In vitro - in vivo Extrapolation toxischer Dosen: Das „equivalent exposure“ Konzept Michael Gülden Institut für Toxikologie und Pharmakologie für Naturwissenschaftler Universitäts Klinik Schleswig-Holstein Campus Kiel, Brunswiker Str. 10, D-24105 Kiel, Germany Quantitative in vitro – in vivo Extrapolation In vitro Toxische Konzentrationen ? M.Gülden, DGPT/BfR-workshop “Dosismetrie in vitro - in vivo”, Berlin, 14.10.2008 In vivo Externe Dosis/Exposition 2 Keine einfachen Lösungen des Problems W. Halle (2003) The Registry of Cytotoxicity: Toxicity Testing in Cell Cultures to Predict Acute Toxicity (LD50) and to Reduce Testing in Animals. ATLA 31, 89-198 M.Gülden, DGPT/BfR-workshop “Dosismetrie in vitro - in vivo”, Berlin, 14.10.2008 3 Quantitative in vitro – in vivo Extrapolation In vitro Toxische Konzentrationen ? In vivo Externe Dosis/Exposition ! “Pharmakokinetik” in vitro Pharmakokinetik • Resorption • Verteilung • Metabolismus • Exkretion M.Gülden, DGPT/BfR-workshop “Dosismetrie in vitro - in vivo”, Berlin, 14.10.2008 4 In vitro Systeme Principal components: • Cells • Culture medium • Culture vessel Serum ≤ 20% Relative cell volume « 1% of total volume M.Gülden, DGPT/BfR-workshop “Dosismetrie in vitro - in vivo”, Berlin, 14.10.2008 5 In vitro bestimmte Konzentrations-Wirkungsbeziehungen basieren auf nominellen Konzentrationen Principal components: 100 • Cells • Culture vessel % viable cells • Culture medium 50 Serum ≤ 20% EC 50 0 Relative cell volume « 1% of total volume 10 1 10 2 Concentration (µM) Nominelle Konzentrationen M.Gülden, DGPT/BfR-workshop “Dosismetrie in vitro - in vivo”, Berlin, 14.10.2008 6 Verteilung und Elimination in vitro Nominelle effektive Konzentration (EC50) • Serumbindung • Zellbindung • Adsorption an Kulturgefäßmaterial • Metabolisierung • Dekomposition Freie effektive Konzentration (ECu50) • Evaporation Toxizität M.Gülden, DGPT/BfR-workshop “Dosismetrie in vitro - in vivo”, Berlin, 14.10.2008 7 Binding of drugs to microsomes Human liver microsomes Warfarin Propranolol Imipramine (Obach R.S., Drug Metab. Dispos.1997, 25, 1359-1369) M.Gülden, DGPT/BfR-workshop “Dosismetrie in vitro - in vivo”, Berlin, 14.10.2008 8 Binding of drugs to hepatocytes (3 µM, 106 cells/ml) Verapamil Propranolol Oxaprozin Omeprazole Metyrapone Metoprolol Isradipin Idapamide Glyburide Diazepam Clozapine Cerivastatin Bumetanide Betaxolol Astemizole Albendazole 2-Ethoxybenzamide 0.0 0.5 1.0 Fraction unbound (fu) (Austin et al., Drug Metab Dispos 2005, 33 (3), 419-425) M.Gülden, DGPT/BfR-workshop “Dosismetrie in vitro - in vivo”, Berlin, 14.10.2008 9 Binding of octylphenol to serum Estrogenicity reporter gene assay using a human cell line EC 50,nominal (µM) 30 EC 50,nominal EC 50,free 20 10 0 0 A 10 20 30 40 50 60 EC 50,free (µM) % fetal calf serum 0.05 0.00 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 % fetal bovine serum (Heringa et al., Environ Sci & Technol. 2004, 38, 6263-6270) M.Gülden, DGPT/BfR-workshop “Dosismetrie in vitro - in vivo”, Berlin, 14.10.2008 10 Influence of albumin concentration on the cytotoxic potency of pentachlorophenol in proliferating Balb/c 3T3 cells % of control 100 EC50 = 32 µM EC50 = 1400 µM 50 5% FCS 5%FCS +1 %BSA 5%FCS +2% BSA 5%FCS +4 % BSA 0 10 1 10 2 PCP concentration (µM) M.Gülden, DGPT/BfR-workshop “Dosismetrie in vitro - in vivo”, Berlin, 14.10.2008 10 3 11 Influence of albumin concentration on the cytotoxic potency of pentachlorophenol in proliferating Balb/c 3T3 cells EC 50 (µM) 100 % of control Specific binding (moles/mol) 1500 50 5% FCS EC50 = 34.5 + 2.3 x [BSA] 1000 500 5%FCS +1 %BSA 5%FCS +2% BSA 5%FCS +4 % BSA 0 0 10 1 10 2 PCP concentration (µM) 10 3 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 Albumin concentration added (µM) (Gülden et al., 2002. Toxicology 175, 201-213 M.Gülden, DGPT/BfR-workshop “Dosismetrie in vitro - in vivo”, Berlin, 14.10.2008 12 Influence of cell concentration on the cytotoxic potency of methylmercury in bull sperm cells ATP content (% of control) 125 100 EC50 = 23 µM 75 EC50 = 2.9 µM 50 15 x 106 cells/ml 30 x 106 cells/ml 25 60 x 106 cells/ml 120 x 106 cells/ml 0 0.1 1 10 100 MeHg concentration (µM) M.Gülden, DGPT/BfR-workshop “Dosismetrie in vitro - in vivo”, Berlin, 14.10.2008 13 125 25 100 20 EC 50 value (µM) ATP content (% of control) Influence of cell concentration on the cytotoxic potency of methylmercury in bull sperm cells 75 50 15 x 10 6 cells/ml 6 30 x 10 cells/ml 25 60 x 10 6 cells/ml 0.2 nmol/106 cells 15 10 5 120 x 10 6 cells/ml 0 0.1 1 10 100 MeHg concentration (µM) 0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 6 Cell concentration (10 /ml) (Gülden et al., 2001. Toxicol. in Vitro 15, 233-243) M.Gülden, DGPT/BfR-workshop “Dosismetrie in vitro - in vivo”, Berlin, 14.10.2008 14 130 Quantitative in vitro – in vivo Extrapolation Das „equivalent exposure“ Konzept In vitro In vivo Nominelle effektive Konzentration (EC50) Externe Dosis/Exposition Nominelle Konzentration,Gewebedosis Freie effektive Konzentration (ECu50) M.Gülden, DGPT/BfR-workshop “Dosismetrie in vitro - in vivo”, Berlin, 14.10.2008 Freie Gewebekonzentration 15 Distribution model for chemicals in vitro extracellular medium n•P Cb = ————— = B • P 1 + KD/Cu bound to serum albumin (Cb) Lipid cells freely dissolved (Cu) freely dissolved (Cu) (VL,e) partitioned into serum lipids (CL,e) CL = Kow • Cu Lipid partitioned into cell lipids (CL,c) (VL,c) B: Specific binding (moles/mole) M.Gülden, DGPT/BfR-workshop “Dosismetrie in vitro - in vivo”, Berlin, 14.10.2008 16 Distribution equation System specific factors Relative lipid volume in the in vitro system Albumin concentration in the medium EC50 = ECu50(1 + Kow•V´L) + B•P Substance specific factors Octanol/water partition coefficient M.Gülden, DGPT/BfR-workshop “Dosismetrie in vitro - in vivo”, Berlin, 14.10.2008 Specific binding to albumin 17 Bioavailability of chemicals in an in vitro system Example: Balb/c 3T3 test system Composition Cell concentration at seeding: 3x 104/ml Albumin concentration in the culture medium (5% FBS): 18 µM Relative lipid volume: free fraction (fu) 1,0 0,8 Phenol ● ● ● MCP 0,6 0,4 ● ● 4-NP ● 4-OP fra 0,00,8 PCP to cti al on 0,6 bu b 0,4 m ou in n 0,2 (f d b) 0.1 µl/ml ● TCP● 0,2 DCP 0,0 1 2 Lindan ● Dieldrin DDT● 3 l og 4 5 6 7 K ow (Gülden & Seibert, 2005. Aquatic Toxicology 72, 327-337) M.Gülden, DGPT/BfR-workshop “Dosismetrie in vitro - in vivo”, Berlin, 14.10.2008 18 p, H p´ e Pe xa p, -DD nt chl p´- E ac or D h o D 4- lor phe T N o n 2, 4, 4 ony phe e 5- -O lp n Tr c h ol ic tyl en hl ph o or e l op no h l Th Di eno io eld l Tr rid ri ib a n ut L yl in zin tin d e M A ch an 2, erc mit lor e 4- ur rip id D ic t y e ic c li 4- hlo hlo ne C ro rid hl ph e or e op no h l M 2, al eno 3Po D W ath l ta init ar ion ss ro fa iu to rin D m lu ex cy en tr o an e Ac pr et opo 2 ide yl x ,4 sa yp -D li h Th cyl en eo ic a e Pr ph cid op ylli n Ve ran e ra olo p l Th P Pa am r a al ra aq il liu c u Et m eta at hy su m le lph ol ne a Ar g te se N lyc n i i co o l c ti tri ne ox Is Ph ide op ro E eno py th l l a an Li th M lco ol iu e h o m t Ph s han l en ulp ol ob ha ar te bi ta l Fraction unbound (fu) Bioavailability of chemicals in an in vitro system Example: Balb/c 3T3 test system 1.0 0.5 0.007 0.001 0.0 (Gülden & Seibert, 2007. ATLA 35, 39-46) M.Gülden, DGPT/BfR-workshop “Dosismetrie in vitro - in vivo”, Berlin, 14.10.2008 19 Application of the distribution model to estimate free cytotoxic concentrations Nominal cytotoxic concentration in vitro (EC50) EC50 much higher than albumin concentration (EC50 » P) ? no yes Determine specific binding to albumin (B) Lipophilicity below critical value (Kow• V´L < 1) ? yes no Lipophilicity below critical value (Kow• V´L < 1) ? no yes EC50- B•P ----------------1 + Kow• V´L EC50- B•P EC50 ----------------1 + Kow• V´L EC50 Free cytotoxic concentration in vitro (ECu50) M.Gülden, DGPT/BfR-workshop “Dosismetrie in vitro - in vivo”, Berlin, 14.10.2008 20 „Equivalent exposure“ Konzept Anwendungsbeispiel Verwendung von in vitro Zytotoxizitätsdaten zur Vorhersage der akuten Toxizität für Fische Fish acute toxic potency vs. cytotoxic potency Fish acute toxicity log LC50 (M) 1 LC50 0 -1 • Endpoint: death -2 • Free aquatic concentrations -3 (OECD guideline test) -4 -5 EC50 -6 • Endpoint: cell death -7 -7 -6 -5 -4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 Fish cell line R1 cytotoxicity log EC50 (M) • Nominal concentrations • Medium with 10% FBS Segner H. & Lenz D., 1993. Cytotoxicity assays with the rainbow trout R1 cell line. Toxicology in Vitro 7, 537-540 Segner H., 2004. Cytotoxicity assay with fish cells as an alternative to the acute lethality assay with fish. ATLA 32, 375-382 M.Gülden, DGPT/BfR-workshop “Dosismetrie in vitro - in vivo”, Berlin, 14.10.2008 22 Fish acute toxicity log LC50 (M) Improvement of in vitro toxicity testing for aquatic toxicity assessment Fish cell line: R1 Mammalian cell line: Balb/c 3T3 • cell death • 24 hours exposure • nominal EC50-values • cell growth inhibition • 72 hours exposure • nominal EC50-values • free ECu50-values 1 1 1 0 0 0 -1 -1 -1 -2 -2 -2 -3 -3 -3 -4 -4 -4 -5 -5 -5 -6 -6 -6 -7 -7 -7 -8 -8 -7 -6 -5 -4 -3 -2 -1 0 R1 fish cell line cytotoxicity (24h) log EC50 (M) 1 -8 -8 -7 -6 -5 -4 -3 -2 -1 0 Balb/c 3T3 cytotoxicity (72h) log EC50 (M) 1 -8 -8 -7 -6 -5 -4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 Balb/c 3T3 cytotoxicity (72h) log ECu50 (M) Segner H., 2004. ATLA 32, 375-382 M.Gülden, DGPT/BfR-workshop “Dosismetrie in vitro - in vivo”, Berlin, 14.10.2008 23 10 7 10 7 10 6 10 6 10 5 10 5 10 4 Fish LC50 (µM) Rainbow trout Fish LC50 (µM) Improvement of in vitro toxicity testing for aquatic toxicity assessment 10 3 10 2 10 1 10 4 10 3 10 2 10 0 10 0 10 -1 10 -1 10 -2 10 -2 (Gülden & Seibert, 2005. Aquatic Toxicology 72, 327-337) 10 7 10 7 10 6 10 6 10 5 10 5 10 3 10 2 10 1 Lindane Balb/c 3T3 ECu50 (µM) Fish LC50 (µM) Fish LC50 (µM) Balb/c 3T3 EC50 (µM) Fathead minnow Malathion Dieldrin 10 -3 10 -3 10 -2 10 -1 10 0 10 1 10 2 10 3 10 4 10 5 10 6 10 7 10 -3 10 -3 10 -2 10 -1 10 0 10 1 10 2 10 3 10 4 10 5 10 6 10 7 10 4 Nicotine 10 1 10 4 10 3 10 2 Nicotine 10 1 10 0 10 0 10 -1 10 -1 10 -2 10 -2 10 -3 10 -3 10 -2 10 -1 10 0 10 1 10 2 10 3 10 4 10 5 10 6 10 7 10 -3 10 -3 10 -2 10 -1 10 0 10 1 10 2 10 3 10 4 10 5 10 6 10 7 Balb/c 3T3 EC50 (µM) M.Gülden, DGPT/BfR-workshop “Dosismetrie in vitro - in vivo”, Berlin, 14.10.2008 Lindane Dieldrin Balb/c 3T3 ECu50 (µM) 24 Quantitative in vitro – in vivo Extrapolation Das „equivalent exposure“ Konzept In vitro In vivo Balb/c 3T3-System Nominelle zytotoxische Konzentration (EC50) HumanserumKonzentration Freie zytotoxische Konzentration (ECu50) M.Gülden, DGPT/BfR-workshop “Dosismetrie in vitro - in vivo”, Berlin, 14.10.2008 Freie Gewebekonzentration 26 Differences in composition of human serum and in vitro systems Balb/c 3T3 cell system Human serum Ratio Albumin concentration 18 µM 600 µM 33 Lipid volume fraction 0.1 ml/l 6 ml/l 60 M.Gülden, DGPT/BfR-workshop “Dosismetrie in vitro - in vivo”, Berlin, 14.10.2008 27 Prediction model for equivalent human serum concentrations 70 EC serum/EC 50,invitro 60 DDT 50 PCP 4-OP ● 40 TCP 30 vi tr o ● ● 4-NP ● Dieldrin ● 20 10 0 0.8 fb 0.6 in ● ● Lindan ● DCP ● MCP 0.4 0.2 Phenol 0.0 ● 1 2 3 log 4 5 6 7 K ow 1 + Kow• V´L,serum ECserum = (EC50-B•Pinvitro) ———————— + B•Pserum 1 + Kow• V´L,invitro (Gülden et al. 2003, Toxicology 189, 211-222) M.Gülden, DGPT/BfR-workshop “Dosismetrie in vitro - in vivo”, Berlin, 14.10.2008 28 p, ex p ac p -D D , 4- hlo p-D T r N o D on ph E yl en ph e Pe 4 e nt -Oc Di no ac t y e l d l 2, hl lp ri 4, 5- T oro hen n Tr hi ph o ic or en l hl id o or az l op in 2, h e 4- A L i e n D m nd ol ic itr a hl yp ne o r ti op lin 4h e C hl H eno or g l o C M phe l2 al n D at ol ex hi W tro o a pr rfa n op r ox 2 , in 4 y Ac p h -D et en yl V ic e K e sa ra C lic p N Pr ylic ami op a l ra cid Ph n en Ph olo ob en l Et a o hy L rbi l le i2 S tal ne O gl 4 Is A yco op s l ro 2 O p 3 Tl ano M 2 SO l et h 4 Pa E an ra tha ol ce n t o Th N am l eo ico ol p h tin Pa yll e ra ine qu at H Ratio Cserum/EC50 Human serum concentrations equivalent to EC50-values in Balb/c 3T3 cell cultures 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 M.Gülden, DGPT/BfR-workshop “Dosismetrie in vitro - in vivo”, Berlin, 14.10.2008 29 Relative potency (potency ranking) in vivo may be completely different compared to in vitro 1000 1000 1000 500 500 500 0 0 0 Pe nt al liu m Th M.Gülden, DGPT/BfR-workshop “Dosismetrie in vitro - in vivo”, Berlin, 14.10.2008 Pr D ex op tro ra no pr lo op l o Pe xy ph nt ac en hl e or op he no l 1500 ac hl or op he 4C no hl l or op he no l Ph en ol 1500 te M al at hi on Li nd an e 1500 su lfa Concentration (µM) EC50 (µM) ECserum (µM) 30 Strategy for extrapolation of equivalent serum concentrations Nominal toxic concentration in vitro (EC50) EC50 higher than serum albumin concentration (EC50 > 600 µM) ? no yes Determine specific binding to albumin (B) Lipophilicity below critical value (Kow ≤ 102)? Lipophilicity below critical value (Kow ≤ 102) ? yes yes no no 1 + Kow• V´L,serum (EC50-B•Pinvitro) ----------------------- + B•Pserum 1 + Kow• V´L,invitro EC50+B(Pserum-Pinvitro) 1 + Kow• V´L,serum EC50 ----------------------1 + Kow• V´L,invitro EC50 Equivalent concentration in serum (Gülden et al., 2006. Toxicol. in Vitro 20, 1114-1124) M.Gülden, DGPT/BfR-workshop “Dosismetrie in vitro - in vivo”, Berlin, 14.10.2008 31 Quantitative in vitro – in vivo Extrapolation Das „equivalent exposure“ Konzept In vitro In vivo Nominelle effektive Konzentration (EC50) Externe Dosis/Exposition Serumbindung Zellbindung Adsorption Metabolismus Dekomposition Evaporation Resorption Verteilung Metabolismus Exkretion Nominelle Konzentration,Gewebedosis Verteilung Freie effektive Konzentration (ECu50) M.Gülden, DGPT/BfR-workshop “Dosismetrie in vitro - in vivo”, Berlin, 14.10.2008 Freie Gewebekonzentration 32
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz