[CANCER RESEARCH 32, 1195-1200, June 1972] Potentiation of Drug Effect by Tween 80 in Chinese Hamster Cells Resistant to Actinomycin D and Daunomycin1 HansjörgRiehm2 and June L. Biedler Division of Drug Resistance [H. R., J. L. B.J, Sloan-Kettering Institute for Cancer Research, and Department of Pediatrics [H. R.], Memorial Hospital for Cancer and Allied Diseases, New York, New York 10021 SUMMARY In vitro studies of Chinese hamster sublines have indicated that cellular resistance to actinomycin D and daunomycin is predominantly due to decreased uptake of drug. Very probably, the alteration mediating resistance occurs in the external cell membrane. For substantiation of these previous findings, sensitive and resistant sublines were grown in the presence of graded concentrations of antibiotics, of the surface-active, nonionic detergent Tween 80 and of various combinations of both. Tween 80 caused a marked potentiation of drug effect, particularly in resistant cells, which exhibited a considerable degree of cross-resistance to the surfactant. Increased uptake of tritiated actinomycin D and daunomycin in the presence of Tween 80 was shown by radioautography to be directly related to concentration of detergent. Both potentiation of drug effect in growth studies and enhancement of uptake of antibiotics strongly support the concept that experimentally developed resistance to antibiotics in these Chinese hamster cells is in large part due to an acquired alteration manifest at the cellular membrane. INTRODUCTION Experimentally developed resistance to AD3 is associated with uptake differences as a consequence of reduced permeability to drug in several bacterial and mammalian cell systems, as previously discussed (2). For a graded series of AD-resistant Chinese hamster sublines, we have provided evidence suggesting that resistance is likewise due to altered membrane permeability. Dose-response data and radioautographic determinations of uptake of AD-3 H indicated that degree of resistance is proportional to degree of cross-resistance to DM and vincristine and proportional to uptake of AD itself (2). Similarly, reduced permeability to drug was considered to be principally responsible for the resistance to DM developing in Chinese hamster cells exposed to this antibiotic (18). As yet uncharacterized and probably nonspecific alteration(s) at the surface of the cell may explain the resistance of these sublines to AD and DM, as well as the 1This investigation was supported in part by TJSPHSResearch Grant CA 08748. 2Present address: Kinderklinik der Freien Universität,l Berlin 19, Germany. 3The abbreviations used are: AD, actinomycin D; DM, daunomycin (daunorubicin); ED50, 50% effective dose; ED80, 80% effective dose. Received December 17, 1971; accepted March 6, 1972. cross-resistance to a variety of other antibiotics and alkaloids that are largely unrelated in mode of action. Whether mechanisms such as described in other studies (8, 12, 19) may also contribute to the resistance of these Chinese hamster cells is unknown. Investigations carried out by Yamada et al. (21, 22) suggested that in vitro exposure of rat ascites hepatoma cells to Tween 80 rendered them more sensitive to the action of nitrogen mustard. Pilot studies encouraged us to use this surfactant as a tool for experimentally altering membrane permeability. Since an appropriate system of cell lines resistant in different degrees to the antibiotics AD and DM was available and since resistance was considered to be mediated by membrane barriers, it was the aim of the present study to demonstrate potentiation of the effect of the antibiotic by the nonionic surfactant. For this purpose, growth response experiments and determination of uptake by radioautography were carried out. Preliminary results have been reported (3). MATERIALS AND METHODS The source of parental cells used in this study, the derivation of resistant sublines, the drug sensitivity assay, and radioautographic technique were described previously (2, 18), except as noted for individual experiments. Eagle's minimal essential medium supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum was used throughout. Resistant sublines were maintained at the final concentration of drug for at least 6 months before this study was initiated and were grown in the absence of drug for 10 to 15 days prior to use in experiments. Sensitivity Assay for Combined Effect of Inhibitors. For comparison of the effectiveness of 2 inhibitors, alone and in combination, a method described by Elion et al. (7) and used with bacteria was modified and adapted to conditions of mammalian cell culture. The sensitivity assay (2) is based on determination of total cell number in cell cultures growing in the presence or absence (controls) of graded concentrations of inhibitor for 72 ±2 hr. Essentially the same technique was used for testing Tween 80 in combination with another chemical agent. When 2 to 4 concentrations of 2 compounds and 4 times 4 combinations were used to obtain growth response data, it was possible to determine ED50 and ED80 values for each combination. The fractional inhibitory concentration was calculated by dividing the effective dose value of the inhibitor, when present in the combination, by the effective dose value of the same inhibitor that would be required to give the same degree of inhibition (50 or 80%) by JUNE 1972 Downloaded from cancerres.aacrjournals.org on June 14, 2017. © 1972 American Association for Cancer Research. 1195 HansjörgRiehm and June L. Biedler Table l Drug concentrations at which resistant lines were maintained; response of cell lines to Tween 80 in terms of ED s0 and ED 80; and degree of resistance and cross-resistance MaintenanceconcentrationCell toAD137624501022791960DM12976231883290Tween of resistance" (%)ED800.0200.0410.0450.0520.0810.050Degree 8011.72.32.84.42.4 lineDC-3FDC-3F/AD IVDC-3F/AD XDC-3F/DM IDC-3F/DM XXDC-3F/AD IV/DMDrugADADDMDMDMHg/ml1.010.02.010.05.0TweenED500.0100.0180.0240.0290.0460.02480 " Resistance is expressed as ratio of ED5 0 values for resistant subline to parental line. Table 2 inhibition of growth of parental DC-3F line and resistant subline DC-3F/AD X by various concentrations of AD and Tween 80 in combination Concentration of agent Fractional inhibitory concentration 80(%)ADTween Cell lineAD DC-3F 80 (Mg/ml)Tween 0.0023 0.0017 0.0011 0.00072 0.00062 0.00052 0.0 0.0 0.001 0.002 0.005 0.0075 0.01 0.012 1.0 0.74 0.48 0.31 0.27 0.23 0.0 0.0 0.083 0.17 0.42 0.63 0.83 1.0 points are located along a straight line connecting 1.0 on the abscissa with 1.0 on the ordinate. Deviation to the left or right of this connecting line indicates synergism (potentiation) or antagonism (interference). Straight lines connecting unities of abscissa and ordinate with experimental points intersect at a point indicating the minimal fractional inhibitory concentration of both compounds. If the sum of fractional inhibitory concentration of the most effective combination (7) is near 1.0, additive effect is assumed; the smaller the sum the greater the degree of synergism. Chemical Agents. The source of most of the chemical agents used in these studies was given previously (2, 18). Tween 80 was obtained from Mann Research Laboratories, Inc., New York, N. Y.; Triton WR-1339 from Ruger Chemical Co., Irvington-on-Hudson, N. Y.; dimethyl sulfoxide, from J. T. Baker Chemical Co., Phillipsburg, N. J.; and neuraminidase, from Worthington Biochemicals Corp., Freehold, N. J. ED, 0.0054 0.0045 0.0037 0.0020 0.0018 0.0012 0.0 0.0 0.001 0.002 0.005 0.0075 0.01 0.023 1.0 0.83 0.69 0.37 0.33 0.22 0.0 0.0 0.044 0087 0.22 RESULTS Response to Tween 80. Chinese hamster cell lines, resistant in various degrees to the antibiotics AD and DM, exhibited an 0.33 approximately 2- to 4-fold increase in resistance to the 0.44 1.0 surfactant, Tween 80 (Table 1). The response to the surfactant could be expressed by a straight line in a semilogarithmic plot, ED, as previously shown for other chemical agents (1, 2, 18). Cross-resistance to Tween 80 was demonstrably greater for the DC-3F/AD X 0.0 1.0 0.0 4.5 DM-resistant than for the AD-resistant sublines. However, 0.002 0.58 0.077 2.6 0.005 0.22 0.19 0.98 despite the differential response of antibiotic-sensitive and 0.01 0.093 0.38 0.42 -resistant cells in the 3-day drug sensitivity assay, the 0.02 0.018 0.77 0.082 attachment of cells to glass at the ED5 0 level of the detergent 0.026 0.0 0.0 1.0 was not noticeably different following inoculation. ED, Cells growing in the presence of detergent exhibited a densely granular appearance which was related to 10.16.23.21.350.440.00.00.0020.0050.010.020.0481.00.610.320.130.0440.00.00.0420.100.210.421.0 concentration and which tended to disappear gradually after removal of the agent. When the concentration of fetal calf serum was increased from 10 to 20%, the toxicity in terms of ED5 o was decreased by about one-half. Tween 80 and Antibiotics in Combination. The combination experiments were performed to determine itself. When fractional inhibitory concentrations and effective whether the surfactant would potentiate the action of AD and dose values for both compounds were matched, it was possible DM on cells sensitive or resistant to these agents. The to plot corresponding fractional inhibitory concentrations in a calculation of fractional inhibitory concentrations (Table 2) coordinate system. Drug effect is considered additive when obviated the problem of quantitative differences in response of 1196 CANCER RESEARCH VOL. 32 Downloaded from cancerres.aacrjournals.org on June 14, 2017. © 1972 American Association for Cancer Research. Cellular Resistance and Tween 80 the various sublines to antibiotic or to Tween 80. The dose-response curves for the DC-3F/AD X subline, at the equivalent concentrations of Tween 80, showed a somewhat wider spread with respect to concentration of AD than for parental DC-3F cells, indicating a higher degree of potentiated growth inhibition of resistant cells. The synergistic effect with AD occurred even at demonstrably nontoxic concentrations of Tween 80 for sensitive and resistant cells. A higher concentration of the surfactant was tested because of cross-resistance of the AD-resistant cells. From the plot of the sums of fractional inhibitory concentrations of the most effective combination, only moderate synergism of drug action against DC-3F is indicated (Chart 1), whereas a much higher degree of synergistic action was exhibited for AD-resistant cell lines. For all resistant sublines, Tween 80 markedly potentiated the action of AD (Table 3). At the ED80 level, the 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 07 08 effect was more pronounced than at the EDSO level (Table 3; Chart 1). Combination experiments with DM revealed drug potentiation with both parental and resistant cells. Differential potentiation in respect to DC-3F and DC-3F/AD IV cells manifested by AD in combination with Tween 80 was also demonstrated when the antibiotic mithramycin was tested (Table 3). In a previous study, the DC-3F/AD IV subline was found to be highly cross-resistant to this antibiotic (2). Experiments performed with Chinese hamster cell lines resistant in various degrees to amethopterin (1) revealed no, or only moderate, synergism when tested in the same system (Chart 2). Uptake of AD-3 H and DM-3 H in Presence of Tween 80. The uptake of tritiated AD by parental DC-3F cells and resistant subline DC-3F/AD IV in the presence of a variety of chemical agents was determined according to the schedule outlined in Table 4. Radioautograms were prepared from cells exposed to EDSO and 10 times EDSO levels of the test agent in O.9 10 TWEEN 80 FRACTIONAL INHIBITORY CONCENTRATION 0.1 Chart 1. Effectiveness of combinations of AD and Tween 80 in terms of fractional inhibitory concentrations determined from ED80 values. »,parental DC-3F (2 experiments); •¿, DC-3F/AD IV; o, DC-3F/AD X. Intersections of straight lines, sums of the fractional inhibitory concentrations of the most effective combination. The sums are given in Table 3. 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 TWEEN 80 FRACTIONAL INHIBITORY CONCENTRATION Chart 2. Effectiveness of combinations of amethopterin and Tween 80 against amethopterin-resistant sublines determined as described in Chart 1. •¿, DC-3F8/A55 (4,455-fold resistance); •¿, DC-3F/A3 (108,400-fold resistance); *, CLM-7/A XVIII (32,200-fold resistance). Table 3 Sum of fractional inhibitory concentrations of most effective combination of Tween 80 with other agents, for parental DC-3F and resistant sublines The procedure for obtaining fractional inhibitory concentration is described in "Materials and Methods" and illustrated in Charts 1 and 2. Sum of fractional inhibitory concentrations at ED80 andED50 levels Cell une Tween 80 and AD Tween 80 and DM ED, ED8C ED, ED, Tween 80 and mithramycin ED8( ED, DC-3FDC-3F/AD IVDC-3F/AD XDC-3F/DM IDC-3F/DM XXDC-3F/AD IV/DM0.610.220.220.310.310.220.660.400.310.380.370.270.320.490.530.400.310.450.710.770.620.450.800.391.000.76 JUNE 1972 Downloaded from cancerres.aacrjournals.org on June 14, 2017. © 1972 American Association for Cancer Research. 1197 HansjörgBiehm and June L. Biedler Table 4 Uptake of AD-3 H by parental DC-3F cells and resistant subline DC-3F/A DIV in presence of various agents at ED 50 and 10 times ED s 0 Cells were exposed simultaneously to either 0. l MgAD-3H per ml (DC-3F) or 1.0 tig AD-3H per ml (DC-3F AD IV) and the test agent for 2 hr prior to preparation of the radioautograms. Mean no. of grains per nucleus in cells IV10XED501.31.51.30.9C0.71.51.91.70.50 IV0.0120.50.231.0°1500.2110.0b0.150.0230.30.05°0.02aED503.33.33.14.52.94.83.86.26.9DC-3F10 agentNoneAmethopterinDMDemecolcineDimethyl Test ED503.73.51.7c3.63.96.13.34.5cED51.40.81.41.21.71.82.01.50.70.45.817.0 X sulfoxideHydrocortisone6-MercaptopurincNeuraminidaseNitrogen mustard4-Nitroquinoline-A^-oxideProflavine sulfateTriton 339Tween WR-1 80ED50DC-3F0.0120.0160.0131.0"2000.421.0b0.350.0230.140.05°0.01°(Mg/ml)DC-3F/AD a % values. b ED50 not determined; these concentrations were tested. c Determinations were technically impossible because of detachment of cells from coverslips. combination with AD-3H. Only Tween 80 markedly enhanced uptake (about 13-fold) in terms of mean number of grains per nucleus in resistant cells, while parental cells were affected to a minor degree (less than 2-fold), at the EDSO level. For the parental cell line, neuraminidase and another nonionic detergent, Triton WR-1339, also appeared to cause slight augmentation of uptake. However, for the resistant subline, the only additional agent to influence grain number was Triton WR-1339 with which there were 4- and 7-fold increases at the 2 concentrations used. Sensitive cells (DC-3F) were shown to take up AD-3 H and DM-3H to about the same extent (less than a 2-fold difference in grain number) in the absence or presence of various concentrations of Tween 80 (Chart 3). For the AD- and DM-resistant sublines, at the EDSO levels of Tween 80 (Table 1), there was an increase in grain number of approximately 10to 20-fold. All resistant sublines exhibited higher grain numbers with the increase in concentration of surfactant (0.002 to 0.05%). The dynamics of uptake for sensitive cells was clearly different, as substantiated by the mean grain number determined at the different concentrations of Tween 80 when the concentration of AD-3 H was reduced 10-fold (Chart 3). DISCUSSION Tween 80 is described as a nonionic, surface-active detergent, polyoxyethylene sorbitan monooleate. Tween 80 and some other nonionic and ionic surfactants appear to increase permeability of the cell membrane and to enhance uptake of dyes and proteins (9-11, 13, 14, 16). The mechanism of action is poorly understood. The surface of cells exposed to Tween 60, for example, increases more than twice 1198 (13), probably as a result of a flattening of the undulated membranes during swelling by the opening of microtubules to the cell surface (15, 17). In the present study, Tween 80 enhanced uptake of the antibiotics AD and DM, especially in drug-resistant cells, as demonstrated by radioautography and as suggested by growth response in combination experiments. Increased uptake, therefore, may have effected potentiation of drug action at the pharmacological sites. According to our findings, AD- and DM-resistant cells are characterized, in proportion to degree of resistance, by a marked reduction in nuclear uptake of tritiated drug (2, 18). However, after fixation with methanol, labeling of both sensitive and resistant cells was markedly heavier; the density of nuclear label exceeded by 3 to 5 times that of sensitive cells exposed to drug before fixation (unpublished observations). The correspondence between molecular weight and degree of cross-resistance to several biologically active agents probably unrelated in mode of action to AD and DM has been noted (2). Incorporation of uridine-3H was relatively less affected by a high concentration of AD, whereas the more sensitive cells, including DC-3F, exhibited marked inhibition of RNA synthesis, as determined radioautographically (2). In a study of cell hybrids formed from a mixture of amethopterin- and AD-resistant (DC-3F/AD IV) populations, the membrane properties of the antibiotic-resistant cells were apparently expressed to a major degree in all the hybrid clones studied. Resistance to AD was close to that of the AD-resistant parent (20). Increased resistance to AD and DM of the sublines derived from the spontaneously transformed DC-3F cells resulted in reduced tumorigenicity in the cheek pouch of conditioned weanling Syrian hamsters; DC-3F/AD X was nontumorigenic (4). The antibiotic-resistant cell lines showed a definite trend toward oriented growth patterns and an increase CANCER RESEARCH VOL. 32 Downloaded from cancerres.aacrjournals.org on June 14, 2017. © 1972 American Association for Cancer Research. Cellular Resistance and Tween 80 100 There is yet no clue as to whether the elevated content of sialic acid, hexosamine, and hexose in the plasma membranes of the AD-resistant subline contributes to the phenomenon of resistance to the antibiotic. The occurrence of new glycoproteins, as well as the increased synthesis of glycoproteins, was described. Since the site of action of nonionic surfactants at the molecular level is unknown, we can only speculate that the differences in membrane composition may protect resistant cells from the action of certain drugs and surfactants as well. X IO Ó 10 O UJ ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The excellent assistance of Miss Roberta A. Devaney and Miss Barbara A. Spengler is gratefully acknowledged. REFERENCES « io 5 o» 'S 100 s JD I IO t LO 0005 001 TWEEN 80(%) 002 005 Chart 3. Uptake of AD-3H and DM-3H, in terms of mean number of grains per nucleus, in the absence and presence of various concentrations of Tween 80. Cells were exposed simultaneously to radioactive drug and Tween 80 for 2 hr. The concentration of AD-3H was 1.0 /¿g/ml,except as indicated, and the concentration of DM-3H was 5.0 Mg/ml. •¿ and «,DC-3F; T, DC-3F/AD II; m,DC-3F/AD IV; o, DC-3F/AD X; V, DC-3F/DM I; 0, DC-3F/DM XX. in adhesiveness to glass substrate, with an increase in degree of resistance (4). Aggregation characteristics of the sensitive and drug-resistant populations supported the finding that resistance to the antibiotics is accompanied by increased intercellular adhesiveness (5). The findings of the present study, however, offer the strongest support yet adduced for our basic concept that altered permeability of the cell membrane is the primary determinant of resistance for both the AD- and DM-resistant Chinese hamster sublines. Quantitative differences in membrane composition of DC-3F and DC-3F/AD X cells have been recently reported (6). JUNE 1. Biedler, ¡.L., Albrecht, A. M., Hutchison, D. ÃŒ., and Spengler, B. A. Drug Response, Dihydrofolate ReducÃ-ase,and Cytogenetics of Amethoperin-resistant Chinese Hamster Cells in Vitro. Cancer Res., 32: 153-161, 1972. 2. Biedler, ¡.L., and Riehm, H. Cellular Resistance to Actinomycin D in Chinese Hamster Cells in Vitro: Cross-resistance, Radioautographic, and Cytogenetic Studies. Cancer Res., 30: 1174-1184, 1970. 3. Biedler, 1. L., and Riehm, H. Reduced Cellular Resistance to Actinomycin D in the Presence of a Detergent. Proc. Am. Assoc. Cancer Res., 10: 6, 1969. 4. Biedler, ¡.L., and Riehm, H. Reduced Tumor Producing Capacity of Chinese Hamster Cells Resistant to Actinomycin D and Daunomycin. Proc. Am. Assoc. Cancer Res., //: 8, 1970. 5. Biedler, }. L., and Spengler, B. A. Aggregation and Growth Behavior of Cultured Chinese Hamster Cells: Relationship to Drug Resistance and Oncogenic Potential. In Vitro, 6: 233, 1970. 6. Bosmann, H. B. Mechanism of Cellular Drug Resistance. Nature, 233: 566-569, 1971. 7. Elion, G. B., Singer, S., and Hitchings, G. H. Antagonists of Nucleic Acid Derivatives. VIII. Synergism in Combinations of Biochemically Related Antimetabolites. ¡. Biol. Chem., 208: 477-488, 1954. 8. Goldstein, M. N., and Zeleny, V. Effect of Actinomycin D on Sendai-fused Actinomycin D-resistant and -sensitive HeLa Cells. 1. Cell Biol., 43: 44a, 1969. 9. Höber, R., and Höber,ÃŒ. The Influence of Detergents on Some Physiological Phenomena, Especially on the Properties of the Stellate Cells of the Frog Liver, i. Gen. Physiol., 25: 705-715, 1942. 10. Modes, M. E., Palmer, C. G., and Warren, A. The Effect of Surface Active Agents on the Permeability to Dye of the Plasma Membrane of Ehrlich Ascites Cells. Exptl. Cell Res., 21: 164-169, 1960. 11. Kay, E. R. M. The Effects of Tween 80 on the in Vitro Metabolism of Cells of the Ehrlich-LettréAscites Carcinoma. Cancer Res., 25: 764-769, 1965. 12. Kessel, D., Botterill, V., and Wodinsky, I. Uptake and Retention of Daunomycin by Mouse Leukemic Cells as Factors in Drug Response. Cancer Res., 28: 938-941, 1968. 13. Malenkov, A. G., Bogatyreva, S. A., Bozhkova, V. P., Modjanova, E. A., and Vasiliev, ). M. Reversible Alterations of the Surface of Ascites Tumor Cells Induced by a Surface-active Substance, Tween 60. Exptl. Cell Res., 48: 307-318, 1967. 14. Miller, G. W., and Janicki, B. W. Further Studies on Selective Cytotoxicity of Triton WR-1339. Cancer Chemotherapy Rept., 52: 243-249, 1968. 1972 Downloaded from cancerres.aacrjournals.org on June 14, 2017. © 1972 American Association for Cancer Research. 1199 HansjörgRiehm and June L. Biedler 15. Nordling, S., and Mayhew, E. Surface Area Changes and the Electrophoretic Mobility of Tissue Culture Cells. Exptl. Cell Res., 43: 77-83, 1966. 16. Palmer, C. G., Modes, M. E., and Warren, A. K. The Action of Synthetic Surfactants on Membranes of Tumor Cells. I. Morphological Observations. Exptl. Cell Res., 24: 429-439, 1961. 17. Patinkin, D., and Doljanski, F. The Effect of Volume Expansion on the Electrophoretic Mobility of Cells. J. Cell. Comp. Physiol., 66: 343-349, 1965. 18. Riehm, H., and Biedler, J. L. Cellular Resistance to Daunomycin in Chinese Hamster Cells in Vitro. Cancer Res., 31: 409-412, 1971. 1200 19. Simard, R., and Cassingena, R. Actinomycin Resistance in Cultured Hamster Cells. Cancer Res., 29: 1590-1597, 1969. 20. Sobel, J. S., Albrecht, A. M., Riehm, H., and Biedler, J. L. Hybridization of Actinomycin D- and Amethopterin-resistant Chinese Hamster Cells in Vitro. Cancer Res., 31: 297-307, 1971. 21. Yamada, T., and Iwanami, Y. The Transport of Nitrogen Mustard TV-oxidethrough Cellular Membrane and Its Cytological Effects in Rat Ascites Hepatoma. Gann, 52: 225-233, 1962. 22. Yamada, T., Iwanami, Y., and Baba, T. The Transport of 14C-labeled Nitrogen Mustard TV-oxidethrough Cellular Membrane Treated with Tween 80 in Vitro. Gann, 54: 171-176, 1963. CANCER RESEARCH VOL. 32 Downloaded from cancerres.aacrjournals.org on June 14, 2017. © 1972 American Association for Cancer Research. Potentiation of Drug Effect by Tween 80 in Chinese Hamster Cells Resistant to Actinomycin D and Daunomycin Hansjörg Riehm and June L. Biedler Cancer Res 1972;32:1195-1200. Updated version E-mail alerts Reprints and Subscriptions Permissions Access the most recent version of this article at: http://cancerres.aacrjournals.org/content/32/6/1195 Sign up to receive free email-alerts related to this article or journal. To order reprints of this article or to subscribe to the journal, contact the AACR Publications Department at [email protected]. To request permission to re-use all or part of this article, contact the AACR Publications Department at [email protected]. Downloaded from cancerres.aacrjournals.org on June 14, 2017. © 1972 American Association for Cancer Research.
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz