City of Visalia General Fund Revenues Blue Ribbon Task Force May 14, 2013 Two Trends in the General Fund • Dominance of Visalia’s sales tax has declined • State continues to eat away at local tax revenues – The State is the third largest department in the City’s General Fund after Police and Fire General Fund Revenues Per Capita $1,000.00 $900.00 $800.00 $700.00 Bakersfield $600.00 Clovis Fairfield $500.00 Fresno $400.00 Tulare $300.00 Visalia $200.00 $100.00 $2007 2008 2009 2010 Note: Fresno data estimated for 2010. Visalia’s General Fund Revenues Per Capita trails other governments If Visalia had the same sales tax dominance today as it did in the 1980s, the General Fund would have another $6 million Cities in Tulare County Varied Tax Bases Share of 1% Property Sales Tax Tax Rate Override Dinuba 18.79% 0.75% 15.32% None Exeter 11.81% 0.50% Farmersville 14.79% 0.50% Lindsay 11.80% 0.50% Porterville 14.09% 0.50% Tulare 11.57% 0.25% Visalia 15.76% None Woodlake Utility Users Tax Rate 7% 5% None 6% 6% 6% None 6% TOT tax 10% 4% None 15% 8% 10% 10% None Visalia has a more narrow tax base than other cities State Take-aways and Local Revenue Response • 1992 and 1993, the State takes local government property tax – Visalia loses $3 million a year in property taxes – 6 out of 8 Tulare County cities respond by imposing a Utility Users Tax • A 6% UUT would raise $10 million for Visalia New Revenues • 2004 Visalia pioneers a local option Sales Tax for operations at ¼ percent – Limited by legislature to ¼ percent – Conservative – was most that was available • Legislature opens door wider – 5 other Tulare County cities adopt not a ¼ cent sales tax but either ½ or ¾ percent tax • Another ¼ cent tax would raise $5 million for Visalia More State Take-aways • 2007, State swaps all but $600,000 in motor vehicle in-lieu (property tax on your horse) for property tax – However, charges the City for administration of the fee for all of the Motor Vehicle In-lieu fees of $8 million. – Eventually, all Motor Vehicle in-lieu fees are kept by the State Yet More State Takeaways • State in 2011 requires ends redevelopment unless a City makes a “contribution” to the State • Cities sue • Courts find that “contributions” are not legal but State may kill Redevelopment • City losses $ 4 mm a year net in economic development and housing funds Trends • Economic trends have reduced the value of the City’s Primary General Fund revenue – Sales Tax • The State has taken City revenues which would otherwise been available for City services – 3rd largest department of the City • Other cities have found revenue replacements If Visalia had the same worker ratio as 20 years ago, the City would have 100 more workers Visalia vs Tulare Average General Fund Spending Per Captia FY 2011/12 Tulare Population 59,089 GF Revenues 33,379,000 Per Capita 565 Visalia 125,770 54,660,000 435 Difference 130 Cost of Living Comparison Local tax Burden For Family of 3 - 2013 Ave. Median Income Median Home Value Visalia 54,019 212,500 Tulare 46,274 183,700 Why Taxes Received by the City Property Tax Portion Property Tax Override Sales Tax Portion Sales Tax Override Utiltiy Taxes Total 238 153 180 45 616 Revenue Taxes Received by City 249 325 159 77 220 1,030 Visalia 24,649,364 Tulare's rate higher portion of 1% Tulare more overrides Visalia higher incomes Tulare 2x Visalia's rate Tulare has UTT Tulare 41,194,001 Difference 16,544,637 Things to remember 1. Visalia’s historical sales tax dominance has faded 2. The State has taken general revenues of the City to solve their budget problems 3. Other governments have a broader General Fund tax base: – – Utility Users tax Higher sales tax override 4. Other Local Governments are now spending more per capita than Visalia
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz