A.P. Language and Composition Summer Reading Assignment 2016 Congratulations on your decision to take A.P. Language and Composition! This course will challenge your writing and close reading abilities while also teaching you the art of argument. Throughout the year, you will learn tips and tricks to improve your writing and how to develop strong arguments. Most of the texts we will read will be nonfiction pieces focusing on current events. This assignment will help introduce you to the terminology and concepts you will use throughout the course. Follow the due dates given to ensure that you stay on track. You will submit everything via e-mail. If when working on your assignment you have questions, you may e-mail me directly at [email protected] Part 1: Terminology Create a journal or notebook of the terms listed below. For each term include the following: Definition (in your own words) Example of the term o Do not simply use the term in sentence. o For example, for alliteration, write: “Sandy sells seashells by the seashore.” Rhetorical Appeals o Ethos o Pathos o Logos Argument Rhetoric Connotation Denotation Diction Equivocation Euphemism Hyperbole Juxtaposition Malapropism Mood Metonymy Synecdoche Sarcasm Syntax Tone Litote Voice Alliteration Assonance Allusion Antimetabole Analogy Anecdote Irony Metaphor Motif Oxymoron Paradox Parallel Structure Parody Pun Satire Simile Zeugma Asyndeton Polysyndeton Cumulative Sentence Periodic Sentence Interrupted Sentence Part 2: Rhetorical Analysis of Nonfiction Texts Read and annotate two books: In Cold Blood by Truman Capote o Online PDF: http://hrsbstaff.ednet.ns.ca/engramja/ENGLISH%2012/In_cold_blood.pdf On Writing by Stephen King o Online PDF: http://biblioteka.teatr-obraz.ru/files/file/English_cinema/Stephen_King_On_Writing.pdf Both of these texts are nonfiction; however, each writer takes a different approach at presenting his argument. While reading, annotate for the terms below focusing strongly on the rhetorical appeals: ethos, pathos, and logos. If you choose to buy the book, use highlighters and sticky notes, and write any comments in the margins. If you choose to read the book online, you can either print and annotate the text or copy the chart below onto a separate piece of paper. Quote/Term/pg# from book Analysis/Why is this important? 1. 2. Part 3: Essay Write a 2-3 page paper comparing and contrasting the presentation of each argument from both books. In your essay, be sure to include specific references to both texts and focus on the writers’ use of rhetorical appeals (ethos, pathos, logos) and figurative language (see terms above). You will be graded using the rubric below: General AP Language and Composition Rubric – Rhetorical Analysis 9 Essays earning a 9 meet the criteria for an 8 essay but are especially sophisticated or demonstrate particularly impressive control of language (style and voice). 8 EFFECTIVE Essays earning a score of 8 effectively analyze significant rhetorical strategies. These essays are logically organized with a focus on significant strategies in mind. An 8 essay provides specific examples from the passage and consistently makes realistic connections between the strategies and the author’s intent or purpose. The prose demonstrates an ability to control a wide range of the elements of effective writing. 7 Essays earning a score of 7 fit the description of a 6 essay but provide more complete analysis or demonstrate a more mature prose style. 6 ADEQUATE Essays earning a score of 6 adequately analyze rhetorical strategies. These essays are organized with a focus on significant strategies in mind. A 6 essay provides specific examples from the passage and makes connections between the strategies and the author’s intent or purpose. The prose is generally clear. 5 Essays earning a score of 5 analyze rhetorical strategies but the analysis may be uneven or inconsistent. 4 INADEQUATE Essays earning a score of 4 inadequately analyze rhetorical strategies. A 4 essay may be unfocused, unorganized, or may appear to be more of a list of all rhetorical strategies rather than an organized analysis of the most significant rhetorical strategies in the passage. They may misinterpret the writer’s position or offer little discussion of how strategies convey the author’s purpose. 3 2 Essays earning a 3 fit the description of a 4 but are less perceptive or less consistent in their control of the elements of writing. LITTLE SUCCESS These essays may misinterpret the prompt or passage or offer vague generalizations. 1 These essays meet the criteria for a 2 but are particularly undeveloped. Part 4: Test Upon returning to school, you will have a comprehensive exam on the terms and both books. The test format will be multiple choice, matching, and short answer. The questions will ask about basic plot points of the texts, definitions and examples of the terms, and examples of the terms above in the assigned texts. Bring your annotated texts/notes and journal of terms to the first class period. Calendar of Due Dates: Submit all assignment by e-mailing me at [email protected] Part 1: Terminology Friday, June 17th Part 2: Rhetorical Analysis of Texts (both books Friday, July 29th are read and annotated) Part 3: Rhetorical Analysis Essay Friday, August 12th Part 4: Test Thursday, August 18th (First Day of School) Helpful Resources: Rhetorical and Literary Terms http://rhetoric.byu.edu/ Explanation of Rhetorical Strategies http://apcentral.collegeboard.com/apc/members/repository/ap06_englang_roskelly_50098.pdf Tips on Writing a Rhetorical Analysis http://cherokeetrail.cherrycreekschools.org/Departments/english/Documents/Rhetorical%20Analysis%20guideli nes.pdf Grammar and Writing Help http://apcentral.collegeboard.com/apc/members/courses/teachers_corner/32360.html More Writing Help https://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz