2/7/2011 Chapter 8: Major Shifts in Bacterial Transcription Student learning outcomes: Describe some major shifts: alternate sigma factors, new RNA Polymerases, Phage T4 DNA multiple promoters competition between DNA binding proteins Important Figs: 1*, 2*, 4, 5, 8, 9*, 10*, 11, 12, 13*,14, 17, 18*, 19*, 22*, 23, 24, 26*, 27* Review Q: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 9, 12, 13, 15, 16, 17, 18 AQ: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 8-1 8.1 Sigma Factor Switching Phage T4 • Phage infection of bacterium subverts host transcription machinery • Establishes time-dependent, or temporal, program of transcription – First early phage genes are transcribed (host RNAP) – Followed by later phage genes – Late in infectious cycle, no transcription of host genes, only phage genes • Change in what genes are transcribed is caused by a change in transcription machinery: (σ ), or new RNAP 8-2 Phage Infection and new σ factors • Recall σ is key factor in determining specificity of early T4 DNA transcription by E. coli RNAP • To shift transcription to other promoters, σ is likely candidate • Variant σ binds different promoters, changes specificity of RNAP • Study of process first defined in Bacillus subtilis phage, SPO1 Phage SPO1 8-3 1 2/7/2011 Temporal Control of Transcription • SPO1 has large genome • Temporal transcription program involves new σ: – 1st 5 minutes: expression of early genes by host RNAP(σ43) – During 5 – 10 minutes: expression of middle genes requires phage gp28 σ – After 10 minutes to end: late genes expressed using phage σ gp33 and gp34 Fig. 1 8-4 Genetic and biochemical evidence for new σ: • B. subtilis normal RNAP (enzyme A) has δ subunit (helps σ) • Mutations in gp28 prevent early> late switch • Purify RNAP from cells after infection; test activity and promoter specificity • During infection, phage SPO1 changes promoter specificity of host core RNAP (β, β’, α) Fig. 2 8-5 Sporulation occurs in Bacillus • Change of σ mechanism applies to changes in gene expression during sporulation: σ A does vegetative promoters • Bacteria exist indefinitely in vegetative state if nutrients are available • Under starvation conditions, B. subtilis forms endospores, tough dormant bodies – New sets of genes expressed Fig. 3 8-6 2 2/7/2011 Sporulation Switching • Whole new set of genes turned on; vegetative genes turned off • Switch occurs largely at level of transcription (Figs. 4, 5) • Several new σ-factors displace vegetative σ-factor from RNAP core: σF σE σH… • Each σ-factor has its own preferred promoter sequence Lane 1, veg; Lane 2, σE Fig. 4: plasmid p213 with two promoters, RNA formed in vitro hybridized to 8-7 Southern blot with these EcoRI-HincII fragments (Fig. 5) Some Genes have Multiple Promoters • Some genes must be expressed during 2 or more phases when different σ-factors predominate • These genes have 2 different promoters – Each promoter recognized by one of 2 different σ-factors – Ensures expression no matter which factor is present – Permits differential control under different conditions Fig. 8 8-8 Bacterial Heat Shock • Heat shock response: defense to minimize damage: induces heat shock genes • Encode Molecular chaperone proteins: – Chaperones bind proteins partially unfolded by heat – Help these proteins refold properly • Heat shock from alternative σ-factor, σ32 or σH – Directs RNAP to heat shock gene promoters – Accumulation of σH at high temperature due to: • Stabilization of σH • Enhanced translation of the mRNA encoding σH • Responses to low nitrogen and starvation stress also depend on genes recognized by other σ-factors 8-9 3 2/7/2011 8.2 RNA Polymerase Encoded in Phage T7 • Phages like T7, T3, and φ11 have small genomes • 3 phases of transcription: classes I, II, and III • gene 1 is necessary for class II and class III genes: – Class 1 genes transcribed by host RNAP – Gene 1 codes for a phage-specific single subunit RNAP: Very specific for promoters of class II, III genes 8-10 Temporal Control of T7 Transcription • Host RNAP transcribes class I genes • One of class I genes is phage polymerase • Phage polymerase then transcribes the class II and III genes • [T7 pol widely used: specific transcription from plasmids such as pUC18 vitro or vivo] Fig. 9 8-11 8.3 Infection of E. coli by Phage lambda λ • Virulent phage (like T4, T7) replicate, kill their host by lysing or breaking it open • Temperate phage, such as λ, infect cells but don’t necessarily kill • Temperate phage have 2 paths of reproduction: – Lytic: infection progresses as in a virulent phage – Lysogenic: phage DNA integrated into host genome 8-12 4 2/7/2011 Two Paths of Phage Reproduction Fig. 10 8-13 Lysogenic Mode Lytic Reproduction • Phage protein (λ repressor, CI) • Phage λ has 3 phases of made, binds 2 operator regions transcription: • CI shuts down transcription of – Immediate early all genes except for cI gene • (host RNAP) – Delayed early • (needs Cro, N) • Lysogen: bacterium harboring integrated phage DNA – Late • (needs Q) • Prophage: integrated DNA • Genes arranged sequentially on phage DNA Outcome depends on protein-DNA interactions; protein-protein competition 8-14 Genetic Map of Phage λ • Linear DNA in phage particle • After infection, DNA circularizes using 12-bp sticky ends (cohesive (cos) ends) • Initial transcription uses host RNAP Fig. 11 8-15 5 2/7/2011 Lytic infection uses antitermination of transcription • Host RNAP transcribes IE genes; rho-dependent terminators (t). • Antiterminator gene product N permits RNAP to ignore terminators, continue to DE transciption • Late genes are transcribed from L promoter when another Q protein antiterminator permits transcription to continue without premature termination Fig. 12 8-16 Lytic Infection uses Antitermination of Transcription and repression of repressor One of 2 IE genes was N: – Used for antitermination Other IE genes is cro – cro encodes repressor of cI gene that allows lytic cycle to continue 8-17 N Antitermination Function • Sites surrounding N gene: – Left promoter, PL – Operator, OL – Transcription terminator (t) • When N is present: – N binds transcript of N utilization site (nut site) – Interacts with protein complex (NusA, B) bound to RNAP – RNAP ignores transcription terminator, continues into delayed early genes Fig. 8-18 13 6 2/7/2011 Lambda Lytic: Antitermination of Late region requires Q • Q binds to Q-binding region of DNA (qut site) as RNAP is stalled just downstream of late promoter • Binding of Q to RNAP appears to alter enzyme so it ignores terminator and transcribes late genes Fig. 17 8-19 Establishing Lysogeny shuts off Lytic Genes • Phage establish lysogeny by: – Production of repressor CI to bind to early operators – Preventing further early RNA synthesis • DE transcription from PR produces cII mRNA translated to CII • CII allows RNAP to bind PRE and transcribe cI gene, resulting in repressor 8-20 Autoregulation of cI Gene Maintains Lysogeny λ repressor CI binds as dimer to λ operators, OR and OL CI turns off further early transcription: • Interrupts lytic cycle • Turnoff of cro very important: Cro acts to counter CI activity Stimulates own synthesis by activating PRM – 3 operator sequences permit cooperative binding of CI Fig. 19 8-21 7 2/7/2011 Lambda Repressor Protein cI protein – 27 kD Dimer of 2 identical subunits: Each has 2 domains: • NH2-terminal DNA-binding • COOH-terminal is site of repressor-repressor interaction for dimerization and cooperative binding • No inducer Fig. 9.5 CI binding operator OL2 8-22 Involvement of OL in Repression of PR and PRM • Repressor binds to OR1 and OR2 cooperatively, but leaves OR3 • RNAP binds to PRM, overlaps OR3 to contact repressor bound to OR2 • Protein-protein interaction required for PRM promoter to work efficiently • High levels of repressor can repress transcription from PRM 8-23 Fig. 22 Evidence for RNAP: CI direct interaction from Intergenic Suppression • Mutation in one gene suppresses mutation in another • Mutant with compensating amino acid change in RNAP subunit σ restored interaction with mutant repressor • Direct interaction between CI and RNAP is necessary for efficient transcription from PRM Fig. 23 Fig. 25; CI contacts σ 8-24 8 2/7/2011 Fate of λ Infection • Delicate balance lysis: lysogeny • need DE expression • Phage particles on bacterial lawn – If lytic infection occurs • Progeny spread ,infect other cells • Circular hole in lawn is plaque – Infection 100% lytic clear plaques – Plaques of λ are usually turbid meaning lysogen is present (resistant to infection) • Some infected cells get lytic cycle, others are lysogenized 8-25 Battle Between cI and cro determines fate of lambda infection • Lysogeny: cI gene codes for repressor, blocks OR1, OR2, OL1, and OL2; – turns off early transcription (including cro) • lytic infection: Cro gene codes for Cro, blocks OR3 and OL3, – turns off transcription of cI • Gene product first in higher concentration determines fate: – cII important here Fig. 26 8-26 Lysogen Induction • When lysogen suffers DNA damage, bacterial SOS response is induced • Initial event is coprotease activity of RecA protein (normally used for DNA recombination) • Causes CI to cut itself in half, removing it from λ operators • Lytic cycle is induced • Progeny phage escape potentially lethal damage of host Fig. 27 8-27 9 2/7/2011 Review questions 4. Summarize mechanism B. subtilis cells use to alter transcription program during sporulation. 17. Present a model to explain the struggle between cI and cro for lysogenic or lytic infection of E. coli by λ. 7. How does phage T7 control its transcription program? What is the difference between antitermination (λ) and attenuation (trp operon) in regulating transcription? 8-28 10
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz