Supporting Information Bony et al. 10.1073/pnas.1601472113 Fig. S1. Monthly precipitation (normalized by its global mean value) predicted by the IPSL and NCAR GCMs in RCE simulations forced by an SST of 295 K or 305 K. Top four panels: with cloud-radiative effects. Bottom four panels: without cloud-radiative effects. In the absence of cloud-radiative effects, these GCMs do not predict any large-scale convective aggregation. Bony et al. www.pnas.org/cgi/content/short/1601472113 1 of 5 A 0 0 280 285 290 295 300 305 310 100 100 200 Pressure [hPa] 200 Pressure [hPa] 280 285 290 295 300 305 310 300 300 400 400 500 500 600 600 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.0 Cloud fraction 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Divergence [day^−1] B 0.15 0.10 0.20 0.15 280 285 290 295 300 305 310 0.15 Stability [K/hPa] 280 285 290 295 300 305 310 Anvil cloud fraction Anvil cloud fraction 0.20 0.10 280 285 290 295 300 305 0.1 310 0.10 0.05 0.00 0.05 0.05 280 285 290 295 300 305 310 0.3 0.5 0.7 280 0.9 285 290 295 300 305 310 Sea Surface Temperature [K] Radiatively−driven divergence [day^−1] Sea Surface Temperature [K] Fig. S2. CRM simulations: vertical profiles of (Upper Left) cloud fraction and (Upper Right) radiatively driven divergence associated with different SSTs (ranging from 280 K to 310 K), and relationship (Bottom Left) between the anvil cloud amount and SST, (Bottom Center) between the anvil cloud amount and the radiatively driven divergence, and (Bottom Right) between the static stability at the level of maximum divergence (and along the 220 K isotherm, dashed line) and SST derived from nonrotating RCE CRM simulations from Wing and Cronin (21). All quantities are domain averages computed over days 50–75 of each simulation. ipsl (AMIP) mpi (AMIP) 0.17 0.165 0.16 0.235 Anvil cloud fraction 0.19 Anvil cloud fraction Anvil cloud fraction 0.175 ncar (AMIP) 0.185 0.18 0.175 298 298.2 298.4 298.6 298.8 299 Surface temperature [K] 0.23 0.225 0.22 298.6 298.8 299 299.2 299.4 299.6 Surface temperature [K] 297 297.2 297.4 297.6 297.8 298 Surface temperature [K] Fig. S3. Interannual variations in full-blown GCMs: relationship between the tropical mean anvil cloud amount and the tropical surface temperature (land + ocean) derived from (Left) IPSL, (Center) MPI, and (Right) NCAR GCMs in AMIP simulations run in a realistic configuration (with rotation, continents, etc.) and forced by observed sea surface temperatures and time-varying radiative forcings (greenhouse gases and aerosols). Each point represents an annual average of tropical mean quantities (30°S–30°N) during 1979–2005. Bony et al. www.pnas.org/cgi/content/short/1601472113 2 of 5 Fig. S4. Relationships among anvil cloud fraction, Tsfc , Dr , and S. Relationships are plotted at the height of anvil clouds, derived from an AMIP simulation run with the IPSL-CM5A-LR GCM in the absence of convective parameterization [so-called SPOOKIE simulation (43)]. Each point represents an annual average of tropical mean quantities (30°S–30°N) during 1979–2005. 0.45 ipsl ncar Anvil cloud fraction Anvil cloud fraction 0.45 0.35 0.25 0.15 ipsl ncar 0.35 0.25 0.15 0.05 0.25 0.45 0.65 0.05 0.85 0.15 ipsl ncar Static Stability [K/hPa] Static Stability [K/hPa] 0.15 0.25 0.45 0.65 0.85 Radiatively−driven divergence [day^−1] Radiatively−driven divergence [day^−1] 0.10 0.05 0.00 ipsl ncar 0.10 0.05 0.00 285 290 295 300 Sea Surface Temperature [K] 305 310 285 290 295 300 305 310 Sea Surface Temperature [K] Fig. S5. Clouds-on vs. clouds-off: comparison of the relationship (Top) between the anvil cloud amount and the radiatively driven divergence and (Bottom) between the static stability at the level of maximum divergence and SST in IPSL and NCAR GCM simulations run (Left) with and (Right) without cloud-radiative effects. (Top Left) R2 = 0.68, ∂f =∂Dr = 0.40 ± 0.13 d; (Top Right) R2 = 0.65, ∂f =∂Dr = 0.37 ± 0.14 d. Bony et al. www.pnas.org/cgi/content/short/1601472113 3 of 5 IPSL GCM 1.0 CRE and ozone CRE and no ozone no CRE and no ozone aggregation index 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 290 295 300 305 Sea surface temperature [K] CRE and ozone CRE and no ozone 0.25 291 293 295 297 299 301 303 305 307 0.20 0.15 0.10 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 Radiatively−driven divergence [day^−1] Anvil cloud fraction 0.25 0.65 Anvil cloud fraction 0.30 Anvil cloud fraction 0.30 no CRE and no ozone 0.60 291 293 295 297 299 301 303 305 307 0.20 0.15 0.10 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 Radiatively−driven divergence [day^−1] 291 293 295 297 299 301 303 305 307 0.55 0.50 0.45 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 Radiatively−driven divergence [day^−1] Fig. S6. Sensitivity to ozone and cloud-radiative effects in the IPSL GCM: comparison of (Top) aggregation vs. SST and of (Middle) the relationship between the anvil cloud amount and the radiatively driven divergence and (Bottom) between static stability at the level of maximum divergence and SST in RCE simulations (Left) with cloud-radiative effects (CRE) and ozone, (Center) with cloud-radiative effects but without ozone, and (Right) without cloudradiative effects and without ozone. Also reported in Bottom panels are the evolutions of static stability along the 225 K isotherm. The aggregation index is defined as the fractional area of the globe covered by large-scale subsidence (31). A value close to 0.5 corresponds to the absence of aggregation. Bony et al. www.pnas.org/cgi/content/short/1601472113 4 of 5 0.30 295 299 301 303 306 Static Stability [K/hPa] Anvil cloud fraction 0.25 0.15 prescribed SST interactive SST 0.20 295 299 301 303 306 prescribed SST interactive SST 0.10 0.05 0.15 0.00 0.10 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 Radiatively−driven divergence [day^−1] 0.5 294 296 298 300 302 304 306 Sea Surface Temperature [K] Fig. S7. Prescribed vs. interactive SST: relationship between (Left) the anvil cloud fraction and the radiatively driven divergence and (Right) the static stability at the level of maximum divergence and SST in IPSL GCM simulations forced by prescribed SSTs or by computing the SST interactively, using an ocean mixed layer of 10 m depth and a CO2 atmospheric concentration set to 0.5, 0.75, 1, 2, or 3 times its present-day value. Bony et al. www.pnas.org/cgi/content/short/1601472113 5 of 5
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz