Indiana Conference on Learning ASAI January 24, 2012 1 Data Speak Pacing Guides Goal Clarity Windows Learning Targets & Assessment Rubrics Research Base Copyright 2012 by Apple Core Professional Development, LLC 2 LET THE DATA SPEAK! Copyright 2012 by Apple Core Professional Development, LLC 3 ISTEP Trend GCCS vs State Percent Gain/Loss 4 GRADE 2009 3 4 5 6 7 8 71 68 67 57 55 54 DISTRICT - GRADES ELA 2010 2011 2009 79 80 70 64 67 67 DISTRICT SCORE ELA TARGET 3 4 5 6 7 8 85 86 77 74 74 69 81 84 85 75 69 72 85 86 77 74 74 69 (+14) (+18) (+10) (+17) (+19) (+15) 64 59 66 55 56 55 DIFFERENCE SCORE +4 +2 -8 -1 +5 -3 77 80 85 78 70 76 ELA 2010 2011 MATH 2010 2011 71 70 77 67 65 73 77 80 85 78 70 76 MATH TARGET DIFFERENCE 76 76 75 83 72 70 2009 (+13) (+21) (+19) (+23) (+14) (+21) +1 +4 +10 -5 -2 -6 MATH 2010 2011 DISTRICT 2009 Elementary Middle School 69 56 77 67 81 72 (+12) (+16) 63 56 73 69 81 77 (+18) (+19) DISTRICT 62 73 77 (+15) 59 72 78 (+19) 5 ISTEP Subgroup Percent Passing Copyright 2011 by Apple Core Professional Development, LLC Copyright 2012 by Apple Core Professional Development, LLC 6 7 ECA Algebra 1 and English 10 Passing Rate Algebra 1 & English 10 Passing Rate 100 76 Percent passing 80 60 60 53 46 40 Algebra English 10 30 20 20 12 0 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Copyright 2012 by Apple Core Professional Development, LLC 8 THE BOTTOM LINE: ◦ OVER THE PAST 2 YEARS, GREATER CLARK COUNTY SCHOOLS HAVE MADE THE FOLLOWING PERCENTILE GAINS: 15% Overall in ELA 19% Overall in Mathematics (ASK US ABOUT OUR SUPERINTENDENT’S ORIGINAL 3-YEAR GOAL FOR STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT!) For the FIRST time in 9 years, GCCS made AYP for 2010-2011! Over these past two years, we have had continuous conversations with all principals and teachers about what is making the greatest impact on student achievement. Overwhelmingly, the answer has been: Combining STANDARDS ALIGNMENT with GOAL CLARITY WINDOWS. It is truly a recipe for success! Copyright 2012 by Apple Core Professional Development, LLC 9 PACING GUIDES STANDARDS ALIGNMENT “Every district needs its own instructional model.” Dr. Robert Marzano 10 UTILIZE THE COMMON CORE AND STATE STANDARDS ALIGN ONGOING STANDARDS FOR THE ENTIRE YEAR ALIGN COMMON CORE AND STATE STANDARDS FOR GOAL CLARITY WINDOWS/LESSON PLANNING USE SUBHEADS TO DENOTE GROUPINGS FOR POSSIBLE GOAL CLARITY WINDOWS ARTICULATION MEETINGS PROVIDE A FORUM FOR DISCUSSION, SHARING, QUESTIONS. Copyright 2012 by Apple Core Professional Development, LLC 11 SAMPLE PAGE FROM GCCS PACING GUIDE, GRADE 7 ELA Quarter Core Standard Learning Targets Domain Goal Clarity Cluster Week Assessed Vocabulary WALT (We are learning this) Assessment/Rubrics WILT (When I learn this) WEEKS 1-36 WEEKS 1-36 READING: LITERATURE CC.7.RL.2 (7.3.4, 7.5.5) - Determine a theme or central idea of a text and analyze its development over the course of the text; provide an objective summary of the text. Ongoing Learning Targets I-STEP+ VOCABULARY: Clarity/Clarify Combine Compare/Contrast Describe Explain Express Revise Sequence Summarize Supporting Details Use of Evidence Theme/Central Idea Objective Summary Elements of a Story CC.7.RL.3 (7.3.8) -Analyze how particular elements of a story or drama interact (e.g., how setting shapes the characters or plot). Copyright 2012 by Apple Core Professional Development, LLC 12 SAMPLE PACING GUIDE PAGE WITH GOAL CLARITY WINDOW ALIGNMENT Quarter QUARTER 2 Core Standard Domain Reading: Informational Text *Note: Using Textual Underlined Evidence Indicators are Learning Targets which will be assessed on the Curriculum MapAligned Acuity Pre- and PostTests. Learning Target Goal Clarity Cluster Vocabulary QUARTER 2 WEEKLY GOAL CLARITY WINDOWS CC.7.RI.1 (7.2.7) -- Cite repetition several pieces of textual bias evidence to support textual evidence analysis of what the text technical manual says explicitly as well as figure of speech inferences drawn from the faulty logic text. reasoning propaganda 7.2.5a Comprehend (or persuasion follow) directions for the argument use of a simple mechanical invalid premises device. invalid inferences 7.2.5b Explain the use of a Interpreting Informational Text in simple mechanical device a Technical Manual by following directions in a technical manual. CC.7.RI.6 (7.2.4) -Determine an author's Determining point of view or purpose in Author’s Purpose a text and analyze how the Author’s Reasoning author distinguishes his or her position from that of others. Figures of Speech Week Assessed WALT (We are learning this) WILT (When I learn this) Assessment/Rubrics I can use information from text to support my answers. I can make inferences based on information from text. I can follow directions in a technical manual. I can define point of view. I can define author’s purpose. I can determine how an author’s views differ from that of others. 7.2.9a Identify problems with an author's figures of speech Copyright 2012 by Apple Core Professional Development, LLC 13 GOAL CLARITY WINDOWS A MODEL FOR INSTRUCTIONAL PLANNING “Every district needs its own instructional model.” Dr. Robert Marzano 14 Greater Clark County Schools gcs.rubiconatlas.org A Language Arts, GCCS Standards Alignment Assessment DOK/Learning Targets & Assessment Rubric Vocabulary Copyright 2012 by Apple Core Professional Development, LLC 15 VOCABULARY STANDARDS Standards Alignment Vocabulary and Key Concepts Copy/Paste or Type the CC/STATE standards/indicators that are to be learned for the GCW in this box. If necessary, deconstruct the CCSS by determining the Learning Targets needed to chunk/scaffold instruction. Look at the Standards, Performance Indicators, and Strands chosen. List key test vocabulary and concepts that students need to know to understand the standard/indicator Introduce and discuss these terms. Use Graphic Organizers such as the Frayer Model for more complex terms (Tier 3 Vocabulary). Copyright 2012 by Apple Core Professional Development, LLC 16 Standards Alignment ELA Grade 6 English/ Language Arts: CCSS-RI.1 Cite textual evidence to support analysis of what the text says explicitly as well as inferences drawn from the text. Indicators (IAS): 6.2.6 Determine the appropriateness of the evidence presented for an author’s conclusions and evaluate whether the author adequately supports inferences. 6.2.7 Make reasonable statements and conclusions about a text, supporting them with evidence from the text. Copyright 2012 by Apple Core Professional Development, LLC 17 Vocabulary/Key Concepts Textual Evidence Explicit Inferences Evaluate Evidence from Text Conclusions Informational Text Copyright 2012 by Apple Core Professional Development, LLC 18 Depth Of Knowledge LEARNING PROGRESSION Copyright 2012 by Apple Core Professional Development, LLC 19 LEARNING TARGETS WHAT DO MY STUDENTS NEED TO KNOW? WHAT DO MY STUDENTS NEED TO BE ABLE TO DO AT THE END OF THIS GOAL CLARITY WINDOW? HOW DO I SCAFFOLD THE LEARNING/CREATE A LEARNING PROGRESSION? HOW CAN I ENSURE THAT I AM ADDRESSING HIGHER LEVEL THINKING SKILLS AND NOT JUST BASIC RECALL OF KNOWLEDGE? DEPTH OF KNOWLEDGE/LEARNING TARGETS/ASSESSMENT RUBRICS WHAT IS DEPTH OF KNOWLEDGE? WHAT DO THESE LEVELS LOOK LIKE ON ASSESSMENTS? HOW DO I INCORPORATE SEVERAL LEVELS OF DOK INTO MY GOAL CLARITY WINDOW ASSESSMENT AND LEARNING TARGETS AS I CHUNK INSTRUCTION? Copyright 2012 by Apple Core Professional Development, LLC 20 BLOOM’S TAXONOMY OF LEARNING DOMAINS Knowledge/Remembering The recall of specifics and universals, involving little more than bringing to mind the appropriate material Comprehension/Understanding Ability to process knowledge on a low level such that the knowledge can be reproduced or communicated without a verbatim repetition. IN DOE DEPTH OF KNOWLEDGE (WEBB) Application/Applying Using information in another familiar situation Analysis/ Analyzing Breaking information into parts to explore understandings and relationships Synthesis and Evaluation/ Evaluating and Creating Putting together elements and parts to form a whole, then making value judgments about the method. LEVEL 1: Recall = Knowledge, Comprehension Recall of a fact, information, or procedure (e.g., What are the 3 critical skill cues for the overhand throw?) LEVEL 2: Skill/Concept = Application Use of information, conceptual knowledge, procedures, two or more steps. LEVEL 3: Strategic Thinking = Analysis Requires reasoning, developing a plan or sequence of steps; has some complexity; more than one possible answer. LEVEL 4: Extended Thinking = Synthesis & Evaluation Requires an investigation; time to think and process multiple conditions of the problem or task. SBAC Learning Targets are also based on Webb’s Model.* Copyright 2012 by Apple Core Professional Development, LLC PARCC LEARNING TARGETS* Target 1: Knowledge Targets Factual information, procedural knowledge, conceptual understandings that underpin each discipline. Target 2: Reasoning Targets Thought processes students are to learn to do well within a range of subjects. Target 3: Skill Targets Require a demonstration or physical skill-based performance Target 4: Product Targets Describe learning in terms of artifacts where the creation of a product is the focus. The specifications for quality of the product itself are the focus of teaching and assessment. • Target 5: Disposition Targets Students’ attitudes about the value of school and learning.** **These targets are not assessed for the purpose of grading but for teachers to understand who the students are as learners so that they can work more effectively with them as individuals and in groups. (-Stiggins) 21 GIVEN THE FOLLOWING STANDARD, DETERMINE THE LEARNING TARGETS and ASSESSMENT RUBRICS (DEPTH OF KNOWLEDGE )THAT COULD BE USED TO ASSESS STUDENTS’ UNDERSTANDING. CCRI.5 ANALYZE HOW AN AUTHOR’S CHOICES CONCERNING HOW TO STRUCTURE A TEXT, ORDER EVENTS WITHIN IT, (E.G., PARALLEL PLOTS), AND MANIPULATE TIME (E.G., PACING, FLASHBACKS) CREATE SUCH EFFECTS AS MYSTERY, TENSION, OR SURPRISE. REFER TO: IAS 10.3.6 EVALUATE AN AUTHOR’S DEVELOPMENT OF TIME AND SEQUENCE, INCLUDING THE USE OF COMPLEX LITERARY DEVICES, SUCH AS FORESHADOWING OR FLASHBACKS. Copyright 2012 by Apple Core Professional Development, LLC 22 Greater Clark County Schools Collaboration / ENGLISH 10 POWER TEAM* (C) / Grade 10 (Jeffersonville High School) STANDARDS ALIGNMENT English/ Language Arts: CCRL.5 ANALYZE HOW AN AUTHOR’S CHOICES CONCERNING HOW TO STRUCTURE A TEXT, ORDER EVENTS WITHIN IT, (E.G., PARALLEL PLOTS), AND MANIPULATE TIME (E.G., PACING, FLASHBACKS) CREATE SUCH EFFECTS AS MYSTERY, TENSION, OR SURPRISE. Refer to: IAS 10.3.6 Evaluate an author’s development of time and sequence, including the use of complex literary devices, such as foreshadowing or flashbacks. ASSESSMENT 5 MC 5 OE/Constructed Response 1 Extended Response DOK/LEARNING TARGETS & ASSESSMENT RUBRIC LEVEL 1 DOK: Define parallel plots. LEVEL 2 DOK: Explain how the author uses parallel plots and flashback to create mystery, tension, or surprise. LEVEL 3 DOK: Analyze Day of the Jackal by Frederick Forsyth, and explain how the parallel plots merge at the end of the novel. Vocabulary Order of Events Parallel Plots Pacing Flashbacks Author’s Choice Time Sequence Foreshadowing Copyright 2011 by Apple Core Professional Development, LLC 23 Goal Clarity Window 24 WHAT DO MY STUDENTS NEED TO KNOW? WHAT DO MY STUDENTS NEED TO BE ABLE TO DO AT THE END OF THIS GOAL CLARITY WINDOW? HOW DO I VARY THE TYPES OF QUESTIONS IN MY ASSESSMENT TO ENSURE DEPTH OF KNOWLEDGE AT VARYING LEVELS? AFTER I ASSESS, HOW DO I ANALYZE THE RESULTS AND USE THEM TO MONITOR/ADJUST INSTRUCTION AND PROVIDE APPROPRIATE TIER 1 AND/OR TIER 2 INTERVENTIONS? Copyright 2012 by Apple Core Professional Development, LLC 25 DETERMINE THE LEARNING TARGETS AND THE ASSESSMENT RUBRIC (DEPTH OF KNOWLEDGE) YOU WISH TO ADDRESS.* CHUNK THE INSTRUCTION AND USE DOK DRILL MORE DEEPLY INTO THE LESSON/ PROVIDE SELF-ASSESSMENT. MODEL. DOK/LEARNING TARGETS USE STATE TESTING FORMAT!** DEVELOP THE QUESTIONS BASED ON DOK. VARY THE QUESTIONS SO THAT MORE THAN LEVEL 1 DOK IS UTILIZED. **THIS IS KEY IN ENSURING STUDENT SUCCESS ON STATE TESTING! ASSESSMENT RUBRIC Copyright 2012 by Apple Core Professional Development, LLC 26 GCW Assessment: Collaborative Reflection Checklist ___Assessment developed before GCW Instruction ___Assessment contains 12-15 items using (Multiple Choice) MC and (Open Ended) OE with 1-2 Review Questions and 1 Predictive ___Assessment aligned to CC State Standards/Indicators/State Pacing Guides/District Pacing Guides ___Assessment Items written in I-STEP/ECA format ___Vocabulary reflective of CC State Standards/Indicators and/or State Maps as well as I-STEP+ and ECA exams ___Assessment questions matched to Skills/Indicators/Depth of Knowledge *( Instruction is scaffolded and logically progresses through the series of steps necessary to address various levels of DOK and mastery.) ___Assessment items indicate the varying of DOK levels of questioning ___Student Self-Assessment component evident or readily available through rubrics/exemplars Reflection and Data Questions 1. What did the data from the assessment indicate regarding student learning of targeted standards/indicators? For example, were there areas that need to be re-taught? (Please list the greatest areas of weakness by standard/indicator and skill. You may also choose to list the names of students specifically needing more assistance as part of this analysis.) 2. What types of questions—identified by Item #)--seemed to be most problematic for the students? (Constructed Response, Extended Response, Open-Ended, etcetera) 3. What instructional adjustments and/or Tier I interventions--(within your classroom setting)--will you implement as a result of analyzing this data? (Examples: Small Group Instruction, Re-teaching, Mini-Lessons, Peer Tutoring, etcetera) Item Analysis Item # and Type Standard/Indicator/Skill Student Name Copyright 2012 by Apple Core Professional Development, LLC Intervention 27 THE BLUEPRINT FOR INSTRUCTION Copyright 2012 by Apple Core Professional Development, LLC 28 RUBRICS AND EXEMPLARS… ADD CLARITY TO GOAL CLARITY ASSESSMENT. CREATE AN UNDERSTANDING OF EXPECTATIONS FOR STUDENTS. RAISE THE BAR FOR QUALITY RESPONSES & PRODUCTS. DE-MYSTIFY THE ASSESSMENT PROCESS. PROVIDE CLEAR EXAMPLES AND GUIDELINES THAT CAN BE USED FOR STUDENT SELFASSESSMENT AND PEER ASSESSMENT AS WELL AS TEACHER EVALUATION OF STUDENT WORK. INCREASE RIGOR AND META-COGNITION. RESEARCH: Grant Wiggins- Anchoring Assessment With Exemplars: Why Students and Teachers Need Models Robert Marzano-Transforming Classroom Grading Copyright 2012 by Apple Core Professional Development, LLC 29 Scores 1 2 3 4 Targets Identify the best unit of measurement for a given object. Distinguish between quarts, gallons, liters, pounds and kilograms. Cite evidence to determine the capacity of a given object. Apply concepts of capacity and weight to answer story problems. Exemplar Problem/DOK Assessment Rubric (1-4) Choose the unit you would use to measure each of the following: Put the following measurement units in order from least to greatest capacity: Choose the best estimate and explain your choice. Answer the following story problem: Gary has a 12 cup punch bowl. He uses a 1 quart container to fill it. How many times must he pour a quart into the bowl to fill it? Pint, gallon, cup, quart ______________________ Liter, milliliter ______________________ Pounds, kilogram ______________________ Glass of soda a. 1c b. 1 gallon Explanation: ______________ ______________ Copyright 2012 by Apple Core Professional Development, LLC Answer: __________________ 30 Level 1 2 3 4 Targets Determine the meaning of words and phrases as they are used in a text…. [6-8.RH.4] Cite specific textual evidence to support analysis of primary/secondary sources. Support claim(s) with logical reasoning and relevant, accurate data and evidence that demonstrate an understanding of the topic or text using credible sources. [6-8.WH.1b] Conduct short research projects to answer a question drawing on several sources and generating additional related, focused questions that allow for multiple avenues of exploration. [6-8.WH.7] Based on your reading, choose the best definition for the word Using facts from the text, list one difference between hieroglyphics and calligraphy. Develop a(n) hypothesis concerning why our society uses the Phoenician alphabet rather than Egyptian hieroglyphics. Compare/contrast the two systems of writing using a Venn Diagram. Cite textual evidence to prove that the Phoenician alphabet was the best choice for our society. Exemplar Problem/DOK Assessment Rubric (1-4) calligraphy. A. Word Processing B. Elegant Lettering C. Block Printing D. Cursive Writing [6-8.RH.1] Difference ____________________ ____________________ ____________________ ____________________ ____________________ ____________________ ____________________ ____________________ Hypothesis _____________ _____________ _____________ _____________ ________ __________________ __________________ __________________ __________________ __________________ 31 LEARNING TARGETS AND ASSESSMENT RUBRICS 6-8. WT.8 6-8.WS.8 6-8.WH.8 Gather relevant information from multiple print and digital sources, using search terms effectively; assess the credibility and accuracy of each source; and quote or paraphrase the data and conclusions of others while avoiding plagiarism and following a standard format for citation. Learning Targets with Stages Stage A Stage B Stage C Stage D 1. Find and Read Articles 2. Make Notes regarding the 3. Use APA Style to from 2 approved websites; 4 Major Sections/Facets of compile References; use the Important Facts and Text Highlight Important Facts. the Research. proper Citation Format. Connections. DOK #1 Read articles regarding #1 Create an Outline using #1 Define plagiarism, #1 Determine the content of the Level #1 your topic from two the 4 major sections/facets paraphrase, and citation. 6 sections of the brochure, approved websites. determined. #2 Manipulate text to #2 Use a Graphic Organizer DOK Level #2 including illustrations. #2 Analyze APA Style determine and highlight the to Summarize the important for proper format for most important facts. 4. Create a Brochure Presenting facts for each of the 4 #2 Identify basic facts and/or paragraphs to include in each citations and references. part of the brochure sections/facets. DOK Level #3 #3 Go back to the #3 Create a paragraph for #3 Format and develop #3 Develop the brochure highlighted text; determine each of the 4 sections/facets the Reference Page according to the pre-determined 4 major sections/topics for sections; use References for the based on the G.O. using proper stylization. the research based upon last section. the most important facts. DOK Level #4 #4 Using the labels from #4 Compile the paragraphs #4 Include all citations in #4 Present an oral presentation highlighting, determine the into an organized mini- the 4 paragraphs using to the class evaluating your organization of the paper. research paper with an proper format, findings. introduction/conclusion. paraphrasing, and quotation style. Copyright 2012 by Apple Core Professional Development, LLC 32 GCW Learning Rubric / Assessment Rubric Standard(s) 8.1.11 Explain the events leading up to and the significance of the Louisiana Purchase and the Expedition of Lewis and Clark. Learning Pathway DOK Level #2 Collaboration Team: Hennegan/Hester Weeks: 21-22 Stage A Stage B Stage C Stage D Thomas Jefferson’s election began a new era in American government. Under President Jefferson’s leadership, the United States added the Louisiana Territory. Challenges at home and abroad led the United States to declare War on Great Britain. Great Britain and the United States went to battle in the War of 1812. After winning the election of 1800, who became the third President of the United States? What new states were added to the United States by the early 1800s? What group led the call to war with Great Britain? What was the purpose of the Hartford Convention? Summarize the ways in which Marbury v. Madison affected the power of the judicial branch of the United States government. Summarize why the Louisiana Purchase was important to the United States. Who were the War Hawks and why did they support war with Great Britain? Summarize the role of Andrew Jackson in the War of 1812. Which of President Jefferson’s new policies do you think was most important? Why? Describe, using three examples, how the United States benefitted from the Louisiana Purchase. Compare and contrast the arguments given in favor of war with Great Britain and against war with Great Britain. How did the United States benefit from the War of 1812? Analyze the importance of judicial review. Do you think Napoleon made a wise decision for France when he sold Louisiana to the United States? Explain you answer. In your opinion, why were the Embargo Act and the Non-Intercourse Act unsuccessful? What do you think were the two most important battles of the War of 1812? Explain your answer. Assessment Rubric DOK Level #1 School: Charlestown Middle Stage E DOK Level #3 DOK Level #4 Vocabulary Question Stems John Adams, Thomas Jefferson, John Marshall, Marbury v. Madison, judicial review, Louisiana Purchase, Meriwether Lewis, William Clark, Lewis and Clark expedition, USS Constitution, impressments, embargo, Embargo Act, Sacagawea, Zebulon Pike, Non-Intercourse Act, Tecumseh, Battle of Tippecanoe, War Hawks, James Madison, Oliver Hazard Perry, Battle of Lake Erie, Andrew Jackson, Treaty of Fort Jackson, Battle of New Orleans, Hartford Convention, Treaty of Ghent Elaborate on the importance of the Louisiana Purchase. What facts would you select to support the idea that the Lewis and Clark Expedition were necessary for United States expansion in the 1800s? Copyright 2012 by Apple Core Professional Development, LLC 33 WHAT CAN I DO RIGHT NOW? LIST! BE READY TO SHARE OUT. IN WHAT AREAS DO I NEED FURTHER ASSISTANCE? LIST! CONTACT US FOR HELP AND INFORMATION. Copyright 2012 by Apple Core Professional Development, LLC 34 Wiggins-McTighe -- Understanding by Design Hayes Jacobs -- Curriculum 21: Essential Education for a Changing Stiggins, Arter, Chappuis, Chappuis -- Classroom Assessment for World Student Learning: Doing It Right – Using It Well Danielson -- Enhancing Professional Practice Marzano -- Classroom Instruction that Works; Teacher Evaluation Video Series; Schools That Work Schmoker -- Results: The Key to Continuous School Improvement Reeves -- Accountability in Action DuFour -- Professional Learning Communities at Work DuFour -- Pyramid Response to Intervention: RTI, Professional Learning Communities, and How to Respond When Kids Don’t Learn Guskey –- Evaluating Professional Development Hess -- 2009 Karin K. Hess: Hess’s Cognitive Rigor Matrix [email protected] Copyright 2012 by Apple Core Professional Development, LLC 35 Dr. Mariane Fisher and Tonja Brading Greater Clark County Schools Administration 2112 Utica- Sellersburg Rd. Jeffersonville, IN 47130 ◦ Mariane: [email protected] (812-288-4802 Ext. 333 or 502-724-7220) ◦ Tonja: [email protected] (812-256-7284 Ext. 306 or 502-550-4900) Copyright 2012 by Apple Core Professional Development, LLC 36
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz