Where did this de!nition come from?
There is a lot of repeating.
!
Life? "
#$%
!&'
#())*+,,-./
0,'%01 23
4/#(56!
+7
!!!1
When did women start being handsome? I thought men were handsome.
*7
!84
9
*+:
;<1=#656>
Who are they
?! !2! to decipher?
,
/
:9
9+0
1=#6@)>+,
31=#5#6>+A0B:
!1=#5##>7"+1
C))#2*+:;
1 Why is there an entire paragraph full of example?
?
8! Stereotype!
!
?!+00
0'D41'
.+4D41=7
!/+?
17
03?
+1>:
7+0
?!3? !.?
1*7!
Terrible Examples, horrible image painted.
<*+0
?1%8.#5552+EF
1C))$7
3!Why is so many example versus thoughts?
!
"
#$
"
!
%&'
!=9>
?=+G1>
/C))6%
!
,!!*(
!#
$
#$#
$
7
#)
!7#)+1
Again, these are examples not thoughts!
8
%.0&
8%'H:2'..4DF
!+001'
=+801:'>
!!%
!
=?
.4:>
)
?
7!
:!
! -!
!
Cheesy Ending...
The article was about different definitions over the course of the years. Fine has many different definitions according to how the context
of how it is being used. The positive example the author uses is "She's so fine, I'd drink her bathwater". The negative example the
author use is "She so fine, She can ride my face". Throughout the article he uses a lot of example to define the word fine.
The article provided great insight on the definition of the word fine. Over the corse of the years, the connotation has changed a little bit.
I think it had more examples than it did thoughts. The title had very little corrolation to the text. Especially when the author spent an
entire paragraph on example.