Coastal water darkening – consequences for coastal ecosystems Konsekvenser av mørkere kystvann for kystøkosystemer Forskerseminar 24. oktober 2012, Havet og kysten DL Aksnes University of Bergen Outline • The Norwegian Coastal Water • Coastal water darkening – Sources for attenuation of light – Expected effects • Future work The Norwegian Coastal Water (NCW) Hjort og Gran (1899) • Less saline than oceanic water • Contains freshwater that has drained to the Baltic Sea, southern North Sea , and from the Norwegian coast • Moves from south to north (Norwegian Coastal Current, NCC) • Freshwater contains more Color Dissolved Organic Matter (CDOM) than oceanic water Coastal Water • Sources for attenuation of light Lurefjorden Masfjorden Light(depth) = Light(surface) e-K*depth K =K(water) + K(algae) + K(CDOM) +... CDOM: Color Dissolved Organic Matter (humic substances, gelbstoff) Coastal Water Water samples from 40 locations • Sources for attenuation of light K k1 k2 Sal k3Chl k 4(6 Oxy) Coefficient, Estimated value β p - value factor k1, Intercept k2, Salinity k3, Chlorophyll k4, Oxygen < 10-5 0.97 ± 0.08 -0.023 ± 0.002 0.046 ± 0.008 -0.022 ± 0.003 -0.50 ± 0.05 0.29 ± 0.05 -0.31 ± 0.04 < 10-5 < 10-5 < 10-5 Coastal Water • Sources for attenuation of light Atlantic source K(CDOM) = 0.05 m-1 Coastal water K(CDOM) = f(salinity) +g(oxygen) Freshwater source K(CDOM) = 0.97 m-1 Long term trends in water clarity Deeper than 100 m Shallower than 100 m Deeper than 100 m Shallower than 100 m Coastal Water darkening – expected effects • The light attenuation (K) determines euphotic zone properties • This can be simulated by standard ecosystem models: P P 2P ( N , I ) P mP v 2 t z z N 2 N ( N , I ) P mP 2 t z ( N , I ) max min( I N , ) Hi I H n N z I I in exp K bg z k P(t , )d 0 Phytoplankton Nutrient Nutrient and light limitation Light at depth Coastal Water darkening – expected effects • The light attenuation (K) determines euphotic zone properties Coastal Water darkening – expected effects • The light attenuation (K) determines euphotic zone properties Clear water Phytoplankton Nutrient Dark water This looks like eutrophication although nutrient input is unchanged! Coastal Water darkening – expected effects Habitat becomes shallower, but also narrower Visual predation becomes less efficient Coastal Water darkening – expected effects • Analysis of fish and jelly competition in the Baltic Sea Water clarity In press, Mar Ecol Prog Ser Coastal Water darkening – expected effects • Analysis of fish and jelly competition in the Baltic Sea Today In press, Mar Ecol Prog Ser Pristine situation Coastal Water darkening – expected effects o Reduced water clarity o Shallower and narrower euphotic zone o Increased phytoplankton and nutrient concentrations in surface layers o Reduced sublittoral habitat (e.g. kelp and associated fauna/fishes) o Reduced abundance of visual predators (fish) and increased abundance of tactile predators (jellyfish) Eutrophication symptoms despite no increase in nutrient input Combination of nutrient input and darkening is likely to magnify symptoms Future work • To understand changes in NCW optics as a result of changes in terrestrial and limnetic systems Future work • To understand changes in NCW optics as a result of changes in terrestrial and limnetic systems Future work • To understand changes in NCW optics as a result of changes in terrestrial and limnetic systems Will enable revision and increased realism of applied marine ecosystem models like the “NORWECOM” mode system P P 2P ( N , I ) P mP v 2 t z z N 2 N ( N , I ) P mP 2 t z ( N , I ) max min( I N , ) Hi I H n N z I I in exp K bg z k P(t , )d 0 Research proposal has been sent to “Havet og Kysten” Future work • Analyses of long term changes in coastal ecosystems should not ignore changes in the optical environment! Nedgang i kysttorsk Tap av tare habitat Økte manetforekomster …..etc. Eutrofi eller ikke? Future work • Monitoring of NCW optical properties are welcome (scattered Secchi observations are useful but not sufficient!)
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz