The Role of Formative Assessment in Achieving Deeper Learning Joan Herman CREATE 24th Annual Conference 2015 Jason Millman Award Address Charleston, North Carolina October 9, 2015 Overview • Definitions • Research on implementation and impact • Challenges in teacher practices • Tools for moving head 2 / 65 Definitions Definitions: Deeper Learning 4 / 65 Definitions: Formative Assessment A process used by teachers and students during instruction that provides feedback to adjust ongoing teaching and learning to improve students’ achievement of intended instructional outcomes (CCSSO FAST SCASS, 2008) 5 / 65 Definitions: Formative Assessment The formative-assessment process uses assessments as an integral tactic to determine whether any adjustments are needed. The assessments employed during this process are, by definition, not the same thing as the process itself. When teachers are told – inaccurately – that formative assessment is a kind of test this is akin to telling a would-be surfer that a surfboard is the same as surfing. (James Popham, 2010) 6 / 65 Key Attributes for Formative Assessment • Learning progression • Learning goals and success criteria • Sharing goals and success criteria with students • Strategies for eliciting evidence during the lesson • Interpreting evidence • Taking action, providing feedback fill in gaps • Involving students through peer- and self-assessment 7 / 65 Coherent Assessment Systems: On-going Data for Improvement 8 / 65 Recent Research on Two Examples of FA-Embedded Interventions • LDC: Literacy Design Collaborative • MDC: Math Design Collaborative Literacy Design Collaborative (LDC) STUDENT 10 / 65 INSTRUCTIONAL LADDER CULMINATING TEACHING TASK EXAMPLE LDC Teaching Task Template: Task 2 Argumentative/Analysis at 3 levels: After researching (informational texts) on (content), write an (essay or substitute) that argues your position, pro or con, on (content). Support your position with evidence from your research. L2. Be sure to acknowledge competing views. L3. Give examples from past or current events or issues to illustrate, clarify, and support your position. 11 / 65 Literacy Design Collaborative (LDC) Preparing STUDENT Reading Process Transition To Writing MINI TASKS INSTRUCTIONAL LADDER 12 / 65 Writing CULMINATING TEACHING TASK MDC Classroom Challenge Ex: Sharing Gasoline Tasks Each day Lara’s mom drives her to school. On the way, she picks up three of Lara’s friends. Chan, Jason and Marla. Each afternoon, she returns by the same route and drops them off at their homes. This map is drawn to scale. It shows where each person lives and the route taken by Lara’s mom. At the end of a term, the four students agree to pay $300 in total towards the cost of the gasoline. How much should each person pay? Try to find the fairest possible method. Show all your work. 13 / 65 Math Design Collaborative (MDC) 14 / 65 Evaluation Questions 1. How do teachers implement LDC/MDC? 2. What is the impact of LDC/MDC on student learning? 3. What conditions and contexts, including implementation quality, influence LDC/MDC effectiveness? 15 / 65 Similar Methodology in Both Studies • Implementation measures including: ü Teacher surveys and logs ü Artifact collection and analysis (modules for LDC; student pre- and post-assessments for MDC) • Student outcome measures including: ü State assessments for treatment/control analyses ü Special CRESST-designed measures for treatment only • Quasi-experimental Design (QED) techniques, e.g. Coarsened Exact Matching and HLM regression analysis 16 / 65 Summary of 2012-13 QED Results in LDC Studies Intervention and Setting Model Outcome Effect Stat. Coef. Signif. LDC Kentucky HLM with CEM KPREP Reading 0.058 5% level LDC Kentucky HLM with CEM KPREP Social Studies -0.026 LDC Kentucky HLM with CEM KPREP Writing 0.030 NS 17 / 65 NS Bang for the Buck: Interpreting Significant Finding in Kentucky 8th Grade History and Science Classes Intervention Time spent on intervention Effect Coefficient Estimation of months of school associated with effect LDC in KY History/Science ~1.5 months 0.058 2.2 months 18 / 65 2012-13 QED Results for MDC in KY 9th Grade Algebra Classrooms Intervention and Setting Model Outcome Effect Stat. Coef. Signif. MDC Kentucky HLM with CEM PLAN Algebra 1% 0.130 level 19 / 65 Bang for the Buck: Interpreting Significant Finding in Kentucky 9th Grade Algebra Classes Intervention Time spent on intervention Effect Coefficient Estimation of months of school associated with effect MDC in KY Algebra ~0.5 months 0.130 4.6 months 20 / 65 Studies’ Findings: Promising • LDC and MDC both show posi1ve, sta1s1cally significant impact on learning in at least one context, with no evidence of harm. Impressive given early stage of interven1on and limited dosage. • Broad support from teachers for both interven1ons – par1cularly LDC • BUT: • Students struggling with new demands • Evidence of gap enhancing 21 / 65 NSF funded research on Challenges to FA practices in mathematics ü Quality of teachers’ formative and interim assessment (n=176 elementary and middle school teachers) ü Challenges in teacher practice (case studies of 8 teachers in 4 schools) Exemplar Analysis: Tool Quality (n=176 California Teachers) • Coding categories: • Tool cycle • Format (number and type of items) • Diagnostic information available from tool • Content quality • Intellectual demand • Almost 1/3 of teachers submitted benchmark tests as exemplars of their FA practice 23 / 65 Analysis of Benchmark Tests 24 / 65 Case Study Results (n=8 teachers) 25 / 65 Case Study Findings • Some formative assessment practices are a familiar part of teacher routine, but quality varies (mean on most dimensions 2.0 on 4 pt scale) • Instruction tended to focus on procedures/ computation vs. deeper conceptual understanding. • Opportunities for meta-cognition, reflection often missing. • Teachers admittedly struggling with incorporation of math practices, mathematical thinking and reasoning 26 / 65 Some Tools for Moving Forward • Formative Assessment Tools for Middle School Mathematics • CSAI formative assessment resources • Model units/PD for integrating ELA and content, including assessment FAM Formative Assessment Prototypes • Builds on FAM study findings: teachers need help with integrating mathematical reasoning • Focus: standards key to Algebra I success: 8.EE.5-6, MP3 • A series of task sets to be used at appropriate point in going math curriculum • Task structure that applies all six attributes of FA • Structure can be adapted for different grades and standards 28 / 65 Big Idea 29 / 65 Task Structure • Set up: Whole class, 5 minutes • Mind stretch: Whole class 5 minutes • Workout: Individual 10-15 minutes • Check your pulse: pair, individual, whole class, 10 minutes • Final stretch: Individual, 15 minutes 30 / 65 Setup How can we use math to get a fair deal? SETUP 31 / 65 Mind Stretch MIND STRETCH 32 / 65 Workout WORKOUT 33 / 65 Check Your Pulse CHECK YOUR PULSE 34 / 65 Final Lift FINAL LIFT 35 / 65 Task Materials Teachers Students • PowerPoint slides • Task Worksheets • Task answer sheets • Challenge Worksheet • Teaching suggestions • Anticipated responses • Teacher work review 36 / 65 FAM Tool Development Guidelines Item 1 • Are challenging yet accessible. 2 • Gather diagnostically rich information. • Embed key content at increasing depth, complexity. • Promote talking, writing, thinking about math. • Scaffold teachers (and students) in analyzing student work, determining next steps. • Provide support materials/processes for teachers 37 / 65 Effects of the FAM Tasks • Small experimental study • Survey results show teachers liked using them and thought they were valuable for their students. Will use them again. • Teachers noted the special value of the webinars, after each task, opportunity to review student work, share lessons learned. • Student survey results positive; post test results scored, stay tuned! 38 / 65 still being CSAI Resources to Support Teachers Implement CCRS and Formative Assessment CSAI Resource Goals • Coach teachers’ thinking • Deepen teachers’ content knowledge • Develop connected learning pathways • Create coherent and accessible process moving from CCRS to daily classroom practice with formative assessment 40 / 65 CSAI Resource Continuum 41 / 65 Formative Assessment Process 1. Understand learning/teaching progressions between and within standards 2. Establish clear Learning Goals for the lesson and associated Success Criteria which will be shared with students 3. Plan strategies to elicit evidence of learning through the lesson 4. Anticipate student responses and how they will be interpreted 5. Plan on appropriate pedagogical action to respond to student progress 6. Involve students in the process through Peer and Self-Assessment 42 / 65 Users Guide for Education Leaders • Select the right resources for teachers • Design effective professional learning for teachers • Pre-implementation planning • Use of the CSAI resources • Sustaining the use of key practices over time 43 / 65 Model Units Integrating ELA with Disciplinary Content • Subject areas: Science, social studies, history, standardsbased • Middle school focus • Incorporate coherent assessment: ü formative (in process, formal) ü Culminating tasks incorporating deeper learning • Purpose: ü Usable instructional tools ü Models as part of professional learning experience 44 / 65 Why Do Zebras Have Stripes? 45 / 65 For further information, please contact me: [email protected] For CSAI resources: http:// www.csai-online.org/collection/ 1505
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz