How quickly can populations adapt to climate change? Chris Wilson Aquatic Research and Monitoring Section Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry Adapting to a changing climate • adaptation to climate change largely focused on economic and environmental impacts • ecological repercussions and impacts on Ontario’s biodiversity are expected to be significant and permanent (www.eco.on.ca) • Ontario action plan includes conserving biodiversity and supporting resilient ecosystems • key question: adaptive potential of wild species and populations 2 How do species react to change? • • • • behavioural response phenotypic plasticity migration adaptation x population extirpation x species extinction 3 Climate change challenges for coldwater species • climate change models predict significant warming for Ontario • coldwater species expected to be hit hardest • ability to cope (shortterm) and/or adapt (long-term)? – local populations – species-wide 4 Climate change challenges for coldwater species 5 Lake trout as a coldwater specialist • common below 8ºC; • optimal range between 8 to 12ºC • [O2] >6 mg/L (<4 = lethal) (Plumb & Blanchfield, 2009) 6 Systems and populations under stress • O2 depletion already a concern • effect of longer stratification interval? (Wilson and Evans 2010) 7 Climate model predictions • lake stratification: earlier onset, stronger gradients, and longer duration temperature + O2 habitat squeeze loss of habitat change in reproductive timing? impacts on juvenile survival; reduced recruitment increased population vulnerability (Ficke et al., 2007) 8 Regional habitat projections for lake trout (Minns et al. 2009) • increasing temperatures (IPCC A2 scenario) • regional changes for lake trout habitat and productivity • how will populations respond? 9 How quickly can populations adapt? • adaptive ability of population – population size (N and Ne) – range in expression of adaptive characters – standing genetic resources – “genetic architecture” and heritability of traits under selection • strength of selective pressures (Naish and Hard 2008) – magnitude and variance – duration; time frame relative to generation time 10 Important traits for selection • Life history – growth rate – age at maturity – size at maturity – fecundity – (asymptotic size) • Ecology – place in food web – feeding strategy – habitat usage • Physiology / metabolism – temperature tolerance – oxygen requirements / consumption 11 Similar thermal performance among lake trout populations Thermal Tolerance Metabolic Scope • acclimation temperature (environment) had much stronger effect than ancestry (population) on thermal performance • reduced energy budget at highest temperature (19°C) • no significant differences in thermal tolerance or metabolic scope • genetic constraints on species-level response (Kelly et al. 2014) 12 Hot times for brook trout? Range considerations Status concerns in New England Range contraction (Meisner 1990) Projected change in distribution (Chu et al 2005) Predicted Species Range Shifts Habitat suitability for brook trout in Canada in: a) 2005 b) 2020 c) 2050 14 Thermal physiology and adaptive potential of brook trout populations • variation among wild populations + hatchery strains fitness differences • scope for activity – thermal stress – oxygen stress – physiological performance within ‘metabolic envelope’ scope for adaptation (photo credit: S. D’Amelio) (B. Stitt M.Sc., C. Cook M.Sc.) 15 Findings and new research questions • responses to increased summer temperatures – delayed spawning; phenological plasticity – [02] challenge > temperature • limited scope for rapid adaptive response • assisted migration (facilitated gene flow) – lake trout: unlikely to increase adaptive responses – brook trout: potential benefit but needs more testing • epigenetic mechanisms for rapid adaptive responses? – controlled breeding crosses: – testing heritability of thermal tolerance from acclimation – gene expression in offspring; transgenerational inheritance 16 Canada’s aquatic biodiversity: a global treasure • Canada’s unique global standing and biological wealth • responsibilities for sustainable management – stewardship – sustainable resource use – may require new approaches 17
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz