MASTER OF PHILOSOPHY (PSYCHOLOGY)
DETAILED SYLLABUS 2013-2015
DEPARTMENT OF PSYCHOLOGY
CHRIST UNIVERSITY
BANGALORE, INDIA
Programme Description
The M.Phil (Master of Philosophy) program is intended principally to be a well-founded
transition into the advanced research at a doctoral level (Ph.D), in which the researcher will
aspire for a higher disciplinary and methodological competence in research. It includes a primary
intensive course work in the general and specific research methodologies, two electives from the
respective area of research, paper presentations in research colloquia, design of a research
proposal and its defense in a colloquium and the final MPhil dissertation along with its
evaluation and defense.
Programme Objectives
1. Train the scholars in the advanced theoretical and philosophical foundation of research in
psychology
2. Equip the scholars in using the strategies of collecting and analyzing data in psychological
research
3. Prepare the scholars for doctoral level research
4. Provide adequate acquaintance in practicing ethics in psychological research
5. Develop skills in presenting and publishing research works in various academic platforms.
6. Sensitize the contemporary debates in the field of social science
Programme Structure
Semest
er
I
II
III
Course
Advanced Quantitative
Research methods in
Psychology
Advanced Qualitative
Research Methods in
Psychology
Applied Data Analysis
and Research Writing
Lab
Dissertation
Course
Code
No. of
Hrs
CIA
ESE
Total
Marks
Credits
RPS
131
60
50
50
100
4
RPS
231
45
50
50
100
3
RPS
232
45
50
50
100
3
Up to
*
*
200
10
12
months
TOTAL
500
20
The dissertation marks include presentation of the proposal (25 marks), presentation of
dissertation (25 marks), final dissertation (100 marks)-double valuation, and viva after evaluation
of the dissertation (50 marks).The total credits for the entire course will be 20.
Admission Criteria
The basic eligibility of candidates intending to pursue M.Phil program is a pass with aMinimum
of 55% in MSc/MA (Psychology) (50% in the case of SC/ST candidates). However, in special
cases, candidates may be allowed to do M.Phil in inter-disciplinary subjects provided the
candidate has acquired sufficient knowledge and competence in the field of study. This will be
assessed on the basis of the candidate’s specializations, work experience and significant
contribution in the specific area.
Assessment of course work
Each course work paper will be assessed upon 100 marks, including continuous internal
assessment and End Semester Examination. The internal assessment for each paper will be done
periodically (CIA 1: 10 Marks, CIA 2: 10 Marks, CIA 3: 25 Marks), by the teachers handling the
classes.
Components for each course work paper
1
2
3
Continuous Internal Assessment (3 Papers)
Attendance
End semester Examination
Marks
45
5
50
TOTAL 100
Marks for attendance: 95-100%: 5, 90-94%: 4, 85-89%: 3, 80-84%-2, 76-79%: 1.
Students can check their attendance in the University Website.
Students who fail to complete CIA requirements on the specified date may be given another
chance to repeat the CIA, before the next CIA, with the discretion of the teacher and with the
consent of the coordinator. The HOD will hand over the consolidated CIA marks to the COE.
The Maximum marks for each end semester examination will be 100, and the examination will
be of three hours duration. The minimum mark to pass in ESE of each paper is 50%. The
minimum marks to pass in each paper is 50% aggregate of CIA and ESE. There is no minimum
mark required for CIA.
In case a candidate fails due to low marks in CIA, he/she can re-register for the subject with the
payment of required fee and complete the CIA requirements, by attending the classes along with
the candidates of next batch, as directed by the HOD.
Semester I
Course Title
Advanced Quantitative Research
Methods in Psychology
Course code
Credits
Total hours
Total Marks
RPS 131
4
60
100
Course Description
The present course consists of two parts namely general research methodology and specific
research methodology in psychology. The first part designed to provide advanced level
understanding of the philosophical assumptions of social science research. The second part
called specific research methodology offers higher level understanding of sampling, research
designs and analysis strategies in quantitative research. Using seminars, group discussions and
lectures as the pedagogy, the course intended to bring the contemporary debate in the area of
social science and psychology. Students taking this paper require to have completed basic
theoretical foundations of quantitative research at the Masters level.
Course Objectives and Learning Outcome
After the completion of this course, a scholar will be able to:
1. Understand of the philosophical foundations of research
2. Familiarize with the principles and practices associated with experimental and non
experimental designs in psychological research
3. Explore the principles informing data collection and sampling methods in research so that
researchers can make informed decisions and good practice in research
4. Understand the theoretical assumptions of various statistical method for data analysis in
quantitative research
Part A
General Research Methodology
Unit 1: Conceptual foundations of research
20 hrs
Meaning of research and scope of research methodology, Philosophy of research – ontological,
epistemological and ethical (axiology) considerations, Identification of problem area,
Formulation of research questions, Typology of Research Designs.
Overview of quantitative research, Logic of Inquiry, Construction of theories, Conceptual
framework in quantitative research.
Introduction to Academic Writing, Structure of Academic Writing, Reading for Research,
Academic Styles, Plagiarism, Publication, Online Resources.
Part B
Specific Research Methodology
Unit 2: Sampling Design and Tools
10 hrs
Sampling: Process and Types sampling; probability and non probability sampling, Errors in
sampling
Issues in sampling
Development of Tools: Classical and modern test theory: assumptions, equations and limitations
Process of Test development: Establishing psychometric properties of a Test
Developing questionnaires and interview schedules
Unit 3: Experimental Research Design
10 hrs
Experimental designs: Introduction to causality, Between-subjects design, within –subjects
design, factorial design, Mixed Factorial experiments single-subject research design.
Validity: Internal and external validity, Threats to Validity: Threats to internal validity and
external validity, balancing internal and external validity
Reliability: Factors influencing reliability.
Unit 4: Descriptive and Correlational Research Design
10 hrs
Descriptive and correlation research strategies, Survey design, Quasi experimental designs: Nonequivalent group, Time-series and developmental design; cross sectional research design and
longitudinal research design, observational designs
Unit 5: Multivariate Designs and Analysis
10 hrs
Introduction to Multivariate methods and analysis, Discriminant Analysis Multiple, logistic and
hierarchical regression
Factor analysis, structural equation modeling (SEM) ,Meta analysis, Mediational
Analysis,Canonical Analysis. Advantages of multivariate strategies
Evaluation
The present course will be assessed upon 100 marks (Continuous Internal Assessment (CIA) –45
marks, Attendance –5 marks and 50 marks for the End Semester Examination). There is no
minimum mark required for CIA.The minimum mark to pass in ESE of the course is 50%. The
minimum marks to pass in the course is 50% aggregate of CIA and ESE.
Part I Continuous Internal Assessment
.
CIA 1: 10 Marks, assessment before the completion of 30% of the classes
Skill and knowledge component: Identification of a relevant research problem, analytical and
review skill
CIA 2: 10 Marks, assessment before the completion of 60% of the classes
Skill and knowledge component: Conceptualizing research design.
CIA 3: 25 Marks, assessment before the completion of classes
Skill and knowledge component: Identifying and understanding multivariate analysis by
reviewing research in relevant areas in psychology.
Marks for attendance: 95-100%: 5, 90-94%: 4, 85-89%: 3, 80-84%-2, 76-79%: 1.
Part II: End Semester Examination
The ESE question paper shall be set for 100 marks and 3 hours duration. There shall be
three parts in the ESE question paper: Part A with 20% choice shall carry 30 marks. Part
B with 20% choice shall carry 50 marks and Part C without choice shall carry 20 marks.
References
Essential reading
Bordens, K. S. & Abbott, B. B. (2005). Research design and methods : A process approach.
(6th ed.). New Delhi. Tata McGraw-Hill Publishing Company Ltd.
Breakwell, G.M., Hammond, S., Fife-Shaw, C., & Smith, J.A. (eds.). (2006). Research methods
in
psychology (3rd ed.). New Delhi: Sage.
Cohen, R. J., & Swerdlik, M.E. (2005). Psychological testing and assessment: An introduction to
tests
and measurement (6th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Recommended reading
Coolican ,H.(2004). Research methods and statistics in psychology. London: Hodder Arnold
Goodwin, C.J. (2002). Research in psychology: Methods and design (3rd ed.). New Jersey:
John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Gravetter, F. J. & Forziano, L. B. (2003). Research methods for the behavioral sciences.
United states. Thomson Wadsworth.
McGuigan, F.J. (1999). Experimental psychology: Methods of research (5th ed.). New Delhi:
Prentice Hall.
Rosnow, R.L., & Rosenthal, R. (2002). Beginning behavioral research: A conceptual primer
(4th ed.).
New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
Schweigert, W.A. (1997). Research methods in psychology: A handbook. Delhi: Sage
Publications
Semester II
Course Title
Course code
Credits
Total hours
Total Marks
RPS 231
3
45
100
Advanced Qualitative Research
Methods in Psychology
Course Description
The qualitative research methodology is characterized by the method of induction, interpretation
and conceptualization. It is a research strategy that emphasizes a conceptual process-mode of
research rather than quantification in the collection and analysis of data. In qualitative research
the reliability, validity and legitimization of knowledge is reached through synthetic and
interpretive research processes. It also encourages a contextual understanding of premises,
methods and results and their applicability in a continuing pursuit of research. The present course
offers an advanced level understanding of ontological and epistemological foundation of
qualitative research. It provides a comprehensive understanding of the process and method of
data collection in qualitative research .Through simulations exercise, the course also covers
various methods of data analysis strategies in qualitative research. Scholars taking this paper
require to have completed basic theoretical foundations of qualitative research at the Masters
level.
Course Objectives and Learning Outcome
After the completion of this course, a scholar will be able to:
1. Understand the theoretical foundation of qualitative research methods in psychology
2. Examine the principles of collecting data using various qualitative research methods
3. Understand importance of interdisciplinary research
4. Become familiar with the principles and skills of analyzing qualitative research
5. Comprehend practices that ensure quality enhancement in research
Unit 1: The Philosophical Basis and Traditions of Qualitative Research
10 hrs
Historical back ground of qualitative research
Ontological and epistemological foundation of qualitative research
Post modern turn in qualitative research
Different traditions in qualitative research: Grounded theory, phenomenological tradition,
ethnographic, auto ethnography tradition and Narrative approach
Contemporary issues and debates in the philosophy of qualitative inquiry
Unit 2: The Qualitative Research Process
5 hrs
Conceptualization of problem in qualitative research, the logic of qualitative research process:
induction and abduction, Conceptual Mapping, Sampling in qualitative research, Practice of
theoretical sampling. Issues of depth and theoretical saturation of data, Negative cases in data,
Designing qualitative research
Unit 3: Data Collection Methods in Different Traditions
10 hrs
Data collection methods in different traditions: Participant observation, interviewing, focus
groups, life history and oral history, documents, diaries, photographs, films and videos,
conversation, texts and case studies
Unit 4: Data Analysis
10 hrs
Transcription and data management process, Data analysis in different tradition
Qualitative Content analysis
Thematic analysis: Analytical induction model, thematic network model
Phenomenological analysis: Traditions in interpretative phenomenological analysis
Narrative analysis: thematic, structural and performative narrative analysis
Discourse and conversational analysis.
Unit 5: Quality Issues in Qualitative Research
10 hrs
Problems of reliability and validity in qualitative research methods, auditing qualitative
research. Theory and generalization as outcomes of qualitative research .Issues of representation
and reflexivity
Evaluation
The present course will be assessed upon 100 marks (Continuous Internal Assessment (CIA) –45
marks, Attendance –5 marks and 50 marks for the End Semester Examination). There is no
minimum mark required for CIA. The minimum mark to pass in ESE of the course is 50%. The
minimum marks to pass in the course is 50% aggregate of CIA and ESE.
Part I Continuous Internal Assessment
.
CIA 1: 10 Marks, assessment before the completion of 30% of the classes
Skill and knowledge component: Developing skills in generating and designing qualitative
research problems.
CIA 2: 10 Marks, assessment before the completion of 60% of the classes
Skill and knowledge component: Developing skills in auditing qualitative research
CIA 3: 25 Marks, assessment before the completion of classes
. Skill and knowledge component: Skills of analyzing data in different traditions of qualitative
research
Marks for attendance: 95-100%: 5, 90-94%: 4, 85-89%: 3, 80-84%-2, 76-79%: 1.
Part II: End Semester Examination
The ESE question paper shall be set for 100 marks and 3 hours duration. There shall be
three parts in the ESE question paper: Part A with 20% choice shall carry 30 marks. Part
B with 20% choice shall carry 50 marks and Part C without choice shall carry 20 marks.
References
Essential reading
Bryman, A. (Eds.).(2007). Qualitative Research 2. Vol 1. New Delhi: Sage publications.
Bryman, A. (Eds.) (2007). Qualitative Research 2. Vol 2. New Delhi: Sage publications.
Bryman, A. (Eds.) (2007). Qualitative Research 2. Vol 3. New Delhi: Sage publications.
Bryman, A. (Eds.) (2007). Qualitative Research 2. Vol 4. New Delhi: Sage publications.
Recommended reading
Biber,S.N.H & Leavy (2006).The practice of qualitative research. New Delhi: Sage publications.
Bryman, A (Ed.) (2007). Sage Benchmarks in social science research methods. Vol.I, Vol.II,
Vol,III, and
Vol. IV. New Delhi : Sage Publications.
Clandinin, D. J. (2007). Handbook of Narrative inquiry mapping a methodology. New Delhi:
Kapur,R.L.(ed.).(1999). Qualitative methods in mental health research. Bangalore: NIAS.
Kidder,L.H., & Fine,M.(1997). Qualitative inquiry in psychology: A radical tradition. In D. Fox
and I.
Kvale,S.(Ed.) (1997).Psychology & Post-modernism. New Delhi: Sage Publications.
Mason,J.(1996). Qualitative researching. New Delhi: Sage.
McGhee, P. (2001). Thinking critically about qualitative research in psychology. In P. McGhee,
New Delhi: Sage.
Prilleltensky (Eds.). Critical psychology: An introduction (pp. 34-50). London: Sage.
publications.
Riessman, C. K. (2008). Narrative methods for the human sciences. New Delhi: Sage
Ritchie,J.& Lewis,J.(eds.).(2003).Qualitative research practice: A guide for social science
Sage publications.
Silverman, D & Marvasti,A. (2008). Doing qualitative research .New Delhi: Sage publication
Smith, J. A., Harre, R., & Langenhove, L.V.(eds.).(1995). Rethinking methods in psychology.
Smith,J.A.(ed.) (2003). Qualitative psychology: A practical guide to research methods. New
Delhi: Sage Publication.
Tuffin, K.(2005). Understanding critical social psychology. New Delhi: Sage.
Wengraf, T. (2004). Qualitative research interviewing. New Delhi: Sage publications
Willig, C.(2001). Introducing qualitative research in psychology: Adventures in theory and
method.
Semester III
Course Title
Course code
Credits
Total hours
Total Marks
RPS 232
3
45
100
Applied Data Analysis and Research
Writing Lab
Course Description
This paper will introduce to the scholars the various analytical techniques in qualitative and
qualitative research. The pedagogical approach of the course will be practice oriented. The
scholars are instructed to work with original or simulated data to understand the issues of data
analysis, writing, and ethical considerations in psychological research. This course also covers
academic writing, publication and ethical considerations in psychological research. Scholars
taking this paper require to have completed basic theoretical foundations of qualitative research
at the Masters level. Pre requisite of the course would be Masters level knowledge in statistics
and qualitative data analysis strategies and style of research writing
Course Objectives and Learning Outcome
After the completion of this course, a scholar will be able to:
1. Develop skills in quantitative and qualitative data analysis strategies
2. Understand the salient features of academic writing
3. Use the advanced level application of SPSS
4. Sensitize scholars on research ethics in practice
5. Train others in SPSS
6. Understand application of software in qualitative data analysis ( advanced level)
7. Understand APA guidelines for research writing and publication.
Unit 1: Statistical Analysis
15 hrs
SPSS: Data Management, Data editing, comparing Averages, ANOVA (one way, Two way,
Repeated measures),MANOVA, correlation, regression ,Discriminant analysis and logistic
regression, Factor analysis ( EFA and CFA),Reliability analysis, mediational analysis.
Nonparametric tests : Non parametric Statistics :chi-square,one sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov
test,Two –independent samples Tests:Mann-WhitneyU,Several independent Samples : Kruskal –
Wallis H and Median
Two Related Samples: Wilcoxon,SignTest,Several Related samples :Friedman,Kendall’s W
Unit 2: Qualitative Data Analysis
15 hrs
Analyzing qualitative data: Data management and analysis in different traditions of data
analysis: Thematic analysis, IPA, Narrative Analysis
Use of software in qualitative data analysis: Atlas /Nvivo
Unit 3: Academic Writing and Publication in Psychology
10 hrs
Introduction to Academic Writing, Structure of Academic Writing, Academic Writing Styles
(APA and MLA), Plagiarism, Publication.
Reporting and writing qualitative research
Unit 4:
Research Ethics
5 hrs
Code of ethics for qualitative and quantitative research psychology
Cultural issues and ethical practice
Evaluation
The present course will be assessed upon 100 marks (Continuous Internal Assessment (CIA) –45
marks, Attendance –5 marks and 50 marks for the End Semester Examination). There is no
minimum mark required for CIA. The minimum mark to pass in ESE of the course is 50%. The
minimum marks to pass in the course is 50% aggregate of CIA and ESE.
Part I Continuous Internal Assessment
.CIA 1: 10 Marks, assessment before the completion of 30% of the classes
Skill and knowledge component: Qualitative data analysis and inductive reasoning
CIA 2: 10 Marks, assessment before the completion of 60% of the classes
Skill and knowledge component: Writing styles
CIA 3: 25 Marks, assessment before the completion of classes
Skill and knowledge component: Application of SPSS in data analysis
. Marks for attendance: 95-100%: 5, 90-94%: 4, 85-89%: 3, 80-84%-2, 76-79%: 1.
Part II: End Semester Examination
The ESE question paper shall be set for 100 marks and 3 hours duration. There shall be
three parts in the ESE question paper: Part A with 20% choice shall carry 30 marks. Part
B with 20% choice shall carry 50 marks and Part C without choice shall carry 20 marks.
References
Essential reading
American Psychological Association (2010). Publication manual (6th ed.). Washington DC.
Heiman, G.W. (2001). Understanding research methods and statistics: An integrated
introduction for research assistants. Delhi: Sage Publications
Recommended reading
Kinnear, P. R. (2010). IBM SPSS statistics 18 made simple. New York. Psychology Press.
Leong, F.T., & Austin. (1996). The psychology research handbook: A guide for graduate
students and psychology (2nd ed.). Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company.
Course Title
Course code
Credits
Total hours
Total Marks
Dissertation
-
10
Upto 12
moths
200
Course Description
The present course intended to conduct a research dissertation based on the area of interest of the
scholars in Psychology. A faculty supervisor would be allotted as a guide to them from the
department. Through regular discussion with the Guide the scholar should be able to identify a
relevant and feasible research problem and conduct a research using appropriate methods
.continuous supervision with the research guide, field experience and inputs from the theory
courses prepares the scholar to meet the prerequisites of a doctoral level research. Continuous
presentation, defense and auditing will enhance the quality of the research work. The course will
also ensure the scholars research ethics and etiquettes
Course Objectives and Learning Outcomes
After completing the course the students will be able to:
1. Achieve the prerequisites of doctoral level research work
2. Developing argumentation from the data using appropriate analytical strategies.
3. Expand analytical and interpretative skills for arriving at a claim in a logical fashion.
4. Practice the international standards of ethical practice in psychological research.
5. Apply APA style of writing in research
6. Identify the application of the findings in the discipline and society at large.
Evaluation
The Dissertation marks include presentation of the project Proposal (25 Marks),Presentation of
Dissertation (25 Marks), Final Dissertation (100 marks) – double Valuation, and Viva after
evaluation of the dissertation (50 Marks). The title page of the dissertation, cover format,
University logo, etc. should strictly conform to the format of presentation as prescribed by the
University and the dissertation (all copies) should carry a declaration by the candidate and
certificate duly signed and issued by the guide. The dissertation should be hardbound in grey
colour. The contents of the dissertation may be divided into different chapters including:
Introduction, Review of Literature, Methodology, Results and Discussion, Summary and
Conclusion, Appendix (if any), Literature cited, Publications (if any) etc.The MPhil dissertation
may generally be written in English (for subjects other than Languages)
Adequate
Areas
The title describes the major variables of the
study an
d theproblem
method ofand
study
2. The
justification of the study Adequate
The Introduction presents the specific
research
Statement
of the general
Problemresearch
states the
purpose
problem and
strategy
of the
research study, relating that purpose to the
state of Knowledge in the literature and
Research
Questions state the relationships
practical
among needs of the profession.
Inadequate
Suggestion
Inadequate
Suggestion
Adequate
Inadequate
Suggestion
Adequate
Inadequate
Suggestion
1.
variables of interest that guides the study
Research Questions define the boundaries of
(Quantitative).
the
research and narrow the focus of the study
Justification
(Qualitative).for Study demonstrates the
importance of the study related to prior
literature, professional
practices, and/or
theoretical development.
Limitations
are stated.
Definition of Terms: important terms are
welldefined. Of Literature
3. Review
Shows how the research is grounded in the
current
Review
of the literature is efficiently
state of knowledge.
summarized.
Priority is given to empirical studies
related to the topic.
4.
Methods
Quantitative
Section describes the data collection
Research
strategy.
Design
Section describes how the study
handles
threats
to validity.
Describes
the population from whom
Subjects
study
Describes
the subjects
sampling or selection
plan to select
methods
Discusses costs to subjects, risks to
subjects,
Provides
forofconfidential
means of
and means
managing risks.
handling
Addressesdata.
informed consent issues.
The candidates will be granted up to a maximum period of months, after commencement
of the course to submit their MPhil dissertation. In exceptional cases the candidates may be
allowed extension of time to submit their dissertation on payment of prescribed fee subject to
successful completion of applicable coursework. However such extension shall be for a
maximum period of one year only. The MPhil dissertation will not be accepted for assessment,
unless the candidate has paid the prescribed fees. The candidate shall submit five hard-bound
copies and a soft copy (CD with word and pdf files) of his/her dissertation work for assessment.
Proposal Evaluation Criteria
Measuring
Instruments
Materials
Procedures
Statistics
Research
Design
Operational definitions of the
instruments are consistent with the
Statement of the Problem.
All variables in title are measured in
some
Discusses reliability and validity of
Manner
each
Describes scoring methods for each
Instrument
Instrument
Describes any experimental materials
used in
the study.
Describes the work plan of the research
project Addresses informed consent
Describes
standardized procedures to
issues.
control
Describes the settings in
Variance
which data collection will
occur.
Describes
the statistical methods to
analyze
Statistics are appropriate for the
data
research
problem
Adequate
Qualitativ
Indicates
how the methodology selected
EEEEEEE
E EEe
influences
data collection,
analysis, and reporting findings.
Assumptions and Rationale for Design:
discusses why the research problem is
suitable for qualitative design
Explains underlying assumptions in the
qualitative methodology selected for
the study
Inadequate
Suggestion
Participants
and Role of
Researcher:
Data
Collection
Procedures
Data
Analysis
Procedures
Methods for
Verification
Describes the setting and issues of
access.
Discusses how the researcher gains
entry into
the subjects’ social environment
Discusses costs to subjects, risks to
subjects, and means of managing
risks.
Discusses how the identity of the
researcher may influence data
collection and interpretation.
Describes
type
of information
toof
be
Provides for
confidential
means
gathered.
handling data.
Describes
data collection
Addresses methods
informedofconsent
issues.
Discusses strengths and weaknesses of
data
Describes
data interpretation
collection the
Procedure
method of
the study
Data Analysis Procedures are
Study has with
means
for assessing
the
consistent
research
tradition
accuracy
defined
in Research
Design.
of the data
and its interpretation.
OVERALL EVALUATION
1. Literature reviewed is appropriate to the focus of the
study. Critical
analysis and synthesis of the literature is evident and
leads to a concise summary of gaps and priorities for
purposes/objectives
are clearly articulated and
2. Study
future
linked research
to the in the field.
review of literature
and/orintheoretical
of the study
light of itsframework.
contribution to
3. Significance
advancing
in the
field is addressed.
The theoretical
/conceptual
perspective(s) informing the
4. knowledge
study and
its role in the study is clearly described and
and methods
are clearly
described in detail
5. Methodology
appropriately applied
throughout
the proposal.
and are
sound; appropriate justification is provided for
plan for thedecisions
ethical conduct
of of
theother
research
is
6. The
methodological
(in light
options)
elaborated.
as appropriate.
7. The plan for disseminating the study findings identifies
relevant
strategies todocuments
advance knowledge
transfer/uptake.
(e.g. data collection
tools or
8. Additional
interview
scripts, letters of information/consents) are included and
support the clarity and completeness of the overall
proposal.
0
0. 1.
5 5
2
2.
5
3
3.
5
4
4.
5
5
9. Writing style, organization and format is consistent
with expectations for doctoral level papers (i.e., well
organized with
logical flow of ideas, analysis supported by appropriate
references, clarity of expression, use of active voice,
writing free of grammatical or technical errors,
completeness
of reference
list,
raised
in the presentation
are effectively
10. Questions
APA format).
answered