliancewiththeTitle24BuildingStandardsCode.
Naturalgas‐relatedemissionsofcriteriapollutantsassociatedwithoperationoftheProjectarebasedonthe
sizeofthemulti‐familyresidential,retail,andrestaurantlanduses,thenaturalgasdemandfactorsforthe
landuses.NaturalgasdemandisbasedondatafromtheCEUS,whichlistsenergydemandbybuildingtype.35
However,sincethedatafromtheCEUSisfrom2002,CalEEModincorporatescorrectionfactorstoaccount
forcompliancewiththe2008Title24BuildingStandardsCode.SincetheProjectwouldalsoberequiredto
meettheTitle24standardsineffectatthetimeofbuildingpermitapplication,thisanalysisincorporatesan
additional correction factor to account for the updated Title 24 Building Standards Code. The correction
factorsareappliedonlytothenewbuildingconstruction.Naturalgasdemandfortheretainedexistinguses
doesnotincorporatetheadditionalcorrectionfactorinordertoaccountfortheageofthebuildings.
3.3.3 Mobile Source Emissions Thetripdistanceswereappliedtothemaximumdailytripestimates,basedonthetripgenerationratesfor
eachlanduseprovidedbytheProjectTrafficStudy36toestimatethetotalVMT.TheVMTestimatestakeinto
account trip and VMT reductions from Project land use characteristics including internal capture from co‐
locatinglandusesontheProjectSite,pedestriantrips,nearbytransitoptions,andnearbyoff‐siteresidential,
commercial,restaurant,entertainment,andofficelanduses.Detailsregardingtripreductionareprovidedin
AppendixA.
34
CaliforniaEnergyCommission,CaliforniaCommercialEnd‐UseSurvey,http://capabilities.itron.com/CeusWeb/Chart.aspx.Accessed
April2016.
35
California
Energy
Commission,
California
Commercial
http://capabilities.itron.com/CeusWeb/ChartsSF/Default2.aspx.AccessedApril2016.
End‐Use
Survey,
36
GibsonTransportationConsulting,Inc.,TrafficStudyforthe1020S.FigueroaStreetProject,LosAngeles,California,(2016).
1020S.FigueroaStreetProject
ESAPCR
AirQualityTechnicalReport
37
3.0 Methodology September 2016 3.3.3.1 Trip Type Thetriptypebreakdowndescribesthepurposeofthetripgeneratedateachlanduse.Forexample,thetrip
type breakdown indicates the percentage of trips generated at single family home for work, for shopping,
andforotherpurposes.Multiplyingthetotaltripsforalandusebytriptypebreakdownpercentageyields
tripsofagiventriptype.TwosetsoftriptypebreakdownareusedinCalEEMod–residentialbreakdown
andcommercialbreakdown.
Residentialtriptype:Theseincludehome‐work(H‐W),home‐shop(H‐S),orhome‐other(H‐O).Ahome‐
worktriprepresentsthetripfromthehometotheworkplace.Ahome‐shoptriprepresentsthetripfromthe
hometoalandusewhereshoppingtakesplace(generallyretail).Ahome‐otherrepresentsallothertypesof
trips generated from the resident such as school, entertainment, etc. The trip type breakdown is from
district supplied information or the 1999 Caltrans Statewide Travel Survey is used as default or specific
informationobtainedfromthevariousDistricts.
Commercial trip type: These include commercial‐customer (C‐C), commercial‐work (C‐W) and
commercial‐nonwork (C‐NW). A commercial‐customer trip represents a trip made by someone who is
visiting the commercial land use to partake in the services offered by the Site. The commercial‐work trip
representsatripmadebysomeonewhoisemployedbythecommerciallandusesector.Thecommercial‐
nonworktriprepresentsatripassociatedwiththecommerciallanduseotherthanbycustomersorworkers.
An example of C‐NW trips includes trips made by delivery vehicles of goods associated with the land use.
The trip type breakdown from the number or workers and or truck trips from ITE and an analysis of
informationprovidedfortheSCABwasusedasdefaulttoassignthetriptypebreakdownsforalllanduses.
Ifanexactmatchtoalandusewasnotavailable,datafromasimilarlandusewasusedasasurrogate.
3.3.3.2 Primary Trip Length InCalEEMod,eachtriptypehasaprimarytriplengthassociatedwithit.Thesetriplengthsarebasedonthe
locationandurbanizationselectedontheprojectcharacteristicscreen.Thesevaluesweresuppliedbythe
districtsoruseadefaultaverageforthestate.Eachdistrict(orcounty)alsoassignstriplengthsforurban
andruralsettings.
3.3.3.3 Pass‐by and Diverted Trips Trip link types further describe the characteristics of the trip attracted to each land use, whether it’s a
primarytrip,adivertedlinktrip,orapass‐bytrip.Forexample,acommercialcustomerpass‐bytripcould
beapersongoingfromhometoshoponhis/herwaytowork.Inaddition,acommercialcustomerdiverted‐
linktripcouldbeapersongoingfromhometowork,andonitswaymakingadiversiontoshop.Pass‐by
trips generate virtually no additional running emissions but could generate additional resting and startup
emissions.Divertedtripsgeneratelessrunningemissionscomparedtoprimarytrips,andcanalsogenerate
additionalrestingandstartupemissions.
3.3.3.4 Mobile Source Emission Factors BecauseCalEEModdoesnotincorporateCARB’smostrecenton‐roademissionsfactormodel,mobilesource
emissionfactorsarebasedonEMFAC2014.Themodelwasrunintheemissionsmode(alsoreferredtoas
the “Burden” mode) and used to generate South Coast Air Basin‐specific vehicle fleet emission factors in
1020S.FigueroaStreetProject
ESAPCR
AirQualityTechnicalReport
38
September 2016 3.0 Methodology units of grams or metric tons per mile, which is the same methodology used by CalEEMod to generate
emission factors using the prior EMFAC2011 model. These emission factors are then applied to the daily
VMTtoobtaindailymobilesourceemissions.
ModelingfortheProjectwasconductedusingthevehiclefleetmixfortheSouthCoastAirBasinasprovided
inEMFAC2014.Mobilesourceemissionsaregenerallycalculatedasfollows:
Mobile:
Emissions=(∑i(Units×ADT×DTRIP×EF)i)
Where:
Units
ADT
DTRIP
EF
i
=
=
=
=
=
Numberofvehicles(samevehiclemodelyearandclass)
Averagedailytriprate[trips/day]
Tripdistance[miles/trip]
Emissionfactor[poundspermile]
Summationindex
Emissionsfrommotorvehiclesaredependentonmodelyearsandthespecifictypesofvehiclesthatareused
totraveltoandfromtheProjectSite.Theemissionswerecalculatedusingarepresentativemotorvehicle
fleetmixfortheSouthCoastAirBasinforthe opening yearofthe Project. Asdiscussedabove,allvehicle
types would visit the Project Site; therefore, the use of the motor vehicle fleet mix for the South Coast Air
Basinisanappropriatemodelingparameter.
3.3.4 Stationary Source Emissions Stationary‐sourceemissionsareestimatedseparatelyoutsideoftheCalEEModsoftware.Stationarysources
mayincludecharbroiling of meatthat mayoccuron‐siteduringfoodpreparation activitiesin arestaurant
kitchen.StationarysourceemissionsarecalculatedbasedonemissionsfactorsavailablefromtheSCAQMD
for charbroiling.37 In order to provide a conservative analysis, it was assumed that the restaurant would
charbroil meat with relatively high emission factors (i.e., hamburger and chicken meat). The quantity of
meat charbroiled in the restaurant is based on survey data from the SCAQMD.38 The estimated emissions
accountforreductionsfromcompliancewithemissionscontrolrequirementsconsistentwithSCAQMDRule
1138.Ingeneral,stationary‐sourcecharbroilingemissionsarecalculatedasfollows:
StationarySourceCharbroiling:
Emissions=(∑i(QMEAT×EF×(1‐C)i)
Where:
QMEAT
EF
C
i
=
=
=
=
Quantityofmeatproductcharbroiledinaday[pounds/day]
Emissionfactor[poundspollutantperpoundsmeat]
Emissionscontrolfactor[percent]
Summationindex
37
South Coast Air Quality Management District, Emission Factors for Commercial Cooking Operations,
http://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default‐source/rule‐book/Proposed‐Rules/1138/par1138pdsr_appendixi.pdf?sfvrsn=2. Accessed April
2016.
38
Ascitedin:SanJoaquinValleyUnifiedAirPollutionControlDistrict,FinalDraftStaffReportRule4692(CommercialCharbroiling),
February21,2002.
1020S.FigueroaStreetProject
ESAPCR
AirQualityTechnicalReport
39
3.0 Methodology September 2016 3.4 TOXIC AIR CONTAMINANT IMPACTS (CONSTRUCTION AND OPERATIONS) The potential for the Project to cause impacts from TACs are evaluated by conducting a screening‐level
analysis.Thescreening‐levelanalysisconsistsofreviewingtheProject’sSiteplanandProjectdescriptionto
identifyanynewormodifiedTACemissionsources.IfitisdeterminedthattheProjectwillintroduceanew
sourceofTACs,ormodifyanexistingsource,thendownwindsensitivereceptorlocationsareidentifiedanda
site‐specificanalysisisconducted.
ThegreatestpotentialforTACemissionsduringconstructionwouldberelatedtodieselparticulatematter
emissions associated with heavy‐duty equipment during demolition, excavation and grading activities.
ConstructionactivitiesassociatedwiththeProjectwouldbesporadic,transitory,andshortterminnature..
OEHHAisresponsiblefordevelopingandrevisingguidelinesforperforminghealthriskassessments(HRAs)
undertheState’stheAirToxicsHotSpotsProgramRiskAssessment(AB2588)regulation.InMarch2015,
OEHHA adopted revised guidelines that update the previous guidance by incorporating advances in risk
assessmentwithconsiderationofinfantsandchildrenusingAgeSensitivityFactors(ASF).Theconstruction
HRA was performed in accordance with the revised OEHHA AirToxicsHotSpotsProgramGuidanceManual
for Preparation of Health Risk Assessments (OEHHA Guidance).39 The analysis incorporates the estimated
constructionemissions,aspreviouslydiscussed,anddispersionmodelingusingtheUSEPAAERMODmodel
withmeteorologicaldatafromtheclosestSCAQMDmonitoringstation.
During long‐term operations, TACs could be emitted as part of periodic maintenance operations, cleaning,
painting, etc., and from periodic visits from delivery trucks and service vehicles. However, these uses are
expected to be occasional and result in minimal exposure to off‐site sensitive receptors. As the Project
consists of residential, hotel, and commercial/restaurant uses, the Project would not include sources of
substantiveTACemissionsidentifiedbytheSCAQMDorCARBsitingrecommendations.Thusaqualitative
analysisisappropriate.
WithregardtooperationalTACemissions,sensitivelandusesandnewsourcesorTACs.TheSCAQMDand
CARB provide guidance regarding siting sources of TACs near off‐site sensitive receptors. As the Project
consists of residential, hotel, retail, and restaurant uses, the Project would not include sources of TAC
emissionsidentifiedbytheSCAQMDorCARBsitingrecommendations
3.5 LAND USE CHARACTERISTICS AND PROJECT DESIGN FEATURES 3.5.1 Land Use Characteristics The Project would represent an urban infill development, since it would be undertaken on a currently
developedsite,andwouldbelocatednearexisting off‐sitecommercial andretaildestinationsand inclose
proximitytoexistingpublictransitstops,whichwouldresultinreducedvehicletrips,VMT,andassociated
transportationemissionscomparedtothestatewideandSouthCoastAirBasinaverage.
TheCaliforniaAirPollutionControlOfficersAssociation(CAPCOA)hasprovidedguidanceformitigatingor
reducingemissionsfromlandusedevelopmentprojects.InSeptember2010,CAPCOAreleasedaguidance
39
OfficeofEnvironmentalHealthHazardAssessment,AirToxicsHotSpotsProgramGuidanceManualforPreparationofHealthRisk
Assessments,(2015).
1020S.FigueroaStreetProject
ESAPCR
AirQualityTechnicalReport
40
September 2016 3.0 Methodology document titled QuantifyingGreenhouseGasMitigationMeasures which provides emission reduction values
for recommended reduction measures.40 The CAPCOA guidance document was utilized in this analysis for
quantifyingreductionsduetolandusecharacteristicsandProjectDesignFeaturesinCalEEMod.
The land use characteristics listed below are consistent with the CAPCOA guidance document, and would
reduce vehicle trips to and from the Project Site compared to the statewide and South Coast Air Basin
average. They would therefore result in a corresponding reduction in VMT and associated air pollutant
emissions.

IncreasedDensity:Increaseddensity,measuredintermsofpersons,jobs,ordwellingunitsperunit
area, reduces emissions associated with transportation as it reduces the distance people travel for
work or services and provides a foundation for the implementation of other strategies such as
enhanced transit services. This measure corresponds to CAPCOA guidance measure LUT‐1.41
According to CAPCOA, the reduction in VMT from this measure applies to urban and suburban
settingsforresidential,retail,office,industrial,andmixed‐useprojects.TheProjectislocatedinan
urban infill42location and is mixed‐use; therefore, this measure applies to the Project. The Project
would increase the Project Site density to approximately 241 dwelling units per acre and 206 jobs
peracre(refertoSection4.I,Population,Housing,andEmployment,oftheDraftEIR,whichprovides
employmentdatausedtoestimatethenumberofjobsperacre).

Location Efficiency: Location efficiency describes the location of a project relative to the type of
urbanlandscapesuchasanurbanarea,compactinfill,orsuburbancenter.Ingeneral,comparedto
thestatewideaverage,aprojectcouldrealizeVMTreductionsupto65percentinanurbanarea,up
to30percentinacompactinfillarea,orupto10percentinasuburbancenterforlanduse/location
strategies.43 This measure corresponds to CAPCOA guidance measure LUT‐2.44 According to
CAPCOA, the reduction in VMT from this measure applies to urban and suburban settings for
residential,retail,office,industrial,andmixed‐useprojects.TheProjectislocatedinanurbaninfill
locationandismixed‐use;therefore,thismeasureappliestotheProject.AccordingtotheCAPCOA
guidance, factors that contribute to VMT reductions under this measure include the geographic
locationoftheprojectwithintheregion.TheProjectSiterepresentsanurbaninfilllocationwithin
40
CaliforniaAirPollutionControlOfficersAssociation,QuantifyingGreenhouseGasMitigationMeasures,(2010).
41
CaliforniaAirPollutionControlOfficersAssociation,QuantifyingGreenhouseGasMitigationMeasures,(2010)155‐158.
42
California Air Pollution Control Officers Association, Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Mitigation Measures, (2010) 59‐60. The project
areameetsthecharacteristicsforanurbansettingwithrespecttotypicalbuildingheightsof6storiesormuchhigher,gridstreet
pattern,minimalsetbacks,constrainedparking,highparkingprices,highqualityrailservice(i.e.,MetroBlue,Expo,RedandPurple
Lines),locationrelativetoregionalcores(5milesorless)andjobs/housingbalance(theCentralCityCommunityPlanAreahasan
existingjobs/housingratioofapproximately7.2).
43
CalEEMod,bydefault,assumesthattripdistancesintheSouthCoastAirBasinareslightlylongerthanthestatewideaverage.Thisis
due to the fact that commute patterns in the South Coast Air Basin involve a substantial portion of the population commuting
relativelyfardistances,whichisdocumentedintheSouthernCaliforniaAssociationofGovernments2016RegionalTransportation
Plan (RTP)/Sustainable Communities Strategy (SCS). The RTP/SCS shows that, even under future Plan conditions, upwards of 50
percentofallworktripsare10milesorlonger(SCAG,PerformanceMeasuresAppendix,p.7,2012).TheRTP/SCSdoesnotspecify
the current percentage of work trips greater than 10 miles in the region, but it can be assumed that the percentage is currently
greaterthan50percentsincethegoaloftheRTP/SCSistoreduceoverallVMTintheregion.Itisthusreasonabletoassumethatthe
trip distances in South Coast Air Basin are analogous to the statewide average given that the default model trip distances in the
South Coast Air Basin are slightly longer but still generally similar to the statewide average. Therefore, projects could achieve
similar levels of VMT reduction (65 percent in an urban area, 30 percent in a compact infill area, or 10 percent for a suburban
center)comparedtotheSouthCoastAirBasinaverage.
44
CaliforniaAirPollutionControlOfficersAssociation,QuantifyingGreenhouseGasMitigationMeasures,(2010)159‐161.
1020S.FigueroaStreetProject
ESAPCR
AirQualityTechnicalReport
41
3.0 Methodology September 2016 the Downtown area of the City of Los Angeles. The Project Site is served by existing public
transportationlocatedwithinaquarter‐mile.TheProjectSiteiswithinanactiveurbancenterwith
many existing off‐site commercial, entertainment, hotel, and residential buildings. The location
efficiencyoftheProjectSitewouldresultinsynergisticbenefitsthatwouldreducevehicletripsand
VMT compared to the statewide and South Coast Air Basin average and would result in
correspondingreductionsintransportation‐relatedemissions.

Increased Land Use Diversity and Mixed‐Uses: Locating different types of land uses near one
another can decrease VMT since trips between land use types are shorter and could be
accommodatedbyalternativemodesoftransportation,suchaspublictransit,bicycles,andwalking.
This measure corresponds to CAPCOA guidance measure LUT‐3.45 According to CAPCOA, the
reduction in VMT from this measure applies to urban and suburban settings (also potentially for
ruralmaster‐plannedcommunities)formixed‐useprojects.TheProjectislocatedinanurbaninfill
locationandismixed‐use;therefore,thismeasureappliestotheProject.AccordingtotheCAPCOA
guidance, factors that contribute to VMT reductions under this measure include the percentage of
each land use type in the project. The Project would co‐locate complementary commercial and
residentiallandusesinclosetoproximitytoexistingoff‐sitecommercialandresidentialuses.The
Projectwouldincludeon‐siteretailandresidentiallandusesandwouldbelocatedwithinaquarter‐
mileofoff‐sitecommercialandresidentialuses,aswellasmajortransitfacilities.Theincreasesin
landusediversityandmixofusesontheProjectSite,aswellasproximitytotransit,wouldreduce
vehicle trips and VMT by encouraging walking and non‐automotive forms of transportation, which
wouldresultincorrespondingreductionsintransportation‐relatedemissions.

Increased Destination Accessibility: This measure corresponds to CAPCOA guidance measure
LUT‐4.46 According to CAPCOA, the reduction in VMT from this measure applies to urban and
suburban settings for residential, retail, office, industrial, and mixed‐use projects. The Project is
locatedinanurbaninfilllocationandismixed‐use,includingresidential andretailuses;therefore,
this measure applies to the Project. According to the CAPCOA guidance, factors that contribute to
VMT reductions under this measure include the distance to downtown or major job center. The
Projectwouldbelocatedinanareathatoffersaccesstomultipleothernearbydestinations,including
restaurant,bar,office,retail,entertainment,movietheater,andresidentialuses.TheProjectSiteis
alsolocatednearotherjobcentersintheregionandwithintheDowntownareaitself.Theaccessto
multiple destinations in close proximity to the Project Site would reduce vehicle trips and VMT
compared to the statewide and South Coast Air Basin average, encourage walking and non‐
automotiveformsoftransportation,andwouldresultincorrespondingreductionsintransportation‐
relatedemissions.

Increased Transit Accessibility: Locating a project with high density near transit facilities
encouragestheuseoftransitbypeopletravelingtoorfromaprojectsite.Thismeasurecorresponds
to CAPCOA guidance measure LUT‐5.47 According to CAPCOA, the reduction in VMT from this
measure applies to urban and suburban settings (also potentially for rural settings adjacent to a
commuterrailstationwithconvenientaccesstoamajoremploymentcenter)forresidential,retail,
office, industrial, and mixed‐use projects. The Project is located in an urban infill location and is
mixed‐use;therefore,thismeasureappliestotheProject.AccordingtotheCAPCOAguidance,factors
45
CaliforniaAirPollutionControlOfficersAssociation,QuantifyingGreenhouseGasMitigationMeasures,(2010)162‐166.
46
CaliforniaAirPollutionControlOfficersAssociation,QuantifyingGreenhouseGasMitigationMeasures,(2010)167‐170.
47
CaliforniaAirPollutionControlOfficersAssociation,QuantifyingGreenhouseGasMitigationMeasures,(2010)171‐175.
1020S.FigueroaStreetProject
ESAPCR
AirQualityTechnicalReport
42
September 2016 3.0 Methodology that contribute to VMT reductions under this measure include the distance to transit stations near
theProject.TheProjectwouldbelocatedwithinaquarter‐mileofpublic transportation,including
existing Metro bus routes (e.g., 4, 28, 81, 442, 460, 701, 721, 728, 910/950, Commuter Express
422/423/438/448/534,DASHF)andtheMetroBlueandExpoLines,andnearbyaccesstotheMetro
Red and Purple Lines within one‐half mile. The Project would provide access to on‐site uses from
existing pedestrian pathways. The Project would also provide parking for bicycles on‐site to
encourage utilization of alternative modes of transportation. The increased transit accessibility
would reduce vehicle trips and VMT versus the statewide and South Coast Air Basin average,
encouragewalkingandnon‐automotiveformsoftransportation,andwouldresultincorresponding
reductionsintransportation‐relatedemissions.

ImproveDesignofDevelopment:Improvedstreetnetworkcharacteristicswithinaneighborhood
enhanceswalkabilityandconnectivity.Characteristicsincludestreetaccessibilityusuallymeasured
in terms of number of intersections (e.g., four‐way intersections) per square mile. This measure
corresponds to CAPCOA guidance measure LUT‐9.48 According to CAPCOA, the reduction in VMT
fromthismeasureappliestourbanandsuburbansettingsforresidential,retail,office,industrial,and
mixed‐useprojects.TheProjectislocatedinanurbaninfilllocationandismixed‐use;therefore,this
measureappliestotheProject.TheProjectwouldbelocatedinahighlystreet‐accessibleareawith
approximately76four‐wayintersectionswithinaonemileareaoftheProjectSite,whichexceedsthe
standard intersection density assumed in baseline VMT modeling. The increased intersection
densitywouldreducevehicletripsandVMTversusthestatewideandSouthCoastAirBasinaverage,
encouragewalkingandnon‐automotiveformsoftransportation,andwouldresultincorresponding
reductionsintransportation‐relatedemissions.

ProvidePedestrianNetworkImprovements:Providingpedestrianaccessthatminimizesbarriers
andlinksaprojectsitewithexistingorplannedexternalstreetsencouragespeopletowalkinsteadof
drive.ThismeasurecorrespondstoCAPCOAguidancemeasureSDT‐1.49AccordingtoCAPCOA,the
reduction in VMT from this measure applies to urban, suburban, and rural settings for residential,
retail,office,industrial,andmixed‐useprojects.TheProjectislocatedinanurbaninfilllocationand
is mixed‐use; therefore, this measure applies to the Project. According to the CAPCOA guidance,
factorsthatcontributetoVMTreductionsunderthismeasureincludepedestrianaccessconnectivity
withintheprojectandto/fromoff‐sitedestinations.AsdiscussedinSection4.J,Transportationand
Traffic,thewalkabilityofexistingfacilitiesisbasedontheavailabilityofpedestrianroutesnecessary
to accomplish daily tasks without the use of an automobile. These attributes are quantified by
WalkScore.comandassignedascoreoutof100points.Withthevariouscommercialbusinessesand
entertainmentfacilitiesadjacenttoresidentialneighborhoodsoftheDowntownareaandproximity
topublictransit,thewalkabilityoftheDowntownareaisapproximately90points;50thiscomparesto
thecitywidescoreof 64 points.AsdiscussedinChapter 2.0,ProjectDescription,theProjectwould
improvethestreet‐levelpedestrianenvironmentandconnectivitywithintheLALIVE,StaplesCenter,
the Los Angeles Convention Center and the surrounding streetscape, with the creation of new
pedestrianscalefeaturessuchasapublicplazaalongS.Figueroawithstreetlevelretail/restaurant
uses,streettreesandlandscaping,publicart,andsignageandlighting.TheProjectwouldpromote
48
CaliforniaAirPollutionControlOfficersAssociation,QuantifyingGreenhouseGasMitigationMeasures,(2010)182‐185.
49
CaliforniaAirPollutionControlOfficersAssociation,QuantifyingGreenhouseGasMitigationMeasures,(2010)186‐189.
50
WalkScore.com(www.walkscore.com)ratestheProjectSite(1020S.FigueroaStreet)withascoreof90of100possiblepoints(scores
accessedonMarch16,2016fortheDowntownLosAngelesdistrict).WalkScorecalculatesthewalkabilityofspecificaddressesby
takingintoaccounttheeaseoflivingintheneighborhoodwithareducedrelianceonautomobiletravel.
1020S.FigueroaStreetProject
ESAPCR
AirQualityTechnicalReport
43
3.0 Methodology September 2016 pedestrian activities and connections to interior uses. Pedestrian access to the Hotel Tower and
lobbywouldbefromahotelmotor‐courton11thStreetandfromthehotellobbyfrontingS.Figueroa
Street. Pedestrian access to the two stories of commercial and restaurant frontage along the
periphery of the Podium fronting 11th Street, S. Figueroa Street, S. Flower Street, and Olympic
Boulevard would be directly from those streets at the ground level or via elevators, stairs or
escalators.PedestrianaccesstothelobbyforResidentialTower1atthecornerof11thStreetandS.
FlowerStreetwouldbefromS.FlowerStreet.PedestrianaccesstothelobbyofResidentialTower2
at the corner of S. Figueroa Street and Olympic Boulevard would be from Olympic Boulevard.
Pedestrian access to the residential units in the Podium at the street level would be via either the
Residential Tower 1 or Residential Tower 2 residential lobbies. In summary, the Project would
provide an internal pedestrian network for Project visitors and residents that links to the existing
off‐site pedestrian network including existing off‐site sidewalks, and would therefore result in a
smallreductioninVMTandassociatedtransportation‐relatedemissions.
3.5.2 Project Design Features The Project would achieve several objectives of the City of Los Angeles General Plan Framework Element,
Southern California Association of Governments Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities
Strategy,andSouthCoastAirQualityManagementDistrictAirQualityManagement Planforestablishing a
regionallandusepatternthatpromotessustainability.TheProjectwouldsupportpedestrianactivityinthe
Downtownarea,andcontributetoalandusepatternthataddresseshousingneedsandreducesvehicletrips
andairpollutionbylocatingresidentialuseswithinanareathathaspublictransit(withaccesstoexisting
regional bus and rail service), and employment opportunities, restaurants and entertainment all within
walkingdistance.
The Project would be designed to incorporate green building techniques and other sustainability features.
Key Project Design Features that would contribute to energy efficiencies include the use of glass/window
areas for ventilation and daylight accessibility, low albedo (high reflectivity) color paving to reduce heat
island effect and drought tolerant landscaping. Other building features would include such items as
stormwater retention; installation of heating, ventilation, and air conditioning (HVAC) systems that utilize
ozone‐friendly refrigerants; use of materials and finishes that emit low quantities of VOCs; use of high
efficiency fixtures and appliances, water conservation features; and recycling of solid wastes. The Project
wouldalso providebicycleparking andpreferredparkingforfuel efficientorelectricvehicle. TheProject
would also be designed to comply with the City of Los Angeles Green Building Ordinance. The following
ProjectDesignFeatureswouldreduceairpollutantemissionsaswellasgreenhousegasemissions:
PDF‐AQ‐1:
GreenBuildingMeasures:TheProjectwouldbedesignedandoperatedtomeetor
exceedtheapplicablerequirementsoftheStateofCaliforniaGreenBuildingStandards
CodeandtheCityofLosAngelesGreenBuildingCodeandachievetheequivalentofthe
USGBCLEEDSilverCertificationlevel.Greenbuildingmeasureswouldinclude,butare
notlimitedtothefollowing:

TheProjectwouldimplementaconstructionwastemanagementplantodivertall
mixed construction and demolition debris to City certified construction and
demolition waste processors, consistent with the Los Angeles City Council
approvedCouncilFile09‐3029;
1020S.FigueroaStreetProject
ESAPCR
AirQualityTechnicalReport
44
September 2016 3.0 Methodology 
The Project would be designed to optimize energy performance and reduce
buildingenergycostby14percentfornewconstructioncomparedtotheTitle24
Building Energy Efficiency Standards as specified in the LEED 2009 Energy and
Atmospherecredit1(EAc1);

The Project would be designed to optimize energy performance and reduce
buildingenergycostbyinstallingenergyefficientappliancesthatmeettheUSEPA
ENERGYSTARratingstandardsorequivalent;

The Project would include double‐paned windows to keep heat out during
summermonthsandkeepheatinsideduringwintermonths.

The Project would include lighting controls with occupancy sensors to take
advantageofavailablenaturallight.

TheProjectwouldreduceoutdoorpotablewaterusebyaminimumof50percent
comparedtobaselinewaterconsumption.Reductionswouldbeachievedthrough
drought‐tolerant/Californianativeplantspeciesselection,artificialturf,irrigation
systemefficiency,alternativewatersupplies(e.g.,rainwaterharvestingforusein
landscaping),and/orsmartirrigationsystems(e.g.,weather‐basedcontrols).

TheProjectwouldreduceindoorpotablewaterusebyaminimumof40percent
comparedtobaselinewaterconsumptionbyinstallingwaterfixturesthatexceed
applicablestandards.

The Project would provide on‐site recycling areas, consistent with City of Los
Angeles strategies and ordinances, with the goal of achieving 70 percent waste
diversionby2020,and90percentby2025.

ToencouragecarpoolingandtheuseofelectricvehiclesbyProjectresidentsand
visitors,theApplicantshalldesignateaminimumof8percentofon‐siteparking
forcarpooland/oralternative‐fueledvehicles,andtheProjectdesignwillprovide
for the installation of the conduit and panel capacity to accommodate future
electricvehiclechargingstationsinto10percentoftheparkingspaces.
PDF‐AQ‐2:
Construction Measures: The Project shall utilize off‐road diesel‐powered
construction equipment that meets or exceeds the CARB and USEPA Tier 4off‐road
emissions standards for equipment rated at 50 hp or greater during Project
construction.Equipment,suchastowercranes,weldersandpumpsshallbeelectricor
alternative fueled (i.e., non‐diesel). To the extent possible, pole power will be made
available for use with electric tools, equipment, lighting, etc. Alternative‐fueled
generators shall be used when commercial models that have the power supply
requirementstomeettheconstructionneedsoftheProjectarereadilyavailablefrom
local suppliers/vendors. These requirements shall be included in applicable bid
documents and successful contractor(s) must demonstrate the ability to supply such
equipment.Acopyofeachunit’scertifiedtierspecificationormodelyearspecification
andCARBorSCAQMDoperatingpermit(ifapplicable)shallbeavailableuponrequest
atthetimeofmobilizationofeachapplicableunitofequipment.
PDF‐AQ‐3:
Control of VOCs: The Project shall utilize low‐emitting materials pursuant to the
requirementsoftheLEEDLow‐EmittingMaterialCreditorequivalent.Indoorcoatings
shallbelimitedto50gramsperliterofVOCsorless.
1020S.FigueroaStreetProject
ESAPCR
AirQualityTechnicalReport
45
3.0 Methodology September 2016 InadditiontotheProjectDesignFeatures,theProjectwouldbesubjecttoregulatoryrequirementsofother
agenciessuchastheAQMD.Theserequirementsinclude:
1. Demolition,GradingandConstructionActivities:CompliancewithprovisionsoftheSCAQMD
District Rule 403. The Project shall comply with all applicable standards of the Southern
California Air Quality Management District, including the following provisions of District Rule
403:

All unpaved demolition and construction areas shall be wetted at least twice daily
during excavation and construction, and temporary dust covers shall be used to
reduce dust emissions and meet SCAQMD District Rule 403. Wetting could reduce
fugitivedustbyasmuchas50percent.

Theconstructionareashallbekeptsufficientlydampenedtocontroldustcausedby
grading and hauling, and at all times provide reasonable control of dust caused by
wind.

All clearing, earth moving, or excavation activities shall be discontinued during
periodsofhighwinds(i.e.,greaterthan15mph),soastopreventexcessiveamounts
ofdust.

Alldirt/soilloadsshallbesecuredbytrimming,wateringorotherappropriatemeans
topreventspillageanddust.

All dirt/soil materials transported off‐site shall be either sufficiently watered or
securelycoveredtopreventexcessiveamountofdust.

General contractors shall maintain and operate construction equipment so as to
minimizeexhaustemissions.

Truckshavingnocurrenthaulingactivityshallnotidlebutbeturnedoff.
2. Anti‐IdlingRegulation: In accordance with Section 2485 in Title 13 of the California Code of
Regulations, the idling of all diesel‐fueled commercial vehicles (weighing over 10,000 pounds)
duringconstructionshallbelimitedtofiveminutesatanylocation.
3. Fuel Requirements: In accordance with Section 93115 in Title 17 of the California Code of
Regulations, operation ofanystationary,diesel‐fueled,compression‐ignition engines shallmeet
specifiedfuelandfueladditiverequirementsandemissionstandards.
4. Architectural Coatings: The Project shall comply with SCAQMD Rule 1113 and utilize
architecturalcoatingsthatmeettheVOCcontentrequirements.
5. Restaurant Odors: The Project shall install odor‐reducing equipment in accordance with
SCAQMDRule1138.
1020S.FigueroaStreetProject
ESAPCR
AirQualityTechnicalReport
46
4.0 COMPLIANCE WITH AMBIENT AIR STANDARDS 4.1 REGIONAL SIGNIFICANCE THRESHOLDS 4.1.1 Construction Emissions Theworst‐casedailyemissionswerecalculatedasmaximumdailyconstructionemissionsforeachphaseby
year. Some individual construction phases do overlap and it should be noted that the maximum daily
emissionsarepredictedvaluesfortheworst‐casedayanddonotrepresenttheemissionsthatwouldoccur
foreverydayofconstruction.ConstructionPhase1and2,however,wouldnotoverlap.Detailedemissions
calculations are provided in Appendix A. Results of the criteria pollutant calculations are presented in
Table5, Phase1–MaximumUnmitigatedRegionalConstructionEmissions, and Table6, Phase2–Maximum
UnmitigatedRegionalConstructionEmissions.Asshowntherein,construction‐relateddailyemissionsforthe
criteria and precursor pollutants (VOC, NOX, CO, SOX, PM10, and PM2.5) would not exceed the SCAQMD
numeric indicators. These calculations include appropriate dust control measures required to be
implemented during each phase of development, as required by SCAQMD Rule 403 (Control of Fugitive
Dust). Construction emission estimates also include emissions reductions from implementation of the
ProjectDesignFeatures,suchastheuseofequipmentthatmeettheTier4emissionsstandardsforoff‐road
construction equipment. Therefore, with respect to regional emissions from Phase 1 and 2 construction
activities,impactswouldbelessthansignificant.
Table 5
Phase 1 – Maximum Unmitigated Regional Construction Emissions (pounds per day) a VOC NOX CO SO2 PM10 b Source PM2.5 b 2017–SitePreparation
<1
1
7
<1
2
1
2017–Demolition
<1
3
16
<1
1
<1
2017–Grading
2
54
40
<1
6
3
2017–Foundation
1
22
25
<1
2
<1
2018–Foundation
1
19
24
<1
2
<1
2018–BuildingConstruction,ArchitecturalCoating
28
14
62
<1
10
3
2019–BuildingConstruction,ArchitecturalCoating,
Paving
28
14
67
<1
10
3
2020–BuildingConstruction,ArchitecturalCoating
28
12
55
<1
10
3
MaximumRegional(On‐SiteandOff‐Site)
Emissions
28
54
67
<1
10
3
SCAQMDNumericIndicators
75
100
550
150
150
55
(47)
(46)
(483)
(150)
(140)
(52)
No
No
No
No
No
No
Over/(Under)
ExceedsThresholds?
a b Totals may not add up exactly due to rounding in the modeling calculations Detailed emissions calculations are provided in Appendix A. Emissions include fugitive dust control measures consistent with SCAQMD Rule 403. Source: ESA PCR, 2016
1020S.FigueroaStreetProject
ESAPCR
AirQualityTechnicalReport
47
4.0 Compliance with Ambient Air Standards September 2016 Table 6
Phase 2 – Maximum Unmitigated Regional Construction Emissions (pounds per day) a Source VOC NOX CO SO2 PM10 b PM2.5 b 2020–Demolition
1
7
24
<1
3
1
2020–Grading
2
38
36
<1
6
2
2020–Foundation
1
15
23
<1
1
<1
2021–Foundation
1
14
23
<1
1
<1
2021–BuildingConstruction,ArchitecturalCoating,
Paving
14
10
45
<1
7
2
2022–BuildingConstruction,ArchitecturalCoating
14
9
35
<1
7
2
2023–BuildingConstruction,ArchitecturalCoating
14
6
33
<1
7
2
MaximumRegional(On‐SiteandOff‐Site)
Emissions
14
38
45
<1
7
2
SCAQMDNumericIndicators
75
100
550
150
150
55
(61)
(62)
(505)
(150)
(143)
(53)
No
No
No
No
No
No
Over/(Under)
ExceedsThresholds?
a b Totals may not add up exactly due to rounding in the modeling calculations Detailed emissions calculations are provided in Appendix A. Emissions include fugitive dust control measures consistent with SCAQMD Rule 403. Source: ESA PCR, 2016 4.1.2 Operational Emissions Operationalemissionswereassessedformobile,area,andstationarysources.Operationalcriteriapollutant
emissions were calculated for the Project for an interim year which corresponds to buildout of Phase 1
(2020)withconcurrentconstructionofPhase2andthefullbuildoutyear(2023).Dailytripgenerationrates
for the Project were provided by the Project traffic study51and include trips associated with the proposed
condos,hotel,office,retailspace,andrestaurants.Operationalemissionestimatesalsoincorporatethegreen
buildingdesignfeaturesdetailedinPDF‐AQ‐1,includingindoorandoutdoorwaterreductionandincreased
energyefficiency.WithregardtoVOCs,SCAQMDRule1113wouldbeenforcedandtheLEEDorequivalent
designfeaturewouldbeimplementedthatlimitsinteriorarchitecturalcoatingemissionsto50g/L.Detailed
emissionscalculationsareprovidedinAppendixA.
ResultsofthecriteriapollutantcalculationsarepresentedinTable7,InterimYear–MaximumUnmitigated
RegionalOperationalEmissionsandTable8,FullBuildoutYear–MaximumUnmitigatedRegionalOperational
Emissions.Theincreaseinoperational‐relateddailyemissions(Projectemissionsminusexistingemissions)
forthecriteriaandprecursorpollutants(VOC,NOX,CO,SOX,PM10,andPM2.5)wouldnotexceedtheSCAQMD
thresholdsofsignificanceduringinterimoperationswhencombinedwithon‐goingconstructionemissions.
51
GibsonTransportationConsulting,Inc.,TrafficStudyforthe1020S.FigueroaStreetProject,LosAngeles,California,(2016).
1020S.FigueroaStreetProject
ESAPCR
AirQualityTechnicalReport
48
September 2016 4.0 Compliance with Ambient Air Standards Table 7
Interim Year – Maximum Unmitigated Regional Operational Emissions (pounds per day) a VOC NOX CO SO2 PM10 Source Phase1Operations
PM2.5 Area(ConsumerProducts,Landscaping)
21
<1
24
<1
<1
<1
Energy(NaturalGas)
<1
3
2
<1
<1
<1
Stationary(Charbroiling)
<1
–
–
–
0.9
0.9
MotorVehicles
2
1
19
<1
19
5
Phase2MaximumConstructionEmissions
14
38
45
<1
7
2
TotalProjectOn‐SiteandOff‐SiteEmissions
38
43
96
<1
27
8
ExistingOperationalEmissions(removed)
7
2
16
<1
7
2
31
41
80
<1
20
6
MaximumNetRegional(On‐SiteandOff‐Site)
Emissions
SCAQMDNumericIndicators
Over/(Under)
ExceedsThresholds?
55
55
550
150
150
55
(24)
(14)
(470)
(150)
(130)
(49)
No
No
No
No
No
No
a Totals may not add up exactly due to rounding in the modeling calculations Detailed emissions calculations are provided in Appendix A. Source: ESA PCR, 2016
Table 8
Full Buildout Year – Maximum Unmitigated Regional Operational Emissions (pounds per day) a VOC NOX CO SO2 PM10 Source PM2.5 Phase1and2Operations(FullBuildout)
Area(ConsumerProducts,Landscaping)
Energy(NaturalGas)
Stationary(Charbroiling)
MotorVehicles
TotalProjectOn‐SiteandOff‐SiteEmissions
35
<1
<1
3
39
1
4
–
2
8
54
3
–
23
91
<1
<1
–
<1
<1
<1
<1
0.9
33
34
<1
<1
0.9
9
10
ExistingOperationalEmissions(removed)
7
2
16
<1
7
2
MaximumNetRegional(On‐SiteandOff‐Site)
Emissions
32
6
75
<1
27
8
SCAQMDNumericIndicators
55
55
550
150
150
55
(23)
(49)
(475)
(150)
(123)
(48)
No
No
No
No
No
No
Over/(Under)
ExceedsThresholds?
a Totals may not add up exactly due to rounding in the modeling calculations Detailed emissions calculations are provided in Appendix A.
Source: ESA PCR, 2016 1020S.FigueroaStreetProject
ESAPCR
AirQualityTechnicalReport
49
4.0 Compliance with Ambient Air Standards September 2016 Therefore,withrespecttoregionalemissionsfromoperations,impactswouldbelessthansignificantduring
interimoperations.Atfullbuildout,theincreaseinlong‐termoperationalemissionswouldalsonotexceed
thresholdsforregionalcriteriapollutantemissions.Therefore,Project‐relatedoperationalemissionswould
resultinaless‐than‐significantimpact.
4.2 LOCALIZED SIGNIFICANCE THRESHOLDS 4.2.1 Construction Emissions The localized construction air quality analysis was conducted using the methodology described in the
SCAQMD Localized Significance Threshold Methodology (June 2003, revised July 2008).52The screening
criteria provided in the Localized Significance Threshold Methodology were used to determine localized
construction emissions thresholds for the Project. The maximum daily localized emissions for each of the
construction phases and localized significance thresholds are presented in Table 9, Phase 1 – Maximum
Unmitigated Localized Construction Emissions and Table 10, Phase 2 – Maximum Unmitigated Localized
ConstructionEmissions. Asshowntherein,maximumlocalizedconstructionemissionsforsensitivereceptors
wouldnotexceedthelocalizedthresholdsforNOX,CO,PM10,andPM2.5.Therefore,withrespecttolocalized
constructionemissions,impactswouldbelessthansignificant.
Table 9
Phase 1 – Maximum Unmitigated Localized Construction Emissions (pounds per day) a NOX CO PM10 b Source PM2.5 b 2017–SitePreparation
1
6
2
1
2017–Demolition
1
15
1
<1
2017–Grading
8
33
3
1
2017–Foundation
4
21
<1
<1
2018–Foundation
4
21
<1
<1
2018–BuildingConstruction,ArchitecturalCoating
4
21
<1
<1
2019–BuildingConstruction,ArchitecturalCoating,Paving
4
29
<1
<1
3
8
108
(100)
No
21
33
1,048
(1,015)
No
<1
3
8
(5)
No
<1
1
5
(4)
No
2020–BuildingConstruction,ArchitecturalCoating
MaximumLocalized(On‐Site)Emissions
SCAQMDNumericIndicators
Over/(Under)
ExceedsThresholds?
a b Totals may not add up exactly due to rounding in the modeling calculations Detailed emissions calculations are provided in Appendix A. Emissions include fugitive dust control measures consistent with SCAQMD Rule 403. Source: ESA PCR, 2016 52
South Coast Air Quality Management District, Localized Significance Thresholds, (2003, revised 2008),
http://www.aqmd.gov/home/regulations/ceqa/air‐quality‐analysis‐handbook/localized‐significance‐thresholds. Accessed April
2016.
1020S.FigueroaStreetProject
ESAPCR
AirQualityTechnicalReport
50
September 2016 4.0 Compliance with Ambient Air Standards Table 10
Phase 2 – Maximum Unmitigated Localized Construction Emissions (pounds per day) a Source NOX CO PM10 b PM2.5 b 2020–Demolition
2
23
2
<1
2020–Grading
6
32
3
1
2020–Foundation
3
21
<1
<1
2021–Foundation
3
21
<1
<1
2021–BuildingConstruction,ArchitecturalCoating,Paving
3
21
<1
<1
2022–BuildingConstruction,ArchitecturalCoating
2
12
<1
<1
2023–BuildingConstruction,ArchitecturalCoating
MaximumLocalized(On‐Site)Emissions
SCAQMDNumericIndicators
Over/(Under)
ExceedsThresholds?
2
6
108
(102)
No
12
32
1,048
(1,016)
No
<1
3
8
(5)
No
<1
1
5
(4)
No
a b Totals may not add up exactly due to rounding in the modeling calculations Detailed emissions calculations are provided in Appendix A. Emissions include fugitive dust control measures consistent with SCAQMD Rule 403. Source: ESA PCR, 2016
4.2.2 Operational Emissions The localized operational air quality analysis was conducted using the methodology described in the
SCAQMDLocalizedSignificanceThresholdMethodology(June2003,revisedJuly2008).Thescreeningcriteria
providedin theLocalizedSignificanceThresholdMethodologywereusedtodeterminelocalizedoperational
emissionsthresholdsfortheProject.Themaximumdailyincreaseinlocalizedemissions(Projectemissions
minus existing emissions) and localized significance thresholds are presented in Table 11, InterimYear–
Maximum Unmitigated Localized Operational Emissions and Table 12, Full Buildout Year – Maximum
Unmitigated Localized Operational Emissions. As shown therein, the increase in maximum localized
operational emissions for sensitive receptors would not exceedthe localized thresholds for NOX,CO, PM10,
andPM2.5duringboththeinterimyear(2020,Phase1operations)andfullbuildoutyear(2023,Phases1and
2 operations). Therefore, with respect to localized operational emissions, impacts would be less than
significant.
4.3 LOCALIZED CARBON MONOXIDE IMPACTS The potential for the Project to cause or contribute to CO hotspots is evaluated by comparing Project
intersections(bothintersectiongeometryandtrafficvolumes)withpriorstudiesconductedbytheSCAQMD
insupportoftheirAQMPsandconsideringexistingbackgroundCOconcentrations.Asdiscussedbelow,this
comparisondemonstratesthattheProjectwouldnotcauseorcontributeconsiderablytotheformationofCO
hotspots,thatCOconcentrationsatProjectimpactedintersectionswouldremainwellbelowtheambientair
qualitystandards,andthatnofurtherCOanalysisiswarrantedorrequired.AsshownpreviouslyinTable2,
COlevelsintheProjectAreaaresubstantiallybelowthefederalandstatestandards.MaximumCOlevelsin
recentyearsare3ppm(one‐houraverage)and2.4ppm(eight‐houraverage)comparedtothethresholdsof
1020S.FigueroaStreetProject
ESAPCR
AirQualityTechnicalReport
51
4.0 Compliance with Ambient Air Standards September 2016 Table 11
Interim Year – Maximum Unmitigated Localized Operational Emissions (pounds per day) a NOX CO PM10 PM2.5 Source Phase1Operations
<1
<1
Area(ConsumerProducts,Landscaping)
<1
24
Energy(NaturalGas)
3
2
<1
<1
Stationary(Charbroiling)
–
–
0.9
0.9
TotalProjectOn‐SiteEmissions
3
26
1
1
ExistingOperationalOn‐SiteEmissions(removed)
1
1
<1
<1
MaximumNetLocalized(On‐Site)Emissions
2
25
1
1
108
1,048
2
2
(106)
(1,023)
(1)
(1)
No
No
No
No
SCAQMDNumericIndicators
Over/(Under)
ExceedsThresholds?
a Totals may not add up exactly due to rounding in the modeling calculations Detailed emissions calculations are provided in Appendix A. Source: ESA PCR, 2016
Table 12
Full Buildout Year – Maximum Unmitigated Localized Operational Emissions (pounds per day) a NOX CO PM10 PM2.5 Source Phase1and2Operations(FullBuildout)
Area(ConsumerProducts,Landscaping)
Energy(NaturalGas)
Stationary(Charbroiling)
TotalProjectOn‐SiteEmissions
1
4
–
5
ExistingOn‐SiteOperationalEmissions(removed)
MaximumNetLocalized(On‐Site)Emissions
SCAQMDNumericIndicators
Over/(Under)
ExceedsThresholds?
a 54
3
–
57
<1
<1
0.9
1
<1
<1
0.9
1
1
1
<1
<1
4
108
(104)
No
56
1,048
(992)
No
1
2
(2)
No
1
2
(2)
No
Totals may not add up exactly due to rounding in the modeling calculations Detailed emissions calculations are provided in Appendix A. Source: ESA PCR, 2016 1020S.FigueroaStreetProject
ESAPCR
AirQualityTechnicalReport
52
September 2016 4.0 Compliance with Ambient Air Standards 20ppm(one‐houraverage)and9.0(eight‐houraverage).Carbonmonoxidedecreaseddramaticallyinthe
AirBasinwiththeintroductionofthecatalyticconverterin1975.NoexceedancesofCOhavebeenrecorded
at monitoring stations in the Air Basin for some time and the Air Basin is currently designated as a CO
attainmentareaforboththeCAAQSandNAAQS.Thus,itisnotexpectedthatCOlevelsatProject‐impacted
intersectionswouldrisetothelevelofanexceedanceofthesestandards.
Additionally,theSCAQMDconductedCOmodelingforthe2003AQMPforthefourworst‐caseintersections
in the Air Basin. These include: (a) Wilshire Boulevard and Veteran Avenue; (b) Sunset Boulevard and
HighlandAvenue;(c)LaCienegaBoulevardandCenturyBoulevard;(d)LongBeachBoulevardandImperial
Highway. In the 2003 AQMP, the SCAQMD notes that the intersection of Wilshire Boulevard and Veteran
Avenue is the most congested intersection in Los Angeles County, with an average daily traffic volume of
about100,000vehiclesperday.53Thisintersectionislocatedneartheon‐andoff‐rampstoInterstate405in
West Los Angeles. The evidence provided in Table 4‐10 of Appendix V of the 2003 AQMP shows that the
peakmodeledCOconcentrationduetovehicleemissionsatthesefourintersectionswas4.6ppm(one‐hour
average) and 3.2 (eight‐hour average) at Wilshire Boulevard and Veteran Avenue.54 When added to the
existingbackgroundCOconcentrations,thescreeningvalueswouldbe7.6ppm(one‐houraverage)and5.6
ppm(eight‐houraverage).
BasedontheProject’sassociatedTrafficStudy,ofthestudiedintersectionsthatarepredictedtooperateata
LevelofService(“LOS”)ofD,E,orFunderfutureoperationalyearplusProjectconditions,oneintersection
would potentially have peak traffic volumes of approximately 62,000 per day. 55 As a result, CO
concentrations are expected to be approximately 5.9 ppm (one‐hour average) and 4.4 ppm (eight‐hour
average)orless,whichwouldnotexceedthethresholds.56Totaltrafficvolumesatthemaximumimpacted
intersection would likely have to more than double to contribute to a CO hotspot given that vehicles
operating today have reduced CO emissions as compared to vehicles operating in year 2003 when the
SCAQMD conducted the AQMP attainment demonstration modeling. Thus, this comparison demonstrates
that the Project would not contribute considerably to the formation of CO hotspots and no further CO
analysisisrequired.TheProjectwouldresultinlessthansignificantimpactswithrespecttoCOhotspots.
4.4 TOXIC AIR CONTAMINANTS ‐ CONSTRUCTION ThegreatestpotentialforTACemissionswouldberelatedtodieselparticulatematteremissionsassociated
with heavy equipment operations during demolition, grading and excavation, and building construction
activities.Inaddition,incidentalamountsoftoxicsubstancessuchasoils,solvents,andpaintswouldbeused.
53
South Coast Air Quality Management District, 2003 Air Quality Management Plan, Appendix V: Modeling and Attainment
Demonstrations,(2003)V‐4‐24.
54
Theeight‐houraverageisbasedona0.7persistencefactor,asrecommendedbytheSCAQMD.
55
Gibson Transportation Consulting, Inc., Traffic Study for the 1020 S. Figueroa Street Project, Los Angeles, California, (2016). The
traffic volume of approximately 62,000 was estimated based on the peak hour intersection volumes under future with Project
conditionsandthegeneralassumptionthatpeakhourtripsrepresentapproximately10percentofdailytripvolumes(theFederal
Highway Administration considers 10 percent to be a standard assumption; see http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/planning/tmip/
publications/other_reports/tod_modeling_procedures/ch02.cfm). The peak value was estimated at the intersection of Figueroa
StreetandOlympicBoulevard.
56
TheexpectedCOconcentrationsarecalculatedbasedontheratioof62,000/100,000multipliedbythescreeningvaluesof4.6ppm
(one‐houraverage)and3.2ppm(eight‐houraverage)andaddingthebackgroundconcentrations.ActualCOvaluewouldlikelybe
lessthantheexpectedvaluesreportedintheanalysisastheaverageCOemissionsfrommotorvehiclesoperatingtodayhavedeclined
ascomparedtomotorvehiclesoperatinginyear2003.
1020S.FigueroaStreetProject
ESAPCR
AirQualityTechnicalReport
53
4.0 Compliance with Ambient Air Standards September 2016 TheseproductswouldcomplywithallapplicableSCAQMDrulesfortheirmanufactureanduse.TheProject
willbesubjecttoseveralSCAQMDrulesdesignedtolimitexposureto TACsduringconstruction activities.
The Project would be required to comply with the CARB Air Toxics Control Measure that limits diesel
powered equipment and vehicle idling to no more than 5 minutes at a location, and the CARB In‐Use Off‐
Road Diesel Vehicle Regulation; compliance with these would minimize emissions of TACs during
construction. The Project would also comply with the requirements of SCAQMD Rule 1403 if asbestos is
found during the renovation and construction activities. Furthermore, the Project would voluntarily
implementthecontrolmeasuresdescribedinPDF‐AQ‐2.
OEHHAisresponsiblefordevelopingandrevisingguidelinesforperformingHRAsundertheState’stheAir
Toxics Hot Spots Program Risk Assessment (AB 2588) regulation. In March 2015, OEHHA adopted new
guidelines which updates the previous guidance by incorporating advances in risk assessment with
consideration of infants and children using Age Sensitivity Factors (ASF). These changes also take into
account the sensitivity of children to TAC emissions, different breathing rates, and time spent at home.
Children have a higher breathing rate compared to adults and would likely spend more time at home
resulting in longer exposure durations. On June 5, 2015, SCAQMD incorporated these guidelines in to
relevantrulesdesignedforpermittingofstationarysources.57Althoughconstructionwouldbetemporary,
construction impacts associated with TACs are addressed quantitatively in a refined HRA. The HRA was
performed in accordance with the OEHHAAirToxicsHotSpotsProgramGuidanceManualforPreparationof
Health Risk Assessments (OEHHA Guidance).58 The analysis incorporates the estimated construction
emissions, as previously discussed, and dispersion modeling using the USEPA AERMOD model with
meteorologicaldatafromtheclosestSCAQMDmonitoringstation.
The cancer risk values for diesel particulate matter (DPM) considers exposure via the inhalation pathway.
The potential exposure through other pathways (e.g., ingestion) requires substance and site‐specific data,
and the specific parameters for DPM are not known for these pathways.59 The OEHHA guidelines
recommends the incorporation of several factors to quantify the carcinogenic compound dose via the
inhalation pathway. Once determined, the dose is multiplied by the compound‐specific inhalation cancer
potency factor to derive the cancer risk estimate. The dose takes into account the concentration at a
sensitivereceptor.Thecancerpotencyfactoriscompound‐specific.Inperforminghealthriskcalculations,
carcinogeniccompoundsarenotconsideredtohavethresholdlevels(i.e.,doselevelsbelowwhichthereare
norisks).Anyexposure,therefore,willhavesomeassociatedrisk.Incrementalhealthrisksassociatedwith
exposuretocarcinogeniccompoundsisdefinedintermsoftheprobabilityofdevelopingcancerasaresultof
exposure to a chemical at a given concentration. Under a deterministic approach (i.e., point estimate
methodology),thecancerriskprobabilityisdeterminedbymultiplyingthechemical’sannualconcentration
byitsunitriskfactor(URF).TheURFforDPMrecommendedbytheScientificReviewPanel60is3.0x10‐4
permicrogrampercubicmeter(µg/m3).ThisvaluecorrespondstoaCancerPotencyFactor(CPF)of1.1per
milligram/kilogram (body weight) per day (mg/kg(bw)‐day). The URF for DPM means that for receptors
57
South Coast Air Quality Management District, Minutes of the June 5, 2015 Meeting, http://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default‐
source/Agendas/Governing‐Board/2015/2015‐Jul10‐001.pdf?sfvrsn=8,AccessedSeptember28,2015
58
OfficeofEnvironmentalHealthHazardAssessment,AirToxicsHotSpotsProgramGuidanceManualforPreparationofHealthRisk
Assessments,(2015).
59
CaliforniaAirResources Board, Report to the Air Resources BoardontheProposedIdentificationofDieselExhaustasaToxicAir
Contaminant,PartAExposureAssessment,ApprovedbytheScientificReviewPanel,(1998).
60
The Scientific Review Panel is charged with evaluating the risk assessments of substances proposed for identification as toxic air
contaminantsbyCARB,OEHHA,andtheDepartmentofPesticideRegulation(DPR),andthereviewofguidelinespreparedbyOEHHA.
1020S.FigueroaStreetProject
ESAPCR
AirQualityTechnicalReport
54
September 2016 4.0 Compliance with Ambient Air Standards with an annual average concentration of 1 µg/m3 in the ambient air, the probability of contracting cancer
over a 70‐year lifetime of exposure is 300 in 1 million. The URF also assumes that a person is exposed
continuously for a 70 year lifetime. This approach for calculating cancer risk is intended to result in
conservative(i.e.,healthprotective)estimatesofhealthimpactsandisusedforassessingriskstosensitive
receptors.Theestimationofcancerriskusesthefollowingalgorithms:
Risk=Doseinhalation×InhalationCPF×ASF
(Equation1)
Where:
Doseinhalation=CAIR×DBR×A×EF×ED×FAH/AT
(Equation2)
InhalationCPF=inhalationcancerpotencyfactor
ASF=agesensitivityfactor
Where:
CAIR=concentrationofcompoundinairinmicrogramspercubicmeter(µg/m3)
DBR=breathingrateinliterperkilogramofbodyweightperday(L/kg‐bodyweight/day)
A=inhalationabsorptionfactor(1forDPM)
EF=exposurefrequencyindaysperyear(day/year)
ED=exposuredurationinyears(year)
FAH=fractionoftimeathome
AT=averagingtimeperiodoverwhichexposureisaveragedindays(day)
TheOEHHArecommendedvaluesfortheparameterslistedabovewereusedintheHRAanalysis.Thedaily
breathingrate(DBR)usedintheanalysiswasbasedonwasbasedonOEHHArecommendationswhichvary
dependingonagewhichareshowninTable13,OEHHARecommendedResidentialDailyBreathingRatesfor
PointEstimateDoseCalculations(L/kgbodyweight). The recommended exposure frequency (EF) is 350
daysperyearwhichisequivalentto0.96(350days/365daysayear).Theinhalationabsorptionfactor(A)
isassumedtobe1forinhalationbasedriskassessment.
Table 13
OEHHA Recommended Residential Daily Breathing Rates for Point Estimate Dose Calculations (L / kg body weight) 3rd Trimester 0<2 Years 2<9 Years 2<16 Years 16<30 Years Average
95thPercentile
225
361
658
1090
535
861
452
745
210
335
Source: OEHHA Air Toxics Hot Spots Program Guidance Manual. February 2015. AsindicatedinEquation1above,eachagegrouphasdifferentexposure parameters whichrequirecancer
risktobecalculatedseparatelyforeachagegroup.Valuesforfractionoftimeathome(FAH)arepresented
in Table14, OEHHARecommendationsforFractionofTimeatHome(FAH)forEvaluatingResidentialCancer
Risk. Once dose is calculated, cancer risk is calculated by accounting for cancer potency of the specific
pollutant,andtheagesensitivityfactor(ASF).
Non‐cancerchronicimpactswereassessedbasedontheHazardIndex.Theevaluationofchronicimpactsis
based on the maximum annual emissions over a 12‐months period of construction activity. The chronic
1020S.FigueroaStreetProject
ESAPCR
AirQualityTechnicalReport
55
4.0 Compliance with Ambient Air Standards September 2016 Table 14
OEHHA Recommendations for Fraction of Time at Home (FAH) for Evaluating Residential Cancer Risk Fraction of Time at Residence Age Range 3rdTrimesterand0<2Years
2<16Years
16‐70Years
0.85
0.72
0.73
Source: OEHHA Air Toxics Hot Spots Program Guidance Manual. February 2015. HazardIndexiscalculatedbydividingthemaximummodeledannualaverageconcentrationatthemaximum
impacted sensitive receptor by the Reference Exposure Level (REL). The REL is the concentration at or
belowwhichnoadversehealtheffectsareanticipated.Forexample,OEHHAhasrecommendedanambient
concentration of 5 µg/m3 as the chronic inhalation REL for DPM exhaust. Therefore, a sensitive receptor
exposed to an annual average DPM concentration of 5 µg/m3 or less would not result in a chronic impact.
Non‐cancerchronicimpactsaffectspecifictargetorgansystems(alsocalledtoxicologicalendpoints),suchas
theeye,nervoussystem,reproductivesystem,andrespiratorysystem.Thechronichealthimpactwiththe
maximumHazardIndexforthesametargetorgansystemisusedforimpactdetermination.
Sensitive receptors used for modeling were placed at the location of sensitive receptor (i.e., residential)
buildingsneartotheProjectSite.Heavy‐dutyequipmentandtrucksweremodeledasvolumesourcesand
werelocatedontheProjectSiteandonroadwaysthattruckswouldpotentiallytravelonwithina0.25mile
distance of the Project Site. Figure 4, Construction Health Risk Assessment Source‐Receptor Diagram,
providesadiagramshowingthelocationsofsourceofProjectconstruction‐relatedDPMemissionswithina
o.25mileoftheProjectSiteandnearbysensitivereceptors.Healthriskcalculationswereperformedusinga
spreadsheettoolconsistentwiththeOEHHAGuidanceandCARBHotspotsAnalysisandReportingProgram
(HARP) version 2 spreadsheet methodology. Table 15, Maximum Carcinogenic Risk for Off‐Site Sensitive
Receptors from Construction, summarizes the carcinogenic risk for representative receptors located
throughouttheProjectSitevicinity.Forcarcinogenicexposures,thecancerriskfromDPMemissionsfrom
construction of the Project is estimated to result in a maximum carcinogenic risk of less than 8 per one
million.Themaximumimpactwouldoccuratsensitivelanduses(residences)directlysouthoftheProject
Site. As discussed previously, the lifetime exposure under OEHHA guidelines takes into account early life
(infantandchildren)exposure.Itshouldbenotedthatthecalculatedcancerriskconservativelyassumesthat
exposure of sensitive receptors (residential uses) would not have any mitigation, such as mechanical
filtration.Asthemaximumimpactwouldbelessthantheriskthresholdof10inonemillion,impactswould
beconsideredlessthansignificant.
Potential non‐cancer effects of chronic (i.e., long term) DPM exposures were evaluated using the Hazard
IndexapproachasdescribedintheOEHHAGuidance.Ahazardindexequaltoorgreaterthan1.0represents
asignificantchronichealthhazard.AsshowninTable16,MaximumNon‐CancerChronicImpactsforOff‐Site
SensitiveReceptors,nearbyoff‐sitesensitivereceptorswouldnotbeexposedtochronicimpactsthatwould
exceed the threshold of 1.0. The maximum impact would occur at sensitive receptors directly east of the
ProjectSite.Therefore,non‐cancerchronicimpactswouldbeconsideredlessthansignificant.Theprocess
ofassessinghealthrisksandimpactsincludesadegreeofuncertainty.Thelevelofuncertaintydependson
1020S.FigueroaStreetProject
ESAPCR
AirQualityTechnicalReport
56
N
0
0.3 km
ConstrucƟon Health Risk Assessment
Source-Receptor Diagram
1020 S. Figueroa Street Project
PCR
Source: PCR Services CorporaƟon, 2016.
FIGURE
4
4.0 Compliance with Ambient Air Standards September 2016 Thispageintentionallyblank.
1020S.FigueroaStreetProject
ESAPCR
AirQualityTechnicalReport
58
September 2016 4.0 Compliance with Ambient Air Standards Table 15
Maximum Carcinogenic Risk for Off‐Site Sensitive Receptors from Construction SensitiveReceptor
Residence–South/SoutheastofProjectSite
MaximumIndividualCancerRiskThreshold
ExceedsThreshold?
MaximumCancerRisk
(#inonemillion)
7.9
10
No
Source: ESA PCR, 2016
Table 16 Maximum Non‐Cancer Chronic Impacts for Off‐Site Sensitive Receptors Chronic Hazard Index Sensitive Receptor Residence–South/SoutheastofProjectSite
0.009
TotalHazardIndex
1.0
Exceedsthreshold?
No
Source: ESA PCR, 2016 the availability of data and the extent to which assumptions are relied upon in cases where the data are
incompleteorunknown.AllHRAsrelyuponscientificstudiestoreducethelevelofuncertainty;however,it
is not possible to completely eliminate uncertainty from the analysis. Where assumptions are used to
substituteforincompleteorunknowndata,itisstandardpracticeinperformingHRAstoerronthesideof
health protection to avoid underestimating or underreporting the risk to the public. In general, sources of
uncertainty that may lead to an overestimation or an underestimation of the risk include extrapolation of
toxicity data in animals to humans and uncertainty in the exposure estimates. In addition to uncertainty,
thereexists“anaturalrangeorvariabilityinmeasuredparametersdefiningtheexposurescenario”andthat
the“thegreatestquantitativeimpactisvariationamongthehumanpopulationinsuchpropertiesasheight,
weight, food consumption, breathing rates, and susceptibility to chemical toxicants.”61As mentioned
previously, it is typical to err on the side of health protection by assessing risk on the most sensitive
populations, such as children and the elderly, by modeling potential impacts based on high‐end breathing
rates,byincorporatingagesensitivityfactors,andbynottakingintoaccountexposurereductionmeasures,
suchasmechanicalairfiltrationbuildingsystems.
TheProjectSitepreviouslyhadagasstationandautorepairshopattheintersectionofFigueroaStreetand
Olympic Boulevard, which were removed from the Project Site in 1990 and replaced with the existing
surfaceparkinglot.Duringremovalofthegasstation,soilcontaminationwasreportedattheunderground
storage tanks (USTs) and fuel dispensers. A vapor extraction system (VES) remediation system removed
61
California Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Health Hazard Assessment, Air Toxics Hot Spots Program, Risk Assessment
Guidelines,GuidanceManualforPreparationofHealthRiskAssessments,(2015)1‐5.
1020S.FigueroaStreetProject
ESAPCR
AirQualityTechnicalReport
59
4.0 Compliance with Ambient Air Standards September 2016 90percentofthetotalestimatedgasolinethatleakedfromthestationandLAFDissuedaNoFurtherAction
letteronJune10,1994.A530‐gallondieselUST,transitionpump,andassociatedundergroundpipingwere
abandoned in place below the existing hotel driveway and landscaped median under a Covenant and
AgreementwiththeCity.Petroleumhydrocarbonswereidentifiedinshallowsoilsamplesinthevicinityof
the abandoned UST and associated piping. Refer to Section 4.E, HazardsandHazardousMaterials, of the
Draft EIR for additional details. As discussed in Section 4.E, the removal of these soils and infrastructure
wouldlikelyrequirespecialhandlingduringexcavation,includingadditionalanalyticalcharacterization,soil
segregation, and transport off‐site to be recycled/disposed of in accordance with Federal, State and local
regulations. The Project would implement Mitigation Measures MM‐HAZ‐1 (Soil Management Plan), MM‐
HAZ‐2 (Health and Safety Plan), and MM‐HAZ‐3 (Additional Site Testing) to ensure that any contaminated
soils are properly identified, excavated and disposed of off‐site in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 1166
(VolatileOrganicCompoundEmissionsfromDecontaminationofSoil),toavoidsignificantimpactsorrisksto
workersorthepublicintheeventthatelevatedlevelsofsubsurfacegasesareencounteredduringgrading
and excavation, and to conduct additional subsurface soil and soil gas sampling and testing in accordance
with the recommendations of the Summary Report for Limited Soil and Soil Gas Investigation, Luxe Hotel,
prepared by Terra‐Petra and dated April 10, 2016. Recommendations pertaining to remediation, public
health,andworkersafetybasedontheadditionalsamplingandtestingwouldbeincorporatedintotheSoil
Management Plan. Implementation of MM‐HAZ‐1, MM‐HAZ‐2, and MM‐HAZ‐3 would ensure that
contaminated soils and materials are removed from the Project Site and transported in a manner that
minimizes or prevents the potential for contaminated soils and materials from becoming airborne or
otherwisereleasedintotheenvironment.Asaresult,healthimpactsfromcontaminatedsoilsandmaterials
wouldnotsubstantiallycontributetoconstructionhealthrisksandwouldbelessthansignificant.
4.5 TOXIC AIR CONTAMINANTS ‐ OPERATION Project operations would generate only minor amounts of diesel emissions from delivery trucks and
incidental maintenance activities. Trucks would comply with the applicable provisions of the CARB Truck
andBusregulationtominimizeandreducePMandNOXemissionsfromexistingdieseltrucks.Therefore,the
Projectoperationswouldnotbeconsideredasubstantialsourceofdieselparticulates.
In addition, Project operations would only result in minimal emissions of air toxics from maintenance or
other ongoing activities, such as from the use of architectural coatings and other products. The Project’s
restaurantusescouldpotentiallygenerateTACsifcharbroilingactivitiesoccurattherestaurant,whichhas
thepotentialtogeneratesmallamountsofchemicalsthatareknownorsuspectedbytheStateofCalifornia
to cause human health impacts.62 However, restaurant charbroiling in the Air Basin would be required to
comply with SCAQMD Rule 1138 (Control of Emissions from Restaurant Operations), which requires the
installation of emissions controls on charbroilers. The emissions controls would reduce the already small
amounts of TAC emissions associated with charbroiling by approximately 83 percent,63such that adverse
healthimpactsarenotexpectedtooccuratnearbysensitivereceptors.Asaresult,toxicorcarcinogenicair
pollutants are not expected to occur in any meaningful amounts in conjunction with operation of the
proposedlanduseswithintheProjectSite.BasedontheusesexpectedontheProjectSite,potentiallong‐
62
U.S.EnvironmentalProtectionAgency,PolycyclicAromaticHydrocarbons(PAHs),January2008,http://www.epa.gov/osw/hazard/
wastemin/minimize/factshts/pahs.pdf.AccessedApril2016.
63
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Methods for Developing a National Emission Inventory for Commercial Cooking Processes:
TechnicalMemorandum,(2003).
1020S.FigueroaStreetProject
ESAPCR
AirQualityTechnicalReport
60
September 2016 4.0 Compliance with Ambient Air Standards termoperationalimpactsassociatedwiththereleaseofTACswouldbeminimalandwouldnotbeexpected
toexceedtheSCAQMDthresholdsofsignificance.Therefore,impactswouldbelessthansignificant.
1020S.FigueroaStreetProject
ESAPCR
AirQualityTechnicalReport
61
5.0 CUMULATIVE ANALYSIS The Project would result in the emission of criteria pollutants for which the region is in non‐attainment
duringbothconstructionandoperation.TheBasinfailstomeetnationalstandardsforO3,PM10andPM2.5,
andthereforeisconsideredafederal“non‐attainment”areaforthesepollutants.
AsshowninTable5,Table6,Table7,andTable8,regionalemissionscalculatedforProjectconstructionand
operationsarelessthantheapplicableSCAQMDdailysignificancethresholds.Thethresholdsaredesigned
to assist the region in attaining the applicable State and national ambient air quality standards. These
standards apply to both primary (criteria and precursor) and secondary pollutants (ozone). Although the
ProjectSiteislocatedinaregionthatisinnon‐attainmentforozoneandPM10,theemissionsassociatedwith
the Project would not be cumulatively considerable as the emissions would fall below SCAQMD daily
significance thresholds. In addition, the Project would be consistent with the AQMP, which is intended to
bringtheBasinintoattainmentforallcriteriapollutants.
5.1 CONSTRUCTION IMPACTS ThereareanumberofcumulativeprojectsintheProjectareathathavenotyetbeenbuiltorarecurrently
under construction. Since the Applicant has no control over the timing or sequencing of the cumulative
projects, any quantitative analysis to ascertain daily construction emissions that assumes multiple,
concurrent construction projects would be speculative. For this reason, the SCAQMD’s methodology to
assessaproject’scumulativeimpactdiffersfromthecumulativeimpactsmethodologyemployedelsewhere
in this technical report. The SCAQMD recommends that project‐specific air quality impacts be used to
determinethepotentialcumulativeimpactstoregionalairquality.
With respect to the Project’s short‐term construction‐related air quality emissions and cumulative
conditions, the SCAQMD has developed strategies to reduce criteria pollutant emissions outlined in the
AQMP pursuant to the federal Clean Air Act mandates. As such, construction of the Project would comply
with SCAQMD Rule 403 requirements and the ATCM to limit heavy duty diesel motor vehicle idling to no
morethan 5minutesat any giventime.In addition,theProjectwouldutilizeaconstructioncontractor(s)
that complies with required and applicable BACT and the In‐Use Off‐Road Diesel Vehicle Regulation. Per
SCAQMDrulesandmandates,aswellastheCEQArequirementthatsignificantimpactsbemitigatedtothe
extent feasible, these same requirements (i.e., Rule 403 compliance, the implementation of all feasible
mitigation measures, and compliance with adopted AQMP emissions control measures) would also be
imposedon constructionprojectsin theAirBasin,whichwouldinclude each of thecumulativeprojectsin
the Project Area. As shown above in Table5, Table 6, Table 9, and Table 10, regional and localized
construction emissions associated with the Project would not exceed the SCAQMD numeric indicators. As
such,theProject’scontributiontocumulativelysignificantconstructionimpactstoairqualitywouldnotbe
cumulativelyconsiderableandcumulativeimpactswouldbelessthansignificantforregionalandlocalized
criteriapollutantsduringconstruction.
5.2 OPERATIONAL IMPACTS The SCAQMD’s approach for assessing cumulative impacts related to operations or long‐term
implementation is based on attainment of ambient air quality standards in accordance with the
requirements of the federal and State Clean Air Acts. As discussed earlier, the SCAQMD has developed a
comprehensiveplan,theAQMP,whichaddressestheregion’scumulativeairqualitycondition.
1020S.FigueroaStreetProject
ESAPCR
AirQualityTechnicalReport
62
September 2016 5.0 Cumulative Analysis Asignificantimpactmayoccurifaprojectwouldaddacumulativelyconsiderablecontributionofafederalor
state non‐attainment pollutant. Because the Los Angeles County portion of the Air Basin is currently in
nonattainmentforozone,NO2,PM10,andPM2.5,cumulativeprojectscouldexceedanairqualitystandardor
contributetoanexistingorprojectedairqualityexceedance.Cumulativeimpactstoairqualityareevaluated
under two sets of thresholds for CEQA and the SCAQMD. In particular, Section 15064(h)(3) of the CEQA
Guidelines provides guidance in determining the significance of cumulative impacts. Specifically, Section
15064(h)(3)statesinpartthat:
“Aleadagencymaydeterminethataproject’sincrementalcontributiontoacumulativeeffect
is not cumulatively considerable if the project will comply with the requirements in a
previously approved plan or mitigation program which provides specific requirements that
willavoidorsubstantiallylessenthecumulativeproblem(e.g.,waterqualitycontrolplan,air
quality plan, integrated waste management plan) within the geographic area in which the
projectislocated.Suchplansorprogramsmustbespecifiedinlaworadoptedbythepublic
agency with jurisdiction over the affected resources through a public review process to
implement, interpret, or make specific the law enforced or administered by the public
agency…”
ForpurposesofthecumulativeairqualityanalysiswithrespecttoCEQAGuidelinesSection15064(h)(3),the
Project’sincrementalcontributiontocumulativeairqualityimpactsisdeterminedbasedoncompliancewith
theSCAQMDadopted2012AQMP.TheProjectwouldnotconflictwithorobstructimplementationofAQMP
andwouldbeconsistentwiththegrowthprojectionsintheAQMP.
Nonetheless, SCAQMD no longer recommends relying solely upon consistency with the AQMP as an
appropriate methodology for assessing cumulative air quality impacts. The SCAQMD recommends that
project‐specific air quality impacts be used to determine the potential cumulative impacts to regional air
quality. As discussed previously, the Project would not exceed the SCAQMD regional numeric indicators.
Therefore, the Project’s incremental contribution to long‐term emissions of non‐attainment pollutants and
ozone precursors, considered together with cumulative projects, would not be cumulatively considerable,
andthereforethecumulativeimpactoftheProjectwouldbelessthansignificant.
1020S.FigueroaStreetProject
ESAPCR
AirQualityTechnicalReport
63
6.0 SUMMARY OF RESULTS Air pollutant emissions associated with the Project have been evaluated to determine the level of impact
fromconstructionactivitiesandfutureoperationsoftheProject.
6.1 CONSTRUCTION Construction of the Project has the potential to create air quality impacts through the use of heavy‐duty
construction equipment and through vehicle trips generated from construction workers traveling to and
from the Project Site. In addition, fugitive dust emissions would result from grading and construction
activities. However, use of typical construction equipment (in terms of size and age/emission standards)
andcompliancewithRule403requirements(regardingdustcontrolmeasuressuchaswateringtwicedaily
and track out prevention measures), minimizes air emissions to the extent warranted. In addition, the
ProjectwouldimplementPDF‐AQ‐1,PDF‐AQ‐2,andPDF‐AQ‐3tominimizeconstruction‐relatedemissions.
As shown in Table 5 and 6, regional construction emissions would not exceed the SCAQMD numeric
indicators.Therefore,impactsrelatedtoregionalconstructionemissionswouldbelessthansignificant.As
showninTable9and10localizedemissionswouldnotexceedtheSCAQMDnumericindicators.Therefore,
impactsrelatedtolocalizedconstructionemissionswouldbelessthansignificant.AsshowninTable15and
Table 16, construction‐related health impacts would not exceed the thresholds and would be less than
significant.Asaresult,Project‐relatedconstructionimpactswouldbelessthansignificant.
6.2 OPERATION Air pollutant emissions associated with Project operations would be generated by the consumption of
naturalgasandbytheoperationofon‐roadvehicles.AsshowninTable7,Table8,Table11,andTable12,
regionalandlocalizedemissionsassociatedwiththeProjectwouldnotexceedtheSCAQMDdailysignificance
thresholds. In addition, the Project would not result in a CO hotspot, or emit unhealthy levels of toxic air
contaminants and odiferous emissions. Furthermore, the Project would be consistent with applicable air
qualityplansandpolicies.Therefore,impactsrelatedtoProjectoperationalemissionsandconsistencywith
applicableairqualitymanagementplans,policies,orregulationswouldbelessthansignificant.
1020S.FigueroaStreetProject
ESAPCR
AirQualityTechnicalReport
65
APPENDIX A AIR QUALITY WORKSHEETS AND OUTPUT FILES 1020S.FigueroaStreet
AirQualityTechnicalReport
AppendixA,AirQualityWorksheets
A.1
ConstructionEmissions(CalEEModandEMFAC2014)

EmissionsModelInputs

CalEEModOutput

TruckEmissions(EMFAC2014)
A.2
OperationalEmissions(CalEEMod)

EmissionsModelInputs

CalEEModOutput–Existing

CalEEModOutput–Project
A.3
OperationalEmissions(EMFAC2014)

ExistingandProject(InterimandFullBuildout)TripandVMTReductions

ExistingandProject(InterimandFullBuildout)MobileSourceEmissions
A.4
OperationalProjectCharbroilerEmissions
A.5
SouthCoastAirQualityManagementDistrictRule403
A.6
ConstructionHealthRiskAssessmentCalculations
AppendixA.1
ConstructionEmissions(CalEEModandEMFAC2014)

EmissionsModelInputs

CalEEModOutput

TruckEmissions(EMFAC2014)
1020 S. Figueroa Street Project EIR
Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Assessment
Project Information
Land Use
Existing Uses
Hotel
Project Phase 1
Residential + Amenities
CalEEMod Land Use Type
Hotel
High‐rise Apartment
Loft/Studio
1‐Bedroom
2‐Bedroom
3‐Bedroom
Penthouse
Retail/Commercial
Restaurant
Hotel
Above‐Grade Parking Structure
Subterranean Parking Structure
Open Space
Project Phase 2
Residential + Amenities
Strip Mall
Quality Restaurant
Above‐Grade Parking Structure
Subterranean Parking Structure
Open Space
Plaza Area
Res. Pop.
178 rooms
112,748 sf
290 DU
352,000 sf
141
73
68
4
4
15,000 sf
15,000 sf
Hotel
300 rooms
280,000 sf
Unenclosed Parking with Elevator
Enclosed Parking with Elevator
City Park
‐
spaces
437 spaces
29.3 ksf
‐
sf
174,800 sf
0.67 acre
360 DU
418,000 sf
High‐rise Apartment
167
94
91
4
4
Strip Mall
Quality Restaurant
Unenclosed Parking with Elevator
Enclosed Parking with Elevator
City Park
Surface Parking
Lot Area (acres)/Developed Area (sf)
Sources: Hazens Group, March 2016; PCR Services Corporation, March 2016
473
DU
DU
DU
DU
DU
15.0 ksf
15.0 ksf
Loft/Studio
1‐Bedroom
2‐Bedroom
3‐Bedroom
Penthouse
Commercial
Restaurant
Units
DU
DU
DU
DU
DU
25.0 ksf
25.0 ksf
25,100 sf
25,100 sf
‐
362
20.5
5.0
‐
144,800
0.47
5,000
spaces
spaces
ksf
ksf
2.70 acres
sf
sf
acre
sf
116,660 sf
587
Construction Schedule and California Emissions Estimator Model (CalEEMod) Inputs
CalEEMod Construction Phase
Phase 1
Site Preparation
Site Demolition
Mass Grading/Excavation
Foundation
Building Construction
Paving d
Architectural Coating
Phase 2
Existing Hotel Demolition
Mass Grading/Excavation
Foundation
Building Construction
Paving d
Architectural Coating
Start Date End Date No. Work Days
8/8/2017
8/15/2017
8/29/2017
11/8/2017
1/17/2018
6/10/2019
10/4/2018
8/14/2017
8/28/2017
11/7/2017
1/16/2018
5/29/2020
7/8/2019
4/7/2020
5
10
51
50
618
21
394
6/29/2020
10/7/2020
11/25/2020
1/25/2021
11/9/2021
8/9/2021
10/6/2020
11/24/2020
1/22/2021
3/15/2023
12/6/2021
1/13/2023
72
35
43
558
20
375
Demo (SF)
16,000
b.
20
Concrete Mat Volume a
(CY)
Concrete Concrete Concrete Vendor One‐ Worker One‐
Way Way Truck Truck Total Truck Daily Capacity One‐Way One‐Way Trips/Max Trips/Max b
Day Day c
(CY)
Trips
Trips
5
9,500 9 2,112 50 353,000
Soil export quantities and foundation concrete mat quantities provided by Hazens Group (December 2015).
Vendor trips are associated with the Building Construction phase and are based on CalEEMod assumptions.
c.
Worker trips are based on CalEEMod assumptions.
d.
Phase assumed to be part of the "Exterior Skin‐Podium (L1) Exterior Buildout and Store Fronts" construction activities.
Sources: Hazens Group, Februrary 2016; PCR Services Corporation, Februrary 2016
11
Soil Haul Truck Daily One‐Way Trips
99,800 ‐ 14 14,258 160 Notes:
a.
Demo Demo Soil Haul Demo Truck Soil Haul Truck Total Truck Daily Soil Export Truck Total a
Soil Import Capacity One‐Way One‐Way Truck One‐Way (CY)
(CY)
(CY)
Capacity (CY)
Trips
Trips
Trips
11
1,957
25
102,300 ‐ 14 14,615 160 8,600 9 1,912 50 10
15
30
25
100 700
10
100
20
15
20
100 500
10
70
1020 S. Figueroa Street Project EIR
Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Assessment
Project Information
Site Preparation
Site Demolition
Mass Grading/Excavation
Foundation
Building Construction
Paving
Architectural Coating
Start
8/8/2017
8/15/2017
8/29/2017
11/8/2017
1/17/2018
6/10/2019
10/4/2018
Trucks per Day
100
Haul Trucks Concrete Trucks Vendor Trucks Workers
8/14/2017
10
8/28/2017
5
15
11/7/2017
160
30
1/16/2018
50
25
5/29/2020
100
700
7/8/2019
10
4/7/2020
100
Existing Hotel Demolition
Mass Grading/Excavation
Foundation
Building Construction
Paving
Architectural Coating
6/29/2020
10/7/2020
11/25/2020
1/25/2021
11/9/2021
8/9/2021
10/6/2020
11/24/2020
1/22/2021
3/15/2023
12/6/2021
1/13/2023
Phase 1
810
<‐ Max Day
580
<‐ Max Day
Phase 2
25
160
50
100
20
15
20
500
10
70
1020 S. Figueroa Street Project EIR
Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Assessment
Construction Equipment and California Emissions Estimator Model (CalEEMod) Inputs
Construction Equipment
Construction Phase
Phase 1
Site Preparation
Demolition
Mass Grading/Excavation
Foundation
Building Construction
Architectural Coating
Paving
Phase 2
Demolition
Mass Grading/Excavation
Foundation
Building Construction
Architectural Coating
Paving
Source: PCR Services Corporation, 2016
Heavy‐Duty Equipment
No. of Heavy‐
Hours of Duty Equipment Operation/Day
Hours of Operation/Week
Rubber Tired Dozers
Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes
Rubber Tired Dozers
Concrete/Industrial Saws
Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes
Excavators
Graders
Rubber Tired Dozers
Scrapers
Bore/Drill Rig
Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes
Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes
Pump
Cranes (Electric)
Forklifts
Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes
Welders (Electric)
Generator Sets
Pump
Air Compressors
Pavers
Rollers
Paving Equipment
1
1
1
1
3
2
1
1
1
1
2
2
4
1
3
1
1
1
2
1
1
1
1
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
6
8
8
8
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
30
40
40
40
Excavators
Rubber Tired Dozers
Concrete/Industrial Saws
Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes
Excavators
Graders
Rubber Tired Dozers
Scrapers
Bore/Drill Rig
Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes
Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes
Pump
Cranes (Electric)
Forklifts
Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes
Welders (Electric)
Generator Sets
Pumps (Electric)
Air Compressors
Pavers
Rollers
Paving Equipment
1
2
1
3
2
1
1
1
1
2
2
4
1
3
1
1
1
2
1
1
1
1
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
6
8
8
8
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
30
40
40
40
1020 S. Figueroa Street Project EIR
Resource Loaded Construction Schedule
last updated:
6/3/2015
On‐Site/Off‐Road Equipment
Month
Phase:
Site Preparation
Rubber Tired Dozers
Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes
Demolition
Excavators
Rubber Tired Dozers
Concrete/Industrial Saws
Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes
Water Trucks
Mass Grading/Excavation
Excavators
Graders
Rubber Tired Dozers
Scrapers
Bore‐Drill Rig
Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes
Water Trucks
Foundation
Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes
Pump
Building Construction
Cranes (Electric)
Forklifts
Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes
Welders (Electric)
Generator Sets
Pump
Architectural Coatings
Air Compressors
Paving Pavers
Rollers
Paving Equipment
Source: PCR Services Corporation, 2016
1
2
3
4
5
2017
6
7
1
1
8
9
10
11
1
12
2
3
4
5
2018
6
7
8
9 10
PHASE 1
11
12
1
2
3
4
5
2019
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
1
1
2
1
1
1
2
1
1
1
1
2
1
2
1
1
1
1
2
1
1
2
1
3
1
2
4
2
4
2
1
1
1
1
2
1
3
3
1
3
1
2
3
3
1
3
1
2
3
3
1
3
1
2
3
3
1
3
1
2
3
3
1
3
1
2
3
3
1
3
1
2
3
3
1
3
1
2
3
3
1
3
1
2
3
3
1
3
1
2
3
3
1
3
1
2
3
3
1
3
1
2
3
3
1
3
1
2
3
3
1
3
1
2
3
3
1
3
1
2
3
3
1
3
1
2
3
3
1
3
1
2
3
3
1
3
1
2
3
3
1
3
1
2
3
3
1
3
1
2
3
3
1
3
1
2
3
3
1
3
1
2
3
3
1
3
1
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
3
3
1
3
1
2
2021
6
7
PHASE 2
8
9
10
11
12
1
2
3
4
5
2022
6
7
8
9
10
11
3
3
1
3
1
2
3
3
1
3
1
2
3
3
1
3
1
2
3
3
1
3
1
2
3
3
1
3
1
2
3
3
1
3
1
2
3
3
1
3
1
2
3
3
1
3
1
2
3
3
1
3
1
2
3
3
1
3
1
2
3
3
1
3
1
2
3
3
1
3
1
2
3
3
1
3
1
2
3
3
1
3
1
2
3
3
1
3
1
2
3
3
1
3
1
2
3
3
1
3
1
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
9
10
11
12
1
2
3
4
5
3
3
1
3
1
2
3
3
1
3
1
2
3
3
1
3
1
2
3
3
1
3
1
2
3
3
1
3
1
2
3
3
1
3
1
2
3
3
1
3
1
2
3
3
1
3
1
2
3
3
1
3
1
2
3
3
1
3
1
2
1
1
1
2
1
1
1
1
2
1
2
4
3
3
1
3
1
2
8
1
2
1
3
1
2
1
1
1
1
2
1
2
4
2020
6
7
5
1
1
1
2
1
3
1
1
1
3
1
4
3
2
4
2
4
3
3
1
3
1
2
12
1020 S. Figueroa Street Project EIR
Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Assessment
Construction Equipment and California Emissions Estimator Model (CalEEMod) Inputs
Architectural Coating Area Calculations
CalEEMod assumes the total surface for architectural coating equals:
Residential Coating Area
2.7 times the floor square footage
75% interior
25% exterior
Nonresidential Coating Area
2 times the square footage
75% interior
25% exterior
Parking Lot Coating Area
6% of the square footage
0% exterior for subterranean
Source: SCAQMD, CEQA Air Quality Handbook, (1993) A9‐124.
Phase 1
Land Use
Residential
Total Residential
Land Use
Hotel
Commercial
Quality Restaurant
Above‐Grade Parking Structure
Subterranean Parking Structure
Total Non‐Residential
Residential Land Uses
Area (sf)
Interior (sf)
352,000 712,800
Exterior (sf)
237,600
712,800 237,600
ENTER VALUES ABOVE INTO CALEEMOD
Non‐Residential Land Uses
Area (sf)
Interior (sf)
280,000 420,000
15,000 22,500
15,000 900
‐
‐
174,800 10,488
Exterior (sf)
140,000
7,500
7,500
‐
‐
453,888 155,000
ENTER VALUES ABOVE INTO CALEEMOD
Phase 2
Land Use
Residential
Total Residential
Land Use
Commercial
Quality Restaurant
Above‐Grade Parking Structure
Subterranean Parking Structure
Total Non‐Residential
Residential Land Uses
Area (sf)
Interior (sf)
418,000 846,450
Exterior (sf)
282,150
846,450 282,150
Non‐Residential Land Uses
Area (sf)
Interior (sf)
25,100 37,650
25,100 37,650
‐
‐
144,800 8,688
Exterior (sf)
12,550
12,550
‐
‐
83,988 25,100
ENTER VALUES ABOVE INTO CALEEMOD
1020 S. Figueroa Street Project EIR
Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Assessment
Phase 1: Demolition
Demolition Schedule
Start Date
End Date
Work Days
8/15/2017
8/28/2017
10
Demolition Quantities
Land Use
Sidewalk
Amount
16
Demolition Volume
Total Sidewalk Area (KSF)
Sidewalk Thickness (ft)
Building Volume (ft3)
Building Volume (CY)
Debris Volume (CY)
16
0.5
8,000
296.30
100 (rounded, estimated)
Truck Size (CY)
Total Truck Trips
Total Truck Trips (one‐way)
Daily Truck Trips
11
10 (rounded, estimated)
20
2 trips/day
Units
KSF
Phase 2: Demolition
Demolition Schedule
Start Date
End Date
Work Days
6/29/2020
10/6/2020
72
Demolition Quantities
Land Use
Existing Hotel Demo
Sidewalk
Amount
332
21
Demolition Volume
Total Sidewalk Area (KSF)
Sidewalk Thickness (ft)
Building Volume (ft3)
Building Volume (CY)
Debris Volume (CY)
21
0.5
10,500
388.89
100 (rounded, estimated)
Truck Size (CY)
Total Truck Trips
Total Truck Trips (one‐way)
11
10 (rounded, estimated)
20
Existing Hotel Demo (one‐way)
Sidewalk Demo (one‐way)
Total Truck Trips (one‐way)
Daily Truck Trips
1,937
20
1,957
28 trips/day
Units
KSF
KSF
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2
Page 1 of 1
Date: 4/19/2016 12:12 PM
LUXE Hotel - Phase 1 Construction
South Coast Air Basin, Summer
1.0 Project Characteristics
1.1 Land Usage
Land Uses
Size
Metric
Lot Acreage
Floor Surface Area
Population
Enclosed Parking with Elevator
437.00
Space
3.93
174,800.00
0
City Park
0.47
Acre
0.67
20,300.00
0
Hotel
300.00
Room
10.00
280,000.00
0
Quality Restaurant
15.00
1000sqft
0.34
15,000.00
0
Apartments High Rise
290.00
Dwelling Unit
4.68
352,000.00
829
Strip Mall
15.00
1000sqft
0.34
15,000.00
0
1.2 Other Project Characteristics
Urbanization
Urban
Climate Zone
11
Utility Company
Los Angeles Department of Water & Power
CO2 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
1227.89
Wind Speed (m/s)
CH4 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
2.2
0.029
1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data
Project Characteristics Land Use - See "Hazen AQ Construction Model Inputs"
Construction Phase - See "Hazen AQ Construction Model Inputs"
Off-road Equipment Off-road Equipment - See "Hazen AQ Construction Model Inputs"
Off-road Equipment - See "Hazen AQ Construction Model Inputs"
Precipitation Freq (Days)
31
Operational Year
2020
N2O Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
0.006
Off-road Equipment - See "Hazen AQ Construction Model Inputs"
Off-road Equipment - See "Hazen AQ Construction Model Inputs"
Off-road Equipment - See "Hazen AQ Construction Model Inputs"
Off-road Equipment - See "Hazen AQ Construction Model Inputs"
Trips and VMT - See "Hazen AQ Construction Model Inputs"
Demolition - See "Hazen AQ Construction Model Inputs"
Grading - See "Hazen AQ Construction Model Inputs"
Architectural Coating - See "Hazen AQ Construction Model Inputs"
Vehicle Trips Woodstoves - No hearths
Area Coating - Parking lot square footage adjustment in AQ Construction Model Inputs
Water And Wastewater Solid Waste Construction Off-road Equipment Mitigation - See "Hazen AQ Construction Model Inputs"
Area Mitigation Energy Mitigation Water Mitigation Table Name
Column Name
Default Value
New Value
tblArchitecturalCoating
ConstArea_Nonresidential_Exterior
252,550.00
155,000.00
tblArchitecturalCoating
ConstArea_Nonresidential_Interior
757,650.00
453,888.00
tblAreaCoating
Area_Nonresidential_Interior
757650
453888
tblConstEquipMitigation
NumberOfEquipmentMitigated
0.00
1.00
tblConstEquipMitigation
NumberOfEquipmentMitigated
0.00
1.00
tblConstEquipMitigation
NumberOfEquipmentMitigated
0.00
1.00
tblConstEquipMitigation
NumberOfEquipmentMitigated
0.00
2.00
tblConstEquipMitigation
NumberOfEquipmentMitigated
0.00
3.00
tblConstEquipMitigation
NumberOfEquipmentMitigated
0.00
1.00
tblConstEquipMitigation
NumberOfEquipmentMitigated
0.00
1.00
tblConstEquipMitigation
NumberOfEquipmentMitigated
0.00
1.00
tblConstEquipMitigation
NumberOfEquipmentMitigated
0.00
1.00
tblConstEquipMitigation
NumberOfEquipmentMitigated
0.00
6.00
tblConstEquipMitigation
NumberOfEquipmentMitigated
0.00
1.00
tblConstEquipMitigation
NumberOfEquipmentMitigated
0.00
3.00
tblConstEquipMitigation
NumberOfEquipmentMitigated
0.00
1.00
tblConstEquipMitigation
NumberOfEquipmentMitigated
0.00
9.00
tblConstEquipMitigation
Tier
No Change
Tier 4 Final
tblConstEquipMitigation
Tier
No Change
Tier 4 Final
tblConstEquipMitigation
Tier
No Change
Tier 4 Final
tblConstEquipMitigation
Tier
No Change
Tier 4 Final
tblConstEquipMitigation
Tier
No Change
Tier 4 Final
tblConstEquipMitigation
Tier
No Change
Tier 4 Final
tblConstEquipMitigation
Tier
No Change
Tier 4 Final
tblConstEquipMitigation
Tier
No Change
Tier 4 Final
tblConstEquipMitigation
Tier
No Change
Tier 4 Final
tblConstEquipMitigation
Tier
No Change
Tier 4 Final
tblConstEquipMitigation
Tier
No Change
Tier 4 Final
tblConstEquipMitigation
Tier
No Change
Tier 4 Final
tblConstEquipMitigation
Tier
No Change
Tier 4 Final
tblConstEquipMitigation
Tier
No Change
Tier 4 Final
tblConstEquipMitigation
Tier
No Change
Tier 4 Final
tblConstEquipMitigation
Tier
No Change
Tier 4 Final
tblConstructionPhase
NumDays
20.00
394.00
tblConstructionPhase
NumDays
300.00
618.00
tblConstructionPhase
NumDays
20.00
10.00
tblConstructionPhase
NumDays
30.00
51.00
tblConstructionPhase
NumDays
20.00
50.00
tblConstructionPhase
NumDays
20.00
21.00
tblConstructionPhase
NumDays
10.00
5.00
tblConstructionPhase
PhaseEndDate
12/2/2021
4/7/2020
tblConstructionPhase
PhaseEndDate
5/6/2020
7/8/2019
tblConstructionPhase
PhaseStartDate
5/30/2020
10/4/2018
tblConstructionPhase
PhaseStartDate
4/8/2020
6/10/2019
tblGrading
AcresOfGrading
76.50
2.70
tblGrading
MaterialExported
0.00
99,800.00
tblLandUse
LandUseSquareFeet
20,473.20
20,300.00
tblLandUse
LandUseSquareFeet
435,600.00
280,000.00
tblLandUse
LandUseSquareFeet
290,000.00
352,000.00
tblLandUse
LotAcreage
0.47
0.67
tblOffRoadEquipment
OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount
1.00
0.00
tblOffRoadEquipment
OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount
3.00
0.00
tblOffRoadEquipment
OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount
2.00
0.00
tblOffRoadEquipment
OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount
2.00
1.00
tblOffRoadEquipment
OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount
2.00
0.00
tblOffRoadEquipment
OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount
2.00
1.00
tblOffRoadEquipment
OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount
2.00
0.00
tblOffRoadEquipment
OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount
2.00
1.00
tblOffRoadEquipment
OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount
2.00
1.00
tblOffRoadEquipment
OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount
3.00
1.00
tblOffRoadEquipment
OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount
2.00
1.00
tblOffRoadEquipment
OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount
3.00
1.00
tblOffRoadEquipment
OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount
4.00
1.00
tblOffRoadEquipment
OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount
1.00
0.00
tblOffRoadEquipment
UsageHours
7.00
8.00
tblOffRoadEquipment
UsageHours
7.00
8.00
tblProjectCharacteristics
OperationalYear
2014
2020
tblTripsAndVMT
HaulingTripNumber
73.00
0.00
tblTripsAndVMT
HaulingTripNumber
12,475.00
0.00
tblTripsAndVMT
VendorTripNumber
114.00
0.00
tblTripsAndVMT
WorkerTripNumber
5.00
10.00
tblTripsAndVMT
WorkerTripNumber
13.00
15.00
tblTripsAndVMT
WorkerTripNumber
20.00
30.00
tblTripsAndVMT
WorkerTripNumber
15.00
25.00
tblTripsAndVMT
WorkerTripNumber
419.00
700.00
tblTripsAndVMT
WorkerTripNumber
84.00
100.00
tblTripsAndVMT
WorkerTripNumber
8.00
10.00
2.0 Emissions Summary
2.1 Overall Construction (Maximum Daily Emission)
Unmitigated Construction
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Year
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
lb/day
NBioCO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
lb/day
2017
5.2260
57.9731
40.3602
0.0598
6.6349
2.7961
9.4310
3.4387
2.5724
6.0111
0.0000
6,026.531 6,026.5317
7
1.7582
0.0000
6,063.454
8
2018
30.2624
25.2342
61.8527
0.1436
8.9421
1.5984
10.5405
2.3715
1.5481
3.9196
0.0000
11,736.59 11,736.591
16
6
0.8249
0.0000
11,753.91
38
2019
30.4873
30.5399
65.9009
0.1559
9.0539
1.7927
10.8466
2.4011
1.7162
4.1174
0.0000
12,600.32 12,600.324
41
1
1.1330
0.0000
12,624.11
73
2020
29.3531
21.1202
55.4382
0.1434
8.9421
1.2130
10.1552
2.3715
1.1742
3.5457
0.0000
11,030.11 11,030.114
41
1
0.7428
0.0000
11,045.71
33
Total
95.3287
134.8673
223.5520
0.5027
33.5730
7.4003
40.9732
10.5828
7.0110
17.5938
0.0000
41,393.56 41,393.561
15
5
4.4589
0.0000
41,487.19
91
Mitigated Construction
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Year
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBioCO2
Total CO2
lb/day
CH4
N2O
CO2e
lb/day
2017
0.7938
3.0943
33.7935
0.0598
2.7922
0.0936
2.8857
1.3954
0.0934
1.4887
0.0000
6,026.531 6,026.5317
7
1.7582
0.0000
6,063.454
8
2018
27.9159
4.8056
62.4985
0.1436
8.9421
0.1129
9.0550
2.3715
0.1077
2.4792
0.0000
11,736.59 11,736.591
16
6
0.8249
0.0000
11,753.91
38
2019
27.8694
5.1571
67.9984
0.1559
9.0539
0.1308
9.1847
2.4011
0.1257
2.5269
0.0000
12,600.32 12,600.324
41
1
1.1330
0.0000
12,624.11
72
2020
27.5455
4.2953
56.3839
0.1434
8.9421
0.1112
9.0533
2.3715
0.1063
2.4777
0.0000
11,030.11 11,030.114
41
1
0.7428
0.0000
11,045.71
33
Total
84.1246
17.3523
220.6743
0.5027
29.7303
0.4485
30.1787
8.5395
0.4330
8.9725
0.0000
41,393.56 41,393.561
15
5
4.4589
0.0000
41,487.19
91
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
CH4
N20
CO2e
11.75
87.13
1.29
0.00
11.45
93.94
26.35
19.31
93.82
49.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Percent
Reduction
Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2
0.00
0.00
0.00
3.0 Construction Detail
Construction Phase
Phase
Number
Phase Name
Phase Type
Start Date
End Date
Num Days Num Days
Week
1
Site Preparation
Site Preparation
8/8/2017
8/14/2017
5
5
2
Demolition
Demolition
8/15/2017
8/28/2017
5
10
3
Grading
Grading
8/29/2017
11/7/2017
5
51
4
Foundation
Paving
11/8/2017
1/16/2018
5
50
5
Building Construction
Building Construction
1/17/2018
5/29/2020
5
618
6
Architectural Coating
Architectural Coating
10/4/2018
4/7/2020
5
394
7
Paving
Paving
6/10/2019
7/8/2019
5
21
Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 0
Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 2.7
Phase Description
Acres of Paving: 0
Residential Indoor: 712,800; Residential Outdoor: 237,600; Non-Residential Indoor: 453,888; Non-Residential Outdoor: 155,000
OffRoad Equipment
Phase Name
Offroad Equipment Type
Amount
Usage Hours
Horse Power
Load Factor
Site Preparation
Rubber Tired Dozers
1
8.00
255
0.40
Site Preparation
Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes
1
8.00
97
0.37
Demolition
Concrete/Industrial Saws
1
8.00
81
0.73
Demolition
Excavators
0
8.00
162
0.38
Demolition
Rubber Tired Dozers
1
8.00
255
0.40
Demolition
Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes
3
8.00
97
0.37
Grading
Bore/Drill Rigs
1
8.00
205
0.50
Grading
Excavators
2
8.00
162
0.38
Grading
Graders
1
8.00
174
0.41
Grading
Rubber Tired Dozers
1
8.00
255
0.40
Grading
Scrapers
1
8.00
361
0.48
Grading
Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes
2
8.00
97
0.37
Foundation
Pavers
0
8.00
125
0.42
Foundation
Paving Equipment
0
8.00
130
0.36
Foundation
Pumps
4
8.00
84
0.74
Foundation
Rollers
0
8.00
80
0.38
Foundation
Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes
2
8.00
97
0.37
Building Construction
Cranes
0
8.00
226
0.29
Building Construction
Forklifts
3
8.00
89
0.20
Building Construction
Generator Sets
1
8.00
84
0.74
Building Construction
Pumps
2
8.00
84
0.74
Building Construction
Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes
1
8.00
97
0.37
Building Construction
Welders
0
8.00
46
0.45
Architectural Coating
Air Compressors
1
6.00
78
0.48
Paving
Pavers
1
8.00
125
0.42
Paving
Paving Equipment
1
8.00
130
0.36
Paving
Rollers
1
8.00
80
0.38
Worker Vehicle
Class
Vendor
Hauling
Vehicle Class Vehicle Class
Trips and VMT
Phase Name
Offroad Equipment
Count
Worker Trip
Number
Vendor Trip Hauling Trip
Number
Number
Worker Trip
Length
Vendor Trip
Length
Hauling Trip
Length
Site Preparation
2
10.00
0.00
0.00
14.70
6.90
20.00 LD_Mix
HDT_Mix
HHDT
Demolition
5
15.00
0.00
0.00
14.70
6.90
20.00 LD_Mix
HDT_Mix
HHDT
Grading
8
30.00
0.00
0.00
14.70
6.90
20.00 LD_Mix
HDT_Mix
HHDT
Foundation
6
25.00
0.00
0.00
14.70
6.90
20.00 LD_Mix
HDT_Mix
HHDT
Building Construction
7
700.00
0.00
0.00
14.70
6.90
20.00 LD_Mix
HDT_Mix
HHDT
Architectural Coating
1
100.00
0.00
0.00
14.70
6.90
20.00 LD_Mix
HDT_Mix
HHDT
Paving
3
10.00
0.00
0.00
14.70
6.90
20.00 LD_Mix
HDT_Mix
HHDT
3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction
Use Cleaner Engines for Construction Equipment
Use Soil Stabilizer
Water Exposed Area
Reduce Vehicle Speed on Unpaved Roads
Clean Paved Roads
3.2 Site Preparation - 2017
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Category
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBioCO2
lb/day
Fugitive Dust
6.0221
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
lb/day
0.0000
6.0221
0.8418
0.8418
3.3102
0.0000
3.3102
0.7744
0.7744
1,228.273 1,228.2737
7
0.3763
1,236.176
8
1,228.273 1,228.2737
7
0.3763
1,236.176
8
Off-Road
1.5071
16.2365
12.3344
0.0120
Total
1.5071
16.2365
12.3344
0.0120
6.0221
0.8418
6.8639
3.3102
0.7744
4.0847
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
0.0000
0.0000
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
Category
Bio- CO2
NBioCO2
lb/day
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
lb/day
Hauling
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Vendor
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Worker
0.0374
0.0470
0.5870
1.4200e003
0.1118
9.0000e004
0.1127
0.0296
8.3000e004
0.0305
114.4058
114.4058
5.6300e003
114.5239
Total
0.0374
0.0470
0.5870
1.4200e003
0.1118
9.0000e004
0.1127
0.0296
8.3000e004
0.0305
114.4058
114.4058
5.6300e003
114.5239
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Category
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBioCO2
lb/day
Fugitive Dust
2.3486
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
lb/day
0.0000
2.3486
0.0195
0.0195
1.2910
0.0000
1.2910
0.0000
0.0195
0.0195
0.0000
1,228.273 1,228.2737
7
0.3763
1,236.176
8
1,228.273 1,228.2737
7
0.3763
1,236.176
8
Off-Road
0.1459
0.6323
6.2998
0.0120
Total
0.1459
0.6323
6.2998
0.0120
2.3486
0.0195
2.3681
1.2910
0.0195
1.3105
0.0000
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
0.0000
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
Category
NBioCO2
lb/day
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
lb/day
Hauling
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Vendor
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Worker
0.0374
0.0470
0.5870
1.4200e003
0.1118
9.0000e004
0.1127
0.0296
8.3000e004
0.0305
114.4058
114.4058
5.6300e003
114.5239
Total
0.0374
0.0470
0.5870
1.4200e003
0.1118
9.0000e004
0.1127
0.0296
8.3000e004
0.0305
114.4058
114.4058
5.6300e003
114.5239
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
NBioCO2
Total CO2
CH4
3.3 Demolition - 2017
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
Category
lb/day
Fugitive Dust
Off-Road
1.5750
2.7216
26.5855
20.8712
0.0245
Bio- CO2
N2O
CO2e
lb/day
0.0000
1.5750
1.6062
1.6062
0.2385
0.0000
0.2385
1.5022
1.5022
0.0000
2,457.468 2,457.4682
2
0.0000
0.6235
2,470.562
0
Total
2.7216
26.5855
20.8712
0.0245
1.5750
1.6062
3.1812
0.2385
1.5022
1.7407
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
2,457.468 2,457.4682
2
0.6235
2,470.562
0
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
Category
Bio- CO2
NBioCO2
lb/day
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
lb/day
Hauling
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Vendor
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Worker
0.0561
0.0705
0.8806
2.1200e003
0.1677
1.3500e003
0.1690
0.0445
1.2400e003
0.0457
171.6086
171.6086
8.4400e003
171.7859
Total
0.0561
0.0705
0.8806
2.1200e003
0.1677
1.3500e003
0.1690
0.0445
1.2400e003
0.0457
171.6086
171.6086
8.4400e003
171.7859
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
NBioCO2
Total CO2
CH4
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
Category
Bio- CO2
lb/day
Fugitive Dust
0.6142
N2O
CO2e
lb/day
0.0000
0.6142
0.0379
0.0379
0.0930
0.0000
0.0930
0.0000
0.0379
0.0379
0.0000
2,457.468 2,457.4682
2
0.6235
2,470.562
0
2,457.468 2,457.4682
2
0.6235
2,470.562
0
Off-Road
0.2845
1.2326
14.8426
0.0245
Total
0.2845
1.2326
14.8426
0.0245
0.6142
0.0379
0.6522
0.0930
0.0379
0.1309
0.0000
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
0.0000
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
Category
NBioCO2
lb/day
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
lb/day
Hauling
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Vendor
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Worker
0.0561
0.0705
0.8806
2.1200e003
0.1677
1.3500e003
0.1690
0.0445
1.2400e003
0.0457
171.6086
171.6086
8.4400e003
171.7859
Total
0.0561
0.0705
0.8806
2.1200e003
0.1677
1.3500e003
0.1690
0.0445
1.2400e003
0.0457
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
171.6086
171.6086
8.4400e003
NBioCO2
Total CO2
CH4
171.7859
3.4 Grading - 2017
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
Category
Bio- CO2
lb/day
Fugitive Dust
6.2995
N2O
CO2e
lb/day
0.0000
6.2995
2.7934
2.7934
3.3498
0.0000
3.3498
2.5699
2.5699
5,683.314 5,683.3145
5
1.7414
5,719.883
0
5,683.314 5,683.3145
5
1.7414
5,719.883
0
Off-Road
5.1137
57.8321
38.5991
0.0556
Total
5.1137
57.8321
38.5991
0.0556
6.2995
2.7934
9.0929
3.3498
2.5699
5.9197
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
0.0000
0.0000
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
Category
Bio- CO2
NBioCO2
lb/day
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
lb/day
Hauling
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Vendor
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Worker
0.1123
0.1411
1.7611
4.2500e003
0.3353
2.7000e003
0.3380
0.0889
2.4900e003
0.0914
343.2173
343.2173
0.0169
343.5718
Total
0.1123
0.1411
1.7611
4.2500e003
0.3353
2.7000e003
0.3380
0.0889
2.4900e003
0.0914
343.2173
343.2173
0.0169
343.5718
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
NBioCO2
Total CO2
CH4
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
Category
lb/day
Fugitive Dust
Off-Road
Bio- CO2
2.4568
0.6815
2.9532
32.0324
0.0556
N2O
CO2e
lb/day
0.0000
2.4568
0.0909
0.0909
1.3064
0.0000
1.3064
0.0909
0.0909
0.0000
0.0000
5,683.314 5,683.3145
5
0.0000
1.7414
5,719.883
0
Total
0.6815
2.9532
32.0324
0.0556
2.4568
0.0909
2.5477
1.3064
0.0909
1.3973
0.0000
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
5,683.314 5,683.3145
5
1.7414
5,719.883
0
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
Category
NBioCO2
lb/day
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
lb/day
Hauling
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Vendor
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Worker
0.1123
0.1411
1.7611
4.2500e003
0.3353
2.7000e003
0.3380
0.0889
2.4900e003
0.0914
343.2173
343.2173
0.0169
343.5718
Total
0.1123
0.1411
1.7611
4.2500e003
0.3353
2.7000e003
0.3380
0.0889
2.4900e003
0.0914
343.2173
343.2173
0.0169
343.5718
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
NBioCO2
Total CO2
CH4
3.5 Foundation - 2017
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
Category
Bio- CO2
lb/day
Off-Road
3.0279
Paving
0.0000
Total
3.0279
24.2164
24.2164
20.1142
20.1142
0.0325
0.0325
N2O
CO2e
lb/day
1.7164
1.7164
1.6798
1.6798
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
1.7164
1.7164
1.6798
1.6798
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
3,128.668 3,128.6682
2
0.4099
3,137.276
3
0.0000
3,128.668 3,128.6682
2
0.0000
0.4099
3,137.276
3
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Category
Fugitive
PM10
Fugitive
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBioCO2
lb/day
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
lb/day
Hauling
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Vendor
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Worker
0.0936
0.1175
1.4676
3.5400e003
0.2794
2.2500e003
0.2817
0.0741
2.0700e003
0.0762
286.0144
286.0144
0.0141
286.3099
Total
0.0936
0.1175
1.4676
3.5400e003
0.2794
2.2500e003
0.2817
0.0741
2.0700e003
0.0762
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
286.0144
286.0144
0.0141
NBioCO2
Total CO2
CH4
286.3099
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
Category
Bio- CO2
lb/day
Off-Road
0.3391
Paving
0.0000
Total
0.3391
1.4693
1.4693
20.9096
20.9096
0.0325
0.0325
N2O
CO2e
lb/day
0.0452
0.0452
0.0452
0.0452
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0452
0.0452
0.0452
0.0452
0.0000
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
3,128.668 3,128.6682
2
0.4099
3,137.276
3
0.0000
3,128.668 3,128.6682
2
0.0000
0.4099
3,137.276
3
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Category
Fugitive
PM10
Fugitive
PM2.5
NBioCO2
lb/day
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
lb/day
Hauling
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Vendor
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Worker
0.0936
0.1175
1.4676
3.5400e003
0.2794
2.2500e003
0.2817
0.0741
2.0700e003
0.0762
286.0144
286.0144
0.0141
286.3099
Total
0.0936
0.1175
1.4676
3.5400e003
0.2794
2.2500e003
0.2817
0.0741
2.0700e003
0.0762
286.0144
286.0144
0.0141
286.3099
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
NBioCO2
Total CO2
CH4
3.5 Foundation - 2018
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
Category
lb/day
Off-Road
2.6591
Paving
0.0000
21.9585
19.8947
0.0325
Bio- CO2
N2O
CO2e
lb/day
1.4777
1.4777
1.4479
1.4479
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
3,117.690 3,117.6902
2
0.0000
0.3833
3,125.739
7
0.0000
Total
2.6591
21.9585
19.8947
0.0325
1.4777
1.4777
1.4479
1.4479
3,117.690 3,117.6902
2
0.3833
3,125.739
7
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Category
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBioCO2
lb/day
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
lb/day
Hauling
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Vendor
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Worker
0.0844
0.1066
1.3335
3.5400e003
0.2794
2.1900e003
0.2816
0.0741
2.0200e003
0.0761
275.3719
275.3719
0.0131
275.6461
Total
0.0844
0.1066
1.3335
3.5400e003
0.2794
2.1900e003
0.2816
0.0741
2.0200e003
0.0761
275.3719
275.3719
0.0131
275.6461
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
NBioCO2
Total CO2
CH4
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
Category
Bio- CO2
lb/day
Off-Road
0.3391
Paving
0.0000
Total
0.3391
1.4693
1.4693
20.9096
20.9096
0.0325
0.0325
N2O
CO2e
lb/day
0.0452
0.0452
0.0452
0.0452
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0452
0.0452
0.0452
0.0452
0.0000
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
3,117.690 3,117.6902
2
0.3833
3,125.739
7
0.0000
3,117.690 3,117.6902
2
0.0000
0.3833
3,125.739
7
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Category
Fugitive
PM10
Fugitive
PM2.5
NBioCO2
lb/day
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
lb/day
Hauling
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Vendor
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Worker
0.0844
0.1066
1.3335
3.5400e003
0.2794
2.1900e003
0.2816
0.0741
2.0200e003
0.0761
275.3719
275.3719
0.0131
275.6461
Total
0.0844
0.1066
1.3335
3.5400e003
0.2794
2.1900e003
0.2816
0.0741
2.0200e003
0.0761
275.3719
275.3719
0.0131
275.6461
3.6 Building Construction - 2018
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Category
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBioCO2
lb/day
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
lb/day
Off-Road
2.3694
19.8161
17.3282
0.0274
1.3778
1.3778
1.3328
1.3328
2,643.242 2,643.2424
4
0.3802
2,651.227
3
Total
2.3694
19.8161
17.3282
0.0274
1.3778
1.3778
1.3328
1.3328
2,643.242 2,643.2424
4
0.3802
2,651.227
3
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Category
Fugitive
PM10
Fugitive
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBioCO2
lb/day
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
lb/day
Hauling
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Vendor
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Worker
2.3619
2.9858
37.3365
0.0991
7.8244
0.0613
7.8856
2.0751
0.0567
2.1317
7,710.413 7,710.4130
0
0.3657
7,718.091
8
Total
2.3619
2.9858
37.3365
0.0991
7.8244
0.0613
7.8856
2.0751
0.0567
2.1317
7,710.413 7,710.4130
0
0.3657
7,718.091
8
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
Category
Bio- CO2
lb/day
NBioCO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
lb/day
Off-Road
0.2918
1.2646
17.9959
0.0274
0.0389
0.0389
0.0389
0.0389
0.0000
2,643.242 2,643.2424
4
0.3802
2,651.227
3
Total
0.2918
1.2646
17.9959
0.0274
0.0389
0.0389
0.0389
0.0389
0.0000
2,643.242 2,643.2424
4
0.3802
2,651.227
3
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Category
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBioCO2
lb/day
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
lb/day
Hauling
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Vendor
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Worker
2.3619
2.9858
37.3365
0.0991
7.8244
0.0613
7.8856
2.0751
0.0567
2.1317
7,710.413 7,710.4130
0
0.3657
7,718.091
8
Total
2.3619
2.9858
37.3365
0.0991
7.8244
0.0613
7.8856
2.0751
0.0567
2.1317
7,710.413 7,710.4130
0
0.3657
7,718.091
8
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
3.6 Building Construction - 2019
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
Category
Bio- CO2
NBioCO2
lb/day
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
lb/day
Off-Road
2.0973
18.0678
17.1707
0.0274
1.1896
1.1896
1.1506
1.1506
2,630.606 2,630.6068
8
0.3637
2,638.244
9
Total
2.0973
18.0678
17.1707
0.0274
1.1896
1.1896
1.1506
1.1506
2,630.606 2,630.6068
8
0.3637
2,638.244
9
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Category
Fugitive
PM10
Fugitive
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBioCO2
lb/day
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
lb/day
Hauling
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Vendor
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Worker
2.1739
2.7386
34.3141
0.0989
7.8244
0.0602
7.8845
2.0751
0.0558
2.1308
7,418.083 7,418.0838
8
0.3423
7,425.271
7
Total
2.1739
2.7386
34.3141
0.0989
7.8244
0.0602
7.8845
2.0751
0.0558
2.1308
7,418.083 7,418.0838
8
0.3423
7,425.271
7
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Category
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBioCO2
lb/day
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
lb/day
Off-Road
0.2918
1.2646
17.9959
0.0274
0.0389
0.0389
0.0389
0.0389
0.0000
2,630.606 2,630.6068
8
0.3637
2,638.244
9
Total
0.2918
1.2646
17.9959
0.0274
0.0389
0.0389
0.0389
0.0389
0.0000
2,630.606 2,630.6068
8
0.3637
2,638.244
9
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Category
Fugitive
PM10
Fugitive
PM2.5
NBioCO2
lb/day
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
lb/day
Hauling
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Vendor
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Worker
2.1739
2.7386
34.3141
0.0989
7.8244
0.0602
7.8845
2.0751
0.0558
2.1308
7,418.083 7,418.0838
8
0.3423
7,425.271
7
Total
2.1739
2.7386
34.3141
0.0989
7.8244
0.0602
7.8845
2.0751
0.0558
2.1308
7,418.083 7,418.0838
8
0.3423
7,425.271
7
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
3.6 Building Construction - 2020
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
Category
lb/day
Bio- CO2
NBioCO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
lb/day
Off-Road
1.8870
16.5343
17.0511
0.0274
1.0338
1.0338
0.9999
0.9999
2,613.964 2,613.9647
7
0.3505
2,621.325
9
Total
1.8870
16.5343
17.0511
0.0274
1.0338
1.0338
0.9999
0.9999
2,613.964 2,613.9647
7
0.3505
2,621.325
9
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Category
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBioCO2
lb/day
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
lb/day
Hauling
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Vendor
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Worker
2.0377
2.5393
31.9862
0.0988
7.8244
0.0598
7.8842
2.0751
0.0555
2.1305
7,117.863 7,117.8636
6
0.3242
7,124.671
5
Total
2.0377
2.5393
31.9862
0.0988
7.8244
0.0598
7.8842
2.0751
0.0555
2.1305
7,117.863 7,117.8636
6
0.3242
7,124.671
5
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
Category
Bio- CO2
NBioCO2
lb/day
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
lb/day
Off-Road
0.2918
1.2646
17.9959
0.0274
0.0389
0.0389
0.0389
0.0389
0.0000
2,613.964 2,613.9647
7
0.3505
2,621.325
9
Total
0.2918
1.2646
17.9959
0.0274
0.0389
0.0389
0.0389
0.0389
0.0000
2,613.964 2,613.9647
7
0.3505
2,621.325
9
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Category
Fugitive
PM10
Fugitive
PM2.5
NBioCO2
lb/day
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
lb/day
Hauling
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Vendor
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Worker
2.0377
2.5393
31.9862
0.0988
7.8244
0.0598
7.8842
2.0751
0.0555
2.1305
7,117.863 7,117.8636
6
0.3242
7,124.671
5
Total
2.0377
2.5393
31.9862
0.0988
7.8244
0.0598
7.8842
2.0751
0.0555
2.1305
7,117.863 7,117.8636
6
0.3242
7,124.671
5
3.7 Architectural Coating - 2018
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Category
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBioCO2
lb/day
Archit. Coating
24.8951
Off-Road
0.2986
2.0058
1.8542
Total
25.1938
2.0058
1.8542
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
lb/day
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
2.9700e003
0.1506
0.1506
0.1506
0.1506
281.4485
281.4485
0.0267
282.0102
2.9700e003
0.1506
0.1506
0.1506
0.1506
281.4485
281.4485
0.0267
282.0102
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
NBioCO2
Total CO2
CH4
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Category
Fugitive
PM10
Fugitive
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
lb/day
N2O
CO2e
lb/day
Hauling
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Vendor
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Worker
0.3374
0.4265
5.3338
0.0142
1.1178
8.7500e003
1.1265
0.2964
8.1000e003
0.3045
1,101.487 1,101.4876
6
0.0522
1,102.584
5
Total
0.3374
0.4265
5.3338
0.0142
1.1178
8.7500e003
1.1265
0.2964
8.1000e003
0.3045
1,101.487 1,101.4876
6
0.0522
1,102.584
5
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
Category
Bio- CO2
NBioCO2
lb/day
Archit. Coating
24.8951
Off-Road
0.0297
0.1288
1.8324
Total
24.9248
0.1288
1.8324
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
lb/day
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
2.9700e003
3.9600e003
3.9600e003
3.9600e003
3.9600e003
0.0000
281.4485
281.4485
0.0267
282.0102
2.9700e003
3.9600e003
3.9600e003
3.9600e003
3.9600e003
0.0000
281.4485
281.4485
0.0267
282.0102
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Category
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBioCO2
lb/day
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
lb/day
Hauling
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Vendor
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Worker
0.3374
0.4265
5.3338
0.0142
1.1178
8.7500e003
1.1265
0.2964
8.1000e003
0.3045
1,101.487 1,101.4876
6
0.0522
1,102.584
5
Total
0.3374
0.4265
5.3338
0.0142
1.1178
8.7500e003
1.1265
0.2964
8.1000e003
0.3045
1,101.487 1,101.4876
6
0.0522
1,102.584
5
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
3.7 Architectural Coating - 2019
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
Category
Bio- CO2
NBioCO2
lb/day
Archit. Coating
24.8951
Off-Road
0.2664
1.8354
1.8413
Total
25.1616
1.8354
1.8413
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
lb/day
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
2.9700e003
0.1288
0.1288
0.1288
0.1288
281.4481
281.4481
0.0238
281.9473
2.9700e003
0.1288
0.1288
0.1288
0.1288
281.4481
281.4481
0.0238
281.9473
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Category
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBioCO2
lb/day
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
lb/day
Hauling
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Vendor
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Worker
0.3106
0.3912
4.9020
0.0141
1.1178
8.6000e003
1.1264
0.2964
7.9700e003
0.3044
1,059.726 1,059.7263
3
0.0489
1,060.753
1
Total
0.3106
0.3912
4.9020
0.0141
1.1178
8.6000e003
1.1264
0.2964
7.9700e003
0.3044
1,059.726 1,059.7263
3
0.0489
1,060.753
1
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
Category
Bio- CO2
NBioCO2
lb/day
Archit. Coating
24.8951
Off-Road
0.0297
0.1288
1.8324
Total
24.9248
0.1288
1.8324
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
lb/day
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
2.9700e003
3.9600e003
3.9600e003
3.9600e003
3.9600e003
0.0000
281.4481
281.4481
0.0238
281.9473
2.9700e003
3.9600e003
3.9600e003
3.9600e003
3.9600e003
0.0000
281.4481
281.4481
0.0238
281.9473
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBioCO2
Total CO2
CH4
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Category
Fugitive
PM10
Fugitive
PM2.5
lb/day
N2O
CO2e
lb/day
Hauling
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Vendor
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Worker
0.3106
0.3912
4.9020
0.0141
1.1178
8.6000e003
1.1264
0.2964
7.9700e003
0.3044
0.0489
1,060.753
1
1,059.726 1,059.7263
3
Total
0.3106
0.3912
4.9020
0.0141
1.1178
8.6000e003
1.1264
0.2964
7.9700e003
0.3044
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
1,059.726 1,059.7263
3
0.0489
1,060.753
1
3.7 Architectural Coating - 2020
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
Category
Bio- CO2
NBioCO2
lb/day
Archit. Coating
24.8951
Off-Road
0.2422
1.6838
1.8314
Total
25.1373
1.6838
1.8314
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
lb/day
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
2.9700e003
0.1109
0.1109
0.1109
0.1109
281.4481
281.4481
0.0218
281.9057
2.9700e003
0.1109
0.1109
0.1109
0.1109
281.4481
281.4481
0.0218
281.9057
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
NBioCO2
Total CO2
CH4
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Category
Fugitive
PM10
Fugitive
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
lb/day
N2O
CO2e
lb/day
Hauling
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Vendor
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Worker
0.2911
0.3628
4.5695
0.0141
1.1178
8.5400e003
1.1263
0.2964
7.9200e003
0.3044
1,016.837 1,016.8377
7
0.0463
1,017.810
2
Total
0.2911
0.3628
4.5695
0.0141
1.1178
8.5400e003
1.1263
0.2964
7.9200e003
0.3044
1,016.837 1,016.8377
7
0.0463
1,017.810
2
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
Category
Bio- CO2
NBioCO2
lb/day
Archit. Coating
24.8951
Off-Road
0.0297
0.1288
1.8324
2.9700e003
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
lb/day
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
3.9600e003
3.9600e003
3.9600e003
3.9600e003
0.0000
0.0000
281.4481
281.4481
0.0000
0.0218
281.9057
Total
24.9248
0.1288
1.8324
2.9700e003
3.9600e003
3.9600e003
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
3.9600e003
3.9600e003
0.0000
281.4481
281.4481
0.0218
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBioCO2
Total CO2
CH4
281.9057
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Category
Fugitive
PM10
Fugitive
PM2.5
lb/day
N2O
CO2e
lb/day
Hauling
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Vendor
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Worker
0.2911
0.3628
4.5695
0.0141
1.1178
8.5400e003
1.1263
0.2964
7.9200e003
0.3044
1,016.837 1,016.8377
7
0.0463
1,017.810
2
Total
0.2911
0.3628
4.5695
0.0141
1.1178
8.5400e003
1.1263
0.2964
7.9200e003
0.3044
1,016.837 1,016.8377
7
0.0463
1,017.810
2
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
3.8 Paving - 2019
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
Category
Bio- CO2
NBioCO2
lb/day
Off-Road
0.7129
Paving
0.0000
Total
0.7129
7.4677
7.4677
7.1826
7.1826
0.0112
0.0112
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
lb/day
0.4047
0.4047
0.3723
0.3723
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.4047
0.4047
0.3723
0.3723
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
1,104.486 1,104.4866
6
0.3495
1,111.825
0
0.0000
1,104.486 1,104.4866
6
0.0000
0.3495
1,111.825
0
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Category
Fugitive
PM10
Fugitive
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBioCO2
lb/day
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
lb/day
Hauling
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Vendor
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Worker
0.0311
0.0391
0.4902
1.4100e003
0.1118
8.6000e004
0.1126
0.0296
8.0000e004
0.0304
105.9726
105.9726
4.8900e003
106.0753
Total
0.0311
0.0391
0.4902
1.4100e003
0.1118
8.6000e004
0.1126
0.0296
8.0000e004
0.0304
105.9726
105.9726
4.8900e003
106.0753
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
NBioCO2
Total CO2
CH4
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
Category
Bio- CO2
lb/day
Off-Road
0.1373
Paving
0.0000
Total
0.1373
0.5948
0.5948
8.4638
8.4638
0.0112
0.0112
N2O
CO2e
lb/day
0.0183
0.0183
0.0183
0.0183
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0183
0.0183
0.0183
0.0183
0.0000
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
1,104.486 1,104.4866
6
0.3495
1,111.825
0
0.0000
1,104.486 1,104.4866
6
0.0000
0.3495
1,111.825
0
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Category
Fugitive
PM10
Fugitive
PM2.5
NBioCO2
lb/day
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
lb/day
Hauling
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Vendor
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Worker
0.0311
0.0391
0.4902
1.4100e003
0.1118
8.6000e004
0.1126
0.0296
8.0000e004
0.0304
105.9726
105.9726
4.8900e003
106.0753
Total
0.0311
0.0391
0.4902
1.4100e003
0.1118
8.6000e004
0.1126
0.0296
8.0000e004
0.0304
105.9726
105.9726
4.8900e003
106.0753
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2
Page 1 of 1
Date: 4/19/2016 12:10 PM
LUXE Hotel - Phase 1 Construction
South Coast Air Basin, Winter
1.0 Project Characteristics
1.1 Land Usage
Land Uses
Size
Metric
Lot Acreage
Floor Surface Area
Population
Enclosed Parking with Elevator
437.00
Space
3.93
174,800.00
0
City Park
0.47
Acre
0.67
20,300.00
0
Hotel
300.00
Room
10.00
280,000.00
0
Quality Restaurant
15.00
1000sqft
0.34
15,000.00
0
Apartments High Rise
290.00
Dwelling Unit
4.68
352,000.00
829
Strip Mall
15.00
1000sqft
0.34
15,000.00
0
1.2 Other Project Characteristics
Urbanization
Urban
Climate Zone
11
Utility Company
Los Angeles Department of Water & Power
CO2 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
1227.89
Wind Speed (m/s)
CH4 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
2.2
0.029
1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data
Project Characteristics Land Use - See "Hazen AQ Construction Model Inputs"
Construction Phase - See "Hazen AQ Construction Model Inputs"
Off-road Equipment Off-road Equipment - See "Hazen AQ Construction Model Inputs"
Off-road Equipment - See "Hazen AQ Construction Model Inputs"
Precipitation Freq (Days)
31
Operational Year
2020
N2O Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
0.006
Off-road Equipment - See "Hazen AQ Construction Model Inputs"
Off-road Equipment - See "Hazen AQ Construction Model Inputs"
Off-road Equipment - See "Hazen AQ Construction Model Inputs"
Off-road Equipment - See "Hazen AQ Construction Model Inputs"
Trips and VMT - See "Hazen AQ Construction Model Inputs"
Demolition - See "Hazen AQ Construction Model Inputs"
Grading - See "Hazen AQ Construction Model Inputs"
Architectural Coating - See "Hazen AQ Construction Model Inputs"
Vehicle Trips Woodstoves - No hearths
Area Coating - Parking lot square footage adjustment in AQ Construction Model Inputs
Water And Wastewater Solid Waste Construction Off-road Equipment Mitigation - See "Hazen AQ Construction Model Inputs"
Area Mitigation Energy Mitigation Water Mitigation Table Name
Column Name
Default Value
New Value
tblArchitecturalCoating
ConstArea_Nonresidential_Exterior
252,550.00
155,000.00
tblArchitecturalCoating
ConstArea_Nonresidential_Interior
757,650.00
453,888.00
tblAreaCoating
Area_Nonresidential_Interior
757650
453888
tblConstEquipMitigation
NumberOfEquipmentMitigated
0.00
1.00
tblConstEquipMitigation
NumberOfEquipmentMitigated
0.00
1.00
tblConstEquipMitigation
NumberOfEquipmentMitigated
0.00
1.00
tblConstEquipMitigation
NumberOfEquipmentMitigated
0.00
2.00
tblConstEquipMitigation
NumberOfEquipmentMitigated
0.00
3.00
tblConstEquipMitigation
NumberOfEquipmentMitigated
0.00
1.00
tblConstEquipMitigation
NumberOfEquipmentMitigated
0.00
1.00
tblConstEquipMitigation
NumberOfEquipmentMitigated
0.00
1.00
tblConstEquipMitigation
NumberOfEquipmentMitigated
0.00
1.00
tblConstEquipMitigation
NumberOfEquipmentMitigated
0.00
6.00
tblConstEquipMitigation
NumberOfEquipmentMitigated
0.00
1.00
tblConstEquipMitigation
NumberOfEquipmentMitigated
0.00
3.00
tblConstEquipMitigation
NumberOfEquipmentMitigated
0.00
1.00
tblConstEquipMitigation
NumberOfEquipmentMitigated
0.00
9.00
tblConstEquipMitigation
Tier
No Change
Tier 4 Final
tblConstEquipMitigation
Tier
No Change
Tier 4 Final
tblConstEquipMitigation
Tier
No Change
Tier 4 Final
tblConstEquipMitigation
Tier
No Change
Tier 4 Final
tblConstEquipMitigation
Tier
No Change
Tier 4 Final
tblConstEquipMitigation
Tier
No Change
Tier 4 Final
tblConstEquipMitigation
Tier
No Change
Tier 4 Final
tblConstEquipMitigation
Tier
No Change
Tier 4 Final
tblConstEquipMitigation
Tier
No Change
Tier 4 Final
tblConstEquipMitigation
Tier
No Change
Tier 4 Final
tblConstEquipMitigation
Tier
No Change
Tier 4 Final
tblConstEquipMitigation
Tier
No Change
Tier 4 Final
tblConstEquipMitigation
Tier
No Change
Tier 4 Final
tblConstEquipMitigation
Tier
No Change
Tier 4 Final
tblConstEquipMitigation
Tier
No Change
Tier 4 Final
tblConstEquipMitigation
Tier
No Change
Tier 4 Final
tblConstructionPhase
NumDays
20.00
394.00
tblConstructionPhase
NumDays
300.00
618.00
tblConstructionPhase
NumDays
20.00
10.00
tblConstructionPhase
NumDays
30.00
51.00
tblConstructionPhase
NumDays
20.00
50.00
tblConstructionPhase
NumDays
20.00
21.00
tblConstructionPhase
NumDays
10.00
5.00
tblConstructionPhase
PhaseEndDate
12/2/2021
4/7/2020
tblConstructionPhase
PhaseEndDate
5/6/2020
7/8/2019
tblConstructionPhase
PhaseStartDate
5/30/2020
10/4/2018
tblConstructionPhase
PhaseStartDate
4/8/2020
6/10/2019
tblGrading
AcresOfGrading
76.50
2.70
tblGrading
MaterialExported
0.00
99,800.00
tblLandUse
LandUseSquareFeet
20,473.20
20,300.00
tblLandUse
LandUseSquareFeet
435,600.00
280,000.00
tblLandUse
LandUseSquareFeet
290,000.00
352,000.00
tblLandUse
LotAcreage
0.47
0.67
tblOffRoadEquipment
OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount
1.00
0.00
tblOffRoadEquipment
OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount
3.00
0.00
tblOffRoadEquipment
OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount
2.00
0.00
tblOffRoadEquipment
OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount
2.00
1.00
tblOffRoadEquipment
OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount
2.00
0.00
tblOffRoadEquipment
OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount
2.00
1.00
tblOffRoadEquipment
OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount
2.00
0.00
tblOffRoadEquipment
OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount
2.00
1.00
tblOffRoadEquipment
OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount
2.00
1.00
tblOffRoadEquipment
OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount
3.00
1.00
tblOffRoadEquipment
OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount
2.00
1.00
tblOffRoadEquipment
OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount
3.00
1.00
tblOffRoadEquipment
OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount
4.00
1.00
tblOffRoadEquipment
OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount
1.00
0.00
tblOffRoadEquipment
UsageHours
7.00
8.00
tblOffRoadEquipment
UsageHours
7.00
8.00
tblProjectCharacteristics
OperationalYear
2014
2020
tblTripsAndVMT
HaulingTripNumber
73.00
0.00
tblTripsAndVMT
HaulingTripNumber
12,475.00
0.00
tblTripsAndVMT
VendorTripNumber
114.00
0.00
tblTripsAndVMT
WorkerTripNumber
5.00
10.00
tblTripsAndVMT
WorkerTripNumber
13.00
15.00
tblTripsAndVMT
WorkerTripNumber
20.00
30.00
tblTripsAndVMT
WorkerTripNumber
15.00
25.00
tblTripsAndVMT
WorkerTripNumber
419.00
700.00
tblTripsAndVMT
WorkerTripNumber
84.00
100.00
tblTripsAndVMT
WorkerTripNumber
8.00
10.00
2.0 Emissions Summary
2.1 Overall Construction (Maximum Daily Emission)
Unmitigated Construction
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Year
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
lb/day
NBioCO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
lb/day
2017
5.2282
57.9870
40.2168
0.0595
6.6349
2.7961
9.4310
3.4387
2.5724
6.0111
0.0000
6,005.168 6,005.1682
2
1.7582
0.0000
6,042.091
3
2018
30.3099
25.5682
58.2224
0.1365
8.9421
1.5984
10.5405
2.3715
1.5481
3.9196
0.0000
11,186.97 11,186.972
21
1
0.8249
0.0000
11,204.29
43
2019
30.5291
30.8490
62.4214
0.1487
9.0539
1.7927
10.8466
2.4011
1.7162
4.1174
0.0000
12,063.62 12,063.623
30
0
1.1330
0.0000
12,087.41
62
2020
29.3912
21.4017
52.1699
0.1362
8.9421
1.2130
10.1552
2.3715
1.1742
3.5457
0.0000
10,520.19 10,520.199
91
1
0.7428
0.0000
10,535.79
83
Total
95.4584
135.8058
213.0305
0.4809
33.5730
7.4003
40.9732
10.5828
7.0110
17.5938
0.0000
39,775.96 39,775.962
24
4
4.4589
0.0000
39,869.60
01
Mitigated Construction
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Year
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBioCO2
Total CO2
lb/day
CH4
N2O
CO2e
lb/day
2017
0.7960
3.1081
33.6500
0.0595
2.7922
0.0936
2.8857
1.3954
0.0934
1.4887
0.0000
6,005.168 6,005.1682
2
1.7582
0.0000
6,042.091
3
2018
27.9635
5.1396
58.8682
0.1365
8.9421
0.1129
9.0550
2.3715
0.1077
2.4792
0.0000
11,186.97 11,186.972
21
1
0.8249
0.0000
11,204.29
43
2019
27.9112
5.4663
64.5189
0.1487
9.0539
0.1308
9.1847
2.4011
0.1257
2.5269
0.0000
12,063.62 12,063.623
30
0
1.1330
0.0000
12,087.41
62
2020
27.5837
4.5768
53.1157
0.1362
8.9421
0.1112
9.0533
2.3715
0.1063
2.4777
0.0000
10,520.19 10,520.199
91
1
0.7428
0.0000
10,535.79
83
Total
84.2544
18.2909
210.1528
0.4809
29.7303
0.4485
30.1787
8.5395
0.4330
8.9725
0.0000
39,775.96 39,775.962
24
4
4.4589
0.0000
39,869.60
00
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
CH4
N20
CO2e
11.74
86.53
1.35
0.00
11.45
93.94
26.35
19.31
93.82
49.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Percent
Reduction
Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2
0.00
0.00
0.00
3.0 Construction Detail
Construction Phase
Phase
Number
Phase Name
Phase Type
Start Date
End Date
Num Days Num Days
Week
1
Site Preparation
Site Preparation
8/8/2017
8/14/2017
5
5
2
Demolition
Demolition
8/15/2017
8/28/2017
5
10
3
Grading
Grading
8/29/2017
11/7/2017
5
51
4
Foundation
Paving
11/8/2017
1/16/2018
5
50
5
Building Construction
Building Construction
1/17/2018
5/29/2020
5
618
6
Architectural Coating
Architectural Coating
10/4/2018
4/7/2020
5
394
7
Paving
Paving
6/10/2019
7/8/2019
5
21
Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 0
Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 2.7
Acres of Paving: 0
Phase Description
Residential Indoor: 712,800; Residential Outdoor: 237,600; Non-Residential Indoor: 453,888; Non-Residential Outdoor: 155,000
OffRoad Equipment
Phase Name
Offroad Equipment Type
Amount
Usage Hours
Horse Power
Load Factor
Site Preparation
Rubber Tired Dozers
1
8.00
255
0.40
Site Preparation
Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes
1
8.00
97
0.37
Demolition
Concrete/Industrial Saws
1
8.00
81
0.73
Demolition
Excavators
0
8.00
162
0.38
Demolition
Rubber Tired Dozers
1
8.00
255
0.40
Demolition
Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes
3
8.00
97
0.37
Grading
Bore/Drill Rigs
1
8.00
205
0.50
Grading
Excavators
2
8.00
162
0.38
Grading
Graders
1
8.00
174
0.41
Grading
Rubber Tired Dozers
1
8.00
255
0.40
Grading
Scrapers
1
8.00
361
0.48
Grading
Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes
2
8.00
97
0.37
Foundation
Pavers
0
8.00
125
0.42
Foundation
Paving Equipment
0
8.00
130
0.36
Foundation
Pumps
4
8.00
84
0.74
Foundation
Rollers
0
8.00
80
0.38
Foundation
Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes
2
8.00
97
0.37
Building Construction
Cranes
0
8.00
226
0.29
Building Construction
Forklifts
3
8.00
89
0.20
Building Construction
Generator Sets
1
8.00
84
0.74
Building Construction
Pumps
2
8.00
84
0.74
Building Construction
Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes
1
8.00
97
0.37
Building Construction
Welders
0
8.00
46
0.45
Architectural Coating
Air Compressors
1
6.00
78
0.48
Paving
Pavers
1
8.00
125
0.42
Paving
Paving Equipment
1
8.00
130
0.36
Paving
Rollers
1
8.00
80
0.38
Worker Vehicle
Class
Vendor
Hauling
Vehicle Class Vehicle Class
Trips and VMT
Phase Name
Offroad Equipment
Count
Worker Trip
Number
Vendor Trip Hauling Trip
Number
Number
Worker Trip
Length
Vendor Trip
Length
Hauling Trip
Length
Site Preparation
2
10.00
0.00
0.00
14.70
6.90
20.00 LD_Mix
HDT_Mix
HHDT
Demolition
5
15.00
0.00
0.00
14.70
6.90
20.00 LD_Mix
HDT_Mix
HHDT
Grading
8
30.00
0.00
0.00
14.70
6.90
20.00 LD_Mix
HDT_Mix
HHDT
Foundation
6
25.00
0.00
0.00
14.70
6.90
20.00 LD_Mix
HDT_Mix
HHDT
Building Construction
7
700.00
0.00
0.00
14.70
6.90
20.00 LD_Mix
HDT_Mix
HHDT
Architectural Coating
1
100.00
0.00
0.00
14.70
6.90
20.00 LD_Mix
HDT_Mix
HHDT
Paving
3
10.00
0.00
0.00
14.70
6.90
20.00 LD_Mix
HDT_Mix
HHDT
3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction
Use Cleaner Engines for Construction Equipment
Use Soil Stabilizer
Water Exposed Area
Reduce Vehicle Speed on Unpaved Roads
Clean Paved Roads
3.2 Site Preparation - 2017
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Category
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
lb/day
Fugitive Dust
6.0221
Off-Road
1.5071
16.2365
12.3344
0.0120
Total
1.5071
16.2365
12.3344
0.0120
6.0221
Bio- CO2
NBioCO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
lb/day
0.0000
6.0221
0.8418
0.8418
0.8418
6.8639
3.3102
3.3102
0.0000
3.3102
0.0000
0.0000
0.7744
0.7744
1,228.273 1,228.2737
7
0.3763
1,236.176
8
0.7744
4.0847
1,228.273 1,228.2737
7
0.3763
1,236.176
8
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Category
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBioCO2
lb/day
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
lb/day
Hauling
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Vendor
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Worker
0.0382
0.0516
0.5392
1.3300e003
0.1118
9.0000e004
0.1127
0.0296
8.3000e004
0.0305
107.2846
107.2846
5.6300e003
107.4028
Total
0.0382
0.0516
0.5392
1.3300e003
0.1118
9.0000e004
0.1127
0.0296
8.3000e004
0.0305
107.2846
107.2846
5.6300e003
107.4028
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
NBioCO2
Total CO2
CH4
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
Category
Bio- CO2
lb/day
Fugitive Dust
2.3486
N2O
CO2e
lb/day
0.0000
2.3486
0.0195
0.0195
1.2910
0.0000
1.2910
0.0000
0.0195
0.0195
0.0000
1,228.273 1,228.2737
7
0.3763
1,236.176
8
1,228.273 1,228.2737
7
0.3763
1,236.176
8
Off-Road
0.1459
0.6323
6.2998
0.0120
Total
0.1459
0.6323
6.2998
0.0120
2.3486
0.0195
2.3681
1.2910
0.0195
1.3105
0.0000
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
0.0000
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
Category
NBioCO2
lb/day
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
lb/day
Hauling
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Vendor
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Worker
0.0382
0.0516
0.5392
1.3300e003
0.1118
9.0000e004
0.1127
0.0296
8.3000e004
0.0305
107.2846
107.2846
5.6300e003
107.4028
Total
0.0382
0.0516
0.5392
1.3300e003
0.1118
9.0000e004
0.1127
0.0296
8.3000e004
0.0305
107.2846
107.2846
5.6300e003
107.4028
3.3 Demolition - 2017
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Category
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBioCO2
lb/day
Fugitive Dust
1.5750
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
lb/day
0.0000
1.5750
1.6062
1.6062
0.2385
0.0000
0.2385
1.5022
1.5022
2,457.468 2,457.4682
2
0.6235
2,470.562
0
2,457.468 2,457.4682
2
0.6235
2,470.562
0
Off-Road
2.7216
26.5855
20.8712
0.0245
Total
2.7216
26.5855
20.8712
0.0245
1.5750
1.6062
3.1812
0.2385
1.5022
1.7407
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
0.0000
0.0000
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
Category
Bio- CO2
NBioCO2
lb/day
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
lb/day
Hauling
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Vendor
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Worker
0.0573
0.0775
0.8088
1.9900e003
0.1677
1.3500e003
0.1690
0.0445
1.2400e003
0.0457
160.9269
160.9269
8.4400e003
161.1042
Total
0.0573
0.0775
0.8088
1.9900e003
0.1677
1.3500e003
0.1690
0.0445
1.2400e003
0.0457
160.9269
160.9269
8.4400e003
161.1042
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
NBioCO2
Total CO2
CH4
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
Category
Bio- CO2
lb/day
Fugitive Dust
0.6142
Off-Road
0.2845
1.2326
14.8426
0.0245
Total
0.2845
1.2326
14.8426
0.0245
0.6142
N2O
CO2e
lb/day
0.0000
0.6142
0.0379
0.0379
0.0379
0.6522
0.0930
0.0930
0.0000
0.0930
0.0000
0.0000
0.0379
0.0379
0.0000
2,457.468 2,457.4682
2
0.6235
2,470.562
0
0.0379
0.1309
0.0000
2,457.468 2,457.4682
2
0.6235
2,470.562
0
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Category
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBioCO2
lb/day
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
lb/day
Hauling
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Vendor
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Worker
0.0573
0.0775
0.8088
1.9900e003
0.1677
1.3500e003
0.1690
0.0445
1.2400e003
0.0457
160.9269
160.9269
8.4400e003
161.1042
Total
0.0573
0.0775
0.8088
1.9900e003
0.1677
1.3500e003
0.1690
0.0445
1.2400e003
0.0457
160.9269
160.9269
8.4400e003
161.1042
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
NBioCO2
Total CO2
CH4
3.4 Grading - 2017
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
Category
Bio- CO2
lb/day
Fugitive Dust
6.2995
N2O
CO2e
lb/day
0.0000
6.2995
2.7934
2.7934
3.3498
0.0000
3.3498
2.5699
2.5699
5,683.314 5,683.3145
5
1.7414
5,719.883
0
5,683.314 5,683.3145
5
1.7414
5,719.883
0
Off-Road
5.1137
57.8321
38.5991
0.0556
Total
5.1137
57.8321
38.5991
0.0556
6.2995
2.7934
9.0929
3.3498
2.5699
5.9197
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
0.0000
0.0000
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
Category
Bio- CO2
NBioCO2
lb/day
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
lb/day
Hauling
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Vendor
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Worker
0.1145
0.1549
1.6177
3.9800e003
0.3353
2.7000e003
0.3380
0.0889
2.4900e003
0.0914
321.8538
321.8538
0.0169
322.2083
Total
0.1145
0.1549
1.6177
3.9800e003
0.3353
2.7000e003
0.3380
0.0889
2.4900e003
0.0914
321.8538
321.8538
0.0169
322.2083
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Category
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBioCO2
lb/day
Fugitive Dust
2.4568
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
lb/day
0.0000
2.4568
0.0909
0.0909
1.3064
0.0000
1.3064
0.0000
0.0909
0.0909
0.0000
5,683.314 5,683.3145
5
1.7414
5,719.883
0
5,683.314 5,683.3145
5
1.7414
5,719.883
0
Off-Road
0.6815
2.9532
32.0324
0.0556
Total
0.6815
2.9532
32.0324
0.0556
2.4568
0.0909
2.5477
1.3064
0.0909
1.3973
0.0000
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
0.0000
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
Category
NBioCO2
lb/day
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
lb/day
Hauling
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Vendor
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Worker
0.1145
0.1549
1.6177
3.9800e003
0.3353
2.7000e003
0.3380
0.0889
2.4900e003
0.0914
321.8538
321.8538
0.0169
322.2083
Total
0.1145
0.1549
1.6177
3.9800e003
0.3353
2.7000e003
0.3380
0.0889
2.4900e003
0.0914
321.8538
321.8538
0.0169
322.2083
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
NBioCO2
Total CO2
CH4
3.5 Foundation - 2017
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
Category
lb/day
Off-Road
3.0279
Paving
0.0000
Total
3.0279
24.2164
24.2164
20.1142
20.1142
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
0.0325
0.0325
Bio- CO2
N2O
CO2e
lb/day
1.7164
1.7164
1.6798
1.6798
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
1.7164
1.7164
1.6798
1.6798
3,128.668 3,128.6682
2
0.4099
0.0000
3,128.668 3,128.6682
2
3,137.276
3
0.0000
0.4099
3,137.276
3
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Category
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBioCO2
lb/day
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
lb/day
Hauling
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Vendor
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Worker
0.0954
0.1291
1.3481
3.3200e003
0.2794
2.2500e003
0.2817
0.0741
2.0700e003
0.0762
268.2115
268.2115
0.0141
268.5069
Total
0.0954
0.1291
1.3481
3.3200e003
0.2794
2.2500e003
0.2817
0.0741
2.0700e003
0.0762
268.2115
268.2115
0.0141
268.5069
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
NBioCO2
Total CO2
CH4
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
Category
Bio- CO2
lb/day
Off-Road
0.3391
Paving
0.0000
Total
0.3391
1.4693
1.4693
20.9096
20.9096
0.0325
0.0325
N2O
CO2e
lb/day
0.0452
0.0452
0.0452
0.0452
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0452
0.0452
0.0452
0.0452
0.0000
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
3,128.668 3,128.6682
2
0.4099
3,137.276
3
0.0000
3,128.668 3,128.6682
2
0.0000
0.4099
3,137.276
3
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Category
Fugitive
PM10
Fugitive
PM2.5
NBioCO2
lb/day
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
lb/day
Hauling
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Vendor
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Worker
0.0954
0.1291
1.3481
3.3200e003
0.2794
2.2500e003
0.2817
0.0741
2.0700e003
0.0762
268.2115
268.2115
0.0141
268.5069
Total
0.0954
0.1291
1.3481
3.3200e003
0.2794
2.2500e003
0.2817
0.0741
2.0700e003
0.0762
268.2115
268.2115
0.0141
268.5069
3.5 Foundation - 2018
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Category
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBioCO2
lb/day
Off-Road
2.6591
Paving
0.0000
Total
2.6591
21.9585
21.9585
19.8947
19.8947
0.0325
0.0325
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
lb/day
1.4777
1.4777
1.4479
1.4479
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
1.4777
1.4777
1.4479
1.4479
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
3,117.690 3,117.6902
2
0.3833
3,125.739
7
0.0000
3,117.690 3,117.6902
2
0.0000
0.3833
3,125.739
7
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Category
Fugitive
PM10
Fugitive
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBioCO2
lb/day
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
lb/day
Hauling
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Vendor
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Worker
0.0858
0.1171
1.2200
3.3100e003
0.2794
2.1900e003
0.2816
0.0741
2.0200e003
0.0761
258.1963
258.1963
0.0131
258.4705
Total
0.0858
0.1171
1.2200
3.3100e003
0.2794
2.1900e003
0.2816
0.0741
2.0200e003
0.0761
258.1963
258.1963
0.0131
258.4705
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
NBioCO2
Total CO2
CH4
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
Category
Bio- CO2
lb/day
Off-Road
0.3391
Paving
0.0000
Total
0.3391
1.4693
1.4693
20.9096
20.9096
0.0325
0.0325
N2O
CO2e
lb/day
0.0452
0.0452
0.0452
0.0452
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0452
0.0452
0.0452
0.0452
0.0000
3,117.690 3,117.6902
2
0.3833
0.0000
0.0000
3,117.690 3,117.6902
2
3,125.739
7
0.0000
0.3833
3,125.739
7
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Category
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBioCO2
lb/day
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
lb/day
Hauling
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Vendor
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Worker
0.0858
0.1171
1.2200
3.3100e003
0.2794
2.1900e003
0.2816
0.0741
2.0200e003
0.0761
258.1963
258.1963
0.0131
258.4705
Total
0.0858
0.1171
1.2200
3.3100e003
0.2794
2.1900e003
0.2816
0.0741
2.0200e003
0.0761
258.1963
258.1963
0.0131
258.4705
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
NBioCO2
Total CO2
CH4
3.6 Building Construction - 2018
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
Category
Bio- CO2
lb/day
N2O
CO2e
lb/day
Off-Road
2.3694
19.8161
17.3282
0.0274
1.3778
1.3778
1.3328
1.3328
2,643.242 2,643.2424
4
0.3802
2,651.227
3
Total
2.3694
19.8161
17.3282
0.0274
1.3778
1.3778
1.3328
1.3328
2,643.242 2,643.2424
4
0.3802
2,651.227
3
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Category
Fugitive
PM10
Fugitive
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBioCO2
lb/day
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
lb/day
Hauling
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Vendor
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Worker
2.4035
3.2780
34.1600
0.0928
7.8244
0.0613
7.8856
2.0751
0.0567
2.1317
7,229.496 7,229.4960
0
0.3657
7,237.174
8
Total
2.4035
3.2780
34.1600
0.0928
7.8244
0.0613
7.8856
2.0751
0.0567
2.1317
7,229.496 7,229.4960
0
0.3657
7,237.174
8
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Category
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBioCO2
lb/day
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
lb/day
Off-Road
0.2918
1.2646
17.9959
0.0274
0.0389
0.0389
0.0389
0.0389
0.0000
2,643.242 2,643.2424
4
0.3802
2,651.227
3
Total
0.2918
1.2646
17.9959
0.0274
0.0389
0.0389
0.0389
0.0389
0.0000
2,643.242 2,643.2424
4
0.3802
2,651.227
3
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Category
Fugitive
PM10
Fugitive
PM2.5
NBioCO2
lb/day
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
lb/day
Hauling
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Vendor
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Worker
2.4035
3.2780
34.1600
0.0928
7.8244
0.0613
7.8856
2.0751
0.0567
2.1317
7,229.496 7,229.4960
0
0.3657
7,237.174
8
Total
2.4035
3.2780
34.1600
0.0928
7.8244
0.0613
7.8856
2.0751
0.0567
2.1317
7,229.496 7,229.4960
0
0.3657
7,237.174
8
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
3.6 Building Construction - 2019
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
Category
lb/day
Bio- CO2
NBioCO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
lb/day
Off-Road
2.0973
18.0678
17.1707
0.0274
1.1896
1.1896
1.1506
1.1506
2,630.606 2,630.6068
8
0.3637
2,638.244
9
Total
2.0973
18.0678
17.1707
0.0274
1.1896
1.1896
1.1506
1.1506
2,630.606 2,630.6068
8
0.3637
2,638.244
9
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Category
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBioCO2
lb/day
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
lb/day
Hauling
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Vendor
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Worker
2.2100
3.0058
31.3071
0.0926
7.8244
0.0602
7.8845
2.0751
0.0558
2.1308
6,954.268 6,954.2681
1
0.3423
6,961.456
0
Total
2.2100
3.0058
31.3071
0.0926
7.8244
0.0602
7.8845
2.0751
0.0558
2.1308
6,954.268 6,954.2681
1
0.3423
6,961.456
0
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
Category
Bio- CO2
NBioCO2
lb/day
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
lb/day
Off-Road
0.2918
1.2646
17.9959
0.0274
0.0389
0.0389
0.0389
0.0389
0.0000
2,630.606 2,630.6068
8
0.3637
2,638.244
9
Total
0.2918
1.2646
17.9959
0.0274
0.0389
0.0389
0.0389
0.0389
0.0000
2,630.606 2,630.6068
8
0.3637
2,638.244
9
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Category
Fugitive
PM10
Fugitive
PM2.5
NBioCO2
lb/day
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
lb/day
Hauling
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Vendor
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Worker
2.2100
3.0058
31.3071
0.0926
7.8244
0.0602
7.8845
2.0751
0.0558
2.1308
6,954.268 6,954.2681
1
0.3423
6,961.456
0
Total
2.2100
3.0058
31.3071
0.0926
7.8244
0.0602
7.8845
2.0751
0.0558
2.1308
6,954.268 6,954.2681
1
0.3423
6,961.456
0
3.6 Building Construction - 2020
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Category
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBioCO2
lb/day
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
lb/day
Off-Road
1.8870
16.5343
17.0511
0.0274
1.0338
1.0338
0.9999
0.9999
2,613.964 2,613.9647
7
0.3505
2,621.325
9
Total
1.8870
16.5343
17.0511
0.0274
1.0338
1.0338
0.9999
0.9999
2,613.964 2,613.9647
7
0.3505
2,621.325
9
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Category
Fugitive
PM10
Fugitive
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBioCO2
lb/day
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
lb/day
Hauling
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Vendor
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Worker
2.0711
2.7856
29.1264
0.0926
7.8244
0.0598
7.8842
2.0751
0.0555
2.1305
6,671.688 6,671.6880
0
0.3242
6,678.495
8
Total
2.0711
2.7856
29.1264
0.0926
7.8244
0.0598
7.8842
2.0751
0.0555
2.1305
6,671.688 6,671.6880
0
0.3242
6,678.495
8
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
Category
Bio- CO2
lb/day
NBioCO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
lb/day
Off-Road
0.2918
1.2646
17.9959
0.0274
0.0389
0.0389
0.0389
0.0389
0.0000
2,613.964 2,613.9647
7
0.3505
2,621.325
9
Total
0.2918
1.2646
17.9959
0.0274
0.0389
0.0389
0.0389
0.0389
0.0000
2,613.964 2,613.9647
7
0.3505
2,621.325
9
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Category
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBioCO2
lb/day
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
lb/day
Hauling
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Vendor
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Worker
2.0711
2.7856
29.1264
0.0926
7.8244
0.0598
7.8842
2.0751
0.0555
2.1305
6,671.688 6,671.6880
0
0.3242
6,678.495
8
Total
2.0711
2.7856
29.1264
0.0926
7.8244
0.0598
7.8842
2.0751
0.0555
2.1305
6,671.688 6,671.6880
0
0.3242
6,678.495
8
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
3.7 Architectural Coating - 2018
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
Category
Bio- CO2
NBioCO2
lb/day
Archit. Coating
24.8951
Off-Road
0.2986
2.0058
1.8542
Total
25.1938
2.0058
1.8542
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
lb/day
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
2.9700e003
0.1506
0.1506
0.1506
0.1506
281.4485
281.4485
0.0267
282.0102
2.9700e003
0.1506
0.1506
0.1506
0.1506
281.4485
281.4485
0.0267
282.0102
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Category
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBioCO2
lb/day
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
lb/day
Hauling
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Vendor
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Worker
0.3434
0.4683
4.8800
0.0133
1.1178
8.7500e003
1.1265
0.2964
8.1000e003
0.3045
1,032.785 1,032.7851
1
0.0522
1,033.882
1
Total
0.3434
0.4683
4.8800
0.0133
1.1178
8.7500e003
1.1265
0.2964
8.1000e003
0.3045
1,032.785 1,032.7851
1
0.0522
1,033.882
1
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
Category
Bio- CO2
NBioCO2
lb/day
Archit. Coating
24.8951
Off-Road
0.0297
0.1288
1.8324
Total
24.9248
0.1288
1.8324
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
lb/day
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
2.9700e003
3.9600e003
3.9600e003
3.9600e003
3.9600e003
0.0000
281.4485
281.4485
0.0267
282.0102
2.9700e003
3.9600e003
3.9600e003
3.9600e003
3.9600e003
0.0000
281.4485
281.4485
0.0267
282.0102
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBioCO2
Total CO2
CH4
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Category
Fugitive
PM10
Fugitive
PM2.5
lb/day
N2O
CO2e
lb/day
Hauling
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Vendor
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Worker
0.3434
0.4683
4.8800
0.0133
1.1178
8.7500e003
1.1265
0.2964
8.1000e003
0.3045
1,032.785 1,032.7851
1
0.0522
1,033.882
1
Total
0.3434
0.4683
4.8800
0.0133
1.1178
8.7500e003
1.1265
0.2964
8.1000e003
0.3045
1,032.785 1,032.7851
1
0.0522
1,033.882
1
3.7 Architectural Coating - 2019
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Category
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBioCO2
lb/day
Archit. Coating
24.8951
Off-Road
0.2664
1.8354
1.8413
Total
25.1616
1.8354
1.8413
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
lb/day
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
2.9700e003
0.1288
0.1288
0.1288
0.1288
281.4481
281.4481
0.0238
281.9473
2.9700e003
0.1288
0.1288
0.1288
0.1288
281.4481
281.4481
0.0238
281.9473
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
NBioCO2
Total CO2
CH4
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Category
Fugitive
PM10
Fugitive
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
lb/day
N2O
CO2e
lb/day
Hauling
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Vendor
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Worker
0.3157
0.4294
4.4724
0.0132
1.1178
8.6000e003
1.1264
0.2964
7.9700e003
0.3044
993.4669
993.4669
0.0489
994.4937
Total
0.3157
0.4294
4.4724
0.0132
1.1178
8.6000e003
1.1264
0.2964
7.9700e003
0.3044
993.4669
993.4669
0.0489
994.4937
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
NBioCO2
Total CO2
CH4
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
Category
Bio- CO2
lb/day
Archit. Coating
24.8951
Off-Road
0.0297
0.1288
1.8324
Total
24.9248
0.1288
1.8324
N2O
CO2e
lb/day
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
2.9700e003
3.9600e003
3.9600e003
3.9600e003
3.9600e003
0.0000
281.4481
281.4481
0.0238
281.9473
2.9700e003
3.9600e003
3.9600e003
3.9600e003
3.9600e003
0.0000
281.4481
281.4481
0.0238
281.9473
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Category
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBioCO2
lb/day
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
lb/day
Hauling
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Vendor
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Worker
0.3157
0.4294
4.4724
0.0132
1.1178
8.6000e003
1.1264
0.2964
7.9700e003
0.3044
993.4669
993.4669
0.0489
994.4937
Total
0.3157
0.4294
4.4724
0.0132
1.1178
8.6000e003
1.1264
0.2964
7.9700e003
0.3044
993.4669
993.4669
0.0489
994.4937
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
NBioCO2
Total CO2
CH4
3.7 Architectural Coating - 2020
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
Category
Bio- CO2
lb/day
Archit. Coating
24.8951
Off-Road
0.2422
1.6838
1.8314
Total
25.1373
1.6838
1.8314
N2O
CO2e
lb/day
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
2.9700e003
0.1109
0.1109
0.1109
0.1109
281.4481
281.4481
0.0218
281.9057
2.9700e003
0.1109
0.1109
0.1109
0.1109
281.4481
281.4481
0.0218
281.9057
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Category
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBioCO2
lb/day
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
lb/day
Hauling
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Vendor
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Worker
0.2959
0.3979
4.1609
0.0132
1.1178
8.5400e003
1.1263
0.2964
7.9200e003
0.3044
953.0983
953.0983
0.0463
954.0708
Total
0.2959
0.3979
4.1609
0.0132
1.1178
8.5400e003
1.1263
0.2964
7.9200e003
0.3044
953.0983
953.0983
0.0463
954.0708
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
NBioCO2
Total CO2
CH4
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
Category
Bio- CO2
lb/day
Archit. Coating
24.8951
Off-Road
0.0297
0.1288
1.8324
Total
24.9248
0.1288
1.8324
N2O
CO2e
lb/day
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
2.9700e003
3.9600e003
3.9600e003
3.9600e003
3.9600e003
0.0000
281.4481
281.4481
0.0218
281.9057
2.9700e003
3.9600e003
3.9600e003
3.9600e003
3.9600e003
0.0000
281.4481
281.4481
0.0218
281.9057
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBioCO2
Total CO2
CH4
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Category
Fugitive
PM10
Fugitive
PM2.5
lb/day
N2O
CO2e
lb/day
Hauling
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Vendor
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Worker
0.2959
0.3979
4.1609
0.0132
1.1178
8.5400e003
1.1263
0.2964
7.9200e003
0.3044
953.0983
953.0983
0.0463
954.0708
Total
0.2959
0.3979
4.1609
0.0132
1.1178
8.5400e003
1.1263
0.2964
7.9200e003
0.3044
953.0983
953.0983
0.0463
954.0708
3.8 Paving - 2019
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Category
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBioCO2
lb/day
Off-Road
0.7129
Paving
0.0000
Total
0.7129
7.4677
7.4677
7.1826
7.1826
0.0112
0.0112
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
lb/day
0.4047
0.4047
0.3723
0.3723
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.4047
0.4047
0.3723
0.3723
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
1,104.486 1,104.4866
6
0.3495
1,111.825
0
0.0000
1,104.486 1,104.4866
6
0.0000
0.3495
1,111.825
0
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Category
Fugitive
PM10
Fugitive
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBioCO2
lb/day
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
lb/day
Hauling
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Vendor
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Worker
0.0316
0.0429
0.4472
1.3200e003
0.1118
8.6000e004
0.1126
0.0296
8.0000e004
0.0304
99.3467
99.3467
4.8900e003
99.4494
Total
0.0316
0.0429
0.4472
1.3200e003
0.1118
8.6000e004
0.1126
0.0296
8.0000e004
0.0304
99.3467
99.3467
4.8900e003
99.4494
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
NBioCO2
Total CO2
CH4
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
Category
Bio- CO2
lb/day
Off-Road
0.1373
Paving
0.0000
Total
0.1373
0.5948
0.5948
8.4638
8.4638
0.0112
0.0112
N2O
CO2e
lb/day
0.0183
0.0183
0.0183
0.0183
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0183
0.0183
0.0183
0.0183
0.0000
1,104.486 1,104.4866
6
0.3495
0.0000
0.0000
1,104.486 1,104.4866
6
1,111.825
0
0.0000
0.3495
1,111.825
0
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Category
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBioCO2
lb/day
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
lb/day
Hauling
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Vendor
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Worker
0.0316
0.0429
0.4472
1.3200e003
0.1118
8.6000e004
0.1126
0.0296
8.0000e004
0.0304
99.3467
99.3467
4.8900e003
99.4494
Total
0.0316
0.0429
0.4472
1.3200e003
0.1118
8.6000e004
0.1126
0.0296
8.0000e004
0.0304
99.3467
99.3467
4.8900e003
99.4494
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2
Page 1 of 1
Date: 4/19/2016 11:56 AM
LUXE Hotel - Phase 2 Construction
South Coast Air Basin, Summer
1.0 Project Characteristics
1.1 Land Usage
Land Uses
Size
Metric
Lot Acreage
Floor Surface Area
Population
Enclosed Parking with Elevator
362.00
Space
3.26
144,800.00
0
Parking Lot
5.00
1000sqft
0.11
5,000.00
0
City Park
0.47
Acre
0.47
20,500.00
0
Quality Restaurant
25.00
1000sqft
0.57
25,000.00
0
Apartments High Rise
360.00
Dwelling Unit
5.81
418,000.00
587
Strip Mall
25.00
1000sqft
0.57
25,000.00
0
1.2 Other Project Characteristics
Urbanization
Urban
Climate Zone
11
Utility Company
Los Angeles Department of Water & Power
CO2 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
1227.89
Wind Speed (m/s)
CH4 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
2.2
0.029
1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data
Project Characteristics Land Use - See "Hazen AQ Construction Model Inputs"
Construction Phase - See "Hazen AQ Construction Model Inputs"
Off-road Equipment Off-road Equipment - See "Hazen AQ Construction Model Inputs"
Off-road Equipment - See "Hazen AQ Construction Model Inputs"
Precipitation Freq (Days)
31
Operational Year
2023
N2O Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
0.006
Off-road Equipment - See "Hazen AQ Construction Model Inputs"
Off-road Equipment - See "Hazen AQ Construction Model Inputs"
Off-road Equipment - See "Hazen AQ Construction Model Inputs"
Off-road Equipment - See "Hazen AQ Construction Model Inputs"
Trips and VMT - See "Hazen AQ Construction Model Inputs"
Demolition - See "Hazen AQ Construction Model Inputs"
Grading - See "Hazen AQ Construction Model Inputs"
Architectural Coating - See "Hazen AQ Construction Model Inputs"
Vehicle Trips Water And Wastewater Solid Waste Construction Off-road Equipment Mitigation - See "Hazen AQ Construction Model Inputs"
Table Name
Column Name
Default Value
New Value
tblArchitecturalCoating
ConstArea_Nonresidential_Exterior
107,725.00
25,100.00
tblArchitecturalCoating
ConstArea_Nonresidential_Interior
323,175.00
83,988.00
tblAreaCoating
Area_Nonresidential_Interior
323175
60000
tblAreaCoating
Area_Residential_Exterior
282150
236513
tblAreaCoating
Area_Residential_Interior
846450
709540
tblConstEquipMitigation
NumberOfEquipmentMitigated
0.00
1.00
tblConstEquipMitigation
NumberOfEquipmentMitigated
0.00
1.00
tblConstEquipMitigation
NumberOfEquipmentMitigated
0.00
1.00
tblConstEquipMitigation
NumberOfEquipmentMitigated
0.00
3.00
tblConstEquipMitigation
NumberOfEquipmentMitigated
0.00
3.00
tblConstEquipMitigation
NumberOfEquipmentMitigated
0.00
1.00
tblConstEquipMitigation
NumberOfEquipmentMitigated
0.00
1.00
tblConstEquipMitigation
NumberOfEquipmentMitigated
0.00
1.00
tblConstEquipMitigation
NumberOfEquipmentMitigated
0.00
1.00
tblConstEquipMitigation
NumberOfEquipmentMitigated
0.00
4.00
tblConstEquipMitigation
NumberOfEquipmentMitigated
0.00
1.00
tblConstEquipMitigation
NumberOfEquipmentMitigated
0.00
3.00
tblConstEquipMitigation
NumberOfEquipmentMitigated
0.00
1.00
tblConstEquipMitigation
NumberOfEquipmentMitigated
0.00
8.00
tblConstEquipMitigation
Tier
No Change
Tier 4 Final
tblConstEquipMitigation
Tier
No Change
Tier 4 Final
tblConstEquipMitigation
Tier
No Change
Tier 4 Final
tblConstEquipMitigation
Tier
No Change
Tier 4 Final
tblConstEquipMitigation
Tier
No Change
Tier 4 Final
tblConstEquipMitigation
Tier
No Change
Tier 4 Final
tblConstEquipMitigation
Tier
No Change
Tier 4 Final
tblConstEquipMitigation
Tier
No Change
Tier 4 Final
tblConstEquipMitigation
Tier
No Change
Tier 4 Final
tblConstEquipMitigation
Tier
No Change
Tier 4 Final
tblConstEquipMitigation
Tier
No Change
Tier 4 Final
tblConstEquipMitigation
Tier
No Change
Tier 4 Final
tblConstEquipMitigation
Tier
No Change
Tier 4 Final
tblConstEquipMitigation
Tier
No Change
Tier 4 Final
tblConstEquipMitigation
Tier
No Change
Tier 4 Final
tblConstEquipMitigation
Tier
No Change
Tier 4 Final
tblConstructionPhase
NumDays
20.00
375.00
tblConstructionPhase
NumDays
300.00
558.00
tblConstructionPhase
NumDays
20.00
72.00
tblConstructionPhase
NumDays
30.00
35.00
tblConstructionPhase
NumDays
20.00
43.00
tblConstructionPhase
PhaseEndDate
8/21/2024
1/13/2023
tblConstructionPhase
PhaseEndDate
2/10/2023
12/6/2021
tblConstructionPhase
PhaseStartDate
3/16/2023
8/9/2021
tblConstructionPhase
PhaseStartDate
1/23/2021
1/25/2021
tblConstructionPhase
PhaseStartDate
1/14/2023
11/9/2021
tblFireplaces
NumberGas
306.00
246.50
tblFireplaces
NumberNoFireplace
36.00
29.00
tblFireplaces
NumberWood
18.00
14.50
tblGrading
AcresOfGrading
52.50
2.70
tblGrading
MaterialExported
0.00
102,300.00
tblLandUse
LandUseSquareFeet
20,473.20
20,500.00
tblLandUse
LandUseSquareFeet
360,000.00
418,000.00
tblLandUse
Population
1,030.00
587.00
tblOffRoadEquipment
OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount
1.00
0.00
tblOffRoadEquipment
OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount
3.00
1.00
tblOffRoadEquipment
OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount
2.00
0.00
tblOffRoadEquipment
OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount
2.00
1.00
tblOffRoadEquipment
OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount
2.00
0.00
tblOffRoadEquipment
OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount
2.00
1.00
tblOffRoadEquipment
OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount
2.00
0.00
tblOffRoadEquipment
OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount
2.00
1.00
tblOffRoadEquipment
OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount
2.00
1.00
tblOffRoadEquipment
OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount
3.00
1.00
tblOffRoadEquipment
OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount
1.00
0.00
tblOffRoadEquipment
OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount
0.00
1.00
tblOffRoadEquipment
OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount
0.00
4.00
tblOffRoadEquipment
OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount
0.00
3.00
tblOffRoadEquipment
OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount
0.00
2.00
tblOffRoadEquipment
PhaseName
Grading
tblOffRoadEquipment
PhaseName
Foundation
tblOffRoadEquipment
PhaseName
Building Construction
tblOffRoadEquipment
PhaseName
Demolition
tblOffRoadEquipment
PhaseName
Foundation
tblOffRoadEquipment
UsageHours
7.00
8.00
tblOffRoadEquipment
UsageHours
7.00
8.00
tblProjectCharacteristics
OperationalYear
2014
2023
tblSolidWaste
SolidWasteGenerationRate
165.60
133.40
tblSolidWaste
SolidWasteGenerationRate
22.81
13.69
tblSolidWaste
SolidWasteGenerationRate
26.25
15.75
tblTripsAndVMT
HaulingTripNumber
1,606.00
0.00
tblTripsAndVMT
HaulingTripNumber
12,788.00
0.00
tblTripsAndVMT
VendorTripNumber
75.00
0.00
tblTripsAndVMT
WorkerTripNumber
18.00
20.00
tblTripsAndVMT
WorkerTripNumber
20.00
15.00
tblTripsAndVMT
WorkerTripNumber
15.00
20.00
tblTripsAndVMT
WorkerTripNumber
349.00
500.00
tblTripsAndVMT
WorkerTripNumber
8.00
10.00
tblWater
IndoorWaterUseRate
23,455,449.22
18,894,667.43
tblWater
IndoorWaterUseRate
7,588,342.81
4,553,005.69
tblWater
IndoorWaterUseRate
1,851,813.04
1,111,087.82
tblWater
OutdoorWaterUseRate
14,787,131.03
11,911,855.55
tblWater
OutdoorWaterUseRate
484,362.31
290,617.38
tblWater
OutdoorWaterUseRate
1,134,982.18
680,989.31
tblWoodstoves
NumberCatalytic
18.00
14.50
tblWoodstoves
NumberNoncatalytic
18.00
14.50
2.0 Emissions Summary
2.1 Overall Construction (Maximum Daily Emission)
Unmitigated Construction
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Year
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBioCO2
Total CO2
lb/day
CH4
N2O
CO2e
lb/day
2020
3.8745
41.1457
33.7046
0.0577
6.6021
1.9065
8.5086
3.4136
1.7540
5.1676
0.0000
5,531.141 5,531.1418
8
1.7465
0.0000
5,567.818
3
2021
15.4688
18.4245
43.3764
0.1105
6.4830
1.0069
7.4899
1.7193
0.9477
2.6670
0.0000
8,536.737 8,536.7378
8
0.8985
0.0000
8,555.606
9
2022
14.6168
10.9917
34.2645
0.0979
6.3713
0.5771
6.9484
1.6897
0.5496
2.2393
0.0000
7,262.741 7,262.7412
2
0.5310
0.0000
7,273.891
4
2023
14.4549
10.1419
32.9183
0.0979
6.3713
0.5015
6.8728
1.6897
0.4777
2.1674
0.0000
7,177.320 7,177.3208
8
0.5179
0.0000
7,188.196
8
Total
48.4149
80.7038
144.2637
0.3639
25.8277
3.9920
29.8197
8.5123
3.7289
12.2412
0.0000
28,507.94 28,507.941
16
6
3.6939
0.0000
28,585.51
34
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Mitigated Construction
ROG
NOx
Year
NBioCO2
Total CO2
lb/day
lb/day
2020
0.7252
3.0076
32.7178
0.0577
2.6771
0.0922
2.7693
1.3584
0.0921
1.4505
0.0000
5,531.141 5,531.1418
8
1.7465
0.0000
5,567.818
3
2021
14.0291
3.3860
45.1133
0.1105
6.4830
0.0933
6.5763
1.7193
0.0897
1.8090
0.0000
8,536.737 8,536.7378
8
0.8985
0.0000
8,555.606
9
2022
13.7667
2.6379
34.7913
0.0979
6.3713
0.0741
6.4453
1.6897
0.0705
1.7602
0.0000
7,262.741 7,262.7412
2
0.5310
0.0000
7,273.891
4
2023
13.6883
2.5319
33.4877
0.0979
6.3713
0.0740
6.4453
1.6897
0.0705
1.7602
0.0000
7,177.320 7,177.3208
8
0.5179
0.0000
7,188.196
8
Total
42.2093
11.5634
146.1101
0.3639
21.9027
0.3335
22.2361
6.4571
0.3227
6.7799
0.0000
28,507.94 28,507.941
15
5
3.6939
0.0000
28,585.51
34
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
CH4
N20
CO2e
12.82
85.67
-1.28
0.00
15.20
91.65
25.43
24.14
91.35
44.61
0.00
0.00
0.00
Percent
Reduction
Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2
0.00
0.00
0.00
3.0 Construction Detail
Construction Phase
Phase
Number
Phase Name
Phase Type
Start Date
End Date
Num Days Num Days
Week
1
Demolition
Demolition
6/29/2020
10/6/2020
5
72
2
Grading
Grading
10/7/2020
11/24/2020
5
35
3
Foundation
Paving
11/25/2020
1/22/2021
5
43
4
Building Construction
Building Construction
1/25/2021
3/15/2023
5
558
5
Architectural Coating
Architectural Coating
8/9/2021
1/13/2023
5
375
6
Paving
Paving
11/9/2021
12/6/2021
5
20
Phase Description
Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 0
Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 2.7
Acres of Paving: 0
Residential Indoor: 846,450; Residential Outdoor: 282,150; Non-Residential Indoor: 83,988; Non-Residential Outdoor: 25,100
OffRoad Equipment
Phase Name
Offroad Equipment Type
Amount
Usage Hours
Horse Power
Load Factor
Demolition
Concrete/Industrial Saws
1
8.00
81
0.73
Demolition
Excavators
1
8.00
162
0.38
Demolition
Rubber Tired Dozers
2
8.00
255
0.40
Demolition
Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes
3
8.00
97
0.37
Grading
Bore/Drill Rigs
1
8.00
205
0.50
Grading
Excavators
2
8.00
162
0.38
Grading
Graders
1
8.00
174
0.41
Grading
Rubber Tired Dozers
1
8.00
255
0.40
Grading
Scrapers
1
8.00
361
0.48
Grading
Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes
2
8.00
97
0.37
Foundation
Pavers
0
8.00
125
0.42
Foundation
Paving Equipment
0
8.00
130
0.36
Foundation
Pumps
4
8.00
84
0.74
Foundation
Rollers
0
8.00
80
0.38
Foundation
Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes
2
8.00
97
0.37
Building Construction
Cranes
0
8.00
226
0.29
Building Construction
Forklifts
3
8.00
89
0.20
Building Construction
Generator Sets
1
8.00
84
0.74
Building Construction
Pumps
0
8.00
84
0.74
Building Construction
Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes
1
8.00
97
0.37
Building Construction
Welders
0
8.00
46
0.45
Architectural Coating
Air Compressors
1
6.00
78
0.48
Paving
Pavers
1
8.00
125
0.42
Paving
Paving Equipment
1
8.00
130
0.36
Paving
Rollers
1
8.00
80
0.38
Worker Vehicle
Class
Vendor
Hauling
Vehicle Class Vehicle Class
Trips and VMT
Phase Name
Offroad Equipment
Count
Worker Trip
Number
Vendor Trip Hauling Trip
Number
Number
Worker Trip
Length
Vendor Trip
Length
Hauling Trip
Length
Demolition
7
20.00
0.00
0.00
14.70
6.90
20.00 LD_Mix
HDT_Mix
HHDT
Grading
8
15.00
0.00
0.00
14.70
6.90
20.00 LD_Mix
HDT_Mix
HHDT
Foundation
6
20.00
0.00
0.00
14.70
6.90
20.00 LD_Mix
HDT_Mix
HHDT
Building Construction
5
500.00
0.00
0.00
14.70
6.90
20.00 LD_Mix
HDT_Mix
HHDT
Architectural Coating
1
70.00
0.00
0.00
14.70
6.90
20.00 LD_Mix
HDT_Mix
HHDT
Paving
3
10.00
0.00
0.00
14.70
6.90
20.00 LD_Mix
HDT_Mix
HHDT
3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction
Use Cleaner Engines for Construction Equipment
Use Soil Stabilizer
Water Exposed Area
Reduce Vehicle Speed on Unpaved Roads
Clean Paved Roads
3.2 Demolition - 2020
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Category
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBioCO2
lb/day
Fugitive Dust
4.8261
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
lb/day
0.0000
4.8261
1.6496
1.6496
0.7307
0.0000
0.7307
1.5335
1.5335
3,733.888 3,733.8882
2
1.0535
3,756.011
3
3,733.888 3,733.8882
2
1.0535
3,756.011
3
Off-Road
3.2226
32.3834
29.7480
0.0387
Total
3.2226
32.3834
29.7480
0.0387
4.8261
1.6496
6.4757
0.7307
1.5335
2.2642
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
0.0000
0.0000
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
Category
Bio- CO2
NBioCO2
lb/day
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
lb/day
Hauling
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Vendor
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Worker
0.0582
0.0726
0.9139
2.8200e003
0.2236
1.7100e003
0.2253
0.0593
1.5800e003
0.0609
203.3675
203.3675
9.2600e003
203.5620
Total
0.0582
0.0726
0.9139
2.8200e003
0.2236
1.7100e003
0.2253
0.0593
1.5800e003
0.0609
203.3675
203.3675
9.2600e003
203.5620
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
NBioCO2
Total CO2
CH4
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
Category
Bio- CO2
lb/day
Fugitive Dust
1.8822
Off-Road
0.4575
1.9826
22.8175
0.0387
Total
0.4575
1.9826
22.8175
0.0387
1.8822
N2O
CO2e
lb/day
0.0000
1.8822
0.0610
0.0610
0.0610
1.9432
0.2850
0.2850
0.0000
0.2850
0.0000
0.0000
0.0610
0.0610
0.0000
3,733.888 3,733.8882
2
1.0535
3,756.011
3
0.0610
0.3460
0.0000
3,733.888 3,733.8882
2
1.0535
3,756.011
3
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Category
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBioCO2
lb/day
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
lb/day
Hauling
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Vendor
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Worker
0.0582
0.0726
0.9139
2.8200e003
0.2236
1.7100e003
0.2253
0.0593
1.5800e003
0.0609
203.3675
203.3675
9.2600e003
203.5620
Total
0.0582
0.0726
0.9139
2.8200e003
0.2236
1.7100e003
0.2253
0.0593
1.5800e003
0.0609
203.3675
203.3675
9.2600e003
203.5620
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
NBioCO2
Total CO2
CH4
3.3 Grading - 2020
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
Category
Bio- CO2
lb/day
Fugitive Dust
6.4344
N2O
CO2e
lb/day
0.0000
6.4344
1.9052
1.9052
3.3691
0.0000
3.3691
1.7528
1.7528
5,378.616 5,378.6161
1
1.7396
5,415.146
7
5,378.616 5,378.6161
1
1.7396
5,415.146
7
Off-Road
3.8309
41.0913
33.0192
0.0555
Total
3.8309
41.0913
33.0192
0.0555
6.4344
1.9052
8.3397
3.3691
1.7528
5.1219
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
0.0000
0.0000
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
Category
Bio- CO2
NBioCO2
lb/day
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
lb/day
Hauling
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Vendor
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Worker
0.0437
0.0544
0.6854
2.1200e003
0.1677
1.2800e003
0.1690
0.0445
1.1900e003
0.0457
152.5257
152.5257
6.9500e003
152.6715
Total
0.0437
0.0544
0.6854
2.1200e003
0.1677
1.2800e003
0.1690
0.0445
1.1900e003
0.0457
152.5257
152.5257
6.9500e003
152.6715
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Category
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBioCO2
lb/day
Fugitive Dust
2.5094
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
lb/day
0.0000
2.5094
0.0909
0.0909
1.3140
0.0000
1.3140
0.0000
0.0909
0.0909
0.0000
5,378.616 5,378.6161
1
1.7396
5,415.146
7
5,378.616 5,378.6161
1
1.7396
5,415.146
7
Off-Road
0.6815
2.9532
32.0324
0.0555
Total
0.6815
2.9532
32.0324
0.0555
2.5094
0.0909
2.6003
1.3140
0.0909
1.4048
0.0000
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
0.0000
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
Category
NBioCO2
lb/day
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
lb/day
Hauling
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Vendor
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Worker
0.0437
0.0544
0.6854
2.1200e003
0.1677
1.2800e003
0.1690
0.0445
1.1900e003
0.0457
152.5257
152.5257
6.9500e003
152.6715
Total
0.0437
0.0544
0.6854
2.1200e003
0.1677
1.2800e003
0.1690
0.0445
1.1900e003
0.0457
152.5257
152.5257
6.9500e003
152.6715
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
NBioCO2
Total CO2
CH4
3.4 Foundation - 2020
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
Category
lb/day
Off-Road
2.1117
Paving
6.7000e003
Total
2.1184
18.3264
18.3264
19.6096
19.6096
0.0325
0.0325
Bio- CO2
N2O
CO2e
lb/day
1.0951
1.0951
1.0738
1.0738
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
1.0951
1.0951
1.0738
1.0738
3,093.675 3,093.6753
3
0.3437
0.0000
3,093.675 3,093.6753
3
3,100.891
9
0.0000
0.3437
3,100.891
9
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Category
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBioCO2
lb/day
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
lb/day
Hauling
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Vendor
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Worker
0.0582
0.0726
0.9139
2.8200e003
0.2236
1.7100e003
0.2253
0.0593
1.5800e003
0.0609
203.3675
203.3675
9.2600e003
203.5620
Total
0.0582
0.0726
0.9139
2.8200e003
0.2236
1.7100e003
0.2253
0.0593
1.5800e003
0.0609
203.3675
203.3675
9.2600e003
203.5620
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
NBioCO2
Total CO2
CH4
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
Category
Bio- CO2
lb/day
Off-Road
0.3391
Paving
6.7000e003
Total
0.3458
1.4693
1.4693
20.9096
20.9096
0.0325
0.0325
N2O
CO2e
lb/day
0.0452
0.0452
0.0452
0.0452
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0452
0.0452
0.0452
0.0452
0.0000
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
3,093.675 3,093.6753
3
0.3437
3,100.891
9
0.0000
3,093.675 3,093.6753
3
0.0000
0.3437
3,100.891
9
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Category
Fugitive
PM10
Fugitive
PM2.5
NBioCO2
lb/day
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
lb/day
Hauling
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Vendor
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Worker
0.0582
0.0726
0.9139
2.8200e003
0.2236
1.7100e003
0.2253
0.0593
1.5800e003
0.0609
203.3675
203.3675
9.2600e003
203.5620
Total
0.0582
0.0726
0.9139
2.8200e003
0.2236
1.7100e003
0.2253
0.0593
1.5800e003
0.0609
203.3675
203.3675
9.2600e003
203.5620
3.4 Foundation - 2021
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Category
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBioCO2
lb/day
Off-Road
1.8962
Paving
6.7000e003
Total
1.9029
16.6317
16.6317
19.4830
19.4830
0.0325
0.0325
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
lb/day
0.9340
0.9340
0.9161
0.9161
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.9340
0.9340
0.9161
0.9161
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
3,093.942 3,093.9428
8
0.3306
3,100.884
9
0.0000
3,093.942 3,093.9428
8
0.0000
0.3306
3,100.884
9
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Category
Fugitive
PM10
Fugitive
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBioCO2
lb/day
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
lb/day
Hauling
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Vendor
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Worker
0.0551
0.0679
0.8598
2.8300e003
0.2236
1.7100e003
0.2253
0.0593
1.5900e003
0.0609
200.2461
200.2461
8.8700e003
200.4323
Total
0.0551
0.0679
0.8598
2.8300e003
0.2236
1.7100e003
0.2253
0.0593
1.5900e003
0.0609
200.2461
200.2461
8.8700e003
200.4323
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
NBioCO2
Total CO2
CH4
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
Category
Bio- CO2
lb/day
Off-Road
0.3391
Paving
6.7000e003
Total
0.3458
1.4693
1.4693
20.9096
20.9096
0.0325
0.0325
N2O
CO2e
lb/day
0.0452
0.0452
0.0452
0.0452
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0452
0.0452
0.0452
0.0452
0.0000
3,093.942 3,093.9428
8
0.3306
0.0000
0.0000
3,093.942 3,093.9428
8
3,100.884
9
0.0000
0.3306
3,100.884
9
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Category
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBioCO2
lb/day
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
lb/day
Hauling
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Vendor
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Worker
0.0551
0.0679
0.8598
2.8300e003
0.2236
1.7100e003
0.2253
0.0593
1.5900e003
0.0609
200.2461
200.2461
8.8700e003
200.4323
Total
0.0551
0.0679
0.8598
2.8300e003
0.2236
1.7100e003
0.2253
0.0593
1.5900e003
0.0609
200.2461
200.2461
8.8700e003
200.4323
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
NBioCO2
Total CO2
CH4
3.5 Building Construction - 2021
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
Category
Bio- CO2
lb/day
N2O
CO2e
lb/day
Off-Road
0.9327
8.5993
9.4485
0.0143
0.5306
0.5306
0.5016
0.5016
1,368.027 1,368.0271
1
0.2727
1,373.754
7
Total
0.9327
8.5993
9.4485
0.0143
0.5306
0.5306
0.5016
0.5016
1,368.027 1,368.0271
1
0.2727
1,373.754
7
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Category
Fugitive
PM10
Fugitive
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBioCO2
lb/day
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
lb/day
Hauling
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Vendor
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Worker
1.3777
1.6965
21.4948
0.0708
5.5888
0.0428
5.6316
1.4822
0.0397
1.5219
5,006.151 5,006.1519
9
0.2217
5,010.807
0
Total
1.3777
1.6965
21.4948
0.0708
5.5888
0.0428
5.6316
1.4822
0.0397
1.5219
5,006.151 5,006.1519
9
0.2217
5,010.807
0
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Category
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBioCO2
lb/day
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
lb/day
Off-Road
0.1603
0.6945
9.8832
0.0143
0.0214
0.0214
0.0214
0.0214
0.0000
1,368.027 1,368.0271
1
0.2727
1,373.754
7
Total
0.1603
0.6945
9.8832
0.0143
0.0214
0.0214
0.0214
0.0214
0.0000
1,368.027 1,368.0271
1
0.2727
1,373.754
7
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Category
Fugitive
PM10
Fugitive
PM2.5
NBioCO2
lb/day
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
lb/day
Hauling
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Vendor
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Worker
1.3777
1.6965
21.4948
0.0708
5.5888
0.0428
5.6316
1.4822
0.0397
1.5219
5,006.151 5,006.1519
9
0.2217
5,010.807
0
Total
1.3777
1.6965
21.4948
0.0708
5.5888
0.0428
5.6316
1.4822
0.0397
1.5219
5,006.151 5,006.1519
9
0.2217
5,010.807
0
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
3.5 Building Construction - 2022
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
Category
lb/day
Bio- CO2
NBioCO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
lb/day
Off-Road
0.8355
7.7686
9.3751
0.0143
0.4467
0.4467
0.4227
0.4227
1,368.366 1,368.3660
0
0.2707
1,374.049
8
Total
0.8355
7.7686
9.3751
0.0143
0.4467
0.4467
0.4227
0.4227
1,368.366 1,368.3660
0
0.2707
1,374.049
8
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Category
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBioCO2
lb/day
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
lb/day
Hauling
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Vendor
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Worker
1.3048
1.5918
20.2419
0.0707
5.5888
0.0427
5.6316
1.4822
0.0396
1.5218
4,923.620 4,923.6203
3
0.2123
4,928.077
8
Total
1.3048
1.5918
20.2419
0.0707
5.5888
0.0427
5.6316
1.4822
0.0396
1.5218
4,923.620 4,923.6203
3
0.2123
4,928.077
8
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
Category
Bio- CO2
NBioCO2
lb/day
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
lb/day
Off-Road
0.1603
0.6945
9.8832
0.0143
0.0214
0.0214
0.0214
0.0214
0.0000
1,368.366 1,368.3660
0
0.2707
1,374.049
8
Total
0.1603
0.6945
9.8832
0.0143
0.0214
0.0214
0.0214
0.0214
0.0000
1,368.366 1,368.3660
0
0.2707
1,374.049
8
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Category
Fugitive
PM10
Fugitive
PM2.5
NBioCO2
lb/day
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
lb/day
Hauling
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Vendor
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Worker
1.3048
1.5918
20.2419
0.0707
5.5888
0.0427
5.6316
1.4822
0.0396
1.5218
4,923.620 4,923.6203
3
0.2123
4,928.077
8
Total
1.3048
1.5918
20.2419
0.0707
5.5888
0.0427
5.6316
1.4822
0.0396
1.5218
4,923.620 4,923.6203
3
0.2123
4,928.077
8
3.5 Building Construction - 2023
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Category
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBioCO2
lb/day
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
lb/day
Off-Road
0.7649
7.1303
9.3351
0.0143
0.3820
0.3820
0.3617
0.3617
1,368.703 1,368.7036
6
0.2686
1,374.343
6
Total
0.7649
7.1303
9.3351
0.0143
0.3820
0.3820
0.3617
0.3617
1,368.703 1,368.7036
6
0.2686
1,374.343
6
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Category
Fugitive
PM10
Fugitive
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBioCO2
lb/day
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
lb/day
Hauling
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Vendor
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Worker
1.2361
1.4988
19.0983
0.0707
5.5888
0.0427
5.6315
1.4822
0.0396
1.5218
4,848.394 4,848.3940
0
0.2039
4,852.676
9
Total
1.2361
1.4988
19.0983
0.0707
5.5888
0.0427
5.6315
1.4822
0.0396
1.5218
4,848.394 4,848.3940
0
0.2039
4,852.676
9
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
Category
Bio- CO2
lb/day
NBioCO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
lb/day
Off-Road
0.1603
0.6945
9.8832
0.0143
0.0214
0.0214
0.0214
0.0214
0.0000
1,368.703 1,368.7036
6
0.2686
1,374.343
6
Total
0.1603
0.6945
9.8832
0.0143
0.0214
0.0214
0.0214
0.0214
0.0000
1,368.703 1,368.7036
6
0.2686
1,374.343
6
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Category
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBioCO2
lb/day
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
lb/day
Hauling
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Vendor
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Worker
1.2361
1.4988
19.0983
0.0707
5.5888
0.0427
5.6315
1.4822
0.0396
1.5218
4,848.394 4,848.3940
0
0.2039
4,852.676
9
Total
1.2361
1.4988
19.0983
0.0707
5.5888
0.0427
5.6315
1.4822
0.0396
1.5218
4,848.394 4,848.3940
0
0.2039
4,852.676
9
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
3.6 Architectural Coating - 2021
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
Category
Bio- CO2
NBioCO2
lb/day
Archit. Coating
12.0893
Off-Road
0.2189
1.5268
1.8176
Total
12.3082
1.5268
1.8176
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
lb/day
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
2.9700e003
0.0941
0.0941
0.0941
0.0941
281.4481
281.4481
0.0193
281.8537
2.9700e003
0.0941
0.0941
0.0941
0.0941
281.4481
281.4481
0.0193
281.8537
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
NBioCO2
Total CO2
CH4
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Category
Fugitive
PM10
Fugitive
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
lb/day
N2O
CO2e
lb/day
Hauling
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Vendor
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Worker
0.1929
0.2375
3.0093
9.9100e003
0.7824
5.9900e003
0.7884
0.2075
5.5500e003
0.2131
700.8613
700.8613
0.0310
701.5130
Total
0.1929
0.2375
3.0093
9.9100e003
0.7824
5.9900e003
0.7884
0.2075
5.5500e003
0.2131
700.8613
700.8613
0.0310
701.5130
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Category
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBioCO2
lb/day
Archit. Coating
12.0893
Off-Road
0.0297
0.1288
1.8324
Total
12.1190
0.1288
1.8324
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
lb/day
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
2.9700e003
3.9600e003
3.9600e003
3.9600e003
3.9600e003
0.0000
281.4481
281.4481
0.0193
281.8537
2.9700e003
3.9600e003
3.9600e003
3.9600e003
3.9600e003
0.0000
281.4481
281.4481
0.0193
281.8537
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBioCO2
Total CO2
CH4
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Category
Fugitive
PM10
Fugitive
PM2.5
lb/day
N2O
CO2e
lb/day
Hauling
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Vendor
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Worker
0.1929
0.2375
3.0093
9.9100e003
0.7824
5.9900e003
0.7884
0.2075
5.5500e003
0.2131
700.8613
700.8613
0.0310
701.5130
Total
0.1929
0.2375
3.0093
9.9100e003
0.7824
5.9900e003
0.7884
0.2075
5.5500e003
0.2131
700.8613
700.8613
0.0310
701.5130
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
NBioCO2
Total CO2
CH4
3.6 Architectural Coating - 2022
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
Category
Bio- CO2
lb/day
Archit. Coating
12.0893
Off-Road
0.2045
1.4085
1.8136
Total
12.2938
1.4085
1.8136
N2O
CO2e
lb/day
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
2.9700e003
0.0817
0.0817
0.0817
0.0817
281.4481
281.4481
0.0183
281.8329
2.9700e003
0.0817
0.0817
0.0817
0.0817
281.4481
281.4481
0.0183
281.8329
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Category
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBioCO2
lb/day
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
lb/day
Hauling
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Vendor
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Worker
0.1827
0.2229
2.8339
9.9000e003
0.7824
5.9800e003
0.7884
0.2075
5.5500e003
0.2131
689.3068
689.3068
0.0297
689.9309
Total
0.1827
0.2229
2.8339
9.9000e003
0.7824
5.9800e003
0.7884
0.2075
5.5500e003
0.2131
689.3068
689.3068
0.0297
689.9309
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
NBioCO2
Total CO2
CH4
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
Category
Bio- CO2
lb/day
Archit. Coating
12.0893
Off-Road
0.0297
0.1288
1.8324
Total
12.1190
0.1288
1.8324
N2O
CO2e
lb/day
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
2.9700e003
3.9600e003
3.9600e003
3.9600e003
3.9600e003
0.0000
281.4481
281.4481
0.0183
281.8329
2.9700e003
3.9600e003
3.9600e003
3.9600e003
3.9600e003
0.0000
281.4481
281.4481
0.0183
281.8329
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBioCO2
Total CO2
CH4
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Category
Fugitive
PM10
Fugitive
PM2.5
lb/day
N2O
CO2e
lb/day
Hauling
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Vendor
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Worker
0.1827
0.2229
2.8339
9.9000e003
0.7824
5.9800e003
0.7884
0.2075
5.5500e003
0.2131
689.3068
689.3068
0.0297
689.9309
Total
0.1827
0.2229
2.8339
9.9000e003
0.7824
5.9800e003
0.7884
0.2075
5.5500e003
0.2131
689.3068
689.3068
0.0297
689.9309
3.6 Architectural Coating - 2023
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Category
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBioCO2
lb/day
Archit. Coating
12.0893
Off-Road
0.1917
1.3030
1.8111
Total
12.2809
1.3030
1.8111
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
lb/day
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
2.9700e003
0.0708
0.0708
0.0708
0.0708
281.4481
281.4481
0.0168
281.8017
2.9700e003
0.0708
0.0708
0.0708
0.0708
281.4481
281.4481
0.0168
281.8017
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
NBioCO2
Total CO2
CH4
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Category
Fugitive
PM10
Fugitive
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
lb/day
N2O
CO2e
lb/day
Hauling
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Vendor
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Worker
0.1731
0.2098
2.6738
9.9000e003
0.7824
5.9800e003
0.7884
0.2075
5.5500e003
0.2131
678.7752
678.7752
0.0286
679.3748
Total
0.1731
0.2098
2.6738
9.9000e003
0.7824
5.9800e003
0.7884
0.2075
5.5500e003
0.2131
678.7752
678.7752
0.0286
679.3748
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
NBioCO2
Total CO2
CH4
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
Category
Bio- CO2
lb/day
Archit. Coating
12.0893
Off-Road
0.0297
0.1288
1.8324
Total
12.1190
0.1288
1.8324
N2O
CO2e
lb/day
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
2.9700e003
3.9600e003
3.9600e003
3.9600e003
3.9600e003
0.0000
281.4481
281.4481
0.0168
281.8017
2.9700e003
3.9600e003
3.9600e003
3.9600e003
3.9600e003
0.0000
281.4481
281.4481
0.0168
281.8017
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Category
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBioCO2
lb/day
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
lb/day
Hauling
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Vendor
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Worker
0.1731
0.2098
2.6738
9.9000e003
0.7824
5.9800e003
0.7884
0.2075
5.5500e003
0.2131
678.7752
678.7752
0.0286
679.3748
Total
0.1731
0.2098
2.6738
9.9000e003
0.7824
5.9800e003
0.7884
0.2075
5.5500e003
0.2131
678.7752
678.7752
0.0286
679.3748
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
NBioCO2
Total CO2
CH4
3.7 Paving - 2021
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
Category
Bio- CO2
lb/day
Off-Road
0.6154
Paving
0.0144
Total
0.6298
6.3303
6.3303
7.1764
7.1764
0.0112
0.0112
N2O
CO2e
lb/day
0.3326
0.3326
0.3060
0.3060
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.3326
0.3326
0.3060
0.3060
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
1,080.126 1,080.1265
5
0.3493
1,087.462
5
0.0000
1,080.126 1,080.1265
5
0.0000
0.3493
1,087.462
5
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Category
Fugitive
PM10
Fugitive
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBioCO2
lb/day
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
lb/day
Hauling
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Vendor
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Worker
0.0276
0.0339
0.4299
1.4200e003
0.1118
8.6000e004
0.1126
0.0296
7.9000e004
0.0304
100.1230
100.1230
4.4300e003
100.2161
Total
0.0276
0.0339
0.4299
1.4200e003
0.1118
8.6000e004
0.1126
0.0296
7.9000e004
0.0304
100.1230
100.1230
4.4300e003
100.2161
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Category
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBioCO2
lb/day
Off-Road
0.1373
Paving
0.0144
Total
0.1517
0.5948
0.5948
8.4638
8.4638
0.0112
0.0112
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
lb/day
0.0183
0.0183
0.0183
0.0183
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0183
0.0183
0.0183
0.0183
0.0000
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
1,080.126 1,080.1265
5
0.3493
1,087.462
5
0.0000
1,080.126 1,080.1265
5
0.0000
0.3493
1,087.462
5
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Category
Fugitive
PM10
Fugitive
PM2.5
NBioCO2
lb/day
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
lb/day
Hauling
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Vendor
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Worker
0.0276
0.0339
0.4299
1.4200e003
0.1118
8.6000e004
0.1126
0.0296
7.9000e004
0.0304
100.1230
100.1230
4.4300e003
100.2161
Total
0.0276
0.0339
0.4299
1.4200e003
0.1118
8.6000e004
0.1126
0.0296
7.9000e004
0.0304
100.1230
100.1230
4.4300e003
100.2161
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2
Page 1 of 1
Date: 4/19/2016 11:54 AM
LUXE Hotel - Phase 2 Construction
South Coast Air Basin, Winter
1.0 Project Characteristics
1.1 Land Usage
Land Uses
Size
Metric
Lot Acreage
Floor Surface Area
Population
Enclosed Parking with Elevator
362.00
Space
3.26
144,800.00
0
Parking Lot
5.00
1000sqft
0.11
5,000.00
0
City Park
0.47
Acre
0.47
20,500.00
0
Quality Restaurant
25.00
1000sqft
0.57
25,000.00
0
Apartments High Rise
360.00
Dwelling Unit
5.81
418,000.00
587
Strip Mall
25.00
1000sqft
0.57
25,000.00
0
1.2 Other Project Characteristics
Urbanization
Urban
Climate Zone
11
Utility Company
Los Angeles Department of Water & Power
CO2 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
1227.89
Wind Speed (m/s)
CH4 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
2.2
0.029
1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data
Project Characteristics Land Use - See "Hazen AQ Construction Model Inputs"
Construction Phase - See "Hazen AQ Construction Model Inputs"
Off-road Equipment Off-road Equipment - See "Hazen AQ Construction Model Inputs"
Off-road Equipment - See "Hazen AQ Construction Model Inputs"
Precipitation Freq (Days)
31
Operational Year
2023
N2O Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
0.006
Off-road Equipment - See "Hazen AQ Construction Model Inputs"
Off-road Equipment - See "Hazen AQ Construction Model Inputs"
Off-road Equipment - See "Hazen AQ Construction Model Inputs"
Off-road Equipment - See "Hazen AQ Construction Model Inputs"
Trips and VMT - See "Hazen AQ Construction Model Inputs"
Demolition - See "Hazen AQ Construction Model Inputs"
Grading - See "Hazen AQ Construction Model Inputs"
Architectural Coating - See "Hazen AQ Construction Model Inputs"
Vehicle Trips Water And Wastewater Solid Waste Construction Off-road Equipment Mitigation - See "Hazen AQ Construction Model Inputs"
Table Name
Column Name
Default Value
New Value
tblArchitecturalCoating
ConstArea_Nonresidential_Exterior
107,725.00
25,100.00
tblArchitecturalCoating
ConstArea_Nonresidential_Interior
323,175.00
83,988.00
tblAreaCoating
Area_Nonresidential_Interior
323175
60000
tblAreaCoating
Area_Residential_Exterior
282150
236513
tblAreaCoating
Area_Residential_Interior
846450
709540
tblConstEquipMitigation
NumberOfEquipmentMitigated
0.00
1.00
tblConstEquipMitigation
NumberOfEquipmentMitigated
0.00
1.00
tblConstEquipMitigation
NumberOfEquipmentMitigated
0.00
1.00
tblConstEquipMitigation
NumberOfEquipmentMitigated
0.00
3.00
tblConstEquipMitigation
NumberOfEquipmentMitigated
0.00
3.00
tblConstEquipMitigation
NumberOfEquipmentMitigated
0.00
1.00
tblConstEquipMitigation
NumberOfEquipmentMitigated
0.00
1.00
tblConstEquipMitigation
NumberOfEquipmentMitigated
0.00
1.00
tblConstEquipMitigation
NumberOfEquipmentMitigated
0.00
1.00
tblConstEquipMitigation
NumberOfEquipmentMitigated
0.00
4.00
tblConstEquipMitigation
NumberOfEquipmentMitigated
0.00
1.00
tblConstEquipMitigation
NumberOfEquipmentMitigated
0.00
3.00
tblConstEquipMitigation
NumberOfEquipmentMitigated
0.00
1.00
tblConstEquipMitigation
NumberOfEquipmentMitigated
0.00
8.00
tblConstEquipMitigation
Tier
No Change
Tier 4 Final
tblConstEquipMitigation
Tier
No Change
Tier 4 Final
tblConstEquipMitigation
Tier
No Change
Tier 4 Final
tblConstEquipMitigation
Tier
No Change
Tier 4 Final
tblConstEquipMitigation
Tier
No Change
Tier 4 Final
tblConstEquipMitigation
Tier
No Change
Tier 4 Final
tblConstEquipMitigation
Tier
No Change
Tier 4 Final
tblConstEquipMitigation
Tier
No Change
Tier 4 Final
tblConstEquipMitigation
Tier
No Change
Tier 4 Final
tblConstEquipMitigation
Tier
No Change
Tier 4 Final
tblConstEquipMitigation
Tier
No Change
Tier 4 Final
tblConstEquipMitigation
Tier
No Change
Tier 4 Final
tblConstEquipMitigation
Tier
No Change
Tier 4 Final
tblConstEquipMitigation
Tier
No Change
Tier 4 Final
tblConstEquipMitigation
Tier
No Change
Tier 4 Final
tblConstEquipMitigation
Tier
No Change
Tier 4 Final
tblConstructionPhase
NumDays
20.00
375.00
tblConstructionPhase
NumDays
300.00
558.00
tblConstructionPhase
NumDays
20.00
72.00
tblConstructionPhase
NumDays
30.00
35.00
tblConstructionPhase
NumDays
20.00
43.00
tblConstructionPhase
PhaseEndDate
8/21/2024
1/13/2023
tblConstructionPhase
PhaseEndDate
2/10/2023
12/6/2021
tblConstructionPhase
PhaseStartDate
3/16/2023
8/9/2021
tblConstructionPhase
PhaseStartDate
1/23/2021
1/25/2021
tblConstructionPhase
PhaseStartDate
1/14/2023
11/9/2021
tblFireplaces
NumberGas
306.00
246.50
tblFireplaces
NumberNoFireplace
36.00
29.00
tblFireplaces
NumberWood
18.00
14.50
tblGrading
AcresOfGrading
52.50
2.70
tblGrading
MaterialExported
0.00
102,300.00
tblLandUse
LandUseSquareFeet
20,473.20
20,500.00
tblLandUse
LandUseSquareFeet
360,000.00
418,000.00
tblLandUse
Population
1,030.00
587.00
tblOffRoadEquipment
OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount
1.00
0.00
tblOffRoadEquipment
OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount
3.00
1.00
tblOffRoadEquipment
OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount
2.00
0.00
tblOffRoadEquipment
OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount
2.00
1.00
tblOffRoadEquipment
OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount
2.00
0.00
tblOffRoadEquipment
OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount
2.00
1.00
tblOffRoadEquipment
OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount
2.00
0.00
tblOffRoadEquipment
OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount
2.00
1.00
tblOffRoadEquipment
OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount
2.00
1.00
tblOffRoadEquipment
OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount
3.00
1.00
tblOffRoadEquipment
OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount
1.00
0.00
tblOffRoadEquipment
OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount
0.00
1.00
tblOffRoadEquipment
OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount
0.00
4.00
tblOffRoadEquipment
OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount
0.00
3.00
tblOffRoadEquipment
OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount
0.00
2.00
tblOffRoadEquipment
PhaseName
Grading
tblOffRoadEquipment
PhaseName
Foundation
tblOffRoadEquipment
PhaseName
Building Construction
tblOffRoadEquipment
PhaseName
Demolition
tblOffRoadEquipment
PhaseName
Foundation
tblOffRoadEquipment
UsageHours
7.00
8.00
tblOffRoadEquipment
UsageHours
7.00
8.00
tblProjectCharacteristics
OperationalYear
2014
2023
tblSolidWaste
SolidWasteGenerationRate
165.60
133.40
tblSolidWaste
SolidWasteGenerationRate
22.81
13.69
tblSolidWaste
SolidWasteGenerationRate
26.25
15.75
tblTripsAndVMT
HaulingTripNumber
1,606.00
0.00
tblTripsAndVMT
HaulingTripNumber
12,788.00
0.00
tblTripsAndVMT
VendorTripNumber
75.00
0.00
tblTripsAndVMT
WorkerTripNumber
18.00
20.00
tblTripsAndVMT
WorkerTripNumber
20.00
15.00
tblTripsAndVMT
WorkerTripNumber
15.00
20.00
tblTripsAndVMT
WorkerTripNumber
349.00
500.00
tblTripsAndVMT
WorkerTripNumber
8.00
10.00
tblWater
IndoorWaterUseRate
23,455,449.22
18,894,667.43
tblWater
IndoorWaterUseRate
7,588,342.81
4,553,005.69
tblWater
IndoorWaterUseRate
1,851,813.04
1,111,087.82
tblWater
OutdoorWaterUseRate
14,787,131.03
11,911,855.55
tblWater
OutdoorWaterUseRate
484,362.31
290,617.38
tblWater
OutdoorWaterUseRate
1,134,982.18
680,989.31
tblWoodstoves
NumberCatalytic
18.00
14.50
tblWoodstoves
NumberNoncatalytic
18.00
14.50
2.0 Emissions Summary
2.1 Overall Construction (Maximum Daily Emission)
Unmitigated Construction
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Year
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBioCO2
Total CO2
lb/day
CH4
N2O
CO2e
lb/day
2020
3.8752
41.1509
33.6433
0.0575
6.6021
1.9065
8.5086
3.4136
1.7540
5.1676
0.0000
5,521.580 5,521.5809
9
1.7465
0.0000
5,558.257
4
2021
15.4944
18.6143
41.1050
0.1053
6.4830
1.0069
7.4899
1.7193
0.9477
2.6670
0.0000
8,171.779 8,171.7798
8
0.8985
0.0000
8,190.648
9
2022
14.6407
11.1657
32.1249
0.0928
6.3713
0.5771
6.9484
1.6897
0.5496
2.2393
0.0000
6,909.251 6,909.2518
8
0.5310
0.0000
6,920.402
0
2023
14.4778
10.3046
30.8624
0.0927
6.3713
0.5015
6.8728
1.6897
0.4777
2.1674
0.0000
6,828.465 6,828.4658
8
0.5179
0.0000
6,839.341
9
Total
48.4881
81.2355
137.7355
0.3482
25.8277
3.9920
29.8197
8.5123
3.7289
12.2412
0.0000
27,431.07 27,431.078
82
2
3.6939
0.0000
27,508.65
01
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Mitigated Construction
ROG
NOx
Year
NBioCO2
Total CO2
lb/day
lb/day
2020
0.7259
3.0129
32.6565
0.0575
2.6771
0.0922
2.7693
1.3584
0.0921
1.4505
0.0000
5,521.580 5,521.5809
9
1.7465
0.0000
5,558.257
4
2021
14.0547
3.5758
42.8419
0.1053
6.4830
0.0933
6.5763
1.7193
0.0897
1.8090
0.0000
8,171.779 8,171.7798
8
0.8985
0.0000
8,190.648
9
2022
13.7906
2.8119
32.6517
0.0928
6.3713
0.0741
6.4453
1.6897
0.0705
1.7602
0.0000
6,909.251 6,909.2518
8
0.5310
0.0000
6,920.402
0
2023
13.7113
2.6945
31.4318
0.0927
6.3713
0.0740
6.4453
1.6897
0.0705
1.7602
0.0000
6,828.465 6,828.4658
8
0.5179
0.0000
6,839.341
9
Total
42.2825
12.0951
139.5819
0.3482
21.9027
0.3335
22.2361
6.4571
0.3227
6.7799
0.0000
27,431.07 27,431.078
82
2
3.6939
0.0000
27,508.65
01
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
CH4
N20
CO2e
12.80
85.11
-1.34
0.00
15.20
91.65
25.43
24.14
91.35
44.61
0.00
0.00
0.00
Percent
Reduction
Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2
0.00
0.00
0.00
3.0 Construction Detail
Construction Phase
Phase
Number
Phase Name
Phase Type
Start Date
End Date
Num Days Num Days
Week
1
Demolition
Demolition
6/29/2020
10/6/2020
5
72
2
Grading
Grading
10/7/2020
11/24/2020
5
35
3
Foundation
Paving
11/25/2020
1/22/2021
5
43
4
Building Construction
Building Construction
1/25/2021
3/15/2023
5
558
5
Architectural Coating
Architectural Coating
8/9/2021
1/13/2023
5
375
6
Paving
Paving
11/9/2021
12/6/2021
5
20
Phase Description
Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 0
Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 2.7
Acres of Paving: 0
Residential Indoor: 846,450; Residential Outdoor: 282,150; Non-Residential Indoor: 83,988; Non-Residential Outdoor: 25,100
OffRoad Equipment
Phase Name
Offroad Equipment Type
Amount
Usage Hours
Horse Power
Load Factor
Demolition
Concrete/Industrial Saws
1
8.00
81
0.73
Demolition
Excavators
1
8.00
162
0.38
Demolition
Rubber Tired Dozers
2
8.00
255
0.40
Demolition
Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes
3
8.00
97
0.37
Grading
Bore/Drill Rigs
1
8.00
205
0.50
Grading
Excavators
2
8.00
162
0.38
Grading
Graders
1
8.00
174
0.41
Grading
Rubber Tired Dozers
1
8.00
255
0.40
Grading
Scrapers
1
8.00
361
0.48
Grading
Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes
2
8.00
97
0.37
Foundation
Pavers
0
8.00
125
0.42
Foundation
Paving Equipment
0
8.00
130
0.36
Foundation
Pumps
4
8.00
84
0.74
Foundation
Rollers
0
8.00
80
0.38
Foundation
Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes
2
8.00
97
0.37
Building Construction
Cranes
0
8.00
226
0.29
Building Construction
Forklifts
3
8.00
89
0.20
Building Construction
Generator Sets
1
8.00
84
0.74
Building Construction
Pumps
0
8.00
84
0.74
Building Construction
Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes
1
8.00
97
0.37
Building Construction
Welders
0
8.00
46
0.45
Architectural Coating
Air Compressors
1
6.00
78
0.48
Paving
Pavers
1
8.00
125
0.42
Paving
Paving Equipment
1
8.00
130
0.36
Paving
Rollers
1
8.00
80
0.38
Worker Vehicle
Class
Vendor
Hauling
Vehicle Class Vehicle Class
Trips and VMT
Phase Name
Offroad Equipment
Count
Worker Trip
Number
Vendor Trip Hauling Trip
Number
Number
Worker Trip
Length
Vendor Trip
Length
Hauling Trip
Length
Demolition
7
20.00
0.00
0.00
14.70
6.90
20.00 LD_Mix
HDT_Mix
HHDT
Grading
8
15.00
0.00
0.00
14.70
6.90
20.00 LD_Mix
HDT_Mix
HHDT
Foundation
6
20.00
0.00
0.00
14.70
6.90
20.00 LD_Mix
HDT_Mix
HHDT
Building Construction
5
500.00
0.00
0.00
14.70
6.90
20.00 LD_Mix
HDT_Mix
HHDT
Architectural Coating
1
70.00
0.00
0.00
14.70
6.90
20.00 LD_Mix
HDT_Mix
HHDT
Paving
3
10.00
0.00
0.00
14.70
6.90
20.00 LD_Mix
HDT_Mix
HHDT
3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction
Use Cleaner Engines for Construction Equipment
Use Soil Stabilizer
Water Exposed Area
Reduce Vehicle Speed on Unpaved Roads
Clean Paved Roads
3.2 Demolition - 2020
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Category
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBioCO2
lb/day
Fugitive Dust
4.8261
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
lb/day
0.0000
4.8261
1.6496
1.6496
0.7307
0.0000
0.7307
1.5335
1.5335
3,733.888 3,733.8882
2
1.0535
3,756.011
3
3,733.888 3,733.8882
2
1.0535
3,756.011
3
Off-Road
3.2226
32.3834
29.7480
0.0387
Total
3.2226
32.3834
29.7480
0.0387
4.8261
1.6496
6.4757
0.7307
1.5335
2.2642
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
0.0000
0.0000
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
Category
Bio- CO2
NBioCO2
lb/day
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
lb/day
Hauling
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Vendor
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Worker
0.0592
0.0796
0.8322
2.6400e003
0.2236
1.7100e003
0.2253
0.0593
1.5800e003
0.0609
190.6197
190.6197
9.2600e003
190.8142
Total
0.0592
0.0796
0.8322
2.6400e003
0.2236
1.7100e003
0.2253
0.0593
1.5800e003
0.0609
190.6197
190.6197
9.2600e003
190.8142
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
NBioCO2
Total CO2
CH4
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
Category
Bio- CO2
lb/day
Fugitive Dust
1.8822
Off-Road
0.4575
1.9826
22.8175
0.0387
Total
0.4575
1.9826
22.8175
0.0387
1.8822
N2O
CO2e
lb/day
0.0000
1.8822
0.0610
0.0610
0.0610
1.9432
0.2850
0.2850
0.0000
0.2850
0.0000
0.0000
0.0610
0.0610
0.0000
3,733.888 3,733.8882
2
1.0535
3,756.011
3
0.0610
0.3460
0.0000
3,733.888 3,733.8882
2
1.0535
3,756.011
3
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Category
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBioCO2
lb/day
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
lb/day
Hauling
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Vendor
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Worker
0.0592
0.0796
0.8322
2.6400e003
0.2236
1.7100e003
0.2253
0.0593
1.5800e003
0.0609
190.6197
190.6197
9.2600e003
190.8142
Total
0.0592
0.0796
0.8322
2.6400e003
0.2236
1.7100e003
0.2253
0.0593
1.5800e003
0.0609
190.6197
190.6197
9.2600e003
190.8142
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
NBioCO2
Total CO2
CH4
3.3 Grading - 2020
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
Category
Bio- CO2
lb/day
Fugitive Dust
6.4344
N2O
CO2e
lb/day
0.0000
6.4344
1.9052
1.9052
3.3691
0.0000
3.3691
1.7528
1.7528
5,378.616 5,378.6161
1
1.7396
5,415.146
7
5,378.616 5,378.6161
1
1.7396
5,415.146
7
Off-Road
3.8309
41.0913
33.0192
0.0555
Total
3.8309
41.0913
33.0192
0.0555
6.4344
1.9052
8.3397
3.3691
1.7528
5.1219
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
0.0000
0.0000
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
Category
Bio- CO2
NBioCO2
lb/day
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
lb/day
Hauling
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Vendor
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Worker
0.0444
0.0597
0.6241
1.9800e003
0.1677
1.2800e003
0.1690
0.0445
1.1900e003
0.0457
142.9647
142.9647
6.9500e003
143.1106
Total
0.0444
0.0597
0.6241
1.9800e003
0.1677
1.2800e003
0.1690
0.0445
1.1900e003
0.0457
142.9647
142.9647
6.9500e003
143.1106
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Category
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBioCO2
lb/day
Fugitive Dust
2.5094
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
lb/day
0.0000
2.5094
0.0909
0.0909
1.3140
0.0000
1.3140
0.0000
0.0909
0.0909
0.0000
5,378.616 5,378.6161
1
1.7396
5,415.146
7
5,378.616 5,378.6161
1
1.7396
5,415.146
7
Off-Road
0.6815
2.9532
32.0324
0.0555
Total
0.6815
2.9532
32.0324
0.0555
2.5094
0.0909
2.6003
1.3140
0.0909
1.4048
0.0000
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
0.0000
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
Category
NBioCO2
lb/day
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
lb/day
Hauling
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Vendor
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Worker
0.0444
0.0597
0.6241
1.9800e003
0.1677
1.2800e003
0.1690
0.0445
1.1900e003
0.0457
142.9647
142.9647
6.9500e003
143.1106
Total
0.0444
0.0597
0.6241
1.9800e003
0.1677
1.2800e003
0.1690
0.0445
1.1900e003
0.0457
142.9647
142.9647
6.9500e003
143.1106
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
NBioCO2
Total CO2
CH4
3.4 Foundation - 2020
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
Category
lb/day
Off-Road
2.1117
Paving
6.7000e003
Total
2.1184
18.3264
18.3264
19.6096
19.6096
0.0325
0.0325
Bio- CO2
N2O
CO2e
lb/day
1.0951
1.0951
1.0738
1.0738
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
1.0951
1.0951
1.0738
1.0738
3,093.675 3,093.6753
3
0.3437
0.0000
3,093.675 3,093.6753
3
3,100.891
9
0.0000
0.3437
3,100.891
9
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Category
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBioCO2
lb/day
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
lb/day
Hauling
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Vendor
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Worker
0.0592
0.0796
0.8322
2.6400e003
0.2236
1.7100e003
0.2253
0.0593
1.5800e003
0.0609
190.6197
190.6197
9.2600e003
190.8142
Total
0.0592
0.0796
0.8322
2.6400e003
0.2236
1.7100e003
0.2253
0.0593
1.5800e003
0.0609
190.6197
190.6197
9.2600e003
190.8142
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
NBioCO2
Total CO2
CH4
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
Category
Bio- CO2
lb/day
Off-Road
0.3391
Paving
6.7000e003
Total
0.3458
1.4693
1.4693
20.9096
20.9096
0.0325
0.0325
N2O
CO2e
lb/day
0.0452
0.0452
0.0452
0.0452
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0452
0.0452
0.0452
0.0452
0.0000
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
3,093.675 3,093.6753
3
0.3437
3,100.891
9
0.0000
3,093.675 3,093.6753
3
0.0000
0.3437
3,100.891
9
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Category
Fugitive
PM10
Fugitive
PM2.5
NBioCO2
lb/day
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
lb/day
Hauling
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Vendor
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Worker
0.0592
0.0796
0.8322
2.6400e003
0.2236
1.7100e003
0.2253
0.0593
1.5800e003
0.0609
190.6197
190.6197
9.2600e003
190.8142
Total
0.0592
0.0796
0.8322
2.6400e003
0.2236
1.7100e003
0.2253
0.0593
1.5800e003
0.0609
190.6197
190.6197
9.2600e003
190.8142
3.4 Foundation - 2021
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Category
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBioCO2
lb/day
Off-Road
1.8962
Paving
6.7000e003
Total
1.9029
16.6317
16.6317
19.4830
19.4830
0.0325
0.0325
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
lb/day
0.9340
0.9340
0.9161
0.9161
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.9340
0.9340
0.9161
0.9161
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
3,093.942 3,093.9428
8
0.3306
3,100.884
9
0.0000
3,093.942 3,093.9428
8
0.0000
0.3306
3,100.884
9
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Category
Fugitive
PM10
Fugitive
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBioCO2
lb/day
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
lb/day
Hauling
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Vendor
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Worker
0.0560
0.0744
0.7815
2.6500e003
0.2236
1.7100e003
0.2253
0.0593
1.5900e003
0.0609
187.6613
187.6613
8.8700e003
187.8475
Total
0.0560
0.0744
0.7815
2.6500e003
0.2236
1.7100e003
0.2253
0.0593
1.5900e003
0.0609
187.6613
187.6613
8.8700e003
187.8475
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
NBioCO2
Total CO2
CH4
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
Category
Bio- CO2
lb/day
Off-Road
0.3391
Paving
6.7000e003
Total
0.3458
1.4693
1.4693
20.9096
20.9096
0.0325
0.0325
N2O
CO2e
lb/day
0.0452
0.0452
0.0452
0.0452
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0452
0.0452
0.0452
0.0452
0.0000
3,093.942 3,093.9428
8
0.3306
0.0000
0.0000
3,093.942 3,093.9428
8
3,100.884
9
0.0000
0.3306
3,100.884
9
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Category
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBioCO2
lb/day
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
lb/day
Hauling
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Vendor
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Worker
0.0560
0.0744
0.7815
2.6500e003
0.2236
1.7100e003
0.2253
0.0593
1.5900e003
0.0609
187.6613
187.6613
8.8700e003
187.8475
Total
0.0560
0.0744
0.7815
2.6500e003
0.2236
1.7100e003
0.2253
0.0593
1.5900e003
0.0609
187.6613
187.6613
8.8700e003
187.8475
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
NBioCO2
Total CO2
CH4
3.5 Building Construction - 2021
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
Category
Bio- CO2
lb/day
N2O
CO2e
lb/day
Off-Road
0.9327
8.5993
9.4485
0.0143
0.5306
0.5306
0.5016
0.5016
1,368.027 1,368.0271
1
0.2727
1,373.754
7
Total
0.9327
8.5993
9.4485
0.0143
0.5306
0.5306
0.5016
0.5016
1,368.027 1,368.0271
1
0.2727
1,373.754
7
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Category
Fugitive
PM10
Fugitive
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBioCO2
lb/day
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
lb/day
Hauling
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Vendor
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Worker
1.3998
1.8601
19.5367
0.0663
5.5888
0.0428
5.6316
1.4822
0.0397
1.5219
4,691.532 4,691.5328
8
0.2217
4,696.188
0
Total
1.3998
1.8601
19.5367
0.0663
5.5888
0.0428
5.6316
1.4822
0.0397
1.5219
4,691.532 4,691.5328
8
0.2217
4,696.188
0
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Category
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBioCO2
lb/day
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
lb/day
Off-Road
0.1603
0.6945
9.8832
0.0143
0.0214
0.0214
0.0214
0.0214
0.0000
1,368.027 1,368.0271
1
0.2727
1,373.754
7
Total
0.1603
0.6945
9.8832
0.0143
0.0214
0.0214
0.0214
0.0214
0.0000
1,368.027 1,368.0271
1
0.2727
1,373.754
7
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Category
Fugitive
PM10
Fugitive
PM2.5
NBioCO2
lb/day
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
lb/day
Hauling
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Vendor
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Worker
1.3998
1.8601
19.5367
0.0663
5.5888
0.0428
5.6316
1.4822
0.0397
1.5219
4,691.532 4,691.5328
8
0.2217
4,696.188
0
Total
1.3998
1.8601
19.5367
0.0663
5.5888
0.0428
5.6316
1.4822
0.0397
1.5219
4,691.532 4,691.5328
8
0.2217
4,696.188
0
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
3.5 Building Construction - 2022
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
Category
lb/day
Bio- CO2
NBioCO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
lb/day
Off-Road
0.8355
7.7686
9.3751
0.0143
0.4467
0.4467
0.4227
0.4227
1,368.366 1,368.3660
0
0.2707
1,374.049
8
Total
0.8355
7.7686
9.3751
0.0143
0.4467
0.4467
0.4227
0.4227
1,368.366 1,368.3660
0
0.2707
1,374.049
8
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Category
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBioCO2
lb/day
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
lb/day
Hauling
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Vendor
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Worker
1.3258
1.7444
18.3650
0.0662
5.5888
0.0427
5.6316
1.4822
0.0396
1.5218
4,613.541 4,613.5418
8
0.2123
4,617.999
4
Total
1.3258
1.7444
18.3650
0.0662
5.5888
0.0427
5.6316
1.4822
0.0396
1.5218
4,613.541 4,613.5418
8
0.2123
4,617.999
4
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
Category
Bio- CO2
NBioCO2
lb/day
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
lb/day
Off-Road
0.1603
0.6945
9.8832
0.0143
0.0214
0.0214
0.0214
0.0214
0.0000
1,368.366 1,368.3660
0
0.2707
1,374.049
8
Total
0.1603
0.6945
9.8832
0.0143
0.0214
0.0214
0.0214
0.0214
0.0000
1,368.366 1,368.3660
0
0.2707
1,374.049
8
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Category
Fugitive
PM10
Fugitive
PM2.5
NBioCO2
lb/day
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
lb/day
Hauling
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Vendor
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Worker
1.3258
1.7444
18.3650
0.0662
5.5888
0.0427
5.6316
1.4822
0.0396
1.5218
4,613.541 4,613.5418
8
0.2123
4,617.999
4
Total
1.3258
1.7444
18.3650
0.0662
5.5888
0.0427
5.6316
1.4822
0.0396
1.5218
4,613.541 4,613.5418
8
0.2123
4,617.999
4
3.5 Building Construction - 2023
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Category
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBioCO2
lb/day
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
lb/day
Off-Road
0.7649
7.1303
9.3351
0.0143
0.3820
0.3820
0.3617
0.3617
1,368.703 1,368.7036
6
0.2686
1,374.343
6
Total
0.7649
7.1303
9.3351
0.0143
0.3820
0.3820
0.3617
0.3617
1,368.703 1,368.7036
6
0.2686
1,374.343
6
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Category
Fugitive
PM10
Fugitive
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBioCO2
lb/day
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
lb/day
Hauling
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Vendor
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Worker
1.2562
1.6415
17.2949
0.0662
5.5888
0.0427
5.6315
1.4822
0.0396
1.5218
4,542.380 4,542.3809
9
0.2039
4,546.663
7
Total
1.2562
1.6415
17.2949
0.0662
5.5888
0.0427
5.6315
1.4822
0.0396
1.5218
4,542.380 4,542.3809
9
0.2039
4,546.663
7
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
Category
Bio- CO2
lb/day
NBioCO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
lb/day
Off-Road
0.1603
0.6945
9.8832
0.0143
0.0214
0.0214
0.0214
0.0214
0.0000
1,368.703 1,368.7036
6
0.2686
1,374.343
6
Total
0.1603
0.6945
9.8832
0.0143
0.0214
0.0214
0.0214
0.0214
0.0000
1,368.703 1,368.7036
6
0.2686
1,374.343
6
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Category
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBioCO2
lb/day
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
lb/day
Hauling
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Vendor
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Worker
1.2562
1.6415
17.2949
0.0662
5.5888
0.0427
5.6315
1.4822
0.0396
1.5218
4,542.380 4,542.3809
9
0.2039
4,546.663
7
Total
1.2562
1.6415
17.2949
0.0662
5.5888
0.0427
5.6315
1.4822
0.0396
1.5218
4,542.380 4,542.3809
9
0.2039
4,546.663
7
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
3.6 Architectural Coating - 2021
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
Category
Bio- CO2
NBioCO2
lb/day
Archit. Coating
12.0893
Off-Road
0.2189
1.5268
1.8176
Total
12.3082
1.5268
1.8176
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
lb/day
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
2.9700e003
0.0941
0.0941
0.0941
0.0941
281.4481
281.4481
0.0193
281.8537
2.9700e003
0.0941
0.0941
0.0941
0.0941
281.4481
281.4481
0.0193
281.8537
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
NBioCO2
Total CO2
CH4
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Category
Fugitive
PM10
Fugitive
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
lb/day
N2O
CO2e
lb/day
Hauling
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Vendor
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Worker
0.1960
0.2604
2.7351
9.2800e003
0.7824
5.9900e003
0.7884
0.2075
5.5500e003
0.2131
656.8146
656.8146
0.0310
657.4663
Total
0.1960
0.2604
2.7351
9.2800e003
0.7824
5.9900e003
0.7884
0.2075
5.5500e003
0.2131
656.8146
656.8146
0.0310
657.4663
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Category
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBioCO2
lb/day
Archit. Coating
12.0893
Off-Road
0.0297
0.1288
1.8324
Total
12.1190
0.1288
1.8324
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
lb/day
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
2.9700e003
3.9600e003
3.9600e003
3.9600e003
3.9600e003
0.0000
281.4481
281.4481
0.0193
281.8537
2.9700e003
3.9600e003
3.9600e003
3.9600e003
3.9600e003
0.0000
281.4481
281.4481
0.0193
281.8537
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBioCO2
Total CO2
CH4
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Category
Fugitive
PM10
Fugitive
PM2.5
lb/day
N2O
CO2e
lb/day
Hauling
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Vendor
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Worker
0.1960
0.2604
2.7351
9.2800e003
0.7824
5.9900e003
0.7884
0.2075
5.5500e003
0.2131
656.8146
656.8146
0.0310
657.4663
Total
0.1960
0.2604
2.7351
9.2800e003
0.7824
5.9900e003
0.7884
0.2075
5.5500e003
0.2131
656.8146
656.8146
0.0310
657.4663
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
NBioCO2
Total CO2
CH4
3.6 Architectural Coating - 2022
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
Category
Bio- CO2
lb/day
Archit. Coating
12.0893
Off-Road
0.2045
1.4085
1.8136
Total
12.2938
1.4085
1.8136
N2O
CO2e
lb/day
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
2.9700e003
0.0817
0.0817
0.0817
0.0817
281.4481
281.4481
0.0183
281.8329
2.9700e003
0.0817
0.0817
0.0817
0.0817
281.4481
281.4481
0.0183
281.8329
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Category
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBioCO2
lb/day
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
lb/day
Hauling
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Vendor
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Worker
0.1856
0.2442
2.5711
9.2700e003
0.7824
5.9800e003
0.7884
0.2075
5.5500e003
0.2131
645.8959
645.8959
0.0297
646.5199
Total
0.1856
0.2442
2.5711
9.2700e003
0.7824
5.9800e003
0.7884
0.2075
5.5500e003
0.2131
645.8959
645.8959
0.0297
646.5199
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
NBioCO2
Total CO2
CH4
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
Category
Bio- CO2
lb/day
Archit. Coating
12.0893
Off-Road
0.0297
0.1288
1.8324
Total
12.1190
0.1288
1.8324
N2O
CO2e
lb/day
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
2.9700e003
3.9600e003
3.9600e003
3.9600e003
3.9600e003
0.0000
281.4481
281.4481
0.0183
281.8329
2.9700e003
3.9600e003
3.9600e003
3.9600e003
3.9600e003
0.0000
281.4481
281.4481
0.0183
281.8329
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBioCO2
Total CO2
CH4
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Category
Fugitive
PM10
Fugitive
PM2.5
lb/day
N2O
CO2e
lb/day
Hauling
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Vendor
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Worker
0.1856
0.2442
2.5711
9.2700e003
0.7824
5.9800e003
0.7884
0.2075
5.5500e003
0.2131
645.8959
645.8959
0.0297
646.5199
Total
0.1856
0.2442
2.5711
9.2700e003
0.7824
5.9800e003
0.7884
0.2075
5.5500e003
0.2131
645.8959
645.8959
0.0297
646.5199
3.6 Architectural Coating - 2023
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Category
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBioCO2
lb/day
Archit. Coating
12.0893
Off-Road
0.1917
1.3030
1.8111
Total
12.2809
1.3030
1.8111
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
lb/day
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
2.9700e003
0.0708
0.0708
0.0708
0.0708
281.4481
281.4481
0.0168
281.8017
2.9700e003
0.0708
0.0708
0.0708
0.0708
281.4481
281.4481
0.0168
281.8017
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
NBioCO2
Total CO2
CH4
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Category
Fugitive
PM10
Fugitive
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
lb/day
N2O
CO2e
lb/day
Hauling
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Vendor
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Worker
0.1759
0.2298
2.4213
9.2700e003
0.7824
5.9800e003
0.7884
0.2075
5.5500e003
0.2131
635.9333
635.9333
0.0286
636.5329
Total
0.1759
0.2298
2.4213
9.2700e003
0.7824
5.9800e003
0.7884
0.2075
5.5500e003
0.2131
635.9333
635.9333
0.0286
636.5329
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
NBioCO2
Total CO2
CH4
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
Category
Bio- CO2
lb/day
Archit. Coating
12.0893
Off-Road
0.0297
0.1288
1.8324
Total
12.1190
0.1288
1.8324
N2O
CO2e
lb/day
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
2.9700e003
3.9600e003
3.9600e003
3.9600e003
3.9600e003
0.0000
281.4481
281.4481
0.0168
281.8017
2.9700e003
3.9600e003
3.9600e003
3.9600e003
3.9600e003
0.0000
281.4481
281.4481
0.0168
281.8017
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Category
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBioCO2
lb/day
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
lb/day
Hauling
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Vendor
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Worker
0.1759
0.2298
2.4213
9.2700e003
0.7824
5.9800e003
0.7884
0.2075
5.5500e003
0.2131
635.9333
635.9333
0.0286
636.5329
Total
0.1759
0.2298
2.4213
9.2700e003
0.7824
5.9800e003
0.7884
0.2075
5.5500e003
0.2131
635.9333
635.9333
0.0286
636.5329
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
NBioCO2
Total CO2
CH4
3.7 Paving - 2021
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
Category
Bio- CO2
lb/day
Off-Road
0.6154
Paving
0.0144
Total
0.6298
6.3303
6.3303
7.1764
7.1764
0.0112
0.0112
N2O
CO2e
lb/day
0.3326
0.3326
0.3060
0.3060
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.3326
0.3326
0.3060
0.3060
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
1,080.126 1,080.1265
5
0.3493
1,087.462
5
0.0000
1,080.126 1,080.1265
5
0.0000
0.3493
1,087.462
5
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Category
Fugitive
PM10
Fugitive
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBioCO2
lb/day
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
lb/day
Hauling
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Vendor
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Worker
0.0280
0.0372
0.3907
1.3300e003
0.1118
8.6000e004
0.1126
0.0296
7.9000e004
0.0304
93.8307
93.8307
4.4300e003
93.9238
Total
0.0280
0.0372
0.3907
1.3300e003
0.1118
8.6000e004
0.1126
0.0296
7.9000e004
0.0304
93.8307
93.8307
4.4300e003
93.9238
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Category
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBioCO2
lb/day
Off-Road
0.1373
Paving
0.0144
Total
0.1517
0.5948
0.5948
8.4638
8.4638
0.0112
0.0112
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
lb/day
0.0183
0.0183
0.0183
0.0183
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0183
0.0183
0.0183
0.0183
0.0000
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
1,080.126 1,080.1265
5
0.3493
1,087.462
5
0.0000
1,080.126 1,080.1265
5
0.0000
0.3493
1,087.462
5
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Category
Fugitive
PM10
Fugitive
PM2.5
NBioCO2
lb/day
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
lb/day
Hauling
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Vendor
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Worker
0.0280
0.0372
0.3907
1.3300e003
0.1118
8.6000e004
0.1126
0.0296
7.9000e004
0.0304
93.8307
93.8307
4.4300e003
93.9238
Total
0.0280
0.0372
0.3907
1.3300e003
0.1118
8.6000e004
0.1126
0.0296
7.9000e004
0.0304
93.8307
93.8307
4.4300e003
93.9238
LUXE Hotel Project
Construction Schedule, Demolition and Soil Excavation Quantities, and Vehicle Trips
Construction Phase
Phase 1
Site Preparation
Site Demolition
Mass Grading/Excavation
Foundation
Building Construction
Paving d
Architectural Coating
Phase 2
Existing Hotel Demolition
Mass Grading/Excavation
Foundation
Building Construction
Paving d
Architectural Coating
Start Date End Date No. Work Days
8/8/2017
8/15/2017
8/29/2017
11/8/2017
1/17/2018
8/14/2017
8/28/2017
11/7/2017
1/16/2018
5/29/2020
5
10
51
50
618
6/10/2019
10/4/2018
7/8/2019
4/7/2020
21
394
6/29/2020
10/7/2020
11/25/2020
1/25/2021
10/6/2020
11/24/2020
1/22/2021
3/15/2023
72
35
43
558
11/9/2021
8/9/2021
12/6/2021
1/13/2023
20
375
Demo (SF) a
16,000
Demo Truck Demo Truck Demo Truck Capacity Total One‐ Daily One‐ Soil Export Soil Import (CY) a
Way Trips Way Trips
(CY)
(CY)
11
‐
14
14,258
Concrete Truck Capacity (CY)
Concrete Concrete Concrete Concrete Concrete Concrete Vendor One‐ Worker One‐
Way Way Truck Total Truck Daily Mat Volume Truck Total Truck Daily Truck a
One‐Way One‐Way Capacity One‐Way One‐Way Trips/Max Trips/Max Trips
Trips
Trips
Trips
(CY)
Day b
Day c
(CY)
160
9,500
9
2,112
50
9,500
9
2,112
50
100
10
15
30
25
700
10
100
353,000
11
Soil export quantities and foundation concrete mat quantities provided by Hazens Group (December 2015).
b.
Vendor trips are associated with the Building Construction phase and are based on CalEEMod assumptions.
c.
Worker trips are based on CalEEMod assumptions.
d.
Phase assumed to be part of the "Exterior Skin‐Podium (L1) Exterior Buildout and Store Fronts" construction activities.
Sources: Hazens Group, Februrary 2016; PCR Services Corporation, Februrary 2016
Soil Haul Soil Haul Truck Total Truck Daily Concrete One‐Way One‐Way Mat Volume
Trips
(CY)
Trips
5
99,800
Notes:
a.
20
Soil Haul Truck Capacity (CY)
1,957
25
102,300
‐
14
14,615
160
8,600
9
1,912
50
8,600
9
1,912
50
100
20
15
20
500
10
70
LUXE Hotel Project
On‐Road Truck Regional Emissions
On‐Road Truck Regional Running Emissions
Construction Phase
Source
Year
Daily
One‐Way
Truck Trips
Work Days Work Hours
per Year
per Day
(days/year) (hours/day)
One‐Way
Trip Distance
per Day
(miles)
ROG
NOX
CO
Running Emissions Factor
(grams/mile)
SO2
PM10
PM2.5
CO2e
ROG
NOX
CO
Regional Emissions
(pounds/day)
PM2.5
CO2e
(metric tons/year)
SO2
PM10
Phase 1
Site Preparation
Site Demolition
Mass Grading/Excavation
Foundation ‐ Year 1
Foundation ‐ Year 2
Building Construction ‐ Year 1
Building Construction ‐ Year 2
Building Construction ‐ Year 3
Architectural Coating ‐ Year 1
Architectural Coating ‐ Year 2
Architectural Coating ‐ Year 3
Paving d
‐
T7 Single Construction
T7 Single Construction
T7 Single Construction
T7 Single Construction
On‐Road MHDT/HHDT Trucks
On‐Road MHDT/HHDT Trucks
On‐Road MHDT/HHDT Trucks
‐
‐
‐
‐
2017
2017
2017
2017
2018
2018
2019
2020
2018
2019
2020
2019
0
5
160
50
50
100
100
100
0
0
0
0
5
10
51
38
12
249
261
108
324
261
70
21
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
0
20
20
25
25
7
7
7
0
0
0
0
0.2010
0.2010
0.2010
0.2010
0.1470
0.1791
0.1662
0.1415
0.1791
0.1662
0.1415
0.1662
6.4607
6.4607
6.4607
6.4607
5.5223
4.2733
4.0394
3.6097
4.2733
4.0394
3.6097
4.0394
0.7497
0.7497
0.7497
0.7497
0.5703
1.1255
1.0697
0.9920
1.1255
1.0697
0.9920
1.0697
0.0160
0.0160
0.0160
0.0160
0.0164
0.0141
0.0144
0.0148
0.0141
0.0144
0.0148
0.0144
0.0718
0.0718
0.0718
0.0718
0.0393
0.0552
0.0489
0.0345
0.0552
0.0489
0.0345
0.0489
0.0687
0.0687
0.0687
0.0687
0.0376
0.0528
0.0468
0.0330
0.0528
0.0468
0.0330
0.0468
1,682.50
1,682.50
1,682.50
1,682.50
1,719.62
1,501.68
1,539.98
1,580.79
1,501.68
1,539.98
1,580.79
1,539.98
‐
0.04
1.42
0.55
0.41
0.28
0.26
0.22
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
1.42
45.58
17.80
15.22
6.59
6.23
5.57
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
0.17
5.29
2.07
1.57
1.74
1.65
1.53
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
0.00
0.11
0.04
0.05
0.02
0.02
0.02
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
0.02
0.51
0.20
0.11
0.09
0.08
0.05
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
0.02 2 0.48 275
0.19 80
0.10 26
0.08 262
0.07 281
0.05 120
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
Phase 2
Existing Hotel Demolition
Mass Grading/Excavation
Foundation ‐ Year 1
Foundation ‐ Year 2
Building Construction ‐ Year 1
Building Construction ‐ Year 2
Building Construction ‐ Year 3
Architectural Coating ‐ Year 1
Architectural Coating ‐ Year 2
Architectural Coating ‐ Year 3
Paving d
T7 Single Construction
T7 Single Construction
T7 Single Construction
T7 Single Construction
On‐Road MHDT/HHDT Trucks
On‐Road MHDT/HHDT Trucks
On‐Road MHDT/HHDT Trucks
‐
‐
‐
‐
2020
2020
2020
2021
2021
2022
2023
2021
2022
2023
2021
25
160
50
50
100
100
100
0
0
0
0
72
35
27
16
245
260
53
105
260
10
20
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
20
20
25
25
7
7
7
0
0
0
0
0.1136
0.1136
0.1136
0.1118
0.1168
0.1145
0.0797
0.1168
0.1145
0.0797
0.1168
4.4601
4.4601
4.4601
3.9978
3.1486
2.9646
1.7668
3.1486
2.9646
1.7668
3.1486
0.4738
0.4738
0.4738
0.4791
0.9165
0.9116
0.8481
0.9165
0.9116
0.8481
0.9165
0.0171
0.0171
0.0171
0.0172
0.0152
0.0155
0.0154
0.0152
0.0155
0.0154
0.0152
0.0212
0.0212
0.0212
0.0192
0.0136
0.0124
0.0056
0.0136
0.0124
0.0056
0.0136
0.0203
0.0203
0.0203
0.0184
0.0130
0.0118
0.0053
0.0130
0.0118
0.0053
0.0130
1,790.29
1,790.29
1,790.29
1,800.48
1,622.06
1,655.51
1,654.08
1,622.06
1,655.51
1,654.08
1,622.06
0.13
0.80
0.31
0.31
0.18
0.18
0.12
‐
‐
‐
‐
4.92
31.47
12.29
11.02
4.86
4.58
2.73
‐
‐
‐
‐
0.52
3.34
1.31
1.32
1.41
1.41
1.31
‐
‐
‐
‐
0.02
0.12
0.05
0.05
0.02
0.02
0.02
‐
‐
‐
‐
0.02
0.15
0.06
0.05
0.02
0.02
0.01
‐
‐
‐
‐
0.02
0.14
0.06
0.05
0.02
0.02
0.01
‐
‐
‐
‐
64
201
60
36
278
301
61
‐
‐
‐
‐
Source
Year
Daily
Number of Trucks
PM2.5
CO2e
(metric tons/year)
On‐Road Truck Idling Emissions
Construction Phase
Work Days Work Hours
per Year
per Day
Idling Time
per Truck
(days/year) (hours/day)
(minutes)
ROG
NOX
CO
Idling Emissions Factor
(grams/hour)
SO2
PM10
PM2.5
CO2e
ROG
NOX
CO
Regional Emissions
(pounds/day)
SO2
PM10
Phase 1
Site Preparation
Site Demolition
Mass Grading/Excavation
Foundation ‐ Year 1
Foundation ‐ Year 2
Building Construction ‐ Year 1
Building Construction ‐ Year 2
Building Construction ‐ Year 3
Architectural Coating ‐ Year 1
Architectural Coating ‐ Year 2
Architectural Coating ‐ Year 3
Paving d
‐
T7 Single Construction
T7 Single Construction
T7 Single Construction
T7 Single Construction
On‐Road MHDT/HHDT Trucks
On‐Road MHDT/HHDT Trucks
On‐Road MHDT/HHDT Trucks
‐
‐
‐
‐
2017
2017
2017
2017
2018
2018
2019
2020
2018
2019
2020
2019
0
5
160
50
50
100
100
100
0
0
0
0
5
10
51
38
12
249
261
108
324
261
70
21
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
15
15
15
25
25
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
2.4393
2.4393
2.4393
2.4393
1.9800
1.6825
1.5610
1.3726
1.6825
1.5610
1.3726
1.5610
56.1771
56.1771
56.1771
56.1771
50.0628
48.4813
44.5192
38.0209
48.4813
44.5192
38.0209
44.5192
10.3466
10.3466
10.3466
10.3466
8.2237
17.2427
16.0614
14.3710
17.2427
16.0614
14.3710
16.0614
0.0641
0.0641
0.0641
0.0641
0.0632
0.0668
0.0660
0.0652
0.0668
0.0660
0.0652
0.0660
0.2216
0.2216
0.2216
0.2216
0.1541
0.1491
0.1241
0.0740
0.1491
0.1241
0.0740
0.1241
0.2120
0.2120
0.2120
0.2120
0.1475
0.1427
0.1188
0.0708
0.1427
0.1188
0.0708
0.1188
6,720.16
6,720.16
6,720.16
6,720.16
6,631.77
7,062.39
6,989.52
6,907.51
7,062.39
6,989.52
6,907.51
6,989.52
‐
0.01
0.22
0.11
0.09
0.09
0.09
0.08
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
0.15
4.95
2.58
2.30
2.67
2.45
2.10
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
0.03
0.91
0.48
0.38
0.95
0.89
0.79
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
0.00
0.02
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.00
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
0.00 0 0.02 14
0.01 5 0.01 2 0.01 44
0.01 46
0.00 19
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
Phase 2
Existing Hotel Demolition
Mass Grading/Excavation
Foundation ‐ Year 1
Foundation ‐ Year 2
Building Construction ‐ Year 1
Building Construction ‐ Year 2
Building Construction ‐ Year 3
Architectural Coating ‐ Year 1
Architectural Coating ‐ Year 2
Architectural Coating ‐ Year 3
Paving d
T7 Single Construction
T7 Single Construction
T7 Single Construction
T7 Single Construction
On‐Road MHDT/HHDT Trucks
On‐Road MHDT/HHDT Trucks
On‐Road MHDT/HHDT Trucks
‐
‐
‐
‐
2020
2020
2020
2021
2021
2022
2023
2021
2022
2023
2021
25
160
50
50
100
100
100
0
0
0
0
72
35
27
16
245
260
53
105
260
10
20
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
15
15
25
25
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
0.9730
0.9730
0.9730
0.9340
1.1982
1.1319
0.9446
1.1982
1.1319
0.9446
1.1982
35.1225
35.1225
35.1225
33.1449
28.7657
26.9322
18.8169
28.7657
26.9322
18.8169
28.7657
3.8999
3.8999
3.8999
3.7248
12.5576
11.9202
10.8527
12.5576
11.9202
10.8527
12.5576
0.0617
0.0617
0.0617
0.0611
0.0641
0.0634
0.0610
0.0641
0.0634
0.0610
0.0641
0.0158
0.0158
0.0158
0.0137
0.0182
0.0158
0.0096
0.0182
0.0158
0.0096
0.0182
0.0151
0.0151
0.0151
0.0131
0.0174
0.0151
0.0092
0.0174
0.0151
0.0092
0.0174
6,466.46
6,466.46
6,466.46
6,401.61
6,793.52
6,722.53
6,475.05
6,793.52
6,722.53
6,475.05
6,793.52
0.01
0.09
0.04
0.04
0.07
0.06
0.05
‐
‐
‐
‐
0.48
3.10
1.61
1.52
1.59
1.48
1.04
‐
‐
‐
‐
0.05
0.34
0.18
0.17
0.69
0.66
0.60
‐
‐
‐
‐
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
‐
‐
‐
‐
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
‐
‐
‐
‐
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
‐
‐
‐
‐
One‐Way
Trip Distance
per Day
(miles)
PM10
RD
PM10
BW
PM2.5
TW
PM10
RD
PM10
BW
PM10
TW
3 9 4 2 42
44
9 ‐
‐
‐
‐
On‐Road Truck Fugitive Dust Emissions (Paved Road Dust (RD), Break Wear (BW), Tire Wear (TW))
Construction Phase
Source
Year
Daily
One‐Way
Truck Trips
Work Days Work Hours
per Day
per Year
(days/year) (hours/day)
Fugitive Dust Emissions Factor
(grams/mile)
PM10
PM2.5
PM2.5
TW
RD
BW
Regional Emissions
(pounds/day)
PM2.5
PM2.5
RD
BW
PM2.5
TW
Phase 1
Site Preparation
Site Demolition
Mass Grading/Excavation
Foundation ‐ Year 1
Foundation ‐ Year 2
Building Construction ‐ Year 1
Building Construction ‐ Year 2
Building Construction ‐ Year 3
Architectural Coating ‐ Year 1
Architectural Coating ‐ Year 2
Architectural Coating ‐ Year 3
Paving d
‐
T7 Single Construction
T7 Single Construction
T7 Single Construction
T7 Single Construction
On‐Road MHDT/HHDT Trucks
On‐Road MHDT/HHDT Trucks
On‐Road MHDT/HHDT Trucks
‐
‐
‐
‐
2017
2017
2017
2017
2018
2018
2019
2020
2018
2019
2020
2019
0
5
160
50
50
100
100
100
0
0
0
0
5
10
51
38
12
249
261
108
324
261
70
21
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
0
20
20
25
25
7
7
7
0
0
0
0
0.2998
0.2998
0.2998
0.2998
0.2998
0.2998
0.2998
0.2998
0.2998
0.2998
0.2998
0.2998
0.0617
0.0617
0.0617
0.0617
0.0639
0.0988
0.1025
0.1061
0.0988
0.1025
0.1061
0.1025
0.0360
0.0360
0.0360
0.0360
0.0373
0.0245
0.0254
0.0263
0.0245
0.0254
0.0263
0.0254
0.0736
0.0736
0.0736
0.0736
0.0736
0.0736
0.0736
0.0736
0.0736
0.0736
0.0736
0.0736
0.0265
0.0265
0.0265
0.0265
0.0274
0.0423
0.0439
0.0455
0.0423
0.0439
0.0455
0.0439
0.0090
0.0090
0.0090
0.0090
0.0093
0.0061
0.0064
0.0066
0.0061
0.0064
0.0066
0.0064
‐
0.0661
2.1154
0.8263
0.8263
0.4627
0.4627
0.4627
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
0.0136
0.4356
0.1701
0.1761
0.1524
0.1582
0.1638
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
0.0079
0.2540
0.0992
0.1027
0.0378
0.0392
0.0407
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
0.0162
0.5192
0.2028
0.2028
0.1136
0.1136
0.1136
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
0.0058
0.1867
0.0729
0.0755
0.0653
0.0678
0.0702
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
0.0020
0.0635
0.0248
0.0257
0.0094
0.0098
0.0102
‐
‐
‐
‐
Phase 2
Existing Hotel Demolition
Mass Grading/Excavation
Foundation ‐ Year 1
Foundation ‐ Year 2
Building Construction ‐ Year 1
Building Construction ‐ Year 2
Building Construction ‐ Year 3
Architectural Coating ‐ Year 1
Architectural Coating ‐ Year 2
Architectural Coating ‐ Year 3
Paving d
T7 Single Construction
T7 Single Construction
T7 Single Construction
T7 Single Construction
On‐Road MHDT/HHDT Trucks
On‐Road MHDT/HHDT Trucks
On‐Road MHDT/HHDT Trucks
‐
‐
‐
‐
2020
2020
2020
2021
2021
2022
2023
2021
2022
2023
2021
25
160
50
50
100
100
100
0
0
0
0
72
35
27
16
245
260
53
105
260
10
20
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
20
20
25
25
7
7
7
0
0
0
0
0.2998
0.2998
0.2998
0.2998
0.2998
0.2998
0.2998
0.2998
0.2998
0.2998
0.2998
0.0682
0.0682
0.0682
0.0692
0.1096
0.1127
0.1157
0.1096
0.1127
0.1157
0.1096
0.0397
0.0397
0.0397
0.0404
0.0273
0.0281
0.0289
0.0273
0.0281
0.0289
0.0273
0.0736
0.0736
0.0736
0.0736
0.0736
0.0736
0.0736
0.0736
0.0736
0.0736
0.0736
0.0292
0.0292
0.0292
0.0297
0.0470
0.0483
0.0496
0.0470
0.0483
0.0496
0.0470
0.0099
0.0099
0.0099
0.0101
0.0068
0.0070
0.0072
0.0068
0.0070
0.0072
0.0068
0.3305
2.1154
0.8263
0.8263
0.4627
0.4627
0.4627
‐
‐
‐
‐
0.0751
0.4808
0.1878
0.1908
0.1691
0.1740
0.1786
‐
‐
‐
‐
0.0438
0.2804
0.1095
0.1113
0.0421
0.0434
0.0446
‐
‐
‐
‐
0.0811
0.5192
0.2028
0.2028
0.1136
0.1136
0.1136
‐
‐
‐
‐
0.0322
0.2061
0.0805
0.0818
0.0725
0.0746
0.0765
‐
‐
‐
‐
0.0110
0.0701
0.0274
0.0278
0.0105
0.0108
0.0112
‐
‐
‐
‐
ROG
NOX
CO
SO2
PM10
Dust
PM10
Exh
Summary of On‐Road Truck Regional Emissions
Construction Phase
Source
Year
Regional Emissions
(pounds/day)
PM10
PM2.5
Total
Dust
PM2.5
Exh
PM2.5
Total
CO2e
(metric tons/year)
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
F
G
H
G
Phase 1
Site Preparation
Site Demolition
Mass Grading/Excavation
Foundation ‐ Year 1
Foundation ‐ Year 2
Building Construction ‐ Year 1
Building Construction ‐ Year 2
Building Construction ‐ Year 3
Architectural Coating ‐ Year 1
Architectural Coating ‐ Year 2
Architectural Coating ‐ Year 3
Paving d
‐
T7 Single Construction
T7 Single Construction
T7 Single Construction
T7 Single Construction
On‐Road MHDT/HHDT Trucks
On‐Road MHDT/HHDT Trucks
On‐Road MHDT/HHDT Trucks
‐
‐
‐
‐
2017
2017
2017
2017
2018
2018
2019
2020
2018
2019
2020
2019
‐
0.05
1.63
0.67
0.50
0.37
0.34
0.29
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
1.58
50.53
20.38
17.52
9.27
8.69
7.67
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
0.19
6.20
2.54
1.95
2.69
2.54
2.32
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
0.00
0.12
0.05
0.05
0.03
0.03
0.03
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
0.09
2.80
1.10
1.11
0.65
0.66
0.67
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
0.02
0.53
0.21
0.12
0.09
0.08
0.06
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
0.10
3.33
1.30
1.22
0.75
0.74
0.72
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
0.02
0.77
0.30
0.30
0.19
0.19
0.19
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
0.02
0.50
0.20
0.11
0.09
0.08
0.05
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
0.04
1.27
0.50
0.41
0.28
0.27
0.25
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
2 288
85
27
306
327
138
‐
‐
‐
‐
I
J
K
L
M
N
O
M
N
O
M
Phase 2
Existing Hotel Demolition
Mass Grading/Excavation
Foundation ‐ Year 1
Foundation ‐ Year 2
Building Construction ‐ Year 1
Building Construction ‐ Year 2
Building Construction ‐ Year 3
Architectural Coating ‐ Year 1
Architectural Coating ‐ Year 2
Architectural Coating ‐ Year 3
Paving d
T7 Single Construction
T7 Single Construction
T7 Single Construction
T7 Single Construction
On‐Road MHDT/HHDT Trucks
On‐Road MHDT/HHDT Trucks
On‐Road MHDT/HHDT Trucks
‐
‐
‐
‐
2020
2020
2020
2021
2021
2022
2023
2021
2022
2023
2021
0.14
0.89
0.36
0.35
0.25
0.24
0.18
‐
‐
‐
‐
5.40
34.56
13.90
12.54
6.44
6.06
3.76
‐
‐
‐
‐
0.58
3.69
1.48
1.49
2.11
2.06
1.91
‐
‐
‐
‐
0.02
0.13
0.05
0.05
0.03
0.03
0.03
‐
‐
‐
‐
0.45
2.88
1.12
1.13
0.67
0.68
0.69
‐
‐
‐
‐
0.02
0.15
0.06
0.05
0.02
0.02
0.01
‐
‐
‐
‐
0.47
3.03
1.18
1.18
0.70
0.70
0.70
‐
‐
‐
‐
0.12
0.80
0.31
0.31
0.20
0.20
0.20
‐
‐
‐
‐
0.02
0.14
0.06
0.05
0.02
0.02
0.01
‐
‐
‐
‐
0.15
0.94
0.37
0.36
0.22
0.22
0.21
‐
‐
‐
‐
67
210
64
38
320
345
70
‐
‐
‐
‐
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
Phase 1
Site Preparation ‐ 2017
Demolition ‐ 2017
Grading ‐ 2017
Foundation ‐ 2017
Foundation ‐ 2018
Building Construction and Architectural Coating ‐ 2018
Building Construction, Architectural Coating, and Paving ‐ 2019
Building Construction and Architectural Coating ‐ 2020
‐
0.1
1.6
0.7
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.3
‐
1.6
50.5
20.4
17.5
9.3
8.7
7.7
‐
0.2
6.2
2.5
1.9
2.7
2.5
2.3
‐
0.0
0.1
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
‐
0.1
2.8
1.1
1.1
0.7
0.7
0.7
‐
0.0
0.5
0.2
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
‐
0.1
3.3
1.3
1.2
0.7
0.7
0.7
‐
0.0
0.8
0.3
0.3
0.2
0.2
0.2
‐
0.0
0.5
0.2
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
‐
0.0
1.3
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.3
0.2
‐ 1.77
288.29
85.24
27.45
305.71
326.96
138.16
I
J
K
L
M
N
O
Phase 2
Demolition ‐ 2020
Grading ‐ 2020
Foundation ‐ 2020
Foundation ‐ 2021
Building Construction, Architectural Coating, and Paving ‐ 2021
Building Construction and Architectural Coating ‐ 2022
Building Construction and Architectural Coating ‐ 2023
0.1
0.9
0.4
0.4
0.2
0.2
0.2
5.4
34.6
13.9
12.5
6.4
6.1
3.8
0.6
3.7
1.5
1.5
2.1
2.1
1.9
0.0
0.1
0.0
0.1
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.4
2.9
1.1
1.1
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.0
0.2
0.1
0.1
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.5
3.0
1.2
1.2
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.1
0.8
0.3
0.3
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.0
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.1
0.9
0.4
0.4
0.2
0.2
0.2
67.36
209.57
64.06
38.14
319.79
345.00
69.95
LUXE Hotel Project
On‐Road Truck Localized (On‐Site Idling) Emissions
On‐Road Truck On‐Site Idling Emissions
Construction Phase
Source
Year
Daily
Number of Trucks
Work Days
per Year
Work Hours
per Day
Idling Time
per Truck
Idling Emissions Factor
(grams/hour)
Regional Emissions
(pounds/day)
(days/year) (hours/day)
(minutes)
ROG
NOX
CO
SO2
PM10
PM2.5
CO2e
ROG
NOX
CO
SO2
PM10
PM2.5
CO2e
(metric tons/year)
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
F
G
H
G
Site Preparation
Site Demolition
Mass Grading/Excavation
Foundation ‐ Year 1
Foundation ‐ Year 2
Building Construction ‐ Year 1
Building Construction ‐ Year 2
Building Construction ‐ Year 3
Architectural Coating ‐ Year 1
Architectural Coating ‐ Year 2
Architectural Coating ‐ Year 3
Paving d
‐
T7 Single Construction
T7 Single Construction
T7 Single Construction
T7 Single Construction
On‐Road MHDT/HHDT Trucks
On‐Road MHDT/HHDT Trucks
On‐Road MHDT/HHDT Trucks
‐
‐
‐
‐
2017
2017
2017
2017
2018
2018
2019
2020
2018
2019
2020
2019
0
5
160
50
50
100
100
100
0
0
0
0
5
10
51
38
12
249
261
108
324
261
70
21
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
15
15
15
25
25
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
2.4393
2.4393
2.4393
2.4393
1.9800
1.6825
1.5610
1.3726
1.6825
1.5610
1.3726
1.5610
56.1771
56.1771
56.1771
56.1771
50.0628
48.4813
44.5192
38.0209
48.4813
44.5192
38.0209
44.5192
10.3466
10.3466
10.3466
10.3466
8.2237
17.2427
16.0614
14.3710
17.2427
16.0614
14.3710
16.0614
0.0641
0.0641
0.0641
0.0641
0.0632
0.0668
0.0660
0.0652
0.0668
0.0660
0.0652
0.0660
0.2216
0.2216
0.2216
0.2216
0.1541
0.1491
0.1241
0.0740
0.1491
0.1241
0.0740
0.1241
0.2120
0.2120
0.2120
0.2120
0.1475
0.1427
0.1188
0.0708
0.1427
0.1188
0.0708
0.1188
6,720.16
6,720.16
6,720.16
6,720.16
6,631.77
7,062.39
6,989.52
6,907.51
7,062.39
6,989.52
6,907.51
6,989.52
‐
0.01
0.22
0.11
0.09
0.09
0.09
0.08
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
0.15
4.95
2.58
2.30
2.67
2.45
2.10
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
0.03
0.91
0.48
0.38
0.95
0.89
0.79
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
0.00
0.02
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.00
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
0.00
0.02
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.00
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
0
14
5
2
44
46
19
‐
‐
‐
‐
I
J
K
L
M
N
O
M
N
O
M
Existing Hotel Demolition
Mass Grading/Excavation
Foundation ‐ Year 1
Foundation ‐ Year 2
Building Construction ‐ Year 1
Building Construction ‐ Year 2
Building Construction ‐ Year 3
Architectural Coating ‐ Year 1
Architectural Coating ‐ Year 2
Architectural Coating ‐ Year 3
Paving d
T7 Single Construction
T7 Single Construction
T7 Single Construction
T7 Single Construction
On‐Road MHDT/HHDT Trucks
On‐Road MHDT/HHDT Trucks
On‐Road MHDT/HHDT Trucks
‐
‐
‐
‐
2020
2020
2020
2021
2021
2022
2023
2021
2022
2023
2021
25
160
50
50
100
100
100
0
0
0
0
72
35
27
16
245
260
53
105
260
10
20
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
15
15
25
25
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
0.9730
0.9730
0.9730
0.9340
1.1982
1.1319
0.9446
1.1982
1.1319
0.9446
1.1982
35.1225
35.1225
35.1225
33.1449
28.7657
26.9322
18.8169
28.7657
26.9322
18.8169
28.7657
3.8999
3.8999
3.8999
3.7248
12.5576
11.9202
10.8527
12.5576
11.9202
10.8527
12.5576
0.0617
0.0617
0.0617
0.0611
0.0641
0.0634
0.0610
0.0641
0.0634
0.0610
0.0641
0.0158
0.0158
0.0158
0.0137
0.0182
0.0158
0.0096
0.0182
0.0158
0.0096
0.0182
0.0151
0.0151
0.0151
0.0131
0.0174
0.0151
0.0092
0.0174
0.0151
0.0092
0.0174
6,466.46
6,466.46
6,466.46
6,401.61
6,793.52
6,722.53
6,475.05
6,793.52
6,722.53
6,475.05
6,793.52
0.01
0.09
0.04
0.04
0.07
0.06
0.05
‐
‐
‐
‐
0.48
3.10
1.61
1.52
1.59
1.48
1.04
‐
‐
‐
‐
0.05
0.34
0.18
0.17
0.69
0.66
0.60
‐
‐
‐
‐
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
‐
‐
‐
‐
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
‐
‐
‐
‐
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
‐
‐
‐
‐
3
9
4
2
42
44
9
‐
‐
‐
‐
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
Phase 1
Site Preparation ‐ 2017
Demolition ‐ 2017
Grading ‐ 2017
Foundation ‐ 2017
Foundation ‐ 2018
Building Construction and Architectural Coating ‐ 2018
Building Construction, Architectural Coating, and Paving ‐ 2019
Building Construction and Architectural Coating ‐ 2020
‐
0.0
0.2
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
‐
0.2
5.0
2.6
2.3
2.7
2.5
2.1
‐
0.0
0.9
0.5
0.4
1.0
0.9
0.8
‐
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
‐
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
‐
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
‐
0.1
13.7
5.3
1.7
44.0
45.6
18.7
I
J
K
L
M
N
O
Phase 2
Demolition ‐ 2020
Grading ‐ 2020
Foundation ‐ 2020
Foundation ‐ 2021
Building Construction, Architectural Coating, and Paving ‐ 2021
Building Construction and Architectural Coating ‐ 2022
Building Construction and Architectural Coating ‐ 2023
0.0
0.1
0.0
0.0
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.5
3.1
1.6
1.5
1.6
1.5
1.0
0.1
0.3
0.2
0.2
0.7
0.7
0.6
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
2.9
9.1
3.6
2.1
41.6
43.7
8.6
LUXE Hotel Project
On‐Road Truck Emissions Rate for Dispersion Modeling
Health Risk Assessment On‐Road Truck Running Emissions Rates
Construction Phase
DPM Source
Year
Daily
One‐Way
Truck Trips
Work Days
per Year
Work Hours
per Day
(days/year) (hours/day)
One‐Way
Trip Distance
per Day
(miles)
Emissions Rate during Work Running Period
Emissions Factor
(grams/mile) (grams/second)
PM10
PM10
Phase 1
Site Preparation
Site Demolition
Mass Grading/Excavation
Foundation ‐ Year 1
Foundation ‐ Year 2
Building Construction ‐ Year 1
Building Construction ‐ Year 2
Building Construction ‐ Year 3
Architectural Coating ‐ Year 1
Architectural Coating ‐ Year 2
Architectural Coating ‐ Year 3
Paving d
‐
T7 Single Construction
T7 Single Construction
T7 Single Construction
T7 Single Construction
On‐Road MHDT/HHDT Trucks
On‐Road MHDT/HHDT Trucks
On‐Road MHDT/HHDT Trucks
‐
‐
‐
‐
2017
2017
2017
2017
2018
2018
2019
2020
2018
2019
2020
2019
0
5
160
50
50
100
100
100
0
0
0
0
5
10
51
38
12
249
261
108
324
261
70
21
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
0.736
0.0718
0.736
0.0718
0.736
0.0673
0.736
0.0673
0.736
0.0552
0.736
0.0552
0.736
0.0357
0.736
0.0212
0.736
0.0393
0.736
0.0357
0.736
0.0212
0.736
0.0357
Average Rate for Phase 1 Construction:
Work Days:
0.00E+00
9.16E‐06
2.75E‐04
8.59E‐05
7.05E‐05
1.41E‐04
9.12E‐05
5.42E‐05
0.00E+00
0.00E+00
0.00E+00
0.00E+00
1.26E‐03
734
Phase 2
Existing Hotel Demolition
Mass Grading/Excavation
Foundation ‐ Year 1
Foundation ‐ Year 2
Building Construction ‐ Year 1
Building Construction ‐ Year 2
Building Construction ‐ Year 3
Architectural Coating ‐ Year 1
Architectural Coating ‐ Year 2
Architectural Coating ‐ Year 3
Paving d
T7 Single Construction
T7 Single Construction
T7 Single Construction
T7 Single Construction
On‐Road MHDT/HHDT Trucks
On‐Road MHDT/HHDT Trucks
On‐Road MHDT/HHDT Trucks
‐
‐
‐
‐
2020
2020
2020
2021
2021
2022
2023
2021
2022
2023
2021
25
160
50
50
100
100
100
0
0
0
0
72
35
27
16
245
260
53
105
260
10
20
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
1.143
0.0212
1.143
0.0345
1.143
0.0345
1.143
0.0192
1.143
0.0192
1.143
0.0167
1.143
0.0054
1.143
0.0192
1.143
0.0167
1.143
0.0054
1.143
0.0192
Average Rate for Phase 2 Construction:
Work Days:
2.11E‐05
2.19E‐04
6.84E‐05
3.81E‐05
7.62E‐05
6.62E‐05
2.14E‐05
0.00E+00
0.00E+00
0.00E+00
0.00E+00
4.19E‐05
708
Source: PCR Services Corporation, 2016
Health Risk Assessment On‐Road Truck Idling Emissions Rates
Construction Phase
DPM Source
Year
Daily
Number of Trucks
Work Days
per Year
Work Hours
per Day
Idling Time
per Truck
(days/year) (hours/day)
(minutes)
Phase 1
Site Preparation
Site Demolition
Mass Grading/Excavation
Foundation ‐ Year 1
Foundation ‐ Year 2
Building Construction ‐ Year 1
Building Construction ‐ Year 2
Building Construction ‐ Year 3
Architectural Coating ‐ Year 1
Architectural Coating ‐ Year 2
Architectural Coating ‐ Year 3
Paving d
‐
T7 Single Construction
T7 Single Construction
T7 Single Construction
T7 Single Construction
On‐Road MHDT/HHDT Trucks
On‐Road MHDT/HHDT Trucks
On‐Road MHDT/HHDT Trucks
‐
‐
‐
‐
2017
2017
2017
2017
2018
2018
2019
2020
2018
2019
2020
2019
0
5
160
50
50
100
100
100
0
0
0
0
5
10
51
38
12
249
261
108
324
261
70
21
Phase 2
Existing Hotel Demolition
Mass Grading/Excavation
Foundation ‐ Year 1
Foundation ‐ Year 2
Building Construction ‐ Year 1
Building Construction ‐ Year 2
Building Construction ‐ Year 3
Architectural Coating ‐ Year 1
Architectural Coating ‐ Year 2
Architectural Coating ‐ Year 3
Paving d
T7 Single Construction
T7 Single Construction
T7 Single Construction
T7 Single Construction
On‐Road MHDT/HHDT Trucks
On‐Road MHDT/HHDT Trucks
On‐Road MHDT/HHDT Trucks
‐
‐
‐
‐
2020
2020
2020
2021
2021
2022
2023
2021
2022
2023
2021
25
160
50
50
100
100
100
0
0
0
0
72
35
27
16
245
260
53
105
260
10
20
Source: PCR Services Corporation, 2016
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
Emissions Rate Idling Emissions during Work Period
Factor
(grams/hour) (grams/second)
PM10
PM10
15
0.2216
15
0.2216
15
0.1798
25
0.1798
25
0.1491
15
0.1491
15
0.1334
15
0.0158
15
0.1541
15
0.1334
15
0.0158
15
0.1334
Average Rate for Phase 1 Construction:
Work Days:
0.00E+00
9.62E‐06
2.50E‐04
1.30E‐04
1.08E‐04
1.29E‐04
1.16E‐04
1.37E‐05
0.00E+00
0.00E+00
0.00E+00
0.00E+00
1.26E‐03
734
8
15
0.0158
8
15
0.0740
8
15
0.0740
8
25
0.0137
8
25
0.0137
8
15
0.0118
8
15
0.0019
8
15
0.0137
8
15
0.0118
8
15
0.0019
8
15
0.0137
Average Rate for SEQ Construction Activity/Taxiway:
Work Days:
3.42E‐06
1.03E‐04
3.21E‐05
9.93E‐06
1.99E‐05
1.02E‐05
1.62E‐06
0.00E+00
0.00E+00
0.00E+00
0.00E+00
1.08E‐05
708
LUXE Hotel Project
On‐Road Truck Emission Factors (Aggregate Model Year, Aggregate Speeds)
EMFAC2014 (v1.0.7) Emission Rates
Region Type: Sub‐Area
Region: Los Angeles (SC)
Calendar Years: 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023
Season: Annual
Vehicle Classification: EMFAC2011 Categories
Units: miles/day for VMT, trips/day for Trips, g/mile for RUNEX, PMBW and PMTW, g/trip for STREX, HTSK and RUNLS, g/vehicle/hour for IDLEX, RESTL and DIURN
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
CO_IDLEX
12
13
14
15
CRITERIA AIR POLLUTANTS
SO2_RUNEX SO2_IDLEX PM10_BW
PM10_TW
16
17
PM10_RUNEX PM10_IDLEX
18
PM2.5_BW
19
PM2.5_TW
20
21
PM2.5_RUNEX PM2.5_IDLEX
22
23
24
25
26
27
GREENHOUSE GASES
CO2_RUNEX CO2_IDLEX CH4_RUNEX CH4_IDLEX CO2e_RUNEX CO2e_IDLEX
CalYr VehClass
MdlYr
Speed
Fuel
ROG_RUNEX ROG_IDLEX NOx_RUNEX NOx_IDLEX
Los Angeles County (SC)
Los Angeles County (SC)
Los Angeles County (SC)
Los Angeles County (SC)
Los Angeles County (SC)
Los Angeles County (SC)
Los Angeles County (SC)
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
T7 single construction
T7 single construction
T7 single construction
T7 single construction
T7 single construction
T7 single construction
T7 single construction
Aggregated
Aggregated
Aggregated
Aggregated
Aggregated
Aggregated
Aggregated
Aggregated
Aggregated
Aggregated
Aggregated
Aggregated
Aggregated
Aggregated
All
All
All
All
All
All
All
0.2010
0.1470
0.1395
0.1136
0.1118
0.1093
0.0724
2.4393
1.9800
1.8138
0.9730
0.9340
0.8932
0.5123
6.4607
5.5223
5.2121
4.4601
3.9978
3.5874
1.4332
56.1771
50.0628
46.8318
35.1225
33.1449
31.0120
15.7439
0.7497
0.5703
0.5526
0.4738
0.4791
0.4820
0.4229
10.3466
8.2237
7.5222
3.8999
3.7248
3.5401
1.8973
0.0160
0.0164
0.0167
0.0171
0.0172
0.0172
0.0169
0.0641
0.0632
0.0625
0.0617
0.0611
0.0604
0.0576
0.0617
0.0639
0.0660
0.0682
0.0692
0.0703
0.0712
0.0360
0.0373
0.0385
0.0397
0.0404
0.0410
0.0415
0.0718
0.0393
0.0357
0.0212
0.0192
0.0167
0.0054
0.2216
0.1541
0.1334
0.0158
0.0137
0.0118
0.0019
0.0265
0.0274
0.0283
0.0292
0.0297
0.0301
0.0305
0.0090
0.0093
0.0096
0.0099
0.0101
0.0102
0.0104
0.0687
0.0376
0.0342
0.0203
0.0184
0.0160
0.0052
0.2120
0.1475
0.1276
0.0151
0.0131
0.0113
0.0018
1,682.27
1,719.45
1,751.30
1,790.16
1,800.35
1,806.13
1,766.65
6,717.33
6,629.47
6,553.65
6,465.33
6,400.53
6,331.29
6,032.38
0.0093
0.0068
0.0065
0.0053
0.0052
0.0051
0.0034
0.1133
0.0920
0.0842
0.0452
0.0434
0.0415
0.0238
1,682.50
1,719.62
1,751.46
1,790.29
1,800.48
1,806.26
1,766.74
6,720.16
6,631.77
6,555.76
6,466.46
6,401.61
6,332.33
6,032.98
Los Angeles County (SC)
Los Angeles County (SC)
Los Angeles County (SC)
Los Angeles County (SC)
Los Angeles County (SC)
Los Angeles County (SC)
Los Angeles County (SC)
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
MHDT/HHDT
MHDT/HHDT
MHDT/HHDT
MHDT/HHDT
MHDT/HHDT
MHDT/HHDT
MHDT/HHDT
Aggregated
Aggregated
Aggregated
Aggregated
Aggregated
Aggregated
Aggregated
Aggregated
Aggregated
Aggregated
Aggregated
Aggregated
Aggregated
Aggregated
All
All
All
All
All
All
All
0.1987
0.1791
0.1662
0.1415
0.1168
0.1145
0.0797
1.8352
1.6825
1.5610
1.3726
1.1982
1.1319
0.9446
4.5768
4.2733
4.0394
3.6097
3.1486
2.9646
1.7668
52.8409
48.4813
44.5192
38.0209
28.7657
26.9322
18.8169
1.2131
1.1255
1.0697
0.9920
0.9165
0.9116
0.8481
18.6009
17.2427
16.0614
14.3710
12.5576
11.9202
10.8527
0.0138
0.0141
0.0144
0.0148
0.0152
0.0155
0.0154
0.0675
0.0668
0.0660
0.0652
0.0641
0.0634
0.0610
0.0956
0.0988
0.1025
0.1061
0.1096
0.1127
0.1157
0.0237
0.0245
0.0254
0.0263
0.0273
0.0281
0.0289
0.0673
0.0552
0.0489
0.0345
0.0136
0.0124
0.0056
0.1798
0.1491
0.1241
0.0740
0.0182
0.0158
0.0096
0.0410
0.0423
0.0439
0.0455
0.0470
0.0483
0.0496
0.0059
0.0061
0.0064
0.0066
0.0068
0.0070
0.0072
0.0644
0.0528
0.0468
0.0330
0.0130
0.0118
0.0053
0.1720
0.1427
0.1188
0.0708
0.0174
0.0151
0.0092
1,462.69
1,500.25
1,538.52
1,579.32
1,620.57
1,653.99
1,652.56
7,127.20
7,053.85
6,981.37
6,899.75
6,786.08
6,715.52
6,468.37
0.0566
0.0573
0.0584
0.0589
0.0594
0.0609
0.0608
0.3591
0.3416
0.3260
0.3106
0.2977
0.2806
0.2671
1,464.11
1,501.68
1,539.98
1,580.79
1,622.06
1,655.51
1,654.08
7,136.18
7,062.39
6,989.52
6,907.51
6,793.52
6,722.53
6,475.05
Source: California Air Resources Board, EMFAC2014, http://www.arb.ca.gov/emfac/2014/. Accessed February 2016.
CO_RUNEX
11
Region
LUXE Hotel Project
Road Dust Emission Factors
Paved Road Dust Emission Factors (Assumes No Precipitation)
Formula:
EFDust,P = (k (sL)0.91 × (W)1.02)
Where:
EFDust,P =
k =
sL =
W =
Paved Road Dust Emission Factor (having the same units as k)
particle size multiplier
2
road surface silt loading (g/m )
average fleet vehicle weight (tons) (CARB uses 2.4 tons as a fleet average vehicle weight factor)
Emission Factor (grams per VMT)
PM10
PM2.5
k
0.9979
0.2449
sL
0.1
0.1
W
2.4
2.4
EFDust,P
3.00E‐01
7.36E‐02
Unpaved Road Dust Emission Factors (Assumes No Precipitation)
Formula:
0.5
0.2
1
EFDust,U = (k ( s / 12) × (Sp / 30) / (M / 0.5) ) ‐ C)
Where:
EFDust,U =
k =
s =
Sp =
M =
C =
Unpaved Road Dust Emission Factor (having the same units as k)
particle size multiplier
surface material silt content (%)
mean vehicle speed (mph)
surface material moisture content (%)
Emission Factor for 1980s vehicle fleet exhaust, brake wear, and tire wear
Emission Factor (grams per VMT)
PM10
PM2.5
k
816.47
81.65
s
4.3%
4.3%
Sp
15
15
M
0.5%
0.5%
C
0.00047
0.00036
EFDust,U
5.20E+00
5.19E‐01
Sources:
SCAQMD, CalEEMod, Version 2011.1.
CARB, Entrained Dust from Paved Road Travel: Emission Estimation Methodology Background Document , (1997).
USEPA, AP‐42 , Fifth Edition, Volume I, Chapter 13.2.1 ‐ Paved Roads, (2011).
PCR Services Corporation, 2013.
AppendixA.2
OperationalEmissions(CalEEMod)

EmissionsModelInputs

CalEEModOutput–Existing

CalEEModOutput–Project
1020 S. Figueroa Street Project EIR
Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Assessment
Trip Generation Rates
Land Use
Existing Uses (2015)
Hotel
Above‐Grade Parking Structure
Subterranean Parking Structure
Surface Parking Lot
Interim Year (Phase 1 ends 2020)
Residential + Amenities
Retail/Commercial
Restaurant
Hotel
Above‐Grade Parking Structure
Subterranean Parking Structure
Open Space
Full Buildout (Phase 1 + 2 ends 2023)
Residential + Amenities
Commercial
Restaurant
Hotel
Above‐Grade Parking Structure
Subterranean Parking Structure
Open Space
Plaza Area
CalEEMod Land Use Type
Hotel
Unenclosed Parking with Elevator
Enclosed Parking with Elevator
Surface Parking
Units
178
‐
86
198
rooms
spaces
spaces
spaces
112,748
‐
34,400
79,200
Res. Pop.
sf
sf
sf
sf
Unmitigated
Trip Rate Trips/day (trips/unit)
Mitigated
Trip Rate Trips/day
(trips/unit)
1,090
6.12
1,090
6.12
1,054
3.63
949
3.27
High‐rise Apartment
290 DU
352,000 sf
Strip Mall
Quality Restaurant
15.0 ksf
15.0 ksf
15,000 sf
15,000 sf
564
1,678
37.60
111.87
314
934
20.93
62.27
Hotel
300 rooms
280,000 sf
1,838
6.13
1,654
5.51
Unenclosed Parking with Elevator
Enclosed Parking with Elevator
City Park
‐
spaces
437 spaces
29.3 ksf
‐
sf
174,800 sf
0.67 acre
High‐rise Apartment
650 DU
770,000 sf
2,139
3.29
1,925
2.96
Strip Mall
Quality Restaurant
40.0 ksf
40.0 ksf
40,000 sf
40,000 sf
1,503
4,476
37.58
111.90
836
2,490
20.90
62.25
300 rooms
280,000 sf
1,838
6.13
1,654
5.51
‐
799
49.8
5.0
‐
319,600
1.14
5,000
Hotel
Unenclosed Parking with Elevator
Enclosed Parking with Elevator
City Park
Surface Parking
Lot Area (acres)/Developed Area (sf)
Sources: Hazens Group, March 2016; PCR Services Corporation, March 2016
spaces
spaces
ksf
ksf
2.70 acres
473
1060
sf
sf
acre
sf
116,660 sf
Source: Traffic Study, March 2016; PCR Services Corporation, March 2016
Notes:
Reductions from transit were accounted for in trip rates.
However, transit/walk‐in reductions were taken by CalEEMod using defaults.
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2
Page 1 of 1
Date: 4/11/2016 3:23 PM
Luxe Hotel Existing Operations
South Coast Air Basin, Summer
1.0 Project Characteristics
1.1 Land Usage
Land Uses
Size
Metric
Lot Acreage
Floor Surface Area
Population
Enclosed Parking with Elevator
86.00
Space
0.00
34,400.00
0
Parking Lot
198.00
Space
0.00
79,200.00
0
Hotel
178.00
Room
2.70
112,748.00
0
1.2 Other Project Characteristics
Urbanization
Urban
Climate Zone
11
Utility Company
Los Angeles Department of Water & Power
CO2 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
1227.89
Wind Speed (m/s)
CH4 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
2.2
0.029
Precipitation Freq (Days)
31
Operational Year
2015
N2O Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data
Project Characteristics - LADWP, 2015 Power Integrated Resource Plan, Table C-1, (2015) C-12.
Land Use - See "LUXE Hotel Operational Inputs"
Vehicle Trips - See Traffic Study
Vechicle Emission Factors Vechicle Emission Factors Vechicle Emission Factors Area Coating - See "Luxe Hotel Operational Inputs"
Energy Use Energy Mitigation -
0.006
Table Name
Column Name
Default Value
New Value
tblAreaCoating
Area_Nonresidential_Interior
224286
175938
tblLandUse
LandUseSquareFeet
258,456.00
112,748.00
tblLandUse
LotAcreage
0.77
0.00
tblLandUse
LotAcreage
1.78
0.00
tblLandUse
LotAcreage
5.93
2.70
tblProjectCharacteristics
OperationalYear
2014
2015
tblVehicleTrips
ST_TR
8.19
6.12
tblVehicleTrips
SU_TR
5.95
6.12
tblVehicleTrips
WD_TR
8.17
6.12
2.0 Emissions Summary
2.2 Overall Operational
Unmitigated Operational
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Category
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBioCO2
lb/day
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
lb/day
Area
5.2824
4.7000e004
0.0488
0.0000
1.8000e004
1.8000e004
1.8000e004
1.8000e004
0.1011
0.1011
2.9000e004
Energy
0.0834
0.7577
0.6365
4.5500e003
0.0576
0.0576
0.0576
0.0576
909.2522
909.2522
0.0174
Mobile
4.3764
10.5383
44.7547
0.0825
5.5083
0.1625
5.6708
1.4714
0.1492
1.6206
7,636.591 7,636.5919
9
0.3480
Total
9.7421
11.2965
45.4399
0.0870
5.5083
0.2203
5.7286
1.4714
0.2070
1.6784
8,545.945 8,545.9452
2
0.3657
0.1073
0.0167
914.7858
7,643.899
7
0.0167
8,558.792
7
Mitigated Operational
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Category
PM10
Total
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBioCO2
Total CO2
lb/day
CH4
N2O
lb/day
Area
5.2824
4.7000e004
0.0488
0.0000
1.8000e004
1.8000e004
1.8000e004
1.8000e004
0.1011
0.1011
2.9000e004
Energy
0.0659
0.5990
0.5032
3.5900e003
0.0455
0.0455
0.0455
0.0455
718.8253
718.8253
0.0138
Mobile
4.3764
10.5383
44.7547
0.0825
5.5083
0.1625
5.6708
1.4714
0.1492
1.6206
7,636.591 7,636.5919
9
0.3480
Total
9.7247
11.1378
45.3066
0.0860
5.5083
0.2082
5.7166
1.4714
0.1949
1.6663
8,355.518 8,355.5182
2
0.3621
Percent
Reduction
CO2e
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
0.18
1.40
0.29
1.10
0.00
5.47
0.21
0.00
5.83
0.72
Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2
0.00
2.23
2.23
0.1073
0.0132
723.1999
7,643.899
7
0.0132
8,367.206
9
CH4
N20
CO2e
1.00
20.94
2.24
4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile
4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Category
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
lb/day
NBioCO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
lb/day
Mitigated
4.3764
10.5383
44.7547
0.0825
5.5083
0.1625
5.6708
1.4714
0.1492
1.6206
7,636.591 7,636.5919
9
0.3480
7,643.899
7
Unmitigated
4.3764
10.5383
44.7547
0.0825
5.5083
0.1625
5.6708
1.4714
0.1492
1.6206
7,636.591 7,636.5919
9
0.3480
7,643.899
7
4.2 Trip Summary Information
Land Use
Weekday
Enclosed Parking with Elevator
Hotel
Parking Lot
Total
0.00
1,089.36
0.00
1,089.36
Average Daily Trip Rate
Saturday
Sunday
0.00
1,089.36
0.00
1,089.36
0.00
1089.36
0.00
1,089.36
Unmitigated
Annual VMT
Mitigated
Annual VMT
2,599,399
2,599,399
2,599,399
2,599,399
4.3 Trip Type Information
Miles
Trip %
Land Use
H-W or C-W
H-O or C-NW
Primary
Diverted
Pass-by
16.60
8.40
6.90
H-W or CW
0.00
H-S or C-C
Enclosed Parking with Elevator
0.00
0.00
0
0
0
Hotel
16.60
8.40
6.90
19.40
61.60
19.00
58
38
4
Parking Lot
16.60
8.40
6.90
0.00
0.00
0.00
0
0
0
LDA
LDT1
LDT2
0.516610
0.060517
0.179979
H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW
Trip Purpose %
MDV
0.140587
LHD1
LHD2
0.041566
0.006616
MHD
0.015092
HHD
0.027587
OBUS
UBUS
0.001923
0.002530
MCY
SBUS
0.004314
MH
0.000602
0.002075
5.0 Energy Detail
4.4 Fleet Mix
Historical Energy Use: N
5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy
Exceed Title 24
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Category
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBioCO2
lb/day
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
lb/day
NaturalGas
Mitigated
0.0659
0.5990
0.5032
3.5900e003
0.0455
0.0455
0.0455
0.0455
718.8253
718.8253
0.0138
0.0132
723.1999
NaturalGas
Unmitigated
0.0834
0.7577
0.6365
4.5500e003
0.0576
0.0576
0.0576
0.0576
909.2522
909.2522
0.0174
0.0167
914.7858
5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas
Unmitigated
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2
N2O
CO2e
Land Use
kBTU/yr
Hotel
7728.64
0.0834
0.7577
0.6365
4.5500e003
0.0576
0.0576
0.0576
0.0576
909.2522
909.2522
0.0174
0.0167
914.7858
Parking Lot
0
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Enclosed Parking
with Elevator
0
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0834
0.7577
0.6365
4.5500e003
0.0576
0.0576
0.0576
0.0576
909.2522
909.2522
0.0174
0.0167
914.7858
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Total
lb/day
CH4
lb/day
Mitigated
NaturalGa
s Use
Fugitive
PM10
Fugitive
PM2.5
Land Use
kBTU/yr
Parking Lot
0
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Enclosed Parking
with Elevator
0
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Hotel
6.11001
0.0659
0.5990
0.5032
3.5900e003
0.0455
0.0455
0.0455
0.0455
718.8253
718.8253
0.0138
0.0132
723.1999
0.0659
0.5990
0.5032
3.5900e003
0.0455
0.0455
0.0455
0.0455
718.8253
718.8253
0.0138
0.0132
723.1999
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Total
lb/day
lb/day
6.0 Area Detail
6.1 Mitigation Measures Area
ROG
NOx
CO
Category
Exhaust
PM10
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBioCO2
lb/day
lb/day
Mitigated
5.2824
4.7000e004
0.0488
0.0000
1.8000e004
1.8000e004
1.8000e004
1.8000e004
0.1011
0.1011
2.9000e004
0.1073
Unmitigated
5.2824
4.7000e004
0.0488
0.0000
1.8000e004
1.8000e004
1.8000e004
1.8000e004
0.1011
0.1011
2.9000e004
0.1073
6.2 Area by SubCategory
Unmitigated
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
SubCategory
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBioCO2
lb/day
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
lb/day
Architectural
Coating
0.7959
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Consumer
Products
4.4817
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Landscaping
4.8200e003
4.7000e004
0.0488
0.0000
1.8000e004
1.8000e004
1.8000e004
1.8000e004
0.1011
0.1011
2.9000e004
0.1073
Total
5.2824
4.7000e004
0.0488
0.0000
1.8000e004
1.8000e004
1.8000e004
1.8000e004
0.1011
0.1011
2.9000e004
0.1073
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
NBioCO2
Total CO2
CH4
Mitigated
SubCategory
Fugitive
PM10
Fugitive
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
lb/day
N2O
CO2e
lb/day
Architectural
Coating
0.7959
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Consumer
Products
4.4817
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Landscaping
4.8200e003
4.7000e004
0.0488
0.0000
1.8000e004
1.8000e004
1.8000e004
1.8000e004
0.1011
0.1011
2.9000e004
0.1073
Total
5.2824
4.7000e004
0.0488
0.0000
1.8000e004
1.8000e004
1.8000e004
1.8000e004
0.1011
0.1011
2.9000e004
0.1073
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2
Page 1 of 1
Date: 4/11/2016 3:22 PM
Luxe Hotel Existing Operations
South Coast Air Basin, Winter
1.0 Project Characteristics
1.1 Land Usage
Land Uses
Size
Metric
Lot Acreage
Floor Surface Area
Population
Enclosed Parking with Elevator
86.00
Space
0.00
34,400.00
0
Parking Lot
198.00
Space
0.00
79,200.00
0
Hotel
178.00
Room
2.70
112,748.00
0
1.2 Other Project Characteristics
Urbanization
Urban
Climate Zone
11
Utility Company
Los Angeles Department of Water & Power
CO2 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
1227.89
Wind Speed (m/s)
CH4 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
2.2
0.029
Precipitation Freq (Days)
31
Operational Year
2015
N2O Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data
Project Characteristics - LADWP, 2015 Power Integrated Resource Plan, Table C-1, (2015) C-12.
Land Use - See "LUXE Hotel Operational Inputs"
Vehicle Trips - See Traffic Study
Vechicle Emission Factors Vechicle Emission Factors Vechicle Emission Factors Area Coating - See "Luxe Hotel Operational Inputs"
Energy Use Energy Mitigation -
0.006
Table Name
Column Name
Default Value
New Value
tblAreaCoating
Area_Nonresidential_Interior
224286
175938
tblLandUse
LandUseSquareFeet
258,456.00
112,748.00
tblLandUse
LotAcreage
0.77
0.00
tblLandUse
LotAcreage
1.78
0.00
tblLandUse
LotAcreage
5.93
2.70
tblProjectCharacteristics
OperationalYear
2014
2015
tblVehicleTrips
ST_TR
8.19
6.12
tblVehicleTrips
SU_TR
5.95
6.12
tblVehicleTrips
WD_TR
8.17
6.12
2.0 Emissions Summary
2.2 Overall Operational
Unmitigated Operational
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Category
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBioCO2
lb/day
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
lb/day
Area
5.2824
4.7000e004
0.0488
0.0000
1.8000e004
1.8000e004
1.8000e004
1.8000e004
0.1011
0.1011
2.9000e004
Energy
0.0834
0.7577
0.6365
4.5500e003
0.0576
0.0576
0.0576
0.0576
909.2522
909.2522
0.0174
Mobile
4.5738
11.0792
44.7153
0.0783
5.5083
0.1639
5.6723
1.4714
0.1505
1.6219
7,260.222 7,260.2225
5
0.3483
Total
9.9396
11.8374
45.4006
0.0829
5.5083
0.2217
5.7300
1.4714
0.2082
1.6796
8,169.575 8,169.5758
8
0.3660
0.1073
0.0167
914.7858
7,267.536
2
0.0167
8,182.429
3
Mitigated Operational
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Category
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBioCO2
Total CO2
lb/day
CH4
N2O
lb/day
Area
5.2824
4.7000e004
0.0488
0.0000
1.8000e004
1.8000e004
1.8000e004
1.8000e004
0.1011
0.1011
2.9000e004
Energy
0.0659
0.5990
0.5032
3.5900e003
0.0455
0.0455
0.0455
0.0455
718.8253
718.8253
0.0138
Mobile
4.5738
11.0792
44.7153
0.0783
5.5083
0.1639
5.6723
1.4714
0.1505
1.6219
7,260.222 7,260.2225
5
0.3483
Total
9.9221
11.6787
45.2673
0.0819
5.5083
0.2096
5.7180
1.4714
0.1962
1.6676
7,979.148 7,979.1489
9
0.3623
Percent
Reduction
CO2e
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
0.18
1.34
0.29
1.16
0.00
5.44
0.21
0.00
5.79
0.72
Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2
0.00
2.33
2.33
0.1073
0.0132
723.1999
7,267.536
2
0.0132
7,990.843
4
CH4
N20
CO2e
1.00
20.94
2.34
4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile
4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Category
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
lb/day
NBioCO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
lb/day
Mitigated
4.5738
11.0792
44.7153
0.0783
5.5083
0.1639
5.6723
1.4714
0.1505
1.6219
7,260.222 7,260.2225
5
0.3483
7,267.536
2
Unmitigated
4.5738
11.0792
44.7153
0.0783
5.5083
0.1639
5.6723
1.4714
0.1505
1.6219
7,260.222 7,260.2225
5
0.3483
7,267.536
2
4.2 Trip Summary Information
Land Use
Weekday
Enclosed Parking with Elevator
Hotel
Parking Lot
Total
0.00
1,089.36
0.00
1,089.36
Average Daily Trip Rate
Saturday
Sunday
0.00
1,089.36
0.00
1,089.36
0.00
1089.36
0.00
1,089.36
Unmitigated
Annual VMT
Mitigated
Annual VMT
2,599,399
2,599,399
2,599,399
2,599,399
4.3 Trip Type Information
Miles
Trip %
Land Use
H-W or C-W
H-O or C-NW
Primary
Diverted
Pass-by
16.60
8.40
6.90
H-W or CW
0.00
H-S or C-C
Enclosed Parking with Elevator
0.00
0.00
0
0
0
Hotel
16.60
8.40
6.90
19.40
61.60
19.00
58
38
4
Parking Lot
16.60
8.40
6.90
0.00
0.00
0.00
0
0
0
LDA
LDT1
LDT2
0.516610
0.060517
0.179979
H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW
Trip Purpose %
MDV
0.140587
LHD1
LHD2
MHD
0.041566
0.006616
0.015092
HHD
0.027587
OBUS
UBUS
0.001923
0.002530
MCY
SBUS
0.004314
MH
0.000602
0.002075
5.0 Energy Detail
4.4 Fleet Mix
Historical Energy Use: N
5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy
Exceed Title 24
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Category
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBioCO2
lb/day
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
lb/day
NaturalGas
Mitigated
0.0659
0.5990
0.5032
3.5900e003
0.0455
0.0455
0.0455
0.0455
718.8253
718.8253
0.0138
0.0132
723.1999
NaturalGas
Unmitigated
0.0834
0.7577
0.6365
4.5500e003
0.0576
0.0576
0.0576
0.0576
909.2522
909.2522
0.0174
0.0167
914.7858
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
CH4
N2O
CO2e
0.0174
0.0167
914.7858
5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas
Unmitigated
NaturalGa
s Use
Land Use
kBTU/yr
Hotel
7728.64
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
PM10
Total
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2
lb/day
0.0834
0.7577
0.6365
4.5500e003
0.0576
lb/day
0.0576
0.0576
0.0576
909.2522
909.2522
Parking Lot
0
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Enclosed Parking
with Elevator
0
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0834
0.7577
0.6365
4.5500e003
0.0576
0.0576
0.0576
0.0576
909.2522
909.2522
0.0174
0.0167
914.7858
Total
Mitigated
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2
N2O
CO2e
Land Use
kBTU/yr
Parking Lot
0
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Enclosed Parking
with Elevator
0
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Hotel
6.11001
0.0659
0.5990
0.5032
3.5900e003
0.0455
0.0455
0.0455
0.0455
718.8253
718.8253
0.0138
0.0132
723.1999
0.0659
0.5990
0.5032
3.5900e003
0.0455
0.0455
0.0455
0.0455
718.8253
718.8253
0.0138
0.0132
723.1999
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Total
lb/day
CH4
lb/day
6.0 Area Detail
6.1 Mitigation Measures Area
ROG
NOx
CO
Category
Exhaust
PM10
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBioCO2
lb/day
lb/day
Mitigated
5.2824
4.7000e004
0.0488
0.0000
1.8000e004
1.8000e004
1.8000e004
1.8000e004
0.1011
0.1011
2.9000e004
0.1073
Unmitigated
5.2824
4.7000e004
0.0488
0.0000
1.8000e004
1.8000e004
1.8000e004
1.8000e004
0.1011
0.1011
2.9000e004
0.1073
CO
SO2
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
NBioCO2
Total CO2
CH4
6.2 Area by SubCategory
Unmitigated
ROG
NOx
SubCategory
Fugitive
PM10
Fugitive
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
lb/day
N2O
CO2e
lb/day
Architectural
Coating
0.7959
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Consumer
Products
4.4817
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Landscaping
4.8200e003
4.7000e004
0.0488
0.0000
1.8000e004
1.8000e004
1.8000e004
1.8000e004
0.1011
0.1011
2.9000e004
0.1073
Total
5.2824
4.7000e004
0.0488
0.0000
1.8000e004
1.8000e004
1.8000e004
1.8000e004
0.1011
0.1011
2.9000e004
0.1073
Mitigated
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
SubCategory
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBioCO2
lb/day
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
lb/day
Architectural
Coating
0.7959
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Consumer
Products
4.4817
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Landscaping
4.8200e003
4.7000e004
0.0488
0.0000
1.8000e004
1.8000e004
1.8000e004
1.8000e004
0.1011
0.1011
2.9000e004
0.1073
Total
5.2824
4.7000e004
0.0488
0.0000
1.8000e004
1.8000e004
1.8000e004
1.8000e004
0.1011
0.1011
2.9000e004
0.1073
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2
Page 1 of 1
Date: 4/14/2016 7:11 PM
LUXE Hotel - Interim Year (Phase 1)
South Coast Air Basin, Summer
1.0 Project Characteristics
1.1 Land Usage
Land Uses
Size
Metric
Lot Acreage
Floor Surface Area
Population
Enclosed Parking with Elevator
437.00
Space
3.93
174,800.00
0
City Park
0.47
Acre
0.47
20,473.20
0
Hotel
300.00
Room
10.00
280,000.00
0
Quality Restaurant
15.00
1000sqft
0.34
15,000.00
0
Apartments High Rise
290.00
Dwelling Unit
4.68
352,000.00
829
Strip Mall
15.00
1000sqft
0.34
15,000.00
0
1.2 Other Project Characteristics
Urbanization
Urban
Climate Zone
11
Utility Company
Los Angeles Department of Water & Power
CO2 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
1163
Wind Speed (m/s)
CH4 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
2.2
0.029
Precipitation Freq (Days)
31
Operational Year
2020
N2O Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data
Project Characteristics - LADWP, 2015 Power Integrated Resource Plan, Table C-1, (2015) C-12.
Land Use - See "LUXE Hotel Operational Inputs"
Construction Phase Off-road Equipment Off-road Equipment Off-road Equipment -
0.006
Off-road Equipment Off-road Equipment Off-road Equipment Off-road Equipment Trips and VMT Demolition Grading Architectural Coating Vehicle Trips - See "LUXE Hotel Operational Inputs" and "Project Trip and VMT Reductions"
Woodstoves - No woodstoves nor fireplaces.
Area Coating - Parking lot square footage adjustment as in "AQ Construction Model Inputs"
Water And Wastewater - See "LUXE Hotel Operational Inputs"
Solid Waste - See "LUXE Hotel Operational Inputs"
Construction Off-road Equipment Mitigation Area Mitigation Energy Mitigation Water Mitigation Energy Use Waste Mitigation Table Name
Column Name
Default Value
New Value
tblAreaCoating
Area_Nonresidential_Interior
757910
453888
tblFireplaces
FireplaceDayYear
25.00
0.00
tblFireplaces
FireplaceHourDay
3.00
0.00
tblFireplaces
FireplaceWoodMass
1,019.20
0.00
tblFireplaces
NumberGas
246.50
0.00
tblFireplaces
NumberNoFireplace
29.00
0.00
tblFireplaces
NumberWood
14.50
0.00
tblLandUse
LandUseSquareFeet
435,600.00
280,000.00
tblLandUse
LandUseSquareFeet
290,000.00
352,000.00
tblProjectCharacteristics
CO2IntensityFactor
1227.89
1163
tblProjectCharacteristics
OperationalYear
2014
2020
tblSolidWaste
SolidWasteGenerationRate
133.40
647.00
tblSolidWaste
SolidWasteGenerationRate
0.04
0.00
tblSolidWaste
SolidWasteGenerationRate
164.25
234.00
tblSolidWaste
SolidWasteGenerationRate
13.69
14.00
tblSolidWaste
SolidWasteGenerationRate
15.75
14.00
tblVehicleTrips
CC_TL
8.40
0.00
tblVehicleTrips
CC_TL
8.40
0.00
tblVehicleTrips
CC_TL
8.40
5.74
tblVehicleTrips
CC_TL
8.40
5.74
tblVehicleTrips
CC_TL
8.40
5.74
tblVehicleTrips
CNW_TL
6.90
0.00
tblVehicleTrips
CNW_TL
6.90
0.00
tblVehicleTrips
CNW_TL
6.90
4.72
tblVehicleTrips
CNW_TL
6.90
4.72
tblVehicleTrips
CNW_TL
6.90
4.72
tblVehicleTrips
CW_TL
16.60
0.00
tblVehicleTrips
CW_TL
16.60
0.00
tblVehicleTrips
CW_TL
16.60
11.35
tblVehicleTrips
CW_TL
16.60
11.35
tblVehicleTrips
CW_TL
16.60
11.35
tblVehicleTrips
HO_TL
8.70
5.95
tblVehicleTrips
HS_TL
5.90
4.03
tblVehicleTrips
HW_TL
14.70
10.05
tblVehicleTrips
ST_TR
7.16
3.63
tblVehicleTrips
ST_TR
1.59
0.00
tblVehicleTrips
ST_TR
8.19
6.13
tblVehicleTrips
ST_TR
94.36
86.47
tblVehicleTrips
ST_TR
42.04
29.07
tblVehicleTrips
SU_TR
6.07
3.63
tblVehicleTrips
SU_TR
1.59
0.00
tblVehicleTrips
SU_TR
5.95
6.13
tblVehicleTrips
SU_TR
72.16
86.47
tblVehicleTrips
SU_TR
20.43
29.07
tblVehicleTrips
WD_TR
6.59
3.63
tblVehicleTrips
WD_TR
1.59
0.00
tblVehicleTrips
WD_TR
8.17
6.13
tblVehicleTrips
WD_TR
89.95
86.47
tblVehicleTrips
WD_TR
44.32
29.07
tblWater
IndoorWaterUseRate
18,894,667.43
7,260,779.53
tblWater
IndoorWaterUseRate
0.00
829,422.31
tblWater
IndoorWaterUseRate
0.00
782,637.87
tblWater
IndoorWaterUseRate
7,610,031.00
12,454,374.27
tblWater
IndoorWaterUseRate
4,553,005.69
2,749,446.45
tblWater
IndoorWaterUseRate
1,111,087.82
167,900.00
tblWater
OutdoorWaterUseRate
11,911,855.55
4,577,447.97
tblWater
OutdoorWaterUseRate
559,996.23
522,896.67
tblWater
OutdoorWaterUseRate
0.00
493,402.13
tblWater
OutdoorWaterUseRate
845,559.00
1,733,346.67
tblWater
OutdoorWaterUseRate
290,617.38
1,733,346.67
tblWater
OutdoorWaterUseRate
680,989.31
105,850.00
tblWoodstoves
NumberCatalytic
14.50
0.00
tblWoodstoves
NumberNoncatalytic
14.50
0.00
tblWoodstoves
WoodstoveDayYear
25.00
0.00
tblWoodstoves
WoodstoveWoodMass
999.60
0.00
2.0 Emissions Summary
2.2 Overall Operational
Unmitigated Operational
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Category
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBioCO2
Total CO2
lb/day
CH4
N2O
CO2e
0.0425
0.0000
44.1398
0.0739
4,054.823
3
lb/day
Area
20.7097
0.2784
24.0838
1.2700e003
0.1323
0.1323
0.1323
0.1323
0.0000
43.2481
43.2481
Energy
0.3694
3.3267
2.5875
0.0202
0.2553
0.2553
0.2553
0.2553
4,030.295 4,030.2956
6
0.0773
Mobile
11.1028
20.4826
91.1977
0.2381
15.4773
0.3193
15.7966
4.1356
0.2946
4.4301
18,382.71 18,382.717
73
3
0.6674
Total
32.1819
24.0877
117.8690
0.2595
15.4773
0.7068
16.1841
4.1356
0.6821
4.8177
0.0000
22,456.26 22,456.261
10
0
0.7871
0.0739
22,495.69
49
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
0.0425
0.0000
44.1398
0.0567
3,113.750
1
18,396.73
18
Mitigated Operational
ROG
Category
NBioCO2
Total CO2
lb/day
lb/day
Area
20.7097
0.2784
24.0838
1.2700e003
0.1323
0.1323
0.1323
0.1323
Energy
0.2837
2.5559
1.9963
0.0155
0.1960
0.1960
0.1960
0.1960
3,094.915 3,094.9150
0
0.0593
Mobile
11.1028
20.4826
91.1977
0.2381
15.4773
0.3193
15.7966
4.1356
0.2946
4.4301
18,382.71 18,382.717
73
3
0.6674
Total
32.0962
23.3169
117.2778
0.2548
15.4773
0.6476
16.1249
4.1356
0.6229
4.7584
21,520.88 21,520.880
04
4
0.7691
Percent
Reduction
0.0000
0.0000
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
0.27
3.20
0.50
1.80
0.00
8.38
0.37
0.00
8.68
1.23
43.2481
43.2481
Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2
0.00
4.17
4.17
18,396.73
18
0.0567
21,554.62
17
CH4
N20
CO2e
2.28
23.21
4.18
4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile
4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Category
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBioCO2
Total CO2
lb/day
CH4
N2O
CO2e
lb/day
Mitigated
11.1028
20.4826
91.1977
0.2381
15.4773
0.3193
15.7966
4.1356
0.2946
4.4301
18,382.71 18,382.717
73
3
0.6674
18,396.73
18
Unmitigated
11.1028
20.4826
91.1977
0.2381
15.4773
0.3193
15.7966
4.1356
0.2946
4.4301
18,382.71 18,382.717
73
3
0.6674
18,396.73
18
4.2 Trip Summary Information
Land Use
Weekday
Apartments High Rise
City Park
Enclosed Parking with Elevator
Hotel
Quality Restaurant
Strip Mall
Total
1,052.70
0.00
0.00
1,839.00
1,297.05
436.05
4,624.80
Average Daily Trip Rate
Saturday
Sunday
1,052.70
0.00
0.00
1,839.00
1,297.05
436.05
4,624.80
1052.70
0.00
0.00
1839.00
1297.05
436.05
4,624.80
Unmitigated
Annual VMT
Mitigated
Annual VMT
2,459,740
2,459,740
3,000,443
1,268,719
567,845
7,296,747
3,000,443
1,268,719
567,845
7,296,747
4.3 Trip Type Information
Miles
Land Use
H-W or C-W
Apartments High Rise
10.05
Trip %
H-S or C-C
H-O or C-NW
Primary
Diverted
Pass-by
5.95
H-W or CW
40.20
19.20
40.60
86
11
3
H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW
4.03
Trip Purpose %
City Park
0.00
0.00
0.00
33.00
48.00
19.00
66
28
6
Enclosed Parking with Elevator
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0
0
0
Hotel
11.35
5.74
4.72
19.40
61.60
19.00
58
38
4
Quality Restaurant
11.35
5.74
4.72
12.00
69.00
19.00
38
18
44
Strip Mall
11.35
5.74
4.72
16.60
64.40
19.00
45
40
15
LDA
LDT1
LDT2
0.510092
0.059583
0.181091
MDV
0.139410
LHD1
LHD2
0.042694
0.006692
MHD
0.016202
HHD
0.032692
OBUS
UBUS
0.001943
0.002491
MCY
0.004392
SBUS
0.000576
MH
0.002140
5.0 Energy Detail
4.4 Fleet Mix
Historical Energy Use: N
5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy
Exceed Title 24
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Category
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBioCO2
Total CO2
lb/day
CH4
N2O
CO2e
lb/day
NaturalGas
Mitigated
0.2837
2.5559
1.9963
0.0155
0.1960
0.1960
0.1960
0.1960
3,094.915 3,094.9150
0
0.0593
0.0567
3,113.750
1
NaturalGas
Unmitigated
0.3694
3.3267
2.5875
0.0202
0.2553
0.2553
0.2553
0.2553
4,030.295 4,030.2956
6
0.0773
0.0739
4,054.823
3
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
CH4
N2O
CO2e
5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas
Unmitigated
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
PM10
Total
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2
Land Use
kBTU/yr
City Park
0
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Enclosed Parking
with Elevator
0
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Hotel
19193.4
0.2070
1.8817
1.5806
0.0113
0.1430
0.1430
0.1430
0.1430
2,258.0500 2,258.050
0
0.0433
0.0414
2,271.792
1
Quality Restaurant
9575.75
0.1033
0.9388
0.7886
5.6300e003
0.0714
0.0714
0.0714
0.0714
1,126.5592 1,126.559
2
0.0216
0.0207
1,133.415
3
Strip Mall
69.863
7.5000e004
6.8500e003
5.7500e003
4.0000e005
5.2000e004
5.2000e004
5.2000e004
5.2000e004
8.2192
8.2192
1.6000e004
1.5000e004
8.2692
Apartments High
Rise
5418.47
0.0584
0.4994
0.2125
3.1900e003
0.0404
0.0404
0.0404
0.0404
637.4672
637.4672
0.0122
0.0117
641.3467
0.3694
3.3267
2.5875
0.0202
0.2553
0.2553
0.2553
0.2553
4,030.2956 4,030.295
6
0.0773
0.0739
4,054.823
3
Total
lb/day
lb/day
Mitigated
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2
N2O
CO2e
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Land Use
kBTU/yr
Enclosed Parking
with Elevator
0
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Hotel
13.405
0.1446
1.3142
1.1039
7.8900e003
0.0999
0.0999
0.0999
0.0999
1,577.0611 1,577.061
1
0.0302
0.0289
1,586.658
8
Quality Restaurant
8.9066
0.0961
0.8732
0.7335
5.2400e003
0.0664
0.0664
0.0664
0.0664
1,047.8350 1,047.835
0
0.0201
0.0192
1,054.211
9
Strip Mall
0.0519616
5.6000e004
5.0900e003
4.2800e003
3.0000e005
3.9000e004
3.9000e004
3.9000e004
3.9000e004
6.1131
6.1131
1.2000e004
1.1000e004
6.1503
Apartments High
Rise
3.9432
0.0425
0.3634
0.1546
2.3200e003
0.0294
0.0294
0.0294
0.0294
463.9058
463.9058
8.8900e003
8.5000e003
466.7290
City Park
0
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.2837
2.5559
1.9963
0.0155
0.1960
0.1960
0.1960
0.1960
0.0593
0.0567
3,113.750
1
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Total
lb/day
CH4
lb/day
0.0000
0.0000
3,094.9150 3,094.915
0
6.0 Area Detail
6.1 Mitigation Measures Area
Use Low VOC Paint - Residential Interior
No Hearths Installed
ROG
NOx
CO
Category
Exhaust
PM10
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBioCO2
lb/day
Total CO2
lb/day
Mitigated
20.7097
0.2784
24.0838
1.2700e003
0.1323
0.1323
0.1323
0.1323
0.0000
43.2481
43.2481
0.0425
0.0000
44.1398
Unmitigated
20.7097
0.2784
24.0838
1.2700e003
0.1323
0.1323
0.1323
0.1323
0.0000
43.2481
43.2481
0.0425
0.0000
44.1398
6.2 Area by SubCategory
Unmitigated
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
SubCategory
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBioCO2
lb/day
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
lb/day
Architectural
Coating
2.9973
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Consumer
Products
16.9740
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Hearth
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Landscaping
0.7384
0.2784
24.0838
1.2700e003
0.1323
0.1323
0.1323
0.1323
Total
20.7097
0.2784
24.0838
1.2700e003
0.1323
0.1323
0.1323
0.1323
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
43.2481
43.2481
0.0425
0.0000
43.2481
43.2481
0.0425
0.0000
44.1398
Bio- CO2
NBioCO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
44.1398
Mitigated
SubCategory
Fugitive
PM10
Fugitive
PM2.5
lb/day
lb/day
Architectural
Coating
2.9973
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Consumer
Products
16.9740
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Hearth
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Landscaping
0.7384
0.2784
24.0838
1.2700e003
0.1323
0.1323
0.1323
0.1323
Total
20.7097
0.2784
24.0838
1.2700e003
0.1323
0.1323
0.1323
0.1323
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
43.2481
43.2481
0.0425
43.2481
43.2481
0.0425
0.0000
0.0000
44.1398
0.0000
44.1398
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2
Page 1 of 1
Date: 4/14/2016 7:10 PM
LUXE Hotel - Interim Year (Phase 1)
South Coast Air Basin, Winter
1.0 Project Characteristics
1.1 Land Usage
Land Uses
Size
Metric
Lot Acreage
Floor Surface Area
Population
Enclosed Parking with Elevator
437.00
Space
3.93
174,800.00
0
City Park
0.47
Acre
0.47
20,473.20
0
Hotel
300.00
Room
10.00
280,000.00
0
Quality Restaurant
15.00
1000sqft
0.34
15,000.00
0
Apartments High Rise
290.00
Dwelling Unit
4.68
352,000.00
829
Strip Mall
15.00
1000sqft
0.34
15,000.00
0
1.2 Other Project Characteristics
Urbanization
Urban
Climate Zone
11
Utility Company
Los Angeles Department of Water & Power
CO2 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
1163
Wind Speed (m/s)
CH4 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
2.2
0.029
Precipitation Freq (Days)
31
Operational Year
2020
N2O Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data
Project Characteristics - LADWP, 2015 Power Integrated Resource Plan, Table C-1, (2015) C-12.
Land Use - See "LUXE Hotel Operational Inputs"
Construction Phase Off-road Equipment Off-road Equipment Off-road Equipment -
0.006
Off-road Equipment Off-road Equipment Off-road Equipment Off-road Equipment Trips and VMT Demolition Grading Architectural Coating Vehicle Trips - See "LUXE Hotel Operational Inputs" and "Project Trip and VMT Reductions"
Woodstoves - No woodstoves nor fireplaces.
Area Coating - Parking lot square footage adjustment as in "AQ Construction Model Inputs"
Water And Wastewater - See "LUXE Hotel Operational Inputs"
Solid Waste - See "LUXE Hotel Operational Inputs"
Construction Off-road Equipment Mitigation Area Mitigation Energy Mitigation Water Mitigation Energy Use Waste Mitigation Table Name
Column Name
Default Value
New Value
tblAreaCoating
Area_Nonresidential_Interior
757910
453888
tblFireplaces
FireplaceDayYear
25.00
0.00
tblFireplaces
FireplaceHourDay
3.00
0.00
tblFireplaces
FireplaceWoodMass
1,019.20
0.00
tblFireplaces
NumberGas
246.50
0.00
tblFireplaces
NumberNoFireplace
29.00
0.00
tblFireplaces
NumberWood
14.50
0.00
tblLandUse
LandUseSquareFeet
435,600.00
280,000.00
tblLandUse
LandUseSquareFeet
290,000.00
352,000.00
tblProjectCharacteristics
CO2IntensityFactor
1227.89
1163
tblProjectCharacteristics
OperationalYear
2014
2020
tblSolidWaste
SolidWasteGenerationRate
133.40
647.00
tblSolidWaste
SolidWasteGenerationRate
0.04
0.00
tblSolidWaste
SolidWasteGenerationRate
164.25
234.00
tblSolidWaste
SolidWasteGenerationRate
13.69
14.00
tblSolidWaste
SolidWasteGenerationRate
15.75
14.00
tblVehicleTrips
CC_TL
8.40
0.00
tblVehicleTrips
CC_TL
8.40
0.00
tblVehicleTrips
CC_TL
8.40
5.74
tblVehicleTrips
CC_TL
8.40
5.74
tblVehicleTrips
CC_TL
8.40
5.74
tblVehicleTrips
CNW_TL
6.90
0.00
tblVehicleTrips
CNW_TL
6.90
0.00
tblVehicleTrips
CNW_TL
6.90
4.72
tblVehicleTrips
CNW_TL
6.90
4.72
tblVehicleTrips
CNW_TL
6.90
4.72
tblVehicleTrips
CW_TL
16.60
0.00
tblVehicleTrips
CW_TL
16.60
0.00
tblVehicleTrips
CW_TL
16.60
11.35
tblVehicleTrips
CW_TL
16.60
11.35
tblVehicleTrips
CW_TL
16.60
11.35
tblVehicleTrips
HO_TL
8.70
5.95
tblVehicleTrips
HS_TL
5.90
4.03
tblVehicleTrips
HW_TL
14.70
10.05
tblVehicleTrips
ST_TR
7.16
3.63
tblVehicleTrips
ST_TR
1.59
0.00
tblVehicleTrips
ST_TR
8.19
6.13
tblVehicleTrips
ST_TR
94.36
86.47
tblVehicleTrips
ST_TR
42.04
29.07
tblVehicleTrips
SU_TR
6.07
3.63
tblVehicleTrips
SU_TR
1.59
0.00
tblVehicleTrips
SU_TR
5.95
6.13
tblVehicleTrips
SU_TR
72.16
86.47
tblVehicleTrips
SU_TR
20.43
29.07
tblVehicleTrips
WD_TR
6.59
3.63
tblVehicleTrips
WD_TR
1.59
0.00
tblVehicleTrips
WD_TR
8.17
6.13
tblVehicleTrips
WD_TR
89.95
86.47
tblVehicleTrips
WD_TR
44.32
29.07
tblWater
IndoorWaterUseRate
18,894,667.43
7,260,779.53
tblWater
IndoorWaterUseRate
0.00
829,422.31
tblWater
IndoorWaterUseRate
0.00
782,637.87
tblWater
IndoorWaterUseRate
7,610,031.00
12,454,374.27
tblWater
IndoorWaterUseRate
4,553,005.69
2,749,446.45
tblWater
IndoorWaterUseRate
1,111,087.82
167,900.00
tblWater
OutdoorWaterUseRate
11,911,855.55
4,577,447.97
tblWater
OutdoorWaterUseRate
559,996.23
522,896.67
tblWater
OutdoorWaterUseRate
0.00
493,402.13
tblWater
OutdoorWaterUseRate
845,559.00
1,733,346.67
tblWater
OutdoorWaterUseRate
290,617.38
1,733,346.67
tblWater
OutdoorWaterUseRate
680,989.31
105,850.00
tblWoodstoves
NumberCatalytic
14.50
0.00
tblWoodstoves
NumberNoncatalytic
14.50
0.00
tblWoodstoves
WoodstoveDayYear
25.00
0.00
tblWoodstoves
WoodstoveWoodMass
999.60
0.00
2.0 Emissions Summary
2.2 Overall Operational
Unmitigated Operational
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Category
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBioCO2
Total CO2
lb/day
CH4
N2O
CO2e
0.0425
0.0000
44.1398
0.0739
4,054.823
3
lb/day
Area
20.7097
0.2784
24.0838
1.2700e003
0.1323
0.1323
0.1323
0.1323
0.0000
43.2481
43.2481
Energy
0.3694
3.3267
2.5875
0.0202
0.2553
0.2553
0.2553
0.2553
4,030.295 4,030.2956
6
0.0773
Mobile
11.5718
21.3902
95.5929
0.2262
15.4773
0.3213
15.7986
4.1356
0.2964
4.4320
17,509.59 17,509.599
97
7
0.6688
Total
32.6509
24.9952
122.2641
0.2477
15.4773
0.7088
16.1861
4.1356
0.6839
4.8195
0.0000
21,583.14 21,583.143
34
4
0.7885
0.0739
21,622.60
71
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
0.0425
0.0000
44.1398
0.0567
3,113.750
1
17,523.64
41
Mitigated Operational
ROG
Category
NBioCO2
Total CO2
lb/day
lb/day
Area
20.7097
0.2784
24.0838
1.2700e003
0.1323
0.1323
0.1323
0.1323
Energy
0.2837
2.5559
1.9963
0.0155
0.1960
0.1960
0.1960
0.1960
3,094.915 3,094.9150
0
0.0593
Mobile
11.5718
21.3902
95.5929
0.2262
15.4773
0.3213
15.7986
4.1356
0.2964
4.4320
17,509.59 17,509.599
97
7
0.6688
Total
32.5651
24.2244
121.6730
0.2430
15.4773
0.6496
16.1269
4.1356
0.6247
4.7603
20,647.76 20,647.762
28
8
0.7706
Percent
Reduction
0.0000
0.0000
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
0.26
3.08
0.48
1.89
0.00
8.36
0.37
0.00
8.66
1.23
43.2481
43.2481
Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2
0.00
4.33
4.33
17,523.64
41
0.0567
20,681.53
39
CH4
N20
CO2e
2.27
23.21
4.35
4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile
4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Category
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBioCO2
Total CO2
lb/day
CH4
N2O
CO2e
lb/day
Mitigated
11.5718
21.3902
95.5929
0.2262
15.4773
0.3213
15.7986
4.1356
0.2964
4.4320
17,509.59 17,509.599
97
7
0.6688
17,523.64
41
Unmitigated
11.5718
21.3902
95.5929
0.2262
15.4773
0.3213
15.7986
4.1356
0.2964
4.4320
17,509.59 17,509.599
97
7
0.6688
17,523.64
41
4.2 Trip Summary Information
Land Use
Weekday
Apartments High Rise
City Park
Enclosed Parking with Elevator
Hotel
Quality Restaurant
Strip Mall
Total
1,052.70
0.00
0.00
1,839.00
1,297.05
436.05
4,624.80
Average Daily Trip Rate
Saturday
Sunday
1,052.70
0.00
0.00
1,839.00
1,297.05
436.05
4,624.80
1052.70
0.00
0.00
1839.00
1297.05
436.05
4,624.80
Unmitigated
Annual VMT
Mitigated
Annual VMT
2,459,740
2,459,740
3,000,443
1,268,719
567,845
7,296,747
3,000,443
1,268,719
567,845
7,296,747
4.3 Trip Type Information
Miles
Land Use
H-W or C-W
Apartments High Rise
10.05
4.03
City Park
0.00
0.00
Enclosed Parking with Elevator
0.00
0.00
Trip %
Trip Purpose %
H-S or C-C
H-O or C-NW
Primary
Diverted
Pass-by
5.95
H-W or CW
40.20
19.20
40.60
86
11
3
0.00
33.00
48.00
19.00
66
28
6
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0
0
0
H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW
Hotel
11.35
5.74
4.72
19.40
61.60
19.00
58
38
4
Quality Restaurant
11.35
5.74
4.72
12.00
69.00
19.00
38
18
44
Strip Mall
11.35
5.74
4.72
16.60
64.40
19.00
45
40
15
LDA
LDT1
LDT2
0.510092
0.059583
0.181091
MDV
0.139410
LHD1
LHD2
0.042694
0.006692
MHD
0.016202
HHD
0.032692
OBUS
UBUS
0.001943
0.002491
MCY
0.004392
SBUS
0.000576
MH
0.002140
5.0 Energy Detail
4.4 Fleet Mix
Historical Energy Use: N
5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy
Exceed Title 24
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Category
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBioCO2
Total CO2
lb/day
CH4
N2O
CO2e
lb/day
NaturalGas
Mitigated
0.2837
2.5559
1.9963
0.0155
0.1960
0.1960
0.1960
0.1960
3,094.915 3,094.9150
0
0.0593
0.0567
3,113.750
1
NaturalGas
Unmitigated
0.3694
3.3267
2.5875
0.0202
0.2553
0.2553
0.2553
0.2553
4,030.295 4,030.2956
6
0.0773
0.0739
4,054.823
3
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
CH4
N2O
CO2e
5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas
Unmitigated
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
PM10
Total
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2
Land Use
kBTU/yr
City Park
0
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Enclosed Parking
with Elevator
0
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Hotel
19193.4
0.2070
1.8817
1.5806
0.0113
0.1430
0.1430
0.1430
0.1430
2,258.0500 2,258.050
0
0.0433
0.0414
2,271.792
1
Quality Restaurant
9575.75
0.1033
0.9388
0.7886
5.6300e003
0.0714
0.0714
0.0714
0.0714
1,126.5592 1,126.559
2
0.0216
0.0207
1,133.415
3
Strip Mall
69.863
7.5000e004
6.8500e003
5.7500e003
4.0000e005
5.2000e004
5.2000e004
5.2000e004
5.2000e004
8.2192
8.2192
1.6000e004
1.5000e004
8.2692
Apartments High
Rise
5418.47
0.0584
0.4994
0.2125
3.1900e003
0.0404
0.0404
0.0404
0.0404
637.4672
637.4672
0.0122
0.0117
641.3467
0.3694
3.3267
2.5875
0.0202
0.2553
0.2553
0.2553
0.2553
4,030.2956 4,030.295
6
0.0773
0.0739
4,054.823
3
Total
lb/day
lb/day
Mitigated
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2
N2O
CO2e
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Land Use
kBTU/yr
Enclosed Parking
with Elevator
0
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Hotel
13.405
0.1446
1.3142
1.1039
7.8900e003
0.0999
0.0999
0.0999
0.0999
1,577.0611 1,577.061
1
0.0302
0.0289
1,586.658
8
Quality Restaurant
8.9066
0.0961
0.8732
0.7335
5.2400e003
0.0664
0.0664
0.0664
0.0664
1,047.8350 1,047.835
0
0.0201
0.0192
1,054.211
9
Strip Mall
0.0519616
5.6000e004
5.0900e003
4.2800e003
3.0000e005
3.9000e004
3.9000e004
3.9000e004
3.9000e004
6.1131
6.1131
1.2000e004
1.1000e004
6.1503
Apartments High
Rise
3.9432
0.0425
0.3634
0.1546
2.3200e003
0.0294
0.0294
0.0294
0.0294
463.9058
463.9058
8.8900e003
8.5000e003
466.7290
City Park
0
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.2837
2.5559
1.9963
0.0155
0.1960
0.1960
0.1960
0.1960
0.0593
0.0567
3,113.750
1
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Total
lb/day
CH4
lb/day
0.0000
0.0000
3,094.9150 3,094.915
0
6.0 Area Detail
6.1 Mitigation Measures Area
Use Low VOC Paint - Residential Interior
No Hearths Installed
ROG
NOx
CO
Category
Exhaust
PM10
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBioCO2
lb/day
Total CO2
lb/day
Mitigated
20.7097
0.2784
24.0838
1.2700e003
0.1323
0.1323
0.1323
0.1323
0.0000
43.2481
43.2481
0.0425
0.0000
44.1398
Unmitigated
20.7097
0.2784
24.0838
1.2700e003
0.1323
0.1323
0.1323
0.1323
0.0000
43.2481
43.2481
0.0425
0.0000
44.1398
6.2 Area by SubCategory
Unmitigated
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
SubCategory
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBioCO2
lb/day
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
lb/day
Architectural
Coating
2.9973
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Consumer
Products
16.9740
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Hearth
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Landscaping
0.7384
0.2784
24.0838
1.2700e003
0.1323
0.1323
0.1323
0.1323
Total
20.7097
0.2784
24.0838
1.2700e003
0.1323
0.1323
0.1323
0.1323
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
43.2481
43.2481
0.0425
0.0000
43.2481
43.2481
0.0425
0.0000
44.1398
Bio- CO2
NBioCO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
44.1398
Mitigated
SubCategory
Fugitive
PM10
Fugitive
PM2.5
lb/day
lb/day
Architectural
Coating
2.9973
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Consumer
Products
16.9740
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Hearth
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Landscaping
0.7384
0.2784
24.0838
1.2700e003
0.1323
0.1323
0.1323
0.1323
Total
20.7097
0.2784
24.0838
1.2700e003
0.1323
0.1323
0.1323
0.1323
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
43.2481
43.2481
0.0425
43.2481
43.2481
0.0425
0.0000
0.0000
44.1398
0.0000
44.1398
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2
Page 1 of 1
Date: 4/14/2016 6:27 PM
LUXE Hotel - Full Buildout Operations
South Coast Air Basin, Summer
1.0 Project Characteristics
1.1 Land Usage
Land Uses
Size
Metric
Lot Acreage
Floor Surface Area
Population
Enclosed Parking with Elevator
799.00
Space
7.19
319,600.00
0
Other Non-Asphalt Surfaces
5.00
1000sqft
0.11
5,000.00
0
City Park
1.14
Acre
1.14
49,800.00
0
Hotel
300.00
Room
10.00
280,000.00
0
Quality Restaurant
40.00
1000sqft
0.92
40,000.00
0
Apartments High Rise
650.00
Dwelling Unit
10.48
770,000.00
1060
Strip Mall
40.00
1000sqft
0.92
40,000.00
0
1.2 Other Project Characteristics
Urbanization
Urban
Climate Zone
11
Utility Company
Los Angeles Department of Water & Power
CO2 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
1163
Wind Speed (m/s)
CH4 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
2.2
0.029
Precipitation Freq (Days)
31
Operational Year
2023
N2O Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data
Project Characteristics - LADWP, 2015 Power Integrated Resource Plan, Table C-1, (2015) C-12.
Land Use - See "LUXE Hotel Operational Inputs"
Construction Phase Off-road Equipment Off-road Equipment -
0.006
Off-road Equipment Off-road Equipment Off-road Equipment Off-road Equipment Off-road Equipment Trips and VMT Demolition Grading Architectural Coating Vehicle Trips - See "LUXE Hotel Operational Inputs" and "Project Trip and VMT Reductions"
Vechicle Emission Factors Vechicle Emission Factors Woodstoves - No woodstoves nor fireplaces.
Area Coating - Parking lot square footage adjustment as in "AQ Construction Model Inputs"
Energy Use Water And Wastewater - See "LUXE Hotel Operational Inputs"
Solid Waste - See "LUXE Hotel Operational Inputs"
Construction Off-road Equipment Mitigation Area Mitigation Energy Mitigation Water Mitigation Waste Mitigation Vechicle Emission Factors Table Name
Column Name
Default Value
New Value
tblArchitecturalCoating
ConstArea_Residential_Exterior
519,750.00
438,750.00
tblArchitecturalCoating
ConstArea_Residential_Interior
1,559,250.00
1,316,250.00
tblAreaCoating
Area_Nonresidential_Interior
1101600
345888
tblFireplaces
FireplaceDayYear
25.00
0.00
tblFireplaces
FireplaceHourDay
3.00
0.00
tblFireplaces
FireplaceWoodMass
1,019.20
0.00
tblFireplaces
NumberGas
552.50
0.00
tblFireplaces
NumberNoFireplace
65.00
0.00
tblFireplaces
NumberWood
32.50
0.00
tblLandUse
LandUseSquareFeet
49,658.40
49,800.00
tblLandUse
LandUseSquareFeet
435,600.00
280,000.00
tblLandUse
LandUseSquareFeet
650,000.00
770,000.00
tblLandUse
Population
1,859.00
1,060.00
tblProjectCharacteristics
CO2IntensityFactor
1227.89
1163
tblProjectCharacteristics
OperationalYear
2014
2023
tblSolidWaste
SolidWasteGenerationRate
299.00
1,450.00
tblSolidWaste
SolidWasteGenerationRate
0.10
0.00
tblSolidWaste
SolidWasteGenerationRate
164.25
234.00
tblSolidWaste
SolidWasteGenerationRate
36.50
37.00
tblSolidWaste
SolidWasteGenerationRate
42.00
37.00
tblVehicleTrips
CC_TL
8.40
0.00
tblVehicleTrips
CC_TL
8.40
0.00
tblVehicleTrips
CC_TL
8.40
5.74
tblVehicleTrips
CC_TL
8.40
0.00
tblVehicleTrips
CC_TL
8.40
5.74
tblVehicleTrips
CC_TL
8.40
5.74
tblVehicleTrips
CNW_TL
6.90
0.00
tblVehicleTrips
CNW_TL
6.90
0.00
tblVehicleTrips
CNW_TL
6.90
4.72
tblVehicleTrips
CNW_TL
6.90
0.00
tblVehicleTrips
CNW_TL
6.90
4.72
tblVehicleTrips
CNW_TL
6.90
4.72
tblVehicleTrips
CW_TL
16.60
0.00
tblVehicleTrips
CW_TL
16.60
0.00
tblVehicleTrips
CW_TL
16.60
11.35
tblVehicleTrips
CW_TL
16.60
0.00
tblVehicleTrips
CW_TL
16.60
11.35
tblVehicleTrips
CW_TL
16.60
11.35
tblVehicleTrips
HO_TL
8.70
5.95
tblVehicleTrips
HS_TL
5.90
4.03
tblVehicleTrips
HW_TL
14.70
10.05
tblVehicleTrips
ST_TR
7.16
3.29
tblVehicleTrips
ST_TR
1.59
0.00
tblVehicleTrips
ST_TR
8.19
6.13
tblVehicleTrips
ST_TR
94.36
86.48
tblVehicleTrips
ST_TR
42.04
29.03
tblVehicleTrips
SU_TR
6.07
3.29
tblVehicleTrips
SU_TR
1.59
0.00
tblVehicleTrips
SU_TR
5.95
6.13
tblVehicleTrips
SU_TR
72.16
86.48
tblVehicleTrips
SU_TR
20.43
29.03
tblVehicleTrips
WD_TR
6.59
3.29
tblVehicleTrips
WD_TR
1.59
0.00
tblVehicleTrips
WD_TR
8.17
6.13
tblVehicleTrips
WD_TR
89.95
86.48
tblVehicleTrips
WD_TR
44.32
29.03
tblWater
IndoorWaterUseRate
42,350,116.65
16,278,912.40
tblWater
IndoorWaterUseRate
0.00
1,006,280.67
tblWater
IndoorWaterUseRate
0.00
1,278,412.99
tblWater
IndoorWaterUseRate
7,610,031.00
12,454,374.27
tblWater
IndoorWaterUseRate
12,141,348.50
7,331,857.20
tblWater
IndoorWaterUseRate
2,962,900.86
447,733.33
tblWater
OutdoorWaterUseRate
26,698,986.59
10,262,792.60
tblWater
OutdoorWaterUseRate
1,358,288.74
634,394.33
tblWater
OutdoorWaterUseRate
0.00
805,956.01
tblWater
OutdoorWaterUseRate
845,559.00
7,851,670.73
tblWater
OutdoorWaterUseRate
774,979.69
4,622,257.80
tblWater
OutdoorWaterUseRate
1,815,971.49
282,266.67
tblWoodstoves
NumberCatalytic
32.50
0.00
tblWoodstoves
NumberNoncatalytic
32.50
0.00
tblWoodstoves
WoodstoveDayYear
25.00
0.00
tblWoodstoves
WoodstoveWoodMass
999.60
0.00
2.0 Emissions Summary
2.2 Overall Operational
Unmitigated Operational
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Category
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBioCO2
lb/day
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
0.0935
0.0000
98.7826
0.1231
6,753.785
3
lb/day
Area
35.3281
0.6194
53.7588
2.8400e003
0.2973
0.2973
0.2973
0.2973
0.0000
96.8184
96.8184
Energy
0.6154
5.5227
4.1752
0.0336
0.4252
0.4252
0.4252
0.4252
6,712.931 6,712.9315
5
0.1287
Mobile
30.7513
57.5915
256.4040
0.4174
27.3215
0.8376
28.1590
7.2982
0.7686
8.0668
38,631.00 38,631.004
48
8
1.8479
Total
66.6947
63.7336
314.3380
0.4538
27.3215
1.5600
28.8815
7.2982
1.4911
8.7893
0.0000
45,440.75 45,440.754
47
7
2.0700
0.1231
45,522.37
75
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
0.0935
0.0000
98.7826
0.0995
5,460.408
3
38,669.80
97
Mitigated Operational
ROG
Category
NBioCO2
lb/day
Total CO2
lb/day
Area
35.3281
0.6194
53.7588
2.8400e003
0.2973
0.2973
0.2973
0.2973
0.0000
Energy
0.4975
4.4708
3.4179
0.0271
0.3437
0.3437
0.3437
0.3437
5,427.378 5,427.3782
2
0.1040
Mobile
30.7513
57.5915
256.4040
0.4174
27.3215
0.8376
28.1590
7.2982
0.7686
8.0668
38,631.00 38,631.004
48
8
1.8479
Total
66.5769
62.6817
313.5807
0.4474
27.3215
1.4786
28.8001
7.2982
1.4097
8.7079
44,155.20 44,155.201
14
4
2.0454
0.0000
96.8184
96.8184
38,669.80
97
0.0995
44,229.00
05
Percent
Reduction
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
0.18
1.65
0.24
1.41
0.00
5.22
0.28
0.00
5.46
0.93
Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2
0.00
2.83
2.83
CH4
N20
CO2e
1.19
19.15
2.84
4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile
4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Category
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
lb/day
NBioCO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
lb/day
Mitigated
30.7513
57.5915
256.4040
0.4174
27.3215
0.8376
28.1590
7.2982
0.7686
8.0668
38,631.00 38,631.004
48
8
1.8479
38,669.80
97
Unmitigated
30.7513
57.5915
256.4040
0.4174
27.3215
0.8376
28.1590
7.2982
0.7686
8.0668
38,631.00 38,631.004
48
8
1.8479
38,669.80
97
4.2 Trip Summary Information
Land Use
Weekday
Apartments High Rise
City Park
Enclosed Parking with Elevator
Hotel
Quality Restaurant
Strip Mall
Other Non-Asphalt Surfaces
Total
2,138.50
0.00
0.00
1,839.00
3,459.20
1,161.20
0.00
8,597.90
Average Daily Trip Rate
Saturday
Sunday
2,138.50
0.00
0.00
1,839.00
3,459.20
1,161.20
0.00
8,597.90
2138.50
0.00
0.00
1839.00
3459.20
1161.20
0.00
8,597.90
Unmitigated
Annual VMT
Mitigated
Annual VMT
4,996,822
4,996,822
3,000,443
3,383,641
1,512,170
3,000,443
3,383,641
1,512,170
12,893,077
12,893,077
4.3 Trip Type Information
Miles
Trip %
Trip Purpose %
Land Use
H-W or C-W
H-O or C-NW
Primary
Diverted
Pass-by
10.05
4.03
5.95
H-W or CW
40.20
H-S or C-C
Apartments High Rise
19.20
40.60
86
11
3
City Park
0.00
0.00
0.00
33.00
48.00
19.00
66
28
6
Enclosed Parking with Elevator
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0
0
0
Hotel
11.35
5.74
4.72
19.40
61.60
19.00
58
38
4
Quality Restaurant
11.35
5.74
4.72
12.00
69.00
19.00
38
18
44
Strip Mall
11.35
5.74
4.72
16.60
64.40
19.00
45
40
15
Other Non-Asphalt Surfaces
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0
0
0
LDA
LDT1
LDT2
0.516610
0.060517
0.179979
H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW
MDV
0.140587
LHD1
LHD2
0.041566
0.006616
MHD
0.015092
HHD
0.027587
OBUS
UBUS
0.001923
0.002530
MCY
SBUS
0.004314
MH
0.000602
0.002075
5.0 Energy Detail
4.4 Fleet Mix
Historical Energy Use: N
5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy
Exceed Title 24
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Category
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
lb/day
Bio- CO2
NBioCO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
lb/day
NaturalGas
Mitigated
0.4975
4.4708
3.4179
0.0271
0.3437
0.3437
0.3437
0.3437
5,427.378 5,427.3782
2
0.1040
0.0995
5,460.408
3
NaturalGas
Unmitigated
0.6154
5.5227
4.1752
0.0336
0.4252
0.4252
0.4252
0.4252
6,712.931 6,712.9315
5
0.1287
0.1231
6,753.785
3
5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas
Unmitigated
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2
N2O
CO2e
Land Use
kBTU/yr
City Park
0
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Enclosed Parking
with Elevator
0
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Hotel
19193.4
0.2070
1.8817
1.5806
0.0113
0.1430
0.1430
0.1430
0.1430
0.0433
0.0414
2,271.792
1
Other Non-Asphalt
Surfaces
0
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Quality Restaurant
25535.3
0.2754
2.5035
2.1029
0.0150
0.1903
0.1903
0.1903
0.1903
0.0576
0.0551
3,022.440
7
Strip Mall
186.301
2.0100e003
0.0183
0.0153
1.1000e004
1.3900e003
1.3900e003
1.3900e003
1.3900e003
4.2000e004
4.0000e004
22.0512
Apartments High
Rise
12144.8
0.1310
1.1192
0.4763
7.1400e003
0.0905
0.0905
0.0905
0.0905
1,428.8058 1,428.805
8
0.0274
0.0262
1,437.501
3
0.6154
5.5227
4.1752
0.0336
0.4252
0.4252
0.4252
0.4252
6,712.9315 6,712.931
5
0.1287
0.1231
6,753.785
3
Total
lb/day
CH4
lb/day
2,258.0500 2,258.050
0
0.0000
0.0000
3,004.1579 3,004.157
9
21.9178
21.9178
Mitigated
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2
N2O
CO2e
Land Use
kBTU/yr
City Park
0
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Enclosed Parking
with Elevator
0
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Hotel
13.405
0.1446
1.3142
1.1039
7.8900e003
0.0999
0.0999
0.0999
0.0999
0.0302
0.0289
1,586.658
8
Other Non-Asphalt
Surfaces
0
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Quality Restaurant
23.7509
0.2561
2.3285
1.9560
0.0140
0.1770
0.1770
0.1770
0.1770
0.0536
0.0512
2,811.231
8
Strip Mall
0.138564
1.4900e003
0.0136
0.0114
8.0000e005
1.0300e003
1.0300e003
1.0300e003
1.0300e003
3.1000e004
3.0000e004
16.4009
Apartments High
Rise
8.8382
0.0953
0.8145
0.3466
5.2000e003
0.0659
0.0659
0.0659
0.0659
1,039.7888 1,039.788
8
0.0199
0.0191
1,046.116
8
0.4975
4.4708
3.4179
0.0271
0.3437
0.3437
0.3437
0.3437
5,427.3782 5,427.378
2
0.1040
0.0995
5,460.408
3
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Total
lb/day
CH4
lb/day
1,577.0611 1,577.061
1
0.0000
0.0000
2,794.2266 2,794.226
6
16.3017
16.3017
6.0 Area Detail
6.1 Mitigation Measures Area
Use Low VOC Paint - Residential Interior
No Hearths Installed
ROG
NOx
CO
Category
Exhaust
PM10
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBioCO2
lb/day
Total CO2
lb/day
Mitigated
35.3281
0.6194
53.7588
2.8400e003
0.2973
0.2973
0.2973
0.2973
0.0000
96.8184
96.8184
0.0935
0.0000
98.7826
Unmitigated
35.3281
0.6194
53.7588
2.8400e003
0.2973
0.2973
0.2973
0.2973
0.0000
96.8184
96.8184
0.0935
0.0000
98.7826
6.2 Area by SubCategory
Unmitigated
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
SubCategory
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBioCO2
lb/day
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
lb/day
Architectural
Coating
3.9138
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Consumer
Products
29.7871
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Hearth
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Landscaping
1.6271
0.6194
53.7588
2.8400e003
0.2973
0.2973
0.2973
0.2973
Total
35.3281
0.6194
53.7588
2.8400e003
0.2973
0.2973
0.2973
0.2973
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
96.8184
96.8184
0.0935
0.0000
96.8184
96.8184
0.0935
0.0000
98.7826
Bio- CO2
NBioCO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
98.7826
Mitigated
SubCategory
Fugitive
PM10
Fugitive
PM2.5
lb/day
lb/day
Architectural
Coating
3.9138
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Consumer
Products
29.7871
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Hearth
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Landscaping
1.6271
0.6194
53.7588
2.8400e003
0.2973
0.2973
0.2973
0.2973
Total
35.3281
0.6194
53.7588
2.8400e003
0.2973
0.2973
0.2973
0.2973
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
96.8184
96.8184
0.0935
96.8184
96.8184
0.0935
0.0000
0.0000
98.7826
0.0000
98.7826
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2
Page 1 of 1
Date: 4/14/2016 6:28 PM
LUXE Hotel - Full Buildout Operations
South Coast Air Basin, Winter
1.0 Project Characteristics
1.1 Land Usage
Land Uses
Size
Metric
Lot Acreage
Floor Surface Area
Population
Enclosed Parking with Elevator
799.00
Space
7.19
319,600.00
0
Other Non-Asphalt Surfaces
5.00
1000sqft
0.11
5,000.00
0
City Park
1.14
Acre
1.14
49,800.00
0
Hotel
300.00
Room
10.00
280,000.00
0
Quality Restaurant
40.00
1000sqft
0.92
40,000.00
0
Apartments High Rise
650.00
Dwelling Unit
10.48
770,000.00
1060
Strip Mall
40.00
1000sqft
0.92
40,000.00
0
1.2 Other Project Characteristics
Urbanization
Urban
Climate Zone
11
Utility Company
Los Angeles Department of Water & Power
CO2 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
1163
Wind Speed (m/s)
CH4 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
2.2
0.029
Precipitation Freq (Days)
31
Operational Year
2023
N2O Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data
Project Characteristics - LADWP, 2015 Power Integrated Resource Plan, Table C-1, (2015) C-12.
Land Use - See "LUXE Hotel Operational Inputs"
Construction Phase Off-road Equipment Off-road Equipment -
0.006
Off-road Equipment Off-road Equipment Off-road Equipment Off-road Equipment Off-road Equipment Trips and VMT Demolition Grading Architectural Coating Vehicle Trips - See "LUXE Hotel Operational Inputs" and "Project Trip and VMT Reductions"
Vechicle Emission Factors Vechicle Emission Factors Woodstoves - No woodstoves nor fireplaces.
Area Coating - Parking lot square footage adjustment as in "AQ Construction Model Inputs"
Energy Use Water And Wastewater - See "LUXE Hotel Operational Inputs"
Solid Waste - See "LUXE Hotel Operational Inputs"
Construction Off-road Equipment Mitigation Area Mitigation Energy Mitigation Water Mitigation Waste Mitigation Vechicle Emission Factors Table Name
Column Name
Default Value
New Value
tblArchitecturalCoating
ConstArea_Residential_Exterior
519,750.00
438,750.00
tblArchitecturalCoating
ConstArea_Residential_Interior
1,559,250.00
1,316,250.00
tblAreaCoating
Area_Nonresidential_Interior
1101600
345888
tblFireplaces
FireplaceDayYear
25.00
0.00
tblFireplaces
FireplaceHourDay
3.00
0.00
tblFireplaces
FireplaceWoodMass
1,019.20
0.00
tblFireplaces
NumberGas
552.50
0.00
tblFireplaces
NumberNoFireplace
65.00
0.00
tblFireplaces
NumberWood
32.50
0.00
tblLandUse
LandUseSquareFeet
49,658.40
49,800.00
tblLandUse
LandUseSquareFeet
435,600.00
280,000.00
tblLandUse
LandUseSquareFeet
650,000.00
770,000.00
tblLandUse
Population
1,859.00
1,060.00
tblProjectCharacteristics
CO2IntensityFactor
1227.89
1163
tblProjectCharacteristics
OperationalYear
2014
2023
tblSolidWaste
SolidWasteGenerationRate
299.00
1,450.00
tblSolidWaste
SolidWasteGenerationRate
0.10
0.00
tblSolidWaste
SolidWasteGenerationRate
164.25
234.00
tblSolidWaste
SolidWasteGenerationRate
36.50
37.00
tblSolidWaste
SolidWasteGenerationRate
42.00
37.00
tblVehicleTrips
CC_TL
8.40
0.00
tblVehicleTrips
CC_TL
8.40
0.00
tblVehicleTrips
CC_TL
8.40
5.74
tblVehicleTrips
CC_TL
8.40
0.00
tblVehicleTrips
CC_TL
8.40
5.74
tblVehicleTrips
CC_TL
8.40
5.74
tblVehicleTrips
CNW_TL
6.90
0.00
tblVehicleTrips
CNW_TL
6.90
0.00
tblVehicleTrips
CNW_TL
6.90
4.72
tblVehicleTrips
CNW_TL
6.90
0.00
tblVehicleTrips
CNW_TL
6.90
4.72
tblVehicleTrips
CNW_TL
6.90
4.72
tblVehicleTrips
CW_TL
16.60
0.00
tblVehicleTrips
CW_TL
16.60
0.00
tblVehicleTrips
CW_TL
16.60
11.35
tblVehicleTrips
CW_TL
16.60
0.00
tblVehicleTrips
CW_TL
16.60
11.35
tblVehicleTrips
CW_TL
16.60
11.35
tblVehicleTrips
HO_TL
8.70
5.95
tblVehicleTrips
HS_TL
5.90
4.03
tblVehicleTrips
HW_TL
14.70
10.05
tblVehicleTrips
ST_TR
7.16
3.29
tblVehicleTrips
ST_TR
1.59
0.00
tblVehicleTrips
ST_TR
8.19
6.13
tblVehicleTrips
ST_TR
94.36
86.48
tblVehicleTrips
ST_TR
42.04
29.03
tblVehicleTrips
SU_TR
6.07
3.29
tblVehicleTrips
SU_TR
1.59
0.00
tblVehicleTrips
SU_TR
5.95
6.13
tblVehicleTrips
SU_TR
72.16
86.48
tblVehicleTrips
SU_TR
20.43
29.03
tblVehicleTrips
WD_TR
6.59
3.29
tblVehicleTrips
WD_TR
1.59
0.00
tblVehicleTrips
WD_TR
8.17
6.13
tblVehicleTrips
WD_TR
89.95
86.48
tblVehicleTrips
WD_TR
44.32
29.03
tblWater
IndoorWaterUseRate
42,350,116.65
16,278,912.40
tblWater
IndoorWaterUseRate
0.00
1,006,280.67
tblWater
IndoorWaterUseRate
0.00
1,278,412.99
tblWater
IndoorWaterUseRate
7,610,031.00
12,454,374.27
tblWater
IndoorWaterUseRate
12,141,348.50
7,331,857.20
tblWater
IndoorWaterUseRate
2,962,900.86
447,733.33
tblWater
OutdoorWaterUseRate
26,698,986.59
10,262,792.60
tblWater
OutdoorWaterUseRate
1,358,288.74
634,394.33
tblWater
OutdoorWaterUseRate
0.00
805,956.01
tblWater
OutdoorWaterUseRate
845,559.00
7,851,670.73
tblWater
OutdoorWaterUseRate
774,979.69
4,622,257.80
tblWater
OutdoorWaterUseRate
1,815,971.49
282,266.67
tblWoodstoves
NumberCatalytic
32.50
0.00
tblWoodstoves
NumberNoncatalytic
32.50
0.00
tblWoodstoves
WoodstoveDayYear
25.00
0.00
tblWoodstoves
WoodstoveWoodMass
999.60
0.00
2.0 Emissions Summary
2.2 Overall Operational
Unmitigated Operational
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Category
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBioCO2
lb/day
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
0.0935
0.0000
98.7826
0.1231
6,753.785
3
lb/day
Area
35.3281
0.6194
53.7588
2.8400e003
0.2973
0.2973
0.2973
0.2973
0.0000
96.8184
96.8184
Energy
0.6154
5.5227
4.1752
0.0336
0.4252
0.4252
0.4252
0.4252
6,712.931 6,712.9315
5
0.1287
Mobile
32.4025
60.3407
265.2679
0.3968
27.3215
0.8486
28.1701
7.2982
0.7788
8.0770
36,737.78 36,737.784
46
6
1.8501
Total
68.3459
66.4827
323.2018
0.4332
27.3215
1.5711
28.8926
7.2982
1.5013
8.7995
0.0000
43,547.53 43,547.534
45
5
2.0723
0.1231
43,629.20
39
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
0.0935
0.0000
98.7826
0.0995
5,460.408
3
36,776.63
61
Mitigated Operational
ROG
Category
NBioCO2
lb/day
Total CO2
lb/day
Area
35.3281
0.6194
53.7588
2.8400e003
0.2973
0.2973
0.2973
0.2973
0.0000
Energy
0.4975
4.4708
3.4179
0.0271
0.3437
0.3437
0.3437
0.3437
5,427.378 5,427.3782
2
0.1040
Mobile
32.4025
60.3407
265.2679
0.3968
27.3215
0.8486
28.1701
7.2982
0.7788
8.0770
36,737.78 36,737.784
46
6
1.8501
Total
68.2281
65.4309
322.4446
0.4268
27.3215
1.4897
28.8111
7.2982
1.4198
8.7180
42,261.98 42,261.981
12
2
2.0476
0.0000
96.8184
96.8184
36,776.63
61
0.0995
42,335.82
70
Percent
Reduction
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
0.17
1.58
0.23
1.48
0.00
5.18
0.28
0.00
5.42
0.93
Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2
0.00
2.95
2.95
CH4
N20
CO2e
1.19
19.15
2.96
4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile
4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Category
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
lb/day
NBioCO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
lb/day
Mitigated
32.4025
60.3407
265.2679
0.3968
27.3215
0.8486
28.1701
7.2982
0.7788
8.0770
36,737.78 36,737.784
46
6
1.8501
36,776.63
61
Unmitigated
32.4025
60.3407
265.2679
0.3968
27.3215
0.8486
28.1701
7.2982
0.7788
8.0770
36,737.78 36,737.784
46
6
1.8501
36,776.63
61
4.2 Trip Summary Information
Land Use
Weekday
Apartments High Rise
City Park
Enclosed Parking with Elevator
Hotel
Quality Restaurant
Strip Mall
Other Non-Asphalt Surfaces
Total
2,138.50
0.00
0.00
1,839.00
3,459.20
1,161.20
0.00
8,597.90
Average Daily Trip Rate
Saturday
Sunday
2,138.50
0.00
0.00
1,839.00
3,459.20
1,161.20
0.00
8,597.90
2138.50
0.00
0.00
1839.00
3459.20
1161.20
0.00
8,597.90
Unmitigated
Annual VMT
Mitigated
Annual VMT
4,996,822
4,996,822
3,000,443
3,383,641
1,512,170
3,000,443
3,383,641
1,512,170
12,893,077
12,893,077
4.3 Trip Type Information
Miles
Trip %
Trip Purpose %
Land Use
H-W or C-W
H-O or C-NW
Primary
Diverted
Pass-by
10.05
4.03
5.95
H-W or CW
40.20
H-S or C-C
Apartments High Rise
19.20
40.60
86
11
3
City Park
0.00
0.00
0.00
33.00
48.00
19.00
66
28
6
Enclosed Parking with Elevator
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0
0
0
Hotel
11.35
5.74
4.72
19.40
61.60
19.00
58
38
4
Quality Restaurant
11.35
5.74
4.72
12.00
69.00
19.00
38
18
44
Strip Mall
11.35
5.74
4.72
16.60
64.40
19.00
45
40
15
Other Non-Asphalt Surfaces
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0
0
0
LDA
LDT1
LDT2
0.516610
0.060517
0.179979
H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW
MDV
0.140587
LHD1
LHD2
0.041566
0.006616
MHD
0.015092
HHD
0.027587
OBUS
UBUS
0.001923
0.002530
MCY
SBUS
0.004314
MH
0.000602
0.002075
5.0 Energy Detail
4.4 Fleet Mix
Historical Energy Use: N
5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy
Exceed Title 24
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Category
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
lb/day
Bio- CO2
NBioCO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
lb/day
NaturalGas
Mitigated
0.4975
4.4708
3.4179
0.0271
0.3437
0.3437
0.3437
0.3437
5,427.378 5,427.3782
2
0.1040
0.0995
5,460.408
3
NaturalGas
Unmitigated
0.6154
5.5227
4.1752
0.0336
0.4252
0.4252
0.4252
0.4252
6,712.931 6,712.9315
5
0.1287
0.1231
6,753.785
3
5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas
Unmitigated
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2
N2O
CO2e
Land Use
kBTU/yr
City Park
0
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Enclosed Parking
with Elevator
0
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Hotel
19193.4
0.2070
1.8817
1.5806
0.0113
0.1430
0.1430
0.1430
0.1430
0.0433
0.0414
2,271.792
1
Other Non-Asphalt
Surfaces
0
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Quality Restaurant
25535.3
0.2754
2.5035
2.1029
0.0150
0.1903
0.1903
0.1903
0.1903
0.0576
0.0551
3,022.440
7
Strip Mall
186.301
2.0100e003
0.0183
0.0153
1.1000e004
1.3900e003
1.3900e003
1.3900e003
1.3900e003
4.2000e004
4.0000e004
22.0512
Apartments High
Rise
12144.8
0.1310
1.1192
0.4763
7.1400e003
0.0905
0.0905
0.0905
0.0905
1,428.8058 1,428.805
8
0.0274
0.0262
1,437.501
3
0.6154
5.5227
4.1752
0.0336
0.4252
0.4252
0.4252
0.4252
6,712.9315 6,712.931
5
0.1287
0.1231
6,753.785
3
Total
lb/day
CH4
lb/day
2,258.0500 2,258.050
0
0.0000
0.0000
3,004.1579 3,004.157
9
21.9178
21.9178
Mitigated
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2
N2O
CO2e
Land Use
kBTU/yr
City Park
0
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Enclosed Parking
with Elevator
0
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Hotel
13.405
0.1446
1.3142
1.1039
7.8900e003
0.0999
0.0999
0.0999
0.0999
0.0302
0.0289
1,586.658
8
Other Non-Asphalt
Surfaces
0
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Quality Restaurant
23.7509
0.2561
2.3285
1.9560
0.0140
0.1770
0.1770
0.1770
0.1770
0.0536
0.0512
2,811.231
8
Strip Mall
0.138564
1.4900e003
0.0136
0.0114
8.0000e005
1.0300e003
1.0300e003
1.0300e003
1.0300e003
3.1000e004
3.0000e004
16.4009
Apartments High
Rise
8.8382
0.0953
0.8145
0.3466
5.2000e003
0.0659
0.0659
0.0659
0.0659
1,039.7888 1,039.788
8
0.0199
0.0191
1,046.116
8
0.4975
4.4708
3.4179
0.0271
0.3437
0.3437
0.3437
0.3437
5,427.3782 5,427.378
2
0.1040
0.0995
5,460.408
3
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Total
lb/day
CH4
lb/day
1,577.0611 1,577.061
1
0.0000
0.0000
2,794.2266 2,794.226
6
16.3017
16.3017
6.0 Area Detail
6.1 Mitigation Measures Area
Use Low VOC Paint - Residential Interior
No Hearths Installed
ROG
NOx
CO
Category
Exhaust
PM10
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBioCO2
lb/day
Total CO2
lb/day
Mitigated
35.3281
0.6194
53.7588
2.8400e003
0.2973
0.2973
0.2973
0.2973
0.0000
96.8184
96.8184
0.0935
0.0000
98.7826
Unmitigated
35.3281
0.6194
53.7588
2.8400e003
0.2973
0.2973
0.2973
0.2973
0.0000
96.8184
96.8184
0.0935
0.0000
98.7826
6.2 Area by SubCategory
Unmitigated
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
SubCategory
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBioCO2
lb/day
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
lb/day
Architectural
Coating
3.9138
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Consumer
Products
29.7871
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Hearth
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Landscaping
1.6271
0.6194
53.7588
2.8400e003
0.2973
0.2973
0.2973
0.2973
Total
35.3281
0.6194
53.7588
2.8400e003
0.2973
0.2973
0.2973
0.2973
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
96.8184
96.8184
0.0935
0.0000
96.8184
96.8184
0.0935
0.0000
98.7826
Bio- CO2
NBioCO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
98.7826
Mitigated
SubCategory
Fugitive
PM10
Fugitive
PM2.5
lb/day
lb/day
Architectural
Coating
3.9138
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Consumer
Products
29.7871
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Hearth
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Landscaping
1.6271
0.6194
53.7588
2.8400e003
0.2973
0.2973
0.2973
0.2973
Total
35.3281
0.6194
53.7588
2.8400e003
0.2973
0.2973
0.2973
0.2973
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
96.8184
96.8184
0.0935
96.8184
96.8184
0.0935
0.0000
0.0000
98.7826
0.0000
98.7826
AppendixA.3
OperationalEmissions(EMFAC2014)

ExistingandProject(InterimandFullBuildout)TripandVMTReductions

ExistingandProject(InterimandFullBuildout)MobileSourceEmissions
1020 S. Figueroa Street Project
Draft Environmental Impact Report
Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Mitigation Measures ‐ Transportation (Based on CAPCOA Guidance (August 2010))
Purpose:
This section provides calculations for vehicle miles traveled (VMT) reductions from BAU characteristics based on guidance contained in the California Air Pollution Control Officers Association (CAPCOA),
Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Mitigation Measures (August 2010).
Notes on Calculations:
1. Percent VMT reduced is calculated individually for each measure based on the formulas for each measure.
2. Certain individual measures or groups of measures have VMT reduction caps, as indicated in the calculations. 3. The location type determines the VMT reduction caps for LUT‐2 as well as the global transportation VMT reduction cap.
4. The VMT reduction cap for the LUT/SDT/PDT/TST group of measures is 5% less than the global transportation cap.
5. When summing the total VMT reductions from multiple measures, a double counting correction is applied as follows.
a. The total percent reductions from the different measures are NOT added together to avoid double counting. VMT reductions for each successive measure are applied only to the "remaining" VMT after the reductions from the previous measure have been taken out.
b. In order to calculate the "effective" VMT reduction percent due to multiple measures, the following formula is applied:
Total Percent VMT Reduction % =
= 100% ‐ [(100% ‐ Measure 1 Reduction %) × (100% ‐ Measure 2 Reduction %) × (100% ‐ Measure 3 Reduction %) × … ]
Example:
Measure 1 VMT Reduction = 5%
Measure 2 VMT Reduction = 10%
Measure 3 VMT Reduction = 7%
Total Percent VMT Reduction % = 100% ‐ [(100% ‐ 5%) × (100% ‐ 10%) × (100% ‐ 7%)]
= 100% ‐ [(95%) × (90%) × (93%)]
= 100% ‐ 79.5%
= 20.5% (this is less than 5% + 10% + 7% = 22%, due to the double counting correction)
Note: Values in the above example are in percent format and 95% is equivalent to 0.95 in decimal format.
Multiplying values that are less than 1 in decimal format results in a smaller number.
EXISTING SETTING
Draft Environmental Impact Report
Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Mitigation Measures ‐ Transportation (Based on CAPCOA Guidance (August 2010))
BUSINESS AS USUAL PROJECT
Location Type
Global % VMT Reduction Cap
Urban:
75%
Less than 5 miles from central business district
Jobs‐rich (jobs/housing ratio greater than 1.5)
Typical buildings are 6 stories or higher
Grid street pattern
Minimal setbacks
Parking constrained on‐ and off‐street
Parking prices high/highest in the region
High‐quality rail; bus service at 10 min or less in peak hours
Location Type
Global % VMT Reduction Cap
Suburban Center:
20%
Typically 20 miles or more from central business district
Balanced jobs‐housing
Typical buildings are 2 stories
Grid street pattern
Setbacks 0 ‐ 20 feet
Parking somewhat constrained on‐street; ample off‐street
Parking prices low (if priced at all)
Bus service at 20 ‐ 30 min and/or commuter rail station
Compact Infill:
40%
Typically 5 ‐ 15 miles from central business district
Balanced jobs‐housing (jobs/housing ratio from 0.9 to 1.2)
Typical buildings are 2 ‐ 4 stories
Grid street pattern
Setbacks 0 ‐ 20 feet
Parking constrained
Parking prices low/moderate
Rail w/in 2 miles; bus service at 15 min or less in peak hours
Suburban:
15%
Typically 20 miles or more from central business district
Housing‐rich
Typical buildings are 1 ‐ 2 stories
Curvilinear street pattern (cul‐de‐sac based)
Parking between street and buildings; large lot residential
Parking ample; largely surface lot‐based
No parking prices
Limited bus service at 30 minute headways or more
Land Use/Location Transportation Measures (65% Reduction Cap)
LUT‐1
Increase Density
% VMT Reduction = A × B [not to exceed 30%]
A (housing) = (Number of DU/acre ‐ 7.6 ) / 7.6
A (jobs) = (Number of Jobs/acre ‐ 20 ) / 20
B = 0.07%
LUT‐2
Increase Location Efficiency
% VMT Reduction Cap for all LUT measures
LUT‐3
Increase Diversity of Urban and
Suburban Developments (Mixed Use)
% VMT Reduction = Land Use × B [not to exceed 30%]
Land Use = % increase in land use index vs. single use
= (Land Use Index ‐ 0.15) / 0.15
Urban: The urban project will be predominantly characterized by properties on which various uses, such as office, commercial, institutional, and residential, are combined in a single building or on a single site in an integrated development project with functional interrelationships and a coherent physical design.
Total Global Transportation VMT Reduction =
(Includes double counting correction.)
29.82%
Cap:
75%
Total LUT/SDT/PDT/TST VMT Reduction =
29.82%
Cap:
70%
Total LUT % VMT Reduction =
29.82%
Cap:
65%
% VMT Reduction =
0.08%
Cap:
30%
A =
A =
0%
119%
Cap:
30%
Number of DU/acre: ‐
Number of Jobs/acre: 43.7
Urban LUT % VMT Reduction Cap:
Compact Infill LUT % VMT Reduction Cap:
Suburban Center LUT % VMT Reduction Cap:
65%
30%
10%
% VMT Reduction =
0.00%
Single family sqft: ‐
a1 = ‐
Land Use Index = ‐a / ln(6)
Multi‐family sqft: ‐
a2 = ‐
a = ∑ ai × ln(ai)
Commercial sqft: ‐
a3 = ‐
ai = building floor area / total square feet of area considered
a1 = single family
Suburban: The suburban project will have at least three uses of the following on site and/or offsite within ¼‐mile: Residential Development, Retail Development, Park, Open Space, or Office.
a2 = multi‐family
(ACOUNTED FOR IN TRAFFIC STUDY)
a5 = institutional
a3 = commercial
B = 0.09
Industrial sqft: ‐
a4 = ‐
Institutional sqft: ‐
a5 = ‐
Park sqft: ‐
a6 = ‐
Total sqft: ‐
a4 = industrial
(Note: If ai = 0, then set ai = 0.0000001)
a6 = park
LUT‐4
Increase Destination Accessibility
% VMT Reduction = Center Distance × B [not to exceed 20%]
Center Distance = (12 ‐ Miles to downtown or job center) / 12
B = 0.20
% VMT Reduction =
18.33%
Cap:
20%
Miles to downtown or job center: 1.0
(Note: Only effective for 8 miles or less)
LUT‐5
Increase Transit Accessibility
(ACOUNTED FOR IN TRAFFIC STUDY)
LUT‐6
Integrated Affordable and
Below Market Rate Housing
% VMT Reduction = Transit × B [not to exceed 30%]
Transit = % project transit ‐ % typical ITE transit
% project transit = ‐50x + 38 [where x = 0 ‐ 0.5 miles to transit]
‐4.4x + 15.2 [where x = 0.5 ‐ 3 miles to transit]
% typical ITE transit = 1.3%
B = 0.67
% VMT Reduction = 4% × % units BMR
% VMT Reduction =
0.00%
Cap:
30%
Miles to transit:
(Note: Only effective for 3 miles or less)
% VMT Reduction =
0.00%
% of units below market rate:
(Note: Only effective up to 30%)
LUT‐7
Orient Project Toward Non‐Auto
Corridor
Not quantified separately; Assumed to be included in LUT‐3
(If included in LUT‐3, VMT reduction should be at least 0.5% per 1% inprovement in transit frequency and
0.5% per 10% increase in transit ridership)
LUT‐8
Locate Project near Bike Path/Bike Lanes
Not quantified separately; Assumed to be included in LUT‐4
(If included in LUT‐4, VMT reduction should be at least 0.625%)
LUT‐9
Improve Design of Development
% VMT Reduction = Intersections × B
Intersections = % increase vs. typical ITE suburban
= (Intersections per square mile of project ‐ 36) / 36
B = 0.12
% VMT Reduction =
14.00%
Intersections per square mile: 78
(Note: Only effective up to 100)
Neighborhood/Site Enhancement Measures (5% Reduction Cap without NEV; 15% Reduction Cap with NEV)
SDT‐1
Provide Pedestrian Network
Improvements
VMT reduction based on urban/rural context and
pedestrian accomodations
Total SDT % VMT Reduction =
0.00%
% VMT Reduction =
0.00%
Cap:
Cap:
Pedestrian network on‐site and connecting off‐site (urban/suburban):
Pedestrian network on‐site (urban/suburban):
5% without NEV
15% With NEV
2%
1%
(Mark an "X" in one of the above)
Marked crosswalks, count‐down signal timers,
curb extensions, speed tables, rasied crosswalks,
raised intersections, median islands, tight corner radii,
roundabouts, on‐street parking, planter strips with trees,
chicanes/chokers, and others.
% VMT Reduction =
0.00%
25% of streets with improvements:
50% of streets with improvements:
75% of streets with improvements:
100% of streets with improvements:
A
B
C
D
25% of intersctions with improvements:
50% of intersctions with improvements:
75% of intersctions with improvements:
100% of intersctions with improvements:
W
X
Y
Z
% of intersections
Provide Traffic Calming Measures
with improvements
SDT‐2
W
X
Y
Z
% of streets with improvements
A
B
C
D
0.25% 0.25% 0.50% 0.50%
0.25% 0.50% 0.50% 0.75%
0.50% 0.50% 0.75% 0.75%
0.50% 0.75% 0.75% 1.00%
(Mark an "X" in one of the above for each group)
SDT‐3
Neighborhood Electric Vehicle Network
% VMT Reduction = Pop × Number × NEV
Pop × Number = NEVs per household [0.04 to 1.0]
NEV = VMT reduction rate per household [12.7%]
% VMT Reduction =
0.00%
Low NEVs per Household:
High NEVs per Household:
0.04
1.0
(Mark an "X" in one of the above)
SDT‐4
Create Urban Non‐Motorized Zones
Not quantified separately; Assumed to be included in SDT‐1
(If included in SDT‐1, VMT reduction should be at least 0.01% to 0.2%)
SDT‐5
Incorporate Bike Lane Street Design
Not quantified separately; Assumed to be included in LUT‐9
(If included in LUT‐9, VMT reduction should be at least 1% of worker commute per additional mile of bike lanes per square mile)
SDT‐6
Provide Bike Parking in Non‐Residential
Projects
Not quantified separately; Assumed to be included in LUT‐9
(If included in LUT‐9, VMT reduction should be at least 0.625%)
SDT‐7
Provide Bike Parking in Multi‐Unit
Residential Projects
Not quantified separately; Assumed to be included in LUT‐9
SDT‐8
Provide Electric Vehicle Parking
Not quantified separately; Assumed to be included in SDT‐3
SDT‐9
Dedicated Land for Bike Trails
Not quantified separately; Assumed to be included in LUT‐9
Parking Policy/Pricing (20% Reduction Cap)
PDT‐1
Limit Parking Supply
Total PDT % VMT Reduction =
0.00%
Cap:
20%
% VMT Reduction =
0.00%
Cap:
12.50%
Cap:
13%
Cap:
5.5%
% VMT Reduction =
= (Actual Parking ‐ ITE Parking) / ITE Parking × 0.5
Actual Parking Spaces: ‐
ITE Parking Spaces: ‐
PDT‐2
PDT‐3
PDT‐4
Unbunble Parking Costs from Property
Implement Market Price Public Parking
(On‐Street)
Require Residential Area Parking Permits
% VMT Reduction = Change in vehicle cost × elasticity × A
Change in vehicle cost = Monthly parking cost × (12/$4000)
Elasticity = 0.4
A = 85%
% VMT Reduction = Park$ × B
Park$ = Percent increase in on‐street parking prices
[minimum of 25%]
B = 0.11
% VMT Reduction =
0.00%
Monthly parking cost: $ ‐
% VMT Reduction =
0.00%
Actual On‐Street Parking Price: $ ‐
Baseline On‐Street Parking Price: $ ‐
Not quantified separately; Assumed to be included in PDT‐1, ‐2‐, and ‐3
(If included in LUT‐9, VMT reduction should be at least 0.09% to 0.36% depending on land use)
Transit System Improvements (10% Reduction Cap)
TST‐1
Provide a Bus Rapid Transit System
% VMT Reduction = Riders × Mode × Lines × D
Riders =
28%
Mode = 17% Urban Center
4% Urban
1.30% Suburban
Lines = Percent of lines serving project converting to BRT
D = 0.67
Total TST % VMT Reduction =
0.00%
Cap:
10%
% VMT Reduction =
0.00%
Cap:
3.2%
Urban Center:
Urban:
Suburban:
17%
4%
1.30%
(Mark an "X" in one of the above)
Lines Converting to BRT:
Total Baseline Lines:
TST‐2
Implement Transit Access Improvements
Not quantified separately; Assumed to be included in TST‐3 and ‐4
TST‐3
Expand Transit Network
% VMT Reduction = Coverage × B × Mode × D
Coverage = % increase in transit network coverage
B = 0.65 Urban Center
0.72 Urban
1.01 Suburban
Mode =
17% Urban Center
4% Urban
1.30% Suburban
D = 0.67
% VMT Reduction =
% VMT Reduction = Headway × B × C × Mode × E
Headway = % reduction in headways [15% ‐ 80%]
B =
0.32 Urban
0.36 Suburban
C =
50% < 50% lines improved
85% >= 50% lines improved
Mode =
17% Urban Center
4% Urban
1.30% Suburban
E = 0.67
% VMT Reduction =
TST‐4
Increase Transit Service Frequency/Speed
TST‐5
Provide Bike Parking Near Transit
Not quantified separately; Assumed to be included in TST‐3 and ‐4
TST‐6
Provide Local Shuttles
Not quantified separately; Assumed to be included in TST‐3 and ‐4
Commute Trip Reduction (25% Reduction Cap ‐ WORK VMT ONLY)
TRT‐1
Implement Voluntary Commute
Trip Reduction Program
% Work VMT Reduction = A × B
A =
6.2% Urban
5.4% Suburban Center
5.2% Suburban
B = % employees eligible
0%
0.00%
Urban Center:
Urban:
Suburban:
Cap:
8.2%
17%
4%
1.30%
0.65
0.72
1.01
(Mark an "X" in one of the above)
Coverage:
0.00%
Urban Center:
Urban:
Suburban:
Cap:
2.5%
17%
4%
1.30%
0.32
0.32
0.36
(Mark an "X" in one of the above)
Headway:
Percent of Lines Improved:
Total TRT % Work VMT Reduction =
% Work VMT of Total VMT:
Total TRT % Overall VMT Reduction =
0.00%
2.5%
0.00%
Cap:
25%
Cap:
15%
% Work VMT Reduction =
0.00%
Cap:
6.2%
Urban:
Suburban Center:
Suburban:
6.2%
5.4%
5.2%
(Mark an "X" in one of the above)
% Employees Eligible:
TRT‐2
TRT‐3
Implement Required Commute
Trip Reduction Program
Provide Ride‐Sharing Programs
% Work VMT Reduction = A × B
A = 21%
B = % employees eligible
% Work VMT Reduction =
% Work VMT Reduction = Commute × Employee
Commute =
15% Urban
10% Suburban Center
5% Suburban
Employee = % employees eligible
% Work VMT Reduction =
0.00%
Cap:
21.0%
0.00%
Cap:
15.0%
% Employees Eligible:
Urban:
Suburban Center:
Suburban:
15%
10%
5%
(Mark an "X" in one of the above)
% Employees Eligible:
Implement Subsidized or Discounted
Transit Program
% Work VMT Reduction = A × B × C
A = % reduction in commute vehicle trips
B = % employees eligible
C = Adjustment from VT to VMT [1.0]
% Work VMT Reduction =
0.00%
Cap:
Urban:
Suburban Center:
Suburban:
A
B
C
Transit Subsidy: $0.75
Transit Subsidy: $1.49
Transit Subsidy: $2.98
Transit Subsidy: $5.96
W
X
Y
Z
20.0%
Setting
TRT‐4
A
B
C
Daily Transit Subsidy
W
X
Y
6.2% 12.9%
20%
3.4%
7.3% 16.4%
1.5%
3.3%
7.9%
Z
20%
20%
20%
(Mark an "X" in one of the above for each group)
% Employees Eligible:
Provide End of Trip Facilities
Not quantified separately; Assumed to be included in TRT‐1 through ‐3
(If included, Work VMT reduction should be 2% to 5%, or total VMT reduction should be 0.02% to 0.625%)
TRT‐6
Encourage Telecommuting and
Alternate Work Schedules
% Reduction in Commute VMT
% Work VMT Reduction =
0.00%
Cap:
9‐day/80‐hour Work Week:
4‐day/40‐hour Work Week:
Telecommuting 1.5 Days:
A
B
C
Employee Participation: 1%
Employee Participation: 3%
Employee Participation: 5%
Employee Participation: 10%
Employee Participation: 25%
V
W
X
Y
Z
5.5%
Schedule
TRT‐5
A
B
C
V
0.07%
0.15%
0.22%
(Mark an "X" in one of the above for each group)
TRT‐7
TRT‐8
Implement Commute Trip Reduction
Marketing
Implement Preferential Permit
Parking Program
% Work VMT Reduction = A × B × C
A = % reduction in commute vehicle trips [4%]
B = % employees eligible
C = Adjustment from VT to VMT [1.0]
Not quantified separately; Assumed to be included in TRT‐1 through ‐3
% Work VMT Reduction =
% Employees Eligible:
0.00%
Cap:
4.0%
Employee Participation
W
X
Y
0.21% 0.35% 0.70%
0.45% 0.75% 1.50%
0.66% 1.10% 2.20%
Z
1.75%
3.75%
5.50%
TRT‐9
Implement Car‐Sharing Program
% Work VMT Reduction = A × B / C
A = % reduction in car‐share member annual VMT [37%]
B = number of car share members per shared car [20]
C =
1,000 Urban
2,000 Suburban
% Work VMT Reduction =
0.00%
Urban:
Suburban:
Cap:
0.74%
1,000
2,000
(Mark an "X" in one of the above)
Implement a School Pool Program
Not applicable.
TRT‐11
Provide Employer‐Sponsored
Vanpool/Shuttle
% Work VMT Reduction = A × B × C
A = % shift in vanpool mode share of commute trips
= 2% to 20%
B = % employees eligible
C = 0.67
TRT‐12
Implement Bike Sharing Program
Not quantified separately; Assumed to be included in LUT‐9 and SDT‐5
(If included, total VMT reduction should be at least 0.03%)
TRT‐13
Implement School Bus Program
Not applicable.
TRT‐14
Price Workplace Parking
% Work VMT Reduction = A × B
A = % reduction in commute VMT
B = % employees subject to priced parking
% Work VMT Reduction =
0.00%
Cap:
13.4%
0.00%
Cap:
19.7%
A: Shift in Vanpool Mode Share:
B: Employees Eligible:
% Work VMT Reduction =
Urban:
Suburban Center:
Suburban:
A
B
C
Daily Parking Charge: $1
Daily Parking Charge: $2
Daily Parking Charge: $3
Daily Parking Charge: $6
W
X
Y
Z
Setting
TRT‐10
A
B
C
Daily Parking Charge
W
X
Y
Z
6.9% 12.5% 16.8% 19.7%
1.8%
3.7%
5.4%
6.8%
0.5%
1.2%
1.9%
2.8%
(Mark an "X" in one of the above for each group)
% Employees Subject to Priced Parking:
TRT‐15
Implement Employee Parking
Cash‐Out
% Work VMT Reduction = A × B
A =
7.7% Urban
4.5% Suburban Center
3.0% Suburban
B = % employees eligible
% Work VMT Reduction =
Urban:
Suburban Center:
Suburban:
0.00%
Cap:
7.7%
7.7%
4.5%
3.0%
(Mark an "X" in one of the above)
% Employees Eligible:
INTERIM YEAR: 1020 S. Figueroa Street Project
Draft Environmental Impact Report
Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Mitigation Measures ‐ Transportation (Based on CAPCOA Guidance (August 2010))
PROPOSED PROJECT
Location Type Global % VMT Reduction Cap
Urban:
75%
Less than 5 miles from central business district
Jobs‐rich (jobs/housing ratio greater than 1.5)
Typical buildings are 6 stories or higher
Grid street pattern
Minimal setbacks
Parking constrained on‐ and off‐street
Parking prices high/highest in the region
High‐quality rail; bus service at 10 min or less in peak hours
Location Type
Global % VMT Reduction Cap
Suburban Center:
20%
Typically 20 miles or more from central business district
Balanced jobs‐housing
Typical buildings are 2 stories
Grid street pattern
Setbacks 0 ‐ 20 feet
Parking somewhat constrained on‐street; ample off‐street
Parking prices low (if priced at all)
Bus service at 20 ‐ 30 min and/or commuter rail station
Compact Infill:
40%
Typically 5 ‐ 15 miles from central business district
Balanced jobs‐housing (jobs/housing ratio from 0.9 to 1.2)
Typical buildings are 2 ‐ 4 stories
Grid street pattern
Setbacks 0 ‐ 20 feet
Parking constrained
Parking prices low/moderate
Rail w/in 2 miles; bus service at 15 min or less in peak hours
Suburban:
15%
Typically 20 miles or more from central business district
Housing‐rich
Typical buildings are 1 ‐ 2 stories
Curvilinear street pattern (cul‐de‐sac based)
Parking between street and buildings; large lot residential
Parking ample; largely surface lot‐based
No parking prices
Limited bus service at 30 minute headways or more
Land Use/Location Transportation Measures (65% Reduction Cap)
LUT‐1
Increase Density
% VMT Reduction = A × B [not to exceed 30%]
A (housing) = (Number of DU/acre ‐ 7.6 ) / 7.6
A (jobs) = (Number of Jobs/acre ‐ 20 ) / 20
B = 0.07%
LUT‐2
Increase Location Efficiency
% VMT Reduction Cap for all LUT measures
LUT‐3
Increase Diversity of Urban and
Suburban Developments (Mixed Use)
% VMT Reduction = Land Use × B [not to exceed 30%]
Land Use = % increase in land use index vs. single use
= (Land Use Index ‐ 0.15) / 0.15
Urban: The urban project will be predominantly characterized by properties on which various uses, such as office, commercial, institutional, and residential, are combined in a single building or on a single site in an integrated development project with functional interrelationships and a coherent physical design.
Total Global Transportation VMT Reduction =
(Includes double counting correction.)
31.65%
Cap:
75%
Total LUT/SDT/PDT/TST VMT Reduction =
31.65%
Cap:
70%
Total LUT % VMT Reduction =
30.26%
Cap:
65%
% VMT Reduction =
0.70%
Cap:
30%
Number of DU/acre: 107.4
Number of Jobs/acre: 151.5
A =
A =
500%
500%
Cap:
30%
Urban LUT % VMT Reduction Cap:
Compact Infill LUT % VMT Reduction Cap:
Suburban Center LUT % VMT Reduction Cap:
65%
30%
10%
% VMT Reduction =
0.00%
Single family sqft: ‐
a1 = ‐
Land Use Index = ‐a / ln(6)
Multi‐family sqft: ‐
a2 = ‐
a = ∑ ai × ln(ai)
Commercial sqft: ‐
a3 = ‐
ai = building floor area / total square feet of area considered
a1 = single family
Suburban: The suburban project will have at least three uses of the following on site and/or offsite within ¼‐mile: Residential Development, Retail Development, Park, Open Space, or Office.
a2 = multi‐family
(ACOUNTED FOR IN TRAFFIC STUDY)
a5 = institutional
a3 = commercial
B = 0.09
Industrial sqft: ‐
a4 = ‐
Institutional sqft: ‐
a5 = ‐
Park sqft: ‐
a6 = ‐
Total sqft: ‐
a4 = industrial
(Note: If ai = 0, then set ai = 0.0000001)
a6 = park
LUT‐4
Increase Destination Accessibility
% VMT Reduction = Center Distance × B [not to exceed 20%]
Center Distance = (12 ‐ Miles to downtown or job center) / 12
B = 0.20
% VMT Reduction =
18.33%
Cap:
20%
Miles to downtown or job center: 1.0
(Distance to Downtown's Financial District)
(Note: Only effective for 8 miles or less)
LUT‐5
Increase Transit Accessibility
(ACOUNTED FOR IN TRAFFIC STUDY)
LUT‐6
Integrated Affordable and
Below Market Rate Housing
% VMT Reduction = Transit × B [not to exceed 30%]
Transit = % project transit ‐ % typical ITE transit
% project transit = ‐50x + 38 [where x = 0 ‐ 0.5 miles to transit]
‐4.4x + 15.2 [where x = 0.5 ‐ 3 miles to transit]
% typical ITE transit = 1.3%
B = 0.67
% VMT Reduction =
% VMT Reduction = 4% × % units BMR
% VMT Reduction =
0.00%
Cap:
30%
Miles to transit:
(Note: Only effective for 3 miles or less)
0.00%
% of units below market rate:
(Note: Only effective up to 30%)
LUT‐7
Orient Project Toward Non‐Auto
Corridor
Not quantified separately; Assumed to be included in LUT‐3
(If included in LUT‐3, VMT reduction should be at least 0.5% per 1% inprovement in transit frequency and
0.5% per 10% increase in transit ridership)
LUT‐8
Locate Project near Bike Path/Bike Lanes
Not quantified separately; Assumed to be included in LUT‐4
(If included in LUT‐4, VMT reduction should be at least 0.625%)
LUT‐9
Improve Design of Development
% VMT Reduction = Intersections × B
Intersections = % increase vs. typical ITE suburban
= (Intersections per square mile of project ‐ 36) / 36
B = 0.12
Neighborhood/Site Enhancement Measures (5% Reduction Cap without NEV; 15% Reduction Cap with NEV)
SDT‐1
Provide Pedestrian Network
Improvements
VMT reduction based on urban/rural context and
pedestrian accomodations
% VMT Reduction =
14.00%
Intersections per square mile: 78
(Estimated based on count of intersections within 1 mile radius of project site.)
(Note: Only effective up to 100)
Total SDT % VMT Reduction =
2.00%
% VMT Reduction =
2.00%
Pedestrian network on‐site and connecting off‐site (urban/suburban):
Pedestrian network on‐site (urban/suburban):
Cap:
Cap:
X
5% without NEV
15% With NEV
2%
1%
(Mark an "X" in one of the above)
Marked crosswalks, count‐down signal timers,
curb extensions, speed tables, rasied crosswalks,
raised intersections, median islands, tight corner radii,
roundabouts, on‐street parking, planter strips with trees,
chicanes/chokers, and others.
% VMT Reduction =
0.00%
25% of streets with improvements:
50% of streets with improvements:
75% of streets with improvements:
100% of streets with improvements:
A
B
C
D
25% of intersctions with improvements:
50% of intersctions with improvements:
75% of intersctions with improvements:
100% of intersctions with improvements:
W
X
Y
Z
% of intersections
Provide Traffic Calming Measures
with improvements
SDT‐2
W
X
Y
Z
% of streets with improvements
A
B
C
D
0.25% 0.25% 0.50% 0.50%
0.25% 0.50% 0.50% 0.75%
0.50% 0.50% 0.75% 0.75%
0.50% 0.75% 0.75% 1.00%
(Mark an "X" in one of the above for each group)
SDT‐3
Neighborhood Electric Vehicle Network
% VMT Reduction = Pop × Number × NEV
Pop × Number = NEVs per household [0.04 to 1.0]
NEV = VMT reduction rate per household [12.7%]
% VMT Reduction =
0.00%
Low NEVs per Household:
High NEVs per Household:
0.04
1.0
(Mark an "X" in one of the above)
SDT‐4
Create Urban Non‐Motorized Zones
Not quantified separately; Assumed to be included in SDT‐1
(If included in SDT‐1, VMT reduction should be at least 0.01% to 0.2%)
SDT‐5
Incorporate Bike Lane Street Design
Not quantified separately; Assumed to be included in LUT‐9
(If included in LUT‐9, VMT reduction should be at least 1% of worker commute per additional mile of bike lanes per square mile)
SDT‐6
Provide Bike Parking in Non‐Residential
Projects
Not quantified separately; Assumed to be included in LUT‐9
(If included in LUT‐9, VMT reduction should be at least 0.625%)
SDT‐7
Provide Bike Parking in Multi‐Unit
Residential Projects
Not quantified separately; Assumed to be included in LUT‐9
SDT‐8
Provide Electric Vehicle Parking
Not quantified separately; Assumed to be included in SDT‐3
SDT‐9
Dedicated Land for Bike Trails
Not quantified separately; Assumed to be included in LUT‐9
Parking Policy/Pricing (20% Reduction Cap)
PDT‐1
Limit Parking Supply
Total PDT % VMT Reduction =
0.00%
Cap:
20%
% VMT Reduction =
0.00%
Cap:
12.50%
Cap:
13%
Cap:
5.5%
% VMT Reduction =
= (Actual Parking ‐ ITE Parking) / ITE Parking × 0.5
Actual Parking Spaces: ‐
ITE Parking Spaces: ‐
PDT‐2
PDT‐3
PDT‐4
Unbunble Parking Costs from Property
Implement Market Price Public Parking
(On‐Street)
Require Residential Area Parking Permits
% VMT Reduction = Change in vehicle cost × elasticity × A
Change in vehicle cost = Monthly parking cost × (12/$4000)
Elasticity = 0.4
A = 85%
% VMT Reduction = Park$ × B
Park$ = Percent increase in on‐street parking prices
[minimum of 25%]
B = 0.11
% VMT Reduction =
0.00%
Monthly parking cost: $ ‐
% VMT Reduction =
0.00%
Actual On‐Street Parking Price: $ ‐
Baseline On‐Street Parking Price: $ ‐
Not quantified separately; Assumed to be included in PDT‐1, ‐2‐, and ‐3
(If included in LUT‐9, VMT reduction should be at least 0.09% to 0.36% depending on land use)
Transit System Improvements (10% Reduction Cap)
TST‐1
Provide a Bus Rapid Transit System
% VMT Reduction = Riders × Mode × Lines × D
Riders =
28%
Mode = 17% Urban Center
4% Urban
1.30% Suburban
Lines = Percent of lines serving project converting to BRT
D = 0.67
Total TST % VMT Reduction =
0.00%
Cap:
10%
% VMT Reduction =
0.00%
Cap:
3.2%
Urban Center:
Urban:
Suburban:
17%
4%
1.30%
(Mark an "X" in one of the above)
Lines Converting to BRT:
Total Baseline Lines:
TST‐2
Implement Transit Access Improvements
Not quantified separately; Assumed to be included in TST‐3 and ‐4
TST‐3
Expand Transit Network
% VMT Reduction = Coverage × B × Mode × D
Coverage = % increase in transit network coverage
B = 0.65 Urban Center
0.72 Urban
1.01 Suburban
Mode =
17% Urban Center
4% Urban
1.30% Suburban
D = 0.67
% VMT Reduction =
% VMT Reduction = Headway × B × C × Mode × E
Headway = % reduction in headways [15% ‐ 80%]
B =
0.32 Urban
0.36 Suburban
C =
50% < 50% lines improved
85% >= 50% lines improved
Mode =
17% Urban Center
4% Urban
1.30% Suburban
E = 0.67
% VMT Reduction =
TST‐4
Increase Transit Service Frequency/Speed
TST‐5
Provide Bike Parking Near Transit
Not quantified separately; Assumed to be included in TST‐3 and ‐4
TST‐6
Provide Local Shuttles
Not quantified separately; Assumed to be included in TST‐3 and ‐4
Commute Trip Reduction (25% Reduction Cap ‐ WORK VMT ONLY)
TRT‐1
Implement Voluntary Commute
Trip Reduction Program
% Work VMT Reduction = A × B
A =
6.2% Urban
5.4% Suburban Center
5.2% Suburban
B = % employees eligible
0%
0.00%
Urban Center:
Urban:
Suburban:
Cap:
8.2%
17%
4%
1.30%
0.65
0.72
1.01
(Mark an "X" in one of the above)
Coverage:
0.00%
Urban Center:
Urban:
Suburban:
Cap:
2.5%
17%
4%
1.30%
0.32
0.32
0.36
(Mark an "X" in one of the above)
Headway:
Percent of Lines Improved:
Total TRT % Work VMT Reduction =
% Work VMT of Total VMT:
Total TRT % Overall VMT Reduction =
0.00%
2.5%
0.00%
Cap:
25%
Cap:
15%
% Work VMT Reduction =
0.00%
Cap:
6.2%
Urban:
Suburban Center:
Suburban:
6.2%
5.4%
5.2%
(Mark an "X" in one of the above)
% Employees Eligible:
TRT‐2
TRT‐3
Implement Required Commute
Trip Reduction Program
Provide Ride‐Sharing Programs
% Work VMT Reduction = A × B
A = 21%
B = % employees eligible
% Work VMT Reduction =
% Work VMT Reduction = Commute × Employee
Commute =
15% Urban
10% Suburban Center
5% Suburban
Employee = % employees eligible
% Work VMT Reduction =
0.00%
Cap:
21.0%
0.00%
Cap:
15.0%
% Employees Eligible:
Urban:
Suburban Center:
Suburban:
15%
10%
5%
(Mark an "X" in one of the above)
% Employees Eligible:
Implement Subsidized or Discounted
Transit Program
% Work VMT Reduction = A × B × C
A = % reduction in commute vehicle trips
B = % employees eligible
C = Adjustment from VT to VMT [1.0]
% Work VMT Reduction =
0.00%
Cap:
Urban:
Suburban Center:
Suburban:
A
B
C
Transit Subsidy: $0.75
Transit Subsidy: $1.49
Transit Subsidy: $2.98
Transit Subsidy: $5.96
W
X
Y
Z
20.0%
Setting
TRT‐4
A
B
C
Daily Transit Subsidy
W
X
Y
Z
6.2% 12.9%
20%
20%
3.4%
7.3% 16.4%
20%
1.5%
3.3%
7.9%
20%
(Mark an "X" in one of the above for each group)
% Employees Eligible:
Provide End of Trip Facilities
Not quantified separately; Assumed to be included in TRT‐1 through ‐3
(If included, Work VMT reduction should be 2% to 5%, or total VMT reduction should be 0.02% to 0.625%)
TRT‐6
Encourage Telecommuting and
Alternate Work Schedules
% Reduction in Commute VMT
% Work VMT Reduction =
0.00%
Cap:
9‐day/80‐hour Work Week:
4‐day/40‐hour Work Week:
Telecommuting 1.5 Days:
A
B
C
Employee Participation: 1%
Employee Participation: 3%
Employee Participation: 5%
Employee Participation: 10%
Employee Participation: 25%
V
W
X
Y
Z
5.5%
Schedule
TRT‐5
A
B
C
V
0.07%
0.15%
0.22%
(Mark an "X" in one of the above for each group)
TRT‐7
TRT‐8
Implement Commute Trip Reduction
Marketing
Implement Preferential Permit
Parking Program
% Work VMT Reduction = A × B × C
A = % reduction in commute vehicle trips [4%]
B = % employees eligible
C = Adjustment from VT to VMT [1.0]
Not quantified separately; Assumed to be included in TRT‐1 through ‐3
% Work VMT Reduction =
% Employees Eligible:
0.00%
Cap:
4.0%
Employee Participation
W
X
Y
0.21% 0.35% 0.70%
0.45% 0.75% 1.50%
0.66% 1.10% 2.20%
Z
1.75%
3.75%
5.50%
TRT‐9
Implement Car‐Sharing Program
% Work VMT Reduction = A × B / C
A = % reduction in car‐share member annual VMT [37%]
B = number of car share members per shared car [20]
C =
1,000 Urban
2,000 Suburban
% Work VMT Reduction =
0.00%
Urban:
Suburban:
Cap:
0.74%
1,000
2,000
(Mark an "X" in one of the above)
Implement a School Pool Program
Not applicable.
TRT‐11
Provide Employer‐Sponsored
Vanpool/Shuttle
% Work VMT Reduction = A × B × C
A = % shift in vanpool mode share of commute trips
= 2% to 20%
B = % employees eligible
C = 0.67
TRT‐12
Implement Bike Sharing Program
Not quantified separately; Assumed to be included in LUT‐9 and SDT‐5
(If included, total VMT reduction should be at least 0.03%)
TRT‐13
Implement School Bus Program
Not applicable.
TRT‐14
Price Workplace Parking
% Work VMT Reduction = A × B
A = % reduction in commute VMT
B = % employees subject to priced parking
% Work VMT Reduction =
0.00%
Cap:
13.4%
0.00%
Cap:
19.7%
A: Shift in Vanpool Mode Share:
B: Employees Eligible:
% Work VMT Reduction =
Urban:
Suburban Center:
Suburban:
A
B
C
Daily Parking Charge: $1
Daily Parking Charge: $2
Daily Parking Charge: $3
Daily Parking Charge: $6
W
X
Y
Z
Setting
TRT‐10
A
B
C
Daily Parking Charge
W
X
Y
Z
6.9% 12.5% 16.8% 19.7%
1.8%
3.7%
5.4%
6.8%
0.5%
1.2%
1.9%
2.8%
(Mark an "X" in one of the above for each group)
% Employees Subject to Priced Parking:
TRT‐15
Implement Employee Parking
Cash‐Out
% Work VMT Reduction = A × B
A =
7.7% Urban
4.5% Suburban Center
3.0% Suburban
B = % employees eligible
% Work VMT Reduction =
Urban:
Suburban Center:
Suburban:
0.00%
Cap:
7.7%
7.7%
4.5%
3.0%
(Mark an "X" in one of the above)
% Employees Eligible:
FULL BUILDOUT: 1020 S. Figueroa Street Project
Draft Environmental Impact Report
Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Mitigation Measures ‐ Transportation (Based on CAPCOA Guidance (August 2010))
BUSINESS AS USUAL PROJECT
Location Type
Global % VMT Reduction Cap
Urban:
75%
Less than 5 miles from central business district
Jobs‐rich (jobs/housing ratio greater than 1.5)
Typical buildings are 6 stories or higher
Grid street pattern
Minimal setbacks
Parking constrained on‐ and off‐street
Parking prices high/highest in the region
High‐quality rail; bus service at 10 min or less in peak hours
Location Type
Global % VMT Reduction Cap
Suburban Center:
20%
Typically 20 miles or more from central business district
Balanced jobs‐housing
Typical buildings are 2 stories
Grid street pattern
Setbacks 0 ‐ 20 feet
Parking somewhat constrained on‐street; ample off‐street
Parking prices low (if priced at all)
Bus service at 20 ‐ 30 min and/or commuter rail station
Compact Infill:
40%
Typically 5 ‐ 15 miles from central business district
Balanced jobs‐housing (jobs/housing ratio from 0.9 to 1.2)
Typical buildings are 2 ‐ 4 stories
Grid street pattern
Setbacks 0 ‐ 20 feet
Parking constrained
Parking prices low/moderate
Rail w/in 2 miles; bus service at 15 min or less in peak hours
Suburban:
15%
Typically 20 miles or more from central business district
Housing‐rich
Typical buildings are 1 ‐ 2 stories
Curvilinear street pattern (cul‐de‐sac based)
Parking between street and buildings; large lot residential
Parking ample; largely surface lot‐based
No parking prices
Limited bus service at 30 minute headways or more
Land Use/Location Transportation Measures (65% Reduction Cap)
LUT‐1
Increase Density
% VMT Reduction = A × B [not to exceed 30%]
A (housing) = (Number of DU/acre ‐ 7.6 ) / 7.6
A (jobs) = (Number of Jobs/acre ‐ 20 ) / 20
B = 0.07%
LUT‐2
Increase Location Efficiency
% VMT Reduction Cap for all LUT measures
LUT‐3
Increase Diversity of Urban and
Suburban Developments (Mixed Use)
% VMT Reduction = Land Use × B [not to exceed 30%]
Land Use = % increase in land use index vs. single use
= (Land Use Index ‐ 0.15) / 0.15
Urban: The urban project will be predominantly characterized by properties on which various uses, such as office, commercial, institutional, and residential, are combined in a single building or on a single site in an integrated development project with functional interrelationships and a coherent physical design.
Total Global Transportation VMT Reduction =
(Includes double counting correction.)
31.65%
Cap:
75%
Total LUT/SDT/PDT/TST VMT Reduction =
31.65%
Cap:
70%
Total LUT % VMT Reduction =
30.26%
Cap:
65%
% VMT Reduction =
0.70%
Cap:
30%
A =
A =
500%
500%
Cap:
30%
Number of DU/acre: 240.7
Number of Jobs/acre: 205.9
Urban LUT % VMT Reduction Cap:
Compact Infill LUT % VMT Reduction Cap:
Suburban Center LUT % VMT Reduction Cap:
65%
30%
10%
% VMT Reduction =
0.00%
Single family sqft: ‐
a1 = ‐
Land Use Index = ‐a / ln(6)
Multi‐family sqft: ‐
a2 = ‐
a = ∑ ai × ln(ai)
Commercial sqft: ‐
a3 = ‐
ai = building floor area / total square feet of area considered
a1 = single family
Suburban: The suburban project will have at least three uses of the following on site and/or offsite within ¼‐mile: Residential Development, Retail Development, Park, Open Space, or Office.
a2 = multi‐family
(ACOUNTED FOR IN TRAFFIC STUDY)
a5 = institutional
a3 = commercial
B = 0.09
Industrial sqft: ‐
a4 = ‐
Institutional sqft: ‐
a5 = ‐
Park sqft: ‐
a6 = ‐
Total sqft: ‐
a4 = industrial
(Note: If ai = 0, then set ai = 0.0000001)
a6 = park
LUT‐4
Increase Destination Accessibility
% VMT Reduction = Center Distance × B [not to exceed 20%]
Center Distance = (12 ‐ Miles to downtown or job center) / 12
B = 0.20
% VMT Reduction =
18.33%
Cap:
20%
Miles to downtown or job center: 1.0
(Distance to Downtown's Financial District)
(Note: Only effective for 8 miles or less)
LUT‐5
Increase Transit Accessibility
(ACOUNTED FOR IN TRAFFIC STUDY)
LUT‐6
Integrated Affordable and
Below Market Rate Housing
% VMT Reduction = Transit × B [not to exceed 30%]
Transit = % project transit ‐ % typical ITE transit
% project transit = ‐50x + 38 [where x = 0 ‐ 0.5 miles to transit]
‐4.4x + 15.2 [where x = 0.5 ‐ 3 miles to transit]
% typical ITE transit = 1.3%
B = 0.67
% VMT Reduction = 4% × % units BMR
% VMT Reduction =
0.00%
Cap:
30%
Miles to transit:
(Note: Only effective for 3 miles or less)
% VMT Reduction =
0.00%
% of units below market rate:
(Note: Only effective up to 30%)
LUT‐7
Orient Project Toward Non‐Auto
Corridor
Not quantified separately; Assumed to be included in LUT‐3
(If included in LUT‐3, VMT reduction should be at least 0.5% per 1% inprovement in transit frequency and
0.5% per 10% increase in transit ridership)
LUT‐8
Locate Project near Bike Path/Bike Lanes
Not quantified separately; Assumed to be included in LUT‐4
(If included in LUT‐4, VMT reduction should be at least 0.625%)
LUT‐9
Improve Design of Development
% VMT Reduction = Intersections × B
Intersections = % increase vs. typical ITE suburban
= (Intersections per square mile of project ‐ 36) / 36
B = 0.12
% VMT Reduction =
14.00%
Intersections per square mile: 78
(Note: Only effective up to 100)
Neighborhood/Site Enhancement Measures (5% Reduction Cap without NEV; 15% Reduction Cap with NEV)
SDT‐1
Provide Pedestrian Network
Improvements
VMT reduction based on urban/rural context and
pedestrian accomodations
Total SDT % VMT Reduction =
2.00%
% VMT Reduction =
2.00%
Pedestrian network on‐site and connecting off‐site (urban/suburban):
Pedestrian network on‐site (urban/suburban):
Cap:
Cap:
X
5% without NEV
15% With NEV
2%
1%
(Mark an "X" in one of the above)
Marked crosswalks, count‐down signal timers,
curb extensions, speed tables, rasied crosswalks,
raised intersections, median islands, tight corner radii,
roundabouts, on‐street parking, planter strips with trees,
chicanes/chokers, and others.
% VMT Reduction =
0.00%
25% of streets with improvements:
50% of streets with improvements:
75% of streets with improvements:
100% of streets with improvements:
A
B
C
D
25% of intersctions with improvements:
50% of intersctions with improvements:
75% of intersctions with improvements:
100% of intersctions with improvements:
W
X
Y
Z
% of intersections
Provide Traffic Calming Measures
with improvements
SDT‐2
W
X
Y
Z
% of streets with improvements
A
B
C
D
0.25% 0.25% 0.50% 0.50%
0.25% 0.50% 0.50% 0.75%
0.50% 0.50% 0.75% 0.75%
0.50% 0.75% 0.75% 1.00%
(Mark an "X" in one of the above for each group)
SDT‐3
Neighborhood Electric Vehicle Network
% VMT Reduction = Pop × Number × NEV
Pop × Number = NEVs per household [0.04 to 1.0]
NEV = VMT reduction rate per household [12.7%]
% VMT Reduction =
0.00%
Low NEVs per Household:
High NEVs per Household:
0.04
1.0
(Mark an "X" in one of the above)
SDT‐4
Create Urban Non‐Motorized Zones
Not quantified separately; Assumed to be included in SDT‐1
(If included in SDT‐1, VMT reduction should be at least 0.01% to 0.2%)
SDT‐5
Incorporate Bike Lane Street Design
Not quantified separately; Assumed to be included in LUT‐9
(If included in LUT‐9, VMT reduction should be at least 1% of worker commute per additional mile of bike lanes per square mile)
SDT‐6
Provide Bike Parking in Non‐Residential
Projects
Not quantified separately; Assumed to be included in LUT‐9
(If included in LUT‐9, VMT reduction should be at least 0.625%)
SDT‐7
Provide Bike Parking in Multi‐Unit
Residential Projects
Not quantified separately; Assumed to be included in LUT‐9
SDT‐8
Provide Electric Vehicle Parking
Not quantified separately; Assumed to be included in SDT‐3
SDT‐9
Dedicated Land for Bike Trails
Not quantified separately; Assumed to be included in LUT‐9
Parking Policy/Pricing (20% Reduction Cap)
PDT‐1
Limit Parking Supply
Total PDT % VMT Reduction =
0.00%
Cap:
20%
% VMT Reduction =
0.00%
Cap:
12.50%
Cap:
13%
Cap:
5.5%
% VMT Reduction =
= (Actual Parking ‐ ITE Parking) / ITE Parking × 0.5
Actual Parking Spaces: ‐
ITE Parking Spaces: ‐
PDT‐2
PDT‐3
PDT‐4
Unbunble Parking Costs from Property
Implement Market Price Public Parking
(On‐Street)
Require Residential Area Parking Permits
% VMT Reduction = Change in vehicle cost × elasticity × A
Change in vehicle cost = Monthly parking cost × (12/$4000)
Elasticity = 0.4
A = 85%
% VMT Reduction = Park$ × B
Park$ = Percent increase in on‐street parking prices
[minimum of 25%]
B = 0.11
% VMT Reduction =
0.00%
Monthly parking cost: $ ‐
% VMT Reduction =
0.00%
Actual On‐Street Parking Price: $ ‐
Baseline On‐Street Parking Price: $ ‐
Not quantified separately; Assumed to be included in PDT‐1, ‐2‐, and ‐3
(If included in LUT‐9, VMT reduction should be at least 0.09% to 0.36% depending on land use)
Transit System Improvements (10% Reduction Cap)
TST‐1
Provide a Bus Rapid Transit System
% VMT Reduction = Riders × Mode × Lines × D
Riders =
28%
Mode = 17% Urban Center
4% Urban
1.30% Suburban
Lines = Percent of lines serving project converting to BRT
D = 0.67
Total TST % VMT Reduction =
0.00%
Cap:
10%
% VMT Reduction =
0.00%
Cap:
3.2%
Urban Center:
Urban:
Suburban:
17%
4%
1.30%
(Mark an "X" in one of the above)
Lines Converting to BRT:
Total Baseline Lines:
TST‐2
Implement Transit Access Improvements
Not quantified separately; Assumed to be included in TST‐3 and ‐4
TST‐3
Expand Transit Network
% VMT Reduction = Coverage × B × Mode × D
Coverage = % increase in transit network coverage
B = 0.65 Urban Center
0.72 Urban
1.01 Suburban
Mode =
17% Urban Center
4% Urban
1.30% Suburban
D = 0.67
% VMT Reduction =
% VMT Reduction = Headway × B × C × Mode × E
Headway = % reduction in headways [15% ‐ 80%]
B =
0.32 Urban
0.36 Suburban
C =
50% < 50% lines improved
85% >= 50% lines improved
Mode =
17% Urban Center
4% Urban
1.30% Suburban
E = 0.67
% VMT Reduction =
TST‐4
Increase Transit Service Frequency/Speed
TST‐5
Provide Bike Parking Near Transit
Not quantified separately; Assumed to be included in TST‐3 and ‐4
TST‐6
Provide Local Shuttles
Not quantified separately; Assumed to be included in TST‐3 and ‐4
Commute Trip Reduction (25% Reduction Cap ‐ WORK VMT ONLY)
TRT‐1
Implement Voluntary Commute
Trip Reduction Program
% Work VMT Reduction = A × B
A =
6.2% Urban
5.4% Suburban Center
5.2% Suburban
B = % employees eligible
0%
0.00%
Urban Center:
Urban:
Suburban:
Cap:
8.2%
17%
4%
1.30%
0.65
0.72
1.01
(Mark an "X" in one of the above)
Coverage:
0.00%
Urban Center:
Urban:
Suburban:
Cap:
2.5%
17%
4%
1.30%
0.32
0.32
0.36
(Mark an "X" in one of the above)
Headway:
Percent of Lines Improved:
Total TRT % Work VMT Reduction =
% Work VMT of Total VMT:
Total TRT % Overall VMT Reduction =
0.00%
2.5%
0.00%
Cap:
25%
Cap:
15%
% Work VMT Reduction =
0.00%
Cap:
6.2%
Urban:
Suburban Center:
Suburban:
6.2%
5.4%
5.2%
(Mark an "X" in one of the above)
% Employees Eligible:
TRT‐2
TRT‐3
Implement Required Commute
Trip Reduction Program
Provide Ride‐Sharing Programs
% Work VMT Reduction = A × B
A = 21%
B = % employees eligible
% Work VMT Reduction =
% Work VMT Reduction = Commute × Employee
Commute =
15% Urban
10% Suburban Center
5% Suburban
Employee = % employees eligible
% Work VMT Reduction =
0.00%
Cap:
21.0%
0.00%
Cap:
15.0%
% Employees Eligible:
Urban:
Suburban Center:
Suburban:
15%
10%
5%
(Mark an "X" in one of the above)
% Employees Eligible:
Implement Subsidized or Discounted
Transit Program
% Work VMT Reduction = A × B × C
A = % reduction in commute vehicle trips
B = % employees eligible
C = Adjustment from VT to VMT [1.0]
% Work VMT Reduction =
0.00%
Cap:
Urban:
Suburban Center:
Suburban:
A
B
C
Transit Subsidy: $0.75
Transit Subsidy: $1.49
Transit Subsidy: $2.98
Transit Subsidy: $5.96
W
X
Y
Z
20.0%
Setting
TRT‐4
A
B
C
Daily Transit Subsidy
W
X
Y
6.2% 12.9%
20%
3.4%
7.3% 16.4%
1.5%
3.3%
7.9%
Z
20%
20%
20%
(Mark an "X" in one of the above for each group)
% Employees Eligible:
Provide End of Trip Facilities
Not quantified separately; Assumed to be included in TRT‐1 through ‐3
(If included, Work VMT reduction should be 2% to 5%, or total VMT reduction should be 0.02% to 0.625%)
TRT‐6
Encourage Telecommuting and
Alternate Work Schedules
% Reduction in Commute VMT
% Work VMT Reduction =
0.00%
Cap:
9‐day/80‐hour Work Week:
4‐day/40‐hour Work Week:
Telecommuting 1.5 Days:
A
B
C
Employee Participation: 1%
Employee Participation: 3%
Employee Participation: 5%
Employee Participation: 10%
Employee Participation: 25%
V
W
X
Y
Z
5.5%
Schedule
TRT‐5
A
B
C
V
0.07%
0.15%
0.22%
(Mark an "X" in one of the above for each group)
TRT‐7
TRT‐8
Implement Commute Trip Reduction
Marketing
Implement Preferential Permit
Parking Program
% Work VMT Reduction = A × B × C
A = % reduction in commute vehicle trips [4%]
B = % employees eligible
C = Adjustment from VT to VMT [1.0]
Not quantified separately; Assumed to be included in TRT‐1 through ‐3
% Work VMT Reduction =
% Employees Eligible:
0.00%
Cap:
4.0%
Employee Participation
W
X
Y
0.21% 0.35% 0.70%
0.45% 0.75% 1.50%
0.66% 1.10% 2.20%
Z
1.75%
3.75%
5.50%
TRT‐9
Implement Car‐Sharing Program
% Work VMT Reduction = A × B / C
A = % reduction in car‐share member annual VMT [37%]
B = number of car share members per shared car [20]
C =
1,000 Urban
2,000 Suburban
% Work VMT Reduction =
0.00%
Urban:
Suburban:
Cap:
0.74%
1,000
2,000
(Mark an "X" in one of the above)
Implement a School Pool Program
Not applicable.
TRT‐11
Provide Employer‐Sponsored
Vanpool/Shuttle
% Work VMT Reduction = A × B × C
A = % shift in vanpool mode share of commute trips
= 2% to 20%
B = % employees eligible
C = 0.67
TRT‐12
Implement Bike Sharing Program
Not quantified separately; Assumed to be included in LUT‐9 and SDT‐5
(If included, total VMT reduction should be at least 0.03%)
TRT‐13
Implement School Bus Program
Not applicable.
TRT‐14
Price Workplace Parking
% Work VMT Reduction = A × B
A = % reduction in commute VMT
B = % employees subject to priced parking
% Work VMT Reduction =
0.00%
Cap:
13.4%
0.00%
Cap:
19.7%
A: Shift in Vanpool Mode Share:
B: Employees Eligible:
% Work VMT Reduction =
Urban:
Suburban Center:
Suburban:
A
B
C
Daily Parking Charge: $1
Daily Parking Charge: $2
Daily Parking Charge: $3
Daily Parking Charge: $6
W
X
Y
Z
Setting
TRT‐10
A
B
C
Daily Parking Charge
W
X
Y
Z
6.9% 12.5% 16.8% 19.7%
1.8%
3.7%
5.4%
6.8%
0.5%
1.2%
1.9%
2.8%
(Mark an "X" in one of the above for each group)
% Employees Subject to Priced Parking:
TRT‐15
Implement Employee Parking
Cash‐Out
% Work VMT Reduction = A × B
A =
7.7% Urban
4.5% Suburban Center
3.0% Suburban
B = % employees eligible
% Work VMT Reduction =
Urban:
Suburban Center:
Suburban:
0.00%
Cap:
7.7%
7.7%
4.5%
3.0%
(Mark an "X" in one of the above)
% Employees Eligible:
1020 S. Figueroa Street Project
Draft Environmental Impact Report
Daily Vehicle Miles Traveled Adjustments
Existing and Project VMT
Land Use (CalEEMod Land U
Project Uses
Residential Units
(High‐Rise Apartments)
Hotel
(Hotel)
Daily Interim Year Project Trips
Daily Existing Trips
4.54 Baseline trip rate per DU
‐20% Transit/Walk Adjustment (Traffic Study)
3.63 Trip rate per Room less Transit/Walk Adj.
8.17 Baseline trip rate per Room
‐25% Transit/Walk Adjustment (Traffic Study)
6.13 Trip rate per Room less Transit/Walk Adj.
Daily Full Buildout Project Trips
4.11 Baseline trip rate per DU
‐20% Transit/Walk Adjustment (Traffic Study)
3.29 Trip rate per DU less Transit/Walk Adj.
‐31.7% VMT Reduction (CAPCOA)
‐31.7% VMT Reduction (CAPCOA)
14.70 H‐W Trip Length (Baseline)
5.90 H‐S Trip Length (Baseline)
8.70 H‐O Trip Length (Baseline)
14.70 H‐W Trip Length (Baseline)
5.90 H‐S Trip Length (Baseline)
8.70 H‐O Trip Length (Baseline)
10.05 H‐W Trip Length (Project)
4.03 H‐S Trip Length (Project)
5.95 H‐O Trip Length (Project)
10.05 H‐W Trip Length (Project)
4.03 H‐S Trip Length (Project)
5.95 H‐O Trip Length (Project)
8.17 Baseline trip rate per Room
‐25% Transit/Walk Adjustment (Traffic Study)
6.13 Trip rate per Room less Transit/Walk Adj.
8.17 Baseline trip rate per Room
‐25% Transit/Walk Adjustment (Traffic Study)
6.13 Trip rate per Room less Transit/Walk Adj.
‐29.8% VMT Reduction (CAPCOA)
‐31.7% VMT Reduction (CAPCOA)
‐31.7% VMT Reduction (CAPCOA)
8.40 C‐C Trip Length (Baseline)
16.60 C‐W Trip Length (Baseline)
6.90 C‐NW Trip Length (Baseline)
8.40 C‐C Trip Length (Baseline)
16.60 C‐W Trip Length (Baseline)
6.90 C‐NW Trip Length (Baseline)
8.40 C‐C Trip Length (Baseline)
16.60 C‐W Trip Length (Baseline)
6.90 C‐NW Trip Length (Baseline)
5.89 C‐C Trip Length (Project)
11.65 C‐W Trip Length (Project)
4.84 C‐NW Trip Length (Project)
5.74 H‐W Trip Length (Project)
11.35 H‐S Trip Length (Project)
4.72 H‐O Trip Length (Project)
5.74 C‐C Trip Length (Project)
11.35 C‐W Trip Length (Project)
4.72 C‐NW Trip Length (Project)
127.13
‐20%
‐15%
86.47
127.15
‐20%
‐15%
86.48
Restaurant
(Quality Restaurant)
Retail
(Strip Mall)
Residential Common Areas
Above‐Grade Parking Structure
Subterranean Parking Structure
Open Space
Trips included in residential land use
Land use does not generate its own trips
Land use does not generate its own trips
Land use does not generate its own trips
Source: PCR Service Corporation, (2016); Gibson Traffic Consulting, (2016).
Baseline trip rate per 1000 sf
Internal Capture Adjustment (Traffic Study)
Transit/Walk Adjustment (Traffic Study)
Baseline trip rate per 1000 sf less Adj.
Baseline trip rate per 1000 sf
Internal Capture Adjustment (Traffic Study)
Transit/Walk Adjustment (Traffic Study)
Trip rate per 1000 sf less Adjustments
‐31.7% VMT Reduction (CAPCOA)
‐31.7% VMT Reduction (CAPCOA)
8.40 C‐C Trip Length (Baseline)
16.60 C‐W Trip Length (Baseline)
6.90 C‐NW Trip Length (Baseline)
8.40 C‐C Trip Length (Baseline)
16.60 C‐W Trip Length (Baseline)
6.90 C‐NW Trip Length (Baseline)
5.74 C‐C Trip Length (Project)
11.35 C‐W Trip Length (Project)
4.72 C‐NW Trip Length (Project)
5.74 C‐C Trip Length (Project)
11.35 C‐W Trip Length (Project)
4.72 C‐NW Trip Length (Project)
42.73
‐20%
‐15%
29.07
42.70
‐20%
‐15%
29.03
Baseline trip rate per 1000 sf
Internal Capture Adjustment (Traffic Study)
Transit/Walk Adjustment (Traffic Study)
Baseline trip rate per 1000 sf less Adj.
Baseline trip rate per 1000 sf
Internal Capture Adjustment (Traffic Study)
Transit/Walk Adjustment (Traffic Study)
Trip rate per 1000 sf less Adjustments
‐31.7% VMT Reduction (CAPCOA)
‐31.7% VMT Reduction (CAPCOA)
8.40 C‐C Trip Length (Baseline)
16.60 C‐W Trip Length (Baseline)
6.90 C‐NW Trip Length (Baseline)
8.40 C‐C Trip Length (Baseline)
16.60 C‐W Trip Length (Baseline)
6.90 C‐NW Trip Length (Baseline)
5.74 C‐C Trip Length (Project)
11.35 C‐W Trip Length (Project)
4.72 C‐NW Trip Length (Project)
5.74 C‐C Trip Length (Project)
11.35 C‐W Trip Length (Project)
4.72 C‐NW Trip Length (Project)
Trips included in residential land use
Land use does not generate its own trips
Land use does not generate its own trips
Land use does not generate its own trips
Trips included in residential land use
Land use does not generate its own trips
Land use does not generate its own trips
Land use does not generate its own trips
1020 S. Figueroa Street Project
Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Assessment
Mobile Source Emissions
Year
Period
ROG
NOx
2015 Winter
9.60E‐08
7.26E‐08
2015 Summer
8.04E‐08
5.73E‐08
2015 Annual
2015 Max
9.60E‐08
7.26E‐08
2020 Winter
5.42E‐08
3.79E‐08
2020 Summer
5.26E‐08
3.44E‐08
2020 Annual
2020 Max
5.42E‐08
3.79E‐08
2023 Winter
4.39E‐08
2.73E‐08
2023 Summer
4.25E‐08
2.48E‐08
2023 Annual
2023 Max
4.39E‐08
2.73E‐08
Notes:
a. RD = Road Dust
b. Exh = Exhaust; BW = Break Wear; TW = Tire Wear
Source: EMFAC2014
CO
7.81E‐07
7.01E‐07
SOx
1.52E‐09
1.40E‐09
Emission Factors (tons/mi)
PM10
PM10
PM10
a
Exh+BW+TW b
RD Total
3.31E‐07
1.90E‐08
3.50E‐07
3.31E‐07
1.65E‐08
3.47E‐07
7.81E‐07
4.35E‐07
4.57E‐07
1.52E‐09
1.31E‐09
1.39E‐09
3.31E‐07
3.31E‐07
3.31E‐07
1.90E‐08
1.90E‐08
1.90E‐08
3.50E‐07
3.49E‐07
3.49E‐07
8.11E‐08
8.11E‐08
8.11E‐08
8.20E‐09
8.10E‐09
8.10E‐09
8.93E‐08
8.92E‐08
8.92E‐08
4.57E‐07
3.40E‐07
3.59E‐07
1.39E‐09
1.17E‐09
1.23E‐09
3.31E‐07
3.31E‐07
3.31E‐07
1.90E‐08
1.88E‐08
1.88E‐08
3.49E‐07
3.49E‐07
3.49E‐07
8.11E‐08
8.11E‐08
8.11E‐08
8.10E‐09
8.00E‐09
8.00E‐09
8.92E‐08
8.91E‐08
8.91E‐08
3.59E‐07
1.23E‐09
3.31E‐07
1.88E‐08
3.49E‐07
8.11E‐08
8.00E‐09
8.91E‐08
PM10
PM2_5
a
RD 1.6
4.4
7.7
PM2_5
b
Exh+BW+TW 0.2
0.4
0.8
PM2_5
Daily
Scenario
Existing
Interim Year
Full Buildout
VMT
9,624
27,015
47,734
ROG
1.8
2.9
4.2
NOx
1.4
2.0
2.6
Notes:
a. RD = Road Dust
b. Exh = Exhaust; BW = Break Wear; TW = Tire Wear
Source: CalEEMod (VMT); ESA PCR, 2016
CO
15.0
24.7
34.3
SOx
0.03
0.07
0.12
Emissions (lbs/day)
PM10
PM10
b
RD a
Exh+BW+TW 6.4
0.4
17.9
1.0
31.6
1.8
Total
6.7
18.9
33.4
PM2_5
PM2_5
a
Exh+BW+TW b
RD 8.11E‐08
8.20E‐09
8.11E‐08
7.14E‐09
PM2_5
Total
8.93E‐08
8.83E‐08
Total
1.7
4.8
8.5
CO2
1.54E‐04
1.54E‐04
1.33E‐04
1.33E‐04
1.18E‐04
1.18E‐04
Scenario
Existing
Interim Year
Full Buildout
Annual
CO2
VMT
2,599,399
7,296,747
12,893,077
(MT/yr)
362
878
1,381
Source: CalEEMod (VMT); ESA PCR, 2016
6
1020 S. Figueroa Street Project
Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Assessment
Paved Road Dust Emission Factors (Assumes No Precipitation)
Formula:
EFDust,P = (k (sL)0.91 × (W)1.02)
Where:
EFDust,P =
k =
sL =
W =
Paved Road Dust Emission Factor (having the same units as k)
particle size multiplier
road surface silt loading (g/m2)
average fleet vehicle weight (tons) (CARB uses 2.4 tons as a fleet average vehicle weight factor)
Emission Factor (grams per VMT)
PM10
PM2.5
k
0.9979
0.2449
sL
0.1
0.1
W
2.4
2.4
EFDust,P
3.00E‐01
7.36E‐02
Sources:
SCAQMD, CalEEMod, Version 2013.2.2.
CARB, Entrained Dust from Paved Road Travel: Emission Estimation Methodology Background Document , (1997).
USEPA, AP‐42 , Fifth Edition, Volume I, Chapter 13.2.1 ‐ Paved Roads, (2011).
ESA PCR, 2016.
AppendixA.4
OperationalProjectCharbroilerEmissions
1020 S. Figueroa Street Project
Draft Environmental Impact Report
Air Quality Assessment
Project ‐ Estimated Charbroiler Stationary Source Emissions
Source1
Project
Charbroiler ‐ 25% fat Hamburger
Charbroiler ‐ Chicken
Total Emissions
Uncontrolled Emission Factors2
(lb/1000 lb)
VOC
PM10
3.94
1.82
32.65
10.48
Quantity3
(lb/day)
116.5
116.5
Emissions Controls4
(percent reduction)
VOC
PM10
86%
86%
83%
83%
Controlled Emissions5
(pounds/day)
VOC
PM10
0.06
0.03
0.09
0.65
0.21
0.85
Notes:
1. Source type is based on the meat with the highest emission factors.
2. South Coast Air Quality Management District, Emission Factors for Commercial Cooking Operations, http://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default‐source/rule‐book/Proposed‐
Rules/1138/par1138pdsr_appendixi.pdf?sfvrsn=2. Accessed April 2016.
3. Quantity of meats charbroiled is based on the average pounds of meat cooked per restaurant consisting of 50% hamburger meat and 50% chicken.
4. South Coast Air Quality Management District Rule 1138 (Control of Emissions from Restaurant Operations) regulates PM10 and VOC emissions from fast‐food restaurants with charbroilers. Catalytic oxidizers reduce VOC emissions by approximately 86 percent and PM10 emissions by approximately 83 percent.
5. It is assumed that PM10 emissions also represent PM2.5 emissions.
Source: PCR Services Corporation, 2016.
AppendixA.5
SouthCoastAirQualityManagementDistrictRule403
(Adopted May 7, 1976) (Amended November 6, 1992)
(Amended July 9, 1993) (Amended February 14, 1997)
(Amended December 11, 1998)(Amended April 2, 2004)
(Amended June 3, 2005)
RULE 403.
FUGITIVE DUST
(a)
Purpose
The purpose of this Rule is to reduce the amount of particulate matter entrained in
the ambient air as a result of anthropogenic (man-made) fugitive dust sources by
requiring actions to prevent, reduce or mitigate fugitive dust emissions.
(b)
Applicability
The provisions of this Rule shall apply to any activity or man-made condition
capable of generating fugitive dust.
(c)
Definitions
(1)
ACTIVE OPERATIONS means any source capable of generating fugitive
dust, including, but not limited to, earth-moving activities,
construction/demolition activities, disturbed surface area, or heavy- and
light-duty vehicular movement.
(2)
AGGREGATE-RELATED PLANTS are defined as facilities that produce
and / or mix sand and gravel and crushed stone.
(3)
AGRICULTURAL HANDBOOK means the region-specific guidance
document that has been approved by the Governing Board or hereafter
approved by the Executive Officer and the U.S. EPA. For the South Coast
Air Basin, the Board-approved region-specific guidance document is the
Rule 403 Agricultural Handbook dated December 1998. For the
Coachella Valley, the Board-approved region-specific guidance document
is the Rule 403 Coachella Valley Agricultural Handbook dated April 2,
2004.
(4)
ANEMOMETERS are devices used to measure wind speed and direction
in accordance with the performance standards, and maintenance and
calibration criteria as contained in the most recent Rule 403
Implementation Handbook.
(5)
BEST AVAILABLE CONTROL MEASURES means fugitive dust
control actions that are set forth in Table 1 of this Rule.
403 - 1
Rule 403 (cont.)
(6)
(7)
(8)
(9)
(10)
(11)
(12)
(13)
(Amended June 3, 2005)
BULK MATERIAL is sand, gravel, soil, aggregate material less than two
inches in length or diameter, and other organic or inorganic particulate
matter.
CEMENT MANUFACTURING FACILITY is any facility that has a
cement kiln at the facility.
CHEMICAL STABILIZERS are any non-toxic chemical dust suppressant
which must not be used if prohibited for use by the Regional Water
Quality Control Boards, the California Air Resources Board, the U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA), or any applicable law, rule
or regulation. The chemical stabilizers shall meet any specifications,
criteria, or tests required by any federal, state, or local water agency.
Unless otherwise indicated, the use of a non-toxic chemical stabilizer shall
be of sufficient concentration and application frequency to maintain a
stabilized surface.
COMMERCIAL POULTRY RANCH means any building, structure,
enclosure, or premises where more than 100 fowl are kept or maintained
for the primary purpose of producing eggs or meat for sale or other
distribution.
CONFINED ANIMAL FACILITY means a source or group of sources of
air pollution at an agricultural source for the raising of 3,360 or more fowl
or 50 or more animals, including but not limited to, any structure,
building, installation, farm, corral, coop, feed storage area, milking parlor,
or system for the collection, storage, or distribution of solid and liquid
manure; if domesticated animals, including horses, sheep, goats, swine,
beef cattle, rabbits, chickens, turkeys, or ducks are corralled, penned, or
otherwise caused to remain in restricted areas for commercial agricultural
purposes and feeding is by means other than grazing.
CONSTRUCTION/DEMOLITION ACTIVITIES means any on-site
mechanical activities conducted in preparation of, or related to, the
building, alteration, rehabilitation, demolition or improvement of property,
including, but not limited to the following activities: grading, excavation,
loading, crushing, cutting, planing, shaping or ground breaking.
CONTRACTOR means any person who has a contractual arrangement to
conduct an active operation for another person.
DAIRY FARM is an operation on a property, or set of properties that are
contiguous or separated only by a public right-of-way, that raises cows or
403 - 2
Rule 403 (cont.)
(14)
(15)
(16)
(17)
(18)
(19)
(20)
(21)
(Amended June 3, 2005)
produces milk from cows for the purpose of making a profit or for a
livelihood. Heifer and calf farms are dairy farms.
DISTURBED SURFACE AREA means a portion of the earth's surface
which has been physically moved, uncovered, destabilized, or otherwise
modified from its undisturbed natural soil condition, thereby increasing
the potential for emission of fugitive dust. This definition excludes those
areas which have:
(A)
been restored to a natural state, such that the vegetative ground
cover and soil characteristics are similar to adjacent or nearby
natural conditions;
(B)
been paved or otherwise covered by a permanent structure; or
(C)
sustained a vegetative ground cover of at least 70 percent of the
native cover for a particular area for at least 30 days.
DUST SUPPRESSANTS are water, hygroscopic materials, or non-toxic
chemical stabilizers used as a treatment material to reduce fugitive dust
emissions.
EARTH-MOVING ACTIVITIES means the use of any equipment for any
activity where soil is being moved or uncovered, and shall include, but not
be limited to the following: grading, earth cutting and filling operations,
loading or unloading of dirt or bulk materials, adding to or removing from
open storage piles of bulk materials, landfill operations, weed abatement
through disking, and soil mulching.
DUST CONTROL SUPERVISOR means a person with the authority to
expeditiously employ sufficient dust mitigation measures to ensure
compliance with all Rule 403 requirements at an active operation.
FUGITIVE DUST means any solid particulate matter that becomes
airborne, other than that emitted from an exhaust stack, directly or
indirectly as a result of the activities of any person.
HIGH WIND CONDITIONS means that instantaneous wind speeds
exceed 25 miles per hour.
INACTIVE DISTURBED SURFACE AREA means any disturbed surface
area upon which active operations have not occurred or are not expected to
occur for a period of 20 consecutive days.
LARGE OPERATIONS means any active operations on property which
contains 50 or more acres of disturbed surface area; or any earth-moving
operation with a daily earth-moving or throughput volume of 3,850 cubic
403 - 3
Rule 403 (cont.)
(22)
(23)
(24)
(25)
(26)
(27)
(28)
(29)
(30)
(Amended June 3, 2005)
meters (5,000 cubic yards) or more three times during the most recent
365-day period.
OPEN STORAGE PILE is any accumulation of bulk material, which is
not fully enclosed, covered or chemically stabilized, and which attains a
height of three feet or more and a total surface area of 150 or more square
feet.
PARTICULATE MATTER means any material, except uncombined
water, which exists in a finely divided form as a liquid or solid at standard
conditions.
PAVED ROAD means a public or private improved street, highway, alley,
public way, or easement that is covered by typical roadway materials, but
excluding access roadways that connect a facility with a public paved
roadway and are not open to through traffic. Public paved roads are those
open to public access and that are owned by any federal, state, county,
municipal or any other governmental or quasi-governmental agencies.
Private paved roads are any paved roads not defined as public.
PM10 means particulate matter with an aerodynamic diameter smaller
than or equal to 10 microns as measured by the applicable State and
Federal reference test methods.
PROPERTY LINE means the boundaries of an area in which either a
person causing the emission or a person allowing the emission has the
legal use or possession of the property. Where such property is divided
into one or more sub-tenancies, the property line(s) shall refer to the
boundaries dividing the areas of all sub-tenancies.
RULE 403 IMPLEMENTATION HANDBOOK means a guidance
document that has been approved by the Governing Board on April 2,
2004 or hereafter approved by the Executive Officer and the U.S. EPA.
SERVICE ROADS are paved or unpaved roads that are used by one or
more public agencies for inspection or maintenance of infrastructure and
which are not typically used for construction-related activity.
SIMULTANEOUS SAMPLING means the operation of two PM10
samplers in such a manner that one sampler is started within five minutes
of the other, and each sampler is operated for a consecutive period which
must be not less than 290 minutes and not more than 310 minutes.
SOUTH COAST AIR BASIN means the non-desert portions of Los
Angeles, Riverside, and San Bernardino counties and all of Orange
403 - 4
Rule 403 (cont.)
(d)
(Amended June 3, 2005)
County as defined in California Code of Regulations, Title 17, Section
60104. The area is bounded on the west by the Pacific Ocean, on the
north and east by the San Gabriel, San Bernardino, and San Jacinto
Mountains, and on the south by the San Diego county line.
(31) STABILIZED SURFACE means any previously disturbed surface area or
open storage pile which, through the application of dust suppressants,
shows visual or other evidence of surface crusting and is resistant to winddriven fugitive dust and is demonstrated to be stabilized. Stabilization can
be demonstrated by one or more of the applicable test methods contained
in the Rule 403 Implementation Handbook.
(32) TRACK-OUT means any bulk material that adheres to and agglomerates
on the exterior surface of motor vehicles, haul trucks, and equipment
(including tires) that have been released onto a paved road and can be
removed by a vacuum sweeper or a broom sweeper under normal
operating conditions.
(33) TYPICAL ROADWAY MATERIALS means concrete, asphaltic
concrete, recycled asphalt, asphalt, or any other material of equivalent
performance as determined by the Executive Officer, and the U.S. EPA.
(34) UNPAVED ROADS means any unsealed or unpaved roads, equipment
paths, or travel ways that are not covered by typical roadway materials.
Public unpaved roads are any unpaved roadway owned by federal, state,
county, municipal or other governmental or quasi-governmental agencies.
Private unpaved roads are all other unpaved roadways not defined as
public.
(35) VISIBLE ROADWAY DUST means any sand, soil, dirt, or other solid
particulate matter which is visible upon paved road surfaces and which
can be removed by a vacuum sweeper or a broom sweeper under normal
operating conditions.
(36) WIND-DRIVEN FUGITIVE DUST means visible emissions from any
disturbed surface area which is generated by wind action alone.
(37) WIND GUST is the maximum instantaneous wind speed as measured by
an anemometer.
Requirements
(1)
No person shall cause or allow the emissions of fugitive dust from any
active operation, open storage pile, or disturbed surface area such that:
403 - 5
Rule 403 (cont.)
(Amended June 3, 2005)
(A)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
the dust remains visible in the atmosphere beyond the property line
of the emission source; or
(B)
the dust emission exceeds 20 percent opacity (as determined by the
appropriate test method included in the Rule 403 Implementation
Handbook), if the dust emission is the result of movement of a
motorized vehicle.
No person shall conduct active operations without utilizing the applicable
best available control measures included in Table 1 of this Rule to
minimize fugitive dust emissions from each fugitive dust source type
within the active operation.
No person shall cause or allow PM10 levels to exceed 50 micrograms per
cubic meter when determined, by simultaneous sampling, as the difference
between upwind and downwind samples collected on high-volume
particulate matter samplers or other U.S. EPA-approved equivalent
method for PM10 monitoring. If sampling is conducted, samplers shall
be:
(A)
Operated, maintained, and calibrated in accordance with 40 Code
of Federal Regulations (CFR), Part 50, Appendix J, or appropriate
U.S. EPA-published documents for U.S. EPA-approved equivalent
method(s) for PM10.
(B)
Reasonably placed upwind and downwind of key activity areas and
as close to the property line as feasible, such that other sources of
fugitive dust between the sampler and the property line are
minimized.
No person shall allow track-out to extend 25 feet or more in cumulative
length from the point of origin from an active operation. Notwithstanding
the preceding, all track-out from an active operation shall be removed at
the conclusion of each workday or evening shift.
No person shall conduct an active operation with a disturbed surface area
of five or more acres, or with a daily import or export of 100 cubic yards
or more of bulk material without utilizing at least one of the measures
listed in subparagraphs (d)(5)(A) through (d)(5)(E) at each vehicle egress
from the site to a paved public road.
(A)
Install a pad consisting of washed gravel (minimum-size: one inch)
maintained in a clean condition to a depth of at least six inches and
extending at least 30 feet wide and at least 50 feet long.
403 - 6
Rule 403 (cont.)
(Amended June 3, 2005)
(B)
(6)
(e)
Pave the surface extending at least 100 feet and at least 20 feet
wide.
(C)
Utilize a wheel shaker/wheel spreading device consisting of raised
dividers (rails, pipe, or grates) at least 24 feet long and 10 feet
wide to remove bulk material from tires and vehicle undercarriages
before vehicles exit the site.
(D)
Install and utilize a wheel washing system to remove bulk material
from tires and vehicle undercarriages before vehicles exit the site.
(E)
Any other control measures approved by the Executive Officer and
the U.S. EPA as equivalent to the actions specified in
subparagraphs (d)(5)(A) through (d)(5)(D).
Beginning January 1, 2006, any person who operates or authorizes the
operation of a confined animal facility subject to this Rule shall implement
the applicable conservation management practices specified in Table 4 of
this Rule.
Additional Requirements for Large Operations
(1)
Any person who conducts or authorizes the conducting of a large
operation subject to this Rule shall implement the applicable actions
specified in Table 2 of this Rule at all times and shall implement the
applicable actions specified in Table 3 of this Rule when the applicable
performance standards can not be met through use of Table 2 actions; and
shall:
(A)
submit a fully executed Large Operation Notification (Form 403
N) to the Executive Officer within 7 days of qualifying as a large
operation;
(B)
include, as part of the notification, the name(s), address(es), and
phone number(s) of the person(s) responsible for the submittal, and
a description of the operation(s), including a map depicting the
location of the site;
(C)
maintain daily records to document the specific dust control
actions taken, maintain such records for a period of not less than
three years; and make such records available to the Executive
Officer upon request;
403 - 7
Rule 403 (cont.)
(Amended June 3, 2005)
(D)
(2)
(f)
install and maintain project signage with project contact signage
that meets the minimum standards of the Rule 403 Implementation
Handbook, prior to initiating any earthmoving activities;
(E)
identify a dust control supervisor that:
(i)
is employed by or contracted with the property owner or
developer;
(ii)
is on the site or available on-site within 30 minutes during
working hours;
(iii)
has the authority to expeditiously employ sufficient dust
mitigation measures to ensure compliance with all Rule
requirements;
(iv)
has completed the AQMD Fugitive Dust Control Class and
has been issued a valid Certificate of Completion for the
class; and
(F)
notify the Executive Officer in writing within 30 days after the site
no longer qualifies as a large operation as defined by paragraph
(c)(18).
Any Large Operation Notification submitted to the Executive Officer or
AQMD-approved dust control plan shall be valid for a period of one year
from the date of written acceptance by the Executive Officer. Any Large
Operation Notification accepted pursuant to paragraph (e)(1), excluding
those submitted by aggregate-related plants and cement manufacturing
facilities must be resubmitted annually by the person who conducts or
authorizes the conducting of a large operation, at least 30 days prior to the
expiration date, or the submittal shall no longer be valid as of the
expiration date. If all fugitive dust sources and corresponding control
measures or special circumstances remain identical to those identified in
the previously accepted submittal or in an AQMD-approved dust control
plan, the resubmittal may be a simple statement of no-change (Form
403NC).
Compliance Schedule
The newly amended provisions of this Rule shall become effective upon adoption.
Pursuant to subdivision (e), any existing site that qualifies as a large operation
will have 60 days from the date of Rule adoption to comply with the notification
and recordkeeping requirements for large operations. Any Large Operation
403 - 8
Rule 403 (cont.)
(Amended June 3, 2005)
Notification or AQMD-approved dust control plan which has been accepted prior
to the date of adoption of these amendments shall remain in effect and the Large
Operation Notification or AQMD-approved dust control plan annual resubmittal
date shall be one year from adoption of this Rule amendment.
(g)
Exemptions
(1)
The provisions of this Rule shall not apply to:
(A)
Dairy farms.
(B)
Confined animal facilities provided that the combined disturbed
surface area within one continuous property line is one acre or less.
(C)
Agricultural vegetative crop operations provided that the combined
disturbed surface area within one continuous property line and not
separated by a paved public road is 10 acres or less.
(D)
Agricultural vegetative crop operations within the South Coast Air
Basin, whose combined disturbed surface area includes more than
10 acres provided that the person responsible for such operations:
(i)
voluntarily implements the conservation management
practices contained in the Rule 403 Agricultural Handbook;
(ii)
completes and maintains the self-monitoring form
documenting
sufficient
conservation
management
practices, as described in the Rule 403 Agricultural
Handbook; and
(iii)
makes the completed self-monitoring form available to the
Executive Officer upon request.
(E)
Agricultural vegetative crop operations outside the South Coast Air
Basin whose combined disturbed surface area includes more than
10 acres provided that the person responsible for such operations:
(i)
voluntarily implements the conservation management
practices contained in the Rule 403 Coachella Valley
Agricultural Handbook; and
(ii)
completes and maintains the self-monitoring form
documenting
sufficient
conservation
management
practices, as described in the Rule 403 Coachella Valley
Agricultural Handbook; and
(iii)
makes the completed self-monitoring form available to the
Executive Officer upon request.
403 - 9
Rule 403 (cont.)
(Amended June 3, 2005)
(F)
(2)
Active operations conducted during emergency life-threatening
situations, or in conjunction with any officially declared disaster or
state of emergency.
(G)
Active operations conducted by essential service utilities to
provide electricity, natural gas, telephone, water and sewer during
periods of service outages and emergency disruptions.
(H)
Any contractor subsequent to the time the contract ends, provided
that such contractor implemented the required control measures
during the contractual period.
(I)
Any grading contractor, for a phase of active operations,
subsequent to the contractual completion of that phase of earthmoving activities, provided that the required control measures have
been implemented during the entire phase of earth-moving
activities, through and including five days after the final grading
inspection.
(J)
Weed abatement operations ordered by a county agricultural
commissioner or any state, county, or municipal fire department,
provided that:
(i)
mowing, cutting or other similar process is used which
maintains weed stubble at least three inches above the soil;
and
(ii)
any discing or similar operation which cuts into and
disturbs the soil, where watering is used prior to initiation
of these activities, and a determination is made by the
agency issuing the weed abatement order that, due to fire
hazard conditions, rocks, or other physical obstructions, it
is not practical to meet the conditions specified in clause
(g)(1)(H)(i). The provisions this clause shall not exempt
the owner of any property from stabilizing, in accordance
with paragraph (d)(2), disturbed surface areas which have
been created as a result of the weed abatement actions.
(K)
sandblasting operations.
The provisions of paragraphs (d)(1) and (d)(3) shall not apply:
(A)
When wind gusts exceed 25 miles per hour, provided that:
403 - 10
Rule 403 (cont.)
(Amended June 3, 2005)
(i)
(3)
(4)
(5)
The required Table 3 contingency measures in this Rule are
implemented for each applicable fugitive dust source type,
and;
(ii)
records are maintained in accordance with subparagraph
(e)(1)(C).
(B)
To unpaved roads, provided such roads:
(i)
are used solely for the maintenance of wind-generating
equipment; or
(ii)
are unpaved public alleys as defined in Rule 1186; or
(iii)
are service roads that meet all of the following criteria:
(a)
are less than 50 feet in width at all points along the
road;
(b)
are within 25 feet of the property line; and
(c)
have a traffic volume less than 20 vehicle-trips per
day.
(C)
To any active operation, open storage pile, or disturbed surface
area for which necessary fugitive dust preventive or mitigative
actions are in conflict with the federal Endangered Species Act, as
determined in writing by the State or federal agency responsible
for making such determinations.
The provisions of (d)(2) shall not apply to any aggregate-related plant or
cement manufacturing facility that implements the applicable actions
specified in Table 2 of this Rule at all times and shall implement the
applicable actions specified in Table 3 of this Rule when the applicable
performance standards of paragraphs (d)(1) and (d)(3) can not be met
through use of Table 2 actions.
The provisions of paragraphs (d)(1), (d)(2), and (d)(3) shall not apply to:
(A)
Blasting operations which have been permitted by the California
Division of Industrial Safety; and
(B)
Motion picture, television, and video production activities when
dust emissions are required for visual effects. In order to obtain
this exemption, the Executive Officer must receive notification in
writing at least 72 hours in advance of any such activity and no
nuisance results from such activity.
The provisions of paragraph (d)(3) shall not apply if the dust control
actions, as specified in Table 2, are implemented on a routine basis for
403 - 11
Rule 403 (cont.)
(6)
(7)
(8)
(h)
(Amended June 3, 2005)
each applicable fugitive dust source type. To qualify for this exemption, a
person must maintain records in accordance with subparagraph (e)(1)(C).
The provisions of paragraph (d)(4) shall not apply to earth coverings of
public paved roadways where such coverings are approved by a local
government agency for the protection of the roadway, and where such
coverings are used as roadway crossings for haul vehicles provided that
such roadway is closed to through traffic and visible roadway dust is
removed within one day following the cessation of activities.
The provisions of subdivision (e) shall not apply to:
(A)
officially-designated public parks and recreational areas, including
national parks, national monuments, national forests, state parks,
state recreational areas, and county regional parks.
(B)
any large operation which is required to submit a dust control plan
to any city or county government which has adopted a Districtapproved dust control ordinance.
(C)
any large operation subject to Rule 1158, which has an approved
dust control plan pursuant to Rule 1158, provided that all sources
of fugitive dust are included in the Rule 1158 plan.
The provisions of subparagraph (e)(1)(A) through (e)(1)(C) shall not apply
to any large operation with an AQMD-approved fugitive dust control plan
provided that there is no change to the sources and controls as identified in
the AQMD-approved fugitive dust control plan.
Fees
Any person conducting active operations for which the Executive Officer
conducts upwind/downwind monitoring for PM10 pursuant to paragraph
(d)(3) shall be assessed applicable Ambient Air Analysis Fees pursuant to
Rule 304.1. Applicable fees shall be waived for any facility which is
exempted from paragraph (d)(3) or meets the requirements of paragraph
(d)(3).
403 - 12
04-1
Crushing
04-2
03-1
03-2
03-3
02-3
02-2
02-1
01-2
01-3
01-1
Clearing forms
Clearing and
grubbing
Backfilling
Source Category
Rule 403 (cont.)
403 - 13
Stabilize surface soils prior to operation of
support equipment; and
Stabilize material after crushing.
Use water spray to clear forms; or
Use sweeping and water spray to clear forms; or
Use vacuum system to clear forms.
Maintain stability of soil through pre-watering of
site prior to clearing and grubbing; and
Stabilize soil during clearing and grubbing
activities; and
Stabilize soil immediately after clearing and
grubbing activities.
Stabilize backfill material when not actively
handling; and
Stabilize backfill material during handling; and
Stabilize soil at completion of activity.
Control Measure
Guidance
(Amended June 3, 2005)
9
9
9
9
Follow permit conditions for crushing equipment
Pre-water material prior to loading into crusher
Monitor crusher emissions opacity
Apply water to crushed material to prevent dust
plumes
9 Use of high pressure air to clear forms may cause
exceedance of Rule requirements
9 Apply water in sufficient quantity to prevent
generation of dust plumes
9 Maintain live perennial vegetation where
possible
9 Mix backfill soil with water prior to moving
9 Dedicate water truck or high capacity hose to
backfilling equipment
9 Empty loader bucket slowly so that no dust
plumes are generated
9 Minimize drop height from loader bucket
TABLE 1
BEST AVAILABLE CONTROL MEASURES
(Applicable to All Construction Activity Sources)
Earth-moving
activities
Disturbed soil
Demolition –
mechanical/manual
Cut and fill
Source Category
Rule 403 (cont.)
08-3
08-1
08-2
07-2
07-1
403 - 14
Pre-apply water to depth of proposed cuts; and
Re-apply water as necessary to maintain soils in a
damp condition and to ensure that visible emissions
do not exceed 100 feet in any direction; and
Stabilize soils once earth-moving activities are
complete.
Stabilize disturbed soil throughout the construction
site; and
Stabilize disturbed soil between structures
Stabilize surface soil where support equipment and
vehicles will operate; and
Stabilize loose soil and demolition debris; and
Comply with AQMD Rule 1403.
06-2
06-3
06-4
Stabilize wind erodible surfaces to reduce dust; and
Stabilize soil during and after cut and fill activities.
05-2
06-1
Pre-water soils prior to cut and fill activities; and
05-1
Control Measure
Guidance
(Amended June 3, 2005)
9
9
9
9
9
9
Grade each project phase separately, timed
to coincide with construction phase
Upwind fencing can prevent material
movement on site
Apply water or a stabilizing agent in
sufficient quantities to prevent the
generation of visible dust plumes
Limit vehicular traffic and disturbances on
soils where possible
If interior block walls are planned, install as
early as possible
Apply water or a stabilizing agent in
sufficient quantities to prevent the
generation of visible dust plumes
9 Apply water in sufficient quantities to
prevent the generation of visible dust plumes
9 For large sites, pre-water with sprinklers or
water trucks and allow time for penetration
9 Use water trucks/pulls to water soils to depth
of cut prior to subsequent cuts
TABLE 1
BEST AVAILABLE CONTROL MEASURES
(Applicable to All Construction Activity Sources)
Apply water to unpaved shoulders prior to clearing;
and
Apply chemical dust suppressants and/or washed
gravel to maintain a stabilized surface after
completing road shoulder maintenance.
11-1
11-2
Road shoulder
maintenance
403 - 15
Stabilize soils, materials, slopes
10-1
Landscaping
09-5
09-4
09-3
Stabilize material while loading to reduce fugitive
dust emissions; and
Maintain at least six inches of freeboard on haul
vehicles; and
Stabilize material while transporting to reduce
fugitive dust emissions; and
Stabilize material while unloading to reduce fugitive
dust emissions; and
Comply with Vehicle Code Section 23114.
Control Measure
Guidance
(Amended June 3, 2005)
9 Installation of curbing and/or paving of road
shoulders can reduce recurring maintenance
costs
9 Use of chemical dust suppressants can
inhibit vegetation growth and reduce future
road shoulder maintenance costs
Apply water to materials to stabilize
Maintain materials in a crusted condition
Maintain effective cover over materials
Stabilize sloping surfaces using soil binders
until vegetation or ground cover can
effectively stabilize the slopes
9 Hydroseed prior to rain season
9
9
9
9
9 Use tarps or other suitable enclosures on
haul trucks
9 Check belly-dump truck seals regularly and
remove any trapped rocks to prevent spillage
9 Comply with track-out
prevention/mitigation requirements
9 Provide water while loading and unloading
to reduce visible dust plumes
TABLE 1
BEST AVAILABLE CONTROL MEASURES
(Applicable to All Construction Activity Sources)
Importing/exporting 09-1
of bulk materials
09-2
Source Category
Rule 403 (cont.)
14-1
14-2
Stockpiles/
Handling
Bulk Material
13-1
13-2
12-3
12-1
12-2
Staging areas
Screening
Source Category
Rule 403 (cont.)
9 Limit size of staging area
9 Limit vehicle speeds to 15 miles per hour
9 Limit number and size of staging area
entrances/exists
9 Dedicate water truck or high capacity hose
to screening operation
9 Drop material through the screen slowly and
minimize drop height
9 Install wind barrier with a porosity of no
more than 50% upwind of screen to the
height of the drop point
Guidance
(Amended June 3, 2005)
403 - 16
Stabilize stockpiled materials.
9 Add or remove material from the downwind
Stockpiles within 100 yards of off-site occupied
portion of the storage pile
buildings must not be greater than eight feet in
9 Maintain storage piles to avoid steep sides
height; or must have a road bladed to the top to allow
or faces
water truck access or must have an operational water
irrigation system that is capable of complete stockpile
coverage.
Stabilize staging areas during use; and
Stabilize staging area soils at project completion.
Pre-water material prior to screening; and
Limit fugitive dust emissions to opacity and plume
length standards; and
Stabilize material immediately after screening.
Control Measure
TABLE 1
BEST AVAILABLE CONTROL MEASURES
(Applicable to All Construction Activity Sources)
Turf Overseeding
Truck loading
16-1
Trenching
Cover haul vehicles prior to exiting the site.
18-2
403 - 17
Apply sufficient water immediately prior to
conducting turf vacuuming activities to meet opacity
and plume length standards; and
Ensure that freeboard exceeds six inches (CVC
23114)
17-2
18-1
Pre-water material prior to loading; and
Stabilize surface soils where trencher or excavator
and support equipment will operate; and
Stabilize soils at the completion of trenching
activities.
Stabilize all off-road traffic and parking areas; and
Stabilize all haul routes; and
Direct construction traffic over established haul
routes.
Control Measure
Guidance
(Amended June 3, 2005)
9 Haul waste material immediately off-site
9 Empty loader bucket such that no visible
dust plumes are created
9 Ensure that the loader bucket is close to the
truck to minimize drop height while loading
9 Pre-watering of soils prior to trenching is an
effective preventive measure. For deep
trenching activities, pre-trench to 18 inches
soak soils via the pre-trench and resuming
trenching
9 Washing mud and soils from equipment at
the conclusion of trenching activities can
prevent crusting and drying of soil on
equipment
9 Apply gravel/paving to all haul routes as
soon as possible to all future roadway areas
9 Barriers can be used to ensure vehicles are
only used on established parking areas/haul
routes
TABLE 1
BEST AVAILABLE CONTROL MEASURES
(Applicable to All Construction Activity Sources)
17-1
16-2
15-1
15-2
15-3
Traffic areas for
construction
activities
Source Category
Rule 403 (cont.)
Vacant land
Unpaved
roads/parking lots
Source Category
Rule 403 (cont.)
403 - 18
In instances where vacant lots are 0.10 acre or larger
and have a cumulative area of 500 square feet or
more that are driven over and/or used by motor
vehicles and/or off-road vehicles, prevent motor
vehicle and/or off-road vehicle trespassing, parking
and/or access by installing barriers, curbs, fences,
gates, posts, signs, shrubs, trees or other effective
control measures.
Limit vehicular travel to established unpaved roads
(haul routes) and unpaved parking lots.
19-2
20-1
Stabilize soils to meet the applicable performance
standards; and
19-1
Control Measure
Guidance
(Amended June 3, 2005)
9 Restricting vehicular access to established
unpaved travel paths and parking lots can
reduce stabilization requirements
TABLE 1
BEST AVAILABLE CONTROL MEASURES
(Applicable to All Construction Activity Sources)
Rule 403 (cont.)
(Amended June 3, 2005)
Table 2
DUST CONTROL MEASURES FOR LARGE OPERATIONS
FUGITIVE DUST
SOURCE CATEGORY
Earth-moving (except
construction cutting and
filling areas, and mining
operations)
CONTROL ACTIONS
(1a)
(1a-1)
Earth-moving:
Construction fill areas:
(1b)
Maintain soil moisture content at a minimum of
12 percent, as determined by ASTM method D2216, or other equivalent method approved by
the Executive Officer, the California Air
Resources Board, and the U.S. EPA. Two soil
moisture evaluations must be conducted during
the first three hours of active operations during a
calendar day, and two such evaluations each
subsequent four-hour period of active operations;
OR
For any earth-moving which is more than 100
feet from all property lines, conduct watering as
necessary to prevent visible dust emissions from
exceeding 100 feet in length in any direction.
Maintain soil moisture content at a minimum of
12 percent, as determined by ASTM method D2216, or other equivalent method approved by
the Executive Officer, the California Air
Resources Board, and the U.S. EPA. For areas
which have an optimum moisture content for
compaction of less than 12 percent, as
determined by ASTM Method 1557 or other
equivalent method approved by the Executive
Officer and the California Air Resources Board
and the U.S. EPA, complete the compaction
process as expeditiously as possible after
achieving at least 70 percent of the optimum soil
moisture content. Two soil moisture evaluations
must be conducted during the first three hours of
active operations during a calendar day, and two
such evaluations during each subsequent fourhour period of active operations.
403 - 19
Rule 403 (cont.)
(Amended June 3, 2005)
Table 2 (Continued)
FUGITIVE DUST
SOURCE CATEGORY
Earth-moving:
Construction cut areas
and mining operations:
Disturbed surface areas
(except completed
grading areas)
Disturbed surface
areas: Completed
grading areas
CONTROL ACTIONS
(1c)
Conduct watering as necessary to prevent visible
emissions from extending more than 100 feet
beyond the active cut or mining area unless the area
is inaccessible to watering vehicles due to slope
conditions or other safety factors.
(2a/b) Apply dust suppression in sufficient quantity and
frequency to maintain a stabilized surface. Any
areas which cannot be stabilized, as evidenced by
wind driven fugitive dust must have an application
of water at least twice per day to at least 80 percent
of the unstabilized area.
(2c)
Apply chemical stabilizers within five working days
of grading completion; OR
(2d)
Inactive disturbed
surface areas
(3a)
(3b)
(3c)
(3d)
Take actions (3a) or (3c) specified for inactive
disturbed surface areas.
Apply water to at least 80 percent of all inactive
disturbed surface areas on a daily basis when there is
evidence of wind driven fugitive dust, excluding any
areas which are inaccessible to watering vehicles due
to excessive slope or other safety conditions; OR
Apply dust suppressants in sufficient quantity and
frequency to maintain a stabilized surface; OR
Establish a vegetative ground cover within 21 days
after active operations have ceased. Ground cover
must be of sufficient density to expose less than 30
percent of unstabilized ground within 90 days of
planting, and at all times thereafter; OR
Utilize any combination of control actions (3a), (3b),
and (3c) such that, in total, these actions apply to all
inactive disturbed surface areas.
403-20
Rule 403 (cont.)
(Amended June 3, 2005)
Table 2 (Continued)
FUGITIVE DUST
SOURCE CATEGORY
Unpaved Roads
CONTROL ACTIONS
(4a)
(4b)
(4c)
Open storage piles
(5a)
(5b)
(5c)
(5d)
All Categories
(6a)
Water all roads used for any vehicular traffic at
least once per every two hours of active
operations [3 times per normal 8 hour work day];
OR
Water all roads used for any vehicular traffic
once daily and restrict vehicle speeds to 15 miles
per hour; OR
Apply a chemical stabilizer to all unpaved road
surfaces in sufficient quantity and frequency to
maintain a stabilized surface.
Apply chemical stabilizers; OR
Apply water to at least 80 percent of the surface
area of all open storage piles on a daily basis
when there is evidence of wind driven fugitive
dust; OR
Install temporary coverings; OR
Install a three-sided enclosure with walls with no
more than 50 percent porosity which extend, at a
minimum, to the top of the pile. This option may
only be used at aggregate-related plants or at
cement manufacturing facilities.
Any other control measures approved by the
Executive Officer and the U.S. EPA as
equivalent to the methods specified in Table 2
may be used.
403-21
Rule 403 (cont.)
(Amended June 3, 2005)
TABLE 3
CONTINGENCY CONTROL MEASURES FOR LARGE OPERATIONS
FUGITIVE DUST
SOURCE
CONTROL MEASURES
CATEGORY
Earth-moving
(1A) Cease all active operations; OR
(2A) Apply water to soil not more than 15 minutes prior to
moving such soil.
Disturbed surface
(0B) On the last day of active operations prior to a
areas
weekend, holiday, or any other period when active
operations will not occur for not more than four
consecutive days: apply water with a mixture of
chemical stabilizer diluted to not less than 1/20 of the
concentration required to maintain a stabilized
surface for a period of six months; OR
(1B) Apply chemical stabilizers prior to wind event; OR
(2B) Apply water to all unstabilized disturbed areas 3
times per day. If there is any evidence of wind driven
fugitive dust, watering frequency is increased to a
minimum of four times per day; OR
(3B) Take the actions specified in Table 2, Item (3c); OR
(4B) Utilize any combination of control actions (1B), (2B),
and (3B) such that, in total, these actions apply to all
disturbed surface areas.
Unpaved roads
(1C) Apply chemical stabilizers prior to wind event; OR
(2C) Apply water twice per hour during active operation;
OR
(3C) Stop all vehicular traffic.
Open storage piles
(1D) Apply water twice per hour; OR
(2D) Install temporary coverings.
Paved road track-out
(1E) Cover all haul vehicles; OR
(2E) Comply with the vehicle freeboard requirements of
Section 23114 of the California Vehicle Code for
both public and private roads.
All Categories
(1F) Any other control measures approved by the
Executive Officer and the U.S. EPA as equivalent to
the methods specified in Table 3 may be used.
403-22
Rule 403 (cont.)
(Amended June 3, 2005)
Table 4
(Conservation Management Practices for Confined Animal Facilities)
SOURCE
CATEGORY
Manure
Handling
(Only
applicable to
Commercial
Poultry
Ranches)
Feedstock
Handling
Disturbed
Surfaces
Unpaved
Roads
Equipment
Parking Areas
CONSERVATION MANAGEMENT PRACTICES
(1a) Cover manure prior to removing material off-site; AND
(1b) Spread the manure before 11:00 AM and when wind conditions
are less than 25 miles per hour; AND
(1c) Utilize coning and drying manure management by removing
manure at laying hen houses at least twice per year and maintain
a base of no less than 6 inches of dry manure after clean out; or
in lieu of complying with conservation management practice
(1c), comply with conservation management practice (1d).
(1d) Utilize frequent manure removal by removing the manure from
laying hen houses at least every seven days and immediately
thin bed dry the material.
(2a) Utilize a sock or boot on the feed truck auger when filling feed
storage bins.
(3a) Maintain at least 70 percent vegetative cover on vacant portions
of the facility; OR
(3b) Utilize conservation tillage practices to manage the amount,
orientation and distribution of crop and other plant residues on
the soil surface year-round, while growing crops (if applicable)
in narrow slots or tilled strips; OR
(3c) Apply dust suppressants in sufficient concentrations and
frequencies to maintain a stabilized surface.
(4a) Restrict access to private unpaved roads either through signage
or physical access restrictions and control vehicular speeds to
no more than 15 miles per hour through worker notifications,
signage, or any other necessary means; OR
(4b) Cover frequently traveled unpaved roads with low silt content
material (i.e., asphalt, concrete, recycled road base, or gravel to
a minimum depth of four inches); OR
(4c) Treat unpaved roads with water, mulch, chemical dust
suppressants or other cover to maintain a stabilized surface.
(5a) Apply dust suppressants in sufficient quantity and frequency to
maintain a stabilized surface; OR
(5b) Apply material with low silt content (i.e., asphalt, concrete,
recycled road base, or gravel to a depth of four inches).
403-23
AppendixA.6
ConstructionHealthRiskAssessmentCalculations
1020 S. Figueroa Street Project Draft Environmental Impact Report
Construction Health Risk Assessment
Construction Phase
Off‐Road Equipment
Phase I
Site Preparation
Demolition
Grading
Foundation‐1
Off‐Road Heavy‐Duty Construction Equipment Emission Rates
Annual
Work Days
DPM Source
Year
DPM
per Year
Emissions a (pounds/year)
(days/year)
Work Hours
per Day
Emissions Rate
during
(hours/day)
Work Period
(grams/second)
Off‐Road Equipment
Off‐Road Equipment
Off‐Road Equipment
Off‐Road Equipment
Year 1
Year 1
Year 1
Year 1
0.1
0.4
4.6
1.7
5
10
51
38
8
8
8
8
3.15E‐04
5.98E‐04
1.43E‐03
7.13E‐04
Foundation‐2
Building Construction‐1
Architectural Coating‐1
Off‐Road Equipment
Off‐Road Equipment
Off‐Road Equipment
Year 2
Year 2
Year 2
0.5
9.7
0.2
12
249
63
8
8
8
7.09E‐04
6.12E‐04
6.00E‐05
Building Construction‐2
Architectural Coating‐ 2
Paving
Off‐Road Equipment
Off‐Road Equipment
Off‐Road Equipment
Year 3
Year 3
Year 3
10.2
1.0
0.4
261
261
21
8
8
8
6.13E‐04
6.28E‐05
2.85E‐04
Building Construction‐3 Architectural Coating‐ 3
Off‐Road Equipment
Off‐Road Equipment
Year 4
Year 4
4.2
0.3
108
70
8
8
6.12E‐04
6.30E‐05
Off‐Road Equipment
Off‐Road Equipment
Off‐Road Equipment
Year 4
Year 4
Year4
4.4
3.2
1.2
72
35
27
8
8
8
9.62E‐04
1.43E‐03
7.12E‐04
Foundation‐2
Building Construction‐ 1
Architectural Coating‐ 1
Paving
Off‐Road Equipment
Off‐Road Equipment
Off‐Road Equipment
Off‐Road Equipment
Year 5
Year 5
Year 5
Year 5
0.7
5.2
0.4
0.4
16
245
105
20
8
8
8
8
7.09E‐04
3.37E‐04
6.30E‐05
2.83E‐04
Building Construction‐ 2
Architectural Coating‐ 2
Off‐Road Equipment
Off‐Road Equipment
Year 6
Year 6
5.6
1.0
260
260
8
8
3.37E‐04
6.30E‐05
Building construction‐ 3
Architectural Coating‐ 3
Off‐Road Equipment
Off‐Road Equipment
Year 7
Year 7
1.1
0.0
53
10
8
8
3.39E‐04
6.30E‐05
8
7.85E‐04
Phase II
Demolition
Grading
Foundation‐ 1
Subtotal
Maximum 12‐Month Emissions
(for Chronic HI analysis)
Off‐Road Equipment
Notes:
a.
California Air Resources Board, California Emissions Estimator Model (CalEEMod).
Source: PCR Services Corporation, 2016
13.0
261
Construction Phase
DPM Source
On‐Road Construction Haul, Concrete, and Vendor Truck Emission Rates
Total
Work Days
Work Hours
Year
One‐Way
per Year
per Day
(days/year)
(hours/day)
One‐Way
Trip Distance
per Day a
(miles)
5
10
51
38
8
8
8
8
0.86
0.86
0.86
0.0718
0.0718
0.0718
0.00E+00
4.29E‐07
1.18E‐05
2.42E‐06
Truck Trips
On‐Road Trucks
Phase I
Site Preparation
Demolition
Grading
Foundation‐1
T7 Single Construction
T7 Single Construction
T7 Single Construction
2
280
43
Emissions Rate
during
Work Period
(grams/second)
Foundation‐2
Building Construction‐1
Architectural Coating‐1
T7 Single Construction
On‐Road MHDT/HHDT Trucks
Year 2
Year 2
Year 2
43
111
12
249
63
8
8
8
0.86
0.86
0.0393
0.0552
4.21E‐06
7.35E‐07
Building Construction‐2
Architectural Coating‐ 2
Paving
On‐Road MHDT/HHDT Trucks
Year 3
Year 3
Year 3
111
261
261
21
8
8
8
0.86
0.0489
6.21E‐07
Building Construction‐3 Architectural Coating‐ 3
On‐Road MHDT/HHDT Trucks
Year 4
Year 4
111
108
70
8
8
0.86
0.0345
1.06E‐06
T7 Single Construction
T7 Single Construction
T7 Single Construction
Year 4
Year 4
Year4
28
420
45
72
35
27
8
8
8
0.86
0.86
0.86
0.0212
0.0212
0.0212
2.46E‐07
7.61E‐06
1.06E‐06
Foundation‐2
Building Construction‐ 1
Architectural Coating‐ 1
Paving
T7 Single Construction
On‐Road MHDT/HHDT Trucks
Year 5
Year 5
Year 5
Year 5
45
111
16
245
105
20
8
8
8
8
0.86
0.86
0.0192
0.0136
1.61E‐06
1.84E‐07
Building Construction‐ 2
Architectural Coating‐ 2
On‐Road MHDT/HHDT Trucks
Year 6
Year 6
111
260
260
8
8
0.86
0.0124
1.58E‐07
Building construction‐ 3
Architectural Coating‐ 3
On‐Road MHDT/HHDT Trucks
Year 7
Year 7
111
53
10
8
8
0.86
0.0056
3.49E‐07
433
261
8
0.86
0.0597
2.95E‐06
Phase II
Demolition
Grading
Foundation‐ 1
Maximum 12‐Month Emissions
(for Chronic HI analysis)
On‐Road MHDT/HHDT Trucks
Notes:
a.
b.
Year 1
Year 1
Year 1
Year 1
DPM Running
Emissions
Factor b
(grams/mile)
The portion of the on‐road trip length within a 1/4 mile of the Project Site.
California Air Resources Board, EMFAC2014 on‐road vehicle emissions model.
Source: PCR Services Corporation, 2016
Construction Phase
DPM Source
Idling Construction Haul, Concrete, and Vendor Truck Emission Rates
Total
Work Days
Work Hours
Year
Number of per Year
per Day
Idling Time
per Truck
(days/year)
(hours/day)
(minutes)
DPM Idling
Emissions
Factor a
(grams/min)
5
10
51
38
8
8
8
8
15
15
15
15
2.22E‐01
2.22E‐01
2.22E‐01
2.31E‐05
6.34E‐04
1.31E‐04
Trucks
On‐Road Trucks
Phase I
Site Preparation
Demolition
Grading
Foundation‐1
T7 Single Construction
T7 Single Construction
T7 Single Construction
2
280
43
Work Period
(grams/second)
Foundation‐2
Building Construction‐1
Architectural Coating‐1
T7 Single Construction
On‐Road MHDT/HHDT Trucks
Year 2
Year 2
Year 2
43
111
12
249
63
8
8
8
15
15
15
1.54E‐01
1.49E‐01
2.88E‐04
3.46E‐05
Building Construction‐2
Architectural Coating‐ 2
Paving
On‐Road MHDT/HHDT Trucks
Year 3
Year 3
Year 3
111
261
261
21
8
8
8
15
15
15
1.24E‐01
2.75E‐05
Building Construction‐3 Architectural Coating‐ 3
On‐Road MHDT/HHDT Trucks
Year 4
Year 4
111
108
70
8
8
15
15
7.40E‐02
3.96E‐05
T7 Single Construction
T7 Single Construction
T7 Single Construction
Year 4
Year 4
Year4
28
420
45
72
35
27
8
8
8
15
15
15
15
1.58E‐02
1.58E‐02
1.58E‐02
3.19E‐06
9.86E‐05
1.37E‐05
Foundation‐2
Building Construction‐ 1
Architectural Coating‐ 1
Paving
T7 Single Construction
On‐Road MHDT/HHDT Trucks
Year 5
Year 5
Year 5
Year 5
45
111
16
245
105
20
8
8
8
8
15
15
15
15
1.37E‐02
1.82E‐02
2.01E‐05
4.29E‐06
Building Construction‐ 2
Architectural Coating‐ 2
On‐Road MHDT/HHDT Trucks
Year 6
Year 6
111
260
260
8
8
15
15
1.58E‐02
3.51E‐06
Building construction‐ 3
Architectural Coating‐ 3
On‐Road MHDT/HHDT Trucks
Year 7
Year 7
111
53
10
8
8
15
15
9.58E‐03
1.05E‐05
433
261
8
15
0.1740
1.50E‐04
Phase II
Demolition
Grading
Foundation‐ 1
Maximum 12‐Month Emissions
(for Chronic HI analysis)
Idling MHDT/HHDT Trucks
Notes:
a.
Year 1
Year 1
Year 1
Year 1
Emissions Rate
during
California Air Resources Board, EMFAC2014 on‐road vehicle emissions model.
Source: PCR Services Corporation, 2016
1020 S. Figueroa Street Project Draft Environmental Impact Report
Construction Health Risk Assessment
AERMOD Source Characteristics
Emission Source
Source
Type
Number
of Sources
Length of Line
Source Group
Unitized
Emission Rate
Release
Height
Length
of Side X
Length
of Side Y
Initial
Lateral
Initial
Vertical
Plume
Height
Plume
Width
Exit
Temp
(m)
(g/s)
(m)
(m)
(m)
(m)
(m)
(m)
(m)
(°F)
Inside
Exit Flow
Diameter
Rate
(ft)
(ft3/s)
Source Group 1
Off‐Road Heavy‐Duty Construction Equipment
Phase I
Volume
12
0.0833
5 15 15
3.49
1.16
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
Source Group 2
Off‐Road Heavy‐Duty Construction Equipment
Phase II
Volume
15
0.0667
5 15 15
3.49
1.16
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
Line‐Volume
Line‐Volume
Line‐Volume
Line‐Volume
Line‐Volume
Line‐Volume
1
1
1
1
1
1
0.1484
0.0990
0.2588
0.0856
0.2336
0.2951
6
6
6
6
6
6
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
10.2
10.2
10.2
10.2
10.2
10.2
16.0
16.0
21.0
24.0
12.0
12.0
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
Volume
1
1.0000
5 26 26
6.05
1.16
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
Volume
1
1.0000
5 26 26
6.05
1.16
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
Source Group 2
On‐Road Haul and Vendor Trucks 1
On‐Road Haul and Vendor Trucks 2
On‐Road Haul and Vendor Trucks 3
On‐Road Haul and Vendor Trucks 4
On‐Road Haul and Vendor Trucks 5
On‐Road Haul and Vendor Trucks 6
Source Group 3
Idling Haul and Vendor Trucks Phase I
Source Group 4
Idling Haul and Vendor Trucks Phase II
Source: PCR Services Corporation, 2016
192.7
128.5
335.9
111.1
234.1
295.8
1020 S. Figueroa Street Project Draft Environmental Impact Report
Construction Health Risk Assessment
AERMOD Results
Emission Source
Source
Type
Source Group Unitized Max AERMOD Concentration
South‐East (383360.00, 3767670.00)
Source Group 1
Off‐Road Heavy‐Duty Construction Equipment (Phase I)
51.99
Volume
Source Group 2
Off‐Road Heavy‐Duty Construction Equipment (Phase 2)
Volume
Source Group 3
On‐Road Haul and Vendor Trucks 1
On‐Road Haul and Vendor Trucks 2
On‐Road Haul and Vendor Trucks 3
On‐Road Haul and Vendor Trucks 4
On‐Road Haul and Vendor Trucks 5
On‐Road Haul and Vendor Trucks 6
4.57
Line‐Volume
Line‐Volume
Line‐Volume
Line‐Volume
Line‐Volume
Line‐Volume
Source Group 4
Idling Haul and Vendor Trucks (Phase I)
34.78
Volume
Source Group 5
Idling Haul and Vendor Trucks (Phase II)
8.47
4.57
Volume
Source: Lakes Environmental, AERMOD View 9.1.0 (Version 15181), 2016; PCR Services Corporation, 2016
1020 S. Figueroa Street Project Draft Environmental Impact Report
Construction Health Risk Assessment
Maximum Individual Cancer Risk Calculations ‐ Sensitive Receptors located Southeast of the Project Site
Phase I
Phase II
Phase 1
Work Day per Year
Site Preparation
Demolition
Grading
Foundation-1
Year 1
Year 1
Year 1
Year 1
Foundation-2
Building Construction-1
Architectural Coating-1
Year 2
Year 2
Year 2
Building Construction-2
Building Construction-2
Architectural Coating- 2
Architectural Coating- 2
Paving
Year 3
Year 3
Year 3
Year 3
Year 3
Building Construction-3
Architectural Coating- 3
Phase 2
Demolition
Grading
Foundation- 1
Year 4
Year 4
Foundation-2
Building Construction- 1
Architectural Coating- 1
Paving
Year 5
Year 5
Year 5
Year 5
Building Construction- 2
Architectural Coating- 2
Year 6
Year 6
Building construction- 3
Architectural Coating- 3
Year 7
Year 7
5
10
51
38
0
12
249
63
0
157
104
157
104
21
0
108
70
Year 4
Year 4
Year4
72
35
27
0
16
245
105
20
0
260
260
0
53
10
Emission Rate
Off-Road Equipment On-Road
0.000314995 0.00E+00
0.00059849 4.29E-07
0.001432917 1.18E-05
0.000712883 2.42E-06
0 0.00E+00
0.000708738 4.21E-06
0.000612279 7.35E-07
5.9999E-05 0.00E+00
0 0.00E+00
0.000613093 6.21E-07
0.000613093 6.21E-07
6.27576E-05 0.00E+00
6.27576E-05 0.00E+00
0.000284995 0.00E+00
0 0.00E+00
0.00061249 1.06E-06
6.29989E-05 0.00E+00
0.000962484
0.001430976
0.000711655
0
0.000708738
0.000336851
6.29989E-05
0.000283495
0
0.000336802
6.29989E-05
0
0.000338768
6.29989E-05
2.46E-07
7.61E-06
1.06E-06
0.00E+00
1.61E-06
1.84E-07
0.00E+00
0.00E+00
0.00E+00
1.58E-07
0.00E+00
0.00E+00
3.49E-07
0.00E+00
Cancer Risk Calculations
Age Bins
3rd Trimester
0 < 2
Parameter
DBR
A
EF
ED
FAH
AT
ASF
Daily Breathing Rate (L/kg (body weight) per day)
Inhalation absorption factor (default = 1).
Exposure Frequency (days/year)
Exposure Duration (years)
Fraction of Time at Home
Averaged Exposure Time Period (days)
Age Sensitvity Factor
CONC
DOSE
Toxic Air Contaminant Concentration (µg/m3)
[= CONC × DBR × A × EF × ED × FAH / AT] (mg/kg‐d)
CPF
Cancer Potency Factor (mg/kg‐d)
Diesel Particulate Matter
RISK
361
1
350
0.25
1
25550
10
1090
1
350
2
0.85
25550
10
5.84E‐02
7.22E‐02
2.27E‐02
5.75E‐01
1.1
1.1
7.94E‐01
6.33E+00
Idling
0.00E+00
2.31E-05
6.34E-04
1.31E-04
0.00E+00
2.88E-04
3.46E-05
0.00E+00
0.00E+00
2.75E-05
2.75E-05
0.00E+00
0.00E+00
0.00E+00
0.00E+00
3.96E-05
0.00E+00
3.19E-06
9.86E-05
1.37E-05
0.00E+00
2.01E-05
4.29E-06
0.00E+00
0.00E+00
0.00E+00
3.51E-06
0.00E+00
0.00E+00
1.05E-05
0.00E+00
Age bin
3rd
3rd
3rd
0<2
0<2
0<2
0<2
0<2
2<16
0<2
2<16
0<2
2<16
2<16
2<16
2<16
2<16
2<16
2<16
2<16
2<16
2<16
2<16
2<16
2<16
MICR
Off-Road Equipment On-Road
1.64E-02 0.00E+00
3.11E-02 1.96E-06
7.45E-02 5.38E-05
3.71E-02 1.11E-05
0.00E+00 0.00E+00
3.68E-02 1.92E-05
3.18E-02 3.36E-06
3.12E-03 0.00E+00
0.00E+00 0.00E+00
3.19E-02 2.84E-06
3.19E-02 2.84E-06
3.26E-03 0.00E+00
3.26E-03 0.00E+00
1.48E-02 0.00E+00
0.00E+00 0.00E+00
3.18E-02 4.84E-06
3.28E-03 0.00E+00
0.008152238
0.012120367
0.006027716
0
0.006003012
0.002853132
0.000533601
0.002401205
0
0.002852713
0.000533601
0
0.002869364
0.000533601
Exposure
Idling
0.00E+00
8.03E-04
2.20E-02
4.54E-03
0.00E+00
1.00E-02
1.20E-03
0.00E+00
0.00E+00
9.56E-04
9.56E-04
0.00E+00
0.00E+00
0.00E+00
0.00E+00
1.38E-03
0.00E+00
1.13E-06
3.48E-05
4.83E-06
0.00E+00
7.37E-06
8.42E-07
0.00E+00
0.00E+00
0.00E+00
7.20E-07
0.00E+00
0.00E+00
1.60E-06
0.00E+00
1.46E-05
4.51E-04
6.26E-05
0.00E+00
9.19E-05
1.96E-05
0.00E+00
0.00E+00
0.00E+00
1.60E-05
0.00E+00
0.00E+00
4.78E-05
0.00E+00
2 < 16
16 < 30
Age Bin
31 < 70
Total 70 Year 745
1
350
14
0.72
25550
3
335
1
350
14
0.73
25550
1
290
1
350
40
0.73
25550
1
70.25
30.25
2.10E‐03 0.00E+00
2.16E‐01 0.00E+00
0
0.00E+00
‐1
Cancer Risk (in one million) [= DOSE × CPF × ASF]
1.1
1.1
7.12E‐01 0.00E+00
1.1
7.83E+00
0.00E+00 7.83E+00
1020 S. Figueroa Street Project Draft Environmental Impact Report
Construction Health Risk Assessment
Maximum Non‐cancer Chronic Hazards / Toxicological Endpoints*
Receptor Group
MEI Sensitive ‐ East
Pollutant
DPM
CREL1
CONC
WFrac
CONCWF
5.00E+00 4.61E‐02 1.00E+00 4.61E‐02
HI
ALIM
9.22E‐03 ‐
BN
CVS
DEV
‐
‐
‐
ENDC
‐
EYE
HEM
‐
‐
IMMUN
‐
KIDN
NS
‐
‐
REPRO
‐
RESP
SK
9.22E‐03 ‐
Sources:
1.
California Air Resources Board, "Consolidated Table of OEHHA/ARB Approved Risk Assessment Health Values" and "OEHHA/ARB Approved Chronic Reference Exposure Levels and Target Organs," http://www.arb.ca.gov/toxics/healthval/healthval.htm.
Tables last updated: January 30, 2014. Downloaded 03/13/2014.
Where:
* Key to Toxicological Endpoints
CONCWF
Pollutant Concentration (µg/m3) multiplied by the weight fraction
CREL
HI
MEI
WFrac
Chronic Reference Exposure Level
Hazard Index
Maximally Exposed Individual
Weight fraction of speciated component
ALIM
BN
CVS
DEV
ENDC
Alimentary Tract
Bone
Cardiovascular System
Developmental System
Endocrine System
EYE
HEM
IMMUN
KIDN
Eye
Hematologic System
Immune System
Kidney
NS
REPRO
RESP
SK
Nervous System
Reproductive System
Respiratory System
Skin
Threshold
Over?
1.0
NO