Electronic Supplementary Information for

Electronic Supplementary Material (ESI) for Faraday Discussions.
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2016
Electronic Supplementary Information for
Three dimensional ink-jet printing of biomaterials using ionic liquids and co-solvents
Deshani H. A. T. Gunasekera*a, SzeLee Kueka, Denis Hasanaja, Yinfeng Hea, Christopher Tucka,
Anna K. Crofta and Ricky D. Wildmana
a
Faculty of Engineering, University of Nottingham, NG7 2RD, United Kingdom.
E-mail: [email protected]
Sample Preparation - Sample Number 1
Volume of [C4C1Im][OAc]
Density of [C4C1Im][OAc]
Mass of [C4C1Im][OAc]
= 8 mL
= 1.055 g/cm3
= 8.4400 g
Mass of cellulose was taken as 2% of the mass of [C4C1Im][OAc], i.e. 0.1688 g
Sample Preparation - Sample Number 5
Volume of [C4C1Im][OAc]
Density of [C4C1Im][OAc]
Mass of [C4C1Im][OAc]
= 6 mL
= 1.055 g/cm3
= 6.3300 g
Mass of cellulose was taken as 2% of the mass of [C4C1Im][OAc], i.e. 0.1266 g
Mass of DMSO was taken as 50% of the mass of [C4C1Im][OAc], i.e. 3.17 g
A
F
B
E
D
C
Figure S1. Apparatus used to fill the DIMATIX materials print cartridge. A) jetting
module B) fluid module C) fill needle D) 1 mL syringe E) cleaning pad and F) syringe
filter
Density Calculation - Sample Number 1
Mass Cellulose
Mass of [C4C1Im][OAc]
= 0.1688 g
= 8.4400 g
Total sample mass
= 8.6088 g
Density of Cellulose
Volume of Cellulose
=0.6 g/cm3
=0.28133 cm3
Density of [C4C1Im][OAc]
Volume of [C4C1Im][OAc]
= 1.055 g/cm3
= 8 cm3
Total sample volume
= 8.28122 cm3
Sample density
= 1.04 g/cm3
Density Calculation - Sample Number 5
Mass Cellulose
Mass of [C4C1Im][OAc]
Mass of DMSO
= 0.1266 g
= 6.33 g
= 3.17 g
Total sample mass
= 10.8876 g
Density of Cellulose
Volume of Cellulose
=0.6 g/cm3
=0.211 cm3
Density of [C4C1Im][OAc]
Volume of [C4C1Im][OAc]
= 1.055 g/cm3
= 6 cm3
Density of DMSO
Volume of DMSO
= 1.1 g/cm3
= 6 cm3
Total sample volume
= 9.0883cm3
Sample density
= 1.06 g/cm3
Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM) Images
A
B
Figure S2. SEM images obtained from Philips XL30 scanning electron microscope A)
sample 6 printed on PET and dried overnight at room temperature, B) sample 7 printed
on PET and dried overnight at room temperature
X Axis
900
800
700
nm
600
500
400
300
200
100
0
-100 0
20
40
60
80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 280 300 320
-200
-300
μm
nm
Y Axis
800
700
600
500
400
300
200
100
0
-100 0
-200
-300
-400
-500
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
200
220
240
μm
Figure S3. WLI images and data obtained from Brunker Contour CT white light
interferometry for sample 6 printed on PET and dried overnight at room temperature
X Axis
300
250
nm
200
150
100
50
0
-50
0
40
80
120 160 200 240 280 320 360 400 440 480 520 560
μm
Y Axis
300
250
nm
200
150
100
50
0
-50 0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
-100
-150
μm
Figure S4. WLI images and data obtained from Brunker Contour CT white light
interferometry for sample 7 printed on PET and dried overnight at room temperature
X Axis
20
40
60
80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 280 300 320
μm
nm
nm
1000
900
800
700
600
500
400
300
200
100
0
-100 0
-200
-300
-400
-500
1100
1000
900
800
700
600
500
400
300
200
100
0
-100 0
-200
-300
Y Axis
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
μm
Figure S5. WLI data obtained from Brunker Contour CT white light interferometry for
sample 6 printed on PET and dried overnight at 50°C
200
220
240
nm nm
X Axis
500
450
500
400
450
350
400
300
350
250
300
200
250
150
200
100
150
50
100
0
50
-50 0
0
-100
-50 0
-100
Y Axis
20
20
40
60
40
80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 280 300 320
60
80
100
120
μm
140
160
180
200
220
240
μm
Figure S6. WLI data obtained from Brunker Contour CT white light interferometry for
sample 7 printed and dried overnight at 50°C