Warmup 2 minutes: Think of some big businesses in the American economy today. 1 minute: Share with neighbors. Share with class Businesses of this sort must find some advantage in being big; otherwise they would not work so hard to grow and expand. Consumers must find some advantage in bigness, too; otherwise, they would not choose to buy things produced or sold by large companies. What might be some of the benefits of “bigness,” for businesses and for consumers? What controversies have arisen as a result of these traits of “bigness”? Some big businesses late in the nineteenth century were called trusts. Examples of Trusts American Sugar Refining Trust American Tobacco Copper Trust Standard Oil Trust Steel Beam Trust United States Steel Corporation A trust was essentially a cartel (or, in other words, an oligopoly/monopoly) Cartels were an arrangement in which two or more firms in the same industry are drawn together by an agreement intended to reduce competition and maintain or boost profits. Trust agreements provided that the stock of the various former competitors would be held by a trustee. The trustee was authorized to make decisions for the collective good of the trust — by controlling the prices that members of the trust would charge for the goods they produced, for example, and by controlling output for the trust. Railroads had benefits… Transcontinental railroads expedited the transportation of goods, services and people throughout the country. Output and employment increased. …but. Not everybody was happy with the railroads. Farmers, in particular, complained bitterly about injustices they saw in the railroads’ operations. The railroads acted as monopolies, the farmers claimed, and they charged higher rates to farmers than to others who shipped goods by rail. Moreover, the railroads were said to benefit unfairly from favorable treatment by the U.S. government, which provided them with valuable land grants and low-interest loans. Oligopoly Game HOW COMPETITIVE WERE THE RAILROADS OF THE 1870S? Some railroad engaged in anti-competitive practices such as price fixing. However, it remained difficult to suppress competition even in the railroad industry. Railroads added tens of thousands of miles of track in the 1870s and 1880s. Additional track provided opportunities for increased competition. Short hauls in rural areas faced little direct competition. However, long hauls between cities usually had two or more railroads in competition. Efforts by railroads to form agreements to fix their rates and find other means to reduce competition almost always failed. Aggressive managers or owners (such as Jay Gould) would break the agreements and begin price cutting. Price cutting took a variety of forms such as price discrimination and rebates. The effect to drive down rates, however, was the same. Watch “Monopolies” from “The Men Who Built America.” Do Activity 25.1. Discuss as a class. HOMEWORK: Read 8.1
© Copyright 2025 Paperzz