JFS M: Food Microbiology and Safety Inhibition of Fungal Growth on Wheat and Rye Bread by Modified Atmosphere Packaging and Active Packaging Using Volatile Mustard Essential Oil K ARIN I. SUHR AND PER V. NIELSEN Introduction M odified atmosphere packaging (MAP) of food has gained a substantial success the past decades, facilitated by developments in the packaging industry of films and equipment and the increasing unease among consumers toward chemical preservatives. Unpreserved bread and bakery products are prone to mold spoilage within 2 to 3 d, which makes them obvious candidates for MAP and particularly for “brown-and-serve” products (Brody 1993). The general recommendation for MAP of bakery products has been a mixture of 60% CO2/40% N2, but specific gas mixtures should be used for each type of product (Smith 1993), and mixtures have varied from 0% to 100% CO2 balanced with N2 (Farber 1991; Zagory 1997). CO2 has an antimicrobial effect, but it is soluble in water and fat, and excessive absorption can cause package collapse. N2 on the other hand is an inert, tasteless gas with low solubility. It is used for displacing O2 and prevents package collapse (Church 1994). A number of MAP studies have focused on the CO2:N2 balance with little or no attention to residual O2 (Drulhe-Aleman 1996; El Halouat and others 1998; Rodriguez and others 2000). However, experiments in our laboratory as well as other studies have shown that the level of residual O2 plays a significant role for mold germination (Smith and others 1986; Abellana and others 2000), and the general rule of max 1% residMS 20040412 Submitted 6/21/04, Revised 7/26/04, Accepted 9/3/04. Authors are with Biocentrum-DTU, Technical Univ. of Denmark, Building 221, 2800 Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark. Direct inquiries to author Nielsen (E-mail: [email protected]). © 2005 Institute of Food Technologists Further reproduction without permission is prohibited ual O2 in MAP of bakery products (Piergiovannia and Fava 1997) may prove insufficient for obtaining the desired self life. Two different methods of introducing the gas mixtures into the package are used in MAP: (1) “flow-pack,” in which the gas is flushed in a continuous flow into the package/film tube before sealing in a form-fill-and-seal machine, which forms pillow packages, or (2) “compensated vacuum” in which a vacuum on the package is broken by the gas, for example, in a thermoforming machine, which forms a tray for the product and a top/“lidding” film is sealed onto the package inside the vacuum chamber. The latter method is advantageous for obtaining the lowest residual air content, especially for porous structured products, while the 1st is recognized for high rate of production (Saunders 1988). The enhanced effect of combining MAP with other preservative measures as for example, nisin (Cabo and others 2001), ethanol (Daifas and others 2000), or weak acid preservatives in reduced doses (El Halouat and others 1998) has been demonstrated and is often the preferred alternative to, for example, actively removing all residual O2 with O2-absorbers. Besides adding to the costs, commercial use of O2 absorbers in sachets has initially met reluctance (outside Japan) because of the risk of creating favorable conditions for anaerobic pathogens and the risk of accidental ingestion of the sachets by consumers (Idol 1997). Active packaging (AP) can be defined as “a mode of packaging in which the package, the product, and the environment interact to prolong shelf life or enhance safety or sensory properties, while maintaining the quality of the product” (Suppakul and others 2003). An antimicrobial agent with potential use in AP is the essenVol. 70, Nr. 1, 2005—JOURNAL OF FOOD SCIENCE M37 Published on Web 1/11/2005 M: Food Microbiology & Safety ABSTRA CT y e br ead ar tificially inoculated with molds w er e packed in modified atmospher es of 0%, ABSTRACT CT:: Wheat and rry bread artificially wer ere atmospheres 50%, 75%, or 100% C O 2 balanced with N2, and 3 lev els of rresidual esidual O2, 1%, 0.03%, or <0.01%/O2-absorber ed CO levels -absorber,, and stor stored for 30 to 35 d. M odified atmospher e packaging (MAP) was quantitativ ely mor e effectiv e for rry ye br ead because few er Modified atmosphere quantitatively more effective bread fewer mold species gr ew at elev ated C O 2. H owev er ye br ead contaminant, Penicillium rroquefor oquefor ti ver grew elevated CO Ho ever er,, the major rry bread oqueforti ti,, was the o ov er-esistant mold and only the use of O2-absorber could pr ev ent gr owth of this species n wheat br ead, all most C O 2-r -resistant prev event gro species.. O On bread, CO the most C O 2-toler ant mold was Penicillium commune owing in 99% C O 2 (with high rresidual esidual O2), and A spergillus CO -tolerant commune,, gr gro CO flavus was the mold species that gr ew at lo west O2 in 75% C O2 tr eatment. The spoilage yyeast/“ east/“ chalk mold grew low CO treatment. east/“chalk mold”” Endomyces fibuliger was less affected b y the differ ent O2 lev els than the tr ue filamentous molds by different levels true molds,, and none of the tested MAP tr eatments could pr ev ent gr owth, but lag-phase was incr eased with O2-absorber on wheat br ead and decr eased with treatments prev event gro increased bread decreased 1% rresidual esidual O2 on rry ye br ead. E xper iments with vvolatile olatile mustar d oil sho wed that A. flavus and Eur otium rrepens epens w er e bread. Exper xperiments mustard show urotium wer ere the most mustar d oil–r esistant species on wheat and rry ye br ead, rrespectiv espectiv ely ategy with MAP and mustard oil–resistant bread, espectively ely.. A combination str strategy mustar d oil pr oved most optimal, and total inhibition was achiev ed with 2 L mustar d oil/r ye br ead slice and bepro achieved mustard oil/ry mustard bread tw een 2 and 3 L/wheat br ead. R esults indicated that the natur e and sur face ar ea of the pr oduct influences effectiv etween bread. Results nature surface area product effectiveness of activ e packaging with mustar d oil. active mustard Keywor ds: modified atmospher e packaging, activ ead spoilage d oil, allyl isothiocyante eywords: atmosphere active bread spoilage,, mustar mustard e packaging, br MAP and use of volatile mustard oil for bread . . . Table 1—Modified atmosphere packaging (MAP) treatments used in packaging of wheat and rye bread. The O 2/CO2 equilibrium inside the package measured on d 2 is shown.a Day 2 Wheat bread Packaging composition % O2 % CO2 abs a 0 0 0 1 0 abs 50 0 50 1 49.5 abs 75 0 75 1 74.5 abs 100 0 100 1 99 Control/Atmospheric air % N2 100 100 99 50 50 49.5 25 25 24.5 0 0 0 % O2 0.00 0.00 1.060·02 0.00 0.060·03 0.970·01 0.00 0.030·05 0.630·01 0.00 0.030·02 0.950·03 19.240·01 % CO2 0.80·4 0.00·3 0.30·2 44.30·6 48.40·1 48.50·8 67.61·7 70.22·1 67.80·1 100.00·0 100.00·0 100.00·0 1.00·1 Day 2 Rye bread % O2 0.00 0.020·01 1.000·01 0.00 0.020·01 0.840·04 0.00 0.030·01 0.900·01 0.00 0.030·03 1.040·04 19.510·78 % CO2 0.60·6 0.00·0 1.20·9 47.21·0 49.70·1 47.00·1 72.01·1 73.60·6 72.40·6 100.00·0 100.00·0 99.50·7 0.40·1 aabs = oxygen absorber inserted in package. M: Food Microbiology & Safety tial oil of mustard (Nielsen and Rios 2000). The active compound of the oil is allyl isothiocyante and it has proved to be a 100 to 1000 times more inhibitory when added as a volatile than through direct addition in media (Sekiyama and others 1996; Suhr and Nielsen 2002). Several packaging film materials have been tested for their allyl isothiocyante permeability (Lim and Tung 1997; Lim and others 1998), and allyl isothiocyante emitters have also been commercialized in Japan (WasaOuro® system from the Green Cross Corp., Osaka, Japan) (Worfel and others 1997). Some investigations of MAP for bakery products have been conducted with uninoculated products, which makes them subject to the particular hygienic standard and difficult to compare (Black and others 1993; Rodriguez and others 2000). Other studies on specific spoilage fungi, on the other hand, have been conducted on laboratory media (Ellis and others 1993a, 1993b; Smith and others 1986) making them difficult to interpret directly into real life situations. The objective of this study was to test the effect of carbon dioxide and residual oxygen contents in MAP of wheat and rye bread inoculated with their common spoilage molds. An active packaging concept combining volatile mustard oil with MAP was furthermore explored to pursue the goal of a 30 d spoilage-free shelf life. Materials and Methods Fungal isolates and preparation of inoculum Common spoilage fungi of wheat bread, Penicillium commune (IBT 21314), P. solitum (IBT 21313), P. polonicum (IBT 21312), Aspergillus flavus (IBT 21323), and of rye bread, P. roqueforti (IBT 18687), P. corylophilum (IBT 13995), Eurotium repens (IBT 9B), and Endomyces fibuliger (IBT 605) were used for inoculation. All cultures originated from spoiled bread and were kept in the IBT culture collection at Biocentrum-DTU, Technical Univ. of Denmark. Cultures were inoculated on Czapek Yeast autolysate extract Agar (Samson and others 2002), except Eurotium repens, which was inoculated on Dichloran 18% Glycerol agar (Samson and others 2002), to check purity and identity. Plates were incubated for 7 d at 25 °C in the dark, after which colonies were transferred to fresh media and reincubated for 7 d under the same conditions to generate inoculums. Suspensions of spores for inoculation were made as 106 to 107 spores/mL in double distilled water with 0.5% agar and 0.5% Tween-80, and 10 L suspensions were used for inoculations. M38 JOURNAL OF FOOD SCIENCE—Vol. 70, Nr. 1, 2005 Inoculation of bread and colony measurements In all experiments, fresh wheat bread (approximately 20.5 cm; radius 4.2 cm) French baguette type (‘Fransk hot-dog brød,’ Cerealia Bakeries, Hatting, Denmark) and sliced rye bread (approximately 8.8 × 9.9 cm; 0.8 cm thick, “Mørkt rugbrød,” Møllens Brød, Helsingør, Denmark) was used. No preservatives had been added to the bread. The bread was stored at 25 °C in the dark, and colony diameter was measured on day 2 or 3, 7, 14, 21, and 30 or 35 in all experiments. In the MAP experiment, rye bread slices were punched out into 9-cm Petri dishes before inoculations in 3 points as described by Gams and others (1998). Whole wheat bread was inoculated in 2 points in the crust. All fungi were inoculated separately and all treatments were done in 5 replicates. For the 1st active packaging (AP) experiment, 2 cocktails of spores ([1] P. commune, P. solitum, A. flavus, E. fibuliger and [2] P. roqueforti, P. corylophilum, E. repens, E. fibuliger) were prepared for wheat and rye bread, respectively, by pooling equal amounts of the single spore suspensions. Wheat bread was inoculated in 1 point and rye bread in 2 points. One unit of rye bread equaled 3 stacked slices (approximately 8.8 × 9.9 × 2.4 cm). Recording of colony characteristics/ dominating species supplemented colony diameter readings. Subsequently, an AP experiment with wheat bread was conducted with A. flavus and E. fibuliger inoculated separately on the same bread. Additionally, to investigate the effect of inoculation level, A. flavus was inoculated in 102, 103, 104, 105, and 106 spores/mL, 3 points per bread. For the 3rd AP experiment; P. roqueforti, P. corylophilum, E. fibuliger, E. repens, and A. flavus was inoculated separately on rye bread, 4 points per bread. Modified atmosphere packaging Three oxygen levels (1.0% O2; “no”/0.03% O2 [contained in the bread]; O2-absorber added) were examined at 4 different levels of carbon dioxide (0%; 50%; 75%; 100%) resulting in a total of 13 different packaging atmospheres, including a control with atmospheric air, as summarized in Table 1. The inoculated bread was placed in 20- × 35-cm-high barrier plastic bags (Ecotop 20/50, OPP20/PELD-EVOHPELD4720, Åkerlund & Rausing AB, Lund, Sweden). The volume of air inside the package (headspace) was more than 3 times the volume of the product therein. The film laminate was 70 m thick and had an O2 permeability of 3 mL/m2/24 h/atm at 23 °C and 50% RH, and water vapor permeability of 1 g/m2/24 h at 25 °C and 75% RH. O2absorbers (ATCO, Atmosphere Controle SA, Caen Cedex, France) URLs and E-mail addresses are active links at www.ift.org MAP and use of volatile mustard oil for bread . . . Table 2—Gas compositions used in active packaging (AP) experiment with volatile mustard oil at a bread factory; both wheat and rye bread were packed. The O2/CO2 equilibrium measured inside the package just after packaging and on d 3 is shown. Packaginga Day 3b Day 3b Wheat bread Rye bread % O2 Flow-pack 100% CO2 Control/Atmospheric air % CO 2 4.75 0·67 0.20 0·07 % O2 79.7 3·2 100.0 0·0 18.65 0 ·77 % CO 2 3.710·42 0.23 0 ·11 0.9 1·1 76.3 1·3 96.1 0·5 18.47 0·40 % O2 % CO2 3.07 0·10 0.00 0·00 0.9 1·0 78.8 0·7 97.1 0·3 a n = 4, b n = 6. Table 3—Species growing on wheat and rye bread with or without volatile mustard oil (1 mL/package) at different atmospheric compositions Wheat bread Rye bread Atmospheric air Flow-pack 100% CO2 Atmospheric air Flow-pack 100% CO2 Control Penicillium spp. Aspergillus flavus E. fibuliger E. fibuligera Penicillium spp. E. fibuliger Eurotium repens E. fibuliger E. fibuligera Mustard oil A. flavusb E. fibuliger E. fibuligera E. fibuliger E. repens E. fibuliger E. fibuliger a a Weak mycelia formation. b 1 to 5 L mustard oil/package. Active packaging (AP) with volatile mustard oil First AP experiment was conducted at a bread factory and the packaging atmospheres were as follows: 100% CO2; 80% CO2/5% O2 (simulating flow-pack conditions); or atmospheric air (Table 2). Additionally, mustard oil (Extract Mex, San Luis Potosi, Mexico) in concentrations of 0, 1, 3, 5, or 10 L/bread was added to a piece of 1- × 1-cm sterile filter paper (Whatman type 1, Struers Kebo Lab, Albertslund, Denmark) contained in a Petri dish and packed along with the bread. All treatments were done in triplicate for wheat bread and replicate for rye bread. Compensated vacuum on a thermoforming packaging machine (Multivac Type R530) was used with a 160-m-thick PA/EVOH/PE film with O2 permeability of 2 mL/ m2/24 h/atm, and water vapor permeability of 7 g/m2/24 h. Package dimensions were 19 × 29 × 4.7 cm. Thus, headspace volume was more than 3 times greater than product volume. In the 2nd AP experiment, wheat bread was packed in 50%, 75%, 100% CO2 with no or 5% O2 (Table 4) and added 2 L mustard oil/ bread. Packaging was performed as previously described for MAP packaging and the same bags were used. Testing of inoculum level effect with A. flavus was done for the 75% CO2/5% O2 treatment only. In the 3rd AP experiment, rye bread was packed in a simulated “flow-pack” condition (80% CO2/1% O2) or atmospheric air with same methodology as described for MAP packaging. After packaging of bread, mustard oil diluted in 96% ethanol was added to the URLs and E-mail addresses are active links at www.ift.org filter paper containing Petri dish inside the bag with a syringe through a gas-tight membrane (TORAY Rubber Seal, Toray, Tokyo, Japan) fastened on the bags. The total volume added to each package was 100 L, mustard oil content was 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, or 5 L. The bags were same size as for previous MAP experiments and the film was “Transobar 12/60” (P-OPET12/PELD-EVOH-PELD55) from Åkerlund & Rausing AB (Lund, Sweden), 62 m thick, and O2 permeability of 3 mL/m2/24 h/atm (23 °C, 50% RH), and water vapor permeability of 1.5 g/m2/24 h (25 °C, 75% RH). All treatments were done in triplicate, unless otherwise stated. Sensory evaluation of AP bread One rye bread slice (‘Mørkt rugbrød’, Møllens Brød, Helsingør, Denmark) or 1 wheat bread (‘Miniflûtes,’ Cerealia Bakeries, Hatting, Denmark) was packed with a filter paper containing Petri dish with 0 (control), 1, 2, 3, 4, or 5 L mustard oil in atmospheric air or MAP (55% CO2/35% N2/10% O2). The same packaging procedure as previously described for MAP experiment, and same type and size of bags, were used. The packed bread was stored for 2 d (room temperature, in the dark) before sensory evaluation by ranking test (Soerensen et al. 1986) preformed by 11 untrained persons (4 male, 7 female) in rooms especially designed for the purpose. The descriptor used was mustard taste, since this was evaluated as the most important attribute from preliminary studies. The mustard smell disappeared/evaporated very quickly from the bread once unpacked. Consequently, to avoid unnecessary confusion among the untrained judges, they were asked to concentrate only on the taste. The ranking of samples were done by marking on a line (14.2 cm) ranging from (1) “nothing unusual” to (6) “unacceptable disagreeable mustard taste.” Additionally, the judges were asked to tick off 1 of 2 boxes indicating the bread sample as “acceptable” or “not acceptable” according to their taste. Results and Discussion MAP experiment Treatments packed with no oxygen had on average 0.03% oxyVol. 70, Nr. 1, 2005—JOURNAL OF FOOD SCIENCE M39 M: Food Microbiology & Safety had a capacity of 50 mL. Packaging atmospheres were mixed with a MAP MIX 9000 gas mixer (PBI-Dansensor A/S, Ringsted, Denmark) connected to a Multivac “chamber-type” packaging machine (Multivac A 300/42 MC, Wolfertschwenden, Germany) using compensated vacuum technique (Drulhe-Aleman 1996). For treatments without O2, food-grade quality CO2 and N2 with purity 99.7% and 99.9%, respectively, were used. Premixed gasses with 1.0% (vol/vol) O2 in CO2 and N2 (analytical tolerance ± 2% and blend tolerance 10% of set point) were used for treatments with O2. The gasses were supplied by AGA Gas GmbH & Co. KG, Bottrop, Germany. O2 and CO2 concentration in packed bags were measured with a Checkmate 9900 gas-analyzing device (PBI Dansensor, Ringsted, Denmark). MAP and use of volatile mustard oil for bread . . . Table 4—Gas compositions used in active packaging (with 2 mL mustard oil) experiment with wheat bread. The O 2/ CO2 equilibrium inside the package on d 2 is shown.a Packaging composition % O2 % CO2 % N2 0 50 50 0 75 25 0 100 0 5 50 45 5 75 20 5 95 0 Control/Atmospheric air 1 Day 2 % O2 0.28 0·07 0.20 0·03 0.55 0·13 5.09 0·30 4.37 0·00 5.92 0·06 9.25 0·04 % CO2 44.2 1·0 67.5 0·1 96.5 0·9 46.7 0·2 65.7 0·4 91.9 0·1 0.4 0·1 an = 3. gen in headspace the 2nd day (Table 1). Packages with oxygen absorbers had no measurable oxygen content, and no mold growth was observed within the testing period on either wheat bread (Figure 1) or rye bread (Figure 2). However, the spoilage yeast Endomyces fibuliger was not inhibited by any of the MAP treatments, albeit oxygen absorbers delayed onset of growth on wheat bread (Figure 1). Early mold growth—day 2—occurred only in atmospheric air (both bread types). However, on rye bread, E. fibuliger showed growth on day 2 in all 1% O2 treatments (Figure 2). On wheat bread, the inhibitory effect of CO2 was clear (Figure 1), and decreasing tolerance of low O2 at increasing CO2 for the molds was particular notable for Penicillium polonicum, P. solitum and P. commune, which showed growth of both O2 residual treatments in 50% CO2 but only 1% O2 sustained growth in 75% CO2. P. commune showed the highest CO2 tolerance with growth at 1% residual O2 in 99% CO2. No significant difference in colony diameter was seen with 1% O2 in N2 compared with atmospheric air, but P. commune was also the only fungus that showed no growth on day 2 in atmospheric air. The lack of effect when reducing O2 from 21% to 1% has also been reported for other spoilage fungi (Agar and others 1990). Aspergillius flavus showed the highest capacity to grow at low residual O2 level at increasing CO2 on wheat bread as it was the only fungus growing when no O2 was added (0.03% O2) at 75% CO2. Miller and Golding (1949) did also find that A. flavus required less O2 than other molds (A. niger, P. expansum, P. notatum, P. roqueforti) on malt agar. The decrease in A. flavus lag-phase for “no”/0.03% oxygen at 75% CO2 compared with 50% CO2 was however peculiar (Figure 1). Growth might have escaped the eye as the mycelium was extremely weakened in CO2 and thorough examination was difficult through the film barrier. Also, minor differences in O2 caused by package differences could explain the peculiarity. The 1st explanation, however, is likely, as the “spot-test” methodology applied requires a relatively large change in growth to occur before an increase in diameter (>2 mm) is recorded. Both A. flavus and P. polonicum showed no significant difference between the 2 O2 residual levels in N2. E. fibuliger was generally little affected by O2 levels on wheat bread without oxygen-absorber inserted. El Halouat and Debevere (1996) also found no difference between atmospheric air and various CO2 (20% to 80%) combinations in N2 on growth of a spoilage yeast (Zygosaccharomyces rouxii). The main spoiler of rye bread, P. roqueforti, differed from the M: Food Microbiology & Safety Figure 1—Growth of spoilage molds on wheat bread at different modified atmosphere packaging (MAP) compositions with 3 residual O2 (1%, 0.03%, or O2-absorber) levels. Controls (atmospheric air) are shown in 100% N2 plots. M40 JOURNAL OF FOOD SCIENCE—Vol. 70, Nr. 1, 2005 Figure 2—Growth of spoilage molds on rye bread at different modified atmosphere packaging (MAP) compositions with 3 residual O2 (1%, 0.03%, or O2-absorber) levels. Controls (atmospheric air) are shown in 100% N2 plots. URLs and E-mail addresses are active links at www.ift.org MAP and use of volatile mustard oil for bread . . . Table 5—Sensory evaluation of wheat and rye bread packed in volatile mustard oil containing atmospheres. The percentage of judges finding the bread samples acceptable is shown. a Mustard essential oil/ package (a) (b) (c) (d) Rye bread Rye bread Wheat bread Wheat bread Air MAP Air MAP Control 1 L 2 L 3 L 4 L 5 L 100% 100% 100% 100% 73% 91% 100% 100% 73% 36% 91% 82% 36% 0% 64% 18% 27% 36% 55% 27% 45% 9% 36% 0% a n = 11. MAP = modified atmosphere packaging. (a) URLs and E-mail addresses are active links at www.ift.org (b) be mediated by water-dissolved CO2, which can make up to 2% of the water phase (Daniels and others 1985). Overall, strong CO2 inhibitory effect on molds—with the exception of P. roqueforti—was seen on rye bread compared with wheat bread. The different natures of the bread types posed a problem regarding quantification of growth. The wheat bread had a more porous and fragile structure compared with rye bread. Disintegration or collapse of wheat bread structure with microbial activity was observed in some cases (that is, E. fibuliger in atmospheric air made holes in the wheat bread), and colonies were spreading inward into the bread instead of horizontally. This explains why, for example, the pattern of larger colonies in atmospheric air compared with MAP on rye bread was not paralleled by wheat bread. Fungi are known to stop their growth when O2 becomes limited (Guynot and others 2003a), and this was also the case in the present study. For example, in atmospheric air packed rye bread P. roqueforti and E. fibuliger had no measurable O2 in headspace on day 7, and on day 14, <0.002% O2 was measured for E. repens and P. commune, which correlated with their growth stagnations. The ability of some aerobic molds to grow at limited O2 concentrations (between 0% to 1%) must rely on specific regulatory functions, perhaps linked to an efficient O2 molecular bounding property, or some other kind of stored reserves from the prior growth in an O2rich environment. Oxygen-absorbers worked efficiently removing all oxygen for the whole testing period of 35 d and thus preventing mold growth. However, the inhibition of spoilage yeasts needed further actions, which impelled the experiments with active packaging. AP experiments In modified atmospheres, volatile mustard oil inhibited growth (c) Figure 3—Mold growth on wheat bread in atmospheric air (a), “flow- pack” /80% CO2/5% O 2 (b), and 100% CO2/0.2% O2 (c), with volatile mustard oil (0, 1, 3, or 5 L) added inside the package immediately before packaging Vol. 70, Nr. 1, 2005—JOURNAL OF FOOD SCIENCE M41 M: Food Microbiology & Safety other molds by growth in all but oxygen-absorber treatments (Figure 2). This extraordinary tolerance to high CO2 and low O2, or even stimulated growth (Magan and Lacey 1984; Haasum and Nielsen 1998), has also been reported on other substrates (Petersson and Schnürer 1999; van den Tempel and Nielsen 2000). Eurotium repens was not able to grow on rye bread at any of the tested MAP conditions. P. commune was inhibited at the lowest (“no”/0.03%) O2 level in N2 and by all CO2-containing atmospheres. Contrary to our results that showed significant differences between different mold species, Smith and others (1986) found no difference between growth of A. niger and Penicillium spores (on PDA media) in MAP with 60% CO2/40% N2 and a wide range of residual O2 values (0.1%, 0.2%, 0.4%, 0.6%, 0.8%, 1.0%, 2.0%, 10%). In another MAP experiment (CO2 20% to 50%/N2 50% to 100%) with uninoculated wheat bread, Rodríguez and others (2000) found that Aspergillus spp. were more sensitive to CO2 than Penicillium spp. Unfortunately, they did not identify the contaminants to species level, which would have added further value to the results. In our study, A. flavus was less tolerant to CO2 than P. commune, but more tolerant than P. solitum and P. polonicum. Growth of A. flavus was observed on day 13 to 15 on peanuts packed in high barrier film and 65% CO2/35% N2 (Ellis and others 1994), similar to our results on wheat bread. This study showed that rye bread was a better substrate for E. fibuliger, as growth occurred on day 2 in all 1% O2 treatments and atmospheric air, compared with only atmospheric air on wheat bread, and “no” oxygen and oxygen absorber treatments were like each other on rye bread. P. commune proved to grow less well on rye bread compared with wheat bread, probably because of the low pH of rye bread (4.2 to 4.5) and the relatively higher water content (about 10%) in rye bread. Antimicrobial effect of CO2 is believed to MAP and use of volatile mustard oil for bread . . . in doses of >1 L/ wheat bread, whereas 3 and 5 L doses in air showed growth on 1/3 of the triplicate samples (Figure 3). Growth of Endomyces fibuliger dominated in MAP, which particularly for wheat bread was in accordance with the 1st experiments results. In air, Aspergillus flavus proved to be the most mustard oil–resistant fungi (Table 3). For rye bread, no qualitative difference (that is, if measured as “growth” versus “no-growth”) was seen between the 3 packaging atmospheres; 3 L mustard oil/rye bread or more inhibited growth in all gaseous compositions (Figure 4), although growth was weaker in MAP conditions and delayed in 100% CO2. Distribution of species, however, was distinctive because Penicillium species were highly sensitive to the mustard oil and no sporulation of molds occurred in rye bread in MAP treatments similar to the wheat bread observations (Table 3). In the next AP experiments, fungi were inoculated separately to avoid interaction effects between the species. Testing of the intermediate dose (2 L/wheat bread) was from a preliminary sensory evaluation at the bread factory also considered interesting. Growth of E. fibuliger was delayed by mustard oil and high CO2, but within 1 wk, growth was observed on all treatments with a colony diameter on day 7 of 3.1 1.5 and 4.8 0.8 mm with and without mustard oil, respectively (data not shown). Growth of A. flavus was prevented by the additive effect of mustard oil in 95% CO2 with 5% O2 (Figure 5b). At lower CO2 levels, total inhibition was not obtained within the testing period. Mustard oil addition stimulated growth at 50% CO2 and low residual O2 (Figure 5a), although lag-phase was increased initially. Growth stimulation by antimicrobials in subinhibitory concentrations has also been encountered in other studies (Marin and others 2002; Suhr and Nielsen 2004). Ellis and others (1993a, 1993b) found that optimization of environmental factors (including gaseous atmospheres) inhibiting growth of A. flavus depended on the inoculum concentration, as conditions inhibiting 101 spores/g were not effective for higher inoculum levels. However, they also found that mold growth generally was higher at 5% headspace O 2 when inoculum level was lower (102 spores compared with 104 spores) while opposite at higher 10% to 15% O2 levels (Ellis and others 1993b). In our study, testing of A. flavus inoculum levels showed that higher level gave earlier growth at 5% O2/80% CO2 with mustard oil, as 106 spore/mL inoculums showed growth on wheat bread on day 7, whereas 102 to 105 had no growth. This indicates that increased inhibition would have M: Food Microbiology & Safety (a) M42 (b) JOURNAL OF FOOD SCIENCE—Vol. 70, Nr. 1, 2005 been achieved if lower inoculation levels had been used in the present work. In accordance with our results, Mari and others (2002) also showed that allyl isothiocyanate vapor on P. expansum inoculated pears had decreasing inhibitory effect with increasing inoculum level. A dosing of 2 L mustard oil was sufficient to inhibit growth of P. roqueforti and E. fibuliger on rye bread (Figure 6). However, additional effect of MAP was necessary to obtain inhibition of Eurotium repens, since this fungus showed tolerance to 3 L mustard oil in air but no growth at 1 L in MAP. E. repens growth occurred between day 21 and 28 in the MAP control treatment (85% CO2/1% O2) opposing the 1st MAP experiment in which no growth was observed in any MAP. However, packaging films with different water permeabilities, but the same specifications for O2 permeability, and a different batch of rye bread were used, which could have affected the result. Decreased tolerance to mustard oil was seen when E. repens was inoculated in a mixed spore solution (Figure 4a), compared with the separately inoculated experiment (Figure 6b), which could be due to microbial interactions or the lower number of spores inoculated. A. flavus was inhibited on rye bread by 2 L mustard oil in air, but showed no tolerance to mustard oil in 85% CO2/1% O2 (Figure 6e). Thus, wheat bread was a better substrate for the mold than rye bread. The common rye bread spoilage mold, P. corylophilum, was inhibited by all mustard and MAP conditions (Figure 6d). This species was also found to be most susceptible to unfavorable environmental factors in a MAP study by Guynot and others (2003b). The ethanol used for dilution of mustard oil did not affect growth (Figure 6) with exception of minor extended lag-phases for E. repens and A. flavus in (ethanol) flow-pack conditions. For achieving antifungal effect by ethanol vapor, higher dosages are required. The minimal inhibitory concentration of vaporous mustard oil above agar against fungi has been reported in the range 0.016 to 0.062 g/mL (Isshiki and others 1992), 1.8 to 3.5 g/mL (Nielsen and Rios 2000), and 3.8 to 118 g/mL gas-phase (Tsunoda 1994). Bread packages from the chamber-packaging machine had a volume of 925 143 mL, which rendered a concentration of 1.3 to 1.8 g/mL gas-phase (with 2 L mustard oil), comparable with the above in vitro results. However, further tests in our laboratory have shown that the mustard oil should be dosed according to the surface area of the bread, and headspace volume is less important for the antifungal effect. This indicates furthermore that the specific product (c) Figure 4—Mold growth on rye bread in atmospheric air (a), “flow-pack”/ 80% CO2/5% O2 (b), and 100% CO2/ 0.2% O2 (c), with volatile mustard oil (0, 1, or 3 L) added inside the package immediately before packaging URLs and E-mail addresses are active links at www.ift.org MAP and use of volatile mustard oil for bread . . . characteristics will be important for the applicability of AP with volatile mustard oil. The sensory evaluation showed that 1 L mustard oil/bread package was generally acceptable (Table 5), and significantly better (less mustard taste) than higher doses (Figure 7). MAP affected the mustard taste negatively, particularly for rye bread, where only 36% found that the taste of 2 L mustard oil/rye bread slice was acceptable compared with 73% acceptance in atmospheric air (Table 5). Wheat bread seemed overall most compatible with mustard oil, and in atmospheric air the ranking order of low level treatments (0 to 3 L) varied to such an extend that no significance was obtained. Even though untrained persons performed the testing, the mustard oil was detected in relatively small quantities, which could suggest that volatile mustard oil for preservative purposes is better suited for less bland products than bread. However, evaporation out of the package with time will lessen and eventually eliminate the sensory effects. AP packed wheat bread with “no” oxygen contained an average of 0.3% residual O2 on day 2 (Table 4). This indicated that less vacuum- (a) (b) ing was used during packaging compared with the 1st MAP experiment (average 0.03% O2; Table 1). The level, however, was comparable with that obtained at the factory with a commercial thermoforming machine (Table 2). Measurements of the O2/CO2 gas equilibrium inside the packages from the factory experiment (Table 2) confirmed the tendency from the MAP experiment (Table 1) with (1) greater residual O2 variability in wheat bread compared with rye and (2) generally higher O2 and lower CO2 headspace levels in wheat bread compared with rye bread packages. There was an initial 3% to 4% loss of CO2 in treatments packed in 100% CO2 atmospheres both at the factory (Table 2) and laboratory chamber machine (Table 4). This, however, was not monitored for the MAP experiment. Collapse of package—known as “snog-down” effect— due to CO2 diffusion into bread or out of package was observed for some high CO2 packages in various degrees in all experiments. These different changes in headspace volume and thus gas composition inside the packages were an unwanted effect and source of error but did not seem to affect colony diameter greatly, perhaps because the snog-down effect appeared relatively late (day 21 to 30). Maintaining low O2 is pivotal in MAP and adequate sealing properties must be required of the high gas-barrier materials. Thermoforming technology has good gas-tight sealing, but leakage problems may occur (Black and others 1993; Smith 1994). This was not observed in our experiment, but a couple of the manually sealed bags used in the laboratory chamber-packaging machine showed leakage and were discarded. Conclusions T (a) (b) (c) (d) M: Food Microbiology & Safety Figure 5—Aspergillus flavus growth at modified atmosphere packaging (MAP) with different CO 2 concentrations with (+m) or without 2 L volatile mustard oil/package and “no” residual O2 (a) or 5% O2 (b). he importance of testing a range of relevant spoilage organisms was seen in this study as their capacity to circumvent preservative measures differed. Thus, a shift in dominating spoilage organisms from molds to yeasts might be induced by MAP technology. The level of residual O2 in MAP had a detrimental effect on growth of spoilage molds, and the high effectiveness of O2-absorbers, regardless of the MAP-gas-composition, was demonstrated since no mold growth (besides the “chalk mold”/spoilage yeast E. fibuliger) occurred in packages containing O2-absorbers. Combining MAP with vaporous mustard oil lessened the critical demand for low residual O2, and furthermore, a combination strategy was found to inhibit all types of spoilage organisms in massive inoculation loads for the desired period of 30 d. For wheat bread, however, a higher (e) Figure 6—Growth of spoilage molds Penicillium roqueforti (a), Eurotium repens (b), Endomyces fibuliger (c), Penicillium corylophilum (d), and Aspergillus flavus (e) on rye bread in atmosphere of 85% CO 2 /1% O 2 (“Flow”) or atmospheric air (“Atm”) and with volatile mustard oil (0/control [“no addition” or “ethanol only”], 1, 2, or 3 L) added to the package. The mustard oil was diluted in ethanol. URLs and E-mail addresses are active links at www.ift.org Vol. 70, Nr. 1, 2005—JOURNAL OF FOOD SCIENCE M43 MAP and use of volatile mustard oil for bread . . . Figure 7—Ranking-test of volatile mustard oil treated rye bread packed in air (a), rye bread in modified atmosphere packaging (MAP) (b), wheat bread in air (c), and wheat bread in MAP (d) according to mustard taste after 2 d storage. The ranking values from 1 to 6 represents from “no unusual taste” to “unacceptable disagreeable mustard taste.” Significant less taste than the other samples at 1% level (a), 5% level (b). Significant more taste than the other samples at 1% level (c), 5% level (d). mustard oil dosing was required than for rye bread, to inhibit E. fibuliger (>2 L/bread) with possible sensory quality implications. Acknowledgments M: Food Microbiology & Safety This work was carried out as a part of Center for Packaging funded by the Danish Natl. Agency for Enterprise. Cerealia Bakeries, Møllens Brød, AGA A/S, and AB Åkerlund & Rausing were supportive providing the materials used. The excellent technical assistance of Anne Winter Hindsby is also gratefully acknowledged. References Abellana M, Ramos AJ, Sanchis V, Nielsen PV. 2000. Effect of modified atmosphere packaging and water activity on growth of Eurotium amstelodami, E. chevalieri and E. herbariorum on a sponge cake analogue. J App Microbiol 88:606–16. Agar T, Garcia JM, Miedtke U, Streif J. 1990. Effect of high CO2 and low O2 concentrations on the growth of Botrytis cinerea at different temperatures. Gartenbauwiss 55:219–22. Black RG, Quail KJ, Reyes V, Kuzyk M, Ruddick L. 1993. Shelf-life extension of pita bread by modified atmosphere packaging. Food Aust 45:387–91. Brody AL. 1993. The market. In: Parry RT, editor. Principles and applications of modified atmosphere packaging of food. Glasgow, U.K.: Blackie Academic & Professional, Chapman & Hall. p 17–40. Cabo ML, Pastoriza L, Bernárdez M, Herrere JJR. 2001. Effectiveness of CO2 and Nisaplin on increasing shelf-life of fresh pizza. Food Microbiol 18:489–98. Church N. 1994. Developments in modified-atmosphere packaging and related technologies. Trends Food Sci Technol 5:345–52. Daifas DP, Smith JP, Tarte I, Blanchfield B, Austin JW. 2000. Effect of ethanol vapor on growth and toxin production by Clostridium botulinum in a high moisture bakery product. J Food Safety 20:111–25. Daniels JA, Krishnamurthi R, Rizvi SSH. 1985. A review of carbon dioxide on microbial growth and food quality. J Food Prot 48:532–7. Drulhe-Aleman E. 1996. Packaging under controlled atmosphere. In: Bureau G, Multon JL, editors. Food packaging technology. Vol. 2. New York: VCH Publishers. p 85–104. El Halouat A, Debevere JM. 1996. Influence of modified atmosphere and preservatives on the growth of Zygosaccharomyces rouxii isolated from dried fruits. Int J Food Microbiol 33:219–29. El Halouat A, Gourama H, Uyttendaele M, Debevere JM. 1998. Effects of modified M44 JOURNAL OF FOOD SCIENCE—Vol. 70, Nr. 1, 2005 atmosphere packaging and preservatives on the shelf-life of high moisture prunes and raisins. Int J Food Microbiol 41:177–84. Ellis WO, Smith JP, Simpson BK, Ramaswamy H. 1993a. Effect of inoculum level on aflatoxin production by Aspergillus flavus under modified atmosphere packaging (MAP) conditions. Food Microbiol 10:525–35. Ellis EO, Smith JP, Simpson BK, Khanizadeh S, Oldham JH. 1993b. Control of growth and aflatoxin production of Aspergillus flavus under modified atmosphere packaging (MAP) conditions. Food Microbiol 10:9–21. Ellis WO, Smith JP, Simpson BK, Ramaswamy H, Doyon G. 1994. Effect of gas barrier characteristics of films on aflatoxin production by Aspergillus flavus in peanuts packed under modified atmosphere packaging (MAP) conditions. Food Res Int 27:505–12. Farber JM. 1991. Microbiological aspects of modified-atmosphere packaging technology—a review. J Food Prot 54:58–70. Gams W, Hoekstra ES, Aptroot A. 1998. III. General methods. In: CBS course of mycology. 4th ed. Baarn, The Netherlands: Centraalbureau voor Schimmelcultures. p 96–106. Guynot ME, Marin S, SanchisV, Ramos AJ. 2003a. Modified atmosphere packaging for prevention of mold spoilage of bakery products with different pH and water activity levels. J Food Prot 66:1864–72. Guynot ME, Sanchis V, Ramos AJ, Marin S. 2003b. Mold-free shelf-life extension of bakery products by active packaging. J Food Sci 68:2547–52. Haasum I, Nielsen PV. 1998. Ecophysiological characterization of common foodborne fungi in relation to pH and water activity under various atmospheric compositions. J Appl Microbiol 84:451–60. Idol RC. 1997. Oxygen scavengers. In: Brody AL, Marsh KS, editors. Packaging technology. New York: John Wiley & Sons. p 687–92. Isshiki K, Tokuora K, Mori R, Chiba S. 1992. Preliminary examination of allyl isothiocyanate vapor for food preservation. Biosci Biotech Biochem 56:1476–7. Lim LT, Britt IJ, Tung MA. 1998. Sorption and permeation of allyl isothiocyante vapor in nylon 6,6 film as affected by relative humidity. J Plastic Film Sheeting 14:207–25. Lim LT, Tung MA. 1997. Vapor pressure of allyl isothiocyante and its transport in PVDC/PVC copolymer packaging film. J Food Sci 62:1061–6. Magan N, Lacey J. 1984. Effects of gas composition and water activity on growth of field and storage fungi and their interactions. Trans Br Mycol Soc 82:305–14. Mari M, Leoni O, Lori R, Cembali T. 2002. Antifungal vapour-phase activity of allyl-isothiocyanate against Penicillium expansum on pears. Plant Pathol 51:231–6. Marin S, Guynot ME, Neira P, Bernado M, Sanchis V, Ramos AJ. 2002. Risk assessment of the use of sub-optimal levels of weak-acid preservatives in the control of mould growth on bakery products. Int J Food Microbiol 79:203–11. Miller DD, Golding NS. 1949. The gas requirements of molds. V. The minimum oxygen requirements for normal growth and for germination of six mold cultures. J Dairy Sci 32:101–10. Nielsen PV, Rios R. 2000. Inhibition of fungal growth on bread by volatile components from spices and herbs, and the possible application in active packaging, with special emphasis on mustard essential oil. Int J Food Microbiol 60:219–29. Petersson S, Schnürer J. 1999. Growth of Penicillium roqueforti, P. carneum, and P. paneum during malfunctioning airtight storage of high-moisture grain cultivars. Postharvest Biol Technol 17:47–54. Piergiovanni L, Fava P. 1997. Minimizing the residual oxygen in modified atmosphere packaging of bakery products. Food Addit Contam 14:765–73. Rodríguez M, Medina LM, Jordano R. 2000. Effect of modified atmosphere packaging on shelf life of sliced wheat flour bread. Nahrung 44:247–52. Samson RA, Hoekstra ES, Frisvad JC, Filtenborg O. 2002. Introduction to foodborne fungi. 6th revised ed. Baarn, The Netherlands: Centraalbureau voor Schimmelcultures. Saunders RE. 1988. Modified atmosphere packaging. Tappi J 1988(Dec):127–9. Sekiyama Y, Mizukami Y, Takada A, Oosono M, Nishimura T. 1996. Effect of mustard extract vapor on fungi and spore-forming bacteria. J Antibact Antifung Agents 24:171–8. Smith JP. 1993. Bakery products. In: Parry RT, editor. Principles and applications of modified atmosphere packaging of food. Glasgow, U.K.: Blackie Academic & Professional, Chapman & Hall. p 134–69. Smith JP. 1994. MAP for bakery products. In: Ranhotra G, editor. Technical bulletin. Vol 14(3). Manhattan, Kans.: American Inst. of Baking. p 1–9. Smith JP, Ooraikul B, Koersen WJ, Jackson ED, Lawrence RA. 1986. Novel approach to oxygen control in modified atmosphere packaging of bakery products. Food Microbiol 3:315–20. Soerensen LB, Jensen JH, Jul M, Zeuthen P. 1986. Konserveringsteknik 1. Copenhagen, Denmark: DSR Forlag. 265 p. Suhr KI, Nielsen PV. 2002. Antifungal activity of essential oils evaluated by two different application techniques against rye bread spoilage fungi. J App Microbiol 94:1–11. Suhr KI, Nielsen PV. 2004. Effect of weak acid preservatives on growth of bakery product spoilage fungi at different water activities and pH values. Int J Food Microbiol 95:67-78. Suppakul P, Miltz J, Sonneveld K, Bigger SW. 2003. Active packaging technologies with an emphasis on antimicrobial packaging and its applications. J Food Sci 68:408–20. Tsunoda K. 1994. Effect of gaseous treatment with allyl isothiocyanate on the control of microbial growth on a wood substrate. J Antibact Antifung Agents 22:145–8. Van den Tempel T, Nielsen MS. 2000. Effects of atmospheric conditions, NaCl and pH on growth and interactions between moulds and yeasts related to blue cheese production. Int J Food Microbiol 57:193–9. Worfel RC, Schneider KS, Yang TCS. 1997. Suppressive effect of allyl isothiocyanate on populations of stored grain insect pests. J Food Proc Preserv 21:9–19. Zagory D. 1997.Modified atmosphere packaging. In: Brody AL, Marsh KS, editors. Packaging technology. New York: John Wiley & Sons. p 650–6. URLs and E-mail addresses are active links at www.ift.org
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz