Progress in Confronting Human Sex Trafficking in Outagamie County Report to the Community Executive Summary Outagamie County Human Sex Trafficking Steering Committee Jonathan I. Cloud Planning and Management Consultant September 2016 Supported by Funding from the Community Foundation of the Fox Valley Region Contents Introduction ................................................................................................................................................... 3 Prevention Pillar............................................................................................................................................ 3 Treatment and Support Pillar ........................................................................................................................ 5 Law Enforcement Pillar ................................................................................................................................ 7 Court Systems Pillar ..................................................................................................................................... 9 Establishment of DMST Care Coordinator Role ........................................................................................ 10 Community Presentations and Media Interviews ....................................................................................... 11 Addendum: 2016-2019 Strategic Action Plan Summary ............................................................................ 12 2 Introduction In January 2015, the Outagamie County Human Sex Trafficking Steering Committee launched an aggressive initiative to confront human sex trafficking. This report provides an executive summary the progress of this undertaking from January 2015 to July 2016. The primary focus of this summary is work by the Pillars, including Prevention Pillar, Treatment and Support Pillar, Law Enforcement Pillar, and Court Systems Pillar. In addition, the newly established role of the Care Coordinator is highlighted along with efforts by Steering Committee members to educate and increase awareness through presentations, panels, and media interviews. The Outagamie County Domestic Minor Sex Trafficking Partnership is comprised of approximately 50 individuals representing approximately 28 agencies and organizations. As of July 2016, progress highlights are as follows: Established a strategy, structure, and effective processes for carrying out projects that address strategic priorities. Initiated efforts to develop a countywide protocol for responding to victims of child sex trafficking and then joined a process led by the Outagamie Department of Health and Human Services which is working to complete this undertaking. Increased community awareness and knowledge about the problem through numerous community events and presentations. Established a new educational process in the schools that reduces the vulnerability of children and that will continue in subsequent school years. Initiated a new process for screening children and youth who come into contact with the human service system. Established for School Resource Officers a new structured interview process for utilization with youth who have returned from being missing or having run away. Established a new training for School Resource Officers to increase their knowledge of the child sex trafficking problem and ways to respond it. Establish a new draft memorandum of understanding that sets forth roles for agencies in the legal system for responding to juvenile offenders that are also victims of sex trafficking. Set the stage for a three-year strategy that builds on the above successes with specific projects and intended outcomes over each of the next three years (see addendum). Prevention Pillar The Project: Educating Children and Youth Educational sessions for children and youth provided in the school setting and designed to increase their knowledge and awareness about DMST. Desired Performance Outcome: At least one educational or training session with youth by June 30, 2016. 3 Actual Performance Outcome: Number of Roosevelt Middle School Student Sessions: Number of Roosevelt Middle School Staff Sessions: Number of Wilson Middle School Staff Sessions: Number of Wilson Middle School Parent/PTO Sessions 15 1 15 1 1 Total Number of DMST Educational Sessions: 33 Approximate Total Number of Students Educated: Approximate Total Number of Staff Educated: Approximate Total Parents/Caretakers Educated: 750-800 80 8 Number of Wilson Middle School Student Sessions: Behavioral or Systems Outcome: Increased knowledge among students about protecting self and others from sexual exploitation. Summary of Participant Evaluation Results: Wilson Middle School: Before Presentation Knowledge Item Answered they knew nothing at all or very little to “I know what sex trafficking is.” Answered they had heard of sex trafficking. Answered they knew a lot about sex trafficking. Answered they knew nothing at all or very little to “I know the warning signs of a trafficker.” Answered they had heard of the warning signs of a trafficker. Answered they knew a lot about the warning signs of a trafficker. Percent 24% 42% 33% 60% 24% 16% Wilson Middle School: After the Presentation Knowledge Item Reported that they learned new ways to keep themselves and their friends safe from traffickers. Reported that they did not learn new ways to keep themselves and their friends safe from traffickers. Reported that they were unsure if they learned new ways to keep themselves and their friends safe from traffickers. Reported that they learned how to help themselves or a friend who may be in danger of being trafficked. Reported that they did not learn how to help themselves or a friend who may be in danger of being trafficked. Reported that they were unsure if they learned how to help themselves or a friend who may be in danger of being trafficked. Percent 90% 1% 6% 86% 3% 9% Roosevelt Middle School: Before the Presentation Knowledge Item Answered they knew nothing at all or very little to “I know what sex trafficking is.” Answered they had heard of sex trafficking. Answered they knew a lot about sex trafficking. Answered they knew nothing at all or very little to “I know the warning signs of a trafficker.” Answered they had heard of the warning signs of a trafficker. Answered they knew a lot about the warning signs of a trafficker. 4 Percent 21% 47% 32% 58% 26% 16% Roosevelt Middle School: After the Presentation Knowledge Item Reported that they learned new ways to keep themselves and their friends safe from traffickers. Reported that they did not learn new ways to keep themselves and their friends safe from traffickers. Reported that they were unsure if they learned new ways to keep themselves and their friends safe from traffickers. Reported that they learned how to help themselves or a friend who may be in danger of being trafficked. Reported that they did not learn how to help themselves or a friend who may be in danger of being trafficked. Reported that they were unsure if they learned how to help themselves or a friend who may be in danger of being trafficked. Percent 90% 1% 5% 88% 2% 7% Conclusion: These evaluation results indicate that for the 750 to 800 students served by this project, the vast majority increased in their knowledge about protecting themselves and others from sexual exploitation. Therefore, the project measurably achieved its prevention objective, which was reducing the vulnerability of children to sex through trafficking through an education process. As one projects outward over the next three years of this initiative, the continuation and expansion of this project will gradually extend this effect to the lives of hundreds more children. As this happens, the Prevention Pillar will carry out three additional projects in the schools over the next three years (see addendum for 2016-2019 Strategic Plan Summary). The intended cumulative effect of these four projects is achieving the impact of establishing a strong school-community DMST process that prevents and detects exploitation of children, and that supports victims in the educational setting as they are served by other agencies. Project Outputs: PowerPoint Presentation: “Sex Trafficking: What Every Student Needs to Know” Human Trafficking Poster Human Trafficking Rack Card Human Trafficking Bus Sign Treatment and Support Pillar The Project: DMST Screening Process Development of a pilot screening instrument and screening process for assessing vulnerability to child sex trafficking. Desired Performance Outcome: Utilization of the DMST screening instrument and process by at least three agencies. Actual Performance Outcome: The DMST screening instrument is being utilized Outagamie County Division of Children, Youth, and Families as part of a continuing instrument validation process. Efforts were undertaken to identity two additional agencies to use the instrument. 5 Behavioral or Systems Outcome: Increased capacity of agencies to identify youth that are vulnerable to and victims of sex trafficking. Pilot Test Data Number of Screenings Completed: Number of Referrals Resulting from Screening: Number of Children Screened: 41 10 32 Focus Group Findings What worked well? Is it realistic for the field? Brief. Realistic. As workers, we are mostly already gathering this info. Not a huge problem or time-consuming to complete it. Not intrusive. Was a guide for asking additional questions for workers who might not know a lot about the issue. One parent recognized their child was not just a deviant youth but had larger issues. Tool is functional. Helped worker know what questions to ask. Workers would not be able to manage a longer tool given workload (such as ones the state is looking at that are 30+ questions. What are the barriers? Forgot to get consent. Need to get used to the process of using the tool. Doesn’t encompass large enough age range. Tool is used 10-17 but what about young parents who we work with? Doesn’t include boys or LGGTQ – need a broader funnel. Worry that this risk will take over most pressing issues related to safety. Need to assess whole family. Need to know what to do next once identified. Conclusion: These focus group findings strongly indicate that this project contributes to increasing the capacity of agencies to identify youth vulnerable to and victims of DMST. A project with this type of complexity takes time to gain traction. But the process of beginning to move the human service field in Outagamie County in the direction of assessing vulnerability to DMST in a structured, reliable manner is underway. This was not the case a year or so ago. As this project continues with expected changes and improvements, the Treatment and Support Pillar will carry out four additional projects in the community over the next three years, one of which is already underway, which is the development of a countywide protocol supported by a multidisciplinary team (see addendum for 2016-2019 Strategic Plan Summary). The intended cumulative effect of these five projects is a well-established and sufficiently resourced DMST care system (i.e., network of programs and services) that includes a countywide multidisciplinary team and multiagency protocol. 6 Project Outputs: Screening Tool (validation underway) Agency Orientation PowerPoint Presentation: “Outagamie County Domestic Minor Sex Trafficking Screening Tool” Focus Group Summary Law Enforcement Pillar The Project: SRO Support and Monitoring for High Risk Youth Developed arrangement to identify and address needs of highly vulnerable youth in the school setting. Desired Performance Outcome: At least five SROs engaged in special monitoring of and support to vulnerable youth in at least four schools by June 30, 2016. Actual Performance Outcome: This interview instrument is being utilized by Appleton Police Department School Resource Officers at four high schools: Appleton East, West, North, and Central. The combined number of students in these four schools is approximately 4,500. The instrument has been utilized about 24 times, resulting in two known referrals of youth for services. Behavioral or Systems Outcome: Identification of and provision of immediate support to high-risk youth by SROs. A twenty-item interview form designed to be used with missing/runaway youth was successfully developed by the Pillar, titled “Appleton Police Department Missing/Runaway Juvenile Return Interview Form.” Structured interviews of vulnerable high school students as identified by SROs is underway. Embedded in the form’s twenty interview questions are several that are related to DMST, such as: Do you have a cell phone or something you text on? Who gave it to you? Have you ever been touched in a way that makes you feel uncomfortable? Have you ever been hit, slapped, punched, kicked, etc. by someone you were with when you ran away? Is anyone making you do something you don’t want to do you are gone? Or making you feel unsafe? Have you ever had to trade sex for food or a place to stay? Has anyone tried to stop you from returning home? 7 Conclusion: Consistent with effective practices, the interview form covers areas that enhance the ability of police officers to identify vulnerability and facilitate provision of immediate support. As this project continues, measures will be included to begin quantifying such things as: Number of interviews conducted. Key findings from the interviews (which will allow compilation of critical data on missing/runaway youth in our community). Number of referrals made by SROs, or support actions taken. Results of referrals or support actions. As this project continues, the Law Enforcement Pillar will carry out three additional projects focused on schools and communities over the next three years, (see addendum for 2016-2019 Strategic Plan Summary). The intended cumulative effect of these four projects is a strong police-school partnership that provides prevention and detection regarding youth and support to school personnel and related community agencies. It is expected that this school-community partnering will help decrease the likelihood of recruitment through the use of police powers (e.g., surveillance, patrol, deterrence tactics, investigation, special operations, apprehension and arrest, etc.). Reinforcing this work is the SRO training that was also carried out by this Pillar, which is discussed below. Project Outputs: Appleton Police Department Missing/Runaway Juvenile Return Interview Form The Project: Training School Resource Officers Development and delivery of one training session on human sex trafficking for SROs delivered at the statewide SRO training in Appleton sponsored by Fox Valley Technical College. Desired Outcome: Conference training session for School Resource Officers that increases knowledge of DMST and school-based law enforcement tactics to address it. Actual Outcome: Overall Rating by Participants: Part One of Training Overall Rating by Participants: Part Two of Training 4.08 out of 5.0 4.28 out of 5.0 Number of Participants in the Training: 15 Notable Participant Evaluation Comments Presenters were great. Good information as well as examples to illustrate the problem that exists. I learned a lot. I never knew about branding. Would have liked to learn more on how to investigate these cases. Instructors presented well. 8 Conclusion: The training evaluation ratings indicate that this project achieved its aim of increasing SRO knowledge about DMST and law enforcement tactics to address it. Project Outputs: PowerPoint Presentation: “DMST in Wisconsin” Training Participant Evaluation Summary Court Systems Pillar The Project: Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) for Working with Juvenile Victim-Offenders Developed agreement for agency roles in adjudicating the cases of juvenile offenders that are also DMST victims. Desired Performance Outcome: Development of a protocol for DMST victims also involved in juvenile justice system by June 30, 2016. Actual Performance Outcome: This Pillar successfully developed a draft Outagamie County Domestic Minor Sex Trafficking Partnership Memorandum of Understanding, dated June 13, 2016. Following its mission statement, the MOU sets forth roles for: Outagamie County Law Enforcement agencies, Sexual Assault Crisis Center, Outagamie County Law Enforcement Departments, Outagamie Department of Health and Human Services, Outagamie County District Attorney’s Office, and the Outagamie County Public Defender’s Office. The laborious process of discussion and negotiating roles among these agencies resulted in development of a legal framework for responding to DMST. Behavioral or Systems Outcome: Review of juvenile offender cases to determine presence of DMST and utilization MOU protocol when identified. Final review and adoption of the MOU by the agencies is expected to occur in conjunction with the Court System Pillar’s 2017 project, which is to establish guidelines for service agencies to assist them in working with victims in ways that will not disrupt or compromise a DMST investigation or prosecution. Having these practices in place are essential for supporting the MOU. Conclusion: Through the MOU, an initial protocol has been developed that will provide legal processes that are responsive to the needs of youth that are victims as well as offenders. As the next project begins and the MOU is executed, the Court Systems Pillar will carry out two additional projects, (see addendum for 2016-2019 Strategic Plan Summary). The intended cumulative effect of these four projects is a victimcentered legal process in which multiple agencies collaborate well to effectively support victim-witnesses and successfully prosecute offenders. 9 Establishment of DMST Care Coordinator Role Through the above-mentioned efforts to develop a countywide protocol for serving child victims of sex trafficking, this initiative recognized the need to establish a role dedicated to coordinating provision of care to victims of child sex trafficking. This role would also work with the Department of Corrections Probation and Parole Officer who, for several years, has facilitated services for adult victims of sex trafficking (i.e., adults charged with prostitution). The DMST Care Coordinator role has been embraced by several key agencies and is deeply involved in both providing care to victims and continuing the work of developing a countywide protocol and multidisciplinary team. Minor Sex Trafficking Cases Received by Care Coordinator: January – July 2016 Case Number 1 Gender Age Female 16 Referral Source (Or Where Identified) Appleton East HS 2 Female 15 Appleton West HS 3 4 Female Female 15 15 Winnebago County Outagamie County 5 6 Female Transgender 17 15 Milwaukee County Appleton Community 7 Transgender 15 Appleton Community 8 9 10 Female Transgender Female 16 16 16 Neenah HS Appleton East HS Outagamie County 11 12 Female Female 17 16 Waushara/Outagamie Outagamie County Primary Services Involved Options Treatment Catalpa Catalpa Bellin Runaway Outagamie YFS Lincoln Hills Probation Catalpa St. Elizabeth’s Hospital Options Treatment Catalpa ThedaCare NA Options Treatment Family Services NA NA Adult Sex Trafficking Cases Received by Care Coordinator: January – July 2016 Case Number 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Gender Female Female Female Female Female Female Female Female Female Female Female Referral Source (Or Where Identified) Grande Chute PD Appleton PD Appleton Community Grande Chute PD Sting Grande Chute PD Sting Menasha PD Appleton PD Appleton PD Sting Appleton PD Sting Appleton PD Appleton Community 10 Primary Services Involved ThedaCare Harbor House Harbor House In-Patient NA ThedaCare Harbor House ThedaCare NA NA NA Community Presentations and Media Interviews 1. Fox Valley Technical College (Social Issues Class and American Society Class) 2. Sheriff-Police Meeting 3. Lion’s Club 4. New Voices Concert Presenters 5. New Voices Panel Discussion 6. WAQ Interview 7. League of Women Voters 8. Women’s Fund Board of Directors 9. UW Oshkosh (Human Services Leadership Class) 10. WHBY Public Service Announcement 11. Shawano Community Members: “Sex Trafficking and Identification” 12. Wautoma Community Members: “Sex Trafficking and Identification” 13. Calumet County Chief’s Meeting 14. Little Chute High School 15. Kimberly Middle School 16. ThedaCare Behavioral Health 17. Statewide SRO Conference (Pillar Project) 18. Voices of Men/Goodwill 19. Fox Valley Technical College Hospitality Program: “Educating Our Hotels” 20. NBC 26 Interview 21. Kaukana High School (health class) 22. Kimberly Clark Sex Trafficking Panel 23. Grande Chute Motel 6 24. Wilson Middle School (parents) 25. Wilson Middle School (staff) 26. Outagamie County Youth and Family Services 27. First English Lutheran Church 28. Leadership Fox Cities 29. Appleton East High School 30. Appleton West High School 31. Appleton North High School 32. Hortonville Middle School 33. Hortonville High School 34. Roosevelt Middle School (Pillar Project) 35. Wilson Middle School (Pillar Project) 36. Staff of Several Area Hotels 11 Addendum: 2016-2019 Strategic Action Plan Summary Prevention Pillar Sequence of Projects 2016 Educating Children and Youth (in the schools) 2017 2018 Monitoring 2019 Practices Response for School Protocol for DMST Personnel Schools SchoolCommunity Teams Educating Children and Youth: Educational sessions for children and youth provided in the school setting and designed to increase their knowledge and awareness about DMST. Monitoring Practices for School Personnel: An established set of practices for detecting vulnerable and exploited (or suspected of exploitation) children (e.g., a conversation with specific questions for students returning to school after runaway episodes or chronic truancy). Response Protocol for Schools: An established schoolwide protocol for responding in the school setting to the needs of students who are victims of DMST, which may take place in conjunction with treatment services and the student’s involvement in the prosecution as a victim-witness. DMST School-Community Teams: In schools where appropriate, a formal team that builds on the response protocol. This team would develop for DMST victims Individual Education Plans (IEPs) that link with services being provided by other community-based agencies, among other appropriate, victim-centered educational support practices. Desired 2019 Impact: A strong school-community DMST process that prevents and detects exploitation of children, and that supports victims in the educational setting as they are served by other agencies. Treatment and Support Pillar Sequence of Projects 2016 DMST Screening Process 2017 Assessment of System of Care MDT and Care Provision Protocol 2018 Improvement of Care System 2019 Improvement of Care System (continued) DMST Screening Process: Development of a pilot screening instrument and screening process for assessing vulnerability. 12 Assessment of System of Care: A process of examining the local service system to identify agencies/programs that do or can serve the needs of DMST victims, and identifying and prioritizing gaps in the system. MDT Care Provision Protocol: Establishment of a multidisciplinary team to meet on a regular basis to develop multiagency care plans for DMST victims. Improvement of Care System: Based on information gathered from assessing the system of care, as well as information gathered by the MDT as it identifies service needs for which there are limited or no services, work with appropriate entities to develop plans for improvement. Such plans may involve modifying or expanding existing services, linking existing services in new ways, changing the focus of existing services, and pursuing funding to establish new services. Desired 2019 Impact: A well-established and sufficiently resourced DMST care system (i.e., network of programs and services) that includes a countywide multidisciplinary team and multiagency protocol. Law Enforcement Pillar Sequence of Projects 2016 SRO Support and Monitor-ing for High Risk Youth 2017 Support to School Personnel (when DMST is suspected) 2018 2019 Support to Response DMST Protocol for SchoolSchools Community Teams SRO Support and Monitoring for High Risk Youth: Developed arrangement to identify and address needs of highly vulnerable youth in the school setting. Support to School Personnel (when DMST is suspected): In conjunction with the monitoring practices for school personnel developed through the Prevention Pillar’s project, establish effective ways of providing support and assistance to school personnel as they become more cognizant of and engaged with this problem. Support to Response Protocol for Schools: In conjunction with the protocol developed through the Prevention Pillar’s project, work with school personnel to ensure a strong role for law enforcement in the protocol for responding to the needs of DMST victims in the school setting. DMST School-Community Teams: In conjunction with the school-community team developed through the Prevention Pillar’s project, work with school personnel to ensure a strong role for law enforcement. Desired 2019 Impact: A strong police-school partnership that provides prevention, detection, and recovery support to school personnel and related community agencies, and through which the likelihood of recruitment is reduced through the use of police powers (e.g., surveillance, patrol, deterrence tactics, special operations, etc.). 13 Court Systems Pillar Sequence of Projects 2016 MOU for Working with Juvenile VictimOffenders 2017 Guidelines for Agencies (to understand legal process impacted by their actions ) 2018 Enhancement of Prosecution and VictimWitness Support Strategies 2019 Enhancement of Prosecution and VictimWitness Strategies (continued) MOU for Working with Juvenile Victim-Offenders: Developed agreement for agency roles in adjudicating the cases of juvenile offenders that are also DMST victims. Guidelines for Service Agencies: A set of guidelines for service agencies to assist them in conducting themselves with victims in ways that will not disrupt or compromise a DMST investigation and prosecution. Enhancement of Prosecution and Victim-Witness Support Strategies: Based on expected progress within the county of identifying victims of DMST and, therefore, a likely increase in prosecutions, identify enhancements that may be needed to keep up with the increased volume and, potentially, increased complexity and seriousness of minor and adult sex trafficking cases. Desired 2019 Impact: A victim-centered legal process that collaborates well with multiple agencies to effectively support victim-witnesses and successfully prosecute offenders. 14 15
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz