Journal of Biogeography, 28, 775±794 Biogeography of the Antilles based on a parsimony analysis of orchid distributions J. Carlos Trejo-Torres and James D. Ackerman Department of Biology, University of Puerto Rico-Rõo Piedras, PO BOX 23360, San Juan, Puerto Rico 00931-3360 Abstract Aim We obtain biogeographical patterns based on the distributions of shared orchid species of the Caribbean. These patterns are used to de®ne biogeographical zones. We then analyse the concordance between the distributional patterns with ecological and physical features of the islands. Location We use orchid species recorded on 49 islands of the Greater, Lesser, and southern Antilles, and the Bahamas. Three continental areas are included: Florida (North America), the Yucatan (Central America), and the Guianas (South America). Methods We use a parsimonious analysis of species distributions that produces the best arrangements of shared taxa among areas. The analysis uses 356 shared orchid species of the 863 species recorded for studied areas. The methodology has been used to infer historical relationships among areas but we interpret the results as static or ecological patterns of biogeographical af®nities. Results Two kinds of island groupings are revealed. (1) Groups with common geology and geomorphology: the Bahama Archipelago, the Virgin Islands, the Cayman Islands and the southern Dutch Antilles. (2) An aggregation of distant islands with a heterogeneous geology but a common physiography: the Greater Antilles/Trinidad/ Lesser Antilles/Margarita-Tobago. The Guianas are linked with the Greater Antilles, while the Yucatan and Florida are linked to the Bahamas. Main conclusions Groupings of islands are congruent with their gross ecological features either from similar geomorphology or common physiography. The strong af®nity among islands considerably distant among each other is explained by the high vagility of dust-seeded orchids. Then, ¯oristic af®nities seem determined by ecological characteristics of islands rather than by dispersal barriers. We predict that other plant groups with dust-like diaspores and animals with good vagility should show comparable biogeographic patterns. Parsimony analysis of distributions (PAD) is an alternative methodology to multivariate analysis to compare biotas, and a graphic complement to quantitative methods producing numerical values. Keywords Antilles, Caribbean, biogeography, Orchidaceae, parsimony analysis of endemicity, distributions, dispersal, islands. INTRODUCTION The Antilles, or West Indies, have been frequently studied by biogeographers. These islands make up one of the largest tropical archipelagos in the world, second only to the islands Correspondence: J. Carlos Trejo-Torres, Department of Biology, University of Puerto Rico-RõÂo Piedras, PO BOX 23360, San Juan, Puerto Rico 00931-3360. 1 E-mail: [email protected] Ó 2001 Blackwell Science Ltd between Asia and Australia. The Antilles are also signi®cant because they represent one of the two connections, by way of an island chain, between two major biogeographical realms: the Neartic and the Neotropic. The majority of studies on Antillean biogeography concern the distributional patterns or the cladistic biogeography of animals, especially vertebrates and insects (e.g. Liebherr, 1988; Woods, 1989; Page & Lydeard, 1994; Hedges, 1996). Surprisingly, there are only a few publications on the phytogeography of this 776 J. C. Trejo-Torres and J. D. Ackerman region (Howard, 1973; Samek, 1988; Adams, 1989; Lavin, 1993; Borhidi, 1996), although the ¯oristics of the area have been actively studied for decades (Zanoni, 1986; Liogier, 1996). The Caribbean region has been divided phytogeographically in three subregions by Samek (1988). These main divisions are: (1) Mexico to Panama, (2) Colombia to Venezuela, and (3) an insular subregion including the Antilles proper. The southern Antilles, from Aruba to Tobago are considered part of the Colombian±Venezuelan subregion. Borhidi (1996) joins both continental subregions, from Mexico to Venezuela, into a single one. While these authors consider south Florida as part of the Antillean subregion, Gentry (1982) included only the Florida Keys in the Antillean region. Distinguishing biotic regions, or de®ning biological boundaries, has been among the major concerns of biogeographers. Traditionally, this has been performed with subjective methods (e.g. Gentry, 1982; Samek, 1988; Borhidi, 1996). However, more objective or analytical approaches have been developed for the analysis of distributional data of organisms (e.g. Gauch, 1982; McCoy et al., 1986; Patterson & Atmar, 1986; Rosen & Smith, 1988; Rosen, 1988; Vargas, 1991; Real et al., 1992; Scheiner, 1992; Worthen, 1996; Puente et al., 1998). Here, we use an alternative method based on a parsimonious analysis of taxa distributions (Rosen & Smith, 1988). This method represents a direct way to search for the biogeographical af®nities among areas (Connor, 1988; Vargas, 1991), for the detection of areas of endemism (Morrone, 1994a; Cardoso da 2 Silva & Oren, 1996; Bates et al., 1998), and for the delimitation of biological boundaries (Posadas, 1996; Posadas et al., 1997; Morrone, 1998). The parsimony analysis presented here is a tool for searching the most parsimonious arrangement of shared species among areas, as a means of revealing the biogeographical af®nities in a hierarchical pattern (Rosen & Smith, 1988; Brady, 1994). The analysis presented here was originally called parsimony analysis of endemicity (PAE), and was suggested by 3 Rosen (1985, cited in Rosen & Smith, 1988) and developed by Rosen & Smith (1988). It was also independently suggested by Legendre (1986) and Connor (1988). Since then it has been employed in the study of extant taxa of New Zealand (Craw, 1988), Australia (Cracraft, 1991), Southeast Africa (Morrone, 1994a), the Patagonia (Posadas, 1996), the Andes (Morrone, 1994b; Posadas et al., 1997), the Amazonia (Cardoso da Silva & Oren, 1996; Bates et al., 1998), the Austral region (Craw, 1989; Morrone, 1998; Glasby & Alvarez, 1999), Mexico (Luna et al., 1999), and the entire world (Conran, 1995). The units of comparison that have been used are sites, quadrants or sections of regions, biogeographical areas, or natural geographical areas (e.g. islands, continents, ocean basins). We use entire islands or groups of them, as the units of study. While the method has been mainly used for discovering the historical relationships among areas, we give a static or non-historical interpretation to the patterns obtained (Rosen, 1992; Posadas, 1996; Posadas et al., 1997). Although the method has been called PAE, we use a more generic name: parsimony analysis of distributions (PAD). The method excludes single-site species (including single-site endemics), and takes into account shared species whether endemic or not to the Antilles or adjacent areas. We substitute the term distribution for endemicity to avoid confusion. Our goal here is to distinguish biogeographical patterns in the Antilles based on one plant family, Orchidaceae. This group of plants, of which there are approximately 700 species in the Antilles, is relatively well known taxonomically and geographically because there are relatively recent orchid treatments for the Cayman Islands (Proctor, 1984, 1996), Puerto Rico (Ackerman, 1995) and the Bahamas (Sauleda & Adams, 1982; Sauleda, 1992). Furthermore, a treatment for the Greater Antilles is underway (Ackerman, 1997; in press). The homogeneous wind-dispersal mechanism (except in bird-dispersed Vanilla) of the dust-seeds among the species of this family, makes orchids a good focal group for the study of distribution. Assuming that most orchids have the same dispersal capacity, their distributional patterns may be explained in terms of other ecological, geographical and historical factors. The questions we address are: (1) what are the phytogeographical relationships among the Antillean islands based on shared orchid species? (2) are these relationships affected when neighbouring continental regions are considered? (3) what is the phytogeographical regionalization of the Antilles based on orchids, and (4) how do the distributional patterns of orchids match with geography, geology, physiography and ecology of the region? Apart from the biogeographical analysis per se, we discuss the use of parsimony analysis of naturally de®ned areas (i.e. islands) with extremely dissimilar number of species, and the use of single-site species to look at ®ner degrees of biogeographical differentiation. METHODS A total of ®fty-two areas (Table 1) were included in the study. Data on the distribution of species were taken from literature and from unpublished sources (Table 2). Synonymies and valid species names were standardized mainly according to J.D. Ackerman (unpublished data). A presence/absence matrix of the 863 orchid species reported for the studied areas was constructed in MacClade 3.01 (Maddison & Maddison, 1992). Using this program, areas were entered in the place of taxa, while taxa were entered in the place of characters. In the matrix, presence was indicated with a `1' and absence with a `0'. Once we constructed the matrix, we ran analyses of parsimony using PAUP 4 (Swofford, 2000). A hypothetical outgroup area with all 0s (no species) were used in the analyses to root the trees. General heuristic searches were carried out to look for the most parsimonious trees, which indicate the ¯oristic af®nities among studied areas. We obtained consensus trees (Strict, Majority Rule and Adams) when more than one equally parsimonious tree were found. A description and a discussion of the parsimonious analysis methodology are Ó Blackwell Science Ltd 2001, Journal of Biogeography, 28, 775±794 Biogeography of the Antilles based on a parsimony analysis of orchid distributions 777 Table 1 Antillean islands and neighbouring continental areas included in the study. The Bahamas islands are combined following Correll & Correll (1982); names in italics are the ones used in ®gures and appendix Greater Antilles Cuba Hispaniola (Dominican Republic & Haiti) Jamaica Puerto Rico Isla de la Juventud Mona Cayman Brac Grand Cayman Little Cayman Lesser Antilles Antigua Barbados Barbuda Dominica Grenada Guadeloupe Martinique Montserrat Nevis Saba St BartheÂlemy St Eustatius St Kitts St Lucia St Martin St Vincent Virgin Islands Anegada Culebra St John St Thomas St Croix Tortola Vieques Virgin Gorda Bahama Archipelago Abacos ± Grand Bahama Andros ± Biminis Cat Crooked ± Mayaguana Exumas Inaguas Long ± Ragged Island Range New Providence ± Eleutheras San Salvador ± Rum Cay Turks and Caicos Trinidad bank Margarita Tobago Trinidad Continental regions Florida (North America) Yucatan (Central America) Guianas: Guyana, Surinam and French Guyana (South America) Southern Dutch Antilles Aruba Bonaire CuracËao information in terms of shared species af®nities. We only used these single-site (island or area) species for speci®c ¯oristic comparisons. Also, Vanilla species were not considered at all because they are animal-dispersed, an anomaly in the orchid family. Area relationships derived from PAD may be altered depending on the inclusion or exclusion of different areas just as is the case when using different ingroup/outgroup taxa in cladistic studies. To test the robustness of our data, we conducted independent analyses of different subsets of areas. RESULTS An analysis of all areas using the 356 shared orchid species produced 216 equally parsimonious trees. The three consensus trees obtained from them produced entirely congruent groupings (Fig. 1). The Strict consensus tree shows the groups found in all the most parsimonious trees. The Majority Rule tree shows the groups found in more than 50% of those trees. The Adams tree gives the highest possible resolution for data distribution. Four main clusters of areas can be identi®ed in the consensus trees (Fig. 1): (1) Greater Antilles/Guianas±Trinidad/larger Lesser Antilles/smaller Lesser Antilles/Virgin Islands/Margarita-Tobago/other smaller Lesser Antilles, (2) Yucatan/Florida/Isla de la Juventud/Bahamas/Mona/ Anegada, (3) Cayman Islands, and (4) Aruba/CuracËao/ Bonaire. Although these are well-de®ned aggregations, the polytomic base of the trees means that relationships among them are not resolved. The arrangement of areas within the groupings is highly in¯uenced by species numbers. DISCUSSION Table 2 Primary data sources for the orchid species presence in the studied Caribbean regions Area Data source Bahama Archipelago Cayman Islands Florida Greater Antilles Guianas Isla de la Juventud Lesser Antilles Sauleda & Adams (1982), Sauleda (1992) Proctor (1984, 1996) Wunderlin et al. (1996) Ackerman, J. D. (unpublished data) Boggan et al. (1997) Jennings (1917), Sauget & Barbier (1946) Garay & Sweet (1974), Nir, M. (unpublished) Hoyos (1985) van Proosdij, A. (unpublished) Garay & Sweet (1974); Kenny (1988) Carnevali, G. (unpublished) Margarita Southern Dutch Antilles Trinidad and Tobago Yucatan found in Rosen & Smith (1988), Vargas (1991) and Rosen (1988, 1992). Only the informative species were taken into account in the analyses (Appendix 1). The uninformative species are those found in only one area; therefore, they give no Ó Blackwell Science Ltd 2001, Journal of Biogeography, 28, 775±794 Groupings of areas vs. physical factors We found two kinds of grouping patterns in the Antilles based on orchid species distributions. One pattern aggregates islands that belong to single geological units while the other pattern groups areas with different geological histories (Fig. 2). In the ®rst pattern, the groupings are easy to understand as they correspond to islands belonging to de®ned geological units. The Virgin Islands holds together as a group (except for Anegada). The islands of the Virgin Islands Bank, which excludes St Croix, were once part of a larger volcanic island that included Puerto Rico. They are old islands, about 105 Ma (Donnelly, 1988) that separated when the sea level rose after the last Pleistocene glaciation, some 18 Ma ago. They are small, low-mountain islands (to 521 m) with hot climates ranging from moist to dry conditions (Ewel & Whitmore, 1973). Similarly, the Bahamas belong to a single geological platform, part of the North American plate. They are low-lying, sedimentary limestone areas. Many of the Bahamas were interconnected in the past (Williams, 1989). Regarding the Cayman Islands, which are located south of Cuba on the Cayman 778 J. C. Trejo-Torres and J. D. Ackerman Figure 1 Consensus trees of ¯oristic af®nities of the Antilles and some continental areas based on a parsimony analysis of 356 shared orchid species distributions. Consensus trees were obtained from 216 most parsimonious trees built by a general heuristic search (tree length 903, CI 0.395, RI 0.626, RC 0.247). Majority Rule and Adams trees are almost identical, except for placement of Anegada and basal areas within the Bahamas branch. Many basal areas of different groups in Majority Rule and Adams trees appear collapsed in the Strict tree. Numbers on branches of Majority Rule tree indicate the percentage of the most parsimonious trees that support the grouping; `+' after numbers indicates the same value for subsequent internodes. Numbers in parentheses after the area-names in the Majority Rule tree are numbers of shared species. Relationships among areas are interpreted through branch connections and not in terms of vicinity in tree branches. Polytomies indicate unresolved af®nities among areas. Names in bold call the attention of some area af®nities. Ridge, are small, low-lying islands with limestone sedimentary substrate to 36 Ma; no connection between these islands and other lands occurred in the past (Proctor, 1984). Lastly, Aruba, Bonaire and CuracËao, with volcanic and sedimentary substrates, are geologically related and part of the South Caribbean Island Chain (Bellizzia & Dengo, 1990). They are also small, low-elevation islands (to 372 m) with volcanic and sedimentary substrates, and have dry climates. In addition to their common origin, each one of these island aggregates has a common geomorphology and physiography with relatively homogeneous ecological conditions and low species richness. The anomalous ¯oristic connection of St Croix with the Virgin Islands group is understandable if we look at the physiography rather than the geology. St Croix has an independent origin from the Virgin Islands Bank; nevertheless, they are physiographically similar. The second pattern is represented by areas differing in geological origin and that are separated by wide geographical distances among themselves. One example is represented by the Bahamas/Isla de la Juventud/Mona/Anegada group. As mentioned above, the Bahama Archipelago is composed of low-lying, sedimentary limestone islands located on the North American plate. The Isla de la Juventud, which lies on the western part of the Cuban Bank, is almost entirely lowlying, part calcareous and part metamorphic (CRAC, 1978). Mona is a small, ¯at, calcareous island between two of the Greater Antilles (Puerto Rico and Hispaniola). Lastly, Anegada is part of the Virgin Islands Bank; however, unlike the other Virgin Islands, it is ¯at, low-lying and calcareous (D'Arcy, 1971). In spite of the separate geological origin, these islands have a similar geomorphology and physiography. The other example of the second pattern is the Greater Antilles/Trinidad/larger Lesser Antilles/smaller Ó Blackwell Science Ltd 2001, Journal of Biogeography, 28, 775±794 Biogeography of the Antilles based on a parsimony analysis of orchid distributions 779 Figure 2 Biogeographical patterns of af®nity of the Antilles based on a parsimonious analysis of 356 shared orchid species distributions. See Fig. 1 for detailed patterns of af®nity and single-island names. Dotted areas: continental areas; short-dashed lines: island groups; long-dashed lines: relationships with continental areas; question marks: unresolved group or controversial af®nity; arrow: presumed af®liation. Island or grouping names: A Anegada, B Barbados, C Cuba, CI Cayman Islands, H Hispaniola, IJ Isla de la Juventud, J Jamaica, LLA Larger Lesser Antilles, M Mona, MT Margarita and Tobago, NBA North-western Bahama Archipelago, PR Puerto Rico, SBA South-eastern Bahama Archipelago, SDA Southern Dutch Antilles, SLA Smaller Lesser Antilles, T Trinidad, VI Virgin Islands. Eastern Antilles/Virgin Islands/Margarita±Tobago/other smaller Lesser Antilles group. The origin of the Greater Antilles, whether continental or oceanic, is under debate (Rosen, 1985; Iturralde-Vinent & MacPhee, 1999); however, they are quite old, ranging from 105 to 80 Ma (Donnelly, 1988), or perhaps 150 Ma (Lewis & Draper, 1990). The Lesser Antilles ®rst emerged as an oceanic island arc about 43 Ma, and later expanded 11 Ma to form the north-western Lesser Antilles, from Dominica to Saba (Coney, 1982; Maury et al., 1990). Finally, the islands of Trinidad, Margarita and Tobago, belong to the Caribbean Mountain System that is part of the continental South American plate (Bellizzia & Dengo, 1990). There has been no connection between these islands and the Lesser Antilles (Donnelly, 1988). Trinidad lost connection with South America some 5 Ma (Persad, 1985). Notwithstanding the differences in geology and age, most of the islands of this grouping are volcanic, mountainous, have a variety of climates and natural communities, and complex species assemblages. Orchid distribution patterns also seem to be in¯uenced by their high vagility. On a regional scale (the Antilles) cohesive clusters of islands spread over hundreds to thousands of kilometres (e.g. Bahamas±Anegada or the Greater Antilles± Eastern Antilles) re¯ect the high potential for orchid dispersal, a capacity that may override the effects of geological history in de®ning the af®nities among those islands. In general, distribution patterns of orchids are explainable according to the physical features of the islands. The similar geomorphology and/or physiography of these islands presumably results in similar ecological conditions that consequently produce similar assemblages of species. However, geology clearly plays an important role in de®ning biogeographical af®nities at a more restricted geographical scale. We do not know to what extent the biogeographical patterns Ó Blackwell Science Ltd 2001, Journal of Biogeography, 28, 775±794 are affected by other factors such as prevailing winds and hurricane tracks. Analysis of areas using different island data sets Different analyses using subsets of areas (using the informative species for each data set) show patterns compatible with the general analysis of all areas. Nevertheless, they do add information about the relationships among some groupings and areas. The following observations are based mainly on the Majority Rule consensus trees (trees not presented). 1 When we analyse only the islands, excluding the continental areas of Florida, the Guianas and the Yucatan, the Bahamas split into two branches. The north-western areas (Andros/Abacos/Providence) form a group with the Isla de la Juventud as basal. The Cayman Islands become a sister clade of this Bahama group. Meanwhile, the rest of the Bahama islands form another group with Mona still as basal. 2 If we eliminate the Isla de la Juventud (and the continental areas), the Bahamas are not divided into two groups as before and form a monocladic group. Mona and Anegada remain as basal areas. 3 When we eliminate the Bahamas (and the continental areas), the Isla de la Juventud interestingly forms a pair with Margarita, and together a sister group of the Cayman Islands, all of them belong to an unresolved clade. Meanwhile, Mona is left unresolved. 4 An analysis of the north-western areas, that is, the Yucatan and Florida, the Bahamas, the Greater Antilles, the Isla de la Juventud, the Cayman Islands, Mona, and the Virgin Islands, shows the Isla de la Juventud in an intermediate position between the Yucatan/Florida/Greater Antilles and the Bahamas/Mona/Virgin Islands. The Cayman Islands remain monocladic and again unresolved. 780 J. C. Trejo-Torres and J. D. Ackerman 5 We also evaluated distributions of just the Greater Antillean area, which includes the Isla de la Juventud, the Cayman Islands, the Virgin Islands and Mona. This analysis reveals the Virgin Islands and Mona as basal of the Greater Antilles in the order mentioned. Meanwhile the Isla de la Juventud joins the Cayman Islands forming an unresolved clade. 6 An analysis of our Eastern Antilles, from the Virgin Islands to Margarita, links Trinidad as basal to the larger Lesser Antilles, particularly as the sister area of neighbouring Grenada. Tobago and Margarita appear as sister areas inserted within the Eastern Antilles group. The Virgin Islands remain monocladic. 7 After merging islands belonging to banks (de®ned by the 200 m bathimetric line: Trinidad + Tobago +Margarita, Virgin Islands except St Croix, Antigua + Barbuda, St Kitts + Nevis + St BartheÂlemy), the Trinidad bank remains as a sister and basal group of the Greater Antilles (as Trinidad alone). Points (1), (3) and (5) denote a close af®nity among the Isla de la Juventud, the Cayman Islands, and the Bahamas. Relationships among the groupings using exclusive and endemic species The parsimony analysis produced consistent assemblages of areas. Nevertheless, the relationships among some of the groupings are not resolved. We attempt to understand these unde®ned af®nities by subjectively examining the number of endemic species, the number of exclusive species (single-site, non-endemic species), and the presence of species of restricted distribution of every island or group. Are all the unresolved clusters of islands in the consensus trees, independent biogeographical provinces? The Eastern Antilles, from the Virgin Islands to Margarita constitute a distinct branch with several minor subgroups. First, the larger Lesser Antilles from Guadeloupe to St Lucia is the most de®ned group, with seven endemic species [Elleanthus dussii Cogniaux, Epidendrum discoidale Lindley, Maxillaria guadalupensis Cogniaux, Pleurothallis dussii Cogniaux, P. ophioglossoides (Jacquin) Garay, Pseudocentrum guadalupense Cogniaux, Stelis dussii Cogniaux]. Secondly, the smaller Lesser Antilles (islands north of Guadeloupe from Montserrat to St Martin) is a `group' that splits along the Eastern Antilles branch (Figs 1 and 2). Some of these islands share two endemic species with the larger Lesser Antilles group (Epidendrum difforme Jacquin and Epidendrum patens Swartz). We recognize that this smaller Lesser Antilles `group' is not cast in stone because basal species-poor areas are prone to changing af®nities. Thirdly, the Virgin Islands, except Anegada, constitute a monocladic but weakly differentiated (no endemic species) group which is ®rmly allied with the Lesser Antilles. Nevertheless, the Virgin Islands have two species that they share exclusively with neighbouring Puerto Rico [Psychilis macconnelliae Sauleda, Tolumnia prionochila (KraÈnzlin) Braem]. This connection was insuf®cient to alter the ¯oristic af®nities of the Virgin Islands with the Lesser Antilles in our analyses. Lastly, Tobago and Margarita form a pair within the Eastern Antilles branch. The fact that these island groups appear as basal and pectinate with respect to the Greater Antilles, indicates a close af®nity among the islands of our Island Arc group. The Cayman Islands are always monocladic and usually occur as an independent clade. They have three endemic species [Dendrophylax fawcettii Rolfe, Encyclia kingsii (C. D. Adams) Nir, Myrmecophila albopurpurea (Strachan ex Fawcett) Ackerman; recent morphological and molecular data fail to distinguish T. caymanense (Moir) Braem from T. variegata (Swartz) Braem]. Among the species of restricted distribution two are shared with the Greater Antilles, Florida and the Yucatan [Harrisella porrecta (Reichenbach f.) Fawcett & Rendle, Tropidia polystachya (Swartz) Ames], other two are shared only with the Greater Antilles [T. calochila (Cogniaux) Braem, T. variegata], and another is shared only with Cuba [Myrmecophilla thomsoniana (Reichenbach f.) Rolfe]. These species in common suggest a close af®nity among the Cayman Islands, the Greater Antilles and the peninsulas of Yucatan and Florida. The Bahamas are also an independent clade in the general analysis. They have ®ve endemic species [Encyclia caicensis (Sauleda & Adams), E. fehlingii (Sauleda) Sauleda & Adams, E. gracilis (Lindley) Schlechter, E. inaguensis Nash ex Britton & Millspaugh, T. sasseri (Moir) Braem]. Of the species with the most restricted distribution, there is only one exclusively shared with Florida [T. bahamense (Nash ex Britton & Millspaugh) Braem] while there are seven shared exclusively with the Greater Antilles [Broughtonia lindenii Lindley, Domingoa haematochila (Reichenbach f.) Carabia, Encyclia fucata (Lindley) Britton & Millspaugh, E. plicata (Lindley) Schlechter, Tetramicra urbaniana Cogniaux, T. gauntletii (Withner & Jesup) Braem, T. lucayana (Nash ex Britton & Millspaugh) Braem]. Thus, the relationships among the Bahamas and the Greater Antilles seems to be considerable. Lastly, Aruba, Bonaire and CuracËao form another independent group. These islands have only three species reported, none of which is endemic. One occurs on different continental and insular areas [Polystachya foliosa (Hooker) Reichenbach f.], one held in common with Central and South America [Brassavola nodosa (Linnaeus) Lindley], and one shared only with Venezuela [Myrmecophila humboldtii (Reichenbach f.) Rolfe]. Thus, the ABC islands show no special af®nity to the rest of the Antilles. Relationships with continental areas The inclusion of the Guianas as a South American continental area was thought as a heuristic exercise. First, the Guianas is a politically de®ned area rather than a biogeographical region. Secondly, the Guianas is likely outside the Caribbean ¯oristic region and part of the Amazonian region (Gentry, 1982). If we were to include other South American regions in this study, no doubt the Guianas would shift af®nities dramatically. The Guianas form a sister group to the Greater Antilles, which is indicative of the strong Ó Blackwell Science Ltd 2001, Journal of Biogeography, 28, 775±794 Biogeography of the Antilles based on a parsimony analysis of orchid distributions 781 af®nities among insular and continental orchid ¯oras (as has been put forth for the ¯ora in general by Samek, 1988; Borhidi, 1996). The Yucatan and Florida form a sister pair of the northwestern Bahamas/Isla de la Juventud group. All these are sedimentary, calcareous, low-lying and ¯at areas. Samek (1988) and Borhidi (1996) de®ned South Florida together with the Bahamas as one province. On the other hand, Gentry (1982) excluded Florida (except for the Keys) from his Caribbean (insular) region. We consider Florida and the Yucatan as provinces not belonging to the Antillean subregion, which are supposedly part of the Continental subregion of the Caribbean. To de®ne more clearly the relationships among the insular Antilles and their neighbouring continental areas, more thorough studies are necessary. Also, the inclusion of other continental areas, working as distant sister areas in the analyses, would be useful. For example, a sister continental area for the Yucatan biogeographical province (DuraÂn et al., 1998) could be a province in central-western Mexico. Both outside provinces belong to the same ¯oristic MexicanCentral American Caribbean subregion (sensu Samek, 1988). Islands with unresolved af®nity The unresolved islands or island groupings found in some consensus trees could be explained in a number of ways. First, it is possible that an incomplete record of the species for these islands could be hampering the resolution of their af®nities. As we improved the species record for the smaller Lesser Antillean islands they became progressively resolved. We expect this trend to continue. Alternatively, the record may be complete and these unresolved areas could be the result of: (1) a lower number of species which would prevent their af®liation with other groups, (2) an equally strong af®nity with more than one of the other groups, and (3) a non-hierarchical structure in the data (Ronquist, 1997; Glasby & Alvarez, 1999). One way an unresolved area or group could be considered distinctive would be if it had a well-differentiated ¯ora (i.e. endemic or exclusive species). It is likely a combination of these factors that play a role in unresolved cases. PAD, species richness and species±area curves The position of areas in tree branches is in¯uenced by species numbers. This pattern is not evident for the Antillean archipelago as a whole and only becomes obvious within the major island assemblages. As we move from the tip to the base of the tree branches, species numbers tend to diminish. This apparent numerical artefact has been stated as one of the main problems resulting from the use of areas with highly dissimilar number of species, and a comparable number of taxa per site has been recommended as a prerequisite for PAE analyses (Rosen, 1988, 1992; Rosen & Smith, 1988; Vargas, 1991; Conran, 1995). What our study shows is that even with very few species the af®liation of an island to a speci®c group occurs when the taxa permit it. Ó Blackwell Science Ltd 2001, Journal of Biogeography, 28, 775±794 Every main cluster has its own species-poor islands. We interpret the basal position of an area as indicative of ¯oristic subordination to the distal areas in the group. Otherwise, when the few species of an area do not de®ne its af®liation, such an area turns out to be unresolved or unstable, being located at the base of the whole tree or at the base of different branches, respectively. In other words, either a high or a low number of species can de®ne membership patterns among areas. Limiting the analysis to areas with a similar number of species would unnecessarily restrict the use of this methodology for the Caribbean and many other regions. Differences in species numbers within our island groups can be converted into species±area curves. We have found that the geologically and physiographically diverse montane islands have a different species±area curve than that for lowlying islands, which are basically calcareous and physiographically homogeneous (Ackerman et al., submitted). The calcareous group, comprised of nineteen islands (including the Cayman Islands), has a z-value of 0.25 (however, r 0.4, P 0.07), a typical value for islands (Rosenzweig, 1995). Meanwhile, the montane island group, composed of twentysix islands (our island arc group), has a z-value of 0.51 (r 0.89, P 0.0001). This is close to an interarchipelagic value found by Adler (1992, cited by Rosenzweig, 1995). Moreover, if a species±area curve for this montane group is calculated with only the endemic species (using only nine islands that have single-island endemics), z 0.68 (r 0.88, P 0.0019) suggesting that habitat diversity is important for autochthonous speciation. The two z-values for the montane group seem to indicate that the Island Arc group behaves as a cluster of provinces (Rosenzweig, 1995) as has been proposed by Borhidi & MunÄiz (1986). In contrast, the endemic species±area curve for the relatively homogeneous calcareous group was not run because there are only three islands (island banks indeed) with endemic species. Phytogeographical regionalization of the Antilles The Antilles is among the principal phytogeographical regions of the world (Gentry, 1982). It has been included within the Caribbean region that extends to continental lands from Mexico to Venezuela (Samek, 1988; Borhidi, 1996). Our orchid data seem to support this view. The phytogeographic sectorization of Samek (1988) and Borhidi (1996) consider every one of the Greater Antilles as provinces. Major geographical aggregations of islands (i.e. the Bahamas, the Lesser Antilles) are also de®ned as provinces, while minor groups of islands (e.g. the Virgin Islands, the Cayman Islands) are integrated with some of the big islands. Apart from the recognition of these kind of divisions, we also examined af®nities among and within them in a tree-like hierarchical structure (Fig. 2). 1 Every one of the major islands of the Greater Antilles (i.e. Cuba, Hispaniola, Jamaica and Puerto Rico) is suf®ciently differentiated to be recognized as a separate province of the Antilles. 782 J. C. Trejo-Torres and J. D. Ackerman 2 The Lesser Antilles were taken as a single phytogeographic province by Samek (1988) and Borhidi (1996). Their orchid ¯ora is suf®ciently distinctive, supporting this view. Our analysis places them as part of the Eastern Antilles group and at the same time subordinate to the Greater Antillean main group. 3 The Virgin Islands were integrated as part of Puerto Rico by Samek (1988) and Borhidi (1996). However, our study places them rather close to the Lesser Antilles, and altogether, as subordinate of the Greater Antilles. 4 The Cayman Islands were considered part of Jamaica by Samek (1988) but as part of Cuba according to Borhidi (1996). Our analysis suggests that these islands have complex af®nities with the Greater Antilles, the Yucatan and Florida continental areas, and also with the Bahamas. 5 The Bahama archipelago was one of the Caribbean provinces distinguished by Samek (1988), Borhidi (1996), and Gentry (1982), and this is also supported by our orchid data. Moreover, our study relates the Isla de la Juventud, Mona and Anegada (geographically and geologically part of the Greater Antilles) as subordinates of the Bahamian Province. The Isla de la Juventud shows a strong af®nity with the north-western Bahamas, while Mona and Anegada are small islands with close af®nity to the rest of the Bahamas. 6 Trinidad, Tobago and Margarita were considered part of the Venezuela±Colombia Caribbean subregion by Samek (1988) and Borhidi (1996), while no clear af®liation for Trinidad and Tobago can be obtained from Gentry (1982). Our data support a closer af®nity of Trinidad with the Greater Antilles instead of the neighbouring Lesser Antilles. Based on its differentiated orchid ¯ora (approximately thirteen endemic species) we consider Trinidad as a ¯oristic province. On the other hand, Margarita and Tobago are linked with the Lesser Antilles± Virgin Islands group rather than with Trinidad. There are two potential problems with these islands. First, we consider that the species record for these islands is not well updated, especially for Trinidad and Tobago whose most recent complete orchid ¯ora was published by Schultes (1960). Secondly, the Venezuelan Guyana may be a more appropriate neighbouring continental area, instead of our Guianas area. If this is true, the islands of the Trinidad bank may be more related to the continent than to the rest of the Antillean islands, as suggested by bat distribution patterns (Trejo-Torres & Rivera, unpublished data) and by geological history. 7 Aruba, Bonaire and CuracËao seem to be independent of the Antillean subregion and apparently part of the Continental Caribbean subregion. Perspectives of PAD The pattern we found for orchids is not necessarily the same for the general ¯ora or for the entire biota of the region. We expect that phytogeographic relationships revealed by orchids might be similar to that of other highly vagile groups of organisms such as wind-dispersed plants, ¯ying insects, ¯ying birds and bats. In this case, area af®nities appear to be de®ned by physical factors, such as geomorphology, physiography, climate, geography and island area. At the same time, it is plausible to predict that less vagile organisms, such as non-¯ying vertebrates and freshwater ®shes, will de®ne different patterns of area relationships, perhaps more in¯uenced by geological and geographical history of areas. The PAE/PAD is an alternative to the use of multivariate phenetic methods for classi®cation of biotas (Rosen, 1988; Vargas, 1991) and for comparing species assemblages. In fact, giving a static interpretation of area relationships, this is a method equivalent to multivariate ones (Rosen, 1988, 1992). Some important differences between PAE/PAD and multivariate methods are: (1) The PAE/PAD uses parsimony algorithms instead of similarity indexes. This means that the hierarchy selected in this manner will be the best supported by evidence, for it maximizes congruence between data and hierarchical patterns (Brady, 1994). (2) The PAE/PAD uses characters (taxa) selected a priori based on their informativeness, that is, species found in all sites and single-site species are eliminated as they give no information on the af®nities among areas (3). The PAE/PAD provides a more uni®ed methodology as multivariate methods use many different similarity indices, which can also yield different results. The PAE/PAD can be seen as a complementary method. While many community analyses are intended to describe quantitative parameters, PAE/PAD is directed to describe composition patterns, based on the identity of species (Worthen, 1996). Also, results of PAE/PAD in the form of trees with a hierarchical structure could be a graphic complement to other methods which produce results that are single numerical values, such as indexes, scores or exponents (i.e. nestedness analysis, Patterson & Atmar, 1986). The hierarchical nature of the results does not necessarily mean that communities are organized that way. After all, af®nities among communities may have an underlying reticulate structure (Ronquist, 1997). We view PAE/PAD as only one way to represent structure in biogeographical data. The PAE/PAD has the potential as a method for understanding ecological biogeographic problems. This is supported by the Caribbean orchids for which composition patterns strikingly match physical and ecological factors. The use of the method as a complement to vicariance and other historical biogeographic methods has been suggested (Cracraft, 4 1991). Because of its phenetic nature, patterns found through PAE/PAD could be re¯ecting ecological phenomena, rather than historical ones. Nevertheless, until now, it has always been used under the historical point of view. Some of the aspects pointed out as disadvantages to the historical approach, do not exist in the ecological context. For example, ¯oristic af®nities, biodiversity comparisons and composition patterns can be seen as phenetic phenomena. For the demarcation of biogeographical units PAE/PAD could be employed before searching for speci®c patterns in distributional data sets. This could avoid distortions from possible structure in the data caused by mixing areas Ó Blackwell Science Ltd 2001, Journal of Biogeography, 28, 775±794 Biogeography of the Antilles based on a parsimony analysis of orchid distributions 783 belonging to different biotas. Within the same context, Morrone & Crisci (1995) suggested the use of panbiogeographic methods as an initial step to do other historical biogeographic analyses. The PAE/PAD could prioritize conservation efforts at the regional level (Posadas, 1996) by identifying areas or islands of high diversity. We have shown that such use can be helpful for the Antilles, one of the world's biodiversity hotspots (Myers et al., 2000). However, conservation efforts often focus on unique species, particularly endemics (island endemics in our case), but PAD uses only shared species. The exclusive use of PAD in formulating conservation strategies can thus be misleading. This is especially true for species-poor islands that appear subordinated to speciesrich islands. Impoverished islands may thus be falsely interpreted as irrelevant for biodiversity conservation. For example, the tiny island of Mona lies subordinate to other islands of our calcareous group yet it is certainly worthy of conservation efforts because Mona has its own set of endemic plants and animals (including an orchid, Psychilis monensis Sauleda). The PAE/PAD do have problems that need to be resolved and these are the interpretation of: (1) the unresolved status among the main groupings of areas, (2) the area relationships when using islands as well as continental regions, (3) the potential use of branch-lengths in the trees. Special attention should also be given when selecting data sets for organisms with diverse ecological characteristics (e.g. birds, which could belong to different guilds: residents vs. migratory, volant vs. non-volant). CONCLUSIONS According to our orchid data, the Antillean islands constitute a phytogeographical subregion of the Caribbean. The Lesser Antilles and the Bahamas are well-de®ned provinces. Meanwhile, the Virgin Islands and the Cayman Islands are poorly differentiated aggregates, perhaps to be considered as incipient provinces. All of them are subordinated to the main Greater Antillean group. Within islands groupings detected by PAD ordering of areas is highly in¯uenced by species numbers. The speciesrich islands form cohesive groupings to which other speciespoor islands unite as subordinates. These subordinate islands are liable to changing af®nities. Orchid species show three core zones of high diversity in the Antilles: the Greater Antilles (Hispaniola, Cuba, Jamaica, Puerto Rico); the larger Lesser Antilles (Guadeloupe, Dominica, Martinique, St Vincent, Grenada, St Lucia); and the north-western Bahamas (Andros, Abacos, Grand Bahama, New Providence, Eleuthera). The patterns we found for orchid distributions in the Antilles are in¯uenced primarily by physical characteristics of areas. That is, areas with common ecological features either because of similar physiographical conditions or common geomorphology form tight clusters, despite their differences in geology or the long distances among them. Ó Blackwell Science Ltd 2001, Journal of Biogeography, 28, 775±794 The highly compatible patterns obtained from different island sets and from different consensus trees indicate that relationships of areas obtained are well supported by the data. In other words, the groups identi®ed are not arti®cial, but rather the result of their orchid-species af®nities. Whereas PAE/PAD is an appropriate methodology for the study of geographical regions based on shared species, single-site species (the majority of which are endemics) are indicative of ®ner degrees of biogeographical differentiation. We suggest using both data sets to analyse biogeographical af®nities, for it integrates differences and similarities. This approach provides a more thorough use of ¯oristic information for the analysis of biogeographical relationships. The parsimony methodology seems to be appropriate for the analysis of areas, or any other natural unit, with very dissimilar number of species. The low number of species found in a unit can de®ne its af®liation or can produce an unresolved ¯oristic af®nity. The lack of af®nity of an area to any group may be either real or an artefact caused by an incomplete species record. The PAE/PAD has great potential as an alternative, complementary or ®rst-step method to other multivariate and phylogenetic methodologies in biogeography. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The study was supported by NSF grants to JDA (DEB9505459, HRD-9353549, HRD-9628475). Arkelio Alicea, Kary GarcõÂa, Eileen Bravo, and Yanet Crespo were students participating in the study under Alliance for Minorities Participation Program at UPR. We thank Steve Rehner logistic assistance in data analysis. We are grateful to Brian Rosen, David Lees, Susan AragoÂn, Marta DõÂaz, and Juan J. Morrone who had made relevant comments on the manuscript. Timothy Johnston assisted editing the manuscript and Celene Espadas, Guillermo Bianchi, and Ana Porzecanski shared important references. GermaÂn Carnevali, Andre van Proosdij, Mark Nir and Hagen Stenzel provided unpublished data. REFERENCES Ackerman, J.D. (1995) An orchid ¯ora of Puerto Rico and the Virgin Islands. Memoires of the New York Botanical Garden, 73, 1±203. Ackerman, J.D. (1997) The orchid ¯ora of the Caribbean: new records and combinations. Lindleyana, 12, 149±152. Ackerman, J.D. (2000) Notes on the Caribbean orchid ¯ora. II. 5 Lindleyana, 15, 89±95. Ackerman, J.D., Trejo-Torres, J.C. & Crespo-Chuy, Y. (submitted) Ecological Biogeography of the Caribbean: where are 6 the orchids? Adams, R.P. (1989) Biogeography and evolution of the junipers of the West Indies. Biogeography of the West Indies: Past, Present, and Future (ed. C.A. Woods), pp. 167±190. Sandhill Crane Press, Florida, USA. Bates, J.M., Hackett, S.J. & Cracraft, J. (1998) Area-relationships in the Neotropical lowlands: an hypothesis based on 784 J. C. Trejo-Torres and J. D. Ackerman raw distributions of Passerine birds. Journal of Biogeography, 25, 783±793. Bellizzia, A. & Dengo, G. (1990) The Caribbean mountain system, northern South America; a summary. The geology of North America: the Caribbean region, Vol. H, Chapter 6 (eds G. Dengo and J.E. Case), pp. 167±175. Geological Society of America, Colorado, USA. Boggan, J., Funk, V., Kelloff, C., Hoff, M., Cremers, C. & Feuillet, C. (1997) Checklist of the Plants of the Guianas (Guyana, Surinam, French Guyana), 2th edn. Smithsonian Institution, Washington DC, USA. Borhidi, A. (1996) Phytogeography and Vegetation: Ecology of Cuba, 2th edn. AkadeÂmiai Nyomda, MartonvaÂsaÂr, Hungary. Borhidi, A. & MunÄiz, O. (1986) The phytogeographic survey of Cuba. II. Floristic relationships and phytogeographic subdivision. Acta Botanica, Academy of Sciences, Hungary, 32, 3±48. Brady, R.H. (1994) Pattern description, process explanation, and the history of morphological sciences. Interpreting the Hierarchy of Nature: from Systematic Patterns to Evolutionary Process Theories (eds L. Grande and O. Rieppel), pp. 7±31. Academic Press, USA. Cardoso da Silva, J.M. & Oren, D.C. (1996) Application of parsimony analysis of endemicity in Amazonian biogeograpy: an example with primates. Biological Journal of the Linnaean Society, 59, 427±437. Coney, P.J. (1982) Plate tectonic constraints on the biogeography of Middle America and the Caribbean region. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden, 69, 432±443. Connor, E.F. (1988) Fossils, phenetics, and phylogenetics: Inferring the historical dynamics of biogeographic distributions Zoogeography of Caribbean Insects (ed. J.K. Liebherr), pp. 254±269. Cornell University Press, New York, USA. Conran, J.G. (1995) Family distributions in the Lilii¯orae and their biogeographical implications. Journal of Biogeography, 22, 1023±1034. Correll, D.S. & Correll, H.B. (eds) (1982) Flora of the Bahama Archipelago (including Turks and Caicos Islands). J. Kramer, Vaduz, Liechtenstein. CRAC (Consejo de RedaccioÂn del Atlas de Cuba) (1978) Atlas de Cuba. Instituto Cubano de Geodesia y CartografõÂa, La Habana, Cuba. Cracraft, J. (1991) Patterns of diversi®cation within continental biotas: hierarchical conguence among the areas of endemism of Australian vertebrates. Australian Systematic Botany, 4, 211±227. Craw, R. (1988) Continuing the synthesis between panbiogeography, phylogenetic systematics and geology as illustrated by empirical studies on the biogeography of New Zealand and the Chatham Islands. Systematic Zoology, 37, 291±310. Craw, R. (1989) New Zealand biogeography: a panbiogeographic approach. New Zealand Journal of Zoology, 16, 527±547. D'Arcy, W.G. (1971) The island of Anegada and its ¯ora. Atoll Research Bulletin, 139, 1±21. Donnelly, T.W. (1988) Geologic constraints on Caribbean biogeography. Zoogeography of Caribbean Insects (ed. J.K. Liebherr), pp. 15±37. Cornell University Press, New York, USA. DuraÂn, R., Trejo-Torres, J.C. & Ibarra-ManrõÂquez, G. (1998) Endemic phytotaxa of the peninsula of YucataÂn. Harvard Papers in Botany, 3, 263±314. Ewel, J.J. & Whitmore, J.L. (1973) The ecological life zones of Puerto Rico and the US Virgin Islands, Res. Pap. 18, p. 72. US For. Serv., Inst. Trop. For., San Juan, Puerto Rico. Garay, L.A. & Sweet, H.R. (1974) Orchidaceae. Flora of the Lesseries Antilles: Leward and Windward Islands (ed. R.A. Howard). Arnold Arboretum, Harvard University, USA. Gauch, H.G. (1982) Multivariate analysis in community ecology. Cambridge University Press, USA. Gentry, A.H. (1982) Neotropical ¯oristic diversity: phytogeographical connections between Central and South America, Pleistocene climatic ¯uctuations, or an accident of the Andean orogeny. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden, 69, 557±593. Glasby, C.J. & Alvarez, B. (1999) Distribution patterns and biogeographic analysis of Austral polychaeta (Annelida). Journal of Biogeography, 26, 507±533. Hedges, S.B. (1996) Historical biogeography of West Indian vertebrates. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 27, 163±193. Howard, R.A. (1973) The vegetation of the Antilles. Vegetation and Vegetational History of Northern Latin America (ed. R. Graham), pp. 1±38. Elsevier Scienti®c Publications, Amsterdam, Netherlands. Hoyos, J. (1985) Flora de la Isla Margarita, Venezuela. Sociedad y FundacioÂn la Salle de Ciencias Naturales, Caracas, Venezuela. Iturralde-Vinent, M.A. & MacPhee, R.D.E. (1999) Paleogeography of the Caribbean region: implications for Cenozoic 8 biogeography. Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist. 238. Jennings, O.E. (1917) A contribution to the botany of the Isle of Pines, Cuba, based upon the specimens of plants from that island contained in the herbarium of the Carnegie Museum under date of October, 1916. Annals of the Carnegie Museum, 11, 19±290. Kenny, J. (1988) Native Orchids of the Eastern Caribbean, p. 88. MacMillan Caribbean, Hong Kong. Lavin, M. (1993) Biogeography and systematics of Poitea (Leguminosae). Systematic Monographs, 37, 87. Legendre, P. (1986) Reconstructing biogeographic history using phylogenetic-tree analysis of community structure. Systematic Zoology, 35, 68±80. Lewis, J.F. & Draper, G. (1990) Geology and tectonic evolution of the northern Caribbean margin. The geology of North America: the Caribbean region, Vol. H, Chapter 4 (eds G. Dengo and J.E. Case), pp. 77±140. Geological Society of America, Colorado, USA. Liebherr, J.K. (ed.) (1988) Zoogeography of Caribbean insects, p. 285. Cornell University Press, New York, USA. Liogier, H.A. (1996) Botany and botanists in Puerto Rico. The Scienti®c Survey of Puerto Rico and the Virgin Islands (ed. J.C. Figueroa), pp. 41±54. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, Vol. 776, New York, USA. Luna, I., AlcaÂntara, O., Espinosa, D. & Morrone, J.J. (1999) Historical relationships of the Mexican cloud forests: a preliminary vicariance model applying Parsimony Analysis of Endemicity to vascular plant taxa. Journal of Biogeography, 26, 1299±1305. Maddison, W.P. & Maddison, D.R. (1992) Macclade: Analysis of Phylogeny and Character Evolution, Version 3.01. Sinauer Associates, USA. Ó Blackwell Science Ltd 2001, Journal of Biogeography, 28, 775±794 Biogeography of the Antilles based on a parsimony analysis of orchid distributions 785 Maury, R.C., Westbrook, G.K., Baker, P.E., Bouysse, Ph & Westercamp, D. (1990) Geology of the Lesser Antilles. The geology of North America: the Caribbean region, Vol. H, Chapter 5 (eds G. Dengo and J.E. Case), pp. 141±166. Geological Society of America, Colorado, USA. McCoy, E.D., Bell, S.S. & Walters, K. (1986) Identifying biotic boundaries along environmental gradients. Ecology, 67, 749±759. Morrone, J.J. (1994a) On the identi®cation of areas of endemism. Systematic Zoology, 43, 438±441. Morrone, J.J. (1994b) Distributional patterns of species of Rhytirrhini (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) and historical relationships of the Andean provinces. Global Ecology and Biogeographical Letters, 4, 188±194. Morrone, J.J. (1998) On Udvardy's Insulantarctica province: a test from the weevils (Coleoptera: Curculionoidea). Journal of Biogeography, 25, 947±955. Morrone, J.J. & Crisci, J.V. (1995) Historical biogeography: introduction to methods. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 26, 373±401. Myers, N., Mittermeier, R.A., Mittermeier, C.G., da Fonseca, G.A.B. & Kent, J. (2000) Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature, 403, 853±858. Page, R.D.M. & Lydeard, C. (1994) Towards a cladistic biogeography of the Caribbean. Cladistics, 10, 21±41. Patterson, B.D. & Atmar, U. (1986) Nested subsets and the structure of insular mammalian faunas and archipelagoes. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 28, 65±82. Persad, K.M. (1985) Outline of the geology of the Trinidad area. Transactions of the Fourth Latin American Geological Conference (July, 1979), Vol. II, pp. 738±769. Port of Spain, Trinidad & Tobago. Posadas, P. (1996) Distributional patterns of vascular plants in Tierra del Fuego: a study applying parsimony analysis of endemicity (PAE). Biogeographica, 72, 161±177. Posadas, P., EsteÂvez, J.M. & Morrone, J.J. (1997) Distributional patterns and endemism of vascular plants in the Andean Subregion. Fontqueria, 48, 1±10. Proctor, G.R. (1984) Additions and corrections to `Flora of the Cayman Islands'. Kew Bulletin, 51, 483±507. Proctor, G.R. (1996) Flora of the Cayman Islands, p. 834. Her Majesty's Stationary Of®ce, London, UK. Puente, A.I., Altonaga, K., Prieto, C.E. & Rallo, A. (1998) Delimitation of biogeographical areas in the Iberian Peninsula on the basis of Helicoidea species (Pulmonata: Stylomatophora). Global Ecology and Biogeography Letters, 7, 97±113. Real, R., Vargas, J.M. & Guerrero, J.C. (1992) AnaÂlisis biogeogra®co de clasi®cacioÂn de aÂres y de especies. Monogr. Herpetol., 2, 73±84. Ronquist, F. (1997) Dispersal-vicariance analyses: a new approach to the quanti®cation of historical biogeography. Systematic Biology, 46, 195±203. Ó Blackwell Science Ltd 2001, Journal of Biogeography, 28, 775±794 Rosen, B.R. (1988) From fossils to earth history: applied historical biogeography. Analytical Biogeography: an Integrated Approach to the Study of Animal and Plant Distributions (eds A.A. Myers and P.S. Giller), pp. 437±481. Chapman & Hall, UK. Rosen, B.R. (1992) Empiricism and the biogeographical black box: concepts and methods in marine palaeobiogeography. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, 92, 171±205. Rosen, B.R. & Smith, A.B. (1988) Tectonics from fossils? Analysis of reef-coral and sea-urchin distributions from late Cretaceous to Recent, using a new method. Gondwana and Tethys (eds M.G. Audeley-Charles and A. Hallam). Geological Society Special Publication (London), 37, 275±306. Rosenzweig, M.L. (1995) Species diversity in space and time, p. 436. Cambridge University Press, UK. Samek, V. (1988) FitorregionalizacioÂn del Caribe. Revista Del Jardõn BotaÂnico Nacional (Cuba), 9, 25±38. Sauget, J. & Barbier, J.S. (1946) OrquõÂdeas. Flora de Cuba, Vol. 1 (eds J.S. Sauget and E.E. Liogier), pp. 341± 404. Contribuciones Ocasionales del museo de Historia Natural, La Habana, Cuba. Sauleda, R.P. (1992) A checklist of Bahamian orchids. American Orchid Society Bulletin, 61, 1022±1023. Sauleda, R. & Adams, R. (1982) Orchidaceae. Flora of the Bahama Archipelago (Including Turks and Caicos Islands) (eds D.S. Correll and H.B. Correll), pp. 336±401. Kramer, Vaduz, Leichtenstein. Scheiner, S.M. (1992) Measuring pattern diversity. Ecology, 73, 1860±1867. Schultes, R.E. (1960) Native Orchids of Trinidad and Tobago, p. 275. Pergamon Press, UK. Swofford, D.L. (2000) PAUP: Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (and other methods), Version 4 for Apple Macintosh. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA, USA. Vargas, J.M. (1991) Escuelas y tendencias en biogeografõÂa histoÂrica. Rev. Esp. Herp., 6, 107±136. Williams, E.E. (1989) Old problems and new opportunities in West Indian biogeography. Biogeography of the West Indies: Past, Present, and Future (ed. C.A. Woods), pp. 1±146. Sandhill Crane Press, FL, USA. Woods, C.A. (ed.) (1989) Biogeography of the West Indies: Past, Present, and Future, p. 878. Sandhill Crane Press, FL, USA. Worthen, W.B. (1996) Community composition and nestedsubset analyses: basic descriptors for community ecology. Oikos, 76, 417±426. Wunderlin, R.P., Hansan, B.F. & Bridges, E.L. (1996) Atlas of Florida Vascular Plants, CD-ROM. Department of Biology, University of South Florida, FL, USA. Zanoni, T.A. (1986) Las expediciones botaÂnicas de William L. Abbott y Emery C. Leonard a la isla de la EspanÄola. Moscosoa, 4, 6±38. 786 J. C. Trejo-Torres and J. D. Ackerman BIOSKETCHES J. Carlos Trejo-Torres is a graduate student at the University of Puerto Rico-RõÂo Piedras working under the guidance of James D. Ackerman. He is studying composition patterns in the limestone forest of the Greater Antilles. He is also working on the biogeography of Caribbean bats. He worked on the community description, ¯oristics and taxonomy of the Yucatan forests and wetlands, especially the endemic ¯ora. James D. Ackerman is a biologist at the University of Puerto Rico-RõÂo Piedras. He has interests in plant ecology, systematics and evolution, particularly of orchids. He has published numerous papers on the evolution of deception pollination and the processes involved in the diversi®cation of the Orchidaceae. Among his current projects is the Orchid treatment for the Flora of the Greater Antilles. Ó Blackwell Science Ltd 2001, Journal of Biogeography, 28, 775±794 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 Aganisia pulchella Antillanorchis gundlachii Aspasia variegata Basiphyllaea corallicola Basiphyllaea sarcophylla Batemania colleyi Beloglottis costaricensis Bifrenaria aurantiaca Bifrenaria longicornis Bletia patula Bletia purpurea Brachionidium parvum Brachionidium sheringii Brachystele guayanensis Brassavola cucullata Brassavola nodosa Brassia caudata Brassia maculata Broughtonia domingensis Broughtonia lindenii Broughtonia ortgiesiana Bulbophyllum aristatum Bulbophyllum pachyrrhachis Calanthe calanthoides Calopogon tuberosus Campylocentrum fasciola Campylocentrum ®liforme Campylocentrum micranthum Campylocentrum pachyrrhizum Campylocentrum poeppigii Campylocentrum pygmaeum Catasetum cristatum Catasetum integerrimum Catasetum macrocarpum Caularthron bicornutum Cochleanthes ¯abelliformis Coelia triptera Comparettia falcata Coryanthes macrantha Coryanthes speciosa Corymborkis ¯ava Corymborkis forcipigera Cranichis diphylla Cranichis muscosa Cranichis ovata 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 Guianas Yucatan Species name/area name 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 Florida Puerto Rico Jamaica 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Hispaniola Cuba Isla Juventud Mona 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Grand Cayman Little Cayman Cayman Brac 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Turks Inaguas 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Crooked Long 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Salvador Exumas Cat 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Providence Andros Abacos St Martin 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Saba St Barth Âelemy St Kitts Nevis St Eustatius Antigua 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 Barbuda Montserrat 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 Guadeloupe Dominica Martinique St Lucia St Vincent 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Grenada Barbados Trinidad Tobago Margarita Vieques 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Culebra Anegada Virgin Gorda Tortola St Thomas St John St Croix 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Aruba Cura Ëcao Bonaire Appendix 1 Data matrix of the ®fty-two Caribbean areas and the 356 shared orchid species included in the study. Species names have been standardized by Ackerman. Species presence is indicated with a one, while absence with a zero. The Bahama islands are grouped following Correll & Correll (1982). See Table 1 for Bahama island groups and other geographical groupings Biogeography of the Antilles based on a parsimony analysis of orchid distributions 787 Ó Blackwell Science Ltd 2001, Journal of Biogeography, 28, 775±794 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Species name/area name Cranichis ricartii Cranichis tenui¯ora Cranichis tenuis Cranichis wageneri Cryptarrhena lunata Cyclopogon cranichoides Cyclopogon elatus Cyclopogon laxi¯orus Cyclopogon miradorense Cyrtopodium andersonii Cyrtopodium punctatum Dendrophylax barrettiae Dendrophylax lindenii Dendrophylax varius Dichaea glauca Dichaea graminoides Dichaea histrio Dichaea hookeri Dichaea hystricina Dichaea latifolia Dichaea morrisii Dichaea pendula Dichaea picta Dichaea rendlei Dichaea trichocarpa Dilomilis elata Dilomilis montana Domingoa haematochila Domingoa nodosa Elleanthus caravata Elleanthus cephalotus Elleanthus cordidactylus Elleanthus dussii Elleanthus longibracteatus Eltroplectris calcarata Encyclia acutifolia Encyclia angustifolia Encyclia brevifolia Encyclia cordigera Encyclia fehlingii Encyclia fucata Encyclia gracilis Encyclia gravida Encyclia inaguensis Encyclia isochila Encyclia kingsii Encyclia nematocaulon 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 Guianas Yucatan Appendix 1 continued 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 Florida Puerto Rico Jamaica 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Hispaniola Cuba Isla Juventud Mona 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 Grand Cayman Little Cayman Cayman Brac 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 Turks Inaguas 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 Crooked Long 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 Salvador Exumas Cat 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Providence Andros Abacos St Martin 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Saba St Barth Âelemy St Kitts Nevis St Eustatius Antigua 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Barbuda Montserrat 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Guadeloupe Dominica Martinique St Lucia St Vincent 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Grenada Barbados Trinidad Tobago Margarita Vieques 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Culebra Anegada Virgin Gorda Tortola St Thomas St John St Croix 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Aruba Cura Ëcao Bonaire 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 788 J. C. Trejo-Torres and J. D. Ackerman Ó Blackwell Science Ltd 2001, Journal of Biogeography, 28, 775±794 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 Species name/area name Encyclia oncidioides Encyclia plicata Encyclia rufa Encyclia serrulata Encyclia tampensis Epidendrum acunae Epidendrum anceps Epidendrum antillanum Epidendrum blancheanum Epidendrum carpophorum Epidendrum ciliare Epidendrum compressum Epidendrum coronatum Epidendrum cristatum Epidendrum dendrobioides Epidendrum difforme Epidendrum diffusum Epidendrum ¯oridense Epidendrum hartii Epidendrum ibaguense Epidendrum imbricatum Epidendrum isomerum Epidendrum jamaicense Epidendrum miserrimum Epidendrum mutelianum Epidendrum neoporpax Epidendrum nocturnum Epidendrum nutans Epidendrum orientale Epidendrum pallidi¯orum Epidendrum paranaense Epidendrum patens Epidendrum polygonatum Epidendrum portoricensis Epidendrum ramosum Epidendrum repens Epidendrum rigidum Epidendrum rivulare Epidendrum scapelligerum Epidendrum schlecterianum Epidendrum secundum Epidendrum strobiliferum Epidendrum vincentinum Epidendrum wrightii Epistephium ellipticum Epistephium parvi¯orum Erythrodes hirtella 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 Guianas Yucatan Appendix 1 continued 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 Florida Puerto Rico Jamaica 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Hispaniola Cuba Isla Juventud Mona 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Grand Cayman Little Cayman Cayman Brac 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Turks Inaguas 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Crooked Long 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Salvador Exumas Cat 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Providence Andros Abacos St Martin 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 Saba St Barth Âelemy St Kitts Nevis St Eustatius Antigua 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Barbuda Montserrat 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 Guadeloupe Dominica Martinique St Lucia St Vincent 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Grenada Barbados Trinidad Tobago Margarita Vieques 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Culebra Anegada Virgin Gorda Tortola St Thomas St John St Croix 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Aruba Cura Ëcao Bonaire 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Biogeography of the Antilles based on a parsimony analysis of orchid distributions 789 Ó Blackwell Science Ltd 2001, Journal of Biogeography, 28, 775±794 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 Species name/area name Erythrodes major Erythrodes plantaginea Eulophia alta Eulophia ecristata Eurystyles ananassocomos Fuertesiella pterichoides Galeandra beyrichii Govenia utriculata Habenaria alata Habenaria amal®tana Habenaria bicornis Habenaria distans Habenaria dussii Habenaria eustachya Habenaria ¯oribunda Habenaria leprieurii Habenaria mesodactyla Habenaria monorrhiza Habenaria pauci¯ora Habenaria quinqueseta Habenaria repens Hapalorchis lineatus Harrisella porrecta Helleriella punctulata Homalopetalum vomeriforme Huntleya lucida Huntleya meleagris Ionopsis satyrioides Ionopsis utricularoides Isochilus linearis Jacquinella globosa Jacquinella teretifolia Kegeliella houtteana Koellensteinia graminea Leochilus carinatus Leochilus labiatus Leochilus puertoricensis Leochilus scriptus Lepanthopsis anthoctenium Lepanthopsis melanantha Lepanthopsis melanantha Lepanthopsis microlepanthes Leucohyle subulata Liparis nervosa Liparis neuroglossa Liparis saundersiana Liparis vexillifera 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 Guianas Yucatan Appendix 1 continued 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Florida Puerto Rico Jamaica 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Hispaniola Cuba Isla Juventud Mona 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Grand Cayman Little Cayman Cayman Brac 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Turks Inaguas 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Crooked Long 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Salvador Exumas Cat 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Providence Andros Abacos St Martin 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 Saba St Barth Âelemy St Kitts Nevis St Eustatius Antigua 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Barbuda Montserrat 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 Guadeloupe Dominica Martinique St Lucia St Vincent 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Grenada Barbados Trinidad Tobago Margarita Vieques 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Culebra Anegada Virgin Gorda Tortola St Thomas St John St Croix 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Aruba Cura Ëcao Bonaire 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 790 J. C. Trejo-Torres and J. D. Ackerman Ó Blackwell Science Ltd 2001, Journal of Biogeography, 28, 775±794 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 Species name/area name Liparis viridipurpurea Lockhartia elegans Lophiasis maculata Lycaste barringtoniae Macradenia lutescens Malaxis domingensis Malaxis hispanolae Malaxis integra Malaxis major Malaxis massonii Malaxis spicata Malaxis umbelli¯ora Malaxis unifolia Maxilaria discolor Maxillaria acutifolia Maxillaria adendrobium Maxillaria alba Maxillaria brachybulbon Maxillaria camaridii Maxillaria coccinea Maxillaria crassifolia Maxillaria in¯exa Maxillaria liparophylla Maxillaria parvi¯ora Maxillaria reichenheimana Maxillaria rufescens Maxillaria uncata Maxillaria variabilis Mesadenus lucayanus Myrmecophila thomsoniana Nidema ottonis Notylia angustifolia Octomeria apiculata Octomeria graminifolia Octomeria tridentata Oeceoclades maculata Oerstedella verrucosa Oncidium altissimum Oncidium ampliatum Oncidium cebolleta Oncidium ensatum Oncidium meirax Ornithocephalus gladiatus Otostylis brachystalix Palmorchis pubescens Paphinia cristata Pelexia adnata 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 Guianas Yucatan Appendix 1 continued 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 Florida Puerto Rico Jamaica 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Hispaniola Cuba Isla Juventud Mona 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Grand Cayman Little Cayman Cayman Brac 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Turks Inaguas 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Crooked Long 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Salvador Exumas Cat 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Providence Andros Abacos St Martin 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Saba St Barth Âelemy St Kitts Nevis St Eustatius Antigua 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Barbuda Montserrat 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Guadeloupe Dominica Martinique St Lucia St Vincent 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Grenada Barbados Trinidad Tobago Margarita Vieques 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Culebra Anegada Virgin Gorda Tortola St Thomas St John St Croix 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Aruba Cura Ëcao Bonaire 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Biogeography of the Antilles based on a parsimony analysis of orchid distributions 791 Ó Blackwell Science Ltd 2001, Journal of Biogeography, 28, 775±794 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 Species name/area name Peristeria cerina Peristeria pendula Pinelia leochilus Platanthera replicata Platystele ovalifolia Platystele stenostachia Platythelys querceticola Pleurothallis ophioglossoides Pleurothallis acutissima Pleurothallis appendiculata Pleurothallis aristata Pleurothallis brighamii Pleurothallis consimilis Pleurothallis corniculata Pleurothallis discoidea Pleurothallis domingensis Pleurothallis dussii Pleurothallis erosa Pleurothallis gelida Pleurothallis grobyi Pleurothallis helenae Pleurothallis hymenantha Pleurothallis imraei Pleurothallis lanceola Pleurothallis laxa Pleurothallis mazei Pleurothallis miguelii Pleurothallis monophylla Pleurothallis mornicola Pleurothallis murex Pleurothallis nummularia Pleurothallis oblongifolia Pleurothallis obovata Pleurothallis polygonoides Pleurothallis pruinosa Pleurothallis pubescens Pleurothallis racemi¯ora Pleurothallis revoluta Pleurothallis ruscifolia Pleurothallis sclerophylla Pleurothallis sertularioides Pleurothallis sicaria Pleurothallis testaefolia Pleurothallis tribuloides Pleurothallis trichophora Pleurothallis trichostata Pleurothallis velaticaulis 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 Guianas Yucatan Appendix 1 continued 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 Florida Puerto Rico Jamaica 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Hispaniola Cuba Isla Juventud Mona 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Grand Cayman Little Cayman Cayman Brac 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Turks Inaguas 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Crooked Long 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Salvador Exumas Cat 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Providence Andros Abacos St Martin 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Saba St Barth Âelemy St Kitts Nevis St Eustatius Antigua 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Barbuda Montserrat 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Guadeloupe Dominica Martinique St Lucia St Vincent 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Grenada Barbados Trinidad Tobago Margarita Vieques 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Culebra Anegada Virgin Gorda Tortola St Thomas St John St Croix 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Aruba Cura Ëcao Bonaire 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 792 J. C. Trejo-Torres and J. D. Ackerman Ó Blackwell Science Ltd 2001, Journal of Biogeography, 28, 775±794 0 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 Species name/area name Pleurothallis wilsonii Pogonia grandi¯ora Pogonia tenuis Polystachya concreta Polystachya foliosa Ponthieva brittoniae Ponthieva diptera Ponthieva harrisii Ponthieva pauci¯ora Ponthieva petiolata Ponthieva racemosa Ponthieva ventricosa Prescottia oligantha Prescottia stachyodes Prosthechea boothiana Prosthechea cochleata Prosthechea fragans Prosthechea pygmaea Prosthechea vespa Pseudocentrum minus Psilochilus macrophyllus Psychilis kraenzlinii Psychilis macconnelliae Psygmorchis pusilla Reichenbachanthus re¯exus Rodriguezia lanceolata Sarcoglottis sceptrodes Scaphyglottis fusiformis Scaphyglottis modesta Scaphyglottis prolifera Schiedeella amesiana Schomburgkia ®mbriata Schomburgkia humboldtii Schomburgkia lysonsii Sobralia fragrans Spiranthes torta Stanhopea grandi¯ora Stelis muscifera Stelis perpusilli¯ora Stelis pygmaea Stelis scabrida Stelis trigoni¯orum Stenia pallida Stenorrhynchos lanceolatum Stenorrhynchos speciosum Stenorrhynchos squamulosum Tetramicra bulbosa 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Guianas Yucatan Appendix 1 continued 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 Florida Puerto Rico Jamaica 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Hispaniola Cuba Isla Juventud Mona 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Grand Cayman Little Cayman Cayman Brac 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Turks Inaguas 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Crooked Long 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Salvador Exumas Cat 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Providence Andros Abacos St Martin 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Saba St Barth Âelemy St Kitts Nevis St Eustatius Antigua 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Barbuda Montserrat 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 Guadeloupe Dominica Martinique St Lucia St Vincent 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Grenada Barbados Trinidad Tobago Margarita Vieques 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Culebra Anegada Virgin Gorda Tortola St Thomas St John St Croix 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Aruba Cura Ëcao Bonaire 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Biogeography of the Antilles based on a parsimony analysis of orchid distributions 793 Ó Blackwell Science Ltd 2001, Journal of Biogeography, 28, 775±794 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 Species name/area name Tetramicra canaliculata Tetramicra eulophiae Tetramicra parvi¯ora Tetramicra urbaniana Tolumnia bahamense Tolumnia calochila Tolumnia gauntletii Tolumnia lyrata Tolumnia prionochila Tolumnia sasseri Tolumnia urophyllum Tolumnia variegata Trichopilia fragans Trichosalpinx ciliaris Trichosalpinx dura Trigonidium egertonianum Triphora amazonica Triphora gentianoides Triphora hassleriana Triphora surinamensis Triphora yucatanensis Trizeuxis falcata Tropidia polystachya Wullschlaegellia aphylla Wullschlaegellia calcarata Xylobium colleyi Xylobium foveatum Xylobium palmifolium Zootrophion atropurpureum 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 Guianas Yucatan Appendix 1 continued 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 Florida Puerto Rico Jamaica 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Hispaniola Cuba Isla Juventud Mona 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Grand Cayman Little Cayman Cayman Brac 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Turks Inaguas 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Crooked Long 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Salvador Exumas Cat 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Providence Andros Abacos St Martin 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Saba St Barth Âelemy St Kitts Nevis St Eustatius Antigua 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Barbuda Montserrat 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 Guadeloupe Dominica Martinique St Lucia St Vincent 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Grenada Barbados Trinidad Tobago Margarita Vieques 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Culebra Anegada Virgin Gorda Tortola St Thomas St John St Croix 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Aruba Cura Ëcao Bonaire 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 794 J. C. Trejo-Torres and J. D. Ackerman Ó Blackwell Science Ltd 2001, Journal of Biogeography, 28, 775±794
© Copyright 2025 Paperzz