y t Code i l a u Q Cracking the s goodnes better n tio satisfac ork good w by John Tooley O ver the course of my 30-plus years in the home requirements and standards. That means for every job, as well as performance industry, I’ve found that most contrac- for every part of the job. tors have only the slightest notion of what constitutes Below I offer some definitions of quality that home perquality work. This became clear to me when, dur- formance professionals can put to work immediately in their ing my talks to contractor groups around the country, I started businesses. First, however, it’s important to understand that handing out 3 x 5 cards asking the attendees to write down their agreed-upon requirements and standards must leave nothing definitions of quality. If there were 50 people in the audience, I to the imagination. They cannot be open to interpretation, and would usually get back 50 different definitions. In many cases, it they cannot be based on feelings or wishful thinking. was the first time any of them If I agree to make that bohad stopped to think about nus room above the garage feel the subject. more comfortable, that promise My aim in this article Although most of these is open to interpretation. If the is to provide a crystal-clear people really want to do good homeowner and I have differwork, their lack of clarity ent interpretations of what feels definition of quality concerning good processes comfortable, the stage is set for makes it hard for them to deconflicts and callbacks. If, on the and guidance on liver—and it’s costing them a other hand, we agree that, after lot of money. I insulate and air seal the room how to achieve it. My aim in this article is to and install new low-e replaceprovide a crystal-clear defiment windows, the temperature nition of quality, and to give in the middle of the room will you guidance on how to achieve it. I will also demonstrate why not deviate more than 5°F from the thermostat set point, then dedication to quality not only pays for itself but also adds to the our goal is clear and measurable. bottom line. If, after the work is complete, the homeowner decides that a 5°F variation isn’t comfortable enough, we can set a new goal using a different number. But no one can argue that we failed to What Is Quality? meet the original goal. The definitions I’ve seen on those 3 x 5 cards include phrases like “goodness,” “better products,” and “work that satisfies the cusQuality Control Vs. Quality Assurance tomers”—little more than well-intentioned sentiments. Such sentiments have two major shortcomings: They’re open to interpreta- In the above example, note that there was a process (measuring tion, and they’re not measurable. the temperature in the middle of the room) in place for deterReal quality work starts with a definition that’s clear and mining whether the contractor met the agreed-upon goal. That’s measurable. Here’s the one I use: Quality is doing agreed-upon what we mean by quality assurance (QA). It’s the act of measur- 26 Home Energy | N ove m b e r/D e c e m b e r 2014 business best practices Home Performance Coalition ing—monitoring the work to ensure that the contractor’s pro- tors to implement quality programs. We start by looking at their cesses are working. current work processes. In doing so, we have found that defecIf the contractor is working for a utility or government pro- tive work is costing most of them 25–40% of their operating gram, as most home performance contractors are, then the pro- budget. Although some contractors count on the fact that the gram usually does QA. However, if the program isn’t consistent program’s inspectors are only going to check 10% of their work, with its QA process, or if the contractor is working for private even a small problem like forgetting to weather-strip the attic clients, I’ll make the case that it’s in the contractor’s financial hatch can be a $200–300 expense once you add up the time it interest to have an in-house QA program. takes for a worker to go back and fix it. Avoiding just a few of The above example also implies that the contractor has a those problems will cover the cost of good in-house QC and QA set of processes in place to avoid deviating from requirements programs. and standards that would meet the agreed-upon goal. That’s quality control (QC). Unlike quality assurance, QC is always the contractor’s responsibility. Remember our definition of quality as meeting agreed-upon requirements and standards. Our standard of quality is zero defects. Not 1% or 2% defects, but zero. There are no gray areas here: Either you meet the standard or you don’t. Either that bonus room stays within 5°F of the set point or it doesn’t. Period. In short, we MUST refuse to tolerate defects. Our culture must be one of prevention. When we make a mistake that causes a defect, we set in motion a process that will prevent the mistake from happening again. It’s a standard of zero defects. John Tooley talks about the effectiveness of process during a session at ACI’s 2013 National Home Performance The sad truth is that we are Conference. fighting the same fires year after A good measurement of quality is the cumulative cost of such year in that most contractors still lack the processes to make sure the work gets done right consistently, or to confirm that it problems. Although perfect conformance to standards is the ideal, no one is perfect. Good companies continually work tohas been done right. One of the services offered by Advanced Energy Corporation, ward that ideal. However, if the cost of nonconformance reaches the company I work for, is helping home performance contrac- 3–5% of the company’s operating budget, it’s time to double down on that work. In fact, a few common but costly errors can take a company to that 3–5% threshold quite rapidly. Say, for instance, that a Dedication to quality work order requires you to blow insulation into every bay in the exterior walls of a home, and that the crew misses just one bay. If not only pays for itself that uninsulated bay shows up on an infrared (IR) camera scan, but also adds to coming back to fill it will usually mean pulling a truck and crew from another job for at least a half day. That’s $4,000–6,000 in the bottom line. lost income. Even the $5,000 cost of a conventional IR camera would pay for itself in one such avoided callback, but a recent innovation has made the economics even more attractive. At least one w w w.h o m e e n e rg y.o rg 27 company, FLIR is promising an accurate IR camera that will plug into an iPhone 5. It is now available. Setting Standards The kind of QC that makes sure the above tasks get done every time requires clear, written standards for completing every task. Quality work is not possible without them. While contractors can certainly write their own standards, there’s a plug-and-play solution—and it’s free. Advanced Energy, with funding from DOE, has helped develop a set of standardized work specifications (SWS) for residential energy retrofits. The National Renewable Energy Lab (NREL) website includes written SWS for single-family, multifamily, and manufactured 28 Home Energy | N ove m b e r/D e c e m b e r 2014 Advanced Energy Figure 1. Checklists minimize the number of customer callbacks by ensuring that the job is done right the first time. homes. They’re very detailed, varying in length from just over 100 to just under 300 pages. The SWS define the minimum requirements for every task that a home performance pro is likely to perform. To create them, we recruited the top experts in each phase of the retrofit process—attic air sealing, insulation, heating and cooling, ventilation, etc.—to help us. Using the SWS will ensure that tasks get done right every time, no matter who is doing them. The SWS are specific enough that crew leaders and inspectors can make sure that work gets done correctly, but broad enough that contractors have choices in how they complete the work. For instance, one standard requires that chases be capped with a material that doesn’t bend, sag, or move when installed, Advanced Energy The Standard Work Specifications offer pictorial guides for contractors to use in the field. Here’s an example for air sealing around windows and doors. Feasible. The outcome must also be something that properly but doesn’t specify a material. The contractor can use plywood, drywall, oriented strand board, or anything else that meets trained workers can achieve on any job with standard materials. If a particular material, tool, or trade is essential, the stanthe requirement. Whether you use NREL’s standards or write your own, an dard must include it. Examples are the requirement that furnace effective standard must address a specific need, must define tune-ups be done by a licensed HVAC contractor, and that a the tasks that have to be completed to meet that need, and caulk meet the requirements of ASTM C834-10. Effective. All solutions must be capable of producing an inmust include a measurable performance outcome. Examples include the requirement that insulation be in contact with tended result. For instance, the only way to ensure that the attic the air barrier, that a vapor retarder cover 100% of a crawl is properly air sealed is to require that the air sealing be done space floor, or that a bath fan exhaust a minimum of 50 CFM before blowing in the insulation. to the outside. Making It Work We actually have a qualCreating a quality program is ity standard for quality stanone thing. Getting employees on dards: the acronym SAFE. All standards must be board is a steeper slope to climb. All standards must be Specific, We have found that SWS— Assessable, Feasible, a nd Specific, or any quality program—will Effective. only get implemented when the Specific. The outcome Assessable, contractor provides employspecified in a standard must ees with written instructions. leave nothing to the imaginaFeasible, and These include (1) notes to use tion. Requiring “substantially Effective. when training employees on airtight” ducts is too vague. SWS, and (2) pictorial guides Requiring that they “not leak covering critical details that are more than 99 CFM25” is specific. Assessable. The outcome stored in a binder in the truck has to be verifiable using standardized equipment. This is what or on a handheld device for use in the field. The contractor can makes QA possible. Verification equipment includes tools like create these references or can hire a consultant to do so. (My IR cameras, blower doors, and Duct Blasters. company offers this service.) 30 Home Energy | N ove m b e r/D e c e m b e r 2014 business best practices Home Performance Coalition We also suggest using Mistake Proofing Verification forms (see Figure 1) that guide the crew chief in performing quality checks in the idends v i d field. This ensures that the job was done right g i b ize and minimizes the chance of a callback later. can real s r o t c a s, Contr But getting workers to follow the specs tandard s r a e l c g requires more than paperwork. It requires a by settin oyees, l p change in attitude—not that of the workers but m e h it that of management. gether w o t g n i k wor n place It’s common for managers to look reflexively i s e s s e r oc for someone to blame whenever something goes having p d n a r work. i e wrong. But my experience working with contrach t f o lity tors—along with several years researching qualthe qua k c e h c to ity efforts in other industries—has taught me that the quality of their quality problems are usually the result of failed output. One of the most important processes. If a duct wasn’t properly sealed, it’s was “drive out fear.” His point was that workers who fear probably not an intentional oversight on the part their bosses will duck under the radar whenever there’s a probof the workers. (Most people actually want to do good work.) lem, and will even lie to shield themselves from consequences. It’s likely that the company lacks good QC and QA processes That kind of culture makes quality improvement impossible. If, to ensure that the job gets done right. on the other hand, workers know they won’t be blamed, they If we believe that process fails more than people, then when will be more willing to work with management to improve prothere’s a problem we will look first at the process. Take the excesses and raise quality. ample of the chase again. Say that a worker caps the chase but I know this works because we’ve done it on the 20-person leaves a 1-inch gap at the edge. Rather than yelling at the worker, team I work with at Advanced Energy. We made a commitment you will get a better result by examining your processes to dethat whenever problems arise, we get together, examine the process, and work to correct it. Our productivity has improved substantially, as has the quality of our results. And the company has become a much more enjoyable place to work. It took us a couple of years to fully realize these benefits, but we are a relatively large organization. A small contractor can make that cultural change a lot more quickly. The point is that contractors can realize big dividends by setting clear standards, working together with employees to make sure the company meets those standards, and having processes in place to check the quality of their work. That’s why, when we help contractors with their quality management plans, we include all of the above. And the savings always more than pay for the effort. After all, no one loses money doing work right the first time. John Tooley tells attendees of the ACI National Home Performance Conference in Denver, Colo., to “think of information as data that makes a difference.” termine what would make that kind of error possible. You may find that your training is inadequate. Fix the training and the problem will probably not happen again. This is what I call the blame-free workplace, and it’s a very powerful motivator. W. Edwards Deming, a founding father of the quality movement, outlined 14 points he considered essential practices for companies that want to increase John Tooley is a senior building science consultant with Advanced Energy Corporation in Raleigh, North Carolina. >> learn more To download the SWS from the NREL website, go to https:// sws.nrel.gov. w w w.h o m e e n e rg y.o rg 31
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz