Published online: December 28, 2015
Article
TBC1D14 regulates autophagy via the TRAPP
complex and ATG9 traffic
Christopher A Lamb1, Stefanie Nühlen2, Delphine Judith1, David Frith3, Ambrosius P Snijders3,
Christian Behrends2 & Sharon A Tooze1,*
Abstract
Macroautophagy requires membrane trafficking and remodelling
to form the autophagosome and deliver its contents to lysosomes
for degradation. We have previously identified the TBC domaincontaining protein, TBC1D14, as a negative regulator of autophagy
that controls delivery of membranes from RAB11-positive recycling
endosomes to forming autophagosomes. In this study, we identify
the TRAPP complex, a multi-subunit tethering complex and GEF for
RAB1, as an interactor of TBC1D14. TBC1D14 binds to the TRAPP
complex via an N-terminal 103 amino acid region, and overexpression of this region inhibits both autophagy and secretory traffic.
TRAPPC8, the mammalian orthologue of a yeast autophagy-specific
TRAPP subunit, forms part of a mammalian TRAPPIII-like complex
and both this complex and TBC1D14 are needed for RAB1 activation. TRAPPC8 modulates autophagy and secretory trafficking and
is required for TBC1D14 to bind TRAPPIII. Importantly, TBC1D14
and TRAPPIII regulate ATG9 trafficking independently of ULK1. We
propose a model whereby TBC1D14 and TRAPPIII regulate a constitutive trafficking step from peripheral recycling endosomes to the
early Golgi, maintaining the cycling pool of ATG9 required for initiation of autophagy.
Keywords Autophagy; Membrane Trafficking; Rab proteins; TRAPP
Subject Categories Autophagy & Cell Death; Membrane & Intracellular
Transport
DOI 10.15252/embj.201592695 | Received 30 July 2015 | Revised 25 November
2015 | Accepted 26 November 2015
Introduction
To remain healthy, cells must clear their cytosol of misfolded
proteins, dysfunctional organelles and intracellular pathogens. To
this end, eukaryotes employ the evolutionarily conserved autophagy
pathways (Mizushima et al, 2008). Macroautophagy (here referred
to as autophagy) is a highly dynamic process involving the
formation of a double-membrane cisterna (the phagophore or
isolation membrane), which expands to engulf portions of the
cytosol, closing to form an autophagosome (Lamb et al, 2013b).
Through the use of receptors, of which p62 is prototypical,
autophagosomes can also be directed to engulf specific cargos
(Birgisdottir et al, 2013). The completed autophagosome then
matures by fusing with the lysosome, allowing the contents of the
autophagosome to be degraded and returned to the cytosol. This
recycling function is crucial for cells and organisms to survive
periods of stress, such as amino acid starvation, growth factor withdrawal and hypoxia (Lamb et al, 2013b), and dysregulation of the
autophagy pathways plays a role in pathological states including
ageing, bacterial infection, neurodegeneration and cancer
(Mizushima et al, 2008).
The core autophagy machinery and the genes encoding it were
originally characterised in Saccharomyces cerevisiae (yeast) through
genetic screening. There are currently 40 autophagy-related (ATG)
genes known in yeast, many of which have mammalian orthologues, and the conserved core Atg proteins fall into several groups.
Upon amino acid withdrawal, the mammalian target of rapamycin
complex 1 (mTORC1) is inactivated, which removes repression on
the ULK (uncoordinated 51-like kinase) complex, which consists of
ULK1/2, ATG13, FIP200 and ATG101(Hara et al, 2008; Chan et al,
2009; Hosokawa et al, 2009; Mercer et al, 2009). The ULK1 complex
then goes on to activate the autophagy-specific phosphatidylinositol
3 kinase (PtdIns(3)K) complex, which includes ATG14, Beclin1,
VPS34 and p150 and nucleates pools of phosphatidylinositol-3phosphate (PtdIns(3)P) at specific sites called omegasomes on the
endoplasmic reticulum (ER) marked by double FYVE domaincontaining protein 1 (DFCP1), where the ER is thought to act as a
cradle for autophagosome formation (Axe et al, 2008; HayashiNishino et al, 2009; Yla-Anttila et al, 2009). The phagophore, a
double lipid bilayer structure, is formed from the omegasome and
expands through the action of two ubiquitination-like enzymatic
cascades. The first of these involves ATG7 (E1) and ATG10 (E2) and
results in conjugation of the ubiquitin-like modifier ATG12 to ATG5
(Mizushima et al, 1998). The ATG12-5 complex associates with
ATG16, acting as the E3 enzyme in the second cascade with ATG7
(E1) and ATG3 (E2), and this complex supports covalent attachment
of ATG8 family members (LC3 and GABARAP proteins in
1 Molecular Cell Biology of Autophagy Group, Francis Crick Institute, London, UK
2 Institute of Biochemistry II, Medical School Goethe University, Frankfurt, Germany
3 The Francis Crick Institute Mass Spectrometry Core Technology Platform, Clare Hall Laboratories, Potters Bar,UK
*Corresponding author. Tel: +44 207 269 3122; E-mail: [email protected]
ª 2015 The Authors. Published under the terms of the CC BY 4.0 license
The EMBO Journal
1
Published online: December 28, 2015
The EMBO Journal
mammals) to the lipid phosphatidylethanolamine (PE) at the phagophore (Mizushima et al, 1998, 2003), dependent on the PtdIns(3)Pbinding protein WIPI2 (Dooley et al, 2014). Lipidated ATG8 proteins
associate with the phagophore as it expands and closes to form the
autophagosome, and remain one of the key markers for autophagosome formation (Kabeya et al, 2004; Klionsky et al, 2012).
Of note, ATG9 is the only transmembrane protein required for
progression of autophagy (Webber & Tooze, 2010). Yeast Atg9 has
been found to localise to small cytoplasmic vesicles, several of
which appear to nucleate the PAS (pre-autophagosomal structure; a
single structure in yeast cells thought to be functionally equivalent
to mammalian omegasomes) under starvation conditions, eventually becoming incorporated into the growing phagophore
(Yamamoto et al, 2012). Importantly, Atg9 does not persist in the
autophagosomal membrane after fusion with the vacuole—it is recycled back to the cytoplasmic vesicles to participate in further rounds
of PAS formation (Yamamoto et al, 2012). Atg9 traffic is under the
control of Atg1 kinase, which phosphorylates Atg9 directly to
control phagophore elongation (Papinski et al, 2014).
The Atg9 vesicles are directed to the PAS by the small GTPase
Ypt1 and its GEF (GTP exchange factor) the TRAPPIII (trafficking
protein particle III) complex (Kakuta et al, 2012); a large, multisubunit tethering complex conserved from yeast to humans (Sacher
et al, 1998; Barrowman et al, 2010). In yeast, the TRAPPs are organised into three complexes—the core TRAPPI complex, involved in
ER-Golgi traffic, the larger TRAPPII complex, which plays a role in
endosome to Golgi and intra-Golgi traffic, and the TRAPPIII
complex, which is essentially the TRAPPI complex with an additional subunit, Trs85 (Barrowman et al, 2010). TRAPPIII and Ypt1
activities have been linked to autophagy (Nazarko et al, 2005;
Lynch-Day et al, 2010; Kakuta et al, 2012; Lipatova et al, 2012;
Shirahama-Noda et al, 2013).
As in yeast, the trafficking of ATG9 appears to be under the
control of ULK1 (an orthologue of Atg1) in mammals (Young et al,
2006) and is crucial for the early stages of autophagy, as fewer
omegasomes form in cells depleted for ATG9 (Winslow et al, 2010;
Orsi et al, 2012). In contrast to yeast, however, we showed that
ATG9 vesicles do not fully fuse with the growing phagophore;
rather, they transiently interact with both GFP-DFCP1- and GFPLC3-positive structures suggesting that ATG9-positive vesicles play
a role throughout autophagosome formation (Orsi et al, 2012).
RAB1 (the mammalian orthologue of Ypt1) is known to regulate
formation of DFCP1-positive structures and autophagosomes
(Winslow et al, 2010; Zoppino et al, 2010; Mochizuki et al, 2013)
and association of LC3B with Salmonella (Huang et al, 2011).
Mammalian TRAPP subunits have been linked to autophagy in a
large-scale proteomics study (Behrends et al, 2010) and knockdown
of a core TRAPP subunit reduces the association of LC3B with intracellular Salmonella (Huang et al, 2011), although unlike yeast, no
TRAPP-dependent regulation of ATG9 trafficking has yet been identified. However, orthologues of most yeast TRAPP subunits are
present in mammals (Scrivens et al, 2011) and recent data generated using epitope-tagged proteins indicates that two different
TRAPP complexes may exist in mammalian cells, broadly similar to
yeast TRAPPII and TRAPPIII with additional metazoan-specific
subunits (Bassik et al, 2013).
Aside from ATG9 membranes, numerous other sources provide
membranes for the growing phagophore. It receives input from the
2
The EMBO Journal
TBC1D14 binds TRAPP to control autophagy
Christopher A Lamb et al
ER-Golgi intermediate compartment (Ge et al, 2013), Golgi (Young
et al, 2006; Itoh et al, 2008), recycling endosomes (Longatti et al,
2012; Knaevelsrud et al, 2013; Puri et al, 2013) and the plasma
membrane (PM; Ravikumar et al, 2010; Moreau et al, 2011, 2012).
As completion of the autophagosome requires expansion into large
membrane vesicles and fusion with other endomembrane compartments to permit degradation of autophagy cargos, the vesicle trafficking machinery of the cell is vital for its progression. Indeed, a
growing list of membrane trafficking regulators impinges on
autophagosome formation and maturation. These have been
reviewed in detail recently (Lamb et al, 2013a,b) and include small
GTPases (Itoh et al, 2008; Zoppino et al, 2010; Moreau et al, 2012),
RabGAPs (GTPase activating proteins) (Itoh et al, 2011; Longatti
et al, 2012; Popovic et al, 2012), SNARE proteins (Itakura et al,
2012; Hamasaki et al, 2013; Puri et al, 2013; Moreau et al, 2014),
sorting nexins (Knaevelsrud et al, 2013) and vesicle tethering
complexes (Liang et al, 2008). Unpicking the functions of these
components will permit a better understanding of the mechanisms
of autophagosome formation.
We previously carried out an overexpression screen of mammalian TBC (Tre-Bub-CDC16) domain-containing RABGAPs to identify
those involved in autophagy (Longatti et al, 2012). We identified
ten TBC proteins that reduced LC3 lipidation on overexpression—
several of which were subsequently found to interact with LC3
family proteins via LIR (LC3 interacting region) motifs (Popovic
et al, 2012). We focused on TBC1D14, a previously rather poorly
characterised TBC protein (Haas et al, 2007; Tempel et al, 2008;
Ching et al, 2010) due to its membrane trafficking phenotype and
co-localisation with core autophagy proteins. TBC1D14 overexpression resulted in formation of an enlarged, ULK1-positive tubulated
recycling endosome (RE) compartment, inhibiting autophagy
(Longatti et al, 2012). REs were found to contribute membranes to
autophagosomes and also harbour several key autophagy regulators
including ATG9 and the ULK complex, findings which have subsequently been confirmed by other groups (Knaevelsrud et al, 2013;
Puri et al, 2013). In particular, one study revealed that SNX18 positively regulates autophagosome formation, and also generates RE
tubules (Knaevelsrud et al, 2013). Despite TBC1D14 being able to
bind to RAB11, it appears not to act as a GAP for RAB11 and may
act as an effector (Longatti et al, 2012), so how TBC1D14 affected
recycling endosome morphology and function in autophagy
remained unclear.
In the present study, we sought to understand how TBC1D14
functions in vesicle traffic and autophagy by identifying candidate
interactors. This approach identified the TRAPP complex as an interacting partner of TBC1D14. We have characterised the interaction
between TRAPP and TBC1D14 and found that the dominant negative effect of overexpressed TBC1D14 we previously identified is
due to its binding to a TRAPP complex. We show that TRAPPC8,
the mammalian orthologue of the yeast autophagy-specific TRAPP
subunit Trs85, mediates the interaction between TRAPP and
TBC1D14, and provide evidence at the endogenous level of the existence of a TRAPPIII-like complex in mammalian cells. We also
demonstrate that TBC1D14 is required for activation of RAB1
through its TRAPP-binding ability. Finally, we have shown that
disruption of TRAPP function results in defects in secretory traffic
and autophagosome formation, and the autophagy defect results
from dysregulation of ATG9 traffic.
ª 2015 The Authors
Published online: December 28, 2015
Christopher A Lamb et al
TBC1D14 binds TRAPP to control autophagy
Results
Identification of the TRAPP complex as a TBC1D14 interactor
To identify TBC1D14 interactors, a GST pull-down assay was
performed on lysate from HEK293A cells using immobilised GST or
GST-TBC1D14. Candidate bands were excised and analysed by mass
spectrometry. The analysis yielded several members of the TRAPP
(trafficking protein particle) complex (Fig 1A, Appendix Table S1).
Using an immunoprecipitation (IP) approach, we validated that
GFP-TBC1D14 could co-precipitate TRAPP subunits including
TRAPPC4 (a conserved “core” subunit) and TRAPPC12/TTC15 (a
metazoan-specific TRAPP subunit; Scrivens et al, 2011), whereas
GFP alone could not (Fig 1B). Using a GFP-tagged TRAPP subunit,
GFP-TRAPPC3 (also a conserved “core” subunit; Barrowman et al,
2010), we found that endogenous TBC1D14 could be precipitated by
the TRAPP complex (Fig 1C).
As TBC1D14 overexpression generates an exaggerated, tubulated
transferrin-positive RE compartment (Longatti et al, 2012) and the
TRAPP complex interacts with TBC1D14, we tested whether TRAPP
subunits were present on the transferrin-positive tubules using
confocal microscopy. Indeed, both endogenous TRAPPC4 and
TRAPPC12 co-localised with the GFP-TBC1D14 and Alexa-647 transferrin-positive tubulated endosomes in HEK293A cells (Fig 1D and
E). We have previously demonstrated that endogenous TBC1D14 is
localised to the Golgi stack (Longatti et al, 2012), and we observed
that the core TRAPP subunit TRAPPC4 and its GEF target RAB1B
both partially localise to the Golgi with TBC1D14 in HEK293A cells
(Fig 1F). These data suggest that the TRAPP complex, TBC1D14 and
RAB1 may function together at the Golgi, and the localisation of
TBC1D14 to tubulated RE evident after its overexpression also
results in mis-localisation of the TRAPP complex.
As we have previously demonstrated, the tubulated ERC (endocytic recycling compartment) generated by TBC1D14 overexpression
is positive for endogenous RAB11, and indeed, RAB11 is required
for the tubules to form (Longatti et al, 2012). We decided to investigate whether the tubules can simultaneously harbour RAB11 and
RAB1, which under control conditions are largely on separate
compartments (Fig 2A, upper panels). The TBC1D14 tubules are
positive for RAB11 as expected, and a subset of the tubules harbour
RAB1B (Fig 2A, lower panels and inset).
Previous studies have shown that membrane traffic and potentially
membrane contact sites can occur between RAB11- and RAB1-positive
The EMBO Journal
juxtanuclear compartments (Marie et al, 2009). We found that
endogenous RAB1 and RAB11 co-localised on stable vesicular structures which are resistant to Brefeldin A (BFA), an inhibitor of
Sec7 domain-containing proteins which fragments the Golgi, confirming the results of Marie et al, 2009;. Importantly, these structures
do not co-localise with the early Golgi marker GM130, which localises
to ER exit sites in BFA-treated cells (Mardones et al, 2006; Fig EV1).
These structures represent stable trafficking intermediates between
RAB11-positive recycling endosomes and RAB1-positive transport
vesicles.
Given that TBC1D14 can bind TRAPP on the GFP-TBC1D14induced tubules, we tested whether RAB1 or RAB11 co-localised
with the core TRAPP subunit TRAPPC4. TRAPPC4 and RAB11A colocalised extensively on the tubules (Fig 2B). Similarly, TRAPPC4
and RAB1B also co-localised on the GFP-TBC1D14-induced tubules
(Fig 2C). These data support a model where TBC1D14 acts as a
bridge between a TRAPP complex and activated RAB11. This
membrane-localised TRAPP can then act as a GEF for RAB1, recruiting it to membranes (Fig 2D).
Amino acids 120–223 of TBC1D14 are required for TRAPP
complex interaction
Having confirmed the mass spectrometry interactions and observed
the striking accumulation of TRAPP on TBC1D14-positive
membranes, we determined which region of TBC1D14 was responsible for TRAPP binding. TBC1D14 has a typical domain structure for
TBC domain-containing RabGAPs (Frasa et al, 2012), with the TBC
domain at the C-terminus of the protein (Fig 3A). Although the structure of the TBC domain has been solved (residues 357–672; Tempel
et al, 2008), nothing is known about the function of the N-terminal
part of the protein. N-terminally GFP-tagged TBC1D14 constructs
were generated and transfected into HEK293A cells, and the cell
lysates were subject to GFP-Trap IP and blotting for TRAPPC12 and
TRAPPC4. We show that the C-terminus of the protein (residues
224–669, encompassing the putative TBC domain from residues
411–611, Fig 3A) does not bind to the tested TRAPP subunits;
however, a 103 amino acid stretch of TBC1D14 (residues 120–223) is
sufficient for TRAPP interaction (Fig 3B). This is distinct from the
region (residues 224–330) we have previously shown to be involved
in an interaction with ULK1 kinase (Longatti et al, 2012). TBC1D14
residues 120–223 will subsequently be referred to as the TRAPPbinding region (TBR).
Figure 1. TBC1D14 interacts with the TRAPP complex.
A GST pulldown used to analyse TBC1D14 interactors. Recombinant GST or GST-TBC1D14 was incubated with or without HEK293A lysate. Bound proteins
were eluted from the beads using Laemmli sample buffer and subjected to SDS–PAGE, with visible bands being excised from the gel and analysed by mass spectrometry.
B Lysates of HEK293A cells expressing either GFP or GFP-TBC1D14 were subjected to immunoprecipitation (IP) with GFP-Trap and then immunoblotted for GFP,
TRAPPC12 and TRAPPC4. White arrowhead indicates GFP, black arrowhead indicates GFP-TBC1D14.
C Lysates of cells expressing GFP or GFP-TRAPPC3 were subjected to IP with GFP-Trap and then immunoblotted for TRAPPC4, GFP and TBC1D14. White arrowhead
indicates GFP, black arrowhead indicates GFP-TRAPPC3.
D Cells expressing GFP-TBC1D14, generating a tubulated endosomal compartment, were fed Alexa-647-labelled transferrin (white, blue in merge) for 15 min in full
medium, fixed, stained for endogenous TRAPPC4 (red) and analysed by confocal microscopy.
E Cells treated as in (D) were stained for endogenous TRAPPC12 (red) and analysed by confocal microscopy.
F Cells in complete medium were fixed, stained for endogenous TBC1D14 (green), RAB1B (red) and TRAPPC4 (white, blue in merge) and analysed by confocal
microscopy. Inset shows protein localisation in juxtanuclear area.
▸
Data information: In (D–F), white arrowheads indicate transfected cells, and yellow arrowheads depict regions of co-localisation in the inset. Scale bars, 10 lm. Data
shown in (B–F) are representative of 3 independent experiments.
ª 2015 The Authors
The EMBO Journal
3
Published online: December 28, 2015
The EMBO Journal
TBC1D14 binds TRAPP to control autophagy
TBR overexpression affects the Golgi and the secretory pathway,
not recycling endosome function
Although we have previously shown that full-length TBC1D14
modulates autophagy by altering vesicle traffic through recycling
A
B
Christopher A Lamb et al
endosomes (Longatti et al, 2012), our data suggest that the
N-terminal TBR may modulate membrane traffic through its TRAPPbinding capacity. We first tested whether GFP-TBR can generate the
tubular RE phenotype seen on overexpression of TBC1D14 (Fig 4A).
The TBR alone appears to be cytosolic and does not generate the
C
D
E
F
Figure 1.
4
The EMBO Journal
ª 2015 The Authors
Published online: December 28, 2015
Christopher A Lamb et al
TBC1D14 binds TRAPP to control autophagy
The EMBO Journal
▸
Figure 2. A subset of GFP-TBC1D14-induced tubules harbour RAB1.
A HEK293A cells transfected with GFP (upper panels) or GFP-TBC1D14 (lower panels) (green) were labelled with anti-RAB11A (red) and anti-RAB1B (white, blue in
merge) antibodies. White arrows depict transfected cells. Inset: GFP-TBC1D14-transfected cell showing triple co-localisation between GFP-TBC1D14, RAB11A and
RAB1B (white arrow heads) and double co-localisation between GFP-TBC1D14 and RAB11A (yellow arrowheads).
B Co-localisation of GFP-TBC1D14, TRAPPC4 (red) and RAB11A (white, blue in merge). White arrowheads indicate regions of triple co-localisation.
C Co-localisation of GFP-TBC1D14, TRAPPC4 (red) and RAB1B (white, blue in merge). White arrowheads indicate regions of triple co-localisation and yellow arrowheads
regions of double co-localisation between GFP-TBC1D14 and TRAPPC4.
D Model for recruitment of RAB1 to tubulated RE. RAB11-GTP recruits TBC1D14 to the ERC membrane, and TBC1D14 in turn recruits TRAPP. TRAPP acts as a GEF to
recruit RAB1 aberrantly to ERC membranes.
Data information: Scale bars, 20 lm.
tubulated RE phenotype—in many transfected HEK293A cells, the
morphology of the RE compartment appears to be intact (Fig 4A).
However, the C-terminal region of the protein (224–669), encompassing the TBC domain, is membrane associated and generates an
enlarged juxtanuclear transferrin-positive structure with peripheral
puncta positive for GFP-224–669 and transferrin (Fig 4A).
To quantitatively assay the effect on RE function, we utilised a
pulse-chase approach where cells transfected with GFP-TBC1D14
and deletion mutants were fed Alexa-647 transferrin (Tfn) for
15 min in full medium, and the fluorescent Tfn chased out of the
cells at 15-min intervals. The GFP-positive cells were sorted and
their Tfn content analysed by flow cytometry. This showed that
while expression of GFP-TBC1D14 or GFP-224-669 impairs Tfn recycling, GFP-TBR has no effect on Tfn recycling when compared to
GFP alone (Fig 4B).
As TBR expression does not affect RE function, what other
membrane trafficking pathways could a TBC1D14–TRAPP interaction
be impacting that may modulate autophagy? A large-scale study of
putative RabGAPs required for normal Golgi morphology showed that
TBC1D14 overexpression resulted in fragmented Golgi stacks in two
different cell lines (Haas et al, 2007). We confirmed this phenotype
using the established cis-Golgi marker GM130 (Fig 4C, compare GFP
to GFP-TBC1D14). Remarkably, overexpression of GFP-TBR also fragmented the Golgi (Fig 4C, GFP-TBR), whereas overexpression of
GFP-224-669 did not (Fig 4C, GFP-224–669). Importantly, previous
studies have shown that mammalian TRAPP subunits are needed for
maintenance of Golgi structure (Yamasaki et al, 2009; Scrivens et al,
2011), supporting the idea that the TRAPP complex and TBC1D14
may be acting in the same pathway.
We used the HeLa C1 cell line (Gordon et al, 2010) to assay the
effect TBR-induced Golgi fragmentation had on constitutive secretion. These cells stably express a GFP-tagged reporter construct
(GFP-FM4-hGH), which accumulates in the ER due to oligomerisation of its tandem FKBP repeats. On treatment with the rapamycin
analogue AP21998 (D/D solubiliser, Clontech), the oligomers are
disrupted and the reporter travels through the constitutive secretory
pathway and is secreted; thus, the total amount of intracellular GFP
decreases over time (Gordon et al, 2010). This means that the
change in GFP fluorescence over time can be used to measure
constitutive secretion.
C1 cells expressing CFP or CFP-TBR were treated with D/D solubiliser over an 80-min time course, and their GFP content analysed
by flow cytometry (Fig 4D). As a control, we also treated C1 cells
with BFA, which blocks constitutive secretion in this and other cell
models (Rosa et al, 1992; Gordon et al, 2010). The results show that
expression of CFP-TBR reduces secretion of GFP-FM4-hGH. This
finding, in conjunction with the Golgi fragmentation data, shows
ª 2015 The Authors
that TBR overexpression alters Golgi function. Therefore,
TBC1D14’s function impinges on both the secretory and endocytic
pathways likely through its N- and C-terminal domains, respectively. These data further support the notion that TBC1D14 binds
the TRAPP complex, as TRAPP subunits are involved in secretion
(Barrowman et al, 2010).
As the D/D solubiliser is a rapamycin analogue, we tested
whether mTOR was inactivated in C1 cells by the D/D treatment,
using as controls the known mTOR inhibitors rapamycin (Sabatini
et al, 1994) and Torin 1 (Liu et al, 2010). After an 80-min incubation, we immunoblotted for GFP, to monitor GFP-FM4-hGH secretion, and the phosphorylated form of the S6 ribosomal protein, a
downstream target of the mTOR-activated p70 S6-kinase (Chung
et al, 1992). Our data show that treatment of cells with rapamycin
or D/D solubiliser promotes secretion of the GFP-FM4-hGH reporter
construct; this is not the case with Torin treatment (Appendix
Fig S1A). Moreover, S6 phosphorylation was not inhibited by D/D
solubiliser treatment but was inhibited by rapamycin and Torin
treatment (Appendix Fig S1A). We used the same treatments on
HEK293A cells and analysed lipidation of LC3-I to LC3-II, a standard
read-out for autophagic flux (Kabeya et al, 2000), and found that
unlike rapamycin and Torin treatment, D/D solubiliser treatment
does not induce lipidation of LC3-I to LC3-II (Appendix Fig S1B),
showing that the D/D solubiliser does not promote autophagosome
formation.
Overexpression of the TBR modulates autophagy at an early step
We have previously demonstrated that TBC1D14 overexpression has
an inhibitory effect on autophagy as measured by LC3 lipidation
(Longatti et al, 2012), via its modulation of vesicle traffic through the
RE. While part of this inhibition is likely due to TBC1D14’s RAB11and ULK1-binding functions, based on TRAPP’s autophagic function
in yeast, we decided to test whether overexpression of TBR alone
could negatively regulate autophagy. HEK293A cells expressing GFPTBR displayed a reduction in LC3 lipidation on starvation with EBSS
in the presence of bafilomycin A1 (BafA1), when compared to
control conditions, suggesting that autophagosome formation is
impaired (Fig 5A). In contrast, cells expressing GFP-224–669 showed
a small increase in LC3 lipidation on starvation suggesting that the
inhibition of autophagy observed upon TBC1D14 overexpression
(Longatti et al, 2012) is mainly due to the mis-localisation of the
TRAPP complex to the tubulated RE (Fig 1D and E).
In order to test at which point in the autophagy pathway TBR overexpression had its effect, we used several fluorescence markers for
autophagosome formation. Firstly, we used HEK293A GFP-LC3B cells
(2GL9, (Chan et al, 2007)) and determined the number of GFP-LC3B
The EMBO Journal
5
Published online: December 28, 2015
The EMBO Journal
TBC1D14 binds TRAPP to control autophagy
Christopher A Lamb et al
A
B
D
C
Figure 2.
6
The EMBO Journal
ª 2015 The Authors
Published online: December 28, 2015
Christopher A Lamb et al
The EMBO Journal
TBC1D14 binds TRAPP to control autophagy
A
B
Figure 3. TBC1D14 binds the TRAPP complex via a 103 amino acid N-terminal region.
A Schematic diagram of full-length TBC1D14, indicating the C-terminal TBC domain (shaded), and truncation mutants used in subsequent analyses.
B HEK293A cell lysates (from approximately 8 × 106 cells per construct) expressing the indicated GFP fusions were subjected to IP and immunoblotting for GFP,
TRAPPC12 and TRAPPC4. Data are representative of 3 independent experiments.
puncta formed upon starvation. As expected from the lipidation data,
fewer LC3B puncta formed on expression of mCherry-TBR compared
to mCherry alone (Fig 5B). As LC3B lipidation and membrane association is a later step in the autophagosome formation pathway, we also
looked at the formation of WIPI2 and GFP-DFCP1 puncta upon starvation. These proteins bind PtdIns(3)P, a marker for omegasomes and
◀
autophagosomes which represent early steps in autophagosome formation (Axe et al, 2008; Polson et al, 2010; Dooley et al, 2014). In both
cases, we found a small but significant reduction in the number of
WIPI2 and GFP-DFCP1 puncta upon starvation (Fig 5C and D). In
summary, these data indicate that TBR overexpression inhibits an
early stage in autophagosome formation.
Figure 4. Expression of the TRAPP-binding region of TBC1D14 impairs Golgi function.
A Cells expressing the indicated GFP fusions (green) were loaded with Alexa-647 transferrin (red; white arrowheads indicate transfected cells) for 15 min, fixed and the
morphology of the transferrin-positive recycling endosomes analysed by confocal microscopy. Scale bars, 10 lm. Arrows in inset indicate the juxtanuclear ERC.
B Cells transfected as in (A) were loaded with Alexa-647 transferrin for 15 min and the fluorescent transferrin chased out for the indicated time periods. At the end of
the time course, the cells were fixed and the transferrin content of GFP-positive cells analysed by flow cytometry. Results are expressed as a percentage of Tfn
fluorescence at t = 0 and are the mean of 3 independent experiments, s.e.m.
C Cells transfected as in (A) were stained for the cis-Golgi marker GM130. White arrowheads depict transfected cells. Scale bars, 10 lm. Bar chart is quantification of
fragmented Golgi complex (> 100 cells per condition from three independent experiments, s.e.m. **P < 0.01, one-way ANOVA with Sidak’s post-test).
D HeLa C1 cells transfected with CFP or CFP-TBR were treated with D/D solubiliser (Clontech) or D/D solubiliser plus 2.5 lg/ml Brefeldin A (BFA) for the indicated time
periods, trypsinised, fixed and their GFP content analysed by flow cytometry. Results are expressed as percentage of GFP levels at t = 0, and the mean of 3
independent experiments s.e.m. is shown.
ª 2015 The Authors
The EMBO Journal
▸
7
Published online: December 28, 2015
The EMBO Journal
TBC1D14 binds TRAPP to control autophagy
Christopher A Lamb et al
A
B
C
D
Figure 4
8
The EMBO Journal
ª 2015 The Authors
Published online: December 28, 2015
Christopher A Lamb et al
TBC1D14 binds TRAPP to control autophagy
TRAPPC8 is the most proximal TRAPP subunit to TBC1D14
and mediates the interaction between TBR and the core
TRAPP complex
The TRAPP complex is a large, multi-subunit complex, with three
distinct variants (I, II and III) in yeast cells (Barrowman et al, 2010).
In mammals, despite the presence of orthologues of most of the
yeast TRAPP subunits (Scrivens et al, 2011), the existence of multiple TRAPP complexes at the endogenous level is unclear. We sought
to identify which of the TRAPP subunits are most proximal to
TBC1D14 and may mediate the interaction between TBC1D14 and
TRAPP. We adapted the BioID system (Roux et al, 2012) combined
with mass spectrometry to study this interaction (Fig 6A). Briefly,
cells were transfected with myc-BioID alone or myc-BioID-TBC1D14
and grown overnight in media supplemented with 50 lM biotin.
The cells were lysed, the samples split, and half of the sample
denatured with 1% SDS. The denatured and non-denatured samples
were incubated with streptavidin resin, and then bound proteins
were eluted, subject to SDS–PAGE and gel lanes analysed by mass
spectrometry. Proteins that are biotinylated and thus bind to streptavidin resin under denaturing conditions are presumed to be most
proximal to the myc-BioID tagged construct.
The scatterplots in Fig EV2A and B show label-free quantification
of TRAPP subunits pulled down in the BioID experiment using
log10-transformed intensity-based absolute quantification (iBAQ)
values calculated from mass spectrometry data (Schwanhausser
et al, 2011). The TRAPP subunits are pulled down by myc-BioIDTBC1D14 under non-denaturing conditions, compared to myc-BioID
alone (Fig EV2A). These data confirm that we can isolate TRAPP
subunits by this method as with the IP approaches in Fig 1.
Fig EV2B compares TRAPP subunits pulled down by myc-BioIDTBC1D14 in denaturing versus non-denaturing conditions. Approximately equal amounts of TBC1D14 are purified in both conditions
indicating that the biotin–streptavidin interaction is not disrupted
under the 1% SDS conditions. This was also the case for TRAPPC8,
to a lesser extent TRAPPC2L and TRAPPC10 but not for other
TRAPP subunits.
The proteins bound to the streptavidin resin in the myc-BioIDTBC1D14 denaturing pulldown are likely to be most proximal to
TBC1D14 as they have been biotinylated. The results indicate that
TRAPPC8 is the most proximal subunit to TBC1D14 (the proposed
biotinylation range of myc-BioID is < 20 nm (Roux et al, 2012)) as
it has high iBAQ scores in both denaturing and non-denaturing
conditions, behaving similarly to TBC1D14.
We confirmed biotinylation of TRAPPC8 under denaturing conditions by Western blot analysis of the streptavidin pulldown
(Fig 6B). TRAPPC4 and TRAPPC12, subunits predicted to be less
The EMBO Journal
proximal by the BioID mass spectrometry analysis, were not found
to be biotinylated in the Western blot analysis, supporting the mass
spectrometry data.
These data indicate that TRAPPC8 may be the most proximal
subunit to TBC1D14, and we hypothesised that TRAPPC8 mediates
interaction of TBC1D14 with the rest of the TRAPP complex. To test
this, we knocked down TRAPPC8 in HEK293A cells and incubated
the lysates with immobilised GST-TBR. This showed that depletion
of TRAPPC8 prevented interaction of the core TRAPP subunit
TRAPPC4 with the TBR (Fig 6C). This loss of TRAPPC4 binding
does not appear to be due to the core TRAPP complex failing to
assemble normally in the absence of TRAPPC8, as GFP-TRAPPC3
immunoprecipitated from HEK293T cells expressing a short hairpin
RNA against TRAPPC8 (shTRAPPC8) pulls down a similar amount
of TRAPPC4 to that from control cells (Fig 6D). These data indicate
that TRAPPC8 mediates the interaction between TBC1D14 and the
rest of TRAPP.
Intriguingly, TRAPPC8 is the mammalian orthologue of yeast
Trs85, the autophagy-specific subunit of TRAPPIII in yeast (Nazarko
et al, 2005; Barrowman et al, 2010). The existence of a TRAPPIIIlike complex in mammals has been suggested previously using overexpressed proteins (Behrends et al, 2010; Bassik et al, 2013), and it
may contain TRAPPC8 and the mammal-specific subunit
TRAPPC12/TTC15 (Bassik et al, 2013). By immunoprecipitating
endogenous TRAPPC12, we showed that endogenous TRAPPC8 was
co-precipitated (Fig EV2C). Using size exclusion chromatography,
we showed that TRAPPC8, TRAPPC12 and the core subunit
TRAPPC4 co-elute in a complex of approximately 600 kDa
(Fig EV2D). TRAPPC4 is also present in a lower molecular weight
complex, which may represent core TRAPP complexes (Fig EV2D).
These data provide the first evidence of the existence of a TRAPPIIIlike complex in mammalian cells at the endogenous protein level.
TRAPPC8 is required for Golgi integrity, secretion and autophagy
Given the interaction between TBC1D14 and TRAPPC8, we
reasoned that depletion of TRAPPC8 might have the same effect on
membrane traffic as overexpression of TBR. We analysed transferrin
recycling in TRAPPC8-depleted cells and found no effect compared
to Rab11 (Fig 7A) as previously reported (Ishii et al, 2013);
however, similar to the effect of Rab1A/B siRNA, TRAPPC8 depletion disrupted Golgi morphology in HEK293A cells (Fig 7B) and
impaired constitutive secretion in HeLa C1 cells (Fig 7C).
These data confirm that TRAPPC8 is needed for maintenance of
Golgi integrity as has been shown for TRAPPC12 and other large
TRAPP subunits (Yamasaki et al, 2009; Scrivens et al, 2011) and
demonstrate a role for TRAPPC8 in normal Golgi function.
Figure 5. TBR expression inhibits autophagy at an early stage.
A HEK293A cells expressing GFP, GFP-TBC1D14 224–669 or GFP-TBR were treated in duplicate with EBSS, EBSS plus 100 nM BafA1 or not for 2 h, lysed and subjected to
immunoblotting for LC3B, tubulin and GFP. The amount of LC3B/tubulin for each condition from three independent experiments is shown on the bar graph, s.e.m.
*P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, one-way ANOVA with Sidak’s multiple comparison test.
B HEK293A GFP-LC3B (2GL9) cells were transfected with mCherry or mCherry-TBR, treated with EBSS for 2 h, fixed and analysed by confocal microscopy.
C HEK293A cells were treated as in (B), fixed, stained for WIPI2 and analysed by confocal microscopy.
D HEK293A cells stably expressing GFP-DFCP1 were treated as in (B), fixed and analysed by confocal microscopy.
▸
Data information: In (B–C), scale bars, 20 lm. For quantification of (B–D), 10 fields of view containing transfected cells were imaged for each of three experiments, and
the number of GFP-LC3B, WIPI2 or GFP-DFCP1 puncta per cell enumerated using Imaris software (Bitplane). Error bars s.e.m., *P < 0.05, ***P < 0.001, one-way ANOVA
with Sidak’s multiple comparison test.
ª 2015 The Authors
The EMBO Journal
9
Published online: December 28, 2015
The EMBO Journal
TBC1D14 binds TRAPP to control autophagy
Christopher A Lamb et al
A
B
C
D
Figure 5.
10
The EMBO Journal
ª 2015 The Authors
Published online: December 28, 2015
Christopher A Lamb et al
The EMBO Journal
TBC1D14 binds TRAPP to control autophagy
A
C
B
D
Figure 6.
ª 2015 The Authors
The EMBO Journal
11
Published online: December 28, 2015
The EMBO Journal
◀
TBC1D14 binds TRAPP to control autophagy
Christopher A Lamb et al
Figure 6. TRAPPC8 is required for TBC1D14 to bind the TRAPP complex.
A Overview of BioID technique used to determine TRAPP subunit most proximal to TBC1D14. D = denaturing conditions, ND = non-denaturing conditions.
B Samples prepared according to (A) (8 × 107 HEK293A cells per transfection) were lysed in TNTE, split equally and denatured with 1% SDS (D) or not (ND) and
subjected to 1-h streptavidin resin pulldown at room temperature. The bound proteins were eluted in 2× Laemmli sample buffer plus 3 mM Biotin and
immunoblotted for the indicated proteins.
C siRNA-transfected control cells (RISC free) or TRAPPC8 knockdown cells (TRAPPC8) were lysed in TNTE and used in pulldown assays with immobilised recombinant
GST or GST-TBR. Bound proteins were subjected to immunoblot analysis using TRAPPC8, TRAPPC4 and tubulin antibodies. Ponceau staining was used to verify
loading of the GST fusion proteins (GST-TBR indicated with arrowhead). The bar chart expresses the relative amount of TRAPPC4 isolated from siTRAPPC8 compared
to siRISC-free control cells from three independent experiments, and error bars are s.e.m. **P < 0.01, unpaired t-test.
D HEK293T cells stably depleted of TRAPPC8 (shC8) or not (shCtrl) were transfected with constructs encoding GFP or GFP-TRAPPC3 and subjected to GFP-Trap IP.
Precipitated proteins were immunoblotted for GFP, TRAPPC4 and TRAPPC8. Bar chart: the amount of TRAPPC4 isolated was normalised to the amount of GFPTRAPPC3 precipitated from three independent experiments and plotted s.e.m., ns = non-significant, unpaired t-test.
Importantly, these trafficking phenotypes replicate those seen for
the TBC1D14 TBR domain.
As TBC1D14 overexpression fragments the Golgi and
inhibits RAB1-dependent processes, we tested whether TBC1D14
overexpression results in a change in RAB1 activation (i.e. GTP
binding) by analysing binding of endogenous RAB1 to its effector,
Golgin-84 (GOLGA5; Diao et al, 2003; Satoh et al, 2003). We found
that endogenous RAB1B bound to GFP-Golgin-84 to the same extent
in cells expressing myc-TBC1D14 compared to control cells, suggesting that TBC1D14 alone cannot promote GTP binding to RAB1B
(Fig EV2E). However, TBC1D14 depletion resulted in a significant
reduction in RAB1B bound to GFP-Golgin-84, comparable to depletion of the core TRAPP subunits TRAPPC4 and TRAPPC8
(Fig EV2F). These data indicate that TBC1D14 is necessary but not
sufficient for normal RAB1-GEF activity. Moreover, these findings
confirm that the Golgi fragmentation phenotype seen on TBC1D14
overexpression (Fig 4C) is not due to a reduction of RAB1B-GTP
levels and is caused by TRAPP mis-localisation.
As TRAPPC8 mediates the interaction between TBC1D14 and the
rest of the TRAPP complex, we decided to investigate the effect of
TRAPPC8 depletion on autophagy. TRAPPC8 depletion resulted in a
striking reduction in GFP-LC3B and endogenous WIPI2 puncta, and
a small but significant reduction in GFP-DFCP1 spot formation
(Fig EV3A–C). These phenotypes were similar to that seen for RAB1
depletion, although RAB1 depletion inhibited GFP-DFCP1 spot
formation more effectively (Fig EV3C). These data show that the
TRAPP complex acts early in autophagosome formation. This
finding is reinforced by the known role of the GEF target of TRAPP,
RAB1, in autophagy and the formation of DFCP1-positive structures
(Zoppino et al, 2010; Mochizuki et al, 2013).
Although we can detect significant defects in early autophagy
markers when TRAPPC8 is depleted (Fig EV3C), and these corre-
late with the phenotype seen on expression of TBR (Fig 5), there
is no effect on LC3 lipidation after TRAPPC8 depletion, and only
a mild effect upon RAB1 depletion (Fig EV4A). To investigate
why this discrepancy may occur, we analysed the morphology of
the ER-Golgi intermediate compartment (ERGIC) in cells lacking
TRAPPC8 or overexpressing TBR (Fig EV4B and C). The ERGIC
has recently been shown to be important in LC3 lipidation (Ge
et al, 2013), and as TRAPPC8 depletion and TBR overexpression
both fragment the Golgi, we tested whether the ERGIC was also
disrupted. Remarkably, TRAPPC8 depletion only mildly perturbed
the juxtanuclear localisation (Fig EV4B), while TBR overexpression severely compromised ERGIC structure with the juxtanuclear
ERGIC53 scattered as puncta throughout the cytoplasm
(Fig EV4C). These findings may explain the discrepancy between
the effects on the formation of LC3-positive puncta and the
lipidation of LC3; lack of a functional juxtanuclear ERGIC in
TBR-expressing cells may result in a more profound effect on
LC3 lipidation, as has been shown in other systems (Ge et al,
2013).
TRAPPC8 function is needed to maintain normal ATG9 traffic
Previous studies in yeast have shown that Trs85/TRAPPIII is needed
for the normal progression of autophagy. There are two models
proposed—firstly, that Trs85 is present on Atg9-positive membranes,
and required to tether them together at the PAS to form the phagophore (Lynch-Day et al, 2010; Kakuta et al, 2012; Yamamoto et al,
2012), and secondly, that TRAPPIII regulates the trafficking itinerary
of Atg9, retaining it at the Golgi in the fed state and providing a reservoir of Atg9 for the induction of starvation (Shirahama-Noda et al,
2013). Given our data in mammalian cells on the effect of TBC1D14
(Longatti et al, 2012) and TRAPP on autophagy and secretion, we
Figure 7. Loss of TRAPPC8 disrupts Golgi structure and function.
A HEK293A cells transiently transfected with RISC-free control siRNA or siRNA duplexes directed against TRAPPC8 and RAB11A and B (knockdown confirmed by
immunoblot analysis) were fed with Alexa-647 transferrin for 15 min in full medium, and the fluorescent transferrin chased out for the indicated time periods. At the
end of the time course, cells were trypsinised, fixed and the Alexa-647 fluorescence analysed by flow cytometry. Results are plotted as percentage of transferrin
fluorescence at t = 0 for the RISC-free control cells, expressed as the mean of three independent experiments s.e.m.
B Cells transiently transfected with RISC-free control siRNA, or siRNA duplexes directed against TRAPPC8 or RAB1A and B were stained for the cis-Golgi markers GM130
or RAB1B and analysed by confocal microscopy. Scale bars, 20 lm in main panels, 10 lm in inset panels. Bar graph: > 100 cells per siRNA were scored for fragmented
or normal juxtanuclear Golgi stacks from three independent experiments. Error bars s.e.m., *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, one-way ANOVA with Sidak’s multiple
comparison test.
C HeLa C1 cells transiently transfected with RISC-free control siRNA or siRNA duplexes directed against TRAPPC8 or RAB1A and B (knockdown confirmed by immunoblot
analysis) were treated with D/D solubiliser for the indicated time periods, trypsinised, fixed and their GFP content analysed by flow cytometry. The line graph shows
the GFP fluorescence as a percentage of t = 0, s.e.m. from three independent experiments.
12
The EMBO Journal
ª 2015 The Authors
▸
Published online: December 28, 2015
Christopher A Lamb et al
TBC1D14 binds TRAPP to control autophagy
The EMBO Journal
A
B
C
Figure 7.
ª 2015 The Authors
The EMBO Journal
13
Published online: December 28, 2015
The EMBO Journal
TBC1D14 binds TRAPP to control autophagy
Christopher A Lamb et al
Figure 8. TRAPP function is required for normal ATG9 traffic.
A ATG9-positive membranes were immunoisolated from approximately 2 × 107 fed (F) or starved (S) HEK293A cells using a monoclonal hamster anti-ATG9 (ATG9) or
control hamster IgM and immunoblotted for ATG9 using a rabbit polyclonal antibody, TRAPPC8, TRAPPC4 and actin.
B HEK293A cells transfected with GFP or GFP-TBR (green) were stained for ATG9 using hamster anti-ATG9 (red) and analysed by confocal microscopy. Scale bars, 20 lm.
C HEK293A cells transiently transfected with RISC-free siRNA or siRNA against TRAPPC8 were stained for RAB1B (green) and ATG9 using hamster anti-ATG9 (red) and
imaged using confocal microscopy. Scale bars, 20 lm.
D Stills at t = 30 min from time lapse imaging of 9B9 cells (stably expressing GFP-LC3 and mRFP-ATG9) expressing either CFP or CFP-TBR (blue). Scale bars, 20 lm.
Inset panels show mRFP-ATG9 and GFP-LC3 contact events at the indicated time points; arrowheads indicate contact events. Bar chart shows number of times a
GFP-LC3 spot was within 1 lm of an mRFP-ATG9 spot (a contact event), expressed as total mRFP-ATG9 contacts per GFP-LC3 spot s.e.m., n = 18 cells per condition
pooled from 4 independent experiments.
hypothesised that TBR overexpression or TRAPPC8 depletion
affected autophagy via alteration of ATG9 localisation or trafficking.
Immunoisolation of ATG9-positive membranes from HEK293A
cells revealed that TRAPP subunits including TRAPPC8 were
co-isolated with ATG9, regardless of the induction of autophagy
(Fig 8A). This is similar to the situation observed in yeast, where
Trs85 is enriched in Atg9 vesicles (Kakuta et al, 2012) and suggests
TRAPP subunits direct ATG9 trafficking. When we disrupted TRAPP
function by overexpressing GFP-TBR, we observed that the juxtanuclear ATG9 accumulation observed in HEK293A cells in fed
medium was disrupted (Fig 8B). The ATG9 juxtanuclear compartment along with RAB1B-positive structures was also disrupted on
TRAPPC8 depletion (Fig 8C), indicating that TRAPP function is
required for ATG9 retention at the Golgi. We investigated the effect
of TRAPPC8 depletion on a second Golgi-localised protein involved
in autophagy, GFP-DFCP1, and found that the juxtanuclear accumulation of GFP-DFCP1 observed in fed cells was diminished after
TRAPPC8 depletion, along with a subtle fragmentation of GM130positive structures (Fig EV5). This shows that TRAPPC8 is required
for the trafficking of Golgi-localised autophagy regulators.
We have previously shown that ATG9-positive vesicles transiently contact growing LC3B-positive phagophore and autophagosomes without actually fusing with them, and have speculated that
lipid or protein delivery may be one of the functions of this compartment (Orsi et al, 2012). To investigate whether TBR expression, and
thus TRAPP inhibition, prevents these transient contacts, we
expressed CFP-TBR or CFP alone in 9B9 cells, which stably express
mRFP-ATG9 and GFP-LC3B (Orsi et al, 2012), and analysed the
number of times mRFP-ATG9 and LC3-positive structures came into
contact (< 1 lm apart) during a 1-h starvation by live confocal
microscopy (Movies EV1 and EV2, still images in Fig 8D). We could
not observe any differences between the number of contacts in CFPTBR- or CFP-expressing cells (Fig 8D). These data show that loss of
TRAPP activity affects the steady-state distribution of the ATG9
compartment, not its ability to tether with LC3-positive membranes.
TBR-induced ATG9 dispersion is independent of ULK1
Previous work from our group has demonstrated that ULK1 kinase
is required for the amino acid starvation-induced redistribution of
ATG9 to peripheral compartments; on starvation, ULK1-depleted
cells retain a juxtanuclear accumulation of ATG9 (Young et al,
2006; Orsi et al, 2012). As disruption of TRAPP function in fed cells
results in dispersion of juxtanuclear ATG9, we wanted to confirm
whether this dispersion requires ULK1.
We transfected cells with non-targeting RISC-free siRNA or siRNA
against ULK1 and subsequently transfected cells with plasmids
14
The EMBO Journal
encoding GFP or GFP-TBR. Analysing these cells by confocal microscopy, we found, as anticipated, that ULK1-depleted cells expressing
GFP alone did not redistribute ATG9 on starvation (Fig 9A, upper
panels). As expected, RISC-free siRNA-treated cells expressing GFPTBR had severely reduced juxtanuclear ATG9 staining in fed conditions (see Figs 8B and 9A, middle panel). Remarkably, this was
maintained in ULK1-depleted cells and upon starvation. These data
suggest that TBC1D14 and TRAPP may act upstream of ULK1 in
regulating ATG9 traffic, perhaps by maintaining normal traffic into
the Golgi. As TRAPP is a RAB1 GEF (Sacher et al, 1998; Barrowman
et al, 2010), we decided to test whether loss of RAB1 activity
phenocopied the TBR overexpression effect on ATG9 traffic. Indeed,
overexpression of myc-RAB1B S22N, a GDP-locked dominant
negative form of the protein (Alvarez et al, 2003), fragmented the
juxtanuclear ATG9 compartment, and ULK1 depletion did not
prevent this dispersion (Fig 9B, middle and lower panels). Conversely, expression of wild-type myc-RAB1B did not result in dispersion
of ATG9 in ULK1-depleted cells, in fed or starved conditions (Fig 9B,
upper panels). These data support the notion that TRAPP- and
RAB1-dependent effects on ATG9 trafficking are upstream of ULK1
activity, and form part of a more fundamental trafficking process.
Discussion
Our previous analysis of putative RabGAP proteins affecting LC3
lipidation identified TBC1D14 as a negative regulator of autophagy
(Longatti et al, 2012). We show here that the mammalian version of
the TRAPPIII complex binds to TBC1D14, and that this interaction is
mediated by an N-terminal 103 amino acid stretch in TBC1D14,
which we call the TBR, and TRAPPC8, the mammalian orthologue
of yeast Trs85 (Scrivens et al, 2011).
Importantly, we show endogenous TRAPPC8 is a subunit of a
“TRAPPIII-like” complex in mammalian cells and behaves as a positive regulator of autophagy, with its depletion reducing the number
of autophagic puncta. Given the interaction between TRAPP and
TBC1D14 and building on our previous finding of TBC1D14’s negative regulation of autophagy (Longatti et al, 2012), we show that
recruitment of TRAPPIII by TBC1D14 tubulates RE and inhibits
autophagy.
We have previously demonstrated that TBC1D14 resides on both
peripheral RE and Golgi membranes (Longatti et al, 2012); however,
the tubules generated on TBC1D14 overexpression are positive for
RAB1, RAB11 and transferrin (Figs 1 and 2). In support of an interaction of TBC1D14 and TRAPPIII, it has been shown that exchange
between the transferrin/RAB11-positive RE and the RAB1-positive
ERGIC/early Golgi can occur (Marie et al, 2009). The presence of
ª 2015 The Authors
▸
Published online: December 28, 2015
Christopher A Lamb et al
A
TBC1D14 binds TRAPP to control autophagy
The EMBO Journal
B
C
D
Figure 8.
ª 2015 The Authors
The EMBO Journal
15
Published online: December 28, 2015
The EMBO Journal
TBC1D14 binds TRAPP to control autophagy
Christopher A Lamb et al
A
B
C
Figure 9.
16
The EMBO Journal
ª 2015 The Authors
Published online: December 28, 2015
Christopher A Lamb et al
◀
The EMBO Journal
TBC1D14 binds TRAPP to control autophagy
Figure 9. A TBC1D14- and RAB1-dependent trafficking step is essential for normal ATG9 traffic.
A Cells depleted of ULK1 (siULK1) or not (RISC free) were transfected with GFP or GFP-TBR (green), starved (EBSS) or not ( EBSS) and stained for ATG9 using hamster
anti-ATG9 (red). Arrows indicate transfected cells. Western blot indicates ULK1 knockdown. Scale bars, 20 lm.
B Cells depleted of ULK1 (siULK1) or not (RISC free) were transfected with myc-RAB1B or myc-RAB1B (S22N) (green), starved (EBSS) or not ( EBSS) and stained for ATG9
using hamster anti-ATG9 (red). Arrows indicate transfected cells. Western blot indicates ULK1 knockdown. Scale bars, 20 lm.
C Model for the role of TBC1D14 and the TRAPP complex in mammalian autophagy and ATG9 traffic. Recycling endosomes harbour a population of TBC1D14 bound to
RAB11, and a population of ATG9 molecules which may traffic to and from the ATG9 compartment. (i) Upon amino acid starvation, TBC1D14 and RAB11 induce a
vesicle trafficking step from RAB11- to RAB1-positive membranes at a tubulo-vesicular transport intermediate (ii). This results in recycling of ATG9 to RAB1-regulated
Golgi compartments (iii) from where ATG9 can be trafficked to the ATG9 compartment in an ULK1-dependent manner (iv). This maintains the ATG9 compartment
under starvation, which can then both contribute to, and promote autophagosome formation from other membrane sources, including the RAB11-positive recycling
endosome (v).
endogenous TBC1D14 on both these compartments indicates it plays
a key role in exchange between RAB11- and RAB1-positive
membranes, via TRAPPIII.
TBC1D14 behaves as a RAB11 effector, but we were previously
unable to characterise any enzymatic activity for TBC1D14 (Longatti
et al, 2012). We show here TBC1D14 acts as a negative regulator of
autophagy by modulating the contribution of both RE and Golgi
membranes to the growing autophagosome through its interaction
with Rab11 and TRAPPIII. TBC1D14 is resident both on peripheral
transferrin-positive structures and the Golgi complex in basal conditions. Upon starvation and autophagy activation, TBC1D14 levels
increase in the Golgi while ATG9 disperses from the Golgi to the
ATG9 compartment, in an ULK1-dependent manner (Young et al,
2006; Longatti et al, 2012). Our previous finding that TBC1D14
overexpression induced tubules do not harbour ATG9 (Longatti
et al, 2012) suggests that normally the TBC1D14–TRAPP interaction
may be important in ATG9 exit from the ATG9 compartment, and
potentially the RE.
Our new findings shed light on the potential function of TBC1D14
and support the model shown in Fig 9C. TBC1D14 at the RE is bound
to RAB11. RAB11 bound TBC1D14 interacts with the TRAPPIII
complex on a vesicular intermediate, where it activates RAB1. This
results in conversion of RAB11-positive membranes to RAB1-positive
membranes facilitating endosome to Golgi traffic. This trafficking step
is required for a rapid cycling of ATG9 under starvation and maintenance of a ready supply of ATG9 vesicles for further autophagosome
formation. TBC1D14 may act to balance direct, bulk contribution of
RE to autophagosomes through its RAB11-binding ability, while
promoting constitutive ATG9 cycling from the Atg9 compartment
through its recruitment of TRAPP and activation of RAB1.
This model has some similarities with that recently proposed for
Atg9 traffic in yeast (Shirahama-Noda et al, 2013), as TRAPPdependent traffic is needed to maintain a cycling “store” of Atg9
vesicles to support autophagosome formation. This study also
identified a role for the GARP (Golgi associated retrograde protein)
complex in returning Atg9 to the Golgi from late endocytic compartments; however, the only identified role for GARP in mammalian
autophagy thus far is in autophagosome maturation (Perez-Victoria
et al, 2010). Despite the lack of an obvious TBC1D14 orthologue,
the yeast orthologues of RAB11 (Ypt31/32) have been implicated in
TRAPP-dependent trafficking and autophagy, suggesting that
elements of this pathway are conserved in yeast (Zou et al, 2013).
A role for mammalian TRAPPIII in autophagy
Our findings are the first to clearly characterise a role for mammalian TRAPP, in particular TRAPPC8, in bulk macroautophagy, and a
ª 2015 The Authors
previous network study supports our conclusions (Behrends et al,
2010). As anticipated from findings in yeast, where Trs85 appears
to be required to nucleate membranes at the PAS to form the
phagophore (Lynch-Day et al, 2010; Kakuta et al, 2012), mammalian TRAPPIII appears to act at an early stage in autophagy, as
disruption of TRAPP function results in reduction in DFCP1-positive
omegasomes, which are thought to be functionally equivalent to the
single PAS found in yeast cells (Axe et al, 2008; Hayashi-Nishino
et al, 2009; Yla-Anttila et al, 2009).
Our findings also clarify the relationship between mammalian
TRAPP and ATG9 vesicles. While our data support the notion that
the TRAPP/RAB1 system is needed to allow ATG9 to cycle through
the endomembrane system, as ATG9 is dispersed under basal conditions upon TRAPP disruption, we also find that isolated ATG9positive membranes harbour TRAPP subunits. We propose that a
TRAPPIII-like complex transiently associates with ATG9-positive
membranes, facilitating a switch between RAB11 and RAB1 at a
vesicular transport intermediate, allowing ATG9 to cycle through
the endomembrane system to return to the Golgi. Our data suggest
that a RAB cascade (Rink et al, 2005) operates during ATG9 trafficking. However, as TBC1D14 appears to act as an effector for
RAB11 rather than a GAP (Longatti et al, 2012), how RAB11 is inactivated in this cascade remains to be determined.
The ER exit machinery is crucial for autophagosome formation
At the molecular level, it is already established that RAB1, one of
the key determinants of ER-Golgi and intra-Golgi traffic and also the
canonical GEF target of the TRAPP complex (Barrowman et al,
2010), is required for autophagosome formation, and in particular
omegasome formation (Winslow et al, 2010; Zoppino et al, 2010;
Huang et al, 2011; Mochizuki et al, 2013), and in our studies, we
have shown that RAB1 is in turn necessary for WIPI2 and LC3
puncta formation. Indeed in yeast, the formation of the PAS from
Atg9 vesicles depends on the yeast orthologue of Rab1, Ypt1
(Lynch-Day et al, 2010; Kakuta et al, 2012; Lipatova et al, 2012),
and there is evidence that Ypt1 can recruit Atg1 to the PAS (Wang
et al, 2013). Our data support the notion that the ER-Golgi trafficking machinery plays a second conserved role in autophagosome
formation, not only creating platforms for and contributing
membrane to forming autophagosomes but also by promoting trafficking of ATG9 from compartments, potentially including the RE, to
RAB1-positive transport vesicles, thus supporting autophagosome
biogenesis (Fig 9C). Further analysis of cells lacking key components of the ER-Golgi trafficking machinery using imaging techniques such as those employed in recent studies (Karanasios et al,
2013; Koyama-Honda et al, 2013) will help to clarify these findings.
The EMBO Journal
17
Published online: December 28, 2015
The EMBO Journal
More broadly, our data add to a growing body of evidence that
proteins and compartments thought to be required for exit of
proteins from the ER and into the Golgi are in fact also regulating
autophagy. Both ultrastructural studies (Biazik et al, 2015) and
biochemical studies have suggested a role for ER exit sites in
autophagosome formation, whereby the ERGIC as a source of LC3
lipidation activity contributes to autophagosome formation, (Ge
et al, 2013). Another recent yeast study has linked ER exit sites to
autophagy (Graef et al, 2013), and indeed, COPII vesicles seem to
be needed for autophagy to progress (Tan et al, 2013). In the wider
context of membrane trafficking, our study highlights the potential
for membrane exchange between RAB11-positive RE and RAB1
regulated early Golgi compartments such as the ERGIC (Marie et al,
2009) in regulating autophagosome formation. The identification
of other cargos that traverse the RAB11-RAB1 route will increase
our understanding of how this trafficking step contributes to
autophagy.
Christopher A Lamb et al
were blocked in 5% BSA in PBS and incubated with appropriate
primary and secondary antibodies in 5% BSA for 1 h each in a
humidified chamber. Fixed cells were analysed using a Zeiss Upright
710 confocal microscope with a 63× objective lens. For spot counting, a 40× objective was used and images were analysed using Imaris
software (Bitplane). For quantification, cells were located using
Hoechst DNA dye and subsequently imaged in other channels.
Live cell imaging
9B9 cells (Orsi et al, 2012) grown in 35-mm glass-bottomed dishes
(Mattek corporation) were starved in EBSS + 30 mM HEPES for
15 min and filmed for a further 60 min at 37°C using a Zeiss Inverted
880 microscope and 63× objective lens with a 0.6 lm Z-section, and
images acquired every 10 s. Proximity of GFP-LC3 spots to mRFPATG9 spots was quantified using Imaris software (Bitplane) with the
Distance Transformation Matlab plugin, with GFP-LC3 spots < 1 lm
from an mRFP-ATG9 spot being scored as a contact event.
Materials and Methods
GST pulldown
Cell culture
Approximately 8 × 106 cells were washed with twice with PBS,
harvested and lysed in 800 ll TNTE plus complete protease inhibitor cocktail (PI) (Roche). The lysates were divided between GST
and GST-TBR resin and incubated for 2 h with rotation at 4°C.
Bound proteins were washed three times in TNTE plus PI and eluted
from the beads with 30 ll 2× Laemmli sample buffer.
Cell lines are described in detail in the Appendix Supplementary
Methods and were maintained in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s
medium (DMEM, Sigma-Aldrich) supplemented with 10% foetal
bovine serum (FBS) and 4 mM glutamine at 37°C and 10% CO2.
Amino acid starvation was induced by washing cells three times in
Earle’s balanced saline solution (EBSS) and incubating in EBSS, or
EBSS + 100 nM bafilomycin A1 (BafA1; Calbiochem) to block lysosomal acidification, for 2 h. For recombinant protein expression for
Western blot and immunoprecipitation, cells were transfected using
Lipofectamine 2000 (Life technologies) according to manufacturer’s
instructions. For recombinant protein expression for confocal analysis, cells were transfected with Fugene HD (Promega) according to
manufacturer’s instructions. For siRNA transfection, cells were
transfected using a forward transfection strategy using two siRNA
hits (Day 1—Oligofectamine (Life technologies) and Day 2—Lipofectamine 2000), except for ULK1 depletion where reverse transfection
using Lipofectamine 2000 was used.
Constructs
GFP-TRAPPC3 was a gift from A. DiMatteis and R. Venditti (TIGEM,
Naples, Italy). Myc-RAB1B wt and myc-RAB1B S22N were kind gifts
from Cecilia Alvarez (University of Cordoba, Spain). Myc-BioID was
from Addgene and was originally generated by the Roux laboratory
(Roux et al, 2012). pECFP-C1 (Clontech) was a gift from L. Ombrato
(Francis Crick Institute). GFP-Golgin 84 was gift from Martin Lowe
(University of Manchester, UK). All other constructs were previously
described (Longatti et al, 2012) or generated during this study.
Confocal microscopy
Cells grown on coverslips were fixed in 3% PFA, or 2% PFA, 75 mM
Lysine-HCl, 10 mM NaIO4 in 375 mM sodium phosphate buffer pH
6.2 (Marie et al, 2009), quenched with 50 lM NH4Cl and permeabilised in 50 lg/ml digitonin or 0.2% Triton X-100 in PBS. Cells
18
TBC1D14 binds TRAPP to control autophagy
The EMBO Journal
Isolation of Atg9-positive membranes
HEK-293 cells were treated with full medium (DMEM) or EBSS for
2 h. Cells were then washed in PBS and harvested by centrifugation.
Pellets were suspended in an isotonic buffer and passed through a
25G needle before pre-clearing by centrifugation. Supernatants were
used for incubation overnight at 4°C with non-specific IgM or
Hamster anti-Atg9 antibody-coupled beads. The ATG9-positive
membranes on the beads were then washed and eluted by peptide
competition. All isolated ATG9-positive membranes were resuspended in Laemmli sample buffer for gel electrophoresis and
immunoblotting.
Flow cytometry analysis of transferrin recycling and
bulk secretion
For analysis of transferrin recycling, HEK293A cells were grown in
6-well cluster plates. The cells were fed fluorescent transferrin
(Alexa-647-Tfn, Life technologies) for 15 min in DMEM, then the
Alexa-647-Tfn chased out of the cells with fresh DMEM for the indicated time periods. For analysis of bulk secretion, HeLa C1 cells
(Gordon et al, 2010) were grown in 6-well cluster plates. Cells were
treated with D/D solubiliser (Clontech), or D/D solubiliser plus
10 lg/ml Brefeldin A (BFA, Sigma-Aldrich) for the indicated time
periods. On completion of the time course, the cells were trypsinised, the trypsin inactivated with DMEM, the cells were fixed in
4% PFA, washed into PBS and fluorescence analysed using an LSRII
or Fortessa flow cytometer (Beckton Dickinson), gating for single
cells with forward and side scatter, and fluorescent tags on overexpressed proteins (GFP or CFP) where necessary.
ª 2015 The Authors
Published online: December 28, 2015
Christopher A Lamb et al
The EMBO Journal
TBC1D14 binds TRAPP to control autophagy
Western blot quantification
Birgisdottir ÅB, Lamark T, Johansen T (2013) The LIR motif – crucial for
Western blots were quantified using ImageJ software (NIH).
Chan EY, Kir S, Tooze SA (2007) siRNA screening of the kinome identifies ULK1
Data analysis
Chan EY, Longatti A, McKnight NC, Tooze SA (2009) Kinase-inactivated ULK
selective autophagy. J Cell Sci 126: 3237 – 3247
as a multidomain modulator of autophagy. J Biol Chem 282: 25464 – 25474
proteins inhibit autophagy via their conserved C-terminal domain using
All graphs were plotted and statistical tests performed using Graphpad Prism software.
an Atg13-independent mechanism. Mol Cell Biol 29: 157 – 171
Ching YH, Munroe RJ, Moran JL, Barker AK, Mauceli E, Fennell T, Dipalma F,
Lindblad-Toh K, Abcunas LM, Gilmour JF, Harris TP, Kloet SL, Luo Y, McElwee
Expanded View for this article is available online.
JL, Mu W, Park HK, Rogal DL, Schimenti KJ, Shen L, Shindo M et al (2010)
High resolution mapping and positional cloning of ENU-induced mutations
Acknowledgements
The authors thank A. Peden, C. Alvarez, M. Lowe, L. Ombrato, K. Roux, R.
Venditti and A. De Matteis for cell lines and constructs. The authors
acknowledge the assistance of the Francis Crick institute Flow Cytometry,
Light Microscopy and Protein Purification facilities with several experiments.
The authors thank F. Barr for helpful discussion and the laboratory members
for useful input throughout the project. This work was supported by the
Francis Crick Institute, which receives its core funding from Cancer Research
UK, the UK Medical Research Council and the Wellcome Trust (CAL, DJ, DF,
APS, SAT), and grants from the German Research Foundation (BE 4685/1-1)
(SN, CB).
in the Rw region of mouse chromosome 5. BMC Genet 11: 106
Chung J, Kuo CJ, Crabtree GR, Blenis J (1992) Rapamycin-FKBP specifically
blocks growth-dependent activation of and signaling by the 70 kd S6
protein kinases. Cell 69: 1227 – 1236
Diao A, Rahman D, Pappin DJ, Lucocq J, Lowe M (2003) The coiled-coil
membrane protein golgin-84 is a novel rab effector required for Golgi
ribbon formation. J Cell Biol 160: 201 – 212
Dooley HC, Razi M, Polson HE, Girardin SE, Wilson MI, Tooze SA (2014) WIPI2
links LC3 conjugation with PI3P, autophagosome formation, and pathogen
clearance by recruiting Atg12-5-16L1. Mol Cell 55: 238 – 252
Frasa MA, Koessmeier KT, Ahmadian MR, Braga VM (2012) Illuminating the
functional and structural repertoire of human TBC/RABGAPs. Nat Rev Mol
Author contributions
CAL designed and performed most of the experiments and wrote the manu-
Cell Biol 13: 67 – 73
Ge L, Melville D, Zhang M, Schekman R (2013) The ER-Golgi intermediate
script. SN and CB generated the stable shRNA cells and provided reagents and
compartment is a key membrane source for the LC3 lipidation step of
advice. DF and APS performed the mass spectrometry analysis of the BioID
autophagosome biogenesis. eLife 2: e00947
experiments. DJ performed the ATG9 immunoisolation experiments. SAT
directed the research, performed the GST pulldown in Fig 1 and wrote the
manuscript.
Gordon DE, Bond LM, Sahlender DA, Peden AA (2010) A targeted siRNA screen
to identify SNAREs required for constitutive secretion in mammalian cells.
Traffic 11: 1191 – 1204
Graef M, Friedman JR, Graham C, Babu M, Nunnari J (2013) ER exit sites are
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
physical and functional core autophagosome biogenesis components. Mol
Biol Cell 24: 2918 – 2931
Haas AK, Yoshimura S, Stephens DJ, Preisinger C, Fuchs E, Barr FA (2007)
Analysis of GTPase-activating proteins: Rab1 and Rab43 are key Rabs
References
required to maintain a functional Golgi complex in human cells. J Cell Sci
120: 2997 – 3010
Alvarez C, Garcia-Mata R, Brandon E, Sztul E (2003) COPI recruitment is
Hamasaki M, Furuta N, Matsuda A, Nezu A, Yamamoto A, Fujita N, Oomori H,
modulated by a Rab1b-dependent mechanism. Mol Biol Cell 14:
Noda T, Haraguchi T, Hiraoka Y, Amano A, Yoshimori T (2013)
2116 – 2127
Autophagosomes form at ER-mitochondria contact sites. Nature 495:
Axe EL, Walker SA, Manifava M, Chandra P, Roderick HL, Habermann A,
Griffiths G, Ktistakis NT (2008) Autophagosome formation from membrane
389 – 393
Hara T, Takamura A, Kishi C, Iemura S, Natsume T, Guan JL, Mizushima N
compartments enriched in phosphatidylinositol 3-phosphate and
(2008) FIP200, a ULK-interacting protein, is required for autophagosome
dynamically connected to the endoplasmic reticulum. J Cell Biol 182:
formation in mammalian cells. J Cell Biol 181: 497 – 510
685 – 701
Barrowman J, Bhandari D, Reinisch K, Ferro-Novick S (2010) TRAPP complexes
in membrane traffic: convergence through a common Rab. Nat Rev Mol
Cell Biol 11: 759 – 763
Bassik MC, Kampmann M, Lebbink RJ, Wang S, Hein MY, Poser I,
Weibezahn J, Horlbeck MA, Chen S, Mann M, Hyman AA, Leproust EM,
McManus MT, Weissman JS (2013) A systematic mammalian genetic
Hayashi-Nishino M, Fujita N, Noda T, Yamaguchi A, Yoshimori T, Yamamoto
A (2009) A subdomain of the endoplasmic reticulum forms a cradle for
autophagosome formation. Nat Cell Biol 11: 1433 – 1437
Hosokawa N, Sasaki T, Iemura S, Natsume T, Hara T, Mizushima N (2009)
Atg101, a novel mammalian autophagy protein interacting with Atg13.
Autophagy 5: 973 – 979
Huang J, Birmingham CL, Shahnazari S, Shiu J, Zheng YT, Smith AC,
interaction map reveals pathways underlying ricin susceptibility. Cell 152:
Campellone KG, Heo WD, Gruenheid S, Meyer T, Welch MD, Ktistakis NT,
909 – 922
Kim PK, Klionsky DJ, Brumell JH (2011) Antibacterial autophagy occurs at
Behrends C, Sowa ME, Gygi SP, Harper JW (2010) Network organization of
the human autophagy system. Nature 466: 68 – 76
Biazik J, Yla-Anttila P, Vihinen H, Jokitalo E, Eskelinen EL (2015)
PI(3)P-enriched domains of the endoplasmic reticulum and requires Rab1
GTPase. Autophagy 7: 17 – 26
Ishii Y, Nakahara T, Kataoka M, Kusumoto-Matsuo R, Mori S, Takeuchi T,
Ultrastructural relationship of the phagophore with surrounding
Kukimoto I (2013) Identification of TRAPPC8 as a host factor required for
organelles. Autophagy 11: 439 – 451
human papillomavirus cell entry. PLoS One 8: e80297
ª 2015 The Authors
The EMBO Journal
19
Published online: December 28, 2015
The EMBO Journal
Itakura E, Kishi-Itakura C, Mizushima N (2012) The hairpin-type tail-anchored
SNARE syntaxin 17 targets to autophagosomes for fusion with
endosomes/lysosomes. Cell 151: 1256 – 1269
Itoh T, Fujita N, Kanno E, Yamamoto A, Yoshimori T, Fukuda M (2008) Golgiresident small GTPase Rab33B interacts with Atg16L and modulates
autophagosome formation. Mol Biol Cell 19: 2916 – 2925
Itoh T, Kanno E, Uemura T, Waguri S, Fukuda M (2011) OATL1, a novel
autophagosome-resident Rab33B-GAP, regulates autophagosomal
maturation. J Cell Biol 192: 839 – 853
Kabeya Y, Mizushima N, Ueno T, Yamamoto A, Kirisako T, Noda T, Kominami
E, Ohsumi Y, Yoshimori T (2000) LC3, a mammalian homologue of yeast
Apg8p, is localized in autophagosome membranes after processing. EMBO
J 19: 5720 – 5728
Kabeya Y, Mizushima N, Yamamoto A, Oshitani-Okamoto S, Ohsumi Y,
Yoshimori T (2004) LC3, GABARAP and GATE16 localize to
autophagosomal membrane depending on form-II formation. J Cell Sci
117: 2805 – 2812
Kakuta S, Yamamoto H, Negishi L, Kondo-Kakuta C, Hayashi N, Ohsumi Y
(2012) Atg9 vesicles recruit vesicle-tethering proteins Trs85 and Ypt1 to
the autophagosome formation site. J Biol Chem 287: 44261 – 44269
Karanasios E, Stapleton E, Manifava M, Kaizuka T, Mizushima N, Walker SA,
Christopher A Lamb et al
TRAPPIII, to the phagophore to promote autophagy. Proc Natl Acad Sci
USA 107: 7811 – 7816
Mardones GA, Snyder CM, Howell KE (2006) Cis-Golgi matrix proteins move
directly to endoplasmic reticulum exit sites by association with tubules.
Mol Biol Cell 17: 525 – 538
Marie M, Dale HA, Sannerud R, Saraste J (2009) The function of the
intermediate compartment in pre-Golgi trafficking involves its stable
connection with the centrosome. Mol Biol Cell 20: 4458 – 4470
Mercer CA, Kaliappan A, Dennis PB (2009) A novel, human Atg13 binding
protein, Atg101, interacts with ULK1 and is essential for macroautophagy.
Autophagy 5: 649 – 662
Mizushima N, Kuma A, Kobayashi Y, Yamamoto A, Matsubae M, Takao T,
Natsume T, Ohsumi Y, Yoshimori T (2003) Mouse Apg16L, a novel WDrepeat protein, targets to the autophagic isolation membrane with the
Apg12-Apg5 conjugate. J Cell Sci 116: 1679 – 1688
Mizushima N, Levine B, Cuervo AM, Klionsky DJ (2008) Autophagy fights
disease through cellular self-digestion. Nature 451: 1069 – 1075
Mizushima N, Sugita H, Yoshimori T, Ohsumi Y (1998) A new protein
conjugation system in human. The counterpart of the yeast Apg12p
conjugation system essential for autophagy. J Biol Chem 273: 33889 – 33892
Mochizuki Y, Ohashi R, Kawamura T, Iwanari H, Kodama T, Naito M,
Ktistakis NT (2013) Dynamic association of the ULK1 complex with
Hamakubo T (2013) Phosphatidylinositol 3-phosphatase myotubularin-
omegasomes during autophagy induction. J Cell Sci 126: 5224 – 5238
related protein 6 (MTMR6) is regulated by small GTPase Rab1B in the
Klionsky DJ, Abdalla FC, Abeliovich H, Abraham RT, Acevedo-Arozena A, Adeli
K, Agholme L, Agnello M, Agostinis P, Aguirre-Ghiso JA, Ahn HJ, Ait-
early secretory and autophagic pathways. J Biol Chem 288: 1009 – 1021
Moreau K, Fleming A, Imarisio S, Lopez Ramirez A, Mercer JL, Jimenez-
Mohamed O, Ait-Si-Ali S, Akematsu T, Akira S, Al-Younes HM, Al-Zeer MA,
Sanchez M, Bento CF, Puri C, Zavodszky E, Siddiqi F, Lavau CP, Betton M,
Albert ML, Albin RL, Alegre-Abarrategui J et al (2012) Guidelines for the
O’Kane CJ, Wechsler DS, Rubinsztein DC (2014) PICALM modulates
use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy. Autophagy 8:
445 – 544
Knaevelsrud H, Soreng K, Raiborg C, Haberg K, Rasmuson F, Brech A, Liestol K,
Rusten TE, Stenmark H, Neufeld TP, Carlsson SR, Simonsen A (2013)
Membrane remodeling by the PX-BAR protein SNX18 promotes
autophagosome formation. J Cell Biol 202: 331 – 349
Koyama-Honda I, Itakura E, Fujiwara TK, Mizushima N (2013) Temporal
analysis of recruitment of mammalian ATG proteins to the
autophagosome formation site. Autophagy 9: 1491 – 1499
Lamb CA, Dooley HC, Tooze SA (2013a) Endocytosis and autophagy: shared
machinery for degradation. BioEssays 35: 34 – 45
Lamb CA, Yoshimori T, Tooze SA (2013b) The autophagosome: origins
unknown, biogenesis complex. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 14: 759 – 774
Liang C, Lee JS, Inn KS, Gack MU, Li Q, Roberts EA, Vergne I, Deretic V, Feng P,
Akazawa C, Jung JU (2008) Beclin1-binding UVRAG targets the class C Vps
complex to coordinate autophagosome maturation and endocytic
trafficking. Nat Cell Biol 10: 776 – 787
Lipatova Z, Belogortseva N, Zhang XQ, Kim J, Taussig D, Segev N (2012)
Regulation of selective autophagy onset by a Ypt/Rab GTPase module.
Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 109: 6981 – 6986
Liu Q, Chang JW, Wang J, Kang SA, Thoreen CC, Markhard A, Hur W, Zhang J,
autophagy activity and tau accumulation. Nat Commun 5: 4998
Moreau K, Ravikumar B, Puri C, Rubinsztein DC (2012) Arf6 promotes
autophagosome formation via effects on phosphatidylinositol 4,5bisphosphate and phospholipase D. J Cell Biol 196: 483 – 496
Moreau K, Ravikumar B, Renna M, Puri C, Rubinsztein David C (2011)
Autophagosome precursor maturation requires homotypic fusion. Cell 146:
303 – 317
Nazarko TY, Huang J, Nicaud JM, Klionsky DJ, Sibirny AA (2005) Trs85 is
required for macroautophagy, pexophagy and cytoplasm to vacuole
targeting in Yarrowia lipolytica and Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Autophagy
1: 37 – 45
Orsi A, Razi M, Dooley H, Robinson D, Weston A, Collinson L, Tooze S (2012)
Dynamic and transient interactions of Atg9 with autophagosomes, but not
membrane integration, is required for autophagy. Mol Biol Cell 23:
1860 – 1873
Papinski D, Schuschnig M, Reiter W, Wilhelm L, Barnes CA, Maiolica A,
Hansmann I, Pfaffenwimmer T, Kijanska M, Stoffel I, Lee SS, Brezovich A,
Lou JH, Turk BE, Aebersold R, Ammerer G, Peter M, Kraft C (2014) Early
steps in autophagy depend on direct phosphorylation of Atg9 by the Atg1
kinase. Mol Cell 53: 471 – 483
Perez-Victoria FJ, Schindler C, Magadan JG, Mardones GA, Delevoye C, Romao
Sim T, Sabatini DM, Gray NS (2010) Discovery of 1-(4-(4-
M, Raposo G, Bonifacino JS (2010) Ang2/fat-free is a conserved subunit of
propionylpiperazin-1-yl)-3-(trifluoromethyl)phenyl)-9-(quinolin-3-yl)benz o
the Golgi-associated retrograde protein complex. Mol Biol Cell 21:
[h][1,6]naphthyridin-2(1H)-one as a highly potent, selective mammalian
target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitor for the treatment of cancer. J Med
Chem 53: 7146 – 7155
Longatti A, Lamb CA, Razi M, Yoshimura S-I, Barr FA, Tooze SA (2012)
TBC1D14 regulates autophagosome formation via Rab11 and recycling
endosomes. J Cell Biol 197: 659 – 675
Lynch-Day MA, Bhandari D, Menon S, Huang J, Cai H, Bartholomew CR,
Brumell JH, Ferro-Novick S, Klionsky DJ (2010) Trs85 directs a Ypt1 GEF,
20
TBC1D14 binds TRAPP to control autophagy
The EMBO Journal
3386 – 3395
Polson HEJ, de Lartigue J, Rigden DJ, Reedijk M, Urbe S, Clague MJ, Tooze SA
(2010) Mammalian Atg18 (WIPI2) localizes to omegasome-anchored
phagophores and positively regulates LC3 lipidation. Autophagy 6: 506 – 522
Popovic D, Akutsu M, Novak I, Harper JW, Behrends C, Dikic I (2012) Rab
GTPase-activating proteins in autophagy: regulation of endocytic and
autophagy pathways by direct binding to human ATG8 modifiers. Mol Cell
Biol 32: 1733 – 1744
ª 2015 The Authors
Published online: December 28, 2015
Christopher A Lamb et al
The EMBO Journal
TBC1D14 binds TRAPP to control autophagy
Puri C, Renna M, Bento CF, Moreau K, Rubinsztein DC (2013) Diverse
autophagosome membrane sources coalesce in recycling endosomes. Cell
154: 1285 – 1299
Ravikumar B, Moreau K, Jahreiss L, Puri C, Rubinsztein DC (2010) Plasma
Tempel W, Tong Y, Dimov S, Bochkarev A, Park H (2008) First crystallographic
models of human TBC domains in the context of a family-wide structural
analysis. Proteins 71: 497 – 502
Wang J, Menon S, Yamasaki A, Chou HT, Walz T, Jiang Y, Ferro-Novick S
membrane contributes to the formation of pre-autophagosomal
(2013) Ypt1 recruits the Atg1 kinase to the preautophagosomal structure.
structures. Nat Cell Biol 12: 747 – 757
Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 110: 9800 – 9805
Rink J, Ghigo E, Kalaidzidis Y, Zerial M (2005) Rab conversion as a mechanism
of progression from early to late endosomes. Cell 122: 735 – 749
Rosa P, Barr FA, Stinchcombe JC, Binacchi C, Huttner WB (1992) Brefeldin A
Webber JL, Tooze SA (2010) New insights into the function of Atg9. FEBS Lett
584: 1319 – 1326
Winslow AR, Chen CW, Corrochano S, Acevedo-Arozena A, Gordon DE, Peden
inhibits the formation of constitutive secretory vesicles and immature
AA, Lichtenberg M, Menzies FM, Ravikumar B, Imarisio S, Brown S, O’Kane
secretory granules from the trans-Golgi network. Eur J Cell Biol 59:
CJ, Rubinsztein DC (2010) alpha-Synuclein impairs macroautophagy:
265 – 274
Roux KJ, Kim DI, Raida M, Burke B (2012) A promiscuous biotin ligase fusion
implications for Parkinson’s disease. J Cell Biol 190: 1023 – 1037
Yamamoto H, Kakuta S, Watanabe TM, Kitamura A, Sekito T, Kondo-Kakuta C,
protein identifies proximal and interacting proteins in mammalian cells. J
Ichikawa R, Kinjo M, Ohsumi Y (2012) Atg9 vesicles are an important
Cell Biol 196: 801 – 810
membrane source during early steps of autophagosome formation. J Cell
Sabatini DM, Erdjument-Bromage H, Lui M, Tempst P, Snyder SH
(1994) RAFT1: a mammalian protein that binds to FKBP12 in a
rapamycin-dependent fashion and is homologous to yeast TORs. Cell
78: 35 – 43
Sacher M, Jiang Y, Barrowman J, Scarpa A, Burston J, Zhang L, Schieltz D,
Yates JR 3rd, Abeliovich H, Ferro-Novick S (1998) TRAPP, a highly
conserved novel complex on the cis-Golgi that mediates vesicle docking
and fusion. EMBO J 17: 2494 – 2503
Satoh A, Wang Y, Malsam J, Beard MB, Warren G (2003) Golgin-84 is a rab1
binding partner involved in Golgi structure. Traffic 4: 153 – 161
Schwanhausser B, Busse D, Li N, Dittmar G, Schuchhardt J, Wolf J, Chen W,
Selbach M (2011) Global quantification of mammalian gene expression
control. Nature 473: 337 – 342
Scrivens PJ, Noueihed B, Shahrzad N, Hul S, Brunet S, Sacher M
(2011) C4orf41 and TTC-15 are mammalian TRAPP components with a
role at an early stage in ER-to-Golgi trafficking. Mol Biol Cell 22:
2083 – 2093
Shirahama-Noda K, Kira S, Yoshimori T, Noda T (2013) TRAPPIII is responsible
Biol 198: 219 – 233
Yamasaki A, Menon S, Yu S, Barrowman J, Meerloo T, Oorschot V,
Klumperman J, Satoh A, Ferro-Novick S (2009) mTrs130 is a component of
a mammalian TRAPPII complex, a Rab1 GEF that binds to COPI-coated
vesicles. Mol Biol Cell 20: 4205 – 4215
Yla-Anttila P, Vihinen H, Jokitalo E, Eskelinen EL (2009) 3D tomography
reveals connections between the phagophore and endoplasmic reticulum.
Autophagy 5: 1180 – 1185
Young ARJ, Chan EYW, Hu XW, Κöchl R, Crawshaw SG, High S, Hailey DW,
Lippincott-Schwartz J, Tooze SA (2006) Starvation and ULK1-dependent
cycling of Mammalian Atg9 between the TGN and endosomes. J Cell Sci
119: 3888 – 3900
Zoppino FC, Militello RD, Slavin I, Alvarez C, Colombo MI (2010)
Autophagosome formation depends on the small GTPase Rab1 and
functional ER exit sites. Traffic 11: 1246 – 1261
Zou S, Chen Y, Liu Y, Segev N, Yu S, Liu Y, Min G, Ye M, Zeng Y, Zhu X, Hong B,
Bjorn LO, Liang Y, Li S, Xie Z (2013) Trs130 participates in autophagy
through GTPases Ypt31/32 in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Traffic 14: 233 – 246
for vesicular transport from early endosomes to Golgi, facilitating Atg9
cycling in autophagy. J Cell Sci 126: 4963 – 4973
Tan D, Cai Y, Wang J, Zhang J, Menon S, Chou HT, Ferro-Novick S, Reinisch
License: This is an open access article under the
terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0
KM, Walz T (2013) The EM structure of the TRAPPIII complex leads to the
License, which permits use, distribution and reproduc-
identification of a requirement for COPII vesicles on the macroautophagy
tion in any medium, provided the original work is
pathway. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 110: 19432 – 19437
properly cited.
ª 2015 The Authors
The EMBO Journal
21