The James Oglethorpe Primary School
Pupil Premium Grant Spending Impact 2015-16
What was the Pupil Premium Grant Allocation Amount for 2015-16?
32 Pupil Premium PLUS 1 Service
Total number of pupils eligible for PPG
£1,320
Amount received per pupil
£42,540
Total amount of PPG received at start of year
£0
Added Funds over year
£42,540
TOTAL to ALLOCATE
How did we spend the funding in the 2015-16 year?
Item/ Project
Cost
Teaching Assistant support in every
Literacy and Numeracy lesson
alongside additional individual and
small group personalised
interventions
£30,000
To purchase high quality resources to
enable teaching assistants to deliver
short-term, high frequency catch-up
programmes.
£2,540
To provide one to one tuition support
for pupil premium children to enable
them to catch up with their peers.
£10,000
Objectives
Attainment: To support each child in achieving at least age related
expectations in Reading, Writing and Maths.
Progress: To support each child in making at least expected progress
(3 Average Points per year)
Achievement: that achievement should at least match that of other
pupils in the school or should be rising, including in English and
Mathematics. (OFSTED)
Attainment: To support each child in achieving at least age related
expectations in Reading, Writing and Maths.
Progress: To support each child in making at least expected progress
(3 Average Points per year)
Achievement: that achievement should at least match that of other
pupils in the school or should be rising, including in English and
Mathematics. (OFSTED)
Attainment: To support each child in achieving at least age related
expectations in Reading, Writing and Maths.
Progress: To support each child in making at least expected progress
(3 Average Points per year)
Achievement: that achievement should at least match that of other
pupils in the school or should be rising, including in English and
Mathematics. (OFSTED)
What was the Impact of our Spending Plan for 2015-16 ?
Attainment
Reading
Percentage of Pupil Premium attaining age
71%
Writing
67%
Mathematics
71%
related expectations.
Percentage of NON Pupil Premium
attaining at least age related expectations.
64%
60%
64%
Average Progress Over the Year
Reading
Writing
Mathematics
Pupil Premium Tracking Points
+3.2
+2.9
+3.4
NON Pupil Premium Tracking Points
+3.2
+3.1
+3.1
Reading
Writing
Mathematics
Percentage of Pupil Premium
15%
25%
10%
Percentage of NON Pupil Premium
17%
20%
23%
JOPs Expected is +3.0 Tracking Points
% Slow Movers Over the Year
Less than +3.0 Tracking Points
NB: See Page 2 for further supporting evidence over the year.
1
The James Oglethorpe Primary School
What Other Supporting Evidence is there of the Impact of our Spending Plan?

Pupil Premium funding has ensured disadvantaged pupils have the opportunities of
curricular enrichment through normal and specially arranged school visits. Targeted
support is provided for Out Of School Hours Activities (OOSHL), Educational Visits and o
attend breakfast club.

Resources have been purchased to facilitate vulnerable pupils' learning at in small short
term interventions run by Teaching Assistants

The range of bespoke and personalised interventions have led to an increase in
confidence levels and an enjoyment of English and Maths.

All children have made significant progress in their language development. Although not
quantifiably measurable, this improvement in their language skills is already evident and
will, in time, have a positive impact on their long-term progress and attainment.

Fees for counselling services have been made available to provide counselling to pupils
where appropriate. Children’s emotional and wellbeing needs are met and they feel safe
and cared for.

During 2015/16 we began our engagement with the AFA programme for all teachers
which provides a high quality coach and a number of training sessions to improve
teaching and learning. This gives us a structured approach to enabling our pupils to have
improved attitudes to learning, and improved family engagement.
“Pupils who are eligible for additional funding receive extra support to make sure that any gaps
in their learning are tackled. These pupils make good progress so that, by the end of Year 6,
there is no significant difference between them and their classmates in English and
mathematics. Additional government funding is used effectively so that eligible pupils achieve
well. The investment in training additional adults to work with pupils, either individually or in small
groups, Inspection report: The James Oglethorpe Primary School, 25−26 June 2014 6 of 9 has
resulted in this group of pupils making good progress.” OFSTED – June 2014
Narrowing the Gap:
A key objective of the Pupil Premium Funding is to help schools narrow the gap
between the achievement of Disadvantaged pupils and their peers.
Here at JOPs we track the achievement of our Pupil Premium children against those
in school who are not Pupil Premium as well as against those nationally who are not.
The bar has been set high as this is the gap that we are keen to close. We want our
Disadvantaged pupils to do as well as all other pupils.
See Pages 3 and 4 of this Report below to see how Disadvantaged pupils here at
The James Oglethorpe School performed at the end of Year 2 (KS1) Year 6 (KS2)
for the school year 2015-16 compared to children in the school who are not
Disadvantaged as well as to Non Disadvantaged pupils nationally.
There is clear evidence that our funding is well spent and making a difference.
2
The James Oglethorpe Primary School
Narrowing The Gap – End of Key Stage SATs
Comparing the achievement of DISADVANTAGED Pupils with Non-DIS
End of Key Stage 2 for 2015-16
Progress
Attainment
Scaled Score 100+
Reading
Range -5.0 to
+5.0
School
National
Non DIS
GAP with
National
School DIS
-1.47
64%
71%
-7%
School Non DIS
-1.44
55%
71%
-16%
GAP within School
+0.03
+9%
11/58 pupils were Pupil Premium: JOPs DIS progress in line with Non DIS
JOPs DIS attainment higher than Non DIS
JOPs DIS gap narrower than for Non DIS
Range -5.0 to
School
National
Writing
+5.0
Non DIS
GAP with
National
School DIS
0.19
73%
79%
-6%
School Non DIS
-0.25
74%
79%
-5%
GAP within School
+0.44
-1%
11/58 pupils were Pupil Premium: JOPs DIS progress in line with Non DIS
JOPs DIS attainment in line with Non DIS
JOPs DIS gap in line with Non DIS
Range -5.0 to
School
National
Maths
+5.0
Non DIS
GAP with
National
School DIS
-2.44
64%
75%
-11%
School Non DIS
-2.03
62%
75%
-13%
GAP within School
-0.41
+2%
11/58 pupils were Pupil Premium: JOPs DIS progress slower than Non DIS
JOPs DIS attainment in line with Non DIS
JOPs DIS gap in line with Non DIS
3
The James Oglethorpe Primary School
Narrowing The Gap – End of Key Stage SATs
Comparing the achievement of DISADVANTAGED Pupils with Non-DIS
End of Key Stage 1 for 2015-16
Attainment
Expected Standard
Reading
School
National
Non DIS
GAP with
National
School DIS
50%
78%
-28%
School Non DIS
80%
78%
+2%
GAP within School
-30%
JOPs national DIS gap wider than for Non DIS. Small cohort of just 4 pupils –
2 out of 4 pupils met the Standard. If 1 more pupil had met the standard we
would be in line with our own Non DIS achievement and national.
School
National
GAP with
Writing
Non DIS
National
School DIS
50%
70%
-20%
School Non DIS
77%
70%
+2%
GAP within School
-27%
JOPs national DIS gap wider than for Non DIS. Small cohort of just 4 pupils –
2 out of 4 pupils met the Standard. If 1 more pupil had met the standard we
would be in line with our own Non DIS achievement and national..
School
National
GAP with
Maths
Non DIS
National
School DIS
50%
77%
-27%
School Non DIS
83%
77%
+6%
GAP within School
-33%
JOPs national DIS gap wider than for Non DIS. Small cohort of just 4 pupils –
2 out of 4 pupils met the Standard. If 1 more pupil had met the standard we
would be in line with our own Non DIS achievement and national.
4